Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 26, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:26:24

Need to Know News (25 August 2022) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Petzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and Brian Davidson in San Antonio.
	Brian?
	No, sir.
	I'm in Houston.
	In Houston, in Houston, Texas.
	We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
	We begin with intelligent expert, believe the CIA was behind the car bombing of the daughter of Alexander Dugan.
	Clearly he was the target.
	Douglas Valentine says Zelensky doesn't go to the bathroom without asking permission from his CIA case officer.
	Author of the seminal book The Felix Program, Douglas Valentine believes the CIA was behind the car bombing that killed Darya Dugin, a journalist and daughter of the well-known Russian intellectual Alexander Dugin, Who was killed Saturday night when a bomb blew up the Toyota Land Cruiser she was driving in a suburb of Moscow.
	She was the intended target along with her father.
	I think probably her father was a primary target, but they were happy to take her out as well.
	His promotion of the Eurasian Union has influenced the thinking of Vladimir Putin and his associates.
	Russia's Federal Security Service, FSB, blamed the Ukrainian intelligence service for the killing, specifying the attack was carried out by a woman named Natalia Shaban, a member of the Azov battalion, along with her brother, who arrived last month in Russia with her teenage daughter.
	She reportedly rented an apartment where she researched Miss Dugina, attended the tradition celebration where her father gave a speech, and she was killed after planning the bomb, fled to Estonia.
	She allegedly rented an apartment.
	Yes.
	Here you see remnants from the explosion, which was rather massive.
	According to Douglas Valentine, Zelensky doesn't go to the bathroom without asking permission from a CIA case officer.
	$10 billion comes with a lot of strings attached.
	The CIA would have been intimately involved in recruiting the woman assassin, preparing the plan every step of the way, and her escape at standard operating procedure.
	He admits there's no direct evidence to implicate the CIA, and he's making an educated guess.
	However, clandestine ops occur by definition without anyone knowing exactly how they happen.
	He further reported at Covert Action Magazine, the CIA doesn't conduct a covert operation of this grandiosity unless it's deniable and worth a risk.
	That's known, so there's rarely direct evidence.
	Just the day before her assassination, The New York Times published a front-page article about Ukraine guerrillas openly admitting planting car bombs targeting pro-Russian police officers and politicians behind Russian blinds.
	Ukraine's special service is also known to have set up a Phoenix-style kidnap and assassination program targeting dissidents, including mayors and local government officials sympathetic to Russia.
	Vassily Posrov, the former SBU officer, proclaimed the SBU had been advised by the CI since 2014.
	CI employees, who have been present since, are residing in clandestine apartments and suburban houses.
	They frequently come to the SBU's central office, holding specific meetings, plotting secret operations.
	Valentine reported the CIA is applying the same organizational structure in Ukraine as it used in South Vietnam to conduct an updated version of the typical two-tier Phoenix program, the top tier to assure political control, the lower to pacify the population.
	Their headquarters, a whole floor, appears to be in this building in Kiev.
	CI foreign intelligence officers advise SVU security to ensure top-tier internal security and political control, and Ukrainian CIA agents run ops into Donbass, Russia, and Belarus, sending illegal travelers, smugglers, and agents to set up agent nets and penetrate the enemy in its territory to carry out sabotage and subversion.
	SBU and the Ukrainian CIA are where hit lists are authorized.
	CIA advise military, militias, and mercenary in deniable political, paramilitary, and psychological obstacles to terrorize and otherwise persuade civilian populations to support Zelensky while demoralizing and fighting the enemy, as in Vietnam.
	Some of the CIA may be operating undercover of state-run police training programs instituted in Ukraine after the 2014 Maiden Coup.
	Others have been assigned to specialized paramilitary units fighting in eastern Ukraine.
	Valentine stated, the original Phoenix program was responsible for the planned assassination of between 25,000 to 40,000 people in South Vietnam.
	Based on that model, assassination became a standardized component of military and CIA ops.
	It has since been perfected, as evidenced by the assassination of Dugin and scores of other examples, from Central America to Iran to Africa and the Far East.
	The CIA is always finding a reason to start a war, so they can send the next generation of young men into battle to learn how to kill in the most brutal fashion.
	That's Phoenix, always rising from the ashes of war.
	Meanwhile, a website which publishes data on Ukrainian servicemen reported in April that Natalia Shaban, born in 1979, served in the Azov-based National Guard, not the same as the U.S.
	National Guard, but formed directly by the hardcore Azov regiment, with many members not directly members of Azov.
	It has made a copy of her certificate indicating military unit 3057.
	And Shaban is the name that her daughter, Sophia Shaban, used when they entered Russia.
	And the assumption is Natalia Voigt is the maiden name of Natalia Shaban.
	The vote of the National Guard members is a close match.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, first, on the lighter side of no coincidences, I only have two cousins on my daddy's side, and one is in San Antonio, a little bit north in Blanco, and another one of my daddy's cousins is in Houston.
	Now, to the serious stuff!
	Oh, your Texas accent sucks.
	You did the best you could, but that's terrible!
	I'll take that.
	So, in 14 and 16, Ukraine became a vassal of the United States.
	That color-revolutionized coup installed a Dominion-like, U.S.-like democracy into Ukraine, where political opponents are jailed and any oppositional media is made illegal.
	Of course the U.S.
	had an assassination program, and of course that's happening in Ukraine.
	Carl B. Herman, Blogspot, any of these news shows, the paper U.S.
	Illegal, and that documents that as a retired AP U.S.
	government teacher and U.S.
	history teacher, the best description I have for the U.S.
	is a lying, looting, illegal, rogue state empire.
	And the war on Vietnam, to give it some context with Operation Phoenix, I want to read just one paragraph from my paper.
	After the war, to make the world safe for democracy, Ho Chi Minh's petition for a democratic Vietnam was denied by the victors of World War I. Vietnam remained under France's dictatorship for economic and political colonial domination.
	The U.S.
	supported Minh during World War II as guerrilla warfare against Japan.
	Only to deny his petition for Vietnam's independence at the end of the war.
	The U.S.
	then paid up to 80% of France's military costs to keep Vietnam enslaved by the French.
	The U.S.
	supported the cancellation of an election in Vietnam when it became clear that Min's socialist economic plan was more popular than a Western-friendly leader.
	The Vietnam War exploded when SecDef McNamara's contrived reporting of the Gulf of Tonkin incident manipulated intelligence at best at first light, but then manipulated into an outright false flag attack, beginning with President Johnson's emergency midnight television announcement to Americans that the U.S.
	was under attack in Vietnam.
	The war escalated with unlawful invasions and attacks in Laos and Cambodia, dropping war bombs sent from all sides of World War II combined on a country smaller than California that killed perhaps 10 percent of their civilian population, about three and a half million.
	The government's stated goal at the time was to defeat communism by winning the hearts and minds of civilians, while the U.S.
	killed over a thousand civilian children, women, and the elderly daily through high-altitude bombing.
	The war killed 58,000 Americans and only ended through massive U.S.
	demonstrations, and I do recommend the YouTube video Matt Damon from Howard Zinn's speech, The Problem is Civil Obedience.
	So Howard Zinn delivered a speech 52 years ago, and the same shit is going on today.
	The U.S.
	is a lying, looting, illegal, rogue state empire.
	No honor, and everything else is just propaganda to cover it.
	Well, first, did you just quote Howard Zinn?
	get from corporate media.
	Brian, this Phoenix in Ukraine is pretty nasty stuff.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, first, did you just quote Howard Zinn?
	He's the guy that wrote the People's History of the United States.
	I got about halfway through that.
	That was terrible.
	I can't believe that in Good Will Hunting they said that that was a good book because it was just so lopsided.
	I just couldn't stand it.
	It's not that great of a history book.
	It's a history book that's designed to set up a new breed of teaching kids that America's history is all bad.
	We were all bad guys.
	Slavery was terrible and the world has come to an end.
	It's basically just the platform of the history book that they're using as a platform to Here is Howard Zinn's complete coverage of the JFK assassination.
	Lyndon Johnson became president of the United States in 1963 following the assassination of John F Kennedy.
	Can you believe?
	It's ridiculous.
	It was the most liberal thing I've ever read in my life and I found it to be offensive in terms of from any wise person's perspective.
	First of all, let's talk about Dugan because that story may have just passed right on by you and you didn't understand really what was going on.
	Dougan's daughter was apparently assassinated in a car bombing on Saturday night.
	Dougan had been the chief editor of Tsarguard TV, which was basically the Fox News of Russia.
	It was supposed to be an Orthodox Christian version of Fox News.
	He was a big supporter of Russian Orthodox Christianity, and he, you know, when reading about his take on government, it wasn't like a sewn-up religious type of government.
	It was more like how you would expect to see an advanced civilization operate these days, but that's what he did.
	He had hired Fox News' John Hannock to help him run the operation at Sargard TV.
	It was, of course, obviously The CIA did everything they could to bury it, including getting them blocked from the YouTube channels and they didn't want them talking to anybody in Russia or anyplace else.
	And so he was a big supporter of Putin.
	And so I want you to think about this.
	What better way to get America involved into a direct war than to have the CIA by proxy use one of their assassination agents to take out his daughter, which would piss off Putin to no end.
	This is, in my opinion, an attempt To do what we did in World War One with the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, which is the CIA is setting up what they've been telling us they've been they're going to do for years.
	I mean, how long have we been hurting hearing?
	It's Russian disinformation.
	How long have we been hearing the setup that it was going to be a big war with Russia?
	The CIA Phoenix program, obviously Phoenix program was Horrendous.
	I mean, the more I've read, I haven't read a whole lot about it, but it was designed to identify and destroy Viet Cong.
	According to CIA papers, they used torture, capture, counterterrorism, interrogation, and outright assassination.
	And they neutralized 81,740 people that would have been fighting for communism using the Phoenix program.
	Look.
	More accurately, I would suggest they would have been fighting for Vietnamese nationalism because this whole communism thing was complete bullshit.
	The Vietnamese were fiercely nationalistic.
	They would never have succumbed to the influence of Red China.
	So that whole domino theory was just utter nonsense.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I saw The Fog of War.
	It was all I had.
	And that was McNamara.
	And of course, ridiculous.
	McNamara saying that we did Vietnam to, you know, to stop the spread of communism.
	That's not what was happening.
	Of course, Vietnam was set up.
	Look, with the media being as bad as it is today, I don't support anything they tell us to believe in.
	And they're telling us that we ought to believe in a war in Ukraine to fight Russia.
	Just don't buy it.
	I don't buy it.
	I don't buy it at all.
	I want us to be independent of this thing.
	I want Russia to do what they're going to do for their country, just like I would want any country to do what they're what they're going to do for their country without CIA control.
	And if you think that Zelensky is anything, he's no different than Biden.
	He's an actor.
	Biden wasn't an actor, but Zelensky's a puppet, just like Biden's a puppet.
	Look at the puppeteering that's taking place with Biden.
	He doesn't even know what he's doing.
	If you watch the video of him signing the latest IRS or Inflation Reduction Act, he looks like a child up there, like a 96-year-old guy looking around going, did I do good?
	Did I do good?
	While he's asking for trying to give the pen back.
	It's ridiculous.
	I don't support any of this that's happening in Ukraine.
	I want to see Russia do what they want to do, and I'm tired of hearing the media tell me that I'm wrong, or that I should be thinking differently.
	I'm not going to do it.
	You're absolutely right.
	Sure, Carl.
	And my conclusion on Xin as a historian is that I appreciate his contribution to make clear of what happened in the Vietnam War.
	He's one of the best analysts that I've found for that.
	And typical of almost every human being is that you find one area that is shady, and then you can't make the jump that everything is shady.
	Very good.
	Cognitive dissonance tends to push away a lot of the other facts that would give a more balanced opinion.
	So I appreciate Xin for what he did in Vietnam.
	And that said, he is as blind as everyone else to most of the rest.
	Very good.
	Meanwhile, Pelosi flip-flots on Biden's student debt forgiveness plan after initial opposition.
	She said he didn't have the authority.
	House Speaker said Wednesday she had no problem with Biden signing the COVID pandemic to cancel hundreds of billions in federal student loan debt.
	President Biden's bold action is a strong step in Democrats' fight to expand access to higher education and empower every American to reach fulfillment.
	Adding the move will help more working families meet their everyday needs as they continue to recover from the challenges of the pandemic.
	However, she took a very different tone just 13 months ago.
	People think the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness, she told reporters in July of 2021.
	He does not.
	He can postpone, he can delay, but he does not have that power.
	It has to be an act of Congress.
	Really, the House of Representatives, where all these financial matters must originate according to the Constitution.
	I don't even like to call it forgiveness because it implies a transgression.
	It's not to be forgiven, just freeing people from those obligations.
	However, the Biden admin insists that the Commander-in-Chief does have that power.
	Lisa Brown, General Counsel for the Department of Education, issued a memo detailing the department's plan to rely on a 2003 law known as the HEROES Act, which gives broad authority to waive or modify student loans to alleviate hardships brought on by national emergencies.
	Brown posited that under this law, the Department could use its authority to address the financial harms caused by the COVID pandemic.
	She also revealed the Biden admin is rescinding a January 2021 memo written by Trump administration that claimed the Education Department was unable to forgive large amounts of debt, saying that conclusion was incorrect.
	Pell grants, the new forgiveness would give up to $20,000 for borrowers who receive federal Pell grants and $10,000 those who have not.
	To be eligible, they must make less than $125,000 a year, less than $250,000 if they're part of a household.
	If all borrowers claim the relief, it'll benefit up to 43 million loan borrowers, 20 million of whom will see their debt completely canceled.
	Now multiply 43 million by $10,000 and see what number you get.
	Biden also announced an extension of the moratorium on student loan payments until December 31st, which was intended to end on August 31st.
	Several progressives, including Elizabeth Warren, urged Biden to go further and cancel up to $50,000 in debt.
	That was always unlikely, as the president has repeatedly shut down for giving that much.
	She still praised the move.
	Biden's action to cancel student debt is life-changing for millions of people.
	It's transformative relief for the middle class, except the question is who's going to pay for it.
	I dare tell you it's going to be the middle and the working class.
	In response, some social media dredged up a video from the 2020 presidential campaign in which he was cornered by a voter who asked if he would get any of his money back after saving it to ensure his daughter would not graduate college owing student loans.
	Of course not, she said at the time.
	Angering the voter.
	So you're going to pay people who didn't save their money and those of us who did the right thing, we're going to get screwed, he said.
	As Warren sought to respond, he continued to press, knowing a friend of his spent his money on a car and vacations instead of covering education.
	We did the right thing and we get screwed, he said, before walking away.
	The plan states some Americans can have as much as $10,000 debt given.
	On Wednesday, several lawmakers reiterated that voters' concerns.
	There's no canceling or forgiveness.
	The debt is transferred to hard-working taxpayers, many of whom paid off their loans already or decided to pursue a different career and forego college.
	This is just bad economic policy, and I do not support this forgiveness approach, said Representative French Hill from Arkansas.
	Biden's plan to cancel is financially reckless and only transfers responsibility to hardworking American transfers, said Rob Whitman from Virginia.
	It's an insult to those who didn't have the opportunity to attend college and those who worked hard to pay off their own debts.
	I joined the military as a GI Bill.
	Began at junior college.
	My wife waited tables.
	We sweated, sacrificed, and saved to pay for our college education, to borrow, start, and grow our small business.
	What lesson is Biden sending wiping-clean-debt students willingly to God?
	Barry Moore from Alabama wrote.
	Carl, your thoughts.
	Well, the debt elimination was not the legislative intent.
	And if you really push into that legislation, it really is just a scheme in order to support the too-big-to-fail banks by backstopping their loans to students.
	So that's one thing.
	And then for Biden to go ahead and take another step towards dictatorial control, that's exactly what our government leaders want.
	So, of course, they'll go into that direction without any explanation or bullshit explanation, just say COVID.
	Now, So the big picture with forcing these kids to go to college.
	So a hundred years ago, there was something called the high school movement, which pushed to make it illegal for children not to complete education until they became adults.
	And that's what we have today.
	And we just take that for granted.
	And what we also take for granted now is the requirement of having a college degree.
	And this really is a system to put students into mind control, Until age 22, and I, Carl B. Herman Blockspot, if you go to the section on public education, I had a 11 part series of US public, US public education.
	Bullshit to train stupefied work animals, and I make those conclusions after 38 years as a award-winning public school teacher.
	I also wrote an article that, you know, I keep thinking that we're close to having a breakthrough, but I wrote this article titled, Think We the People Are Close to Winning?
	A Conversation 100 Years Ago Might Also Conclude the U.S.
	Couldn't Possibly Get More Corrupt.
	And the it just gets worse and worse.
	We have this escalating exponential growth curve of aggregate debt and student debt.
	And here in California, it's particularly.
	Biting to me, we had the best post-secondary education system in the world, in my opinion.
	We had community colleges that also included the trades.
	We have the Cal State system, which was a college degree, and the UC system, which is a research quality.
	And it used to be next to nothing to pay.
	And now, we have this scheme where we start out kids Brian, I think this is a transport effort to buy votes, and it's going to piss off as many as it's going to encourage.
	I think it's a wash, and it's a bad policy.
	Bad, bad finance.
	work to help pay for those bills.
	But Brian, I think this is a transparent effort to buy votes, and it's going to piss off as many as it's going to encourage.
	I think it's a wash, and it's a bad policy, bad, bad finance.
	Your thoughts?
	If you're under 30 and you're listening to this, first of all, congratulations to Thank you.
	There may be hope yet.
	But if you're under 30, they think you're stupid.
	They're just going to pay off your debt.
	Doesn't that sound like a vote buying scheme?
	That's exactly what it is.
	And what do we have?
	An unlimited supply of money.
	We're just going to print more, more, more, more, more, more.
	We're going to pay off everybody's debt and buy all the votes.
	They think you're stupid.
	And I was looking at a Paul Craig Roberts article today where he basically said the colleges and the higher degrees are basically just creating ignorance and emotionally driven groupthink.
	And I tend to agree with them.
	You know, when I was a kid, I had to go mow lawns to earn money to be able to have something to buy something.
	Now, they don't have to work.
	They live with their parents until they're 26, 27, 33 years old.
	You've got to have a work ethic if you want to survive in America.
	And we have a huge homeless problem.
	We have a huge problem all over the place.
	Why?
	Are you going to take on more debt if you're not going to end up getting a job that's going to pay for your debt?
	And why would the government come in and take up the cost for your debt?
	Of course, what with the grants that were given to all the colleges from the federal government, what happened?
	Did the price of college go down?
	No, we gave them more money.
	They spent more money.
	They raised their charges.
	And Carl, you mentioned California.
	You know, I saw that just the other day they were putting some sort of initiative together where they were going to ban the sale of get brand new gas vehicles in California, which means everybody's got to upgrade the electric I think that what is happening in California is so ridiculously stupid that they're literally trying to drive everybody out of the state so they can buy up the land cheap.
	I mean, it is so ridiculously dumb and these people are so controlled.
	These politicians are so controlled in California.
	It just doesn't make any sense anymore.
	And that said, how is paying off all this Student loan debt gonna deal with our real problem right now, which doesn't it feel like it's inflation?
	Because it feels like that to me.
	I went to the grocery store to get a bag of cheese the other day.
	It was $7.95 even here in Texas.
	This is getting out of control.
	I have to earn more.
	I have to literally earn more money every day just to cover the cost of gas and fuel and tires and insurance everywhere.
	It's all more expensive.
	This is going to be a disaster, and I think they know it's going to be a disaster, and I think they're doing it to gain control of society as a whole, enslave us all, and the last thing they want is for you people under 30 to learn to think for yourselves.
	That's why they want you in school, so you won't think for yourselves.
	And that's pretty much all I've got to say on that.
	I think Pelosi had it right a year ago, and she's got it wrong now for political purposes.
	They're afraid of the Democrats being wiped off the board.
	Carl.
	Yeah, Brian, I think you exactly have it, is that the masters behind these operations are somehow hyper-intelligent enough to perceive how to propagandize large groups, approximately 98% in my estimation of the American public, and they do want groupthink.
	And I think that their last move, because they're so exposed, is to try to force a civil war, or at least a false flag for a civil war, So that they can come in with military and try to squash it and then bring in, as Jim was talking about last week, to bring in UN troops as peacekeepers in order to finally destroy the country.
	And it is Tragic Comet.
	It is Emperor's New Clothes Obvious.
	And wow, it is exciting times and it is at an endgame.
	Something is going to break.
	Yeah, it's pretty damn depressing when the Democrats are screwing the country to retain power over our government.
	Judges urge Trump to provide more evidence of Florida's new motion.
	He wants to get back material seized by the FBI, asking the court to appoint an independent party, a receiver, a very appropriate thing to do.
	To order the government to provide a more detailed inventory list and to have any items outside the scope returned.
	In fact, the whole warrant appears to be ridiculous.
	It said any item from the whole period Trump was in office.
	It lacked specificity.
	It didn't say what kind of items and all sorts of things were taken, even including three passports.
	The filing raised concerns about Trump's rights being violated.
	A special master, typically a retired judge, ought to be appointed to ensure the government did not receive privileged materials.
	We need an impartial, that means not Republican, not Democrat, Impartial special master to go in there, look what they see, give back what is rightfully his, seems clearly declassified, seems privileged attorney-client from when he was in the White House that you'd never have been seen, said Alana Haba on Fox News.
	District Judge Eileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, said she received the motion but wanted another filing elaborated to facilitate appropriate resolution on or before August 26th.
	Let's see now.
	That's right now.
	August 26th, tomorrow, plaintiffs shall file a supplement to the motion elaborating the asserted basis for the exercise of the court's jurisdiction, the framework applicable to the exercise, the precise relief sought, and the effect of the proceedings before Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, status of plaintiff's efforts to perfect service on defendant.
	Trump's motion was assigned to Cannon, but Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in the case.
	U.S.
	officials have not yet answered the motion.
	The August 8th search warrants at Mar-a-Lago was authorized by a federal court upon the required finding of probable cause.
	I've read the affidavit.
	I don't see probable cause there, not even remotely.
	The Department's aware of this.
	The United States will file its response in court.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, this is a Trump-appointed judge that will make the call on this.
	And what we're seeing is just the most... So, the Fourth Amendment says is that you gotta go to a judge, and you have to make an argument showing probable cause of committing a crime.
	And that is what should go public to make that determination.
	And there would be an interesting backup question.
	I've just read some surface stuff to compare the move against Trump versus what Obama has, what W. Bush has, and what Clinton has, and then going back from there, because my surface understanding is that we're seeing just another round of blatant hypocrisy in order to smear Trump with something that'll just have the people be more Trump derangement syndrome.
	Brian, your thoughts.
	It doesn't.
	It makes listening to that story.
	It may sound like you need a law degree to parse this out, but it's not that hard.
	This is a pretty straightforward Bill of Rights issue.
	And what good is it to have a Bill of Rights if it's not enforced or understood or very easy?
	There's a bunch of precedent on this all over the place.
	I think I saw some snippet of maybe it was a Supreme Court Justice Bork or one of the other ones the older ones, and he said what good is it to have.
	These documents, if we don't properly enforce them, this shouldn't be that hard.
	Trump is a citizen.
	This is a very clear, manifest example of a very simple legal concept that's been around since the founding of America, and yet we've got to plod through it like it's the world's most complex legal thing.
	As for what's happening with Trump, I don't know.
	I don't know what they're after.
	They haven't told us what they're after.
	I don't know why Trump is allowing this to happen the way he's allowing it.
	I don't know if the Department of Justice has any good guys left.
	I simply don't know what's going on with all this because I can't believe any of the mainstream media.
	It's so hard to find good reporting on things like this because all these FBI guys are shut up.
	There's some whistleblowers that are coming out and talking about it related to Hunter Biden, related to Trump, things like that.
	But I think that's just it.
	A ploy to save face.
	I don't know what to believe.
	All I know is that if my possessions in my home are not safe and secure without them having a reasonable, probable cause, and they can just go out, dig around on expeditions looking for a crime, then we're all in big, big trouble.
	And that's the bottom line on this issue.
	Well, Brian, I think you got it right.
	The affidavit was by one Patrick Burns, who was actually in the White House when Trump was contemplating appointing Sidney Powell to be a special counsel to look into how the election was stolen, he reversed himself.
	He made a temporary appointment for about 10 minutes and then reversed himself after he spoke with Mark Meadows about it.
	It seems to me such a stretch.
	He had the right to make the appointment, so far as I can see.
	Some suspect that the FBI were involved in the Russiagate, where they're actually trying to find evidence he had implicating the FBI.
	But the FBI has taken a heavy hit, and support has galvanized around Donald Trump because of this event.
	So, by any measure, it has backfired massively.
	Meanwhile, new whistleblower claims the FBI delayed key investigation is coming from my senator whom I esteem and met recently, Ron Johnson.
	Another FBI whistleblower has come forward to say the FBI delayed its investigation into the Hunter Biden laptop.
	Ron Johnson, a leading investigator into Biden, sent a letter to the GOJ Inspector General about the latest whistleblower claims.
	They've contacted my office to share serious concerns about the handling of the Hunter Biden laptop, and FBI leaders at local level told employees you will not look at that laptop when it was discovered at a Delaware computer repair shop in 2019.
	The new claims allege the FBI did not even begin to examine the content until after the 2020 presidential election, a year even after the FBI obtained the laptop in December of 2019.
	They also allege the leadership said employees are not going to change the outcome of the election again Possibly referring to former Director Comey's letter to Congress about Hillary Clinton's private email server coming just days before the 2008 general election after he enumerated all the reasons why she should have been indicted and then added no reasonable prosecutor, however, would pursue the case.
	It's clear to me, based on numerous credible whistleblower disclosures, the FBI cannot be trusted with handling Hunter Biden's laptop.
	I call on you, this is the Inspector General, to immediately investigate and begin by obtaining the history of the actions taken on the laptop.
	When the laptop story first surfaced in October 2020, weeks before the election, then-candidate Biden and other Democrats alleged it was disinformation, while Twitter and Facebook moved to block New York Post articles on its content.
	They revealed Hunter's extensive overseas business ties, including with entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party.
	A former associate, Tony Bobulinski, said in late 2020 the emails disclosed in the New York Post report were authentic and that he had an email in May of 2017 about a business plan with a Biden Zoneda holding firm.
	Tony Bobulinski was interviewed during the debate with Tucker Carlson and nearly jumped out of his chair when Joe Biden said he had nothing to do with his son's business dealings.
	In emails about the energy firm CEFC, the H was referring to Hunter, Joe Biden, the big guy.
	Malinsky, a former President Trump, made several references to the big guy claim in a 2020 October presidential debate.
	With Biden before that, Republican senators wrote that Hunter had engaged in millions of dollars in questionable financial transactions with social and foreign individuals, including the wife of the former mayor of Moscow and CCP-linked individuals.
	Hunter, in an ABC News interview, has said he engaged in no illegal activities.
	His business deals were proper.
	Enormous sources have said that CNN and other sources, federal investigators, are still looking into it.
	But of course, when it could have made a difference, they stood silent and suppressed any reports whatsoever about the contents, which are rather horrific.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Yeah, first in context with Brian talked about the fog of war is what we're in and we can't be sure of a lot, but we do have sufficient evidence already to demand arrest of the leaders.
	And the only way that we're going to get the truth is after those arrests when whistleblowers can come forward and we can verify independently evidence that is being.
	Literally and figuratively covered by corporate media.
	So that laptop, you have Hunter calling his dad the big guy and 10% for the big guy.
	You also have the massive exponential growth of Biden's wealth.
	Now all of this really requires an external audit to figure out the income source of these monsters.
	You also have direct evidence, film and photographic evidence on the laptop of Hunter naked with small children.
	You also have the big deal that we have shown on this show of a guy who looks an awful lot like Joe Biden naked and strapping about a 13-year-old naked girl whose hands are bound.
	So, and one of my favorites as well, You have Hunter naked with both Obama daughters naked on the bed along with their pet dog.
	So it's just absolutely more corrupt than anybody can imagine.
	And this is going to go on and continue to go on until we have some breakthrough for arrests.
	Spot on, Carl.
	Brian.
	Is it really this easy to buy America's politicians?
	I mean, is it?
	Is it really?
	I mean, that story is about Hunter Biden getting money from China.
	We've heard about Hunter Biden getting money from Ukraine.
	We see Nancy Pelosi running around.
	Don't tell me she's not bought and paid for.
	Her husband just had the big dewey.
	He's obviously that was bought and paid for with some favor someplace.
	Our justice system needs to do one thing well.
	It needs to act as a legal umpire.
	You're safe.
	You're out.
	Simple as that.
	All this complex agency buying.
	I mean, you can buy the FBI now.
	Somebody's got enough power to buy the FBI.
	What was Epstein all about?
	These people getting caught on this island or on this plane with all these underage kids.
	Were they just buying politicians?
	Who's got control?
	If we as a people don't begin to see that we are no longer capable of having a justice system that acts straight up as just an umpire in legal matters, we're hopelessly caught in a bureaucratic downward spiral that's going to end up in a cycle of depravity that's going to break this nation and turn us more good versus bad, left versus right, Republican versus Democrat.
	Guys, We need to see a prosecution.
	When was the last time we saw one?
	A non-politically motivated criminal prosecution of a high-level official.
	Jim, can you remember seeing one?
	I think we got to go back to Nixon and his resignation.
	I think it's about that far along.
	It's really embarrassing, Brian.
	You're absolutely right.
	So that was 73?
	That's 50 years ago.
	Yeah.
	I think you're right.
	Carl can confirm that.
	If they've got no fear, why not sell out?
	Because they're certainly not worried about their soul.
	Good point.
	Carl, did you want to add?
	Yeah, part of the themes that I present is that it's all owned, it's all captured, and that is the enormity of the task in front of us.
	And the paper that I have, U.S.
	Illegal, is that I think that we've been a rogue state empire completely owned, or increasingly owned, for well over, coming up over 200 years now.
	So it really is that bad, and we've just been propagandized to believe otherwise.
	Very good, very good.
	Meanwhile, look at this.
	Here's an interesting... Are we headed for a crash?
	Look at the S&P.
	Look at how the stock market's gone up.
	Look at where it's headed now.
	This looks to me very, very disturbing, and that there really isn't any serious doubt about it.
	Major experts have been predicting and warning us to do something about it, where most of us have no idea what we could actually do to protect ourselves.
	Carl, would you like to comment on this?
	Yeah, I think that we are in for a major crash one way or the other.
	The stock market is a rigged casino.
	And if you go to any of these news shows into the looting trillion sections, I can walk you through part of the data, just some of the ones that I can just grab off the top of my head.
	Over 99% of the trades on the New York Stock Exchange are called flash trades.
	This is why gold in my Saks Bank makes a daily profit.
	This is insider trading.
	This is what you guys were just talking about a moment ago with the Pelosi's.
	It's insider trading.
	This is why Harvard has an endowment of whatever the fuck it is, 40 billion, 70 billion, I don't remember.
	It's all inside.
	And all of these so-called retirement funds that we're all invested in, those are all owned.
	I document that For CalSTRS, the California State Teacher Retirement System, and the California Retirement System, the net income, so when I looked at the figures and deconstructed this stuff, we had $600 billion invested, allegedly to pay for retirees.
	The net income generated from that $600 billion in California?
	One.
	One, we paid the Wall Street investors $2 billion.
	So it is just a rigged casino, and I think that that is going to break.
	I think our opponents want to use the break for an emotional push for civil war.
	If the White Hats are in charge, then this would just be part of the show that would be required to snap people out of their stupor.
	I think they also want to use a collapse to switch to digital banking, where they can control every aspect of our lives.
	Brian, your thoughts?
	Yeah, the math doesn't make sense.
	Obviously, we can't continue just pumping money into this system.
	And Carl described it as a casino.
	Heck, I'd prefer to go to the casino.
	At least I know it's fair play.
	I mean, really, would you rather play a hand of blackjack or put your money into some hedge fund?
	As a middle-class working American, do you really think that somebody's not going to just chop off a massive cut before they give it back to you if you play according to the rules?
	The whole system's broken.
	There's too much money out there.
	It's too easy to have wealth.
	Look at how many billionaires we have and how many millionaires we have.
	Did they really earn it?
	Look, it's going to break, and maybe a higher education means learning to spend more time growing a garden.
	I hate to say it, but it's just about as simple as that when it comes down to it, because sooner or later, you're not going to have enough fuel in your car to go to the grocery store, or enough money in your cart to Get the groceries.
	Sooner or later, it's going to break.
	And when those dominoes begin to fall, everybody's going to be in bad shape.
	And can you imagine what's going to come rolling out, crawling out of the cities and the gutters when that day happens?
	You better be able to blow up your local bridge because when that comes out, you're going to be in big trouble.
	Everybody's going to be in big trouble.
	Brian, I think you're absolutely right.
	Very troubling.
	Very disconcerting.
	Meanwhile, Fauci addresses GOP skepticism regarding his impending retirement.
	If it were to happen, it would be a grateful day.
	The man's going to go down as the greatest mass murderer in history.
	Fauci announced he'd be stepping down at the end of the year.
	I'll be leaving these positions in December to pursue the next chapter of my career.
	Adding, as a public health bureaucrat, his years have been the honor of a lifetime.
	The timing sparked speculation from prominent Republican critics he's retiring just in time to avoid difficult questions from a newly minted GOP congressional majority next year.
	Andy Briggs tweets, Dr. Fauci is conveniently resigning from his position in December before House Republicans have the opportunity to hold him accountable for destroying our country over these past three years.
	This guy is a coward.
	Rand Paul, a frequent foe during hearings, reacted to his decision with resolve.
	He tweeted, Fauci's resignation will not prevent a full-throated investigation into the origins of the pandemic.
	He'll be asked to testify under oath regarding any discussions he participated in concerning the lab leak.
	He elaborated.
	I think it's no coincidence he decided to step down right after the election.
	I think he, like many others, perceives the Republican will take over at least one house and that there will be an investigation into his wrongdoing.
	Another Kentucky Republican, Representative James Comer, echoed Paul's commitment.
	The congressman, who serves as his party's ranking member on the House Oversight and Reform Committee, elaborated on his intentions.
	He cited email as evidence Fauci had changed his tune regarding the origins of COVID.
	You remember he said no taxpayer dollars were going there.
	They were not doing gain-of-function research, which we now know was not true.
	The big mystery related to the pandemic remains how it developed and spread.
	Fauci shrugged off accusations of the possibility of a tough congressional hearing influencing his decision.
	None at all.
	Not even the slightest.
	I have nothing to hide, and I can defend everything I've done, so that doesn't faze or bother me.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Yeah, Paul roasted him on the royalties that he received for pushing and pimping those drugs that he refused to disclose how much he received in royalties.
	And as well, he was just recently on Fox News being interviewed, excuse me, and he said, I never ordered a lockdown.
	I'm not even going to try a New York accent.
	I'm Hesitant now.
	I don't have that one anyway.
	Apparently I don't have a Texas accent.
	So Fauci claimed he never ordered a lockdown.
	And then immediately on public media, people are putting up the film clips where he ordered a lockdown.
	He advised the lockdown.
	He requested it.
	He said that that was best for everyone and he should have done it sooner.
	So any of these news shows, the paper My Best Shot goes through sufficient documentation that again, you know, We the people need to withdraw consent and demand arrests.
	We don't have much.
	We have what we think and what we say and what we do and that needs to be focused to recognize the extent of the evil.
	These are crimes against humanity just in this one area of policy and likely one of the greatest attacks on human beings across the planet in known history.
	He needs to pay.
	We need to demand arrests.
	Yes, yes.
	Brian, your thoughts?
	Well, I remember the first press conference when COVID hit and we had our Dr. Fauci out there.
	And I got the extended video of that because somebody told me to take a closer look at it.
	And sure enough, Fauci comes right out onto the stage and he slips his hand into his jacket, the old hidden hand trick.
	You know, for anybody who can study Freemasonry or a lot of these ancient religions, this is something that goes way back.
	And that tells me that Fauci's a member of the club.
	Does it sound like he doesn't have a get-out-of-jail-free card?
	I mean, the guy's boasting like he's got nothing to hide.
	He's just simply straight out lying to us about where this came from and how it came from.
	This morning, I heard a snippet from a song from 2013 talking about COVID.
	This was a rap song that had the coronavirus in it back in 2013, when theoretically nobody knew what it was all about.
	Who owns the patents on the coronavirus?
	This whole thing stinks to high heaven.
	And Carl, while I agree with you that we need to see an investigation or a prosecution, this is an exercise in masturbation.
	It's just stupid.
	Nobody's going to get prosecuted that's a part of the big club.
	Fauci's a part of the big club.
	They're all part of the big club.
	It's just not going to happen.
	They're going to cycle it out of the news.
	Whoever is trying to put together an investigation and do the right thing will be shut down or paid off.
	I'm sorry.
	I just simply don't believe in the system anymore.
	I don't believe it.
	I won't.
	And for good reason.
	I think you've got it right.
	Meanwhile, Biden's energy secretary just told troubling Americans to do something truly infuriating.
	His approval ratings are in the tank with no sign of rising.
	One of the reasons is his admin is utterly toned deaf.
	Biden's Energy Secretary just told struggling Americans to do something truly infuriating.
	Of all the Biden members of the Cabinet who are bad at messaging, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granville may be the worst.
	She really stepped in it when she went on TV and told poor people to buy solar panels to combat the worst inflation since 1982.
	She appeared on Fox News Sunday and said, if you're low-income, you can get your home entirely weatherized through the expansion of the bipartisan infrastructure laws, a significant expansion.
	You don't have to pay for anything.
	If you want heat pumps, insulation, new windows, that's covered.
	If you're moderate income, you can get 30% off the price of solar panels, which can be financed so you don't have the big outlay on the front.
	If you don't qualify for the weatherization, you'll be able to starting next year, get rebates on appliances and equipment to reduce your monthly energy bill by up to 30%.
	It's all about reducing costs for people.
	On the average, solar panels cost $12,000 to install, so Graham wants struggling families to avail themselves of a 30% debate and only pay $8,400 when inflation is through the roof.
	The Democrat solution to rising prices is folk over $1,000 for solar panels and electric vehicles.
	This is how out of touch the elites are with the American people.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Yes, yes.
	Brian, first, I do agree with you that there is no hope at all in the present system.
	We are in Dante's hell.
	Abandon all hope.
	Ye who enter here.
	And I do recommend that 1970 essay by Howard Zinn where he does capture the totality of evil that we're facing.
	So what we need is a breakthrough.
	A breakthrough is by definition something that is unimaginable and unpredictable in the present.
	I agree with you entirely by all calculations of what we can see and get our hands on.
	We're fucked!
	If we do get a breakthrough, it looks like it's going to result in civil war.
	So we're left with this paradox of a surrender to hoping that we have friends in high places, hoping that somehow life will evolve a way out of this.
	While we're doing everything that we can, it is truly a perilous situation.
	Now, to that, to the snippet of solar, yes, our masters do have a narrative of electric cars, so they're going to push it, and whatever BS facts, whatever they, whatever BS they can cobble together to push people into solar and electric, whatever, they're just, it's all a pretense to care covering the big Sadistic, psychopathic actions of the ongoing crush of empire.
	Brian.
	I hope you're right.
	And I've heard some information from some insiders that there is such thing as a white hat.
	Of course, I wanted to believe In it to when I first started studying it, the idea that Trump was somehow working with some military unit that was sitting behind the scenes planning the rebirth of America.
	And I'd like to believe it, but I just simply don't see any evidence of it out there in the real world.
	As for this article, this is look, I'm middle class at best.
	Pay all this money for an electric gas pump to be installed on my house and solar panels to be put on my roof.
	I'm having a hard time with day-to-day mortgage if I'm middle class.
	I'm having a hard time with gas prices being even where they're at right now, which I guess I'm thankful for since it was up to $5 a couple of months ago.
	This is going to break.
	If everybody's in this much debt, credit card debt is where it's at.
	People can't afford what they're doing.
	They can't afford their gas.
	They can't afford their cars.
	They're going to find themselves stuck where they can no longer function in society like a normal person.
	And when people do that, they get crazy.
	If you can no longer function in society, you're going to get crazy and you're going to take what you need to survive.
	And I think that there's a much larger portion of this population here in America that's getting themselves into that position than ever before.
	We have a homelessness problem.
	We have a tax income problem.
	We have problems everywhere.
	And Boy, I hope you're right, Carl.
	I hope there's some master plan, someplace, somehow.
	And I'm a Bible guy.
	I see it, too.
	But I just don't see how, with this bureaucracy in place, it's going to happen.
	I'd rather prepare for the worst and hope for the best than hope for something good and just bury my head in the sand and hope it's not going to change.
	You're absolutely right.
	Plan for the worst, hope for the best.
	Meanwhile, the Supreme Court issues a rare emergency order on elections ahead of the midterm.
	The Court issued an emergency Friday, siding with black voters who challenge Georgia's system of electing members to the State Public Service Commission.
	Court watchers consider the move a rare example of the Court siding with voters over state officials in disputes regarding elections.
	Election litigation usually moves quickly.
	A lower court will issue a preliminary ruling days or weeks before an election, leaving little time for the losing side to pursue a full-fledged appeal.
	In those circumstances, the losing side might file an emergency request asking the Supremes to put a lower court's ruling on hold, known as asking for a stay, while the normal appeal is pending, although stays are meant to be temporary.
	They often effectively resolve the issue at the heart of the case for the upcoming election.
	Media reports show SCOTUS restored a district court ruling requiring this year's election for two of the commissions to be postponed so they could create a new system for electing commissioners.
	The unsigned order left the door open for the state's officials to try again to get Georgia's rules revised for November.
	Later, Georgia indicated it would not ask again for the appellate court to halt the trial judge order while the appeal on the merits played out.
	The case began when a group of black leaders sued the state, claiming the Republican-controlled General Assembly approved a redistricting plan last year, diluting the black vote in two of the five districts.
	A judge postponed two November elections for the Public Service Commission, ruling the electoral structure disenfranchised black voters.
	Almost immediately thereafter, the appellate court reversed the decision, and then the U.S.
	Supreme Court found the election should not proceed while the appeal continues.
	The case is being closely watched because the State Public Service Commission sets customers' utility rates and oversees the construction budget of projects.
	The commissioners run statewide but must live in one of the five districts.
	The move was a fair example.
	Signing with voters over.
	The Supreme Court restored a district court ruling requiring this year's election for two of the commissions need to be postponed.
	The unsigned order left it open.
	A marketer for Marklet Beck, who represented the challengers, said the Supreme Court order was an important step toward ensuring that November's PSC elections are not using a method that unlawfully dilutes the votes of black voters.
	The Supreme Court comes as many states are fighting over new congressional maps.
	They, however, will not be in place until 2024.
	The ruling adds to a string of court defeats for Ohio's ruling Republicans amid the once-for-a-decade restricting process that states undertake to reflect population changes.
	Despite those failures, Ohio's 2022 congressional primaries went forward under an earlier invalidated U.S.
	House map.
	It created ten safe Republican seats, five Democrat seats.
	A high court majority said the latest map packed Democrats into three districts that would vote heavily for a Democrat, while unfairly splintering counties and cities around heavily Democrat Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Columbus.
	As noted by Dave Wasserman, the U.S.
	House editor of the nonpartisan Cook Report, this may not be bad news for Republicans in the short or the long term.
	His tweet?
	As expected, Ohio's Supreme Court throws that GOP map as an illegal gerrymander, but it's too late to redraw in time for 2022.
	Expect Republicans to draw a slightly different gerrymander in time for 2024, when the Court's balance could shift to the right.
	In June, the Supreme Court sided with the Louisiana state legislature by allowing the state's Republican-drawn congressional map to remain in place.
	A federal judge had previously ruled the map violated the Voting Rights Act and ordered it to be redrawn.
	In a brief one-page order, however, the Supreme Court said it would wait until next term to rule on the matter, given there's a similar case from Alabama scheduled to be argued next term.
	Before that, Florida's Supreme Court delivered a gigantic win to Governor DeSantis and Republicans in the sunshine shape by rejecting a request for a hearing over the state's new congressional map that eliminates a majority black district.
	In early June, the Kansas Supreme Court also ruled Republicans' new redistricting laws legal and will make it more difficult for the only Kansas congressional delegate to win re-election.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well this case is simply about gerrymandering and this is a practice that has existed in the United States for over 200 years and it's a way of rigging an election and the name of the game is to create these safe seats and the hope and then you throw in the money with there for propaganda and then the pathway of these people is that they're going to rise to power once elected if and only if they support Their party's official business.
	Pence!
	I remember when he was a just a member of Congress, but he volunteered to go on the Sunday morning political talk shows and pimp the wars of W. Bush.
	So he rose into prominence.
	And that's how you get a committee chair.
	And that's how you begin to get as rich as the Pelosi's and the Biden's.
	So this is an ongoing clown show.
	And this is, as we've been talking about, it's going to go down the memory hole and they're just going to do the same thing.
	Over and over again.
	And coincidentally, my wife just today, so her concern, she pretty much despised the official narrative on everything, but she is now so concerned with what she's seeing that she recommends that we expatriate and live out of the country.
	So that is a big sign for me that some of this is beginning to penetrate.
	Wow, Brian.
	Okay, so first of all, the election system, obviously, 2020 was a good example of how bad it really is.
	The second thing is, there were so many words in that article, I could barely figure out what was good and what was bad, because it's a language in and of itself, understanding elections.
	Let me just suggest that the French Do it right.
	And as far as I know, they're the only country out there that does it right.
	Paper ballots and IDs.
	They have the results that night.
	There's rarely, if anything, ever overturned.
	They keep it very simple, very sweet, and do it well.
	But on a bigger question, on a more philosophical question, What good is even a fair election if the minds of men are enslaved and pushed and pulled one way or another?
	What we need is to help people understand the bigger issues that are in play and focus on the bigger issues that are in play.
	People aren't going to do that until they understand that they've been lied to.
	That they're being lied to.
	So our job in this forum here today is to help free the minds of men.
	People come to you, Dr. Jim Fetzer, because they want to know the truth, because something feels wrong.
	It's not quite right.
	They come to you, Dr. Fetzer, because they want a logical explanation that makes sense, that puts the pieces together, which is why we have such a strong community in the false flag area.
	They know that they're under some sort of black magic, propaganda, psychobabble that's happening, and they're coming to us for the truth.
	Well, stay here on this channel.
	You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free, but it's one step at a time.
	Once you realize how much they're deceiving you, it's no longer going to be Republicans and Democrats.
	It's going to be right and wrong.
	And then we can do a fair election.
	Well said.
	Now, in France, we have this discrepancy that while they're using paper ballots and getting the totals the night, Tens of millions of Le Pen votes were torn.
	It turns out in France that if you have a, yeah, just as Carl's showing here, if you have a defaced ballot, they will not count it.
	So they had all these little tears, just as Carl was illustrating there, that deprived Le Pen of what would have been an historic victory over Macron.
	So even a system that's as reasonable as that in France, sad to say, is subject to corruption and manipulation.
	Meanwhile, Uvalde family says sue gun manufacturer, gun store is part of a massive—get this—$27 billion lawsuit.
	It also lists Uvalde City and the county police, the Texas Rangers, the Texas Department of Public Safety, and the U.S.
	Border Control as defendants.
	This comes from InfoWars' Adam Salazar reporting.
	Editors note, Brian Davidson, PI, with whom I authored the Law Enforcement False Flag Stage Event Checklist, which you can download here, discuss a Uvalde School shooting event which appears to be modeled after Sandy Hook, where among other anomalies we had two men, both with the same last name, claiming to have the same daughter.
	It was a gross glitch.
	Instead of shooting his mother, he shoots his grandmother, and shoot of 21st graders and 6th adults, he shoots 19th, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th graders, where even one of the Sandy Hook teachers is recycled for the event.
	The story.
	A gun maker and gun shop were listed as defendants in a massive $27 billion class action lawsuit set to be filed on behalf of parents of victims slain in the Robb Elementary School mass shooting in Uvalde.
	The actual number of those who were killed I'd take to be zero.
	Announced Sunday, the families represented by the law office Bonner & Bonner wants to hold a litany of defendants liable for the shooting that is alleged to have claimed the lives of 19 children and two school staffers, one of whom had previously died at Sandy Hook, including several city, state, and federal law enforcement agencies that failed to stop the gunman, Salvador Ramos, back in May.
	According to San Antonio ABC affiliate, the lawsuit was robbed by school police, former school district chief Aaron Dondo, who's just been fired, Uvalde City Police, Uvalde County Sheriff, Texas Ranger, Department of Public Safety, and Border Patrol defendants.
	Gun manufacturer Daniel Defense, which made the gun used during the shooting, and Oasis Outback Gun Store, which legally sold Ramos the gun he used, are also listed as defendants.
	There will be some institutional defendants as well, such as the school board or city council of the city of Baltay.
	He claimed the lawsuit was being filed to serve the community.
	Right.
	Are they going to give that $27 billion to the community?
	What we do is to help and to file a $27 billion civil rights suit under our United States Constitution, one of a kind in the whole world.
	The lawyer argued law enforcement ignored the Constitution Fourth Amendment by depriving people of life.
	This is some stretch.
	People have a right to life under the 14th.
	What we've seen here is the law enforcement has shown a deliberate conscious disregard of life.
	Bonner said the nearly $30 billion price tag will ensure what happened in Uvalde where police were caught on camera hesitating for an hour to confront the shooter never happens again.
	Everyone is hurting and bleeding over what happened in Uvalde.
	It's up to us to make sure it doesn't happen again.
	He did not elaborate on how the gun store, which followed all the protocols in selling the firearm, or the gun maker, had any responsibility in the shooting.
	Daily Caller reports Daniel Defense and Oasis Outback did not respond to requests for comment.
	Border Patrol and City of Uvalde would not comment on pending legislation.
	Lawyers said they'll file suit in September after the DOJ concludes its investigation targeting Daniel defenses reminiscent of wrongful death suit filed by Sandy Hook parents against Remington in 2014 that resulted in a landmark $73 million settlement to nine victim families seven years later.
	The suit comes that gun control group Uvalde Strong for Gun Safety demanded Oasis Outback stop selling assault rifles and ammunition or face protest.
	I embedded two reports that Brian and I have done, which you can find on my blog at jameshfetzer.org.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, Brian is right, is that you will discover the truth and we will guide you through it.
	And part of the confidence that we have in making these promises is that when you look with your own two eyes and get your hands on this material, things do jump out at you.
	And with a little bit of practice, you get pretty good.
	Good at it, and when you network with a bunch of people like that, you get a pretty good grasp.
	You get sufficient evidence for action.
	So, this $27 billion, huh?
	This emperor's new clothes ridiculousness.
	This follows with the $73 million judgment against Remington, where the Remington CEO apparently just rolled over and he had an opportunity, like Alex Jones had, like Jim Fetzer is taking the opportunity, To call out the obvious that the facts behind this are ridiculous and everybody should stop right here, right now, because the facts don't support the premise of the case that this attack even happened.
	And I don't know why Remington rolled over.
	Maybe an FBI agent threatened his 29-year-old daughter with a fatal car accident.
	I don't know, but it would be typical and consistent with their operations.
	So even if you believe the official story, which you can't believe anything of the official story, the gun was legally sold and there's no argument against the gun manufacturer.
	So what we are seeing is just this totalitarian, mindless push to, we had earlier with the Fourth Amendment destruction, just to go ahead and raid your political opponents.
	We talked about Zelensky has already done that.
	He's already removed the political opponents and the stations and the media.
	In Ukraine, and in Amrev 1.0, the destruction of Fourth Amendment rights what was codified in the Fourth Amendment was part of the major argument for independence, but the war went hot when our own government went after our guns in Amrev 1.0.
	So, we are taking step by step towards this endgame.
	Something is going to break, and I'm with you guys, is that this is a paradox where, you know, I am at 95% confidence that this is the show from the White Hats, and at the same time, I am fully prepared and doing everything that I can For this worst case scenario, because in the fog of war, anything that the white hats can do, next generation black hats can do also.
	Brian, your thoughts?
	Well, I'm here on your channel because I believe that there is a phenomenon here in America called the false flag.
	I've been studying these going back to Orlando.
	That's where I started.
	That's where I cut my teeth on the Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting.
	Of course, after that, we had Las Vegas.
	We had Sutherland Springs.
	We had Santa Fe, Texas.
	So Texas has been home to quite a few events that are in question.
	If you can find it, go to 153.news.net and go to, I mean, this is if you're looking for evidence that it's real, and find some of Robert Masry's work, who went by, well, he was Sidethorn and Conspiracy Granny on Sutherland Springs.
	If you want to believe that they happened, just take a look at the building.
	At that particular one, they said that there was 14 30-round magazines that were cycled through in less than a couple minutes inside the church, yet there were no bullet holes at all.
	So, the question on the issue of false flags comes down to what are you willing to accept as evidence?
	At what point will your mind concede?
	That the event did not take place, and therefore you have to change your mind about the information that you currently have.
	I don't know where that breaking point is.
	For me, it took three or four or five months, which shows you how hard-headed I can be when it gets to a certain issue, but it took three or four or five months for the truth of what happened in Orlando
	To finally dawn on me, and when it did, it was because I finally consented that the entire media apparatus was corrupt, that I was being lied to from early childhood all the way up until now, when I finally said, forget it, and I cleared it all out and said, I'm going to relearn everything from scratch.
	It took me a while to rebuild my head after that, but that's the process that you have to go through to understand a false flag.
	I can tell you on Uvalde, You've got to believe that these cops went into that school at 11 35 and didn't take out the shooter until some 70 minutes later.
	I'm pulling these numbers off the top of my head because I didn't review all my files, but they did not enter that room where he was holed up with all these kids.
	For that long.
	And they didn't clear the place out until 56 minutes after everything started.
	You've got to believe that.
	If you believe that good cops in the face of a gun would not enter that room under those circumstances, then I guess you're welcome to believe Yuvaldi.
	If you take a look at the totality of what's there, there's too many problems that haven't bothered being explained.
	And if you'll notice, Once they dealt with it, they pretty much cycled it out of the news.
	They keep bringing it back up again here a little bit here and a little bit there with this lawsuit.
	And just think about the absolute stupidity of the lawsuit.
	That's like saying that Ford Motor Company is responsible for the woman I killed.
	In my car because they manufactured the car while I was driving.
	It's just it's it's total insanity what they ask you to believe.
	But in order for you to even have a mindset that allows you to evaluate you have to allow for the idea.
	That they lied to you on such a massive scale and they reinforce it by continuing to propagandize you, continuing to shape your mind and twist you and train you and make you believe it with just pure mass propaganda.
	I've broken through it.
	I don't see it anymore.
	They don't have any power over my mind anymore, and I guess that makes me a threat.
	And sooner or later, they'll probably come after me like they've come after you, and they've come after Wolfgang, and they went after Robert Masry, and they went after everybody else who played the game, even for a few minutes, Alex Jones and others.
	Guys, you have to understand that I am here not for me.
	I sleep like a baby.
	I'm here for you.
	And I'm here for your kids, so that y'all can learn to think and y'all can break through these issues on your own, so you'll realize what they're doing to you.
	That's all I'm gonna say.
	And you're doing a great job of it, Brian.
	I'm just so proud to have you here.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
	Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
	My petition is on the docket of the Supreme Court.
	While I originally believed it was a First and Second Amendment case, the summary judgment protocols in Wisconsin allow the judge to decide whether or not my facts were reasonable and exclude them if, in his objective opinion, they were not.
	As you will see from my petition, which you can download to your own desktop from the Supreme Court's docket, the Court of Appeals, Fourth District, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed.
	In other states, such as Texas, however, the case against me would have been tossed or sent to a jury for determination of the disputed facts.
	But in Wisconsin, the court could in effect determine the facts, regardless of my evidence.
	It turns out this is a national problem, and I'm teeing up the case for SCOTUS to make summary judgment protocols uniform throughout the nation.
	I believe they are going to do just that and set things right.
	Check out more, givesandgo.com, Funding Fetzer.
	Givesandgo.com, Funding Fetzer.
	Final thoughts.
	Carl, yours.
	One of my mentors was Buckminster Fuller.
	And I was friends with him the last three years of his life from 1980 to 1983.
	And I read many of his books.
	And one of the things that struck me about Bucky is that he was a breakthrough engineer and designer.
	And he got to a point where he recognized that his ideas were not marketable.
	That when he challenged existing power structures, he wouldn't get any of his ideas through.
	And he became suicidal, and he had a chat with what he said was God, and he decided that he would just go ahead and throw his life away.
	But, since he was going to throw his life away anyway in suicide, he thought he would throw it away under the question of what can one person do?
	And he said that he needed to stop talking, I believe he said, for two months.
	He just had to stop Talking because he recognized so much of what he said was bullshit of what he heard from others and what he read and what was accepted conversation in society.
	And that experiment for Buckminster Fuller went on for the rest of his life, almost 60 years.
	So for me, the driving passion is as I am an educator, but an educator is just a student.
	I want to know what's going on.
	I want to know what these things are and what jumps out of you.
	Out at you soon enough if you push and for me it was pushing for service for working with the being one of the approximately 100 leaders with the Citizens Lobby Group results working for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty that when I discovered for myself that our leaders wanted poverty they weren't going to end it they reneged on every promise public and private.
	That it is a lie.
	And then, once you look at one lie, you look at other lies, and it's all a lie.
	All a lie.
	There isn't anything that I have any confidence that we're told the truth about that makes any difference whatsoever.
	So, with that, again, in the land of paradox, I encourage our audience, I appreciate your intellectual integrity and moral courage, and that's the only alternative.
	What are you going to do?
	Surrender to these psychopaths, these slimy, hair-sniffing, child-groping, people-defending, a demented character actor as a president?
	There's no option other than to stand for the truth, and we'll see where that road takes us.
	Brian, your final thoughts?
	Oh, the deeper I dug, the deeper the hole got, and There came a point when I began realizing that that old theology education that I had had 30 years ago was beginning to solidify in my mind as to what was really going on, and I took a fresh look at all that information.
	You know, from a philosophical perspective, Socrates was considered to be the wisest philosopher ever to have lived, and yet he claimed to know nothing.
	It was all questions.
	It was all learning.
	It was all trying to make sure that something was true.
	I just finished up with Dr. Fetzer's logic course.
	It was tremendously helpful in helping me parse the information that I was bringing in.
	I thought that was great.
	We've got the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference coming up.
	I've just finished a pretty in-depth study of Freemasonry, going back quite a ways.
	And now I'm moving into stuff that goes all the way back, Solomon and Moloch and I mean, way back, old, old biblical time and rituals and that sort of stuff that I'm trying to incorporate and understand because what I'm trying to do is figure out why a false flag is effective and what is their goal.
	What is going on?
	I literally believe there's some sort of Ritual and some sort of value and reward that these people get from just being able to run one of these rituals and deceive people.
	I haven't gotten to the bottom of it yet, so if you're out there and you've got some good information for me, go ahead and put it in the comments down below.
	But I'm trying to put together the connection and figure out why they are so dedicated to deceiving us What is it that they get from it?
	What is the gain that they get from it?
	And to me, it's a pretty challenging question, and it's probably one that I could dedicate the rest of my life to, but I'll tell you that there are more important things, and that's you.
	You're more important than what I understand or what I know, so I just want to give the information that I get to you in hopes that you too will turn around and come and see it the way and become a member of our army.
	I'm just so glad to have Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and Brian Davidson from Houston, Texas as colleagues and collaborators on these shows for you.
	Most of these events that are staged are intended to manipulate public opinion.
	By committing acts of fake terrorism, but coming across as terrorism to instill fear into the target population and make us more amenable to manipulation and promote a political agenda, which by and large, since the Obama administration, has been dedicated to gun control.
	They want to take our guns away from us.
	Some of them are completely absurd, and even the court cases have not reflected how clearly they are indefensible.
	For example, in Sandy Hook, Wayne Carver, the medical examiner, said the parents were never put in contact with the children, but were identified on the basis of photographs.
	As I've observed, that was appropriate, because the children basically only existed in the forms of photographs.
	And yet, Neil Hesselin, who brought a lawsuit against Alex Jones, insisted he held his son, Jesse, in his arms as he died.
	What they're saying cannot both be true.
	Neil Hasslin is contradicting Wayne Carver.
	But what they are saying can both be false.
	And the fact is, I sought to intervene in all three of the Alex Jones cases to point out that there's been no judicial determination whether anybody died at Sandy Hook.
	And, believe it or not, I was opposed by both sides.
	Not just the Sandy Hook parents, which was unsurprising.
	They're making money hand over fist over this fraud, but also by the Alex Jones Defense Council.
	I was taken aback.
	They've gone and grown now and number an amount of money that $27 billion is mind-boggling.
	It's completely absurd and indefensible.
	There's no way around it.
	And they want us to swallow complete hokum.
	For example, One parent claimed she could only identify her daughter based on the green Converse sneakers she was wearing, and they showed a pair of green Converse sneakers that had just come out of a box.
	The laces had never been tied, feet had never been in the shoes.
	They had his speck of blood.
	It was all phony as could be, and then Matthew McConaughey, who claims to be from Uvalde, came down to lend his moral support, and he brought along his wife, and guess what she was wearing?
	Green Converse sneakers.
	I'm telling you, the promotion of product placement here is just stunning, and it hits you right like a bullet between the eyes.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	This bullshit has gone far beyond the realm of rationality.
	It's total propaganda, political theater.
	They're just trying to see how dumb you are.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Join us.
	Visit my blog.
	Learn all you can about false flags.
	Download the law enforcement false flag scripted event checklist that Brian and I put together.
	Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends, your loved ones, because between Ukraine, the Vax, and other nonsense, we do not know how much time we have left.

▲