All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 19, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:57:17
The Raw Deal (19 November 2021) Rittenhouse NOT GUILTY!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Bye.
When you attend a funeral, it is sad to think that sooner or later those you love will do the same for you.
And you may have thought it tragic not to mention other adjectives to think of all the weeping they will do.
But don't you worry, no more ashes, no more sackcloth, and an armband made of black cloth will someday nevermore adorn a sleeve.
For if the bomb that drops on you gets your friends and neighbors...
There'll be nobody left behind to grieve.
And we will all go together when we go.
What a comforting fact that is to know.
Universal bereavement, an inspiring achievement.
Yes, we all will go together when we go.
We will all go together when we go.
All suffused with an incandescent glow.
No one will have the endurance to collect on his insurance.
Lloyd's of London will be loaded when they go.
We will all fry together when we fry.
We'll be French fried potatoes by and by.
There will be no more misery when the world is our rotisserie.
Yes, we all will fry together when we fry.
We will all bake together when we bake.
There'll be nobody present at the wake.
With complete participation in that grand incineration, nearly three billion hunks of well-done steak.
We will all char together when we char.
and let there be no moaning of the bar.
Just sing out a tedium when you see that ICBM and the party will be come as you are.
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, because we lost our guest on Wednesday and
had the opportunity for addressing the assassination of JFK, but where there may be others who
have questions about it, I'm going to open the lines early for the whole second hour.
Remember the number 540-352-4452.
540-352-4452, 540-352-4452 for the whole second hour, where I'll be commenting on the
current status of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial where there have been several rather extraordinary
events explained what I anticipate is going to be the outcome, and also cite several articles
from my blog, jamesfetzer.org, which I'm ecstatic to report is back up and active, and I publish,
since it went back online yesterday, six or seven blogs that are at
Actually, each and every one about rather important issues, including several on the Kyle Rittenhouse case, so I'll mention them.
So just know you can have the whole second hour to raise questions.
We have the 58th observance of the assassination on Monday, the 22nd, and virtually everyone
is aware.
That's where my serious research on conspiracies began with the assassination of JFK and the
controversy generated by Oliver Stone's film JFK.
And let me mention in that regard that yesterday I did a special two-hour version update of my, you know, Collaborative research on the assassination, which is at my bit shoot channel, Jim Fetzer.
So if you just scroll down, it's probably like the second or the third of those posted now.
Just yesterday as a JFK special, which I dedicated to Oliver Stone.
So for those who may want to share what The experts I brought together and I together in a coordinated effort have discovered about the assassination.
You'll find a distillation there on Bitchute Channel, Jim Fetzer.
Meanwhile, let me begin with a Kyle Rittenhouse situation here.
We have the judge.
Banning NBC and MSNBC from the courtroom after an alleged producer followed the jury bus last evening.
Well, it turned out to be a stringer, a person who identified himself as James J. Morrison, claiming he was a producer for NBC employed with MSNBC under the supervision of someone named Irene Bion, B-Y-O-N, in New York City for MSNBC.
He stated he'd been instructed by Bayan to follow the jury bus.
The matter is under further investigation at this point.
That's the latest I have.
He was ticketed for violating a traffic control signal.
He's not here today.
I have instructed that nobody from MSNBC News will be permitted in this building for the duration of the trial.
This is a very serious matter.
I don't know what the Climate truth of it is, but it would go without much thinking that someone who's following a jury bus, that's an extremely serious matter.
Now, he got the traffic ticket because he ran a light in order to keep up with the jury bus.
And I think it's pretty obvious that MSNBC and NBC had the objective of identifying the jurors.
Here's the explosive reaction from Twitter.
Jack Posobiec.
Judge Schroeder says the reporter who was taken into custody was James J. Morrison, and he claims to be working for Irene Byron of NBC in New York on LinkedIn.
There is an Irene Byron who lists herself as an NBC producer in New York.
Tim Pool.
Holy shit, this looks legit.
People already found Irene Byron at NBC via LinkedIn.
It seems that MSNBC was trying to expose the identity of the jury.
Or Rakita Media.
Breaking.
MSNBC instructed their journalists to follow the jury bus.
Here's another.
Jack Pasubic again.
Breaking.
MSNBC has been banned from Kenosha Courthouse for duration of Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
Julio Rosas.
Judge Schroeder.
Kenosha police reported someone followed the bus carrying the Rittenhouse jurors last night while claiming to work for MSNBC.
It is under investigation.
No one working for MSNBC will be allowed inside the courthouse for the duration of the trial.
Here's another.
Tim Poole.
Irene Byron has just nuked her LinkedIn account.
Holy shit!
Her account is still archived and available.
And then we have a photograph of her who appears to be Chinese.
NBC News producer Irene Byron instructed a reporter To follow a bus transporting the Rittenhouse jury in an effort to get pictures of them for intimidation purposes.
Trump was right.
The media is the enemy of the people, and I agree with that 100%.
The media has turned on the American people.
Well, I believe one of Trump's most valuable contributions to American society was to expose the fake news media.
Now, Andrew Branca, who's an expert on self-defense, he has a blog at LawOfSelfDefense.com.
He's done absolutely sensational analysis of all of the charges against Kyle Rittenhouse.
You can find on my blog the most recent Andrew Branca suspect a rogue juror number 54, four person, is holding back acquittal.
Hello.
Today completed the third day of jury deliberations in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse with no verdict being achieved before the jury was sent home for the day.
There wasn't much real action today with the exception of notable events and my own increasing belief that we're dealing with a single holdout juror for guilt and that this juror is number 54, a four person.
Now, if you go to my blog, if you go in for about 15 minutes, you'll see Andrew Branca giving an update and report and he talks about this juror.
You know, during juror selection, she seemed to know a lot about the case.
She knew the, you know, key parties, including those who had attacked Kyle by name.
She seems to be a bit on the arrogant side.
The judge believes that she's a diehard liberal and that she wants to get a conviction against Kyle.
And I frankly suspect that she is a plant.
That the Democrats had any number in the jury pool who are going to do their duty, you know, meaning get a conviction here regardless of the evidence, regardless of the evidence.
Now, included here with this wonderful interview with Judge Branca, who my regard is the single most authoritative source in legal analysis, I also added Is legal analysis and where he points out that there are five elements to self-defense.
These elements are.
And it's he's talking about them in relation to the assault by Joseph Rosenbaum.
Who actually had threatened to kill Kyle, had Kyle boxed in, who another witness testified, attacked him from behind when he was at the car dealership, tried to grab Kyle's weapon, and where Kyle wound up shooting him in the hand, in the leg, in the groin, and then when he was lunging toward Kyle in the back, which turned out to be the fatal wound.
Now, here's what Andrew Braca has to say about it.
The five elements.
Innocent.
Clearly it was Rosenbaum who was a physical aggressor here and Kyle was a victim of that unlawful attack.
This element is consistent with self-defense on these facts.
Imminent.
The attack Kyle was defending himself against was actually in progress and so qualifies as an imminent attack.
This element again is consistent with self-defense on these facts.
Proportionality.
By seeking to seize control of Kyle's rival, Rosenbaum was apparently arming himself for the purpose of carrying out his earlier death threat against Kyle and simultaneously attempting to disarm Kyle and leave him defenseless.
Rosenbaum's attack is therefore deadly in nature, justifying a proportional deadly force defense by Kyle.
This element is consistent with self-defense on these facts.
Avoidance.
Wisconsin is a stand-your-ground state, so the elements of avoidance would not normally apply in an otherwise lawful act of self-defense.
Even if it did apply, however, Kyle was in desperate flight from Rosenbaum, who sustained his relentless pursuit until a point of actual contact.
If avoidance did impose a legal duty to retreat, Kyle would have met that duty.
This element is consistent with self-defense on these facts.
Reasonableness.
The circumstances facing Kyle would certainly justify a subjectively genuine fear of deadly bodily harm, and there is nothing about Kyle's perceptions or reactions to those events which were those of an unreasonable person.
This is readily accessible from the video and eyewitness accounts of what happened.
This element is consistent with self-defense on these facts.
In short, there would appear to be no reason to believe, to a reasonable degree of legal certainty, that the state can disprove beyond a reasonable doubt Kyle's claim of self-defense with respect to Rosenbaum.
Conclusion.
The shooting of Rosenbaum by Kyle was lawful self-defense.
Now he proceeds to apply that to the other charges, count two, Reckless conduct toward Richard McGinnis, count three, the shooting of Anthony Huber, count four, the shooting of Gabe Grosskreutz, count five, reckless conduct toward an unknown male, and count six, the unlawful possession of a gun charge.
Let me address the following.
Given that this charge is a mere misdemeanor and that I have previously done a comprehensive legal analysis of this charge elsewhere, I'll simply Direct you all to that analysis of lawofselfdefense.com slash Rittenhouse, where you can find all our aggregated coverage of the Rittenhouse case.
Further, a conviction on this charge would in no way diminish the self-defense justification and lack of criminal recklessness we've already discussed with respect to the other charges.
I will note in passing That at a recent pre-trial hearing, even Judge Schroeder himself expressed confusion at how the relevant gun law statute was to be applied, suggesting that the statute in question is unconstitutionally vague on its face.
If so, the charge should be dismissed before trial, or alternatively, the jury not instructed on the charge before its deliberations.
Indeed, that's precisely what happened.
This charge was dismissed.
It turns out the law was a function of the length of the barrel, that you were not permitted to have a short-barreled rifle.
But Kyle's AR-15 was a perfectly standard AR-15, and therefore the law did not apply to Kyle.
So the prosecutors, and this is one of their multiple occurrences of malfeasance in this case, had surreptitiously introduced an additional charge about unlawful possession of a weapon that did not apply to Kyle.
So the judge dismissed the charge.
The jury does not have that before it for consideration.
Here's the bottom line.
The bottom line is that if the verdict in this case is based on actual merit and on the actual evidence on applicable law, the outcome ought to be not guilty on every felony count.
As for the gun charge, nobody seems agreed on how that law is to apply, but my own analysis suggests it's simply inapplicable on the face of this case or unconstitutionally vague.
OK, folks, don't forget to join us starting today for our daily coverage of the Rittenhouse trial, starting from jury selection and continuing through the verdict, and heaven forbid it should come to this, sentencing.
Now, this is all, I think, very, very appropriate.
We have an additional blog, actually two more, about Rittenhouse.
Here's a very nice piece entitled The Kyle Rittenhouse Prosecutor's Case Come Down to Rioting Good, Self-Defense Bad.
This is authored by Eddie Scarry, who observes that the bulk of Thomas Ringer, the prosecutor's questioning of Rittenhouse, assumed that unless a person has physically touched you, there's no reason to protect yourself with force that may prove deadly.
I liked Scary's theme so much, as I add in an editor's note, that I adapted it for a letter to the editor of the Wisconsin State Journal, which published a piece, Guilty or Innocent, Rittenhouse was wrong, the title of which they have changed in the online version as follows, knowing full well that this left-leaning paper was unlikely to publish it, and indeed they have not.
The title I suggested was scary.
Riding Good, Self-Defense Bad, Editor.
It's embarrassing that you have published an ideological defense of the Rittenhouse prosecution, where three members of the same family, the mayor, the DA, and the detective, appear to have conspired against Kyle to deny his legal rights.
Kyle took a citizen's commitment to defend property and human rights more seriously than the Kenosha police, who stood down while looting and rioting was taking place.
He sought to provide medical assistance for which he was attacked.
A meticulous legal analysis by Andrew Branca provides a thorough and detailed exoneration on every account.
That's why the prosecution now wants to include lesser charges.
They know they have no case.
Kyle was kicked in the face by one rioter.
Another tried to break his neck with a skateboard.
A third testified he had a handgun and was pointing it at Kyle, who shot him in the arm.
They, not Kyle, were the aggressors.
It's insulting for anyone to suggest that he was acting as a vigilante or patrolling with illegally obtained guns, neither of which appears to be the case.
On the contrary, Kyle's actions were heroic.
As a former Marine Corps officer who supervised 15 DIs and 300 recruits through basic training, his performance was admirable.
The attacks were imminent and deadly.
His actions were reasonable.
The media and its allies must attack Kyle because his example of self-defense is inspiring, and he showed the world why an AR-15 might make a difference for the public good.
He deserves our admiration.
James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
And it now appears that a rogue juror has thwarted the jury from acquitting him, which was unquestionably Her assigned task.
That was her mission.
Here's a scary piece I want to share with you from The Federalist, which is a simply excellent website and organization dedicated to upholding the Constitution and defending states' rights.
If you follow the prosecution's case against Kyle Rittenhouse, the only logical end is the assertion that self-defense is almost never an option, and visiting the scene of a riot is only okay if you are there to burn property.
There are other facets to lead prosecutor Thomas Binger's arguments.
That Rittenhouse, now 18, was in illegal possession of a gun that he showed up in Kenosha, Wisconsin, that night of riot looting because he was pursuing danger and they could have easily done things differently.
But the bulk of Binger's questioning of Rittenhouse relied on the assumption that unless a person has physically touched you and unless you are at the scene for reasons not in line with others present, There is no reason to protect yourself with force that may prove deadly.
Rittenhouse faces charges for murders of Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, as well as the intentional attempted homicide of Greg Grosenkreutz.
It's not disputed and it's on video that Rittenhouse shot all three and only Grosenkreutz survived.
It's also on video and backed by eyewitness testimony that each of the three men was running after Rittenhouse and making attempts to take his gun.
Rose Scrooge, who was armed at the time himself, said he tried grabbing Rittenhouse AR-15.
Finger played the videos, which the jury has seen multiple times already, and acknowledged in questioning that Rittenhouse was being chased that night in August 2020.
But his emphasis has been that, one, Rosenbaum, the shooting of whom set off the whole episode, never physically touched Rittenhouse.
And two, that Rittenhouse presence, by its very nature, was needlessly provocative.
The absurdity was captured in one specific exchange between Binger and Rittenhouse.
Binger.
So you saw someone who was trying to put out a fire who got assaulted?
Rittenhouse.
Yes.
Binger.
But if you're going to help people, why would you expect anyone would try and hurt you, Rittenhouse?
I don't know.
Somebody did try to hurt me and I was helping people.
Binger has apparently never prepared for an unexpected disaster.
He may not even buckle his seatbelt.
I can't be sure.
Rittenhouse testified that he was in Kenosha that night at the request of a car lot owner
who had been looking for men to protect his business, which had previously suffered damage
from nights of rioting.
He said he brought his AR-15 and a medic kit for the purpose of patrolling the area and
offering care to anyone injured.
He said that beforehand he had seen destruction done to the city where his father lives and
where Rittenhouse had been working as a lifeguard.
That's why he brought the gun in the event that he needed it for his own protection.
There had been, after all, reports of physical assaults against police and a business owner
in addition to the property damage.
But Binger adopted a tone to suggest he was utterly confounded as to why anyone would show up in Kenosha to offer aid while armed with a gun.
Binger, I asked you why you brought the gun.
You said you needed it for protection.
I said, protection against what?
You said you didn't think you needed protection.
I'm confused.
Can you help me understand why you're telling us you needed a gun for protection but didn't think you needed protection?
Rittenhouse, who is apparently light years of having a binger in IQ.
I brought the gun for my protection, but what I was saying was I didn't think I would have to use a gun and end up defending myself.
Binger is presumably also confused by people who purchase home insurance.
Why do they need that unless they plan on setting their own homes on fire?
The prosecutor was equally stupid in making the case that Rittenhouse was at fault for being in a place he had the right to be but shouldn't have been, at one point, Binger asked.
You know that you're running into a crowd that's not friendly to you, right?
And also, were you surprised that a crowd would react that way when they just saw you shoot someone?
The implication is that Rittenhouse, having shot someone who was chasing him, should have known that all of this was coming because he made the choice to show up at a riot.
He did make that choice, but so did everyone else who showed up to loot, vandalize, and torch private and public property.
Rittenhouse's reason for showing up to limit the damage just happened to be unpopular.
That doesn't make him a criminal.
It makes him a dissident.
When you reach the logical conclusion of the prosecutor's craze, that's Rittenhouse's crime.
He was in a dangerous place where the rioters, other known by Binger as the good guys, didn't want him and therefore Rittenhouse was the instigator.
It's preposterous.
The jury probably knows that.
Eddie Scarry is a D.C.
columnist and federalist and author of Privileged Victims, How America's Culture Fascists Hijacked the Country and Elevated Its Worst People.
That's a simply excellent, excellent article.
I'll have more to report about other indications of what's been going on, not only in Koh Inosha, elsewhere, where pallets of bricks have shown up, giving convenient access to the riders to throw them through the windows of stores, just accommodating exactly what they need to wreak mayhem.
So we're about to hit the break.
And and afterwards, remember at the top of the hour, I'm going to take your calls 5403524452, including about JFK,
our conversation of Wednesday on the event.
But when we return from the break, I'm going to address bricks in Kenosha again.
Pay no attention to the brick wizard behind the curtain.
The Wizard of Oz The Wizard of Oz
The Wizard of Oz Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com
We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made
Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing
dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution.
Radio, radio, radio, radio.
Hey everyone, it's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The Lord is with thee.
Om Nadi Om Nadi Diyo Om Nadi
Jai Jai Jai Jai Jai Jai
Jai Jai Jai Jai Jai Jai
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8pm ET Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen
Garcia at freedomsledge.com, The People Station.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts,
guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your
host.
Well, a website called the Starfire Codes, follow the money trail road they're suggesting, has been analyzing the
appearance of these pallets of bricks at all these riot locations that thus strangely show up in such a timely
fashion.
I want to share this, which again is available on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
Where I reiterate, I'm ecstatic to have it back.
Let's talk about the mysterious bricks surfacing in Kenosha.
There are already calls of suspicious activity coming through the police scanner.
Between 12 noon and 1 p.m.
Eastern earlier today, a Kenosha officer checked a local alleyway and verified there are bricks everywhere.
Hmm.
Preparing for the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict already, are we?
This should all sound familiar because it's how we got into this mess to begin with.
In 2020, during the Kenosha riots when Kyle Rittenhouse was arrested, mysterious bricks were delivered.
In fact, every single city where a riot broke out had stacks and stacks of bricks delivered seemingly out of nowhere.
In most places, security had been disabled so that no one could access security camera videos or see who delivered the bricks in stacks off of trucks on huge pallets.
Naturally, if you happen to put this question in front of thousands of curious researchers who have fun working together and you ask, who is the brick wizard?
It's basically like firing off a shot at the beginning of a race.
Urge to follow the bricks.
We dove right in.
And you'll see photograph after photograph of these huge pallets of bricks.
They are enormous.
They're also very heavy.
Joe Olson, who is an engineer, has observed.
They're so heavy that a group of men could not carry them, that they had to be lifted off of a flatbed truck using a forklift.
Pro tip, many of the tweets from the corresponding dates in late May and early June 2020 regarding the BRICS and their timelines have mysteriously disappeared since from Twitter.
Really, I'm shocked.
In other words, what we have here is a whole lot of posts that were put up on Twitter showing these stacks of bricks at convenient locations if you're rioting.
It's a good thing Telegram creates a hard backup of the media when you post so you never have to lose anything that Twitter decides to censor.
Notice, all these tweets I'm posting, they're all gone.
All of them.
Here's one, for example, conservative Rio, Frisco, Texas.
There have been groups organizing protests in Frisco for 5 p.m.
this evening.
All of a sudden, this shows up on the path of the protests.
You want to tell me this is not planned and organized now?
Another, El Snabatan, Acme Brick Corporate Office, 3024 Acme Brick Plaza, Fort Worth, Texas.
With a phone number.
Give me a call.
See if they'll drop off on a street corner.
Another huge stack of bricks.
There we have the phone number.
Acme Bricks.
Oh!
Acme Brick.
That's real cute.
And it's go time.
From here, it takes us all of 10 seconds to figure out after grabbing the photos down off Twitter.
We're a smidge good, kind of good at what we do.
And you know, humble.
Acme Brick is a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, and that would be Warren Buffett.
And that's Bill Gates' mentor.
Behold the brick wizard.
List of assets owned by Berkshire Hathaway.
First on the list is Acme Brick Company.
So we wonder, Do the rest of these links from the budget disclosure track back to BH Berkshire Hathaway?
Huge stake in Amazon made billions off of the lockdown and Apple contact tracing, also Costco.
And I'll be honest, I wasn't thinking this through entirely yet.
Later, it dawned on me that the purpose for holding that much Apple clearly would be to short it.
When the Three Gorges Dam finally collapses and all of Apple's production facilities are downstream of the water flow in a place with zero drainage infrastructure, like, say, No-Wish Show, we wanted to know what else he owns and the pieces start to fit together, kind of like interlocking bricks.
And here he gives links to several articles.
Edwards J.
2019.
What does Warren Buffett own?
Yahoo Finance, 2021.
The Berkshire Hathaway portfolio.
Friedman Z, 2019.
Yes.
Warren Buffett really owns seven of your favorite companies.
Buffett's stocks have made a killing off of COVID lockdowns.
He also shorted the airlines and made a killing on that, too.
The Trump administration was bringing antitrust conspiracy charges against Teva in Buffett's portfolio, which Teva tried to simply walk away from, thinking there was no way the administration would pursue this during a pandemic, and even published a ballsy press release to that effect when the U.S.
did bring charges.
To that effect, when the US did bring charges, Tiva is in generics.
They ended up donating an obscene amount of hydroxychloroquine and they make astrozinca
Zetrov, Zinke, Blitzkrieg, and the rest of it.
Both are, of course, used as treatments for COVID.
And then we have more photos again and again about the pallets of bricks, again from Twitter, seeing all kinds of Twix tweets this morning—Texas tweets this morning about brick deliveries magically appearing at Planned Peaceful Procepts site.
All have Acme Brick signs on them.
I think I'd be finding out who ordered these.
Here's another.
Brick Palace in Frisco, Texas for rioters in Antifa, delivered by Acme Brick Fort Worth, company owned by Berkshire Hathaway.
Gates recently left the board.
And Marmon Group, Chicago, owned by Jay and Robert Pritzker and Berkshire Hathaway.
Very deep.
Huge rabbit hole.
At this point, coverage from zero hedge drops.
Durden Tee, 2020.
More bricks appear in advance of Monday demonstrations in Baltimore, Texas.
Baltimore, huh?
You think with all that Baltimore aerial surveillance, we'd have an idea on who's dropping bricks by now?
At that time, Arnold Ventures had furnished an entire Baltimore aerial surveillance program, funded an entire Baltimore aerial surveillance program.
The same pallets have surfaced in multiple cities, including Baltimore, which has crazy aerial surveillance in place, so Baltimore should have been able to pull footage on the brick drop in their city.
Except that the Arnolds, who funded the aerial surveillance in Baltimore, their firm's director used to work for the Gates Foundation.
Part of the press puff piece was how they started AV as an answer to Gates' call for all billionaires to step into philanthropy.
Apparently, surveilling all of Baltimore from the sky without the citizens' consent is somehow philanthropic.
Wake me up when the doublespeak is over.
With this group, damn near everything means the opposite of what it says.
For example, child trafficking charities are ways to hide trafficking children.
Notice they're not called anti-trafficking charities.
COVID treatment is not called anti-COVID treatment.
Cancer treatment is not called anti-cancer treatment.
This is like living in a Chuck Palahunic novel.
This dropped from Timcast.
Timcast 2020.
New York Police Department says evidence proved rioting is planned.
Activists caught giving out bricks to protesters.
Then we started to notice something really weird.
We started to see all of this divide and conquer interplay with oligarchs, politicians, business people, and corporate entities paying off criminals via an elaborate bail money laundering scheme that funneled money back from nonprofit organization to the courts to be returned to the criminals through the bail system, not back to the nonprofits.
No matter which trail we follow, Bricks, drugs, stocks, banks, non-profits, corporations, it didn't matter.
Every single money trail led us back to the same groups.
Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway.
Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway are the four largest investment firms on the planet.
They literally own everything.
There is no competition.
There is only the illusion of competition.
So ultimately, if you want to know where the bricks are coming from, we're really looking at asymmetrical warfare funded by many billionaires on behalf of the entire cabal to destabilize America.
The only things they fear are unity and people like Kyle Rittenhouse.
Meanwhile, we have a satirical post with a photograph Of Kyle.
Kyle Rittenhouse asked to step outside and defend the courthouse while verdict is being read.
So there's Kyle with his AR-15 in a group holding hammers and bench forks and clubs.
Another.
Meanwhile, we know 500 Wisconsin National Guard on standby as Rittenhouse in trial near Zant.
And there you have Leonardo DiCaprio.
And this may be a scene from Titanic where he's in his tuxedo holding out a glass to make a toast.
If you would have done that the last time, this never would have happened.
Meaning, had Evers, the governor of Wisconsin, whose total mediocrity, sad to say, responded, accepted, for example, Donald Trump's offer to provide additional forces and backup In Kenosha to put down the rioting, we wouldn't have had this happen.
But I'm convinced the Democrats are all in on this.
They want it to happen.
And that has to be why you have this rogue juror who just happens to have been made the forewoman holding up the acquittal, which ought to have taken place within a matter of hours.
The case is so clear cut.
Even the prosecution made the case.
Let me now mention, by the way.
The defense has twice now submitted a motion to dismiss with prejudice on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct.
The judge at any point here, even after a verdict were read, can grant a motion to dismiss with prejudice, which would mean the charges could not be refiled.
Now, I've already mentioned how the gun charge was not an appropriate charge because his gun did not violate the law, which the judge dismissed, but it was included nevertheless and improperly.
In addition, even though the judge had explained in advance of the actual trial certain issues that were off limits and could not be addressed, the prosecutor nevertheless brought up how Kyle hadn't talked about the case between the time it happened and the time of the trial when he went on the witness stand, which let me add is unusual.
There are risks with a The accused taking the stand, but he handled himself with aplomb.
Very impressive.
And he asked him, nevertheless, about why he'd remained silent where the judge had to dismiss a jury and chewing out for violating Kyle's Miranda rights, where this is established law for 40 or 50 years.
This was a grotesque abuse on the part of the prosecutor.
He also made the absurd argument That if you bring a gun to a scene that you forfeited the right to self-defense, he ought to tell that to every one of us who owns a concealed carry permit.
We have a gun because we may need it for self-defense.
But according to the prosecutor in this case, that means we forfeited our right to self-defense.
Even first year law students, by the way, know better.
In that, in these instances, and where in addition, Saturday, they admitted that they had a very high quality version of this drone surveillance footage, where one of the attorneys actually admitted in court that our version is clearer than that, which they had never shared with the defense.
Now, for those who may be unaware, the prosecution bears the greater burden.
The prosecution is supposed to be dedicated to justice and the application of the law and to share any evidence, including that which tends to exonerate the accused with a defense.
This they did not do.
Boss, the defense has issued another motion to dismiss.
And frankly, I believe that if the jury remains deadlocked, which I'm now predicting because a four woman has is on a mission and the other jurors, I believe.
Some or more are not going to acquiesce in the face of her obstructive attitude that we're going to have a hung jury, in which case I believe the judge is going to declare a mistrial with prejudice.
He could, however, even so declare after a verdict were rendered, should the verdict be one of guilt on any of these charges, because it's so clearly not justified by the evidence and the law.
In other words, it would be a miscarriage of justice to allow it to stand.
But bear in mind, the rioters already have their bricks on hand, compliments of Acme Brick Company, which is owned by Bookshire Hathaway, compliments of Warren Buffett.
You know, these people, you think they're good guys.
I tell you, it's disgusting what's going on here.
Meanwhile, There are some good guys out there, including Robert Kennedy Jr., who I regard as a sensational guy.
He's got a new book about Fauci, by the way, the real Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, just been released on November 16th.
Bobby Jr.
was supposed to go on coast to coast.
Just a couple days ago, it was canceled.
Surprise, surprise.
The Democrats and the others running these obs can't afford to have the truth shared with a large audience where Bobby does his research.
Check it out.
You can find it on Amazon.com.
Buy it today.
I've embedded a link right there on my blog to this article.
Children's health defense.
OSHA suspends Biden's employer vaccine mandates following court order, which I find heartening because OSHA, it appears, is not willing to violate the law and the Constitution.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration said Tuesday it suspended the mandate to comply with a November 12th ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, barring the agency from enforcing them pending judicial review.
A federal judiciary panel on Tuesday assigned the case to an appeals court in Cincinnati.
In a major blow to the Biden administration, The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA, on Tuesday suspended implementation and enforcement of its Emergency Temporary Standard, ETS, on mandatory COVID vaccination and testing in the workplace.
Under the ETS, employers with more than 100 employees were given until January 4th to comply with President Biden's COVID vaccine mandate.
However, A November 12th ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals barred OSHA from enforcing the ETS pending adequate judicial review of a motion for permanent injunction.
OSHA's latest action does not affect a separate directive from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requiring employees of medical facilities to be vaccinated by December 6.
Which, by coincidence, happens to be yours truly's birthday.
In a statement Tuesday, OSHA said the court ordered that OSHA take no steps to implement or enforce the ETS until further court order.
While OSHA remains confident in its authority to protect workers in emergencies, OSHA has suspended activities related to the implementation and enforcement of the ETS pending future developments in the litigation.
In its November 12, 22 page ruling, the court called the Biden administration mandate fatally flawed and said OSHA should take no steps to implement or enforce the mandate until further court order.
The court said the mandate fails to consider that the ongoing threat of COVID is more dangerous to some employees than to others, according to the ruling.
The mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplace and workers that have more than a little bearing on workers' varying degrees of susceptibility to the supposedly grave danger The mandate purports to address the court order must be obeyed.
This court order must be obeyed.
And OSHA has apparently indicated it will, said Ray Flores, Children's Health Defense Legal Counsel.
However, I have not seen this news trickle down to employers who, to my knowledge, have not issued widespread pauses on company mandates.
No mainstream media outlets were reporting OSHA's news about the suspension at the time this article was published.
The case against the Biden administration was brought by a variety of entities ranging from state attorneys general, including Texas, Mississippi, and Utah, family, American Family Association, and multiple businesses and individuals.
As the Defender reported Tuesday, there are dozens of lawsuits making their way through the courts challenging the mandates on behalf of teachers, health care workers, police, firefighters, and more.
A federal judicial panel on Tuesday assigned at least 34 of those lawsuits, including the one in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that resulted in OSHA suspending its ETS, to an appeals court in Cincinnati.
The New York Times has reported.
According to the Times, a court for the U.S.
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation randomly selected the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit by drawing from a drum containing entries for the 12 regional courts of appeal, each of which has at least one related case pending.
The procedure can be used to consolidate cases that are raising the same issue.
While simplifying the legal dispute, the step also had the effect of removing the matter from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District in New Orleans.
This month, a three-judge panel there had blocked the government from moving forward with a rule declaring that it grossly exceeds the authority of the occupational safety issue that issued it.
According to Reuters, OSHA has issued 10 emergency standards in its 50 years history of the six challenged in court.
Only one survived intact.
And in my judgment, it's most unlikely this one will survive as well.
Deservedly, it will go down in flames Well, the Biden administration has been seeking to destroy America, not only by its open borders flooding the country with illegal immigrants, not only by its wildly inflationary massive spending bills, the larger one of which has just been passed by the House, but I believe will die in the Senate, deservedly so.
Interrupting supply chain so that Americans are going to be short of food and other necessities of life deliberately, where a Deputy Secretary of the Treasury has announced that the supply chain problems aren't going to be alleviated until every American is vaxxed, revealing this is completely fraudulent.
Because there's no good reason why vaccination status should have anything to do whatsoever with these supply chains, where it appears the master plan is proceeding in three stages.
They're using the masks to kill us slowly, the vaccines to kill us more rapidly, and then mass starvation to finish the deal, where deagle.com is projecting that the US population itself is going to drop.
From 330 million in 2020 to only 65 in 2025, a diminution of 265 million of our fellow American citizens, which no doubt is going to include many of our friends, neighbors and relatives, God forbid, but that's what the Biden administration wants for us.
I'm going to open the calls after this break.
Remember, 540-352-4452.
540-352-4452.
And I repeat that my Real Deal JFK Special dedicated to Oliver Stone can be found on my BitChute channel, BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
I'll be right back.
I'm listening to Revolution Radio. I'm listening to the radio. I'm listening to the radio.
I'm listening to the radio.
We'll be right back after this message.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhorns during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying
to yourself.
Go!
Because we know who they are and what they do.
This is what they do and we must fight back.
You can torture us and bomb us.
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us!
Good evening.
Are you awake yet?
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
But time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
Revolution Radio Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Newt on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return
you to your host.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
you you
yes i'm here i I'm back.
The jury is coming in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, so we're going to report the outcome here.
I don't see any callers as yet.
Let me try to pull it up so we can get live reports on the air.
Written as trial live.
Live updates.
Watch live.
Trial day 13.
This is a commercial of course.
No surprise there.
Let's see what we've got.
I see Kyle standing.
The judge looking around.
Okay, well listen, I'm going to turn up the volume.
The audio is a little bit bad. I'm going to turn up the volume.
Okay, well listen, I'm going to turn up the volume.
Thank you.
you Verdict reached day 13.
As I say, I predict if they come in with a guilty verdict, the judge, I believe, is going
to grant a motion to dismiss with prejudice.
The prosecutor's misconduct in this case has been egregious!
Lots of comments on the chat board there.
The families of the deceased, of those who were killed or wounded, have been invited into the courtroom.
Here we go. They appear to be.
Bye.
Mm-mm-mm.
Blanking out some of the discussion going on in court.
I have it on another TV.
Here's the judge.
Waiting for everyone to be in place it appears.
Silence.
What?
Judge pondering.
Judge pondering.
Silence.
All the better we spent so much time on the background to the trial.
52,422 watching now on this particular YouTube channel.
I do encourage everyone to check out the book.
we go. In the audience portion. No, it doesn't need to be.
There are a lot of people who No, it doesn't need to be.
Um, there...
There can't be any reaction at all, no matter how strongly you may feel.
And it's understood that many people do have strong feelings.
But we can't permit any kind of a reaction to the verdict.
And as you can see, there's quite a bit of law enforcement here.
And you will be whisked out of here if there is any.
So just be aware.
They're bringing in the jury now.
Would you come down please?
Yes.
Thank you.
Judge Schroeder, in my opinion, has done a marvelous job of conducting with a couple
of caveats.
He ought to have sequestered the jury, in my opinion, because they were vulnerable to exposure to the opinions of others when they were at home.
I think that was a mistake.
Number two, he could have simplified the jury instructions, which were very complicated.
Difficult to follow.
That would have been beneficial in arriving at a conclusion.
Third, a request was made to take the jury instructions home and several commentators have suggested that was a bad idea because it leaves the jurors consulting dictionaries to look up words that in their technical legal usage may differ from their ordinary language dictionary definitions.
I'm most concerned that this rogue juror, number 54, held out for some conviction on some matter, which I suspect would then be a lesser-included offense, which would be... Sorry, members of the jury, have you... Here we go.
Would you give your adjournment, please?
54.
54, and has the jury reached a verdict as to each count of the information?
One verdict and one verdict only.
Yes.
Would you hand all the paperwork to the bailiff, please?
That's the only thing that you didn't tell me.
Yeah, everything.
Yeah, thanks.
May I see that tool, please?
Oh, sure.
Thank you.
The defendant will rise and face the jury and hearken to its verdicts.
The defense will now hear the verdict.
The first count of the information, Joseph Rosabaugh.
We, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse, not guilty.
As to the second count of the information, Richard McGinnis.
We, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse, not guilty.
As to the third count of the information, Unknown Male.
We, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse, not guilty.
As to the fourth count of the information, Anthony Huber.
We, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse, not guilty.
As to the fifth count of the Information Gage Gross Court, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse, not guilty.
We, the jury, are these your unanimous verdicts?
Is there anyone who does not agree with the verdicts as read?
We wish the jury full... He's hugging his...
Defense team, he's clearly emotional.
Just about three weeks ago.
This is a just verdict.
I told you it could last two weeks and two days.
This is three weeks.
You were a wonderful jury to work with.
You were punctual.
You were attentive.
And the forgotten six over here who had a very difficult job of Not guilty at all.
discussing the case during the time that they were sequestered as well.
All of you, you're just, I couldn't ask for more to work with.
And it has truly been my pleasure.
You, I think, without- Still I'm on the air.
I'll call you when I'm done.
Just in terms of your, the attentiveness and the cooperation that you gave to us justifies the
confidence that the founders of our country placed in you.
So I dismiss you at this time.
You're never under any obligation to discuss any aspect of this case with anyone.
You're welcome to do so as little or as much as you want.
The media have requested, a number of media sources have requested the ability to talk to you and they have been allowed to present presentations to you that you'll get in writing.
And it's entirely up to you whether you want to contact them.
They are not to contact you.
If anyone does contact you, just tell them you're not interested in discussing it, if that's the case.
And if anyone persists in doing so, report that to us and it will be addressed.
I assure you.
At the beginning of the trial, there was some concern About information and your safety.
And I assure you that we will take every measure to ensure that your concerns are addressed and respected.
And I'm going to talk to you for just a minute, not about anything to do with the case, but just about that sole issue.
And as they say, you're welcome to discuss the case as little or as much as you want.
And any questions, anybody?
Thank you so much.
And after four years, you're eligible for service again.
It would be my pleasure to work with you.
Thank you.
Yeah, please.
Or in the library.
It's not going to be more than a minute.
Or maybe it will be.
Yeah, take them upstairs.
That's fine.
Mr. Richards?
Any word from the state?
The jury has...
All right, the notion of the defendant is granted.
The charges against the defendant on all counts are dismissed with prejudice and he is released from the obligation of his bond.
Anything else?
Thank you.
Good day.
Fascinating, fascinating.
The judge also granted the dismissal on all counts with prejudice.
He also granted that.
Okay, we'll be glad to take calls.
I'm going to turn off the live stream here.
And glad to take any calls anyone may have about the case or about JFK or about whatever else.
This is a very welcome, just a verdict.
I'm very impressed.
And they can take those bricks and shove it.
This is very, very good.
This is American justice at work.
I'm extremely pleased.
We could not take for granted it would play out this way.
But what has happened was the right thing to do.
Let me figure out how I can, you know, shut it off.
Let me see if we got any callers here.
Very good, very good, very good.
Listen.
Mitchell, you're there.
Would you like to comment on what's happened here?
I find this absolutely wonderful.
I'm enthralled.
This was 100% the correct verdict.
The law, the evidence supported it.
It appeared that the other jurors convinced the woman holdout that Kyle was innocent on all counts.
This is a great day for America.
Your thoughts, Mitchell?
Yeah, I'll turn down the background.
I got it, I got it.
Go ahead.
Now, Mitchell, we should be okay.
Go ahead.
Should this military-grade zoom lens be made illegal in the U.S.?
This new gadget is basically a super telephoto lens for your smartphone.
I don't know what happened there.
Let me see if I can get rid of everything in the background.
Mitchell, can you join?
Hey, Jim, I'm here.
It's been a really loud environment and I really can't join.
I'm sorry.
Here we go.
I found the one that was at fault.
Here we go.
Mitchell, can you hear me?
Yes, we got you, Jim.
OK, go ahead, Mitchell.
I'd like your reaction to what we've just what's just transpired.
Not guilty in all counts.
The judge also granting the motion of the defense for a dismissal of all charges with prejudice.
Both have taken place now.
Your thoughts?
Let the riots begin.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Well, there will be riots.
I mean, there's no doubt there's going to be riots by the left.
Um, because they have to stoke this, uh, this outrage, um, just as they, you know, continue, you know, the psyop of, you know, racism in America.
You know, we have a culture problem.
We don't have a racism problem.
Not that racism doesn't exist.
Sure.
It does everywhere, but we have a serious culture problem.
And until we deal with the culture problem that is using racism as a weapon and, you know, as this activist plank to divide people and then pit them against each other, that's not good for any society and certainly isn't good for America.
But, you know, it's it's it shouldn't this trial shouldn't have even been held.
The facts are so plainly obvious from the very beginning to the end that, you know, the Kyle Rittenhouse affair is a political witch hunt.
It's the continuation of this political witch hunt against conservatives and others.
As far as I see it.
Yes, yes, I agree with all of that.
Let me reiterate, callers are welcome to share their opinions and thoughts about Kyle or the Vax or the JFK or Martin or Bobby.
I'm open for discussing all of those in Maryland, too.
So remember the number 540-352-4452.
Kyle Rittenhouse, not guilty on all counts.
to 4452, Kyle Rittenhouse, not guilty on all counts.
It was a just verdict under very complicated, contentious circumstances.
I am very happy, even ecstatic.
I'm about as happy about this as I am that my blog's back up, so just horrific.
Mitchell, any more you'd like to add here? I'm almost not quite speechless over this.
I'm just ecstatic.
What I will say is that this may sound premature a little bit, but I would not surprise me if now that Merrick Garland and the Attorney General's Office, the U.S.
Justice Department, now And now comes to indict Kyle Rittenhouse.
It would not surprise me this continuation of this political war.
We have a 281 caller just joining us.
OK, two minutes to the break.
Two minutes to the break.
OK, well, let's take the caller after the break.
I'd like to respond to the comment you just made.
That Garrick Marlin, who's just an absolute POS, has no business being an Attorney General, most certainly had no business being elevated to the Supreme Court.
It's a good thing he was not.
He's a clear miscreant willing to weaponize the Department of Justice and the FBI.
The Inspector General of the Department of Justice has warned That the Department of Justice and the FBI are taking actions that appear to represent the politicalization of the administration of justice in the United States.
And I'll tell you, Mitchell, what you're suggesting, if they were now to bring charges against Kyle, that would confirm that in Spain for every American who's lived through this.
It's been a very significant development.
The prosecutor went way out of his way to try to frame an innocent man.
This was such an obvious case of self-defense.
They were piling on, piling on, piling on.
It was all ideological.
I'm just tremendously relieved, Mitchell, that The right verdict was reached on all counts.
I was very seriously concerned that there might be a compromise.
I think the jurors were exemplary here and coming to a just verdict.
And I'll be very pleased to take our first caller right after the break.
We're coming up against it.
Let me say Joe Biden's popularity now in the latest polls, 38 percent support.
Kamala Harris, 28% support.
This administration has the worst polling because it's doing such a disgraceful job.
It's betraying the American people.
The incompetence reeks from every pore.
I cannot begin to say how much I hold these Democrats in contempt.
And they are going to pay for it massively in 2022.
I think it would be wise of them not to try to make an example out of Kyle from the Department of Justice that if they do so, they're committing a colossal blunder that is only going to make matters worse.
We're up against a break.
I'll take the caller from the 281 area code as soon as we return.
I'm listening to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their
support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in
an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio.
The National Anthem.
Bye.
Oh Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8 p.m.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomstretch.com,
The People Station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your
host.
Well, a friend of mine has just emailed me saying, Jim, you should move to Kenosha.
Ha!
Meaning he thinks I'd get a fair shake in a jury there where I did not here in Madison.
We do have the caller from Mary Code.
Well, we have two callers on the line now.
281, we're taking you first, of course.
Please give us your first name and your state and join the conversation.
281.
Yes.
Hello, Jim Mitchell and listeners in Pearson, Texas.
Oh, great.
OK, go for it.
Yeah, I'm not going to be long and then I'll have to put it on mute because, you know, I'm working and then I take a break to talk to you.
Oh man, I'm just so ecstatic as well.
If anything, I sure hope that he lawyers up, Kyle lawyers up and goes after civil lawsuits, you know, against, just like Nicholas Sandman did.
Go and sue the MSNBC, CNN, whoever for defamation of character.
for it, especially MSNBC for hiring that journal that's a tail to bus for the jurors.
He needs to sue Joe Biden for calling him a white supremacist, outright character assassination
that's liable.
Don't you agree?
Yeah I think there's a, there are going to be a lot of ramifications here, legal consequences.
I think right now, Kyle is just tremendously relieved.
You could see the emotion when they came in with a verdict on all counts not guilty.
It was absolutely 100% the appropriate verdict.
And I think the timing was impeccable, given I spent the first hour virtually all of it in reviewing the Kyle Rittenhouse case, and then the first segment of the second hour, we had the verdict come in, and now we have the final segment of the second hour to discuss it.
Bruce, why don't you stand by while I bring in Scott from San Diego.
Scott, give us your thoughts.
Hey, guys.
Good morning.
Yeah, you know, I'm pretty stumped.
I'm stupefied.
I thought for sure they were going to be pressured into a guilty verdict, you know, at least on the, you know, minimum charge just to placate the mob.
But, you know, what I find fascinating is I went over and was listening to MSNBC about after this.
Well, they're ideologues, Scott.
They're ideologues.
Their minds are made up and the facts don't matter, and that's on issues across the board.
They're totally unscientific.
You know, they should have had this evidence, they should have done this and that.
These people just don't stop.
Well, they're ideologues, Scott.
They're ideologues.
Their minds are made up and the facts don't matter, and that's on issues across the board.
They're totally unscientific.
I mean, they claim they're following the science, but they aren't.
They're following their goals and aspirations and wanting to secure political control.
But I'll tell you, you're raising a really interesting issue, because all of these zealots
on MSNBC especially are going to be profoundly embarrassed by this result, and they're going
They're going to turn themselves into pretzels trying to explain why the jury was wrong, even though you had 12 jurors and on each of the six counts they had to be unanimous.
I mean, this is like 92 votes of innocent when you multiply.
Go ahead.
And they're also, they're also referring to a, you know, a sympathetic judge.
Uh, you know, it's just all the garbage, man.
I just don't get it.
It's going to be interesting because they are going to go through all kinds of convolutions.
I think you raise a really good point, Scott.
I'm fascinated.
There was, there was one thing, oh I'm sorry.
No, you go ahead.
I was just gonna say the only, yeah.
There was one thing when Garland was being questioned in Congress in that committee,
and they were asking him about the, you know, surveilling the parents.
You know, not one of those, I don't know if they were senators or representatives,
asked him, will your FBI be monitoring the board members as well for their demeanor and the way
that they've been treating the parents?
you You know, cause that's what is getting the parents pissed off is the way that the board members are just treating them with such disrespect and dismissiveness.
You know, ignoring what they're saying, cutting them off in mid-sentence with, oh, your time is up, you know, just humoring them.
It's just sickening.
And one of them asked, hey, are you going to be watching your own school boards?
You're going to be, you know, seeing how they're acting.
Are they provoking this, this reaction?
Yes, yes, yes.
They're turning parents who are concerned about what their kids are being taught into schools into domestic terrorists and absolutely giving a free ride to the looters, the rioters, and the arsonists.
I think if there's any reaction from Black Lives Matter, for example, to what happened in Kenosha, It's going to reveal that this is all a stunt, that this is all political theater.
No black person was shot by Kyle Rittenhouse.
It was three white guys, each of whom had an extensive criminal background.
These were not virtuous persons, and they were not victims.
The judge made a number of very appropriate rulings early on to wit that the prosecution could not refer to them as victims, but that they could be referred to as looters and rioters, which they were.
Bruce, if you're still there, if you'd like to add to what Scott's had to say, you're welcome.
If Bruce is gone, go ahead. Yeah, I'll just throw in this.
Jim, the mayor of Kenosha, he's openly responsible for everything that transpired,
for failing to enforce the law and keeping order, by pulling the cops off the rioters,
the arsonists, is what they were, allowing them to go rampage the city, gonna take citizens,
take up arms, to go and confront these idiots. I mean...
Well, it's like Biden.
Look, the president of the United States, who campaigned allegedly because he was going to bring us together, declared that Kyle Rittenhouse was a white supremacist and Scott very appropriately observed that he ought to be vulnerable to a lawsuit for that.
Now, it turns out that public officials and the performance of their duties are immune from lawsuits as a rule, but there can be exceptions.
I'm not sure whether this would qualify as one or not.
But it is the case, for example, senators and representatives in the Senate or the House Cannot be sued for what they say there, no matter how outrageous, stupid or false.
So there are going to be complications here.
But I believe this is a great victory for the American people.
It's certainly a vindication for our judicial system and for jury trials.
I'm very favorably impressed.
Scott, would you like to add some more thoughts?
I think, yeah, I think it does send a message that, no, you do still have the right to protect yourself.
Yes, absolutely.
They've been trying to hammer home this narrative that, hey, you're supposed to just, you know, sit down, shut up, and let the mob do what it's going to do, you know, and if you're nice, then they might leave you alone.
It doesn't work that way.
Well, I mean, just think of the stupidity of the prosecutor declaring that because Kyle brought a weapon to the scene that he'd forfeited his right to self-defense.
And as I mentioned before, every one of us who has concealed carry knows the absurdity of that position.
I mean, that he should have even asserted it is outrageous and demeaning.
I mean, frankly, it's an embarrassment.
Because the reason for concealed carry is in order to protect yourself in self-defense in circumstances warranted.
So if what he were declaring were true, then anyone who does concealed carry has thereby forfeited the right to self-defense.
I mean, just think of the manifest absurdity of that declaration.
Bruce, Bruce, if you're still there in Texas.
Yeah, go ahead.
Then I'll come back to you, Scott.
Bruce.
Yeah, I really have nothing else to add.
I'm going to list it off live.
Okay, Bruce, thank you for calling in.
Thank you for calling in, Bruce.
Scott, Scott, go ahead with your further thoughts.
Oh, I'm sorry.
I was distracted by something and I forgot what I was going to say.
That's okay, Scott.
I was saying about the right to self defense.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Um, you know, there's, um, I don't know.
I just have so many, so many like random thoughts about Well, for instance, the thing that frustrates me with these questioning sessions that they do with these in Congress, like when they had Mike Milley on there, you know, when they were asking about the critical race theory, and he said, you know, well, I've read, you know, Mein Kampf and the Communist Manifesto and all that too.
You know, they should have came back with, well, have you implemented any of the philosophies of the Communist Manifesto?
Or any of that?
Because you're implementing these philosophies.
So I don't see how that has any relevance.
Just stuff like that.
It just seems like people are letting things slide without question.
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
I do think this is a vindication of the Second Amendment.
It certainly sets an inspiring example of self-defense.
I was in awe when I studied this in detail and his agility in using that weapon.
Now, I've I fired an AR-15 myself.
It's lightweight.
It's very versatile.
No wonder it's so popular.
It's the best all-around rifle I think I may have ever seen in my life.
And that's, you know, there's a military version, which does go full automatic, of course, but Kyle was not in possession of one.
And no civilian is allowed to have an automatic weapon.
And that's where the Democrats play word games.
By trying to demonize the civilian version of the AR-15, calling it an assault weapon or a weapon of war, which, when it's not capable of firing on full automatic, it does not qualify as either an assault weapon or a weapon of war.
So it's insulting when they play these games with the American people, but that's because they have nothing else.
They don't have better arguments to deploy, and therefore they go about seeking to lie, cheat, steal, which appears to be now the trademark, the area of specialization for the Democratic Party USA, which looks very much Like what we have had in Stalinist Russia or Mao's China.
I'm sorry to say the Democrat Party has completely disgraced itself and I believe is going to go down to a massive defeat, an historic defeat in 2022.
I will not be surprised for the Democrats to lose 100 seats in the House.
100 seats in the House.
Go ahead.
Sorry.
Oh, let me ask you a question, Jim.
You used to be Democrat, right?
I voted Democrat until Trump came on the scene because they seemed to me to have the better candidates.
But when it was Hillary versus Trump, it was no contest.
Go ahead.
OK, so let me ask you this.
Do you think that the Democratic Party has changed?
Oh, yeah, absolutely.
This is not the party of JFK or FDR.
I always declared myself to be a JFK, FDR Democrat because I believe in Social Security, unemployment insurance, workman's compensation, Medicare, Medicaid programs that make a difference in the lives of Americans.
But the Democrat Party has transformed.
It's gone full radical, socialist, communist.
It's unbelievable to watch this happen.
I have been stunned by the evolution of the Democratic Party today to be virtually, virtually a communist party.
I mean, I can't believe that could happen in the United States, but it has.
Go ahead.
Yeah.
Well, because I have like, you know, virtually my whole family is Democrat and they're pretty horrible people.
And they've been Democrat all their lives, and they don't feel like the party's changed at all.
Oh, the party's massively changed.
Perhaps you were duped in the beginning to think that they were for something, when they were actually just saying that in order to lure followers.
I wasn't duped!
I mean, for crying out loud!
Look at the alternative campaign!
Do you think that they were always the way that they are?
No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
They were always liars and cheaters and phonies and frauds.
That's been outlaid.
I think Trump has caused them to go to desperate measures because he redefined the Republican Party.
He turned the party from one to another.
Well, don't get me wrong, I'm not a Republican helper.
Scott, Scott, Scott!
I damn Trump.
Scott, let me answer, let me answer the question.
Trump transformed the Republican Party into a populist party.
It took it from being a country club, rich man's group that wanted limited government and all this, into a party that was actually advancing the interests of the American people.
That's why you've had this transformation.
Trump has been picking up support from, or the Republican Party, now that it's transformed under Trump, has been picking up more and more support from independents, from blacks and from Hispanics.
We're seeing it taking place right away because the Democrats have abandoned them for a bizarre set of agenda items.
I mean, look, if they can destroy gas and oil in the United States, we're going to go into the economic toilet in a way from which the nation will never recover.
Trump had made the nation energy independent for the first time, and yet the first act of Biden when he got into office was cancel the XL pipeline, which had contributed to that outcome.
He's now, of course, contemplating getting rid of the Pipeline 5 from Ontario into Michigan that provides gas and energy for the Midwest where we'd have people freezing in the Midwest if that happens.
They're messing with a supply chain because they want to promote the vaccine agenda when the vaccines are killing people right and left.
There's never been a situation where you had a medical product or procedure that brought about A tiny fraction of the adverse effects we have here that hasn't been immediately pulled off of the market.
Okay.
May I interject?
Go ahead.
Yeah.
Okay.
So on that note about the vaccine killing people.
Okay.
Don't get me wrong, but I don't see it.
I know a lot of people that have got the shot and none of them have died.
None of them have gotten sick.
I mean, some of them have gotten, you know, like the sickness, but not like the heart disease and all that other stuff.
Scott, you're not... I don't know.
It's weird.
You're not doing your homework.
There's massive evidence.
I've been reporting this time after time after time.
We haven't had a caller yet.
I've never talked to anyone.
So, it's a blur.
I just...
It's weird you kind of kind of break it's like somebody's got a it's like somebody broke into the Line here or something.
I'm getting a bunch of static Scott Scott I'm glad you called me and I'm gonna take this dollar from the line with me.
Thank you for calling.
Thanks for taking my call.
Bye.
Of course 9-1-3, area code, give us... Oh, you've got the background noise.
My goodness, what should we do about that, Mitchell?
Okay.
I'll get rid of it.
If you can, please do.
Okay, go ahead, 9-1-3, join the conversation.
Yes, this is John calling from Lee, Sonoma, Missouri, and I have a challenge on my Facebook page that I would like to challenge anybody They can prove that Trump is not an insider and I'll give you my Corvette.
And it's worth quite a bit of money.
And there's only one way we're going to see through the bottom of this.
People are going to have to start removing Trump's begonias from their esophagus because the guy has a lot of dirt piled up and I can prove it.
And like I said, I have a Corvette up for grabs on my Facebook page, John Seals, if anybody would like to come.
Get a Corvette.
If you want a Corvette, come check it out, because we've been sold a box of rocks, and the left and right are playing monkey in the middle with these people, and we've got to shatter this left and right paradigm.
Okay, thanks for sharing.
I think you're going to lose that Corvette.
Let me just point out, if Trump were in the pocket of the man... It's been on there for over a year.
John, John, John, listen to me.
Trump did so much good for the United States.
He made us energy independent.
He revived the economy.
The lowest earning wage earners were seeing their wages rise at the highest rate.
He was cramping down on the border.
It was because Trump was doing so much good for America, they had to get rid of him.
If you, if what you're saying were true, it would not have been necessary to go to such great lengths as to steal the election, because Trump was already in their pocket.
So they could just go along with Trump, since the people seem to like him and promote his agenda, which was their agenda, according to you.
I think your position is just ridiculous.
That's my frank, candid opinion.
So I hope you're lucky and you don't lose your Corvette, but I think you're grossly mistaken.
Let's see if we can get 780 caller, a caller from the 780 area code.
Please join.
Give us your name and your state.
Justin Lucas or just Justin.
I'm from Alberta.
OK, go ahead, Justin.
Oh, that last guy that was saying that he's not seeing people die from COVID, that guy's ridiculous, man.
I just listened to Dr. Peter McCullough yesterday on LifeSite News say that they now, with the new study that they just did, that you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from COVID-19.
And they submitted that peer-reviewed study, and they're trying to... the place in Europe that handles those scientific journals, they tried to pull it off of... stop it from being submitted, and now Dr. Peter McCullough has taken them to court.
Yes, I'm with you.
Peter McCullough is the most cited physician on the planet.
He's a leading expert.
He's really a reliable source.
And I'm just kind of appalled to have some of the comments such as we're getting today from callers.
They seem to be completely sincere.
But in my opinion, they're grossly misinformed.
And that's true whether we're talking about the virus, the vaccine being deadly, or we're talking about Trump being a traitor to the American people.
I think they're wrong on both counts.
There's so much evidence out there, and I talk about it so often, I'm kind of floored to get those comments.
For example, the World Health Organization has a data bank of over 2 million who have suffered adverse effects from the jab, over 2 million.
That's extraordinary, because the year before the jab, there were only 2,000.
And so there's been a thousand fold increase of adverse effects since the jab was introduced.
And before that, it was only 87.
And before that, one or two, meaning there are more adverse effects from the jab than from all other vaccines together in history.
It's just stunning what's going on here.
Truly fascinating to get these reports because they seem to me to be grossly mistaken.
Further thoughts of yours?
Yes, continue.
Oh, Jim, when I first heard you on Red Ice Radio, I don't know, eight years ago maybe or something, I was super suspicious of you myself.
But I gotta tell you, you are a stand-up guy, and this is the best radio on the market, I'm telling you right now.
I listen to it every day, and you're telling it like it is.
You're top-notch, man, and I really appreciate everything that you're doing, and you're making a difference.
I don't care what anybody says.
It's just crazy what's going on right now, and I really appreciate everything that you're saying and you're putting out every day.
Well, you've got to call in more often!
I'd love to hear that.
That's just a wonderful report.
Let's see, who do we have here?
Were you 7-8-0?
Do we have a 7-8-0 caller standing by?
Yeah, I'm 7-8-0, but another thing that I find super interesting from the Catholic perspective that I come from Yeah.
The divide in the church and the difference between the bishops that are standing up for the one true holy faith that's been around for 2,000 years and the new Novus Ordo Catholics.
And Archbishop Lugano, he's making a big difference.
He's telling it like it is.
He's saying the same stuff that you and Giuseppe are saying.
And there's a few other bishops like him, Bishop Strickland and Bishop Williamson, you know, who told the truth about what he had investigated with World War II and the Holocaust with the Society of St.
Pius X. Yes, yes, yes.
It's such a It's an amazing time that we're in, but it gives us the opportunity to stand up for what's right and really make a difference.
So I just wanted to say that.
I'm just delighted you called in.
Let me say, you mentioned the Holocaust.
I had my wiki entry gutted.
Because I organize a conference on academic freedom, Are There Limits to Inquiry, where we use JFK 9-11 and the Holocaust as examples.
They just gutted my wiki page.
Well, I've just rediscovered it.
It was archived some obscure location and I've reposted it.
So if you go back about five on my blog there, you'll see a review of what I have been doing, what I had been doing up until the time when they gutted my blog, which I believe was in 2014.
And there's a link to my piece on the Holocaust, the Holocaust narrative, Politics Trump Science.
I want to thank everyone for calling in.
This has been an exciting day, in my opinion, a great day for America, and I praise Revolution Radio.
It's doing a wonderful job for the public and all of our callers.
Ruth, Scott, and you, I especially appreciate.
Thanks for calling in, everyone.
Have a great weekend, and spend as much time as you can with your family and friends, because we don't know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection