All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 17, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:21
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (16 October 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and David Kenney
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome folks to Truth Vs. News.
Incorporated's N-Dollar line of hosts and producers.
And this is October the 16th.
We're in the middle of the 10th month, nine and a half months of proceedings this year.
And have things gone well?
Are things going better now this year?
Or are they going down?
And what's the future here?
Well, this is Truth Vs. News.
We're bringing you the facts of what really happened.
You ain't gonna get nowhere else.
You should share this.
And we have the best people in the world to host this show.
Of course, Jim Fetzer, the author and editor of this fantastic, controversial book.
He's in the top of the news and he's done other controversial things.
Like, who killed Oswald?
I mean, who killed JFK?
He's done fantastic work.
And he is the man of the year, I'd say right now.
Then we have Scott Bennett, a military intelligence officer.
Who has been there, done that, and is still doing it, and raising a lot of attention around the world as to what's really happening.
He's the author of this book, Shilligan, that was produced by him under stressful conditions as he wrote it in prison.
And so, and that's an outstanding volume there.
David Kenney, California attorney, who's drinking up a storm here, raising canes at the school boards, and having a great time.
Well, anyway, we better get back to the news.
Is it going better, Jim, in Ukraine?
What's happening over there?
Well, let's take a look, Don.
Russia strikes in Ukraine after a U.N.
vote condemning what's supposed to be an annexation of four regions.
Actually, it was all conducted in accordance with international law.
This wasn't actually an annexation.
These were referenda, where they all chose to join Russia by overwhelming votes.
Meanwhile, Russia is reportedly targeting my colleague in a region around Kiev, even while the UN was condemning the acquisition of these four regions by their own voluntary vote.
Three quarters of the 193-member General Assembly, it was vetoed in the Security Council, voted in favor of resolution calling Moscow's annexation illegal.
That appears to be contrary to the facts.
Four countries joined Russia in voting against the resolution—Syria, Nicaragua, North Korea, and Belarus.
Thirty-five countries abstained, including China.
The rest did not vote.
The General Assembly vote followed a veto last month of a similar resolution before the 15-member Security Council.
Meanwhile, more than 50 Western countries met in Brussels Wednesday to pledge more military aid to Ukraine, especially air defense weapons, following heavy retaliatory strikes after a Ukrainian attack on the bridge connecting Ukraine with Russia.
It was not immediately clear whether the weapons that were promised by the French President Emmanuel Macron – radar, missiles, and so on – were part of a commitment made in Brussels or Sabra.
He also called on Vladimir Putin to resume diplomatic negotiations with Kiev, but it's Zelensky, who's denied it, meanwhile—this is very, to me, peculiar—Sweden opts out of a joint probe into the Nord Stream leak and refuses to share its own finding, citing its own national security.
According to Eurojust, a joint investigative team is one of the most advanced tools in international cooperation in criminal matters, comprising a legal agreement between the competent authorities of two or more states for carrying out criminal investigations.
Doing that, if Sweden were to join, would have to share information from its own probe into the leaks that it has withheld, saying the information is confidential.
Lundqvist, the Swedish prosecutor, told Reuters the information subject to confidentiality is directly linked to national security.
What in the world is going on there?
He noted that outside of the proposed formal investigative team, Sweden has otherwise been cooperating with Denmark and Germany in investigating all of this.
A German interior ministry spokesman said the German federal police have completed their part of investigating the alleged sabotage of the pipeline and handed over their findings.
Sweden's outgoing Prime Minister Andersson said the country cannot share information with Russia.
In Sweden, there's secrecy around preliminary investigation that apply in this case.
Prior to that, Swedish security service had announced on October 6, based on its preliminary investigation, the leaks were likely caused by serious sabotage and by detonations.
A total of four leaks have been detected, two on Nord Stream 1, two on Nord Stream 2.
Sparking widespread suspicion and concerns, including by NATO, of sabotage.
That sentence should be reversed, including of sabotage by NATO.
While both Nord Stream pipelines were not in operation, both were filled with gas that leaked.
Nord Stream 1 had recently stopped supplying, and Nord Stream 2 never began operation.
The fourth leak, off southern Sweden, was reported by the Swedish Coast Guard on September 29th.
An old report is that destruction that occurred the same day simultaneously on three strings of the offshore pipeline is unprecedented.
Explosions were recorded along the Nord Stream pipelines.
The first by seismologists early Monday, a second stronger, also registered by seismic stations in Denmark, Norway and Finland.
The chief of Russia's foreign intel service told TASS they have intel on sabotage without elaborating.
Meanwhile, Nord Stream 1 has been the main source of Russian gas in Europe until August 19, when Gazprom shut it off for maintenance.
Russia has blamed international sanctions for deterring the pipeline routine maintenance because a critical turbine has not yet been returned from Canada.
Meanwhile, Nord Stream 2 never came into operation.
Many believe the whole thing with Ukraine was intended to disrupt relations between Russia and Germany, which had brought a peace and tranquility Europe.
Meanwhile, many have been thinking since March or April that Zelensky had actually fled his country and was hiding in France or elsewhere.
Something looked off about his videos, as though they were performed before a green screen meeting with people like Nancy Pelosi and Hollywood celebrities.
Turns out all these flights in and out of Ukraine are grounded because of the war, but Hollywood actor Ben Stiller still just happened to show up to shoot a video with Zelensky?
How does that work?
We think we have the answer.
It's a commercial from a Hollywood production country literally shooting a holographic video with Zelensky in the style of all those dumb Marvel comic book movies.
It makes it appear the diminutive Ukrainian comedian who was installed in the presidency by the CIA is taller than he is and in a room with different dignitaries talking with him, but it's all fake.
Raising the interesting question, why does Congress keep sending money to this clown?
Nothing we're looking at when it comes to this war is real, yet we're now sending something like a hundred billion to Ukraine in a massive money laundering scheme.
Here's a commercial of Zelensky shooting a video with a Hollywood production crew, and ask yourself whether anything you've seen out of Ukraine in the past few months is real.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, that last image of Zelensky shooting a video in a green screen environment, I wouldn't be surprised if that's being done at Ramstein Air Force Base.
This is going to have components of U.S.
psychological warfare They're masters of that.
They've got all the studio technology.
So I think that's exactly what they're doing.
They've put Zelensky in a safe spot or else the Russians would take him out.
They would know how to get him.
They no doubt know where he is, but they are doing this dramatized image of him as a Hollywood center person.
Tucker Carlson, I think, has done some remarkable work this past week in which he broadcast You know, the raw truth on the clownish stupidity and arrogance of Zelensky, having the gall to demand money from the West to support, you know, their budget and stuff.
And Tucker did it very well, mockingly, you know, criticizing him, essentially saying, you know, who are you to come to our country and demand money?
You're a clown.
Get out of here.
Now, that is rebroadcast on Russia Today and many other Russian networks.
So the Russian networks are taking the most conservative speaker in American news and highlighting and holding him high as an example of what real Americans are saying and believing.
That's who Putin is referring to when he understands that there are people in America and Europe that do not support this woke climate change LBGT military juggernaut new world order that is born out of the globalist fascist ideology from Ursula von Leyden to Macron to Trudeau.
We don't believe in Biden.
And the Russian mission.
Because we understand it.
We understand exactly, precisely why this happened.
This happened because of the U.S.
coup d'etat in 2013-2014, which was to preserve the biochemical labs that had been planted there.
Yanukovych had been ousted in the coup d'etat by the fag Lindsey Graham and John McCain and Victoria Nuland and John Kerry and Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
Turning Ukraine into a money laundering poorhouse that then began a genocide of the Eastern Ukrainians, bombing and artillery them and killing old people and children because they would not recognize the puppet regime of the U.S., nor would Crimea.
So Ukraine responds with a genocide and cutting off the water from Crimea and doing all sorts of international crimes.
And that's why Russia stepped in to turn the water back on to Crimea.
And to protect the people that were being raped and pillaged in Donetsk and Lugansk and Kherson and have been fighting back these Nazis ever since.
And the voting of these people in these regions to rejoin Russia is a spectacular testament to what the Declaration of Independence was for the United States.
It's also consistent with the United Nations Charter.
It's consistent with human beings choosing to live by divorcing themselves from a fascist enslaving government.
That's what the Jews did in Egypt, for God's sake, when they left Pharaoh.
That's what the Americans did when they left the British And that's what the Ukrainians in Eastern Ukraine did when they left the fascist Nazis in Western Ukraine.
They were covered in Nazi tattoos and brainwashed by the CIA various MKUltra programs.
We've seen this great moral momentum behind Russia's movement, and you see the immoral insanity behind the U.S., and that is being manifest in things such as the destruction of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.
And as I've said before, The destruction of the Nord Stream Pipeline and the subsequent or consequent cutting off of energy and fuel is going to lead Europe down into a dark age this winter and you are going to see Hitlerian type personalities rise up and say the same vitriolic rhetoric
against the United States that will have a resonance of truth that everyone will be convicted by and someone will be standing up saying, we are Germans and the United States has just shut down our ability to stay warm in our houses and your women and your children and your old people are going to die as a result.
Is that a friend of Germany?
Is that a friend of France?
Or is that a slave master?
So we need to cut off everything from the United States and rejoin with Russia to turn our fuel back on and also overthrow these climate change mongoloids led by the Greta Thornburg or whatever her name is.
Greta, yeah, the little munchkin mongoloid girl who keeps, you know, protesting the climate change.
I think you're going to have an awakening in Europe this winter because of the suffering they're going to endure.
And they have a right and they have a duty to blame it entirely on the United States and Biden and Ursula von Leyen and all the rest of these little minion quacks.
And the only question I would say is, how do you like Trump now, Europe?
How do you miss Trump now?
Because Biden and the US have basically crippled you.
And you're going to have a lot of people die and freeze during the next six months.
So, we'll see what happens.
It's going to be interesting.
David, your thoughts?
I'd just like to go back to the Nord Stream issue.
The reason Sweden is not sharing its findings is clear to me.
Sweden is not a part of NATO, nor is Finland.
Norway, of course, joined a long time ago.
And it has to relate to their strategic and geopolitical considerations, their national security, because if they were to come out and say that they found the United States or Germany or the United Kingdom blew up Nord Stream 2, that would be even more provocative than NATO pounding the Donetsk and Luhansk regions.
The fact of the matter is Biden and Blinken foreshadowed their interests in Nord Stream.
Biden was involved in Biden and both Joe and Hunter Biden were involved in, you know, the natural gas warfare, pre-warfare taking place in Ukraine.
So the fact that all pipelines, so to speak, have been demolished is not surprising to me.
But I agree with Scott that you're going to see Europe actually fall apart.
I think, you know, I was watching a show today where the comment was that Europe took after a climate policy endorsed by Greta Thunberg or whatever her name is, rather than following what Donald Trump said about two years ago in front of the UN that the minute Germany adopted its policies they'd be the victim of Russia in the event of hostilities.
Now you have Russia looking at its border with Finland.
And I think you're just going to see more and more NATO encroachment.
And this guy in Brussels, I forget, Stoltenberg or whatever his name is, I mean, it's just off the map with his threats.
So taking those factors into consideration and having Ben Siller appear in Ukraine when no one can fly in leads me to the conclusion that this is indeed programming that's taking place by Biden's regime.
There's nothing new about it.
If you remember when he just first got elected, there were scenes that were supposedly from the White House where the walls were falling apart.
The scenes out the window were incongruent with those at the White House.
So it's just nothing but programming and this continual programming to the Populous is really starting to disturb me existentially, because I just can't believe what I'm hearing from anyone.
The sources that report, the degree of accuracy, the truth that's supposed to be, you know, it's working to get its way out.
You know, this is all very disturbing.
I think we're right on the footsteps of World War III.
or the Armageddon.
I think you got it right.
A good place to be, Al.
Meanwhile, this is rather fascinating.
It's a lengthy study.
I won't go through all of it, but it's so terribly important.
Get this.
Most pediatricians refuse to treat unvaccinated children because they're paid a bounty for every fully-vaxxed kid in their practice above a certain threshold.
This is outrageous.
Edward Henry has documented the facts.
Outrageous.
I spoke with a couple with a newborn baby who had to leave the pediatrician's office because it wouldn't allow them to forego getting their child vaxxed.
They continue to push vaccinating the newborn.
The best thing you could possibly do is to not have your newborn children vaccinated.
But the office follows the national standard of care set forth by the CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics.
According to the CDC, they would need to receive more than 47 doses of vaccines, including boosters, for 17 different diseases before they reach 15 months of age.
That's just absurd!
The pediatric practice of 15 doctors stated, if the parents persisted in not allowing them to vax, they would need to abide by the written policy requiring them to find another pediatrician who agrees with their beliefs.
The parents called a pediatrician to find another doctor.
The first four they called refused to treat unless they agreed to have him vaxed if it finally agreed without him being vaxed, but only if they submitted a religious exemption.
There appears to be a medical phalanx to push parents into vaccinating their children.
The Immunization Action Coalition provides doctors with a sample vaccine policy statement ready for you to adapt for your practice.
If you should absolutely refuse to vaccinate your child despite all our efforts, we will ask you to find another health care provider who shares your views.
The Immunization Action Coalition is funded in partnership with the CDC, and I'll bet anything it goes right back to the raw child.
The latest data, however, shows specific vaccines are unequivocally not safe.
Government officials, with well-documented conflicts of interest, with a $50 billion vaccine industry, systematically obscure the risks while exaggerating the benefits.
The government has quietly admitted culpability paying out more than $4 billion for thousands of injuries and deaths caused by the vax.
And an HHS study found that fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are even reported.
So if you multiply that, it might be the ought-to-be-out over $400 billion instead of only $4.
Big Pharma is exerting influence over WHO, FDA, and CDC to pass track and shortcut safety studies.
This is very serious.
CDC, frankly, is a vaccine company.
It owns 56 patents, buys and distributes $4.6 billion in vaccines through the Vaccination for Children program, over 40% of its total budget.
Moreover, Big Pharma funds, populates, and controls dozens of CDC programs through the CDC Foundation.
Sweetheart deals with pharma.
Most of us were shocked to learn the CDC takes funding from industry.
It's outrageous that industry is allowed to punish the CDC if the agency actually conducts research that might cut into their profits.
The couple thus has come up against a massive syndicate funded by vaccine manufacturers.
Their ordeal in finding a physician who will treat their unvaccinated child is not unusual.
Many a pediatrician refuses to see child patients whose parents have decided not to have their children vaxxed.
You'll notice the spokesman for a pediatric office was a chief financial officer.
Listen to this.
Why would the chief financial officer be the one giving reasons for the policy to refuse service on VAX children?
Brian Argo is an MBA, not an MD.
He's a financial expert, not a medical expert.
You think there'd be a medical reason for the policy?
You think the pediatrics office would appoint a medical doctor to give a medical reason for the policy instead?
They appoint a financial officer to present the rationale for refusing service to unvaccinated children.
But he does not give a financial reason, nor does he give a medical reason.
He gives us the reason recommended by the AAP.
He did not say the pediatric office makes a lot of money by vaccinating children, and every unvaxxed in its medical practice threatens that money stream.
But that's the situation.
It's outrageous.
Doctors have to vaccinate, it turns out, a certain percentage of their patients, or they don't get a bonus.
CSBS, Blue Cross Blue Shield says doctors need to vaccinate 63% of their patients to get a payout of $400 per vaccinated child.
Outrageous!
Thus, there's a financial motive at the core of pediatricians not allowing unvaxxed kids in their practice.
Pediatricians won't treat the unvaxxed because they need a certain threshold to be vaccinated to be paid a bounty from insurance companies for each vaccinated child.
What I found, this is Edward Henry, was surprising.
The evidence to establish this allegation is true.
Below are screenshots from the Blue Cross Blue Shield 2016 Performance Recognition Program.
Under that program, if a pediatrician can convince 63 other parents to receive a full schedule of the 10 listed vaccines prior to the child's second birthday, you'll receive a $400 bounty per patient.
This is just bribery for medical malpractice.
A perverse monetary incentive for pediatricians to push for childhood vaccines.
Incidentally, a pediatrician can make up to $40,000 a year from this program, as an example.
There's no limit to the amount of money the pediatrician can make each year.
If he had 200 patients meeting the program criteria, with a bounty of $400 apiece, he could make $80,000 just by having them faxed.
Indeed, that figure might be closer to reality.
A research study of 89 pediatric practices in 31 states involving 373 practitioners found that each had an average of 1,546 patients, an average of 773 measure of individual patients treated regardless of the number of an average of 773 measure of individual patients treated regardless of the One patient visiting three times would be counted as a single patient.
They found 21%.
They found 27.4% of the patients were two years or younger.
Thus, on the average, each pediatrician treated 218.8 patients who were two years or younger.
That means the average pediatrician could count on a bounty payoff of about $84,720 from Blue Cross Blue Shield.
When you visit a pediatrician and find them pushing vaccines, you now know why.
It has nothing to do with the well-being of your child.
It has everything to do with money.
Indeed, there's a perverse incentive to pressure parents to have their children vaccinated as early as possible and as often.
Because if the pediatrician does not meet the 63% threshold, he receives zero dollars.
Thus, every parent is lobbied hard to have their kid vaxxed by their second birthday.
He has a pecuniary incentive to load as many vaccines into the child as early as possible.
Thus, The adverse effects are accentuated because a child's immature immune system is being attacked and compromised when he is least able to deal with the many poisons.
For the love of money is the root of all evil, which, while some covet after, they have erred from the faith and pierce themselves through with many sorrows.
Here you see the performance program.
There it is.
Seeking 63% for a payout of $400 apiece.
Here's more.
The percentage of children who would meet the combined 10 criteria on or before their second birthday, 63%.
Stunning stuff.
Completely disgusting.
Scott, your thoughts.
Well, first of all, let me start out.
This is a personal issue for me now, too, Jim, because a distant family member, relative, two people got the shot.
And we all have the idiots in our family who get the shot.
Well, these two young people got the shot, had a baby.
Uh, I, I was skeptical if it was even going to be born alive.
It did come out alive.
It does have black eyes, brown eyes.
I don't know if it's because it's got distant Hispanic, you know, heritage or what, but the doctors are telling all the family, everybody has to be vaccinated with the flu shot, COVID-19 and the tetanus shot.
So they're, the doctors are pushing everybody around the child to get vaccinated.
And I of course said, I will never get a shot of any kind ever again, ever.
And so, essentially, they said, well, you can't come around the child.
I said, fine, I won't see any of you ever again.
And we're at that level where families are being broken.
The idiots versus the non-idiots.
The vaxxed who are becoming, you know, troglodyte knuckle-dragging retards with their brain frontal lobe withering.
And those of us who aren't and won't.
So, you're witnessing a great mitosis.
And, you know, those statistics and everything you just mentioned, Jim, speaks for itself.
Never before have I ever thought we'd have this area of society and where we are right now, where the medical industry and the doctors and the people that are supposed to have taken the Hippocratic Oath to help people do no harm, have sold their souls for 30 pieces of silver in the form of a $600 or $400 bonus to get little children
Filled with these toxic vaccines that I think overwhelmingly we've also seen have turned this nation into an autistic retard nation.
We are full of autism, people that can't function, people that can't think.
We have allowed these doctors to destroy people for what 30, 40, 50 years?
Thank God I was born in Scotland and I didn't get any of this trash And I didn't have any of the afflictions that you see so much around everybody.
So I think we're approaching a time, and you know me, Jim, I'm a mild, passive, non-confrontational kind of guy.
Well, what we are approaching, I think, and I said that facetiously, is the same thing that happened in that video where the Australian guy comes up to the car with the two doctors and busts through the window and roars and yells and grabs the doctor by the scruff of the neck.
You realize what you have done.
Essentially.
Giving these people the vaccines.
You people are going to pay.
Do you realize how much you've done?
How much damage you've done?
That's just the start.
I foresee people like that, multiplying, where they're going to go in and they're going to break the windows and drag these doctors out by the neck and kill them.
Beat them to death.
Kill the nurses.
Kill the administrators.
Because their child, their baby, their wife, their mother, their father had been killed and they knew about it.
They were getting paid to do it.
How many children are going to be killed off with all these vaccines?
So I see a backlash coming in a very blood-curdling, Stephen King, torturous way, where all of these prophets of death wearing the white coats, calling themselves doctors, and they're not.
They're going to be, I think, targeted by people who have been injured or lost family, loved ones, or who themselves Have found out that now that they've been jabbed, it's only a matter of time before they're dead.
And I foresee great vengeance coming upon these people in the medical community.
And right there, where you have a MBA finance guy making decisions about medical issues, whether to treat a child or not, That is just a prime example of the explosion that's about to happen.
I foresee great bloodshed and acts of vengeance and revenge and payback for the injuries that these doctors have done to all these people that have had this vaccination.
That day is coming.
Yeah, I think you're right, Scott.
David?
Well, Being an equally mild-mannered skeptic, you know, I saw the Washington Post did a hit piece on this lawyer by the name of Tom Renz.
And, you know, Tom Renz said, I've become a reluctant leader.
And he talks about You know, the Department of Defense, and I think he even attended a hearing with Ron Johnson, Senator out of Wisconsin.
He represented, if I might add, he represented the medical science experts that came in and testified about the medical military statistics, which indicated an 800% increase in neurological disorders, 300% increase in Bell's palsy, things like that.
Tom Rents, who I interviewed, that was the attorney that represented them to Johnson.
Right, so this Washington Post hit piece comes out on him and, you know, from the moment I first heard Tom Renz on some of the Truther channels, for lack of a better word, I suspected that his work was in its infancy because there were certain comments that he would make that I was concerned about.
I thought that his intent was good, and I believe that his evidence was also sound.
When I read the Washington Post article, it was an ad hominem attack on him, and it kind of tore him apart, even though I think, as I mentioned, that I believe his intentions are sound.
So he's got this attack on the Department of Defense, and of course it's from the DOD's mandatory vaccination policy.
I have been fascinated with that since the inception of the coronavirus.
I'm more interested in, you know, doing an investigation of the start of the coronavirus, kind of Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2, which are going to be equally as catastrophic in terms of their fallout.
But my interest is primarily on the origins of the coronavirus and I've seen nothing that Assists me or that tells me that any government anywhere is undertaking that study.
That study is having to be done by by self-starters.
People like myself who are interested in it.
They want to take review of it.
There's no funding to support that investigatory approach.
And you would think that with the Under the auspices and under the financing that the United States government has, the CDC, the WHO, the Department of Health and Human Services, and everything would have a real public forum where they would engage and embrace the ideas
And here the evidence you get the various reporting that says only 1% of adverse events are being reported.
So you, you multiply I think they have I think banners for freedom shows that there are over 30,000 deaths, or approximately 30,000 deaths associated with the coronavirus so that's 1% that's 300,000.
That's 1%.
That's 300,000.
And then we have this falling out taking place.
I just read a study out of Scotland and it said that the amount that the risks, the impact of long COVID, long COVID, is just beginning.
People are beginning to show signs and symptoms of erosion and this ongoing coronavirus battle, we're just gonna get used to it 'cause we're gonna be dealing with it and seeing it for the rest of our lives.
And as at our advanced stage, Jim, I think we're not gonna outlive this virus controversy.
It's the impacts on it.
Don, you'll be around for plenty of time, but the impacts on it are such that its effect on modern civilization is going to take it apart.
And so when I see things like Tom Renz, when I see safety and efficacy being debated but never confronted or We're never promoted in the media, I get super disturbed.
And it just goes again that this is a community in action.
Okay, there's a community in action with a false narrative, just poisoning all America.
And, and I believe these are external forces.
And I believe they're in corporations now.
And I just see this all out attack taking place on the people of America.
Yes, absolutely right.
One thing, David hit this thing, Jim, and we've talked about this before, but it warrants revisiting again.
If the United States military has been vaccinated to the 80%, then 80% of the United States military is going to be corroding, falling apart, dying, losing their minds, going into Alzheimer's, dementia.
They are now being deemed unworthy of flight status.
That was one of the things that one of the scientists was talking about.
The entire military is dead Because of this, essentially.
What do you have to, and they have the border being flooded by savages from Central America, MS-13, military age young men, what are they going to do?
There's no warrior class that's going to be able to stand up.
And they're pouring through?
Well, what happens in the Machiavellian grand plan?
Well, you flood up all these Hispanics, and you refill the military with them, and then you've got a police force to hold the internal population of the United States under gun.
That was what Mike Harris was talking about.
That's a possible scenario.
But to think that this country has injected, 80% of the people have gotten one shot or more, is mind-blowing That we have become, and I attribute it to a spiritual darkness.
God has handed this country over to the death and wickedness that it has manifested in its culture and its government and its law on every level.
And this country is about to fall like Sodom and Gomorrah, and we are witnessing the foreshadowings of it through this shot to 80% of the people.
And what happens when you have a financial crisis?
Guess what?
A barter system.
What's bartered?
Cars, clothes for food, guns for this, knives for this, and little girls on the street that are snatched and put into human trafficking.
They're part of a barter system.
And the rape of America, like we've never before seen since biblical times, since the Jews of old were taken into Babylon.
That same sort of fall is what I see coming upon the United States.
And I hate having to say it, but if I didn't, I would be derelict in my duty not to report the truth.
Jim?
I want to add one thing.
I had, you know, this morning I went with my wife and we went out to a local farmer's market and they have this prison book project and they, you know, you trade books, you buy books that are, you know, being discarded and all of a sudden I saw this elementary school book and I looked at it because it talked about DNA, it talked about genetics, you know, just as a general approach and I picked it up
I just took a look because I was interested in the title.
I thought gee my gosh for first or second grader this is really competitive indoctrination so to speak.
So I picked it up and I started thumbing through and within the first three to five pages I'm reading this exposition in multi-syllable words that are just far beyond the learning capacity of a First or second grader.
And it's talking about mRNA and explaining what mRNA is.
And it's talking about the digital crisis and the choice of people to take, you know, engage in gene altering.
And I'm looking at this and this is like written for, you know, elementary school.
I just, I was like stunned.
It just shocked me.
What the hell is going on?
Well, you're right, David.
I mean, it's all unbelievable.
We've been taken over by a criminal syndicate that's incorporated Big Pharma as a mechanism of the destruction of the United States.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
State Department pushes gender transition for kids.
The state considered bans.
This is equally outrageous.
The U.S.
State Department's Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Strategic Plan has sparked controversy, including transfer-funded gender transition care for employees and their children.
Some states have begun banning those very same transgender surgeries and drugs from use on children, calling them child abuse.
The State Department might not just be paying for their kids to receive these surgeries.
They're penalizing Foreign Service officers who disagree and pressuring countries to perform these procedures on children, said Jim Banks of Indiana, who Nancy Pelosi refused to be a part of the January 6th Commission, reporting.
Biden signed an executive order in June aimed at combating these state efforts.
During these confirmation hearings, I said I judge the success of my tenure in part by how I lead the department to being more diverse, equitable, inclusive, and accessible, which is really a master plan for promoting incompetence on the basis of consideration of gender, Sex, sexual orientation, and equity.
Blinken said after the plan was released, our country's diversity is our greatest strength, he added, which is completely absurd.
The policy lays out strategies to increase support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex employees and family members.
The plan commits the State Department to assess resources for gender dysphoria and gender transition care.
We'll develop a department-wide targeted plan to achieve equity.
The plan says the agency will evaluate and ensure inclusion and safety procedures for LGBTQI plus children.
Republicans have begun pushing policy to ban transgender surgeries and drugs from use on children.
Arkansas, the first state last year to ban transgender procedures and drugs for minors, which I applaud.
They need to get to be 18 before they make these decisions, said Robin Lindstrom, a Republican, quite appropriately.
Meanwhile, in Texas, Governor Greg Abbott's investigation into child transgender transitions are viewed as child abuse.
The Florida Agency for Healthcare said the state's Medicare coverage will not pay for transgender drugs or surgeries.
Tennessee is also among the four most states considering an outright ban on these procedures.
Allegations arose that Vanderbilt was pushing transition treatments for profit and forcing out employees who disagreed.
A video included a Vanderbilt University Medical Center doctor in 2018 touting That transgender surgery bring in a lot of money.
We should not allow permanent life-altering decision that hurt children or policies that suppress religious liberty all for the purpose of financial gain, said Tennessee Governor Bill Lee, a Republican, which was totally appropriate.
Scott.
So on the karmic level, we go around the world, we destroy seven countries in five years, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, we decimate civilization, and then God's vengeance turns us into a nation of queers who cut off their penises and girls that glue them on.
That sounds like a karmic retribution that God's given this country.
Because it's absolutely a nightmare.
women's sports, and we've turned into a nation of sexual schizophrenics.
That sounds like a karmic retribution that God's given this country, because it's absolutely a nightmare.
We are at the edge of oblivion when we as a culture, as a people, as a nation, believe that human beings can change their status, We're not talking about drag queen, transvestite, you know, mentally deranged people who, you know, watch The Birdcage with Robin Williams or LaCasio Falls or any of these little super things.
We're talking about going into young children, young impressionable children, young girls who are between 9 and 12, And cutting off their breasts and giving them hormone therapies.
It is demonic and evil, and when Putin says it's a crime against humanity, he is right.
And when he says they have lost their minds in his speech for the Russian Duma a couple weeks ago, he is right.
And as for me and my house, I would stand with Russia and Putin and the rest of any other country on earth whose people say it is wrong and evil to be pushing this transgender LGBT agenda and any nation that does it is manifesting that is being turned into hell.
We are at a level that I am just in awe that this is happening.
But then again, I come to this is a spiritual darkness.
God shall give them strong delusion to believe a lie.
And the strong delusion Is filling this country like carbon monoxide filling a garage when you start the car and don't and close the windows and doors.
Everyone in this country, except President Company and watch the show, everyone else is completely losing their mind.
And any nonsense about, well this is just people's opinion and all this, it strikes at the core of civilization.
I can't see how any country, China, Russia, Iran, any country with normal traditional values, looks at America with anything other than disgust and contempt for this policy alone.
LGBT, transgender surgeries, the State Department having the gall to do this.
If something should erupt this country into bloody revolution, where these politicians like Blinken and others are killed with their heads put on a pike, It's this kind of mass child abuse masquerading as some sort of liberty, freedom, enlightenment of diversity.
It is absolutely a lie from the bowels of hell, from the minions of hell, and I don't see this country lasting long if we don't rise up against it violently.
Otherwise, we are destined for the ash heap of history.
Jim?
David, It's really interesting to me.
I've always been a great believer in the concept of liberty and also in the concepts of democracy, the ability to debate issues, to come out and to make determinations based on reason, based on facts, based on evidence.
And dealing with the LGBTQ world has always been challenging because it presents notions of the pursuit of happiness, which is a protection of the United States Constitution.
I'm not arguing for it, I'm just pointing out the arguments that are often raised.
But I really depart from that when, like, We went to Palm Springs yesterday.
We went out to Cabazon where they have an outlet out there.
My wife was looking for some things.
And so we go into downtown Palm Springs and there's this drag festival or drag brunch that they have.
And I couldn't, good God, I can't believe this.
You know, here's a restaurant in downtown Palm Springs having a drag lunch on Saturdays and on Sundays.
And I went like, I just can't believe it.
And then there was this Anita Rose, who was the hero for doing this or hosting it.
So, you know, I put on the YouTube and I put in the name Anita Rose, and I see this guy, this overweight guy dressed up like a girl wearing a bunch of it looks like fake boobs and stuff and doing this dancing that is just purely I wouldn't even call it entertaining.
It's really kind of disturbing, would be a fair assessment of it.
But the most disturbing thing I saw when this thing's going on, is in the background, I saw there was someone who was wearing like an animal's head, and in some shorts, like rainbow shorts.
And I said, that's the body who's attending this event.
And I thought, oh my gosh, it just really concerned me.
So let's go to the whole transgender thing for a moment.
I agree with the assessment that you have to be at least 18 to even be exposed to these ideas.
I believe that.
I believe our children are sacrosanct and they should be left alone.
And I even think 18 is a questionable threshold.
21 might be more appropriate.
But this whole This whole indoctrination, I read in, I think it might have been the New York Times, where now Blinken and Biden were proposing that there be criminal provisions, or someone in their administration was proposing there be criminal provisions, if parents didn't protect the gender-affirming
character of their transitional kid.
I mean, this has just totally gotten out of hand.
You know, I grew up in a world where boys were boys and girls were girls and, you know, carry on and grow up.
You know, I learned half the things about sex from my cousin who told me the names and what they meant when I was, you know, 12 or 13 years old and And you know, I grew up pretty much like every normal American, and when I see this kind of stuff and this exhibitionism, because there's no other word that covers it, it's just sexual dysphoric exhibitionism.
It's very disturbing.
Now, I realize that there's a marketplace of ideas, and I would think that in the 30, 40, 50 years of life, you'd have no problem adhering to some of the Judeo-Christian teachings that we've all had.
But for the most part, you're not seeing that anymore.
There's a push and a move in society and in schools to have this binary, non-binary, cisgender, gender-affirming, queer, whatever, you know.
And it's just, it's really...
It's like they've harnessed the sin and they put it over here and they're calling it something else.
But Tucker Carlson had a guest on and she tore apart an Encinitas Union High School District Board of Education for having a drag show or having a drag queen elder, like 25 years or older, showing up as a crossing guard.
And this woman took the school board to task and it was just a wonderful presentation of the influence that the public has in getting or reaching school board members.
And it's very important.
You know, I just hope that our conservative people run for school boards and really implement the Judeo-Christian policies we all grew up with.
One thing too, this is not just exhibitionism, this is active psychological abuse upon children.
And there's a school, I think it's in Canada or something, a metal shop or wood shop, where this thing pretending to be a woman with uh grotesquely exaggerated breasts artificial breasts or implants or something that grotesquely reached down to the waist i mean this is something out of a nightmare and he's teaching and i'll say he it he is teaching metal shop or woodworking shop to young high school students
That obviously aren't thinking about metal or woodworking.
They're looking at this thing as a young student with horror, with fear, with what the hell is this?
We don't have schools to traumatize and torment and kind of grab to children.
They are there at school to define themselves, to acquire skills, to acquire knowledge, to learn in a safe environment, not to be subject to the demons from Sodom and Gomorrah.
And those sort of people that do that to children ought to be dragged out and killed, killed by groups of parents that find the violating of their children a death penalty crime.
You can throw due process in there, but that has to stop immediately and they don't back down unless you go right at them.
Yeah, you can file and say you're served notice, you're doing grotesque damage to children, But you know what they do in the old mafia days?
You get Luigi and Al Pacino, or whoever they are, to go up, and that teacher that has the grotesque breasts and woodwork wouldn't show up again, ever, anywhere.
And maybe that's what needs to happen, because we are now at the point where the education system is flooded with these militant, homosexual, LGBT, fascist kamikazes that have children swearing allegiance to the rainbow flag instead of the stars and stripes, Glorifying, snickering, making videos on TikTok.
Those people ought to be, after due process of law, executed for child abuse.
Because there's no other word for it.
This isn't about their opinions.
They want to go and march at a gay parade in their own private time, fine.
But don't bring it in and try and fill young impressionable children with this evil, and that's what it is.
It's not choice, it's evil.
Period.
PayPal has sent social media blaze with a major change. - Yeah.
They have a self-created controversy.
A major decline since the beginning of the year.
Their stock price has fallen over 50% since January.
Their market value decreased by nearly $114 billion.
It's only 104.3.
Profitability concerns surrounding fintech have grown in recent months as fear of a recession have taken precedence.
They fear the aggressive increase in interest rates by the Fed to tame inflation will lead to a hard landing for the economy.
The problem is a sharp slowdown in economic activity is going to have a heavy impact on many house Where PayPal has now employed the idea of a $2,500 fine taken directly out of your resources for misinformation.
As if all these challenges weren't enough, PayPal created a big problem on its own.
Documents were leaked in which a company says it'll impose financial penalties on customers who violate the policy.
Any misinformation penalized with a $2,500 fine.
If a client is found guilty of 4X, they could be fined $10,000.
They would withdraw the amount directly from the customer's account.
Violations of this unacceptable use policy is a violation of PayPal user agreement.
We subject you to damages including liquidated of $2,500 per violation debted directly from your PayPal account.
What's interesting is it's marked, last updated, November 3rd, 2022.
The policy was only due to come into effect in just under a month.
The leak of the document has resulted in a massive outcry.
Some co-founders of the firm, like Elon Musk and David Marcus, were among the critics, which goes against everything they believe in.
It's hard for me to openly criticize a company I used to love and gave so much to, said Marcus.
But Mayfall's new AUP goes against everything I believe in.
A private company now gets to decide to take your money if you say something they disagree with?
Insanity.
Musk whipped?
Agreed.
The leak has aroused all the critics of the tech giants, who perceive them as being too powerful and intolerant.
PayPal is enacting private social credit, commented one user.
How does PayPal know you're spreading misinformation?
What are they watching, our social media accounts?
I don't get it, said another.
Contacted by the street, PayPal said it was an error.
The notice that went out was an error with incorrect information.
PayPal is not pining people for misinformation.
This language was never intended to be asserted in our policy.
Our teams are working to correct our policy pages.
They thus found themselves in damage control.
We're sorry for the confusion this has caused.
The question is whether it's too late for the reputation of the firm, which risks ending up on the blacklist of anti-big tech, including meta platforms, Facebook, Instagram, Alphabet, YouTube, and Twitter, among others.
Scott, you may have a chance to begin a comment, and then we'll pick it up after the break.
PayPal already lost this argument if it tries to do this, because misinformation is saying Mexicans flew Japanese Zeros into World War II Pearl Harbor.
That's misinformation, because it didn't happen.
Misinformation is not saying the statistics on COVID-19 indicate this is a mRNA vaccine that hurts and kills and damages more people than helps.
That's true.
That's based on facts.
And if PayPal gets any stupidity into trying to rob people of their money based on telling the truth and facts, they're going to go bankrupt in lawsuits.
Jim?
David?
Yeah, sounds to me like Capital One took over PayPal.
It's just outrageous.
It's just outrageous.
PayPal is discredited and stuff.
I don't think it can ever get its good name back.
Yeah, it's done.
It's done.
Wait, wait.
I take that back.
I probably have a PayPal account.
I don't want them taking $2,500 out of my account.
Make sure you don't have $2,500 in there.
Leave $1,000 or whatever, or $500, whatever dollar you get put into your account so they can't take it out of your bank.
Dumped the policy, they've taken it back.
So they say!
So they say!
Too little, too late.
Don, take us out.
Jeff Metzner caught him.
If it were to happen, who would be the judge of it?
Of course.
Anyway, this is Truth vs. News.
This has been a rockin' first hour here.
Boy, I tell ya, things are shakin'.
And this is October the 16th.
Come back for a second hour.
It's gonna be equally as hot, I'm sure.
We're on a roll here.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection