All Episodes
Previous Next
June 13, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
58:29
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (12 June 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back, folks, to Truth vs. News Incorporated.
This is June the 12th, and we're in the heat of a heavy conversation that really is bugging us, so let's just carry on and see what's next here.
Go ahead, Big Jim.
Thanks, Don.
Oops.
We need to catch up with the show, the stories, where we are today.
All those we've covered already.
Getting close.
Nope.
Getting close.
Eating bugs, how awful.
No more freedom of speech because Davos doesn't like it.
A New York Times investigation.
Over a dozen children were still alive in Uvalde while the police waited for protective equipment.
A review of new documents and video by the New York Times indicates over a dozen kids were still alive for over an hour while local police were waiting for protective equipment.
An investigation into the police response during the massacre has been ongoing.
Reports indicate officers waited outside the classroom and school for over an hour.
By the time specialized border agents ignored orders to hold back and breach the classroom, 19 children and two teachers had been killed or so they would have us believe.
The new evidence reviewed by the Times shows more than a dozen remained alive for over an hour before officers entered the classroom.
Heavily armed officers delayed confronting a gunman in Uvalde for more than an hour, even though supervisors have been told some trapped with him needed medical equipment.
The Times Report is simply infuriating.
How many lives could have been saved if the police, having advised properly by their chief, Peter Arradondo, to take the gunman out immediately?
The new documents appear to indicate the tragically slow response directly contributed to a higher death toll.
One victim, a young girl, died in a hospital after bleeding for an hour after she was shot.
That shocking report led to Katie Torr muttering, Jesus, as she heard the news.
The New York Times also exposed why Arradondo wanted officers to wait.
People are going to ask why we're taking so long, a voice investigator believed to be the chief, says on the body cam.
Erredondo, it seems, advised the heavily armed officer to wait for protective equipment to lower the risk to law enforcement officers.
The time's right, he was agonizing over the length it was taking to secure shields that would help protect officers when they entered and found a key for the classroom door.
Two weeks ago, the Texas Department of Public Safety Lieutenant Chris Olivares explained to CNN, police responding to the shooting were held back because they could have been shot, which seemed to be a part of the job description one recognized prior to wearing any form of a badge.
Videos posted online appear to show officers fighting with parents who are begging them to go in and stop the shooter.
One such video appears to show the scene with people yelling and screaming as police push them away from the parameter.
Some may have been pepper sprayed or even tackled to the ground.
One hero mom Or so we're told.
Angela Rose Gomez drove 40 miles from her job as a farm worker to reach the school after learning of the shooting, was handcuffed after complaining about the police response, managed to be released, then ran into the building to save her own children.
The Times report brings up even more questions.
It calls the previous assertion by State Senator Roland Gutierrez, who initially claimed Arradondo didn't know about the 911 calls, indicating children were still alive.
Even with additional documents and videos, much about the chaotic scene remains unclear, including precisely when Chief Arradondo and other senior officers became aware of injuries inside the classroom.
Pavois, again believed to be Arradondo, said, we think there are some injuries in there several minutes before it was finally breached.
Personally, this is a massive distraction from what I believe is a false flag event, so I'm I'm intrigued, because the Democrats to promote gun control wanted the emotional impact of kids being killed, but it's all being obfuscated by the police failing to do their duty.
I mean, it's ridiculous.
Scott, your thoughts?
That's the most outrageous aspect of this, is the police Stopping parents, handcuffing parents, putting them on the ground as they allegedly try and save their children.
That flipped the script.
That has changed the whole thing because that gets policemen killed.
When parents are stopped from rescuing their children, I'm surprised some guy didn't jump in a truck and run over those officers and barricade right through the school.
And that's something that's not going to bode well for any police any time ever in these sort of situations.
And I do think it's a false flag.
The psychographics of this individual buying two large caliber rifles that are over $5,000, brand new.
These are firearms that you have to be proficient at.
You have to understand how they work.
You have to have gone to the range.
You don't just pick these up and start shooting.
I mean, they're a little advanced.
So it doesn't match the profile of some mentally disturbed, emotional kid doing this.
So I don't buy the narrative.
I think it's a false flag for gun control purposes.
And it shows us the evil that is, you know, insidiously trying to assert itself in these events.
They're desperate to try and disarm the American public, and this is how they do it, with false shooting of children events.
But the entire narrative isn't guilt tripping people into turning in their guns, rather the opposite.
It is showing people we have created such a schizophrenic society over 30 years With atheism in the schools and transgenderism and, you know, male toxicity of masculine toxicity and things like that, you're creating a Frankenstein generation that doesn't surprise people when they, you know, allegedly do these crimes.
And it's not gonna stop people from getting guns.
In fact, it's probably gonna motivate people.
And that's why Sheriff Grady in Florida said, If you come into our town to shoot our children, we will shoot you graveyard dead.
And once again, when I commented about Sheriff Grady's wise policy, John Michael Chambers of American Media Periscope pulled my show and said, you're inciting violence.
And I said, that is a damn lie.
I am commenting on what Sheriff Grady has said, and that is an official policy by a sheriff.
And it has nothing to do with inciting violence.
It is identifying the policy of the sheriff that is elected by the people that is clearly saying, this is how you respond to domestic terrorists.
And I think we're going to see more and more Sheriff Grady's rising up and doing that, Jim.
Very, very good comment, Scott.
I'm embarrassed that John Michael Chambers turned out to be some kind of bleeding heart left winger, Scott.
He certainly misrepresented himself to you and to me.
Holly, your thoughts?
Mute.
Well, I think the event in Texas, as well, is a way of showing the police standing down, you know, however they were involved, was meant to promote the narrative as well that, you know, by the liberals and whatnot, that police are useless.
We can't utilize police.
They're not going to save us.
Obviously, we need gun control because, you know, the cops aren't going to go and protect your children at a school, etc.
I'm trying to fight that.
narrative of already like the school resource officer and all this you know all the different uh things that they've supposedly put in place like locked doors and keeping kids locked within the school and like having uh resource officers basically armed police at a lot of schools already and uh basically basically making the argument that that's not necessary as well yes
Well, even if you assume that the shooting was real, and I can guarantee it wasn't, it was all staged, they've lost the impact because it's all been obfuscated by the police failure, the dereliction of duty, which parents find completely outrageous and legitimately so.
Let me illustrate how we know this was fraudulent.
Number one, he's supposed to have shot his grandmother and then gone to this school and shot up a bunch of second, third, and fourth graders.
Clearly modeled after Sandy Hook.
Well, the purported shooter there, six feet tall, 112 pounds, was supposed to have shot his mother and then gone over to the elementary school and shot up 20 first graders and six adults.
Now, they obviously have to vary the cadence.
So now he's shooting his grandmother and going to shoot 19 second, third and fourth graders and two teachers.
He crashes a truck.
And this might as well be product placement because it's an F-150, a very expensive Ford pickup truck that's very popular.
How in the world did he get a hold of that?
Then after he crashed the truck, he fired at two witnesses over here at a funeral home, entered a building where a teacher had left the door unlocked.
Now this was a 97 degree temperature day.
There's no way a teacher ought to be leaving the door open to let all the hot air in.
He walked at the school while firing at it.
In fact, an initial report had it all the shots were fired outside of the school.
It was a fraud.
How did a totally impoverished dropout of ambiguous sexuality, who couldn't hold a job as mop boy at Wendy's, buy five grand worth of rifles at a holographic site?
On a totally unrelated topic, have you noticed how many sex perverts are in the FBI and federal law enforcement in general?
It's weird.
Anyway, the Ecotech holographic site alone is $800 or so plus installation.
The question is not how did he get the guns.
He bought them.
The question is where did he get the money, and by the way, these are high-end AR-15s.
They're very expensive.
So we're talking about maybe $6,000 to $8,000 worth of weapons.
Meanwhile, here we have some photographs of the teachers.
Remember at Sandy Hook, there were two particularly photogenic kids.
One was a little boy, Noah Posner, and the other, a little girl, Emily Parker.
We saw a lot of them at the time.
They were heart-rending.
Well, here they seem to have focused on Amory Jo Garza, 10 years old.
And by the way, you'll see, they have these quality, studio quality photographs of each.
But get this.
We got this little Garza girl and listen to this.
Sorry for your loss.
You're holding a picture of your daughter.
She had just won an honor roll.
What do you want people to know about her?
That she was just trying to do the right thing.
She's just trying to call the cops.
That's... She... This is literally like her worst fear.
She talked to us about something like this.
So I... I'm a med-8.
So when I arrived on the scene, they still had kids inside.
They started bringing the kids out.
And I was... Angel Garza talking about his daughter who has died here 10 years old.
10 year old Amory Joe Garza was another fourth grader at Rob Elementary.
She was a real good student.
She was a very good daughter.
Amory loved to draw, do science experiments, and make people laugh.
She was the perfect daughter.
Yeah, she was a perfect daughter.
When he heard about the shooting, Alfred Garza III raced to the school.
While waiting for news about his own daughter, Garza says he tried to comfort the children who did manage to get out.
They were just overwhelmed.
It's hard to even Wrap your mind around something like that.
I just want to honor her name.
of his baby girl posing proudly with her honor roll certificate just hours before the shooting.
I just want to honor her name.
I just want her to be remembered as the type of person that she was. - So she's got a different father on each network.
I mean, it's embarrassingly bad.
Those who are doing these events aren't rocket scientists and they fuck up.
A messy screw-up was made with our crisis actors.
Two different crisis actor dads claim the same daughter with the same name and honor roll certificate.
Both dads claiming the same last name broadcast on two different networks.
In the video that shows the same girl with two different dads, if it were to be dad and stepdad, which they'd like to convince us was an innocent mistake, then it has to be daughter and stepdaughter.
The video's a completely legit bust of this song.
Two dads with the same last name, both calling her their daughter?
Bullshit.
Busted.
They effed up the script and that's all there is to it.
I think Jim Stone's absolutely right.
This was a colossal blunder.
They got caught with their pants down.
Don't get punked by bullshit.
This video destroys the whole damn thing.
Meanwhile, we had a Sandy Hook teacher by the name of Victoria Soto turn out and play the role of a teacher at Uvalde as well.
You mentioned Victoria Soto.
That's her on the right.
Resurrected as Eva Morales in time to be shot at Uvalde.
Jim, did you know our favorite Muslim, Dr. Oz, had a kid on his TV show and supposedly survived Sandy Hook?
The Turkish doctor asked the kid a few leading softball questions.
Are you proud of your teacher?
The kid shrugs and says, yes.
After it continues, the child gets frustrated and noisy and says, it was a drill.
What?
And Dr. Oz has nothing with his mom?
The kid dropped?
Can't anyone see this ridiculousness?
And let me say, once it was noticed that it was the same actor playing both roles, they put up other photographs of a different woman and claimed that was supposed to be the Hispanic teacher.
But I guarantee you 100% it was Victoria Soto from Sandy Hook and they paid her big bucks to come down to Uvaldo and reprise her role.
Scott, your thoughts?
Yeah, this is what America has turned into.
This is the degenerate, deceitful, schizophrenic nation that we've come into with Anderson Cooper, the sodomite, up there telling lies with crisis actors who don't have any tears in their eyes, Don't have any emotional grip in their heart if they had just lost a child, a loved one.
They wouldn't be able to stand.
They wouldn't be able to endure any sort of composed presentation.
So it's a laughingstock, and the media is a laughingstock, and the people who buy this and believe this are laughingstock idiots that deserve the death and slavery that's coming their way.
This is how tyranny evolves.
This is how the Second Amendment is destroyed.
This is how a Gestapo police force inevitably is going to transform America into a police state, and I think
These sort of things again the police and having a having a role and a participation in this uh shows us there is absolutely uh no one that can be trusted and the least of all anyone wearing badges with guns as far as I'm concerned they are public enemy number one and they should be executed for treason because this is this is a seditious conspiracy and an act of treason in the worst way Jim.
Really, really embarrassing and bad.
Holly, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think it was a senator on CNN.
He was from Connecticut talking about how he's been working his whole professional career in the Senate to pass a gun Legislation and not pro-gun legislation, but gun control legislation and saying that the House and the Senate needed to act quickly because the Uvalde shooting could be out of the news cycle very quickly.
And they're kind of lamenting about that.
So they're saying that, you know, they need to get these rhinos and everyone in line, basically.
Before the news cycle kind of flips and people forget and they're not traumatized by by these sort of constant events right now.
So obviously they understand what they need to do and how they need to use it as an opportunity to try to push forward legislation like we were discussing earlier.
Right, and they got to do as fast as they can before people stop and think through what's going on and realize they've been played.
Yeah, like Pelosi said, you gotta pass it before you can read it, right?
That's right.
And all of Connecticut is just as corrupt as it comes.
It's just astonishing that the whole state has been promoting the phony story about Sandy Hook.
Meanwhile, a House GOP candidate shares a post claiming Buffalo and Uvalde were false psych-ops.
Actually, it's rather more subtle than that.
They merely raised some questions.
But who's to inhibit the left-wing media from exaggerating to attack?
Carl Paladino's been endorsed by fellow New York Republican Elise Stefanik, a member of the House GOP.
She replaced Liz Cheney, who got the boot deservedly so for being an anti-Trumper.
A congressional candidate in New York, endorsed by a member of the GOP leadership, shared a Facebook post claiming the mass shootings in Buffalo and Uvalde were false flags.
Carl Palladino, a Buffalo businessman and former candidate for governor, reposted a conspiracy theory-laced message—wait till you hear it—by another person casting doubt on whether the shootings at a supermarket in Buffalo and an elementary school in Uvalde were real.
And of course they weren't.
They were completely staged, according to screenshots of the since-deleted post captured by the watchdog group Media Matters for America, which is a very nasty left-wing outfit.
Paladino's been endorsed by Representative Elise Stefanik, the number three Republican in the House.
He's running for the seat held by GOP Representative Chris Jacobs, Recently announced he was ending his reelection bid after he came out in support of a federal ban on so-called assault weapons.
I think most Republicans just wouldn't have anything to do with him after that.
The 23rd Congressional District includes suburbs of Buffalo.
I'm proud to announce my endorsement of my friend Carl Palladino in New York 23.
Stefanik wrote, Carl is a job creator and conservative outsider who will be a tireless fighter for the people of New York in our fight to put America first to save the country.
NBC News has reached out to Palladino's campaign and Stefanik's office.
Here's the quote.
In almost every mass shooting, including the most recent horrific Buffalo Tops Market and the Texas school shootings, there are strange occurrences that are never fully explained.
That's the post.
That's the post for which he's being targeted.
Ridiculous.
Meanwhile, they won all out, brought a B-list Hollywood actor down to Uvalde, who claims it's his hometown.
Matthew McConaughey is worth some $106 million.
Ted Curd tweeted, from his ivory tower, this actor is telling poor people to give up the guns that protect their families.
Here you go, Matthew.
Meanwhile, he appeared at the White House to call on lawmakers to pass gun control legislation.
The Uvalde parents allegedly could only identify their daughter body by a green cover, says Look at those shoes.
The laces have never been tightened up.
They just came out of a box.
The idea she was so shot up, they could only identify her by her shoes.
That's just ridiculous beyond words.
And there's not a speck of blood on these shoes, which have never been on anyone's foot.
Oh, those pair of shoes like they came fresh out of the market.
Absolutely.
And guess what?
When Matthew McConaughey comes to Uvalde, he brings along his wife, Camilla, and surprise, surprise, she's wearing green Converse sneakers too.
I mean, how insulting can you get?
Meanwhile, another tweet.
McConaughey.
We're still having arguments every day about what a fax is.
Ron Filipkowski.
The extent to which right-wingers across the social media are blasting McConaughey tells you exactly how effective he was today.
His performance, frankly, was amateurish, ridiculous.
Comical.
He was looking at his script to make sure he got the words right.
He was giving gesticulations that were hyperbolic.
He lost votes in support for gun control rather than gaining.
It was embarrassingly bad.
Scott, I don't know if you saw it, but this was just shameless.
This guy came down and pulled this stunt.
Your thoughts?
Well, all of these actors are mentally deranged, unhinged individuals living in a fantasy world, thinking that they're somehow anointed prophets that translate to the lowly, humble, animal masses.
And it's a sickening display of the material gluttony that these liberal leftist institutions have I mean, accumulated over 50 years.
People really need to, you know, really need to reevaluate everything that they're doing and what they spend their time and their money on and who they spend it on.
No one should ever go see another Matthew McConaughey movie ever again.
No one should ever, I mean participate, of course, in any of these gun registration scams.
Again, we've said it before, the Second Amendment, a well-regulated militia being necessary for the freedom, the security of a free state, the right of the people,
To keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, shall not be licensed, shall not be certified, shall not be registered, shall not have any government paperwork whatsoever restraining a person's ability to keep and bear arms and their ability as individual citizens who happen to be well-regulated, well-disciplined, well-practiced,
In the art of strategic tactical operations which are meant to destroy domestic enemies and foreign enemies.
That's what the Constitution says.
A well-regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state.
It means to secure and defend the free state against those who would make it insecure.
Those tyrants that would come in and enslave the people.
Whether it's government, police, or Matthew McConaughey, that's why people enjoy the right to keep and bear arms, to defend their freedom, their liberty, and their state from these sort of gun-grabbing tyrants in Washington D.C.
And again, I would not be surprised if the Democrats become so mentally unhinged And the police as well, that they think they can bully the American people, and if anyone will trigger a civil war, it's going to be the police and the Democrats.
By picking a fight, they will not win.
Jim?
Very thoughtful, Scott.
Holly, your thoughts?
Yeah, it was so bad, and obviously, yeah, the symbolism.
I think you had talked about On another show with that guy, Dave, talking about the sneakers or how there's always like shoe references or something weird in some of these events.
Like, I don't know, similar to like a color revolution thing or like a shoe reference.
You know, there's always one guy with a shoe or one shoe left at something like that.
So obviously that's not like a smoking gun or anything, but it's just something, something strange that always gets brought up.
Yeah.
New deal.
Only... There you go, Scott.
The Converse sneakers are the green new deal I like that.
Meanwhile...
Filmmaker Michael Moore continues to call for the Second Amendment to be repealed.
You don't need a gun!
He wants to remove nearly every gun from civilian ownership.
This guy has gone so far off the edge, I cannot believe it.
Michael Moore calls on media to say it's time to repeal the Second Amendment.
He decided to join MSNBC following Uvalde massacre because making a film that I thought would end this didn't work.
Staying off TV wasn't forcing change either.
I thought, I have to be completely honest with people.
And so I said it.
I said something that I know the Democrat Party leaders and others don't want.
They don't want this said.
I believe a majority of Americans are thinking it.
A lot of people are afraid to say it.
I'm going to say it.
I said it that night live on television.
Indeed, on May 25th, Moore joined MSNBC's Chris Hayes and demanded drastic action from Congress, including a moratorium on buying firearms.
The liberal filmmaker then took it a step further by asking, who will say on this network or any other in the next few days, it's time to repeal the Second Amendment?
Moore told Rumble listeners he wanted to speak to them directly about the remark because he plans to repeat the controversial talking point.
He repeatedly said powerful Democrats are scared such rhetoric could cost them elections.
But he doesn't care what politicians think of him.
And frankly, they think very little of him.
More insistent Americans with his ideology will win before urging listeners to repeat his controversial talking point.
I said it then, and I say it now, and I'll keep saying it, and I want you to say it with me.
Repeal the Second Amendment!
This sentence in our Constitution, it was written 235 years ago.
Repeal the Second Amendment!
Then he read the Second Amendment to listeners and said, America's founding fathers wrote the line in order to help protect against the British on the heels of the Revolutionary War.
There were no guns back then, not the way we know them now.
They had these muskets, these kinds of rifles that didn't have bullets because a bullet had not been invented yet.
So they had musket balls.
That's all they knew then, that and cannons.
More than read.
A new Second Amendment, he wrote, and proposed it to serve as a general idea for a replacement, which includes a buyback program that will remove all civilian guns within five years.
Except, of course, the criminals aren't going to give up their guns.
Get this.
Congress shall have a well-regulated system for the extremely limited ownership of firearms and weapons, and they will make laws regarding ammunition capacity, storage locks, registration, the vetting of the owner, strict minimum age requirements, all of which are necessary to the security of a free state and the right of a people to be safe from gun violence.
The people's right to not be shot or threatened by those who bear arms shall not be infringed.
I can't begin to tell you.
I can't begin to tell you the stupidity of Michael Moore.
I mean, he doesn't understand anything about weapons and guns.
He doesn't understand that people use guns for defensive purposes millions of times every year.
Over the last five years, 147 kids have died in these.
I mean, that would be the number if they were real.
But by the estimates, 200,000 Americans' lives are saved every single year.
So if you take guns away, since the criminals aren't going to give up their guns, when you outlaw guns, only outlaws have guns.
I mean, Michael Moore must be the greatest retard on the face of planet Earth.
Scott, your thoughts?
Oh, a more disgusting, loathsome, painful to even look at individual, I know not.
I mean, he makes Jabba the Hutt look like a victorious swimsuit model.
Michael Moore is a hideously ugly, I wouldn't be surprised if it's a woman, uh transgender or something but he's he's a disgusting troll and uh this nonsense about uh you know repealing the second amendment again no one believes that everyone in their heart of hearts knows that the second amendment is uh to preserve liberty from a tyrannical government
And every single gun owner that I've ever, ever met on the range, in the military, and elsewhere, are the most responsible, intelligent, law-abiding individuals on the planet.
It is not conservative Republican Christians that go around doing bad things.
It is Democrats from dysfunctional, Schizophrenic families have been given drugs, lithium, mental mood disorders, they've been brought up in broken homes, they've been subjected to all sorts of social chaos.
That's what Democrats are, not conservative Christian Republican types.
So the great divorce needs to occur very quickly.
And people need to know that that's the way.
Tucker Carlson said it too.
You try and take people's guns, you will have a civil war in this country overnight.
Jim?
Yeah, I think you're right, Scott.
And deservedly so.
Hawley, your thoughts?
I'm just thinking about like who Michael Moore could possibly be like, be appealing to and I'm guessing it's like, like liberal women like living in the suburbs that have no idea about anything about gun ownership or anything.
They never touched it.
They're like afraid to pick it up.
You know how to convert a liberal person, you know, they don't even have to stop being liberal, just sign them up for a gun safety course, like a women's gun safety course.
They'll come back, they'll be empowered, they'll learn their rights, you know, they'll become, they'll suddenly love the Constitution, they'll love spending time with the girls at the range, and they'll change their mind about it, and they'll understand what it's like to protect their family and everything like that, especially as we see Crime start to move into the suburbs.
We're even seeing this here where people are driving up from out of state to go start stealing stuff out of people's yards, whether it's lawnmowers or four wheelers or whatever, and eventually things are going to turn hot from that.
Even the people who are completely blind, you know, and living in their bubble are going to have to understand that as things get desperate and people can't afford basic things like food, etc.
and you legalize drugs, you know, in Portland, Maine, they've got, they've just, they opened up a clinic called the church of safe injection and people are overdosing like crazy.
Guess what?
They're handing out needles and crack pipes and all that sort of stuff in this democratic city.
And then they're surprised when the 33 year old woman who founded it mysteriously died recently, they're all talking about what happened.
I don't know.
There's speculation as to how she could have possibly died.
But I'm thinking that all of this liberal disease is just making things absolutely insane for women.
I'm just speaking as a woman, seeing how, you know, women are being degraded by society and learning to give up their rights and like listening to people like What, Michael Moore and like Joe Olson said, people, women in Texas love McConaughey because he's handsome.
Like they're going to vote for him for governor or something based on that.
It's a joke.
It's just a joke.
And you got Robert De Niro on the one hand saying Biden's doing a good job.
And you got Matthew McConaughey coming down and saying, give up your guns.
I mean, this is incredible.
Jimmy Kimmel.
And Biden going on Kimball.
I mean, isn't it pathetic?
There are some Democrats who think maybe Joe shouldn't run for president again.
Gee, the problem is, who are they going to run if they don't run Joe?
And Joe obviously can't run.
Meanwhile, Pelosi was blindsided when radical left-wing activists gave her this devastating news.
Get this.
Nancy Pelosi thought she had everything lined up for her latest left-wing scheme.
Then she was hit with a nasty surprise.
In San Francisco, Pelosi claimed everything was in line for a new assault weapon ban to be voted in the House after other gun control measures.
And then as we get through, those other gun control measures would be having a hearing and marking up the assault weapons ban following all of that.
Of course, Pelosi thought she had it all lined up to ram the new ban through Congress.
Then she was hit with a nasty surprise she never saw coming.
Apparently, gun control activists don't believe the Democrats have the votes to pass a new assault weapons ban.
According to a report from Politico, as many as 15 House Democrats oppose that restriction, according to some activists, tallies more than enough to sink the legislation.
With only a razor-thin 12-seat majority in the House, vulnerable Democrats facing tough midterm elections in swing districts could deal a fatal blow to Pelosi and the left's gun-grabbing ambitions.
But even if the new assault weapon ban were to pass the House, it already faced an uphill battle on the Senate.
As things currently stand, Democrats would need at least 10 Republicans to betray conservative voters to break the filibuster and pass it.
On top of that, more cold water was poured on a potential assault weapon ban when the Democrats' lead Senate negotiator, Senate Chris Murphy, the one from Connecticut to whom you referred, Holly, publicly announced any bipartisan gun control deal would not include it.
Well, it looks like the so-called assault weapon ban is going nowhere.
That's not going to stop Democrats from trying, with the help of weak-kneed Republicans, to ramp whatever gun control measures they can into law.
But no matter what, defeating the left efforts to reinstate a new assault weapon ban is just one of many victories needed to stop Democrats' latest gun-grabbing schemes.
Scott, your thoughts?
You're muted.
Yeah, I think this is destined to go nowhere.
You're not going to have a majority of people want to pass anything like that, especially in a precarious time where the borders are being flung open.
You have a mass invasion.
You have rumblings of war with China, which everyone knows could invade California.
You've got other conflicts.
that are stemming up.
And I think the population realizes this is a time unlike any other where the Second Amendment is sacred and inviolable.
And they're not going to allow these tyrannical Democrats to disarm the American people.
It's just not going to go anywhere.
And people aren't going to be apologizing for their maintaining their Second Amendment either.
I think they're going to be actually preparing to use them because the government is so over the top in this totalitarian push, labeling every conservative a domestic terrorist.
I think the writing's on the wall and people would never obey anything anyway.
And again, if cops are so stupid to think they can go into neighborhoods and confiscate people's guns, you're going to have a lot of dead cops, Jim.
I certainly agree with that.
Scott Hawley, your thoughts?
Well, I think we're going to see which we're already seeing more.
We're seeing some areas that are going to continue to take this road where they're just going to Put people into these ghettos and jazz centers.
And I will say, in San Francisco, what did they repeal?
Was it the DA over there, Scott, or something like that?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
The progressive district attorney.
Yes, yes, yeah.
I think that's actually a good sign, you know?
It is.
In San Francisco, for crying out loud.
That's Pelosi's hometown.
Yeah, because even everybody in San Francisco is sick and tired of seeing these black homeless thugs come in with shopping carts and rob Target blind and then just walk out.
And they're tired of a district attorney saying, we're not going to prosecute anyone that robs under $900 worth of stuff.
Isn't that incredible?
Just incredible.
only prosecutes people who defend their shops with guns.
They're the only ones being arrested.
So I think San Francisco is a sign.
People are done with all of this stuff.
And also, in San Francisco, they had like 600 police officers that refused to get the jab.
They were all fired.
Isn't that incredible?
Just incredible.
Meanwhile, a devastating new ball just left.
Pelosi's world crumbling before her very eyes.
Democrats were down to the last card in the deck.
It's the left's last chance to save its congressional majorities.
But a devastating new poll just left Pelosi's world crumbling before her very eyes.
She planned the January 6 witch hunt committee to serve two purposes.
It's supposed to serve as the third impeachment of Donald Trump and a way to block him from running for president in 2024.
The committee was also formed to craft a political narrative for Democrats to run on in 2022 about how Republicans represent a danger to democracy.
Both of those goals look like they're headed for the trash bin.
A new NBC News poll showed 45% of Americans blame Donald Trump for what happened on January 6th, compared to 55% who do not.
NBC reports.
Just 45% of Americans say Donald Trump is solely or mainly responsible for the rioters who took the U.S.
Capitol during the January 6th attack, versus a combined 55% who say the former president is only somewhat responsible or not really responsible, according to the latest NBC News poll.
That's a shift from the January 2021 NBC poll taken days after, when 52% said Trump was either solely or mainly responsible, compared to 47% who disagreed.
The erosion in those holding Trump responsible has come across the board among Democrats, who declined from 91% to 87%, Republicans, 11% to 9%, and Independents, 44% to 41%.
The committee is set to kick off the prime time on June 8th.
It's already done so, but it's losing steam rapidly.
Committee members even brought in a former producer of Good Morning America to spice it up, to attract maximum attention.
The corporate-controlled media is planning to cover them wall to wall.
But the committee is running against a stubborn problem.
A majority of Americans no longer believe the false talking points and hype from the corporate-controlled media and Democrat Party about January 6th.
Americans have had a chance to reassess the day's events, and the left-wing narrative that Democrats and the media hyped about an armed insurrection attempting to overthrow the government collapsed for the simple reason that it just isn't true.
Meanwhile, don't let these identical twins fool you.
One is an annoying, loud, obnoxious Muppet.
The other is Miss Piggy.
Big Networks see huge rating decline with the January 6th hearing.
Surprise, surprise!
CBS, NBC, and ABC, which switched their regular primetime programming to air the House Select Committee January 6th first public hearing Thursday, saw huge ratings decline.
ABC, whose fall schedule normally includes Grey's Anatomy at 8pm, took in the largest haul with 4.8 million, while NBC and CBS carried 3.5 and 3.3 million, respectively.
The three outlets typically average $18 million collectively during prime time.
$18 million.
ABC World News Tonight with David Muir, average 7.4 million total viewers for the week of May 30th, while NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, average 6.06.
President Biden's State of the Union address drew 6.3 for ABC, 4.86 for CBS, and 4.71 for NBC.
The committee asserted that former President Trump was at the center of a conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results.
Get this.
January 6th, primetime hearing watched by an estimated 20 million viewers.
Update!
An estimated 20 million watch the January 6th hearing across 12 networks.
The audience breakdown show viewership among those 55 and older was 15.2, an estimate 3.6 in the 35 to 54, and 834,000 among 18 to 34-year-olds.
The figures include out-of-home viewing and connected TV viewing.
It does not include PBS, which has carried the hearing, but has a different data delivery timing.
By contrast, Biden's State of the Union drew about 38 million, but viewers were also likely exposed to portions of the hearing via social media clips and news coverage following the event.
Get this, Denisha D'Souza dares the January 6th committee to air his movie 2,000 Mules at public hearings and attempt to refute it.
2000 Mules reveals the extraordinary work by Truth of Vote founder Catherine Engelbrecht, a business owner and election intelligence expert, Greg Phillips.
Catherine Engelbrecht is the founder of Truth of Vote, an election integrity project launched in 2009.
Greg Phillips has been in conservative politics for 40 years, working with committees, parties, campaigns, and election intelligence operations.
He has built political apps, including Ground, Ork, and ID3.
He is also a founder and managing partner of the pro-Gingrich super PAC, Winning Our Future, and election intelligence company Offset Group.
Greg is currently working with Catherine Engelbrecht from To The Vote in their historic investigation of Democrat ballot trafficking in the 2020 election.
Catherine and Greg told the Gateway Pundit they discovered 7% of the mail-in ballots were trafficked during the 2020 election.
The investigators told us their evidence will be released following the movie launch next month.
The number of traffic ballots exceeds the margin of victory for Joe Biden's several battleground states, including Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia.
Without these ballots, and not counting the thousands of others stolen in the 2020 election, President Donald Trump would have easily won re-election.
The mainstream has either ignored the film or put shallow, easily debunked arguments on the findings discussed in the documentary.
Too bad the January 6th Committee is not interested in the truth.
That's not their goal.
On Saturday, Director Dinesh D'Souza dared Louis Cheney's January 6th Committee to air 2000 Mules live during one of their sham hearings and see if they can refute it.
Meanwhile, get this, they're using teleprompters!
They brought in an ABC guy so he has the whole thing scripted and they're using teleprompters.
This is not a legitimate congressional investigation.
This is a scripted propaganda campaign against Donald Trump to promote the Democrats and try to make the case that Trump should not be allowed to run for president again because they know for a certainty he will clean their clock.
Scott, Well, you know, Dinesh D'Souza has every right to aggressively lobby this on Capitol Hill, and certainly it should be filed as newly discovered evidence in any court action, any court filings challenging this election that the courts have refused to give standing.
I think there's grounds to say newly discovered evidence has been found that indicates massive fraud occurred in this election cannot be let to stand you cannot allow a false president to be to be recognized so there's
This certainly should be part of the legal remedy in this country because everything is observable and provable and I think it's to not do it, to not evaluate this and not have some sort of a review and an audit of the material in his film is an indictment that the country is absolutely corrupt and the government's corrupt and there's
There's uh riddled with fraud that uh you know this is the republican the constitution has been overthrown and that alone gives license to people to declare we're in a state of civil war because this film shows very clearly uh the massive fraud that occurred and therefore we are not going to be recognizing the results of this fraudulent election.
Jim?
Yes, very good.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think the Democrats are going to play, you know, super dirty and do whatever they can to try to overthrow this next election because they're just hemorrhaging from their own base and just rigging insane right now.
I wanted to mention a couple instances in Michigan.
They arrested one of the Michigan governor candidates who's trying to run.
He was doing pretty well, successful against Whitmer, which I mean, anyone could pretty much run and try to win against her because she's so hated over there.
Michigan governor candidate Ryan Kelly, who was at the Capitol on January 6th, is arrested.
You know, they raided him.
The FBI arrested him.
And just as he's I mean, why did they wait until now?
I mean, just as his campaigns really rubbing up and he was getting a lot of support.
Also, former police chief James Craig from Detroit.
He was one of the early candidates run against Whitmer.
He's a great guy.
He was a police chief of Detroit, an African-American who refused to let Antifa and BLM just run roughshod over Detroit.
He straight up said, you guys aren't allowed in here.
You can't protest.
Go, you know, BLM.
They shipped them in a bus load out to like the suburbs and they have like a rally or an event like in the suburbs of Michigan.
Like nothing happened because they wanted to go and try to burn down Detroit.
And police chief Craig said, no way.
And so Police Chief Craig was actually just disqualified and they threw out a bunch of his ballots saying that his ballots weren't legit.
So, you know, you see the hypocrisy of that.
And then also there was the GOP Senate candidate, John James, who is also African-American.
He was running for Senate, a rock war vet, a dad.
His signs were literally everywhere in Michigan and they rigged his election in 2020 as well and stole his election for Senate.
So Michigan, just example of what the Democrats are going to be doing.
They're already doing this in all kinds of states right now.
They're playing super dirty to keep in someone like Whittler and other people.
Other Democrats are trying to hold on to as many of these people as possible.
How did we reach a point of having such a corrupt party, you know?
I mean, the Democrats were once a great American political party.
This is a party of JFK, for crying out loud, of FDR.
I cannot believe the sorry state we've come, Scott.
Your thoughts?
Well, I mean, that's what you would think any sane person and party would want and see, that the only way they have hope is to have a JFK type of individual.
But you don't see that type of leadership in the Democrats.
They're all about transgender, homosexuality, LGBT this, critical race theory, everything's violence, everything's oppression, everything's revenge, everything's tyranny.
Everything's coercion.
You will wear the mask, you will get the vaccine, or you will be ostracized, and you will be punished, and the government, the state, will do it to you, and there's nothing you can do against it.
Oh, really?
That's how civil wars start.
That's when people start getting violent and bloody, and we, again, we haven't tipped it off yet.
But when people start to recognize that they've gotten the shot and they're killed or they've killed their children or their family or their wives with this shot, then you're going to see bloodshed.
Then you're going to see people taking vengeance out on everyone that forced them to get a shot, whether it's their employer or the hospital or the doctor or the nurse.
I think we are coming to a day of reckoning, and that's another reason why they're so nervous about guns and firearms, is because they realize that when the American people learn of this and figure it out, there will be hell to pay, and the Democrats are going to be the ones paying the price with their own blood, Jim.
Holly, your thoughts about the big picture here?
Well, I just think we kind of have to wait and see as far as The Democrats are probably going to try to find a way to stop the election from even happening.
I know that sounds weird, but I mean, they're going to have their butts handed to them otherwise, and they know it.
So they're going to have to find some way to do in more mail-in ballots or more rigging or some sort of a bank to lock people down or some something to, you know, that'll be so big it'll stop like the news cycle or something.
Because if they lose all these seats that they're they're supposed to, I mean, they're done for, you know, A generation, at least.
Yeah, I think the two alternatives are another lockdown on medical basis.
If, as I understand, the vaccine includes these little capsules that can be set off by 5G and cause bleeding from every orifice to promote Marburgs, then they're going to have to lock down the country and all voting by mail so they can steal it again.
The alternative, if we actually have war with Russia and it appears Biden The puppet is doing everything he can by his masters to provoke a war, then there might be a position of martial law.
Either way, I think the Democrats feel those are their options.
I don't see any other.
Do you, Scott?
No, they're going to do martial law.
That's their only hope.
They have to generate an excuse to go into martial law, just like the COVID-19 was a form of martial law.
If you're not essential, stay home, right?
Well, they didn't have the power and the law to do that.
But they're going to try and get away with it again, probably monkeypox, or they're probably going to set off and detonate some sort of a nuclear device or a dirty bomb and try and grit people down that way.
But it's not going to work.
It will trigger A revolution and a sense of civil war that will spread like wildfire.
And again, I could see if Trump has any brain, if he has any manhood, he will in some way declare he is the president The 2000 mules and all the election fraud that has been revealed show very clearly that he was the president.
He never left, he never surrendered, and he is reactivating his presidency.
He is reassuming his position as the lawfully elected president of the United States.
And to hell with Biden and these Democrats, and let the country split that way.
You'll see the strongest people will be supporting Trump, and if the Democrats want a civil war, they can start it, but we'll end it.
Jim?
Well, I can't see how we'd be any worse off going to stand up for the United States, for the Republic, And for truth and justice for all.
Don, take us out.
Okay, thanks so much for watching Truth Vs. News here on June the 12th.
What a show this was, everything from bugs and...
And this group is going down.
I mean, the country here is just on the edge, and we've got to be on the edge of truth and not pulling off the edge of lies and hypocrisy.
So, thanks for watching, folks, and we'll see you next week.
▲
Export Selection