Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 10, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

03:59:11

David Zublick's "Dark Outpost" 9/11 SPECIAL (8 September 2021)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you you
	Greetings.
	I see you've found your way to the dark outpost.
	Welcome, travelers.
	I'm David Zublik, your host on this excursion to the darkest outpost of the human mind and beyond.
	Thank you for being with us once again.
	We appreciate it.
	We have what I think is a great show coming up for you today in about an hour from now.
	Junny Silcox is going to join us to talk about what happens if the power grid goes down for any number of reasons.
	Natural disaster, some sort of cyber attack, an EMP attack.
	What would happen if all of a sudden we were plunged into the Stone Age without electricity?
	Junny Silcox is going to give us the science behind what would happen.
	If the grid were to go down.
	And then following that, Dr. James Fetzer will join us.
	Originally, today, we were scheduled to talk about the Las Vegas shooting.
	However, as we approach the 20th anniversary of 9-11, Dr. Fetzer and I both thought it would be appropriate to tell you about the 20-year lie.
	Actually, 20 years of lies With regard to what really happened on that fateful day, September the 11th, 2001.
	Was it an inside job, as many believe?
	What happened to Building 7?
	Did planes really hit the Twin Towers?
	And if this was something of an inside job, who or what was behind it?
	We're going to spend two solid hours going over 9-11 in the 20-year lie with Dr. James Fetzer, A little bit later on in the broadcast.
	In the first hour, we have news, and we're going to open up the telephone lines for you.
	All right?
	Before we do any of that, let's do as we do each and every day on this broadcast, if we could, and honor our nation and its flag.
	And of course, our nation is in distress right now, so we're flying our flag upside down.
	I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
	And to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
	All right, thank you very much.
	I want to talk to you about something real quick here.
	Did you know that Apple, you probably heard about this, has announced a controversial new security update?
	to their iPhones and their tablets and their computers.
	They said they're going to start scanning all of your Apple devices for illicit materials.
	Specifically they were trying to target child pornography.
	Now of course we here on this program have fought against child pornography.
	We've fought hard against pedophilia and child sex trafficking.
	We're doing everything in our power to put an end to it.
	Cause that's just something that I believe needs to be protected.
	Our innocent young children.
	However, the fourth amendment to the United States constitution, the ability to be secure in our persons and our effects also is high on my priority list.
	And as much as I want to see pedophiles and those who create child pornography brought to justice.
	I don't think private companies or even the government should have the right, without some sort of a warrant, to view whatever is on our computers, our tablets, or our cell phones.
	Now Edward Snowden slammed these plans.
	He called them a disaster in the making.
	He was correct about that.
	Nearly 100 policy and rights groups have asked Apple not to go through with this update and to I guess the good, Apple has delayed this plan of theirs for the moment.
	But believe you me, believe me you, the only reason they delayed it is because it got out and caused an uproar.
	If they can find a way to sneak this in, they will.
	Now Apple isn't the only company doing this.
	You need to know that.
	A lot of tech giants breach your privacy every single day in multiple ways.
	But you can fight it.
	Again, all you got to do is get yourself a virtual private network or a VPN.
	A VPN is something that allows you to surf the web without the prying eyes of business entities, the government, or anybody else, including your ISP.
	And the best VPN out there is VirtualShield.
	VirtualShield adds an external layer of security to all of your online accounts.
	It routes a user's online activity through their encrypted virtual tunnels.
	This prevents hackers, corporations, and of course even your ISP from tracking you across the internet.
	Plus, VirtualShield themselves has a strict no log policy.
	Like other VPNs do, believe it or not.
	The other VPNs do have a log policy.
	They track you even if they're saying they're protecting you from the prying eyes of others.
	Virtual Shield doesn't track you at all.
	It's fast, secure, easy to use.
	There are no hidden fees.
	Look, I do a lot of surfing on the web to find alternative stories to bring you that the mainstream media is not reporting.
	And as a result, on occasion, I have to go to some pretty dark places.
	Places that are dangerous for most people to traverse.
	I don't want the prying eyes of others preventing me from bringing you the news that you need to have.
	I've tried other VPNs, but VirtualShield is still the absolute best.
	And it's the only one that I use right now.
	I highly recommend VirtualShield.
	And right now you can get 50% off a subscription to VirtualShield by using virtualshield.com www.virtualshield.com forward slash zooblick or just click the link in the description of this video.
	Again, www.virtualshield.com forward slash zooblick.
	Check them out today.
	All right, will you do that for me?
	All right, let's go to the Dark Hour Post News Center and see exactly what is going
	on in the world we live in right now.
	There is a lot going on and one of the things you need to be aware of is the fact that,
	oh, you're going to love this one.
	Hundreds of thousands of people are really upset about the vaccine mandates.
	And I mean, this is getting bad.
	It's getting really, really bad and people are starting to do something about it.
	And one of the things that people are upset about is the misinformation that's being put out there so that people will have to correct themselves, if you will, on what can be used to treat COVID-19.
	Now, one of the things that we've talked about that you can use against COVID-19 that works very well, two things, obviously hydroxychloroquine, which is One of the earliest things that were mentioned, but also Ivermectin.
	Now, the mainstream media has been attempting to make Ivermectin out to be something that is extremely dangerous.
	The Associated Press was forced to issue a correction after it falsely claimed that 70% of calls to the Mississippi Poison Control Center were about people ingesting Ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
	The actual number was 2%.
	Now look folks, You know, we've got people coming on this broadcast who have tried ivermectin to prevent COVID-19.
	It's a preventative as well as a killer.
	I mean, basically COVID-19 is a parasite.
	It's a worm, okay?
	Genetically manufactured in a lab worm, but a worm nonetheless.
	Ivermectin is used to treat parasites in animals like horses, but the same medicine also works to kill the Parasites in humans the parasite of COVID-19 it knocks it out However, you shouldn't be taking the you shouldn't be going out to the store to buy yourself the the tube of horse ivermectin Although we've had some people on the broadcast who are actually doing that You're better off getting the pills from a doctor.
	All right.
	Now it's getting more increasingly difficult to to get a doctor to Prescribe anything other than the vaccine and other topical things to treat COVID-19.
	But there are places you can get ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
	One of the places is America's Frontline Doctors and the other is a website called BuyIvermectin.com and BuyIvermectin.US.
	You can purchase ivermectin online from a doctor and have it delivered to you.
	As well as hydroxychloroquine.
	We highly recommend that you seek a doctor's advice before you do anything.
	Don't just go off and, you know, purchase these things half-cocked.
	Make sure you're under the care of a physician who will recognize the value of using these already approved medicines for the treatment of COVID-19.
	Don't let the FDA or the CDC or anybody else steer you in a different direction, but make sure that you're doing this under the advisement of a doctor and not just going off on your own and doing this.
	But in an article published August 23rd, 2021 about people taking livestock medicine to try to treat coronavirus, the AP erroneously reported, based on information provided by the Mississippi Department of Health, that 70% of recent calls to the Mississippi Poison Control Center were from people who had ingested ivermectin to try to treat COVID-19.
	State epidemiologist Dr. Paul Byers said the number of calls to poison control about ivermectin was about 2%, not 70, 2%!
	He said of the calls that were about ivermectin, 70% were by people who had ingested the veterinary version of the medicine.
	As Chris Menahan notes, NPR also amplified this story, fake news, saying the department said that at least 70% of recent calls to the state poison control center were related to people who ingested a version of the drug that is formulated to treat parasites in cows and horses.
	The NPR National Public Radio has not yet issued a retraction or an apology, which was, you know, circulated thousands of times, while the retraction will only be seen by a fraction of those who read the original anyway.
	Over the weekend, Rolling Stone Magazine faced massive humiliation after it asserted that there were so many patients overdosing on ivermectin that Oklahoma hospitals were being overwhelmed and that gunshot victims were going untreated.
	Well, they were forced to walk that story back as well after the Northeastern Hospital System Sequoia issued a statement clarifying that it has not Treated any patients due to complications related to taking ivermectin, which includes not treating any patients for ivermectin overdose.
	Again, the original story went viral, while the retraction, the revelation that it was fake news, is only circulating in conservative circles right now.
	You know, again, the mainstream media, they just make this stuff disappear and go away if it doesn't fit their narrative.
	My question to you is, what do you think about all of this?
	I would like to hear from you right here, right now, and here is the telephone number.
	Oh, that's not the, nope, nope, that's not the one.
	I want the toll-free number.
	Thank you very much.
	877-703-4830. 877-703-4830 if you would like to sound off and this or anything else 877-703-4830.
	877-703-4830.
	877-703-4830.
	Now here's a story I brought to you a little bit earlier today on our morning news update, which by the way we post on Rumble and BitChute about an hour and a half before we go live.
	Mom furious after discovering that leftist teacher taped a face mask on her son.
	Check this out.
	A Las Vegas mom is furious after discovering that her nine-year-old son had a mask taped to his face by a leftist school teacher in front of his classmates.
	The abuse took place at Reedham Elementary School in Mountains Edge, Nevada.
	The mother told KVVU-TV.
	It's a shocking example of the creeping authoritarianism that's flourishing at public schools under the guise of keeping people safe from COVID.
	The mother who wishes to remain anonymous said he went to get a sip of water, forgot to put the mask on.
	The teacher did not tell him to put it back on.
	She didn't send him to the office.
	Instead, she pulled him in front of the classroom, in front of all the students.
	She then taped the mask across the top of his face.
	World Net Daily, WND, is reporting the mother said the substitute teacher, this was substitute, added a second layer of tape from her son's nose to his forehead.
	She wants the instructor fired for child abuse.
	When her son recounted the incident, the mother was horrified to learn that taping masks to children's faces has been happening in his classroom since the beginning of the school year.
	Now, for a lot of people, the school year actually began yesterday, the day after Labor Day.
	But for some school districts across the country, school has begun already and began in August.
	So as a result, this may have been going on for quite some time.
	The mother was especially outraged after learning that the punitive ritual is apparently designed to embarrass and shame forgetful children.
	Her son told her that the same terrifying bullying had happened to at least five other students.
	She said, I'm furious.
	I was scared for my son and what kind of long-term effect it's going to have on him socially.
	The fact that the entire class was laughing at him.
	He was crying.
	He was humiliated.
	The mom said she is not opposed to face masks in general because this is not a political issue for her.
	But she's angry that children at Reedham Elementary School have been punished and humiliated simply for forgetting to wear their masks all day.
	The mom filed a police report is considering taking legal action against the school to make sure this outrageous child abuse does not happen again.
	She said it's corporal punishment, basically.
	It's a form of corporal punishment.
	It's physical punishment.
	The school district, which said it's investigating the incident, released a statement saying the district is aware of this isolated incident and is dealing with the employee through the proper channels.
	The principal proactively notified the family of the investigation.
	What do you think about this?
	Should the substitute teacher be fired?
	Should the substitute teacher be prosecuted for child abuse?
	Well, that's what I want to know.
	Well, you tell me.
	Here's the telephone number 877-703-4830.
	Let's take a telephone call here from Dina?
	Is that you, Dina?
	Yes, this is Dina.
	How are you doing, David?
	I'm doing well.
	How are you?
	I'm doing well.
	Just wanted to make a comment.
	We have horses and we use ivermectin on our horses.
	And if people would actually follow the dosage per weight and they use ivermectin gold, there is absolutely nothing wrong with them using it.
	So you can use it.
	In fact.
	Go ahead.
	Oh yes, you can.
	Oh yes, you can.
	Um, you can most definitely use it.
	It is safe.
	The only problem is, is one tube is going to, is going to treat up to 1500 pounds.
	And I know the Ivermectin Gold is a good one.
	Some of the dewormers that they sell, you just need to use logic.
	You need to do a little research.
	But they actually, if you, If you think about it, we've had a long time where animals actually get better care and have better care than actually people.
	I mean, that's sad, but that's the fact.
	That's what world we live in.
	So for people who cannot get their hands on the Ivermectin pills, just weigh yourself and then follow the instructions.
	Practice with the tube first because you have to screw.
	Don't Immediately put it straight into your mouth or whatever.
	Practice with it because it's going to shoot out like if you were to put it into a horse's mouth.
	So put it, shoot it into something else and then break it down per your weight.
	Cause there's hundred pound sections on there.
	Can you put it like, can you put a dab of it on your finger and then put it in your mouth?
	Yeah, I would section it out per the 100 pounds.
	If you have, you know, a 150 pound person, you'd move that dial up and to 150, then screw it down, then squeeze it out.
	That dial protects it from squeezing any more out.
	But yeah, put it somewhere else before you put it in.
	That way, if you actually squeeze out a little bit too much, you can break it down.
	But one tube can treat a whole family.
	Now, do you live on a farm?
	Do you own horses?
	Yes, we do.
	We own three horses.
	We have chickens.
	We have other stuff.
	And I verified with a lot of other people.
	I actually know people who have used it and gotten over and gotten well.
	But there's only a lot of the horse dewormers that are out there.
	It's hard to get your hands on the gold But it's even harder to get your hands on the Ivermectin for people in the human doses.
	So, you know, if you're faced with this issue, it's good to have some stored up somewhere if you can find it and have it in your cabinet in case you have to deal with it.
	Do you have to have a prescription to get it for animals as well?
	No, you do not.
	Oh, you don't.
	So you could buy it at a pet store that sells Pet supplies for for like people who for like people who live in Africa.
	Okay.
	Well, okay.
	Well, that's some that's something to know.
	I mean, you know, like I said, I think people should have access to it if it works.
	And obviously, you said you've known people that have had COVID and have used this to get over it.
	And I understand it really knocks it out.
	It really works.
	Yes, I know.
	Well, I have it on standby.
	You can also make homemade hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine.
	I have that made.
	I actually did get some grandchildren well with that.
	We kept the ivermectin on standby.
	Children tend to get over it fairly quickly.
	My immune system is up.
	I was around them.
	I went over and helped take care of everybody.
	The farrier that I knew that used I knew the farrier that used ivermectin in the horse form paste and he got immediately better and no one else in the family got it.
	So their immune systems were better and that was another large family.
	So you can also check out Ann Barnhart.
	She has a lot of information on ivermectin and which types to use.
	Ann Barnhart dot com.
	Okay.
	I've heard of it.
	The information is out there.
	Well, I appreciate that.
	My concern only was that I didn't want people taking something that wouldn't work as well.
	Like I said, we have a couple of guests that I know that have taken the ivermectin.
	Now, can you take it?
	Let me ask you this question.
	Do you take it as a preventative, a prophylactic, or should you wait until you are suffering from symptoms of COVID before taking it?
	Now I don't, we're not taking it as a preventative.
	We have it because it's hard to get ahold of.
	I mean, just buying horse dewormer is hard to get ahold of right now.
	But you have to know which one to get, which horse, you know, which dewormer to get.
	But no, we don't take it as a preventative.
	I have vitamin C, vitamin D and zinc that we take as a preventative and all of our other vitamins and natural supplements.
	And then I have homemade cloroquine made from basically the soaking or stewing of the rinds of grapefruit and lemon.
	So we have that, and you add honey to it, and it is bitter, but that is a natural hydroxychloroquine.
	You can find the recipes online.
	Yeah.
	It's very interesting.
	Well, listen, I appreciate the information very much, and I hope you and your entire family remain happy and healthy, and I appreciate you watching the program, and I certainly hope you'll call in again.
	Okay, thank you.
	Thank you very much.
	I enjoyed the show, by the way.
	Thank you, I appreciate it very much.
	Bye-bye.
	Bye-bye.
	Okay, well I guess you can take the pace.
	As I said, you know, we've had, I believe it's John Carmen that takes it.
	He's got it in the pace for me.
	Also got the pills, but I just want to make sure that people are safe.
	You know, maybe doing it with your doctor's advice, but if the doctor is not going to give it to you and you don't want to get the vaccine, you may have to, you may have to make a choice on that.
	Tell me what you think.
	877-703-4830. 877-703-4830. I certainly would like to hear from you on this hot topic.
	877-703-4830.
	877-703-4830.
	Now, doctors are now saying they are not going to treat people, in some cases, who are not vaccinated.
	This is coming from, let's see, where's this information from?
	Jellyfish.News, by way of Zero Hedge, By Tyler Durden.
	From Australia to the shores of the Sunshine State, pressure is growing on the unvaccinated as another doctor has decreed that she will no longer treat unvaccinated patients.
	A decision she insists is entirely consistent with her Hippocratic oath, while the Premier of the Australian state of Victoria has announced plans to lock out all unvaccinated people from the state's economy.
	Look, how long before that happens here, folks?
	I'm serious.
	How long before you're not going to be able to make a purchase?
	You're not going to be able to do anything unless you're vaccinated.
	It's already started, right?
	I told you, you know, many venues, especially, and now they're starting with, they're starting with entertainment venues, like concert halls, theaters, and that sort of thing.
	And I can understand why they're doing that, because they want to get the sheeple, the populace, what do you call them, the plebes, used to the idea of not being able to get something that they want without being vaccinated.
	You know, Broadway, resuming this month, right?
	In New York.
	You want to go to a show?
	Got to be vaccinated.
	Got to have your proof of vaccination.
	And you still have to wear a mask on top of it.
	Here where I live, we have several entertainment venues, concerts, that sort of thing, that are now going to require proof of vaccination before you are allowed to get in to see a show.
	Now, that's fine as far as I'm concerned, because I'm just not going to go.
	I don't really care.
	They're not going to get my money, especially if Especially if they're going to say, you trade your life for the ability to be entertained for two and a half hours.
	Forget it.
	Not going to happen.
	And certainly not going to be sitting in an audience for two and a half hours wearing a mask.
	That's not going to happen either.
	Just not for me.
	And I'm sure for a lot of you that you feel the same way.
	So that's fine.
	Right now you have the ability to make a choice, but eventually you try to walk into a store Right?
	Maybe your local pharmacy, your CVS, your Rite Aid.
	I'm not saying they're doing that right now.
	They're still encouraging masks.
	For a while, they required them.
	Now, they're encouraging them.
	How long before it is before they say, you know what?
	In order to come into the store to make a purchase, a grocery store, a pharmacy, any kind of a store, clothing store, you have to be vaccinated.
	And that's it.
	Now, they're doing it in certain places on the honor system.
	Right?
	Like with restaurants and such where you can, you know, sit down and you know, you don't have to have a mask on if you claim to be, if you, if you, if you are vaccinated, but they can't really prove that they're not requiring a vaccination card.
	How long before that changes and how long before anything that you do requires that you'd be vaccinated before you do it?
	Getting a driver's license, being able to vote.
	Being able to vote, being able to be treated by a doctor on a regular basis.
	You got to be vaccinated or you're not going to go to a doctor.
	Being able to make any kind of a purchase, being able to go to school, being able to hold a job.
	It's already happening with employment, right?
	How many of you are under the gun right now by your employer to get vaccinated?
	Are you going to do it?
	Now don't quit.
	I've said this before, make them fire you.
	Because even though they're saying right now that people don't have a legal case against their employers, that it's perfectly fine for them to require proof that you be vaccinated in order to continue to work there.
	And although they say it does not violate the HIPAA laws, believe me, if we have some smart attorneys out there, they're going to start digging into this and seeing if they can't set a precedent by challenging this.
	And if even one of them breaks through and succeeds, Well, then you're going to see a slew of lawsuits across the country by people who are fired by their employers for not being vaccinated.
	Right?
	It won't be long.
	Trust me.
	Trust me.
	But again, right now, we're starting to see this at the beginning in other countries.
	You're locked out of the economy.
	You can't do anything.
	Now, you might even say to yourself, okay, fine.
	Let's say I get locked out of the economy.
	It is now, today, possible to live your life completely off, you know, off the proverbial, I don't want to say off the grid.
	You could.
	You could live off the grid.
	But you could also live semi-off the grid.
	In other words, what I mean is you don't have to leave your home to go to a store to buy anything.
	Food, right?
	And I'm not just talking about things like DoorDash and getting a pizza or, you know, whatever.
	I'm talking about there are grocery stores that will deliver to you.
	You've got, what are some of these services that will shop for you, deliver to you, whatever.
	You can purchase a car and have it delivered to you.
	You can purchase appliances, books, anything.
	Like Amazon, if you want to deal with Amazon right and a lot of us a lot of people do And other companies like that you can and you basically don't have to leave your house you get food liquor whatever whatever you want So you don't have to go, but how what would happen if all of a sudden?
	Companies like Amazon and I'm not trying to give any of these companies an idea But what if something were to happen all of a sudden?
	They said you know what if you want to have any sort of contact with us if you want to Purchase anything from our company you have to be vaccinated and you're going to have to scan in and upload your vaccination card to Amazon servers or you will not be able to receive anything so that you can't even get stuff at home.
	You're not even able to live in the privacy of your own home unless you're vaccinated.
	They're starting to do that, and I think you're going to see this happening.
	Trust me.
	It's a very, very dangerous situation.
	If you want to comment on this, 877-703-4830, 877-703-4830, or anything that's on your mind, we are open line from now until the next 15-20 minutes before we bring in our first guest for today, Ginny Silcox, talking about the grid being down.
	Victoria and this part of Australia which like most of Australia is still living under draconian lockdown restrictions with residents of Melbourne who make up the vast majority of the state's population abiding by a 2100 to 2100 hour to 0500 hour curfew while being prohibited from leaving their homes except to work.
	Don't think it happened here folks.
	You don't think it could happen here?
	Trust me.
	Except to work, buy groceries, or get a COVID vaccination, those are the only three reasons that you can leave your home in Australia.
	All right?
	Now, when the state's lockdown is finally lifted this coming Sunday, it's supposed to be, right?
	After more than two months, Premier Dan Andrews said future restrictions will apply only to those who are unvaccinated.
	The state is on track to hit 70% of its adult population having received their first vaccine dose by Sunday, at which point the Premier has promised to loosen restrictions, but only for the vaccinated.
	He said this is going to be a vaccinated economy.
	A vaccinated economy.
	And you get to participate in that if you are vaccinated.
	We're going to move to a situation where to protect the health system, we're going to lock out people who are not vaccinated but could be vaccinated.
	And if you're making the choice not to get vaccinated, he said you're making the wrong choice.
	I told you yesterday about a story also taking place in Australia where they are I'm going to start texting people, the government, and at least one part of Australia is going to start texting people on their cell phones.
	When you receive this text, you have 15 minutes to text back a picture to the government showing where you are, because if you're supposed to be in your home or at work or grocery shopping and you're any place else other than where you're supposed to be, They're going to send out police officers.
	Did anybody remember seeing a video came out a few months ago of a kid about 18 years of age?
	He was in some sort of a, I think it was a fast food restaurant.
	I could be wrong in Australia.
	And he didn't have a mask on.
	Somebody called the cops on him.
	The cops came, they picked up this kid like a rag doll and they threw him onto the floor.
	He fell on his head and then they dragged him out of the, out of the store.
	Right?
	I heard he died.
	Well, this is the type of stuff that's going on in Australia right now.
	And believe me, folks, and of course, one of the reasons it's being allowed to happen is, of course, Australians gave up their guns.
	They surrendered their firearms and their ability to protect themselves from an overreaching, tyrannical government.
	And now, they're putting up with this crap.
	What do you think about it?
	877-703-4830.
	877-703-4830.
	Incredible.
	And do you... How do you feel about this?
	I mean, how do you feel about the entire economy being based on you getting the jab?
	Will you participate?
	incredible. And do you, how do you feel about this? I mean, how do you feel about
	the entire economy being based on you getting the jab? Will you participate?
	Will you allow this kind of thing to to continue?
	Oh, let's see.
	Mexico's government orders Biden to pay cash in exchange for stopping illegals from flooding the U.S.
	border.
	That's nice.
	Thousands of Canadians.
	I'm beginning to love the Canadian people here more and more each and every day.
	If you're a Canadian in our audience, I certainly wouldn't mind hearing from you.
	If you want to give us a call at 877-703.
	4830 thousands of Canadians rose up to reject Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during a recent campaign stop in Ontario.
	Protesters gathered outside a venue during his campaign stop to express their disgust at his woke policies.
	The crowd chanted F Trudeau during the event.
	Journalist Andy Nego noted on Twitter, a group of people shouted F Trudeau in Cambridge, Ontario as he's campaigning for the snap election.
	The Trudeau campaign was forced to switch venues at the last minute to avoid large protests.
	The Gateway Pundit is reporting the protesters were not fans, were not fans of the Prime Minister.
	They had several chants including, lock him up, outside his rally. Well, you know folks, you folks in
	Canada there, you've been putting up with a lot of crap. You really have. My concern is it's
	going to happen here in the United States. I continue to empathize and sympathize with
	people in other countries, but again, if you give up your first amendment rights and
	your second amendment rights and allow the government to dictate to you what you can do and
	what you can't do, they're just going to continue to intrude and intrude and intrude
	until you have nothing.
	I hope we in the United States here are smart enough to not allow the government to get out of hand.
	Make sure you are maintaining Your rights.
	Make sure that you are maintaining your first, second amendment rights and your fourth amendment rights.
	Here in Michigan, we have an interesting story.
	Michigan health system employees are suing over the vaccine mandate.
	A group of 51 employees of a Detroit healthcare organization filed a lawsuit Monday, challenging their employer's COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
	The lawsuit argues that the Henry Ford Health System violated the plaintiff's right to bodily autonomy and the right to reject medical treatment under interpretations of the 14th Amendment.
	The lawsuit seeks a court order declaring the mandate unconstitutional and unenforceable.
	And this is what I'm talking about.
	Eventually, and it's already starting to happen, there are going to be employees who are going to challenge this, right?
	If these people succeed against the Henry Ford health system, if they succeed, and I don't know if they will, you know, because you can't, you can't even trust our United States Supreme Court anymore, um, to do the right thing.
	They don't, they don't, uh, you know, uh, uphold the constitution.
	They don't, um, apply the constitution to the laws to see if they, they, uh, cut muster.
	They just willy nilly make up things as they go along.
	They have ever since Roe v. Wade.
	But I'm telling you, you know, if this stands up, these employers may be forced to back down.
	They may finally be forced to say, you know what, we can't force you to get vaccinated.
	And I'm hoping that's exactly the case.
	The Henry Ford Health System announced a vaccine mandate on June the 29th, advising staff and contractors to become vaccinated by September the 10th.
	That's a couple of days away from today.
	Henry Ford Health System management warned that those who don't become vaccinated by the deadline would face suspension and be given until October 1st to get the vaccine.
	The lawsuit cites data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, to allege, contrary to the description provided on the VAERS website, that 13,627 deaths have occurred in the United States as a result of COVID-19.
	The lawsuit goes on to cite an anonymous person who identifies as a computer programmer, Providing a professional estimate that VAERS data is underreported by a factor of five.
	The lawsuit uses the anonymous affidavit to allege that 65,000 Americans have lost their lives to these vaccines.
	And that's a fact, folks.
	A lot of people want to deny this, but People are dying from the vaccine.
	People are getting the various variants, like Mu and Delta, from the vaccine.
	These are not people that are, you know, getting regular COVID.
	They're getting the variants.
	Only people who have been vaccinated, or I should say, to be fair, because I could be wrong, most of the people who are getting these variants have been vaccinated.
	Okay.
	The lawsuit states the mandate requires that plaintiffs choose between exposing themselves to potential harm or death or abandon their careers in health care.
	A disclaimer on the VAERS website states, VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination.
	While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness.
	The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable.
	In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases.
	This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically.
	Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.
	All right, so good.
	I'm glad that somebody has finally filed a lawsuit, and I'm going to be following this one very carefully,
	as I hope many of you in this audience will.
	And let's just see.
	Let's just see what happens here.
	Let's see.
	Can the South African government make the COVID vaccine compulsory?
	BBC admits Syria chemical attack documentary had serious flaws.
	Cuba passes misinformation law calling online criticism of the government cyber terrorism.
	That's the kind of thing we kind of suspect from Cuba, don't we?
	I mean, seriously?
	Let's just be honest.
	Let's see.
	FDA has approved its first oral blood thinning medication for children.
	Why do children, in most cases, need blood thinning medication?
	Why would they need blood thinning medication?
	That's usually for people that are getting older, right?
	Who have high blood pressure, unless a lot of kids are getting high blood pressure now.
	Let's see.
	What else is going on in the news here?
	Portugal bans arrivals from super vaxxed Israel. Victoria Premier warned that the
	unvaccinated would be locked out of Australia's society.
	Well, that's what we were just talking about here.
	So that's what's happening right now, too.
	European nations adopting national IDs linked to digital wallets.
	That's coming here, too.
	And that's going to be tied into the vaccine thing here, too.
	Portugal announced Sweden banned travelers from Israel, the most vaccinated nation on earth.
	And Pfizer to require twice per day COVID pill alongside vaccines.
	Ah, shock poll.
	72% of Americans would quit their job if employer mandated COVID vaccines with no exemption to opt out.
	Well, um, I'll say that's okay.
	Let them fire you.
	Make them, if you quit, I think you have a, you have no basis for a lawsuit.
	You have to make them fire you.
	do not quit. COVID positive patients are being told the type of variant they're infected with
	cannot be legally disclosed.
	So they can't tell you what variant you have.
	That's interesting.
	Top FBI official in charge of crimes against children arrested for sex crimes against children.
	I think I told you a little bit about that yesterday.
	As media focuses on COVID-19, a new study finds fire did not cause Building 7's collapse on 9-11.
	I'll have to talk to Dr. James Fetzer about that when he joins us in about an hour and 15 minutes, right?
	Let's see.
	Forbes deletes article by education expert asserting that forcing children to wear masks causes psychological trauma.
	Well, we know what happens if a teacher in school masks, shames you, and tapes a mask to your children.
	We just told you about that a little while ago.
	Mainstream media is lying to you.
	Ivermectin was first approved for humans decades ago.
	So, like our caller Dina mentioned.
	Interesting.
	It was first approved for use decades ago for humans.
	So it's not just horse medication.
	Joe Rogan contracts COVID, bounces back within days using drug cocktail, including ivermectin.
	Okay.
	And what else?
	Fake News Media Freaks Out Over Grassroots Republicans Uprising Against Election Fraud.
	And anything else that we need to know?
	Okay.
	I think you're pretty much up to speed on the latest news and information, so we appreciate that.
	All right.
	We're just about out of time for phone calls, so we're going to turn that off right now.
	I appreciate it, Dina, for calling into the program.
	Maybe we'll have a little bit of time later on the show to resume our open line conversation.
	I make no promises about that, but we'll consider it.
	Okay.
	All right.
	For those of you watching the show live, stand by because in just about 10 minutes from now, Ginny Silcox is going to be joining us to talk about the grid down.
	What happens if the grid goes down through whatever reason, natural disaster, We're seeing more violent weather this year than ever before in many parts of the country where I live.
	I mean, every time they say it's going to rain, it's not just a rain.
	It's a thunderstorm with flooding, biblical-type flooding on our freeways and everything else.
	I don't remember a summer when we've had stuff like this back to back to back.
	You can't just get a regular rainstorm anymore.
	And they're saying we're going to have a very, very, very bad winter this year.
	You and I are going to be suffering through that together in many parts of the country.
	So we'll keep each other company every day here from noon to 4 p.m.
	Eastern Time as we struggle through this bad weather.
	But nonetheless, for whatever reason the grid goes down, if it happens, what happens to us?
	Do we get thrown back into the Stone Age?
	What can we do?
	Are there things we can do to avoid this?
	Improving the infrastructure.
	Well, we'll find out when we talk with Ginny Silcox.
	And then a little bit later on in the program, as I said, Dr. James Fetzer is going to join us.
	The 20-year lie we've been lied to from the very beginning about what happened on 9-11.
	And we're going to get into all of that with Dr. James Fetzer in the third portion of the program today.
	Now, for those of you who are watching the show, Live on Rumble, you're going to get the chance to see the entire program, all four hours of it.
	However, however, if you miss the live show today, the only thing you're going to see is a little bit later on today, we're going to post, oh, the first hour or so of the broadcast on Rumble and BitChute.
	You can watch that.
	But if you want to see the entire four-hour program, including Our special report on 9-11 and the report about the grid being down with Jenny Silcox.
	You have got to become a member of the Dark Outpost Inner Circle.
	What's a Dark Outpost Inner Circle?
	Dark Outpost Inner Circle is a premium site where you get access to the entire four-hour show each and every day and your ability to watch it and or listen to it at your convenience.
	All you got to do is to go to darkoutpost.tv to learn more.
	Now what do you get with the Dark Outpost Inner Circle?
	Well, you get news and information and guests and opinions that you're not going to get any place else.
	Stuff like this.
	I'm going to do it.
	I'm going to do it.
	you.
	Just head on over to darkoutpost.tv.
	Sign up for that one-year membership.
	It's only $29.99 for a one-year membership.
	It's cheap and it gets you access to some great content you're not going to get anyplace else.
	In addition, if you'll sign up for that one-year membership and then email me a copy of the receipt for that one-year membership, email it to darkoutpostdocuments At gmail.com, that's darkoutpostdocuments, all one word, at gmail.com, in addition to all that great content, you're gonna receive something that we call the Super Bundle of Reports.
	Now, what's a Super Bundle of Reports?
	It's a Super Bundle of Reports about the scourge of pedophilia and child sex trafficking taking place here in the United States and around the world.
	Here's more information on the super bundle.
	I'm going to show you how to make a super bundle.
	So, let's get started.
	You can download the super bundle from the link in the description.
	so so
	You can download the super bundle from the link in the so
	In addition, I want to let you know that our online store is now open and we've got some merchandise on there such as these great Dark Outpost caps, we've got t-shirts, We've got cell phone cases, all kinds of good things.
	We're adding merchandise to the store all the time.
	We're going to have a lot of other products, some of which are promotional for Dark Outpost.
	We're hoping that you'll purchase those because all the money goes to support Shared Hope International, a group that we're supporting that's doing everything in their power to put an end to pedophilia and child sex trafficking here in the United States and around the world.
	So the money goes directly to them.
	You'll be saving some kids, bringing some criminals to justice.
	and advertising Dark Outpost at the same time.
	So we hope you'll do that.
	If you make a purchase from our Dark Outpost online store, all you have to do to get to that store by the way is to go to darkoutpost.com Click the link to the online store or click on the picture of the young lady wearing one of our t-shirts and that'll take you right to the online store.
	Make a purchase, a t-shirt, hat, cell phone case, whatever, and then email us a picture of you wearing that cap or t-shirt or on the back of your cell phone with the logo on it.
	And we're going to have a drawing once a week and we will give a prize out to someone who has made a purchase from the online store.
	And most of the items in the store are only about 20 bucks.
	So you're going to get a prize worth a lot more than that.
	So go to the store, make a purchase, help some kids, and you may win a prize when we begin doing our drawings, which will be a week from this Friday.
	So get over to the online store right now.
	All right, we're going to take a quick break.
	And then when we come back in about, oh, about 15, 20 seconds, Ginny Silcox is going to join us.
	We're talking about the grid down.
	Stay with us.
	Ginny, how are you?
	I'm good, Dave.
	How are you?
	I'm doing fantastic.
	It's so good to see you again, as always.
	I'm excited about talking about the grid today.
	I was just thinking about that.
	We'd be thrown into the Stone Age if this were to happen.
	Yeah, in a lot of ways.
	Well, I want to tell you what my motivation is for this.
	Well, basically, I did work for the Emergency Operations Training Academy, which is part of the National Nuclear Security Administration, which is part of DOE.
	The things that people seem to think about a power outage is that it's just a transient thing that it may be a blip for a day or two or even a week if it's a hurricane or something like that.
	Right.
	But the people down in New Orleans are looking at an outage that's going to last months.
	Oh, it's long term.
	In certain areas.
	Because the entire infrastructure washed away.
	So there are a lot of reasons why the grid might go down and there are, you know, there's a whole bunch of stuff out there on the internet that can help you prepare for something like that and a lot of it is the standard prep type stuff.
	But there are a lot of choices you need to make and I'm hoping in this little presentation to make people aware of maybe some things they may not have thought of.
	Right.
	And also to explain a few things about The some of the technical aspects and there are some things that can really mess with your mind when it comes to AC electricity and and suffice it to say that a lot of big motors like
	Oh, pumps and things that are using like, say, 450 volts AC.
	A lot of ag equipment uses higher voltages, conveyor belts and things like that.
	Things in factories and chemical plants and rail yards, all those things, they kind of use Multi-phase power, so there are usually instead of just the single phase that we use in our houses, there's multiple signals coming through that will go up to very high voltages in a lot of places.
	And the thing about motors particularly is that if the power goes out and then comes back wrong, sometimes the power comes back phase reversed.
	And when that phase reversal occurs, it'll make a motor run backwards.
	I've never heard of that.
	Really?
	Yeah, it can happen.
	Yeah.
	And that's not good if you've got a sump pump running.
	Would that make you put the water back in your house?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, so these are things to think about, and I'll get into more detail.
	I just wanted to start with the first one, the first graphic, which is not really a graphic at all.
	I'll read this, though.
	I hope your audience doesn't mind.
	When you look at who these experts are, it might make a difference.
	The headline is, 90% of U.S.
	population could die if a pulse event hits the power grid.
	When a large electromagnetic pulse, EMP, or geomagnetic disturbance, a GMD, event occurs, which according to Senator Ron Johnson, there's a 100% certainty will happen at some time in the future as many as 9 out of 10 people in the US could die.
	Johnson, chairman of the U.S.
	Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, posed questions to witnesses testifying on Capitol Hill before his committee.
	He asked James Wolseley, chairman of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, what would happen to a society if the electrical grid were to be down for an extended period of time, such as a year or two following an EMP event?
	And Willsley responded, it's briefly dealt with in the Commission Report of 2008.
	There are essentially two estimates on how many people would die from hunger, from starvation, from lack of water, and from social disruption.
	One estimate is that within a year or so, two-thirds of the U.S.
	population would die.
	The other estimate is that within a year or so, 90% of the U.S.
	population would die.
	We're talking about total devastation.
	We're not talking about Just a regular catastrophe.
	And in these times it's really something when you say a catastrophe is just a regular catastrophe.
	But if you think about something like a tsunami, tsunamis can be caused by a limited number
	of factors.
	It could be the site of a volcano sliding into the ocean, it could be a huge earthquake in an undersea fault, or it could be a large calving from an iceberg or something like that.
	Those are pretty predictable, not real predictable in terms of timing.
	We have an entire system that does the tsunami warnings and can contract the height and progress of a tsunami across oceans.
	We have an entire buoy system.
	Although we have monitors all over the place on the electrical grid, we have a very complex situation going on with the power grid.
	I also want to caution people that, number one, if you're in a city The vulnerabilities are so great, and I will get into some of this, that I'm recommending that you not be in a city.
	Just plain don't be in a city.
	Don't live in a city.
	And you'll be lucky if you work in a city and something like this, a major power outage happens, you'll be lucky to get out alive.
	Even if you're just walking.
	Wow.
	You'll be lucky to get out alive.
	Think about it.
	The hurricane just took out major parts of the power grid in Louisiana.
	It can be weather related.
	It can also be seismic related.
	One of the reports I saw when I was working at DOE was out of the University of Blacksburg, Virginia, or University of Virginia at Blacksburg.
	They looked at the projections for a 7.2 earthquake on the New Madrid fault line or fault zone.
	Within about 20 seconds, 2 million people would be homeless and 15 major arterial bridges would be compromised.
	That would be gas pipelines and electrical.
	There's a huge amount of electrical power generation going across that river in terms of huge cables, conduits.
	Those would be severed.
	Wow.
	Yeah.
	So 20 seconds for 2 million homeless.
	So seismic activity does have an effect on electricity.
	And the other thing that really drives me crazy is when I see it flooding like that happened in New York City, people are all out there walking around in the water, not even paying any attention to the fact that there's live electricity in that water.
	Yeah, that's true.
	And the other thing is, one of the most disturbing pictures to me was that guy smoking a hookah on an air mattress floating in an alley that was flooded.
	And it's like, do you realize that's sewage?
	Well, you see pictures of people canoeing through their neighborhoods when there's flooding after a rainstorm.
	You know, if there's any power lines down, People think, well, all these things have circuit breakers that are going to trip as soon as there's a ground fault type of a situation.
	That's not necessarily true, because what if lines fall down and get crossed?
	There's no breaker in there.
	As you work your way up the hierarchy of supply, the amount of electricity it takes flowing to trip a circuit gets bigger and bigger, because it's a distribution network.
	So, if you've got a major trunk line that's accidentally shorting to a feeder line, it's going to do it.
	There's no breaker in place to stop that.
	Because the trunk line's not going to get up to the threshold where it itself would be tripping.
	Anyway, so we've got several factors.
	There's weather, there's seismic, there's terrorism, and I have a couple of hair-raising stories about that.
	I think it was outside of San Francisco when I was working at DOE.
	I retired in 2012.
	I think it was around 2010.
	There was a really weird little episode outside of San Francisco at a major junction point for the San Francisco electrical supply where all these guys in black clothing with AK-47s Got out and ringed a fence that was around an electrical substation.
	And apparently they had AK-47s or something.
	And they just knew right where to shoot into this substation.
	And they took it down.
	They didn't have to breach the fence.
	A lot of people always think that a terrorist attack is going to involve a bomb or something.
	It doesn't have to.
	All they have to do is take something away from you.
	Like you said, we're not prepared.
	I hope we're going to get a little bit into preparedness here.
	Yes, we are.
	The problem is people need to understand that all the stuff that we take for granted could be gone in a second.
	Yeah, and the reason DOE – by the way, there's another part of the statistics that came later in that presentation that we started with, where they're saying between 80 and 90 percent of the people would die – is that DOE, at the time that I was there, the projection was that it would take six to ten years to bring the grid back.
	It doesn't just fail and come back.
	It's not like a circuit breaker that you just screw up.
	We're going to look at a video that's going to show us why.
	We do have a major issue in this country in that most of our transformer equipment is manufactured in China.
	That's a huge vulnerability with multi-facets that we can see.
	Those could have faults engineered right into them.
	They could have sensitivities and programming embedded into them that will respond on a given covert signal to just shut down.
	There's any number of things about our grid that's horribly vulnerable.
	I also want to say that The Department of Energy is not fully responsible for all the aspects of maintaining the electrical grid in this country.
	It's a distributed thing.
	There are a lot of private companies, there are a lot of state-owned companies, and federal government facilities, and then there's the nuclear side of things.
	The nuclear power generation is a real mix.
	It's a mix of privately and publicly owned facilities throughout the country.
	The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is charged with maintaining basic safety standards and inspections and stuff like that.
	That's one of the other ways the power grid goes down.
	When the power goes out, the first thing you want to find out is how widespread is it and how long is it going to last?
	I guess I'm saying, if it were a solar event, and by the way, we just had a sea flare that hit the Pacific Rim, and it could do radio frequency disruptions and stuff like that.
	A couple of years ago, we had an X-flare, a very powerful, I think it was like an X-5 flare, that missed us by three days.
	If the planet had been in the way of that X5 flare, we would have permanently lost a lot of infrastructure.
	There are any number of other things that could have happened that would have really messed up our total infrastructure.
	Not only do we have electricity supplied by radiation, we have electricity supplied by coal-fired plants also.
	If you think about coal-fired plants in a major X-flare, the main thing that's going to fry in all these conditions is the sensors.
	A lot of these plants are automated.
	They don't just have people out there shoveling coal into a furnace.
	A lot of it's robotic and a lot of it's conveyor belts and stuff like that.
	Censors are in a unique position.
	When you have censors on a line, say supplying coal to a furnace, then the furnace burns the coal and heats the water and the steam turns the turbine.
	That's how that works to generate power.
	The censors that are all along that line, I believe it was 2009, I think maybe 2008.
	There was a presidential commission on the possible effects of EMP.
	I remember that Newt Gingrich was in charge of the big committee on that.
	They put out an amazing report.
	One of the biggest weaknesses they found across the country is in our SCADA system, which is Supervisory Control and Data Access.
	If you think about a chemical plant, a new plant, a coal-fired plant, anything generating power, if the sensors fry, It's going to shut down.
	It has protocols in place meant to shut everything down so bigger problems don't occur.
	So it's got a fail-safe built in, but the other, well, I'll get into a little more detail on some of that.
	So anyway, long story short, so those are the things.
	There's seismic, there's a big storm, There could be a nuclear problem and when you want to, when your power goes out, you don't, you would, you know, it's a matter of curiosity to try to find out whether it's in a very selected area or whether it's widespread.
	Well, I remember 2003.
	Do you remember 2003?
	I'll never forget 2003.
	When some sort, I think it was a substation in Ohio and maybe one in Canada.
	Yeah, it was Ohio and Canada.
	And we were like without power for three days.
	Yeah.
	I have some pictures of that.
	Yeah, I remember that.
	I'll never forget it.
	Tell you what, would you bear with me and let's skip ahead and go to number five?
	Sure.
	This is the first thing that's going to happen when the power goes out.
	Total gridlock.
	Yep.
	Because the light, the traffic control is gone.
	Now, you know, in olden times, back in 2003, olden times, Dave, people kind of thought it was, you know, they took it in stride to some degree.
	There might have been a little bit of panic, but there wasn't a whole lot of violence.
	No.
	People weren't prone to go into looting mode immediately in 2003.
	And we didn't have Antifa.
	Can you imagine what Antifa would do with something like this?
	They would have a field day.
	Oh, yeah.
	And so when, you know, people in big cities are kind of used to being in traffic jams.
	But when you get on the roof of your car and that traffic jam stretches as far as you can see in either direction, you think about the financial consequences to this.
	Oh, yeah.
	You've got all these people are dislocated.
	They can't get home.
	Their cars are vulnerable.
	And yet, you know, they have needs.
	They have physical needs.
	In the case of a power outage, like the one I'm referring to, which is more than just a blip, more than just a day or whatever, well, with a traffic jam like that, there was no trash service.
	There's no police and fire and ambulance.
	They can't get through.
	The only thing you have is helicopter.
	That's right.
	This is something to think about, even in the suburbs.
	My brother lives in a suburb of Philadelphia, right between I-95 and Route 1.
	And he has green grass and a nice big garden and a cute little house and I keep saying you gotta move out of there.
	So, I don't need you to get away from the cities.
	You're also saying get away from suburbs as well.
	Live in the country.
	Live in a rural area.
	Or a small town that's remote, somewhat remote.
	Yeah.
	Or some place that is not going to be the first line that's hit by the mob.
	The panicked mob that comes out of the cities and has got enough gas to go 40 miles in their cars, if they can move their cars.
	But 40 miles is about, I would call that the, well 20 miles is a good chunk.
	So between 20 and 40, you are going to see some of the more capable people that are coming out of the cities and they're going to be hungry and freaked out and tired and panicked.
	And your neighborhood will be filled with people hiding in bushes and eating your garden.
	I'm also thinking about a couple of other things.
	I know that one of the things that's being heavily promoted now, I don't know, maybe if you see these commercials in your area, are these companies that offer something called whole house generators.
	Most of these little things that light up a room or keep your refrigerator going, these things will switch over to, if you have natural gas, they'll switch over your power to natural gas automatically when your power goes out and click it back on when the power comes back.
	Click it off and the power comes back on.
	So it sounds great.
	My only concern is if you have power and nobody else in your neighborhood does, if people got violent they'd be storming your house to get
	you out of there.
	Well that's some of the stuff I'm going to talk about because you really need to, you
	have to be aware of how you look in a situation like this.
	And I have a little Honda 1000 watt generator and I also have a bigger generator, 3200 watt
	and I'm on a well and I'm also on a river.
	I'm on a river with cold water, so I'm not going to try to do my refrigeration in my house.
	I have a mesh box that I've made.
	I can throw out in the river with my foodstuffs if I want to keep something cold.
	At a certain point, I'll give up on trying to keep things cold.
	I'll be going into another kind of food that probably doesn't need refrigeration.
	The other part of this is that your neighbor becomes your enemy.
	That's a horrible thing to say.
	It's very harsh.
	We'll discuss a little bit more about that.
	Here I am talking about the various ways power goes out.
	The fact is that natural gas and municipal water are still pumped.
	Something has to provide pressure to get that material through the distribution network.
	Most people think, big office buildings and hospitals all have big backup generators.
	The fact is, and this is something I know from DOE, is that Most people probably don't realize that anytime you have a large fuel supply, it is a strategic nightmare to try to defend it and disappear it.
	I think about when I worked at DOE, part of the time our offices were located in an office park.
	Right on the other side of the office park was one of the larger hospitals in Albuquerque.
	They had big power generators out back.
	I got to know one of the people who worked over there.
	I said, well, you've got these big generators.
	Where's the fuel supply?
	She said, well, it's under the parking lot, but that is a problem.
	I said, well, how much run time do you have?
	She said, three to five days.
	So, they've got three to five days to evacuate that hospital.
	Then they have no power.
	So, you know, you think, okay, well, they've got enough backup power to get the people down out of the elevators.
	Not necessarily.
	It really depends on what kind of a facility you're dealing with.
	And the other thing is, too, that communication systems, they have backups as well.
	It's the same thing.
	There are limits on how much fuel you can store.
	Alright.
	Alright, so let's take a look at number two.
	Alright. Now this is terrorism.
	And And you're looking from coast to coast in the United States.
	And so if a small nuclear bomb were set off in the air, Around 300 miles up over Omaha, this is the kind of outages you would see.
	Now the problem with a nuclear bomb going off is it puts out this huge spike of energy and so that'll trip relays, fry transistors, It'll do things that'll mess with logic mainly.
	Yeah.
	And people have to realize that there's a lot of logic in your vehicle.
	Even if you have an older vehicle, I've got a 91 Toyota truck and I'm not counting on my truck being mobile if something like this occurs because the module in my truck could possibly fry.
	Right.
	And I do think about that and the way I park my truck is under a metal roof with its nose pointing into the best shielding I can do.
	Because a solar flare can do this or a nuclear bomb can do this.
	Terrorism can do it or the sun can do it.
	And of course it wouldn't have the same kind of dispersion if it were the sun doing this but this is a single point nuclear discharge over the center of the country and You can see by the damage zones that major cities all around the whole country would be affected.
	Yeah.
	I mean every single major city.
	Coast to coast, big city.
	And then almost all of Canada and Mexico and wow.
	Yeah, so that's an amazing dispersion when you think about just a 10 kiloton nuclear bomb.
	I mean, that's achievable by so many countries, I don't even want to count them anymore, around the world.
	And getting something to go up 298 miles, I believe that could probably be done by, you know, just a, what do they call those, Club K missiles?
	The Russians have them, they're in freight containers.
	You just put a nuke on the top and send it up 300 miles, set it off, and the country fries.
	And the thing about it is it's not a complete frying or anything like that.
	Some things would be working and some things wouldn't.
	But that brings me to my next point.
	My next important point is it's called cascade failure.
	Because our electrical grids are hooked together.
	Right.
	And everybody thought Texas was in really good shape.
	I believe they're grid number seven.
	And Texas has a lot of its own power generation.
	They have huge wind farms, and they disabled a lot of their coal-fired plants.
	And this is something we were looking at just last winter, right?
	When the Texas power grid went down?
	Last December, yeah.
	I'll never forget it.
	I have friends in Texas, and wow!
	Yeah, a lot of people died in that.
	And I think Texans were shocked at how vulnerable their grid is.
	But the other thing that shocked them was how politics had gotten it, wormed its way in there.
	And their backup power, which would have been coal-fired plants, politics had made it happen that they could not immediately fire up those coal-fired plants.
	And so they really had no fallback.
	And all the wind generators were iced up and couldn't turn, couldn't generate power.
	And their safety fallback that they used for years and years was no longer available.
	So people found out how bad that was because it turned so cold for them.
	And they're used to being really hot, not cold.
	But my point is that whether it's hot or cold, you're going to be really uncomfortable.
	And some people will die because of thermal factors, unless it's right at that Nice point of the year where your temperatures are not boiling or freezing.
	For here, here in this part of the state, there aren't that many days where we have those conditions.
	You get about three or four days in one week.
	Yeah, if you're lucky.
	You don't have to have your air conditioning or your furnace on.
	It's just ideal.
	Open a few windows and you're good to go.
	The other thing that really got people in Texas was no water.
	They had no ability to pump water unless they had hand pumps or, you know, generator fired pumps.
	At least what happened in Texas was not as bad as a solar flare or an EMP from a bomb because that has, you know, at least their generators would work in a situation like they had in Texas.
	There's a good chance that a generator may not work depending on what kind of control circuitry it has.
	Big generators, by the way, are attention getters.
	My little 3200 watt generator is kind of a beast when it comes to noise.
	If we were in a bad grid down situation, I would pick and choose where I put my generator and when I ran it.
	I probably wouldn't be running at night.
	Yeah, that's interesting because it's true and they don't sell mufflers for those things like they do.
	No, that's one reason I bought the little Honda.
	I just recently purchased the little Honda generator because they're so quiet and I have a workshop out back that nobody lives in and so carbon monoxide wouldn't be a factor and it's short enough of a run that I could, I just went and bought a really, really heavy extension cord that I could get that little Honda running.
	Nobody would see it or hear it.
	And I would make sure that the windows had light blocking curtains on them so that people can't see that I've got lights on.
	And, you know, the only reason I really would want power is because it would be taken away from me.
	I look at that as an opportunity to prove that I have some survival skills.
	We'll see.
	Well, if anyone cares, you do.
	I know that from our previous conversations.
	Let's take a look at number three.
	These are geomagnetic disturbances or EMP.
	Once again, an EMP can come from a nuclear explosion or it's an electromagnetic pulse.
	It could also come from the sun.
	I think it was 1859 there was the Carrington event.
	I believe that's the date.
	The Carrington event occurred at a time in our history where most people were still using kerosene lanterns and ice boxes if they had any ice.
	They didn't have electricity in their homes so much.
	It was the era of gas light.
	I just wanted to point out, I'm going to read just a few of these things.
	They graved these geomagnetic experiences from minor through extreme.
	And we can just take a look at the power systems.
	So, under a minor flare, weak power and grid fluctuations can occur.
	And a grid fluctuation is like a temporary brownout.
	And multi-phase systems may have phase disturbances at that point, and that's when pumps and other machines might run backwards.
	And that's disruptive, but usually not fatal.
	So we'll go through moderate, high latitude power systems may experience voltage alarms, long duration storms may cause transformer damage.
	And that's going to be our next graphic.
	And then under strong ones, Voltage corrections may be required.
	False alarms triggered on the same protective devices.
	You know most people go, oh well it's just a false alarm.
	Well my question is, in a nuclear plant how do you know?
	That's true.
	One of the things they do in nuke plants is they add redundant sensors.
	So they'll have three sensors on a critical system and that way if two are saying it's out of water and one is saying it's full, they'll go with the out of water scenario.
	The thing is, if sensors are giving you bad information, your function is compromised and you are in an emergency.
	In a nuclear plant, you need to know that the control rods are under control.
	If they're getting hot, then you could have a meltdown.
	It's really critical to know that you've got plenty of water being pumped through and that the temperature of the system is under control.
	Under severe conditions, possible widespread voltage control problems and some protective systems will mistakenly trip out key assets from the grid.
	And what we're about to see is a video where a hacker is messing strictly with a relay that ties this, I believe it's a 27 kilowatt generator, into a grid system.
	I'll explain more when we get to that.
	And then the extreme problems, which would be like from an X-Flare, Widespread voltage control problems and protective system problems can occur.
	Some grid systems may experience complete collapse or blackouts.
	Transformers may experience damage.
	If you think about what a transformer does, it's got coils of wire and it can take a given amount of voltage and current.
	And then through the relationship of a coil on one side to a coil on the other side of the transformer, you might have 200 windings on one side and 400 windings on the other side with an insulator in between.
	The electricity passing through the The relationship from 200 to 400 is transformed upward in voltage.
	They do that to drive massive amounts of power through high tension lines.
	If you think about a power distribution system that stretches out for miles and miles, they've got to have a fair amount, like 10,000 volts, 10,000 to 50,000 volts going through those high overhead lines to be able to push that current through all that resistance.
	So, they're transformed up so they can distribute it, and then they get back down to the neighborhood where you have those little cans on the poles, and that's where it's transformed back down for your house to be able to use it.
	I want to throw a quick question in, because I think this is the appropriate time.
	When we have, here in Michigan this year, we've had a lot of thunderstorms and a lot of power outages locally.
	Which have lasted from, you know, hours to a few days, depending upon whatever you live in.
	And every time this comes up, we get the people that are whining, well, why don't they just bury all the lines underground, like they do in some cities, so that these power lines won't be knocked down by a storm and that sort of thing.
	And of course, the utility company says, well, yeah, we could do that.
	But number one, we'd have to dig up everybody's backyard.
	And sometimes, When the power goes out and it's an underground system, it's just as bad getting to it and fixing it as it is with the overhead line.
	Even worse in a flooding situation.
	Yeah, so... I don't know if that makes any difference.
	That's one of the reasons it was so dangerous to have all that flooding in New York.
	Because all their power does run in tunnels under the city.
	And I think New York has a two foot water table.
	So they've got a big problem there and the infrastructure in New York is some of the oldest in the country.
	New York came to the attention of DOE when I was there.
	It's a huge emergency right now.
	I mean, even before the hurricane hit, it was a huge emergency.
	It's one of those ongoing things, and they're constantly battling corrosion and leakage and all kinds of crazy stuff going on with their electrical system.
	Underground has its advantages, but it also has a lot of disadvantages, including price.
	If you look down in Louisiana, where the whole grid failed, Because it got knocked down.
	Well, they've got a zero, you know, they have a one inch water table.
	Yeah.
	In a lot of places there.
	They couldn't do it there, but.
	Yeah, and plus that's a marine environment, so they have the corrosion and salt water.
	It's the same with New York City.
	They've got the, you know, the Hudson, not Hudson, the New York Harbor, right there.
	You know, so that it's not just a matter of fresh groundwater that wants to come in, it's salt water.
	So it's very corrosive.
	Okay, let's bring up the video here.
	I hope it runs.
	It's real short.
	Yep, you won't be able to talk over it, but you can tell me about it after it's all set up.
	Yeah.
	Here it is.
	So...
	Wow.
	That's all it took that hacker to do.
	And that was a 27 kilowatt generator at Iowa National Labs.
	And they did this as an experiment.
	They had a segmented grid hooked up with, they were warned that people on that part of the grid, they were They were all DOE.
	It was DOE complex.
	And they wanted to see what this hacker could do.
	And he picked a very circuitous, very obscure way of doing that.
	But he was able to take that whole grid down.
	And basically what he did was he was messing with the timing and toggle of a single relay with his 30 lines of code.
	And he broke it into the system.
	They didn't give him any help.
	He was able to break right into the system and he just simply took a relay offline.
	So the first thing he caused, which you couldn't see, was a sag in the amount of power that was available to the whole grid.
	This generator was running.
	So the first thing he did was he just touched that relay and made it back off and take that part of the generation of the power offline.
	And then it was offline, and then he started bringing it back on.
	Did you see how it shuddered?
	Yeah.
	Yes.
	And then it shuddered.
	Well, synchronization, if you think about the power grid, anybody who's ever done solar and had a grid intertie?
	A grid intertie, the first thing that the power company will give you a lot of trouble about trying to put your electricity that you're generating back into their system.
	And part of the, they really, Raised a ruckus about that when inverters started having the grid intertie.
	Because the synchronization has to be perfect.
	So when you throw your power into the system, it has to be in exactly the right phase as the power that is already there.
	Otherwise, it's going to subtract from the energy available.
	So it has to be exactly synchronized.
	And what this hacker did was he took the whole generator down by bringing it in off cycle.
	And the existing electricity, it was trying to supply its own electricity, but as it was trying to come in off sync, that's what you saw, the shutter.
	Because all of a sudden, the existing line that it was trying to tap into, to supply power, was out of phase with it.
	So it was like a punch in the gut every time he threw that relay.
	And finally, it just completely destroyed the synchronization of the engine of the generator, the motor.
	Wow, incredible.
	It just destroyed it.
	See, it's not a difficult thing to do, right?
	It was an old generator, but it was in good working condition.
	And SCADA programming is not all that hard.
	I've done it.
	It uses GPIB, which is a general purpose instruction bus.
	And you can do it in C++ if you feel so inclined.
	Or you can do it in binary.
	Yeah, so anyway, my point being is that it's not a super tough task for hackers to be messing with things.
	And when you think about the fact that China has 20,000 hackers 24-7 attacking various parts of our electrical infrastructure, When I worked at DOE, I was friends with the IT guy and he was sweating bullets one day and I was like, okay, tell me what's up.
	He's like, I just had to disallow an entire block of IP addresses from the Asian Rim because they were probing every IP address in our office.
	They'll do it at night.
	You don't leave your computer on at night because you could be, especially if you're hooked up to the internet, Then you're hackable.
	Let's take a look at number six.
	I really squeezed all these together because I wanted to quickly talk about them.
	These are things that will go down and some consequences.
	The air traffic control system is going down.
	So will the rail traffic control system go down, and the regular car traffic control system.
	Those have power backups, but not for that long.
	And so you'll get the consequence, which is on the top left and then next one over, the guy sleeping on the baggage conveyor.
	So the process of traveling will be jammed up.
	I don't know how you could prepare for this.
	No matter what, when you're traveling, especially by air, you're in what I call a security extended situation where your strategies and your planning ahead should include some sort of disruption consequences.
	You should be able to, you know, not just trust that your flight's going to be there when you need it to be there and get to where it's going, You know, when you get there, it's not going to necessarily be true.
	And we know that weather can do it, but so can power outages.
	Yeah.
	And, you know, there is a backup system, of course, for landing planes that are in the air.
	That's what happened on 9-11.
	You didn't hear about any plane crashes on 9-11, but they did take it down.
	And so they got all those, it was chaos.
	They had planes landing at the nearest available airport.
	Which may or may not have been able to accommodate them, but they had to land.
	And so the third one over is people getting stuck in elevators and various other situations.
	Some places have a lot of interlocks.
	Elevators are one of the biggest concerns if you're in a city or if you're in a hospital.
	Yeah.
	It's a huge thing.
	And the other thing is that a lot of circuitry that we use, you know, in a way I feel like the United States has been somewhat naive.
	But then you look at the India power system and it's like, well, they're pretty naive too.
	There's very few, it's really difficult to protect communications equipment because it's by its very nature, it's up in the air and it is designed To spread a signal out a long distance and grounding on a tower is a huge issue.
	It's extremely important, but the only way I really know of to protect against a big solar flare or an EMP Is to use what are called optoisolators.
	And that's where the actual signal is converted to light.
	And so light doesn't transmit electrons.
	And so the receivers on the inside stay intact.
	Even if the light goes out or if there's a surge in brightness.
	It's not going to damage the interior circuitry.
	But we have not included... In a big hurry to put in the 5G system.
	They have not included a lot of optical protection on towers.
	So cell phone towers, there's a very good chance a solar flare could just set them on fire.
	And then the one in the middle row is what happens in the city with the trash.
	Yeah, garbage pickup, wow.
	Yeah, so it's a real health risk, but it's also a rat problem.
	Yeah.
	Rats spread disease, especially in cities.
	I was just listening to a seminar from a woman who has two homes, one in Puerto Rico and one here somewhere in the San Luis Valley.
	She was talking about how she had her chicken feed stored in the barn and how she developed a population of very sleek and healthy Norway rats.
	She knew they were grain fed and so those might have been some good eating.
	Well, but the rats let me remind people that rats in the city,
	man those are just plain disease spreaders.
	So garbage has consequences.
	Bubonic plague, right?
	Yeah, among other things.
	And so the next picture right in the middle is what happens these days when the power goes out, and that's looting.
	Yeah.
	And looting comes with violence.
	I mean, looting is a violent sport.
	And so, if you live in a city and you live near a shopping area, you should not be counting on using that shopping area during a power outage.
	It won't be there.
	It'll be gone.
	And then the other thing that concerns me too is that how How unaware people are of the facilities that are nearby.
	I mean, do you live near a train yard or do you live near a nuke plant or do you live near a chemical plant?
	If you live within 10 miles of a chemical plant or a nuke plant or a rail yard, a major rail switching yard, you should be prepared to evacuate on a moment's notice.
	And the other thing is you should be prepared to shelter in place.
	Because one thing that's not going to happen, let's say a nuclear plume, a radioactive plume got generated due to a fault at a nuclear power plant.
	You're not going to have any power and you will have a cloud of radioactivity heading your way.
	And at that point, the first responders have the onus of deciding whether to tell people that they'd be safer if they duct taped all the seams on their windows and doors and put wet towels down and stayed in the house as compared to getting in the car in gridlock situation and evacuating right into a radioactive plume.
	And the same thing goes for chemical plants.
	You know, you don't know what happens with sensors that are frying, or pumps that fail, or whatever goes on when electricity is gone, and the lights will be out, so they're going to have trouble seeing what's going on.
	You know, they'll probably have orderly shutdowns, if possible, in situations like this.
	You know, they have to have protocols for orderly shutdown, but there is a very good chance that sensors could be fried.
	Oh, yeah.
	And so, you know, you don't want to be shut down into a tizzy.
	Yeah, I mean it's an urgent situation no matter what.
	And sometimes the power doesn't go down, it doesn't just go out, it'll go down in lumps and bumps.
	And that'll cause something to turn off, and then turn back on, and then turn off, and then maybe burn out or run backwards.
	And so then you don't know what kind of chemical combinations could be created in a place like this.
	You could have a cloud of chlorine gas heading your way.
	So this is, if you live within 10 miles of a nuke plant, a rail yard, or a chemical plant, you should be ready to evacuate on a moment's notice, but you should also be prepared to properly shelter in place.
	So that means having food, water, and probably gas masks, and also a supply of baking soda.
	Now why would I say baking soda?
	Baking soda.
	We have a number of different values, but which one are you thinking of in particular, Jenny?
	Neutralizes acids.
	Oh yeah.
	And so if you live in a very humid environment and a chemical plant has a breakdown and there's a, you know, you do what you can to stop air infiltration.
	You block off all the air vents and you turn off all the fans and you, you know, you block off all the seams for your windows and doors.
	And if you start getting a stinging or burning sensation in your mouth and eyes and skin, then if you've got water and baking soda, you'll still be okay for a while.
	And rail yards, who knows what the heck?
	I mean, I've heard of incredible things being shipped on the rail lines, things you would never believe.
	And so, you know, if rail signaling gets jacked up, And sensors and coordination gets messed up.
	And by the way, most of the infrastructure for the rail in this country needed updating 30 years ago.
	Now a lot of the people, they take it for granted.
	They see these nice new trains, but the tracks that they're traveling on and the signaling systems, they could be very antiquated.
	And so, especially wherever there's a freight line, people who live all along that freight line should be prepared for a derailment that might end up with a rupture.
	Wow.
	You know, because signals, the signals are how the trains know and how the switches go.
	So, if the train is switched into the wrong location and there's another train on a siding, well, then you're going to have a derailment.
	And spilling chemicals and hazardous waste and... Whatever.
	Yeah.
	So, I just kind of wanted to turn people on to some resources and peak their conversations about what they need to do to not be one of the 90% of people who's going to die.
	I'll tell you though, when I hear 90%, I kind of think, well, maybe it's not worth sticking around for.
	It's like surviving something like this and then realizing these people get these underground bunkers and they survive.
	Then they come out, what's left of the world, right?
	Yeah, and I really laugh when I think about people with their underground bunkers when they're in a seismic area.
	Yeah, right, exactly.
	It's like, oh, okay.
	And then there's also the The fact that underground bunkers are going to be one of the first targets of the hungry hordes.
	That's right.
	They're going to find the air shafts, don't you think they're not?
	And so what are they going to do?
	The first thing they're going to do is shut the air shafts so they will exterminate everybody in the bunker and then they'll dig it out.
	Yeah, right.
	Cut off their air supply, let them just die, and then you don't have to face somebody with a gun when you come down there.
	That's right.
	So, these are amazing thoughts.
	Let's go to the next one, which would be seven.
	This is, as you can see, it's a very simple website.
	It's something I look at from time to time.
	I think these guys have a noble purpose.
	And I wanted to bring up nuclear.
	People go, oh, well, a nuclear problem is not an electrical problem.
	But yes, indeed.
	Why do you think we have so many nukes?
	So if you live near a nuclear plant, let me mention the fact that, number one, if you live within 10 miles of a nuclear plant, you should be doing all kinds of things with your nutrition to reduce the effects of getting extra neutron radiation.
	Because you are.
	If you're within 10 miles of a nuke plant, There's a good chance you're getting an extra dose of neutron radiation.
	It just kind of comes with the territory.
	And so, you know, the more cancer-defeating things you can do in your nutrition, the better off you'll be, and the better off your children will be.
	So this is a nuclear status map.
	So anyone can access this site to see what the status of the nuclear power plants in this country are?
	Yeah.
	This is not private at all.
	I believe it's a private foundation.
	But it's kind of like a nuke watch for all the power plants.
	And I look at it from time to time.
	And you can see where I am.
	There's nothing.
	If you look at the place where Colorado, Utah, Nevada, and New Mexico all come together, or Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and Colorado, see that area?
	Yeah.
	That's kind of like a blank circle there, where the four states intersect.
	I'm about 150 miles from that little intersection point.
	And that's by my intention.
	And I also track the wind patterns.
	Right.
	That's important.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	My brother is a type 2 diabetic and I had a real revelation before I ever even dreamed of working for the Department of Energy.
	I was teaching in Philadelphia one day and there was a restaurant I liked that had a brochure on the table and it was the report of the Senate Subcommittee on Low-Level Ionizing Radiation.
	from the nuclear tests that were done in the 50s.
	It tracked the winds.
	My brother in Pennsylvania was in the womb at the time we had the greatest waves of radiation coming over us from those nuclear tests.
	They said heart disease and diabetes were the two main results of that.
	I still think of all those 1950s sci-fi movies with the giant grasshoppers.
	Godzilla!
	Godzilla.
	I'm still waiting for that to come.
	So that netc.com is a good place to go if you live anywhere near a nuke plant.
	You can monitor its status.
	They keep the average amount of emissions and then they look at the highs and the lows and they change status.
	They update it pretty regularly.
	It's just a group of concerned citizens that are Doing very important public service, I think.
	So let's go to the last graphic, Dean.
	All right, there we go.
	And number eight.
	These are my questions for your viewers.
	Uh-huh.
	Okay, so if you are in a vulnerable place, and that could be a very crowded suburb or a city, your choices are, and this is really for any of us that end up, you know, we should really assess what happens when all your support structures go down.
	So, move now to a better place is the best thing I can tell you.
	Believe me, I know that cost and sacrifices are required.
	You may love going to classical music concerts.
	That might be one of the highlights of your life.
	So, you have to make a choice between losing that and assuring safety for yourself and your family.
	It seems like a silly choice, But as a musician I can tell you it's not trivial.
	You have to decide what's the best thing for your loved ones and for yourself.
	And it's pretty selfish to make a choice that you like to go to concerts and if the power goes out your kids are going to fry in some way.
	You're right.
	And then shelter in place.
	And now there are times when first responders will be banging on your door, telling you there's a plume headed your way, you got to get out.
	But for the most part, it's not going to be that way.
	For the most part, the best thing to do is to shelter in place.
	You have all your familiar things, you have whatever backup supplies, you know, food and water are heavy.
	And when you bug out, I think you should assume, not many of us are hardened outdoor campers.
	And if you're going to bug out, you could bug out for maybe three days and then be ready to come back.
	But shelter in place, it could be because of a chemical or nuclear plume, or it could be because you have defensible space.
	And you've got all your supplies and everything in place.
	I myself, I'm choosing to shelter in place.
	There's nothing nearby that's going to, unless there's an accident on the highway with a truck that's got some sort of a plume coming out of it, which is pretty unlikely because the town that borders me has a pretty low speed limit.
	And they're very experienced truckers that travel on that highway.
	You know, I'm still a mile from a highway, and I do consider that.
	And so, I just want to warn people, you know, they think they're going to bug out and go camping and have fun and hunt rabbits, you know, have a fire and see the stars at night, and that's going to last for three days, and then you're going to be very uncomfortable.
	No matter which of these three options you choose to take, there's one thing I would add, and I'm sure Ginny will not disagree with me, have a gun.
	That's a given!
	I didn't even put that in there!
	Whether you're bugging out, staying home, or moving to a completely different location, because there are going to be other people besides you moving to those other locations, and it's going to be, this is mine, this is mine, I want yours, I want yours, and you're going to have to... You know, and Dave, I live in a very self-sufficient town.
	We're in the Rocky Mountains, and we know that our power could go out at any time.
	Like during a blizzard?
	Yeah.
	We do have some overhead lines.
	This is mountain territory.
	They're not going to be digging big old ditches through granite to try to put a power line in.
	It's all poles.
	We have SLVREC, which is the San Luis Valley Rural Electrification Company.
	They're some of the most reliable I've ever experienced, actually.
	I've lived in Philadelphia, where I went to school the first for the first degree and I lived in Denver and I lived in Albuquerque and I don't live in a city by choice because and I'm really lucky that I can have this choice you know and a lot of people can't imagine what they would do in a small town they can't imagine what they would do for a profession but I'm telling you your profession doesn't matter when the power goes out you won't have it.
	Not only that there's a lot of things that especially if anything positive at all Came out of this COVID PSYOP.
	It's the fact that people learned they could do things out of their house.
	They don't necessarily have to be in place at some office.
	As long as the infrastructure is in place.
	Exactly.
	Now I'm thinking that we're looking in the future at a double or triple whammy.
	And I don't know whether it's, it's just, well, once again, it's my spidey sense.
	You know, I, I don't, These days, I don't count on really anything.
	I think that there are some forces that want to destroy this country.
	I think we're all pretty aware of that.
	There are some communist countries that would love to have our mineral resources, and we're in the way.
	This is nontraditional warfare.
	In a lot of ways.
	So we might have a bio-attack, a bio-weapon attack, and then we might also have big power outages or some other disruption to our food supply or whatever.
	You know, and I don't see these things coming one at a time.
	I think at the same time, it'll be a multi-pronged attack.
	So I think the power grid is going to be one element of that.
	No, because I'll tell you, I have seen experiments of technology that I will not go into that is capable.
	First of all, they know the GPS of every junction and every condenser along the power system.
	And they have the ability with a directed energy weapon to specifically take out toggle points along the grid.
	So there you have it, Dave.
	Jimmy, what a great presentation.
	It's very frightening, but it's something we needed to hear.
	And what are we covering next week?
	I think next week I would like to take it off.
	A friend and I are going to go out to Durango and just take it easy for a little while.
	Good for you!
	All right.
	We'll plan on talking in a couple of weeks then.
	Yeah.
	Okay, Dave.
	Thank you.
	God bless and take care.
	See ya.
	Bye-bye.
	Jimmy Silcox here on the Dark Outpost.
	All right.
	Stand by because in just a couple of moments we are going to be joined by Dr. James Fetzer and we're going to talk about 9-11.
	We call it, well, we call it the 20-year lie.
	Standby.
	do do
	之 do
	do do
	Dr. Fetzer is going to be with us for a couple hours today and we're really glad to have him.
	We're going to go over 9-11 because I call it, I titled this video, The 20-Year Lie.
	This is the 20th anniversary of the 9-11 and I want to call it the attacks of 9-11.
	Dr. Fetzer has put together an outstanding presentation, but welcome to the program.
	Oh, David, it's a delight.
	I refer to these like JFK 9-11 as observances, because I think of anniversaries as things you like to celebrate, and these most assuredly are not.
	No, they're not the things that we like to celebrate, but the things that we need to remember, especially if there are evil forces, some of which are probably within our own government causing these These things to occur so I'm very glad that you with us.
	Let me let me bring up the just a moment here the the presentation that you have so that we can get this going and this is going to be fascinating and All right, so we're gonna allow it here we go.
	All right.
	We are set to go.
	Dr. Fetzer.
	Let's do it.
	Oh Well, for those who may not know, I'm the founder of Scholars for 9-11 Truth in 2005, where I brought together experts from all around the world and an organization that had all around 600 members by the end of 2006 in four different categories, pilots, engineers, all kinds, structural, civil,
	Aeronautical, especially important physicists, and we pooled our resources.
	So what I'm going to be reporting here really is as a result of collaborative research and not simply opinions of my own, where one of the great benefits of my methodology is that we have the benefit of criticizing one another.
	Yeah, if you want to show the very first slide, It turns out that the Taliban have observed that Osama, in their opinion, had nothing to do with 9-11, and that just happens to be 100% correct.
	It turns out, as I turn to the second slide, Osama was actually our man in Afghanistan.
	He was instrumental in getting the Stinger missiles into the hands of the Mujahideen that they used to shoot down Soviet helicopters and planes.
	He was an officer in the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman, an official of the agency, David.
	visited him in a hospital in Dubai shortly before his death on 15 December 2001 from his medical maladies.
	It's tough to get those dialysis machines in and out of those caves in Afghanistan.
	He was buried in an unmarked grave in accordance with Muslim tradition.
	There were local obituaries.
	By the 26th, Both CNN and Fox had caught up when we were reporting that Osama bin Laden was dead.
	David Ray Griffin, the Dean of 9-11 Research, has a book about it entitled, Osama Bin Laden Dead or Alive.
	But if you flip to the next slide, you'll see Barack Obama found it politically expedient to resurrect Osama and have him die again in a stage raid on a compound in Pakistan on May 2, 2011, a decade later, so that he could position himself as the For a triumphal reelection as a president got the most wanted man in the world.
	It was all completely fraudulent, total hoax.
	But they even made a movie about it that was at one point thought to be a candidate for An Academy Award, Zero Dark Thirty, but it was a fantasy.
	Politically expedient and beneficial to Obama, by the way, who, as I have reported previously, nullified the Smith-Munn Act of 1948 to legalize false flag events like Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, and all that right here in the USA.
	So we have a great deal to thank Barack Obama For having done to the country, unfortunately, none of it has turned out to be good.
	The very next slide, David, is fascinating because it turns out that Richard Gage, who has been the sole head of architects and engineers for 9-11 Truth, has now stepped down.
	Regard this as an extremely positive development for a multiplicity of reasons.
	Number one, architects and engineers have been a limited hangout.
	They won't even talk about who is responsible and why, but only give a theory about what happened to the World Trade Center focusing on Building 7.
	What they point out about Building 7 is that it came down in a classic controlled demolition, which is true, but which Dan Rather pointed out already the day of the event.
	So in my opinion, in all these years with Richard Gage, he made no progress over what we learned from Dan Rather already on 9-11.
	But architects and engineers, because it was made up of architects and engineers, drew a huge amount of support from the American people.
	They thought this was the right truth organization to invest in, not understanding that it was a limited hangout, not understanding he wouldn't talk about who was responsible or why, not understanding that they had members who were gonna Defend the myth that an airplane had actually hit the Pentagon, which turns out to be an absolutely crucial issue, because since the Pentagon is America's command and control center, if the Pentagon hit was a hoax, then you know the entire 9-11 operation was a fraud, as indeed I shall demonstrate to be the case.
	So here we have, yes, for our show today, what happened on 9-11, who is responsible, and why.
	And I'm so pleased to have the opportunity to do these programs with you, David.
	The very next slide is actually an introduction.
	If you were watching television that day, this is what might have happened if you were watching a MASH rerun.
	Check this out from the May Russell site.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Yep.
	I'm going to play it right now.
	I'm just, uh, you're on the, you slipped slides.
	Yeah.
	Oh, I did.
	I'm sorry.
	I apologize for that.
	Let's, uh, let's hear this up here.
	One more up, one more up, David.
	All right.
	I don't know how that happened.
	I must've accidentally touched it.
	Got it.
	It's playing now.
	Yeah, this is classic footage, but look how telling it is.
	This was all broadcast on 9-11.
	No second plane, it was a bomb.
	Bombing another building, not second plane.
	That's a bomb.
	Who said it was second plane?
	That's what we're told, second plane, we saw it on television.
	Alright, thanks a lot.
	This is...
	of how much of the plane actually impacted the building.
	You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
	The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left... Oh, what happened?
	You moved it and it stopped the audio.
	pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand.
	There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that.
	Because there's no plane.
	Which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon
	and then caused the side to collapse. Now, even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon,
	you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately. It wasn't until almost
	about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.
	Jeff, it's a United Airlines plane. It's believed to be at that site outside Pittsburgh, isn't it?
	That's exactly right John with 45 people total on board and one of the more profound things today the imprint of terrorism seared not only on Wall Street but also on Main Street.
	Here you have an area 80 miles to the southeast of Pittsburgh in this plane which went down at about 10 o'clock this morning.
	We have rescue vehicles that came in earlier in the day and they have turned up nothing.
	No one believed to be alive from this crash.
	Some of the media just getting back to the scene which is about A quarter of a mile up on the hill back behind me and so some of the first pictures just starting to come in within the last hour.
	I want to get quickly to Chris Konicki.
	He's a photographer with the Pittsburgh Affiliate of Fox Affiliate.
	He was back there just a couple of minutes ago and Chris, I've seen the pictures.
	It looks like there's nothing there except for a hole in the ground.
	Basically, that's right.
	The only thing you could see from where we were was a big gouge in the earth and some broken trees.
	We could see some people walking around in the area.
	But from where we could see, there wasn't much left.
	Any large pieces of debris at all?
	No, there was nothing.
	Nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there.
	Smoke, fire?
	Nothing.
	It was absolutely quiet.
	It was actually very quiet.
	Nothing going on down there.
	No smoke, no fire.
	Just a couple of people walking around.
	They looked like part of the NTSB crew walking around, looking at the pieces.
	How big would you say that hole was?
	From my estimates, I would guess it was probably about 20 to 15 feet.
	Probably not 10 feet long, or 10 feet wide.
	What could you see on the ground, if anything, other than dirt and ash?
	You couldn't see anything.
	You could just see dirt, ash, and people walking around, broken trees.
	It says that City Hall in Oakland will remain open.
	It will be business as usual.
	He is urging people to remain calm, given what is going on.
	Remain calm.
	Oakland City Hall will remain open, but in San Francisco, City Hall has been closed. We're also just getting word here now that
	a second United Airlines jet, flight 175, from Boston to Los Angeles is now missing. Again, if you've
	just joined us, there have been four separate plane crashes. Three of those planes were en route
	to California. Two were heading to LAX.
	The third was heading to San Francisco International Airport. That was specifically
	the one heading to SFO United. Flight number 93 from Newark to SFO.
	It apparently crashed.
	In Pennsylvania, fairly close to the border of Maryland and not too far from Camp David.
	Why is that significant?
	Because one of the groups constantly claiming responsibility for all these terrorist attacks is the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
	And it was this week in 1978 that the Camp David Accords were reached.
	Is there a connection at this point?
	We don't know, but it is important to be aware of that situation.
	In Washington D.C., Many congressional leaders have been transferred to a secret location.
	Some senators have described this as a second Pearl Harbor.
	And President Bush was in Florida this morning, but he made a brief announcement when the first attacks were clear on the World Trade Center, and he was heading back to Washington, D.C.
	At this point, we don't know exactly where he is.
	They're trying, they're not really broadcasting that information, but we are told that the
	president is safe right now.
	We're waiting for a press conference to start in San Francisco from the Office of Emergency
	Services to discuss what the situation, what the city's reaction to all of this is going
	to be.
	But again, right now.
	The next slide, David, shows the four official flight paths for the four commercial carriers.
	One of the oddities being that each of these planes, although on transcontinental flights officially, were only about one-third floor.
	Flight 11 had 92 when it could handle 351.
	175 only 65 when it could handle 351.
	77 at the Pentagon only had 64 when it could handle 289.
	93 in Shanksville only 45 when it could handle 289.
	351, 77 at the Pentagon only had 64 when it could handle 289, 93 in Shanksville only 45
	when it could handle 289. You wonder how these airliners could remain in business if they're
	doing transcontinental flights with so few passengers aboard.
	Exactly.
	Let's pick up on the commentator from Shanksville in the very next scene.
	He said, and he was not alone, the eerie aspect of the crash site was there was no sign that any plane had crashed there.
	David, as you well know, as I love to explain, we're told you can't prove a negative, but that's wrong.
	You can prove there's no elephant in your living room by going there and looking for signs of the presence of elephant, finding none.
	You're entitled to infer that's because there's no elephant there.
	If you're in Shanksville, look at this hole in the ground, and you see there's no signs of any plane having crashed there, you're entitled to infer that's because... You would think that there would be at Some sort of a piece of fuselage somewhere.
	Nothing!
	I know, I know, I know, David.
	Take a look at the next and you'll see what it ought to have looked like.
	Because here you have actual real plane crashes in Amsterdam, Missouri, Russia, compared with Shanksville.
	I mean, this is just silly.
	This is just ridiculous.
	There's no sign of any plane having crashed there.
	And if you go to the very next slide, you see we were even being given a description of the hole in the ground.
	This is one of the two reporters who was explaining there was no evidence any plane had crashed there.
	When he was asked the dimensions of the hole, he said it was about 10 by maybe 15 or 20 feet.
	But listen, this is an airliner with a 125-foot wingspan.
	It had a tail that stood 44 feet above the ground.
	The idea that it could leave such a tiny hole and no debris is simply absurd.
	If we go to the next slide, we actually see what would be a GIF if it will play.
	There we go!
	Wonderful!
	This is what the government, or some apologists, claim that this was an area where mining had taken place, David, and therefore it had disappeared into an abandoned mine shaft.
	I mean, give me a break, right?
	So I know they should have dug that up.
	We know what to do with miners trapped in mine shafts.
	We break out the bright lights and heavy equipment and dig 24-7 in the hope by some miracle someone might have survived.
	But they did not do that here, David.
	Even though there were 64 souls aboard this plane, allegedly, we didn't do any digging.
	For the obvious reason, there was nothing there.
	What do you think happened to all the people that were allegedly on that flight, the Manifest?
	There was a famous, he was a member of our, I think he was a member of our government, his wife was on there.
	No, you're thinking about Pentagon 77, Barbara Olson.
	Yeah!
	Well, listen, I'll talk about each of these, David.
	But the fact is that Flight 93 was still in the air after the crash.
	So, you know, you can just make up a list of names as a passenger list.
	I mean, that's child's play for Hollywood or for the military, for that matter.
	So, you know, these were, for the most part, simply fictitious names.
	Remember, and when we talk about Las Vegas, you'll discover they use the names of persons who had died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death.
	They may have done similarly here, but it was all nonsense.
	It was all just a script.
	Go to the next and we see further proof of chicanery.
	The photograph on the left was allegedly taken by a local resident named Val McClatchy, but when you compare the smoke there with what we would have had from an airplane crash on the far right, it's not the right kind of smoke.
	It ought to have been dense and black and thick.
	It looks like it's smoke from some sort of a fire that was deliberately set.
	Actually, from a demolition, David.
	That in the middle is from a demolition, just an explosive set off.
	Not only that, but if you track the geography, it turns out that that cloud on the left was over a pond, and therefore can't possibly have been the location.
	They made mistakes, David.
	Some of those participating in these frauds are not rocket scientists, and they make blunders.
	If you look at the next slide, you'll see again what a real crash site would look like.
	And compare, just compare it with Shanesville.
	It's really, this is not a challenging assignment.
	To infer that if a plane had crashed there, there would have been massive smoke, debris, fires, black thick smoke, that in Shanksville there was no debris, no fires, no thick black smoke, leading to the inference, technically it's known as modus tollens in logic, no plane crashed there.
	In fact, it's fascinating if you look at the very next slide, David.
	Pilots for 9-11 troop tracked this air-ground communication system that was on Flight 93 and discovered that it was still airborne after it had officially crashed in Shanksville.
	It was over Champaign-Urbana, Illinois.
	And indeed, as I shall subsequently explain, the aircraft, the actual plane that was used for Flight 93, wasn't formally deregistered or taken out of service until 28 September 2005.
	In other words, this plane was still in the air four years later, David.
	Go to the next slide and you'll see, while the Pentagon is the most heavily surveyed building in the world, they only released five frames from a surveillance camera, and the frames have the wrong date and time, David.
	How curious is that?
	Suggesting they're fabricated.
	Now, you'll notice the one in the upper left is conveniently labeled plain.
	Well, if you look just above the gate mechanism, you'll see what looks like a white plume coming from what could be a plane.
	We'll look at this more closely momentarily.
	Meanwhile, the other four were showing this growing fireball, but I'm going to offer reasons to believe even those were fabricated and faked.
	Now, if you look at the next frame, David, I invited a colleague from JFK Research, Jack White, to size the image of a Boeing 757 to the tail seen in this photograph.
	He's adjusted for forms of distortion, which is why it looks curious to get an accurate comparison, but you can see a 757 is about twice the size of what we have there.
	A brilliant student of 9-11 who was the Navy's leading electronics troubleshooter before he resigned and went to work for Raytheon, Dennis Camino, has done massive work to identify what this was, and it turns out to have been an unmanned aerial vehicle known as a Global Hawk.
	Where the white bloom is not from the plane, and had it been a jet fighter, the exhaust would have been black, but appears to be from firing a missile into the building.
	You may recall Donald Rumsfeld the day before announced that the Pentagon was missing $2.3 trillion from its budget.
	This was a very odd thing to do on a Monday, because it's the kind of story that, as they say in the biz, will get legs and grow and develop.
	As though he knew something would intervene in the meanwhile and he'd be able to waltz into the halls of Congress the following day and ask for hundreds of billions more in defense spending, which is exactly what happened.
	They have recently renovated this wing, the only wing of the five-sided Pentagon to be renovated.
	Absolutely unbelievable.
	After personnel and property accept that, Rumsfeld directed the section chief to bring
	all his budget experts together in the West Wing with all the records from the missing
	$2.3 trillion, claiming of course he was very embarrassed that they needed to get to the
	heart of the matter so that they could be killed and the records could be destroyed
	during the attack.
	How's that, David, for efficiency?
	Absolutely unbelievable.
	When I saw the alleged list of victims from the Pentagon, I I was astonished that there were three dozen budget experts, analysts, accountants, financial.
	I mean, it was just stunning to me.
	But that's because it was set up.
	If you go to the next slide, you'll see what is officially supposed to be the hit point at the Pentagon.
	Now, it's about 10 feet high and 15 or 20 feet wide.
	Once again, way too small.
	Remember, this, like the plane in Shanksville, is another Boeing 757 with a 125-foot wingspan,
	a 100-ton aluminum airliner.
	You got a couple of cars on fire, some giant spools of cable, and unbroken windows.
	But what do you not have?
	You don't have a massive pile of aluminum debris.
	You don't have bodies, seats, luggage, wings, tail.
	David, not even the engines were recovered, and they're virtually indestructible.
	As you can see, there are no puncture holes in the facade of the Pentagon for the engines to have entered.
	Turning to the next slide, you'll see, as Jamie McIntyre was explaining, about 45 minutes later, you had this section of the Pentagon facade collapse.
	Now, I believe what happened here is that Donald Rumsfeld, who was a key player on this event, Look at the vision of the Pentagon facade and didn't think it looked serious enough.
	So we had to bring down this additional section of the Pentagon.
	In other words, it was purely optical, theatrical effect, David.
	Pure Hollywood.
	I was going to say Hollywood, great.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Now the next slide reveals why I am convinced even those fireballs turn out to have been fake.
	Notice, this is that area that was renovated.
	Do you see any signs from an intense fire?
	No.
	Notice in particular, unlike the third floor on the left, there's a wooden stand that appears to have been from an Oxford Unabridged Dictionary.
	It's not even cinch!
	So where are the signs of this intense fire?
	They are not present.
	Once again, leading to the inference that's because there was no intense fire.
	Now the next slide is especially telling.
	This is a depiction of the official approach According to the government, barely skimming the ground at over 400 miles an hour.
	Now, David, it turns out that that plane, the Boeing 757, at that speed, over 400 miles an hour, because of what is known as downdraft, sometimes also called ground effect, could not have come closer than 60 or even 80 feet to the ground Which is higher than the Pentagon at 71 feet is tall, because it's an aerodynamic impossibility.
	In other words, we got a gross violation of the laws of aerodynamics, which as I've emphasized again and again, anytime you have a violation of the laws of physics, or engineering, or biology, chemistry, ballistics, anatomy, what have you, you know you're witnessing a fantasy.
	Well, here, as a depiction of a Boeing 757 traveling more than 400 miles an hour, this is a depiction of a fantasy.
	It's almost like the plane would have had to have crashed out of the ground and then slid into the Pentagon.
	Yeah, and those engines would have tore up huge gouges in the lawn.
	Huge gouges in the lawn, David.
	I mean, remember, you see an occasional depiction of someone caught behind a jet engine and how they're blown a hundred yards away because of the force of the engine.
	Well, take a look at the very next slide and you'll see It just happened, and this was coincidental, that there were two civilian lime green fire trucks in the vicinity at the time, which meant they were the first on the scene, and here you observe they're extinguishing the very modest fires that remain.
	But David, notice, That clear green Pentagon lawn.
	There's not a token of debris.
	I mean, you thought, you thought Shanksville was pristine.
	Look at this lawn.
	Absolutely nothing there.
	Nothing there.
	If someone were to insist, oh, that's just the angle of the camera, which I grant is a ludicrous argument, take a look at the very next slide.
	This is from the BBC doing a special.
	I mentioned in passing, They actually came here to my home near Madison, Wisconsin, and interviewed me for eight hours for their very first Conspiracy Files program on 9-11.
	Eight hours, David!
	They chose to use seven and a half minutes.
	In other words, in that eight hours, I must have given them at least a hundred arguments of how we know That 9-11 was fabricated or fake, but they chose just seven and a half.
	One point I made where I suspect that a C-130 that was circling the building had dropped some of the debris onto the lawn.
	That was the one they chose.
	I think they believed that would appear to be the greatest stretch.
	I was put on with Dylan Avery Who, of course, had created Lose Change, the fabulous popular film about 9-11, and with Alex Jones for four and a half minutes.
	So Dylan was the snot-nosed kid, Alex Jones the messianic preacher, and I was the kooky professor.
	Then they spent 45 minutes talking about why anyone would believe these things as though it were a question of psychology rather than logic and evidence.
	Look at the next slide, David, and you'll see now, even after that section of the building has collapsed, there is no debris.
	There is none.
	No signs any plane had crashed there.
	And for all the obvious reasons that supports, no plane crashed there.
	Well, eventually, debris did begin to show up, and if you look at the next slide, you'll see what was by far the most interesting piece, Because it actually is a section from the fuselage of a Boeing 757.
	Now notice, about it however, do you see any signs of this being derived from a violent collision?
	Or an intense fire.
	You're right, David.
	See, it ought to have been crunched up if it was in a violent collision, and there ought to be signs of the intense fire, but there are none.
	Not only that, but if you notice there, entwined in the fuselage is a piece of vine, not indigenous to the Arlington, Virginia area.
	Look, I know, David, look at the next slide and you get a close-up of the vine.
	So the question becomes, what in the world are we doing here?
	Well, there's a retired attorney at law by the name of James Hansen from Columbus, Ohio, who recognizes 757 as a superb safety record.
	There are very few incidents of them having crashed, but one occurred near Cali, Colombia in 1995.
	David, take a look at the very next.
	You'll see a photograph from the crash site where the pilots lost their way and passed through jungle where these vines are in abundance and crashing into the side of a mountain.
	The salvage was conducted by an Israeli firm.
	So they appear to have saved up this piece of debris from a crash in Cali in 1995 to put it on the Pentagon lawn On 9-11-2001.
	That's really farsighted.
	You know, who knows when they might have used it, but they didn't bother to tidy it up.
	They didn't take out the piece of vine, David.
	Again, I say, a lot of those involved in this are not rocket scientists.
	So we get some really surprising blunders.
	One more image you can see from the salvage site.
	Now I didn't mention, by the way, when I first showed that the trajectories of the four commercial carriers, but all four were from airports that had the same security firm, ICTS, which yes, yes, yes, surprise, surprise, is an Israeli firm.
	So the Israelis were running the security at the airports from which the planes allegedly departed.
	Israelis were involved in the salvage of this component from the crash of a 757 that shows up on the lawn of the Pentagon on 9-11.
	You're beginning to see a pattern here about which we shall have more to say.
	Now, the next slide is the officer, the pilot, who was of the 130, Who claimed, you know, BBC, after my suggestion that he had dropped the debris, they actually interviewed him so they could include it in their segment and he said he thought it was absurd.
	He didn't actually say it was false.
	He said he thought it was absurd.
	I just had a conversation with Dennis Camino, whom I've already mentioned, and Dennis believes that he was actually directing the Global Hawk that fired the missile into the West Wing of the Pentagon, that it was conducted, he was the operator of the unmanned aerial vehicle.
	So his role may have been different than I was proposing, but he had a role here.
	The next slide is very, very interesting too, because we've already discovered the aerodynamic impossibility of the approach of barely skimming the ground at over 400 miles an hour.
	Well, here another aspect of the official account is that the plane took out a series
	of stationary lampposts, one, two, three, four, five, six, en route to its destination.
	Well by Newton's third law, equal and opposite reaction, the effect of a plane traveling
	over 400 miles an hour hitting stationary lampposts would be the same as if the plane
	were stationary, hit by lampposts traveling over 400 miles an hour.
	Now, they would have destroyed the wings, which are full of fuel, which would have mixed with air, and then exploded, causing the plane to cartwheel across the Pentagon lawn, leaving lots of debris.
	But of course, as we already know, there was none.
	Therefore, this story, too, is preposterous.
	And again, you have actually a physical impossibility involved here of having that kind of damage to the wings and explosion and yet leave no debris.
	It did not happen.
	Now, the next slide is particularly interesting because there was an aspect of this that the public does not appreciate at all, to wit, The Green Line is the official trajectory of the Flight 77 toward the building.
	But a group of 9-11 students calling themselves Citizens Investigative Team discovered that just north of that Green Line there was a CITGO station and that there were a number of witnesses who actually watched a large plane approach the Pentagon Where their eyewitness reports are identified by the yellow lines, David.
	Now they all lead to the building where they witnessed a large explosion and presume the plane had hit the building.
	I have a colleague, another colleague from JFK Research, Roy Schaefer, however, who has a buddy, Dave Ball, who was a trucker in front of the Pentagon that day.
	And he reported to Roy how he watched as a plane flew toward the Pentagon and then swerved over the building.
	And Roy was puzzled because Dave still seemed to think a plane had hit the building, even though he had not witnessed, but rather the opposite.
	I said, Roy, we got to get Dave on the air.
	Let him come on with me and tell his story.
	Dave was reluctant.
	So I said to Roy, you tell him he'll be much safer once he gets his story out.
	But by the time Roy got back to him, it was too late.
	Dave was found dead in an abandoned building.
	Oh, wow.
	See, so that's exactly what happened.
	In fact, he's a Hollywood stuntman with a plane to do this thing.
	It's fascinating, David, that Leon Panetta was in the underground bunker with Dick Cheney beneath a White House, where Michael Rupert, in his book Crossing the Rubicon, based on publicly available sources, concluded Dick Cheney was the executive director Of 9-11, and where Minetta's talking about an aide coming up to Cheney and saying, sir, it's 50 miles out, sir, it's 40 miles out, sir, it's 30 miles out, do the orders still stand?
	And Cheney whips around and says, have you heard anything to the contrary?
	The order had to be to not shoot down the plane.
	That would have been the obvious thing to do.
	You'd lose the plane and the passenger, but not the property and the personnel at the target.
	This appears to be the plane they saw with their yellow lines, their witness, that it was being directed to the Pentagon to make it appear, create the optical impression of a plane having actually hit the Pentagon.
	Remember, David, the Pentagon has to be the most heavily defended Building in the world as well.
	They have anti-aircraft missile sites all over the place, but none were deployed here because Dick Cheney ordered the plane not to be shot down.
	The next slide is also very interesting.
	There are five different, you know, rings to the pentagon.
	The D, E, C, B, and A ring from outer to inner.
	In the C ring, there was this hole in the C ring Where you can see, or not quite make out the words, it says, punch out.
	Now, there was a smell of cordite, which is a commonly used military explosive that appears to have been employed to create this impression, which they were alleging was from a part of the plane, like a landing gear.
	But you remember the angle at which the plane was approaching the building.
	If this had been caused by a landing gear, it would have been asymmetrical, not perfectly round.
	So, here you have further evidence, too, of fabricating evidence, faking it, where they even forgot to wipe out the instruction, punch out.
	How bad is that, David?
	Punch out, yeah, it's like, oh my God.
	Is that something?
	So here in the next slide you see Jamie McIntyre.
	We already heard him live from the Pentagon saying from his close-up inspection there was no sign of any plane having hit anywhere near the Pentagon.
	He would later be pressured to retract that statement, which he did in the following way, David.
	He said, only a fool would think no plane, or say no plane had hit the Pentagon, meaning he'd been a fool to think that his bosses at the network wanted him to report the truth.
	This was too much heavy water propaganda for him to bear, and he subsequently resigned from CNN, even though he was by far their best reporter on the scene.
	The next image is of April Gallup.
	She was a civilian employee at the Pentagon.
	And this big explosion occurred at the side of the building when she first turned on her computer.
	She thought somehow maybe she'd set it off.
	Well, she walked out of the hole and looked around and saw no signs, no signs of any plane having hit the Pentagon.
	But she did report this malachordite, this commonly used military explosive.
	Dennis said earlier today that they put pressure on April Gallup as to what she should say, but she preserved her integrity and reported the actual experience she had, which confirmed no plane had hit the Pentagon.
	The next slide is also extremely interesting.
	This is Major General Albert Stubblebine, who is formerly in charge of all U.S.
	military signals, including photographic intelligence.
	In other words, this is a top guy in analyzing photographic evidence.
	During an interview he gave here with a reporter in Germany, he explained how he knew that no plane had hit the Pentagon, namely because there would have been the imprint of the plane on the side of the building and it wasn't there.
	Now, he and I, David, did a show where I went through the evidence I have for all four of the crash sites, and General Stummelbein not only agreed, but gave additional reasons of his own of how we knew that none of the four planes had crashed on 9-11.
	The next slide is very interesting, too.
	There was a rumor later, and I think it was in relation to Flight 93, that a plane was headed for the Capitol, that a Capitol building was next.
	This led to the members of the House and the Senate pouring out onto the steps of the Capitol.
	And when they looked around, they saw this billowing black smoke coming from across the Potomac.
	Well, I knew those lime green civilian firetrucks had extinguished the fires, so where in the world did this come from?
	When I investigated, it turned out they came from a series of enormous dumpsters in front of the Pentagon.
	I was just going to say they're clearly dumpsters.
	I was just going to say that.
	Isn't it something, David?
	You talk about your Hollywood theatrics and special effects.
	Subsequently, a member of scholars would come through Duluth and show me 44 more frames where you could see light between the building and the dumpsters.
	How bad is that?
	Now, when we get into the politics of 9-11, which is crucial, it turns out that Ehud Olmert and Bibi Netanyahu were conducting conferences on terrorism in Tel Aviv in the late 1980s and even published a book about it.
	Before anyone really was familiar with the concept.
	This was tied in with a dissolution of the Soviet Union, you can see in the very next slide, which occurred in 1991, where the U.S.
	made all these solemn agreements not to politicize Eastern Bloc countries that would become independent.
	Not to militarize them, not to attempt to turn them into NATO nations, all of which we have grossly violated.
	But the point is that adjacent with the dissolution of the Soviet Union
	emerged something called the Project for a New American Century,
	element of which is shown in the very next slide, where they published a lot of documents.
	This was staffed by neocons, the overwhelming majority of whom
	are dual US-Israeli citizens.
	And they were claiming that if America would only move militarily into the geopolitically sensitive area
	of the Middle East and exert political and military pressure,
	we could create a new American empire that would endure for the next 100 years.
	That was just a camouflage.
	This was an Israeli effort to draw the United States into the Middle East, to take out the modern Arab states that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region, and eventually confront the Persian nation of Iran.
	You'll notice, however, in one of their publications about rebuilding America's defense is in the bottom left.
	They talk about Americans may be slow to realize the historic opportunity afforded by the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
	Thus, they wrote further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.
	Remember, we had the Anchor reporting, politicians are already talking about this as a second Pearl Harbor.
	Again, that was pure theatrics, pure Hollywood, and there was going to be no future American empire.
	This is all to benefit Israel.
	Indeed, the next slide shows General Wesley Clark, who had served as Supreme Commander Allied Forces Europe, meaning he was a commanding general of NATO, when he returned to the Pentagon, encountered a general who told him we were planning to attack Iraq.
	And they both thought it was peculiar because Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.
	Nor, as I've already explained, did Afghanistan.
	Eventually, he would return a month or so later and encounter the same general and ask, are we still planning to invade Iraq?
	And the general said, oh no, sir, it's much worse.
	Step into my office, he said, I've just received a memorandum from Secretary Rumsfeld.
	The plan is to overthrow the governments of seven countries in the next five years.
	Beginning with Iraq and Libya, ending with Syria and Iran.
	And Clark said, well, is that memorandum classified?
	And the General said, oh, yes, sir.
	So Clark said, well, then don't show it to me.
	I may want to talk about it, which he eventually did on the 3rd of October 2007 at the Commonwealth Club of California.
	Well, the next slide you see two of the key players from the Project for a New American Century who came into the Department of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz on the right and Richard Perle on the left, who are leading advocates for the war in Iraq and indeed support for U.S.
	involvement in the Middle East.
	This is the political background against which 9-11 has to be understood.
	The next slide shows the Twin Towers.
	These were marvels of engineering and design.
	David, they received many awards, in part because of the innovative architecture you can see in the very next slide.
	There were 47 massive core columns for the primary source of support, and then 230 external steel support columns where they were connected by steel trusses that would be filled with concrete, which I will say more, create all this open office space.
	Now, a part of the design we see on the next slide is that the steel, the thickness of the steel varied.
	It was 6 inches in the sub-basement, then 5, 4, 3, down to only being a quarter inch thick at the very top.
	This will be particularly important when the official report claims that the top, which had the least amount of steel, collapsed and caused the rest of the building to fall.
	If you look at the next slide, you see actually the World Trade Center had seven buildings.
	The Twin Towers were, of course, predominant as 110 stories tall.
	But then you had in the background Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, and multiple other buildings which were all to be destroyed during the event.
	It's interesting, in the very next slide, That we find that records about the asbestos problem in the Twin Towers were all allegedly lost.
	The destruction solved the asbestos problem.
	Here's the deal.
	The board authority had directed the World Trade Center had to deal with the asbestos in the building.
	It began construction in 1966, completed in 1970.
	But!
	If you did it by a conventional controlled demolition, that would have released all the asbestos and other heavy metals into the atmosphere.
	Therefore, a classic controlled demolition of the Twin Towers was ruled out.
	And if you were to design scaffolding around the two buildings, it would have been so elaborate because of their size, it would have cost about a billion dollars.
	So, with the attack by terrorists, the problem was solved.
	The very next slide, David, you'll see the extent of the devastation.
	It was all and only buildings with a WTC, World Trade Center designation, were destroyed.
	And it was a rather thorough process at that.
	If you turn to the next slide, you see members of the Port Authority.
	These are very prominent Zionists, dual U.S.-Israeli citizens, Frank Lowry, Paul Eisenberg, Ronald Lauder, who moved the World Trade Center into the hands of Larry Silverstein, seen in the very next slide, into private hands for the very first time.
	Now, Larry Silverstein took control of the World Trade Center just six weeks before 9-11.
	His first act, you can see in the next slide, was to fire the security firm that had been looking after the tower since they were first opened in 1970 and hired an Israeli firm, Kroll.
	He also renegotiated insurance on the World Trade Center, adding an anti-terrorist clause, so that when there were ostensibly two plane attacks, he claimed double indemnity.
	And he pocketed $4.5 billion on a $114 million investment.
	They don't call him Lucky Larry for nothing, David.
	If you look at the next, you see Odego was a messenger service that was an Israeli asset that appears to have notified Jewish employees not to come into Lower Manhattan that day, not to come to work.
	I even had a little old lady from Brooklyn call me to say that the rabbi had told the members of her synagogue not to go into Lower Manhattan that day.
	So they were looking after their own.
	To the best of my knowledge, only one Jewish person died on 9-11.
	The next slide reflects a photograph that was supposed to show the terrorists, Mohammed and others, about to board a plane.
	It's very peculiar how the government has a list of these 19 terrorists that allegedly was found in the luggage of Mohammed Adda, as though if you were engaged in a conspiracy, you'd write out a list of all your co-conspirators.
	This turns out to be a lot of nonsense, as I'm going to explain subsequently.
	But it was very convenient, made it effortless.
	For the government to claim to know the identities of the participants, which, in fact, were equally fabricated.
	They had nothing to do with 9-11, no more so than Osama bin Laden.
	Turns out, as the next slide shows, that their passports, however, were issued by the CIA.
	I mean, how about that?
	But then, of course, that's because the CIA engages in conspiracies.
	We lost Robert David Steele recently as former CIA, and one of the criticisms made of Steele was he was a conspiracy theorist.
	But think about it.
	What does the CIA do but conduct conspiracies, coups, assassinations, staged events around the world, David?
	I mean, the CIA is conspiracy central.
	So to accuse a former CIA guy of being a conspiracy theorist means he knew what he was talking about.
	You see in the very next slide where Donald Rumsfeld was talking about the missing $2.3 trillion.
	And, since I've already explained, turn to the very next and you'll see a fellow who was a chief financial officer for the Pentagon at the time, Dov Zorkheim, not only a dual U.S.
	citizen but a rabbi, had his own company for flight maintenance to take control of an airline had it been hijacked from the ground.
	I believe The original plan in New York was to use remote-controlled drones in order to attack the Twin Towers until they discovered that the construction of the buildings was so formidable that they would have crumbled external to the buildings.
	It would have been impossible to get the planes into the building, which they needed to do in order to claim that explosions set off there had weakened the steel and caused the buildings to collapse.
	Now on the very next slide you see footage from a French film crew that just happened to be in New York, where Leslie Raphael, a Scottish student, has discovered that for them to have been at this place at this time required the satisfaction of a hundred improbable circumstances.
	Now realize, you're going to hear, because the plane is flying faster than the speed of sound, by the time you hear the sound, the plane is already far distant from where the sound emanated.
	So for this photographer to be able to swing his camera up after hearing the sound, he had to know what was coming.
	This came by accident.
	And the film crew is called the Naudets.
	N-A-U-D-E-T-S.
	They were actually filming on DeWayne Street.
	So they really took just the ladders made up the street they were on, David, to call themselves the Naudets.
	I mean, this is in your face.
	This is so insulting.
	But most Americans have no idea.
	You look at the next slide, David, and you see what an actual 767 in New York, both planes were 767s, which are slightly larger and faster than the 757s ostensibly used at the Pentagon in Shanksville, and it ought to have looked something like this.
	Taking a look at the n'aw day footage, however, as the next slide shows, instead it looked like this, which Rosalie Grable online, known as the Webfairy, described as resembling a flying pig.
	It most certainly doesn't look like a Boeing 767.
	Take a look at the next and you get the frame where you had the impact And, you know, well, who knows?
	It's kind of curious.
	But what's more curious is the very next frame.
	Because, you see, the initial impact created a kind of a Z configuration on the left.
	But by the time the smoke cleared, it had turned out to be an elongated V.
	But apparently not sufficiently elongated, because as the next slide shows, they actually extended the tip of the wing impact on the upper right there, even though it's the most fragile part of the wing.
	I mean, this is just ridiculous, David!
	An aluminum plane isn't going to succeed in crashing through a massive steel and concrete 500,000-ton building.
	So the question becomes, how were those cutouts made?
	If you look at the very next slide, it turns out there were all these twinkling points of light, which I believe were a series of tiny explosives that were set off to create the cookie-cutter-like cutouts.
	The next slide shows the fact that this Flight 11, which will turn out to not have even been in the air that day, was intersecting with seven different floors.
	Remember, each of them Consisting of a steel truss connected at one end with the 47 massive core columns at the other with the external steel support columns filled with 4 to 8 inches of concrete.
	The variance, David, being because it had V-shaped grooves that were 4 inches deep.
	So in some places it would be 4 inches deep, in others 8.
	But because the buildings were 208 feet at a side.
	We're talking about an acre of concrete on a steel truss for each of the seven floors.
	Look at the very next and you'll see some of the cutouts.
	And what's most striking is there's no indication of any plane.
	There are no plane parts there whatsoever.
	So what happened to the plane?
	The next slide shows that inside the Twin Towers there are groups of Israeli art students.
	They call themselves the Gelatin Group.
	They were performing external events outside the buildings on scaffoldings.
	Those are boxes and boxes of fuse holders.
	I believe the gelatin group were there to prep the building to create those cookie-cutter style cutouts.
	Now what most Americans have no idea is how much activity was actually taking place on 9-11, as the next slide shows.
	I mean, this was a very busy day, particularly for the New York police, who were really superb in their performance and professionalism.
	Look at the next slide, for example, David, and you get an indication of some of the roles that the ORT students were playing.
	Planting jammers on buildings to block Port Authority dispatchers and first responder radios.
	Plant explosives on the New Jersey side of the George Washington Bridge where the cables are anchored.
	In order to collapse a bridge, explode a truck in the Lincoln Tunnel, explode a truck in the Holland Tunnel, park trucks with demolition devices in specific parking areas of the Twin Towers.
	In other words, they were going to try to isolate Manhattan from the rest of the world as an island apart, David.
	Now, it turns out, and you can look at the next slide, a woman in Liberty State Park, New Jersey observed five individuals who seemed to her to be dressed in Arab gown, who were celebrating while they were filming the destruction of the Twin Towers.
	They became known as the Dancing Israelis.
	She reported it to the state police who apprehended them in a van of Urban Moving System, which just happens to be an Israeli asset that had a diagram, a painting, ...of a plane in the Twin Towers on the side, where the driver said, we are not the problem.
	Our problem is your problem.
	The problem is the Palestinians.
	Inside the truck, there were residues of explosive, bog cutters, passports, and money.
	Now, these guys were arrested and held for 71 days until they were released by an assistant to Attorney General John Ashcroft and allowed to return to Israel.
	The next slide shows that after their return, three of them went on Israeli television and explained they had been there to document the destruction of the Twin Towers.
	Well, they obviously could not have had that assignment without prior knowledge, so clearly they knew what was going to happen.
	Here you see the Assistant Attorney General who released them turned out to be Michael Chertoff.
	Guess what?
	Yes, another dual U.S.-Israeli citizen who had succeeded Tom Ridge as the second head of our New Department of Homeland Security created by the Patriot Act.
	Thousands of pages that were sitting on the shelf for the right occasion.
	Outrageous!
	Completely taking 35 agencies that had been competing with one another for intelligence and consolidating them, where it's well known, when you have rival competing agencies, you're far more likely to learn the truth than having a single monolithic spokesman.
	Take a look at the next and you'll see one of the images of the flight 175 approaching the South Tower.
	There turned out to be some 52 videos of the plane approaching the building, which means it was possible to calculate the flight, the trajectory of the plane in air.
	If you look at the next slide, you'll see pilots from 9-11 did a calculation, and they discovered that the plane was traveling too fast for the altitude.
	Apparently they committed the blunder ...of taking the cruising speed at 35,000 feet and assuming that could be attained at the much lower elevation of 700 to 1,000, where the air is three times more dense.
	So pilots, in their documentary, 9-11 Intercepted, portrayed what would have happened Had a Boeing 767 been flying that fast, in the next slide, David, you'll see, it would have physically come apart in the air.
	Physically come apart in the air.
	That's quite a telling result, David, don't you think?
	From this wonderful Truth Group.
	Pilots for 9-11 Truth.
	A plane can only travel that fast at a higher altitude.
	If it's trying to travel that fast or that speed at a lower altitude, the plane would have disintegrated.
	That's exactly 100% correct.
	And yet, look in the next slide what we're shown.
	The plane is just disappearing into the South Tower, which has led some to liken the South Tower to a 110-story cube of butter, or the plane to a ghost plane.
	Here you'll see in the very next slide how it was intersecting with eight different floors.
	As I mentioned, each floor represented an acre of concrete on a steel truss connected at one end to the massive core columns at the other to the external steel support columns.
	There's no possible way a plane could have made an entry.
	It was a physical impossibility.
	But look what we actually saw in the very next slide, David.
	This is from the Evan Fairbanks looking upward.
	You have the plane passing its entire length into the building in the same number of frames it passes its entire length through air, which makes sense only if a massive 500,000 ton steel and concrete building provides no more resistance to the trajectory of an aircraft in flight than air.
	And you'll notice, too, down at the bottom left, there was a peculiar nose-out phenomenon.
	This happened as a mistake, hand-eye coordination, where it poked through.
	The nose is the most fragile part of the aircraft.
	There's no possible way a real aircraft could have had a nose-out.
	And what happened by the networks at exactly this point was they faded to black.
	So here they're in the midst of taking the most important historical footage in American history and they fade to black because it was a mistake.
	Right.
	Now the next slide shows what ought to have happened, had a real plain approach.
	It would have crumbled, body seats, luggage, tail, wing, fallen to the bottom, fallen to the ground.
	We know, however, what happened, which is quite the opposite.
	Here you see the massive fireball that occurred.
	This appears to have been from pre-positioned jet fuel or even You know, that gasoline-based jet stop, that spectacular fireball that extinguished in about 15 seconds.
	Well, we know what happened beneath the facades of the North and the South Tower, as you see on the next slide, David.
	There was completely bereft of any debris.
	No bodies, no seats, no luggage, no wings, no tail.
	Which means, of course, the planes didn't actually encounter the buildings.
	Something else was going on.
	And indeed, Jack White noticed, as you look in the next slide, there was an engine that was found at Church and Murray, you see it there on the right, set on the sidewalk underneath a steel caffolding and a canopy, which were undamaged.
	Which appears to have been unloaded from this white van that Fox News actually captured.
	Four or five men in FBI vests unloading.
	They even appear to have used that dolly in the process.
	Just think about it, David.
	Had this actually been an engine from Flight 175?
	Traveling at a high velocity, it would have dug up the sidewalk.
	It would have made a tremendous mess.
	But here it's just sitting on the sidewalk, and guess what?
	It turns out to be an antiquated engine.
	It wasn't even currently in use.
	Another one of those muck-ups by the Brain Trust, who was faking staging these events.
	The very next slide shows How the Massey building was virtually impenetrable by aircraft and some of the damage done by hitting small birds in flight.
	You get more of that in the very next image, where you see some of the damage.
	Now, look, just think about it.
	If hitting small birds in flight can do this kind of damage, think about hitting an acre of concrete on a steel truss and what that would have done.
	Take a look at the nose, right?
	It would have been completely broken.
	Yeah, the whole plane would have been obliterated.
	Now take a look.
	Some of the apologists refer to the Sandia test.
	This was a fighter jet mounted on a railroad truss propelled by a rocket into a nuclear bunker-resistant barricade.
	And it blew into millions of little tiny pieces.
	But they're claiming that's why we don't have any signs of the aircraft.
	It just blew into all these little pieces.
	They'll claim that for the Pentagon, if they can.
	But notice, it didn't pass through the barrier.
	Nevertheless, we have, by contrast, a plane passing its entire length into air by all those videos.
	So the question becomes, how did they fake it?
	The next slide shows one of the theories.
	...advanced by the WebFerry, that it was computer-generated images.
	The very next was advanced by Ace Baker, who created his 9-11 Sci-Opera, the theory of video compositing, that there's a delay of some 17 seconds between the time video is filmed and video is broadcast, that allows the addition of images Versus the third account from Richard D. Hall, in the next slide, that is actually done using holograms.
	Now, the first two theories, CGI and video compositing, would have required that the plane be visible in real time.
	Would have made it impossible for the plane to be visible in real time.
	It would have only been visible after the CGI or added images.
	And yet, We have hundreds of witnesses, David, who claim to have seen a plane in real time.
	They described it differently.
	Some said a large plane, some said a small, some said military, some said commercial.
	But all of this lends plausibility to Richard Hall's theory of the use of a hologram.
	Let me explain.
	Take a look at the very next image.
	What he did Yeah, yeah, thank you.
	What Richard did was to take of these 52 videos of Flight 175, about 27 or 28, were sufficiently precise that you could create a plot of the location of the plane as it approached the building and the time it was occupying that plot.
	He discovered the government, NIST, had a similar plot, which it claimed was based on radar data.
	But when he looked at their radar data, it did not look right.
	Now it turns out, and the next slide reflects, that there actually was radar data.
	But it's very peculiar, because the radar data was for a plane that was like 1,200 feet to the right of the plots he'd made of the plane hitting the South Tower.
	That led him to the conjecture, which appears to be well-founded, that the plane that was captured on the radar was projecting the image of the plane that was captured in the videos.
	And that's why it was traveling at too fast a speed, performing the impossible entry, and leaving no debris.
	Check out the very next slide as summarizing key elements of this.
	You had the impossible entry, but not impossible for a hologram.
	You had an impossible speed for a Boeing 767, but not for a smaller plane projecting the image of a 767.
	You had radar picking up the real plane, but not the image because there was nothing solid there for radio waves to bounce off of.
	So we get what's shown in the very next image, Richard D. Hall's theory of how it was done, which I believe is 100% correct.
	And if you flip to the very next slide, David, you'll see I was sent a page From an Australian military manual for an airborne holographic projector for a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location ideal for optical deception and cloaking as a necessary distraction or to fool the public about what was the cause of the destruction of the Twin Towers
	when no real planes were at work here.
	And indeed, if you look at the very next slide, you'll see Pilots for 9-11 Truth also studied, based upon air-ground communication, the location of Flight 175 and discovered it was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, after it had officially hit the South Tower.
	Now David, the next slide is one of the most fascinating aspects of all of this, because Donald Trump was the first personality in the world to contest the official version of the attacks of 9-11 on television.
	That very day.
	After noting the engineers who built the Twin Towers were now working for him, he declared on New York's Channel 9 it was impossible that Boeing's could have burst through the steel structures of the towers.
	He continued by saying that it was also impossible they could have caused the towers to collapse.
	He concluded by affirming there had to be other factors of which we were as yet unaware.
	He actually used the word bombs Remember in that opening footage, you had the young man say, bombs!
	And the reporter said, no, no, it was planes.
	We saw it on television.
	Well, that's part of the power of television, David.
	We see it on television.
	We think it's real, no matter how much it may be a fabrication.
	Now the next slide shows that there were earlier explosions in the sub-basements of the North and the South Power that were intended to coincide with the visual impact of the planes on the building, to be explained by jet fuel falling through the elevator shafts.
	So, the next slide shows damage to one of the lobbies from these explosions.
	They were fairly substantial.
	If you look at the next slide, you can see there were even seismic reports from these initial, although there's smaller ones up at the top, then you have the much larger from what was supposed to be the collapse of the towers.
	Well, it turns out Gordon Ross and Craig Furlong, who are students of 9-11, members of scholars, did a study and discovered that the radar reports of when the planes hit the building and the seismic reports did not coincide.
	Look at the next slide, David, and you'll see That, in fact, the commission had a 14-second discrepancy of the plane hitting after the original seismic for Flight 11, and a 17-second discrepancy in relation to the seismic from the South Tower.
	In other words, they got him hitting the building late, too late, to have been responsible for the seismic reports.
	If you look at the next slide, you'll see the whole idea of falling through the elevator shafts was a stretch anyway.
	There are only one or two of these elevator shafts.
	Otherwise, you'd go down 30 floors, you'd have to get off, go down another 30 floors, get off, go down another 30 floors.
	So it could be time-consuming and arduous to get all the way up and down.
	William Rodriguez, who was the chief custodian in the North Tower, came to Madison and gave a talk, and while he and I and Kevin Barrett were having dinner afterwards, he talked about watching how the sub-basin filled with water after these early explosions.
	He also explained how he had a colleague who was trapped in an elevator shaft but survived.
	On the other hand, another colleague had all this flesh hanging from his body from the explosion.
	It was then I realized the purpose of those earlier explosions was to drain the sprinkler systems of water so they could not extinguish the very modest fires that would remain after the fireballs burned out.
	Now, the key to understanding why they had to develop a novel mode of demolition is found in the very next slide.
	It turns out that The Twin Towers were constructed in an area that was below the water level of the Hudson.
	They were therefore surrounded by a kind of a dike, colloquially referred to as the Bath Hub.
	They had to find a way of destroying the Twin Towers that didn't also damage the Bath Hub, because then you would have had Hudson River water flooding beneath lower Manhattan, the most valuable real estate in the world.
	And if you look at the very next slide, David, you see the bathtub, the remnant of the bathtub after the evacuation of the debris, and it was essentially intact.
	Now, we're told, of course, that buildings collapse.
	But take a look at the very next slide.
	This is a North Tower.
	Does that look like a collapse?
	Actually, what's happening is the buildings are blowing apart in every direction from the top down.
	You find them being converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust.
	Every floor is remaining stationary until it's turned To be blown to kingdom come, in the memorable words of Morgan Reynolds.
	So that the next slide, which shows the official account that the plane is supposed to have caused those upper floors to collapse, well, you're talking about a minuscule percentage of the mass of the steel bringing about the collapse of the rest of the building.
	Again, another physical impossibility.
	Chuck Baldwin, who's a retired high school math, physics, and chemistry teacher, did multiple calculations, you'll see one in the very next, to wit that when they talk about the downward force, they're ignoring the upward, all the support.
	The downward force, call it a unit of one, was overwhelmed by the upward force of 118.
	In other words, it wasn't even possible.
	Just as Donald Trump observed, it wasn't even possible for those buildings to collapse.
	And look at the next slide, David.
	What do we have there?
	Can anyone in the world think this is a collapse?
	And notice in the foreground, you have Building 7 still standing robust.
	It would only go down seven hours later in a classic controlled demolition.
	So here I think this has to be as convincing as any single photograph could be, that the story we've been told about 9-11 is nonsense.
	Now the next slide is a GIF.
	Hopefully it works and it'll show very, very good.
	This is the destruction of the final remnants of the core columns for the North Tower.
	They are being converted into dust.
	The process involved here is known as molecular dissociation.
	It's an effect of a nuclear event having taken place.
	Now, Judy Wood believes that it was done by directed energy weapons, but as I'm going to explain, the nuclear hypothesis can explain everything The Dew Hypothesis can explain, but the Dew Hypothesis cannot explain everything the Nuclear Hypothesis can explain.
	Look at the next slide, David, and you see how these buildings were converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust.
	Let me simply add, by the way, the conversion of materials into very fine dust is a trademark of the use of nuclear devices.
	Now we have two diagrams, one for the south and one for the north, as to how this was done.
	A small nuclear device was in the sub-basement of the building.
	Remember, it was a tube within a tube.
	So the nuclear device went upward and destroyed the 47 massive core columns from the bottom up.
	And then as a residual effect, it blew apart the buildings from the top down.
	That was a part we observed.
	What's most interesting here about the South Tower is that the top floors of the South Tower started to tilt off to the side and then just disappeared.
	Just disappeared as a result of the nuclear process.
	The next slide shows similarly what happened with the North Tower, once again.
	Except in this case, the North Tower did not tilt to the side.
	It just remained upright.
	But as we saw, it even went through this process of molecular dissociation.
	Judy Wood has talked about what she calls the toasted cars.
	If you look at the very next slide, David, you'll see some of what she's talking about, with these automobiles that had very, very strange effects, the toasted cars.
	And if you look at the next slide, you'll see others, more toasted cars.
	Now, the experts I've dealt with, including Joe Olson, for example, who's an engineer qualified in civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical, has published several pieces about the use of nukes on 9-11, and has explained how the radiation pattern would account for the toasted cars.
	So it appears that toasted cars are explicable on the nuke hypothesis, but look at the next slide.
	There you have this massive steel assembly that was ejected upward at a 45 degree angle and outward some 600 feet into the winter garden.
	So that, as the next slide shows, David, one of my colleagues says, the winter garden is where dews and nanothermite go to die.
	Nanothermite, may I say.
	Is this an analyzed version of thermite, which is an incendiary, burns at very intense temperatures.
	A thermite is used to weld together railroad ties, for example, and also to disable military equipment.
	You drop a thermite grade down the barrel of a howitzer and it will fuse together the firing mechanism so it's inoperable.
	Well, Richard Gage, who now has just stepped down, has advocated nanothermite as being the cause of the destruction of the Twin Towers, in spite of the fact that Team Mark Hightower, who is a chemical engineer and I, published three articles already in 2011 explaining how it was impossible for nanothermite to have been responsible Because it's such a weak explosive.
	It's only one-thirteenth as powerful as TNT.
	Indeed, another of the supporters of the nanothermite hypothesis, an associate professor of chemistry emeritus from the University of Copenhagen, Niels Herreth, has calculated The amount of nanothermite it would require to destroy a Twin Tower has 29,000 metric tons of nanothermite.
	David, that's like filling a Twin Tower with circus peanuts.
	I mean, it's simply obscured.
	So here in the very next slide, we have some very important Evidence here.
	Jet fuel fires, even if they burn hot enough and long enough, would cause a building to sag and gradually collapse, not abrupt blow apart in every direction.
	Jet fuel could not have ejected 300 tons up at a 45 degree angle and 600 feet outward into the winter garden, nor could dews.
	To explode steel, an explosive needs to have a detonation velocity of 6,100 meters per second.
	To explode cement, a detonation velocity of 3200 meters per second is required.
	Kerosene, which is a principal ingredient in jet fuel, however, has a detonation velocity of only 1600 meters per second.
	Worse yet, nanothermite has a detonation velocity of only 895 meters per second.
	David, you can't get there from there.
	And it can even blow apart concrete, much less steel.
	Many nukes, however, would have had the observed effect.
	What we see in the very next slide, moreover, is the results of the U.S.
	Geological Survey, studying dust samples from 35 locations and discovering elements that would not have been present had this not been a nuclear event, including Barium and strontium, neither of these elements should ever appear in building degree in these quantities.
	The levels never fall below 400 parts per million for barium, never drop below 700 parts per million for strontium, and reach over 3,000 parts per million for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
	Thorium and uranium.
	These elements only exist in radioactive form.
	Thorium is a radioactive element formed from uranium by decay.
	It's very rare.
	Should not be present in building debris ever.
	So once again, we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
	Lithium.
	With the presence of lithium, we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of uranium, deuthorium, and helium, with subsequent decay of the helium into lithium, has taken place.
	Lanthanum, the next element in the disintegration pathway of barium.
	Tritium, the next decay element after strontium, which further confirms the presence of barium.
	Chromium, the presence of chromium is one more telltale signature of nuclear disintegration.
	Tritium, a very rare element, should not be found at concentration 15.5 times normal in the basement of World Trade Center Building 6, no less than 11 days after 9-11, which is another signature of a nuclear event.
	Not only that, David, but yes, in the next report we find all kinds of medical maladies have been incurred by first responders and local residents.
	They have had all kinds of abnormal and rare medical maladies like leukemia, multiple myeloma, esophageal and pancreatic cancer, very much the same pattern as after Chernobyl, when the reactor there The very next reflects the fact that all of the reported renovation work for the World Trade Center was destroyed on 9-11.
	We have several reports that Ace Elevator was undertaking the greatest elevator renovation project in history, which of course gave them access to the core columns and every other element where they would need to have access in order to prepare for this event.
	Now, we hear about a collapse.
	What you see in the very next image is the result of a bona fide collapse.
	This was of a concrete structure, I believe, in Pakistan.
	But notice how you have this stack of debris of a collapse.
	Well, in the very next frame, David, you have the sequence for what happened to WTC7, a sequence that exemplifies a classic controlled demolition.
	You have a little kink at the top, comes down at nearly freefall.
	That means all the support columns were blown out at the same time, and when it's over, We have a stack of debris equal to about 12% of the original height of 47 floors.
	If you look at the next slide, that's 5 1⁄2 floors of debris from Building 7.
	Now, what we did not have with the Twin Towers, however, by contrast, was 12% of the 110 floors of debris, which would have been equal to about 13 1⁄2 floors.
	It was not there indeed.
	Father Frank Morales from St.
	Mark's Episcopal Church came on my radio shows twice and both times reported the Twin Towers were destroyed to or even slightly below ground level.
	Now, there's a fascinating witness here in the next slide, Barry Jennings.
	He was from the New York security, went to Rudy Giuliani's command and control structure in Building 7, where he had two floors with their own air and water.
	He found half-eaten sandwiches, still steaming cups of coffee.
	A fireman came along and said, we got to get you out of here, while he was inside the building.
	This was in the morning.
	Explosions were taking place.
	A stairwell was blown out from under him.
	At one point he felt himself stepping over dead bodies, but in the pitch blackness he could not see them.
	When he got out, however, he gave reports.
	This is from one of his interviews where he talked about it.
	Now, One of the major complaints about the 9-11 Commission Report is it didn't even mention Building 7.
	So NIST had to do a separate report claiming very modest fires have been responsible, which is preposterous.
	This may have been the most robust building ever designed by the hand of man.
	It was erected over two enormous electrical generators to provide backup electricity for Manhattan.
	It was designed to never collapse.
	So, just days before they would publish their report, which Barry Jennings could have contradicted based on his own eyewitness experience, he turns up dead.
	Surprise, surprise.
	David, look at the next and you'll see the contrast between Building 7 in the upper left, that's that five and a half floors of debris, And where Building 1 stood, in the right center, there's nothing there.
	I mean, there are a few, you know, fringe remnants from some of the lower external support columns, but there's no 13 1⁄2 floors of debris.
	A very fascinating development occurred where the BBC got off script, as you can see in the very next slide.
	Here you have a reporter by the name of Jane Stanley.
	This was at 4.57 in the afternoon, reporting that the Solomon Brothers building had collapsed.
	Now, Solomon Brothers owned a big chunk of Building 7, so it's also known by that name.
	But if you look at the very next slide, you see this was a major glitch, because the building's still standing over her shoulder.
	David, the BBC has never been able to explain this away.
	They have never been able to explain it away.
	I mean, it's just embarrassing.
	But you want to talk about collusion between the media and the intel agencies and a false flag.
	Here you have a perfect illustration.
	The very next slide is also extremely interesting.
	You heard the anchors say that a popular front for the liberation of Palestine had called in and claimed responsibility.
	Well, that was completely absurd.
	But they complemented it, and this is between the destruction of the South Tower and the North, by showing footage of Palestinians rejoicing in order to convey the idea That this was simultaneous, that this was a live broadcast, and that the Palestinians were rejoicing at what had happened in New York City, when in fact they, like the rest of the world, were just as slack-jawed and stunned by these developments as everyone else.
	I knew at the time it was archival footage from some religious or political event where the Palestinians had reason to rejoice, which is exactly what it turned out to be.
	Typical, David, I've got to say, of an Israeli overreach.
	They go a bridge too far.
	It's like the driver of the urban moving system van saying, we're not the problem, our problem is your problem, the problem is the Palestinians.
	Well, the Palestinians had absolutely nothing to do with this.
	I mean, after all, ask yourself, this is very sophisticated Even according to the official account, commandeering four commercial carriers, perpetrating these atrocities.
	We know the account is false, but can you imagine how anyone would ever think Palestinians could pull it off?
	And once you understand that, in fact, the destruction of the Twin Towers were nuclear events, it's robustrous.
	What we have is a stunning narrowing of the options.
	It appears as though those nukes may have been from Davy Crockett warheads that were given to Israel that they reprocessed and by one account brought back to New York City aboard a submarine.
	The very next slide shows Rudy Giuliani, who is regarded as America's mayor.
	Let me make an interesting point.
	Rudy I would venture to guess it would take a month to line up one dump truck in New York City.
	A month to line up one.
	Lee. This is extraordinary. The fire and police authorities wanted a forensic investigation,
	but he moved forward aggressively. I would venture to guess it would take a month to line up one
	dump truck in New York City, a month to line up one, but he had 115. So they were ready to go
	immediately after this alleged incident.
	They were ready to go immediately, and David, get this.
	Judy Wood very astutely observed that while dump trucks were being used to haul out debris, they were bringing in tens of thousands of tons of dirt, which was being put on the debris pile.
	Now, this is what the Soviets did with Chernobyl.
	They covered the debris pile with dirt to absorb the radiation.
	That was going on in New York City at the time.
	And Rudy Giuliani, I'm sorry to say, was right in the center of it all.
	Very bad.
	Now, the next slide is going to come as quite a surprise to some, because I've already alluded to the fact that Flight 11 was not even in the air that day.
	How do we know?
	Edward Henry captured a page from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics that keeps records on every commercial flight in the United States, the time it's scheduled to take off, the time the gate closes, the time it pulls away from the gate, wheels up, wheels down, arriving at the airport, No entries at all for Flight 11.
	It was not even in the air.
	That, of course, was supposed to be the plane that hit the North Tower.
	And here, in the very next slide, we have the very same absence of data for Flight 77, which, of course, was for the Pentagon.
	So neither Flight 11, North Tower, nor 77, the Pentagon, were even in the air that day, David.
	Meanwhile, I did further research with FAA registration records shown in the next slide.
	And I discovered that the planes that were used for those flights, and remember the same aircraft, the same physical aircraft, could be used today, Tampa to Chicago, tomorrow New York to San Francisco.
	The actual physical aircraft that were used for those two flights were not formally deregistered or taken out of service until 28 September 2005.
	So, we have the anomaly of how can planes that were not even in the air have crashed on 9-11 and how can planes that crashed on 9-11 have still been in the air four years later?
	David, this is just massive.
	The hoax was so elaborate.
	Isn't it stunning?
	It's devastating.
	Your research is beyond reproach.
	It's amazing.
	We'll take a look at the next, the Patsy's.
	These were the 19.
	By the way, 15 of them from Saudi Arabia.
	None were from Afghanistan or from Iraq.
	They have nothing to do with it other than the role of Patsy's, in fact.
	David Ray Griffin, in his magisterial work, the 9-11 Commission Report, Omissions and Distortions, makes, as his very first point, that a half a dozen of these guys turned up alive and well the following day and made contact with the British media.
	Mohammed Adda's father even said his son called him and was petrified.
	They were afraid they were going to be hunted down and killed.
	Because they had nothing to do with it.
	So, I mean, after all, if these guys are alive and well the following day, then obviously they did not die in suicide crashes, leading to the following summary of the situation, as the next slide shows.
	If no planes crashed, then no passengers died, and no Islamic hijackers caused them to crash.
	And if no Islamic hijackers caused them to crash, then there was no warrant or any justification for the war on terror.
	It's all been an elaborate fraud, David, where we invaded Afghanistan right away because of its vast mineral wealth and its poppy fields.
	And then Iraq, which... Yes, yes, yes, yes.
	You see, in Afghanistan, they have one of the world's largest deposits of lithium, which is used for components in computers, triggers in nuclear weapons and electric car batteries, rivaled only by a deposit in Bolivia.
	And then, of course, the CIA, ...wanted to get into Afghanistan to protect the poppy crop.
	The Taliban had eliminated 90% of the poppy crop, but the CIA that has become fabulously wealthy, trading drugs, the biggest drug dealer in the world, which it got hooked upon in Southeast Asia, Uh, wanted to resume business in Afghanistan, which of course it promptly did.
	So those are the real reasons we went into Afghanistan.
	It had nothing to do with Osama bin Laden or these Islamic hijackers who were merely patsies and had nothing to do with it.
	And why did the bin Laden family get an escort out of the United States right after this happened too?
	Say again, David?
	Oh, yeah!
	The family.
	The Osama family.
	Yeah, yeah, the Osama family.
	All U.S.
	aircraft were all taken down.
	They were all grounded, except for special flights for the Bin Laden family.
	And actually, I believe members of the Saudi royal family, where the Saudis turned out to have put up money for the event.
	They weren't otherwise involved, but the Saudis appeared to have put up money.
	But it was basically an Israeli op.
	Now, if you look at the next slide, this is pretty fascinating.
	This is a fellow by the name of Philip Zelikow.
	When they organized the 9-11 Commission, David, they originally were suggesting Henry Kissinger should be the head.
	Well, Henry's a really good guy if you want to cover things up.
	But he would have had to disclose all of his financial holdings, so he declined the honor.
	Instead, they brought in Philip Zelikow.
	Now, let me give you a little background about this guy.
	His area of specialization in the Academy, he was a professor, Was the creation and maintenance of public myths.
	M-Y-T-H-S.
	You could have knocked me over with a feather when I discovered Philip Zelikow was an expert in the creation and maintenance of public myths.
	He is my candidate for having scripted the events of 9-11.
	He knew what it would take to create a public myth.
	He knew it would be terrific to have some heroic passengers try to commandeer an airplane
	and bring it down in a crash in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
	He knew having phone calls back and forth would be touching, elaborate, even though
	A.K.
	Dudney, a professor of computer science from Western Ontario, did flights around the country
	with three different types of cell phones and discovered at speeds over 200 miles an
	hour or altitudes above 2,000 feet, it was impossible to maintain cell phone connection
	because they couldn't switch routers from one cell phone tower to another fast enough.
	So that when you look at the major elements of the 9-11 account, the official account,
	think of it as a theory floating in space and connected to evidence by these little
	chains, some to the cell phone calls, some to the passengers, some to the crash sites,
	some to the World Trade Center and the like.
	We have discovered none of those links to the evidence are sustainable, that the evidence
	is either fabricated or had completely other causes.
	But Philip Zelikow was therefore the perfect guy to put in charge of the 9-11 Commission
	and get this, David.
	He completed a draft of the Commission report a year before he shared it with any member
	of the staff, a year before.
	And would you believe, David, and I find this embarrassing, because I taught there twice.
	As a visiting associate professor in like 1977-78, and then as a visiting full professor in the spring of 1981.
	He's a professor of history in the department at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Philip Zelikow, whom I reiterate is my candidate for having scripted the events of 9-11, For which he was extremely well qualified, given his background was in the creation and maintenance of public myths.
	Now, in the next slide you see a key figure in regard to legal issues, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who has bottled up all the lawsuits that may have been involved, brought against the airliners, ICTS, remember that's the Israeli security firm, World Trade Center owners and the like.
	Hellerstein has bottled it all up.
	This was very clever.
	And needless to add, Judge Hellerstein is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
	Look at the very next slide, and you see the masterminds behind the event.
	Ehud Umert, on the left, and Bibi Netanyahu, on the right, both of whom are former Prime Ministers of Israel.
	And then you see, in the very next slide, The two here who had to be elected in 2020.
	This is why they had to steal the election in 2020 in Florida to bring into place Dick Cheney and George W. Bush.
	Now, Bush was a dim bulb, as we all know.
	It's very interesting that he actually made a couple of revealing observations that the government has subsequently sought to suppress.
	He said When he saw the first plane hit the North Tower, he thought to himself, man, what a terrible pilot!
	He said this on more than one occasion, David.
	Now, that footage by the Naudé brothers wasn't even played in real time.
	That didn't show up until the following day.
	The only way George Bush is going to watch this, and it's clear he saw it in real time as he was headed to Booker Washington Elementary in Bradenton, Florida, where I used to reside, is through a Secret Service closed television network where the Secret Service had to have a camera on that facade of the North Tower where no one would think anything interesting would be taking place unless they'd seen it.
	You know, knew in advance what was planned and the agenda.
	So they actually captured for George H.W.
	Bush to observe what Bush said he thought was a really terrible pilot.
	Then when he's at Booker talking about a story about a girl and her pet goat, which he's holding upside down, Andy Card, who's the Chief of Staff, comes in and tells him there's been a second attack, and therefore America is under attack.
	And then we get all the nonsense about a new Pearl Harbor and everything else.
	But W was obviously left out of the loop, by and large.
	And the only way he could have seen that happen in real time was on the closed circuit Secret Service television.
	A fascinating aside.
	Meanwhile, Dick Cheney, as I've observed already, appears to have been the executive director from this bunker beneath the White House where Michael Rupert documents from massive sources all in the public domain his role here in his magnificent book, Crossing the Rubicon.
	Now, the next slide is from a blog I just published, written by Thierry Maison, who was a French intellectual, who noticed right off the bat something was wrong at the Pentagon.
	Namely, that you had this allegation that this very substantial Boeing 757 had hit the Pentagon, and yet there was no debris.
	So in 2002, this is shortly thereafter, he created a website called Hunt the Boeing and published a book called Pentagate, which is still available online, in which he laid out the evidence that no plane had hit the Pentagon.
	And as I believe I mentioned in the beginning, the reason the Pentagon is so absolutely crucial is that as America's command and control center, You know, if no plane hit the Pentagon, if the Pentagon story was fake, then the entire operation of 9-11 was a fraud.
	And we now know the entire operation of 9-11 was a fraud.
	For those who may want more, in our final slide, I published America Nuked on 9-11.
	I brought together around 17 different experts in this case, David.
	It's another case of my methodology of collaborative research panning out.
	And as you can see from the images right there on the cover and on the back, I've been giving you a very comprehensive and very detailed and thorough accounting of what we have discovered so that
	America nuked on 9-11, compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	This was a Mossad operation.
	It was a brainchild of Bibi Netanyahu and Ehud Umar to draw the United States into the Middle East, to take out the modern Arab state that sort of counterbalanced Israel's domination of the entire region, and eventually to confront the Persian nation of Iran.
	It didn't get that far, David, fortunately, because of the intervention of Russian and Iranian troops at the request of Bashar al-Assad, who is a democratically elected president of Syria.
	Any Americans who still have the lingering impression We're in the Middle East to bring democracy to Syria.
	Do not understand.
	We cannot bring democracy to Syria because Syria is already a democracy.
	It would be like bringing lithium to Afghanistan.
	We have been abused and used by the Israelis, not for the first and not for the last time, David.
	But every American needs to understand That this small nation in the Middle East that so many of us for so much of our lives regarded as America's gallant ally is actually anything but.
	Dr. Fetzer, just a brilliant, brilliant report.
	Comprehensive.
	I can't say enough about your research.
	I mean, everything is backed up solidly with facts.
	I'm going to make this entire show, normally we do the first hour or so on BitChute and Rumble and then we have the rest of the program on our premium channel.
	I'm making this entire show today available for everyone because they need to see this.
	They just absolutely need to see this.
	And I want to remind people about the seminar, FalseFlags2020.com.
	False Flags in Conspiracy 2020.
	Let me add why that's of special interest here.
	In the False Flags in Conspiracy 2020 conference, Joe Olson, that engineer I mentioned, gave a presentation on the use of nukes.
	In New York City on 9-11.
	So if you go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com, you can download that as well as the other 20 plus presentations to your desktop for free at no charge.
	And you have the app falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
	And even though it's free, please donate to Dr. Fetzer's Legal Defense Fund.
	Next week, at this time, we're going to do an entire three-hour show with Dr. James Fetzer raising a telethon to help him out.
	But I want to throw this up onto the screen, too, real quick.
	Very important.
	I want to get this up on here.
	If you want to help Dr. Fetzer out besides going to falseflagconspiracies2020.com, you can also send a check or money order to the James H. Fetzer Legal Defense Fund, 800 Violet Lane Oregon, Wisconsin 53575 or if you have Zell, and many of you do, you can contribute at jfetzer at d.umn.edu.
	And again, we're going to have a telethon next week here on the broadcast with Dr. Fetzer.
	We're going to help him out with his legal defense fund.
	But again, falseflagconspiracies2020.com to get more information about this and many other conspiracies.
	This was the most comprehensive and brilliant analysis of what really happened on 9-11 that I have ever heard.
	And I'm making it available to everybody to watch because this is very important.
	And I want to thank you, Dr. Fetzer, for all of your hard work, for being here today and for being here every week.
	And I sincerely look forward to talking to you next week and helping you.
	It's my great pleasure, David, and let me emphasize what we're doing next week is seeking to fund my research, which includes using the legal system to try to expose what actually happened at Sandy Hook, but also taking on Amazon.com for banning so many of my books, six of my books, and making other efforts to expose how the American people have been abused Thank you, Dr. Fetzer, and we'll talk to you next week.
	God bless you for your excellent work.
	We really appreciate you.
	My pleasure.
	Thank you.
	Dr. James Fetzer here on the Dark Outpost.
	Well, I've got to tell you, folks, this has been a red-letter day, and I want to thank Dr. Fetzer for all the hard work that he does here on this broadcast when he joins us every week.
	Please be here next week when we help him sincerely and truly to generate some money for his legal defense fund because this is a man who has done so much for our country.
	I can't say enough.
	He's trying to protect you.
	He's trying to protect us from what our own government is doing to us and you need to be aware of it folks.
	You need to be aware of it.
	Well, that's going to do it for today.
	Thanks for being here.
	We really appreciate you very much.
	Ben, stop by the Dark Outpost online store at darkoutpost.com.
	Buy some good merchandise, all right?
	Thank you very much.
	We appreciate it.
	We're out of time, so we're out of here.
	Zooblick, out!

▲