All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 9, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:22:03
Need to Know News (9 September 2022) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
Just released, the Queen of England has died.
She was a monarch who ruled over Britain for 70 years, was a head of state of 15 prime ministers.
This is a development where we're just making the announcement, but I want to invite comments from Carl and Brian both.
Carl, your thoughts initially.
Well, I got two thoughts.
One is that there is a lot of chatter among white hats that this is the code of London Bridge has fallen, and we shall see.
As always, you know, I invite help from friends in high places, and I certainly hope that that's a signal for it.
My other comment on it, having recently been to the UK, it's kind of a thing.
In British culture, through their version of corporate media, just to ask people, who is your favorite royal?
As if it's a thing, when really we should put the monarchy in context, that this is the most racist idea imaginable.
A bloodline ruling, huh?
Huh?
That's racism for you.
And to understand that the history of the British Empire was a soul-crushing endeavor to control resources, both natural resources and the human resources, in order to maximize the profits of those natural resources.
And finally, that the United States of America became an independent country because we got fucking tired of having the government promise one thing and not deliver.
Now we have a new PM, of course, who's also declared she's up for using nuclear weapons.
Brian, your thoughts?
I didn't know that the Queen had died until just now, so I don't, I haven't really thought through it, but I agree with Carl in the sense of bloodlines.
I'd be really interesting to hear, see if he could get a guest on that.
What is his name?
Greg Hallett?
Your friend?
He's very good on this stuff.
I'm rooting for the man.
I hope something develops positively with him.
I guess I'll quote the Naked Gun on this one.
No matter how ridiculous it seems to us to have a queen, that's what they do.
One of my favorite quotes about the queen.
As for bloodlines, yeah, I've got a lot of study on that independently on that particular issue.
We're going to talk about it a little bit later today with one of the articles that we've got here to cover, but I'm against them.
I'm an American.
I believe that the best mind wins and right makes might and that That we really don't.
We did everything we could to develop this country apart from and separate from monarchies and kings and queens.
And we created a great Democrat, Democrat society, Democratic society or Republic society.
And, you know, I'd be interesting to see how things change.
That's about all I have to say about it at this point in time.
Well, you mentioned Greg.
I've had trouble reaching him of late.
He was potentially in line to be the next monarch as King John III, whether you may or may not have been abreast of that.
And I'm just worried that they may have off with his head so that when they contest, he'd establish that genetically, That the Windsors are a fraudulent family, that when you look at the genetics, and this is a hereditary aristocracy, a hereditary monarchy, that they're actually illegitimate, which meant he was a major threat to the crown.
Carl.
And that new UK PM I did see and I sent Jim and Joe, I'll have to include Brian in the stuff that I send you guys, but a tweet from I think 2001 from the current UK PM lamenting the passage of Jimmy Savile, the pedophile, and remarking about the good times they had with pizza.
That's bad.
That's very bad.
It's in pizza slang for little girls.
Meanwhile, 56% viewed Joe Biden's speech as an extremist speech that was unacceptable.
56% recast Republicans as a threat to the foundation of our republic and found the speech unacceptable.
The poll asks, what's your opinion on President Biden's recent primetime address to the nation, in which he accused his political opponents of representing an extremism that threatens the very foundations of a republic?
56% said the speech itself represents a dangerous escalation, I'm sure is the word meant, in rhetoric designed to incite conflict among Americans.
Only 35%—which, by the way, approximates Biden's polling—say the speech was acceptable campaign messaging.
8%—no opinion—may have missed it altogether.
Nearly 20% of Democrats viewed the speech negatively, 62% of Independents, and 89% of Republicans.
I think the 62% of Independents is a key number there.
The polling comes after the Biden admin claimed the official White House speech.
Representing the official position of the Biden admin was not political.
Democracy is not a partisan or political issue, said the Deputy Press Secretary Chris Marr.
How absurd is that?
The following day, Biden tried to walk back his dark speech, portraying Republicans as extremists who threaten the United States.
I don't consider a Trump supporter to be a threat to democracy, he replied when asked by reporters.
When people voted for Donald Trump and support him now, they weren't voting for attacking the Capitol.
They weren't voting for overruling an election.
They were voting for a philosophy that he put forward.
His backtrack came after images from his speech went viral, showing an angry president flanked by Marines with red lighting in front of Independence Hall.
A post-millennial tweeted, Biden's dark and divisive speech has been widely criticized for targeting a segment of the American population and labeling them a threat to the republic.
Here's the image.
Let me say, by the way, Biden's remarks the day after suggest to me he didn't actually give the speech.
I believe the speech was done using a hologram.
Biden's too prone to gaffes.
They couldn't risk a speech like this getting messed up by his incapacity to deliver.
I believe it was done with a hologram.
I suspect he may have not even seen it.
Meanwhile, after Joe Biden during his big speech, he called mega-Republicans violent, extreme, and dangerous while ignoring the violence on the left, such as the Summer of Love, when we had BLM, Antifa, others looting, rioting, committing arson, which was all egged on and approved by the Democrat Party.
Meanwhile, most Americans say civility and tone in politics have gotten worse.
A vast majority—80%—believe civility is worse, and compared to 12% claiming it's the same, and 7% who believe it's improved.
How could 7% think it's been improved?
7 in 10—67%—are pessimistic about the ability of Americans to come together.
80% think the U.S.
is more divided today compared to their parents' generation, shortly after the survey's completion.
This was actually before the speech.
Biden delivered the angry and divisive speech we've been reviewing, where he demonized mega-Republicans as a threat to the country.
This entire speech was, in my opinion, a startling contrast to his original speech.
Pit from his inauguration, where he claimed he was going to bring unity, bring the country together.
Too much of what's happening in our country today is not normal.
Donald Trump and the mega-Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.
And here, in my view, is what is true.
Mega-Republicans do not respect the Constitution and do not believe in the rule of law.
They do not recognize the will of the people, refuse to accept the results of free elections, working now in state after state to give power to decide elections of partisans and cronies, empowering election deniers to undermine democracy itself.
This is really shocking stuff when you consider how since 2016, the Democrats nonstop for four years protested that Trump was not a legitimate president, refused to accept the election, were willing to resort to violence.
Madonna talked about dreaming of blowing up the White House.
Katy Perry carrying around an image of the severed head of Donald Trump.
Absolutely incredible.
Biden claimed mega forces are determined to take the country backward to an America where there's no right to choose to privacy contraception to marry whom you love.
They promote authoritarian leaders.
They fan the flames of political violence or a threat to personal rights, to the pursuit of justice, to the rule of law, to the very soul of this country.
Well, the speech was well-received by Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, who called it inspiring and optimistic.
Absolutely stunning.
Carl, your thoughts?
Tragic comic!
And the more they do, the more I like!
So, the endgame is either going to be a devolution into Civil War, which I think is the strategy of whatever this script is that is being enacted out in front of us.
The only thing that they can do is continue to project what they themselves do onto their opponents because they are totalitarian zealots.
They want dictatorial control and they have to pretend that it's the other side that are doing this and what they want is they want the brainwashed on the left along with the rhinos they control to be greater than anybody who has any competence in the truth and so
I would just say that as this incivility becomes more and more disparate, as the polarity gets greater and greater apart, to hang on to the people who are under delusion and just stand with the truth.
If you're challenged, like, I don't bring these topics up.
They're sensitive and people tend to snap.
But if it does come up, just tell them that they were lied to, and have a few areas where you can point to the evidence to prove it.
And it's not a left-right issue.
Bush and Cheney, they lied.
They were the same.
Bush Sr.
is all the same.
And this is all being exposed now.
And until these people are ready to join us, we'll continue to stand as Americans for inalienable rights above a constitution of limited government.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, you know the old saying, he's pointing one finger at us, that means there's four fingers pointing back at him, which mirrors what Carl said about what was going on.
Just because I wanted to get an An independent perspective on this.
I was thinking about what the Democratic Party used to be versus what they are now.
You know, there was a time before they were globalists.
And so what I did was I went and got the transcript from the JFK library from July 4th, 1963, which was his address at Independence Hall.
Let me read a couple things from it to deal with this issue.
And think of the contrast between who Joe Biden and the Democrats are today versus what they used to be.
Kennedy said, because our system is designed to encourage both differences and dissent, because its checks and balances are designed to preserve the rights of the individual and the locality against preeminent central authority, you and I, governors, recognize how dependent we both are upon one another for recognize how dependent we both are upon one another for the successful operation of our unique and happy form of government.
Our system and our freedom permit the legislative to be pitted against the executive, the state against the federal government, the city against the countryside, party against party, interest against interest, all in competition or in contention with one another.
Our task, your task in the State House, and my task in the White House is to weave from all these tangled threads a fabric of law and progress.
We are not permitted the luxury of irresolution.
Others may confine themselves to debate, discussion, and that ultimately luxury, free advice.
Our responsibility is one of decision, For us to govern or to choose.
And I read the entire speech.
I'm just going to read that snippet right here.
But what we're dealing with here in the Democratic Party is not what they used to be.
I have a tremendous amount of respect for JFK for fighting what he fought and going up against what they are.
I would say I probably have supported them even today.
What we've got here is It's just un-American.
It's not right.
And obviously, they're setting something up for a mass... You know, it's funny.
I read 1984 this last week and wow!
It still gives me the creeps and the chills thinking about the contrast between what was written in that book and where we are today.
Those are wonderful observations, Brian.
I have always historically considered myself to be a JFK, FDR Democrat, and I believe in the social safety network, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment insurance, workman's compensation, programs that actually help the people.
But the Democratic Party has moved so far away from the principles in which I, in JFK, and FDR believe that it's ridiculous.
They have become a totalitarian authoritarian operation that bears no resemblance to what we've had in the past of American parties that have been very tolerant of differences in a political arena.
Carl, yes.
Yeah, the most telling issue to me is the Democratic refusal, the leadership refuses to have Medicare for all or universal health care.
This saves... I have read, gosh, how many cost-benefit analyses?
I think it's...
It's in the dozens, at least.
And all of them show that we save tremendous amounts of money by eliminating the insurance companies as the middlemen, as the parasites between doctors and patients.
The last study that I remember was by my colleague Ellen Brown, and that we would save $600 billion annually by removing the insurance companies.
About, it's over 5,000 per average U.S.
household.
And yet, yeah, the Democratic leadership of today, they're just snakes and liars, and they won't do anything.
All they're going to do is virtue signal as they push these narratives to disarm America.
And now that they're so exposed, and I do stand that the White Hats are exposing them, they're desperate and they are just going bananas, aren't they?
Well, Carl, I think it reflects the influence of big pharma and hospitals on politics.
And remember, the DNC stole the election from Bernie Sanders.
They transferred 13 primaries he'd won to Hillary's column to guarantee she'd have the nomination in 2016, only to be taken to the cleaners by Donald Trump because of the rural vote, which they could not rig.
Brian?
Well, I'm glad that Carl brought up the issue of healthcare.
You know, I'm one, I actually spent the first 10 years of my first career focusing on large scale healthcare dynamics and Medicare for All, while it sounds really good to the people, the problem that we have in the insurance system overall is that we don't have enough competition.
The government regulations have set the level so high to be able to play the game that you can either be Blue Cross or UnitedHealthcare or Cigna or Aetna or Humana.
Those are the only guys that can play because of all the rules and the restrictions and regulations.
If we went back to a truly free market rather than a fixed price Medicare That's for those who know that's called the resource based relative value schedule is what they use to pay doctors and hospitals and that's Those are the tables that they use to determine how much somebody gets paid for the work that we do.
If we went Medicare for all, Medicare, the government would be deciding what these people and their value is worth.
I'm totally against that.
I believe in open market competition and I think that's where we ought to be.
And yes, the insurance companies are parasites.
iTrue was one of them.
I was a parasite that lived and breathed in that industry and that's how I wanted to get rich when I was younger.
But These days, I see the system as so invariably broken that something has to change, and if I could wave a magic wand and fix it, it would be, okay guys, government out!
Y'all can work it out in your own communities.
You can set up your own little insurance plans.
You can work with your local hospitals.
You can work with the big hospitals.
You can come up with a payment schedule and a price, and you can gather money up together, and you can literally insure people.
That's, it's just not going to happen.
The Buccas and their lobbyists would never, Bucca Blue, United, Sigma, they would never, ever, ever allow it.
And yes, pharma and the big players pull all the strings with all those people in DC.
So, The system's broken, it's broken beyond belief, and I would suggest getting yourself some alternative medicine books for the future if you want to actually leave anything for your kids when your body begins to break.
That's a sensational and very insightful critique, Brian.
Thank you for that.
Meanwhile, Biden takes the heat for spending 40% of his days in office on vacation.
It might be, given his incompetence, that we're better off for it.
Biden's weekend Johnson vacation spanned 234 days, out of seven of them at his homes in Washington and Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, out of 589 in office.
The RNC chair Rhoda McDaniel said Republicans believe it's a winning campaign issue, along concerns over the effects of Biden-era spending, including The $1.9 trillion stimulus package last year, and this year's $437 billion environmental and health care bill.
Voters want Republicans who actually show up to work to dig America out of Biden's recession, secure the southern border, and put an end to reckless spending of taxpayer dollars.
Soon Democrats will be able to join Biden on his weekend vacations when Americans vote him out in less than 70 days.
The 19-month tally of Biden trips was assembled by the RNC, including days he spent at his Delaware residences as well as at Camp David and trips to Nantucket, Massachusetts and Kawash Island, South Carolina.
White House spokesman Andrew Bate pushed back, saying the president sees a nonstop job that chief executives can do from anywhere in the world.
Regardless of location, he's taken fewer vacation days than the modern norm.
While Biden's staff dispute the characterization he's not working on these trips, he's generally out of the public eye for most of his days away from D.C.
while relaxing with family members and friends.
In other words, of course they're lying about it.
What else do they do?
Transparency advocates say it's alarming Biden refuses to release visitor logs for locations other than the White House, which makes a mockery of his administration's self-praise for releasing partial West Wing visitor logs.
First on Hunter, under federal investigation for tax fraud, money laundering, and lobbying violation with regard to his foreign business dealings, Well, we know 10% was for the big guy, his father, Joe, often travels with him and repeatedly introduced him to associates during his vice presidency.
Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, an outstanding good man.
One would hope that President Biden is working when he's on vacation in Delaware, but the unwillingness of the White House to disclose his official visitors suggests there's something to hide, including that Biden is completely checked out from his job when away from the White House.
At the same time, fit and added, the secrecy makes it easier for Hunter and the family to continue their grift.
For more than a decade, Judicial Watch and liberal group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington battled for presidential visitor logs, including for personal residences.
The White House notes Biden regularly travels to Delaware and elsewhere with senior advisers, while Deputy Chief of Staff General Mally Dillon vaguely attested to the president's workload, claiming—pushing back on the notion that he was simply enjoying R&R.
The idea there's a lot of downtime in the schedule of fallacy, she claimed, he basically has a team around him.
So he has everything he needs at the ready.
I mean, face it, the guy's incompetent and incapable of doing anything, so he'd have to have a staff around him or nothing would ever get done.
A White House official pointed out readouts of Biden's calls from Delaware with Ukrainian President Zelensky and former Israeli PM Bennett, as well as public remarks from Delaware, were reflected in monthly job numbers.
But the majority of Biden's days unfold out of view of the rotating White House press pool, which is generally kept away from the president when he's not in D.C., frequently going entire days without a glimpse.
On rare occasions, he's disclosed work while away from D.C., including at his Wilmington home with Chuck Schumer and Joe Manchin, where he unsuccessfully tried to revive his $2 billion Build Back Better spending package.
He also sometimes answers press questions away from Washington, notably falling off his bicycle in June when approached by a group of reporters.
The eldest ever president has taken the heat for his trips away before, including spending more than a quarter of his days his first year in office in Delaware alone.
Then-White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said last year and again in January he would not voluntarily publish visitor logs from Delaware.
That's pretty stunning!
Well, the president goes to Delaware because it's home where his son and former wife are buried, in a place that's close to his heart.
A lot of presidents go to their home.
We have gone a step further in releasing visitor logs, but they're not going to do it.
Carl G., I wonder, what has he got to hide?
Your thoughts.
Yeah, it is.
I am more and more optimistic.
The more that is happening, the better it looks for those of us standing on the side of truth.
So, the big picture, remember, we have the least popular presidential candidate on the left, Biden, the hair-sniffing, child-groping, senile war criminal, along with the least popular VP, cackling Kamala, okay?
And they steal the election.
All right, all right.
So now, why not?
40% of his time in vacation as they continue the plot line that he's a senile hair sniffer at the very least.
So something is going to break.
The midterms are not going to be allowed under the script.
There's going to be some sort of false flag going on to distract or they're going to have to steal the midterms.
It's just getting more and more outrageous.
And for those of us on our side, use this to our advantage as people begin to notice things and talk about things, point out the lies and their option to withdraw consent.
And just to step back with us and rise above the clown shows.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, it's painfully obvious to all of us who have studied any history at all, especially history related to American presidents, that this particular one is a puppet.
I mean, even the mainstream media now is beginning to show clips where they're proving it.
I saw Grassley, who we were talking about last week, this week, On a Fox Business News interview, claimed that Susan Rice was really the one running the country, that she's basically the POTUS, the way that she's pulling the strings.
So I don't believe Biden's anything more than a puppet.
I think he's always been a good puppet to what they've been looking for.
I don't trust a word he says.
You know there's somebody behind the scenes writing the script and all.
I mean, he even has a hard time with the teleprompter.
Whether or not Some of these older politicians are even still running around leaves me a lot of questions.
I can't remember the last time I saw a picture of Hillary Clinton in an actual interview was I don't know if she's Still around or what the situation is, but I have a feeling that half of these leaders that we see up at the top levels of government are really just puppets on somebody else's strings.
And the question is, who's pulling the strings and where is the conspiracy?
How deep does the conspiracy go?
Does the organization that's behind the conspiracy actually exist?
How do you identify it?
How do you research it?
How do you figure out The map and the puzzle pieces to put all of it together.
Which on this show, you know, we study false flags.
We study conspiracies.
I'm glad.
I'm proud of it.
I'm putting together a lot of resources that I'm going to take out one of these days and show the rest of Jim's audience as an update to my recent research on open source intelligence.
But anybody who's got a computer and internet connection these years can figure out things that 40 years ago would have been impossible to figure out.
And you just have to get some basic skills and go figure it out.
It's not terribly difficult, but you're going to see a lot more false flags.
You're going to see a lot more fake events, and they still happen every day.
I follow them at a distance, waiting for the big one to happen, but they're happening all the time.
The feds are pulling them off, and the feds are running the show, and this Biden presidency is nothing more than just another false flag.
I think the weight of the evidence does support that it's Obama people bullying the strings and Susan Rice highly probable for the day-to-day under his supervision, but they themselves are controlled by George Soros and the Rothschild family.
So I think this is a puppet show with several layers of manipulation before we reach public encounters.
Meanwhile, and this is rather startling, Biden ordered the hit on Mar-a-Lago.
In August, the country watched in shock when the FBI launched a vicious political raid on Trump's family home in Florida, ransacked his belongings, harassed him through the Democratic Party and the media, pushing negative propaganda meant to justify the actions against him, slamming his family, his associates, and his loved ones.
The DOJ and the FBI then exposed their dark tactics and intentions to shape politics in the U.S., not something Americans are used to seeing play out in the open.
While the corruption was being exposed from the Trump raid, further evidence of drastic corruption at the FBI and then the DOJ was also exposed.
Showing how the FBI protected Biden before the 2020 presidential election, suppressing voters from talking about news stories that were negative to Biden, all things for which the FBI was responsible.
Of late, there's been a bit of pushback.
Trump has been assigned a special master to evaluate what happened during the raid.
The DOJ has been stopped from investigating for a while.
The country is finding out that Biden has his fingerprints all over the order to harass Trump.
The ruling temporarily enjoins or forbids the Biden administration from reviewing and using deceased materials in the DOJ investigation of Trump.
In page two to three of the ruling, get this, Judge Cannon revealed that the Biden regime actually ordered the FBI raid to serve studies documents at Mar-a-Lago.
Ordered!
On April 12, 2022, NARA notified plaintiff it intended to provide the 15 boxes to the FBI the following week.
A plaintiff then requested an extension.
The White House Counsel's Office granted the request on May 10, 2022.
NARA, that's of course the National Archives, informed plaintiff that it would proceed with providing the FBI access to the records as requested by the incumbent president.
There it is, the smoking gun.
This directly contradicts what Biden has asserted.
When asked last month whether the White House coordinated the raid with the Department of Justice, Biden denied having any involvement whatsoever.
White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre denied the White House had advance notice.
Looks like the Biden regime has lied to the American people, but who should be surprised?
They've been doing it from the beginning.
This shows the FBI raid was indeed a politically motivated op to target Biden's chief political rival in a bid to keep him from running for president once again in 2024.
Remember, He's not just a past president, but he's the odds-on candidate to be the future president.
So this operation was as grossly political and corrupt as it could possibly have been.
The special counsel task to review, for instance, found instances of attorney-client privilege and executive privilege will be selected Thursday.
That would be today.
PRN reported on Cannon's ruling with a leftist slant.
U.S.
District Judge Aline Cannon has granted former President Trump's request for a special master, temporarily stopping federal prosecutors from using those docs from their investigation into obstruction and mishandling of government secrets.
The decision was expected.
Last week, she said she was inclined to grant Trump's request, and a hearing on the matter took place last Thursday.
The DOJ laid out its argument against the special master, signaling it was likely to appeal.
Cannon, a Trump appointee, cited in her order the need to ensure the appearance of fairness and integrity under the extraordinary circumstances presented.
A special master is an independent third party, typically attorney, appointed by the judge to review material seized for anything that may be protected, such as by attorney-client privilege or by executive privilege.
The judge also ordered the government to cease any review or use for its criminal investigation until the special master review is completed.
But the intel community may continue its review to determine potential national security risks from the classified material being kept outside of a secure government facility.
But we know, in fact, it was in a secure facility and it had been doubly protected.
And we know that while the documents may have been stamp classified, that does not mean they have not been declassified, which is a key ambiguity that is infecting the public impression of this entire case.
She set a deadline of Friday, that's tomorrow, for two parties to submit a joint filing with a list of proposed candidates and a proposal of the duties and limits.
Legal experts have explained requesting a special master is another attempt from Trump to undermine the work of the DOJ and question their integrity.
But others have argued it will just be another procedural loophole the department has to go through.
But it's clear this was a political raid.
Trump is simply asserting his constitutional rights as a former president of the United States.
All this effort to smear Trump over the raid is completely outrageous, in my opinion.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, it could be an outrageous slaughter for the psychopaths and the liars.
So let's take a look and compare and contrast.
If the black hats are in charge and Biden isn't really in control of this thing, Then the fact that he put his name on that document would be, oops!
And that would be a big mistake.
But how could that possibly happen?
They would have all those documents reviewed.
They would have somebody in the FBI have the point man for that.
And there would be no way that they would implicate the president.
On the other hand, it could be the White House in control, and this is just another example of exposure.
So I think that with these 20 claimed FBI whistleblowers ready, we are now at the move in this chess game where you tell your opponent, check.
Because this is an endgame move.
How else could this be an endgame move?
Well, you've got a special master.
And what if the special master comes out with a report saying, you know what, this was all based upon, a raid was based upon secret testimony that maybe Trump had violated the law.
Versus Trump already establishing to the FBI that all the materials were declassified.
So that could also be an endgame move.
Fascinating political theater.
Brian, your thoughts?
Yeah, it's a very interesting puzzle.
You know, they're only going to let us know what they're going to let us know about what really happened.
And of course, the big questions are, why did they really order it?
Did they order it because they thought that they could catch Trump in some sort of Classified document scandal and thus make him ineligible to run for president?
Did they order it because they were setting up some sort of event or civil war?
Because sure it did make a lot of people upset and they must have seen that coming.
Did they order it because they're losing confidence in their ability to control the outcome of elections after what happened in 2020?
I don't know what's at the bottom of this.
I don't trust anything I see on the mainstream media and, you know, we just read an article from NPR.
They're trained to deceive, in my opinion.
They're not very good at what they do and they tend to be told what stories they're going to run and how they're going to run it.
I don't know the answers to the questions about Trump and Mar-a-Lago.
I smell something that smells very funny.
I hope that there is something called a white hat.
I hope that there is going to be some sort of takedown.
But at this point in time, remember, there's only one guy that's gotten in trouble for anything.
And this is this guy that was walked out of the FBI building a couple weeks ago.
Walked out!
Oh, that's trouble.
Was he in cuffs?
Is anybody going to be in trouble over anything?
Or are they just going to cut another deal and let everybody off scot-free like they Did with Swalwell and the Chinese prostitute.
I don't know.
I don't know how far they're willing to go.
I don't know who to trust.
And I'm having a hard time putting the pieces together with the very foggy description that we're getting of what actually happened from the mainstream media.
It'd be interesting to see how it plays out, but that's all I can say about it at this point.
Well, it was an unconstitutionally broad warrant for any documents from the entire period of his presidency.
If they actually had anything that could be used in court, it would be dismissed as the fruit of a poisonous tree.
It would be inadmissible in a court of law.
None of this really is looking forward to a judicial resolution.
It's all for public relations.
And I say, Joe Biden is so incompetent, I don't think he ever had that devious quality.
He's a pedophile.
He's incompetent.
He's corrupt.
This is Susan Rice.
This is Barack Obama pulling the strings, a mastermind, a raid on Mar-a-Lago with a president's approval or direction.
That is the dark heart of Barack Obama at work.
To undermine the American people's confidence in Donald Trump.
It's a despicable act, but perfectly consistent if you trace his history and what he's done to the United States.
Meanwhile, Bear in mind, your enemy is not in Russia.
Here you see a rogue's gallery of some of the prime candidates who are doing the most to damage America today.
Meanwhile, embalmers have been finding numerous long, fibrous clots that lack post-mortem characteristics.
This is weird stuff.
Several embalmers have been observing many large, sometimes very long, fibrous but rubbery clots inside the corpses they treated are speaking out about their findings.
It's not yet known if the cause is the COVID vax or COVID or both, but I guarantee 100% it's the vax.
There really is no other reasonable explanation whatsoever.
This isn't even a close call.
The epic time to receive videos, photos of the anomalous clots.
Mike Adams, who runs an accredited lab in Texas, analyzed clots in August, found them to be lacking iron, potassium, magnesium, and zinc.
Adams' lab used inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, usually testing food for metal pesticides and geophosphates.
Excellent!
This is a very high-quality lab.
We have tested one of the clots from embalmer Richard Hirschman via ICP-MS, also side-by-side live human blood from an unvaccinated person.
He found the clots are lacking key elements present in healthy human blood, such as iron, potassium, and magnesium, suggesting they're formed from something other than blood.
Adams is joining analytic forces with more doctors and planning to invest out of their own pocket to figure out the composition of probable causation.
The string-like structures differ in size, but the longest are as long as a human leg, the thickest as thick as a pinky finger.
Richard Hershen, a licensed funeral director named Balmer in Alabama, recalls he's been in the trade since the tragedy of 9-11.
Prior to 2020-2021, we probably would see between 5-10% of the bodies that we would involve having blood clots.
We're familiar with what blood clots are, and we've had to deal with them over time.
50-70% of the bodies he sees now, however, have clots.
For me to embalm a body without any clots, kind of like how it was in the day prior to all this stuff, it's rare.
The exception is to embalm a body without clots.
They're not normal postmortem clots, rather long tiny strings that may have etiologic in the devs, meaning contributing to dev, preventing circulation in those regions.
Other than if Jones spike protein can and does unfold and form a different configuration, contributing to tight string-like bonded structures with longitudinal twisting as well as cross-binding visible by microscopy, each one measuring angstroms in diameter, Where it takes 25,400,000 angstroms to make an inch, where a typical capillary is around 5 microns, so many strings are needed to occlude a vessel.
The embalming process has become much more difficult, too, causing some embalmers to have to drain the blood via multiple points instead of a single.
In 20 years of embalming, I've never seen these white fibrous structures in the blood, nor any others in my field.
I have seen strange clots in many different individuals.
It doesn't seem to matter what they die of.
They often have similar substances in their blood.
Makes me concerned, because if something is wrong in the blood, it begs the question, is something causing people to die prematurely?
The answer, of course, is yes.
As the summer of 2021 went on, COVID deaths were on the decline, but the clots were increasing in number.
My suspicion is the vax may be the cause of these strange clots.
I realize I'm not a doctor nor a scientist, but I know what blood looks like.
I'm very familiar with the embalming process.
I do not know 100% what causes these clots, but I know from my experience with speaking with other embalmers That none of us had seen this strange clotting before, meaning prior to the use of the vax.
He's embalmed thousands of bodies.
He feels the blood of most bodies he's seen has changed.
He's not afraid to lose his job because it's a trade embalmer not employed by a funeral home, but also cautious not to reveal exactly where he works.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, this is another area of evidence, and where we are in this battlefield for AMREF 2.0 is that we have an abundance of evidence to prove criminal fraud of the leaders who have pushed
This illegal forced injection of experimental medicine, and this is as clear as federal law title 21, which echoes the Nuremberg Code and is also repeated in my California state law, is that everybody has the right to decline experimental medical products without any coercion.
So the damages Of these of this fraud are have killed at least in the hundreds of thousands of Americans.
So, the final place is that our opponents, they're rushing to dictatorial control.
They have to criminalize their political opponents and.
Any alternative media and they're working as fast as they can down that path it seems and versus where we are standing for truth demanding arrests of these people and then we would get full disclosure of the truth but only after we have some sort of a breakthrough that would preempt those arrests.
Right.
Well, it's interesting to study the blood.
You know, I've spent quite a bit of time back studying the Bible and theology degree and such when I was younger, and there was always something very special in religious literature in general about the blood.
And one of the things that I first remember saying when I heard about the vaccines was just shortly after they came out, I was having a discussion with a pediatric pulmonologist, He was talking about what these vaccines were going to be, and I remember just turning to him and saying, you know, I think I'm with the Jehovah's Witnesses on this issue because the blood is sacred.
You know, I couldn't really put all the pieces together about what it all meant in my mind, but ever since then I have been looking at it.
Back in the olden days, going way, way back, these cultish Pagan rituals would include the drinking of blood and the combining of blood and the destruction of the blood.
They were rituals designed to corrupt the human identity.
It's an old, old thing to be able to corrupt the human identity, crossbreed.
There were certain things that were religiously forbidden, including Bestiality and inappropriate relationships, different types of intermarriage that weren't good in their old religious literature's eyes.
Now, when it comes to the blood, I think that they wanted to introduce a corruption agent, and I think that the ultimate goal was simply death.
What do the gun control agenda and human blood have in common, and vaccines that human blood have in common?
Well, Take away the guns, people die.
You introduce a poison into the human bloodstream, people die.
If you can introduce a poison that's in the bloodstream that causes a woman not to have irregular cycles and reproduce properly, then people won't be born.
In my opinion, there's something underneath the hood here that's part of a depopulation agenda, and there's all types of times in recent history when the Gates Foundation and others went out and introduced different types of poisons and vaccines and Different types of things to human bodies, testing them in low-income type environments and primitive nations, and the result was people dying or becoming paralyzed.
So, I'm very suspicious about the introduction of anything in the name of modern medicine to the bloodstream, and this is just one of them where I'm just going to have to rely on my lack of understanding.
Just so you know, the Jehovah's Witnesses can point to all sorts of biblical Biblical verses as to why the blood is special and one of the more important issues from a religious perspective as to why the blood is special is the answer to the question, who was Jesus's father?
Because certain properties are passed down from the father to the child through the blood.
And so if Jesus was who he claimed to be, then his blood was not corrupted with this traditional corruption agents that had been in it since sin entered the world.
It's old Romans and old Leviticus there.
But it's an interesting discussion.
I don't know what they've introduced.
I don't know why they've introduced it.
But I have a feeling that at the end of the day, it's all about blinding humanity and corrupting humanity and ultimately killing off people before they have a chance to experience salvation.
Oh, I think you've got it all right, Brian.
Obviously, depopulation is the objective here.
Meanwhile, a zombie media cartel bill is back and worse than ever, which would strengthen the legacy media and punish anti-establishment outlets, including ours.
A new version of the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act—notice they always have names that are the opposite of what they're intended to do, such as the Inflation Reduction Act, which is only going to increase inflation—is circulating and worse than the original.
It allows mainstream legacy and left-wing media to form exclusionary cartels and then empowers them with extraordinary collective bargaining power to collude with big tech.
It spares to serve out the greater specificity how to exclude conservative and anti-establishment media from any benefit.
It contains a provision allowing eligible media companies to form a cartel, creating admission criteria unrelated to the size of an eligible digital journalism provider or the views expressed by its content, including criteria to limit membership to only eligible publishers and eligible broadcasters.
That's especially significant for specificity.
The mainstream and left-wing cartels may not exclude based on size or views, but that is not how it will happen.
The self-appointed mainstream and left-wing cartels are allowed to exclude based on the usual totally subjective factors.
Trustworthiness, fake news, extremism, misinformation, hate speech, conspiracy, correction policy, expertise, authoritativeness, Here are a couple of the key players in all this nonsense.
All these terms are viewpoint neutral, but when interpreted by the leftist non-government organization media watchdogs like news cards and fact checkers, they wind up targeting just one side of the political spectrum.
Despite misleading the American public for years, most of the news companies who published the discredited Russiagate conspiracy theory, like the New York Times and Washington Post, continue to receive green approval rating from news guards, while those that actually debunk the conspiracy theory, like Breitbart or Fox, are smeared as untrustworthy and unreliable.
It's easy to imagine a news cartel pointing to news guard criteria as an allegedly viewpoint-neutral excuse to exclude conservative and independent media.
The bottom line?
Any conservative or independent or free speech advocate, much less any Republican who does not see the fatal flaw, is whistling bass a graveyard not worthy of political support.
All they're doing by supporting this amended bill is rewarding the mainstream legacy in left-wing publishers and big tech by allowing them to exclude whomever they deem not part of the club.
And who do you think that will be?
Here's a hint.
Last week, the President of the United States called half the country extremists who threaten the very foundation of our republic.
Fortunately, some important voices are speaking out.
Numerous have testified to the bill's failings before the House and Senate, including Glenn Greenwald, Dan Greiner, and Dr. Daniel Francis.
The DOP leadership of the House has condemned the bill, with Kevin McCarthy calling it the antithesis of conservatism and Jim Jordan warning it'll be used to suppress competition.
They, the media, will use it to discriminate against people who don't fit into their category, who aren't defined as oppressed, and are going to determine—and who's going to determine that definition?
In the Senate, the bill has been condemned by a growing number of Republicans, including Marsha Blackburn, Marco Rubio, Tom Cotton, and Mike Lee.
FCC Commissioner Nathan Symington and the Legal Scholar worked on Trump's proposal.
Section 230 reforms have also warned of the dangers of the legislation.
Fight for the future tweets.
The government should not determine what is a news outlet and what is not.
It's not just conservatives opposing the bill.
It's also transparently aligned with the interests of corporations that even some progressive think tanks have spoken out against.
These include Public Knowledge, which called it a gift to Wall Street media execs, and Fight for the Future, argued it enables an internet-killing link tax, Free Press, which called it a bailout for Rupert Murdoch, the left-leaning Electronic Frontier Foundation, also opposes the bill.
All emphasize how it would benefit America's largest, wealthiest, and most corrupt media companies.
Despite this widespread opposition, lobbyists have brought it back again with amendments that should leave the public in no doubt this is a bailout for the legacy media.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, I think it's great.
More evidence that we're getting down to this endgame.
So, of course, our opponents, they want a ministry of truth for fact-checked, non-extremist news and school books because of their great commitment to the truth.
So that's exactly, and that's the battle.
So the battle, the two sides of the battle are our side, and we say, look, corporate media, they're proven liars, and here's the evidence, Carl B. Herman.
Blogspot is my contribution.
Just go to any of these news shows and I have a published paper via the Claremont Colleges documenting that corporate media sold lies known to be false as they were told to sell the wars formerly known as on Terror.
So we say, you know, these people, we need to arrest these people, not listen to them and surrender more control.
And our opponents, what they want is they want to have that the extremists, the DVEs, the domestic violent extremists, those are us, that we're rounded up for covid camps or something or and we're either re-educated um we may be put into prison or we may be executed in order to match the outstanding model of democracy in china that has the one people's party brian
yeah i enjoyed this particular story and he's carl's exactly right it's It's a ministry of propaganda.
They're literally trying to set up a cartel of news sources.
And just to give you all a feel for how to go about researching this stuff, you can go to congress.gov and check out the bill.
Take a close look at who's sponsoring the bill, and take a look at the transcripts from the Senate hearing related to this committee.
But who's sponsoring it?
Amy Klobuchar, where have we heard that name?
Cory Booker, Dianne Feinstein, Geronimo Mazzi, Dick Durbin.
You've got pretty much the who's who list of the dark sided forces that are co-sponsoring this thing and putting it out there.
Obviously it's a massive, it's an attempt at a massive corporate takeover.
Of all of mainstream media, you know, what we need to do on the right-hand side is create a better, more reliable, crowdsourced news source of RSS feeds and lists.
I find myself, whenever I have to go get news from the internet, having to research the contents of actual articles and the history of actual articles before I can determine whether or not I can rely on somebody to tell me the truth.
And we should all have that skill set.
As for this, this bill was heard in a hearing, and I read Daniel Francis.
He's a Harvard professor in media.
I read his transcript for what he says, and he's violently against the idea of setting up a media cartel.
He was just one of many people that are violently against this, but again, back to that old 1984 book.
Hey, this is exactly how it all begins, and You know, as citizens, we've got to do what we can to keep something like this from actually becoming a law.
So, you know, it's important to reach out to your local representatives and these other representatives.
Let them know about how distasteful this is.
Yeah, this is incorporating the Ministry of Truth as a kind of a public-private partnership.
Meanwhile, Lauren Fix, the car coach, 15 states manned cast powered cars, your state is next.
Will you get rid of your gas-powered car?
Will you move out of state to a place still permitting fossil fuels?
Or will you comply and install a charging station and buy an electric?
California is planning to ban the sale of gas-powered cars and trucks by 2035 due to illegal technicality.
More than one-third of U.S.
states may soon follow suit.
California is making a very strong statement due to a carve-out in the U.S.
Clean Air Act and California Research Board, which requires 35% of cars sold in California be electric, plug-in hybrid, or hydrogen by 2026, and then ramps up 8% a year after that.
California is the only state that can make emission standard mandates beyond the federal government.
Even though the Constitution states, one state cannot dictate the rules of the other 49.
The law also allows a loophole permitting others to adopt the California standard without the federal government approval, and even without any citizen input.
Voters should be making this call, not governments.
Only 16% of cars on the road today are EVs.
This is happening even when there's a serious car shortage.
EV batteries are reliant on hard-to-get Chinese rare earth minerals.
States are not giving consumers any tax credit unless the EV and its battery materials are from North America.
Another fact to consider, only 18% of current vehicles are electric in California, and only 6.3% across the whole U.S.
are electric.
In addition, the nature's electric grid can barely support what's already in use.
Notice when California sent a letter just this past week in response to the heat wave to all residents to cut back on charging completely, raise their thermostat to 80 degrees and shut off all their lights.
Obviously, more reviews are not the answer and will only make matters worse.
California's governor, Gavin Newsom, announced a state plan to phase out gas-powered cars two years ago.
This means other states that have opted into California standards will officially have the ability to follow suit.
So far, 15 have agreed to follow the California plan, even though there's no requirement they do so.
California's rule doesn't ban the sale of gas-powered cars on the used car market, You won't be fined if you drive a gas car after 2035.
It's only about new car sales.
However, as more states adopt the California standard, it could be a real tipping point for the electric vehicle industry.
At some point, it's going to be hard to find a gas station.
The only consolation you have now is that the mass conversion is not going to happen overnight.
There are states that have signed on, that may be next, to ban gas-powered cars.
Remember, this can change as most of the governors may not be in office on the dates the new laws are set to take effect.
As states struggle economically and citizens push back, things can change if you stand your ground.
Another fact to consider, this is a repeat, This is a repeat.
Here, between 1980 and 2020, the combined emissions from the six most common air pollutants actually dropped 78%.
So why do we need to have this necessity to go to electric vehicles?
We're already doing fantastic.
States complying?
New York.
Governor Kathy Hunschel, who's a monster, signed a bill phasing out gas.
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection will adopt and implement.
Vermont wants to increase EVs.
Maine has its own climate action plan called Maine Won't Wait.
Washington Governor Inslee signed a bill requiring all cars be electric by 2030, five years before California.
Connecticut Governor Lamont signed a bill ensuring that trucks and vehicles and all that will build 150,000 EVs on the road by 2025.
Oregon has said at least 90% of new vehicles sold annually will be zero emission by 2035.
New Jersey will work to increase the number of EVs and infrastructures on the road by 2040.
85% of new light-duty vehicles will be EVs.
Maryland Clean Car Program Adopted To Follow California's Low Emission Program.
Delaware Announces State Will Adopt California Regulation.
Colorado Said The State Taking Action To Achieve 100% Renewable By 2040.
Rhode Island Joined 11 other states phasing out gas powered by 2035.
Minnesota signed on.
New Mexico clean air rules.
Virginia signed.
Virginia!
Nevada has set goals of reducing greenhouse by 28% by 2025 and 45% by 2030.
Pennsylvania hasn't officially announced, but it is taking steps to support EVs.
Despite the positive trend, California EV mandates are still very aggressive, and even in California, they're going to be extremely challenging to actually meet.
That's just a fact.
The state's objective depends on many factors, such as inflation, charging and fuel infrastructure, supply chains, labor, critical mineral availability, and pricing, and the ongoing semiconductor shortage.
Since the overwhelming majority of Americans prefer gas power to electric, Biden in California will force the EVs on the population.
It won't be done voluntarily.
Even though one in five electric owners has switched back to gas because of the inconvenience of charging.
I mean, after all, it takes about seven minutes to fill a gas tank, but electric take hours of charging to drive 35 miles.
Charging electric is a total hassle, say 20% of EV owners, so they're going back to gas.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, here in Northern California, in San Ramon, on Monday we did have a partial blackout in the afternoon.
It didn't affect where we live, but my sports club down the street sent an email saying, don't come to the club, we're out of electricity.
And I looked at the map, it was a partial blackout.
So, put on your Black Hat thinking cap with me for a moment and remember who you are as Black Hats.
You're at war against we the people.
What the Black Hats want is they want a cold, chipped, controlled slave force.
Okay?
So, why are they doing this?
Well, see, you got to get rid of gas and gas engines because you got to destroy the resistance.
You got to make sure everyone is plugged into the one Ring to rule them all system and then you're going to limit the supply and you'll blame climate change or the domestic violent extremists.
That's an area for right for false flags is destroy the power grid and then blame the the trust QAnons for it and just do that.
And then you're going to push people and you control you manufacture these wildfires Because what you want is you want the city, you want to force people into pods into the city.
And this is part of the WEF plan, because remember what the Black Hats want is they want you to own nothing, wash four body parts, and eat bugs, and be happy.
So that's on one side of this battlefront.
And the other side of the battlefront is, as always, na-na-na, Brian, your thoughts?
don't play another game with them.
Want to know.info has a great section on the top.
Go to energy and you have demonstrated for you several free energy devices.
- Brian, your thoughts? - Oh, I'm glad you brought up the free energy devices.
That's exactly what I was thinking in relation to this.
I'm all for not buying gas anymore.
I love it!
I don't want to buy gas, but Carl's absolutely right.
We're going to be divided into the haves and the have-nots, and they're trying to push it up the timeline as fast as possible.
If they can prevent our movement, they can prevent our assembly.
If they can prevent our assembly, they can prevent us from fighting back and resisting this agenda that's coming through.
I liken back to Nikola Tesla.
He came up with some great ideas.
He was getting ready to roll some stuff out.
What happened to that?
You know, when he teamed up with Westinghouse, it finally made financial sense for him to do it.
But the problem that we've got here is that the government decides who the winners and who the losers are going to be.
In any of these large wars and these battles, and it's the lobbyists and the politicians that are bought and paid for.
Obviously, somebody is going to be a big winner in the electric vehicle slash alternative energy vehicle machine that they're trying to put out there.
Who's going to be the big winner?
Because it's not going to be you and I. It's not going to be the middle class or less.
We're still going to be required to pay more, whether it's for electricity, to charge our vehicles or whether it's for gas that comes out of the ground and is transported to my local gas station.
Obviously what they're doing is they're just tipping their hand for where they're wanting to go with this.
And by the way, I'm all for a clean environment as well.
I'm glad to see that emissions have been reduced and I'm all for alternative energy sources.
I'd like to see it all be free if possible.
My grandfather on my wife's side, when we were cleaning out his house after he died, We came across his old plans for a water-powered engine.
So, you know, it's been around for a long, long time.
The question is, why hasn't somebody made it work?
And I think people have made it work.
It's just that the resistance is futile when they're willing to murder you to get what they want.
That's right.
When they make it work, that's when you get snuffed.
Carl?
Have you guys seen?
There's epic rap battles of history.
There's an episode called Tesla versus Edison and it's a great three minutes.
These guys get hundreds of millions of views and they do a little bit of the research and they knew enough that Tesla had been screwed out of an energy breakthrough and that their opponents were glad to do it to make a buck off of them.
Yes, yes, yes.
We'll look for that.
Edison versus Tesla.
Thanks for mentioning it.
Meanwhile, Times Square to become a sensitive gun-free zone.
As of Thursday, visitors—that would be today—Times Square will not be able to carry concealed firearms, even if they have a permit.
City and state leaders have announced certain locations, including Times Square, are sensitive areas, a euphemism for gun-free zones.
Other sensitive places include government-owned buildings, medical care facilities, theaters, restaurants, houses of worship, and parks.
As governor, my number one responsibility is keeping New Yorkers safe, said Kathy Hochul.
That's why, when it came down to the Supreme Court decision, we were ready for it.
Hochul's talking about NYSRPA v. Broome, in which the Supreme Court struck down the New York state law that would put severe restrictions on gun permits.
Mayor Eric Adams of New York City seemed both supportive of and bemused by the sensitive area restrictions newly imposed upon his city.
I never thought, from the days of watching cowboy movies as a child, leave your gun at the door becoming reality in the state of New York.
The area is a gun-free zone.
Think about that.
We actually have to say that in our city.
There are some exceptions.
Area residents, those who work in the area, will be exempted, as well as those who are transiting through.
But what it means to be transiting is unclear.
Also unclear is whether the exemption extends to other aspects of the new law, which includes 16 hours of required classroom training, 2 hours of live fire training, according to Fox.
Applicants must also submit a list of social media accounts from the last three years so that officials can assess their character and conduct.
And God forbid you watch any of my shows or support Donald Trump.
Governor Huntsville insisted the new restriction would be enforced immediately.
Although no new resources have been allocated, no additional NYPD will be dispatched for this purpose.
We always evaluate where we deploy our resources at the Commissioner, Keyshant Sewell.
If there's a need to increase those resources, we'll do so, but as things stand now, we already have a robust detail assigned to Times Square.
To alert visitors to the new policy, written notice will be posted and there will be video messages.
The New York Post reports the unpermitted applications in New York have jumped 54% since SCOTUS ruled.
However, sheriffs have noted that new gun restriction laws will likely create a paperwork bottleneck that will delay the processing of new permit applications.
Carl, your thoughts?
So there's a new magic word called sensitive, eh?
So that's all that it is.
It's a magic word saying, yeah, yeah, yeah.
So we're going to dictate policy now and fuck.
Whatever limits the law because it's sensitive.
It's sensitive.
It's freedom, democracy, sensitive.
An abundance of caution.
They just come up with this stuff via focus groups and that's all bullshit.
This is another battlefront and the endgame positions are, is that the sheeple are disarmed.
And vulnerable.
That's one.
I'm not very comfortable with that position at all.
And the other position is our position, which includes that we arrest these people for obvious crimes centered in ongoing lie-started illegal wars of aggression, bankster looting in the trillions, and these crimes we document annually, kill millions, harm billions, and loot trillions.
So just another battlefront and the battle goes on.
Brian.
Oh, I think I've made this statement before and argued for it.
Obviously, we study false flags.
I don't know how many times I have to say that, but most of them appear to have the agenda behind them of taking away people's guns, ultimately, and disarming the Second Amendment, taking the teeth out of it so that it can't actually affect the way we live and the way we operate within society.
So why is it so important for them to push these agendas so hard?
Well, in my opinion, if you remove the guns, you promote Murder and death and crime and mayhem, because that's what's in the hearts of men.
The only thing that stops my neighbor from coming and taking food out of my pantry when he gets hungry is the threat that I've got a gun and will kill him when he steps into my house.
So, if the overall agenda is gun-free, then I believe that the overall agenda is actually murder, death and mayhem in society.
It's a fallacy to simply believe that if we can disarm people that all of a sudden we're all going to become good people and we're all going to have our hearts in the right place and nobody's going to do bad things anymore.
It's ridiculous.
The whole thing is ridiculous.
We are not the threat.
They are the ones that want to take away our ability to protect ourselves.
Those are the ones that are the real threat, but they've got you.
They're trying to convince all of America that it's the opposite, which is a traditional Democrat argument.
It's not you.
It's us.
It's not us.
It's them.
I don't believe they're going to be able to pull it off.
Times Square is a gun-free zone.
It's ridiculous, but New York has some pretty draconian laws.
Carl.
But Brian, the murder and mayhem will only come to the extremists.
We'll make sure that Antifa takes care of them.
It'll all work out for the one good party in the end.
That's going to be their rhetoric.
That's what they're going to try to sell.
Again, having the government decide who the winners and the losers are comes down to even the battle that you have with the person you meet on the street.
We can't have the government deciding who the winners and losers are in all of these struggles.
You got it exactly right, Brian.
I couldn't agree more.
We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Meanwhile, not only does the demented one put the total in totalitarianism, but he puts the holo-holo in hologram.
I mean, let's face it.
He cannot be real.
Allowing children to choose their own sex?
There's nothing real about that.
Nothing human.
It's an idea based on nothing.
It's a perversion of nature.
In a real world, this would be a violation of the Nuremberg Code.
But we do not live in a real world.
We seem to be bit players in a bad horror movie written and directed by a production company called Woke Dump.
And I cannot even give it one star.
Those participating in this madness deserve a special place in the Holy Weird Walk, Perk Walk of Shame, whatever and wherever that is.
Could it be that since Biden's son is a certifiable pervert, his real goal is to turn our children into the same?
I would not put that past the Hollow Man, F.J.B., and his minions.
Biden's new Title X proposals, by the way, Title IX proposal will codify the gender derangement of the left.
According to the American Thinker, here we have an excerpt by Jane Levy.
If there's anything that's advanced in American society, you can be sure that woke leftists will destroy it.
So it is with Title IX.
A one-sentence statute of the Education Amendments of 1972 that ended sex-based discrimination in educational institutions opened the doors for women aspiring to become doctors, engineers, and experts in any field of choice brought parity to college sports and launched the battle against sexual harassment.
In this 50th year of that landmark law, the Biden admin wants to rewrite it to suit the radical leftist ideology of gender identity and fluidity.
This is dangerous because it codifies a spreading gender derangement of the left.
Worse, it will immerse young minds in learning environments that condition them to believe, without critical thinking, that the biological idea of sex is false.
It will unleash other complications as well.
Already, Americans are suffering the tyranny of woke ideology.
We have reached the abyss in which some people can't or won't define what a man or a woman is.
Girls are forced to share private space with biological males.
Teachers are canceled or fired for using the wrong pronouns.
Schools are hiding their curricula from the public and parents.
Final thoughts.
they think might object.
Sadly, the insanity extends to parents losing custody of their children for opposing capriciously imposed and dangerous gender transitions.
The codification of woke gender will only cause the unending stream of such cases to proliferate.
Final thoughts.
Carl, yours. - Wow, those are great comments.
I think those are my favorite.
I think that's my number one favorite all time.
So thank you so much to those commenters and our audience for your ongoing intellectual integrity and moral courage to stand for the truth.
Those comments evoke in me is, I agree with Dante, is if you're going to be human, Yes, that's our situation.
and all hope ye who enter here and Shakespeare, hell is empty.
All the demons are here.
Yes, that's our situation.
All the institutions have been captured by the enemy.
They're Satanists, they're pedivores, and they just brutalize and kill millions every year.
And that's our situation.
So what are we going to do?
We're not going to surrender.
We're not going to say nothing.
We're on the team in this AMREV 2.0.
We're on the team for the Great Awakening.
I think it's a great way to characterize it, because the evil can't survive in the darkness.
The great majority of human beings, if they only could recognize the truth and get slapped out of it, they would not consent to that evil.
Even the people, the minions within evil, I think if given the opportunity to leave, a lot of them would say, I'm out.
That pedivore.
No, no, I'm making a lot of money off of the sheeple.
I was down for that, but not eating the kid.
So we shall see.
And the other side are the Satanists, and they're just showing their hand.
Nothing will be enough for them.
They want to own everything and ask us to be happy about it.
Brian, your final thoughts?
Any human being out there that's ever been able to lay eyes on totally unrestrained depravity understands that evil does exist.
There is some force out there that's fighting against the very beautiful nature of mankind and womankind and the way that The order's been set up, the beautiful mountains and the beautiful skies and everything that's out there is just absolutely wonderful from an initial parent's perspective and it was set out like that.
But something has come into this world and it's corrupted us and they've done it as an insult, in my opinion, as an insult to the designer who designed such a beautiful, well-balanced, such a wonderful system that made my hands and my feet and my eyes and my hair and my daughter reproductive systems
And to take a child and so mess with their mind that they are confused about their identity as a boy or a girl is a perfect example of Basically, the big middle finger to God from Satan and those that are under control of him.
It's like, hey, yeah, you made it beautiful.
Yeah, you made it wonderful.
You made this wonderful child, but I'm going to show you I'm going to corrupt this child and I'm going to do so much so that they don't even understand what sex they are.
So, I think it's definitely something very evil and I spend a lot of time trying to figure out How that evil is working.
Here's one that I've been working on recently, Satan Prince of this World, and combine that with other ones to figure out what is the force behind it?
How do you fight against that force?
And what do we say and what do we do to stand up and prevent it from overtaking our children's future and our children's lives?
Something that's a worthy endeavor for any human being, but especially for people like us that are in the business of telling the truth.
Well, Brian and Carl have made innumerable, very insightful comments today during our conversation and review of these latest developments.
I think the perversion, the loss of sanity, ordinary reason and responsibility of the Democratic Party is nowhere more manifest Then with regard to gun control, let's think of an experiment.
Suppose we took some major cities in the United States and imposed the strictest gun control.
Then if gun control worked, we'd expect they'd have the lowest rate of gun violence in the country, right?
But is that what happens?
Look at Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore.
They have the strictest gun laws in the country.
They all have Democrat mayors.
They're all relentless in imposing it.
And guess what?
They have the highest crime violence, the highest gun violence, the highest rate of murder in the United States.
How dumb are we supposed to be?
How stupid?
Are the Democrats to impose this on the American people?
It is grotesque.
It's just as bizarre as trying to turn little boys into little girls and little girls into little boys.
This is a perversion.
And that is what has become of the modern Democrat Party.
This is so far removed from JFK and FDR as to be in another world completely.
A world of unreality, a woke world in which nothing makes any sense, and yet it's pursued with a fervor of zealot.
We see it on every hand.
Don't let yourself be played.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends and your family.
We do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection