All Episodes
Previous Next
March 4, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
40:36
The Real Deal, Part 8: Climate Change: Myth vs. Reality with Joe Olson, P.E. (3 March 2022)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Real Deal, with a continuing expose about the climate change mythology with Joe Olson, who's been doing a sensational job.
If anyone has any doubt about it, go back and just watch the very first, and you'll see we have known from the beginning that this was a gigantic scam.
Over 600 million years of world history, there has been no correlation between the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and the temperature of the Earth.
None!
Lacking that correlation, there cannot be a causal relation.
Unless it were incredibly subtle and complex and virtually defies detection, in which case it would be meaningless or all but in terms of formulating policies.
So I'm very impressed with what Joe has been doing here.
This is now our eighth installment, Joe, in this program.
Would you like to say a few words about what has gone before?
Yes, this is a three-sided assault against energy use by human beings, and it's well thought out and it's been decades long in planning and implementation.
We've squandered over a hundred Billion dollars since 1990 on carbon climate endangerment findings.
And like I mentioned in one of my Canada Free Press articles, if all you fund is findings for danger, danger is all you will find.
And so that's what we've had.
We've had this government forced effort to convert everything into non I want to punch the decline on this.
I got an incoming call to absolutely non-renewable and inefficient systems of eco-trinkets.
So segments one through five, we covered the false science of radiation backwarming.
And then in chapter six, we covered the green energy Fraud.
And then in seven, we covered peak oil, which is the other item.
So what they've tried to tell us is that by using thermal carbon-based energies, we're changing the climate, that we can use something that's non-thermal and have a quote, sustainable, which is a complete fiction.
And then the third thing is that, well, we got to get off of fossil fuels anyway, because we're running out of them.
And Chapter 7, we pretty much conclusively proved that oil is abigenic and that it was produced for a billion years before the first single cell life forms are here.
You pick up traces of organic matter as these hydrocarbons percolate up through soil layers and rock layers.
And you end up what would be called hydrogenated sediment layers of peat that form cold seams.
But all of that's just based on the same thing, which is output of carbon and oxygen and hydrogen as byproducts of fission inside the Earth's crust.
And that's another giant mover that was Never discussed by any of the climate change people and that is the variable fission rate that's in the planet and anybody that looks around can notice that we don't have a constant rate of earthquakes and a constant rate of volcanism on the planet so those two forces are connected to the same fission force and therefore the fission forces is not constant.
So today we're going to discuss these kind of as a unified subject because they're all related.
So chapter eight, we're going to start with the EV ship fire.
Well, let me just mention that you are a founder of Principia Scientific, which is doing a fantastic job of getting real scientific information out to the public.
And Joe, it seems to me this combination of scientific illiteracy and political zealotry is Profoundly damaging to the United States and its economy, and it's very difficult to perceive how this cannot be a deliberate effort to take down the United States economically by destroying its base of energy, which is spectacular.
We just had the stunning development today that proposals to reopen the XL pipeline, given the soaring energy price of gasoline and all the extraordinary aspects going on with Russia being curtailed, and the Democrats voted it down.
Well, it turns out now that the Energy Secretary has admitted during a conversation and interview that high energy prices and low supply are a deliberate part of the Democrats' effort to change how we provide energy to America.
This is disgusting, and there it is right in our face, Joe.
Yes, well, you and Carl and I will talk about the wonderful Department of Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm when we discuss this later today, but we'll get back over to the subject about our wonderful renewable electric vehicles.
Currently there's a million electric vehicles or partially electricated hybrid vehicles in the United States with a fleet of 300 million.
So obviously it's going to take an enormous amount of new batteries and new electric motors to increase that fleet size to go 100% EV and that doesn't explain where you're going to get the electrical generation to make all of those goofy systems operate.
So let's just start with the subject of electric vehicle fire.
On a ship.
Got it.
Maritime Transportation Fire Hazard.
Yeah, this is a ship full of Bentleys, Audis, and Porsches.
The most expensive automobiles you can get.
And the whole ship and all of its cargo are at total loss because the EV fire started and there's no way of suppressing them on those boats.
And there's no way of shipping the batteries separate from the vehicles because they're built into the vehicle.
A Tesla has a $25,000 battery that's built into the floor plan that you basically have to completely disassemble the car to ever replace the battery.
And so then we'll get into the little issues that we have as far as using batteries as a backup for energy systems.
And that would be our item number two on our slide sheet.
The MOS landing battery goes over offline due to overheating for the second time.
Another Principia Scientific article.
So we'll just put that up.
Yeah, it's up.
It's up.
Okay.
Yeah, you have a real problem with these things.
And part of the problem is that you end up just like we had mentioned previously, you get dendrites inside the battery, which are based on the impurities that are in the battery.
And you cannot make 100% Pure materials, considering you have to have a cathode, an anode, an electrolyte, and so you're going to end up with having a certain amount of impurities, and those impurities are going to end up collecting together, and because of the constant movement of electrons, they're going to end up causing deposits that will short the batteries out, and that's what makes the batteries overheat, and that's what also ends the life of the battery.
So here we have Energy Story Facility owned by Vistra Energy, Moss Landing, California houses the largest lithium-ion battery.
Oh, that's going to save the world!
We got lithium-ion batteries!
Only problem is the battery pack keeps on melting.
So, let's just go ahead.
We got a lot of information to cover today, so I don't want to dwell on a whole lot of this.
I just want to introduce something as articles where the readers can do their own research.
And we've got a lot to cover and we don't have much time left to get this information.
Well, here we have, Joe, a better way to recycle lithium batteries is coming soon from this Princeton startup.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, there you go.
Yeah, they figured out how they could recycle the cathode.
Well, I'm sorry folks, the cathode is only 5% of the volume of a lithium-ion battery, and so by being able to do an extremely expensive, and they list in this article,
Uh, the previous methods of trying to recover the materials and cathodes and anodes and and all of the toxic processes that you have to go through and the fact that it's more energy costly to recycle these things than it is to just throw them in a landfill and ignore that you ever had them and go out and dig some more material.
But, you know, if you're going to consider petroleum as a finite resource, why don't you consider lithium, barium, and phosphorus, which are the materials that go into solar cells, and nickel, hydrides, and everything it takes to go into a lithium, and cobalt that materials it takes to go into lithium batteries, why don't you consider those elements as being finite?
And the more of them you dig up and the more of you turn into junk and dump into your landfills, the harder those materials are going to be refined.
And just like we mentioned, if you've got to have a 300-fold increase in the number of vehicles that are using this goofy transportation system, then you have set up an absolute Self-defeating system of future energy and transportation.
It's absolute insanity.
And Joe, since oil is a virtually inexhaustible resource naturally produced by Earth, while these other precious elements are not, it seems to me the argument about sustainability is completely against going in terms of battery or electrically driven vehicles.
It's just absurd!
They've got the equation reversed, all the values.
This is incredible scientific stupidity or a deliberate malfeasance and misrepresentation.
It's absolutely deliberate, and all you have to do is look at what they're doing by depriving Europe and the world markets of Russian gas and Russian petroleum products.
So, you know, these people are absolute pirates and cannibals and savages and barbaric.
And they are the ones that are directing all of our policy.
They put themselves in leadership positions worldwide.
And this is intentional.
And it's been an intentional fraud since day one.
Okay, now we're going to switch over to LNG tankers.
Now, this is a really good article, and it has a really good video.
But there again, we don't have time for the video.
But if you go to the video, you can scroll down to the...
I think it's item number E in the tape that they discuss.
There's different types of LNG carriers, and so LNG is liquid liquefied natural gas, and the way you do that is you chill natural gas, which is a really light molecule You chill it down to minus 160 degrees centigrade in order to store it in a tank, but then you can't continue to refrigerate it.
You have a highly insulated tank, and you get chirogenic fracturing of materials when you chill them down that cold.
So, we don't know what the actual cycle time is for these things being Chilled and then thawed out, but you have to get inside after each shipment.
They have to get inside and visually inspect them for cracks along the different weld lines, and these are typically made out of spheres, and you can't get steel tanks to form spheres without having welds and seams in them.
So, you know, bottom line is it's really intensive.
And then you liquefy this stuff.
They boil the gas off in order to keep it at the constant temperature.
And then they put that gas either into the air supply on a diesel engine, or they're trying to convert these giant diesel engine boats into nothing but LNG boats.
But when you figure out the amount of energy it takes to liquefy the natural gas, you put it into this giant pressure vessel that costs an enormous amount, takes up a lot of space on the ship, and then you have to boil it off.
And then either you're Flaring or you're running it through the engine or you're trying to run the whole boat on it.
By the time you get to wherever you're going, you've lost 10 or 20 percent of your available product.
Then you offload the product and then you've got an empty boat that you can't put anything in to ship back over to wherever your source for liquefied natural gas is.
It's absolutely insane!
I was involved in doing a rail proposal for the City of Houston using a high-speed heavy rail connecting intercontinental downtown seven university campuses and the Medical Center with a 27.5-mile high-speed heavy rail.
And this would have been a very functional rail system for the City of Houston, but I was denied that because of the political Power elite who I'd actually met in person.
I met every senator that was in the Houston Metro Tax District, which I think there was about a dozen of them, and every Texas House of Representatives, and every U.S.
congressman that was in our district to try to explain to them what was going on.
I had three meetings with Tom DeLay.
I had an hour and a half long meeting with Bill Archer.
Tom DeLay was chairman of the Transportation Committee.
Bill Archer was chairman of Ways and Means Committee.
I've sat eyeball to eyeball in private meetings with four City of Houston mayors, every member of City of Houston Council, every member of the Commissioner's Court in Harris County.
I've gone through more than you could possibly imagine to have a reasonable discussion about how to solve transportation problems in a logical engineering way, and been denied by these political puppets on absolutely every level.
So one of the people on that- What's their agenda, Joe, that denies them of adopting efficient principles of engineering for such a basic function as transportation?
Because everything to them is a puppet show that they can rip people off on.
Kathy Whitmire, who was mayor at the time, who I had an hour and a half meeting with, is an absolute airhead, and she publicly stated that she was mayor for life because Houston's Power Elite had selected her.
Well, once she let it out of the bag that there was a Power Elite in Houston that was running the puppet show, they decided to replace her.
And the chairman of Metro at the time that I was making my real proposal was a guy named Bob Lanier, who was a very crooked real estate agent and lawyer.
And we'll get into that in just a second.
I went down and made my presentations, including routing maps and complete cost analysis.
I had assembled a design team with 260.
Engineers and architects, and we were more prepared to go against the Walt Disney and Siemens corruption system that was being placed on our city.
But the mayor who was in charge of appointments at Metro fired Bob Lanier in December of 1989.
I went and had a meeting with him a couple of months later at his land development office, And I said, Bob, Kathy Whitmire's trying to do a no-bid contract.
It's a violation of state competitive bidding law, Vernon's Code 664-4.
Lanier, who was a lawyer, said, yeah, I know.
He said, one of our local contractors, who he named, said if he didn't have to bid against anybody, he could hide $200 million of excess profit in that billion-dollar rail project, and we'll all get rich on it.
That's what was going on behind the scenes.
And I looked at him, and I went, gee, Bob, why don't you go along with him?
And he said, because I already made enough money.
I didn't need to make any more that way.
And I looked at him, and I went, yeah, you and Joe Johnson, the owner of Metro National Memorial City Hospital and Memorial City Shopping Mall, bought University Savings, syndicated it with your crooked buddies, bankrupted the
University savings and you got 140 million dollars from the Resolution Trust Corporation and later I ended up meeting the author of the Mafia, the CIA and George Bush, Peter Bruton, who was selling a book that described the S&L 600 billion dollar ripoff that happened during the 80s And I picked up a copy of his book.
I had worked on 50 of the projects and knew a dozen of the principles, and nobody went to jail other than a couple of mafia guys that were really sloppy and were set up.
So, bottom line is, that's what we've got.
We've had a crime syndicate run in the country, and Houston claims to be crime-free.
We don't have the mafia like they do over in New Orleans.
No, we've got a more sophisticated method of mafia here in Houston.
So anyhow, when Lanier got elected as mayor, he decided that he would let Enron do our transportation system in Houston, and he gave them $60 million of taxpayer money to convert buses to liquefied natural gas.
And what happened is that when you take a normal diesel engine bus, diesel is a lubricant.
And so it lubricates the injectors, and it lubricates the fuel pump, and it lubricates the pistons and rings as they're operating.
And a normal city bus with a diesel engine in it lasts at least a half million miles.
Some of them go a million miles before having an overhaul.
Very dependable, very economical system.
But in order to, quote, reduce our carbon signature, they switched them over to LNG, and they were burning out the engines in less than 50,000 miles.
So, they realized at that point, well, you can't just put gas in a diesel engine because it screws it up.
Well, duh!
Did they have morons implementing this plan?
I mean, anyone knows diesel has oil right in the mixture.
I mean, that's part of the distinctive feature of diesel fuel.
California was able to convince the EPA that the 500 parts per million of sulfur that's in diesel fuel was what was causing acid rain, so they forced everybody to go to zero sulfur diesel fuel, and the same thing with our coal-fired power plants.
Well, I don't have a problem with a stationary plant like a a coal-fired power plant.
You can do clean coal, and you can scrub that out, and guess what you do with the sulfur that you get out of the smokestack from a coal-fired plant?
You sell it as fertilizer, because it's one of the six elements that's mandatory for any life-living organism on this planet, and the forest fires in California release more Stored sulfur from the cellulose in the trees then is released by the diesel vehicles that operate in California.
So that's how insane the EPA's part of this equation is.
The whole thing's just absolutely wall to wall nuts.
Government by bureaucrats truly is a disaster.
Here's the next.
California getting new fueling stations for hydrogen cars, but who will use them?
Well, I think we'll get to that one in just a second.
I've got another one.
Texas A&M's professor, natural gas refining process results in an industry breakthrough.
This is posted at T-A-M-U-E-D-U, and I think we've posted it at Principia.
I'll see if I can't get it reposted if we haven't.
Joe, do you want to show it if I miss a slide?
Yes, yes, yes.
Bring it up.
Yes, yes, yes.
Now, what this college engineering professor did is that what this college engineering professor did is that he took-- Are you showing it?
I mean, I can't see it.
Oh, I can't.
I don't know how to share.
I can resend it to you.
Yeah, let me pause and let's do that, Joe.
Hang on a minute.
Okay, okay.
Here we go, Joe, about the Texas A&M professor's natural gas refining process.
Go for it.
Results in an industry breakthrough.
Yes, this is a professor that several years ago, let's see, this is in 2015, came up with a process that was scalable and cost-effective at $3 per gallon to convert natural gas directly to gasoline.
This is called a GTL energy.
Uh, process and it's at that point pretty cost efficient and you have a lot of places especially in Texas.
I've got several friends that have oil leases and they end up with what's called stripper wells where you get a certain amount of natural gas flowing out of the ground along with a certain amount of crude oil.
And if there's not a pipeline nearby, it's impractical to try to store that natural gas.
So they just flare it off.
So you drive along these oil fields and you see these giant stacks.
Sometimes they're burning off dangerous compounds.
That's normally what's happening at refineries where they have flare stacks.
But when you've got a series of stripper wells out there and there's no natural gas pipelines because the yield is so low.
And what is really the more valuable product is the liquid hydrocarbons that are coming out.
So they're just flaring this stuff off.
And that energy could be easily recovered with this GTL process that this guy came up with.
And it's scalable.
So you could make it whatever size you needed, and then you'd just have a separate tank where you store gasoline.
And the advantage is this gasoline has zero impurities in it.
It burns far cleaner than even gasoline with ethanol in it, and it has far less damage to your engine.
So this is an absolutely brilliant process, but we can't get any government to say, well, this would help solve some of our energy process.
Let's quit flaring gas.
Let's start turning gas into gasoline instead of let's put liquefied natural gas on tankers.
Why don't we turn gas, natural gas Then you don't have to go through the refining process, Joe!
I mean, this is stunning!
This is huge!
I know!
Why can't we talk about anything sensible in this planet?
It's absolutely insane!
And then let's just talk about, we've already discussed how stupid Electric cars are, but let's talk about the other little savior that they keep bringing up.
Oh, we're going to have a hydrogen economy.
Well, hydrogen is the smallest and simplest atom there is.
It forms a diatomic molecule, so you have two hydrogen atoms hooked together, It has, like I said, the lowest energy density.
And we'll just pull up slide number five and just see exactly how stupid this little eco trick it is.
California is getting new fueling stations for hydrogen cars, but who will use them?
Yeah, yeah.
Currently they have 47 fueling stations.
And the way you get hydrogen is either you break apart natural gas to get the four hydrogens and and release the one carbon that's in that, which is an energy intensive.
And when you end up with a fuel that has less energy than the molecule that you broke up to get the fuel.
So that's stupid.
The other way of doing it is by electrolysis.
You run electric current through water, you can get the hydrogen and oxygen to go to the separate cathode and anode terminals and bubble up, and so you can recover the oxygen, you can recover the hydrogen, but there again, it takes more energy, electrical energy, than you can get out of the hydrogen to split water to get hydrogen.
Okay, and the wonderful thing about hydrogen as a combustion product is that you get nothing but water vapor as a byproduct, but there again, if it costs you more to get hydrogen, why don't you just burn the natural gas, or why don't you just use the electricity in the form that it's initially in?
Now, I was a college student in the 70s and I had a teaching professor that was getting his PhD in chemistry and he got a contract from an Australian company to go down and do hydrogen fuel cells.
He says, man, we're getting ready to have breakthrough technology.
You won't believe these things are 98% efficient.
He said in a few years nobody will have A gasoline-powered vehicle at all because everything will be hydrogen-powered fuel cells.
Well, here we are 50 years later.
Where's your hydrogen-powered fuel cells?
It still isn't a perfected technology and it still is enormously energy inefficient.
So now we'll switch over to item number six.
You want to have hydrogen in your car?
Yeah, let's go.
Let's go look at what hydrogen cars really do.
Hydrogen stations.
Got it.
Yeah, hydrogen is delivered in two different pressure ranges.
One of them is called H70, which is 10,000 psi.
Another one is H35, which is 5,000 psi.
I was a scuba diver, and we had steel tanks that were 45 cubic foot tanks that weighed 50 pounds.
that uh operated at 2200 psi and there was a real danger if you had a filled tank and you left it sitting out in the sun the tank would heat up enough that it would blow the j valve out of the top of the tank and you would have a rocket that would go through a concrete wall I mean it would shoot a half mile because that's what a rocket is
And then they came up with aluminum tanks that were 80 cubic feet instead of 45, and those operated at 3,000 psi.
Again, the same problem.
But now you're talking about having a vehicle that has either a 10,000 psi pressure vessel in it, and those things are heavy.
The aluminum 80 cubic foot tanks were the same weight as the steel tanks, and you had greater volume, so you could have a longer downtime with the same weight of tank.
But imagine what's going to happen when one of these hydrogen vehicles gets in an accident where it breaks the valve that is tapped into that pressure vessel, or it gets in a fire and that pressure vessel gets heated up.
And look at the Hindenburg, What happened when that thing caught on fire?
We wouldn't sell the Nazis helium in the 1930s because it was a strategic element, and so they ended up using hydrogen as the buoyant gas in the Hindenburg, and look at how fast it took for the Hindenburg to blow up!
Now imagine if you had 10,000 psi of gas because you just left the filling station and you got in an accident and the car that you ran into catches on fire and your tank heats up.
What's going to happen with all that gas?
One of the other ones, there's a thing that shows the percent of flammability, and anytime you've got a concentration up to 75% of hydrogen, it is explosive.
So, if you get a concentration above that, then it doesn't have enough oxygen to become explosive, but hydrogen is an extremely dangerous material to be working with, and it's also highly reactive, so it's going to be sitting there eating holes in your tank, eating holes in your pipe, and you're using it through a gas engine, so it's going to be eating up parts of your fuel distribution system, and eating up the rings on your piston, because there again, it has no lubrication properties.
So, And you're producing water inside the combustion chamber.
So, you know, bottom line is everything that these clowns are forcing us to believe is life-saving is life-endangering.
And I'm just absolutely fed up with these people.
I don't know how much longer we can stand this.
And now, you know, when you've got these political forces and you get this clown like our appointed Jennifer Granholm, Department of Energy.
Yeah, she went to Berkeley, got a BA in political science, then she went to Harvard and she got a law degree, then she worked as an assistant AG in the DOJ for a few years, and then she got elected in 1998 as Michigan Attorney General, and then she got elected as governor in 2002 and served until 2011 as governor of Michigan,
I'm sorry lady, where's your science education?
I'll debate you and anybody on your DOE team any day, any time, on proper science involving anything to do with energy and the climate.
The Biden administration seems to have made it their policy to appoint incompetent, unqualified individuals to crucial positions within the government, Joe.
It happens again and again and again.
Take Pete Buttigieg in the Department of Transportation.
He knows nothing about transportation whatsoever.
It's just an insult.
Here you got a woman with a background in law and political science at the Department of Energy.
Give me a break.
Oh, hey!
Look who Trump appointed!
Rick Perry!
Yeah, or Governor Goodhair.
You know what he got his degree in?
Agriculture.
And he was a C-minus student.
The only way he passed it is he was on the Texas A&M YELL team, which gets out and, you know, jumps around in the field and acts like cheerleaders without having any girls.
And so that's how he got his degree.
And, you know, I can admire the fact that he was a pilot in the Air Force, but that still doesn't mean he had any That's very, very disappointing in Donald Trump.
at all, and he was appointed head of the Department of Energy under Trump.
That's very, very, very disappointing in Donald Trump.
He has to know enough to appoint good qualified people to keep positions.
Well, you know, the problem is the puppet show is owned by the same party, and they do these fake elections, and they end up having a rhino versus a dino, And we did a great program here in Houston, me and a local film producer, that's up on the James Fetzer website, about election fraud.
And this covers the efforts by Catherine Englebright on True the Vote.
Dr. Laura Presley, who ran for city council in Austin and was cheated by electric voting machines.
Our appointed Director of Elections under the Secretary of State's office.
The Secretary of the State was appointed by Rick Perry The Secretary of State hired a Rose Law Firm attorney named Keith Ingram to be the Director of Elections and he said that you don't he notified all 254 county clerks in Texas that you don't need to conform to the state laws on elections.
And this was proven in 2016, ignored by our state legislature, which only meets every two years, because the rhinos could give a flip less about having functional elections.
They could give a shit less about having a functional debate about energy, about green energy, about petroleum.
We end up with college professors that will not let you come and speak to their classes because it's politically improtune to go in there and talk about You can't even set up a table on a college campus and provide alternative information to the students that are walking by because you would be listed as a counter-revolutionary.
You know, the problem is the whole system is run by these same kind of morons, wall-to-wall, and we don't have a soapbox to stand on to be able to address these outrageous things that are going on worldwide.
But certainly in America, we deserve to have better than this.
I think you got it exactly right.
Meanwhile, we have this monster engine.
Yeah, yeah, this is the Wasilla 14-cylinder engine, 114,800 horsepower.
This is what drives those big container ships back and forth across the oceans going to Uh, Europe and going to China to pick up and, uh, supplies and drop off supplies.
And this is what makes our global economy run.
Now, we had previously mentioned that a horsepower was 550 foot pounds, and that a cubic foot of dirt, which is one foot by one foot by one foot of dirt, weighs 125 pounds.
So, if you lift a cubic foot of dirt up four feet, that is 550 foot pounds.
That is one horsepower.
Well, because it's a unit of energy, you can also convert that into watts, which would be 774 watts.
Well, if you've got a solar cell, and you're producing one and a half watts per square foot, Then it would take a 25 by 25 solar cell to be able to produce one horsepower.
How big a solar cell are you going to have to put on that freighter to be able to get 115,000 horsepower?
And then you only get it for six hours a day.
The other 18 hours a day you're going to be sitting in darkness waiting for the sun to shine and hoping the wind doesn't blow you back further than you traveled that day.
The whole concept of converting off of non-thermal fuels is absolute folly.
It's, you know, it's Using chicken little science to find jack-in-the-beanstalk energy solutions proposed by Pied Piper for Cressors.
The whole thing is just absolutely insane, and I'll debate anybody, anytime, anywhere, because they know that what they're saying is lies, and that's why they will not
debate anybody, and that's why we found Principia Scientific, because they own the publishing companies, they own the broadcast industry, they own all of the peer-reviewed books and magazines and everything, the radio stations, they own absolutely everything.
It's a miracle of God that I was able to be on Coast to Coast AM five times, and thank you, George Norrie, for having the courage to bring me on and discuss these items.
And right now, we've got a program.
Jim and I did one two weeks ago on 9-1-1, but I'm doing a weekly program on TNT Radio with other members of Principia Scientific, and we cover a lot of subjects, and we'll be covering some more.
Go ahead.
Jim and I are also confronting every other conspiracy that is absolute provable fact, which is all of the mass casualty events, the 9-1-1 event.
You know, lunar landing.
You can pull up on Bitshoot and see our interview that we did on the Apollo mission, how completely impossible that was.
Even to this day, we don't have the ability to fly to the moon, walk around and drive our golf carts and, you know, chip holes in one and come back.
We do not have that capability at this point.
We certainly didn't have it 60 years ago.
Joe, you're just doing a sensational job.
I can't thank you enough for taking on this series.
You are a veritable encyclopedia, a wizard at engineering.
I am so impressed.
Do you have a final thought to conclude our presentation today?
No, other than we've got plenty more to come, folks, because we're down there every day digging, and we're finding more and more stuff, and you're going to be shocked at what we find on some more events that have been lied to us about.
But hopefully, we're going to reach that threshold where we have the critical mass, and we're able to wake people up.
And we can get the honest debate that we deserve, and we can get some people that are honest voices and confront these lies.
And once you do, once you confront these lies, they'll fold like a cheap suit, because they know that they're lying.
And it'll be transparent as soon as somebody that understands things and can articulate them is able to confront them with their lies.
So, bottom line is, we presented an enormous amount of material today.
You've got several hours of research, if you're not familiar with these topics, to read the subjects that we brought up, read those articles, do your own vetting, and educate yourself, and educate the people around you, because this 40-minute, 50-minute tutorial is not nearly enough.
You need to do far more homework, and this is particularly aimed at the high school gifted and talented students in science and Technology, Engineering and Math, our STEM students, and the college students that are absolutely being force-fed this baloney by their professors.
You need to be able to confront them with actual reality and say, this is what is actually going on.
And the items that we mentioned today, a lot of them are covered in my most recent article, which was part of my Presentation on Coast to Coast AM.
It's an article that's from Muscle Power to Carbon Empowerment at Principia Scientific.
It was mentioned in a previous article.
It's part of my latest, which was March 18th, If you're a Coast listener and subscriber, you can go and listen to that for free.
If not, there'll be more of this information to come and if you've got any questions, leave them down in the comment section.
I'll be more than happy to gather these questions from the comment section and Jim and I can do a I'll go back over the comments on all of the previous ones and see if we can collate a group and that way we can do a discussion where we actually answer your questions.
So this is a dialogue that we want to have with the people that are interested in solving the problems that we've got as humanity.
Joe, you're doing a sensational job.
This, like the other episodes of our Anti-Climate Warning Exposé, which constitute a series of tutorials, where Joe Olson is doing a masterful job of explaining the issues, is available at my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
Check it out!
Meanwhile, thank you for joining us today.
We'll be back with another installment in the very near future of more of the information which you don't want to let yourself be played by the climate change movement, which is rooted in scientific illiteracy and political zealotry.
Thanks for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection