All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 10, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:12:40
Need to Know News (8 December 2021) with Giuseppe Vafanculo
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, delighted to be joined today by Giuseppe Pafangulo from the District of Criminals.
David Scorpio seems to be thriving and surviving at an undisclosed location.
Meanwhile, CNN's Tapper, and this is highly unusual, rips Hollywood, the NBA, and Nike over their lust for Chinese money.
There's no amount that can buy enough soap to wash that blood off their hands, he declares.
Highly unusual, considering CNN is really a spokesman for the far left.
He's taken on Hollywood, the NBA, More for what he said was turning a blind eye to human rights atrocities in China, and instead taking the communist country's money hand over fist at each and every opportunity.
During Sunday's conclusion for State of the Union, he lauded the Women's Tennis Association for staying up for morality and speaking out against brutality, where this famous tennis player has simply disappeared.
After Peng Shui accused former Vice Premier Zhang Gui of sexual assault, she disappeared.
Not only is the International Olympic Committee not raising its voice in solidarity and protest, the IOC is helping the Chinese government by providing cover.
Yes, the Olympics are supposed to be free and apart from politics, but this is not about politics.
The allegations against the Chinese government go far beyond its treatment of Shuai.
He also pointed the finger at Hollywood and Disney over its recent decision to film live-action Mulan in Xinjiang, when more than a million Ugandan Muslims have been placed in internment camps.
The millionaires and billionaires of Hollywood, the NBA, the IOC, and Wall Street are so eager for Chinese cash, they're pretending none of this is happening.
Of course, Apple and Nike publicly claim to decry slave labor, but to be clear, what we're seeing from U.S.
corporations is not about a company surviving, it's about discontent with just hundreds of millions of dollars desiring instead billions.
No amount of money can buy enough soap to wash that blood off their hands.
Highly unusual, I think, but commendable score.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
I think Jake Tapper, like every of the globalist mouthpieces at CNN, is full of hubris and the height of hypocrisy.
So he may or may not be—I haven't researched it—be one of the countless dual-citizen traitors that are mouthpieces for Israel and the Rothschilds at CNN.
And he has the audacity to call out China when he is licking the rectum of the most violent, psychopathic, bloodthirsty country on the face of the earth, which is Israel.
The number one illegal organ trafficking entity in the nation.
They are part of the sex trade, global underage sex trade.
They've murdered millions of Middle Eastern Muslims and Christians.
And they've got the United States, which has murdered probably hundreds of millions
of innocents in the last century in service to the Rothschilds and the one world government
globalist agenda.
And even in the last 20 years, the greater Israeli project easily responsible
in the last 20 years for the murder of somewhere between 15 and 20 million innocents worldwide.
And he has the arrogance, the hubris to call out China and call out these corporations when he's a lapdog
for even more despicable human rights abusers, which is Israel in the United States.
We make an overwhelming case just that.
I'm just kind of tickled to see a little bit of light coming from an otherwise dark black hole known as... Well, it's misdirection, Jim.
It's don't look at the real villains.
Look at, oh, China's the new boogeyman.
Look at this hand.
Look at China.
Look at Russia.
Don't look at this hand, which is murdering way more people and far more villainous.
Giuseppe, I gotta admit, you have made your case.
Meanwhile, the National Center for Public Policy Research has stated, after a young Asian girl was savagely beaten in Philadelphia, the situation was made worse when a liberal city council member tried to explain away what prosecutors called ethnic intimidation.
Appearing on the Ingram angle, Project 21 co-chair Horace Cooper said he was outraged, both by the video and the response of the elected officials, warned of the societal cost of not responding appropriately.
Four black teenage girls have been charged with aggravated assault, ethnic intimidation, criminal conspiracy, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person in a disorderly conduct with one of theft, Related to the November attack on a group of Asian girls on a SEPTA train.
Caught on videos, the attackers are seen ganging up on one girl in particular.
As the city tries to process the racial violence, that large city council member, Helen Gim, made a curious comment, seeming to make excuses.
They are trying to articulate out what they need to see done better by institution, Jim claimed, to address racial bias intimidation.
Ingram noted, the left has gotten so radical they're now essentially justifying racial violence.
She's got it right.
Horace replied, yes, it's true.
I should have expected to see this kind of bad behavior, but unbelievably how elected officials could say that we're going to explain away, cover up, and reward this kind of violent behavior We would anticipate seeing this problem all across America if this mindset were allowed to continue.
Ingram added that Jim has also appeared to try to play both sides, despite her comments on the possible social justice motives, which are dubious in the extreme.
She also participated in protests against violence targeting Asians.
In condemning the Liberals' abdication of authority, Horace said, what we need to end is excusing violent behavior.
Now, there has been for a bit of time, more than a few years, a growing problem of minorities attacking non-minorities or attacking other minorities, and the completely, completely ignores it.
Here's what the rule needs to be.
You don't hit people, you don't slap people, you don't rob people, you don't beat them down, and if we do, we don't care why, we're going to hold you accountable.
That's the message that stops this from happening, and that's a message that doesn't have to come from the White House.
It doesn't have to come from the outhouse or from anywhere else.
It's a common sense answer.
Shame on this council member who happens to be Asian, not being willing to stand up for a common-sense mindset horse, concluded.
I couldn't have said it any better myself, remarked Ingram.
Giuseppe, your thoughts about that exchange?
I think, by the way, Laura does a better job than Hannity, though Tucker is the best of the three and doing a lot of good work.
Your thoughts here?
Well, Jim, the globalist initiative to destroy sovereign first world nations, such as the Republic of the United States, has made remarkable headway in using racial division.
And as such, you've got the American black, which is 13% of the overall population, so a clear minority.
81%, perhaps even 85% of all blacks, American blacks, Exist at the working class level or higher, and I have figured out how to make it work.
They're getting squeezed like everyone else in this country now by the globalists in their intent to destroy the working class and the middle class and move this country into the North American Union and ultimately into one world government controlled by the internationalist Jew, the Rothschild global satanic cabal.
What the problem is, Jim, is that through their point person,
their attack chihuahua, George Soros, with his endless amount of Rothschild funds,
they've weaponized the urban black, the thug, and they've, through the facades,
the scams of Antifa and BLM, burn, loot, and murder, you've got a small fraction of the black minority
in this country that's been weaponized and is extremely violent.
And so you also have the traitorous internationalist Jus Soros seeding tons of money into elections
that has bought off even school boards, district attorneys, city council members everywhere in this,
especially the major megacities of the communist, communitarian, globalist cities such as Philadelphia,
Chicago, Washington, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, Detroit, Houston, the list goes on and on
anywhere where they've been able to buy off those type of petty tyrants.
And as such, Ingram is exactly right.
Uh, H the.
The federal government shouldn't be involved.
It should be local community leaders, local law enforcement, but they're at the point now where the internationalist Jew controls this federal government, and if you try to do anything commonsensical, pragmatic, to try and teach these mongrels how to behave in a society, you're called a racist, you trigger riots, So the police don't want to get involved in a lot of stuff anymore.
Jim, it's really tragic, but Ingram's right.
And you know who's the most annoyed at this situation?
The decent blacks in these cities.
They've had enough.
So at some point, the spotlight needs to focus on these petty tyrants and who's funding them.
And people in these cities need to take back their cities and reestablish the rule of law.
Good points, good points all.
The defund of police was such a calamity, such a god-awful idea.
Meanwhile, it appears we have another false flag with a group no one has ever heard of marching on the District of Columbia.
Poll numbers for 81 million votes, getters Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are in the toilet.
Her inner circle's abandoning her faster than rats jumping from a sinking ship.
Americans no longer trust our intel agencies, especially after the January 6th, where people like former Oath Keepers AZ Chapter President Ray Epps, who spent days calling on Trump supporters to join him, turned out to be briefly on the FBI's Most Wanted list, only to disappear, turned out to be an FBI informant.
Americans paid a king's ransom to stay at home during the pandemic, refused to go back to work, small businesses collapsed, China and Russia on the march, food and fuel prices skyrocketing, the number of Democrat lawmakers who've announced their retirement before the 2022 election when they would be wiped out, Stand at an astounding 19, and that number is going up.
And with an Omicron variant doctor in South Africa, Democrats and Dr. Evil were hoping to bump up the crisis levels.
Turns out to be a variant with very, very mild symptoms.
The Deep State needed something to happen to distract, so tonight a group of masked men, of whom no one has ever heard, headed to Washington, D.C., marched to the Lincoln Memorial, then almost as quickly as they can marched back to the U-Haul trucks that brought them to the event.
Just ridiculous!
The left made up stories about the group and their ties to right-wing extremists and white supremacy, which is their theme.
The problem is, no one on the right has ever even heard of these guys.
Conservatives seem to think they have a pretty good idea where they came from.
It's unbelievable.
A group called Patriot Front is currently marching on the National Mall in Washington, D.C.
Here you can see them almost running away from their final destination, the Lincoln Memorial.
Fragile white males wear white masks, not hoods, to reclaim America from fragile white males.
Patriot Front is definitely a front for a shitload of punk-ass bitches.
Conservatives who spend most of their lives reporting on political news have never heard of the Patriot Front group.
Jamel McCallion, Jay, who has over 102,000 followers on Twitter, tweeted, I'm in a lot of political circles and I've never heard of this Patriot Front event.
Want to know why?
Because this isn't our event.
This is an FBI and TIFO orchestrated red flag to create a distraction.
Be vigilant.
Stay focused.
Sounds just like January 6th.
Another with 213,000 followers had this to say, the whole point of a false flag is that it's not immediately clear who is responsible.
If you're forming a front group of patriots, the name shouldn't be an obvious one, such as Patriot Front, for example.
Conservative comedian Tim Young has hilariously asked if today's Patriot Front parade is the FBI spending their end of the year user or lose it budget.
Very likely.
Election Wizard, with over 245,000 followers, mocked the group, suggesting the Feds are trying to be a little more original.
They could have been a little more original.
Patriot Front sure sounds like the generic and totally unoriginal names the FBICI use for their Shall's Air America European youth campaign.
RKT Productions.
Popular conservative suburban black man had this to say.
A group called the Patriot Front marched through D.C.
earlier.
Mass?
More like Fed Front.
Meanwhile, a Christmas tree has been set on fire.
Mid-tone Manhattan owned by the Fox News.
The suspect, 49 years old, climbed up the metal superstructure.
The tree, an artificial sculpture shaped to look like a tree.
Lit papers he brought with him.
And Giuseppe, it went up in flames.
Your thoughts?
Well, first on the Patriot Front phenomenon, Jim, the first thing is that follows a week of absolute embarrassing poll numbers and absolute embarrassing missteps by the living glory hole Joe Biden and the heels-up Caligula Harris.
You know, they've just been shooting themselves in both feet so much they've got to start shooting hands.
So they needed something.
And secondly, all you have to do is a little forensic historical evidence comparison to when the actual right-wing patriots, people like David Duke, Richard Spencer, Mike Pinovich, Eric Stryker, and all the others, Organized a march in Charlottesville to make a point and got set up for the whole ridiculous scam by the federal government.
They had been announcing it for weeks and months.
I follow all the, or many of these far right wing websites and chat areas and everyone was talking about it.
You gotta come up, but you know, be careful, protect yourself and you know, it was publicly known
and the precision and the look that it's almost cartoonish that they're all marching like Nazis.
They all dress the same.
They all wore white face masks.
That's clearly the FBI, Mossad, Antifa kind of thing.
The Antifa communist effort to make it look like the right was doing it when clearly
I would have known about it.
Most people who monitor the right would have known about it.
It was a poorly done false flag to try and deflect from a really bad week.
This is false flag is farce, Giuseppe.
It's absolutely incredible they're even attempting these stunts because it makes everyone think about January 6th and realizing that too was a fraudulent event, but more sophisticated in the way it was executed.
Meanwhile, Jussie Smollett is getting nuked in his criminal trial.
Witness admits Smollett staged everything.
He continues to go downhill as a disgraced actor.
The evidence increasingly reveals his self-inflicted hate crime.
Testimonies now reveal the rope the two men purchased at a hardware store.
The key masks they wore were used to purchase with a $100 bill.
The Smollett gave to one of the men.
They even did a dry run of the event before staging the attack.
The former Empire actor may now go down as the leader of one of the biggest hoax events of recent history, except there have been many much more significant.
It's just a nasty example of fakery.
Smollett won't back down, still claims he's innocent, which I find completely absurd.
But he's Experts warn, even when Smollett is inevitably found guilty, it's unlikely he'll serve jail time.
Not sure how it's possible, but important the facts of the case matter.
You shouldn't be able to make up a hate crime and get away with it.
The court and jurors are working through the evidence now, seeking a fair verdict, while Smollett and his lawyers continue to look for a way out of the mess he created three years ago.
It's not a hate crime, it's a staged crime, or better, a staged hate crime.
Check out a video for hype.
Here's what happened immediately when the charges were dismissed by Cook County State's attorney, Kim Fox.
It was bizarre.
There was no justification for dismissing it.
The Chicago police were furious.
The fraternal order slammed Fox's conduct as highly suspicious, labeling the decision arbitrary, capricious, and suspicious.
Turns out she had recused herself Formerly, after exchanging texts with Smollett's relatives, she tried to wrestle the case out of the Chicago PD, having it led by the FBI, because she knew the FBI would cover it up.
She sought to steer the investigation the way the family wanted after being contacted by former Michelle Obama aide Tina Chan.
Meanwhile, why does it look like a cover-up to protect Kamala?
It's going to turn out to be obvious as I'm going to elaborate.
It turns out that Jussie is actually Kamala's nephew.
Jussie had campaigned for Kamala.
Turns out Fox and Harris are close friends.
Fox credits her as her mentor, the one responsible for her own career.
Harris was part of Fox's transition team when she became Cook County prosecutor.
So it would seem Fox's Indetta Harris has said as much herself.
Here's a Tim Fox, Kim Fox tweet.
I'm so excited that Kamala has decided to run for president.
I would not be where I am today without her guidance during my first run for political office.
And she has continued to monitor me as I work to reform the criminal justice system to turn it inside out, of course.
Here are the guys who attacked Jussie Smollett.
Two Nigerian bodybuilders.
One is Jussie's personal trainer.
The other's an extra on the set.
The newspaper coverage isn't even pointing out the guys who attacked Jussie were black, who were pretending to be rednecks wearing face ski masks.
It's just embarrassing.
He's Jussie on the stump, campaigning for his aunt, and they do not mention this is the case.
Meanwhile, just from today, catch this.
What are your thoughts, Jussie?
Former Empire actor Jussie Smollett, after testifying yesterday in his own defense, he stands accused of staging a racist attack on himself.
Next hour, both sides are set to give their closing arguments in the case, putting his fate in the hands of a jury.
Let's bring in Leo Terrell, civil rights attorney and Fox News contributor.
So, as they go into closing arguments, who do you think has the upper hand?
And has his team been able to sow reasonable doubt about whether this was a hoax?
I think the prosecution has the upper hand.
Dana, I'll tell you right now, the defense, Jesse's team only wants one juror.
They want one juror for a mistrial so he can basically claim vindication.
Because that's what he wants.
His story is unbelievable.
The only person who believes the story of Jesse Smollett is his family and Jesse Smollett.
It is a false narrative.
And Dana, more importantly, he's made a mockery of the civil rights laws.
Those laws were there to protect people who were true victims.
Jussie Smollett is not a true victim.
Well, one of the entities that did believe him initially was the media.
Let's take a look back at how they initially covered it.
I don't like that it's being put out there in the media that this is a possible hate crime.
There are a lot of questions in this case, but I know Jussie Smollett is a really, really good guy.
I just want justice to be served in this case.
And the media has really cast so much doubt on his story, which I find so personally offensive.
He's given a detailed account, an account that Chicago police have said has been consistent.
He hasn't changed his story.
They also said it's credible.
Police have said that.
And also that he has been very cooperative.
And since then, it almost seems like the media is kind of reluctant to cover the story and this trial, which is a doozy.
They're embarrassed.
They're totally embarrassed.
I mean, you look at that interview Robin Roberts did.
It was embarrassing.
And she won't even acknowledge it.
Don Lemon is trying to cover the story, yet he had personal involvement.
The left does not care about the truth.
It's their narrative.
They wanted an anti-Trump, to divide this country based on race.
And it's shameful.
And it's overwhelming evidence that when the left does not get what they want, they will ignore it, Dana.
And that's what they're doing.
They're ignoring this trial because they were absolutely wrong.
I don't know if we know enough about the Don Lemon connection, because I could imagine, since you did know him, he was perhaps trying to get more information about the story, but we'll let him decide that.
I did want to quote this from Kyle Smith.
He writes at National Review.
Everyone should read his columns.
He wrote, who can believe one word Jussie Smollett says?
Smollett compared the attack to a Looney Tunes cartoon, and I think we know who the Wile E. Coyote of this saga is.
Kyle Smith also writes for the New York Post, and that's where you can find that.
The rest of the column is hilarious, and I encourage people to read it.
How long do you think the jury will deliberate?
Well, I'll tell you right now.
They're going to close the arguments.
The trial was no more than two weeks.
I will submit to you, Dana, that you will have a verdict probably Friday, if possible, no later than Monday.
Jurors do not want to go through the weekend, so don't be surprised if you get a jury verdict Friday.
You think they have that much to discuss?
Do you think they have that much to think about?
No, I'll tell you right now.
Let me be very clear.
It's going to be one.
Jesse Smollett has only one hope.
He's looking for one juror to nullify the verdict.
Because I would submit to you that 10 or 11 jurors believe that he basically made this story up.
I'm thinking one juror.
All right.
Leo Terrell, have a great Wednesday.
Good to see you.
Nice to see you.
Think about that, Giuseppe.
I mean, Leo Torelli sees right through it.
Jussie's playing for one juror to get a mistrial.
How disgusting is this whole event?
And I got your humor, your reaction to all the mainstream, the left-wing media defending Jussie as such a good guy.
I mean, Jussie wouldn't lie to us, would he, Giuseppe?
No, not Jussie, not my man Jussie.
Well, Jim, my God, I'm of two minds of this, right?
The Occam's Razor pragmatic Giuseppe says this guy is just an attention-seeking clown who is irrelevant.
And he's been on the fringes of real celebrity and real power, and he thought that he could get back in the spotlight with this ridiculous buffoonish staged event.
I mean, my favorite part is he claims he was beaten by two MAGA enthusiasts who turn out to be Nigerian men dingo incredibly shapely and bodybuilders, right?
And those are the two poster children for the MAGA movement in my mind.
That's what I see everywhere.
And so that's my pragmatic mind.
My conspiratorial having studied under the great Jim Fetzer is that the globalist media set this guy up to further erode the already fragile
relationship between blacks and whites in big cities. So it and with the controlled media throwing
gasoline on the fire, it's once again the globalist idea to create a race war. And this is
just a and a classic opportunity to get the communist delusion, face diaper wearing libtards
all worked up and refusing to change their mind versus realistic people.
people.
So it's one of those two.
This guy's such an idiot.
I think Terrell laid it out so completely.
They're just hoping that one corrupt juror can send this to a mistrial.
But I hope that if they're going to closing arguments, they finished up.
I hope even today they find him guilty, because I've watched a little bit of that trial, and they had the key witness testify.
It's all fake.
I saw him do it.
How could you not find him guilty when, you know, But again, these Antifa, burn loot, and murder types, they're narcissists.
They're special snowflakes.
If there's one of those on that jury, they don't care about the rule of law.
They don't care about justice.
They just care about, I hate Whitey, blame Whitey for everything.
But much like the dark, dark melatonin of the Nigerian Mandingos, all these people need to look in the mirror and see reality of who's to blame, not us.
Oh, it's so absurd, Giuseppe, the idea.
Two rednecks would be wandering around at 2 a.m.
on a Sunday morning, coldest night, carrying a bottle of bleach, which would have been frozen solid in a noose, so that they could put it around a gay, black actor who just happens to be coming out of a subway at 2 a.m.
I mean, this is so stupid!
I can't imagine the moron who wrote the script, which may have been Jussie Smollett himself, but remember... Of course!
Kamala and Cory Booker had an anti-lynching bill before the Senate that no one thought was necessary, so they needed to stage an event to gain public support through a stunt, and she was describing it immediately as a modern-day lynching.
I mean, how convenient.
They're all in on it.
So my second scenario, you're proving it.
Caligula Harris heals up Harris.
Booker and Fox, the affirmative action installed DA.
I mean, it's absurd.
And of course, probably the Beetlejuice shrunken head mayor there, Lori Lightfoot, was probably in on it.
They all think they're so clever and they're so incompetent.
And they're so easily exposed, and I thought it was brilliant of Fox News to have a very good civil rights attorney in that black guy, Terrell, say, look, you know, so they can't be accused of racism at all.
That dude's calling them out, right?
It's pretty smart.
They actually strive to be fair and balanced, believe it or not.
The other networks attack them, but they're the ones who are the propagandists.
Yeah, I thought Leo was excellent on this occasion.
Meanwhile, we have for the first time the Supreme Court has posed to retract a fundamental right.
I'm rather concerned about this.
For the first time, the Supreme Court has posed to take a fundamental right away from half the people of the country, meaning the women, The court's oral argument on December 1st in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health confirmed what progressives have feared since Trump added three right-wingers to the court.
The six are about to gut the right to abortion, or so it appears.
If the court Renounces the liberty interest represented in Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, it would be an unprecedented contraction of individual rights and a stark departure from principles of stare decis, meaning the obligation to follow precedent, said U.S.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Perilogar told the court.
And yet, the justices Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Gorsuch appear ready to do just that.
And while Chief Justice Roberts may not be ready to squarely overturn Roe and Casey, he's signaled readiness to uphold the Mississippi law that outlaws abortions after 15 weeks, essentially gutting the right of women to choose an abortion.
In 73, Roe held that abortion was a fundamental right for a woman's life and future.
States could not ban abortion until the fetus was viable, which is around 23, the end of the second trimester, able to survive outside of the uterus.
The Supreme Court reaffirmed the essential holding in a 1992 case, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, said states could only enact restrictions on abortion that do not impose an undue burden on the right to a pre-viability abortion.
No, not specifically mentioned in the Constitution.
The court in Roe v. Casey grounded the right to abortion in the Liberty section of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, saying states shall not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
I regard Roe v. Wade as one of the wisest decisions in the history of the court, essentially affirming that the developing person only qualifies as a person.
The developing entity only qualifies as a person with the social and legal rights attendant thereto when it becomes viable.
Therefore, unrestricted abortion in the first trimester, states can regulate how it's done in the second trimester, but any abortion other than to preserve the life or the health of the mother during the third qualifies as murder and is prosecutable thereby.
This, in my judgment, is a decision that is democratic and American in the sense that it leaves each woman in a particular circumstance a decision.
It does not force any woman who wants to carry the term to have an abortion, unlike the pro-life position that would force a woman with an unwanted fetus to carry the term, which in my opinion reduces her to the status of reproductive slavery.
So, I am now and have always been a strong proponent of the pro-choice position, believing Roe v. Wade was properly decided, and I'm very upset at the prospect it might be overturned.
Your thoughts?
Well stated, Jim.
Complicated issue.
To me, it really is the, what, one of the root, root planks on the platform that is the ring that is the culture war.
The boxing match that is the culture war and you make a very compelling case.
I would be more apt to go along with the pro-life crowd if they didn't immediately abandon, they're so concerned about this fetus.
being born and once they're born, they don't put a lot of time into helping that child have a decent life, right?
All of a sudden, it's a good luck, you know, we got to see you born. And so I also think that it's it's very selfish
and narcissistic of a lot of these women to use abortion,
because they didn't work, they were too stupid to not be on the pill or to
not get a prescription for the morning after pill.
I mean, I think it's a tragedy that any type of abortion occurs after the first trimester at all, but I do respect the body of law, and it's just such a, again, a visceral Irrational hot button.
It's not a debate anymore.
It's become a belief system between the two sides.
And I think you stated it very, very lucidly.
What's at stake?
And yeah, well stated.
I'll go that way.
Well, you make a number of very telling points, Giuseppe, including the pro-life position for many appears to be that life begins at conception and ends at birth, because they're not paying any attention to the developmental issues we know are unwarranted.
Children tend to become juvenile delinquents and future criminals, so sociological and demological studies show that it's really a bad idea to bring unwanted children into the world.
The strongest beginning any child can have in life is to have a loving care in parents, especially both parents, a mother and a father.
And obviously, bringing unwanted children via the pro-life position does not accomplish that goal.
So I commend your observations.
I think you're spot on.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Get this.
We spoke earlier today on the event About how well InfoWars does in bringing issues to the attention.
I just want to acknowledge my opinion that Alex Jones does a very good job of letting people know what's really going on, things they should be concerned about, even if he's not really positioned to carry them through, to sort them out.
Here you have a sampler, nuclear war red alert, U.S.
government now publicly threatening Russia with a preemptive thermonuclear war.
How absurd is that?
Reports the UK government could pass a mandate vast taxes for this week.
The TV show mysteriously deletes a poll after the vast majority opposed mandatory vaccination.
More bad news for Kamala as the new poll finds her popularity falling further and further, only 40%.
Think she's even qualified to be president?
How New York Hospital fires 100 unvaccinated employees that claimed a religious exemption?
How the NEA board member suggests unvaccinated with religious exemptions deserve to die?
Giuseppe, I'm telling you, those are all really good stories for the American people to be aware of, and I think Alex Jones did a good job in bringing them to the attention of the public.
Well, I agree.
I think that Alex Jones, somewhere down the line, once he started to get into the, when he ticked the digit over to the millions of dollars in annual revenue with his business, his multimedia and vitamin business, I think at some point he was compromised.
And to me, Jim, it seems as though he's a little bug flying around here.
He's a classic 80 20 rule where 80 percent of his staff and himself does some really excellent journalism, pragmatic, honest.
But then he he's he doesn't go where he needs to go anymore when it comes to globalist hot buttons like the Sandy Hoax,
like the internationalist Jew, the Rothschild, like the what's really going on with a lot of these
that we cover.
And so I think your point is well made, but I also believe he is now a compromised
in his absurd refusal to really take it out head on with the Sandy Hoax is really tragic.
So I think somewhere along the line, he got enough of a net worth that they could do this to him.
And of course, the 80-20 percentage of 80% accurate and true and 20% misinformation is the classic formula for propaganda.
So I think you essentially indict him appropriately.
I mean, Sandy Hook, I've sought to reach out to him to lend assistance, but been rebuffed on every side.
Meanwhile, from a Yale epidemiologist, COVID-19, a pandemic of fear manufactured by authorities.
COVID-19 has been one of fear, manufactured by those in nominal positions of authority as the virus began to spread, according to Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Reich.
In an appearance on American Thought Leaders, Reich spoke out that, by and large, what has characterized the Chinese Communist Party virus pandemic has been a degree of fear in people's response to the fear.
In other words, it's been a mass illusion.
Overall, I'd say we've had a pandemic of fear which has affected almost everyone, the infection itself affecting relatively few.
By and large, it's been a very select pandemic and predictable, very distinguished between young versus old, healthy versus chronic disease, so we quickly learned who was at risk and who wasn't.
However, the fear was manufactured for everyone, That's what characterized the whole pandemic, that degree of fear in people's response thereto.
Reich has authored more than 300 original peer-reviewed publications, was formerly a member of the board of editors for the American Journal of Epidemiology.
I'm looking at clinicians who have now treated with more than 150,000 patients with fewer than two dozen deaths using hydroxychloroquine.
Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Reich on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and other therapeutics, including, of course, ivermectin.
He suggested individuals who held the nominal positions initially spread a much worse picture of the dire nature of the virus than was warranted.
That included messages that everyone was at risk, everyone could die, everyone needed to stay in their homes to protect society.
People were quite afraid of that message, as anyone would be, with the government, with authorities, with scientists, scientific people, medical people in authority.
In public health institutions all saying the same thing beginning about February or March of last year.
So we all kind of believed it.
It was being repeated from so many sources with such authority.
In the first two months, stringent lockdowns and mask mandates were implemented to curb the transmission in the U.S.
and around the globe.
It led to widespread heightened anxiety levels.
All our levels were raised and we made a decision to curtail to dubious degrees our exposure to other people, some more than others.
I think everyone had levels of anxiety that really affected how they carried out their lives at that time.
Meanwhile, Biden has claimed 96 to 98 percent of Americans need to be vaccinated before the nation could go back to normal, pushing the rhetoric that the unvaccinated are to blame for slowing down the nation's economic recovery, which is absurd.
It's the lockdowns.
It's the mandates that have created chaos across the board.
According to data from U.S.
Center for Disease Control, just over 70% of American adults have been fully vaccinated, while 23.9% have received a booster dose.
Watch the interview.
Meanwhile, the Los Angeles School District is vaccinating students without their parents' knowledge or consent.
This is outrageous.
This has me ready to barf.
Alarming reports are coming from California about school districts vaccinating students without the consent of their parents.
I cannot fathom the rage I would personally feel were I one of those parents.
Watch this interview.
Even though the vaccine mandate for LAUSD doesn't go into effect until January 10th, some parents tell us that they believe their kids are being pressured into getting the jab.
I should have been involved.
Maribel Duarte says her 13-year-old son, a student at the Barack Obama Global Prep Academy in South LA, brought home this vaccine card after having accepted the COVID-19 vaccine at school.
She says he said yes when someone offered it in exchange for pizza.
The lady that gave him the shot and signed the paper was the one that told my son, please do not say anything.
I don't want to get in trouble.
LAUSD says student matters are confidential and wouldn't comment specifically, but did say its Safe Schools to Safe Steps incentive program is meant to ensure several steps are in place for vaccinated students to receive prizes.
Duarte says she's not against the vaccine.
She's vaccinated herself, but it's different with her son.
In regards to my son's health, I am against it.
Because he's got some underlying conditions that concern you?
Yes.
He has problems with asthma and allergy problems.
I think it's very appropriate that she should be concerned and very inappropriate.
The school should have moved forward, but this is the kind of thing this complete buffoon we have in the White House wants to promote across the nation.
This is outrageous.
Wow, Jim, those two stories lead me to think of the, a play on words of the Dickens,
instead of a tale of two cities, a tale of two Jews, because Dr. Harvey Risch is a Jew,
and he's taking on a powerhouse Zionist globalist movement.
And I really respect that he's doing this because the Zionist learned elders of Zion
have no problem removing the lesser brethren from the chessboard if they go against the protocols,
and he is clearly going against the protocols right now.
So good for him.
I mean, to be honest and moral at that level is very courageous, and I salute him.
And he's absolutely right.
It's a scandemic.
It's been a scandemic since day one.
And the mayor of Chicago, sorry, Los Angeles, is a Jewish guy with an Italian last name, Garcetti,
and he is a communist traitor through and through, dual citizen communist traitor,
under the tutelage and guidance of a radical lesbian rabbi who is a complete communist.
And the fact that what's hilarious about that woman, the mother, is she doesn't even understand that her son has asthma and allergies because he's vaccine damaged.
All allergies in children, all asthma is basically vaccine damage.
It's been that way since the 60s for people who have certain sensitivities and There was no peanut allergies, Jim.
Now all these children can go into anaphylactic shock if they eat a peanut butter and jelly sandwich because of the death jab.
All jabs are the death jab now, Jim, because the learned elders, the Zionist globalists, and their assassination wing, Big Pharma, are literally poisoning anyone who takes those ridiculous Excellent.
Excellent commentary, Giuseppe.
Definitely a tale of two Jews and I salute Dr. Harvey Risch and I hope that he has some influence in bringing down this
global scam.
Excellent, excellent commentary Giuseppe.
Meanwhile, we have a Ron Owens has reviewed Bobby Jr's book about the real Anthony Fauci.
It's a very long review, and I don't think it's all equally worthy, but I wanted to share some segments of it with you.
Others appear to share my interest that the real Anthony Fauci became the number one bestseller at 95% five-star reviews out of over 1,500, which may be close to a record.
There are a lot of those who are very impressed with what Bobby has done.
Though the text seemed fine and generally well edited, reports Ron, I noted some stylistic quirks.
The text margins were narrow, so they lacked chapter headings.
The font size was smaller.
This could have been a 600-page book.
That was squeezed down to 480.
RFK Jr.
clearly ranks as a leader of America's anti-vaxxer movement, which may broadly encompass 20-30% of the population.
His massive bestseller seems likely to become its seminal text.
I would regard myself, however, as on the other side.
After considering his views, I think the disagreements may be more apparent than real.
I lack the scientific expertise to evaluate 95% of his claims.
Yet even if many or most were correct, I don't think I would need to retract any of the statements I've made in the past denouncing anti-vax crackpots.
So clearly this is a guy on the other side.
The first and longest chapter discusses various responses to the COVID pandemic, arguing that the use of extremely cheap but reasonably effective medical treatments such as HEQ and ivermectin was torpedoed by vested interests in the powerful pharmaceutical industry, eager for lucrative profits from experimental vaccines and their own patented and very expensive drugs.
That's so obvious, I can't believe, that Ron Owens would dispute it.
Just ridiculous.
He does admit, however, he thought he made a reasonably persuasive case, especially with regard to Ivermectin.
Meanwhile, he's closely identified with COVID vaccine issues, pleasantly surprised to discover few sharp disagreements, even more pleased with his discussion of one of my own areas of focus, the American biowarfare program, which Owens reviews as essential to understand what's going on here today, noting that few mainstream journalists are willing to address it, Yet Kennedy squarely confronts a reality devoting his last and second-longest chapter to the topic.
Though he's a liberal Democrat with deep ideological roots, in today's topsy-turvy America, his only significant mainstream media has come from an hour-long interview with Tucker Carlson, which I watched.
Very fine interview, where Tucker praised him as one of the bravest and most honest people he'd ever met.
Near the end, he was told that if they only read one chapter, the section on American biowarfare was the most important.
Begins with a brief overview of World War II origins, controversial military programs, officially abolished by Nixon in 69, afterward banned by international treaties, but there was a giant loophole Allowing the continued existence of dual-use biodefense projects so that much of what had been biological warfare was simply rechristened vaccine research and under the Pentagon and National Institutes of Health.
Kennedy focused on Dr. Robert Kadlec, a central figure in the story he tells, where Kadlec had been one of America's leading advocates of biowarfare.
Arguing that technology offered the possibility of launching powerful attacks against a food supplier population of global adversaries while minimizing the risk of direct retaliation.
He wrote in 1998, Biological weapons under the cover of an endemic or natural disease occurrence provides an attacker the potential for plausible denial.
Biological warfare's potential to create significant economic losses and consequent political instability, coupled with plausible deniability, exceeds the possibilities of any other human weapon, which appears to have been appreciated by the global elite in their efforts to bring about a massive genocide.
The chapter also notes close links between America's biowarfare establishment and the Wuhan lab, where America funded to undertake gain-of-function research, which Fauci has been attempting to deny but not getting away with it.
The author is careful to avoid including any explicit accusations of scenarios, but I believe the evidence is overwhelming.
Based on Kennedy's public focus and individuals championing it in his book, I would expect a detailed critique of vaccines and controversial public health measures.
And so it did.
I was pleased to see a lengthy chapter on the nexus between the mysterious new virus and America's longstanding biological welfare program, but a major portion was devoted to an entirely different topic, one I had not expected to encounter and found completely astonishing.
The eponymous target of Kennedy's book is Dr. Anthony Fauci, who spent five decades playing a leading role in public health activities of the American government before he became the official face of our response to COVID.
With a calm, soothing demeanor of an experienced physician and his ubiquitous presence on TV, he was elevated as a national hero by the political mainstream, which endorsed the policies he advocated but eventually attracted huge hostility from the segments of the population vehemently opposed to lockdowns, masking, and vaccinations.
I found Kennedy's account as shocking as anything I've ever encountered.
Extraordinary claims obviously require extraordinary evidence, but his chapters on AIDS include more than 900 sourced references, many to academic journals.
I thought I had a strong scientific background with my original in theoretical physics.
I'm not a medical doctor nor a virologist, let alone anyone specializing in AIDS.
Those research would mean nothing to me even had I sought to read them, so I was forced to seek other indications.
That is, 200 pages on AIDS represented something other than surest lunacy.
The book carries glowing praise from a long list of medical doctors and scientists with names and backgrounds unknown to me, including nearly a million practicing physicians.
A few could surely be found to endorse almost anything.
However, the first endorsement on the back cover is Professor Luc Montagnier, who received the Nobel Prize for discovering HIV in 1984, who writes, Tragically for humanity, there are many, many untruths emanating from Fauci and his minions.
RFK Jr.
exposes the decades of lies.
Moreover, we're told that as far back as the San Francisco International AIDS Conference in 1990, Montagnier had publicly declared, the HIV virus is harmless and passive, a benign virus.
Perhaps the Nobel laureate endorsed the book for other reasons.
Perhaps meaning his striking 1990 statement has been misconstrued, but surely the opinion of a researcher who won the Nobel Prize for discovering HIV should not be totally ignored in assessing is a role in all of this and he is hardly alone.
Kennedy explains the following year top Harvard microbiologists organized a group consisting containing some of the world's most distinguished virologists and immunologists and they issued a public statement endorsed by three additional Nobel laureates raising the same questions.
His narrative of the origins of the HIV-AIDS connection is completely stunning and seems well-documented.
Dr. Robert Gallo, an NIH researcher in Fauci's orbit, originally announced HIV as the apparent cause of AIDS at a PAC-1984 press conference, which he held before any of his supportive research had actually been published and reviewed by his peers.
Only long after the theory had become firmly embedded in the national media did it come out that only 26 of the 76 AIDS victims in a seminal study showed any trace of the HIV virus.
Extremely slender read for such a momentous conclusion.
Furthermore, critics noted that thousands of documented AIDS victims similarly lacked any signs of HIV.
Millions of those infected by HIV exhibited no symptoms of AIDS.
Correlation does not imply causality, but in this case even the correlation seemed a really loose one, and I dare say it's the best evidence we have typically for causation.
So it's too often said that, well, correlation is not causation.
Correlation is usually the most important evidence we have, especially correlation that shows when you lack the alleged cause but still have the alleged effects.
Or, have the alleged cause but do not have the alleged effects undermines causal claims based upon correlations, where the evidence refutes them themselves.
According to Bobby Jr., fully orthodox age researchers grudgingly admit no scientific study has ever demonstrated that HIV causes age.
The widespread accusations of serious misbehavior and outright intellectual theft that swirled around Gallo's laboratory research were afferentially confirmed by legal proceedings that helped explain why his name was not included on the Nobel Prize for the HIV discovery.
Carrie Mullis, a renowned inventor of PCR technology, and himself another leading public critic of the HIV-AIDS hypothesis, at Duisburg even underscored the confidence of his HIV skepticism by offering to be injected with HIV-tainted blood.
Rather than openly debate such a strong scientific opponent, Fauci and his allies blacklisted Duesenberg from receiving any government funding, thereby wrecking his research career, while vilifying him and pressuring others to do the same.
This was how Fauci got his power.
According to fellow researchers quoted by Bobby, Duisburg was destroyed as a warning and example to others.
Meanwhile, Fauci deployed his influence to have his critics banned from the major national media, ensuring few outside the narrow segment would even become aware of the continuing controversy.
These elements merely scrape the surface of Kennedy's remarkable story.
I urge those interested, buy and read the book and decide for themselves.
And in expensive options, it's Kindles available for just $2.99.
For further information, you can consult the lengthy review by the French writer Laurent Goyer, which focuses on the HIV AIDS chapter, and are the most explosive but underreported.
I found the medical history presented by Kennedy absolutely extraordinary, representing, as it does, a near-total inversion of the scientific reality I had always accepted until a few weeks ago.
I do vaguely recall my newspapers had occasionally included some mention of these sorts of AIDS controversies 25 or 30 years ago, but I had assumed these disputes had long since been resolved.
Though I've now read all his AIDS chapters twice and found his narrative disturbingly credible and persuasive.
I would obviously need to read several books on the other side before I could form an intelligent opinion.
He's a top figure in America's much-vilified anti-vax movement.
His book is a major element of the cause, his strident attack against pharmaceutical companies, medical orthodoxy, and Fauci.
Have earned him numerous powerful enemies.
If his AIDS claims were really as ridiculous as they would seem, would they not have already become a lightning rod for attacks against him?
Of course!
Suppose that his anti-vax tome had devoted 200 pages to argue that our world is secretly controlled by invisible 12-foot tall reptilians from another dimension.
His enemies would have unleashed a huge storm of media ridicule against him for that lent lunacy, thereby discrediting his critique of vaccine campaigns.
Yet, instead, complete silence has greeted his AIDS claims, raising questions in my mind whether the medical establishment suspects it has a great deal to hide and that many of his accusations might be correct.
As an outside observer with no special expertise, I was impressed by much of the material he marshals in support of his unorthodox views on vaccines and COVID treatment.
I found the evidence he provided on AIDS and HIV.
Vastly more comprehensive and persuasive, while backed by far more authoritative experts.
But if, as he argues, the truth about HIV and AIDS has been successfully suppressed for decades by the entire medical industry, we must necessarily become very suspicious about other medical claims, including those regarding COVID and vaccinations.
Prior to opening the book, I'm not sure I'd ever read anything by R.F.K.
Jr.
Though he's in his late 60s and carries one of the most famous political names in modern American history, I was only slightly aware of his activities until about a decade ago.
I remained almost as ignorant of the true circumstances surrounding this assassination of his famous father and uncle.
Casually accepting the soothing media narrative that both of their tragic gods admit their hands have deranged lone gunmen, as I emphasized in my original American Proved article.
Once we pierce our media veil of ignorance in several important matters, we should become much more willing to expect that other investigations will produce other surprises.
Although his book deals with subjects outside my expertise, which I've never before explored, I think it may be as important as any of the works on history and politics I've read over the years.
Although Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
has never held any public office, this book by itself demonstrates that he is absolutely worthy of his family name.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
It had to be a hard, uh, Review for Ron Unst to write, because Ron is squarely in the—he's an incredibly bright guy, by the way, and he is born of Jewish parents, unwed, whose mother got involved with a married guy on their way to Israel, and she decided to have the baby as a single mother
And so this guy is incredibly smart.
Father was an Israeli professor.
He made money early on with tech stuff.
And then as an investor somehow, it's not really clear how he did it.
It's not mentioned on his wiki biography.
But he did take that money and begin to get into a very conservative man.
And so he really believes vaccines are not quack scenes, which we both know.
They're all worthless.
They've been worthless.
This is Essentially, what has occurred is the original block of feces
created by the grifter Brit Edward Jenner in the late 17th century with his specious
claims that he cured smallpox.
That first brick of shit has now been built into enormous elaborate cathedrals of shit
about immunization and quaxination and it's become its own thing now where it's pseudoscience
taken as religious dogma, the cult of the magic jab, the cult of the magic pill, the
cult of the white lab coat.
And good old Ron, bright as he is, believes that and he's very, very, very tactful in
trying to remain aloof from writers on his own website, the Uns Review, which is amazing
And some of the writers that are there, Mike Whitley, the Saker, many other really good independent minds occupy there.
And here this guy's hardcore Jewish and yet the ADL accuses him of hate speech and the... where's the other one?
What's the other guy?
And the Southern Poverty Law Center accuses him of a white nationalist publication.
So again, you know, not all Jews are alike, and this guy clearly believes the lies of the pseudoscience of quaxination, but he was very fair in trying to express his opinion Whereas if you go to a site, there's some people, especially Mike Whitley, who have just savaged the death jab and savaged the scandemic.
And so hats off to Antz for being fair and balanced.
Although you can tell he's just like, oh, I don't want to break this this way.
I, you know, with his things like, well, I'm not, I'm not a medical doctor, so this doesn't mean anything to me.
But He, you know, that's just his way of trying to say he doesn't want to have to admit he's been wrong for 30 years, but he does a pretty good job in a tactful way.
I think those are very nice and appropriate comments, Giuseppe.
My piece on what's wrong with conspiracy theories, where I explain that because they're theories, they can be evaluated by the same criteria as scientific theories, published on the UN's Review, has received nearly 500 comments, and I recommend for anyone who's still skeptical about scientific Uh, about conspiracy theorists, understand that we are investigating crimes the government has refused to investigate, typically because it leads back to the government itself, which is why they seek to suppress us.
The CIA, after all, is conspiracy central.
Yep.
So it's not surprising they would attack those who want to expose their malicious activities and denigrate them as conspiracy theorists.
Don't let yourself be played.
Meanwhile...
We want to hear from you, send fan mail, pro or con, to live needtoknowatgmail.com.
Live needtoknowatgmail.com.
Here's from Beverly.
Good points made about the possibility the Wisconsin parade massacre and Aubrey case in Atlanta may be false flags.
The Aubrey case always sounded strange to me.
After George Floyd, various face-based incidents kept happening, several incidents and you hear nothing.
They're always a bit over the top.
Even the Blake in Wisconsin have a dozen or so cops unloading their weapons on one guy.
The situations always appear to be configured to incite the most outrage.
Maybe the Wisconsin Parade Massacre will turn out to be another Sandy Hook that no one really died.
Good thing if no life was lost.
It was so horrible and senseless.
Meanwhile, I am presenting the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference 2021 this weekend on Saturday and Sunday.
If you go to my blog, On the upper menu, check out It's This Weekend.
It'll bring you to a description of what's going on here.
You can get your tickets as well.
On Saturday—and this is only a partial list, I have other speakers to be added—I have Nick Kohlrstrom on the Gunpowder Plot, Holly Seeger on Bacon's Rebellion, Next Generation Students on Was Pearl Harbor Really a Surprise Attack?
Other students on the true story of JFK never having been told.
You'll be surprised.
They reveal aspects of JFK that Oliver Stone has yet to uncover.
I'll be giving a special report about 9-11.
Susan Bradford on the politics of business.
The Abramoff and Enron scandals.
Joe Olson.
On the fall of America, building on it all.
Sarah Westall, a wonderful investigative journalist herself on the COVID conspiracy and mind control.
A musical interlude with Dolly Domograt and Mo Ranton.
But I'm telling you, a couple of additional speakers who are heavyweights are going to be added to the Saturday lineup.
Then on Sunday, Nick on who wrote Shakespeare's plays, Alison Menard on the undead, three unusual legal cases involving women who may or may not actually have died.
Then a tale of two cities where I explain what happened in Kenosha and Waukesha.
Russ Winters follows with others, including Giuseppe, High Strangeness, Woz Waka Shiop, Dina Pollard-Sacks on the vaccine wars from a legal perspective.
She's completely brilliant.
Ron Avery, who has an archive on my case, addresses the Posner v. Fetzer lawsuit, and then another involving himself, fake news and fake law in a police state in which we're living today.
Mike Palachuk, my dear colleague on Freedom of the Press, Carl Herman, American Revolution 2.0, Olli Dommegaard, How My Last Name Became a Verb.
And bear in mind, I have two other presentations that will be added to that list.
So go to Paul Zweig, go to jamesfetzer.org to check out Paul Zweig and the Conspiracy Conference 2021.
See in the lower left, it's this weekend.
Click there And you'll have the opportunity to pick up a ticket, by the way.
I would do all this for free, but it turns out it's impractical, and while I'm engaged in all these legal issues, although I'm doing this pro bono, my attorneys, for reasons best known to themselves, expect to be paid.
So there's a situation, Giuseppe.
I welcome comments on the conference, your thoughts about everything else, and your final remarks for today.
Well, Jim, first, a belated happy birthday.
I know your birthday was a couple days ago and I'm glad to see you in such great shape at the young age of 82, I believe, right? 81.
81, young age of 81.
And well done, sir.
You're still a powerhouse at 81.
And so I would urge people to go and spend a little bit of money.
It's $25 to get one month's access.
You don't have to watch them in real time.
Or a better deal is spend $40 and you have a year's access to it.
And this money is going to pay down Jim's legal fees, his legal defense funds.
You know, there's so many worthy charities or worthy investments.
Please go and support Jim and help him continue his fight.
Because how many people do you know have the courage to take on the deep state the way the good professor has?
And so I salute you, Jim.
And I think the False Flags and Conspiracy Conference is going to be a rousing success.
Well, thank you so much for that endorsement, Giuseppe.
It's such an honor to be doing these shows with you, with Scorpio, with Michael Ivey, with Carl Herman, with Joe Olson, with Miriam Hennane, and others who have joined us over the years.
I think it's terribly important the American people know the truth about their own history, and I'm doing everything in my ability to bring them that truth.
Notwithstanding the intervention of Amazon.com, among others, which I believe has been acting as an agent of the state by banning, of the 12 books we publish at Moonrock Books, six of my books banned by Amazon Which is the indoor record for actual serious content.
Six Seuss books have been published for cartoonish drawings that are supposed to be racist, but that's trivial by comparison to what they've done here, where I continue to bring together teams of experts to sort out what really happened and publish it for the benefit of the American people.
Not only my book on Sandy Hook, but on the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, even the moon landing.
Though I believe that's because of a set of issues disputing the official narrative of World War II.
Something about gas chambers and Zyklon B that turns out to have no basis in history or fact.
So please brace yourself intellectually.
Join us.
For false flags and conspiracies, 2021 begins at 9 a.m.
Central Time.
Saturday runs to 9 p.m.
Then again, 9 a.m.
Central Time.
Sunday runs to 9 p.m.
And as Giuseppe explained, the virtues and the benefits.
You can get one month's access or you can get a full year access.
Contemplate.
Believe me, Your donation, your contribution will be going to a most worthy cause.
So if you believe in the First Amendment or the Second, or both, believe me, I'm doing my best to support them for your benefit.
Thank you for joining us today, and as I am observing, spend as much time as you can with your friends and loved ones, because we do not know how much time we have left.
Thank you.
▲
Export Selection