All Episodes
Previous Next
July 1, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:25:21
Need to Know News (30 June 2022) with Carl Herman and Principled Vegan
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and my favorite principled organic vegan from an undisclosed location somewhere also on the West Coast.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with Deafening drumbeats for war.
Biden sends more troops to the Ukrainian border.
101st Airborne has been deployed.
Six destroyers to the Mediterranean.
They have 35 squadrons to the UK.
This is very, very bad.
First, the U.S.
is moving troops from the 101st Airborne Screaming Eagles into NATO-allied countries on the western border of Ukraine.
First, deployment from Fort Campbell, Kentucky, to Europe in 80 years.
Second, he's announced six U.S.
Navy Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are being moved to the Mediterranean to provide air defense missions and the ability to launch cruise missiles well inland into Russia.
Gee, I wonder if the Russians are even going to notice.
Third, Biden's sending two additional F-35 squadrons to the UK to station additional air defense and other capabilities in Germany and in Italy.
This is not a defensive posture, but an offensive buildup of U.S.
troops across the broad western border of Ukraine in a positioning of advanced first strike elements in proximity to Russia.
By the way, under international law, if a nation expects an imminent attack, it is entitled to attack first with a preemptive strike.
It seems to me NATO is setting itself up for a preemptive strike.
I know it sounds outlandish, but the World Economic Forum that influence and manipulate geopolitical politics are the driving force for the war with Russia.
Their holy grail of climate change and the massive shift in global economic policy that comes with executing the climate change agenda is so consequential that such a massive move is needed.
More specifically, we know already there will be a global food shortage, As a result of the new world order energy policies that undermine the Build Back Better agenda.
We do not know the extent of the food deficit, but it is going to be serious.
We also know majority voices, including of the U.S.
within the NATO alliance, have decided it's more important to follow the climate change policy than it is to food people.
UK and Germany propose trying to avoid further conflict by generating more food.
The US and Canada, however, have blocked the effort, saying maintaining the shift toward new Western energy development is more important.
I cannot emphasize this enough.
If you do not accept the scale, scope, and severity of the collective West's entrenched commitment to climate change, you will be caught off guard, not begin to appreciate what's coming, NATO and the West, led by Biden, have placed oil and gas sanctions against Russia.
The U.S.-led Russian energy sanction follows similar already in place in oil and gas for Iran and Venezuela.
Simultaneously, the G7 will not allow Africa to develop its own natural gas to produce fertilizer to increase yield and harvest.
Controlling food production in Africa by controlling the energy company investment needed to manufacture fertilizer.
Again, as with biofuels, the G7 and West are prioritizing climate change, which will ultimately cause food shortages and famine.
Within this dynamic, the West has an ideological problem.
Sooner or later, the issue will surface with massive interest.
People around the world will figure it out.
The absence of food will change things.
People in all parts of the world will get angry once they realize it's being caused by Western governments prioritizing climate change over people.
Things will get intense.
Things will get ugly.
The Western leaders need a scapegoat, a way to focus the world's anger away from them and onto something else.
They're trying to pin it all on Vladimir Putin, who is, according to John Kirby, weaponizing food.
Let's just call it what it is.
He's weaponizing food.
He's got an essential blockade there in the Black Sea that nothing can leave by sea.
And that's, of course, how Ukraine has historically got its brain to market.
Not coincidental, Kirby was moved from Pentagon to the NSC Strategic Communications at the White House related to what's going on here.
Notice too, the looming shortage is being blamed on Russia.
The collective world leaders positioned by NATO talking points are going to justify war against Russia to stop the global food crisis from worsening.
They will claim it's Vladimir Putin who's disrupted world energy production.
Which is about as absurd as it gets, since Russia prepared to sell its energy all over the world and was doing so very successfully with Europe until they imposed the sanctions.
NATO and the West will claim Putin the reason why food fertilizer is in short supply, that the war in Ukraine is a source of a global energy, food, and economic crisis.
The war against Russia will be justified as a war to stop Putin from creating mass starvation.
If you can't see how this narrative is being constructed, I cannot lay it out more clearly.
A NATO and Western alliance war with Russia is not a matter of if, it is now a matter of when.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wars and rumors of wars.
So this is all propaganda to cover the attempted color revolutionizing of Ukraine that began in 14 and 16 and then killed about 14,000 in Donbass when that region refused to be another puppet of NATO in the US and the UK.
This is also covering the Great Reset and they have to do this because when we see this escalating aggregate debt curve, this exponential growth is unsustainable, so they need to have something crash and then blame it for the Great Reset and then Attempt to have everyone own nothing, wash for body parts and to be happy.
And they're also, this is a war against we the people.
It is an attempt to cull and then genetically modify who's left as a workforce.
So they're attacking food supply lines and production at all stages.
And the scapegoat is going to be Putin.
So it's Putin's price hike Putin's food shortage.
And according to Boris Johnson, it's all also because of Putin's toxic masculinity.
And then, you know, maybe he's going to lobby for some sort of sex hormone drugs next for Putin to kind of advance multiple agendas at once.
But of course, Putin can't be responsible for the destruction of 65 to 100 food processing plants right here in the United States.
That's ludicrous.
Vegan, your thoughts?
Well, I'm glad I'm a vegan, and I'm not for Bill Gates, not that kind of vegan, just so we're clear here, because I know that he wants to do the genetically modified meat and whatnot, lab-grown meat.
Don't want to sound like a hippie, but I think that people should be growing fruits and vegetables if they have any land.
Backyard, they have those hydroponics they could put in their homes.
Have something on the side.
Don't depend on the grocery stores.
Regarding the gender-affirming hormones, Carl, with the toxic masculinity.
Well, I feel that whether or not you take hormones, you are who you are.
So, um, I don't feel that that's going to work.
Like if you're a dishonest person and you're like aggressive, you're still going to be dishonest and aggressive.
I do know someone who is taking these, uh, what are they?
Um, estrogen supplements.
And, um, I'm very disturbed.
We've had some arguments, um, I told him it's not going to change anything in his life.
And he was promoting this.
There's a trans model, Montoya, Queen Montoya.
And, well, this person is going through the Dodger Stadium getting the vaccine and then talking about the new normal.
So why am I bringing this up?
You're using trans people for this agenda!
I told my friend that!
I don't know if he could see it, but it's very alarming to me.
I don't care if you love someone of the same sex.
The opposite sex.
I mean, we've been dealing with that for years.
But when we're pushing it, that's... we have to open our eyes.
When you push anything, one has to open their eyes.
So...
It's an absolute agenda.
I was wondering where the climate change was coming into play, like what would be the end result, and you've just presented it.
I learned about global warming in Catholic school back in the 80s, and I do believe in it, but not the way that these people are twisting it.
I'd never heard of the World Economic Forum before this scandemic, and I would like the whole organization to be shut down.
Thank you.
Oh yeah, I couldn't agree more.
Yeah, the trancing is being repudiated by the American people.
No one other than the weirdos really are into it.
Meanwhile, if we're confronting a military challenge, get this.
Army drops high school diploma requirement as military faces unprecedented challenges under Biden.
We can't get enough people into the military.
After completely bending the knee to woke ideology, gutting itself with unconstitutional mandates that force an experimental and dangerous vaccine upon members, the U.S.
military has now taken the hacksaw to standards used to find and train new recruits.
In addition to lowering almost every physical qualification, they've now dropped the requirement to have a high school diploma or GED in a desperate effort to attract new blood—really, it's just any blood—into the ranks.
To be eligible, new recruits simply have to have a score of 50 on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, And be 18 or older.
And, of course, still breathing.
The Army explained in an announcement Thursday.
Officials for the service blamed a lack of ability and desire among young Americans for the recruiting struggles.
But, of course, they see what's happened to the military.
They see it's being gutted.
They see the VAX mandate is being forced upon them.
Or you're being mustered out.
As of now, the Army has reached only 40% of its recruitment goal for the fiscal year.
This is on a par with the other branches.
According to one military official, the situation has reached crisis levels.
This recruiting crisis is like a slow-moving wave.
As the military has become smaller and the public is less and less familiar with those in uniform, it has grown and COVID accelerated it.
In addition to relaxed educational requirements, the Army has removed restrictions on placement size and number of tattoos, as well as enhanced benefits and perks for new recruits.
But little has worked so far.
Unbelievably, The struggle to find new recruits is so bad, previous recruiting goals have been revised downward, yet the Army is still a full 60% away from its 2022 goal with just three months to go.
The Army and sister services scrambled this year, increasingly generous benefits and policy tweaks, Hit 40% while struggling to fill the ranks.
It's so grim, the Department of Defense has reduced its total force size because the prior recruiting goals were out of reach.
As the military brass those standards out the window, is it wonder Americans aren't clamoring to join the service?
Military preparedness now means having proper training on building a safe space for gender-sensitive ideology to the course.
Always using the proper pronouns.
Just take a look at the Navy's latest training video for its sailors.
Sadly, it's not a joke.
With Biden as commander-in-chief, it's happening across the board.
Here's a further observation.
The U.S.
Navy released a children's show-style instructional video to train sailors on proper gender pronouns and creating a safe space.
In honor of Pride Month, the Navy released a new training video for sailors teaching them to use proper gender pronouns to create a safe space for everybody.
The ridiculous video which looks like it was clipped from a children's TV show features two rainbow-clad hoes.
I mean, this is bad.
Carl, your thoughts?
People are recognizing that the military is not defending America, and the definition of America is our Constitution.
So people are recognizing the military is not defending inalienable rights over the Constitution.
That is worth standing for, fighting for, and dying for.
But we have a rogue state empire.
Instead, Carl B. Herman, Blogspot, any of these shows, the documentary series U.S.
Illegal will walk you through that the U.S., all they ever do Is they virtue signal for freedom and then they come up with some lie and invade resource rich territory to control those resources, both the natural resources and the.
Human resources.
So until we get this breakthrough, it's just a weakening of America on all fronts.
It is embarrassing.
And yet, again, with the paradox, is that this disclosure to us, to the Americans, to be able to see what we were really dealing with, and it's around the world, that whatever our opponent is, it has infiltrated everything.
And that we really are dependent upon friends in high places, or so it would seem, for some sort of a breakthrough.
Because after 45 years of civic activism, my experience is that no matter how powerful, how factual, how charming the messengers are, it just has not been enough yet.
Well, as a former Marine Corps officer who used to supervise 15 DIs and 300 recruits going through basic training, I gotta say, this new woke military is a total absurdity.
It will never make its recruitment goals when you paint the tanks pink and have everyone wear tutus.
I'm telling you, it's insulting and embarrassing, and it's not going to attract anyone who's willing to learn to fight and die to kill for their country.
This is a Travesty beyond words.
Vegan.
Well, vegan says it all.
I don't like violence.
Unfortunately, we've had wars and some of them have worked.
I don't think dancing in a tutu is going to work.
I don't know, maybe it will.
But no, seriously, those pronouns.
Look, if you want to be called something and you're going to get angry at something else, then fine, I'll just call you what you want.
But these pronouns, to me, are very silly.
I would rather not have pronouns anymore.
I don't want to learn about pronouns.
I don't want to see pronouns next to somebody's name.
That's how I feel.
I went to Catholic school.
We used to diagram our sentences.
The nuns were very specific on the first person, second person, third person, but I don't want to see another pronoun.
Not as it stands.
I wanted to go back to the trans movement here.
You know, I actually interned with RuPaul back in the day.
You wouldn't call him, though, a transgender because he just did drag.
As far as I know, he's perfectly fine with being a man, and in fact, he said that it took three hours for him to get all made up.
So he didn't get made up.
It was on the radio.
Why am I bringing this up?
Because again, I just feel we've gone to this other level where you need to, like, transform into the feeling that you feel, and it's not even healthy for people's bodies.
I mean, if you're in the military, you want to be in tip-top shape.
If you are taking hormones, and I'm not saying that they're allowed, I don't know that, but that's like a drug.
And it's easy to get addicted to anything, and they can cause cancer and other things.
So why are we allowing the public, especially children, to do this?
I mean, has this country and some other countries gone mad?
I don't understand.
You know, I kind of think it started with people that They got so overweight and were afraid to say anything because you don't want to fat shame anyone.
I get it.
We don't want to hurt people's feelings.
But in the meantime, this country specifically has really done a number on the health of the general population.
When you see all the soda and the burgers and the Cheetos and things like that.
I mean, there's not many people left that actually have a good fit form.
It's the truth.
They eat the sad American diet.
Sad.
Standard American diet.
So I just feel that we're just... This was only natural.
You know, this health thing.
And then this movement thing.
Last note, Todd Callender, he's an attorney.
He's worked with America's Frontline Doctors, and I know that he was fighting over the Department of Defense with these vaccine mandates.
Now, I don't know how far that's gone.
But as far as I know, that is one attorney who's standing up to this and there are soldiers that they're leaving the military because they don't want to be injected.
And Dr. James, you are completely right.
We are becoming weaker, and the military should be doing something.
And they're not.
They're only doing orders.
They should be critical thinkers.
And Carl, you're right about the messengers.
There's only so much that you can do.
I am so tired of calling my public officials, making public comments.
This takes a long time.
There is a vaccine bill.
First it was for 12 year olds, now they upped it to 15.
That they could get a vaccine without a parent's consent.
This has been going on for a month!
It's like, why can't people see through this?
And why are there only just like a few sprinklers of people that are doing anything?
I just want to wipe my hands clean and I want to go back to the basics.
Can we go back to the basics?
Thank you.
Devoutly to be wished.
We have essentially castrated our military.
It's not going to be worth a damn.
Meanwhile, L.A.
Times reports eight bombshells from Hutchinson all turned out to be duds.
The establishment treated the testimony of former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson as if it were damning for Trump before her claims began falling apart.
The L.A.
Times, including Fox, set aside basic rules of journalism, accepting as fact the surprising claims made by a witness whose testimony was based entirely on hearsay and it was never a subject of cross-examination.
Indeed, beneath the report it said, first-hand, when none of it was first-hand.
The Times published a list of eight bombshells, some soon debunked, others remaining dubious, some repetitions of common knowledge or things other witnesses had reported before.
Namely, several Trump aides knew the risk of violence before January 6, as did the President himself, which is why he approved the use of 20,000 National Guard troops to see the Capitol on January 4.
But then it was rejected by Pelosi, Schermer, and the mayor of Washington, D.C.
Trump knew January 6th rally attendees had weapons.
They were not AR-15 rifles, but a variety of implements, flagpoles, shield pampers for anyone could see on television.
No weapons were Found on any of those who entered the Capitol.
White House counsel raised concern about Trump's speech.
Already known for prior testimony, completely unremarkable, Trump wanted to go to the Capitol on January 6th.
The Times admit Trump already said himself he wanted to lead protesters in a peaceful march, but former Chief of Staff Meadows said that was only metaphorical.
Trump lunged for a limousine steering wheel.
The accusation has been refuted already by the two witnesses, Hutchison stated, the Secret Service has said it's prepared to deny this unlikely claim under oath.
Trump didn't want to take action to stop the riot.
Trump's reluctance to act, his delays once rioters, has been a subject of criticism since January 6th, not new information, but actually spoke out telling his people to go home, to be peaceful, To act in accordance with the law.
Trump threw his lunch at the wall after reading a William Barr story.
It's one of several Hutcheson made-makes purely on hearsay.
Trump has himself denied.
He said that was just ridiculous.
And frankly, he's far more credible than she.
And he was actually there when she was not.
Trump and Meadows want to include pardon language in his speech.
If true, it would be unremarkable given the overzealous investigation of those linked to Trump.
It would be reasonable even for the innocent to seek pardons.
Meanwhile, the January 6th panel hasn't sought a rebuttal of Hutchison's testimony.
Overhearing?
They aren't welcome.
They haven't reached out to the secret service who are challenging Signing a source from James Rosen, the Secret Service agent who were present with then-President Trump on January 6th in the motorcade that would be dubbed the beast as a presidential.
He actually was in the SUV already and eager to speak with a House panel.
No representative, however, has reached out to the Secret Service.
According to January 6th, lack of outreach is notable because the Secret Service has said that January 6th investigators can access any documents or witnesses they deem relevant.
She said he was in the beast, which is shown here, but actually he was in an SUV.
One more indication, she was totally unreliable, talking off the top of her head.
She wasn't a first-person witness to anything to which she testified.
Carl, your thoughts?
So the LA Times, to call that a bombshell, that's the same word that they chose for the factless Russiagate that's now proven as paid propaganda and for the crimeless impeachment.
It's a tragic comic.
So, this woman gave testimony of hearsay.
So and the committee decided not to interview the people who are actually present to check the testimony of the hearsay.
So this is as far away from reality as you can possibly get.
And, you know, it's just a fair test for the American public and the world to be able to discern for themselves that what we're getting From this January 6th committee is just pure smear propaganda of the lowest factual correlation to anybody who would be what they would do to find out what happened if they cared about what happened.
And really what happened on January 6th is that this was a false flag to stop the presentation of evidence from the Republicans to demonstrate election fraud in 2020.
And the ratings have just fallen like lead, and NBC even cut to a golf match because they were so bad.
The American people have long since figured out that this is a Soviet-style show trial with no contrary witnesses, no one defending the president, no one is taking it seriously, and they care about other matters like inflation and food shortages and the immigration prices and rising crime and they care about other matters like inflation and food shortages and the immigration prices and rising crime rates, all fostered by the Democrats overwhelmingly more Vegan.
Well, I had an elder family member who was starting to take the bait, but she didn't like Hutchinson's demeanor, and I thought that she looked a little bit uppity as well with her testimony.
She's like, just too much like, oh, She's just so... How can I explain this?
It just doesn't seem real.
Just like so many of these false flags that you, Dr. James, have introduced us to.
And I hope to talk about that, Uvalde.
I know you did it already, but... Boy, what I saw there, having been an actor, I can absolutely see that they were not method trained.
So, it's a shame, um...
What's happening to this country?
I don't think any of us have ever experienced anything like this.
And on January the 6th, I was outside the LA City Hall and I do believe that there were people from the CCP there.
They were taking pictures.
They came to me very closely.
So I believe we're in operation with Not only the Soviet Union, former Soviet Union, but the CCP, and you know more than me, but it was suspicious over there as well.
And it was scary.
There was some violence going on over there.
And I'm pretty sure it was Antifa attacking the people that were standing up for election integrity.
I was hands off.
Oh, I think you're absolutely right.
And her testimony reminded me of the bizarre accounts of the women at the Kavanaugh confirmation claiming he'd participated in a gang rape and the like.
I mean, it was ludicrous.
She was on that order and had no greater credibility than did they.
Outrageous.
And yet the Democrats indulge it time after time.
The Democrats indulge it.
Here we have now Jackson to be sworn in as Breyer retires.
Nearly three months after she won confirmation, Katania Brown Jackson is officially becoming a justice.
51 years of age, she'll be sworn in on Thursday.
That would be today, just as the man she's replacing, Justice Stephen Breyer, retires.
The judicial pay-to-do is to take place at noon, so it's already occurred.
His retirement will take effect after nearly 28 years on the bench.
The court is expected to issue its final opinions today, and several of them have been very significant, including reining in the EPA and its ability to regulate climate change—a very good decision—and support Alaska in Trump's Remain-in-Mexico asylum program, both of which have been released.
In ceremony, the court said it would stream live.
Jackson will recite two oaths, one administered by Breyer and the other by the Chief Justice.
She, a federal judge in 2013, will be the first black woman to serve as a justice, will join three women, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Amy Coney Barrett, the first time four women have served together on the nine-member court.
The Senate confirmed her by 53 to 47, mostly party-line vote.
But with support from three Republicans, she's been in a sort of judicial limbo, remaining a judge on the federal appellate court in D.C., but not hearing any cases.
She'll be able to begin work immediately, but the court will have already finished the bulk of its work until the fall, apart from emergency appeals that occasionally emerge.
Meanwhile, the justices handed down a major 6-3 decision protecting the First Amendment.
This was very, very interesting.
This one restored a football coach's religious liberty.
The Supreme Court handed a big win to a former Washington High School football coach who lost his job because he recited a prayer on the 50-yard line after the games.
At issue was whether a public school employee praying alone but in view of students was engaging in unprotected government speech, and if it's not government speech, does it pose a problem under the First Amendment?
The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision the answer to both questions is no.
Joe Kennedy was fired from his job after preying on games.
School administrators in Washington need to learn a bit about the First Amendment.
Unwilling to let the government jeopardize his rights, he took the issue all the way to the Supreme Court.
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote his act of engaging in a brief, quiet, personal religious observance by praying on the field was doubly protected by the First Amendment.
He means by that freedom of religion and freedom of speech.
He also wrote the local government had discriminated against the coach, assuming his job was to ferret out and suppress religious expression.
There's a massive win for every American who cares about their First Amendment rights.
He was wrongfully deprived of his job for simply praying.
That cannot happen in the United States.
At least, it cannot occur and be constitutional.
The coach wasn't forcing his players to pray or subjecting others.
It's hard not to assume the school board simply wanted to erase any visible religious actions in public and discourage teachers.
So, by ruling six to three in favor of a football coach, they decided that Washington School Board had violated his First Amendment rights.
I think that's a very nice decision, though I'm not a religious person myself and only extremely and frequently engaged in prayer.
Carl?
Well, for Brown Jackson, first of all, this is a woman who is being appointed as a script reading puppet.
She has been a federal judge, a judge of any type, for nine years only.
So, and my dog is very upset about her being called by this expert as well.
We know what you're saying, Carl.
So the First Amendment case, that is great.
So this is a case where the court ruled appropriately that a private religious expression after a football game would be protected speech.
He is not acting as a government agent promoting prayer.
And as well, the, the freedom that he has to his own religion is also appropriate and I thought that quote that it's not the school district's job to ferret out religious expression and then to attack it.
And as a high school teacher.
Now retired, people need to know that the head coach of the football team has the most time-consuming job of any of the sports.
And these people are paid just a modest stipend, where if you count up the coach's hours, he is giving a gift of love to be a head football coach.
He's getting paid maybe a dollar an hour.
The heat of going through that is just ridiculous.
At Hayward High School, where I taught, our head football coach resigned in protest over the attacks that he had of students so-called testing positive not being able to practice and play when they were asymptomatic.
So it's just a horrible condition.
And I'm glad that he stood up and we got a win in the column for the good guys, finally.
This is the kind of action that's so petty.
It's just embarrassing that the school board took this action against him.
And I think it's very appropriate the court spoke up in his defense.
I definitely feel that teachers are targeted, especially in these past two years.
I see nothing wrong with prayer being, it's not just religious.
Anybody can pray.
It's just energy.
And if you want to say that we don't have energy, then you might as well not believe that Einstein existed.
So I'm glad that he won.
I hope that does something for us.
I mentioned prayer a couple times in classes, and I told them it doesn't have to be religious, and then I skirt, you know, right on.
Because they do mindfulness exercises, right?
And I don't like calling them meditations per se, because that can get some people upset as well.
So it's like, okay, but sometimes you do call it meditation.
Then why can't you say prayer?
I mean, there's different things that one can do.
I'm not too much into football, but I'm not into it at all.
But I guess I have nothing more to say on that except The teachers have been targeted, and I don't like it.
Teachers need to speak out for the First Amendment.
I've been trying to do that for the past almost a year.
Actually, let's say two years, but at least a year for something that happened to me that I believe was a First Amendment right.
But the attorneys, they don't want to really help too much about the First Amendment.
I guess they don't know what to do.
They're always talking about religious freedom, which is in the First Amendment, but not about the speech.
And if you're not saying anything wrong and you are Punished for that, then someone should step up for the teachers.
Because we're educating.
That's why we were hired.
And it just makes no sense to me.
And it makes me feel like I want to jump back from it too.
Carl, I'm vested and I'm like wondering what, you know, what's going to happen for me.
Because I was on the radio for a long time, the Jersey Shore.
And I used to talk about different issues and whatnot, usually over dance music, and it's just very difficult for me to feel like I'm walking on glass when I shouldn't.
Obviously, there's professionalism and a time and place, but I think that the students should know what's going on with this whole scandemic, planned pandemic, which isn't even a pandemic.
It's a planned epidemic.
But nobody will talk about this.
And I think that that's unreasonable and it's an injustice.
And unfortunately, a lot of them have been brainwashed.
Although I had one student was debating with another saying that the masks were bad.
I didn't say anything, but I was happy in my mind.
Oh yeah, the masks are just horrible.
I can't believe that anyone would advocate wearing them.
Meanwhile, check this out.
New from Mattel, Barbie's boyfriend is getting a much needed and way more inclusive makeover.
Introducing... His belly lets you know he's pregnant, and his beard lets you know he's a man!
Because men can get pregnant just like women.
In fact, there's no definition of women.
We literally have no idea what a woman is.
Pregnant Ken does all the normal things every birthing person does.
Like chest feed, then hide his breasts with chest binders.
He rocks baby to sleep with his supple masculine arms.
And Ken, being a man and therefore a good driver, can even put baby in the back of the car for a fun drive around town!
But not everyone in Barbie World is as open-minded as Ken.
Men can't get pregnant?
Hey, wait a minute!
You're just a woman on hormones!
Shut up, bigot!
Tell your birthing people to buy you a pregnant Ken today, because why should women be the only ones who can experience the miracle of getting an abortion?
My body, my choice!
Available in the non-gender-specific toy aisle at Target, adjacent to the Chess Windows for Kids.
Not legal for sale in Florida, Texas, or South Carolina.
I gotta ask your reaction to that.
I mean, tell me, Carl!
I think lampooning things and humor is appropriate to do.
And the bottom line, away from all the funny stuff, is Baphomet, B-A-P-H-O-M-E-T, is really looked up to as a deity among the Satanists.
And the idea of Satanism, which is all I can do to best factually describe the leadership of our Opponents, and I recommend Jim's work for Pizzagate, Reel or Fiction, or the documentary Fall Cabal, to walk people through the evidence that these people believe that they need to do this transgender, mixed-sex, both-sex type of things, and they're just soft-pedaling it.
And it is ridiculous.
It is ridiculous.
As ridiculous as Big Mike.
And yes, yes, yes, and Mehmet has both female breasts and male genitalia, just like Michelle Obama.
Vegan.
Yeah, I've seen that video.
I would love to see that exposed.
I mean, not.
Yeah, I thought that that Barbie thing was real for a moment, but glad it was humor.
I didn't like the abortion thing.
It was upsetting.
Yeah, if you want my opinion on pregnancy, I like to say pregnancy termination because it's just, I don't know, the word abortion, it's so ugly and hard and I don't believe in it.
I mean, I'm like most people where I feel if something happened to you, incest, sexual assault, I can't I can't state that a woman should have to go through that for nine months.
Other people think differently.
I know it's still a creature living inside.
You know, I am a vegan and I wish that more vegans would feel the same way and be pro-life.
You know, it's not even a religious thing.
It could be, but it's just, thou shall not kill.
You know, religious or not, we don't kill.
We allow creatures to live their lives, right?
We can't just like snuff Someone else so I believe that you know if you are in love with someone or Many people do it anyway, and they're not in love with someone the intercourse I think if you abstained or really if you were even celibate, I mean you can there's all sorts of Intimate things that you could do without doing that which could conceive a child you have to you have to
Be prepared to have that child.
You have to want to have that child.
That's my opinion, at least.
It should be conceived in love.
Not it, but the child should be conceived in love.
And if you're not prepared for that, then be celibate or abstain.
But that's too difficult for people to conceptualize.
It's too crazy.
I don't know why.
I mean, there's obviously other things you could do to I don't want to get gross here, but I don't know why it's that hard.
I truly don't.
But it seems to be for a lot of people.
What I'm saying is taboo.
Shouldn't be.
Yeah, yeah.
For a sexually reproducing species, you know, sexual activity is innate.
I mean, it's gonna happen.
And if somehow an unintended pregnancy occurs, I believe fully a woman should have the choice of how to handle it.
I believe Roe was one of the most wisely decided of all court cases.
But I have many friends whom I respect who take a different view than mine.
I thought this was an hilarious lampooning.
Meanwhile, we have proof that Pfizer shots killed even Colin Powell.
Get this.
Dr. Gene Ruby breaks the news that former Secretary of State Colin Powell died in October 2021 from the Pfizer two-shot series.
He was on his way to get his booster when he died, all reported into the AVAIR system by long-term assistant.
Dr. Jane shows you that hundreds of pharma companies are shoving the deadly failed mRNA material into all products, not just vaccines.
Just take a look at their pipelines.
I'm very disturbed by that, by the way, that mRNA could be put in all kinds of products.
Meanwhile, here we have Lionel addressing Abortion.
The issue is whether this is a liberty protected by the Constitution.
I'm sure that it is not, said Justice Scalia.
The long-standing traditions of American society have permitted it to be legally proscribed.
I'm amazed at how many simply do not understand the law of the Constitution, SCOTUS, or why Roe was an abomination.
I am convinced, as I think most legal scholars are, that Roe v. Wade itself is an unconstitutional decision, a serious and wholly unjustifiable judicial usurpation of state legislative authority.
And notice, by the way, the decision the Supreme Court has made is simply to return the matter to the states, respectively, for their decisions.
Thus fake Robert Bork, as he testified before a Senate subcommittee back in 1981, adding it's by no means the only example of unconstitutional behavior by the Supreme Court.
Bork might have made a great justice, but I have no doubt that this guy, Merrick Garland, would have been a travesty.
Thank God he didn't make it onto the court.
Robe Bork, not a shred of legal reasoning.
Nothing.
It took judicial imperialism to a level never before imagined.
No one ever reads Roe v. Wade.
That's a problem.
Twitter is a place for extreme opinion, not realistic compromise.
The method of killing a human child—there's an ambiguity here about using the word child to something not yet a live birth—is so horrible, most clinical descriptions evoke a shudder of revulsion, Scalia observes.
Social media have given Americans the idea the louder and meaner, the more effective their argument.
It bothers Americans when they're reminded just how little the Constitution actually means compared to the legislative process.
Something strange happens to a man who dons a kill.
Nothing makes me happier than when Americans are screaming at each other because it means they're thinking.
To say the New York Times is misleading doesn't begin to capture the flavor of their duplicity.
A favorite parlor game here at Homestead is to pass around the table so-called celebrity reactions to dobs to be read and performed in the most over-the-top of renditions available.
Don't you love the way the radical left claims it cares about universal child care when it repeatedly and purposefully turns its back on child sexual predation at every level of society?
I think that's a really serious problem.
I'm frankly surprised at the tempered response to Dobbs, and this is the case where the court reversed Rowe, compared to what I thought would happen from the BLM and TIFA agent provocateurs and shock troops.
I thought for sure they'd go full George Floyd.
Let's hope it stays like that.
Imagine being Maureen Dowd and truly believing anyone cares about what you think.
Merrick Garland knows he can and will be replaced with and by a number of politically mindless automatons in the event the shadow government cryptocracy finds his present problematic.
What he says is scripted and he's under orders to comply.
There's a wonderful parlor game we play on Twitter.
Pretend to notice irregularities involved in the Epstein case.
Expect something will come of our obvious illumination of reality.
Wrong.
Switching to the political, which is far more important in the long run, and you'll agree.
Americans believe in some form of pro-choice and some form of abortion limitations.
You have to deal with such vagaries if you're going to win midterms in 2024.
Really, in 2022?
The Constitution doesn't guarantee contraception or sodomy or same-sex marriage or LGBTQIA+.
Practices and methodologies Americans participate in, and the reason you do not need the Constitution to freely participate, don't confuse the two.
In addition to puberty blockers we're making available to our most innocent, let's throw in contraception to make the necessity of abortion a thing of the past.
Who's with me?
Here's a percentage of women reporting that specific reasons contributed to their decision to have an abortion There are a whole list here.
Having a baby would dramatically change my life.
Interfere with education, job, employment.
Have other children.
Can't afford a baby.
Unmarried.
Student or planning to study.
Can't afford a baby.
Can't employ the basic needs.
Unemployed.
Can't leave the job.
Would have to find a new place to live.
Not enough support from husband or partner.
Husband or partner is unemployed.
Currently on temporary welfare.
Don't want to be a single mother or have a relationship.
Not sure about relationship.
Partner and I don't want to get married.
Not in a relationship now.
Relationship or marriage may break up soon as when a partner is abusive.
Have completed my child.
Very not ready for another.
Don't want people to know I had sex or got pregnant.
Don't feel mature enough to raise another child.
Husband or partner wants me to have an abortion.
Possible problems affecting the health of the fetus.
Physical problem with my health.
Parents want me to have an abortion, was victim of rape because pregnancy was a result of incest.
I think those are all really legitimate reasons if it's early in the pregnancy.
Let me try this one more time.
You can be pro-choice, yet believe Roe was judicially ludicrous.
Guttmacher in the snippet reflects the overwhelming majority of abortions are obtained for convenience and lifestyle, not for health or rape or incest.
While the professional Democrats are railing against Kavanaugh at all, for as they say, lying about his intentions, not one official has mentioned the determination of who leaked Alito's graft opinion.
Corey Motso, Dred Scott, and Roe, the trifecta of judicial incoherence.
Joni Mitchell said you don't know what you've got till it's gone, and that proves true with Justice Scalia.
SCOTUS corrected a fallacy.
Substantive due process is an oxymoron, should never have been the basis for abortion, there's no constitutional right.
And if you don't like that, talk to your state legislature as you do every other law.
It all started with William Douglas in 1965, Departure from Reality, when he concocted the right to privacy out of nowhere in Griswold v. Connecticut.
Two very important constitutional decisions were made as to abortion and concealed permits, but be not mistaken.
The political ramifications of them will be significant for Republicans.
Systematized, choreographed, orchestrated, planned, organized performance are outrage, now directed towards state legislatures.
Hell, the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.
Roe and Casey are overruled, and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.
The court's decision in Roe was as shameful and judicially convoluted as its decision in Dred Scott.
Scalia is looking down upon us with a big smile as one of the worst moments in judicial history has finally been corrected.
I have no interest whatsoever in anything the occupant of the White House has to say about anything.
I'm far more interested in what the committees say who draft his teleprompter ramblings.
If you don't like today's SCOTUS, all you have to do is pass a constitutional amendment or lobby your state legislature.
In the nascent day of the corrupt schizoid political career, the current White House occupant vocally and strongly disapproved of Roe and said, get this, women do not have the sole right to say what should happen to their bodies.
Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion overturning Roe, arguing the court should correct the error of protection for same-sex marriage and contradiction access, which is a bit much in my opinion.
Twitter, again, a place for extreme opinion.
The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.
A dozen states have passed trigger laws drafted to go if Roe and Casey were overturned.
The U.S.
is the best place to argue about any form of legal and constitutional matter because the fact that virtually no one understands the issues does not in any way serve as an impediment to yelling and screaming.
There's no constitutional prohibition against or a right to the death penalty.
Interesting analogy.
States decide that individually.
In 1982, Biden proposed a constitutional amendment to overturn Rao and allow the state to choose their own.
Has he forgotten?
Have his script writers forgotten?
We haven't.
My passion is not against abortion.
It's against the judicial fallacy and oxymoron of substantive due process.
And I recognize there's a good chance anyone reading this has no idea what that means.
So be it.
Have the Rad Left embraced Bernie's Swedish-style socialism?
Are they stuck in a Stockholm Syndrome?
How is it the Rad Left owes so many women impregnated by relatives?
Post-mortem trolling from the culturally and intellectually subliterate, the RBG, that's Ruth Bader Ginsburg, hagiographers, now turn on their once-beloved subject of adoration.
We have completely lost touch.
With a concept of pride and being proud until tomorrow.
That's from Lionel Nation.
I might disagree with a lot of that, but he sure says it well and gets a lot of points out.
Carl, your thoughts?
Dr. Jane Ruby is among thousands of medical professionals speaking out against the vaccines and the forced medical products.
If you go to any of these news shows, the Carl B. Herman blogspot.
Second paragraph, the paper, My Best Shot, is my essay.
4,700 words to our 100 school teachers last year that provides sufficient documentation that everybody should be demanding the arrest of these Liars!
So for the Roe vs. Wade, the Jade Doe in that case, if memory serves correctly, this was a woman who had had two children from two different fathers, was impregnated by a third, Attempted to take advantage of laws where if you claim rape, you can get an abortion.
She was denied and had that third child from a third father.
She ended up taking money from both sides of the debate and is a AP U.S.
government teacher.
I would agree with the court that you're stretching the Constitution, which they do all the time.
What it's supposed to be is that human beings have inalienable rights above a constitution.
So now this debate will go back to the states with what states want to do.
And yeah, I appreciate Lionel.
I get his mailers also.
And what I want to just mention is the hypocrisy going into the midterms is that you have the Democratic Party saying that you can force these injections experimental injections and in the schools you can force
The students to wear these experimental masks and force the students to take these experimental so-called tests but uh that isn't recognized as a violation of my body my choice when really we've had my body my choice and that's upheld by title 21 in federal law since the Nuremberg trial in the Nuremberg code which made it clear that
Any type of medical experimentation on people has to be only and always with their full consent.
Yes, yes.
By the way, the part I liked the most was that list of reasons why women might want to or need to have an abortion, and I thought it was a very comprehensive list.
In my classes, when we debate, I was always astonished how many modes of birth control my students could come up with.
I mean, dozens, many of which I was unfamiliar with, but I did sometimes make the practice.
You know what we call couples who practice the rhythm method?
Parents.
Very good.
Yeah, Carl, I'm so sorry that the Nuremberg Code hasn't really taken effect, because I thought that that would stop everything, and it's just not.
It's not a law.
It's an international code, and they're just going around it.
And then, of course, they'll say that this is medical.
It's not, you know, it's to save your life.
So they'll always put the The planned epidemic, the scamdemic, they'll always spin it and they'll say it's not the same.
But you're right.
To me, the vaccine, the test, it's all like a genitalia instrument to me.
So I don't understand why people can't see it like that.
Body invasion, it's invasive.
So if you're not consenting, That's a no, plus the ingredients in the test, too.
They were bad.
But people, again, people don't look into this kind of, these matters, and I don't understand.
I say celibacy to the medical mandates and celibacy to this intercourse.
That's how I feel.
So again, I do support pro-life.
Except in certain circumstances.
And inalienable, which some people say inalienable, think about that one, that's like natural law.
So, um, if, you know, if it's natural or godly or whatnot, then you have those rights.
And that's what we really should be living our life.
One other thing about religion when we're talking about prayer, well, I say it's not religion necessarily, it could be, but I'm kind of thinking maybe public schools and the government, maybe they're so afraid of religion if they push it away so much because they know that's in the Constitution and they don't want you
To know your rights in the Constitution.
And the schools don't teach the Constitution very well.
In some schools, you have to be very careful how you teach it.
And that is a disgrace.
It makes me want to move.
I don't know what's a better country than the United States, but our system is pretty whacked.
Nice, nice.
I love our diversity of point of view here.
I think it's splendid.
Meanwhile, Paul finds American opinions about gender are changing, but not in favor of the far left.
A number of Americans believe gender is assigned at birth.
Contra, the pro-transgender narrative has grown, according to a new survey.
While pro-trans rhetoric has reached a fever pitch in the last few years, fewer Americans are buying into the idea that gender is unrelated to biological sex.
Abuse survey based on interviews with over 10,000 adults found 60% of Americans believe gender is determined by sex assigned at birth.
That's an increase from the 56% in June of 2021 and 54% in September of 2017, suggesting forcing Americans to accept the pro-trans narrative is backfiring.
Here you have a reality-winning David Marcus tweets.
Can be different from sex assigned at birth or is determined by sex assigned at birth.
Look how the percentage is growing.
Still, the survey showed nearly 8 in 10 believe transgender face discrimination.
A majority support laws that would protect transgenders from discrimination.
The survey also showed a majority of American adults, 58%, support proposals that would require transgender athletes to keep on teams that match the sets they were assigned at birth.
On the other hand, only 17% reject such proposals.
24% said they neither support nor oppose them.
The International Swimming Association has determined that only biological women can compete in women's sports, biological men in men's, but they have a new category for transgenders, or OPAR.
More Americans also support laws prohibiting physicians from helping children undergo gender transition than oppose them.
46% of 53.
Did political affiliation make a difference?
Democrats and those who lean to the left are more than four times as likely to say a person's gender can be different from the sex they were assigned at birth.
61% versus 13.
Democrats are also far more likely to say our society hasn't gone far enough in accepting those who are transgender, 59 to 10 percent.
For their part, 66 percent of Republicans say society has gone too far.
There are stark partisan differences on many laws and policies related to transgender issues.
Fascinating stuff.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yes, yes.
So first with what you said too, Jim.
I also enjoy the diversity of the points of views among us.
It's similar to the diversity of the color spectrum from blue to me through green to Monique.
For this transgender issue, we're in World War III.
That depressing environment is going to have an effect, of course, on people at all different levels.
I was a GSA advisor as a high school teacher, the Gay-Straight Alliance.
I was teaching in Phoenix at Central High School, and students came up to me and recruited me to be an advisor.
They wanted to start a club.
There had never been a GSA at That high school in Phoenix.
And I said, yeah, sure, I'm happy to help you out.
But let me just ask you, why are you asking me?
And this cute little committee looked at me and said, we know that you're going to protect us, Mr. Herman.
I said, you're right, right.
Now, they had planned on having, for the first time, to be able to ask their same sex Boyfriend-girlfriend to go to a school dance that fall and of course they were concerned because not only some of the students were very upset over the idea of same-sex couples but some of the staff were openly talking about it.
So as a teacher of 12th grade economics and US government.
I just happened to have a, a, these like one of the all American offensive lineman, a guy who's like six five 300 pounds just a respected guy on campus so I went to him and said hey, You know, this dance coming up.
I'm the GSA advisor.
Some of the students are concerned that they might face some harassment at the dance, and I don't know how you feel about it.
And his eyes got big, and he just reached down and put a huge hand on my shoulder, and he said, Mr. Herman, we'll take care of it.
And we found out that like a few days later some of the students in GSA ran into my classroom all excited and they said that this guy in the offensive line walked up to them at lunch to where they were eating and everyone stopped and looked at these huge young men and my man said, we understand your concern.
We'll take care of it.
Anybody, anytime on this campus does anything to threaten you or make you feel uncomfortable, you talk to us.
And that was it.
That was it.
Great story.
Well, when I was in high school, there was this young man and apparently he was being dunked in the trash can because he was gay.
I mean, he didn't come out.
And I went to the prom with him!
So, and I had graduated from high school already, so I'm quite comfortable around gay males particularly, because they were all in the theater, even if they didn't say anything.
And I think I have you beat, Carl.
I even wrote a song about lesbians.
I called it, She Wants No Boyfriend, Just A Wife, because, you know, whether you're a lesbian or not, still seems Nice to have a wife to do things for you, right?
Even if they're a man.
And I won some song awards on that, but I will tell you, when I first presented the song, I was getting egregious feedback, like, oh, are you a lesbian?
It wasn't accepted at the time, but I, like yourself, I was accepting and I didn't want anything to happen to people.
In my college, I saw a note that was on the floor, someone had dropped it, and it was penned by a female that said she discovered she was a lesbian and she wanted to kill herself.
So when I've seen this kind of stuff and heard this kind of, you know, stories, of course you feel for them.
But again, now I'm going to go to the present time when I feel that this is an absolute agenda, especially with the transsexual or gender.
I like that survey.
I kind of think that there should be a trans female and a trans male category because I don't think that it is fair to put the different genders and whatnot in the same category or have an open one.
There was a spa, this made the news in LA, We Spa, and there was a transgender female with The male part still.
And made the women and the children very uncomfortable.
And so there were people that were protesting outside and Antifa got involved and they started swinging punches at the people that were not fine with this.
And I called the Wii Spa and I said, well maybe you should have a dressing room that deals with just trans.
Didn't seem to go over with them, but I know, like, how many categories are we going to make?
But I don't feel that it's fair that that trans female has been winning, the one who goes to the University of Pennsylvania.
She's big, for goodness sakes!
So, Governor Wolf of Pennsylvania It's on the line for him if he's going to sign a bill, which has actually passed, not to have the trans, you know, different ones into the opposite gender sports, but it doesn't seem like he's going to sign it.
He feels that it's discriminatory.
I think he should sign it.
And even my trans friend thinks it shouldn't be.
But with rights, like basic humane rights, obviously anybody should have their basic humane rights.
Anyone.
That's all.
Well, we were all so thrilled when women's sports began to be funded and supported on an equal basis as men.
That was an historic development.
Here you have a guy who claims to be a woman who's setting all kinds of women's swimming records.
He ranked like 524th among men.
So it's just indicative of the gross disparity.
You cannot have that happen and be fair to women who have trained to excel in their sports to be devastated by some man come in.
And I guarantee that's a form of cheating.
It's disreputable.
It's a disgrace.
So we can have three categories, men's sports, women's sports, and other.
And we won't even bother to otherwise define it.
Anyone who wants to be another is welcome to compete.
In that open category.
Meanwhile, the Fed chair realizes how little we understand about inflation.
This is pretty strange.
You'd think the head of the Fed is going to understand what's going on.
He's in charge of reducing Biden's 40-year high inflation by a difficult process of increasing interest rates.
It's classically defined as too much money chasing too few products, So supply and demand means the price is going to increase because the demand is greater than the supply.
We believe we can do that.
That's our aim.
The pathways, however, have gotten narrower.
It involves pain, but worse would be failing to address inflation.
He says, I think we understand better how little we know, but he shouldn't be in such a state of ignorance.
Actually, the mechanisms of inflation are rather well understood by and large.
Breitbart reported that the economy shrank at a 1.6% annual pace while inflation hurt consumer spending.
The government's first estimate at the economy shrinking 1.4, second 1.5.
First time the economy registered negative growth since early in 2020.
Consumer spending was much weaker than previously thought, suggesting inflation was already weighing down the economy, raising the risk of a recession.
Consumer spending was revised down from an estimated 3.1 to the far smaller 1.8.
Data show consumers cut spending on food, clothing, and home furniture after adjusting for inflation, which has been fueled by Biden's massive spending packages, war on American oil, and supply chain woes.
Meanwhile, A red wave is looking more and more likely.
Last week, forecasters updated their predictions for four midterm elections based on the way voters in four states have cast their ballots.
The updated predictions improve the chances of Republican victory in two congressional races in Texas, moving Vermont's gubernatorial to a safer Republican.
In a fourth race, Utah's Senate They've lowered incumbent Republican Mike Lee's chances, though it's still believed he will pull out a win.
The editors of Crystal Sabato's Crystal Ball have lowered the outlook for Texas' 34th congressional from lean Democrat to likely Democrat, believing the race will be much closer, and I guarantee you The Democrats are going to lose big in Texas.
The change was prompted by the unexpected victory of the heavily Hispanic by a Mexican-born Republican mayor of Flores in last week's Texas special.
She defeated a challenger, Dan Sanchez, 51-43.
This district had been Democrat for, I don't know, 100, 150 years.
Flores will face Democratic Congressman Vincente Gonzalez, who currently represents District 15, but redistricting has placed him within the newly-drawn 34.
Crystal Ball also upgraded its forecast for the newly-drawn 15 from Leans Republican to Likely Republican.
Both Cook Political reported inside elections, also predicting that the Republican candidate, Monica de la Cruz, will dominate in Texas 15.
According to Inside Elections analyst Nathan Gonzalez, Mayor Flores' victory is just one piece of evidence indicating the 2022 midterms will be about voters punishing the president's party.
With the Democrats having the barest majority, they can only afford a loss of two seats to cling to power.
And the way things are shaking out, the chances the Democrats could squeak out a win are non-existent.
I continue to predict the Democrats are going to lose us 100 seats in the House and three or four in the Senate.
Carl, your thoughts?
With Fed Chair Jerome Powell, what a lying sack of spin.
I mean, I don't understand inflation.
WTF?
What the finance?
So this guy is a former partner of the Carlyle Group and the lies of omission that he claims, ignorance of Oh, no one could see it coming.
Yeah, since the Fed began 100 years ago, they have utterly failed with their mission statement.
The dollar is worth less than 1% of where they started.
If you wanted to minimize the cost of interest rates, then why don't you introduce public banking And get rid of the two big-to-fail banks and all the money that goes in there.
If you had a public bank of your state that issued a 5% mortgage and a 5% credit card, I know in California because I checked, that revenue stream alone would abundantly pay for all taxes with no need of any additional state tax.
You have Shadow Stats economist John Williams.
So Powell also lies by failing to mention that the definitions of unemployment and inflation have changed over time.
And if you really wanted to count and compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges, then the inflation rate Is about 18% now.
And that is, and if you take a look at the, as we talked about the aggregate debt curve, so you have an aggregate debt, an exponential debt curve, and it's because we create what is used for money only and always as a negative number.
So the system is like adding negative numbers forever.
We don't understand inflation.
Yeah, because you're just playing stupid.
So we do have, the good news is that we have Superior Mechanics, Carl B. Herman, Blogspot, any of these shows go into the section of looting trillions.
I do have one published paper via the Claremont Colleges and the Mechanics of actually having a system that would minimize inflation go all the way back to a paper written by Benjamin Franklin Who was so excited because Colonial Pennsylvania discovered they didn't need to charge any taxes when they were the bank.
So we really have in the And for the election, you have the Great Awakening versus corporate media, Dominion voting machines, and 2,000 or more mules, so we'll see what's happening.
And even though the rhetoric and what we hear from corporate media and political leaders and economic leaders has never been worse, I think we're in the best position historically we have ever been for an Emperor's New Clothes breakthrough and victory, but we shall see.
Many excellent points, Colonel Vega.
I would like that Emperor's New Clothes to be spread throughout the globe.
I've been saying that for a long time.
A lot of people don't know that story.
I don't know much about inflation except It doesn't take a brainiac to know that with all the money that we put out there in the past two years due to the scamdemic, obviously it's not going to be worth as much as it was before.
This just in, S&P 500.
Lost 21% in the first half of 1970.
And apparently it did the worst since 1970 today.
So you can look forward to more inflation, I guess, during a period of high inflation.
It just came in, so you're going to have to look at that.
I wanted to ask you, too, with regards to the 2,000 mules that you mentioned, do you know if anything is happening with that, Carl?
I did see that film in the theater.
Yeah, one of the people involved managing the mules allegedly has been arrested, but nothing yet in terms of the breakthrough that we need.
It's another data point of high optimism that people are paying attention to this.
Both the Texas and the Arizona Republican parties, the GOP committees for those states, have officially declared that from their experience of watching 2000 Mules, that they have voted that the 2020 election results are no longer legitimate for them.
Yes, which is welcome development.
Excellent.
And I put that song in the chat too, Dr. Jason.
Yeah, I see it.
I'm looking forward to listening to it.
Maybe for another time.
I think that's great.
I'm tickled.
We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to LiveNeedToKnow at gmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnow at gmail.com.
Remember, my petition is on the docket of the Supreme Court.
While I originally believed it was a First and Second Amendment case, the summary judgment protocols in Wisconsin allowed the judge to decide whether or not my facts were reasonable and exclude them if, in his subjective opinion, they were not.
As you will see from my petition, which you can download to your own desktop, the Court of Appeals, Forest District, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed.
In other states, such as Texas, however, the case against me would have been tossed or else sent to a jury for determination of the disputed facts.
But in Wisconsin, the court could, in effect, determine the facts regardless of my evidence.
It turns out this is a national problem, and I'm teeing up the case for SCOTUS to make summary judgment protocols uniform throughout the nation.
I believe they are going to do just that and set things right.
Check it out at givesandgo.com slash fundingpatsir.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
Regarding Jim's trial, one of the points that I'm emphasizing is for people to appreciate the extent to which our opponents have controlled everything.
All of the institutions, including the judicial branch, and most people were fairly optimistic.
Jim received a show trial.
As an AP U.S.
government teacher, my take on a judge is similar to what an umpire will do.
An umpire knows the rules and is tempted to have a fair game where evidence is presented for a jury's consideration and then the jury determines the facts of the case.
What happened in Jim's trial is that the judge became a dictator And he excluded the evidence, he excluded the jury, and just went ahead and said, yeah, I've evaluated the evidence and you're guilty, and that's that, which is the Orwellian opposite.
So hopefully that the string of good choices of the Supreme Court will carry forward, and that what we're seeing is a gradual transition.
Now, in terms for our audience, I appreciate everyone of intellectual integrity and moral courage.
There are more of us than you imagine, and we just need to keep resonating for truth, justice, and the American way of inalienable rights.
That's all that we got, so make your voices count.
Reagan, your final thoughts?
Final thoughts.
Okay, I want to make a correction so that I didn't sound burgly.
I'm looking at theweek.com.
It says S&P 500 on track for worst start to a year.
Since 1970, so that's what I meant to say.
I also would like to state that there should be a department for false flags, and you should be leading it, Dr. James.
And if you establish one, I'm going to send my resume to you.
Because unfortunately, the only people that are able to really get into the nitty gritty of the facts, the specifics, are people with a lot of time.
Or, you know, maybe professors, maybe retirees, maybe people that don't have a job, and then all of a sudden you're called conspiracy theorists, when you're really very intelligent, and you don't have anybody to hold you back, like a job that doesn't want you to say such things, because they're in on the agenda!
So I really would like and I think it would be very beneficial for something to be created and not just have books on it, but to be created because there's too many of them happening and it's causing a lot of chaos.
causing a lot of chaos.
And then lastly, what was I gonna say?
It was about the constitution.
Oh, yes commoner law.
You should look into that There's a class I'm gonna be taking it's to sue your employer And I'm sure there's a lot of you who want to do that right now because you've been let go because you are You thought your body should be preserved, and they didn't, because they were paying you.
So look into this.
See if you can represent yourself.
It's not as difficult as you might think.
I'm taking it.
I think it's interesting, whatever happens.
I'm not saying I'm going to sue my employer, but for sure, if you have been let go, For religious reasons, for the medical mandates that were illegal, you should look into it.
Thank you.
Well, I'm just overjoyed to have Principal Organic Vegan back with us.
She has such an original cast of mind.
I celebrate diversity of point of view.
Carl, steadfast in delivery, very knowledgeable from a historic perspective, a master of statistics, We celebrate diversity of opinion, but alas, the government of the United States does not.
They're constantly suppressing and censoring even the January 6th Committee as a reflection.
It's a show trial.
They're not allowing real debate.
They're not allowing cross-examination, as Alan Dershowitz has observed.
Don't believe any witness who's never been subjected to cross-examination.
That's what this whole administration needs to be subjected to—cross-examination.
Even the Department of Justice has gone full-fledged 100 percent left-wing radical to the detriment of their role in administering the laws of the United States.
They actually issued a complaint when the Supreme Court ruled against New York City that to conceal carry does not require a special permit, saying they took exception.
What's not the role of the Department of Justice to take exception to rulings by the Supreme Court?
It's the role of the Department of Justice to enforce the laws as they are interpreted by the Supreme Court.
So get your act together.
Merrick Garland is going to lead just a disastrous Executive branch here with regard to law and order in the United States, which is pitifully in short supply.
The President of the United States allowing lawless migrants massively into the country, defunding the police, allowing criminals back on the street.
They're causing mayhem.
This is one of the many reasons the Democrats are going down to a catastrophic failure in the midterms, assuming we're allowed to have them.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends and family.
▲
Export Selection