All Episodes
Oct. 5, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
28:30
MD Whistleblower in the Military Grounds Pilots Due to Vaccine. New Lawsuits Filed by Dr Simone Gold
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I don't like no one else.
Thank you so much for being here.
Thank you.
I got a box. You hold that and I'll get this.
I've got a box with other solutions to the text that you're going to want to talk about.
I've got a box with other types of solutions.
I don't want this to slip.
I've got a box with other types of solutions.
I'm Dr. Simone Gold.
I'm the founder of America's Frontline Doctors.
As most of you know, I'm in an emergency position, experienced more than 20 years, and Stanford University educated attorney.
That's what led me to found America's Frontline Doctors last year.
Since that time, it's become a very big movement.
We are a civil rights organization.
Civil rights organization.
We see the biggest human issue, human rights movement of the day.
is trying to mandate human beings to give up their bodily sovereignty, the right to bodily integrity.
We think this is a catastrophic situation and a crisis of huge constitutional proportions for our nation.
Because of that, America's Frontline Doctors is engaged in much litigation around the nation.
We filed our first lawsuit in Alabama.
That is still pending.
We have a lawsuit against the University of California.
That is still pending.
We filed against Mayor de Blasio in New York about a month ago.
Because his mandates to require everyone to be vaccinated to participate in public life is reminiscent of Jim Crow.
And we asked Jim Crow de Blasio to stand down.
We're waiting for a result on that.
You may remember that about three or four weeks ago, we filed a case versus the Department of Defense that's filed in Colorado, but it's currently pending before Judge Moore.
That was initially a TRO.
The TRO was not granted.
Just last night, we filed a preliminary injunction in that same case, and I'm going to tell you what's in that preliminary injunction and amended complaint.
In the federal district court pending for Judge Moore in Colorado, we filed a preliminary injunction to immediately halt all illegal
COVID-19 vaccinations for all military personnel, including any military employees,
airline pilots, and those who have fully recovered from COVID infection. To date, there have
been no screenings for COVID-recovered people. Please hold on.
This illegal action violates 10 U.S.C.
Section Code 1107.
In response to this litigation filed three to four weeks ago, the Defendant Department of Defense has actually accelerated its inoculation program in an effort to prevent its soldiers and military personnel from asserting their lawful rights.
The preliminary injunction motion, along with the amended complaint, broadens the class of plaintiffs to also include the Department of Defense contractors, and is based on the now-proven fact that COVID-recovered people have superior immunity.
The evidence presented includes expert witness testimony.
From two military doctors and a well-credentialed professor of pathology that have found that both the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines contain a pathological toxin, a poison, commonly called PEG.
Each such vaccine lists either ALC3015 in Pfizer or SM102 in Moderna as key ingredients of the billions of nanoparticles in each dose.
The revelation was so alarming to these doctors that one of the plaintiff's experts, Army Lieutenant Colonel Teresa Long, M.D., who is the head flight surgeon at Fort Rucker and is responsible for the health and safety of Army air crews, made a halting, shocking declaration.
In her expert opinion, all military flight crew who have received any of the biological products should be grounded from flying until an MRI screening of their cardiovascular system is performed in order to rule out these life-threatening adverse reactions to the shots.
To date, there are no screenings.
The preliminary injunction is the next step in the legal battle to protect our military.
This violence for the purpose of ceasing any further involuntary vaccinations based on the evidence of these adverse events,
including, that are becoming increasingly common, including life-threatening blood clots and myocarditis and pericarditis,
inflammation of the heart.
These adverse events are listed on the Pfizer-BioNTech's own fact sheets,
and the evidence of this widespread harm, especially in younger persons, especially in males, has become irrefutable.
It is not just flight crews who are negatively affected by this,
there's Dr. Stiglitz, who is another Army doctor who is also given an affidavit.
People cannot believe that the manufacturers would knowingly put a toxin in their product and test it on our entire population for the first time during these phase 3 clinical trials that our country is participating in.
It is so incredulous that they would use the global population for these toxic experiments that we engaged a world-class pathologist, Dr. Ralph Grams, to run mass spectrometry on the ingredients to ensure this is so.
Dr. Grams has provided sworn testimony that both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna emergency use COVID vaccines contain a substantial and significant amount of these toxic materials.
It is no wonder people are having deliberate Deliberate and debilitating allergic reactions to these shots, says Dr. Graham.
Dr. Grams used state-of-the-art mass spectrometry laboratory equipment to make his findings.
These key ingredients are known carcinogenic toxins, and numerous studies have found anaphylaxis reactions to the PET compounds in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
The inoculations are currently being forced on all service members, including those who've already recovered from COVID-19.
This despite the fact that numerous studies show proof that COVID-recovered patients It's common sense and scientifically supported that those who recover do not require a vaccination.
The military regulations agree with this point and defining regulation AR40-562 actually excludes people with prior immunity from compulsory vaccinations.
It also excludes people who are allergic to any ingredient.
This policy has been regulatory law in the military since 1908.
So what has changed that would permit the Secretary of Defense to annul this rule?
That is the question.
There's more here, but what I want to turn my attention to, that's kind of a bit of an overview, is I want to read to you some of the affidavit prepared and submitted by one of the experts.
Before I share with you her testimony, let me share with you her background.
Lieutenant Colonel Theresa Long is a physician, flight surgeon.
Received her bachelor's degree from the University of Texas at Austin.
Completed her medical degree at the University of Texas at Houston.
She's a field surgeon for 10 years.
Then she completed her residency in aerospace and occupational medicine at the United States Army School of Aviation Medicine.
She holds a Master in Public Health.
She's also been trained in Combat Readiness at Fort Rucker as an Aviation Safety Officer.
She's also trained in Medical Management of Chemical and Biological Causalities at Fort Detrick.
She's board certified, I think I mentioned that, in aerospace medicine.
She's currently the brigade surgeon for the 1st Aviation Brigade Fort Rutger, Alabama.
And she is responsible for certifying the health, mental and physical ability and readiness for nearly all 4,000 individuals on flight status at this post.
She received specialized military training from infectious disease doctors from the Army, Navy, and Air Force on emerging infectious disease threats, FEMA training, emergency preparedness training, medical effects of ionizing radiation, OSHA, aerospace toxicology, epidemiology, biostatistics, medical research, and disaster planning.
She functions as a medical and scientific advisor to an aviation training brigade,
seeking to identify risk mitigation strategies and biostatistical analysis
of the SARS-CoV-2 infections in both vaccinated and unvaccinated soldiers.
She has identified, diagnosed, and treated many COVID-19 patients.
She has personally observed the vaccine adverse events.
And there's more, but I want you to understand who she is.
Dedicated physician, supremely qualified, and in charge of the health of all the people
on this military base.
Unimpeachable.
She's also now, for the fact-checkers out there who intend to discredit this fine woman, under federal whistleblower protection.
So you stand forewarned.
She's analyzed what's gone on, and based upon her analysis and her education and experience, she states the following, and I'll read you some of her affidavit.
Part of it stems from her background in risk management as a risk management expert.
And she identifies five steps of risk management that she and anybody in risk management in the military is supposed to follow.
You're supposed to do the five things.
Identify the hazards.
Assess the hazards.
Develop the control and make decisions.
Implement controls.
Supervise and delegate.
She notes that the CDC and the FDA are civilian organizations and are not binding upon the military.
First to identify the hazard, then assess the hazard.
She concludes, using an mRNA vaccine in our fighting force presents a risk of undetermined magnitude in a population in which less than 20 active duty personnel out of 1.4 million died of SARS-CoV-2.
Aircraft Training Program, ATP 519, Section 1 through 8, says,
accept no unnecessary risks.
An unnecessary risk is any risk that, if taken, will not contribute meaningfully to mission accomplishment
or will needlessly endanger lives or resources.
She's saying that this violates classic risk management teachings in the Army.
Research shows that most individuals with myocarditis do not have any symptoms.
Complications of myocarditis include dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and carries a mortality rate of 20% at one year and 50% at five years.
According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information, the U.S.
National Library of Medicine, despite optimal medical management, overall mortality has not changed in 30 years.
You get myocarditis?
You have a very good chance of having a very impaired and shortened life.
So step three in the risk management protocol is to develop the controls and make a risk decision.
Because vaccination with mRNA increases the risk of myocarditis, a comprehensive screening program should be implemented immediately to identify the individuals who've developed myocarditis.
She goes on to step four, implement controls, supervise and evaluate.
She notes, the labels for Comirnaty and BioNTech clearly state that the vaccination should not be given to individuals that are allergic to ingredients.
She has noted that one of the primary ingredients of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system is ALC1035.
The toxicity report on ALC1035, which comprises 30 to 50% of the total ingredients, include
polyethylene glycol, which is the active ingredient in antifreeze.
Mm.
It is hard to believe that this is necessary to be a key ingredient in the community shops.
She states, I cannot discern what form of alchemy Pfizer and the FDA have discovered that would make antifreeze into a healthful cure for the human body.
Many scientists agree with this, and she references a group of 57 scientists and doctors who also concur.
Her assessment is that ASC0315 is a known toxin with little study, specifically restricted to research only, and effectively has had no prior use in humans like this.
Now, she points out that we're not checking the adverse events the way we are required to by law.
There is a recommendation made by the Government Accountability Office In the GAO's Survey of Guard and Reserve Pilots and Aircrew, GAO 02-445, published September 20, 2002, in which it was recommended that the Secretary of Defense should direct and establish an active surveillance program to identify and monitor adverse events.
This is different than VAERS, which is passive.
The military is violating its own regulation, which requires it to maintain an active registry, track every single one.
They are not compliant.
She points out something.
This is not shocking enough.
Let me share with you another incredibly shocking Point of information that all Americans need to be made aware of what's happening to our military.
She is aware and attesting to the fact that the Secretary of Defense, Austin, gave an order in relation to COVID vaccine mandates this week.
In an information paper, it was stated, unit personnel should use only as much force as necessary to assist medical personnel with immunization.
The use of force to administer a medical treatment or therapy against the will of a mentally competent individual constitutes medical battery and universally violates medical ethics.
She goes on to explain some of her own personal experience, and she relates the following.
Patient encounter.
I'm speaking as the Lieutenant Commander now.
Quote, I've personally observed the most physically fit female soldier I have ever seen in 20 years in the Army.
Both from collegiate level athletic ability for ranger school, to becoming physically debilitated with cardiac problems, newly diagnosed pituitary brain tumor, thyroid dysfunction within weeks of getting vaccinated.
Several military physicians have shared with me their first-hand experience with a significant increase in the number of young soldiers with migraines, menstrual irregularities, cancer, suspected myocarditis, and reporting cardiac symptoms after vaccination.
Today, one reason I was a little bit late this morning is the following.
And again, I'm speaking in the voice of the Lieutenant Commander.
Today, I received word of one fatality and two ICU cases on Fort Hood.
The deceased was an Army pilot who could have been flying at the time.
All three pulmonary embolism events happened within 48 hours of their vaccination.
I cannot attribute this result to anything other than the COVID-19 vaccines as the source of these events.
Each person was in top physical condition before the inoculation, and each suffered the event within two days post-vaccination.
I find the illnesses, injuries, and fatalities observed to be the proximate and immediate cause Uh, due to the COVID-19 vaccinations.
She goes on.
I can report of knowing over 15 military physicians and health care providers who have shared experiences of having their safety concerns ignored or being ostracized for reporting these safety concerns.
She concludes with the following.
One.
None of the ordered emergency use COVID-19 vaccines can or will provide better immunity than an infection recovered person.
Two, all three of the COVID vaccines are more risky, harmful, and dangerous than having no vaccine at all, whether a person's COVID recovered or not, having had the infection.
3.
Direct evidence exists and suggests that all persons who have received a COVID-19 vaccine are damaged in their cardiovascular system in an irreparable and irrevocable manner.
Due to the spike protein production that is engineered into the user's genome, each such recipient of the COVID-19 vaccine already has microplots in the cardiovascular system that present a danger to themselves, their health, and safety.
That such micro plaques over time will become bigger plaques by the very nature of the shape and composition of the spike proteins being produced.
That at the initial stage of this damage, micro plaques can only be discovered by cardiac biopsy or MRI screening.
That due to the fact that there is no functional MRI screening currently being conducted, it is my professional opinion, speaking as the Lieutenant Commander Flight Surgeon who is responsible for approving the health and safety and flight military readiness of the military personnel on her base, it is my professional opinion that substantial foreseen risks currently exist which require proper screening of all flight crews.
By virtue of their occupations, these flight crews present extraordinary risks to themselves and others given the equipment they operate, munitions they carry, and areas of operations in close proximity to population centers, and that without any current screening procedures in place, Related to this identifiable risk, I must and will therefore ground all active flight personnel who received vaccinations until such time as the causation of these serious systemic health risks can be more fully and adequately assessed.
That in accordance with the foregone, I hereby recommend to the Secretary of Defense that all pilots, crew, and flight personnel in the military service who require hospitalization be grounded similarly for further dispositive assessment.
And that this court should grant an immediate injunction to stop or defer the harm to military personnel.
We have an esteemed Well-credentialed, experienced flight surgeon, medical degree, master's in public health, special expertise in chemical and biological training, risk management, responsible for the health and safety of the military people on her base, responsible to assert flight readiness for the soldiers on her base, grounding the pilots due to their unacceptable health risks posed by the vaccines,
Which spike proteins cause microclotting, which can develop into larger clots.
There's well documented instances of myocarditis, pericarditis, well known risk to young, healthy people, especially young males.
She relates knowing of a flight pilot who just died, apparently one to two days ago, $48 after getting the shot.
Two others currently in the ICU.
I think she said this was at Fort Hood.
This is the case that's filed today.
And we hope that the judge evaluates the information properly and orders the Department of Defense to halt the COVID-19 mandatory inoculation policy.
Thank you.
I can take some questions.
Thank you.
I can take some questions.
Thank you.
I can take some questions.
Thank you.
I can take some questions.
Thank you.
I can take some questions.
Thank you.
I can take some questions.
Thank you.
I do not.
That's a lying question.
It's Judge Warren, if somebody wants to check.
Dr. Goldie and Trottier from Discussing the Truth Miami.
In your opinion, you're not military, in your opinion, is safe biological weapon on the United States?
Are the shots?
Yes.
I think it's an unacceptable national security risk to give all of our military personnel a medication that did not exist last year.
That is my opinion.
Marine Corps veteran, my son's serving in the Air Force overseas.
They forced the backs on him, and so it's upset me.
People don't know they've done this before with the anthrax, and there were two forms of anthrax, and a lot of people died.
The O.K.
City bombing had a lot to do with that.
Is there anything we can do as veterans to come alongside and, you know, help expose this in an even deeper way, especially to our community?
The word needs to get out that we are fighting these cases and we're filing these cases on behalf of our military.
One of my concerns as a non-military person who receives a lot of messages, for example on Twitter, is that this is not known to the soldiers that there are people fighting.
I would urge everybody with any connections to any military veterans or current military to spread the word as aggressively as possible that there are people out there fighting for you.
And don't succumb to what we know to be an illegal regulation.
In addition to everything I said today, long-standing military regulation is that if you've had the illness, you can't be forced to take the shot.
That's one of the most obvious things that's gone wrong with this order.
So please spread the word to every military group to which you belong, that there's fights going on out there.
And the Secretary of Defense is going to have to answer for this one in particular.
So we'll see what the future holds.
This is Rick with the Blessed Teats Show.
And thank you first, Simone, for being on the front lines of this battle.
Just give her a quick hand.
And my question is really timing.
Do you have a thought about how quickly this could actually help our soldiers if it's successful?
I will say that as Speaking as a doctor, lawyer, watching this whole battle, this is going to move on quickly.
You know, the TRO that was submitted three or four weeks ago in this case, the judge ruled in about four days, I think.
Don't hold me to that.
This preliminary injunction gives more information than a TRO.
And what I've read to you today from the Lieutenant Commander is such a breathtaking, whistleblower kind of affidavit.
I believe next week.
If I was the judge, I would have to rule on this next week.
This is very, very urgent.
I can't speak for the judge, but that's why you file a preliminary injunction, is to get a very quick result.
Great.
What prophylaxis program would you recommend to the public and or civilian contractors with whom employers are requiring the vaccine?
There is a lot of treatment options on America's FrontlineDoctors.org.
I think it deviates a little bit from this press conference to talk about it,
but there's a lot of early treatment options.
They include hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, dutastatine, phenylfibrate is within very promising cultures, meaning
you all have to take this with zinc.
This is...
In relation to this press conference, I want to point out that the limitations of early treatment access
is really an American problem and a Western nation problem.
These medicines are easily obtained in other parts of the world, and it's America that is being very, very stubborn on this issue, and we can speculate about why that is.
Are any of these vaccines for the last 20 months being manufactured in China?
And part of that same question, if not the vaccines themselves, due to the lack of capacity in the West, are any of the pharma active ingredients being made over the APIs?
I'm not equipped to answer that question.
I don't have the information.
I'm just going to stick to today's content.
I can't answer that intelligently.
extract all of the nanostems deals.
Is that a concern for Americans?
That kind of contamination in vaccines?
I'm just going to stick to today's content.
I can't answer that intelligently. Thank you.
Hi, Denise Bowland, Remember This TV Show.
I'm from New York, so I'm with you with de Blasio.
It's also two-part.
Do you feel that any of these lawsuits will have successful results with so many liberal judges out there?
And if not, do you see them going door-to-door and forcing vaccinations?
We learned a little bit as we go.
The first case that we filed in the Northern District of Alabama is very comprehensive.
If you're curious about the whole picture of what's going on in the last 18 months, you really should look at that case filed in the Northern District of Alabama.
An easy way to find it is on americasmartlanddoctors.org.
Go to the legal section, look for Alabama, you'll find it.
It's clear that it's complicated stuff for a judge.
Even an ethical, honorable judge reading all this stuff is complicated.
So, we haven't had an answer from him yet.
In the meanwhile, we've filed other cases that are not quite as complicated.
The case, for example, pending before the Supreme Court versus the University of California is only on behalf of the COVID-recovered college student.
It's a much more limited question.
If you've had something, you don't need a mandatory shot, per the university's own policies.
We've tried to make it a little bit more limited for that very reason, which is these
are hard cases to adjudicate.
Specifically in New York, the reason we stood in New York is primarily a civil rights issue.
As I said at the outset, America's Frontline Dutchess perceives itself to be a civil rights organization.
Mayor de Blasio put forth a mandate that is discriminatory on its face.
It has a disparate impact on Black people.
Black people are absolutely getting vaccinated at a lower rate.
This is dismissed, really with a pejorative kind of slang expression of vaccine hesitancy, as though there was nothing worth being hesitant about.
When you look in the history of our nation, in terms of government programs and vaccine programs, they've had a negative, a greater negative impact on Black people, and they've had to fight very hard to be heard on that subject.
So they fight for years and years, and then finally it's, oops, yes, my bad, right?
This is how it's gone.
It's gone like this.
course we all know about Tuskegee and Henrietta Lacks, but there was a CDC whistleblower,
a senior scientist, Dr. William Thompson, who came forward in 2012 and in 2014 he revealed
that in his work as a CDC senior scientist, he was ordered by his CDC bosses to take the data
that he had, he and other scientists had discovered, that the MMR measles vaccine was disproportionately
harming black babies and his CDC bosses ordered him to shred the documents into four big huge blue
bins, right? He was also under federal whistleblower protection for that story. There's also five other
vaccines that have disproportionately hurt black people, usually babies, like the hepatitis
vaccine given to black babies had a disproportionate impact.
We put all of that in the case because it is showing that there's a legitimate reason why black people are more hesitant.
But by the way, even if it wasn't a very scientifically understandable reason, by New York City law,
Export Selection