All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 26, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
46:01
The HighWire | Financial Insider Exposes Covid Fraud
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
When I started the Informed Consent Action Network, it was right on the heels of having made the film Vaxxed.
I toured the nation, really the world, with that documentary that I think changed the conversation around vaccine safety, especially around the MMR vaccine.
I wanted to get deeper in that investigation.
I wanted to start investigating all the vaccines.
And I knew that the only way I could do that is if I could figure out a way to penetrate the legal blockade.
Everywhere I went, I was meeting with the biggest lawyers in the world.
I will not tell you who they are.
Many of them famous.
You've read about them for years.
Saying, is there any way you could help me with this issue?
Because, and they would all say the same thing.
They would say, well Del, as you well know, the 1986 Act protects vaccines.
There's no way to sue.
There's no way to get in there.
We can't get discovery.
There's no way to make money on it for those that were trying to, you know, do, you know, wrongful death cases and things like that.
And so we're not interested.
But I kept looking and I finally found a lawyer that had a different perspective.
And when we discussed it, we started saying, well, look, we may not be able to sue the manufacturer, but we could certainly sue the government of the United States that took on all that liability.
Of course, I'm talking about really one of the most important aspects of the Informed Consent Action Network, that's our legal team, headed by Aaron Seery, who I think will go down in history as one of the greatest and most important constitutional attorneys in the world.
We've won against the CDC, the National Institute of Health, Health and Human Services, the FDA.
cases revealing what they've been trying to hide.
There's our cases to date against the government.
There's a whole slew of cases that are private and civil in matters, some going on right now, like I said, the one in D.C.
And behind all of that, as you well know, when you're donating to the Informed Consent Action Network, nearly half of our budget is going into our legal work, which also includes all those FOIA requests, the document dumps, Fauci's emails.
But I'm bringing that up because there's a particularly important moment going on right now It's not actually a case that we are the plaintiff on, but Aaron Seary has been handling the case of the public health and medical professionals, including Dr. Peter McCullough and many of the other doctors we've had on this show that want to see the Pfizer data.
We've covered this extensively.
Many articles have even hit the mainstream on this issue.
The FDA Our regulatory agency, not Pfizer, the FDA requested at first to have 55 years to process the FOIA request over vaccine data, saying, I mean, here they only took, you know, a few weeks to look at the data themselves to decide it was safe for all of us, but we're going to need 55 years before we give it to the public.
This on the heels of our government saying, don't worry, we know we're using emergency use authorization, we know this is experimental product, we'll be totally transparent with you through the whole process.
Well, obviously they didn't want to be, and then it extended for 55 to 75 years.
Then we're hearing it's going to be 75 years, because there's even more pages than they realized.
Well, Aaron Siri took them to court on behalf of those medical doctors.
And one, and basically forced that they were going to have to release that data within one year.
I think it's about 55,000 pages per month instead of the 500 they wanted to release.
And we reported just a couple of weeks ago here was paramount importance.
Judge orders FDA to hasten release of Pfizer vaccine docs rather than producing 500 pages a month.
The FDA's proposed timeline, he ordered the agency to turn over 55,000 a month.
That means all the Pfizer vaccine data should be public by the end of the summer rather than, say, the year 2097.
I had Aaron Sirian.
He talked about the fact that they brought in Pfizer attorneys then.
Then they basically said, get out of our way to the Department of Justice.
Pfizer pushes to intervene in lawsuits seeking COVID vaccine information from FDA.
I mean, do you see what Aaron's dealing with here?
I mean, first of all, they admit, basically, we control the government.
This is, yeah, well, it's the FDA until Pfizer gets pissed off.
Now they're bringing their attorneys.
They tried to change it, tried to get involved, Aaron Siri won again.
So don't worry, that data is coming out.
It's going to be here over the next year.
We're about to start seeing 55,000 pages a month.
And you may be asking yourself, what, you know, Del, I mean, what use are these things?
I mean, it's not like someone's going to jail or something.
Well, I'll tell you what the use is.
It starts affecting the company itself and this is what we saw happen directly as I think a response to that.
Look at this article.
Pfizer quietly adds language warning that unfavorable preclinical and clinical or safety data may impact business.
Now as you should probably know if you own a large corporation that stockholders are Investing in, if you have insider information that lets you know our stock is about to crash, we kind of have to warn the stockholders because they can't be left holding the bag when we had information they needed to have.
So what happened?
They started rewriting all their documents.
They called a special meeting to speak to their stockholders.
It was about the fourth quarter and full year 2021 earnings conference call prepared remarks.
This is February 8, 2022.
We got some excerpts in the red lines.
You can see this is what was changed in their information.
Phase 4 data for community and any other vaccine candidate in the Beyond Tech program, Pax Lovett, or any other future COVID-19 treatment in any of our studies in pediatrics, adolescents, or adults, or real-world evidence, including the possibility of unfavorable new preclinical, clinical, or safety data There it is again.
of existing preclinical, clinical, or safety data, adding, or further information regarding the quality of preclinical, clinical, or safety data, including by audit or inspection.
Guess what they expect is down the road for them.
Or further information regarding the quality of pre...
There it is again.
They keep saying this concerns about clinical data integrity.
Why?
Probably because they've committed fraud.
It's just a guess.
But to get deeper into this, and I think to get a different perspective, you know, we say, well, how does this affect us?
Well, when it starts affecting the financial side of this, how many times are we saying, well, it's greed.
It's all about the money.
They're all in for the money.
I tend to say that power is more important than money.
But if we're going to try and understand the events of the world right now, and especially this pandemic, perhaps it would be good to see it through the eyes of somebody that really looks at the financial movement and maybe to help us understand what it means that they're giving new warnings to the stockholders.
My next guest has worked for, I think, it's the largest investment company in the entire world.
We're talking about BlackRock.
I think, what is it, nine trillion dollars?
Nine trillion dollars they have in their work, which is shocking.
It's like bigger than most nations themselves.
I'm talking about Edward Dowd, who was a portfolio manager, an equity portfolio manager.
But just to get a sense of BlackRock and who he worked for, this is an ad that's recently been put out by them.
Every great idea.
Every breakthrough.
Started with a question.
Someone asked the why.
Poked holes in the way things are to see what they could become.
And right now, the world is facing some big questions.
About how to push forward without leaving people behind.
How to break with the past and create a better future.
So on behalf of more and more people, BlackRock is asking bigger questions.
Bolder questions.
Questions that challenge convention and give rise to new thinking.
Questions like, how can valuing workers more increase a company's value?
And how can the economy go green without putting communities in the red?
Because the bigger questions we ask, the bigger actions we can take.
Helping us tackle the biggest question of them all.
How can we all prosper?
BlackRock, ask bigger questions.
I am speaking now with former equity portfolio manager for BlackRock, Edward Dowd.
Edward, it's an honor to have you joining us today.
Thank you.
Thanks for having me Dowd.
Glad to be here.
Now, I am not going to get into conversations about BlackRock, even though they seem to own, like, or be a part of almost every element of the world that we live in.
I'm sure you've signed every type of NDA necessary.
But what I do want to ask you is having, you know, your experience, having come up through the financial system, obviously a career that got you into very powerful positions in handling Gigantic portfolios and finances.
How would you say, because of that, that shaped your perspective of the world different than somebody that maybe isn't involved in sort of the financial side of the society we live in?
Yeah, that's a great question.
You know, I was at BlackRock for 10 years and managed a large cap growth portfolio.
We grew the assets to $14 billion.
I left there in 2012, so I haven't been at BlackRock for a while.
Most of my former colleagues are gone as well.
I will say this.
I've seen many frauds in my career.
I was a young Wall Street Investment Bank Equity Research Analyst at Donaldson, Muffin, and Genrette.
I was an Electric Utility Analyst.
I saw the dot-com fraud unfold before me.
Then I saw the housing fraud that went onto the bank's balance sheets.
And sure enough, the central banks and the government started getting involved in the money.
And the frauds moved on to central bank balance sheets and governance.
So it's a it's a fraud writ large.
And so what I saw coming down the pike with this COVID stuff just started to make me very curious, very, you know, Cynical, so to speak.
What were the first questions that, you know, you asked yourself as, you know, I always say that moment I'm watching, you know, videos out of China, people plunging face first, we start hearing maybe there's a pandemic, maybe there's not.
Obviously, that's going to affect the markets.
What were the first questions you were asking yourself?
Well, prior to the COVID pandemic, Many of us in the financial community had been wondering when the big global debt party was going to end, and we were trying to figure out what event would come in to usher that end.
And when COVID first hit, and I saw all the videos... Quickly, when you say global debt party, I mean, that sort of language, I think, I mean, to a layperson, what are you talking about when you talk about a global debt?
What are you referencing?
What debt are we talking about?
So, you know, after the great financial crisis, The response was to solve the debt problem on the bank's balance sheets with more debt on government balance sheets and central bank balance sheets.
So they've been doing for the last 10 years credit creation, money supply pump to paper over the problems from the banks.
And so the debt has grown so big that at some point the credit system is at the end of its days here.
So, you know, at some point some country is going to default.
It'll set off a chain of events that will spread like wildfire that the money authorities can't control.
Those of us in the financial community for years had been trying to figure out what that would look like.
We kind of speculated, as we do, they'll have to provide cover for that because they can't take the blame for the creation of the problem.
When COVID hit, I didn't immediately think that, although I was suspicious.
Because I'm in the financial markets, I was super on top of the COVID in China before anybody on the island of Maui was.
So I was going to Costco about six weeks before anybody even knew what COVID was.
But as soon as the propaganda out of China started coming, you've got to realize something about China.
Nothing comes out of China unless they want it to.
So those viral videos going around, people dropping in the streets, looked very stage production oriented.
So many of us started to really question how deadly the virus was.
So my fear dissipated quickly.
And then, you know, it came out later that the virus, 99.9% of us survived.
So that's when it clicked with me that something else was afoot.
As a guy that I'm sure deals with numbers, you probably understand how to read a graph.
When you were looking at the imperial model and these projected numbers of millions of people dying, were you immediately suspicious of that?
Did you look into that at all?
Look, I saw the scare tactics they used.
Being on Wall Street, you know garbage in, garbage out.
You can make up anything.
I'm a man who looks at data and I also look at real world experience.
And on the island of Maui, no one was getting COVID.
No one was dying.
And you know why that happened?
Because COVID was here in the fall of 2019.
Everyone got sick and we kind of got immunity.
People didn't start getting COVID again until, you know, wait for it, 2021.
Right.
So now let's look at the biggest part of the market side of this, which was a vaccine, a promise of a vaccine, a warp speed vaccine.
What were your thoughts at the announcement that the only way we were going to get out of this pandemic was a brand new vaccine that they hadn't even started manufacturing really yet?
What were your thoughts then?
Well, what really tipped me off that something was afoot was April 5th, Of 2020, about three or four weeks after the country shut down, James Bullard, the St.
Louis Federal Reserve president, got on Face the Nation.
And the question was asked, how do we come out of this economy with all the fear and people not willing to go out?
And he said, oh, well, due to new technology, we could have badges that determine someone's immunity.
OK?
Wow.
And then the next question was, I didn't see the segment, but the question was, OK, we'll come back and we'll talk about the surveillance technology that will be used to institute that.
Well, you know, those of us on Twitter that follow financial markets raised a big stink and they buried that talking point for months and months and months.
But I saw it.
I just was so super curious as to why a Federal Reserve president would have such a solution so quickly and talking about our health.
Okay.
And you got to remember in the summer of 2020 into the fall of 2020, if you talked about vaccine passports on social media, you were called a conspiracy theorist.
Yeah.
Well, lo and behold, you know, with the virus, it's 99.9%.
We all survive.
They started to ratchet down on our heads with these vaccine passports and mandates.
I started to see what was going on.
And I, you know, You don't need to be a rocket scientist here.
Was this a product that you were excited about?
The Pfizer or the Moderna or AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson?
I mean, you don't have to tell me if you don't want to, but did you get in line to this brand new technology that was going to save the world?
Absolutely not.
Why?
Well, I'll tell you, I only knew two things at the time.
It was Operation Warp Speed, An Operation Warp Anything sounds like a disaster to me because things are cut.
That's one.
Right.
Number two was, it was experimental.
Okay.
And with the technology that had never been used in vaccines before, this mRNA technology, let's call it what it is, it's a gene therapy.
Yeah.
I said to myself, knowing this fact, because I'm in the investment world, it normally takes seven to 10 years for safety data to be vetted on any vaccine.
Normally introduced.
Takes years and years of clinical data and trials.
So with that, those two pieces of information, myself and a couple of my friends on Wall Street said, we'll wait.
And that's what we did.
And you know, pretty quickly, you know, April, June, July, April, May, June, July, the anecdotes started popping up.
And I'm, you know, I'm not a statistician, but I know enough about stats to know that In a normal vaccine, I should not be hearing any anecdotes about someone being injured or having an adverse reaction.
That should never happen.
But we started hearing anecdotes, and that's what tipped off Steve Kirsch, who took the vax.
So those of us who understand math and probability were horrified at what we were hearing early on.
And it's gotten only worse since then.
And I've been doing a lot of work to show, unfortunately, the real world consequences of this disaster.
Let's get into that.
I mean, you sort of predicted much of this in tweets early on, you know, saying that this, you were sort of afraid this was sort of... Here we go.
I have an idea for a dystopian movie.
The background begins in 2020, a virus that mimics the flu sweeps across the globe.
Some believe it's a man-made bioweapon to provide cover for global economic collapse from an unsustainable debt load and rising wealth inequality, the majority.
believe their governments in dutifully obey orders to shelter in place while supply chains dissolve.
They lose jobs or small businesses, and eventually the middle class is wiped out.
Inexplicably large, big box businesses are allowed to operate, and folks are allowed to shop there.
That's May 3rd, 2020.
A lot of what you said there is really the big question I'm asking today on this show is, A lot of times I get into science, but just looking at the global events, it feels like there's something else pulling the strings that maybe we don't see.
A gray matter, if you will, that seems to be driving things that isn't showing up on the radar.
What's going on in this catastrophe that's got you the most worried?
Well, I wrote that tweet.
Uh, in 2020, because I started to suspect that the pandemic, uh, I don't want to get into the debate of whether it was launched on purpose or they use it as an excuse.
Let's just assume that it's a convenient excuse.
Okay.
To, um, to, uh, provide cover for a, uh, sovereign debt crisis.
So I felt like a criminal.
Okay.
That's why I was so able to actually predict what happened if I was, uh, If I was a criminal and I needed to cover up a sovereign debt crisis, I would introduce or take advantage of this virus to introduce a system of control to prevent the riots when the sovereign debt crisis does unfold.
And I would have a vaccine passport.
I would have digital identification.
I would restrict travel.
I would, you know, under the guise of medical help and what's called tyranny, I would be Cut down riots and all sorts of things.
But, you know, that's what I would do.
And that's why I was so accurate in that.
And it looks, the thing that shocked me the most is the global coordination of all this.
Yeah.
When do global governments ever agree on anything?
But the talking points, the timing, the unified messaging suggests to me something else is afoot.
Now, can I prove that?
No.
But I watch what people do and not what they say.
And, you know, this thing should have been over months ago.
And they keep actually turning the screws on our necks.
Especially in Europe.
Yeah.
Now, you've sort of publicly said that you believe fraud is taking place at Pfizer, which is something, as I sort of led into with this, the attorney we work with is also representing these medical doctors that put FOIA requests forward demanding to see the Pfizer data from the trials.
They wanted that to take 75 years.
Aaron Siri is one, and now we're going to see that over a year.
We're seeing these warnings to the stockholders, so financially it looks like They're being affected.
But when you've been looking at it and you say you suspect fraud, what are the things that sort of jumped out at you, sort of those milestones as you were looking at, as we have been, any data we can find?
What was it?
Because I know we come from sort of a medical perspective.
I'm a medical journalist from CBS, but I've never looked at from a financial perspective.
What were the things that were jumping out at you when you were looking at the data on the Pfizer vaccine?
Well, You know, a couple things happened last year that really made me go public in a very vocal way on Twitter.
And the number one thing was when the FDA inexplicably said that they were going to release the data in 75 years.
I immediately said, that's proof of a cover up.
That's fraud on its face.
Prima facie evidence.
We've never seen this before from the FDA hiding something for 75 years.
So as an investor, I can go out onto Twitter and say publicly, I have an investment thesis, this is fraud.
Show me the data, okay?
Then maybe I'm not right.
But, you know, since I've gone public and gotten more notoriety, I went on Steve Bannon's show, and I said it would be a lightning ride.
And lo and behold, people have been reaching out to me.
Wall Street, former insurance sell-side analyst, Brooke Jackson.
And I did a podcast with Brooke Jackson, and I talked to her for three hours, and I'm In my opinion, I'm 100% convinced it's fraud.
The data was garbage.
And for people that don't know who Brooke Jackson is, just very quickly, that story.
Yeah, Brooke Jackson was the Ventavia whistleblower who came out in November and she talked to the British Medical Journal, which is a very well-established journal.
She gave them all the receipts.
They have all the receipts.
And that story, unfortunately, kind of disappeared because the fact-checkers and the manipulators of the perception Tried to bury it, and even the BMJ was horrified that they were fact-checked.
This is a well-respected journal.
Yeah.
And it kind of faded out of the limelight for a little bit, but when she heard me use the word fraud, she said, you're the first person I've heard say that.
So she contacted me.
We talked for three hours.
And as someone who, you know, analyzes the story, there was a lot of fraud.
There was so much fraud, it actually overwhelms you when you listen to it.
But I focused in on one thing that really struck home to me, and that was that she oversaw 1,000 patients out of the 44,000 clinical trial data, okay?
And she said that the study was unblinded, and what that means is bias is introduced, and in normal, and even by Pfizer's own protocols, that data should be thrown out, okay?
It wasn't.
It was rolled up into all the data, She tried to warn the FDA about this, and within six hours of warning the FDA, she was fired six hours later.
I mean, you can't make this up.
And then she was contacted by a Pfizer attorney who turns out to have a swamp creature background, Mark Barnes.
I mean, this is like one of those horror movies where you run to the police officer to save you and you find out the police officer works for the very people you're running from.
She goes to the government, the FDA, that's supposed to be the watchdog agency, making sure proper science is being done.
I work for Octavia, which is not Pfizer, but a company hired to do these trials.
They unblinded it illegally.
This is supposed to be a double-blind study.
That means the evidence has been contaminated.
I need to let you know.
And instead of them saying, great, apparently she gets fired just six hours later.
So they obviously went back to her bosses and Pfizer probably, which is really, really a terrifying development.
Right.
And you know, some of the people who wanted to poo-poo her Story said, well, it's only a thousand patients.
It's not a big deal.
Well, first of all, I don't care.
They were wrapped up into the 44,000, but the way the math works in the, if you look at the, uh, the trial, um, that they calculated the efficacy on the actual 95% lie efficacy, which is all already been proven.
It's a lie, right?
But they said, they said in the vaccine group, there were eight people.
And by the way, it was only a 28 day study and other ridiculous thing.
So, In those 28 days, eight of the vaccine group got COVID.
164 of the placebo group got COVID.
So that's how they calculated the number.
Well, if it's an unblinded study and bias is introduced, all you have to do is take 75 of those, 1,000 in just her group alone, and move it over to the vaccine group.
That's a 50% efficacy, all 164.
Uh, it's 0% efficacy.
And, you know, look, where there's smoke, there's fire.
They covered up her site, they fired her.
If you don't think other sites were doing this, you know, I got another, you know, I'll sell you, you know, like selling ice to an Eskimo.
So do you think those things are going to as they have to release this data?
What are you expecting or what are you thinking?
We're going to see.
I mean, obviously, we have a product that didn't come anywhere near 95 percent.
Now that we have the benefit of having giving it to millions, hundreds of millions of people around the world.
So, efficacy dropping within weeks after first shot, weeks after second shot, third shot seems useless, fourth shot being used in Israel.
Do you think we're going to see evidence of this inside of that control that we haven't seen?
Absolutely, unless they redact everything.
But I think the data is going to look ridiculous, number one.
You know, because of my notoriety, a lot of smart scientists have been talking to me, and people that work for pharmaceutical companies guiding people through the FDA regulatory process.
And someone pointed out to me, there's probably a crime that's been committed by the FDA, and that's what they call BMO audits, B-I-M-O.
After a clinical trial, you're supposed to go in and actually do an audit On some random sites of the actual records, the electronic records, or that, you know, they didn't just make up the data.
Right.
This facts, they didn't even do those audits.
And that can be proven.
That's fraud on the government's part as well.
And, you know, look, the hiding of the data suggests something really went wrong.
And there's what I call institutional imperative wholesale corruption at the FDA.
That just happened over time.
Do you think this is leading to sort of hiding vaccine deaths, things like that?
I mean, and what happens if our government is involved in literally hiding what would essentially be murder if it's known and not being disclosed to people taking the product?
Well, that's part of the problem, right?
So the government's in on it.
Who's going to come save us?
And, you know, look, the evidence is overwhelming at this point.
I don't know if you saw the story out of Germany yesterday.
I mean, it was quite shocking.
You brought that to our attention as we were just reaching out to you to bring you on.
So go ahead and break it, because I think this is gigantic.
Tell us what this story is.
But bottom line is, you know, this is a global fraud.
It doesn't just reside in the U.S.
So a German health care insurance company went public yesterday and said that basically the government is underreporting the number of vaccine side effects.
Forget deaths.
They're not talking about deaths, just side effects.
They ran the numbers on a huge amount of their own people, and they came up with an underreporting factor of 10 times.
So they think there's actually 10 times more of the side effects that the government is letting people believe.
And they said, we had to release this because normally, you know, you would keep this data to yourself and just do some pricing.
But because it's so ridiculous, they said we had to release this to the public because it's the ethical thing to do.
Okay.
My understanding is it's about roughly 10 or 11 million people in their insurance program and something over 250,000.
They ran codes, right?
ICD codes looking at what types of things are the people we're paying for What are they claiming?
What are they going to the hospital for?
And they found, you know, hundreds of thousands of them were getting codes for vaccine injury.
And this is all brought, you brought this to our attention yesterday.
I'm just sort of, for the people that are just now hearing about this, that's gigantic.
And what they basically said, we're talking, if that's just in our insurance group, then our government is looking at millions of people being injured by this vaccine.
Somebody better do something about this.
These numbers are off the hook.
Look, let me put some numbers there.
They imputed, just by their own sample, that in Germany, it's two and a half to three million side effect injuries or complaints.
Germany's got 83 million people.
Germany's got 83 million people, that's 3.6% of the population.
Wow.
So, you know, that doesn't account for the people who didn't report side effects, didn't Or haven't had a side effect yet.
Right, right.
So if you do that math, that's 1 in 25 people in Germany had an adverse reaction.
1 in 25.
No drug's ever been approved on that nonsense before.
Is it possible?
I mean, when I heard this, my first thought was, these insurance companies have got to be asking themselves, and as this is coming out, I have to think, because we could probably talk about it too, but we saw the insurance companies up in Indiana reporting 40% rise in deaths between 18 to, there it is, rise in non-COVID-19 deaths.
I think it was 18 to 49 life insurers think the deferral of medical treatment during the pandemic contributed to an increase in death benefit claims not directly tied to COVID-19.
Whatever they're guessing, he said a 40% rise in deaths, which is just astronomical.
But here we're talking about in Germany, they're just saying, hey these are just injuries.
We're talking millions of them.
But is it possible that an insurance company coming forward like that could set off a wildfire?
Because I have to imagine these insurance companies say, wait, hold on a second.
We're not going to pay for an injury that a mandated product by our government did to the people that we're covering.
Why should that be our responsibility?
Is it possible that we could see insurers, you know, insurance companies suing governments for a defective product that is, you know, creating billions of dollars in costs?
The legal ramifications are just mind-boggling at this point, but the most important thing that the German insurance company did is they gave cover to other insurance companies to talk about this, because I've seen in the, you know, the first week of February, a lot of U.S.
insurance companies reported.
They didn't say it was the jabs, but they started introducing a new category called indirect COVID death, whatever that means.
And you know, the numbers are the numbers.
The numbers accelerated in the second half of 2021 with the introduction of a so-called miracle vaccine.
And we saw from a number of companies that spoke to this, an increase, a faster death rate amongst the younger people in the cohort than the older people.
Okay.
What do we know about what happened in the second half of 2021?
Mandates.
For kids and young people.
Yeah.
Well, this is 18 to 64, but let's just talk about They're all people that work.
These are group like policies that I analyzed.
So what do we know that happened?
Mandates and boosters started hitting.
It makes no sense why younger people would be dying due to deferred treatment.
These are healthy working age adults.
Here's a tweet, let me just read this out.
Summation of major insurance company, corporate groups, policy loss ratios, death claims over Q4, fourth quarter rate versus 2019 rates.
Unum is plus 36% in their death claims, plus 57% at Lincoln, plus 41%.
plus 36% in their death claims, plus 57% at Lincoln, plus 41%.
I mean, this is a science fiction movie happening right here.
These are astronomical rises in deaths that are taking place.
And you know, the one American insurance, Mr. Davison, he put some meat on the bones.
He said a 10% rise in mortality would be a three standard deviation event, which in stats world is big deal.
Yeah, he's 40% rise was a once in a 200 year flood.
And what people need to understand about the insurance industry is these actuaries, they know how to predict the death rates because they're very steady.
These death rates don't wildly fluctuate unless there's something else going on.
And there's definitely something else going on, and it's something we've never seen, and it's becoming unavoidable at this point as to what the reason is.
Obviously, I believe it's the jabs.
You know, we can talk about funeral homes, too.
They've had some interesting results.
What's going on with funeral homes?
Oh, you got this.
There's another funeral homes.
A picture is worth a thousand words from SCI 10K.
Notice the acceleration in stock returns starting in 2021.
Well, so if you look at the stock returns in 2020, they weren't that great.
These are funeral homes are on the rise.
Stocks, you know, catapulted.
So what does this say from I mean, this is just finances.
People say, well, what does that have to do with debts?
But for someone like you, what does this mean?
Well, so if you look at the stock returns in 2020, they weren't that great.
That was, you know, when, you know, everybody was dropping like flies back then.
Yeah.
OK, then we have a vaccine, a miracle vaccine.
And the stock price appreciation accelerates, as did some of the results from these companies.
And I have. - I, Carriage Services just reported today, and I'm not on the conference call because I'm with you, Dell, but I would have been.
But let me just tell you what I saw.
Revenues up 14% year over year, same-store sales up 9% year over year.
Um, you know, we saw the, um, uh, also if you go on to the next slide, we saw that basically, uh, there was an acceleration in the summer because these guys did monthly results.
And, um, we saw an acceleration into the summer, both year over year and sequentially.
Then there was a dip off in November, December, but guess what?
Results are accelerating again into December and into January.
They actually provided January data.
The numbers are plus 9% sequential growth from November and plus 15% sequential growth from December and January.
Okay.
What's going on?
The authorities are saying to us, hey, the pandemic's ending.
Well, riddle me this.
Why are funeral homes Accelerating into January.
Now, these are public funeral homes that only represent about 10% of the market.
90% of the market is private.
So we're just getting a glimpse into this.
Incredible.
To sort of sum it all up, your perspective right now as you look at this, the future of the U.S.
and then the global view of the world, In the face because in for the first time ever this isn't a vaccine that was just given in this country or selectively all around the world was a mandate for this vaccine that is I'm with you to me unless I mean I don't know did did some poison just get released from the earth or is there an alien group you know hitting us with photon rays what is going on I'm kind of like down with Occam's razor
You know, the simplest answer is usually the one that's true.
What is the one thing that changed on this planet?
A mandated experimental vaccine that now Pfizer is warning its stockholders, look out, we have some problems on the horizon as people start to see what we actually made here.
What happens?
What is your sort of worst case scenario right now that you're embracing or thinking about?
So I've shared this on Steve Bannon's show and other shows.
So here's the problem.
Unlike other frauds, where the regulators step in and, you know, are the watchdogs, the watchdogs are in on it this time.
The government's in on it.
Whether they were dupes or they are criminals, you know, we can sort that out later, but they're in on it.
So they're going to do a cover up.
And I'm calling for this thing to be pulled immediately and stopped.
We need adults in Washington to step forward.
The evidence is undeniable at this point.
Now, absent that, they're going to, you know, look, think like a criminal.
What does a criminal do that's caught?
Because they are caught.
There's enough of us that know this.
And the word spreading Wall Street is getting skittish.
They're listening to me and they're starting to get out of these stocks because they, you know, they don't want to lose money.
And also, I think a lot of people, a lot of investors on Wall Street, they took these jabs.
They thought this was the greatest thing since sliced bread.
And, you know, people are dying and the funeral homes are filling up.
What I suspect is they're going to triple down.
And you know, I find it very curious that this German insurer talks yesterday and all of a sudden, you know, we're at war in Ukraine and no one really even cares.
I know no one in this country that cares about Ukraine.
No one.
So globally, this, you know, will this cover up have been a success?
I mean, you know, I've talked to other people that say that, you know, we are pension funds.
I mean, tell me about pension funds and where pension funds are at and what that plays into this conversation.
Well, so pension funds are underfunded across the globe.
Let's just talk the globe.
This is a philosophical thing.
Because of the debt that all the countries have acquired in the form of just the debt plus the unfunded liabilities and all these pensions, Europe has a different pension system than the US, so they actually have more obligations than we do.
Social Security is de minimis compared to Europe.
This is a philosophical question and I can't prove this, but let's play the game.
Since the creation of the Federal Reserve, It's been viewed mostly by capitalism that you want to extract a unit of profit from a human.
It's always been beneficial to extract profit from a human.
Let's suppose the map is flipped and the system writ large, not a bunch of people in a room smoking a cigar, but the system sees it's more profitable to kill a human because of the unfunded liabilities.
I just throw that out there.
I think it's something we need to think about.
I can't prove any of it, but maybe the map is split.
Well, I mean, and I too, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I think we're allowed to ask the question.
We have a disease that seemed to only affect those in the pension class, as I call it.
And every drug that seemed like it could cure them or help them, either prevent it or save them in a hospital, was denied, made illegal.
And we tell them, go home, wait till your lips turn blue, bring you in, put you on remdesivir, which is a drug that can shut down your kidneys, put you on a ventilator where you have about a 9 in 10 chance of dying.
It seems to me when we look at, you know, who was really vulnerable, both from this disease and from the hospital treatment here in America and around the world, it's those over the age of about 70 with other comorbidities.
All those people that I would assume Are really big in this pension class.
And so, you know, we certainly have to ask the question is incredibly convenient that that is the generation that is being wiped out both by this virus and by our response to the virus.
You know, Are we, and when you look at Russia, are you worried at all about just total chaos and potentially a world war, a civil war here in America?
I mean, do your thoughts go to those places?
Well, my thoughts on Russia, this is Kabuki theater, I'm not worried about a nuclear war because, you know, everyone dies, okay?
I think this is a big distraction and they want to fill the headlines up with this as the bodies pile up across the country and the globe.
But what I do worry about is, as the news of this spreads, and it's spreading, more and more people are going to become super distressed, agitated and angry.
And, you know, they're going to demand from their, hopefully they demand from their politicians to act and start asking questions.
If they don't act, I'm fearful that, you know, we're going to see what happened in Canada happen here, which is people go to Washington, D.C., The protest, and then the authorities get kinetic on us rather than we're kinetic on them.
So I view chaos and insanity over the next several months.
Don't get too fearful about this.
several months, sorry.
So it's just, you know, don't get too fearful about this.
It's out of our control, but I mean, there's no one coming to rescue us except ourselves and everybody needs to get involved.
And, you know, my clarion call to Wall Street is you've been jabbed.
You own some fraudulent stocks.
Get out of them.
My goal is hopefully that, you know, red stocks and declining stocks can wake up the marginal mind.
And my goal is to save as many people as possible.
And through individual conversations and just pointing out what's going on on Wall Street, because the mainstream media is an accomplice In murder at this point, in my humble opinion.
Full stop.
I couldn't agree with you more.
Where do you find hope?
I find hope in that, um, I've been very involved in the mandate, anti-mandate movement here.
And, uh, I, uh, you know, come to realize the people I thought be standing shoulder to shoulder with me, you know, I wouldn't have anything in common with them, but, you know, this is, you know, we're fighting each other.
I'm finding people all across the globe, and it's created a great community.
And it's taught me and others that this isn't about the blue team, the red team, the vegans, the carnivores, the black, the white, the Hispanic.
We're Team Humanity.
And the group of people that are with me are as diverse as can be.
And this is a beautiful thing, because we love freedom, and we love individual liberty, and we don't like people telling us what to do with our bodies.
My hope is we're all finding each other and more and more people are waking up.
There is this great awakening to the 30-40 year war con that we've been seeing.
This Ukraine nonsense is just another example of it.
The fact that it's so not favored by the American people says to me, the hope is people are catching on more so than we would think.
Edward Dowd, thank you.
We are finding each other.
Thank you for being out there.
We were able to find you on short notice deciding to speak to our audience.
You are a busy man, rightfully so.
You're looking at this in a very clear way.
Your voice is so important.
So I want to thank you for being courageous, for being a hero, and for taking the time to join us when you could have been on a very interesting meeting online.
Thank you and best of luck.
I hope you'll stay in touch as we sort of continue to track these issues around the world.
Del, thank you for your bravery and your team's bravery.
I mean, this is, this is, um, we need you.
We need everybody to stand up.
This isn't, you know, just everybody needs to get involved in any way you can.
So I really appreciate people like you to get this message out and people are listening and I, you know, I'm, I'm into predicting things.
I'm going to make a call.
You guys are the mainstream media now.
They're done.
They're dead.
It's over.
Fantastic.
I'm with you on that.
How do people follow the work that you're doing?
You're putting out some great tweets.
Just go ahead and what's the best way to track your work?
On Twitter, for now, at Doud Edward, D-O-W-D Edward, and on Getter, at Edward Doud, D-O-W-D.
I dump all my research on there with some commentary and predictions about what I'm seeing and what's happening.
Fantastic.
Edward, have a great day.
Thank you for your time.
Take care.
You too.
▲
Export Selection