All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 7, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:21
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (6 February 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back, folks, to Truth Vs. News.
This is the 6th of February, 2022, and we're right in the middle of some hot things about vaccines and life and death issues that seem to be caused by the wrong factors.
Go for it.
Yes, we're looking at Edward Hendry's analyses here.
Additionally, according to the ONS five-year average weekly deaths by sex and age group, figures between 2015 and 19, children aged 10 to 14, recorded deaths have risen 44% above the average in weekly figures for recorded deaths have risen 44% above the average in weekly figures
The JCVI Independent Advisor to the UK government determined that the available evidence indicates individual health benefits from vaccination are small in those age 12 to 14.
The benefits granted by the shot is only marginally greater than the potentially known harms.
In fact, it's the opposite, claiming there's uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the harm.
But it's clear here that the risk of death and harm is overwhelmingly greater than any alleged benefits.
Given the uncertainty of the risk, the JCVI consider the benefits too small to support advice on a universal program of vaccination of otherwise healthy 12- to 15-year-old children.
That's trying to excuse themselves without admitting to the truth that this is devastating in its consequences and ramifications.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, this is the problem I have with the political leaders of today.
They do not reflect the accuracy of the statistical analysis in these revelations, which is their purpose for being in government, in law, in political office, is to represent, interpret, and manifest policy around the truth that ensures the domestic tranquility and creates an environment where people can Live in peace and harmony and stability.
And instead, the statistical truth about this vaccine is being ignored or intentionally perverted and twisted by Republicans and Democrats alike and these lying fools like Fauci.
Rand Paul gets up there and he says, quote, we know the vaccines work.
They do not work.
They do not stop infection or transmission or hospitalization, yet these idiot Republicans and double idiot liar Democrats get up there and they repeat this stuff.
And the statistics you're citing, Jim, are black and white factual.
Trump has the same issue.
And the thing I have a problem with is I am a leader, and leaders speak the truth.
The truth is the strongest psychological warfare weapon, because the truth obliterates everything in its path.
And Donald Trump hasn't championed the truth.
Mitch McConnell hasn't championed the truth.
Of course we know Pelosi and the evil minions can't.
But it offends me that this has been so playfully thrown about like a strategic, uh, well, we've got a plan, we've got a strategy.
How many simple-minded people who don't have the brains, who don't have education, who are followers, how many of these simple-minded people and their children have been killed because no one stood up and said, no, don't get this, Take ivermectin, take hydroxychloroquine, take your vitamin D3, take all these alternatives, but don't get this.
Nobody has stood up and said that.
So I've got a real problem because they have contributed by their silence, their act of omission, they've contributed to the deaths of these people all around the world.
And the statistics is a 52% Children in Britain having a higher chance of dying.
This is a mass suicide.
This is a mass child sacrifice.
This is a global action of evil and demonism that the words can't even describe.
And there's no political advantage or strategy to playing nice with this stuff.
Leaders, real leaders, stand up wherever they are and say this is all false, it's all a lie, and the statistics and the truth and the measurement that we've had for the last two years prove it.
Because you can look from the statistics from 2018 until now, and you see very clearly what the truckers put together in their documentation.
This is a mild flu and it has been wildly and evilly distorted and corrupted for political manipulation purposes and children and people are dead because they were lied to or the truth wasn't proclaimed to give them a light out of the darkness and instead they simply were too dumb or too ignorant or too selfish or too disinterested to go the opposite way and not get a jab.
So we've got a lot of people who have who have inadvertently been accepted this vaccine because no one was standing up in politics, in the media, aside from not even Tucker Carlson, but Tucker's the best one out there.
No one else has been saying, don't get this.
Look at the ramifications.
I won't be surprised when you have squads of people organizing to take revenge, deadly revenge, on every doctor, every lawyer, every nurse, every mayor, every politician that has contributed to the unintended suicide of their family members.
I won't be surprised when this country goes in that way because I think in the next year, We very well could see The Walking Dead 2.0 with all of these people who've gotten the disease and the shot just completely coming off apart at the wheels.
And there's no other excuse or no other explanation than this fake vaccine that is the cause of it.
Jim?
I will not be surprised either, Scott.
Don?
Real quickly, a little correction there, Scott.
You said the increase in England was 52% for kids.
No, the story says it was 50, instead of 52%, it was 52 times.
Right, right, 52 times greater risk of death.
Children, little children who don't know that are in our custody, that God's given us to protect, and that's what's so infuriating to me is these poor little children have been sacrificed by their parents and they're all going to die because of it.
The entire gene pool of this country This world, not all of them, but a huge percentage has been polluted and destroyed because of this, Jim.
Holly, your thoughts?
Right, it's better to have a millstone tied around your neck, right, Scott?
So thinking about Robert Kennedy Jr.'s book and all of his work that he's been doing with so many other people, there's a lot of people who have been on the fridges talking about a vaccine injury of children in the United States there's a lot of people who have been on the fridges talking about a vaccine injury of children in the United States and the vaccine schedules that have just become so aggressive, especially after the past
And I think a lot of people have talked about that's why they're pushing so hard to have small children be injected now so that they can add that to the vaccine schedule.
And then from there, they can have the liability.
They won't have any sort of liability if it can be added to the vaccine schedule.
They cannot go to court.
As parents, they can go fight in the separate vaccine courts to try to push, because with the ruling in 1986, they said that the vaccines are, it's an unavoidable damage, basically, is what the legal term was.
Correct.
So from there, they can make the argument, well, you know, you knew what you were getting into.
And with Reimer Folnick's lawsuits and everything, the grand jury that they've put together, they're trying to establish malice of forethought and mens rea, or a guilty mind.
And from a legal standpoint, I think it's an open and shut case.
If they look at statistics for the batch numbers, basically it's what they're arguing, the batch numbers of the vaccines globally, and then the results from certain batches and how people are dying in certain areas.
And so I think if anything, this will finally expose the centuries of the vaccine scam as a way to depopulate, to maim, to experiment on people, especially children.
This has been going on for so long, going back to early smallpox, vaccinations, inoculations, experiments, where they've been trying to create a chimera They've been trying to destroy humanity, destroy the children, injure them.
I myself, I had found out a few years ago that I was severely injured by the MMR vaccine.
I was injected three times with it.
Had basically a stroke the first and second time.
I was described as floppy.
The doctor's notes that I was floppy for a day and a half after Having my first and second dose I had my third dose at about Four years old.
So a lot of this stuff, people have tied this in with the metal poisoning.
And of course, I'm not a doctor or a scientist.
This is just what everyone's been putting together over the especially the past 30 years, as far as the autism spectrum, which they're talking about, nearly half of children are on some sort of spectrum now, hopefully, people will finally wake up to the fact that all of this has been manufactured and created as a poison.
You're 100% correct.
It's just outrageous.
Absolutely outrageous.
Meanwhile, a Hopkins study antibodies detected up to 21 months with natural immunity.
They've been trying to downplay natural immunity.
A study from Hopkins showed 99.3% of unvaxxed who were previously infected maintained antibodies for up to 21 months after testing positive.
It would be longer, I suspect, but there hasn't been more than 21 months to test.
The report, published in the Journal of the AMA, Dr. Marty Makary was on hand with Shannon Bream, noticed a common question he gets is natural immunity and circulating antibodies.
How does this compare with vaccines?
Is it equal or superior?
He replied that while vaccines are good against severe disease, antibodies are seen to diminish within a few months from the vaccine.
But with natural immunity, it's much better, more durable, and consistent with what the CDC found.
We need to be more precise in our language.
Rather than viewing the population as vaxxed or unvaxxed, Americans should be thinking in terms of the immune and the non-immune, because those who are unvaxxed would have had or are immune And therefore, even if they're unvaccinated, they should not be viewed as running risk.
The doctors felt they needed to do it on their own.
The CDC, of course, is balking when they talked about masks and mandates.
He described how many doctors do not wear masks as a matter of choice.
Smart people realize we're not going to live with masks forever, he said, even though Leanna Wynn suggested that cloth masks, little more than facial decoration, that's actually a good statement.
I would say if you choose to go, that you're vaccinated and boosted, make sure you're wearing a mask, even though it's outdoors.
There's no place for them in the light of Omicron, however.
Wear a three-ply surgical mask.
Don't wear a cloth mask.
Malarkey blasted his own Hopkins and the media for downplaying a study that showed lockdowns only reduced death by 0.2 percent.
The study was conducted by economists, and he told Tucker Hopkins itself did not even put out a press release about this study.
If you look at the media coverage, it's one of the biggest stories in the world today, yet major media outlets have not covered it.
Meanwhile, Mike Adams, the die-off is here.
Life insurance payout skyrocketed 258% as post-vaccine deaths rapidly accelerate.
A little-known Reuters story that garnered almost no attention, Dutch insurer Aegon revealed its third quarter had skyrocketed 258%.
Now contrast that with the earlier study Edward Henry was talking about 40%.
Here they're talking about 258%.
The difference is found in the COVID vaccines.
In 2020, they weren't available.
The payouts only reached $31 million.
After three quarters of vaccination, the death payout hit $111 million, an increase of 258%.
Insurance companies are gradually realizing the truth about the vaccines, even as a complicit murderous mainstream tries to cover it up.
The death signals now emerging in the finances of insurance companies can't be swept under the rug.
Given the 258 increase was recorded for Quarter 3, it begs the obvious question, how much worse will it be for Quarter 4 or for the first quarter of the new year?
On any normal pre-COVID day, about 7,700 people die.
If those deaths rose by 100%, that means an extra 7,700 people are dying.
Multiply that over a year, that's an additional 2.8 million deaths.
That's for merely 100%!
258% increase.
That means an extra 15,000 people are dying every day in America.
That's a vaccine holocaust being played out in real time.
Truth be told, we're probably at that point right now.
The data sets just haven't caught up with the reality of what's happening.
Cancer death rates have almost certainly doubled in 2021 as a consequence of the Destruction of the antibodies caused by the vax, headed for even higher numbers in 2022.
The cancer industry, dominated by pharma-industries, will bury the numbers as long as possible to avoid anyone asking questions of why so many are dying from cancer all of a sudden.
The vaccine holocaust is real and accelerating.
So not only do we have the actual vaccine holocaust, but the holocaust cover-up being run by the complicit murderous parties.
They're all in on it.
Big pharma, big tech, big media, big government.
They're all mass murderers, and they're all working to cover it up as long as possible so they can coerce even more people to commit vaccine suicide before the body count becomes undeniable.
That's the level of evil we're dealing with in society right now, and it's all being run under the banner of science.
Under this dangerous death call, the whole world is supposed to pretend that the vaccines are halting infectious transmission and hospitalization, looking the other way while so many who are vaxxed die prematurely.
Israel, at a 96.2 vax rate, is now the leading in COVID cases per capita.
This proves the vaccine has the opposite effect we were promised in the name of science.
That's because, of course, the vaccine is the pandemic.
COVID would be over now if not for the vaccines continuing to inject people with spike protein bioweapons that cause organ failure and death.
It's no coincidence vaccine injury symptoms are then categorized as COVID by the corrupt, murderous medical establishment that received financial kickbacks from the government for killing people with ventilators and remains severe.
The Hershey Company, meanwhile, is firing unvaccinated employees, confirming it's an evil company.
I really thought I'd be okay, said Kim Durham, a payment analyst and sourcing buyer.
I thought, you cannot question my faith.
No one could question that.
He had a religious exemption.
Assume she would get it.
I thought this was behind me until September when I met with an HR representative.
It was an interrogation on his religious beliefs.
They twist what words in your mouth.
I was asked personal questions that had nothing to do with religion.
Mm-hmm.
The shock when she received word her request for religious accommodation had been denied.
Everyone interviewed mentioned similar problems.
Have you ever been fast?
Your children fast?
You protect yourself when you leave home?
How often do you go to church?
You take Tylenol, Buprofet, Tums, or Midol.
So the Hershey Company, which sells low-grade processed sugar-filled candy bars that promote diabetes and obesity, - He was interrogating employees over whether they take Tom's And if they take Tums, they're not allowed to object to spike protein mRNA objections.
Something tells me the Hershey Company is now run by God-hating demons.
It's awful what's going on here.
Scott, your thoughts?
We have a lot of background noise all of a sudden.
Yeah, I think, you know, this is again awakening and dividing humanity and specifically the citizens of the United States.
You are either on the side of good health, freedom, no vaccines, no mandates, no masks.
Or you are on the side of vaccines, masks, and the tyranny of an authoritarian state.
And I don't want anything to do with someone who believes that.
I see them as an enemy.
And an enemy is treated with a lethal distancing.
And that's where we need to go, is really re-tribalize, reorganize, disconnect ourselves from all systems and institutions of this country and this government and these fools who are believing this nonsense.
We have to create our own schools, our own Supermarkets, our own military, our own militia, our own entire way of life.
Because what previously we erected in the United States over the last hundred years has become so saturated with evil and stupidity that there's no hope.
You have to amputate that limb.
And build a new boat and go in and don't let anyone follow you.
Don't let anyone come into your boat who doesn't believe and is ready to preserve and protect your absolute individual liberty.
Because only when the absolute individual liberty is preserved and protected can the collective identity and liberty be maintained.
So the left has lost itself in collectivism.
We're at that Anne Ryan moment We're the most prosperous, the most independent, successful people are divorcing themselves from society and moving somewhere.
Some to Florida, some to other places.
But we're at that Ayn Rand moment where society is metastasizing and you're seeing the sickly, the stupid, the perverted, the vaccinated, the ignorant, all withering in their own madness.
And those of us who are choosing a separate path are going in a different way.
And it is traumatic.
It is painful.
It is suffering.
But you know what?
Get past the pain.
Get past the trauma.
And focus on the future.
And focus on preserving your life and your health.
And shutting out all of the guilt trip, mind control propaganda that the left and their media are trying to infect you with.
Jim?
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, just... Sorry, you're gonna have to skip me.
It's fine.
We want her commentary too, Holly.
Well, the voice of children speaks volumes, doesn't it, Jim?
It does indeed.
Go ahead.
Okay, we'll take to the very next story.
Okay.
Changes in crime and killing of police after constitutional carry adopted.
Believe it or not, now, according to the left, if you have more people with guns, you have more murder and you have more crime.
That's their theory.
Unfortunately, it contradicts the facts.
With Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Indiana, Nebraska, Ohio, and other states seriously considered adopting constitutional carry, Professor Carl Moody, our research director, has done empirical work on the change in crime rate and police killing after constitutional carry laws have been adopted.
Notice where you have constitutional carry.
I wish it were true right here in Wisconsin.
I do have.
My own concealed carry permit.
This means, I think, that you don't even have to have a permit to carry.
And look at all the green states.
And then you have a right to carry in the blue states.
And just a couple where they may issue.
California, of course.
New York, of course.
New Jersey, of course.
Delaware and Maryland.
And Massachusetts.
Surprise, surprise.
Changes in crime and killing of police after constitutional carry.
Information provided by Professor Moody, College of William & Mary, and Research Director for the Crime Convention Research Center, analyzing the 13 states that enacted constitutional carry, for which we have murder rate data of 2018.
So we have at least three years of data.
Arkansas, Arizona, Alaska, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Missouri, Maine, New Hampshire, North Dakota, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
Vermont also has constitutional carry, but have had it continuously from the time they became a state.
So there's no comparison crime data available.
The drop in murder is statistically significant, but the change in violent crime is not.
Murder before 4.49 after 4.31.
after 4.31.
Violet crime, 331.5 after 318.2.
Effect on officers killed, same states as before for murder and violent crime, no statistically significant change.
Mean before, 213 per thousand, mean after 2.07 per thousand.
Firearm homicide, same states as shown No statistically significant change.
Mean before 2.56.
Mean after 3.45.
Bear in mind, when you compare the murder distribution rate with the electoral college rate, it's very clear the areas with the highest gun violence and murder rates are all controlled by the Democrats.
Take a look at the map.
The statistics are overwhelming.
And of course, When you look at Chicago as an exemplar, Chicago has the most stringent gun control laws and the highest murder rate in the nation.
Clearly, the Democrats' anti-gun agenda is not working and has been further compromised by their defunding the police, which has led to skyrocketing crime rates in all the cities that have followed it.
Scott.
Well, Jim, let's reflect upon the Second Amendment.
It says, as we've read, a well-regulated militia.
That means a group of individuals with their own guns.
Back in 1776, as it is now, the same exact logic and description applies then as it does now.
A well-regulated militia consists of, is made of, individuals Who come and gather and join and unite with their own weapons, or they can be provided, but their weapons come with them and they form and they gather into a team.
So it's not individuals, it's a team.
It's a militia.
It's a unit.
A well-regulated militia, meaning well-trained.
They know how to shoot.
They know how to reload.
They know how to aim and maneuver.
That is necessary for a free state.
The right of the people, the right of the persons, aggregate, each individual person, the right of each individual person, the right of the people as a whole, to keep and bear arms, to keep on their person, to keep in their car, to keep in their home,
And bear and carry and hold on their person to defend their rights and freedom and defend others shall not be infringed, not licensed, not permitted, not allowed.
It shall not be stopped or interfered with on any way, shape or form.
That is what the Constitution says.
And any interpretation, misinterpretation otherwise, like Biden has tried to say, only certain people could have Well, if you've been stopped and you've been charged with something, you can no longer have it.
No, that's all a lie.
Your constitutional rights are fully restored to you, every single one, when you are released from prison, so to speak.
Or unless you've never been in prison, your rights are unalienable.
They cannot be taken away, licensed, or permitted.
So the right to keep and bear arms is an unalienable right that God gives you to defend your life, and defend your freedom, and defend your safety and your happiness.
So that's the eternal law and the rule.
The other thing is, The Declaration of Independence states very specifically, when a government becomes destructive of our liberties, when it adopts tyranny and despotism and evinces the attempt to subjugate people under that despotism, it is the right and the duty of people to overthrow such government.
Not asked, not file an application, not go for a parade, a permit, but to overthrow as Christ overthrew the money changers in the in the temple.
So we're at that point that people have to remember and recognize and affirm the right to keep and bear arms is given to you by God to defend your life, who he gave you, Your right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness means you have a right to live without masks and impediments and vaccines.
So your Second Amendment guarantees your right not to be violated with a vaccine mandate and stick something in your arm.
And government, when it becomes destructive of your life and liberty, that's when you overthrow it.
And I think we're on that verge.
That's what's happening in Canada.
They are overthrowing a tyrannical government.
That doesn't mean they're going to the law of the jungle.
That doesn't mean the whole thing is anarchy.
It means they are overthrowing these bad leaders, these bad school districts, and they are going to be reinserting and reinstituting authorities that are going to defend their safety and happiness.
Jim?
I think they're not trying to overthrow the government, Scott.
I think this is a redress agreement.
They're petitioning the government to undertake reforms rather than revolution.
They're not trying to get rid of the parliamentary system in Canada.
They would be happy for a change in PM, which would be an appropriate response.
But I think we want to preserve that distinction between reform and pressing for reform through democratic procedures and revolution.
But it's important to recognize that this is coming to the next step.
You've described very accurately the first step, which is the petitioning of the government for the redress of grievances with the hope that the government is going to address the grievances and actually heal them or compromise.
If the government is totally shutting it down and not wanting to hear it and trying to imprison people, then there is no redress of grievances.
At that point, they have to overthrow it because it's become tyrannical.
And that's where we're going.
No one wants to go that way.
We shall see.
We shall see how it plays out, Scott.
Maybe we'll have some inkling as early as next week.
Meanwhile, Russia slams the U.S.
false flag claim.
The allegations are reminiscent of fake claims in 2003 that Iraq had biological weapons.
Moscow's Washington embassy says, I like how they're being aggressive and going after the bullshit coming from the American government.
America's accusation Moscow is playing a stage of false flag in Ukraine is reminiscent of U.S.
bogus claims Iraq was in position of weapons of mass destruction, the Russian embassy in Washington said on Friday.
Exactly right.
The Pentagon claimed that the U.S.
had received information Moscow is playing a fake attack on Ukraine military or intelligence forces as a pretext for invasion.
As part of this fake attack, we believe Russia would produce a very graphic propaganda video, including corpses and actors depicting mourners and images of destroyed locations.
I believe any video Russia produced would be very graphic, would include corpses, but it would because American elements there—Private Army, Blackwater—is already there to bring this about.
So it's a propaganda operation here, And the American government, of course, is fostering it on the public.
According to Russian diplomats, the accusation is a complete lie and a fabrication on the same level as America's claim before it invaded Iraq.
This is typical of the United States.
The international community remembers the forgeries the U.S.
used for military interventions around the world, including the well-known vial of Colin Powell.
The diplomatic mission was referring to the now-infamous speech by former Secretary of State at the U.N.
Security Council when he took a test tube of white powder from his poffet in an effort to convince the world that Saddam Hussein was in possession of biological weapons.
Two days later, the invasion showed the claims were false.
He expressed regret for his presentation, calling a blot on his record, which it was.
America's latest accusation following claims made in January.
Russia sent a group of operators trained in urban warfare to attack Russia's own proxy forces in eastern Ukraine.
What's happened here?
America has sent a group of operatives trained in urban warfare That's what's going on.
Meanwhile, China is joining Russia in opposing NATO expansion.
Moscow and Beijing issued a statement showcasing their agreement on a raft of issues during a visit by Putin to the Winter Olympics.
He claimed Western powers are using NATO to undermine Russia.
No doubt about it.
Comes as tensions over Ukraine, where he denies plans to invade.
100,000 Russian troops are at the border.
That's in case something should happen there that would warrant their intervention if, in fact, the Russian sympathetic elements in the eastern Ukraine were to be attacked, which I predict is going to happen.
While lengthy joint statements did not revert directly to Ukraine, they both accused NATO of espousing a Cold War ideology, no doubt about it.
They said they were seriously concerned about a security pact between the U.S., U.K., and Australia.
Which we'll see.
Australia built nuclear-powered submarines now.
Russia said it supported Beijing's one-China policy, asserting that self-ruled Taiwan is a breakaway province that will eventually be a part of China again.
No doubt.
No doubt.
Putin is a guest star in Beijing for the start of the Winter Games.
Of more significance is the increased cooperation and shared view that President Xi and Putin are keen to show.
Amid a growing war of words, the U.S.
accused Russia of planning to stage the fake attack.
Russia denied, and the U.S.
did not provide evidence to support it.
So, it's time, many believe, for the U.S.
to leave NATO and for Europe to resolve its internal conflicts.
Since 1916, when the U.S.
entered the First World War, Eurocentrism, or focus on Europe, has dominated U.S.
foreign policy.
Through NATO, America has been the military defender of Western Europe for 73 years.
Now is the moment to dissolve NATO, which was really created as a response to the expansionist tendencies of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which, however, dissolved in 1991, and remind Europe's countries, especially Germany, they're on their own.
After the Soviet Union fell, the UN began breaking military ties with Europe.
When the anti-democratic European Union of 27 nations was formed in 1993, the divorce should have advanced.
Europe has shown more than capable of self-defense since that union.
Main achievement to clear the ground for Germany to reclaim its leading position, German economic strength has trapped poorer southern European countries in debt.
Germany has shut down its nuclear power facilities, is retiring its coal plants, failing terribly at relying on renewable energy sources like wind and solar.
They're relying on imports which come from Russia, especially gas through Nord Stream 2.
Therefore, if the European Union remains, Germany and Russia will have complete control of the European continent, completing a centuries-old objective for both.
The alliance is unbalanced in terms of money and the U.S.
responsibility to intervene in practically all internal and external problems involving Europe.
Germany has turned its back on Ukraine, insisting on a slavishly pro-Russian policy.
For years, Germany benefited from NATO's defense and security.
The U.S.
should tell Germany and the rest of Europe, we're done with NATO and being dragged into your internal conflicts.
Find a solution.
A moment has arrived to concentrate on the domestic front and the global hegemony that communist China seeks.
This country lacks the riches and resources that defend Europe against itself, tackle economic and societal problems, and challenge China.
The withdrawal from NATO will compel Europe to address Europeans' longstanding sustainability and Russia's goals.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, The NATO and European countries should have declared on the day of 9-11 that all European alliances and connections and a relationship with the United States is cut off and ended and stopped.
Because the United States has obviously committed a false flag act of political self-attack in order to justify this Juggernaut of military activism around the world to take out seven countries in five years.
Every NATO and European country should have at that moment after September 12th or September 30th, you know, when they figured it out, but it shouldn't have been long, they should have instantly said we're having nothing to do with the United States because they have destroyed their own country as the Russians knew and they sent over that September 11th World Trade Center
statue or monolith, which I'm sure Donald put up, that image of the Twin Towers having an explosion inside the core of the building was reflective of the nuclear explosion that went inside the core of the building.
That's why the U.S.
took that war memorial, that memorial of September 11th, and put it far out so no one could see it, because it reflected the accurate physical truth of the explosion inside the building.
So September 11th has launched this juggernaut and from 2001 until now, what do we have?
What has the United States done for Europe?
Well, it's destroyed all of the countries of Afghanistan and Iraq and Libya and Syria.
It's allowed Pakistan and all these Africans to come flooding across the Mediterranean Sea up into Germany and France and Scandinavia and Britain and rape and pillage and desecrate these cultures.
That's what the United States has done with the unleashing of these terroristic wars.
And Merkel and Cameron Sarkozy and all these clowns have allowed it.
The George Soros-Kalergi plan has allowed it.
But it certainly wasn't Russia that did this to Europe.
It certainly wasn't the former Soviet bloc countries that allowed this to happen.
It was France.
It was Germany.
It was Britain.
It was the United States.
It was Canada.
It was Australia.
So the reality is Russia is a better friend to Europe than the United States, Canada, Australia, and Britain could ever be.
We've inflicted trauma and death upon Europe unlike anything else.
So I think for that reason, common sense is going to rise up.
The European nations are going to say, you know what, we're done with NATO.
The Soviet Cold War does not exist.
Any longer.
This whole alliance has no purpose.
Russia is more of a defender of our values than the United States.
Isn't it Russia that has marriage between a man and a woman and mother and father is a preeminent core social value that the Russian policies are going to always protect?
How come no European country leader says that?
How come the United States doesn't say that?
How come Donald Trump hasn't said that?
In fact, Donald Trump did the opposite by having the gay rainbow flags appear below the embassies.
Those are not Christian values.
Those are not European values.
Those aren't Russian values.
They're not my values.
But yet we're witnessing the West disintegrate in madness and stupidity and schizophrenia with transgenderism and everything else.
All of this is balancing the opinions and the affections of Europeans and any sane-minded people towards Russia.
Because it is preserving culture, not destroying it.
We've destroyed it.
And this whole false flag game of Ukraine is going to blow back against the United States.
It's another gulf of Tonkin.
The British are involved with troops that are there.
They're hoping that they're gonna uh trigger a false flag and then say the Russians did it so now we have to have a no-fly zone and then with the no-fly zone we'll put in missiles and then we'll incrementally move against Russia and encircle and chop it up and eat it a bite at a time like we're eating an elephant.
Where it's actually going to result in the reverse.
Russia's not going to attack Ukraine, but the entire domino schematic of NATO and the European Union alliances is already coming apart with nations like Croatia and Hungary saying, no, no, no, no, no.
We are not in this.
And what that really means is we're on the side of Russia and not the warmongering West.
So I think what they intended is now going to be totally reversed and the opposite is going to come true.
And that's why it's very dangerous because you could have massive false flags in the United States for the Democrats to impose martial law and keep their political power.
They will not go quietly into the night, Jim.
Holly, your thoughts?
Let's turn to our next story, which has to do with the price of ammonia needed for synthetic fertilizer is skyrocketing so that we're on the verge of a global famine, unlike anything we've ever seen in modern history.
Let me say, this rounds out the threefold technique to depopulate the world, the mass killing us slowly, the vaccines faster, but ultimately starvation.
Global fertilizer prices have tripled.
This is going to have a catastrophic impact on food production all over the world.
The experts have warned us in advance.
I want to say loud and clear, we risk a very low crop in the next harvest.
I'm afraid we're going to have a food crisis.
In Europe, the natural gas benchmark hit an all-time high in September.
A major producer of ammonia, a key ingredient which increases crop yield, has skyrocketed.
Last summer, a ton of ammonia was $110.
Now it's $1,000.
It's just incredible.
With the prices tripling, many farmers are considering whether to forego even purchasing fertilizer.
It turns out that we're going to see a scenario where yields are depressed.
I mean, either the government will have to readjust their budgets and import food, or there will be food shortages, no doubt.
Food scarcity is already reaching desperate levels in many regions.
On Wednesday, the World Food Program's Madagascar program manager appeared to describe the severity of the country's down and resiling famine.
Not only that, but a major casualty should Russia and Ukraine go to war.
would be even higher food prices.
Ukraine and Russia are heavyweights in global wheat, corn, and sunflower oil trade, leaving buyers from Asia, Africa, and the Middle East vulnerable to more expensive bread and meat if supplies are disrupted.
That would add to food commodity costs already the highest in the decade.
I believe that the Rothschild banking empire wants a war between Russia and Ukraine to wipe out the global wheat, corn, and sunflower oil trade to promote the global starvation that will bring about the greatest number of deaths.
Sadly, most people don't even realize this is happening.
The mainstream isn't actually addressing it.
Eventually, everyone will talk about it because it's going to be a really big deal.
Unfortunately, the vast majority is going to be absolutely blindsided by what is happening when starvation breaks out on an enormous worldwide scale.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, from a human terrain mapping point of view, the mental breakdown that is being facilitated and accelerated by the vaccine, by the fog that's going to continue to this, by a combination of The loss of, you know, things and freedom.
We're really witnessing a subhuman, you know, lobotomy on the world's population.
A lot of them.
Present company excluded.
But they're going to go into frantic, hysterical mode.
Wild, crazy, barbaric mode.
That's what the New World Order, the Soros types, the fascist, authoritarian, masonic types want.
They want this walking dead chaos so they could institute their order, right?
And they're saying these words now too, the new rules order.
So their agenda is to subjugate all of society using this chaos, and I think it's actually going to have the opposite effect, Jim.
It doesn't take a lot of people to overthrow governments and overthrow bad, bad governments and bad cultures.
It takes a small group of leaders who the rest of the people will follow because they have the truth on their side.
They're vital.
They're courageous.
They're aggressive.
And they're attacking the problems.
They're not putting up with it.
They're not tolerating it.
They're not having peace deals with it.
They're attacking the problems.
That's what's happening when women go into the PTA meetings.
They're attacking critical race theory.
They're not asking.
They're not, please, please do this or we're begging you.
No, they're attacking.
They're going in saying, you better stop this or else we're coming after all of you.
We're prosecuting all of you.
And some of it get a little bit more animated.
So that's what we're witnessing is the rise up of conservative independent leaders and freedom people who are attacking the left.
They're attacking Justin Trudeau by going to Ottawa.
They're not pleading with him to meet with them.
That time is over.
That time is past.
He has refused to meet and talk with people.
Biden has refused to meet and talk with people.
Now you've got the people of this country and elsewhere, and Australia too, rising up and attacking These people, these police, these government fake politicians that have been trying to exert authoritarian control over the populations using a fear pandemic of a mild flu to issue in inoculations that will lead to deterioration of health, death, mental fog,
And conveniently, the disintegration and evaporation of certain social security bills and pensions.
So there is a financial issue behind this.
There is an insurance revelation behind this.
But people are rising up against it, and they need to rise up and continue to get more aggressive.
Well, we'll see, Scott.
I hate to think you're overly optimistic.
How many times- Could I jump in for a sec, Jim?
Sorry, I haven't- Oh, absolutely, Holly.
I thought you were unavailable.
Yeah, go for it.
Sorry for missing out a couple times.
Well, I think it was Joe Olson who was talking about the four horsemen of the apocalypse the other day on one of your shows.
Yes.
War, death, famine, and pestilence.
Got me really thinking about all the different operations in which we are under right now, whether you're talking about the supply chain, the targeted food, where you're talking about fertilizer plants, etc.
Going after Bill Gates, buying up millions of acres right now and leaving it fallow.
So I think people need to wake up to the larger agenda that we're seeing.
And it's really just trying to wake up the populace at this point.
Yeah, good.
Excellent.
Excellent comments.
Now, I like that Russia is speaking out.
Here's another piece from Russia Today.
How many times has the U.S.
said, just trust us, and then lied?
In a single day, two members of the American press asked for clarification and evidence from the Biden administration were painted as sympathizers of Russia and of ISIS.
Efforts by the media to establish objective truth, rather than act as stenographers for the government, is now apparently considered an act of disloyalty to the country.
The first instance occurred a gaggle in which the White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, addressed a U.S.-led liquidation of the latest ISIS leader in Ibdeb province.
According to President Biden's televised retelling, the target blew himself up and took some family members and others out with him just as American troops were moving in to kill.
But Why would he do that?
Because he's a coward, Biden suggested.
But these people aren't cowards.
The whole story is absurd.
I know the U.S.
had put out a statement that ISIS detonated the bomb themselves, but will the U.S.
present any evidence?
There are people who are skeptical of the events that took place and what happened, according to, you know, asked an NPR correspondent.
Good for him.
Skeptical of the U.S.
military's assessment when they went and took out the leader of ISIS, Ms.
Psaki replied, that they're not providing accurate information, that ISIS is providing accurate information.
No, she's just trying to conduct an ad hominem here.
I think the whole story is ridiculous.
It's far more likely they used a cruise missile or the equivalent.
These members, these ISIS people, aren't going to kill their own families just because Americans are attacking them.
Not only have we peddled narratives portraying Western private contract founder White Helmet activists as do-good humanitarians and objective witnesses rather than a convenient propaganda front, but the New York Times just last November published a headline, how the U.S.
hit an airstrike that killed dozens of civilians in Syria, where an F-15E fighter dropped a 500-pound bomb Right before another aircraft dropped two more 2,000-pound bombs, only after a time investigation that they admitted they killed up to 80 people, including civilians, arguing the women and children may have been combatants.
How absurd!
The Syrian conflict was also the back prop to the U.S.
murder of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani at Baghdad airport, after which the Trump administration publicly claimed self-defense.
U.S.
intel claiming Soleimani was planning an imminent attack on American interests, but A White House memo itself later debunked it.
The same day Psaki was fending off those who were buying the latest movie scenario peddled by Washington, State Department spokesman Ned Price accused a veteran journalist of favoring Russia over America when he dared to ask for evidence of Price's assertion Russia was setting up a false flag event to justify a Ukrainian invasion.
Price accused Russia during a press brief of developing a fake pretext to initiate and potentially justify military aggression against Ukraine.
Veteran journalist Matt Lee of the AP asked for proof, some evidence to accompany the assertions.
Price replied, if you doubt the credibility of the U.S.
government or the British government or other governments who want to find solace in information the Russians are putting out, that is for you to do another smear.
So here you have a longstanding respected member of the American press promptly smeared because he dared to show skepticism over what could become a NATO and U.S.
pretext for war rather than Russia.
False flag rhetoric suggesting some kind of potential future threat to a NATO ally has been used by the military to justify moving weapons ever closer to the Russian border.
This is effectively setting up a narrative whereby anything that occurs now on the Ukraine-Russia border could be pinned on Russia and justify NATO aggression regardless of who might be responsible for the act.
Well said.
How many times has the U.S.
already created false-like pretexts to justify wars and invasions?
There's been the imminent threat of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the imminent threat with the Gulf of Tonkin, followed by the spectacle of a defeatist exit from the embassy in Saigon after telling the public America was winning the war.
The imminent threat of the Marxist Sandinistas in Nicaragua that justified secret weapons sales to Iran to fund the Contras, all the while lying about it.
Then the imminent threat of an armed Iran.
Then the imminent threat of the Taliban in Afghanistan, resulting in the White House declaring their defeat post-invasion, followed years later by an abrupt U.S.
military exit with the Taliban retaking total control.
Fear has always allowed the U.S.
government to mobilize public support, whether of communism, terrorism, or even a virus.
Fear has given them far too often a carte blanche to take action that are of questionable value to the average person, whose interests are routinely sacrificed for those of an elite few.
They no longer deserve the benefit of the doubt on anything that comes out of their mouths, and standing up for the American people's best interests isn't an action.
It's a very definition of patriotism.
Meanwhile, JFK assassination expert Lee claims Lee Harvey Oswald's lone gunman theory is bullshit, but of course we've known this.
This is Cyril Weck.
So I wrote him and asked for an evaluation of the current status of JFK Research.
Cyril, we all agree the single bullet theory is bullshit, but we've known that for over 50 years.
So that is not news.
What I and others here no doubt would appreciate is your personal assessment of the current state of JFK Research, I and others.
We're acutely disappointed by Oliver Stone's JFK Revisited, which you, David, Doug, and others were featured.
Even when it featured experts like yourselves, it did not address their more important work on the fabrication of the x-rays, the revision of the Zapruder film, Physical alteration of JFK's cranium by Humes and Larry's extraordinary work, complimenting that of Ralph, that Lee was in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository when JFK's motorcade passed by.
I cannot imagine how a new film by Oliver Stone would leave out discoveries of such extraordinary importance.
I suppose it was the result of relying upon DiEugenio as a scriptwriter, a blunder in my opinion of mind-numbing proportions.
I assume you know of these developments and I'm interested in knowing whether you recommended their inclusion to Oliver, my own.
JFK Special 18 November 2021, which I dedicated to Oliver Stone, presents some of the new evidence that, in my and others' view, ought to have been included.
Nothing in this 2021 film was not already known by 1980, when Lifton's book first appeared.
So what's the explanation for these omissions?
Thanks, D.M.P.S.
I'm also copying Oliver on this message and invited his response as well.
Here you can find it, the real deal.
November 18, 2021, JFK Special, dedicated to Oliver Stone, whose new film will be released on 22 November 2021.
His JFK was a masterpiece with three flaws.
He did not know Oswald was in the doorway of the book depository at the time the JFK motorcade passed by, or that it was a pruder film that had been massively edited, no doubt because he was relying upon advice from Robert Groton, Who has played the JFK community virtually from the beginning.
And he paused at three hit teams, where there turned out to have been eight assassins.
My worry is that this sequel, which I've been told was screenwritten by one Jim DiEugenio, may suffer from similar defects.
We shall see.
Meanwhile, if we have any time, Scott, your comments are welcome.
Well, I would just say that the Gulf of Tonkin and that era is very important today because my guess is they are going to shoot down some American planes or an American ship, multiple ones, and claim it was done by the Russians to try and trigger a justification for American troops moving into Ukraine and distract America from the Civil War.
They're going to inflict a self-inflicted false flag, shoot down American planes or do something and try and blame it on Russia, which is a complete lie.
But that's the British commandos and the British government's role and Blackwater's role.
And they are trying to just, you know, lie blatantly to the American people.
That journalist called it out and said, where's the proof?
And the guy, Ned Price said, I just gave you the proof of my testimony, which is a flat out lie.
But this is something to beware and not tolerate for an instant.
Jim?
Yeah, I think you got it right, Scott.
And we want to thank Holly for being able to join us as much as she could today.
She has the travails of being the equivalent of a single mother with a child and all kinds of business responsibilities.
We love it when she's here and we appreciate the conflicts, the challenge she faces.
Don, take us out.
Anything else you want to add, Scott?
Or Jim, what's your take-home message today?
We have another minute.
Anything else you want to add, Scott?
Well, I just think everyone needs to support the truckers.
They should call GoFundMe on Monday morning and yell and scream at them for fraud and violating the rights of Americans.
That has an impact.
Yell and scream at GoFundMe.
Their corporate headquarters is in Redwood City, California.
And complain and send them emails and phone calls.
And also do the same to the American Republicans and the Democrats that are trying to stir up this war against Russia in Ukraine.
Call these liars and call them what it is.
They have to create fear and say there's a monster on the other side of the fence, so you better keep me in positions of power so I can keep that monster at bay.
It's all a lie.
They themselves are the monster.
The pulling the strings of a fake puppet on the other side of the fence.
So that's why they use fear is to distract people and keep their jobs.
But if the American people rose up and went on the attack against these politicians and said, no, you're liars and frauds and Lindsey Graham and McCall and all of these Republicans, you're dead men walking.
That's not what the Republican Party is.
And it will never be so long as free Americans are.
They need to overthrow these warmongers and call them out for what they are.
And, you know, it's It's ironic that they don't have the same allegiance to preserving our borders against a foreign invasion, and Tucker's the only one who's been saying that, so people really need to get aggressive and go on the full attack.
Okay, and Jim, thank you so much for this wonderful show.
It's hot when everybody should see this.
This show, I think, is vital to our survival.
You're not going to get this anywhere else.
And I really do appreciate you all coming on Truth vs. News here on the 6th of February, 2022.
My goodness.
Just get out there and show it to everybody.
This is a wonderful show.
▲
Export Selection