All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 30, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:36:18
Need to Know News (29 SEPTEMBER 2022) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
We're here to give you all the news you need to know.
We begin with a North Stream attack on the North Stream 1 and 2, which appears to be sabotaged and where the country with the most to gain is the United States.
On the night of September 26th, a sharp drop in pressure was recorded in Line A of 2.
Well, a hole in the pipeline.
The evening of the same day, the North Stream 1 recorded a pressure drop too.
Turned out to be there were two in the second.
Unbelievable!
The North Stream and North Stream 2 gas pipeline passed through the exclusive economic zones and territorial waters of Russia, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, and Germany.
Judging by a map published by Gazprom, both branches pass near the southeastern side of the Bornholm Island.
The leak is recorded in the northeast.
It's very disturbing.
The destruction that occurred in one day simultaneously on three lines of offshore gas pipelines in the Nord Stream system is unprecedented.
It's impossible to estimate the time frame for restoring the operability of the gas transport infrastructure.
Indeed, some estimates have it could be done in a couple of days.
Some estimates have it could not be done ever, that it might have permanently damaged.
Despite U.S.
sanctions, the Nord Stream 2 was completed in September.
And technical gas was launched along the beeline.
Both pipes were filled.
Since after Moscow recognized the independence of the Donetsk and Luhansk Republic in February, the German authorities suspended certification, decided to use its capacity for gas, the Russians did, in regions of northwestern Russia.
Here you see some about the planning of the pipeline.
It was a very elaborate process with Russia, Germany, Sweden, Finland all involved.
It has a capacity, this is North Stream 2 now, 55 billion cubic meters per year.
Upwards of 1,200 kilometers.
The sea depth 210 meters.
Lane of the speed of the pipeline took place at a rate of three kilometers per day.
The number of segments over 200,000.
The capacity has been growing since it was launched in 2011.
This is for one, nearing its 55 billion per year target.
For Europe, it needs 129 billion additional imports.
Oh, these are cubic meters.
Yes, 55 billion cubic meters.
It needs 129 billion cubic meters additional import in the next 20 years.
Which would be cheaper than other options.
The 55 million cubic meter capacity will supply upwards of 26 million European households.
Generating electricity from natural gas produces up to 50% less CO2 than from coal, if you're concerned thereof.
North Stream, one of the last gas supply routes to Europe, bypassing Ukraine.
Pumping through North Stream 1 has been reduced at 25% of the maximum since the summer.
Gazprom explained this with problems with the gas turbines.
At the end of August, the gas supply stopped completely.
Sources investigating are convinced that it Not just could be, it has to be sabotage.
It's reasonably suspected the pipeline was blown up by the Special Services of the United States in order to finally stop the gas supplies to Germany from Russia.
Back in September of 27th, well, that's only a few days ago, a detachment of Navy ships led by the amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge, and ironically, when I was in the Marine Corps, at one point I was aboard the Kearsarge, announced the completion of work in the at one point I was aboard the Kearsarge, announced the completion of work in the
They completed their tasks in the Baltic and were spotted heading to the Straits into the North Sea, 30 kilometers from the site of the alleged sabotage on North Stream 150, kilometers from the threads of the North Stream 2.
The incidents raise a lot of suspicions.
Meanwhile, the energy crisis in Europe is gaining momentum and the situation is expected to worsen as winter approaches.
Now listen to Tucker nail this sucker!
Good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson.
Tonight, I hate to start a Tuesday evening on a grim note, but one of the environmental catastrophes, one of the great environmental catastrophes of our time, is unfolding tonight off the coast of Denmark.
The Nord Stream pipelines, which are enormous Russian-owned conduits that carry natural gas from Russia to Western Europe, have been breached.
As we speak, Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 are pouring millions of cubic meters of natural gas into the Baltic Sea.
Pictures from the air, which you can now see on your screen, show a toxic bubble field more than half a mile wide.
You can only guess at how many marine mammals are being killed right now.
Countless.
But the lasting damage may be to the atmosphere.
Natural gas is comprised of up to 90% methane.
Methane, as Joe Biden has often told you, is the key driver of global warming, which is of course an existential threat to humanity and the planet.
So if you're worried about climate change, what just happened to the Nord Stream pipelines is as close to the apocalypse as we have ever come.
So the question is, how did this happen?
And it turns out it was not an accident.
At the very same time that leaks in these pipelines were detected, Swedish officials recorded two powerful undersea explosions, each one of which was equivalent to hundreds of pounds of TNT.
Nothing in nature can account for that.
Almost immediately, the pipelines began leaking in three separate places.
So there's only one explanation for what happened.
This was an act of industrial terrorism.
That was very obvious to the Prime Minister of Poland, and he wasted no time in saying so.
Watch.
Today, we are also dealing with an act of sabotage.
We do not know the details of what happened yet, but we can clearly see that it is an act of sabotage.
An act that probably marks the next stage in the escalation of the situation we are dealing with in Ukraine.
We can clearly see, he said, this was an act of sabotage, an act of terrorism.
Well, yes, we can see that.
So the question is, who did it?
And of course, the prime suspect is obvious.
It would be the same man who caused domestic inflation here in the U.S.
and stole the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton.
That'd be Vladimir V. Putin.
The Washington Post got right to it.
Putin, they declared, is now weaponizing the Nord Stream pipelines.
According to the Canadian ambassador to the U.N., Vladimir Putin has decided to use, quote, pollution as an act of war.
Progressive Twitter strongly endorsed this conclusion.
Putin did it.
And that makes sense, until you thought about it for just a moment.
Vladimir Putin may be evil, they tell us that he is evil, but is he stupid?
Probably isn't stupid.
And yet, and here's the strange part, if you were Vladimir Putin, you would have to be a suicidal moron to blow up your own energy pipelines.
That's the one thing you would never do.
Natural gas pipelines are the main source of your power and your wealth, and most critically, your leverage over other countries.
Europe needs your energy, now more than ever, with winter approaching.
If you can't deliver that energy, then countries like Germany have no need to pay attention to what you want.
You're in the middle of a war, an all-hands-on-deck war, so you need all the leverage you can get.
Under these circumstances, there is no chance you would blow up Nord Stream 1 or 2.
Not now, obviously.
In fact, it's so obvious that even our famously dim Secretary of State, Tony Blinken, seemed to acknowledge it.
Sabotaging Nord Stream, he said today, is quote, clearly in no one's interest.
Right.
But really only half right.
It is true that blowing up Nord Stream does not help Vladimir Putin.
He would not do that.
Why would he?
But that doesn't mean that other countries wouldn't consider doing it.
They would consider it, and we know they have considered it, because at least one of them has said so in public.
In early February, less than three weeks before the war in Ukraine began, Joe Biden suggested, on camera, that he might take out these pipelines.
Watch.
If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again.
Then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2.
We will bring an end to it.
But how will you do that exactly, since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control?
We will, I promise you, we'll be able to do it.
Notice how he phrased that.
And he's the president.
He doesn't phrase things by accident, particularly when he's reading off cards.
He didn't say, I will pause the delivery of gas from Russia to Germany.
He said, there won't be a Nord Stream 2.
We'll put an end to it.
We'll take it out.
We'll blow it up.
And I'll have to call you back.
How will you do this, he was asked.
I promise you we will be able to do it.
They thought this through.
Yeah, I'm recording a show right now.
very much including us, didn't take Biden seriously when he said it.
Yeah, I'm recording a show right now.
This is the man who lectures you about using a wood stove or driving an SUV because of its emissions.
This is the guy who spent billions trying to mitigate cow flatulence because methane.
Would that guy really blow up a methane pipeline in the middle of the Baltic Sea?
It was hard to imagine.
That would be an unimaginably reckless act.
That would be the kind of thing you would do if you wanted to start a nuclear war.
It would be insane.
And yet, in retrospect, it's obvious they were thinking about this because Joe Biden wasn't the only person to suggest it.
Toria Nuland at the State Department said pretty much the very same thing.
Nuland is a lifelong war cheerleader.
She worked to bring about the Iraq invasion, never apologized, kept going.
She helped engineer the coup that overthrew the Ukrainian government some years back.
So capable, clearly she's capable of anything.
But environmental terrorism?
Even for Toria Nuland, that seemed too much, too extreme.
And yet, here she is in January.
With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have very strong and clear conversations with our German allies, and I want to be clear with you today.
If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.
One way or the other, we'll stop Nord Stream.
Now looking back, those words seem chilling eight months later as natural gas pours into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere.
So you have to ask, could the Biden administration really do something like this?
We can't say for sure.
We don't know for sure.
We can tell you that close allies of the Biden White House believe they certainly did do it.
Radek Sikorski is a Polish politician.
He's chairman of the EU-USA delegation in the European Parliament.
He's connected.
He's also the husband of regime stenographer Anne Applebaum of The Atlantic magazine.
Sikorski is so close to Joe Biden, he's got a picture of the two of them together in his Twitter profile.
So when the pipelines blew up, Sikorsky responded immediately, and here's what he wrote.
Thank you, USA.
So once again, did the Biden administration really do this?
It's hard to believe.
Given that it's an atrocity, it's effectively an act of terrorism, we don't want to make that accusation.
But we should tell you that, maybe not coincidentally, today a brand new pipeline was unveiled.
A pipeline that carries non-Russian natural gas in roughly the same area as Nord Streams 1 and 2.
This is called the Baltic Pipe.
It was inaugurated in Poland.
It will carry natural gas from Norway through Denmark to Poland and other countries nearby.
And it's likely to do very well, since now it has less competition.
Making sense?
What does the White House say about this?
How are they accounting for what happened today?
Well, they're not exactly enthusiastically denying responsibility for it.
Instead, they're looking at the upside.
Here's the president's publicist noting that the destruction of yet another energy pipeline is yet another opportunity for you to buy an electric car.
As you all know, these pipelines weren't pumping gas into Europe at this time.
NS2 was never operational, as you guys know.
NS1 has not been operational for weeks because Putin has weaponized energy, and we have said this many times before.
This just drives home the importance of our efforts to work together to get alternative gas supplies to Europe and to support efforts to reduce Oh, moving to clean energy!
Say the people who very may well be responsible for letting methane into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere at a scale that most people can't imagine.
The people lecturing you about your SUV may have blown up a natural gas pipeline and created one of the great catastrophes of our time.
In its effect on the environment.
If they did this, this would be one of the craziest, most destructive things any American administration has ever done.
But it would also be totally consistent with what they do.
What do they do?
They destroy.
These people build nothing.
Not one thing.
Instead they tear down and they desecrate.
From historic statues, to the Constitution, to energy infrastructure.
And no one in Congress is trying to stop any of it.
They're just preparing for the inevitable fallout.
Tonight, the Senate just advanced a spending bill with $35 million for the Department of Energy to, quote, prepare for and respond to potential nuclear and radiological incidents in Ukraine.
What?
The spending bill also brings the total U.S.
expenditure on Ukraine, the war, but also funding its government, and energy for Ukraine, to $67 billion on the eve of what could be a massive economic disruption here to our economy.
$67 billion.
How much is that?
Well, it's more than Russia's entire military budget last year.
And Congress is expected to fully pass the bill later this week with Republicans nodding along like the zombies they are.
What will be the effect of this?
Every action has a reaction.
Equal and opposite!
Blow up the Nord Stream pipelines?
OK, we ventured a new phase.
One in which the United States is directly at war with the largest nuclear power in the world.
Doesn't mean it will go nuclear immediately, but it does suggest there could be consequences.
If we actually blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, why wouldn't Russia sever undersea internet cables?
What would happen if they did that?
What would happen if banks in London couldn't communicate with Banks in New York.
Just that one piece of it.
Leaving aside its potential effects on our power grid.
But let's just say the banks couldn't communicate with each other for one day.
What would the economic effect of that be?
Oh, it would cascade downward into your house.
We could have an actual collapse.
We could wind up very quickly in third world conditions.
Those are the stakes.
Have the people behind this, the geniuses like Toria Nuland, considered the effects?
Maybe they have.
Maybe that was the point.
Subscribe to the Fox News YouTube channel to catch- We have a government of morons.
I want to play that because it's so comprehensive and I believe this is going to be a decisive turning event in modern history.
Carl, your thoughts?
A lot of strong points in that from Tucker Carlson.
So we have in Nord Stream, we have the explosions recorded.
I'll put an article into the show notes that we also have flight radar data of U.S.
Navy Sikorsky Seahawk helicopters making about 10 flyovers and hoverings over that area in the month of September.
And we also have, I'll forgive Tucker For his apocalyptic refuted global warming part there but we certainly have the question of who benefits from this and it is the U.S.
cutting off income from Russia supporting a competing pipeline and we have Victoria Nuland and Biden promising to end This.
So, this is so heavy-handed now.
You know, you wonder how much more of an endgame do we have to get before something is going to break, and apparently we have more.
And for Propaganda Pierre to pitch the electric car with that, that was nice.
That was a good touch on her part.
I'm surprised she didn't find some way to bring in that.
That just means it's more of a reason to get vaccinated.
67 billion dollars to Ukraine.
All right.
So there's a little over 100 million U.S.
households.
So that means that the average household in the U.S.
has spent $6,000 on Ukraine in total.
Now that's for an average $50,000 a year income.
So if you make more or less, you can do multiples of that.
If your household makes $100,000, that means that you have contributed $12,000 towards that lie.
Very good, Carl.
Brian?
Well, I think, like you, Jim, I think this is a very, very big deal, and I've been watching it carefully.
But, you know, according to RT, the CIA warned Germany that a pipeline attack was coming a few weeks ago.
So the CIA knew it was coming and fortunately the case will be solved very shortly because they found a passport floating in the water and it belongs to a six foot four left-handed man on a dialysis machine who lives in a cave.
They're gonna put a put the patsy on somebody on this thing if they're even gonna bother and I don't even think they're even gonna bother but You know, if the CIA saw it coming, then they have their suspect and they're going to get ready to, to, you know, arrest or kill them.
It'll be a lone gunman, obviously.
Now that pipe was one and a half inches thick of steel surrounded by concrete.
So not exactly easy to breach.
And you know, it doesn't seem to me that a guy with a boat could be go, you know, Driving on by and drops a can of TNT over the side that just happens to blow up this massive production of a pipeline that's so ridiculous.
You know, I think of Hunter Biden on this as well.
Who is he working for?
He's working for Burisma.
Burisma operates gas pipelines and so they're also a competitor with Nord Stream.
It's interesting that today The U.S.
Embassy in Moscow told all the Americans to get out.
Biden's, I'm sorry, not Biden, but Putin's been making every effort he possibly can and even announced last week that they were going to soon have total independence from the U.S.
dollar.
So it doesn't surprise me if this is the type of attack, false flag attack, that is going to lead to a larger level of war.
I went through all of Paul Craig Roberts articles addressing this today, and I'm convinced that Russia didn't move as swiftly as they should.
He's convinced of that in terms of getting us out.
I don't know what else to say about it, but this is the type of thing that could be so serious that it affects us, our gas prices, our budgets, our household income, and leads us right into a very, very serious war, which I think these globalists want.
So So that's my take on it.
Yes, yes.
Well, the CIA could warn Germany because the CIA was planning the event, and that gives them a form of plausible deniability to warn when they know for a certainty it's coming.
It's clear this was done by Navy UDT-type people.
That's what they do.
They use explosives to blow things up underwater.
I don't have any doubt about it.
As I said, I even served aboard that ship.
I mean, give us a break.
This is horrendous, and it's an act of environmental terrorism for which the United States bears responsibility.
Russia is already taking this to the United Nations.
The evidence is just too clear-cut.
When you've got the President of the United States in this monstrous Victoria Nuland saying this is what they're going to do, Under certain circumstances, a circumstance is realizing it's done.
There's not a lot of room for doubt as to who is responsible.
And when you go through the other parties, there's no other party that really would benefit from undertaking this action than the United States.
Sad to say, really gone awful.
Good Tucker work here.
Meanwhile, exposed The vast pro-Ukrainian bot army designed to influence Western policy makers.
Get this.
Researchers at the University of Adelaide have published a landmark paper about Twitter bots.
They found a staggering 5.2 million tweets on social media from 23 to March 8, 60 to 80 percent shared by fake accounts, 90 percent of which were pro-Ukraine.
They had the hashtags, I stand with Ukraine, I stand with Zelensky, I support Ukraine, and Miss Like the Ghost of Kiev, a fictional Ukrainian fighter pilot who is farcically alleged to have downed 40 Russian jets within hours of the military op commencing.
Significant spikes were recorded at key points in the initial stages of fighting.
They were identified overwhelmingly in the English language.
The fake users sought to drive more disruption in English-speaking countries and influence a variety of user groups.
The accounts were successful in the objective of stimulating discussion and trends, including the question of whether Ukrainians should flee the country.
This study is the first analysis of social media content related to the conflict.
It covers a very small time period, just two weeks, but look how much was going on!
It's almost inevitable the level of pro-Kiev sentiment expressed by users, trolls and organic alike, will have increased further beyond the 90% recorded during this time frame.
One need only spend a few minutes scrolling major social media to identify a profusion of anonymous, recently registered users pumping up pro-Ukraine, pro-NATO, and pro-war propaganda, attacking anyone critical of the ascendant Western narratives.
It is, in the words of writer Caitlin Johnstone, the most aggressively trolled war of all time.
Unsurprisingly though, the Western media, overwhelmingly committed to not publishing negative information about Ukraine, no matter how abundant it may be, has universally ignored the bombshell findings of this academic paper.
A hesitancy to report on matters that do not reflect positively on Kiev is somewhat understandable.
On August 4th, Amnesty International published a report on Ukrainian troops basing forces and weaponry in residential areas, including schools and hospitals, endangering civilians and constituting a war crime.
Three days later, CBS broadcasted a documentary showing 30% of the Western arms shipments to Kiev actually reached the front line—only 30%.
The rest disappearing or being sold on the black market.
Such was the incendiary response to these report on social media.
Amnesty was bullied into apologizing for anger and distress.
CBS went further and pulled this documentary from the web.
The academic study suggests much of this counterblast was actually attributable to automated account, not to human beings, and deliberately intended to create the false impression that condemnation of both organizations was omnipresent.
We have this study raising obvious questions about something called NNAFO, North Atlantic Fellows Organization, a leading blast in the counterblast against Amnesty and CBS.
NAFO has a history of harassing pro-Russian voices and mass reporting accounts until they're temporarily or permanently suspended.
Many prominent officials have praised the group, and it's received positive profiles in The Economist, Politico, and The Washington Post.
As is so often the case.
Dubious tactics and conduct, of which Russia is widely accused, cease to be villainous when its Western countries and their allies are performing it.
One might reasonably ask whether the entire mainstream media controversy over Kremlin bots on social media was not just a smokescreen for far larger and more effective operations much closer to home.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, fascinating, and I am pleased with the progression of events.
So you have Elon Musk attempting to, or I don't know if he was attempting, but at least he put in the purchase for Twitter, and through that we have the drip drip understanding of how much these fake accounts influence what is called public opinion.
So you got two weeks of data, and out of the 5.2 million tweets in that time, 60-80% of them are just fake, and 90% of that is pro-Ukrainian propaganda, huh?
That's what we need to know, and that would be obvious for me as a historian.
When you have a totalitarian government, you employ all your assets to prop up the regime.
Now, when we lampoon Those totalitarian governments is just overhanded, over-the-top propaganda.
We laugh how people could believe in that bullshit, such obvious bullshit.
Well, now we get to see it up front and close at home.
And it is over-the-top, obvious bullshit.
It's interesting how Elon Musk just stumbled over this Twitter fraud on this massive scale.
are going to go down in an instant.
And if we have friends in high places, that might be an elegant end.
If we do not, then we have the risk of Civil War, World War III.
It's endgame scary times.
It's interesting how Elon Musk just stumbled over this Twitter fraud on this massive scale.
Who would have imagined?
Brian.
Yeah.
Well, so there's a lot of public opinion out there.
And those people that are out there that are, don't understand what's going on in the world, tend to go to Twitter to look to see what other people are thinking.
What other people are saying?
And I can't tell you how many times I've seen the I stand with Yuval, the I stand with Ukraine, strong Texas, strong this, strong that.
And you just know when these little slogans get rolled out within 24 hours of some catastrophic event that we're trying to be sold by the media that something isn't quite right with the entire scenario.
They've got the fundraising episodes up and the whole situation.
Now the bots are just there to get the weak ones that are just involved in groupthink and just looking for what is other what do other people believe because I'm going to do the most popular thing.
Does anybody remember who said propaganda has to be popular and has to adapt to the perception of the least intelligent?
That's a great quote.
Yeah, well, that was Adolf Hitler.
He also said the great masses of people will more easily fall for the big lies than the little one.
Quote, unquote, Adolf Hitler.
Guys, the playbook is being played on us right now, right here in America.
And that's why I'm a big supporter of turn off your TV, check with some sources once a week and go figure out what the news has to say.
Other than that, live your life.
Because if you, if you think that you can rely on these social media platforms to give you any ounce of Educated opinion, you're going to find yourself in a bad spot is mindless.
And I do think we've lost the war.
I think most of America is so, so gone.
But the good news is, according to the research I've been doing, just taking a look at Reddit, which had some sort of very liberal, conservative clash, it seems like there's a lot of people right now that are Waking up to the idea that our entire environment is fabricated right now.
I think I can quote, I think I can look at about seven or eight posts just over the last 24 hours in the Reddit conspiracy forum where people are like, hey, I guess I'm just noticing this now.
Maybe I'm a little late to the game, but this is all fake.
It just feels fabricated.
I think they're overplaying their hand.
They're overplaying their hand.
They're using the same tactics over and over again.
They're going to have to get creative.
And I don't even think they're going to bother with the Nord Stream Pipeline.
They're just going to bury that under the rug like Stephen Paddock.
So it is what it is.
Several thoughts.
One, the little lies don't work because people are used to little lies, but they don't have the imagination that anyone could lie on the magnitude of the big lie like the pandemic.
I think that's a perfect example of the big lie.
There's a Brand new poll results just out today from ABC showing that nationwide, the Republicans have a five point edge over the Democrats, but in the battleground states, 21 point lead.
21 points.
For the Republicans.
That suggests to me the propaganda that has been coming from the left, which has been so massive, has worn out its welcome, just as you're implying, Brian, in that it's sinking in, that the country is ready to get rid of this rubbish.
I say we got morons running our government.
I mean, this act was incredibly stupid.
Look how effortlessly Tucker points out they could simply cut our internet cables.
I mean, how simple would it be?
Tit for tat.
You cut our gas pipeline underwater, we cut your internet cable underwater, and we're hamstrung.
I mean, I see it coming.
It's going to be on that order.
I think you're both right spot on.
Meanwhile, Exposed.
Zuckerberg made millions for election meddling.
We thought he was being generous or public-spirited by throwing in, what, $410 million.
We're at $10 fake ballot.
That would be 41 million phony ballots.
The Center for Renewing America has petitioned the IRS to look into Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan's finances.
The couple's participation in the most recent election, they believe, was highly questionable and had to have been motivated by personal benefit.
The think tank strongly recommends the agency launch an investigation to determine whether or not they violated applicable federal tax regulations.
During the most recent election, Zuckerberg and another of others made significant financial investments in an effort to tilt the race in favor of Joe Biden.
Zuckerberg's financial losses, Carol Swain tweets, could be related to his collaboration with the FBI.
His nonprofit was involved with manipulating outcomes through his $400 million investment in ballot drop boxes and grants to local government.
Zuckerberg election fraud.
They assert a number of organizations, like the Center for Election Innovation and Research and the National Vote at Home Institute, were complicit in swaying the outcome in favor of Biden and other Democrats.
They were compensated with around $400 million for their activities.
About a half a billion was put into the campaign for the presidential election by a scheme masterminded by David Plouffe.
Who had previously served as Obama's campaign manager.
The chief executive of META, formerly known as Facebook, and his wife are those who made the assertion the money they gave to a progressive organization was nothing more than an effort to make sure the 2020 election went off without a hitch.
Data professionals, however, how the money was dispersed called them out on their foolishness, pointing out the flaws in their logic.
Here you have Wisco Trav tweeting, it's time to arrest Mark Zuckerberg.
He's engaging in crimes against this nation, some of which include election interference, election fraud, illegal surveillance of political rivals, and pushing slanderous defaming content as factual evidence of crimes committed.
According to their findings, the funding was allocated on a strongly politicized basis that benefited Democrats.
Furthermore, it was primarily allocated to locations that leaned Democratic to finance a partisan effort and affect the outcome.
William Doyle also stated the plan should not be used to finance traditional political campaigns.
Rather, emphasis was placed on partisan electioneering in support of Biden.
He further observed the far left plan primarily cared about funding the infiltration of election offices at the municipal and county level by left-wing activists, utilizing those offices and platforms to establish favored administrative processes, voting techniques, and data sharing agreements as intense and intense outreach operations in areas heavy with Democratic supporters.
The complaint that was submitted by the think tank demands an investigation be conducted by IRS into this partisan scheme, as ought to have been done long ago.
One suggests IRS look into evidence of illegal political conduct and the receipt and use of incorrect personal income tax credits for payment to one or more of those entities.
Another complaint argued the left-leaning organization that participated should not be allowed to keep their charitable tax status going forward.
According to the complaint, the tax-exempt status should be revoked because the expenditures were made for partisan campaign interference in blatant and willful contravention of U.S.
law.
In another filed in support of the initial, it was mentioned the CEO of Meta and Y did not take part in these activities without receiving some kind of benefit in exchange, such as an illegal tax deduction.
The complaint states the IRS will be the one to judge whether or not the Metacabal left sufficient evidence for IRS to find them guilty of tax offenses, but it's incumbent upon IRS to recoup what is likely a bogus tax deduction on the roughly $100 million order of magnitude and illicit taxpayer subsidy running to support Democratic electioneering goals.
Meanwhile, former White House physician observed Biden's mental acuity is fading.
Former White House physician Representative Ronny Jackson of Texas has repeatedly been concerned about Biden's mental acuity, and he recently said the problems are growing worse.
Breitbart reported that during an appearance on FNC, Fox News, Sunday Morning Futures, he warned that Biden's condition appears to be deteriorating.
He had actually served as a position to previous presidents Bush, Obama, and Trump.
It's not gotten any better, he reported.
It's continued to get worse.
When he was a candidate, Americans have continued to have questions about a lot of his bizarre behaviors.
This holding hands thing is one.
The way he makes up stories, just repeatedly telling stories everyone has documented as false.
This happens pretty frequently.
He has the emotional outbursts.
He shovels when he walks.
He slurs his speech.
Despite numerous requests for Biden's health record to be made public and to submit a cognitive test, there are only crickets from the Biden admin.
Notable quote, something bad's going to happen domestically here in this country with a potential terrorist crossing our border, or something bad's going to happen overseas from the national security standpoint, and we're going to get lots of Americans killed.
And that's when the people will really want to dig in and see what's going on.
It will be too late then.
We need to make sure he can do this job, and I honestly don't think that he can.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first, with that first article, it's exactly what we were talking about.
Facebook, Twitter, this is projection.
This is the Orwellian opposite.
They're blaming Russia bots when it's really the American killery bots that is the main thing.
I think that our opponents delight in this type of projection.
So Facebook fundamentally is fraud because we do have the recognition that about 50 government tax paid employees were in conversations with Facebook and Twitter over COVID regarding what information to censor from their platforms.
And then you got, so $400 million, huh?
Well, let's kind of weigh out the two options about where that money was going.
So one option is what Zuck claims is that, oh, it's because we love free speech and the democratic process.
But they're not for free speech, so it's far more likely that they want censorship applied to the political process, and an independent investigation certainly would reveal that.
Again, as a history teacher, just take a look at what Zelensky has already done, and what's happening in the U.S.
You demonize and criminalize your political opponents.
Especially those in the media, you shut them down so that you just have the one people's party voice, and that would be a more consistent explanation for that 400 million.
So, in the environment that we have, Carl B. Herman Blackspot, any of these shows, the context section, is that the U.S.
is not limited government in a constitutional republic.
It is far more accurate to say it's a lying, looting, illegal, rogue state empire, And it commits false flags to push narratives for totalitarian control.
And for Biden, first, as we have covered extensively, this guy is an actor.
We can tell that definitively because of the earlobes and dated previous pictures.
The real Biden has a detached, flappy earlobe, and this actor, whatever he is in a mask, has Attached earlobes.
So it's two different people.
That means it's a PSYOP.
And the PSYOP includes the growing dementia of this character playing the president.
And, you know, to put this in context, too, for whatever Biden is, this is a child-groping, hair-sniffing, plagiarist-lying war criminal.
And criminal against humanity for his COVID draconian measures, which includes the violation of federal law code 21, which upholds the Nuremberg Code by these forced poisonous injections into people.
So, we'll see what develops next.
Again, exciting endgame.
Yes, very well said, Carl Bryant.
Well, I think that the just I agree with Carl and that the money related to what Facebook is willing to spend to sway an election sounds totally ridiculous.
400 million dollars.
You know, I don't think I've ever given Facebook a penny directly and I'm a citizen just like anybody else.
So when a product is given to me for free, then I guess that means if they're making that kind of money, I'm the product and I'm I'm a pretty expensive product for them because I'm not giving them money, but they're somehow making this much money for being able to persuade me and change my voice.
What is voting other than our voice publicly stated as to who we're going to support to be our government, the people that are going to lead us.
So it's crazy to me that Facebook can throw These kind of numbers around and it does go to show how badly inflated the stock market is.
Because like I said, I don't think I've ever given Facebook a dollar and I know I don't buy enough products off Facebook that they're making any serious money.
So it tells me that they're just using this funny money to run their big operation to try to control and manipulate and modify our voices and to see them meddling elections.
It doesn't surprise me a bit.
They've got to control those people that are willing to Send those pallets of money their direction so they can continue to persuade me to change my mind.
The next story was about Biden's mental status, and I found this quote.
Come children, let us shut up the box and the puppets for our play is all played out.
William Thackeray, 1856 or something like that.
Look, He's a puppet.
It's all played out.
Everybody can see it.
There is nobody anywhere that thinks this guy is a brilliant cognitive intelligence that's given years and years of good service to America and is the Less belligerent version of Trump.
Everybody knows what he is.
He's a puppet.
The play is played out.
It's over.
But they're not going to give up power and they're not going to give up control.
And the problem is, fundamentally, is that when people like us are oppressed this long by having to think By even not getting our votes counted when we're oppressed this long.
What do you think is going to happen if they ever loosen up on us?
What do you think that the ramifications are going to be when they back off?
I don't think they can back off because I don't think they'll ever have power again in America, at least not for generations.
I think they know it's coming to an end very quickly, and they're scrambling to hold on to whatever they possibly can, even using this puppet.
It's ridiculous.
So, everybody knows Biden's old and decrepit and probably a fake and mental or whatever, but at the end of the day, both he, Harris, and I think, frankly, most of our federal-level senators also have the same vote.
So, that's all I have to say on that issue.
Well, those were wonderful things to say.
Just for those who may be unaware of the history, Facebook originated as a CIA project.
It was called LifeLog.
The day before they brought in Zuckerberg and changed the name to Facebook, it was to find a way to get Americans to tell the CIA everything it wanted to know about their personal lives, every detail, spontaneously, voluntarily, and with enthusiasm.
And it's worked like a charm.
Meanwhile, the entirety of Hurricane Charlie of 2004 could fit inside the eye of Hurricane Ian 2022.
in 2022, simply mind boggling.
I'm not the only observer who believes this is an extraordinary hurricane.
It appears to be a case of weather manipulation, and I'm convinced this is a Biden administration publishing Ron DeSantis.
For, you know, many brilliant political strokes, most recently, of course, sending 50 migrants to Martha's Vineyard, which was hugely embarrassing.
These are very nasty people.
And you can see in the major actions they're taking in retaliation, they take no prisoners.
This is outrageous, un-American, undemocratic And I think if we do get a midterm election, it explains why we have this 21-point edge in the states that are going to make a difference.
Meanwhile, executive order advances biotech transhumanist agenda.
This is very disturbing, too.
I predicted this no-testing-required formula, which went beyond COVID shots.
According to the executive order Biden just signed, that's exactly what's about to happen.
From Dr. Joseph Mercola, a very astute guy.
On September 12, 2022, he signed Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy.
Sounds nice, doesn't it?
Specified in that order is the development of genetic engineering technologies and techniques to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way we write software and program computers, as well as genetic technologies to unlock the power of biological data using computing tools and artificial intelligence.
Anyone find this resonating with Bill Gates?
This executive order establishes a fast-track pipeline of mRNA shots and gene therapies that will further the transhumanist agenda to create augmented humans and bring us into a post-human world.
Drugmakers have clearly expected this free-for-all.
They have loads of mRNA candidates in their pipeline.
September 14, 2022, for example, Pfizer initiated a phase 3 study that will test a quadrivalent mRNA-based flu shot on 25,000 American adults.
mRNA-based flu shot.
You can well anticipate it's going to have devastating effects similar to those of the present vax.
Moderna begins its phase 3 flu job in early June 2022.
Moderna wants to create an annual mRNA shot covering all the top 10 viruses.
If Biden signed the order which specifies the development of genetic engineering technologies and techniques, obstacles for commercialization will be reduced.
That means things like testing, so that innovative technologies and products can reach markets faster, even if they are therefore overwhelmingly less safe.
What we have here in the nutshell, therefore, is a creation of a fast-track mRNA pipeline.
When, in June, the FDA quietly implemented a future framework scheme to deliver reformulated COVID boosters without additional testing, I predicted the no-testing-required formula would spread beyond COVID shots, and that's exactly what's happening.
The FDA has also put out medically false and misleading COVID booster campaign messages proving we've officially entered the year of transhumanism.
It's time to install that update.
Update your antibodies with the new COVID-19 booster.
Don't be shocked.
You can now recharge your immunity with an updated COVID-19 booster.
Is this the death knell to allopathic medicine?
Historically, gene therapies have had to jump through extra hoops, which is why so few exist on the market.
As of 2021, there were 20 gene therapies commercially available.
The world's first gene therapy trial didn't begin until 1990, so it's still a very new field.
It actually Clapsed overnight in 1999 when a teenage trial participant died from side effects.
An FDA investigation concluded research had moved too fast.
Safety had not been put first in violation of the Hippocratic Oath.
First, do no harm.
Progress, thanks to increased caution, slowed from there on.
Such caution is now being thrown to the wind.
There will be disastrous ramification.
Millions will die from poorly tested gene therapies.
Eventually, medical research and allopathic medicine will both cease to exist.
The survivors, Val, have nothing to do with that murderous cabal ever again.
The only way they might be able to keep going is if they are in control of people's brain function or able to force drugs under threat of death or worse, neither of which is impossible at this point, shocking though it may seem.
We're looking at a cornucopia of mRNA shots coming our way.
The flu shot, for example, are in the works.
Pfizer initiated their phase 3 Moderna.
The current job candidate includes hemagglutinin dioproteins for four different influenza strains.
HA is a major influenza surface glycoprotein that's considered an important target to generate broad protection against influenza and is a primary target of currently available influenza vaccines.
Over the past three years, I've written articles exploring the transhumanist agenda.
Basically, the goal is to transcend biology through technology, to meld human biology with technology and artificial intelligence.
In September of 2020, I posted a video with Dr. Carrie Magee in which she suggested we're standing at a crossroad.
One reason why it's important to know whether synthetic RNA creates permanent changes in the genome is because synthetic genes are patented.
If they cause permanent changes, humans will contain patented genes.
That brings up very serious questions.
See, now patents have owners, and owners have patent rights.
Are they going to own our body?
Who will be responsible for protecting it?
If your cell phone can receive info from your body, what can your body receive from it or other sources?
Could transmissions affect your mood, your behavior, your physical function, your thoughts, your memories?
So far, It doesn't appear the COVID shots has these capabilities built in.
But in his September 14, 2022 Substack article, Human Cyborgs Are Just a Beginning, Dr. Robert Malone reviewed several of these plans.
Several reports tell the story about human machine function and implication for the future of DoD.
It doesn't leave a lot to the imagination, does it?
Since these shots are designed to manipulate your biology, they have the potential to also alter the biology of the entire human race.
Nearly two years later, we still don't know the extent to which they may be doing that, and nevertheless, more fast-tracked and untested gene therapies are on the way.
One reason it's important to know for certain about the permanency of the changes is for that patent reason.
The hydrogel used to preserve the MRA, by the way, can also contain nanobots to create a bioelectric interface capable of connecting to a smartphone or other interface.
Novel technologies that measure biological data such as blood sugar are based upon this.
Such technologies will, of course, have immediate ramifications for our privacy.
Human augmentation technologies deemed technically feasible by 2050 at the latest include ocular enhancements to improve sight and situational awareness, optogenetic bodysuit to restore improved muscular strength and control, auditory enhancements and neural enhancements of the brain for two-way data transfer and brain-to-brain communication.
Changing what it means to be human.
A plan to turn you into a genetically edited cyborg.
A report.
Human augmentation at the dawn of a new paradigm.
A strategic implication project.
Reviews of scientific goals.
Physical performance, such as strength, dexterity, speed, and endurance can be enhanced, as well as physical senses.
Psychological performance, such as cognition, emotion, and motivation can be influenced to activate and direct desired behavior.
Social performance, the ability to perceive oneself as part of a group and the readiness to act as part of a team can be influenced.
They list several different ways to bring these about, including genetics and non-invasive brain interfaces, passive and powered exoskeletons, drugs and nanotechnology, neurostimulation, augmented reality technologies, such as external holograms or glasses with built-in artificial intelligence, and sensory augmentation technology, such as external sensors or implants.
This is very disturbing stuff.
This dystopian future being promoted by the World Economic Forum, Fourth Industrial Revolution, and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not.
Importantly, The Human Augmentation Report readily admits human augmentation can directly enhance behavior.
And if you think they're just brain fodder for geeks in uniform, think again.
The military is spending lots of money.
We've got a cyborg soldier.
We've seen these robberies edited in films and movies.
People who are supercharged by artificial means where technology has changed their capacities.
In other words, Don't let people come to the conclusion human cyborgs are a bad idea, they insist, because at worst that might prevent their development, or at best, pitch regular people against the augmented elite, making their efforts to rule the plebs all the more difficult.
Once again, We are being played before we even know what the playing field looks like.
I think that this is right.
The control capabilities go far beyond Orwell's 1984.
In a November 2019 interview with CNN, history professor Yuval Noah Harari, a Klaus Schwab disciple, stated that humans are already hackable, meaning that technology exists by which a company or government can know you better than you know yourself.
The knowledge can be used for both good or evil.
According to Harari, the available capabilities already go far beyond Orwell's 1984 authoritarian vision, and it's only going to become more powerful from here on out.
The predicted algorithm will increasingly be used to make decisions that historically have been made by humans, including whether or not you'll be hired for a job, whether you'll be granted a loan, the scholastic curriculum of all, even whom you will marry.
To learn about these transhuman initiatives and the race to merge man with machine and artificial intelligence, check out True Stream Media video below.
There are even ongoing attempts to upload the human mind into the cloud.
Ultimately creating a form of digital hive mind where everyone communicates via Wi-Fi telepathy.
This, despite the fact we don't fully understand what the mind actually is or even where it's located, this is coming.
Final thoughts?
I don't know what it will take to prevent the dystopian post-human world envisioned by Schwab and his technocratic minions, but I suspect education would be the cornerstone of such an endeavor.
People need to become aware of the plan where we're being led with all these novel therapies and inventions.
In the short term, it's crucial to realize fast-tracking genetic engineering technologies and techniques to write circuitry for cells and program biology the same way we write software and program computers mean they're going to cut corners.
Loads of them.
Testing is going to be done on the population at large, just as they've done with the COVID jabs.
The results of such experimentation are relatively predictable.
People will be seriously injured.
Many will die.
So think long and hard before you agree to take any of these forthcoming gene therapies.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first, I want to point out that I agree with Brian that these psychopaths only rule in one direction and they can't back up.
They can't admit anything.
They can't release any of the control.
Otherwise, if the truth gets out in one area, then it's going to spill over into all the areas and then it's the emperor's new clothes jig is up.
When I began writing articles in 2009, one of the, I think it was the very first article that I wrote was about for truth and reconciliation.
Because we have so many of these minions, and if you were to honestly assess the Evils playing team, most of these people are not gonna, they don't want to be on that team.
That side is loveless.
It is a pyramid at the top, it's script readers, it's loveless, they just use people as tools.
And the truth and reconciliation will give opportunity for people to exchange the full truth for a modicum of forgiveness.
And that, I think, will be a big idea moving forward when people find out The full truth.
So our opponents have this transgender trans human agenda and they just want everybody to to be shot and take a knee to this one rainbow unicorn party as so that they can be tweaked genetically tweaked upon demand and
They want people to agree to this great reset, so that you'll be a minion to Klaus Schwab and eat nothing, or eat bugs, own nothing, live in a pod, and somehow be happy with that.
Marcia Engel was the chief editor to the New England Journal of Medicine, and she was at Harvard's Medical School for decades.
I don't know if she may still be there, but in the context of what we're looking at with Big Pharma, she is the strongest to be able to document that approximately 50% of what she sees in Big Pharma research is fraudulent.
It's just bought and paid for.
She documents that the profits of Big Pharma, the leading 10 Pharmacological companies in the U.S., their profits are greater than the next 490 companies on the Fortune 500 list.
She concludes, rightly, that this is not competition.
It is an oligarchy who are in collusion.
Oh, and she also says that you're never going to get universal health care from any of these experts because they're all in it for profit.
Withdraw consent?
Demand arrests of the people at the top for the psychopathy?
Carl B. Herman Blogspot, any of these shows, my best shots, or any of the documentation that you prefer is sufficient documentation to...
Demand their arrests.
And these are crimes of fraud.
They're crimes against humanity.
And the other option is that if people don't want to get involved, then they're going to continue to be just a tortured herd animal.
And they're just going to be dictating you until you are cold.
As an example of Mercola's non-testing regimen, the latest COVID booster has only been tested on eight mice and no humans whatsoever.
Stunning.
Brian?
Well, you know, I fear for our children.
I fear for especially the young men and women who are going to join the military because it's only in a military setting where they'd ever be able to test or implement any of these things at all.
They've been Indicating that they wanted to change humanity from the beautiful, elegant, and wonderful creation that it is for a long, long time.
And of course, all of science fiction has been built around this idea of the superhuman.
Terminator, the robots, iRobot, Elysium, District 9, Dr. Strangelove, You know, that goes back to the Nazi stuff.
Iron Man, Captain America, RoboCop, Ghost in a Shell, Darth Vader, Ex-Mahina, Johnny Mnemonic, Blade Runner, the original, plus the 2019 Star Trek Into Darkness are just the ones that I could list off the top of my head for how long and how hard they've been trying to program us to allow us to, to allow them to change us.
I am not impressed with modern medicine.
I am not impressed with modern medical science beyond what the cardiologists can do, the doctors can do.
I'm not impressed with the drugs, you know.
It just shocks me that people are willing to put their bodies through these treatments to get out of pain.
And, you know, I'm glad they saved my life when I had my heart attack, and I'm glad they were there, but that was, they literally stuck a catheter into a vein and stuck a stent in there, like old tech.
But I don't think that the transhuman agenda has anything, any more legs on it in the next 10, 15 years than I don't think it's gonna change humanity enough for them to get what they want.
I think it's all just speculation and conjecture and a money spending spree.
Like if there's an executive order that authorized all this by Biden, how long do executive orders last?
Not long enough to do a single test with any of these things.
So I don't see it as being the big threat to society that others might see it as.
Excellent, excellent comments.
Just excellent.
Meanwhile, New Zealand Prime Minister calls for a global censorship system.
Surprise, surprise.
Jacinda Ardern is the latest liberal leader to call for an international alliance to censor speech.
Unsatisfied with the unprecedented censorship of social media companies, leaders like Hillary Clinton have turned from private censorship to good old-fashioned state.
Speech regulation has become an article of faith on the left.
Our turn-user speech this week to the UN General Assembly to call for censorship on a global scale.
She lashed out at disinformation, calling for a global coalition to control speech.
After a nod toward free speech, she proceeded to lay out a plan for its demise through government regulation.
But what if that lie told repeatedly and across many platforms trumps, inspires, or motivates others to take up arms, to threaten the security of others, to turn a blind eye to atrocities, or worse, to become complicit in them?
What then?
This is no longer a hypothetical.
The weapons of war have changed.
They are upon us and require the same level of action and activity that we put into the weapons of old.
We recognize the threats that the old weapons created.
We came together as communities to minimize these threats.
We created international rules, norms, and expectations.
We never saw that as a threat to our individual liberties.
It was rather a preservation of them, the same as applied now as we take on these new challenges.
She noted how extremists use speech to spread lies without noting that non-extremists use that same free speech to counter those views.
To answer a question, how do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists, is that you convince them using the same free speech, logic, evidence, argument.
Instead, she wants to silence those who have different views than her own.
Referring to a global censorship coalition as a light-touch approach to disinformation, when it's anything but, she revealed how sweeping such a system would be.
She defended the need for global censorship on having to combat those who question climate change, and the need to stop hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology.
After all, how do you successfully end a war people are led to believe the reason for its existence is not only legal but noble?
How do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists?
How do you ensure that human rights of others are upheld when they are subjected to hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology?
It's the same rationale used by authoritarian nations like China, Iran, and Russia to censor dissenters, minority groups, and political rivals.
What is hateful and dangerous is a fluid concept that governments have historically used to silence their critics.
She's the smiling face of a new generation of censors.
The older generation, such as the Iranians, did not pretend to support free speech, openly admitted they were crushing dissent.
The point is, we need to be equally on guard when censorship is pushed from the left, with the best of motivation but the worst of means.
As the great civil libertarian Justice Louis Brandeis once said, the greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning, but without understanding.
Here she is speaking up for the diminution of free speech.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, Big Jack!
Our Dern!
She has, similar to Big Mike, she has additional biological features that women do not have.
So, she virtue signals for free speech, and then I found that what she talked about is the usual projection.
She claims that she cares about people taking up arms.
Oh, you mean like the U.S.
and the U.K.
and the NATO-led wars of aggression that in the U.S.
rogue state empire have killed over 30 million since World War II?
My dog is so upset about it, she wants to know that she's barking mad about it.
Big Jack says that she's worried about threatening security.
Oh, you mean like the COVID camps in New Zealand and Australia where people are ordered to go in there and to take forced medical injections?
Or atrocities?
Oh, yeah, you mean like poverty that kills a million children every month from preventable poverty when they have these wars of aggression to control all the resources?
You know, we are one false flag away from really an endgame.
And the false flag, it hasn't happened yet, it could be a nuclear war, it could be an economic collapse, it could be the assassinations of President Obama and or the actor playing Biden to completely cut down free speech.
We are also one breakthrough away from people really being able to have this Emperor's New Clothes moment where the illusion is dropped instantly and we'll see what happens.
I have a modest point and then a larger one.
The modest is I have it from a very reliable authority that she is in fact a hermaphrodite.
She has both Sexual genital.
But more importantly, you can't discover the truth if you can't debate whether it's true or false.
If you can't produce evidence to confront and test alternative hypotheses, you'll never know which end is up.
And that's the point.
They don't want us to know.
They want to dictate.
They want to tell us and for us to accept, no matter how absurd it might be.
That is reason why they regard freedom of speech and of inquiry as a threat to their power and control.
Brian.
Well, how it dies.
You know, we're Americans.
We have a pretty well-developed sense of fair play and a pretty good understanding that we have free speech actively in place right now, but I've seen places that don't have it.
And this story reminds me of in 1997 in July when I was in Shanghai went to Fudan University.
And I remember that was when I was in college.
So in college, obviously here in America, we have open thought and open ideas and debate and discussion and everybody's got a different opinion about things.
I got over there and I realized that whenever I was in a discussion in the dorm rooms at Fudan University, if there was more than one person around, then the discussion had to All go in the approved direction.
And then I noticed that you get somebody aside and you go play ping pong with them down at a local cafe, and they'll really, they'll sort of come up and say, hey, you know, this is what I think about this.
Is it really like that over there?
Do you really have freedom of speech and open newspapers?
And that was, of course, when Hong Kong was coming back into Chinese possession after the 100-year lease was up on that.
And so it was a real patriotic time.
But I started learning as much as I could about it.
And what it turns out is that In a Chinese dorm room, there's eight students, one of which, unknown to the other seven, is working with the Chinese Communist Party, who's got a hall monitor working down at the end of the hall.
And so the one that is the informant can't can't reveal who they are because they're relying on that to get a better job with the government when they're done with their schooling.
So he gets an extra benefit when he's done with his schooling because he's a report, he's an internal undercover agent that reports back to it.
So the only time you could get them to talk to you was when you were separate in a one-on-one environment, because whenever there was two or more of them around, they had to take the party line, not knowing if the other one is the undercover agent.
That's the reality of what communism and free speech does.
You have to stick to the party line.
You have to say what's expected to be said.
And when the government can come in and control what kind of job you have or what kind of income you're going to make, What employer you're going to be assigned to, and what's coming for us in the future is our digital bank accounts, our digital money.
And when they can fine us for bad speech or bad think or whatever, we will find ourselves in that position where we're totally controlled and we cannot escape to that individualistic, debating, open sort of conversation.
So my overall take on this is, It's communism and it's control.
And that's what it looks like.
It's just totally, totally stifling when that happens.
By the way, that university had the highest suicide rate among all universities in China.
Carl.
I wanted to add that when we adopted our daughter from Southern China in 2002, I found the same thing.
And one of the people on our tour from the government, when we were just walking alone, told me that that was the system, is that there's always a spy.
And so you always, in a group setting, have to give the government line.
And we had this on a bus tour.
We were with a group of probably 20 families.
And I asked a question, the bus tour guy was talking about the economic progress of China and the growth rate of the economy.
And I asked, well, how's the Chinese government seeing freedom of speech connected to economic output?
Because most people think that you need the free access to information in order to maximize economic productivity.
And this guy, his face started turning a little bit white.
And he looked at me and he gave me a speech.
He said that it is true that I participated in the People's Movement for Freedom at Beijing University when I was a student there.
And you could tell that this guy was just dying inside, and he said, it is true that our government was right in that instance, and that we have to move slowly towards democracy to avoid the blow-up of the former Soviet Union.
And then he just paused and looked at me, and that's all he said, and I nodded, and everybody in the bus knew that he had been busted as a student in Beijing University, and part of his penance was to give that little speech.
Yes, yes, yes, yes, absolutely.
Absolutely.
Meanwhile, FBI raids home of Catholic pro-life speaker, author with guns drawn as his terrified kids watch.
This is what we've come to in the United States today.
A well-known pro-life author, sidewalk counselor, and father of seven was the latest victim of a DOJ SWAT raid and arrest for supposed FACE Act violations at his rural home as his children looked on screaming.
Mark Hooke is the founder and president of The King's Men, which promotes healing for victims of pornography addiction and promotes Christian virtues among men in the U.S.
and Europe.
According to his wife, Ryan Marie, who spoke with LifeSite News, he also drives two hours south to Philly every Wednesday as a sidewalk counselor for six to eight hours at two different abortion centers.
Ryan Marie, his homeschooling mother, describes how the SWAT team, a 25 to 30 FBI agent, heavily armed of course, stormed their property with around 15 vehicles at 7.05 in the morning.
Having quickly surrounded the house with rifles in firing position, they started pounding on the door and yelling for us to open.
Before, she explained, her husband tried to calm them, saying, please, I'm going to open the door, but please, my children are in the home.
I have seven babies in the house.
But they just kept pounding and screaming when he opened the door.
They had huge rifles pointed at Mark and pointed at me and kind of pointed throughout the house.
When they came in, they ordered the kids to stay upstairs.
Our staircase is open, so the kids were all at the top of the stairs facing the front door.
I was on the stairs as well, coming down.
The kids were all just screaming.
It was very scary and traumatic.
After asking why they were there, the agent said they were to arrest Mark.
When Ryan Maury asked for their warrant, they said they were going to take him, whether they had a warrant or not.
When Ryan Marie protested saying that as kidnapping, you can't just come to a person's house and kidnap them at gunpoint, they agreed to get the warrant for her from one of their vehicles.
At this point, he asked her to get him a sweatshirt and his rosaries, but when she returned, they'd already loaded him into a vehicle.
They provided the first page of the warrant, said they were taking him to the federal building in downtown Philly.
After they'd taken Mark and the kids were screaming that he was their best friend, the FBI agent on the porch kind of softened.
I think they realized what was happening, or maybe they actually looked at the warrant.
They looked pretty ashamed at what had just happened.
As a result, the homeschool mother said her kids were really sad and stressed.
So I've already reached out to some psychiatrists and psychologists trying to help us through this.
I don't really know what's going to come of it.
When you see guns pointed at your dad and your mom and your house when you first wake up in the morning.
A warrant charged him with violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act due to a claimed attack of a patient escort.
Ryan Murray stated the charge comes from an incident that had already been thrown out of the district court in Philly, but was somehow picked up by Merrick Garland's DOJ.
On several occasions, when Mark went to a sidewalk counselor, he took his eldest son, who was only 12 at the time, for weeks and weeks.
A pro-abortion protester would speak to the boy, saying crude, inappropriate, and dusky things, such as, your dad's a fag.
Another statement was too vulgar for her to repeat.
Mark would tell the pro-abortion man he did not have permission to speak to his son and please refrain.
He kept doing it.
He came into the son's personal space, obscenely ridiculing his father.
At this point, Mark shoved him away from his child and the guy felt bad.
He didn't have any injuries or anything, but he tried to sue Mark.
The case was thrown out of court in the early summer.
Since the Biden admin has taken power, Carlin's Department of Justice and FBI committed dozens of SWAT team raids that have been characterized as political weaponization of the federal agencies against pro-lifers, Trump supporters, conservative Christians, and medical freedom advocates, for example.
In contrast, the left-wing rioters who caused enormous damage in cities across the nation in 2020 The Summer of Love, with riots, looting, and arson, and the vandals who have attacked dozens of pro-life centers this year with little or no legal ramifications.
The DOJ implemented the harshest of consequences for those they identified as having anything to do with January 6th.
These actions have included early morning SWAT team raids, ransacked homes, confiscation of property, indefinite pretrial solitary without bail in a dedicated D.C.
prison, significant physical abuse, and a violation of constitutional right to a speedy trial.
In March, The FBI rounded up 10 pro-life activists, including Joan Andrews Bell, with SWAT team raids that served to intimidate and humiliate the accused through an exercise of excessive force.
A surface video is one of the raids showing armed agents holding pro-lifers at gunpoint, ordering them to put their hands up, drop to their knees, and scoot backwards to their front door in the middle of the night.
The pro-lifers are respectful and compliant throughout.
After the FBI's unprecedented raid on Mar-a-Lago, Governor DeSantis called in another escalation in the weaponization of federal agencies against the regime's political opponents.
Soon after Biden's September 1st speech, where he declared war on conservative Christians, dozens of Trump allies had their homes raided by the FBI, which Steve Bannon referred to as a Gestapo tactic.
And said it was all about intimidation.
Indeed, it has been.
And it's going on apace.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, again, this is so heavy handed.
I have to conclude that this is jumping the shark and that this is a script.
But let's take a look at it for what it says in the story.
So the FBI, in order to conduct such a raid, it has to be for cause.
And for the cause to be something that was dropped by the justice system for not meeting the standard of a crime, and as well, is that If you have a 12-year-old boy and you're engaged in vulgar language, there are phrases that you can say that are characterized as fighting words.
Especially if you have physical proximity and other circumstances, the father would be perfectly appropriate to create distance between somebody who is engaged in fighting words and his 12-year-old son.
Now, yesterday you had that great interview, Jim, with Wolfgang Halbig and his attorney, And Wolf told the story similarly of a raid in the middle of the night to pull him out of his house for photo ops that didn't meet the qualification for such a raid.
So what we're seeing in this SIAP, whatever it is, whoever's in charge, are the preludes to disappearing people because that would be the next step.
You would disappear the people and then You would tell the people that, oh yeah, so there's another DVE, domestic violent extremist, and I know when we ask you about them, they all seem like the nicest people and that you would never have suspected.
That's what happens for the disappearing of people.
And regarding that 12 year old, Don't ask President Biden how to treat a 12-year-old, though.
At the White House speech the other day where he had called on a Congresswoman who had been dead over a month in an alleged car crash, which may have been a communication.
Biden also said that a woman in the crowd had to come talk to him later because they first met.
She was 12.
He was 30.
Grotesque.
Ryan.
Yeah, the story, look, he's Catholic, and I think you can still go to heaven if you're Catholic, but why take a chance?
That's kind of how I feel about it.
No, listen, the Catholics, I'm glad he was out there doing what he's doing.
He's exercising his right to free speech.
He's doing everything he can.
He believes that children are being murdered inside the womb, and that's his right to do that.
For the government to come back down this hard, it makes me think that either there was some sort of mistake made or they wanted to send some sort of message.
I don't know what that message would be other than stay away from our murder clinics and stay away from our abortion things, but they don't... Look, when there's some old things about religion that If there's dark influences in a particular area, there's certain words, certain phrases, things from the Bible that can set these people off pretty badly and these manifestations off pretty badly.
And I imagine that this Catholic was messing around in the spiritual warfare area with somebody that was maybe just as deeply entrenched on the other side.
The war broke out and the other side just decided to go straight up medieval on him and sick the FBI on him.
I don't think the FBI agents had bad intentions necessarily, you know, but it is ridiculous the way that they come in and do their SWAT raids, 25 people and early in the morning with all these people.
Somebody gave them bad information.
Somebody controlled them.
Somebody manipulated them.
And I'm sure at this point in time, they're probably digging around to figure out how they got manipulated.
But yeah, it's a sad story.
Those are great points.
And it's either an excessive zeal based on misinformation or a deliberate attempt to be provocative to bring about increased tensions and initiate a civil war where they believe they can bring down the full force of the military on their political opponents.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail.
Broadcom to live.
Need to know at gmail.com live.
Need to know at gmail.com a comment.
Well, the first investigation and prosecution must be the U.S.
Department of Justice, the Bureau, the company, DHS, and AIPAC.
These are part of a very large recall crime syndicate that murders, mass murders, covers up.
For example, they murdered Seth Rich and many more and did 9-11.
The Murrah Building, Ruby Ridge, and more.
Because for murder, there's no statute of limitations on this large U.S.
government RICO crime syndicate.
Because these entities all have dirty hands, none can be involved in these domestic terror investigations, and all will have to be done by special U.S.
Navy military tribunals.
Here's another.
Try not to miss yesterday's Raw Deal.
Most of the show deals with Miles Mathis' attack on Dr. Fetzer.
He actually believes Jim's trial is staged.
In truth, I've never had much faith in Mathis.
Some of his theories were just off the wall.
Others had some validity.
For me, this reeks of controlled opposition.
Paul mentioned someone with whom he'd spoken felt that Mathis is more than one person.
I tend to agree.
If you check into his endless scientific findings, there's just no way one person could have done all this research in one lifetime.
Hundreds of years ago, mastery of science would have been much easier.
Consider someone like Immanuel Swedenborg, who mastered all the science at the time and then delved into the spiritual.
After reading the PDF at the end of this comment, it becomes obvious Mathis has done little, if any, real research into Wisconsin's summary judgment law.
If you read the following article, it's easy to see how far off course Mathis really is.
Cross motions for summary judgment should be treated as agreement for the court to decide the case upon the legal issues presented only when the court independently determines there's no genuine issue of material fact with regard to each party's separate motion.
The court documents are all on the stolen jamesfetzer.org, now converted to posnervfetzer.com.
I have to agree with Mathis when it comes to the Alex Jones Show trial, but he's way the hell off course when it comes to Jim's trial.
And for Mathis to claim even Jim's appeal to SCOTUS is fake is simply ridiculous.
Mathis, or all those who may use his name, is part of the problem and part of the show, not part of the solution.
Meanwhile, my case is now pending.
It will be in conference here on the 7th of October, although by the 10th, whether or not the Supreme Court will hear it.
But I proceeded through 10 of the 12 stages to actually have a hearing before the Supreme Court of the United States.
Final thoughts, Carl, yours.
Well, again, my ongoing appreciation to our audience members for their intellectual integrity and moral courage to stand for the truth.
That was very well-constructed comment.
Yeah, it is a RICO situation, and we do have a criminal syndicate.
It is a pyramid.
Those orders do go down and people are controlled.
It's almost an AI-type, bot-borg mentality just to do what you're ordered and then you'll get the scraps from the table that are allotted to that type of a position.
Now for us, what we're doing in the AMREV 2.0 is we're encouraging The empowerment of the bottom of the pyramid, the people down at the bottom with us, just to stand for truth and to withdraw consent.
This is the type of movement that Gandhi and then Dr. King concluded was necessary, both those guys assassinated, and then we would need to continue until we achieve some sort of Emperor's New Clothes breakthrough event.
In our situation, we haven't achieved that breakthrough event, but the event does happen in an instant.
If our opponents get their way, then they'll continue to control the sheeple.
They want a herd animal behavior controlled by fear so that they can use human beings as a resource to empower them.
Now, empowering toward what leads into all kinds of interesting spiritual and perhaps even ET speculation about what this slave species is really for, but that's what they appear to have.
And if they can control enough, then they're going to push us into the Great Reset.
And Native Americans, by the way, from their past wisdom, they claim that this is the fourth iteration of humanity with the previous three already having been Great Reset one way or another.
So all that we got is what we think and what we say and what we do.
So continue to make those counts.
Brian, your final thoughts?
Um, I'm going to throw this one a little bit out of left field.
But, you know, I've always been a bit of a skeptic about the idea of Q and where we go one and where we go all, you know, I always wanted to see the evidence that there was actually something there and that a white hat actually exists.
But I, I received an inbound call from a retired Lieutenant Colonel this week, letting me know that It is indeed real and that there is movement that's taking place behind the scenes.
And it's actually just not being covered by the media.
He told me that there was a hundred U.S.
Marshals in Ottawa this last week at the offices of the Privy Council.
So I don't know why I can't seem to find that on the surface web, but that's what I'm hearing.
So I hope it's real.
I hope there's, there's, there's something in there that's fighting back because otherwise I don't think we have a chance in hell.
Let me say, I think you both made wonderful contributions today.
I'm inclined to agree with you, Brian, that it's exaggerated to think how much they can roboticize human beings, but by God, they're going to give it a try.
I want to emphasize that January 6th wasn't an insurrection, but we did have an insurrection in the United States, and it occurred on November, during the vote, the theft of the election of 2020.
They took over the government of the United States from the American people, who chose Donald Trump to be our president once again.
It was an insurrection.
It was on a monumental scale, an unprecedented theft of an election in America.
We've all known there were minor degrees, but this was massive, overwhelming, thorough, detailed, comprehensive.
They had to do that to install a complete, total, brainless puppet.
No actual thinking human being with any degree of moral modicum Would be able to sustain the flooding of immigrants into the United States, the destruction of the American economy, the untold censorship that's taking place here.
They needed a moron, a middle midget, to be the fall guy.
No serious human being would occupy the office of President of the United States and not make at least an effort to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities.
Here we have completely the opposite.
We have a patty puppet being manipulated behind the scene.
He has no brain, no consciousness, no awareness of anything he's doing, no sense of responsibility whatsoever.
They needed a fall guy.
They found the perfect one.
And behind the scenes, I tell you, Barack Obama, George Soros, other miscreants are having a field day.
They're enjoying themselves at the expense of the American people.
Whether the Republicans sustain this endeavor is yet to be seen.
Thank you for joining us today.
Spend as much time as you can with your friends, your family, your loved ones.
We literally do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection