All Episodes
Previous Next
May 24, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:13:19
Need to Know News (23 May 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson in Houston and Carl Herman, San Ramon, California.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin, however, today with a special report from Joe Olson about the Crimes Against Humanity Tour.
Joe, bring us up to date.
Yes, well they're touring the United States.
They have another event June 11th in Plano, which we'll get to in just a second, but this weekend's event on the 21st was at the Woodlands Marriott, and I was absolutely stunned.
I thought the thing would have sold out.
I thought they'd done a pretty good job of promoting it.
I'd sent it to people in Texas that I considered to be activists and concerned in this particular event, And I was shocked when I walked into the room at 10 o'clock in the morning and there was only about 40 people there.
I got a chance to talk to Judy Makovitz before the show and then we'll get to what we talked about afterwards a little bit later.
And I ended up talking to Patrick Woods during lunch.
So here's the basic rundown of the program.
They started off with a guy who was a local activist who'd done a good analysis, probably a 30-minute long presentation on the deaths and the adverse reactions.
I didn't get his name because he wasn't on the printed roster.
He had just showed up and they gave him like 30 minutes to start the program.
Excellent presentation.
I will find out where his material is and where we can link to it because it's very important.
Then they had Patrick Wood, who I was unfamiliar with, but he's the author of Technocracy Now, and he goes through the historical roots of all this stuff.
It goes back to the Jacobin societies, which were parallel with the Jesuits and the Freemasons, which most people have never heard of.
They were very active in the American Revolution.
They were very active in the French Revolution.
And so I've got a great video on that.
I will put that down in the comments as a link, a YouTube video, so you can get that little bit of historical perspective.
But basically, he laid out how they have been setting this plot for transhumanism for almost 100 years now.
And all of the organization, and all of the things that they've implemented, and All of the ways they've infiltrated every system of checks and balances worldwide to make this a reality.
Then the second speaker was Dr. Judy Mechovitz, who explained in excruciating detail the level of gain of function that's been going on for the last 30 years in our government to create diseases that they can then create, quote, cures for.
And she's a very highly She's a published author and researcher.
She has a PhD in, I was told, virology, but she said it's actually in microbiology.
And so she's misclaimed as being a virologist, which she says she's not.
But I got a signed copy of her book, Plague of Corruption, which I had read as an e-book a week before it was even published, and I sent it over to Coast to Coast.
They had her on, and I mentioned that to her, and she goes, yes.
And after we aired the program, they never put it up on their website, so nobody could Nobody could hear the two-hour program she did on April 14, 2020, but I was very glad to be able to shake her hand, and we had a little conversation after the lunch meeting.
Then during lunch, I went to lunch with Patrick Wood and got to talk with him.
He's going to be doing a presentation to the TNT radio program that we're doing, and so we're in the process of lining that up, probably end up being sometime in July.
Then the next speaker was Reiner Fulmich.
He's the German lawyer who's been heading the international court thing, and it was very obvious that he was under duress, and so I'm not sharing anything that's confidential that he didn't disclose at the meeting.
But he said that he and his family live in a ranch in Northern California and we all know what gruesome nuisance has done to young families and people living particularly in rural areas of Northern California.
They're trying to exterminate everybody up there through every possible threat vector imaginable, which is Floods, droughts, fires, electrical power outages, you know, every way imaginable for them to try to destroy human populations in that part of the planet and then they're making life insufferable for families that have children.
And then the other problem that he is dealing with is that he's part of a German law firm and there was 17 lawyers involved in his firm When he first started taking on these Goliaths and now there's only three lawyers left, 14 of them have moved on to other positions where they don't have the political exposure, number one.
Number two, he can't go visit his own law firm in Germany and do first-person legal work with them without being triple jabbed to even get into the stupid freaking country.
So, you know, here's a man that's being marginalized every way possible.
He's put so much on the line.
It's unbelievable.
And he presents documentation on the absolute provable international conspiracy that's going on.
And then the fourth speaker was Dr. Richard Fleming.
This guy got his PhD in physics when he was 18 years old.
He went to medical school and became a cardiologist, and then since he had a lot of spare time, he went to law school and got a law degree.
He presented an hour and a half long testimony with everything necessary to prove that this was absolutely 100% gain of function, absolutely known by all of the pharmaceuticals and the government bureaucrats that are in charge of this and everything it takes to have a first class.
He presented it and said it's on his website as grand jury testimony.
And what he's encouraging people to do is to go to their local authorities.
If you've had somebody in your county who has been injured or killed from these pharmaceuticals, you can go to your county district attorney and file a complaint so that we can get these people indicted for the crimes that they're committed.
There's more going on on that in Texas, and I'm working behind the scenes on that.
But here's the bottom line.
There was 40 people at this event.
If they were counting on any amount of income for all of these people to fly in, Patrick Wood flew in from Phoenix, Judy Makovich lives in Los Angeles, Dr. Fleming lives in Dallas, but to be able to put on an event like that and only have 40 people show up was absolutely heartbreaking.
And they are going to have a couple of more tour dates.
One of them is in Tampa, but on June 11th, they're going to be in Plano.
And they're at the Plano Event Center.
They've reserved for 1,000 seats, but I talked to the event center this morning.
They said that if the ticket sales go up, they could easily have 2,000.
We need everybody in Texas to show up and support these people and let our politicians know that we are not going to put up with any more of this medical tyranny.
I'm going to write an article about that.
I will have it posted within the next two days at Principia Scientific describing all this.
I'm sure Jim will post it.
I'm sure we'll discuss it further.
And I'm going to forward it to every one of the senators and representatives that's in the Dallas area.
I'm going to forward it to every one of the district attorneys that's in every surrounding county.
I'm going to forward it to every Tea Party group, every activist group, every anti-vaccine group, every pro-health group, everybody who claims that they want to do something about body autonomy and medical freedom.
I'm going to put you on notice.
Get off your butt.
Go to Dallas.
Spend $100 and support these people in person.
They desperately need our support.
Joe, I got to tell you, from the beginning in the digital age, I thought doing a physical tour is...
is inefficient.
What you need to do is do video presentation and get them everywhere, and you have a vast audience at much less expense and time consumption.
So I've never felt these tours traveling around were a good idea.
It just seemed to me to be fruitless in terms of reaching, and what you're telling me is a turnout is equally disappointing.
Carl, your thoughts, your thoughts.
Well, I salute Joe and all the patriots who are engaging for this important information to be made public.
Carl B. Herman Blockspot, any of the episode series, I'm up to 56 of them now, of challenging my school district.
I also have For the public to use sufficient documentation in the essay, My Best Shot, and a follow-up to our School Teachers Union Board that has sufficient explanation, documentation, and proof to support your ethical demand for literal arrests, as Joe passionately and accurately states, for crimes against humanity.
And yeah, the idea of what to do in civic activism is a problem.
I engaged beginning 45 years ago.
For 18 years, I was a key volunteer with the Citizens Lobby Results.org, and that led up to two UN summits for heads of state for ending poverty.
You know, 40 people, from my perspective, is that that is really secondary because, as Jim is saying, you're also leveraging other ways to communicate.
Now, there is something very empowering when human beings get in proximity to each other and they kind of get a reality check and it's just a different experience that's more empowering than back Back in my day, we just had a telephone!
So I like both of them.
And as my own personal experience, this type of civic activism is going to be like any other type of a hobby.
It's going to cost you some money.
Well, I would say this tour is losing more money than it's making.
Whether it's having an impact is another question, and I agree there's a great benefit from person-to-person interaction.
But, Joe, I mean, what's your considered opinion?
I know you're enthusiastic.
We're all enthusiastic about what they're doing.
The question is the mode of delivery.
I've been to dozens of these.
I went to the one up in Frisco, and there was probably 500 people in a room hearing a similar group of doctors, and they were there all day long, and everybody was very active.
The interesting conversation I had with Judy Makovitz towards the end, she was standing there signing books.
I got a copy of the book.
I was waiting in line to get it signed, and the guy in front of me said, well, what do you know about Charles Lieber?
And she goes, was he involved in any of this?
She goes, oh no, he was just one of the professors at Harvard University that was involved in the biology department.
And I said, whoa, whoa, whoa, Judy.
He's actually in the nano engineering department over there at Harvard.
And what he was doing is he was developing the graphene oxide nano sheets That's the portion of the vaccine that he was involved in producing.
He did the nanotubes for delivery of pathogens and chemicals inside that can be activated by 5G.
I said, he had 60 patents on nanotechnology.
That's the portion of the vaccine that he was involved in producing.
She went, oh, I didn't know that.
So there's a benefit.
You know, I might not have been able to have contact with her through her email or telephone or whatever, but first person contact.
But here's the thing.
We've got three weeks to make the event in Irving an enormous success.
And if we can get a thousand people to show up at the Plano Event Center on June 11th, We need to do that.
We need to make sure that our public officials know about it.
We need to make sure the local news media knows about it.
We need to make sure everybody that's the least bit interested in getting objective, highly technical information on the medical tyranny that's been surrounding us there.
So that's my final opinion on it.
Thank you, sir.
Got it, Joe.
Yeah, no, I'll be glad to publish on my blog and we'll put it in our shows and all that.
So I'm all for it.
Good, good, good.
Meanwhile, W shows once again that he's a mediocrity.
He's admitting the U.S.
broke the promise not to expand NATO one inch to the east, and he's telling Ukraine to destroy as many Russian troops as possible.
This is the mind of a moron!
Believing he was actually speaking with President Zelensky of the Ukraine, who was duped by a prankster into admitting NATO expansion had violated the U.S.
promise not to do that.
After Zelensky called him a very, very wise person, he should have known it was a prank at that point already, the former president said he didn't want Russia to become a member of NATO either.
He wanted them on the fringe, but wanted Ukraine in NATO.
And he told Zelensky, your mission is to destroy as many Russian troops as you can.
He then condemns Putin for putting an end to Wall Street and Washington domination of Russia under Yeltsin.
NATO's expansion, of course, is among the causes for the Ukraine war.
Here's Kim Dotcom tweeting.
In a prank call, George W. admits the U.S.
broke its promise to Russia not to expand NATO eastward because times have changed and the U.S.
was adjusting to the times.
Important all notions to know that U.S.
agreements have an undisclosed expiration date.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
and the U.K.
split with France and claim there's no exit ramp for Putin.
This is very bad, in my opinion.
Speaking to an Italian outlet, U.K.
Foreign Minister Liz Truss said Russia must be defeated in Ukraine and there were no exit ramp for Putin, even though others are advocating a negotiated agreement, including French President Macron.
The comments were in response to Macron suggesting the West could end the war by making compromises.
We'll have to do this with Ukraine and Russia around the table.
The end of the discussion and the negotiation will be set by Ukraine and Russia, but it will not be done in denial, nor in exclusion, nor even in humiliation.
Along with Paris, Germany and Italy are pushing for a diplomatic over a military resolution, but the White House is in line with Downing Street.
We want to see a strategic defeat for Russia, calls Julianne Smith, U.S.
Ambassador to NATO.
We want Russia to leave Ukraine.
We want Russia to stop the violence, stop these indiscriminate brutal attacks on civilians, obviously buying the propaganda.
Russia isn't doing that.
It's the Azov battalion and the Ukrainians.
It's embarrassing when our diplomats are shedding propaganda, but that's nothing else for them to do, I suppose.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well it's really disappointing that we're watching them stage set all the dominoes for World War III right before our eyes and we're doing absolutely nothing to stop it.
Absolutely disgusting tweet by Ted Cruz saying that we are defending our democracy by sending 40 billion dollars to Ukraine.
It's like What planet do you live on?
These people are absolutely horrible.
When the bill passed for the funding in the U.S.
Senate, it was 89 to 11, and there was only 11 Republicans, and it didn't include either of the two rhinos from Texas.
We told you they were terrible.
Anyhow, it's disgusting, and as far as George H.W.
Bush, or little baby Bush, yeah, we've got three libraries to war criminals that were former presidents here in Texas, and one of them is to baby Bush's daddy, who was the pilot at age 18
of a TVM Avenger off of the aircraft carrier San Jacinto at the Chichijima and there was a submarine waiting with a lifeboat outside of artillery range from the island watching him fly over and then a puff of smoke came out of his plane and then he jumped out and ditched the plane and the the way you evacuate an Avenger is you have to roll to one side let your radio man
And your co-pilot eject first before the pilot ejects.
Otherwise, they go down with the plane.
They went down with the plane.
This guy had 300 hours of flight time.
You can read about in a book called Flyboys.
F-L-Y-B-O-Y-S.
Interesting history on all this stuff.
But he kind of glosses over the fact that it appears that the reason George H.W.
Bush had to go through emergency training to become a pilot at such a young age with no prior qualifications was that Prescott Bush was under investigation for trading with the Enemy Act, and they needed a family hero.
And as soon as he was rescued by the submarine, they brought him back to the United States and discharged him from any further war duties.
Oh, you know so much history that we could go on forever.
This is not about W. It's about W, not about George Herbert Walker Bush, okay?
I'm a little disappointed with that commentary.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, the first story is Bush admitting that they violated a treaty in the name of peace because times change.
That is just such a stunning and deep admission by the deep W. So when he says that times change, that you can go ahead and violate this treaty, because be clear, by changing who you bring into NATO, NATO is a treaty and the purpose of NATO is for peace.
So for you to undermine NATO by taking steps that would destabilize its purpose, you know, that's violating the treaty and we don't have to go very far to be able to see that that was irrelevant keeping treaties for the war on Iraq.
So when Bush says times change and that allows us to violate a treaty, he's admitting we have no honor.
The United States has no honor.
We serve only ourselves, which is a pretty good definition of evil, and that anything that we say to promote upholding international law is just virtue signaling.
So he's saying all that in that statement that, you know, if we say, if we dictate, times change.
And of course, the leaders have to stop any peace efforts.
And for me, the very interesting possible and likely motivation They have to keep the war going at all costs because of what is going to be discovered and disclosed about those biological labs that the Russians found.
They might just find sufficient proof to be able to demonstrate that all of these so-called Outbreaks were engineered by a weapons by led by the US.
And that might be that why all the money and all the media blitz is going at all costs to support Ukraine and bringing this up to the brink of World War Three, and perhaps even further than that.
I think those are all right on.
I agree with all that.
Meanwhile, the House passes a bill expanding the federal anti-terrorism mandate.
This, by the way, appears to be why they had to have the Buffalo shooting.
When they need support, in this case for a sweeping domestic terrorism bill, they need to fabricate an event that will make it look as though the bill were actually needed, even though it's not.
The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2022 passed narrowly on a 222 to 203 vote in Wednesday with Illinois Representative Adam Kinzinger, who said, a real weird case, the sole Republican to vote yes.
It's going to create a new anti-terrorism office focusing on conservatives and Trump supporters, have the FBI assign more prosecutors for hate crimes and domestic terror, a separate interagency task force for white supremacists and neo-Nazi infiltration—hence, we needed Buffalo.
The bill's sponsor, Democrat Representative Brad Schneider, said it was needed following a racially motivated mass shooting in Buffalo.
This is just ridiculous.
The whole thing was a fraud.
Even the video that was released turned out to be the rehearsal video.
The actual event took place an hour or so later.
Republican opposition was largely centered on fear of parents opposed to public school mandates could be labeled domestic terrorists.
That's the sort of thing they want to do.
They want to go after everyone who doesn't kowtow to the Democrats.
GOP opponents were joined by some progressive Democrats, led by Missouri Representative Cori Bush, who said the legislation could result in increased federal surveillance on minorities and activists and concerns raised by the ACLU.
How well it's going to happen and fare in the Senate is a good question.
I don't think it will fare well there.
Meanwhile, a former Clinton lawyer tries to block damning evidence.
This is attempting to show that computer research that claimed to demonstrate a hidden back channel between Trump and Russia was really fabricated.
Durham is reporting planning to utilize evidence from FBI agent David Martin to cast doubt on specific data and conclusions that Sussman presented the FBI.
Sussman, of course, is on trial for the false claim that he wasn't operating on behalf of the Clinton campaign when he was indeed working for Hillary.
According to Sussman's attorney, these efforts are going to go beyond what the court has said it would accept.
They wrote such testimony should be rejected.
According to the defense, Durham wants to bring in expert opinion.
This sort of testimony the court has excluded from fact witnesses, including about spoofing, where the CIA, for example, has the ability to make any email come from any origin, in particular from Langley, making it look as though it came from Moscow.
Shusterman is charged in connection with a meeting on 19 September 2016 when he delivered to then FBI General Counsel James Baker two thumb drives and three white papers alleging connection between Trump and Russia's Alpha Bank.
It was all ridiculous.
Meanwhile, new DOJ notes show they panicked after Trump called them out.
Two days after Trump tweeted accusing Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower, the FBI held a high-level meeting in a state of panic.
Handwritten notes taken were released by attorneys representing former Hillary campaign lawyer Michael Sussman as evidence in their client's defense.
While they do little to exonerate Sussman, they reveal quite a lot about the FBI.
By March of 2017, the FBI already knew the allegations about Russian collusion were almost certainly false.
When Trump tweeted his campaign was being spied upon, it sent a shockwave by the FBI leaders panicked about how he could know so much about their efforts to trash him.
From the notes, it's clear the FBI was scrambling to cover its tracks.
The bulk of the meeting, including FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Acting Attorney General Dana Bonetti, was spent discussing Trump's tweets.
Notes were taken by three DOJ officials.
Mary McCord, as written, McCabe told DOJ that the FBI was trying to determine what was behind the voters' tweets.
Despite knowing the claims were of Russian collusion were false, it's clear the FBI was doubling down on the collusion claim while keeping key details from the DOJ officials attending the meeting.
They repeatedly described the debunked Steele dossier as crown-reporting, representing it to be official government intelligence when it was nothing of the kind.
The same misrepresentation was for the FISA warrant on Carter Page, which McCabe described as fruitful.
We all know, however, it contains significant errors.
What they're doing is confirming stuff I wrote about years ago and exposing the Russia hoax.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes.
Well, anybody that's curious about the Buffalo shooting event, great interview that Dr. Fetzer did with Brian Davidson last week on how that thing was totally staged.
And this is typical theater for these folks.
They've got a bill in Congress that they want to get people mobilized on.
They come up with some emotive event that they can say, this is what caused it.
That's real similar to the Jesse Smollett and the Bubba Wallace hanging things.
When we need to pass an anti-lynching bill, how can we get that to pass?
Well, let's frame a couple of black guys with a couple of fake nooses and see how far we can go with that.
Now, getting back to the FBI, absolutely wonderful C-SPAN hour-long interview that I found this morning by the author of The burglary, and her name is Betty Medster, M-E-D-S-G-E-R.
I'll put a link to it.
Bottom line is in Philadelphia on March 8, 1971, a group of activists burglarized the FBI office.
They managed to get an enormous number of files proving that J. Edgar Hoover had a whole secret operation going inside the FBI and they found the field notes for agents on how to conduct secret operations and how to keep them secret.
This bothered J. Edgar Hoover so bad that he assigned 200 agents to it and they worked on it for five years without ever finding who the eight people were that were involved in it.
She ended up meeting some of the people and wrote a book about it after it was long enough past the Statue of Libertations That they didn't have a problem, but absolutely stunning information on that.
And then the final little cap on this is if under the trial that's going on with Sussman, one of the witnesses was Robbie Mook, M-O-O-K, who was with the I'm with her campaign, and he said that Hillary personally approved the release of the false information on the Alpha Bank.
So, bottom line is, we got her fingerprints absolutely on every bit of this, but now we just got one more piece of evidence.
Excellent.
Yeah, I think it's all tying together.
Hillary is in it deep, and the proof is there.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act.
So Joe was accurately describing historically what our opponents do.
They create false flags to push forward narratives that they want and have corporate media parrot those narratives and they push legislation into the area where they want to go.
So all of it is theater.
It's all fake.
It's all staged just like that.
You get a goal, you create a false flag, you execute the false flag, you follow it up with the narrative forever.
And sure, even though it's theater, you can kill real people, and they do.
It's whatever creates the best theatric effect.
And one way to look at this goal is what we started out with is transhumanism.
And they want a type of controlled humanity.
And the best portrayal that I like artistically is in the new redoing of Westworld.
Where you have these completely apparently human-like creatures, but they're totally controlled, or at least that's what the Masters want.
Except in our human reality, it's kind of like that.
Except the Masters are vampires that also feed on us.
And then for the Sussman trial, it's the same thing.
It's what the Clinton campaign did is they created a false flag and a narrative.
They attempted to execute it and then push those narratives forward.
So that's all that these people do.
And they of course need to have They need to groom their agents within these three-letter organizations, which they have, and then those are the minions to evil on the inside, and you keep promoting these people so that you get organizational control.
Let's see, anything else?
Oh, and in the case of the whole Sussman thing, the goal was probably something like you take what people perceive Trump to be as his greatest strength, which let's say it's just patriotism, Patriot Trump.
And you're going to create the false flags in the narrative to show the Orwellian opposite that he's just a commie.
And in addition, you have the artistic reversal is that this is just projection about what Hillary actually is.
Hillary pretends to be the patriot when she's the actual commie.
Yes.
Nice.
Nice.
Yeah.
Well, Hillary's been corrupt from the beginning.
Her history is so sordid.
Meanwhile, Conrad Black writes, a swamp must be drained.
This is pretty thoughtful.
The Democrats are increasingly desperate at the return of Trump as it becomes more likely each week.
They're muddling the sequence of events that got us to the president impasse.
Trump ran against a corrupt, back-scratching, log-rolling society of the old Bush-tans.
The Clinton play-to-pay scheme, the Biden sale of influence and access, the semi-disguised socialist racism, elitism of the Obamas, and the flabby sameness and ineffectuality of the Bush, McCain, Romney, McConnell, Ryan Republicans.
Trump says people were dissatisfied with a bipartisan swamp and ran as strenuously against the Bushes and McCain and Romney as he did against the Clintons and Obamas in 2016.
The anti-Trumpers of both parties in the most legally questionable presidential election in U.S.
history eased Trump out of 2020 With the aid of 4.8 million harvests and ballots, 95% of the national political media, and 70% of the campaign money to bring in, unintentionally one assumes, though plenty of warning, the most incompetent regime in the country's history.
In 2020, the Washington establishment demonstrated the accuracy of Trump's claim of how corrupt and unscrupulous it was.
Biden has demonstrated it's even more incompetent than Trump alleged.
The swamp must be drained.
This takes, although it may be in some ways, probably no one less formidable in his egocentricity and demagogic talents than Trump could do it.
The Republicans between Trump and Reagan were all inducted into it themselves.
The Republican never-Trumpers are as fierce in their animosity toward Trump as toward the Democrats, and the Democrats are toward Trump.
Only Trump can finish a job.
That's why the latest anti-Trump wheeze is to send Biden and Trump out to pasture together as though it were an even trade.
The Democrats get rid of their two biggest problems and the Republicans return to being doormats.
Awarded the White House and Speakership at times as long as they don't disrupt the major slide into the Democrat socialist paradise with a permanent tax-free lunch for their rich friends at Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and Hollywood.
Biden is irrelevant.
Trump has a stamina of a 40-year-old.
The call for joint retirement is bunk on all counts.
Pennsylvania illustrates a political polarization and also provides a solution.
The Democrats will nominate a sanderite leftist for the Senate.
The Republicans will almost certainly win with a Trumpite, a description fitting all four of their frontrunners, and all four are more or less carpetbaggers.
The Republican nominee will be another senator's loyalty is to Trump if he returns as president, rather than Senate Leader McConnell.
The walls are closing in on the Democrats.
Here's one of their favorite completely disastrous phrases about Trump, where they're trying to solve a gigantic fraud that he had colluded with the Russians in the 2016 election.
The Democrats hid their innocuous candidate in his basement on grounds of COVID.
While using the same justification for drastic changes in key states of voting and vote counting rules, changes that were often effective illegally, and the judiciary abdicated and refused to judge any of the serious complaints on their merit.
It was the most dangerously illegal assault on the integrity of the election process and on the constitutional balance of power in our country's history.
The problem is not that both 2020 candidates are now too old elderly.
The problem is 2020 And the run-up demonstrated the swamp is as venal and self-interested and corrupt as Trump said it was, and they are back.
If we go back to business as general, as usual, a stronger Democrat than Biden and a compliant consensus Republican, the rot of 2016 accelerates.
When the congressional Republicans, though most were really supporters, appreciated his program, Between the Republican majority in Congress, the first two years, and the prerogatives of executive action, Trump got much of his program through, despite unprecedented harassment.
The authors of the perfidious fraud of the 2020 election were rescued by Trump's inept response and abdication of the judiciary, including, of course, the Supreme Court's decline to take the Texas case.
Trump inadvertently collaborated with his enemies by bungling daily COVID, bungling the first debate by his belligerency, warning about ballot harvesting, but not challenging it legally from the outset comprehensively, and only sending poor Rudy out on a trick-or-treat show when the battle was over.
There were circumstances that caused Trump to call 250,000 of his supporters to the Olympics adjacent to the White House on January 6, 2021.
He enumerated grievances against the electoral process, the court's failure to try important cases, having unsuccessfully urged the mayor of Washington, the Speaker of the House, to try to enhance security because they were complicit in orchestrating it to smear Trump.
Urging the crowd to demonstrate at the Capitol but do so peacefully and patriotically.
This provoked the second asinine stab at impeachment, now ostensibly to remove Trump from an office that he had already vacated.
Trump thus provoked in four years a 100% increase in the number of presidential impeachments that have occurred in the previous 228 years of our history.
The march of the criminalization of policy difference has been manifest, thereby none of the four being justified.
The House Committee to investigate January 6th, stuffed with pathological Trump haters, from which Pelosi barred a couple of Trump's prominent defenders, will excavate a new low in malicious partisanship and televise its hearings in June.
No one believes them.
No one cares.
January 6th, this is the point that wasn't an insurrection.
There were many months of arrests and interrogations where the prosecutors resorted extensively to their widespread practice of abusing the plebeian rules to subordinate extort perjured inculpatory evidence against a real target, Trump and his organization.
Promises of minimal sentences, immunity from prosecution for perjury.
This has not turned up a thing, and the last Trump wanted was anything that could be imputed to him as an attack on constitutional government.
That charge is a bit rich, coming from this gang of Democrats.
They've tried to distract the country with the abortion question, but it isn't working, any more than the country believes that Vladimir Putin and the oil companies are responsible for the highest gas prices in history.
Their latest gambit is to try to whip up hysteria one more time on COVID, But that won't fly either.
The only one who had anything right was Trump, with his imaginative and determined pursuit of a vaccine.
Of course, we have qualms about that.
The Trump haters of both parties who rattled the windows of Washington when they heaved a sigh of relief at Trump's departure, only now emerging from denial that he's about to run over them with a steamroller much larger and more fueled by righteousness than the one they drove over him.
Woke, 1619 revisionism, racist disinformation, and violent protest all have to be torn up root and branch.
But if Trump does return, he must give less ammunition to his enemies.
American history and public policy are not all about him.
The presidency of the U.S.
is such a great office, it requires its occupants to behave with a higher level of civility and dignity than Trump often did while president.
He will return to that office and do better if he's less needlessly abrasive and self-obsessed.
The country can start again in 2028 with new leaders, a fully House-trained, post-Trump Republican Party, and a rebuilt Democrat Party over the Yahtzee-Mandean wreckage of Biden, Sanders, Harris, Schumer, Pelosi.
Really?
I think that's quite brilliant.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I'm a little less enamored with Trump than I was when I first voted for him in 2016.
He had absolutely no awareness of the senior executive service, the 10,000 government appointees that are in a special training program with no background checks, no minimum education requirement, and they're placed in charge of every one of the federal bureaucracies.
And these people dance to a completely different tune.
They're the fifth column of the World Economic Forum type folks that were installed under a bill that was passed by Jimmy Carter.
So we've had this thing gradually building and metastasizing since that period of time.
I'm not convinced that he's the best candidate we could have in 2024.
I'm really at this point leaning a whole lot towards Ron Johnson, the distinguished senator from Wisconsin.
And I'm less sensitive about DeSantis because of his really strong ties with Israel and some of the other things that he's pushed.
But bottom line is, I really think that Trump has expended and done the best that he could, but he just didn't do good enough.
And he certainly, if he gets a second term for whatever reason, We need to get rid of Jared and Ivanka.
They were absolutely toxic.
And the 2000 Mules movie, absolutely stunning information, and I haven't seen him do a lot to promote that.
So bottom line is they're re-releasing that movie in theaters, so if you didn't get a chance to support it by going last week or the May 2nd and 4th showings, Try to go this week and be in a room with a bunch of other patriots and spend your $20 and spend an evening away from Netflix among real people watching real evidence of real crimes against our democracy.
Excellent commentary, Joe.
I'm fascinated by your suggestion of Ron Johnson.
He's my senator.
I think the world of him.
It's a fascinating idea that he might become the nominee.
I understand reservation about Trump and Ivanka and Jared, needless to say, not even deserving mention.
I share your concern about DeSantis and Israel, by the way.
Many have felt Trump, too, was much too much under the thumb of Zionists.
Carl, your thoughts?
Or 2020 when we get an honest accounting Trump will have won that election somewhere between two thirds to four fifths of the vote so it would be the biggest wipeout in presidential history.
So again, it's just total projections of From our opponents.
And for Trump, if he is a patriot and he was connected, then of course they saw this coming.
Of course they did.
So either we're witnessing the show where the US military is in charge and And they'll reveal this whenever they're ready to reveal it, because if you really were a white hat in control, you would have all the damning evidence available and ready.
But either way, if it's the show, or if it's just the horror show of the long, ongoing winter of Biden, our responsibility is the same.
And it is to join in draining the swamp as unpleasant and distasteful as it may be.
And the only way that the swamp is going to get drained is through arrests.
So we need to be able to explain, document, and prove that these are crimes and that we are completely justifiable.
We're the Americans for refusing to do anything other than call out criminals when they are criminals.
Including January 6, which is actually another great example of this false flag narrative.
So, on January 6, the mall cops, led by Pelosi, opened up the doors from the inside to let Antifa members in.
Just at the time when the evidence for election fraud was going to be presented.
And then, so you create the false flag and the narrative, and the narrative is that these were terrorist insurrectionists, when it's actually they were really an opposite.
No, no, no, it was Pelosi and Biden are the domestic terrorists, and they're literally engaged in the insurrection of election fraud, which again is treason.
So, we're at this crazy place still, and those of us who see, this is the Emperor's new clothes, baby.
Keep pointing, keep using our voice, and we'll see what happens.
Excellent, excellent.
Both right on.
Meanwhile, What do we know about this guy?
He's not an engineer, never finished college, not a doctor, not an epidemiologist, not a virologist, intellected, documented thief, owns virus patents, owns vaccine companies, visited Epstein-Pitto Island countless times.
There he is, man of the year, Bill Gates.
Meanwhile, whose pandemic treaty will strip Americans of their rights?
Conservative commentator Daniel Horowitz has troublesome news.
The WHO wants 193 of 194 nation Taiwan being set aside at the request of China to not appear as an independent nation to sign a treaty surrendering sovereignty over the health care of its citizens.
That would include the US, who would have to recognize who is a single world organization reigning over one world, one health, and the UN version of what's fair and equitable.
That means who determines who gets a vax, who should be forced, requires you to carry a vaccine passport even to buy groceries, or you don't eat, strips Americans of their rights, On 22 May 2022, the World Health Assembly convened yesterday in order to address this issue, ratifying the treaty that's been expressly amended.
One of you or another may know the actual outcome.
I understand that some 13 or 14 amendments were defeated and that the amendments were bad news.
Notably absent is the nation of Taiwan because China does not view Taiwan as a sovereign nation but a part of China.
There's a deeper connection.
The WHO contributed to the COVID outbreak with its toting to China.
Even liberal news admits holding China and the WHO accountable is necessary in relation to the pandemic.
Says NBC, Biden, like President Trump, recognizes the WHO has mismanaged the pandemic.
We need to get to the bottom of the COVID cover-up.
Who assures us there's nothing to see?
Just move on.
Should we sign a treaty recognizing a failed health organization and surrendering our sovereignty?
I certainly hope not.
Meanwhile, did Fauci just convince swing voters to poll for Trump?
He's declared that if Trump is elected, he's out.
I think that's a good reason.
If you look at the history of what the response was, I think, you know, as you can say, it wasn't optimal.
That's how she told Jim Acosta.
History will speak to itself about that.
But here you have the man responsible for more deaths than anyone in world history, I'm convinced.
Fauci as head of the NIH for Allergies and Infectious Diseases funded gain-of-function research apparently was going on on a massive scale to make diseases more serious so that big pharma can come in and rescue us from diseases it had contributed to creating with Fauci as its instrument.
Trump and Fauci had frequent public disagreements.
Fauci pushing for mass in lockdown, Trump pushing for a Sweden-esque hands-off approach.
While Fauci may now insist he won't continue his role when he'd be 84 years of age, he may not be in a position to accept the job if Senator Rand Paul is able to follow through to bring the top doctor justice if the DOP retakes the Senate at a midterm election.
Zero Hedge tweets.
You can't fire me.
I quit.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, amazingly enough, the same time we got WHO trying to push their medical tyranny act, we have the Davos gang meeting in Switzerland, where they have 5,000 Swiss military guarding their location and a no-fly zone with anywhere around the facility.
So Jack Prosobiec, P-O-S-O-B-I-E-C, flew over there with his news crew.
And when he was exiting the airport, the Swiss police said, you're not allowed to leave the airport and neither any of your crews.
So they definitely are up to some tricks.
If they eliminated 12 of 13 items, it's only because they're going to add 13 more next week as soon as they get this one passed.
So bottom line is you can't trust a single thing that these dirty SOBs are doing.
And this happens to be the 75th anniversary of the United Nations, the ones who've saved us from so much war and so much disease and so much poverty for the last three quarters of a century.
Yeah, let's all take off our hats and bow to the great almighty UN.
Screw them!
Yeah, I was raised to believe the UN was the greatest hope for world peace, but it's fallen so far short, it's become something close to the opposite.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, Joe calls them SOBs, and that's true.
Servants of Ball.
So, when people talk about this potential Who Treaty, the strongest talking points, in my experience, is just to say that it can't be a treaty.
It's not possible to override the Constitution of the United States.
If you wanted a serious proposal for what they're asking to do is to transfer authority to who to dictate health orders, you could do it.
You need a constitutional amendment for that.
So good luck with that.
That's why they're pretending that they can go around it.
They can't.
And anything that violates the Constitution is just void.
So for those people to argue that they can destroy the United States of America's legal authority, its own authority, by pretending that they could give it away to who, that's treason.
That's an attack on the United States of America that is defined literally by our Constitution.
So if you attack the Constitution in that way, It is committing treason and I do remind the people of the history in the Nuremberg trials, the propagandist journalists were also put on trial and I certainly do look forward to and hope that that would be the case for our six corporate media giants here.
Excellent.
Excellent, Carl.
Excellent.
Very nice points.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
buys millions of monkeypox vaccines.
As a single Massachusetts man is infected, what do they know we don't?
The U.S.
government has ordered millions of doses of a vaccine that protects against monkeypox following one confirmed case.
The order amounts to $119 million for Jynneos vaccines used for the prevention of both smallpox and monkeypox.
The order will convert Bulk Metis vaccines, which are already made and invoiced, into freeze-dried versions that have an improved shelf life.
Wow!
The total government contract amounts to $299 million to provide 13 million freeze-dried doses.
Elsewhere, there have been bigger outbreaks.
The UK reports a total of nine monkeypox.
Notably, the last two had no travel links to any other country.
Monkeypox is a viral disease first discovered in 1958 among colonies of monkeys that were being kept for research.
I would say, therefore, they were subject to the development.
They were the instrument by means of which monkeypox was developed.
It was not natural.
It was induced.
The first human case in 1970.
Fever, headache, body aches, swelling, nymph nodes, chills, exhaustion.
Then you develop a rash spreading across the body.
The illness tends to last two to four weeks, been shown to cause death in as many as 10% who catch it.
On Wednesday, Massachusetts Department of Health said they had a single case, the first to be detected in the country in 2021.
Two other cases were reported.
DPH is working closely to follow up on this.
I'm extremely suspicious.
Joe, your thoughts?
Is our next pandemic going to be monkeypox?
Compliments of the CDC.
Oh, yeah.
Yes, and I don't remember which one of the presenters, if it was Judy or Dr. Fleming, but they said absolutely 100% the current monkeypox.
They've done the genome search on it, and it is a lab-produced, gain-of-function, zoonomic transcribed Pathogen absolutely 100% was lab developed.
So that's exactly one of the factors that they're throwing against us.
The other one is Marburg, which they've also weaponized.
So you wonder what was going on in those 30 labs that we had over there in Ukraine and why Russia was intent on capturing enough material to incriminate these folks.
I guarantee you the evidence is going to come out and hopefully Russia will have War crimes trials very publicly and very soon because we need to stop this whole entire process.
It's disgusting to the max.
I think Russia will prove to have done something beneficial to the whole world by wiping out this den of corruption and biological germ warfare research.
Outrageous.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, there are many tipping point areas that would be game enders.
So I do like an alternative pronunciation of the monkey pox, where the K is silent.
There's Ben Fulford who has a weekly article that I've subscribed to for about 10 years.
And I said to you guys earlier today, he printed out like five different examples of corporate media using old photos of monkeypox and pretending like it's new.
And one case wasn't even monkeypox, it was something else.
So, you gotta ask, what is the motivation of our opponents for making this move?
And I think it ties back to the beginning, that they want to conquer the world, and via transhumanism.
So, in order to get to their goal, they have to continue the injection program to put into the sheeple what they want to have in them in order to enact their evil plan.
Monkey pox minus K equals money pox.
I think you got it right, Carl.
I think you got it exactly right.
Big box.
Meanwhile, Brian Davidson did a wonderful analysis with Giuseppe and Scorpio on Speak Free.
Remember, I pointed out that we have similarities with New Zealand.
Here you see the shooter emptying the magazine.
But the shell casings disappear in midair.
They never hit the ground.
You don't hear that tinkle of brass.
How is that possible?
Not with a real gun or a real weapon or real rounds.
It's not possible.
Notice how much the weapon is all painted up.
Looks very much like the weapon in Buffalo.
embarrassingly bad.
Turns out they did a CGI.
They added...
This is clearly an application.
This is longer video.
Here's a nice illustration of how it's done.
The End.
The End.
Now, when we turn to the video here of this Topps-friendly store, where the driver, it turns out, had to drive four hours to get there.
Notice, when he starts shooting with his painted-up weapon, there's no ejection of cartridges from the weapon.
No ejection of cartridges from the weapon, which means this is totally fake.
Not only that, but believe it or not, we're going to discover this was actually the rehearsal video.
This is about an hour before the official video.
So, falls down.
That's a white woman, notice.
A white woman, the very first one he shot.
There appears to be another white woman.
He goes inside.
Where are all the customers?
Where are the customers?
By the way, we have a very telling scene where he turns around to pop one who's already on the ground, and it's a burst of air.
The head does not blast open, just a burst of air.
So what do we have going on here?
These are the alleged parties, but notice none of them are white.
So what happened to that very first white woman he shot?
Meanwhile, Brian used a method of shadow analysis to determine the time at which this actually took place.
Here you have the woman in parallel with ES in stock.
Turns out that was taken at 1-18 on the 14th of May.
1-18.
But when the police show up, when the police show up, when there's a frame missing here, the police show up and he does another shadow analysis and it's 2.31.
In other words, we got the rehearsal video.
Meanwhile, when he's inside the store, unattended, empty cart, other items strewn about, tight corner, nobody there, nobody there, look wherever you want.
Nobody is there.
This business, pointing at the body on the ground.
No blood, no explosion.
Paper moves when the shot's fired.
More coal on the ground, but look at this.
This is what would happen had that been a real stall.
The difference is startling.
The difference is startling.
Take another look.
But when we actually had it here, it was just up off of air.
Meanwhile, we had a witness talking about how he had encountered with the shooter.
Listen to this.
Grady Lewis.
I heard the first shot, and 1.7 seconds after that, I looked up.
0.6 seconds.
Another shot.
And he was just shooting people.
Was he just randomly targeting people, you think?
Just shooting anybody?
Yes.
He was randomly shooting people outside.
And then I seen a security guard run in.
When I saw the security guard run in, I was like, well, this ain't no movie.
This is for real.
And then he went in shooting.
Shooting more people.
I still see it in my head that this guy was actually just shooting at people standing there.
It's crazy.
A guy was just shooting at people.
He targeted black people.
Yes.
He killed almost everybody.
Tell me where you were when you saw him.
I saw him walking through the exit door.
Here at the Topps.
Here at Topps, on Friday.
And I said, he looks out of place.
This is the day before.
He looks out of place.
And I walked up to him and I said, where you from?
He said, two or three hours from now.
Then we started talking about race.
And I was like, well, there's only one race.
He's like, well, he didn't say he disagreed, but he said he feels that there's different races.
What did you think of him in that moment?
If you ask me right now, that kid that I met on Friday wasn't racist.
Not the kid I met on Friday, but... Super smart?
Super smart.
He had a plan, obviously.
You must have a mix of emotions, right?
I mean, you could have been there.
Very easily.
Five minutes earlier, you would have been there.
One minute and 20 seconds.
I just walked across the street.
I just opened up my thing.
Bang!
Bang!
This is such unbelievable bullshit.
Get more of his story.
Lewis said the suspect, who was wearing a shirt that said Genius, told him on Friday, when they had a previous encounter the day before, he was in Buffalo to see the countryside.
Another resident, Daniel Love, told the Washington Post he interacted with a man wearing the same shirt on Friday and believed him to be the shooter.
They talked for more than an hour.
That's Brady Lewis and the shooter.
Lewis said he bought the Tina Gatorade.
They discussed, among other things, space and critical race theory.
Lewis recalled a suspect telling him critical race theory teaches that white people are violent.
Lewis said he was sure it was the same person he spoke to the day before on Sunday when he saw the gunman's mugshot.
He said he told the police about his encounter.
The Buffalo Cops didn't immediately respond.
Lewis said the suspect asked him where he was going to be at TOPS the next day.
He said he'd be there at 5 p.m.
on Saturday when his friend's shift started.
Lewis, who is black, doesn't know what to make of the fact his life was spared from other blacks and women in his community were killed.
I guess I can't say he liked it, but maybe he did like me a little bit.
I don't know.
If I was standing there, would he have shot me?
I don't know.
But he asked me if I was going to be there, and then he came earlier.
Let me just say, How ridiculous is all of this?
Joe, give it a shot.
Yeah, well, I think Lewis might have gone off script for this particular thing.
He cited, man, this is my moment to shine.
I'm just going to go ahead and ad-lib a whole bunch of extra stuff.
Let's bring me some more of that Gatorade over here, boys.
Yeah.
So much theater, it's ridiculous.
But speaking of theater, there's been a lot of miscegenation for centuries between the races all over the planet.
So, you know, this racial purity thing is a little bit of a joke.
If you take the DNA of the average black person in America, it's 25% white.
Shakespeare, in his play Othella, had a black man who was Amur, M-O-O-R for those of you who don't understand history, and that was written in 1603.
And blacks have their own little level of discrimination based on the percentage of black you are, and if you happen to be like three-quarters white because you had a white grandma and a white grandpa and a You know, and bottom line is you end up having them on both sides of your family tree far enough back that you end up being really light-toned.
They call that high yellow.
So maybe the lady that got shot in the parking lot, she's just a high yellow.
And the other white people that got shot, maybe they're just the other brand of black people that they kind of keep them along for demographics and, you know, Uncle Tom stuff.
But bottom line is, This whole thing stinks to high heaven, and I watched the video that you did with Bryan Davidson.
I was laughing all the way through it, because he was going frame by frame with this stuff.
But I've got to see the one with Giuseppe, because those guys have got to be a riot.
Bryan is incredible, man.
Well, Scorpio observed, what self-respecting racist is going to spend an hour talking to a black guy about Craig O'Reilly?
It's stupid!
Stopwatch, he said, 1.7 seconds later?
Who in the world?
This is obviously, totally fake.
Complete bullshit.
Complete bullshit.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, we do have sufficient proof to reject any analysis and anybody who believes this official story once presented with the evidence.
And as well, anybody who would reject consideration of this evidence are covering up for this crime.
As Jim pointed out, the Christchurch video, that is sufficient evidence to call the thing a fake.
And you got to know the motivation.
So again, as we've been talking about for the show, is that they generate these false flags in order to get to a political goal.
And the Christchurch, you have the disarmament of the public.
And here in Buffalo, you have as well that for disarmament and for this Domestic Terrorism Act.
And the Domestic Terrorism Act will criminalize any speech against the narrative or they'll just call you a domestic terrorist in the end.
So they keep blurring and blurring distinctions because they're just fucking liars through and through.
So the points that I didn't hear anybody point out is that in the video for Buffalo, At the first shots, you had Trunkman fall down without anybody, without the gun pointed at him.
And that airburst, those two ladies were on the ground before they were shot.
And of course, as that demonstration showed, it's anatomically impossible to have a gun.
You had an air puffer that was just massaging her head.
The shadow angle is damning definitive proof of what time that thing actually took place.
And then, so, you know, Curious, the 1.7, that's a 17.
Cute.
All right, I'll give him cute.
It's cute.
It's intriguing.
But, you know, we're pretty fucking impatient on the other end for this.
The guy says it ain't no movie.
But what I found most telling is this duping delight.
So duping delight is a term that people involved in criminal investigations are trained to observe.
And those are little tells where you're just, as Joe was saying, he's proud of himself.
He's probably thinking, damn, I'm a good actor here.
And the hat.
So if it is 17 involved, the hat would be an appropriate theme.
It's the best theme of all is Jamaica and then one love.
So the idea that we're all human beings, we're all connected, it's one love.
I mean, nice theme, but man, it's been a long show, gentlemen.
Unbelievable.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Meanwhile, we'll go right to our final thoughts.
Meanwhile, we'll go right to our final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yes, well, I'm lucky enough to be a co-host of a program on TNT Radio on Saturday evenings from 6 till 8 on Central Standard Time.
And we've interviewed Jim Fetzer.
We've interviewed a whole bunch of really good people, and what I like to do is to do an hour-long video with Jim on a Zoom call ahead of time so that, number one, we can put it at Principia Scientific, where my other co-hosts are, And share that visual information to supplement the radio program.
And we did that first with Matthew Eard.
It's a great one hour interview on the BitChute channel.
But upcoming, we're going to have interviews with Virginia Young, who's an expert on 5G.
Jennifer Bridges, who's the nurse that's doing the 200-person class action suit against mandatory jabs by Methodist Hospital, and a guide out of South Africa that has a website called Germ, J-E-R-M, Warfare.
His name is Jeremy.
So look forward to those things coming up.
In addition, we will probably have Patrick Wood, We've got, which I mentioned earlier, on Technocracy Rising is the book that he wrote.
And then we've also scheduled Mark Shaw, who's author of 30 books, including stuff on Dorothy Kilgallen and Marilyn Monroe, JFK.
He's a lawyer and an expert researcher and author.
So, look forward to those shows coming up in the near future.
Oh, Mark Morano, I'm sorry, forgot.
Mark Morano with Climate Depot.
So, we're going to have some great discussions coming up all summer long.
So, stay tuned, folks.
That's terrific, Joe.
Carl, your final thoughts?
So it might be that the best that we can do as patriots is to offer people choice and that we are small pieces on a very large chessboard.
And the idea that transhumanism has been an agenda of our opponents for a hundred years really begs the question of who our opponents are.
And if you're thinking transhumanism passed a hundred years ago, Then you really need to consider some other history, like the facts that Carl B. Hermann blocks about any of these shows.
I give you the speculative history and the definitive history that there have been advanced civilizations in our prehistoric Earth history demonstrated by megalithic architecture.
And there may be a tremendously wild backstory to human history, because we know our opponents lie.
I would like to know that history.
We're never going to get it until we accomplish the arrest of leaders in the obvious areas of crimes of centred in war and money.
You're both contributing so very much, and I love all the efforts Joe's making, and Carl, your efforts with the school district are tremendously powerful and significant.
Let me say, my suit before POTUS Before the Supreme Court has been docketed, and there's a lot going on here.
This is instead of Posner versus Fetzer, this is Fetzer versus Posner, where I expose that the entire system for summary judgments in Wisconsin is corrupt and perverted and not in alignment with those of other states, which makes it effortless for a
A plaintiff to waltz into Wisconsin and win a liability trial where the judge can suppress any evidence presented by the defendant as unreasonable and merely set it to one side.
When I was going through the process, I realized I was not getting a fair shake.
It took me a good while, however, to understand why, including conversation with a guy with a lot of experience in Texas explaining to me how this could not have happened in Texas.
So in this particular petition for a writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court, I contrast the process in Wisconsin with a process in Texas and exhibit how the process in Wisconsin is completely inappropriate and violates I contrast the process in Wisconsin with a process in Texas and exhibit how the process in Wisconsin is completely inappropriate and violates both a Seventh Amendment guarantee to a trial by jury and the Fourteenth Amendment to equal due process under law, essentially
inviting the court to incorporate the seventh within the 14th, which is really appropriate, but to make all these matters uniform throughout the states.
It's not just a matter of salvaging my case, but repudiating my case as representative of a whole class of cases where the offenses against the citizens of Wisconsin continue to this day.
I believe the case is teed up for the Supreme Court to knock it right out of the ballpark and that they're going to expedite this case because otherwise we have these continued offenses with the abuse of summary judgment ongoing in Wisconsin, where a retired professor of law has observed to me that the abuse of summary judgment is the greatest corrupt practice in the United States.
Here's an opportunity for the court to set it right.
Thank you for joining us today.
Spend as much time as you can with friends and family because, again, alas, we do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection