Truth vs NEW$ PART 1 (28 November 2021) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett and Holly Seeliger
|
Time
Text
Welcome folks to Twins vs News Incorporated.
I'm Don LaGuardia, producer at TD.Consultants, at live.com, and this is November the 28th.
And we're here after the Thanksgiving time to celebrate another show.
We've been doing these shows for four and a half years, five and a half years almost.
So anyway, it's pretty good.
And also we now have, of course, we're proud to have Jim Fester, the most dangerous man in America, He's a leading expert in false flags and conspiracies and tracing down facts.
He's a fact producer here.
And Scott Bennett will join us.
He's a former army intelligence officer who's got an exceptional military mind.
And of course, the wonderful Holly Seeliger, who began her news broadcasting and video reports a decade ago.
And she contributes mightily to things.
So what happened there in Wisconsin last week, Jim?
Well, Don, a lot of things going on here.
We had a Christmas parade killer who drove in a zigzag pattern to hit as many people as possible.
Fellow's name is Daryl Edward Brooks Jr.
He has quite a rap sheet.
Since the incident, the media has tried to play down that it was motivated by his extreme political views, support for BLM, hatred for white people, or Disenchantment with the verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, which seems overwhelmingly to be the cause of all of this.
Numerous outlets were falsely reporting he was trying to flee the scene of an earlier crime, of course, by driving through a parade of innocent people.
That's what we all do when we flee the scene of an earlier crime.
Connect a more serious one, a massacre.
Police confirmed they were not chasing books as he plowed through the Christmas parade in Waukesha.
An affidavit against the killer reveals even more crucial details.
According to Officer Butren, the vehicle appeared to accelerate rapidly, took an abrupt left turn into the crowd of parade participants.
Now, Andy, no, Has been doing a good job of covering this.
Observing here, the affidavit against the massacre suspect has been released.
No details, including 62 were injured.
The driver stopped and accelerated.
Witnesses said he drove in a zigzag to hit as many as possible.
The officer reported he was seeing an intentional act to strike and hurt as many people as possible.
Another eyewitness said driving in a zigzag pattern with direct intent hit as many parade participants as he could.
Here we have Detective Casey working traffic control.
I shall not go through all the details, but this is part of the actual indictment witness statement.
He saw a red Ford Escape when it was at White Rock and East Main Street.
He stepped in front and pounded on the hood and yelled multiple times, stop!
He was wearing a shirt with patches that said Waukesha Police, wearing a black hat with white letters stating police, but he continued driving, brushing him off the car.
Casey subsequently identified the driver as Daryl E. Brooks, Jr., date of birth, February 21st, 1982, here and after, referred to as the defendant.
While the defendant was driving westbound on East Main, he struck numerous pedestrians, both parade participants and spectators.
Casey later observed three adult victims, A, B, and C. All three had traumatic injuries as a result of being hit by the vehicle.
Victim D, another adult, Well, was transported but died, whereas the first three were dead on the scene.
Victim E, an adult, was transported to Aurora Summit and subsequently died.
We had three women who were part of the dancing grannies, one of their husbands, and yet another, whom I believe was a spectator.
Based on his training and experience, Officer Boutrin estimated the vehicle speed to be about 25 miles an hour plowing through the parade.
It was actually a little faster earlier, interestingly.
The vehicle was sticking to the north side of the road in the open lane between the parade participants and the speculators.
He was looking straight forward directly at them, had no emotion on his face, even though he yelled to stop.
Continued westbound on East Main, honking its horn.
They began to increase their speed.
It appeared the brakes were activated.
That's interesting.
He thought he was going to try to come to a stop and attempt to make a right-hand turn out of the parade route, but that's not what happened.
Instead, he took an abrupt left into the crowd of participants.
Very, very bad intentional act.
Lots of people injured.
Books killed six people.
Injured at least 62.
Thirteen children remain hospitalized.
Six in critical danger.
Why did he do it?
As Chris Manahan notes, the media is still referring to the massacre as a parade crash or even as an accident.
Refusing to acknowledge that it was a deliberate attack.
I don't think there's any room for doubt and certainly the witnesses confirm it was intentional.
Holly, your thoughts?
You can just tell by how the mainstream media has basically dropped the story at this point, which is so unfortunate and tragic.
These people, people suffered and people died during this incident.
I'm not exactly sure if it's just a reaction to the Rittenhouse verdict or if this will be a continuation of events that we will see targeting Christmas and the holiday season, another way to scare people into not attending these types of events.
The mainstream media has been so successful in basically stopping all the holidays over the past couple years that If they can't push it again with this new Omicron variant or whatever they're calling it, they can start having these events which they will say is, oh, it's an unfortunate accident that all these people get mowed over at Christmas.
And it does remind me of other events that have happened in Europe over the years.
I think they're was an event at some sort of a Christmas bazaar or
something like that in Germany at one point or there's been similar types of events over the years with
the end result always being to try to scare people away from having any sort of holidays or
getting together with other people in public. Yes, yes, good points.
No doubt this was intentional, and it contradicts the official left-wing narrative.
We're glad to have Scott joining us now.
How the Waukesha Parade Hall was made possible by left-wing district attorneys' attempts at bail reform.
According to Betsy Brainerd Smith, a retired police sergeant, law enforcement in cities including Milwaukee, New York, Chicago, L.A.
are facing not only understaffing but low morale due to the disastrous policies of releasing criminals back on the street.
Which is at little cost to them, but at great expense to the communities that are so affected by having them back out on the street.
These extremely liberal prosecutors want to talk about restorative justice, and what that means is putting the public in danger, trying to give them too many opportunities to re-offend.
The controversy surrounding bail reform has reared its ugly head in the wake of the Waukesha Christmas Parade attack by Darryl Brooks Jr., accused of five, as of Tuesday, now six, counts of intentional homicide.
Brooks has a rap sheet spanning 50 pages, but he was out on bail for only $1,000 after stealing a woman's cell phone, punching her in the face, and running her over with an SUV, presumably The same car used in the assault on the parade.
When we arrest somebody, especially for a violent crime, and they're out almost immediately, and then they re-offend, that wears on the absolute soul of police officers.
I mean, think of all the time and effort it takes to track them down, to gather the evidence, get them indicted, bring them to jail, get them convicted, and it's all undone by left-wingers like this District Attorney John Chisholm.
Who announced an internal investigation into its own office and its recommendation bail be set so low, but that appears to have been his own intention.
The state's bail recommendation in this case was inappropriately low in light of the nature of recent changes, charges, and appending charges.
He's saying this, in other words, in retrospect, even though he had promoted low bail and was even boasting about it, In addition to his lengthy criminal record, he had an outstanding warrant in Nevada for actually not registering as a sex offender, but also he has charges of bail jumping.
So, I mean, think about it.
Here's a video showing what happened.
It's a bit horrific, but I will play it again.
It's a bit of a shock.
Oh, my God.
Oh, my God.
That's a guy who was let out on the street on $1,000 bail, even though among his offenses, was running over his girlfriend with the very same vehicle that he used here to mow down the parade.
His colleague in Waukesha took a slightly different approach this time around.
She asked for what was granted bail at $5 million, supposedly high enough he couldn't possibly pay it.
But the mistake is people like George Soros, who support all these things, could pay it and get him out anyway.
He never should have been let out earlier because of the warrant from Nevada.
But even if there hadn't been a warrant in Nevada, the bail should have been sufficient.
Only a thousand, obviously not.
This could easily fall in the category of attempted murder, meaning driving over his girlfriend with his car.
This, allowing him out with his trivial bail, is so egregious someone should lose their job over it.
That's how bad it is.
Meanwhile, Joseph A. Kemp put out the following tweet, call to prayer, for Jaisal and Torres 11 fighting for life right now after their Christmas parade attack by terrorist pedophile Daryl Edward Brooks.
Brooks was released from custody two days prior to the attack pending trial for violent offenses on a thousand dollars bail.
At the time he was released from custody he had an active warrant for his arrest in Nevada for failure to register on the sex offender registry.
The district attorney's office bragged online about his efforts to reform the bail system.
Her pelvis is broken, she's lost a kidney, she has lacerations on her lungs and only kidney, bleeding internally, suffered much bruising around her face and body, a skull fracture.
Here's this darling 11-year-old girl who's going to be affected for the rest of her life by this mystery and absolutely disgusting.
Scott, we're so glad you could join us.
Your thoughts?
Well, the true test of this case and the hypocrisy of the country and the judicial system or the righteousness of it is if they charge him with a hate crime.
They charge him with purposefully targeting people who are white.
Uh, if that can be done in every other case that exists, they certainly should apply it to this case, too, and raise this as a significant issue.
And I think, you know, the attempted murder of his girlfriend with the car, and this certainly sets a character.
But it's absolutely horrific, and it shows you really the depth of animalism that animates so many of these black, thuggish, gangster, tattooed-face, rapster, criminal, pedophile rapists.
You know, they really are Yeah, it's unbelievable.
and they should be treated that way.
So I think this is, again, another indication, I think, of the hypocrisy and the violence
that is under the surface.
Jim?
Yeah, it's unbelievable.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think this is indicative of what we've seen over the past couple of years,
starting with the pandemic.
The Democrats used this as an opportunity to release people on bail, or even have them released without bail at this point.
They were letting criminals out early.
And claiming it was because the jails were crowded and people could get COVID, so they were letting people out of jail early and finding all kinds of reasons to put people back on the streets.
I'm also wondering if this individual has any sort of drug use history, drug problems, because I know fentanyl and other types of these hard drugs are available right now, just coming over the US border like crazy right now.
Really affecting people and it's something that's not discussed with the mainstream media and of course in these democrat run led areas.
Don, you wanted to add?
Yeah, I guess one word exception to what Scott said is what people being black will say that People who are perverts are in all races and in all positions and statuses, even in leadership.
How about people who are really pretty sick up there?
And I think we're seeing that in all kinds of stuff with this COVID and Omicron and all this other stuff.
But it isn't just the race, but it's sort of bringing it up.
There's a lot of history that is really untoward and people doing things that are And getting away with it.
So that's my little thought.
Thanks, Don.
Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson, the media won't investigate the motives in the Waukesha massacre.
Here's why.
Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges in Kenosha just two days later.
A black nationalist BLM supporter drove an SUV through a Christmas parade in Waukesha.
It was a slaughter.
These are all Tucker's words, by the way.
Six were killed, including three grandmothers and an eight-year-old boy, 47, were injured very badly, some of them children.
Police say the man who did this is a career criminal named Daryl Brooks.
As of tonight, he's not publicly explaining why he committed mass murder.
Instead, the media and local authorities have decided to speak for him.
The main thing they want you to know is these killings had absolutely nothing to do with the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict just two days before.
Nothing whatsoever.
The timing is just one of those amazing coincidences.
There is no evidence this is a terrorist incident, announced Waukesha Chief of Police.
But if indiscriminately murdering women and children at a Christmas parade isn't terrorism, then what exactly is it?
Or what exactly is?
Well, it's a vehicular mishap.
Here's how Twitter's in-house news team described it.
Five people dead and more than 40 injured after car drives through parade.
Car!
It's the fault of the red SUV.
Other news had another explanation handy.
They told us Brooks was fleeing from knife fight.
And the implication, of course, was he got spooked and drove through the parade by accident.
You know, as you do.
Then MSNBC took the theory a step deeper and suggested the police had somehow goaded Daryl Books into driving into people by firing a gun at him.
It only turns out that that only happened when he was leaving after having run through the parade, not when he was entering.
So Brooks was doing whatever he could to get away from police so effectively, it's the cops' fault.
Except, no, that's not what happened.
Eyewitnesses, many described Brooks zigzagging down the street, trying to murder as many innocent people as he could.
The killings were absolutely intentional, and no, Brooks was not being chased by the police.
That's a lie.
So much for that theory.
So the question remains, why did Daryl Brooks commit mass murder in Waukesha?
The media don't seem interested in finding out.
Not even a little bit.
So they've decided to ignore the story completely.
And they are.
Subpoenas to Roger Stone from some fake congressional committee are apparently more important than Six's death, like a Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
As far as the national media are concerned, it's simply not happening.
The more we learn about Daryl, the easier it is to understand why the media don't want to talk about him.
Brooke's social media feeds are full of racist and black nationalist propaganda.
In one of his rap songs, he includes lines from Malcolm X justifying race hate against whites.
He posted a picture of a fruit bowl arranged to display the letters B-L-L with a raised fist, and not insignificantly.
He also criticized the jury's verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse case on Facebook.
One BLM activist was happy to connect the dots.
He described Book's mass murder as retaliation for the Rittenhouse acquittal watch.
BLM activists vomit.
They have someone in custody.
We may have to wait and see what they say, why this happened.
It sounds like it's possible that the revolution has started in Wisconsin.
It started with this Christmas parade.
The initial person that reached out to me said this has to do with a verdict.
Tucker, this has to do with the verdict.
That's the obvious conclusion.
Is it true?
Again, we've not confirmed it, but we can be absolutely certain the national media will spend zero time trying to find out why, because they're implicated.
News organizations spent more than a year telling us that a case that had precisely nothing to do with race was somehow a referendum on civil rights of black people and the rise of white supremacy.
So if it turns out that those lies, and they are lies, got six people murdered, they'll probably be the last to tell us.
We do know that Darryl Books should never have been on the street in the first place.
He was a thoroughly loathsome person.
Want evidence?
Well, he bragged about pimping his 16-year-old girlfriend, Books.
Now all of a sudden I'm a pedophile?
Let me explain that.
Ten years ago in 2006, I got a case with my oldest daughter's mama.
Yes, my baby mama.
I didn't know the bitch was 16 at the time.
She gave a statement to the police.
Yeah, she was hoeing and I was pimping and that she was 16 and I didn't know that, okay?
Yeah, for some reason this guy spent most of his life free.
A few weeks ago, probably not surprisingly, he was charged with punching the mother of his latest child in the face and then running her over with his car.
So he should have been in jail for that.
But the Milwaukee County District Attorney, a radical called John Chisholm, released books on a $1,000 bail.
So $1,000 for beating and running over a woman.
Why?
Well, because John Chisholm believes that bail is racist.
A few years ago, Chisholm acknowledged that letting violent criminals out of jail was certain to cost lives, but he explained it's still worth it because of equity.
Quoting him.
Is there going to be an individual I divert or I put into a treatment program who's going to go out and kill somebody?
You bet.
Guaranteed.
It is guaranteed to happen.
It does not invalidate the overall approach.
Tucker, in other words, the deaths of innocents, old ladies, small children are small pies to pay because the principle of equity is so beautiful and so important.
That is a diseased way of thinking.
It's how cult leaders and dictators think.
It's not a Western worldview.
But suddenly, it's a mainstream position within the Democratic Party.
Scott, I think Tucker was on fire here.
Your thoughts?
Well, he certainly is one of the few thinkers in the media.
And, you know, part of the investigation needs to look into this guy and determine if he was a Black Muslim, because there you add a religious fanaticism to his Wahhabist ideology.
If he is, and many of the militant Black Muslims are You know, viciously anti-white, and they blame, ignorantly, whites for slavery and things like that.
They don't blame the Arabs.
So that's a question.
Is he a black Muslim?
And not all Muslims are like that.
The Shia and the Iranians, I certainly found no animosity in them, but this is indeed A reaction to the Rittenhouse verdict of innocence.
And you know, the thing is, Jim, they're going, these Black behaviors and this Black venom and this Black hysteria is only going to end up destroying, you know, any advances that Blacks think that they have made over the last 50, 60 years.
They will be retrograding and deteriorating and any in any social conditions that will result in the ostracization of blacks from, you know, jobs and businesses and society so These sort of things don't help the blacks at large.
It only destroys them and it hurts them.
Now, they're not all like that, of course.
I've known a lot of blacks in the military and the government and such, but they're the intelligent, articulate, thinking, well-speaking, well-dressing, you know, black Americans.
But these sort of tattooed face pieces of garbage, You know, really belong in the garbage heap cemetery because they don't add anything to society and they only destroy their own race and their own reputation.
So the mainstream media, of course, throwing this out and ignoring it is why most Americans are completely disconnecting from CNN and MSNBC and the New York Times and all of these, you know, attempts to Push this black propaganda and all this.
So you really are seeing a lot of people waking up by the actions of the media and these black fanatics.
And I think people aren't going to put up with it for very long at all, Jim.
I think it's extremely telling that the media don't want to address the question.
I think Tucker hit the nail right on the head.
Holly, your thoughts.
Well, as I mentioned before, I think this is just extremely telling of what we are seeing and will continue to see with these Democrat policies.
It's extremely liberal policies to violent crime in the major cities now.
And they're using race as the excuse or they're, you know, they use COVID as an excuse.
And they can't really hide behind this anymore because we're seeing more and more violent crime homicides are way up
in the United States right now, especially in major cities.
And it's all due to these policies where they are letting criminals,
people who have committed violent crimes, like as you described and Tucker described,
violent crimes against his own pregnant baby mamas, if you will, and they still are allowing him out.
He should not be in society once you've committed that many crimes.
You should be getting help and shouldn't be allowed to drive a car
after committing attempted vehicular manslaughter, it sounds like, already.
I mean, this should be, the blood should be on the hands of these prosecutors.
I mean, the- district attorneys and whatnot who have continued to let
and if just that individual I mean there must be dozens more other people who they've let out who
have committed just just as violent acts of crime and will continue to do so and like you said
it'll only be a blurb in the mainstream news unfortunately. Good comments. Don just
noticing what you've got there.
Equality is very different than equity.
Equality would be like equal justice under the law.
Everyone measured by the same standard.
Equity means giving people what they deserve, which requires a subjective standard.
Equity versus equality.
Ah, you got it.
I see, Don.
There are two parts there.
Way to go.
Okay.
Fascinating.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch.
Far-left actress Debra Messing bucks the party narrative on lethal Waukesha parade attack.
One of the few on the left is demanding for the media to frame the horrific incident as a domestic terror attack.
Debra Messing, dear mainstream media, a man intentionally drove his car through a parade killing six and injuring 50-plus.
It was not an accident.
Call it by its name.
Waukesha Massacre.
And it was a domestic terrorist attack.
Don't minimize, please.
She has been outspoken in the past against conservatives, former President Trump and his supporters.
In one humorous instance, she expressed shock and confusion over a headline from the far-right satire site The Babylon Bee.
Meanwhile, two U.S.
Senators make a joint statement on exploiting the Waukesha Christmas Parade.
has been charged with five counts of first degree so far, given the extraordinary bail
of five million, Messi known for her title role in a television comedy series, Will & Grace.
Meanwhile, two U.S. senators make a joint statement on exploiting the Waukesha Christmas
parade.
I am somewhat bothered by this.
Senators released a joint statement by Senator Ron Johnson and Tammy Baldwin as follows.
It's come to our attention outside individuals or groups may attempt to exploit the tragedy that occurred last Sunday in Waukesha for their own political purposes, as the U.S.
Senators representing Wisconsin won from each political party.
We're asking anyone considering such action to cease and desist.
We have full confidence in the local officials who responded with extraordinary professionalism, competence, integrity, and compassion.
They have many different duties to perform in the coming days, weeks, and months, and should be afforded the respect and support they deserve to undertake their responsibilities without outside interference.
Their top priority is to begin the healing process within Waukesha by providing comfort and support to surviving family members of the deceased and those injured both in body and spirit.
They must also conduct a thorough investigation and afford the accused full due process.
These will not be easy tasks, will be made even more difficult if conducted within a politically charged atmosphere.
Too late.
We ask everyone to demonstrate their interest and concern by praying for the victims, their families, and the entire community of Waukesha.
And what I say to that is, the media isn't giving us even the basic facts about the case.
So I think these are rather misconceived statements, even though I'm a huge fan of Ron Johnson, less so of Tammy.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, Ron Johnson, like many of these other politicians, toots a good horn, but he doesn't go into battle.
I spoke with an investigator of Ron Johnson's at length over several hours, over a few days.
Over the shell game report and Lieutenant Colonel Schaefer and all of the material that was contained in my report about Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, the State Department, and Ron Johnson did nothing, and his investigator did nothing, and I exposed Covington and Burling, so there's no excuse for that.
And, you know, I think they're just like parrots, and they're actors, and they like to play a good game, but they don't play, you know, they don't really get into the war.
So, you know, I think we need better leaders rising up, and that's going to, you know, clean out the gene pool that we have that's been afflicting us in this country.
And, you know, the increasing shooting events and things like that, we're only going to see more of those.
The question is, are some of these false flags, are they distraction operations, or are they real and legitimate?
Are they, you know, behavioral reactions to the Rittenhouse verdict and the other activities?
I think this one, you know, has a particular authenticity to it, but we're entering a very twilight world in this country that we have to keep our eyes peeled and not be fooled by any issue or any person, Jim.
Yeah, good stuff, Scott.
Yes, Paula, your thoughts?
Well, I'm very concerned about the increasing in crime that we are seeing now and we will see in the future as we see inflation going up like crazy, housing becoming less and less affordable for people.
People being forced out of work due to these mandates.
And we've talked about this, the supply chain breakup.
And then on top of that, just the years of Democratic policies, oftentimes decades of the Democrats running these cities and having no opposition.
There's no strength on the Republican Party to really get into these These big cities and actually stand up to what is going on in these Democrat run cities right now.
We know, of course, as we've talked about, there's so much election rigging right now.
They own these major cities.
We've talked about this at length with the Democratic Party and the labor unions working together to control
all of the voting and the polling centers in these major cities.
So they've got these major cities at a stronghold right now.
And we're also seeing a coordinated lootings right now, which I think in my mind is also organized
by the same people.
So I'm very concerned.
I think if you're in a major city right now, if you're one of our viewers,
it would definitely be a good time to get out if you haven't already,
because there's no one stopping people from committing violent crimes
and from looting at this point, and that it will extend to people's homes.
We're seeing it right now in public spaces, in stores, etc., on the street, at events, but it's going to start happening to people's homes very soon if this does not stop.
I think you're right, Holly.
I mean, what could have been more obvious that defunding the police is going to mean less police on the street?
And with less police on the street, law enforcement will decline, more crimes will occur, and they're going to get increasingly serious.
But we have this Democrat narrative espoused by critical race theory that you're either an oppressor or the oppressed, and the oppressors are the white people and everyone else is oppressed.
And if you're black, you're a victim, and the whites are the aggressors.
So when we have an event like Mishawaka, where the black is the aggressor and mowing down a bunch of whites, they don't want to talk about it.
Scott, your further thoughts?
Oh, Scott.
Yeah.
Yeah.
No, no, no.
I have nothing to add, Jim.
Go ahead.
Okay.
But I mean, that's what's crucial and why the media doesn't want to talk about it.
Get this.
Only 36% believe Kyle Rittenhouse media coverage was fair.
There were all kinds of videos of the altercation.
They proved beyond any doubt he was the innocent victim, an illegitimate peer of his own life, when these brave scumbags, who were also white, attacked him, one with a gun, one with a skateboard, one with his bare hands.
Let me ask, More people die from being beaten to death with bare hands or strangled with bare hands than die from guns.
And of those who die from guns, the overwhelming majority die from handguns, very rarely from rifles.
And of course, overwhelmingly, it's blacks killing other blacks with handguns.
When 1,000 likely voters were asked how fair was the coverage in the Rittenhouse trial, only 14% said very fair, only 22% somewhat.
Meanwhile, a clear plurality, 47%, said not very fair, 19%, or not at all fair, 28%.
very fair. 19% or not at all fair 28. 18 had no opinion.
Here's an even more stunning number.
Only 15% said coverage was biased in favor of Rittenhouse.
23% said it was neutral, but another clear plurality, 47%, said it was biased against Rittenhouse.
In their disgraceful and disgracefully dishonest coverage of the story, the corporate media did not even try to hide its two primary goals.
One, lynch Rittenhouse with an unjust life sentence, and two, if Rittenhouse were acquitted, incite riots in Democrat-run cities.
Meanwhile, RSN, which is a left-wing site, is trying to distort the story, shift the emphasis.
We knew they were going to do it.
Kyle Rittenhouse has set off a QAnon civil war.
Kyle Rittenhouse comments about his former lawyer, a top leader in the QAnon world, has unleashed a toxic battle within the conspiracy movement.
Yes, Nothing about a black BLM guy mowing down and slaughtering a bunch of Americans at a parade.
No, no, let's talk about Kyle's comments about Elle Lin Wood.
While most Americans are preparing to have a nice day on Thanksgiving, pro-Trump lawyer Lin Wood is spending the holiday on Telegram complaining about his children sparking a civil war in the QAnon world.
News to me, by the way.
Wood, who said Thursday his children would once again not be spending Thanksgiving with him, has spent the last three days in an increasingly toxic battle on the encrypted messaging app, where Wood has blasted his critics, praised his defenders, has spat Again, when Kyle Rittenhouse publicly accused him of taking advantage, which has consumed the QAnon world, sucking in almost every major figure in the Q universe, including former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, Georgia Reverend Marjorie Taylor Greene, my fellow CEO Mike Lindell, and right-wing talking head Dan Bongino.
QAnon followers, who had until now almost universally seen Wood as a leading figure within the movement, have been divided, unsure whether to continue to follow him or turn their backs.
As some QAnon believers spend Thanksgiving in Dallas awaiting JFK's return, notice here the attempt to imply they're all loons, The Wood Controversy threatens to cause a skiven within the QAnon church.
Notice it's supposed to be a religious movement that could irrevocably change the course of the movement.
The controversy began with Tucker Carlson, the increasingly far-right adjacent Fox News host, secured the first interview with Rittenhouse after he was acquitted.
During the interview, Rittenhouse said Wood, who briefly represented him last year, had taken advantage of him and the reason he spent 87 days in jail, and said the $2 million raised by Wood's fight back group for Rittenhouse bail was for their own benefit.
Almost immediately, the Wood pile-on began.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it's very strange in a lot of different ways.
Again, Kyle Rittenhouse being represented by Lin Wood and these others, there certainly is a requirement to explain what happened, why things were done certain ways.
Rittenhouse isn't the sharpest tack, of course.
He kind of glorified not taking a shower for a month or something like that.
And that's really quite ridiculous because he was afraid of the guards and it's just, you know, that's not how things work.
I know, I've been there.
So, you know, there are some very odd things about the Rittenhouse Kid.
He's lucky to have survived with his life and it wasn't because of his tactical expertise, it was because of the clumsiness And the inefficiency of his attackers.
And of course, God was sort of guiding him.
But I think he's really awoken the American public up to the confirmation of the Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms, and the right to shoot people who try and hurt you and kill you.
And that's going to gird and strengthen and replicate all across America.
And that's going to put the left on their heels and retreat.
That's why the media has gone apoplectic.
Is because this is a confirmation that Americans will kill if their lives are put in danger using the Rittenhouse precedent.
Now, Lin Wood's relationship, you know, with Michael Flynn and Frank, or Mike Lindell and Ricky Schroeder, the actor put up the money to get him out.
And how that's evolving is very strange.
How Michael Flynn and Sidney Powell and all these people fit into there and the QAnon thing, this article obviously is a hit piece.
They're trying to create a divide and conquer movement.
Again, the QAnon and all the stuff that started with Trump, it got people thinking, but if Trump doesn't step back and this whole presidency of Biden gets thrown out, he's not going to be able to run in 2024, because people will say, you're a coward, you're a weakling, or you're a traitor, because you abandon the field of battle instead of standing up and doing what should have been done, and that is Uh, you know, declaring this a national emergency, declaring this a national security incident.
And as a result of this, again, what's happened with this vaccine and the killing of people and the infertilization of people and all of this stuff with the COVID thing, all of that's on Trump's neck.
And Flynn and all these people that are up there, they're going to be seen and judged as liars and empty suits and snake oil salesmen that have not followed through.
They haven't produced anything.
And again, it's still in process, but I think like Mike Harrison said, every day that goes by that Trump and all of these people that have been blowing this horn of, he's returning to power, it's only a matter of time, it's this, you know, next month, next month, next month, unless that is all resolved in favor of exposing the fraud, all of them will be exposed as profiteers and liars and corrupt And I don't think people are really going to put too much stock in them.
They're not going to invest in them because this is not about them or Trump or the QAnon thing.
This is about America waking up and seeing authoritarianism and tyranny and the left communism trying to take over the country.
And I don't think people are going to tolerate it.
And as I've said before, you already see states declaring independence from the federal government.
The National Guard of Oklahoma has declared they will not be forcing their soldiers to get a shot in defiance of the Pentagon.
That is a huge monumental political plate tectonic shift.
When the National Guard of a state declares independence from the Pentagon's policies, it's only a matter of time before that state and other states all fall together into a consortium, coalition, confederacy, and declare, not only are we not following any guidance from Washington on this subject, we're not recognizing Washington as a legitimate power at all.
The Union is still in effect.
But any recognition of these usurpers and these fraudulent politicians is null and void.
I think that's the future destiny of this country, and people are going to be rising up as political leaders.
Like a gal that we had on last week who was actively raided by the FBI, and I'll get into that more, but she was actively raided by the FBI.
It is a canary in the coal mine incident where this mother This housewife and an activist parent who has been protesting all of this corruption of the schools, the FBI put her on a list, broke down her door, and terrorized her and her kids.
And people should go to AmericanMediaPeriscope.net, go to Great Awakenings, and you can see the show on Friday.
It will chill your blood, but at the same time fire a passion that I think is only going to grow and grow and grow When people see the weaponization of the intelligence and the law enforcement and FBI and Department of Justice against parents like this gal, you know, there you've got a civil war without even trying to start one.
Jim?
Yeah.
Well, you've made a lot of important points there, Scott.
One minor detail, I watched the whole interview with Tucker and read about it, and Kyle didn't not take a shower by choice.
And in fact, when he finally had the opportunity, his skin was peeling off his body.
I don't think he was at all happy about that.
Well, but he said his cell didn't have running water.
Apparently it did not have running water, Scott.
Yeah, he was explicit about it.
I know, but yeah.
That's unbelievable.
I know, I know, I know.
Go ahead.
Holly, your thoughts.
Well, I think Kyle Rittenhouse and others, I had to look up their name.
Mark and Patricia McCloskey from St.
Louis, the people who were charged with waving guns in a threatening manner at Antifa and other, you know, rioters, protesters, whatever the mainstream news wants to call them, who broke into a gated community.
The McCloskey's had I think the house that they had was it on the National Register of Historic Homes
it was like basically like a museum home that they were that they owned and maintained and
You know, you can see the woman she's got her gun like this like real threatening but serious
I mean they did their best I mean these people literally broke down down the gate and
were worth marching and threatening people on their doorstep basically and
Threatening to burn down their home Right, and I mean these and the prosecutors went after them
for pointing their own guns on their own property I add intruders so it's the same thing a very similar to in
for pointing their own guns on their own property at at intruders so it's the same thing. A very similar to in the
the case with Kyle Rittenhouse Right. And I mean these and the prosecutors went after them
case with Kyle Rittenhouse, they want to make an example of anyone will do any
sort of standing up any sort of protecting, they want to basically make sure that everyone is scared to death of
what could possibly happen to them if they stand up for themselves and as the prosecution argued in the Rittenhouse
case.
And so Kyle Rittenhouse should have just taken it you should have pointed his gun and should have fired a gun,
you should have taken the beating because apparently that's the American thing to do is just roll over and and let
criminals and people that you know the individuals that he shot.
You know one of them I don't remember his name right now but he had been just released out of jail like literally
just released. Rosenbaum.
Rosenbaum, Fred.
Sodomizing a little boy and forcibly doing oral sex on the boy.
Five cases of child rapes got five cases.
And people are acting like, you know, he was the victim in this case and, you know, there was no justice in this ruling.
And I do recommend people listen to Scott's interview about the FBI raid because it's so telling, it's so chilling, and these individuals like Antifa and others who showed up, you know, on the McCloskey's doorstep, you know, those, they get charged and yet the FBI, who are individual citizens, as that woman said, they were just
saying, oh, I'm just doing my job.
Scott was talking about how she should turn around and sue these individuals of working
for the FBI. And I am concerned about the expansion of the IRS, because I believe this will also be
another thuggery organization. And as people try to get away from this social media, social credit,
biometric tracking, this whole everything where they want to track every single what $600,
$600 transaction, where are they going to use the IRS as thugs in the same way as the FBI?
I'm very concerned about that.
So these cases might not seem important, but in the larger scheme, it's part of a larger Chilling effect to make sure that people do not stand up out of fear of this horrific retaliation.
Yeah, go ahead Scott.
What Holly's just describing, we've said it before, and I believe what's going to be happening, because of the threats and the intimidation and the pressures and the false prosecutions and the prosecutorial misconduct against the McCloskeys, against Rittenhouse, against these others, what I anticipate happening are people are going to very quietly shoot and kill or defend themselves and not report anything.
You're not going to be reporting stuff to the police.
And also the police are going to recognize that.
Let me say one story.
I remember an old friend of mine who was Italian and was in Oakland and stuff.
He told a story.
about uh you know a black robber coming into a convenience store and the cop and he shot him and had to kill you know kill him the cops had come and they they had like a friendship or affinity and they said to the guy uh you've got 15 minutes to clear out and erase the surveillance tape And he did.
He erased it.
So the cops came and said, oh, OK, the surveillance tape wasn't working, nothing to investigate.
And that was it.
That is going to happen, I think, more and more and more because people are not going to tolerate being abused.
They're not going to bring a skateboard to a gunfight.
They're going to shoot and they're just not going to report it.
And the police are going to be on the side of the citizens, I think, and That's not a vigilante situation, but I think you're going to have more and more of that happening, Jim.
Yeah, let me just add, it looks to me like the Soros agenda is to get DAs who are going to defend the criminals and suppress the citizens who are issuing complaints.
I mean, it seems they flipped the role of the law.
So instead of protecting the law abiding, they're protecting the law violating.
This is really disgusting.
And it's perfectly consistent with Soros' avowed objective to destroy the United States.
Now, this is just rather amusing.
Some have thought Carl Rittenhouse looked like Noah Posner all grown up.
And while I admit that there's a certain resemblance, we know that, in fact, Noah Posner wasn't even a real person.
Noah Posner was a fiction made up out of photographs of his older stepbrother, purportedly here on the left, Michael Vabner.
When he was a child.
Thus, when Kelly Watt first proposed the hypothesis that Kyle was Noah all grown up, or that Noah was Kyle as a child, six of us went to work on it.
We discovered they had the same eyes, the same eyebrows, the same ears, the same nose, the same mouth, the same shape of skull.
I sent to Larry Rivera, who'd done brilliant work proving the figure known as Doorman in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository was, in fact, Lee Oswald, as Harold Weisberg, Jim Garrison, and others have believed.
So I was sure he could help to solve the issue by superposition.
I sent him the top two photographs there without identifying who they were, never mentioning Sandy Hook or anything of the like.
I just asked, are they or are they not the same person?
And he created a GIF, which occurs when you can have two photographs with the same perspective and make the distance between the pupils of the eyes the same.
And here you see Noah turning into Michael Vabner, or alternatively, shall we say, Michael Vabner turning into Noah, since that was how it was done.
And in my opinion, this is among the most powerful proofs that Sandy Hook was fabricated They fake the kids using photographs of older kids when they were younger, where one of my colleagues, Mona Alexis Presley, has reason to believe some of the parents even used photographs of themselves when they were children to be their alleged deceased kids from Sandy Hook.
Scott, your thoughts?
Yeah, and it's all about money.
It's all about a massive gun control event cover-up that the FBI, the Department of Justice, FEMA, and everyone was playing a part in.
And I think the exposure of that that you've done, Jim, will inevitably be brought into evidence in any legal filing.
Because when you exposed this, and many others did, of course, too, As a fraud, it nullifies any claims made by this Posner that you defamed him by, you know, making any claims.
He can't be defamed if what he did was a fraud and a lie, and the court should be advised that this is fraud upon the court.
The event did not happen.
Therefore, you can't have a criticism or a defamation suit against Jim Fetzer for exposing the truth.
And that, even if it goes up to the Supreme Court, that will vindicate you, Jim, by exposing this entire scenario did not happen.
And the court has been abused and corrupted.
And by that, the Constitution violated.
It is a massive psychological operation on the American public for political purposes.
And it may get to the Supreme Court, and hopefully it will, Jim.
Thanks, Scott.
Yeah, I'm working on it, but believe me, trying to intervene in various cases to get the truth out about Sandy Hook is proving very challenging.
They're throwing up every obstacle they can.
On both sides, both the plaintiffs and the defendants do not want my intervention when I'm pointing out the cases are predicated on the assumption On taking for granted that 20 kids and six adults died at Sandy Hook, for which they have no established proof, and I have a mountain of proof to establish the contrary, so that these are illicit proceedings, even judicial.
They're improper and wrong.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I don't have a whole lot to say about that except that I wish you the best with all of your work and it would be interesting to see.
I don't know if these individuals, you know, the children who supposedly would be now adults now or be in college or they would be old enough to speak out, you know, or say something if they in fact are still alive.
Or if they say if they are who they say they are if they've got a different name or what they're doing now so I would be interested to see if anyone would ever want to blow the whistle you know and say that they were one of these children or whatever or their parents put them up to this or if they're just totally fine if they are alive and living their lives to someone else what you know be fascinating to see what they're actually doing if that's the case you know.
Well, Wolfgang Helbig is a photograph of eight or of the Sandy girls who are alive and well and looking real perky and most decidedly not desiccated or six feet under.
So there's a lot going on there.
Let's see.
I know we're coming up to our break.
We may have time to commence.
Three minutes.
Don?
Three minutes.
Three minutes.
DOJ to pay millions over the FBI failure.
This is in relation to Parkland.
This was another fraudulent event, completely staged.
The kids were actually sent home at 1 p.m.
There were 3,500 students there.
They were sent home at 1 p.m.
because it was a holiday, Valentine's Day.
Only a couple of dozen stayed behind to play the role of crisis actor in this alleged school shooting.
In a joint filing Monday, lawyers representing families of those killed shades of Sandy Hook and injured during the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High in Parkland confirmed a financial settlement had been reached.
Now, the DOJ has agreed to pay out some $127.5 million.
This is quite stunning considering they were simply faking the whole thing, just as at Sandy Hook.
The alleged survivor's families split $27 to $130 million divided by 26 families.
That's $1 million to $5 million for having pretended to have lost a child during a mass shooting that in fact was a FEMA drill masquerading to promote gun control.
The settlement centers around the FBI failure to properly investigate two tips about the gunman.
Although no resolution could ever destroy what the Parkland family's lost, this settlement marks an important step toward justice that Christina Infante, lead attorney for the families of the victims, who has to know better.
One of the warnings provided the FBI came about a month before when a woman contacted to say she feared a former student of Marjory Stoneman Douglas, Nicholas Cruz, had armed himself and intended to slip into school and start shooting the place up.
This is very curious.
To my understanding, Nicholas Cruz was still a student there, and imagine how many tips the FBI must get.
Another tip-off cited a YouTube comment from a user under the name of Nicholas Cruz, who claimed they were going to become a professional school shooter.
The FBI previously accepted that it received the two tips, but failed to act on them as it must on the millions of tips it gets, the overwhelming majority of which are not very credible.
This could have been a clever way to plant the idea to bring about a suit just like this one.
17 were killed, another 17 wounded, except, among other points, they forgot to put up the obituaries.
That's just one of the failures here.
Who'd have been expelled from the school before the incident?
Pled guilty last month to multiple counts of first-degree murder and attempted murder.
This is poor Cruz.
Prosecutors have said they'll seek the death penalty.
His legal team hoping to avoid that fate when the penalty phase of the trial begins next year.
But just to illustrate how fake it was, this is from inside a classroom at Marjory Stoneman High School where they use a training dummy with no head and no arms and a pool of fake blood to simulate an actual victim.
Here's a video of kids listening to their fake screams.
Watch it.
We'll talk about it after the break.
I'm so sorry.
It's okay, darling.
Oh my gosh!
Oh my gosh!
Oh my god.
Come on.
Water bottle, can you get back up?
Get the bag, get the water bottle.
Let's go, let's go.
Oh my God.
Come on, come on.
Oh my God.
Come on, come on.
Oh my God.
Run, run, run!
One of the students interviewed Kelsey Friend, student who survived massacres, said, it was like a movie.
It looked so real, but it felt so fake.
Dawn, take us out.
We'll return to Parkland after the break.
Oh, yeah.
Looks so real, but been so fake.
It's like that's the news these days, and that's what's really happening.
And so come on back for more real news here, folks.