All Episodes
Previous Next
May 13, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
51:32
Real Deal Special (12 May 2022): Sky Dragon Slaying Program on TNT with Joe Olson and Matt Ehret
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is a Real Deal Special where I, Jim Fetzer, am your host, and I have as my guest Joe Olson, who's a brilliant engineer.
He's a co-founder of the Principia Scientific with John O'Sullivan, who resides in the UK and who may be joining us should he be able, as we proceed, With a special guest, Matt Enright, who is a Canadian historian and author.
This is an introduction to a special, a two-hour special on Saturday on TNT.
Joe, take it away.
Yes, I've been following Matt's work for a very long time, and he and I are going to have some really heated discussions about some things about various ways of viewing history, but he's brought to the table a whole bunch of facts, particularly about Canadian history, that I didn't particularly know.
And then he's also got some interesting precepts on American history, and those are the ones that we're going to be discussing mainly on Saturday night, because that's a two-hour radio program on TNT.
It's called Sky Dragon Slaying, And we'll put a link to that once it's posted underneath the comments in this one at both of our websites.
And Matt's going to post it at his website as well.
So Matt, go ahead and give a quick introduction yourself and where we are in the state of the world today.
Yeah, most certainly, Joe.
And thank you, Jim, for hosting this little promo video.
Well, myself, I'm a co-founder of the Canadian Patriot Review.
It's a geopolitical history magazine that I set up in 2012, just because there was a deficit in analysis of what role Canada played within a broader global chemistry within a A broader great game.
And I found that nobody was really dealing with the reality back then of the inevitability of a systemic breakdown, the oncoming economic collapse, which really started, I think everyone could agree, in 2008, we lost our economy, the system blew out.
And we have had now 13 years of a bailout system, just pouring money out of thin air.
To infuse into these zombie banks to keep them from melting down and kicking the can just down the lane a little bit longer to avoid the inevitable.
But the inevitable is coming and we're living through it now.
So there is an inability to one address either Canada's involvement in that broader process since our banking system is highly integrated into the City of London derivative bubble complex.
It's one time bomb.
And also there is no ability to really recognize the reality that we weren't a democratic country.
So all of the analysts that were popping out The opinionators, who always have something to say about things they know nothing about, were making all sorts of commentaries about Canada, treating us as if we were a sovereign country.
And the reality was, based on the history research myself and a few associates had done, it was obviously a British dictatorship.
It was a British colony, and it always had been since 1776.
Um we've been maintained as a geostrategic uh beachhead within the Americas as the only monarchy with privy councils and embedded deep state enshrined in a privy council office with a governor general and lieutenant governors you know embedded in every single province signing royal assents so it's like very clearly if anybody just takes a a kid Can look at this and recognize that this is not a democracy.
But, you know, there's a lot of intellectual baggage that clutters people's minds and then they start thinking that the the poison that the propaganda is real.
So anyway, I set up this this magazine to showcase the history work, a lot of the geopolitical economic analysis for Canadian audience, but also for a more broad audience, too.
And then more recently I found myself working as a writer for a Strategic Culture Foundation, which is a news geo-strategic magazine in Moscow.
I set up the Rising Tide Foundation with my wife Cynthia, Cynthia Chun, who's also a co-writer with me.
We recently published a book series on the untold history of Canada as well as the clash of the two Americas.
And yeah, I'm a senior fellow with the Moscow or the American University in Moscow.
Sorry.
So those are my different hats.
Wonderful.
Very impressive.
Oh yeah, incredible.
My introduction to this began when I was in high school.
My grandfather had five acres of real estate on the bay side of Padre Island, down across from Boca Chica, which is where Musk has his new SpaceX launch, about 30 miles south of Brownsville.
On the Gulf of Mexico and on the intercoastal canal.
And he had held on to that property for about 10 years and there was supposed to be a causeway that went across up until that time they had just a floating bridge that swung out of the way every time that traffic needed to go up and down the intercoastal.
Well, he had ended up having heart bypass surgery put his property up for sale.
Reluctantly, it sold for $600,000, and magically, the state of Texas managed to squirt that causeway with a double S and land in the center of his five-acre tract, which had been purchased by Senator Lloyd Benson, Senator John Tower, both U.S.
senators, and the state governor, along with the head of the Public safety.
So they managed to sell the property for 1.2 million and they kept an acre on each side, which they sold for additional several million.
And the state of Texas ended up spending several million more to make the changes to the causeway to develop South Padre Island.
So I've known about it since then.
Then during the 80s, I worked for real estate developers here in Houston, which I didn't know at the time because I was just a junior engineer.
I didn't realize that they were crooks.
But they were heavily involved in the SNL crisis.
And I got politically active in Houston, ended up going through divorce court.
One day I'm walking into divorce court, there's a guy named Pete Bruton, an investigative reporter, who's currently a lawyer and journalism professor at Texas Tech University.
And he was selling a book called the Mafia and the CIA and George Bush at card table in front of the courthouse because no bookstores would carry his book.
And so I bought a copy of it, and I had known a whole bunch of the people that were involved in that.
That S&L crisis in the mid-80s was over a $600 billion ripoff of the U.S.
taxpayers.
And then Matt wanted to say that the crisis started in 2008 with the housing crisis.
They've been doing a series of these things forever.
And in the 1990s, we had the dot-com, we had Enron, which was Houston-based, and I met executives with Enron at a number of my projects, and then we also had the Project Hammer, which, when the Iron Curtain fell in 1991, Bush and the gang went out and borrowed 300 million dollars to buy up Russian assets, went over there, and they named it after
Armand Hammer, who was the Rothschild frontman, along with Morgan, that went over and ripped off Russia after the Bolshevik revolution.
I didn't know that!
I knew about Albert Hammer, but I never put two and two together.
That's amazing!
Armand Hammer was the name for the... Ah, shit!
That's why they love rubbing our nose in every bit of this crap, and it's just crap, crap, crap, you know?
So bottom line is, I've been very well aware of that portion of the program, And then now, Putin has done an excellent job.
He really, he really has got them in a corner.
I don't know if you follow Alex Kristof and the Duran.
Oh, Christopher.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yes.
Yeah.
And, and, and, and Gonzalo Vera.
He had a program this morning that he said that Russia has 75 trillion in flange and frangible assets, which would be commodities and resources that the world markets need.
And Putin is absolutely in the driver's seat.
And these people are bankrupting the hell out of America and Europe in order to keep their money operation and sex slave trafficking going in Ukraine.
Absolutely stunning.
Absolutely.
No, I know.
I just heard it announced as well this morning, the fact that Russia is now fully putting on the brakes to the exports of various vital materials that are super important for the Western economy to any country that has just been part of the enemy team.
And yeah, this is very important on so many levels.
But I think it's a big, it's a big test for people in Europe and North America at this point.
Like, do we as a people want to tolerate a leadership, a technocratic, sociopathic leadership that obviously has no interest in keeping, not only has no interest in keeping us alive, is actually more intent on killing innocent civilians and the real economy across Europe in order to fight an unnecessary war that has so many points of easy resolution.
There are so many ways of not having this war.
And it just starts with simply agreeing to the terms, the very reasonable terms of not expanding NATO anymore onto Russia's perimeter.
Don't put in anti-ballistic missile shields pointed at Russia.
Don't do that, right?
Stop doing belligerent, you know, saber-rattling war games on Russia's border.
Just don't do those things.
That's all you have to do.
You don't have to get rid of NATO.
You don't have to go back to NATO as it was in 1994.
You don't have to do that either.
Just simply agree to not have Ukraine or Georgia or, I mean, now Finland is going on the hot track to get in, bypassing even the elected population, or bypassing the population's will.
Sweden is now passing a resolution to say, oh, we don't have to have a broad vote of the people on whether we join NATO because they're not well enough informed of the facts to make decisions for themselves.
So they're now delegating that authority purely to their technocrats in their ivory towers.
So it's not that hard to avoid.
That's just disgraceful that that should happen.
Finland and Sweden and Switzerland have all benefited immensely from their neutrality.
They've not had to handle a defense budget.
They didn't need it.
Moscow has only wanted assurance Ukraine would not become a NATO nation after the massive expansion since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, when the West made solemn assurances that it would not expand one inch to the east There were 14 NATO nations in 1991.
Today there are 30, which came predominantly from the Eastern Bloc countries who encroach upon Russian national security.
Putin has been very emphatic about it, and now it turns out we're getting all kinds of proof of corruption in Ukraine entailing prominent Democrat politicians, especially occasional Republicans.
We know Nancy Pelosi's son was working in Ukraine.
We know John Kerry's son was working in Ukraine.
We know Matt Romney's son was working in Ukraine.
And of course, above all, Joe Biden's son was working in Ukraine.
He even, of course, as we know, threatened to withhold a billion dollars in foreign aid for Ukraine if they didn't fire The prosecutor is looking into the corrupt business entity Burisma, where his son had a $50,000 a month job for which he was totally unqualified.
It was pure excess.
And now there's a brand new report that the Democrats were involved in funding the biolabs and in collusion with Big Pharma to make big money to fund a Democrat party And that Nancy Pelosi and a host of others were involved in this up to their neck, which may explain why Pelosi traveled to Ukraine to kiss Zelensky's butt.
It was embarrassing and humiliating for the United States.
But she's trying to protect the financial interests of the Democrat Party at the expense of America.
And where you, as you have so artfully outlined, have explained, the sanctions on Russia are actually emancipating Russia.
The world is rejecting the petrodollar as a reserve currency.
It's collapsing.
The ruble is surging.
And Russia is indeed, as you portray, in the driver's seat.
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, I'd like to hear some more of Matt's thoughts.
You and I have had 200 different conversations up at Bitshoot.
Matt, what's your opinion of what Jim just said?
I couldn't agree with what you just said anymore.
I mean, you know, the fact is we need Russia a hell of a lot more, especially, especially Europe needs Russia a hell of a lot more than Russia needs Europe.
And that that's absolutely becoming clearer and clearer by the day.
The fact is, you know, even Russia even simply made the point, it's not like we're going to withhold oil or natural gas from you.
You know, they tried to push these sanctions.
The sixth sanction regime that they tried to push involved cutting off Russian oil supplies.
I mean, if you look at the amount of hydrocarbon consumption that comes from Russia that goes to Europe, it's something like over 50 percent of their needs come from Russia.
Some of the Eastern Bloc countries are well over 60 to 70% of their needs.
And frankly, Russia is going to be able to compensate by selling discounted oil to India, which is already increasing massively their Russian oil.
It's still nothing compared to what the Europeans need, but India is going to be increasing their Russian imports massively.
Russia is giving a discount for obvious reasons.
The China definitely needs influxes of oil for their development strategies.
A lot of the Eurasian powers, as part of the Greater Eurasian Partnership, are willing to openly absorb a lot of the Russian losses.
And frankly, with oil prices skyrocketing right now to over $100 plus a barrel on the international markets, based on these sanctions and the so-called scarcity that's being artificially created, I mean, Russia is raking it in financially.
If we just look at on that lower level,
making more money per capita like just this in the last like five month cycle than they did the same five month cycle the previous year by a long shot so yes there's inflation uh like the sanctions are hurting russia in a variety of ways there's there's a lot of inflation happening i think it's 17 so there is some pain but not nearly the pain that you see coming on to the life that the people uh living across europe were being told you have to suffer die and starve in order to save ukrainians
From a war that doesn't need to happen, first of all, and these Ukrainians are openly part of an operation that was installed there as a fake puppet regime by Victoria Nuland and company in 2014.
You mentioned Burisma.
I mean, who's the main owner of Burisma?
Do you guys, have you guys heard of, you know, the main owner of Burisma?
Kolomarsky!
Kolomarsky!
Igor, Igor, Kolomarsky, yeah!
This guy threw two shell companies in the British Cayman Islands, owns Burisma, and this is the guy who not only so-called, you know, they say, oh, how could Zelensky or how could Kolomoskoy be supporting Nazis?
Everyone knows they're Jewish.
And it's like, well, this goes beyond religion.
There's a higher geopolitical interest that has nothing to do with religion.
And yet Kolomoskoy did set up the, what was it, the Israel European Parliament.
He set that up.
He's the founder in 2011.
He set up, like, quite a few things, but at the same time he's the biggest funder of the IDAR, the Azov Battalions, since 2014.
That's openly acknowledged, even by mainstream press, has been forced to acknowledge this very, very clear, ugly fact of ardent, hardcore neo-Nazis, who even today, like, you know, Zelensky on Victory Day, this week was the week of Victory Day, right?
May 8th, May 9th.
Zelensky, what does he do?
He posts on his Twitter feed pictures of Ukrainian soldiers to honor the memory of those who fought in World War II.
But what soldiers did he post, which he later had to erase?
It was soldiers who had the Nazi skull crest on their vests that he posted publicly, and they just weren't even thinking about the PR.
Like, what would this look like?
And they've done this several times.
Um, they, they had the, uh, was it the Black Sun of the Occult?
The Black Sun of the Occult on one of the Women for Women's Day that NATO posted on their social media.
They had, like, let's, let's cherish our women soldiers in Ukraine.
Yeah, okay, which, which women soldiers did you pick?
Oh, one who had a Nazi Black Sun of the Occult on their military uniform.
It's super blatant.
So who's fighting World War II here?
Like, I mean, who's honoring World War II?
If you look at Russia this week, Oceans of people holding banners and pictures of their relatives who died.
Putin's brother died.
Everyone in Russia knows has family who suffered and died in World War II.
25 million.
I mean, we suffered a lot, too, in Canada, you know, and the Americans lost 500,000 lives, soldiers.
Comparatively though, to the sacrifice Russia made to put down the fascist machine, it is super insignificant compared to those numbers.
And in Canada, we had no Victory Day celebrations, no marches.
I remember when I was, I'm not that old, but I remember in elementary school in the 1990s, I remember it was a big deal.
Victory Day was a huge deal.
Oh yeah.
VE came and went in the United States without a breath mentioned about it.
It was absolutely horrible.
I looked for evidence of parades in the U.S.
and there was little tiny trickles, hardly anything.
Yeah, and one thing you have to realize is that the people that rule this planet spend a long time setting up the dominoes, and they don't want anything that happened to disrupt the domino flow.
And you and I have a disagreement about what a wonderful patriot FDR was.
I could go through a whole bunch of things, and Jim knows a lot on this too.
He absolutely had forewarning about Pearl Harbor.
Douglas MacArthur, who they call dugout Doug because he dug out and hid, a great article on him, I mean a book by Dr. Barlett, I think he's a University of A&M professor, and he had access to all the original documents, and I'll send you a link to that because that's something we'll discuss on Saturday evening, but he said on December 8, 1941,
Douglas MacArthur's Pearl Harbor.
He had advanced warning over 12 hours that the Japanese had attacked Pearl Harbor and that they had massive amounts of material within striking range of Manila, and he lined up all the planes, filled them full of gasoline, and didn't have a single picket set out to monitor incoming flights from the Japanese.
And so they were able to bomb half of the The entire inventory of B-17s was in Manila, and over half of them were bombed that day by the Japanese, along with a bunch of P-40s.
So he willingly destroyed a whole bunch of war material, and then FDR didn't want the American people to think that there was a problem.
He had had three different destroyers attack German submarines out in the Atlantic before Pearl Harbor Day, And after Pearl Harbor, and we declared war on Germany, he did not black out the coasts, and the Germans had what was called Torpedo Alley, the happy days.
Between January of 1942 and June, they sunk 400 U.S.
tankers and killed 5,000 merchant marines along the U.S.
coast.
There was no pickets, there was no planes that were flying, there was no Coast Guard cutters, What time frame is this?
I'll send it to you.
No, no, you just said the time frame, though.
I just wanted to hold that in mind.
Yes, yes.
January '42 until June of '42.
It's called Torpedo Alley.
I'll send you some stuff so that we can discuss this, and that's really one of the reasons why I wanted to today, is so that we'd be better prepared to discuss the key issues that we need to refine our thinking on.
Another thing, you always mention about how Hamilton is this, you know, great patriot.
He was a Rothschild protege.
He was an opium and rum and slave trader, and he was one of the millionaires in the, but he was also the one that, that forced the first American bank charter where we started our debt banking with the Rothschilds.
And so I have a disagreement about what a wonderful patriot he was, but then I also have a disagreement about Lincoln, but we'll get into that.
Probably won't even mention that on Saturday.
Yeah.
Oh yeah, yeah, yeah.
And today, and And today, there are very few American heroes left in the pantheon.
Who's a good American president for you guys?
Oh, well, you just sent me one today about what a wonderful guy Harding was.
Have you read?
Oh, come on.
The most corrupt presidents in American history.
Layton McCartney.
Who's a good president for you guys?
Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Lincoln, FDR, I stand, JFK.
I endorse all of those as great presidents.
Notwithstanding Joe's critique, no president was flawless, but we've had some great leaders who built this into a once great nation.
I'm glad you guys like Washington and JFK.
I'm glad we've got some coherence and some agreement on some of that.
Yeah, you know, look, there's a lot of points of disagreement we could definitely flesh out.
I don't know which one you'd like to hit first.
You kind of threw a lot at me right there.
Yeah, let me just briefly go through Harding.
Let me give you the thumbnail on Harding.
He married a woman that was 10 years older than him because she was wealthy enough to be able to finance his political campaigns.
And he ended up being governor of Ohio because he was a front man for Standard Oil of Ohio, which he was absolutely a 100 percent company boy for Rothschilds.
Do you guys like Trump, by the way?
Possibly. - That's true.
Possibly.
Yeah, I'm mixed on Trump.
Anyhow, he was a... I kind of like Trump, just so you know.
I kind of like him, even though I think that there's problems there.
But he's also... I can point out a lot of points of corruption and bad people he did business with over the years.
I got that too.
He had serious flaws, but he did a great deal of good for America.
I have no doubt.
Yeah, but I'm just saying, the logic I'm seeing extended to Hartig's work, I just see the same parallel in Trump's life and bio and associated work that he did too.
That's not exactly what you could take to the bank as far as a condemnation of somebody being an evil agent, deep stater, puppet or something.
Well, let me finish the comparisons between Harding and Slick Willie.
Harding had a 16-year-old girlfriend when he was governor, and right after he got elected, they had sex in the Oval Office, and she wrote about it in her diary.
And the people that owned the Washington Post, which at the time was one of the premier publications in the nation and one of the chief propaganda outlets, was Ned and Evelyn, E-V-A-L-Y-N McLean.
They had a mansion a block from the White House that was on a corner and they owned the mansion right next door to it.
They had a circular port that could share driveways so they could receive guests at their major mansion.
And then they had a tunnel underneath that connected to the mansion next door.
The mansion next door, every week, the U.S.
Treasury Department brought $50,000 worth of confiscated alcohol during Prohibition to the McLean mansion so that they could have parties over there.
And at one of their parties, they brought a bunch of Rockettes down from New York, and they were up there dancing and entertaining the senators and the lobbyists and, you know, everybody that was involved in the government.
And somebody threw a whiskey bottle, hit one of the women, knocked her off of the bar where she was dancing.
She ended up hitting her head really hard.
The attorney general of the United States said, I'll take care of this.
He stuck her in a car, drove her to the hospital in Washington, D.C., opened the door, walked around, dragged her out and left her on the sidewalk and just drove off.
And nothing ever happened from that.
So, you know, when I'm reading this stuff about... Was the Attorney General of Washington, D.C.? ?
The Attorney General of the United States dropped her off at a hospital, and it's in the book.
I mean, yeah, if you read it, it's stunning.
Usually, I mean, I find that a little surprising because when high-level officials do something terrible, it's a rare practice for them to actually take dirty, like, janitorial plumber work into their own hands.
There's usually an entire apparatus to create some degrees of separation.
So I find some of that, some of that, my You know, not having like read the book, but my red alarm bells immediately go off.
My bullshitter goes off a little bit when I see something like that.
I will find the exact segment in the book and read it to you on Saturday.
I'm sure.
I mean, like I said, for me, like the thing with anecdotal evidence, I don't, I don't really, I take anecdotal evidence when I look at history with a big, big boulder of salts, because that's stuff that is very easy to create mythologies based on hearsay.
And, you know, look at Russiagate, right?
I'm sure future historians are going to, like, look back and say, oh, yeah, look at what the Ukrainian ambassador under Trump said about Trump.
You know, she said it.
He did these things.
And it's like that's lying.
Part of an intelligence network with an agenda, you know.
But again, future historians are going to write thousands of books on all this shit.
Black seen white, right?
So, I don't know.
I mean, like I said, when it comes to anecdotal evidence, like I said, I'm not going to discount it, but at the same time, I take that stuff with big salt grains all over the place.
I'm with Matt on that.
You've made a fascinating intro to what you're going to be doing on Saturday.
Joe, tell us about the program, because I think everyone is already hooked.
Certainly, I am.
Well, TNT Radio is one of the programs that's put on by Asia Pacific, and I think the head guy there is Mike Ryan.
He was formerly with a news group down in Australia.
That's where they're based out of, and supposedly they've got 2 million listeners, and our program has been on since, I said, In February, and we've gotten increasing viewership every month so every week, and so we've been doing a weekly program, and Jim was on there, back in March and we did a two hours on 911, which I've done extensive.
Research on, written three well-published papers on it, and then also we've done a lot of different videos on BitChute on that.
But getting back to Harding, you sent me a thing this morning on Harding, and I absolutely 100% agree he was poisoned because the Teapot Dome scandal was catching up to him, and there was no easy way out.
And that's what I think they're going to end up doing.
I think that's a little bit overly simplistic.
Well, his wife was with him, and she had reasons to not want to keep the guy around.
Oh, I'm not saying that there was no teapot dome.
I'm not saying that I'm necessarily discounting the teapot dome thing.
I'm just saying that the cause of death and the lack of autopsy, like the assassination, is too simplistic to just associate it with one scandal when you ignore... because I'm all about context.
You know this from my writings.
I like context a lot.
Right, right, right.
And there's a big spectrum of context that's being ignored in terms of what was the global chemistry, what was the global process underway that he played a role or didn't play a role within.
And I think from that point there's a higher thrust of history that he was interfacing with in a very strategic way that had a lot to do with the rise of I think the most important driver of that moment in time that he was in there
was the end of World War II and the roundtable organizations, operations that had both set up shop inside the United States under Ivy Lee, you know, the first president of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921, and all of the same groups that had set up the Federal Reserve just a few years earlier in 1913.
These were all the same groups that had worked in London, in Paris in 1919, setting up the British Institute for International Affairs, Chatham House is what it's sometimes called, As sort of the think tank branch of the roundtable movement of Cecil Rhodes and Milner.
And the other aspect of that that came out of the exact same meetings was the League of Nations and its covenant.
And its covenant was entirely based, especially with Article 10 of a collective security pack of all of all members of the League of Nations.
Right.
Who, if one member kind of like NATO's Article five, same thing, they already had it.
Article five of NATO.
Is just a retweak of the failed Article 10 of the Covenant of the League of Nations that said if one nation gets into a war, you're legally obliged every every member to also participate in that same war, which is just a great formula.
If you're if you're a British imperialist maniac who wants to just create divide to conquer forever and forever wars, you want that.
You want like those sorts of things in place.
And I mean, that's what I saw as the primary thrust in that early period when Harding was getting into the Oval Office.
And the fight of nationalists around the world in Ireland and Canada, I documented in my research, I think for the first time, the actual array of nationalists called the Laurier Liberals who were fighting against the Roundtable movement in Canada.
They were fighting against the League of Nations with their Irish Free State collaborators.
People are like Michael Collins and others in Ireland.
They're working very closely.
And the network that I saw in the United States, both on both parties, Republican and Democrat, who were all supporters of Harding, were the ones who were doing the biggest fighting, throwing wrenches into the machine of the League of Nations and disrupting that on the one side.
I also saw what I've documented is the the efforts that were created to maintain bilateral economic and security deals.
So the U.S.
Harding refused to allow for a supranational entity to take control of sovereign nation states' ability to do bilateral treaties with Austria, with Germany, with a variety of countries.
Russia, big time, too.
And in 1922, you had what was known as like the people think, oh, yeah, the Versailles Treaty had to had to happen.
Right.
Germany had to be punished for their evil works they did in World War One.
Well, that's not true.
If you actually look at it, Germany was the last to militarize in World War One.
The whole like, you know, Antoine Cordial set up by the by British secret diplomacy with Germany and sorry, with France and Russia signed up with Britain to get into war.
And, you know, you just look at like how how was this thing manufactured?
It was the manufacturing of a war.
It occurred through the assassination of a variety of leaders who were completely opposed to getting into this kind of conflict.
You had a lot of leaders in Germany and in Russia and in France who were all trying to build economic relations and positive cooperation, signing peace and diplomacy deals, people following the Bismarck Frederick List tradition, right, in all countries.
They were very active.
A lot of them were assassinated.
From 1890, where Sadi Carnot was killed in 1895, Bismarck was ousted.
There were 300 German high officials who were killed, assassinated, by the Organisation Consul, which is sort of like the German variant, a terrorist group controlled, kind of like the Black Hand of Serbia.
That was another British intelligence agency controlled terrorist organization that killed the disposable Archduke.
Right.
But these are these just like today, just like today's ISIS or the earlier Weather Underground Movement or, you know, the Red Brigades of the 70s.
Right.
That carried out assassinations of Aldo Moro and other statesmen in Europe.
Same same model was used back then using anarchists, psychopathic, you know, not even psychopathic.
I won't abuse the word.
But using very, very radicalized anarchists in cells were deployed to carry out the assassination of McKinley.
That was tied to Emma Goldman, who was tied to Bertrand Russell, who was tied to the Neo-Malthusian League of Britain, who was tied to Prince Kropotkin.
Prince Kropotkin had an entire array of anarchist networks that he commanded.
When he was in Britain, in Russia, that carried out the assassination of Alexander II.
It's a highly integrated complex.
And like I said, 300 German statesmen were killed before the hyperinflationary effects, which were always predictable of the Versailles debt repayments, kicked into gear.
There was a lot of efforts to derail that and create a solution that did not involve hyperinflation.
But the British oligarchy who had taken control the Lord, the Lord Milner was like the head of the government of Lloyd George Milner was the man and he was the head of the roundtable with with his little like.
Weird, homoerotic network of sociopaths.
These are sociopaths, young men who were sort of, they cut their teeth destroying the Boers in the Transvaal Republic in South Africa.
They called it Milner's Kindergarten.
Leo Emmerich, Philip Care.
They were all part of this nasty network.
They wanted to destroy Germany and destroy the German-Russian historic relationship, but also the German-Russian-American historic relationship, since all three countries had strong traditions of cohesion.
All the way going back to the American Revolution, when Catherine the Great came in and really turned the tides of the League of Armed Neutrality in favor of the rebels.
The Germans were also helping a lot, right?
I mean, not Scharnhorst, but you had German Prussian troops training, fighting even in combat with the colonials.
So there's this ancient, this old tradition that had to be destroyed.
And and so, again, the Organization Consul played a big role, which became Hitler's paramilitary branch of the Nazi regime.
That was when the Organization Consul killed Rathenau.
And I'm saying all this to get at Harding, right?
But when Rathenau, the foreign minister who was a follower of Friedrich List, the Friedrich List Society was massive in Germany at that time.
It was bigger than anything fascist.
And it was all based upon the idea of large-scale economic development, the Zolverine idea of Bismarck, that was the idea, and collaboration with Russia on rail development, industrialization, state-backed controlled credit for the development of your nation's productive powers, that was all there.
Rathenau was organizing the Rapallo Accord.
And the Rapallo Accord, you guys know what that was?
Fill us in.
Yes, go ahead.
No hyperinflation.
That was the better part.
You know, with the new Russians, the new Russian government, you had psychopathic Trotskyite deep state traders who were very, very tied to Arm and Hammer, bringing in the new economic policy with Arm and Hammer, complete like economic rape of Russia, kind of like what was done under Soros in the 90s.
Same sort of model was what was done then.
Trotsky was the key guy there, along with a few others.
Bakunin was another army, another character and anyway.
But then you actually had some patriots who didn't want to sacrifice their culture and their nation on that altar, and they fought against Trotsky.
That's why Trotsky was ultimately kicked out of Russia.
People wonder, like, why was Trotsky kicked out in 27?
That's why.
Because some people didn't want to commit suicide.
But anyway, the better, smarter branch of that network that were fighting against the deep state, they organized with Walter Rathenau, the foreign minister of Germany, The Rapallo Accords, which would have basically cancelled all of Germany's debt repayments to Russia, and Russia and Germany would agree on a mutual industrial policy of basically undoing the damage, right?
Under Versailles, Germany's industrial base, its rail were all taken over by the Allies.
The North Cilicia, the Rhine, the Ruhr regions, all of the mining districts were all taken control of by this looting operation.
Um, which basically also their agricultural base was destroyed.
Um, so their ability to produce wealth to pay the debts was removed and they were just given debts at a printing press to print money.
Obviously, this was going to result in hyperinflation.
That was the point.
So under this other idea, with the Friedrich List movement coming into force, into play, another guy who was a big part of the German delegation who wasn't assassinated was Kurt Von Schleicher, who did become chancellor and defeated Hitler in 1932 in Germany.
He had a very different idea.
He was an anti-fascist to the extreme, and he was assassinated during the Night of the Long Knives.
But he was Rathenau's assistant.
In the the Rapallo Accords, and that would have involved both so a new economic relationship, no debt repayments and industrial development to really rebuild and heal Germany from the economic destruction that was incurred during the course of the war and after.
Well, Warren Harding and especially the American delegations were playing a key role in defending that process both on so many levels.
I mean, I write about that.
There's books that have also been written about that.
But that whole process disrupted the entire one world government depopulation agenda that was supposed to be in place in the 20s.
Like, right after World War I was over, the solution that was proposed by those who started World War I was one world government, get rid of nation states, have a eugenics-based new world religion to reduce the world population.
That was going to be it.
That wasn't supposed to fail.
It failed because of the policy activities and commitments that I saw coming out of, like I said, those networks I just mentioned.
And so I'm looking at this context, and when I see little scandals about a chick getting screwed, and that's what you're going to say is going to cause the assassination of Harding, when you ignore that bigger process, I find a big grain of salt.
Matt, you're a veritable encyclopedia.
You're talking about a scenario that's being replicated today.
One world government, abolishment of borders, mass genocide.
Is there any prospect of surviving this threat to humanity?
Yeah, of course.
It's failed before.
Yeah this isn't the first time it's been tried like you said you know it's been done when you look at history this way as a global chemistry and that's the thing as a Canadian I really tried I recognized early on that I had no way to solve the problems of like what were the paradoxes of Canada why were we a monarchy by looking at just Canadian books there was no solution because Canada is a fiction And nobody recognizes, they don't start their research with the recognition that it's a geopolitical illusion.
It's a fiction that was created by British grand strategists in 1774 to keep the 13 colonies from having a 14th member, a 14th colony, signing together a declaration saying, we're going to create a new type of government, right?
Founded on the idea of the inalienable rights of all people and the sovereignty of all people, not one sovereign.
So we were bribed to stay out of that.
Ben Franklin was up here organizing for five weeks.
In April 1776, trying his heart out with an American delegation, four other guys, trying so hard to convince the Quebecois to just come on down, send a delegation, like it's in your best interest.
And we got bribed.
We stayed out of it.
And so all of history has been, I think the way I look at it, is a series of tragic abortions of potential.
Um, and also positive abortions of evil, right?
So things could have been a lot worse at different moments, decisive moments of change, but they weren't because People, certain people, chose to risk their lives and more to do what was difficult and take a leadership position when there was a vacuum of leadership and derailed evil.
Matt, I do not see leadership in the world today.
I see it nowhere.
Trump had that potential, but it doesn't appear to be realized.
What can be done?
How do you see this playing out?
So look, yeah, definitely Trump has that potential.
And I think, honestly, that that part of the Republican faction that rallied around Trump that were not neocons is the only viable thing I see in the United States.
I think the Democratic Party in the past, a long time ago, the Democratic Party had some elements of moral viability.
I don't see much evidence of that anymore.
Even they had like a little inkling with the Tulsi Gabbard, you know, and they had to like kick her out because she had a little bit too much morality and common sense, so she had to go.
So yeah, I do see the Republican, the better patriotic Republican movement as being the only viable thing.
Trump's got up his game a lot more.
I mean, right now, I understand.
I understand that he has used a technique.
I see it as a technique of saying something that is ugly or crazy and then doing something eminently reasonable as a policy action, right?
And I get that.
That works.
It works good.
I do think he has some bad blind spots, but I do think that what he did Especially between 2016 and 2019, the end of 2019 and early 2020, demonstrated a viable battle plan that would work to disrupt completely this entire Great Reset, global, technocratic, transhumanist, call it what you want, right?
Dark Age.
I would just call it a Dark Age.
A technocratic, feudal Dark Age is what is on the potential line here, right?
The things he was doing was that I thought had the greatest global significant value was Oh, there's a few things.
Well, number one, calling for pulling the U.S.
obviously out of any obligations to the World Health Organization.
That was a key vital thing.
So I don't care if you know the fact that he he's stupid about vaccines.
OK, he's stupid about vaccines.
He thinks that he did such a great thing with Warp Speed.
I don't think so.
Most people who are smart don't think so.
But the fact is that if you were going to pull the U.S.
out of any support of the World Health Organization, It doesn't really matter that these vaccines exist because you're not going to be forced to, you know, put some sort of an international fascist mandate on on pandemics or to demand people do the, you know, inject themselves to keep their jobs or maintain their livelihood.
That's one thing.
Number two is extracting the U.S.
from obligations to the World Trade Organization by restoring protectionism.
You have to have the better Republicans right now have to return back to that common sense that every nation has the right and mandate to utilize protectionism, which is what Trump did by flushing NAFTA, right?
NAFTA said it's illegal to use protectionism.
Trump said, no, we need it because look what we did for 50 years, right?
Atrophying our industrial base, our machine tool sector.
Everything's been destroyed by British free trade looting under globalization.
So that was a vital formula as part of the rehabilitation, the healing of our infrastructure, our industry, that we need to support our own people.
We can't keep on relying on cheap goods from sweatshops.
That's a cycle of dependency that's destructive for the slave producer societies as well as for us.
Nobody benefits, ultimately.
There's no nation, right?
It's only a small coterie of supranational financiers above nations who are the middlemen who think that they benefit.
And they kind of do, but they kind of don't because they need their parasite that needs the host to stay alive.
Otherwise, when the host dies, the parasite doesn't doesn't do well.
The other thing was moving the U.S.
into a military cooperative policy with Russia on Syria.
The U.S.
patriots right now should be much more competent.
And I see many pro Trump people thinking that Ukraine is on the right side of history and Russia is the new state, the new Satan.
That's insane.
If you think that that indicates the biggest Political illiteracy in the world.
No, Trump put the US military in Syria into a cooperative policy with Russia, so they were actually jointly doing exchange and collaboration on a variety of levels.
Implicitly, that means also collaborating with Bashar al-Assad.
He defunded the National Endowment for Democracy.
Massively, which earned him the ire of so many deep state psychopaths like Victoria Nuland and many others in the CFR.
Because, you know, this was a regime change front operation as it's been since it was created in 82.
He defunded it in Hong Kong, he defunded it in Ukraine, he defunded it in Xinjiang, he defunded it everywhere it exists, in Ethiopia, and he extracted Towards the end of his his his turn, he extracted the CIA from its involvement in conventional U.S.
military systems.
Very important.
And Douglas MacGregor talked about this quite a bit.
And he was subverted every step of the way by agents within his own State Department, his own deep State Department the whole time.
Right.
We're now back in force.
The other and I think the most important thing is he called for He invited, he bypassed the State Department and he invited the Vice Premier of China to the Oval Office in May 2019, and he gave an impromptu speech and announcement echoing the future US-China trade deal that would be consolidated, you know, in January 2020 a big year or big big month when everything when it was turned inside out.
But that was also the year of the US trade US China trade deal that would involve, first of all, China buying $350 billion of US finished goods to rehabilitate the US.
Rust belt, which desperately needs to be rebuilt.
Our machine tool sector is our economic sovereignty.
If we don't have machine tool sectors, we can't produce for ourselves.
We can't wipe our own ass.
We're nothing.
It's just, you know, sovereign in name only.
So that was a part of the healing process was this.
But also, he said, Russia, China and the USA together, instead of spending billions of dollars, I'm paraphrasing, but this is literally what he said.
Instead of spending billions of dollars on nuclear weapons and military systems that are going to destroy the world, he said, well, how about we spend that money instead on economic development and things that will end world hunger?
That works.
That's the way of thinking that the empire, that any empire from Babylon to the present, they don't deal well with that way of thinking.
Right.
And Trump, by him doing that outside of the authorization of the State Department, he bypassed all protocols to do this.
Well, let's let's take a break right there, because in April of 2017, Xi Jinping came over and was having dinner with Trump at Margo Vista and Margo Lugger, whatever the hell it is.
Yeah.
Mar-a-Lugger.
Yeah, they were having dinner, and the White Helmets had staged fake gas attacks in Syria, and he launched 100 missiles in, and then he did it again in April of 2018, and Pompeo said that we have killed hundreds of Russians in Syria, and at the very end of Trump's term, he said we kept U.S.
troops on the eastern side of Syria in violation of UN accords and without the invitation of the host country because we needed the petroleum out of there.
So I can't sign off on everything being wonderful in the Trump world at all.
OK, look, here's the thing.
Trump was somebody and I said like what he says and what he does are often two different things.
And also, you gotta keep in mind, the military-industrial-intelligence complex didn't become less independent after it killed JFK and took over control of the U.S.
government.
It's not less independent now than it was then.
It was already pretty independent then.
Let's give Jim a word on this.
My word is that Matt is completely brilliant.
He's got a grasp on this.
It's phenomenal that I think this is a sensational introduction to the two-hour program forthcoming on Saturday.
I think everyone who's watching this is absolutely 100% hooked.
I agree with Matt right up and down the line, with a possible exception of whether Merchant Russell was involved in some of these diabolical schemes.
I'm skeptical about that as a huge admirer of the great British philosopher who published a hundred books.
But with that caveat, I think Matt's got a grip on this.
It's phenomenal.
Joe, I want you to close this out by just talking about the show where people can learn more, because I think there are a lot of enthusiastic viewers who are eager to tune in.
We'll put the URL to the show, and it is aired live in the United States.
It's from 6 to 8 Central Time on Saturday evening, and then we will put it.
It's usually posted on their website a couple of days later, and so as soon as that URL is available, we'll get that to Matt so he can put this on his website.
We'll put it certainly under your BitChute channel as well, Jim.
Well, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Real Deal.
My great pleasure today to feature Joel Olson and Matt Earhart talking about their forthcoming TNT special.
We've just discovered a real treasure here in Matt, just a sensational historian.
I'm sure you have enjoyed this as much as I. Stay tuned for more Real Deal specials, but meanwhile, don't miss this show Saturday.
It's a keeper.
Thanks for being here.
▲
Export Selection