All Episodes
Previous Next
April 13, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:09:39
Need to Know News (13 April 2022) with Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined by Holly Siegeliger from an undisclosed location in the East.
Scorpio Alaska cannot join us, but we're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
Dr. Brian Hardis has revealed to Mike Adams and others bombshell about the origins of COVID mRNA vaccine and remains severe.
It's absolutely disgusting.
Stu Peters interviewed him on Watch the Water, the video file for which was too large for me to upload to my blog.
But Joe Olson and Michael Ivey and I reviewed it on Need to Know yesterday, including some segments where we think he's got it right.
Here we have, about it, major COVID development.
The world premiere of Watch the Water may have nailed what's been going on in the role of distraction and disinformation promoting the fake COVID pandemic and the vax, where it appears, oddly enough, that snake venom may be playing a crucial role.
Fascinating.
After watching our discussion, Robert Davis sought to confirm Dr. Arda's research and found a study from the University of Arizona linking COVID deaths with snake vena.
A University of Arizona researcher finds certain enzyme that could be driving COVID deaths.
This is back on the 1st of September of 2021.
Tucson, Arizona.
Snakes are starting to play a big role in COVID-19 research.
Scientists from the University of Arizona have discovered an enzyme similar to one found in rattlesnake venom that could be driving COVID-19 deaths.
We found evidence that there was an enzyme, a snake-like enzyme, in the blood of people who were at extraordinarily high levels, said Dr. Floyd Chilton, the senior author of the study with the University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
Joe Olson, not with us here today, tracked down fatality statistics with the poison snake venom, and he points out that venoms are generally not toxic if swallowed, but must be injected under the skin by snake spiders into the tissues normally protected by skin in order to be toxic.
However, we do not recommend drinking venom.
This may be why they are injecting it using the vax.
Dr. Artis reveals the bombshells about it.
There are these several interviews with Mike Adams that are available on my blog at jameswetzer.org.
Let's take a look at a part of this one.
Surprise, surprise.
You can't hear the sound here, but you can hear it on my blog.
Check it out.
Go to jamesfetzer.org.
This is one you don't want to miss.
Holly, this is stunning stuff.
It implicates the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, and the WHO in a monstrous plot to murder millions, even billions of human beings on planet Earth.
It is stunning.
Your thoughts?
Well, I had seen some of the Stu Peters interview with Dr. Artis.
It's been absolutely viral right now and really fascinating to see it being discussed on many different platforms.
His interview, Mike Adams has picked it up, several other larger alternative news platforms have really picked it up.
And I've already seen some people try to debunk some of this saying, well, you know, they're acting like COVID exists, et cetera, that the numbers weren't fudged.
They're saying that the venom is in remdesivir, and they're saying it's in the jab.
They're not necessarily saying that people are coming down with the poison.
So I think there's people a little bit confused about how this is actually being transferred.
But if you look at the patents, as they have described, and also I believe Dr. Sherry Tempeny said, And maybe Dr. Mikovits as well, Lee Merritt as well, said that there are hundreds if not thousands of other drug patents waiting in the wings.
Many of them could be connected to a lot of these venom patents like he had artists had described.
They can be made to target certain organs within the body.
So if you have diabetes, it could be made to look like you died from diabetes or if you've got So, in a lot of ways, like the classic method of poisoning, it can be undetectable and it can be tailored to an individual.
So this reminds me a lot of the research that I had done way back in 2017 and 2018.
Talking about poisonings, and I had discussed that with a lot of my connection with the Salem witch trials and people becoming ill, and then people calling it witchcraft, which pharmakia means sorcery or witchcraft, and I said that these were people who were members of the Royal Society, like Cotton Mather and other people who came out of Harvard, and guess what?
Harvard and Boston and MIT All these same organizations are still running the Royal Society and, like you said, the NIH and CDC to this day.
So I think this probably goes back centuries.
Of course, the patents, all this will become more and more revealed, but really some crazy information that's coming out right now.
So I think it's certainly plausible.
Excellent, excellent, excellent comments, Holly.
Very, very nice.
Meanwhile, The war is going to slash Ukraine's GDP by over 45% according to the World Bank.
Ukraine's economic impact will likely contract by a staggering 45.1% as the Russian invasion has shuttered businesses, slashed exports, rendered economic activity impossible, enlarged swaths of the world.
The World Bank also forecasts Russia's 2022 GDP output to fall by 11.2% because of the punishing financial sanctions imposed by the U.S.
and its Western allies, which are, as I've observed, a form of collective punishment that is in violation of international law and the Geneva Conventions.
No one's talking about it.
The World Bank's war in the region economic update said the Eastern European region, comprising Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova, is forecast to show a contraction of 30.7% growth in 2022.
In Central Europe, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Poland and Romania will be cut To 3.5 from 4.7 due to the influx of refugees, high commodity prices, and deteriorating confidence.
For Ukraine, the World Bank estimates over half of the country's businesses are closed.
Others operate well under normal capacity.
The closure of black cheese shipping has cut off some 90% of the country's grain exports and half of its total.
That grain export is especially important from the point of view of the World Economic Forum and the Great Reset, because it's going to lead to the failure to feed cattle and sheep, animals as sources of food, and also grains for human food consumption.
It's going to contribute massively to a food shortage.
It's going to precipitate what appears to be starvation on a scale unprecedented in world history.
The World Bank said the wars rendered economic activity impossible in many areas.
Estimates of infrastructure damage exceed $100 billion.
The bank said the 4.5.1% contraction excludes The damage to physical infrastructure.
The magnitude is subject to a high degree of uncertainty, of course.
It would lead to a 9% contraction in the World Bank's European and Central Asian region of marketing.
The Russian invasion is delivering a massive blow to Ukraine's economy and enormous damage to its infrastructure.
Nothing surprising about that.
Consequently, though they might be otherwise doing the same, Ukraine is seeking tens of billions in financial aid from the International Monetary Fund's COVID relief program.
Kiev says it's in dire economic straits, as we've just seen due to the invasion, while the World Bank estimates it'll drop by a staggering 45, technically 45.1 in 2022.
We're under great stress and the very worst condition.
The question is the survival of the country.
Can you help?
This is Ukraine's finance minister, Sergey Marchenko, proposing Ukraine be given access to billions in IMF funds allocated for international COVID relief, but never used.
The U.S.
and a number of allies have also pledged billions, including a Euro 1.2 billion, 1.3 billion dollar loan from the EU, a 3 billion support package from the World Bank, and another 575 mil from World Bank member states.
Ukraine estimates 270 billion in damage since this began.
Meanwhile, Goodness gracious me, I can't keep up today.
More news today that I can't find on the West, maybe because it is just breaking, but it's coming out of Gazprom and Germany and it won't surprise you in the least bit.
In fact, I'm featuring it because it will make a lot of you laugh because you commented exactly this.
Gazprom Germania's largest storage facility is 99% depleted.
For those of you who don't know, the German authorities, there's no other way of saying it, stole Gazprom Germany.
They just, just thievery thuggery, they just took it because they were that panicking about Russian gas etc.
It's not even nationalization.
Nationalization is actually where you pay for it.
You give like a fixed rate to the buyer.
No, this was seizure.
This was something the Kremlin was irate about.
Gas reserves in Germany in the event of a cessation of supplies from Russia will last until the end of summer or early autumn.
Ooh, just in time for winter.
God, imagine the spot prices.
Currently we have enough gas until the end of summer or the beginning of autumn, but I am doing everything possible so that this situation does not arise at all, Muller said.
The company Gazprom Germania GmbH, which was previously transferred under temporary control of the German regulator, that's a very nice way of saying stolen, isn't it?
At least they say temporarily, will do everything possible to fill storage facilities by 80% by October 1st, in accordance with the requirement of the European Commission, the head of the FSA is sure.
Which will be expensive, since the largest Gazprom Germania storage facility in Germany is less than 1% full, the official said.
He did not rule out that Germany would have to do without Russian gas in the upcoming winter.
And lamented that the country did not give up energy from the Russian Federation in a timely manner.
Oh, goodness me!
If only someone had warned them!
Shall we go take a look?
This is President Trump in 25th of September 2018.
Would you like to hear not just what he said, but how the Germans reacted?
Shall we just take a quick look?
Germany will become totally dependent on Russian energy if it does not immediately change course.
Here in the Western Hemisphere, we are committed to maintaining our independence from the encroachment of expansionist foreign powers.
It has been the formal policy of our country since President Monroe That we reject the interference.
God, I miss that guy.
I mainly miss the way he said China.
But Germany, who's having the last laugh now?
You should be ashamed of yourself and your incredibly intelligent people.
I know you are, but we know that the incredibly intelligent people aren't the ones signing off on laws and all this crap, don't we?
I feel so sorry for you, Germany.
Your people are fantastic, but Jesus, the people in charge are as bad, if not worse, than those in charge of the UK.
West's gone And the United States, I think they're all scalawags and just incompetent and corrupt.
Hawley, beyond belief, your thoughts?
Well, I think that was a great presentation by that guy.
Talking about Gazprom and also Nord Stream 1 and 2, I don't think people realized that those pipelines were going directly from Russia to Germany.
So it was meant to be just between those two countries.
So why is the G7 getting involved?
Why is the EU getting involved?
Why are they trying to destroy Germany?
Why is there a huge push with this Green New Agenda with Germany?
These other countries should be minding their own business.
They shouldn't become an issue of the world stage.
So as we've discussed before, and Lieutenant Scott Bennett has done great research on this as well, it seems as though a lot of this isn't just about targeting Ukraine and targeting Russia, but also targeting the economy of Germany and making sure that they are collapsed and they are beholden to this
There's absolutely nothing wrong with Nord Stream 1 or 2 until the EU and all these big multinational corporations got involved.
They're willing to basically freeze the Germans to death at this point.
Talking about the food prices as well.
Just because of global instability, this really started with the lockdowns and there's different concepts that people have discussed about as far as the, when you're talking about global financial markets and global trade, we're living in an era of globalism with the food supply.
So there's something called like the bullwhip effect where during lockdowns people Stockpiled a bunch of stuff, stuff was overordered, and then there was a surplus, and then there's fears about more lockdowns, now there's fears about the war economy, so you can see the price is kind of going crazy and a lot of countries want to hold on to their own grain reserves.
They don't want to export and then on top of that with sanctions, different countries aren't sure who they're allowed to actually export or import to.
So this just causes problems with the global food supply chain.
Never mind, as we have discussed before, sanctions on Russian fertilizer, their agricultural fertilizer products, and then wheat exports.
Ukraine and Russia are basically the breadbasket of a lot of parts of the Middle East and of Egypt and northern Africa.
So many countries are already holding on to their grain supplies, concerned that they're going to run out of food pretty soon.
And then when you're talking about third world countries, and even here in countries that aren't quote unquote third world, we only have a couple of months, if that, of food supplies backed up before you have absolute mayhem.
So we're looking at a controlled demolition here that I think really was started by the purposeful lockdowns.
Holly, I think you got it exactly right, and I'm sad to say that most Americans are going to be totally unprepared for what is to descend upon the world.
Meanwhile, the famous Edgar de Gaye painting was renamed for the Ukraine war.
How bizarre.
Due to the present circumstance, the British National Gallery, I've been there, has altered the name of a 19th century drawing by French Impressionist Edgar Degas from Russian dancers to Ukrainian dancers.
Beside the deserved eye roll toward the wokeness, the gallery, joining the ranks of people seeking to cancel the past, is heresy.
Degas named his painting, if you rename it, you're canceling Degas, not Russians.
After Ukrainian artist and activist Miriam Naim penned letters to Western art museums that had pieces from the series, the painting's original name was changed.
It's a micro-win, Naim said.
Forcing a gallery to do something ridiculous will be a crowning achievement.
If she is a DeGay fan, she certainly did not respect him.
The gallery confessed the name change was a product of public pressure, had nothing to do with new facts uncovered regarding his work.
Duguay is an innocent bystander who's been victimized by the mob.
For many years, the title of this classic work has been a topic of debate.
It's been explored in academic literature.
Why a pastel drawing called Russian Dancers would be controversial is quizzical.
Would an artist have been pressured to rename a painting called The Muslims in the wake of 9-11?
And of course, the Muslims had nothing to do with it.
The gallery said due to increased spotlight over the last month, because of present circumstances, they thought it was an excellent time to revise the painting's title to better reflect the painting's theme.
But how can it be when the theme is Russians dancing?
According to a Calories Efficient website description, the dancers in the 1890 pastel and charcoal work are probably definitively Ukrainian rather than Russian, as though Ukraine had not been a part of Russia at the time.
No additional explanation provided.
Probably.
Definite.
Definitely.
Despite the shaky confidence of the statement, it wouldn't matter if the dancers were in fact Ukrainian.
Dugay titled his piece Russian Dancer.
Full stop.
Meanwhile, Laura Logan says she was pushed out of Fox Nation.
More censorship.
Cancel culture.
Former CBS journalist Logan said she was forced out of Fox after she made public comments about White House advisor Anthony Fauci.
This is embarrassing.
Reflects very badly on Fox.
I was definitely pushed out, she said, during an interview.
I mean, there's no doubt about it.
They don't want independent thinkers.
They don't want people who follow the facts, regardless of the politics.
She's had hit pieces done by legacy news outlets that hurt her prospects, saying if they Google you and they see a Washington Post or New York Times hit piece on you, they don't want anything to do with you, right?
Well, we can't hire you for our event.
We can't employ you.
I've always said I don't belong to any party.
I don't belong to anyone's side.
I don't care about media organizations who for years have reported false stories.
Why should I care what they have to say?
She also confirmed that she was dumped by Fox during another interview.
She appeared as a guest on the network's Opinion Program and hosted documentaries produced by Warm Spring Production on Fox streaming service Fox Nation.
She drew controversy after criticizing Fauci for his policy agenda during the pandemic.
What you see on Dr. Fauci, this is what people say to me, that he doesn't represent science to them.
He represents Joseph Mengele, the Nazi doctor that experiments on Jews during the Second World War and in the concentration camps.
Some Jewish group criticized her for the comments, and she was dropped by talent agency UTA, offered in a statement to news outlets earlier this year, after the Fauci remarks, she has not appeared on Fox News since.
I don't really know, she told the Daily Beast, I'm not on their payroll.
So, you know, I'm not in communication with them.
Before appearing on Fox, Logan is from South Africa, was a correspondent for CBS for decades, appearing on the flagship program 60 Minutes.
Fox has now publicly confirmed Logan's status, which the Epoch Times contacted for comment.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think we're just living in unprecedented times here.
I mean, I think we've got all kinds of different agendas coming forward, and people really need to be able to look into alternative news and to see what is really out there.
And the mainstream media, everything that we've seen right now, just showing The compounding of all the different lies that we've seen over the years.
It's been harder and harder to really understand what's going on here in the United States, from where they're talking about locally, you're talking about statewide, or even nationally.
And we're seeing that the mainstream media too is becoming more and more visible as an enemy to the United States, to the people, to the truth.
To the upcoming midterm elections and the recent global agendas that we've seen.
And I think that this show is so important that we continue to be pushing the idea that there's other alternative ways that people can look into different types of information that's out there.
And I just think it's absolutely crazy the times that we're living in, Jim.
Wanted to know what you thought about some of that.
Oh, I think you're spot on, Holly.
All this cancel culture, all the censorship, totally un-American, totally undemocratic, anti-intellectual, irrational in the extreme, but politically driven with an intent to accomplish a certain agenda that has nothing to do with truth or freedom or democracy.
Trump insider Roger Stone supports a presidential pardon for Julian Assange.
Roger Stone, whom I know personally, a longtime confidant of Trump and a legendary Republican operative, believes that the president, in this case Biden, ought to pardon Julian Assange.
Stone joined a political insider to discuss recent claims by the Mueller probe that he colluded with Russia and talked about the Trump 2020 campaign, possible indictments of Trump-linked individuals, and the Russia collusion hoax.
Stone's also in the crosshairs of the special counsel given his involvement in the Trump campaign.
There have been many news stories of late about his connection to journalist Jerome Corsi, whom I also know in WikiLeaks.
Which I admire.
While discussing all these potential legal dangers, I asked what he thought of the President's ability to pardon those convicted under the Mueller probe.
Yesterday, the President said he may still issue a pardon to Paul Manafort, his former campaign manager, who is currently serving a jail sentence related to the Mueller probe.
Oh, I see.
This is out of date.
November 2018, he's talking about Trump.
What an embarrassment.
Holly, nevertheless, you can address the issues.
I got that one wrong.
Well, I think, I don't know.
I mean, I was going to say, I don't know if Roger Stone was calling his bluff or whatever, but I mean, there's no way in heck that he would ever party in Julian Assange.
There's no You know, reason to really even mention that to Biden, other than the fact that he's calling out his bluff now.
I have heard, as far as Julian Assange goes, and the WikiLeaks and Vault 7, all the information that could come out about the Clinton Global Initiative and the Steele dossier, all these individuals, it would actually be
It would behoove Trump and people who are trying to look into the rigged election, etc., if Julian Assange were brought to the United States, extradited to the U.S., and put on the stand to actually testify in a lot of this.
There has been discussion about that.
I know his lawyers are trying to fight to make sure that he does not get extradited because, of course, it obviously would be scary, particularly under the Biden administration, if he were brought Uh, to the United States because he is basically charged with like treason and they made up all kinds of things where under any normal circumstance this is journalistic integrity.
This is what actual investigative journalists do.
Any journalist doing their due diligence would use primary sources or research and they're not supposed to be just talking heads and puppets as I said about You know, CNN and all these idiots that are given their 4am talking points.
So I personally would like to see more of that information, especially if we see the Durham report and this information about the Steele dossier and the election rigging.
All of that information coming out directly ties to WikiLeaks.
So I just don't, as I said, I just, it would actually kind of be dangerous, you know, if I would think for Julian, who just got married, by the way, to be extradited to the United States or be pardoned under Biden.
Obviously, that's not going to happen.
Well, thanks for making my faux pas be of great value.
I loved your commentary, Holly.
That was simply excellent.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Biden travel agency, night flights, illegal immigrants being dropped all over the USA.
It's happening unabated.
The floodgates are open.
There is no border to the United States.
Millions of migrants are flooding the U.S.
They are changing the demographics of America permanently.
There's going to be no going back.
This is dumbfounding, astonishing, deliberate to destroy America and its integrity as a nation.
Holly, I want to invite your comments on that political cartoon because I think it's so telling.
One more time.
Jim, can you pull that up one last time there?
Oh sure, absolutely.
Yes, yes.
It's the migrants dropping by the flyover.
Right, well I think it's kind of fascinating that the United States were basically involved in a proxy war or World War III to make sure that the A border of integrity of Ukraine is intact, and all these other countries are concerned about talking about all the migrants and everything.
Ukrainian migrants going into Poland and other countries, and there's always more money for war, right?
So the Biden administration is throwing all kinds of money.
They're talking about sending more money to Ukraine this week, turning it into a quagmire.
Meanwhile, our borders are open.
The southern border is open.
We're still having issues with Canada, between the United States and Canada, as far as Canadians and Americans being able to cross the border up there because of the lockdowns but the southern borders just open to anyone at this point and obviously our beloved borders are Kamala Harris still hasn't done anything about it and has no plans to do so.
That's enough to make you vomit.
The United States is being destroyed deliberately by the Biden administration.
Have no doubt about it.
That is their agenda.
Meanwhile, Pfizer documents wreak a fraud.
Big Pharma liability shield begins to unravel.
This is significant.
Recently released Pfizer docs show the Wuhan coronavirus vaccine can cause systemic damage to the body.
It appears to be because it includes king cobra or snake venom.
This is likely the reason why the pharma giant, through the FDA, asked the judge to keep the data from the public for as long as possible.
Actually, he says 55.
It was supposed to be 75.
Which is the average lifetime of an American citizen.
It was the same stunt pulled by the Warren Commission.
The supporting docs weren't supposed to be released for 75 years, so no one who had been alive at the time of the assassination of JFK would be around to read the supporting evidence and realize how the country had been completely deceived and boon-swaggled.
In the April 1st episode of the Ben Armstrong Show, the host talked about the Pfizer doc dump.
With 55,000 pages dumped in April, a team has been assembled to go through it.
Pfizer doesn't want the public to know how dangerous the COVID vax is.
It has committed fraud, saying it's safe and effective.
Unfortunately, also involved in the scheme are the government, the FDA, the CDC, and media companies, not to mention the WHO.
Pfizer and Moderna know from their studies how dangerous the vax is, and if independent researchers can prove fraud, they will lose their liability protection and people will be allowed to sue them.
That's devoutly to be wished.
Take them to the cleaners!
When the FDA granted Pfizer full approval for their vacs, there were already known side effects, but there was no way to sue them for vaccine injury.
If it could be proven Pfizer's data shows increased all-cause mortality and that the company hid this to encourage people to take the vacs, then there is an existence of fraud, said BlackRock executive and investment advisor Edward Dowd.
All the protections they enjoy at the moment Would be gone.
This is why Pfizer wants to keep its docs away from the public eye as long as possible.
If you didn't do anything wrong, you wouldn't care if people looked at your stuff.
You know it's supposed to be public record in the first place.
Armstrong also showed an interview with Naomi Wolf, whose team found how dangerous the vax is.
Wolf indicated authorities are using the vax to experiment on people and use them as lab rats—actually, to kill them deliberately.
They said these are not vaccines at all, about which he's 100% correct.
The mRNA injection made by Pfizer and Moderna manipulate genes.
Making them a form of gene therapy rather than vaccine.
We now have even more serious indications that they use snake venom to paralyze our diaphragm to cause respiratory problems that imitate what are being attributed to COVID but have an entirely different causal source.
Meanwhile, Dowd considered Pfizer's attempt to conceal data showing the actual risk as obvious evidence of fraud.
He pointed out the Herculean efforts of Pfizer to withhold data despite legal challenges that it should be released.
Many reports also show there are more deaths in the VAX compared to the un-VAX.
FDI's backing of Pfizer in its refusal to release the data is an attempt to conceal VAX deaths.
Pfizer got blanket immunity with emergency use authorization of their fraud, and it comes out, fraud eviscerates all contracts.
That's case law.
Another whistleblower, Dr. Jessica Rose also obtained data from the Pfizer-Dom, which shows toxic fats have been used in the vaccine are causing problems in people because they go to the organs.
Actually, it's going to be the snake venom that goes to the organs.
That was from the Roger Stone mistake.
Meanwhile, 75% of VAX women have miscarriages in the first trimester, one of the horror stories we have here.
Fertility clinic data shows an increase of miscarriages by 400% in the first trimester if you received a COVID VAX.
If you received it after the first trimester, it still increases miscarriages by 233%.
More data from the document, duh.
Naomi Wolf gives an update on what has been found so far.
Very disturbing stuff.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think as we've discussed in previous videos, I think there's a push by these vaccine companies to try to get the jab onto the list of childhood vaccines.
And that's why they they're trying to get approval for children, because once they can get it onto a vaccine schedule for children, they basically have to.
If people are injured, you'd have to go through the vaccine courts, which are established back in the 80s.
So they've got a lot of immunity once that happens.
Also, they had passed it for emergency use authorization.
So there's all kinds of it's a complete legal mass as far as what they were able to do to try to bypass the fact that this is gene therapy.
They're basically admitting that it was not any sort of treatment.
This was experimental from the very beginning.
People were showing, nurses and other people, were showing the packet inserts that were completely empty.
No one was allowed to know what was going on.
It was just all a big lie and a big propaganda storm.
They fudged a lot of the numbers in the hospitals.
They locked down and killed a bunch of people within nursing homes in order to boost up death numbers in the very beginning.
But they got rid of the flu from statistics in order to make it seem like everyone was dying from this.
I mean, we could go on for an hour about all the different ways in which they lied.
To try to make this operation successful and to inject as many people as possible.
And as more information comes out that this is basically just poisoning people, it's hard for people to fathom.
But I think because we've been revealing this for so long, it really doesn't even surprise me at this point, you know, how diabolical this whole thing is really at this point.
In some ways, it just doesn't even phase me anymore.
It's like, what else can they throw at us at this point?
It's insane.
Wow, very nice.
Very nice, Holly.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, a famed Bangladesh mask study excluded crucial data.
Surprise, surprise.
Even on its face, masks are obviously harmful.
You're recycling oxygen-depleted air.
That means it could have put a strain on your cardiovascular system.
It's going to kill brain cells.
Unlike skin cells, brain cells do not regenerate.
The damage is permanent.
That's just obvious on its face.
With one exception, every gold standard study of mass has failed to finely slow the spread of the contagious respiratory diseases.
The outlier is a widely cited study in Bangladesh during the pandemic.
Where its authors claim it proves mass mandates or strategies like handing out masks at churches and public events could save thousands of lives each day globally and hundreds each day in the U.S.
It's just bullshit.
In reality, the authors altered their study to exclude the data that would prove or disprove that very claim as a blatant violation of research ethics.
Surprise, surprise.
Biasing the study to hide the harms of masks, which are far more common and serious than portrayed by governments and media outlets.
The Bangladesh mask study, published by Science, which is generally a reputable journal, was a cluster randomized controlled trial in plain language.
Randomized controlled styles are studies in which people are randomly assigned to receive or not receive a certain treatment, like wearing a mask.
This allows them to control for every possible confounding factor, something that is not possible with any other study design.
Thus, clinical research guides called RCTs the gold standard.
Cluster RCTs involve giving the same treatment to people who interact with one another, whether it be household, villages, workplace, or whatever.
This is useful for studies on masks because the prevention of one infection in an individual can prevent a chain of subsequent transmissions to others.
In short, the basic study design was ideally suited to determine if masks work.
But the way in which it was executed undermined the entire enterprise in terms of its scientific validity, and I dare say this was done on purpose.
As required by research ethics, the authors of the MASS study published a pre-analysis plan explaining how their RCT would be conducted and what it would measure.
Pre-analysis plans are a tool to prevent biased or dishonest researchers from changing the goalpost after results begin to pour in.
Per the journal Epidemiological Reviews, in designing the protocol of any clinical trial conducted today, there would be a requirement the endpoints and case definition be clearly laid out in advance.
In fact, Regulatory authorities hold the investigators to these redetermined endpoints to avoid what is sometimes called data dredging, or looking for those outcomes for which significant differences would be found.
Likewise, an article from the World Bank's Development Research Group Explains the primary reason for pre-analysis plans is to avoid many of the issues associated with data mining and specification searching by setting out in advance exactly the specification that will be run and with which variables.
In other words, it's a preclude, what's known as special pleading, Or also known as the method of selection and elimination, selecting the evidence that supports a predetermined conclusion and eliminating the rest.
Scientific studies must be based on all the available relevant evidence.
The pre-analysis plan for the Bangladesh Mass Study states it will measure hospitalizations and mortality, but those measures are completely absent.
They don't give you the data for hospitalizations or for mortality, a flagrant breach of research ethics, obscuring the only data that could objectively prove whether masks save or cost lives on the net.
Meaning in their net difference.
To accurately measure the impact of masking or other medical intervention, one has to measure actual deaths, not some other variable.
This is because measuring whether masks prevent COVID-19 infections, as the Bangladesh study does, doesn't measure how many died from COVID-19 or any of the lethal risks of masks identified in medical journals, such as cardiopulmonary events.
Elevated CO2 inhalation, social isolation, heat, humidity, and other discomforts.
In fact, a study of the Spanish flu, in which Anthony Fauci was a participant, revealed that most of the deaths, which were vast in number, tens of millions, did not die from the flu, but from bacterial pneumonia infections that were promoted by, guess what, wearing masks.
Only RCTs that measure death can capture the net effect.
That's why medical journals call all-cause mortality in RCTs the most objective outcome, the most relevant outcome, the most significant outcome, the most important outcome, the most important outcome, a hard and important endpoint.
Unlike other data, which can be easily manipulated through statistical tampering, all-cause mortality is straightforward and solid.
All you have to do is count.
If an RCT is large enough and properly conducted, a simple tally of all deaths who receive or didn't receive a treatment proves whether it saved more lives than it takes.
This gets more complicated for cluster RCTs, but it's still a clear-cut process.
Because the lead and final authors of a clinical study are most responsible, therefore.
A fax asks Yale economics professors Jason Abeluk and Ahmad Mustafa Mubarak why they flouted their pre-analysis plan to measure death.
As documented in the full record of the email exchange, they gave counterfactual answers, meaning contradicted the facts, and then failed to reply after they painted themselves in a corner.
In a key part of the exchange, Abolick claimed, Collecting mortality data would have required us to revisit every household at Endline in order to survey them.
We only collected blood from the small subset of households symptomatic during our study period.
Given the nationwide lockdown that went into effect, another round of revisits would have been prohibitively expensive and complicated.
If we prioritized the other outcome variables, we had much better hope of being statistically powered.
Directly quoting from the author's working paper, Just Facts Ask, Given that your team was able to collect follow-up symptom data from 98% of the individuals in the study, why would they need to revisit every household and end line to survey them?
Likewise, the working paper reveals our study surveyed all reachable participants about COVID-related symptoms and then used the data to calculate that masks reduce the risk of COVID-like symptoms.
But they're not bothering with hospitalizations or deaths.
During the same survey, they could have easily asked if anyone in their household had died.
In fact, the authors may have done that because they would not answer these questions.
Did you collect mortality data during any part of your study before the end line is so?
Would you share it?
Just ask those straightforward questions twice.
But the authors did not reply.
Obviously, they were going to impugn their own integrity had they answered truthfully.
Beyond excluding the death data, which made the whole study pointless, the authors engaged in other actions that reflected poorly upon their integrity.
One of the worst was touting their findings with far more certainty than warranted by the evidence.
Some wrote in a New York Times op-ed declaring mass work, a claim undercut by the following facts from their own study.
Their study's primary outcome of positive blood tests for COVID-19 antibodies found that less than 1% of the participants caught COVID-19, including 0.68% in villages where people were pressured to wear masks and 0.76% in villages that were not.
This difference, total difference of 0.08%, he's pointing to a study of more than 300,000, probably not even statistically significant.
The paper lays down 4,000 words before it reveals the sampling margins of error, which showed with 95% confidence that, or so they claimed, surgical masks reduce the relative risk of catching COVID by as much as 22% to not at all.
Cloth masks reduce the risk of catching symptomatic COVID by as much as 23% or increase the risk by as much as 8%.
Not statistically significant as the commenter used to describe study results that are totally positive or totally negative throughout the whole margin of error like the results above.
Yep, the authors skipped this fact in their op-ed and buried it in their paper writing at the end of an unrelated paragraph.
It showed no statistically significant effect for class math.
Their analysis doesn't quantify any of the uncertainty caused by the fact they only tested 3% or 10,790 of the 342,126 participants.
or 10,790 of the 342,126 participants.
This tiny sample may not reflect the other 97% because the study made no attempt to test people for COVID-19 unless the owner of the household's primary phone reported a member of their household had symptoms like a fever, sore throat, fatigue, or headache, 60% of the family 60% of those reportedly had symptoms did not submit to a COVID test.
Their analysis assumes the following mask promotion interventions had no effects on the objectivity or willingness of participants to accurately report symptoms.
Making them watch a brief video of notable public figures discussing why, how, and when to wear a mask.
Sending them twice-weekly text messages reminding them of the importance of wearing a mask.
Asking them to make a verbal commitment to be a mask-wearing household.
Asking them to place signage on doors that declare they are a mask-wearing household.
Giving A monetary incentive of $190 to the village leader of at least 75% of the village adults wore masks.
In other words, they were bribing the participants to support a predetermined conclusion.
Like their paper, their op-ed states, People over 50 benefited most, especially in communities where we distributed surgical masks.
But this does not suggest that only older people need to wear masks.
Rather, widespread community mask wearing reduces COVID risk, especially for older people.
It's so obvious this study was bought and paid for.
Embarrassing.
Science ought not to have ever published it.
Their pre-analysis plan to measure results for each decade of age range showed no significantly different effect between 18 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, and over 70.
They also excluded the breakdown from their paper, relegated it to a supplement.
Their paper engages in the dishonest practice of data dredging by featuring results that were not included in their reanalysis plan, like imputing symptomatic serial prevalence for missing blood draws, allowing them to transform statistically insignificant results into significant ones.
Their analysis uses complex analytic strategies like a generalized linear model with a boson, family, and log-blank function evoking these warnings from academic works.
Manipulation of data involves subjecting data to multiple statistical techniques until one achieves the desired outcome.
A general principle of data analysis recommends using the most appropriate, yet simplest, statistical techniques in research so findings can be better understood, interpreted, and communicated.
Statistical malpractice Typically occurs when complex analytical techniques are combined with large data sets.
Indeed, as a general rule, the better the science, the less the need for complex analysis.
Reminiscent of the claim, lies, damn lies, and statistics.
After all, this did not require a complicated statistical analysis.
All you had to do is count the number of hospitalizations, count the number of deaths in the respective comparison groups.
Based on their study, finding that mass wearing was 13% in villages that were not pressured to wear masks, 42% in those that were, they extrapolated the result to claim that if everyone wore masks, the reduction would most likely have been substantially larger.
Our best estimate is that for every 600 who wear surgical masks in public areas, we have an average of one death per year given recent death rates in the U.S.
Those claims are based on shaky statistics laced with absurd assumptions, failing to account for any of the lethal risks of masks.
Worse still, simply counting the people who died in the study could settle the issue, or at the very least, define the outer boundaries of the effects of masks on death.
Yep, the authors didn't collect this easily obtained data as specified in their pre-analysis plan, or in fact, what is the case, they were simply withholding it because it contradicted the predetermined conclusion they were being paid to produce.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, we've seen how so much of this was, has been, continues to be a psychological operation.
So, getting people to wear a mask, massive experiments with compliance.
The science was never there, so they went back and forth.
You know, Fauci was saying, Oh, you have to wear a mask or masks don't work.
And then it changed from one week to the next.
And then we had so much compliance.
We had mandates.
None of this was legal.
There was no legal precedence.
Congress didn't pass any of this.
They would attack people's businesses.
They were attacking people's jobs.
They were attacking people's ability to be parents.
They're going after children in schools.
They were firing people.
You can't get what Biden just extend the mask wearing for two more weeks on airplanes.
Now there's no science behind any of this.
We know it's it's just all about compliance.
It's about Getting people to give up their own autonomy.
I think that this will expand to many other opportunities to get people to give up their free will and their own bodily autonomy.
Whether you're talking about a jab or facial recognition technology or their social credit score program that they want.
Anything that they can try to do to get people to give up any sort of rationale or self-control.
Making sure that the government and these NGOs and like you said the NIH and the CDC control people's minds and then using the propaganda wing, the mainstream media to push this and then going using different government entities like OSHA and others to try to get compliance here in the United States shutting down businesses if they don't require Uh, them to wear masks.
Biden used the federal government as a way to try to get mask compliance on a large scale.
And if it wasn't for people like you and myself and other people and alternative media and others who have been saying that this whole thing is a farce from the very beginning, I think this would have continued on.
I mean, they're still trying to push it to this day.
The information, the science, the studies that came out Everyone said trust the science and yet you actually look at their own science and you're talking about how people were bribed, how they fudged numbers, they manipulated people, they paid people off.
So it's just, it's pretty telling that this is what we see.
They're still attacking children.
I mean, this is devastating to children, like you said.
Their ability to breathe, their ability to interact, especially in the age of autism where people, children, need to have even more interaction, more facial contact, exposure, and verbal skills.
Everything, IQ has dropped, everything has dropped.
Their health has been destroyed.
They're talking about bacterial pneumonia from wearing these things.
I mean, they're dirty.
There's more evidence that these things make people sick than help people, obviously does not help people at all.
So, That information is just tremendous, Jim.
Thanks for sharing that.
Well, and they knew it all along.
And Holly, the point you make about speech is particularly important.
We have all these little infants and toddlers who, because they're mass and because their parents are mass, cannot see how the mouth is used to form words.
Their speech development has been set back, I predict, permanently by the failure to take that opportunity at that stage of development.
Their neurological development and linguistic ability is permanently compromised.
And all because we had sadistic bastards like Anthony Tony the Rat Fauci perpetrating a fraud on the American people.
Just disgusting.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
The Sandy Hook school shooting, a huge controversy that lingers.
J.W.
Williams.
Editor's note.
Apart from a few erratas, such as describing me as the author rather than as the editor of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, it was a FEMA drill to promote gun control, 2015, second edition, 2016.
J.W.
Williams did a good job of summarizing my case, and I'm flattered to appear on G. Edward Griffin's Need to Know website, where those who think that my effort to carry it to the U.S.
Supreme Court, where I'm in the process of drafting my writ of certiorari for submission, are invited to support me via GiveZenGo.com.
I have an excellent attorney working for me, engaged in drafting the writ as we speak.
Here's what they've published.
James Fetzer, author of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, It Was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control, was unable to present his evidence in a lawsuit brought against him by a parent of a child reportedly killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012.
Fetzer plans to take his case to the Supreme Court.
He said that there has never been a determination that anybody ever died at Sandy Hook, and that ought to be done before Remington, the gun manufacturer, pays $73 million to settle a lawsuit with parents of children from Sandy Hook.
Fetzer tried to intervene in the Remington case.
Curiously, both parties in the case, the Sandy Hook parents and Remington, opposed Fetzer's intervention on their behalf.
James Fetzer acquired University, an author of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, offered his book for free after it was censored, and then it was downloaded over 10 million times.
I have that.
And I just spoke with the fellow with Good Intel Connections and gave me that estimate, who got it from a higher source.
He believes that's a reliable figure.
Mr. Fetzer has collected evidence, he says, shows the 2012 shooting event at the San Diego Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut was really a federal emergency management agency drill that was then used to claim that children and teachers were massacred in the shooting.
But in truth, it was a deception and no one really died that day.
He says the purpose of the state shooting was to promote gun control.
Fetzer was sued by Lenny Posner, father of Noah Posner, who was reportedly shot to death by Adam Lanza, who stole the gun from his mother and shot her before killing 20 students and six adult staffers and teachers at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
Mr. Posner filed a lawsuit because Fetzer claimed that his son Noah was issued a death certificate that was not authentic.
Fetzer had two experts examine the death certificate, and they said it was not authentic.
Curiously, a total of four different death certificates have been presented.
Editors note, To be a bit more precise, the death certificate I published had been given to my co-author Kelly Watt by Mr. Posner.
The document experts examined the four introduced prior to the oral hearing, during which a fifth was introduced.
The experts' conclusions were disputed by Mr. Posner.
The judge, instead of simply excluding the document expert reports, which would be grounds for an appeal, instead set aside the expert reports as someone's opinion, thereby shutting down Fetzer's ability to submit evidence in his own defense.
The case should have been sent to a jury to resolve this disputed fact.
On the topic of the death certificate, the judge refused to allow Fetzer to present any evidence that Sandy Hook was a hoax and no one died.
Fetzer quoted the judge as saying, whether or not Sandy Hook really happened is not relevant to this.
The truthfulness or the accuracy of the death certificate But Noah Posner's death certificate alleges he died at Sandy Hook on December 14, 2012, of multiple gunshot wounds, which makes Fetzer's evidence extremely relevant to the death certificate issue.
The judge made a summary judgment when the primary fact of authenticity was in dispute.
After the judge granted the summary judgment against Fetzer, a jury trial was held for damages without knowing of his evidence, and he was ordered to pay $450,000 to Mr. Posner in 2019.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court refused to review Fetzer's case.
Editors note, when he appealed, the denial of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals for District 4, and he is now taking it to the U.S.
Supreme Court.
Mr. Fetzer has stated that no one may be denied life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
This case will be used to deny the right to due process and is a threat to jurisprudence.
Therefore, Fetzer may pursue a case of deprivation of rights under color of law because a judge violated his rights in the form of dereliction of duty.
Fetzer can only bring this lawsuit after all other avenues have been exhausted, including going to the U.S.
Supreme Court.
Last month, in a precedent-setting case, Armington Arms, the manufacturer of the Bushmaster AR-15 that was purportedly used in the 2012 San Diego shooting, agreed to settle a lawsuit by families of San Diego victims for $73 million.
The settlement will be paid through insurance companies.
This is the first time a gun manufacturer will pay a mass shooting claim in the U.S.
because there's a federal law that shields gun makers and dealers from host civil litigation.
However, there's a loophole in the law if marketing of the firearms contributed to the massacre.
The Cerebus private equity firm bought Remington in 2007 and was accused of launching an aggressive campaign that pushed sales of AR-15s through production placement in first-person shooter video games and by touting the AR-15 as an effective killing machine.
In retrospect, I must say, I wonder if they did this deliberately.
Cerberus used the assets of Remington Arms to borrow hundreds of millions of dollars, saddling with debt in 2012, which led to Remington's bankruptcy.
Cerberus is also the parent company of Dyncor, a major national security contractor with the U.S.
government that charges billions for overseas military and police training.
DynCorp has been involved in a number of scandals, including pedophilia, rape, child trafficking, sexual slavery, with boys in Afghanistan, and child pornography.
In 2018, former President Trump named Cerberus co-founder Steven Feinberg to head the President's Intelligence Advisory Board.
That may not have been a wise choice.
Mr. Fetzer says no one died at Sandy Hook.
Here are some of his reasons for saying that.
The school had been closed since 2008.
No teachers or students were there.
There were no ambulances, no medevac helicopters, nor any school buses at the scene.
He also says that a FEMA manual for the blast casualty exercise was discovered, editor's note, which he included in the book as appendix A.
Mr. Fetzer tried to intervene in the Remington lawsuit because there's never been a determination that anyone ever died at Sandy Hook, and he says that ought to be done before Remington pays $73 million.
Curiously, both parties in the case, the Sandy Hook parents and Remington, opposed Fetzer's intervention on their behalf.
Fetzer said that the management of Remington is in on it and is part of the plot for gun control.
Former President Obama nullified the Smith-Mutt Act of 1948 by supporting the Modernization Act of 2012, which now allows the government to use tactics within America that the CIA commonly uses in other countries, such as propaganda, fake shootings, stage riots, and crisis actors.
Fetzer says that Sandy Hook was a FEMA drill, presented as mass murderer to promote gun control, and he was sued to make him shut up.
He said that Remington has paved the way for the scam to require gun owners to obtain insurance as a way to get registration and confiscation.
One can only wonder what the jury verdict would have been if the evidence for this seemingly outrageous claim had not been suppressed.
Lots of citations.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I just think that this is a fantastic how a lot of this has played out.
We've seen the Biden administration starting to talk about ghost guns.
So this has been a huge issue for Biden.
His entire career is still limiting access to the Second Amendment.
Making up all these stories about guns and he's all concerned about ghost guns, you know, the day after he does this whole presentation on ghost guns, we've got more shootings, more mass shootings, more mass events here in the United States.
This has been an agenda that has been pushed.
It was pushed by the Obama-Biden regime.
It's being pushed here now.
I was just waiting.
It's like a roulette wheel or something.
They spin it around and they're like, what's the next thing that they're going to use to try to go after Americans?
Is it going to be a pandemic?
Is it going to be the guns?
Is it going to be medical tyranny?
Whatever it's going to be, they have to keep cycling back and forth.
So I wouldn't be surprised if throughout the summer we see a lot more, you know, shootings and a lot more push by the Biden administration and by Congress, etc.
to restrict Second Amendment rights.
It just seems like that's what they do when the news cycle starts to die down.
They always go back to this, like this has been Biden's big push this whole time.
So that's just my thoughts on connecting this to what I've just seen locally and most recently in mainstream news here.
Oh, you're absolutely right, Holly.
I think that Biden is in deep water on every issue.
They're trying to change the subject, from the migrants flooding the border, from the catastrophe with the food supply, from the COVID, from the war, everything, where they've massively mucked up to something they feel more comfortable with, gun control.
The latest Brooklyn deal is a staged event.
And it just happens to coincide with him talking about ghost guns.
But frankly, the American people aren't going to buy it.
The last thing we're going to do at this stage in our history is give up our guns.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Here's Ursula in Ukraine viewing bodies which, according to conflicting press reports, can have been on the ground not less than nine days, but perhaps as much as three weeks?
Sure thing.
Even the Sandy Hook Massacre looks more credible.
Fools.
New Ursula van der Leyden, President of the European Commission, sees dead victims in Bukha in Ukraine.
Meanwhile, more about it from the Daily Mail.
The Fake Dead tweets, Scotty the Trucker 888.
The Fake Dead are highly employable.
Also, they are great at voting.
Meanwhile, about Colonel Douglas McGraver from Beverly.
I may have misspelled the name.
The correct address is recommending that I should invite him on the show.
On another note, the powers that be are having fun playing God with geoengineering.
Friday afternoon in Charlotte, North Carolina, the weather turned cold and windy.
Same conditions Saturday.
There were also rain sprinkles in the afternoon for a few minutes, then the sun came out.
Today, Sunday, it's very chilly.
By Tuesday, the temperature will rise to the mid-70s, and Wednesday and Thursday it will be in the low 80s.
Demand swings and temperatures are quite odd and wreak havoc on farmers' planting crops.
Geoengineering, I believe, is being used to help destroy the food supply, along with the other pandemic measures being taken.
She's absolutely right.
This is weather engineering manufacture taking place.
Meanwhile, my Conspiracy 101 Critical Thinking and Conspiracy Theories course has a second class meeting tonight.
Here I am in St.
Paul, Minnesota with Jesse Ventura and Vince Bugliosi after Vince received an honorary doctorate in law degrees from the Hamlin School of Law.
Everything you ever wanted to know about conspiracy theory is what we're afraid to ask, but this time you don't need to be afraid.
Registration remains open.
Go to mixandstream.com slash critical hyphen thinking dot html.
I'd love to see you there.
Meanwhile, final thoughts, Holly.
Just terrific.
Well, thanks, Jim, for having me on again today.
You're a super busy guy, so I'm really excited to be able to do these weekly shows with you.
We also do Shows on Sunday with Scott and Don Gron as well.
So I'm glad you're able to fit me into your schedule and I always get really nice comments when we do shows together.
So look forward to next week too.
You're doing a sensational job with it and I know all the demands you're under so I'm just grateful you can join me doing these shows.
I do apologize that I had some slides out of order today.
There was just an awful lot going on and some unexpected developments.
Apologies for that.
But I'm just delighted Holly could join me today and give such a sensational contribution to our efforts to get the truth out.
There's a lot going on here.
This COVID thing has been the greatest swindle on humanity in the history of life on planet Earth.
Pay attention.
Don't let yourself be plagued.
Spend as much time as you can with your friends and loved ones because between the vaccine and a potential nuclear war and whatever else the administration is going to throw at us, we really literally do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection