All Episodes
Previous Next
June 29, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
45:56
Need to Know News TEXAS TUESDAY (28 June 2022) with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to another Texas Tuesday.
We have Joe Olson in Houston and Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, now residing in Asheville, North Carolina.
Because of unanticipated computer problems, today is going to be a bit on the makeshift side, but we're going to cover a lot of stories.
Turns out the Senate sergeant at arms has been found dead.
He had six laptops that no doubt would have been a great interest, revealing about what's going on with regard to the January 6th and the orchestration of the events of that day.
Which appear to have been coordinated using blackberries.
Does everyone remember who loved those blackberries?
He used to boast about them.
It appears the whole thing was coordinated using a series of blackberries.
Joe, pick it up from there.
Yes, this is a story that was put forward by George Webb, who I followed from almost day one, back when he was still working with Jason Goodman and his previous crew, and he was talking about Eric Braverman and the Clinton Foundation, and the story that you have posted at Fetzer's website
states that it's Michael Luciano, L-U-C-I-A-N-O, but previous stories that I got on this guy that was Sergeant of Arms that died, his name was Michael Stenger, S-T-E-N-G-E-R.
The only thing I can find on Luciano is that he's a blogger that blogs about January 6th, but Stenger was definitely a retired Marine, or former Marine, whatever you call it, retired from the Secret Service for 30 years and had been appointed as assistant attorney, Sergeant at Arms in the Senate.
And then when the other guy retired, he was promoted to commander and he was there on January 6th.
And he made a tape statement stating that the investigation ought to concentrate on the hundreds of provocateurs that were there.
And he was supposed to testify today and then he's 71, he suddenly died.
So I wondered if they had the fast acting or the 5G activated jab that I'm sure he was required to take because he was a federal employee and worked in Congress.
Or if they had some other means of disposal similar to what possibly happened with Dr. Carrie McJay.
Who was in a plane wreck, so we'll talk about that a little bit later.
Right, this looks clearly taking him out because he knew too much.
My mistake about the naming, Michael Luciano seemed to have authored a specific blog for George Webb, so that was a mistake.
The name, as you've got it right, was this singer guy, the former Marine.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, it looks awfully fishy.
All right.
I don't know why this guy would be in possession of those blackberries.
Do you guys have any clue to that?
Why would he be in possession of all these other people's BlackBerrys?
Well, Michael, it seems he had recordings on his laptop of the communications that were done with the BlackBerrys, that he had six laptops that were taken that have disappeared, contingent on his death, which appears to have been the motive.
I see.
Yeah.
Further on in that article, it has a graphic of the Democrats in the network, in this BlackBerry network.
And boy, is it a rogues gallery.
You got Debbie Wasserman Schultz in there, Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Henry Waxman, Weiner, the former Obama chief of staff, bunch of people that are familiar to everybody in Democratic leadership.
So yeah, that was hot information that suddenly disappeared with his death, evidently.
I'm very sorry that we don't have the images, but as you observe, the blog itself is available at jamesfetzer.org, and this appears to be a big hit.
Joe, you mentioned Dr. Kerry Magee going down in a plane crash.
That, of course, is something that has been used in the past.
The case with which I'm most familiar is that of Senator Paul Wellstone, whose plane went down just 60 miles north of my office on the Duluth campus of the University of Minnesota while I was still On the faculty there is a McKnight professor, now of course retired, but I conducted extensive research, published a book about it, flew a guy who's a PhD in electromagnetism up from Australia, so we were
Tromping around in the snow in 35 below zero weather, picking up pieces of the charred fuselage, which I had subjected to analysis by a retired professor of chemistry, who observed they'd been subjected to fires far more intense than would have been from a normal plane crash.
And indeed, it appears they used an electromagnetic field to pop all the computerized components on the Wellstone plane, and had it prepped With magnesium or thermite paint or whatever, so it burned intensely for seven hours, the fire could not be extinguished, so to reduce the plane and its contents to charcoal.
With Dr. Maje, it doesn't appear they had that elaborate, but taking people out by plane crashes is well known to the CIA, and it's happened repeatedly in the past.
Your further thoughts?
Oh yeah, look at JFK Jr.
Look at E. Howard Hunt's wife, who was carrying $200,000 of milk money from the CREEP committee to reelect the president into Chicago's Midway Airport, and she was blown out of the air.
And then we had a guy in 1983, the congressman that was running, said he was going to run against George Bush and take Bush out, and he was shot down in a Korean airliner.
So they don't have a problem.
And also, Huey Long!
Huey Long, yeah, the senator up in Alaska.
Stevens, the one that disappeared.
Pan Am 101 had 25 disgruntled CIA agents, including the station chief at two different locations.
One of them was Cyprus, and I think the other one was Crete, but both of them were disagreeing with what was going on as far as national policy, and so they were ordered back to Foggy Bottom for retraining, along with a bunch of their staff that Apparently was disagreeing with what the CIA had to say and that's when Pan Am was shot down over Lockerbie, Scotland.
So yeah, I looked up the flightaware.com site and this is a tail number N14FC.
It was a Piper Comanche PA-24 single engine piston driven plane.
They're pretty reliable, but if you look at the flight data, the things like bouncing up and down as far as airspeed, And that's not typical for how you would fly one of those planes.
Normally, it would have three axis autopilot because this was an IFR plane.
uh filed flight plan which is why it shows up on the uh flight aware log site and the final uh altitude was 1300 feet which is the elevation of the airfield that they crash landed in in uh Meriwether, Georgia and then the final speed was 91 miles per hour and
Airplanes don't have airbags on them, so when you hit the ground at 91 miles per hour, you're going to have a little bit of a problem before the plane finally slows down.
You're going to have some pretty severe g-forces.
She supposedly broke a leg and has some other injuries.
Her boyfriend, who was flying the plane, has a brain concussion and they think spinal injuries.
They thought she might be released from the hospital today, so that's the latest data, but it's hard to get any data because it's it's completely boycotted by the mainstream media.
Joe, you said that she crash landed at an airfield.
She put out a text of sorts.
I don't know what.
What post this is, it's not Twitter, but when she regained consciousness in ICU and she put this out, she said they were, the engine stalled and nobody knows why yet.
They were gliding fine and the RPM dropped to zero in seconds and we dropped like a rock.
And it says that they were headed into trees, but Billy, the pilot, found a loggers trail that he followed, so we didn't get major damage from the trees before crashing. so we didn't get major damage from the trees before Wow, that's fortuitous.
That's very fortuitous, but that certainly sounds like a deliberate takedown.
I really wouldn't have any reservations about concluding this was a deliberate effort to take it out.
Joe, would you agree?
Well, that would certainly be on my list of suspicions.
I'd, you know, I'd want to see the evidence, but certainly some more will come out.
There's some really great people that are online.
One of the guys I follow is Blanco Lurio, who's a, his real name is Juan Brown, and he's a pilot, I think for Continental, but anyhow, he's a commercial airline pilot.
And he does a blog channel and they investigate all these accidents within days.
And so they're always ahead of the NTSB reports on it.
So that's about enough on that particular subject.
Well, we got Biden bemoaning the decision of the Supreme Court to reverse the New York state policy requiring a special reason for carrying concealed carry
Arguing that that would render the Second Amendment a second-class right when it's a full constitutional right and that there's no necessity to have a special justification that everyone has it as their constitutional right to carry.
And this is driving the Democrats at least as bananas as has the reversal of Roe.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, the Supreme Court also said yesterday that if you're a football coach, you can pray with your school members after a football game.
And opponents from the other team, you can all kneel down and pray.
It's okay to kneel down and pray to the black gods matter, but you can't kneel down and pray to any other god.
You know, it's like, give me a freaking break.
These people are so head wedged.
It's ridiculous.
And wait till the Supreme Court rules on West Virginia versus the EPA.
This is going to revisit a 2007 decision, Massachusetts against the EPA, where they said that if you're driving your SUV in Connecticut, you're making us hot in Massachusetts.
And so we need to have control of the air over the whole entire planet.
These people are absolute idiots, and to give you an idea how much idiots they are, this is the G7 This is from The Conservative Treehouse.
U.S.
and Canada tell G7 that climate change policy is more important than feeding people.
Boris Johnson and his German counterpart, Chancellor Ulf Schulz, supported a plan to divert food crops from biofuels to human fuels.
And Trudeau and and FJB said, no way, we're going to even increase the amount of biofuels.
These people are absolute idiots.
They will starve us in order to do their stupid little green plan.
Which I guarantee you is as fraudulent as anything that ever happened.
So depending, it could be that the Supreme Court just says, you know, we don't think that the FBA has the right to judge a gas molecule that has always been present in the atmosphere and that has a direct linear increase in photosynthesis, which produces cellulose, sugars, and starches that we need for houses, clothing, and food.
And for them to try to control that, And some stupid philosophy that it changes the temperature of the planet is absolutely absurd, but I'm not counting on the Supreme Court because I've looked at the undergraduate degrees of all nine of those black robe disease clowns, and none of them had a science class their whole entire college career, and I doubt that they ever had any meaningful science when they were in high school.
These people are absolute clowns, and for them to make judgments about Uh, scientific evidence is, uh, preposterous.
Joe, that's very, very disturbing.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, I don't have a lot to say about that other than what's there already.
I'm just generally glad to see some examples popping up of the Supreme Court moving back to interpreting the Constitution in a more literal manner rather than just looking at it as an open book that they can interpret whatever they feel like the The political winds blow at the moment.
It's almost as if the ghost of Antonin Scalia had returned to the Supreme Court.
Yeah, and I agree.
I think Scalia was a very strong proponent of the Constitution, and he was a guy who wouldn't let, wouldn't suffer fools gladly, and I think these Verdicts, even when I may disagree as I do about Roe, appear to have some basis in the Constitution.
The question about Roe is well raised in an article also published on my blog by Michelle Goodwin entitled, Justice Alito, reproductive justice is in the Constitution, and here she's alluding to the 13th Amendment basically emancipating slaves.
She, I think, is viewing the force carrying the term, as do I, as a form of reproductive slavery, but she's talking especially about the history of slavery.
And now the masters, you know, abuse the black women slaves and force them into reproduction.
You know, I mean, I think she has a point.
But this question seems to me really to be one that hinges on whether a woman ought to be entitled to choose whether or not to carry a term where I believe that the unwanted fetus where The ruling of Roe didn't require anyone to have an abortion, so if you did not want to have an abortion, you certainly weren't required to do so.
On the other hand, when you deny the right to abortion, you effectively guarantee or force a woman to have to carry the term an unwanted pregnancy, which is why I characterize it as A form of reproductive slavery and regard Roe is a very democratic American principle decision and regard this, the reversion, although it's not an abolition of abortion to the states,
As actually undemocratic, un-American, and even, in my opinion, immoral, I know that most of those who are supportive of the pro-life movement would take exception, and I understand that.
But my reasons are rooted in the nature of morality and the issue of personhood, which is a stage at which the developing entity is entitled to the social moral and legal status of being a person, which does not occur until the end of the second trimester when viability sets in, which is among the reasons I regard Roe as one of the wisest decisions ever given down by the submarine court.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, if you haven't figured out how basic biology works, there is a thing called a woman, and when a thing called a man puts a thing called a sperm inside a woman, there's a potential for there to be something called a baby.
And so if you can't get past that part of biology, then the discussion is absolutely fruitless.
But there's A number of ways that you can avoid having a baby.
And so if you just don't have control over your basic bodily functions and you just accidentally get pregnant on a regular basis or you get pregnant, you know, bottom line is the personal responsibility is for the two adults in the room.
Certainly, the man should know if he's fertile or if he's had a vasectomy.
Certainly, the woman should have some idea when her ovulation cycle is and be able to take preventive measures.
We all know what those are, so we don't have to go into the detailed discussion of birth control methods, but there's plenty of effective birth control methods.
I don't see this as being the flaming issue.
That they make it out to be, number one.
And number two, it's like, you know, grow up.
We all have to live with the consequences of our actions.
And if you can't deal with those consequences, then just be celibate for, you know, a decade or two.
You'll have menopause and it'll go away.
You won't have a problem.
Joe, I'm going to do my best to restrain myself.
I reject virtually every argument you just made.
I think they're poorly founded, but I don't want to Have that debate here and now.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, the one concept that Joe brought up that is almost never part of this discussion, and I almost hate to even talk about this in 30-second sound bites.
If you want to debate this issue, we should do an entire show on it.
The concept that Joe brought up is that of responsibility.
We're continually being manipulated with the divide and conquer tactic, and this issue is among the top issues that they use for that.
I'm tired of hearing these same tired, tedious arguments without getting very deeply into the arguments themselves.
This article that you have now used in the last four or five shows you've done, Jim relies heavily on emotional manipulation.
It conflates the treatment of black slave women 160 years ago to the extraordinarily different cultural conditions we have now.
The same kind of emotional manipulation that we would point out and decry if it was a different subject like a false flag.
And like Joe was saying, the missing ingredient in these constant, tedious, and repetitive discussions about abortion is that of responsibility.
All the talking points are about a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy.
But the woman is not the only one involved here.
Last I checked, it takes a man and a woman to create a pregnancy.
All of the rights that we have exist within a cultural context in which there is some form of responsibility involved for one's actions in using those rights.
Why is the issue of a woman's responsibility for having become pregnant in the first place never a part of this discussion?
It's always framed in terms of, oh, it's a woman's rights.
To put the discussion only in terms of a woman's right to choose or determine what happens with her own body is, in my mind, something that Jim brings up Periodically, a form of special pleading.
It omits the body of fact that the life growing within her is not entirely the same thing as her body.
Nor does that linguistic framing of the issue address the interests and rights of the other party involved in the creation of the human life within her, that being the man who had sex with her to cause the pregnancy in the first place.
Both man and woman have responsibility for their actions.
Do you want me to go on?
No, I agree with you 100%.
It's great, but the issue as I see it has to do with the stage at which the developing entity, which of course is a form of human life, there's no question about that, Reaches the point where it's entitled to the status of personhood, which is a concept with social, moral, and legal standing.
Whereas I see the court in Roe having ruled, in essence, that that status of personhood is attained at the end of the second trimester, when the developing entity attains viability and is therefore entitled to be treated as a separate entity from the mother up until that point.
When it attains viability and thereby personhood, it does not have that status of being a person.
And if it's not a person, it's not even a deliberate killing of a non-person is not murder.
So that there's a lot of You know, language spinning, demonization of women who maybe in dire circumstances can't afford to bring another baby and they have too large a family, they can't continue to work and put food on the table, keep a roof over their heads.
There are innumerable differences in circumstances whereby a woman Even if she took every precaution, nevertheless became inadvertently pregnant, does not want to carry the term.
I believe we as a humane society, I respect that.
And I, I reject the description of those who support abortion in the first six months as baby killers.
That's just wrong.
That term applies to, uh, uh, I, I, uh, accepted after the six, Month period during after the second trimester, but normally it's used for the product of a live bird.
There's hyperbolic language being slung on both sides, and that gets me back to what I've said in the first place, that this is an issue that is continually used to divide and conquer.
And your point about what you say about slippery language or something like that, that certainly can be applied to those two terms, viability and personhood.
Well, I don't think those are slippery terms at all, actually, but we will save that for another day.
I like to both have strong and vigorous opinions well expressed.
We, meanwhile, have a situation where Heather Mullins is reporting two recounts in Georgia required after the voting machines were incorrect by up to 15%.
That's just an aside about how bad it has been with Dominion voting machines.
Meanwhile, Mike Adams is reporting how Putin's announced a new BRICS global reserve currency project to replace a petrodollar supported by gold.
In my opinion, the sanctions on Russia by the West have not simply backfired, but they're Catastrophic consequences, including the loss, the real total permanent loss of the dollar as a reserve currency for oil transactions, to which I believe it shall never return, which is going to have dramatic effects for Americans here at home.
It's going to reduce our quality of life.
It's going to reduce the spending power of the dollar.
It's going to have devastating effects for America that we brought upon ourselves by virtue of the policies and actions of our own corrupt governments, which were never aligned with the best interests of the American people, sad to say.
Joe.
Yes, well it's not just going to be the American dollar, it's also going to be the goofy euro and it's also going to be the British pound because all of all three of those are fiat currencies and all of them are interlinked with each other.
Another article here at The last refuge, the conservative treehouse.
French President Macron tells Joe Biden that begging Saudi Arabia for more oil won't help.
The Saudis are at maximum production already.
And this is Macron telling this to FJB, but it's being filmed.
And so immediately, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan steps in and tells the group they need to go inside and have this conversation because the media can hear what they're discussing.
Oh, gee, yeah, that would be a real problem if the media actually disclosed that you guys are a bunch of ignorant clowns and that you're running a total clown show.
But now we have another thing.
This just ended.
Was the G7 just ended?
But we have the G20, and they seem to keep moving the goalposts on this.
If you look at the stories starting a day ago, Kremlin says that Putin will attend the G20 summit in Bali, Indonesia.
And this is from a day ago at Politico.
And then if you look, Italy's Draghi, who's a fake Prime Minister of Italy, says that the G20 presidency has ruled out the presence of Putin.
And then five hours ago, it says, Schultz says the G7 leaders will attend the G20 even if Putin comes.
That's it, politico.
And then Reuters says that Russia's Lavrov will attend the G20 foreign meeting.
So, so bottom line is Putin said, yeah, I'll show up.
And Yelensky is supposed to show up there or Elensky or Zelensky, whatever his, you know, proper name is.
But anyhow, the clown from Ukraine is going to show up and he's going to pass the hat around and try to collect more sobs and dollars for his little ongoing fiasco.
But it looks like they they're going to blank Putin out.
But that's OK, because Lavrov is a very smart guy and he speaks English and he will be able to to handle this situation very handily.
Number one.
Number two, I would be real nervous about having Putin travel just for the same reasons that we mentioned earlier about, you know, airline accidents.
I think that's a high potential on something like that for happening with such a high profile character in such a dangerous time.
So I'm very happy that Putin is not going and Lavrov can certainly play ball with these clowns.
Yeah, Lavrov is so experienced.
He's so wise.
He's so discerning.
He's nobody's fool.
I couldn't agree more.
Putin traveling in any airspace is a bad idea.
These Stinger missiles we've given have gone all over the world.
Anyone can shoot down any plane they want virtually willy-nilly.
It would be a colossal blunder to allow him to travel such a distance in airspace, so I'm glad to hear that that appears to be how it's playing out.
Michael?
Well, I would virtually echo what both of you guys just said.
As soon as the prospect of Putin traveling to Indonesia to a meeting like that, I thought, uh-oh, especially since we just talked about Karimade's plane possibly being taken down and the degree to which Putin and his leadership is being demonized all over the world right now.
I was thinking, I hope he has a really good fighter escort, but even fighter escorts can't stop missiles.
And like you, I like Sergei Lavrov a lot, and I hope he attends and continues to speak the truth like he's been speaking.
Now Rand Paul has reported that this new gun bill that a number of Republicans supported, which includes red flag laws, was not discussed within the Senate.
They weren't allowed to see it before the vote was taken.
Yeah, Michael, give us more.
Fill us in.
Well, it's not on that subject, but the story that you did before that was that Mike Adams story entitled How America Ends, and it's talking about the BRICS plan to stop using the U.S.
dollar as the reserve currency and to replace the petrodollar.
You know, a case can be made that the United States and really the Western bloc is being taken down several notches.
And the case can be made that the foundation of is definitely the United States power.
And in another way, all of the Western bloc's power has been the fact that the U.S.
dollar is the global currency.
And something that Adam says in that story is that it's going to be powered by blockchain and backed by gold, this new BRICS currency.
And this is a heavy thing, because I'm extraordinarily skeptical about the widespread acceptance of any form of digital currency, because That platform has a tremendous potential for control to the level of abject slavery.
And that control would be in the hands of some global banking cabal.
And that's the last people that I want to trust not to abuse that power.
Yes, those are very appropriate comments.
Joe, further thoughts of yours?
- Well, yeah, yesterday they cut a fiber optic cable coming into your neighborhood and you had no internet at all for half of the day yesterday.
And then today you have a little bit of a glitch where apparently you've overloaded your hard drive and so you can't get anything else to open or close.
And so you may end up having to buy a whole new hard drive.
So, bottom line is, do you trust a whole bunch of digital ones and zeros that somebody else has complete control over and you have no ability to access it if you have no power?
And, you know, in a situation where you've got rolling blackouts, I had no power for 10 days after Hurricane Ike.
After the ice storm that we had here in Texas on Valentine's Day two years ago, I had no power for almost a week.
So, you know, it's not like you have digital currency.
You have something.
How many times do you go into a store where they They're internet services down and they can't take credit cards so you know if you want to place yourself in such a perilous environment where you have no alternative and that's what they want they want to have no physical currency at all and so if you don't have physical currency it's pretty much like you don't have national sovereignty and you don't have individual sovereignty because you have nothing except Yes, I think those are all excellent points.
to be able to have total control over.
And to me, that's a very bad prescription for moving a healthy society forward. - Yes, I think those are all excellent points.
Among the other stories were that a Joe Biden cheat sheet has been discovered It actually got onto the camera that he's being told where to go, what to say, when to sit down, when to stand up.
It's evident the man is completely incompetent.
He has no capacity to think things through.
He's merely A word reader.
I mean, Nana White used to describe herself as a letter turner.
Well, Joe Biden, this guy, is not President of the United States.
He's a word reader.
That's all.
And he's not even very good at that.
So it seems to me the American people are justifiably fed up His ratings continue to plunge.
They're going down and down and down.
I think 22% among young people, not much higher among Hispanics.
If the Democrats thought their open borders were going to be welcomed by Hispanics who earned their place in American society, they are being completely Rudely awakened because Hispanics despise what the Biden administration has been doing with all this massive influx of illegals rolling out the red carpet, virtually making them citizens, or oh, but automatically giving them cell phones and the like.
I mean, it is disgusting beyond belief.
Joe.
Yeah, well here's we got another story at the conservative treehouse horror in San Antonio.
At least 42 people found dead inside an abandoned semi-trailer during human smuggling operation.
That's an interesting story.
And then we had a Republican elected to a district that has never had a Republican in the last 150 years.
Myra Flores from down in South Texas, and she goes to get sworn in for a seat that was vacated, and so they had a special election.
She won without even having a runoff, and so she goes to get sworn in, and who is going to be there at the swearing-in service but the Speaker of the House?
And so Nancy Pelosi's standing there at a photo op, and Mira Flores's two young daughters are standing next to her, and Nancy elbows one of them in the shoulder and just pushes her out of the way.
So the optics for the Spanish people is like, yeah, here's your great white master, the wicked witch of the West, elbowing your little Hispanic brown girl out of the way during a photo op.
Absolutely hilarious.
So that's another story that I think people should Tune in and enjoy.
And then what was the third one?
Oh, this one's absolutely incredible.
They had Brett Baer was interviewing Carrie Lake, who's running for governor of Arizona.
And he started off saying that there's absolutely no evidence of any voter fraud that affected the 2020 election, and why was she trying to run on that?
And she goes, there's ample evidence.
Have you seen 2,000 mules?
He goes, no, and we're not allowed to talk about it here on Fox News.
And it's like, well, okay.
And he goes, but I did get something that I want to talk to you about.
Seems like you've been hanging out with a bunch of drag queens.
We've got a guy that said that he came to a birthday parties at your house, dressed in drag, and we've got photos of you with him.
And it's like, Hey, I was a news reporter on the TV station there for 30 years.
They sent me to a lot of assignments where I didn't have the choice of what the content was going to be.
And a couple of those were events where there was drag queens there.
And yes, I interviewed the guy or I stood next to him during a photo op.
But he never came to my house, I don't support drag queens in elementary schools, and why are you trying to tar me with this brush?
He goes, on the first day that I'm elected, we're going to have an official investigation and jail people over what happened with the voting, and we're going to close our borders, and we're going to put the Arizona National Guard down there, and we're going to deport the illegals that are in Arizona.
You got anything else to say?
Absolutely hilarious, man.
Yeah, I've watched that video with Pelosi.
I think she actually hits her with her hip.
She actually is nudging her with her elbow at the same time she hits her with her hip.
It's really disgraceful and embarrassing that Pelosi is so vain and self-centered that she can't even be respectful to our children of this newly elected member of Congress.
Really despicable.
Michael.
Yeah, regarding Joe Biden, the first subject there, in my mind, for anybody with half a brain, it's been obvious from the first that this guy is just an incompetent actor who just does his best to walk up there and read what's in front of him, so it's not a big surprise that he has cue cards.
That's kind of a shorthand version of what teleprompters are in the first place.
Um, and, uh, every time the guy tries to speak in an impromptu manner, uh, it's just a disaster.
So, uh, they're just trying to bide their time until they can, uh, they'll, they'll probably, I think they'll probably bump him off in some way, probably in some way that will continue to, uh, divide the country.
Maybe, uh, a guy with an AR-15 or something.
And Joe mentioned a minute ago that cold wave that took out the Texas power system last winter.
I can't remember who it was.
It might have been Mike Adams talking about that and saying that the one of the main factors in the power system going down was the fact that the overall holding company or umbrella company that handles most of Texas powers these days had relied heavily, invested heavily
And when it got that cold, the wind wasn't blowing, and the generators were frozen, and it took out a whole chunk of the Texas power system, and they just weren't expecting it.
Yeah, well, it's even worse than that.
Our stupid, ignorant Governor Perry passed the Energy Act when he replaced Bush as governor.
He was lieutenant governor under that.
When Bush got elected, he replaced him.
He put in an energy policy that requires ratepayers that 25% of all new capacity has to be renewables.
So, it was a gift to T. Boone's Pickin', the wind grifter from the Panhandle, and the Panhandle is littered with these windmills.
The problem that windmills have is in the wintertime, when it's really cold, you don't have the wind blowing, but you could still have ice build up, and they have to run electric heaters on the blades in order to keep the blades from icing up And breaking off.
So that's one of the problems.
In the summer when the wind isn't blowing, the blades can heat up from the sun and distort and then they end up having to replace the blades.
So in the summertime, they have to spin the windmills for when the wind isn't blowing.
So bottom line is a windmill never produces 10% of the energy it takes to manufacture the silly damn things.
A photoelectric cell never produces 10% of the energy that it takes to manufacture those silly things.
And biofuels, which is the ethanol and the soybean diesel, take more energy to produce the fuel than you have in the fuel.
So all three of those, quote, green energies are all net energy losers.
And it turns out electric vehicles are virtually impossible to repair.
No one has specialized skills.
I think the whole green energy thing is an unmitigated disaster.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, I said what I meant a minute ago, and I totally agree with what both of you just said.
It's just a gigantic scam, and the real agenda Behind the whole green energy agenda is to take control of energy out of the hands of individuals and put it in the hands of a global, I want to use the word elite, but you know what I mean?
It's a global criminal cartel.
Yes, yes, yes.
Well, today's an unusual day.
We're having an abbreviated version of the show.
We're actually to the point where I'm glad to call for our final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yes, had a really great conversation over the weekend with Bart Simbrell about the Apollo moon landings and how fake they were, and I also, in that episode, I mentioned a number of the defects in NASA, and it's really worth listening to.
I don't, I won't go into it.
I repeated it on yesterday's show with Carl, but it's really worth listening to the Bart Sombrel interview.
It's at Principia Scientific, and then today I did an interview on the weekend of the June 11th Crimes Against Humanity Tour up in Dallas with a group in Dallas called Offbeat Business Media and they just aired the clip today.
It's 45 minutes long.
It's really good.
It's at Spotify and I'll put a link to that down in the comments so people can hear 45 minutes more of me talking about all of these various issues.
Well, you're making such great points, Joe.
Michael, I'm going to return to the forced vaccine issue and read a small quote from Del Bigtree, like this.
How many lives could have been saved?
Our government, the United States of America, forced people to get vaccines and still are, by the way, that had not been properly safety tested.
That's the story.
Is that the world you want to live in?
That's the result of what we're doing.
We've studied this, we scrutinized it, and now we know that the U.S.
government, by action of forcing people to get a vaccine in order to be employed, murdered people.
That is the truth.
People have died because of blood clots, and it was caused by the United States government.
So the United States government has, and I might add is, murdered its citizens.
Close quote.
No doubt about it, Del Bigtree is doing a great job, as is Kerry Magi, and a whole host of others, Judy Mikovits, Peter McCullough, Joe Mercola, a whole lot of people who are being targeted by the deep state, really ultimately the Rothschild banking empire, which is trying to seize control of the entirety of planet Earth.
I think, once again, Joe Olson from Houston and Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, for a wonderful Texas Tuesday under highly unusual circumstances vis-a-vis our formatting.
But we're going to continue to bring you all the news you need to know.
Bear in mind, the situation is not getting better.
And the war situation in Ukraine is clearly getting noticeably worse, all because of the misguided policies and activities of the West, including the United States.
So hold on to your hat.
It's going to be a wild ride, and let's hope we all survive.
Thank you for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection