Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 20, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:32:21

Need to Know News TEXAS TUESDAY (19 April 2022) with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, welcoming you to another Texas Tuesday.
	We got Joe Olson in Houston, Texas.
	Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, now living in Asheville, North Carolina, here to bring you all the news you need to know.
	We begin with a Ukrainian commander who has surrendered, explained the people in Mariupol hate the Ukrainian forces.
	I believe this is true across the board.
	In a very rare interview, a Ukrainian Marine Corps commander, Nikolai Burakov, who surrendered his entire battalion, admitted the population of the city was, as he put it, negatively disposed toward the armed forces of Ukraine.
	He had no regrets about the surrender of over a thousand Marines, able to keep them alive, no reason they should die on behalf of a cause in which they did not believe.
	The massive surrender was kept very hush-hush by the American media, still claiming Ukraine is somehow winning the war.
	Ukraine's PM even bragged his army will fight to the last man in Mariupol.
	This is like the Israelis.
	They'll fight to the last U.S.
	soldier.
	Watch Ukraine's PM say strategic port of Mariupol has not fallen.
	Adding the encircled forces defending the city from Russian attack.
	We'll fight to the end.
	It's funny to watch these Redditors and other Marvel Comics fans slowly begin to realize the war is lost.
	Here's Simon Schuster tweeting, I'm in touch with one of the last defenders of Mariupol.
	He's wounded.
	After the Bukha massacre, he said, surrender is not an option.
	He feels they're staying to accomplish his mission.
	They tied up so much Russian firepower, it gave other cities a chance to survive.
	Does he not realize that Bukha massacre was carried out by the Ukrainian Azov battalion?
	This is embarrassing.
	Meanwhile...
	British Special Air Service soldiers are training troops on Ukrainian territory.
	I guarantee you Vladimir Putin is going to take a very dim view of this on how to use anti-tank weapons provided by London.
	They arrived in Kiev a couple weeks ago to begin training on the new generation light anti-tank weapon known as NLAWS.
	The revelation is the first report of a NATO member having a military presence in Ukraine since the intervention, where Moscow has acknowledged now any such forces there and military equipment are legitimate targets.
	Of course they are.
	The British Ministry of Defense wouldn't confirm the mission, citing on not commenting on special ops, but this is a very bad thing.
	Captain Yuri Mayoneko, one of the Ukrainian commanders speaking with the Times, said the British train was necessary since new recruits and returned vets had no experience with the N-laws.
	Last week, of course, the U.S.
	added an additional $800 million, including 155 howitzers.
	Get this now.
	Because we have a big update to do with Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
	Russia has just announced war on Elon Musk's SpaceX Starlink constellation.
	And in the same fell swoop, it has accepted that its missile frigate, the Moskva, which went down in the Black Sea, was in fact taken down by enemy fire, not a fire on its deck.
	This is a two-part story coming out of Russia.
	We have Natasha and Shivangi joining us with more on this.
	Natasha, tell us more.
	The Starlink satellites, I believe, were used to orchestrate the firing on the Russian flagship that went down in the Black Sea, and now a war has been launched on this Starship-Starlink cluster, isn't it?
	First admission, by the way, of Russia admitting here that Moscow was indeed shot down by using Starlink satellite.
	So now they've admitted that, first of all, there was an attack on the Moscow.
	Earlier, remember, Ankit, they were saying that it was a victim to a storm while it was being taken to a port.
	But now this admission has come by Russia itself saying that Starlink satellite was used to bring down Moscow, the flagship ship.
	I gotta say, well, I'm a fan of Elon Musk in terms of what he's doing with Twitter, for example.
	I think this was a colossal blunder on his part as a private citizen to intervene by giving actionable intelligence to Ukraine.
	I don't think he's gonna come out of this unscathed.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, it gives excellent cover for the folks that really own and control everything, and that's Vanguard and BlackRock, and they've got major holdings in Twitter, and they've already said that they're going to take him out, so now they've got an excuse.
	They can take him out and say, Putin took him out!
	So all they've got to do is just frame the exit strategy for him.
	So yeah, he's signed his own death warrant from a number of standpoints, and I'm not real impressed with the guy.
	You ought to see a video done by Greg Reese.
	It gives the backstory on that guy.
	It's only about five minutes long.
	Really incredible.
	Other things.
	Today's a special anniversary.
	On the 18th of April in 75, hardly a man is now alive who remembers that famous day and year.
	That was when Paul Revere rode around and told us the Redcoats were coming.
	18th of April, 1942.
	Doolittle and 90 volunteers of the U.S.
	Air Corps launched off the deck of the USS Hornet.
	first time ever twin engine bombers took off and they had the thing loaded with 16 planes flew over and bombed Tokyo and most of the guys managed to survive that even though they didn't have enough gas to make it to their final destinations and ended up dumping uh and then in 1993 right after
	uh Janet Reno got uh sworn in as uh the uh attorney general she fired 92 out of 93 US attains.
	attorneys in the United States.
	The only one she didn't fire was Michael Chernoff, who will pop up again sometime in the near future.
	Uh, and that ended the investigations of the MENA drug smuggling and the Iran-Contra stuff, and that it also was able to paint, you know, white Christians as being these militant, you know, horrible people.
	Uh, four ATF agents lost their lives that day.
	All four of those ATF agents had been bodyguards for Clinton when he was governor, and all of them were promoted to federal positions, and all of them were killed by friendly fire.
	Amazing coincidence.
	And then, amazingly, On 1995, on April 18th, they had a bombing at the Oklahoma Murrow building.
	And that was also to frame white militias and gun owners and everything else.
	So, you know, bottom line is we've got a very historic day on April 19th.
	And let's just don't forget all of the wonderful things that have happened on this day in the past.
	Fabulous report.
	It's trivia, but in junior high school, I wrote a paper about the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo.
	And of course, because the Japanese homes were made of wood, it was devastating.
	I mean, just massive onslaught.
	Michael, your thoughts.
	Yeah, that's good within one day, Joe.
	Today is the 19th, you know.
	Well, I had it written down correctly in my logbook.
	Yeah.
	Let's see, going back to Ukraine, practically every independent commentator, actually every independent commentator that I Here, coming out of the Ukraine, essentially tells the same story that they lay low when they're in the control of the Ukrainian army or the Azov guys, because they know they'll get killed otherwise.
	But then, when they actually tell the truth, they're hoping to get liberated from this ridiculous regime there by the Russian invasion.
	You know, it doesn't surprise me that when they go into areas like Mariupol, all the people there are saying, boy, am I glad you have liberated us from those guys.
	I think the controllers of the West were hoping to get another grinding extended war there, just like the USA suffered through in Afghanistan.
	And on a longer time scale, it seems like ever since the Korean War dragged on and on with no declaration of war and no decisive victory, it seems like, and then followed by the Vietnam War, It seems like that's the kind of war that the controllers of this world actually like.
	To make lots of money, kill as many people as possible, and extend it as long as they can.
	Then moving to this declaration of war against the Musk satellite system.
	Well, Duh!
	Didn't he say like a month ago that he would allow Ukraine and NATO to use his satellite system for positioning and triangulation of Russian positions?
	And if that's the case, if that's the case, he's only bringing it on himself.
	I agree, Michael.
	Did you guys want to mention this truth teller in Ukraine who seems to have disappeared and whom I suspect has been brutally murdered by the Azov battalion?
	Yes, absolutely.
	We're talking about Gonzalo Lira.
	And Gonzalo Lira is a wonderful man, wonderful commentator, father of two.
	He married a Ukrainian woman, but he was born in Chile, but he's got U.S.
	citizenship.
	He's educated in America, and he's got some funny title that he uses for his Something like Red Pill Philosopher or something that he that he uses in his his podcasts and videos.
	And he's a really, really good commentator.
	And evidently he's gone missing.
	And there were there's a lot of buildup to it because the Ukrainians he lives in Kharkov and his family's already out of there.
	He's gotten them away.
	But they don't like truth being told there.
	Everything that we're hearing here in the West is total propaganda and they're cleaning up any leaks like he represents to them so that they can lie about this war and he's gone missing and everybody's quite concerned about it.
	Yeah, I have no doubt he's been taken out.
	I mean, these are brutal, brutal people.
	I mean, they are not just neo-Nazis, they are Nazis.
	Meanwhile, Republican Wave, a panel of journalists sound alarm for the Democrats ahead of the 2022 midterm elections.
	Stand in line.
	Everyone's drawing the same conclusion.
	Last week, a new CNBC poll found Biden's job approval at 38%.
	Only 35% approved by the state of the economy.
	Significant loss of support among Americans who opt to elect him.
	Of color, women aged 18 to 49, and Americans younger than 35.
	I'll meet the press on NBC.
	The panel of journalists explained how the poll exposed the issues powering the Republican wave this November.
	It is coming!
	Post Chuck Todd pointed out the most critical issues is young Americans and their perception of the economy.
	87% of Americans 18 to 34 rate the economy fair to poor.
	Only 12% good or excellent.
	Voters under the age of 35 have never experienced inflation.
	They're used to, like, well, there's a new gadget.
	In six months, it'll be cheaper, not more expensive.
	Now, if you want to buy a house for the first time, you're paying a higher interest rate than your parents have ever paid.
	Never mind food and gas.
	This is a huge part of the Democratic coalition.
	The chief correspondents of PBS NewsHour agreed with Todd.
	It's not great.
	It's not great.
	You're talking about one of the key groups.
	Now he helped Democrats win back control of Congress, propelled Biden into the White House, along with 2,000 mules, of course, and massive other forms of theft of the election, but are going to be a play in larger numbers than ever before in the midterms.
	Ruth Marcus, a deputy editor at The Post, pointed Nevada's ground zero for Democrat pains.
	This is a state that went for the Democratic candidate four times in a row.
	It's a state Biden won.
	His approval rating there now is below the overall poll.
	It's at 35 percent.
	Most scary and ominous, peeling off of Hispanic voters in Nevada.
	Slump of approval rating from 73% a year ago to 52% now.
	If you just read, if you're a Democrat candidate or pollster, you read it in gulp.
	What's going on here?
	Eugene Daniels of Politico said Democrats are not appealing to voters because they're only talking about what they've accomplished in the past.
	Voters are saying, well, what are you doing now?
	Matt Continetti, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, summarized the panel's concerns, explaining the economy, education, and crime are the trifecta issues that are empowering the Republican wave this November.
	Meanwhile, a federal judge ruled the Biden mask mandate is unlawful.
	Good for her!
	A federal judge in Trampa has vacated the federal transport mask mandate for planes, trains, buses, and public transportation.
	District Judge Katherine Kimball Mazzel found the CDC exceeded its statutory authority with a mask mandate and violated rules that guide CDC regulations.
	After Joe arbitrarily announced a federal transportation mandate, the CDC triggered enforcement without any required time for public feedback on the new regulations.
	I like this.
	The court declares unlawful and vacates the mask mandate.
	Good for her.
	Within the ruling, one of the common-sense arguments was noted.
	Prior to Biden taking office, there was no mask mandate.
	He then invoked them, but there was nothing substantially different in and about the spread of COVID-19 and mitigation efforts.
	The mask mandate was arbitrary and capricious, with no justification from the CDC, and no required time to provide feedback from the public.
	The government's legal argument was that public feedback comments on rulemaking were irrelevant because the mandate was going to be enforced regardless of public opinion.
	That argument was summarily dispatched by the judge saying just because the government has a predetermined outcome in mind does not relinquish them from the obligation to follow the law.
	Sensing they were going to lose, remarkably, government lawyers argued only the original plaintiff should be granted relief, meaning only the two persons who filed the lawsuit should be exempt.
	That didn't work.
	The federal transportation mask mandate is vacated.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, sounds like some pathetic little small hat lawyers got in there and tried to pull the only rabbit they have out of their hat.
	Absolutely absurd.
	We've still got this circus going on with the January 6th folks hearings in Congress.
	And yesterday, Jim Jordan was invited to speak in front of not the whole commission because nobody's meeting anymore.
	Everything's by Zoom.
	But he was allowed to speak, even though he's not on the committee and they don't allow anybody who's not on the committee to speak.
	They were only managed because of some requirement for bipartisanship.
	They had to have a number of Republicans on there.
	And there's only so many Liz Cheney's that you can put on there that are rabid dogs.
	So they had two different Republicans that are on this committee who invited Jordan to speak on their behalf.
	And each one of them yielded four minutes of time to Jordan.
	He absolutely blasted Pelosi on all of the failures of this administration and all of the attacks, vicious attacks that they did against the Trump administration before this.
	So that's interesting.
	But it's nice to know that we have a mandate It's being expired as far as gagging on a stupid face diaper but yesterday there was a flight that went from Denver to DFW and the pilot had a heart attack immediately on landing the plane and to his good fortune there was a nurse and an army medic on board they were managed to Hit him three times with the defibrillator paddles and get his heart started again.
	They rushed him to the hospital, where we all know what happens in the hospital, but he's been in contact with a guy named Joshua Yoder, Y-O-D-E-R, with U.S.
	Freedom Fighters, and they've been filing a number of lawsuits against these rotten airlines, including American, And they intervened immediately, showed up at the hospital with a team of lawyers and Dr. Robert McCullough, who's an expert cardiologist, and they prohibited the hospital from killing this guy and saying it was something else.
	So he's, uh, he's preparing a suit.
	His name is, uh, Captain Snow, S-N-O-W.
	So expect some more on that front, because these people have had absolutely enough, and he said the pilots from American Airlines are gonna just Great reports.
	and they're going to close down the airline and sue the shit out of these people.
	And Texas, you've got criminal jurisdiction over Fort Worth-based American Airlines.
	Clean these guys' clocks.
	Send them to jail.
	They're criminals.
	Great reports.
	Michael.
	Yeah, that's a great story.
	I didn't know the detail of that story, although I'd heard about that pilot and his heart attack, but I didn't know that those doctors descended on the hospital and kept him alive, kept him out of the COVID protocols.
	That's great.
	Regarding the story about the Democratic meltdown in November, all I got to say is it couldn't happen to a nicer, elitist club of traitors.
	Uh, then this current iteration of the Democrat Party with emphasis on rat, uh, even though I don't hold a great deal of hope concerning the Republicans either at this point, but it does hold the possibility of slowing down this, uh, obvious attempt of actually taking down the United States by the party currently in power and, uh, the total Jewish domination of the executive branch.
	Other than that, the signs are so strong that they're going to get killed in November that it causes some degree of apprehension in the sense that a cornered animal is dangerous and it'll strike out.
	So, who knows what the hell they'll pull.
	And the story about the Florida judge, that's a great development about knocking down the mass mandated transportation.
	Basically, in my mind, because it gives one hope that there's still some form of life and integrity in the justice system.
	Yeah, as I've observed numerous times, the problem occurs between the time one of these unconstitutional directives is issued and the time the courts repeal them.
	They did this knowing it was unconstitutional, knowing it would not survive legal challenge, but seeking to get as much mileage out of it as they could.
	Meanwhile, CNN's latest analysis?
	Biden can't do much about all the crises he's facing.
	In other words, let's give the guy a pass.
	I mean, after all, he's an old guy, and he's the president, but he really can't do anything about it.
	The column authored by White House correspondent John Horwood argues the hands are tied when it comes to inflation numbers, the humanitarian crisis at the border, the pandemic, and rising crime across the nation.
	Have you ever heard such horse shit?
	In a column worthy of the loftiest levels of ridicule, so biased in defense of Biden, one wonders if it were not written by himself, were he cognitively capable of doing it?
	There's not much he can do to curb inflation, not much he can do to stop migrants from reaching America's southern border.
	Has he ever heard of the wall?
	Has he ever heard of, you know, keeping us energy independent?
	Have you ever heard of enforcing the law?
	Have you ever heard of funding the police or to reduce crime or to make vaccine resisters get shot so it hastens the end of coronavirus?
	This guy is so ignorant, so stupid, so biased.
	It's embarrassing.
	A leader who shrugs his shoulders at it all, a media who runs cover for him.
	He has a host of problems he can't do much to solve.
	Why do we need him?
	Hartwood's defense is so strong he actually managed to cast some blame in the direction of another source, Republicans and a couple of Democrats who've defied the party line.
	There's not much he can do to compel cooperation from defectors within his thin Democratic congressional majorities.
	So obviously he's going after Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin.
	There's nothing he can do to compel it from Republican adversaries who'd rather aggravate than alleviate.
	What planet does Harvard think it's a GOP's job to alleviate Biden's burdens?
	It's a president's job to alleviate America's burdens.
	If he can't solve these problems, his entire administration needs to step down so we can get someone who can tweets Tim Young very appropriately.
	He goes on to explain Biden is a victim of circumstances.
	He adds, history shows presidents can rarely change their political weather in midterm elections.
	A little advice?
	Biden could start by not being catastrophically bad at his job.
	In nearly every category, his approval numbers have been underwater.
	On the topics he claims to be out of Biden's control, he's categorically blamed by the American people for the economy with the approval rating of 35, 60% disapproving immigration, 60% disapproval, crime, 69% disapproval. 60% disapproval, crime, 69% disapproval.
	In general, his standing has sunk now, 38%.
	According to last week's CNBC All-American survey, alas, of course, he's not to blame.
	Can't do anything about it, folks.
	After all, it's not Biden's fault that people need to choose between eating what they want and prepping themselves a nice bowl of lentils and beans.
	Inflation stings most if you are less than 300,000.
	That's most Americans.
	Here's how to deal with it.
	Take the bus.
	Don't buy in bulk.
	Try lentils instead of meat.
	Nobody said this would be fun.
	This is the kind of shit we're getting from the administration.
	The Washington Post.
	Don't rant about short-staffed stores and supply chain wars.
	Lower expectation.
	Get used to starvation.
	Even Biden blames Putin for many of his failures and even shrugged his own shoulders.
	promised if elected he would take responsibility instead of blaming others, has consistently blamed Russian President Putin for many of his failures and even shrugged his own shoulders.
	On gas price last month, he said, it's gonna go up.
	Can't do much right now.
	Russia is responsible as though canceling the XL pipeline had nothing to do with it, as though withdrawing permits to drill on federal land had nothing to do with it, as though making us no longer energy independent had nothing to do with it.
	Can't do much is a hell of a 2024 campaign theme.
	Harwood, meanwhile, has a history of blaming former President Trump.
	The CNN reporter tried sharing a message from commanders of withdrawal from Afghanistan that took place under Biden was actually Trump's fault.
	Blamed him for an election loss, calling him a giant anvil on the backs of Republican candidates.
	How absurd is that?
	When Democrats get shelved in the 2022 midterms, he'll be the first psychophantic puppy to jump into Biden's labyrinth to defend.
	If you can take that to the bank, Joe, this is just disgusting.
	Oh yeah, it's insufferable to have to sit and listen to that stuff.
	Yeah, Biden didn't cause any of his problems and neither did the Democratic Party.
	Everything is just, you know, an accidental circumstance and it's all the fault of somebody else.
	It's like the most amazing set of narcissistic denials ever imaginable.
	Anybody that took a course in statistics in college, You might not have wanted to learn it, but you ended up learning a whole bunch of things, and one of the things you learned about was in polling and how easy it is to rig polls with what's called push poll.
	You ask a question first that leads the respondent into a certain answer so that you can actually skew the polls incredibly, and every poll that I've ever seen
	Done by any major polling company has been wrong by about 15% which is what they already know is the margin of manipulation that they can statistically get away with because if you lie more than 15 or 20% the people go that lie that polls a bunch of BS so they use polls to project so that people will join in with the herd and vote for the candidate or have the opinion that they want And so they manipulate polls in that regard.
	And then they also manipulate polls.
	The poll that I saw on Biden was his approval rating was 21%, which is consistent with the 15% manipulation factor.
	So if they're claiming he has a 35, he's really got a 20%.
	Approval rating.
	Anybody that goes to grocery store or filling station or has to pay their property taxes or has to endure the rampant crime that's going on nationwide knows that this man is not popular even in his own silly party.
	You can watch him in the White House.
	Nobody wants to shake his hand.
	Nobody wants to talk to him.
	He is an absolute 100% worse failure.
	Of course, that means that you have to discount some of the failures of Woody Wilson and, you know, FDR and LBJ and Tricky Dick and, you know, so we've had a same category.
	Well, it's overwhelmingly worse.
	I can't believe you'd even say that Michael Michael your thoughts.
	You guys are awfully hard on Mr. Joe there.
	The title of that article, Can't Do Much About the Crises He's Involved With, made me laugh because he can't do much about anything.
	I'm surprised that he can dress himself in the morning.
	All he does is dodder to the speaker's podium and do his best to read the teleprompter.
	You know, the placing of this Slow Joe character in the position of predecedent is like a huge joke on the American people by these controllers behind the scenes.
	Think about what they've gotten away with the last 20 years.
	They put George Bush, an imbecile, in there for eight years.
	Then Barack Obama was a gay man with a man playing his wife and two fake children.
	Then Trump was an accidental detour of their agenda.
	So now putting Biden in there, it's like they have to up the ante with every presidential election.
	Let's see if we can put somebody in there who's obviously mentally impaired and get away with it.
	Yeah, nice, nice, nice points, Michael.
	Meanwhile, We have Ohio University paying $400,000 damage to a professor who refuses to use students' preferred pronouns.
	Hear, hear for the professor.
	A public university will pay $400,000 to a philosophy professor, God bless him, who refuses to use a student's preferred pronoun.
	It arrives four years after the school punished him for not using the student's preferred pronouns.
	He argued they violated his First Amendment right.
	During a political philosophy class in January 2018, Shawnee State University professor Nick Merriweather responded to a biological male student's question by saying, Yes, sir.
	When the class ended, the student confronted Merriweather.
	He declared to be transgendered.
	He referred to as a woman with feminine titles and pronouns.
	When Merriweather did not instantly agree, the student became belligerent and promised to get him fired.
	The student filed a complaint triggering a formal investigation.
	He said the pronouns would force him to speak and act contrary to his own Christian convictions and philosophical beliefs.
	He offered to address the student by the individual's first or last name, but the student insisted he use the preferred pronouns.
	Shawnee State rejected his compromise, claimed he effectively created a hostile environment, slapped him with a warning written in his personnel file, threatened further corrective action.
	Merwell encountered with a lawsuit asserting the Portsmouth Bay School violated his First Amendment and 14th Amendment right to due process.
	The lawsuit was dismissed in February 2020, but revived by the 6th U.S.
	Circuit Court of Appeals in March of 2021.
	Shawnee State punished a professor for his speech on a hotly contested issue, and it did so despite the constitutional protections afforded by the First Amendment, the three-judge panel wrote in a unanimous opinion.
	The district court dismissed the professor's free speech and free exercise claims.
	We see things differently and reverse.
	Thursday, Alliance Defending Freedom announced Meriwether had won his case, which will now pay the university 400,000 damage and attorney fees.
	As part of this settlement, they agree Meriwether has a right to choose when to use or avoid using titles or pronouns referring to or addressing students.
	The university agreed he'll never be mandated to use pronouns, including if a student requests pronouns that conflict with his or her biological sex.
	This gauge forces us to defend what used to be common belief.
	Nobody should be forced to contradict their core beliefs just to keep their job.
	ADF Senior Counsel Travis Barman observed, Dr. Merriweather went out of his way to accommodate his students and treat them with dignity and respect, yet his university punished him because he wouldn't endorse an ideology he believes to be false.
	We're pleased to see the University recognize the First Amendment guarantees Dr. Merriweather and every other American the right to speech and act in a manner consistent with his faith and convictions.
	Public universities should welcome intellectual and ideological diversity, where all students and professors can engage in meaningful discussion without compromising their core beliefs.
	Dr. Merriweather rightly defended that freedom to speak and stay silent and not conform to the University's demand for uniformity of thought.
	We commend the university for ultimately agreeing to do the right thing in keeping with its reason for existence in the marketplace of ideas.
	Yes, indeed.
	Very good for the professor.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, universities used to be an open forum for all available ideas and open to discussion on a wide variety of subjects, but they've really gotten to be total mind control indoctrination centers.
	Colonel Allen West was due to speak at a New England college last week, and he was run out of there by a student group, and you don't have to look very far before you see conservative speakers being driven out by these Uh, zealot students that just, uh, they have no idea.
	There is no First Amendment with these people.
	It's like they're part of a collective and they've got a hive mind and they're gonna attack anybody that questions their hive mind.
	It's like, The most absurd thing imaginable, and they're so poorly trained in absolutely every branch of science and just completely ignorant of history.
	It just amazes me how we have this group of people who sit around and act like pseudo-intellectuals at college and, you know, sip their lattes and tell you how morally superior they are because they agree with everything The collective tells them to believe.
	It's absolutely absurd.
	A very disappointing turn of events for American universities, but I'll tell you what, they were overrated to begin with, and if we lose 75% of the college class professors and courses, better for all of humanity, because the 25% that are remaining are the ones that are going to be actually learning something in college worthwhile.
	From around 1998 to 2006, when I retired after a 35-year career in higher education, the influence of political correctness was growing on the Duluth campus of the University of Minnesota and elsewhere.
	I saw it as a real problem and constraint on freedom of speech.
	And indeed, it has proven to be precisely that.
	Despicable.
	Good for Meriwether.
	Michael.
	Yeah, I have a good friend who was a professor of English literature at Tulane.
	And he decided to quit in 1992 after being in academia for about 15 years and moved to India to become like the literary guy for a large organization there for that precise reason.
	That he saw this coming, that every time he expressed any non-woke opinion, they didn't call it woke back then, it was just non-liberal opinion or Marxist opinion, then he was vilified.
	So he just gave up his career and moved to India.
	Joe mentioned the woke students being part of a collective.
	When he said that, I'd say they're part of a cult.
	It's a very insular belief system that has been imposed on the kids in colleges and academia these days.
	And God bless that philosophy professor, indeed.
	I mean, there's one more indication that the justice system hasn't completely been controlled yet.
	I'm just sort of surprised that the cultural Marxist behind the curtain didn't jump in here to appeal the judge's decision rather than allowing the university to enter into a logical settlement like that.
	Yeah, well, the Court of Appeals, too, obviously fulfilled its obligation under the law, which is not universally true, sad to say.
	Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
	I have some people I know, collars to my shell, who don't think there's such a thing as nuclear weapons.
	Here's that little piece.
	We'll watch part about addressing that issue.
	It was the height of the Cold War, and U.S.
	scientists and engineers were working tirelessly to develop the world's first thermonuclear fusion bomb.
	The project, dubbed Operation Ivy, was set to trigger the most powerful explosion in human history by unleashing 10.4 megatons of energy, 450 times the power of the bomb dropped on top of Nagasaki.
	The U.S.
	was desperate to beat the Soviets and attain this world-shattering technology, making all necessary preparations for it to be an iconic and unprecedented event.
	Then, on November 1st, 1952, a burst of scorching light and destruction like the world had never seen ruptured the sky and covered the horizon in an ominous orange haze.
	The cameras on the Lugulab Island and the Inuitak Atoll of the Marshall Islands recorded the humbling blast as a colossal white mushroom cloud could be seen for miles.
	As the Americans showed their military and technological supremacy to the world They also unveiled groundbreaking scientific discoveries, knowledge that they would secretly keep for themselves.
	Beyond the A-bomb.
	The cataclysmic debut of nuclear weaponry in 1945 demonstrated to the world the lethality that human-made destruction could reach.
	The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had single-handedly cut World War II short, forcing the Japanese Empire to capitulate, even after stating that they would fight to the end.
	As the curtains of the nuclear age unfurled, the world's superpowers were determined to take nuclear technology as far as it could go.
	Italian physicist Enrico Fermi, known as the father of the nuclear age, had considered the idea of using a fission reaction, like the one produced by an atom bomb, to trigger a much more devastating fusion reaction as early as 1940.
	Fermi shared his idea with Edward Teller, with whom he worked on the Manhattan Project, developing the first atomic bombs.
	Still, at the end of World War II, all interest in a weapon thousands of times more potent than the recently employed atomic bombs subsided.
	However, the Soviets tested their first atom bomb in 1949, much sooner than America had projected.
	And they knew that the next step for the Soviets would be to develop a thermonuclear bomb.
	A passionate debate ensued, with some scientists arguing that developing such a weapon was irresponsible, while others saw it as inevitable.
	Still, if the Soviets beat them to the technology, the U.S.
	This would face the risk of destruction.
	Teller Ulam, designer.
	Ultimately, the U.S.
	decided to go ahead with the development of a thermonuclear device, and on January 31, 1950, President Harry S. Truman greenlit a program to develop a hydrogen bomb.
	The design was led by Edward Teller, who designed a weapon based on the theories of therme.
	At the time, Teller and his team called the concept of a hydrogen bomb a super.
	For months, the design faced one technical obstacle after another, and the idea that the very concept might be impossible to develop was considered for a moment.
	In a contrived chain of events, many scientists working on the super did everything they could to develop the technology, while also hoping it would be impossible to do so.
	As time passed, and no feasible design was achieved, it looked like the concept was genuinely impossible to materialize.
	However, a breakthrough idea from the Polish expatriate mathematician Stanislaw Ulam was incorporated into Teller's concept in 1951, resulting in the first workable design for a megaton-range hydrogen bomb.
	The concept came to be known as the Teller-Ulam design, and it entailed a device activated in specific stages and within specialized chambers inside the weapon casing.
	The major breakthrough was the separation of the fission and fusion mechanisms, and to use the radiation caused by the fission bomb to first compress the fusion fuel before igniting it, causing the thermonuclear reaction.
	The elegant design was so well put together that it convinced all remaining detractors that the hydrogen bomb was not only possible, but it was unavoidable, and it would just be a matter of time before the Soviets caught up to the idea.
	After a small-scale test to guarantee the mechanisms worked correctly, The first full-scale thermonuclear detonation was programmed for November 1st, 1952.
	Preparation.
	Preparation.
	As the project advanced, some detractors made last-ditch attempts to halt the detonations.
	One of the most iconic cases was made by the State Department Panel of Consultants on Disarmament, chaired by J. Robert Oppenheimer.
	The father of the atom bomb.
	Oppenheimer felt that avoiding a test might forestall the development of a catastrophic new weapon and open the doors for future arms agreements between the nations.
	Alas, he and his team couldn't amass the necessary political pressure to convince Washington to halt the project's development, and the scheduled test moved forward.
	The early Teller-Ulan design prototype lacked many engineering adaptations to make it mobile, and the initial iteration resembled more a factory building than a portable warhead.
	The entire device weighed 74 metric tons, and it was housed in a large corrugated aluminum building called the Shot Cab, which was 88 feet long, 46 feet wide, and 61 feet high, with a 300-foot signal tower installed nearby.
	The massive building was located on the Pacific island of Ilugalab, part of the Inuitak Atoll.
	The area became an intricate scientific complex, with Ilugalab Island connected to neighboring islands by a 9,000-foot artificial causeway.
	On top of this path was an aluminum sheet tube filled with helium ballonets, which allowed gamma and neutron radiation to pass without restrictions to instruments in the unmanned detection station 202, located on a second island.
	A wide array of instruments were set up on the station and the neighboring islands to record all the data released by the blast, including camera and film equipment that recorded the entire event.
	The detonation.
	On November 1st, 1952, the American personnel was stationed 50 miles from the detonation site on ships.
	Then, at 7.15am local time, the test was finally carried out.
	As the device was activated, it produced a yield of 10.4 megatons of TNT, which initially manifested itself as a colossal fireball at the radius of 2.1 miles.
	The menacing fireball then rose as a second sun due to buoyancy, creating a cataclysmic scene for the spectators to see.
	As the fireball kept rising, it tainted the sky orange While thermonuclear explosion-induced lightning struck all around the flaming sphere, making the hellish scene even more daunting.
	Then, after the fire subsided, a massive mushroom cloud rose to an altitude of 56,000 feet in less than 90 seconds and stabilized at the height of 135,000 feet, with its top part eventually spreading out to a diameter of over 100 miles.
	The blast created a crater of 6,230 feet in diameter and 164 feet deep, completely erasing the island of Ilugalab off the map.
	In addition, the explosion and ocean waves stripped the islands clean of all vegetation, while radioactive coral debris fell upon ships positioned more than 35 miles away.
	The different sensors and filters set up by the researchers captured considerable amounts of material, They hoped would help uncover the elusive undiscovered elements 99 and 100 that had been only theoretically predicted.
	As expected, the scientists were able to detect the existence of two new elements, which were eventually named in honor of Albert Einstein and Enrico Fermi, Einsteinium and Fermium.
	The novel elements have been produced by intensely concentrated neutron flux at the detonation site.
	To ensure the scientific supremacy of the US, The discovery was kept secret for several years as they underwent thorough and exhaustive testing.
	Eventually, public credit for the discovery was given to the experiment's researchers, but only after a scientific advantage was obtained by the US.
	The astonishing footage remains a reminder of the relentless destruction man can unleash in the pursuit of ultimate power.
	Thank you for watching my video.
	What do you think of this impressive footage?
	I wanted to show that because I have, you know, even some callers who are highly intelligent who deny the existence of nuclear weapons.
	And it is so bizarre, Joe.
	I just don't get it.
	Your thoughts.
	Yeah, well, you also have to deny the existence of nuclear power.
	So how do you explain nuclear submarines and nuclear aircraft carriers?
	And, you know, the evidence of what happened at White Sands in 1945 prior to bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is completely obvious.
	I mean, you can see the glass baked sand on the desert.
	And we have Operation Starfish, which was done in Johnson Island a few years later, where they did an atmospheric test about 200 miles above the surface of the Earth.
	It was several thousand miles from Hawaii, but because of the curvature of the Earth, which, get over it, it's not flat, Knocked out the power in Hawaii, which was the very first man-made EMP, electrical magnetic pulse, which we have to worry about now with nuclear weapons.
	The original hydrogen bomb used deuterium, which a normal hydrogen atom has just a proton.
	But if it has an extra neutron, then that makes it deuterium.
	And if it has two neutrons, that makes it tritium.
	Deuterium is 1.56 parts per million of water, so it took an enormous amount of refining to be able to, distillation, be able to get enough deuterium to make a hydrogen bomb.
	And so the actual Teller-Ulam design was to use lithium, where you have a six proton and neutron molecule that you can put inside the nuclear trigger.
	And when it breaks down, it gives you six hydrogen atoms that are heavy atoms.
	So bottom line is that's how they were able to do that and reduce the size for hydrogen bombs by an enormous amount.
	And it increases the magnitude by about one magnitude, about 10 times increase in the strength based on the amount of fissionable material you have, which is the uranium or plutonium pit.
	So anybody that has any level of physics and chemistry training should be able to educate themselves to the point where they realize, yes, it's a good thing.
	It is possible to have nuclear power plants.
	Yes, it is possible to use that form of energy in a more rapid form and have a nuclear bomb.
	So, you know, it's just a waste of time to talk to these people.
	Some people are so perpetually ignorant that you can't educate them.
	So just kind of go, well, I'm sorry you feel that way, but someday you may be educated.
	And if not, you can take this to your grave because they're not changing the facts of physics.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Yeah, did I hear them say something about Operation Ivy at the first of that?
	I never knew my namesake was in that context.
	It's actually called Ivy Mike.
	Seriously?
	Seriously, I'll send it to you.
	No, seriously.
	Oh, seriously, it's called Ivy Mike?
	Yes, it's called Ivy Mike.
	That's a trip.
	I wonder if that's where my parents came up with it.
	But people who believe the idea that the entire development of nuclear weapons is a giant hoax would, of course, claim that the videos of those early bombs being detonated were some form of video fakery.
	But it occurred to me that A lot of that footage was beyond the capabilities of video fakery when they were made in like the 40s and 50s.
	It's not like today when you can put digital images on anything on the screen.
	Back then, there were some definite limits to what you could show, and some of that footage is just stunningly accurate for seeing explosions that big.
	One point in that video that I would disagree with is early on it said something about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki being responsible for the surrender of Japan.
	I don't think that's historically correct.
	The Japanese had already had their main cities absolutely devastated by firebombing campaigns, and they were desperately trying to surrender prior to those bombs being dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
	I think it was more of a signal to the Soviet Union of U.S.
	military superiority.
	Meanwhile, Steve Kirsch has a brilliant piece.
	These people deserve the credit for the deaths of nearly a million Americans so far.
	This is a treatment guideline panel member, specifically Roy M. Glock, H. Clifford Lane, and Henry Massour, who have approved all these absurd guidelines.
	The members of the panel apparently doesn't seem to place any value on human life.
	I will show several examples.
	At no time is there a risk-benefit analysis where dollar amount is placed on the value of a human life.
	For example, if there are 100 trials and 90% were positive and 10% were neutral, should the NIH recommend the drug?
	Unfortunately, they aren't accountable to anyone, so they never have to defend themselves.
	Nearly a million have died in the U.S.
	for their failure to correctly assess what the data says and recommend interventions more likely to be beneficial than detrimental.
	What do they do instead?
	They recommend you take a vaccine that's more likely to kill than to save you.
	I've invited any of them to discuss this in a recorded meeting with me and a few of my colleagues, but even with a name your private incentive, none of them will accept because they know their decisions were indefensible.
	In an email to a professor of medicine at a top university, I noted that no matter what the evidence says, they won't change the recommendations.
	The professor wrote back, suspect you may be correct.
	That means fact checkers can't attack this article with ad hominem attacks on my credentials, and they can't attack the article on the data either.
	Let's have a recorded conversation about it if you've got questions about the facts.
	Hydroxychloroquine.
	I was one of the founders of Dr. Boulware's study on HGQ, which showed it was effective for COVID given early, not statistically significant because the trial didn't have enough patients.
	However, David Weissman discovered the effect was statistically significant if one factors in the delivery time of the drug.
	When the mainstream refused to publish his analysis, he did it on a preprint server.
	Here's a summary.
	338 studies from 5,370 scientists show a statistically significant improvement in mortality.
	The 15 studies looking at mortality found an average of 72% reduction in mortality, meaning a 72% reduction in death.
	The drug has been officially adopted for early treatment in nearly all 35 countries.
	In one study, the drug and combination reduced their risk by 99.8%, with a p-value of less than 1 to the 10,000, which means it's unlikely it could have occurred by chance.
	Suppose you just got COVID.
	Your doctor offers you the drug as part of your treatment.
	Do you say, yes?
	I can't tell if it'll help or hurt?
	No.
	Given this data, I guess everyone who would understand the data would choose number one.
	That's what I would choose.
	Talking about HGQ.
	The NIH guidelines, however, says the correct answer is number three, do not use.
	They say because of the two trials they choose to review, it didn't reduce by the time you were sick.
	In other words, by NIH reasoning, who cares if the drug reduces your risk of death by 72%?
	If it didn't reduce the time you were sick, it should not be used.
	The logic here is inexplicable.
	We ignore the significant death benefit of 15 studies and instead choose two, where it did change the time you remain sick.
	In short, lives don't matter to the NIH panel.
	They will simply focus on studies and metrics to make the drug look like it did nothing.
	Talking about HCQ.
	Fluvoxamine.
	The highest level of proof and evidence-based medicine is meta-analysis and systematic review, published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.
	For fluvoxamine, we now have that as of April 6, 2022.
	Fluvoxamine for outpatient management of COVID-19 to prevent hospitalization.
	What did NIH do with the new information?
	They ignored it.
	The rating of neutral for fluvoxamine will change, even though the drug passed the highest bar in evidence-based medicine.
	Evidence doesn't matter to them.
	Fluvoxamine had a 12-time mortality benefit if you start taking it early, as shown in the TOGETHER trial.
	That's way better than any vaccine, but who cares?
	The committee ignores all the data, says it can't figure out if the drug will help or not.
	They will not be held accountable to anyone.
	No public challenge allowed.
	Ivermectin.
	Same deal with Ivermectin.
	Lots of studies with Ivermectin.
	There are multiple peer-reviewed meta-analysis and systematic reviews saying the drug works.
	Same reaction from the committee.
	They aren't sure if it works or not.
	Look at the significant results from 82 studies from 815 scientists, 129,808 patients in 27 countries.
	Significant improvement for mortality, ventilation, ICU, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance.
	83, 63, 40% improvement for both laxatives, early and late treatment.
	56 percent in three RCTs, 53 percent lower mortality from 42 studies.
	The NIH says there's insufficient evidence to make a recommendation.
	You have only 82 studies from 815 scientists with 129,808 patients in 27 countries.
	You think we need more evidence?
	That's why Pierre Cory got a tattoo on his arm.
	Insufficient evidence.
	Inspired by my 16-year-old daughter who got a tattoo yesterday without her knowledge, I decided to get one to no longer have to be reminded what my medical opinions are based upon.
	Insufficient evidence.
	Other drugs.
	Lots of others that have convincing data.
	Low side effect profile.
	Anything where the green line is solely to the left is highly likely to be helpful.
	NIH, however, doesn't recommend using any of them, except for molnupiravir, paxiloid, and remensivir.
	Now, I challenge you to cover the drug labels on the left and pick out those three drugs from the lineup below.
	It's impossible, isn't it?
	Do you have a pattern here?
	The only drugs getting approval from the NIH are proprietary drugs from big drug companies.
	That's the common factor.
	Here is the irony.
	Every one of the repurposed drugs or supplements listed in the table above has a better risk-benefit profile than the vaccine.
	We don't recommend the drug supplement.
	We do recommend the vaccine.
	It makes no sense.
	Why I say the committee members are responsible for nearly a million deaths?
	The Farid Tyson early treatment protocol has been available since March of 2020.
	It has a 99.8% mortality reduction.
	They told NIH about the protocol in July of 2020.
	There have been around 850,000 COVID deaths since.
	Had the NIH recommended a free Tyson protocol, nearly 550,000 lives could have been saved.
	At the time, there were no better alternatives.
	Why ignore it?
	Conflicts of interest?
	Panel members had conflicts of interest that were disclosed and not disclosed.
	That would normally be a problem, but it just doesn't matter because nobody is holding them accountable.
	My challenge?
	I invite members of the NIH committee who voted to recommend against any repurposed drugs and or supplements to an open debate to discuss this with me and a few of my colleagues.
	I'll even throw in a financial incentive to make it worth your time.
	Name your prize.
	Needless to say, they're not going to do it.
	They know this is all bullshit.
	I submit they're all bought and paid for to begin with to murder as many Americans as possible.
	And they're in the key position to do it, Joe.
	Disgraceful.
	Yeah, well, we have a whole bunch of people that need to be prosecuted criminally, and that would be Tony Fauci and his lovely wife, Christine Granady, who is in charge of medical ethics at NIH, and she hasn't been able to find
	Any ethical problems with any of the things that any of the CDC and FTC have been doing and she certainly hasn't spoken out about it and then we also have Frances Collins who is at FDA and so we have a whole gang of these people that that need to have all of their assets seized and they need to spend the rest of their life either in jail or they need to just be executed.
	If we can execute supposed doctor mingles for crimes less than this, than for killing millions of people.
	These folks certainly deserve more than that.
	And I've attended a whole bunch of medical conferences in the last year and a half, including one in Frisco where I got to hear Dr. Richard Bartlett, who's a doctor out in West Texas that had treated at that time, 1500 patients who came to the hospital very, very sick.
	And he treated them with Budesonide He said, this is an over-the-counter steroid that has been used in inhalers.
	It's so safe that we trust 10-year-olds to self-administer it.
	All you have to do is just, you know, press on the inhaler, inhale it a few times, and then rinse it out to get the residue out of it.
	It's like absolutely crazy that we have that particular protocol is also not allowed, and there's a great conference that's being held in about a dozen different cities called Crimes Against Humanity Tour.
	It includes Dr. Judy Makovitz, Reiner Fulmik, and Dr.
	Richard Fleming, and it's going to be coming to a city near you.
	Make every effort you can to see these people in person and go ahead and pay the price because it's worth it to support people who have been able to stand up against this onslaught of flood the zone Rockefeller World Economic Forum and who mandated dictates against all of humanity.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Yeah, Richard Bartlett's a great guy.
	He's out in Odessa, Texas, speaking of Texas Tuesdays.
	That's a terrific article cleared by Steve Kirsch there.
	I'm glad you took time to go through it.
	It lays out a clear and logical case calling out the members of the NIH's COVID-19 Treatment Committee being responsible for close to a million excess deaths in this situation.
	Great statistical case.
	And it points out the fact that the NIH, as well as specifically in that, but it also applies to the FDA and the CDC, are completely captured agencies.
	They are not what they pretend to be.
	Kirsch wants to know in that article why they made the decisions that they made.
	And in that context, I think we can all figure that out, because it certainly wasn't from logic or concern for any kind of real science.
	And it reminded me of a quote from Leslie Manoukian that I've read before.
	And just the short version is, quote, there's no way to explain The tens of thousands of deaths that have been reported to the CDC and the European Medicine Agency, and yet these products, the vaccines, persist in being marketed to the public.
	There's simply no innocent explanation for that.
	I couldn't agree more.
	No innocent explanation.
	Indeed, it's mass murder on an unprecedented scale.
	Meanwhile, Mike Adams is appropriately sounding the alarm.
	On the heels of rail carriers canceling grain shipments, they're now warning fertilizer rail shipments are being halted during spring planting to guarantee there will be no food to eat.
	As you may recall, 10 days ago, I warned rail carriers were declining, declaring force majeure and halting shipments of grain to dairy herds and other cow herds across America.
	Really, beef, steer herds.
	In that announcement, I warned this was an engineered collapse of the food supply, where rail carriers were being ordered to drop certain loads in order to maximize the coming wave of food scarcity and famine to promote starvation.
	Now, devastating news from CF Industry, one of the largest fertilizer producers in the world, confirms the engineered food collapse plan is being expanded to include fertilizer shipments.
	According to an April 14th announcement, Univacific is halting the delivery of fertilizer shipments right in the middle of peak planting season for farmers.
	CF Industry warns that railroad-mandated shipping reduction will result in nitrogen fertilizer shipment delays during the swing application season that will be unable to accept new rail sales involving Union Pacific for the foreseeable future to guarantee the crops will not survive.
	Even more alarmingly, CF Industries warns there's only one of 30 companies to face these restrictions.
	This means Union Pacific is essentially dropping fertilizer shipments and grain shipments all across America.
	Put another way, America's food infrastructure is being deliberately shut down.
	The implications are catastrophic.
	It affects not just fertilizer, but also diesel exhaust fluid necessary for all tractors, transportation trucks, construction equipment, and other machinery that use diesel engines.
	As CF Industry explains, the shipment primarily from the Davidson Complex in Louisiana and Bortneal Complex in Iowa.
	The rail lines serve key agricultural areas, Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas, California.
	Products affected include nitrate and fertilizers such as urea and urea ammonium nitrate, as well as diesel exhaust fluid.
	Without diesel exhaust fluid, you can't run tractors.
	And to the Green New Deal lunatics who think that halting diesel engines will magically make the world green, while they absurdly try to suck all the CO2 out of the atmosphere, which will kill all plants, by the way, you're about to experience the starvation, chaos, and violence that comes from shutting down agriculture.
	Good luck to all.
	This engineer halting a fertilizer shipment appears to be timed to severely disrupt spring planting across North America.
	Consistent with what we observed, Biden's deliberate shutdown of America's energy infrastructure, which began on day one, From that very day, Biden and his handlers, Obama especially, have been meticulously deconstructing America's food and energy infrastructure, causing shortages and price inflation.
	Yet its prices and scarcity both continue to worsen.
	Psaki says it's all Putin's fault as a convenient commerce story.
	The truth is that fake President Biden is seeking to plunge America into mass starvation, food riots, and chaos.
	The shutting down of energy, food, and fertilizer is just one small part of this nefarious scheme.
	Meanwhile, the application of nitrogen fertilizer is critical to maximizing crop yield.
	If farmers are unable to secure all the nitrogen fertilizer they require because of supply chain disruptions, yield will be lower.
	In truth, without nitrogen fertilizer, crop yields would be nothing short of catastrophic.
	Perhaps that's why China has been buying up all the grain supplies around the world, stockpiling like mad in anticipation of a global food collapse that's being engineered.
	A perfect storm of black swan events.
	Smell food doom on a global scale.
	If 2021 was a COVID chapter, Global Clap 2022-23 is going to be the famine chapter.
	A conversion of black swan events is spelling out the absolute certainty of global food scarcity and mass famine.
	Some include the unleashing of economic sanctions against Russia, halting Russia's ability to export fertilizer and food crops such as wheat, The Grand Solar Minimum Sun Cycle is producing lower levels of solar radiation to reach Earth for the next several years, leading to global crop failure and, historically, the fall of nations and empires.
	Unbound money printing by the Fed, leading to rapid evaluation collapse of the value of the dollar versus food, skyrocketing food inflation.
	Which the UN's FAO now puts at 12.6% month after month, meaning food prices will double every six months at this rate of inflation.
	U.S.
	government program paying farmers to destroy their crops deliberately contributing to food scarcity skyrocketing diesel fuel prices.
	Raising the cost of inputs for farming because they run on diesel equipment.
	Climate change lunatics trying to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, which will starve food crops and devastate global yields.
	Since CO2 is a key nutrient, plants need to grow even more than they need oxygen.
	The upshot very clear.
	Accelerating food inflation.
	Food prices, without question, will double by the end of 2022.
	Food prices will almost certainly double again in 2023.
	Food riots will break out worldwide, already begun in Sri Lanka, Peru, and other nations.
	Food riots will break out in the USA later in 2022, first appearing in Democrat-run blue cities and spreading.
	In 2023, we will see food rationing and price controls both demanded and enforced by governments in the world, including the U.S.
	Widespread food insecurity will lead to global uprisings and revolutions.
	Nations will fall.
	Sri Lanka is already in default on its dollar bonds and facing the toppling of its political leadership, and we're not even out of April yet.
	In response to rising chaos, governments will declare national emergencies, roll out police state control to manage the masses.
	China's brutal lockdown at 25 million plus in Shanghai is an early preview of things to come.
	Most importantly, people who do not have alternative sources of food will likely starve.
	That means you either need to store food or learn how to grow food.
	Ideally, you'll have capabilities in both, which is what will keep you alive.
	I understand some faced with bad news resort to saying, I can't handle anymore.
	I just prefer everything's going to be fine.
	I beg you to reconsider your stance, however, because you can't pretend to be not starving when you are starving.
	Food scarcity will shock people back to reality.
	They've been living in a delusional dream world.
	Anyone who chooses to ignore this engineered food collapse will likely die of starvation.
	He has more.
	He has lots of documents to back it up.
	I think he's got it right.
	Joe, what are your thoughts?
	Yeah, it's really disappointing that they use engineered as an adjective for crises that they create, which are nefarious, and also that they use engineering in other terms like geoengineering, which is another offensive use of the word engineering, but be that as it may.
	There's absolutely no environmental negative impact from additional carbon dioxide Photosynthesis is a direct linear function for the amount of carbon dioxide that's in the air surrounding the plants that need carbon dioxide from the air in order to produce sugars, starches, and cellulose, which is what all life on the terrestrial part of the planet lives on.
	So it's absolutely absurd that these people still have their knickers in a twist over something that they absolutely do not understand and that the government has no business trying to control at all.
	It's absolutely insane.
	We're overdue for an AGW number nine program.
	Possibly we can do that tomorrow.
	See what your schedule's like.
	I can start sending you material.
	I really want to tear into the EPA because they've attacked All sorts of really nefarious things as being a problem when they ignore things that are absolutely provable problems, like they do nothing about the glyphosate, which is an absolute toxin, and there's some great articles that we could throw in on that about the Saturday, Joe.
	I cannot do it tomorrow.
	caused by the use of that, as well as the killing of the nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria, which made it possible to grow crops without using chemical fertilizers.
	So if you're up for that, maybe we can do that tomorrow.
	I'll see if I can book a room at the library so we've got a nice, comfortable place to broadcast from.
	Saturday, Joe.
	I cannot do it tomorrow.
	Michael, your thoughts.
	Yeah, that is a serious black pill article from Mike Adams right there, but I can't think of a thing in it that I disagree with.
	that I disagree with.
	I want to draw people's attention who go to see that article or copy it.
	To the three videos that he includes at the bottom of the article by what you might call the big three of guys who are video bloggers, who for quite a while now have been talking the truth about the larger context of our environment and our cosmic neighborhood.
	Those being Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observers, Christian Westbrook, Who goes by the name Ice Age Farmer and David Dubin who blogs under ADAPT2030.
	Now I've got a little sequence of ideas here.
	The video by Ben Davidson, it goes into the fact that the Earth is experiencing an ever-accelerating shift of its magnetic pit poles, magnetic field and magnetic poles right now, so that the north and south poles are actually approaching each other on track to meet, if they do meet, in the Indian Ocean.
	The Earth, in general, is enveloped in the electrical field of the Sun, and as the Sun goes through thousand-year electrical cycles, the magnetic field of the Earth is affected dramatically.
	What we might be seeing with recent events, talking about our magnetic field and shifting of the poles, is a prelude to, it's possibly, and that's what Davidson talks about, is a prelude to a 12,000 year cyclic event in which the Sun does what might be called a mini nova and wipes out approximately 80% of the life on the Earth.
	And if that's the case, it occurred to me that there are pervasive stories in practically all the cultures of the earth, how God periodically wipes the slate clean, so to speak, when mankind has lost its way and descended into materialism and immorality and generally evil deeds and thinking.
	You know, the most recent was the stories of the Great Flood that appear in practically all cultures all over the Earth.
	And it's interesting to see this convergence of how we're seeing the outlines of such an ascendance of evil on this planet right now, with these insane things that they're throwing at the people of the world.
	And these things and these concepts are totally opposite from any form of spiritual or moral conceptualization of the human being.
	And these things are happening at the same time that we're due for another mini nova that could bring about a similar wiping of the slate.
	Well, with all due respect, Michael, I don't think there's actually scientific evidence for a worldwide flood.
	I don't think that occurred.
	Of course, I'm not a religious person.
	I'm an agnostic.
	Joe, you'd like to address the Super Bowl?
	Yes, yes, I would.
	years ago, we had the Holocene extinction, which melted mile-thick ice caps over both poles and raised sea level 440 feet.
	So coastal cities were under 450 feet of water, which would pretty much be a flood in most people's book.
	And also it caused the extinction, particularly in North America, of all of the large mammals, which would be the mammoths, the mastodons, the giant sloths, the dire wolves, which were 400 pounds, saber-toothed tigers, which were 900 pounds, Uh, so it's pretty irrefutable that we do have periodic events that cause enormous disruption to life on this planet, and certainly we could say, take a good look at the sun as being the cause of that.
	So, yeah, I don't have a problem with that as far as a hypothesis.
	I'm just hoping it doesn't turn out to be that bad and that quick.
	Yeah, well, I'm certainly open to being shown to be wrong, and I won't be unhappy if I were.
	Toyota warns about rushing into electrification.
	Remember, Toyota has been a pioneer in the field.
	Robert Wimmer, Toyota's head of engineering and environmental research, testified before the Senate that a big switch to electric vehicles faces hurdles competitors like GM are ignoring.
	If we are to make dramatic progress, electrification will require overcoming tremendous challenges, including refueling infrastructure, battery availability, consumer acceptance, and affordability.
	This comes on the coattails of Audi's CEO saying the company won't develop new internal combustion engines BMW is saying the exact opposite.
	I'm with BMW.
	As well as many a GM laying out a timeline for ditching ICE powertrains entirely.
	That's internal combustion engine powertrains.
	These moves are controversial.
	Passions run strong on both sides.
	Much of them come with different governments threatening internal combustion engine bans.
	As Wimmer points out, however, only 2.7% of cars in the world are electric vehicles, a tiny sliver.
	They're acting as though the EV formula had been cracked.
	The problem Wimmer brought up—refueling infrastructure, power grids, battery availability, consumer acceptance, and affordability—are huge constraints before the industry goes headlong in the EV direction.
	Before anyone starts going off on Toyota's anti-progressive and backward, critics should reveal Toyota has a long-standing history of innovation.
	Toyota figured out the magic formula for hybrids to make them accessible to the masses, pushing electrification more than any other maker.
	It endured a lot of He, for flooding roads with countless Prius drivers, some of whom was a dear friend of mine now departed, that technology has matured to the point where there's a hybrid version of just about every Toyota model line at this point.
	Tundra, Sequoia, Land Cruiser, 4Runner, Tacoma being exceptions for now.
	That doesn't mean Toyota's above criticism, but accusing the automaker of being against technological progress is ridiculous.
	Keep in mind, Toyota and Tesla were business partners, resulting in the RAV4 EV, but no other all-electric model.
	While both companies are mum on the reason for ending the arrangement, some would speculate Toyota saw something it didn't like in Tesla, or in EV technology in general.
	Known for being fiscally conservative, while Tesla is not in the least, it could have been just that.
	For whatever reason, Toyota has been increasingly skeptical about purely electric vehicles.
	It took decades for the automobile to become mainstream.
	Cars used to be playthings for the wealthy.
	Henry Ford helped to make automobiles affordable and practical for everyday people.
	Why we now think electric vehicle adaptation can happen overnight is a mystery.
	Wimmer didn't say electrification isn't the future, that it's dumb.
	He brought up very specific concerns that need to be addressed.
	Even Elon Musk has brought concerns about the strain EVs will place on the power grids around the world.
	That ought to be enough to cool everyone's jets, not to turn away from EVs, but realize it's going to take time how to figure out and to move forward into an electrified future.
	Governments and automakers can't just steamroller reality with disastrous consequences, which is exactly where these law and policies will lead.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Talk about a softball.
	Yeah, yeah, this is the whole green movement.
	It depends on three total lies.
	One of them is that carbon dioxide controls the Earth's climate, which is a complete fraud, which we've covered in the AGW series.
	And then also that there's some type of sustainable green energy that's like so safe for the planet, which if you look at the actual life cycle development of those, all of them are net energy losers and all of them are horribly Destructive to the environment in and of themselves.
	And then the third thing is that we're going to, we got to switch anyway, because we're going to run out of fossil fuel, even though it's being produced on a regular basis and has been since the very start of the planet 4 billion years ago, when the atmosphere was methane and ammonia.
	And there wasn't a single cell life form on the planet for the first billion years while it cooled down in that very hostile chemical environment.
	So the methane that was here did not come from leftover dead dinosaurs and ferns.
	And actually life evolved from hydrocarbons because we are carbon based life forms.
	And so anybody that's spent a little bit of time taking organic chemistry classes can pretty easily understand that everything about the green movement, in particular, the EV cars is an indefensible position. - Yeah.
	Yeah, the greens have gone stark raving mad.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Yeah, I like that.
	Those three lies of the climate change pushers.
	I like that, Joe.
	Relative to the story about Toyota, it sounds to me like some of the engineers at Toyota have been doing some figuring regarding the pricing and projected sales, the impractical characteristics of electric cars, and realizing, wait a minute, this total outlawing of gasoline-powered vehicles is going to put most of this company out of work.
	Well, it's insane, the agenda.
	Joe and I are doing quite a lot about it.
	We'll be doing more even as early as this Saturday.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail to live need to know at gmail.com.
	Live need to know at gmail.com.
	My Conspiracy 101 course on Critical Thinking and Conspiracy Theories is chugging along.
	We've had our first two classes.
	Our third will be this Wednesday about Argumus, Deductive, Inductive, and Abductive.
	It's not too late to join the class.
	We have video recordings of the first and the second classes, but after this I would say would be too late.
	So now would be the time if you're going to join.
	Now would be the time You can go to my blog at jamesfetzer.org and check out Conspiracy 101 and find the registration link at the bottom here.
	Mixnstream.com slash critical hyphen thinking dot html.
	Mixnstream.com slash critical hyphen thinking html.
	Not too late.
	For to join now, but too late after this.
	I would not recommend anyone joining the class after Wednesday.
	Meanwhile, final thoughts.
	Joe, yours.
	Yeah, well, we're in this situation because we've got a really corrupt political system and this just popped up at the last refuge, the conservative treehouse.
	Georgia Lawfare left its attempt to block Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene from re-election through obscure use of the Insurrection Act because she was sworn in the 1st of January, and she happened to be there on January 6th.
	She's involved in the overthrowing of the U.S. government, and they're going to try to get her removed from the ballot.
	The movie 2,000 Mules is based on two petabytes of data that were collected by True the Vote, and it's a two-hour-long documentary produced and directed by Dinesh D'Souza.
	It will be in 250 movie theaters on May 2nd, and then again on May 4th, and then they're going to do an event in Las Vegas.
	I believe it's on May 7th, which is going to be a Zoom thing that's available worldwide, and it's going to be a Zoom thing that's available worldwide.
	And trust me, the voting machines that we've used in America for the last 25 years are all crooked.
	It's very well known by the rhinos, very well known by the dinos.
	And both political parties agree to this corruption because they want to be able to pick their candidates in the primary.
	And then they want to split power 49 to 51 between each two parties so they can keep this stupid false left-right paradigm going.
	And that's why we have to stop that.
	I did a great interview back on the 1st of March with a guy named Steve Sands, who's a videographer here in Houston.
	And Jim posted it.
	It was posted at a Rumble site, but Jim posted it at his BitChute channel.
	So if you go to Jim Fetzer BitChute, you can also look up Joe Olson in the search box, and look for the title, Institutional Fraud of Our Democracy, which is a 33-minute long discussion.
	of the fraud that I am very well aware of in Texas, and then some of the national implications of that.
	And that was posted on March 2nd, 2022.
	So educate yourself and please go to these events, go to Crimes Against Humanity Tour and meet these people and share with other patriots.
	And please go see the 2000 Mules.
	Disconnect your cable and find something useful to do with your time.
	Michael, your final thoughts.
	I've got two quick things.
	One, One, I wanted to plug a fabulous article from author Donald Jeffries.
	It was written in January, and it's posted on the Sherry Tenpenny website.
	And the title is a takeoff from that phrase, What if they threw a party and no one came?
	And then, in the 60s anti-war movement, that got changed to, What if they threw a war and no one came?
	And the title of this piece is, "What If They Gave a War and No One Knew?" So that's the situation that we're in right now.
	There's a war being waged against humanity itself by a rapacious and insane global oligarchy.
	And the other thing is a quote from Dr. Lee Merritt, speaking of the war theme, and it goes like this.
	At the end of the day, we've been funding our own murder.
	We've been paying taxes to the federal government that pays for stuff like the development of bioweapons to go off to Ukraine and offshore bioweapons research, not to be used against some distant military adversary, but to be used against us.
	They're coming after us and our children.
	They want some of us dead, and they want some of us transformed into something inhuman.
	And if we don't wake up to this reality and start fighting with every breath to take our world back, not just the country, we have to take this whole world back.
	The funding for this is coming from our labor, from the fruits of our labor.
	Very good, Michael.
	Another fantastic Texas Tuesday, I'm so very pleased.
	Many will recall the poem, Fire and Ice.
	Some say the world will end in fire, some say in ice.
	From what I've tasted of desire, I hold with those who favor fire.
	Though I think I know enough of hate to say that ice is also great and would suffice.
	I think we represent the alternatives of icy starvation amidst a lack of food and a thermonuclear war that has turned us all into ash and a heap.
	Would it were the case nuclear weapons don't exist?
	We did a nice survey today that ought to disabuse anyone of that Fantasy, however much they might prefer that to be the case.
	So do it again to prepare yourself for the inevitable food stories.
	There's no way it can be stopped.
	It cannot be stopped.
	And if it turns out that Nuclear war winds up taking us out.
	At least it would have spared you the horrors of starvation.
	That's the unfortunate, very bleak outlook of where we stand today.
	It would be good if someone to rise up as a mighty force to straighten out the United States of America.
	But he's become a den of inequity, accessible, committed to murdering Americans, not defending every action the Biden administration has taken since coming into office, has been destructive of America.
	That's no accident.
	That's by design.
	Spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you love.
	We literally do not know how much time we have left.
	Make every moment count.
	Thanks for joining us.

▲