Need to Know News (21 June 2021) with Carl Herman and Joe Olson
|
Time
Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm delighted to be joined today by Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and Joe Olson from Houston, Texas.
We have a lot of news to share with you.
You need to know here today.
Glenn Grunewald has asked reasonable questions about the FBI's involvement in the January 6 Capitol Hill event.
Tucker Carlson has been blowing the case out of the water, explaining how one after another FBI agent appears to be involved in this.
Well, Grinwald asks, if the FBI had advanced knowledge of what was plotted yet did nothing to stop the attack, it raises numerous possibilities about why that is.
It could be they just had yet another intelligence failure of the kind they claim caused them to miss the 9-11 attack, and therefore need massive new surveillance authorities, budget increases, and new Patriot Act-type laws to fix it.
It could be They allowed the riot to happen, however, because they didn't take it seriously enough, or because some of them supported the cause behind it, or because they realized there'd be benefits to the security state if it happened.
Or it could be they were using those operatives under the control to plot with, direct, and drive the attack, as they've done so many times in the past, and allowed to happen either out of It negligence or intent.
We have Tucker providing massive evidence indicating this was a matter of intent.
He refers to the Waco, Texas Twin Peaks shooting.
Everything about it was sketchy from the onset.
Local, state, and federal law enforcement units surrounding the gathering of bikers at the restaurant No one admits exactly who started it, but when the smoke cleared, many of the dead were shot by .223 ammo, later identified, of course, used by SWAT team and federal snipers who were pre-positioned.
That's pretty damn troubling.
Almost 200 people were arrested, many charged with conspiracy, but not a single person was ever convicted.
After a few years of obfuscation, muddled attempts at framing a prosecution and a district attorney who wouldn't release any information to defense attorneys, the prosecution dropped the cases against all the persons involved.
Proof, just like that, the story of a massive shooting event simply disappeared.
Such was the mayhem of the gunfight that erupted between the biker gangs that it may have never been entirely clear how the clash had left nine dead and 20 injured actually unfurled.
But the public now knows exactly how the criminal investigation ended.
After 177 arrests, 155 indictments, there was one trial and no convictions.
There was not a single conviction for any crime.
All the cases were just dropped.
It was absolutely certain the Feds had undercover agents in both the Banditos and Cossack motorcycle gangs, as law enforcement had attributed a wide variety of criminal behavior, including drugs, racketeering, murder, conspiracy, and violence to both nationwide organizations.
Even three years after, the leaders of the Banditos were arrested on unrelated charges.
Frame-up charges a conspiracy against 277 bikers have a similar smell to the 200 arrests of a conspiracy in the January 6th Capitol riot.
Perhaps once the January 6th narrative is exhausted, those prosecutions will also be dropped and prove the story will just disappear.
Here what do we have about the Waco shootout?
Erupted at a Twin Pikes restaurant, more than 200 persons, including bandidos, Cossacks and their allies
had gathered for a meeting about political rights for motorcyclists.
Law enforcement, including 18 members of the Waco police and four state troopers had gathered to monitor
the restaurant and meeting from the outside.
And according to police returned fire after being shot at.
Nine bikers killed, 18 wounded or injured, 177 individuals ultimately arrested and initially detained.
The response by prosecutors was widely criticized as brazen overreach led to a four-year prosecutorial fiasco that resulted in zero convictions.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, great start.
So Glenn Greenwald, try saying that name fast three times in a row, he has impressed me for about a decade.
He needs to up his game, though.
He is able to document as an attorney these massive crimes, but he doesn't take the next step to demand the arrest of the leaderships of the political parties enacting those crimes.
So he's understating this, which is okay.
That might be perfect for the Fox viewers.
And I don't know if it was Glenn or somebody else, but somebody on Tucker's show just flat out said, look up Operation Mockingbird.
I don't know if it was him or not, but this is good progress, gentlemen.
For the FBI, the FBI was indicted.
They were convicted in the King family civil trial for Martin's assassination, where U.S.
government agencies were found guilty by the jury for assassinating Martin.
With overwhelming evidence, the FBI should be viewed as a criminal organization conducting these crime du jours to further a political agenda that is unaccountable to the public.
I'm very encouraged by what's coming forward to the public view.
Excellent.
Joe, your thoughts?
election fraud and now they cover up in the smear with the January 6th event.
But we'll see. I'm very encouraged by what's coming forward to the public view.
Excellent. Joe, your thoughts?
Well, yeah, as coincidence, I've actually ridden with the Banditos.
One of my best friends.
We both had Norton motorcycles.
We both had matching Triumph T140Ds.
And then as I went further into marriage and then into divorce court, he ended up getting Harleys and moving in with the Bandito bunch.
And so I'd go out riding with him.
And many times I've been at parties with the Bandito guys.
They're not the group that they claim to be, but the other interesting fact is that at that meeting was about 200 people, and it was called the Club of Clubs.
It included veterans groups, antique motorcycle restorers, BMW clubs, British motorcycle clubs, Italian motorcycle clubs, Christian motorcycle clubs, And out of that group there was probably 50 total that were Cossack and Banditos and the Cossack guy had just been recruited to the Cossacks for about two months and was a known at afterwards as being an ATF agent that had taken up
A plea with those guys in order to reduce charges for something he was involved in.
He's the one that fired the first shot.
Everybody was pre-positioned.
They had a dozen snipers set up, and they just massacred those people.
Had absolutely nothing to do with a biker war that was ongoing.
It was completely 100% ATF and Texas DPS staged event.
Great reporting, Joe!
Wow!
And Tucker's just been doing a sensational job.
My head is off to him.
I frequently said he's the only journalist on TV worth watching.
He's been blowing the hell out of the FBI staging the Capitol riots.
Very, very powerful stuff he's been producing night after night.
Meanwhile, a CBS host offers a bizarre excuse for Walgreens shoplift or caught on camera.
Turns out in San Francisco, they're just allowing everyone to steal anything they want.
Tony Docalupa, co-host of CBS This Morning, defended the theft.
It was outrageous.
Footage of the incident surfaced Tuesday showing an unidentified male on a bicycle filling a trash bag with what appeared to be hair products.
Two persons, including a security guard, filmed the suspect while he took his time placing items in the sack.
Watch as he biked down the aisle and out of the store.
Doople and others discuss the incident after the clip parody began.
Well, crime is never justified, of course.
The co-host, Anthony Mason, added, I will say, I think they could have made a little better effort to stop the bicycle.
I mean, you could have disrupted the bike.
And Dookable added, well, I mean, I don't know.
You don't need to be a hero over some toothbrushes or whatever.
That reads as an act of desperation.
I mean, you're not getting rich on what you take from a Walgreens.
You're getting probably something you need.
Co-host Vlad Duthers, however, interjected, I mean, a bagful?
They look like hair products, which are valuable.
He's filling his bag full of them.
Co-host Adriana Diaz pointed out they were indeed hair products, not necessities like toothbrushes or over-the-counter medication.
Liana Melendez, a KGO-TV reporter who saw him shoveling merchandise into the trash bag, told her the station of the suspect, who remains unnamed at this time, sort of ran into me with his bicycle on the way out of the store.
It's hard for me as a journalist to say, I won't be involved.
I can't get involved.
I have to be sort of neutral.
But this is also my city.
I live in this city.
I see this constantly.
Not only Walgreens, wet cars, my garage been broken into twice.
She pointed out such crimes are becoming commonplace across the city.
At what point do we say enough is enough?
We want our city back.
Meanwhile, San Francisco Police Lieutenant Tracy McCray told Fox she has gotten used to shoplifters taking what they want in stores across the city without facing consequences.
What happened at Walgreens has been going on in the city for quite a while.
I'm used to it, I mean.
We can have a Greatest Hit compilation of people just walking in and cleaning out the store shelves and security guards, the people who work there, just standing by helplessly because they can't do anything.
All fingers, however, seem to point to the district attorney, Chessa Bowden, as the cause of the behavior, who appears to be one of the George Soros nominees for DA, which he's done across the country to destroy American law enforcement and assist them in justice.
San Francisco Police Officer Association President Tony Montoya slammed Bowden's lazy fair policies, which he said are promoting a criminal's first agenda, just as Soros wants.
This brazen criminal behavior is endured every single day by San Franciscan.
It's a direct result of District Attorney Chessa Bowden and his enablers, Criminals First Agenda.
McCray agreed and said Bowden's agenda is destroying the city because criminals are not being prosecuted for any crimes as felonies or commercial burglaries.
Such theft cases get slapped down to misdemeanors.
Meanwhile, MSNBC has caught stealth editing Joy Reid's bizarre conspiracy theory.
In the latest episode of the Rubin Report, Blaze TV host Dave Rubin shared a clip
from Joy Reid's show, The Readout, that NBC apparently doesn't want you to see.
Discussing the Capitol riot.
She downplayed Antifa's role, saying they're just anti-fascists, they don't show up anywhere, before rattling off a bizarre conspiracy theory about Proud Boys fighting with Antifa and BLM so that Trump could impose the Insurrection Act and they could act as a militia.
By the way, James Sullivan, the brother of John, a leader of Antifa, declared long ago that John had led 226 Antifa members into the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters to disrupt the discussion of the voter theft.
And in fact, the latest report I have is that John Sullivan has now been indicted, maybe because of the issues being presented here.
Let's just listen to Louie Goldbart.
He's claiming he was told by Capitol Police there was going to be an influx of Antifa, who they claimed are basically the devil.
They're just anti-fascist.
They don't really show up anywhere.
We're seeing in some of these cases where Proud Boys and others are saying the anticipated Antifa would come and fight them, that BLM Matter supporters would come and fight them so Trump could impose the Insurrection Act, she said in a clip obtained by the Gateway Pundit.
However, in the version uploaded to YouTube, NBC appears to have removed her bizarre rant.
Without providing any explanation or disclaimer.
The timestamp at the bottom right was apparently removed, too, to cover up the edit.
Lady, you gotta screw loose, Dave said in response to Reed's claims.
That's the nicest way I can put it because Antifa and BLM is burning down Portland and Seattle.
They've destroyed parts of LA and San Francisco.
New York City is becoming dangerous.
Many other blue cities.
When I talk about lie laundering, this is exactly what lie laundering is.
You got an MSNBC host telling you what you see doesn't exist, meaning Antifa and BLM burning things down.
When that didn't happen, And then what didn't happen is really the important thing.
Me and the Proud Boys were going to show up, and Trump would use the fighting for the Insurrection Act.
Even executives at Banana's MSNBC thought that was too crazy to air, which is why they cut it, changed the timestamp, everything else.
This is just so consistent with how the mainstream media and corporate press works.
Meanwhile, a poll is showing Biden's approval rating dropping as Democrats despair at the course of the nation.
A national poll shows Biden's approval has dropped below 50% for the first time since he took office, with disillusioned Democrats leading the way.
It now stands at 48% compared with 54% just two months ago, 43% disapproved compared to 41% in April.
His rating is still net positive, but seems to have taken a dip with growing uncertainty that his signature spending plans will be enacted.
More than 7 in 10 Americans have inflation concerns, according to the poll.
47% question.
Some are very concerned the Biden plans will lead to spiraling inflation.
24% adding they're somewhat concerned.
Those who said they were somewhat concerned included 93% of Republicans, 70% of Independents,
but even 55% of Democrats. The poll found barely one-third of Independents approved
of the president's job performance, while less than one-fifth approved.
Eighty-three percent of Democrats in April said they thought the country was moving in the right direction, but in Wednesday's poll, only 59 percent.
Look at that drop from 83 to 59.
The share of Democrats saying the country's on the wrong track rose by 20 percentage points to 32 percent.
The Times said one of the top takeaways for the Paul Democrats are the ones growing most disillusion and fast.
That's pretty significant, I think.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, it is.
If we had a graph of that decline, that would be in another two months that Biden's administration would completely have.
It would be laughable.
But we'll see.
The first story in San Francisco with no prosecution.
So this is the condition that we're Opposing.
This is the third world war.
These psychopathic parasites who are supposed to uphold the law.
That's what they're supposed.
That's their job in government to uphold the law.
And then they don't do the exact opposite by refusing to uphold the law, allowing this looting.
And this is all in San Francisco.
And Nancy Pelosi isn't going to have anything to say about it unless she wants to go back on her quote before when there was arson and looting and killing.
In Portland, and she said, gee, I hope this happens in every city.
Okay, well, you're getting a little bit of taste of it in San Francisco.
And that news reporters comment of this quandary about how involved do I get?
Well, everybody that's part of why we have need to know news is people need to up their game with what they do consider to be important enough to get involved in.
And then that other story, that was an interesting choice of propaganda.
And again, people are seeing Operation Mockingbird in action.
And this is just gaslighting, telling people that what they see, they don't see, or it doesn't mean that, trying to dictate the meaning of events.
And Biden's Dems, maybe they're starting to see the light.
So again, the overall trend on this is hopeful.
I agree.
Joe, your thoughts?
Oh, yeah.
Here's the news headline.
Walgreens says petty theft in San Francisco has gotten so out of control it had to close 17 stores.
CVS had told employees not to interfere because sometimes the thieves get violent.
Yeah, I've been to San Francisco dozens of times in the last 50 years, and it has been in a steady decline, so it's in an even further decline.
Now, interesting that John Sullivan led 200 Antifa people into the Capitol, and the estimates are that 600 people attacked the Capitol, and 400 people have been in jail without any real charges for since The end of January, and they went and busted Dr. Simone Gold, who's not only a medical doctor but also an attorney, and they busted her with a 24-man SWAT team.
So it's kind of like crazy that that's what's going on in this world.
Oh, Joe, I couldn't agree more.
Disgusting beyond belief.
Disgusting beyond belief.
And I've got one other thing, Jim.
Sure, please do.
Uh, Louie Gohmert, and I wouldn't have believed it if I wouldn't have seen the videotape, he was asking a woman of the U.S.
Forest Service if it was possible for NASA or the Forest Service to change the moon's orbit so that it could change the Earth's climate.
I mean, this guy...
I had respect for him before because he's a former prosecutor, but the problem is these people that have a law degree in general have no science education at all, and to make a statement like that is as stupid as the guy that said that if we put more troops on Guam, the island could tip over.
I mean, give me a break.
Flat Earth or Hollow Earth theory, Joe.
I mean, they just don't understand anything about physics or science.
I mean, the illiteracy among the American people.
The problem being this is a political figure who's in a position to affect the course of events, so I share your dismay.
Meanwhile, we have a Democratic mayor who wants to require citizens to pay an annual fee to own guns.
This is the mayor of San Jose, not too far from where you are, Carl.
It's quite normal for community leaders to come together after a tragedy to find ways to mitigate future events, but there's a line that cannot be crossed when it comes to certain things, namely the law.
As you may have heard, San Jose became the place of another mass shooting a few weeks ago at the Valley Transportation Authority light rail yard, leaving nine innocent victims dead.
Where the Democrat Mayor Sam Liccardo sat down with his staff to consider ways that could ensure it didn't happen.
He came up so far as far from a good idea.
Let's take a look.
Instead of increasing security or other similar members, he's proposing to require all citizens of San Jose who own a gun to buy mandatory gun ownership insurance and pay an annual ownership fee for the same According to KPIX-TV, in a statement he made, with council approval, San Jose would become the first city in the United States to require every gun owner to have liability insurance for their firearms.
San Jose would become the first to require gun owners to pay a fee to compensate taxpayers for the public cost of responding to gun violence.
He continues saying these gun control measures would ensure victims are compensated where there's an insurable event.
And of course, insurance companies will help make gun possession safer.
Now, if you're anything like me, you're wondering just how expensive this fee might be.
If I had to guess, it's probably enough to make anyone but the wealthy think twice about purchasing their own firearm within city limits.
Ricardo said that's not the goal.
If the measure were approved, we will not impose fees that are so great as to be prohibitive to ownership.
He states a purpose to help compensate taxpayers for the cost of everything from emergency rooms to police response only.
For now, the exact amount is unknown.
He'll supposedly be sitting down with a team of experts to calculate.
Then again, according to the Executive Director of Gun Owners of America, Sam Paredes, Mayor Liccardo's proposed measures are anything but legal.
Paredes said, I strongly believe the mayor is trying to do something he has no authority to do.
Reason number one is that the state of California has what is called preemption laws that stop local governments from passing laws that contradict state-level ones.
As the Giffords Law Center states, preemption occurs when a higher level of government, in this case the state of California, removes regulatory power from a lower level, such as the city of San Jose.
Well, what this means is that because California already has its own state guidelines and regulations on firearms, San Jose does not have the authority to overrule those and make its own.
Secondly, Paredes points out that implementing such laws would essentially make criminals out of law-abiding citizens who own guns and pass through the community.
He said, that's why no other city has successfully done what the mayor is proposing.
There is then, of course, the matter of the Second Amendment.
As Ferdinand says, it is, we believe, very strongly unconstitutional for the government to require a law-abiding citizen doing nothing more than exercising their Second Amendment right to be required to have insurance or be taxed while they're exercising that enumerated right.
And he has a point.
As American citizens, law-abiding ones, we are required to pay insurance on things like vehicles, homes, and even our health.
But none of those are expressly protected by our national constitution, as is the right to keep and bear arms.
That makes any attempt to limit or attack such ownership unconstitutional.
Sergio Liccardo got these measures approved.
I'm sure it'll be proven in court sooner rather than later.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, so Joe had a personal story with the bikers, and I have one with Mayor Ricardo.
So when he was just elected in 2014, I was teaching math in San Jose.
And just for fun, I looked at the mayor's promises, and one of the promises he made was to end homelessness in San Jose.
And I was teaching at a low-income middle school, I was teaching math.
My algebra class, the eighth grade math results were so good, our test results were the only one our principal bragged to the other principals about.
Now, keep that in mind for the end part of the story.
So I asked my eighth grade students, I said, hey, the new mayor, young guy, Latino, he promised to end homelessness in our city.
Isn't that nice?
And they all said, yeah, that'd be great.
I said, What do you think would be a good math question to ask the mayor about that?
I mean, really, seriously, if we were to end homelessness.
And this takes a while for the students to critically think, but eventually they get the right question.
How much is that going to cost?
We should ask him that, shouldn't we?
What else should we ask?
And the students thought about this, well how much money you got?
Yeah, that's called how much are they going to budget for that?
I said to the students, just between between us, do you think really he's budgeted that money or it's far from the truth?
And they say, oh, no, he's going to be a liar.
So I set up the call and I have it on a speakerphone so that everyone can hear everybody, so that it kind of forces the mayor's office to be honest and polite and respectful and honest.
So we asked the question and we got the now I'm setting them all up for this.
This is all a setup to talk to the mayor about the probability or the possibility of public banking.
Being able to cut their infrastructure costs in half.
If they're the bank, then they don't have to go on the bond market.
And then, like paying a mortgage, the cost doubles over the life of the mortgage.
So anyway, we call up the mayor's office.
We find out that the mayor only budgeted 10% of the project.
Only 10%!
And then, you know, this one of the students asked, hey, how was that honest?
How is it honest that you promised to end homelessness, but you never planned to do it because you didn't have the money?
And then that forced the guy to spin and to look bad.
The end result is that I did introduce the topic of public banking and our students followed this, and the mayor's office refused to inquire into the issue, even though we had to force to acknowledge in front of the students, yes, If we were the bank, it would cut our borrowing costs in half.
Yes, that would be good.
Yes, we would like to do that, but then they had to explain all the reasons why they couldn't.
Finally, we escalated to the Chief of Staff.
Now, this is near the end of the school year in May, and the Chief of Staff says, you know what?
Your students are going to be leaving pretty soon, but it's going to take us a couple of weeks to get an answer for you, Mr. Herman.
And we'll touch base with you at the beginning of next year.
And that's shortly before I found out that I was being fired from the district against, expressly against, the principal's demand to keep me.
Yeah, I mean, you had the only course he was able to brag about, for crying out loud, Carl.
This is obviously a political retaliation, because you embarrass the mayor.
And these Democrats don't like to be embarrassed when they make phony proposals that they can't possibly keep.
Joe, your thoughts?
The death of one person is a tragedy, but the death of a million people is a statistic.
Joseph Stalin, during the last century, genocide, which is genocide by government, killed over 100 million people.
We want to talk about a problem.
Let's talk about what was in great game India today.
Moderna vaccine North Carolina University.
Turns out that on the 12th of December 1919, Moderna sent their vaccine over to Ralph Baric at North Carolina to verify that it would be effective against a COVID-19 SR2 that hadn't even been identified for another 19 days.
So you tell me, what is the major problem in this world?
A bioweapon pharmacy and a bioweapon government or Individuals having the right to control their government by having the right to their own self-protection.
I'm sorry.
Yeah, absolutely.
You have so many agencies that are actually protecting the companies.
I mean, the CDC is really a public relations firm for the big pharma or even a marketing arm.
And you have a government that's not willing to stand up for the people.
That means we're helpless.
We are just lambs to be led to the slaughter Because there's nobody to stand up for the actual citizens against this onslaught that's going to make McFarland a big box at the expense of many, many American lives.
It is a disgraceful joke.
You put your finger right on it.
A further thought you'd like to add?
Yeah, we're facing millions and millions of people that are going to be dead or incapacitated, their lives are going to be ruined, and the lives of their families are going to be ruined.
These people in the pharmaceutical industry and the government that's in charge of watching them are the worst enemies of the people of this country, and it is not the Second Amendment.
So that's something that we absolutely have to expose.
I think we agree 100% with you, Joe, 100%.
This is a fascinating story.
A North Korean defector says even North Korea was not this nuts after attending an Ivy League school.
She went to Columbia.
One of several hundred North Korean defectors who settled in the U.S., she transferred to Columbia from a South Korean university and was deeply disturbed by what she found.
I expected that I was paying this fortune all this time and energy to learn how to think, but they were forcing the way they want you to think.
I realized, wow, this is insane.
I thought America was different, but I saw so many similarities to what I saw in North Korea.
I started to worry.
The similarities included anti-Western sentiment, collective guilt, and suffocating political correctness.
She saw red flags immediately upon arrival during orientation.
She was scolded by a university—this is Columbia now—staff member for admitting she enjoyed classic literature like Jane Austen.
I said, I love those books.
I thought it was a good thing.
But the staff member said, you know, those writers had a colonial mindset.
They were racist bigots and were subconsciously brainwashing you.
It only got worse from there.
She realized every one of her classes at the Ivy League school is infected with anti-American propaganda, reminiscent of what she'd grown up with.
American bastard was one word for North Koreans she was taught growing up.
The math problem would say, there are four American bastards.
You kill two of them.
How many American bastards are left to kill?
Unreal.
She was also shocked and confused by issues surrounding gender and language.
Every class, the instructor asks the students to announce their preferred pronouns.
English is my third language.
I learned it as an adult.
I sometimes still say he or she by mistake, and now they're going to ask me to call them they?
How do I incorporate that into my sentences?
It felt like a regression in civilization.
Even North Korea is not this nuts.
North Korea was pretty crazy, but not this crazy.
She learned to shut up to maintain a good GPA to graduate.
In North Korea, she didn't know of concepts like love or liberty.
Because I've seen oppression, I know what it looks like.
By the age of 13, she'd witnessed people drop dead of starvation right before her eyes, which, by the way, may be coming to America.
These kids kept saying how they're oppressed, how much injustice they've experienced.
They don't know how hard it is to be free.
I literally crossed the middle of the Gobi Desert to be free, but what I said was nothing.
Many people fought harder than I. She and her mother first fled the oppressive North Korean regime in 2007 when she was 13 years old.
They crossed into China over the frozen Yalu River, fell into the hands of human traffickers who sold them into slavery.
She for less than 300, her mother for 100.
With help of Christian missionaries, they managed to flee Mongolia.
They walked across the Gobi Desert.
They eventually found refuge in South Korea.
She published a memoir in order to deliver it.
She described what it took to survive in one of the world's most brutal dictatorships.
People here are just dying to give their rights and power to the government.
That's what scares me the most.
She accused American higher education of stripping people's ability to think critically.
This is what's happening in America.
People see things, but they've just completely lost the ability to think.
Witnessing the depth of America's ignorance up close has made her question everything about humanity.
North Koreans don't have internet.
We don't have access to any of these great thinkers.
We don't know anything.
But here, While having everything, people choose to be brainwashed, and yet they deny it.
Having come to America with high hopes and expectations, he expressed her disappointment.
You guys have lost common sense to a degree I, as a North Korean, can't even comprehend.
Where are we going from here?
No rule of law, no morality, nothing good or bad anymore.
It's complete chaos.
I guess that's what they want, to destroy every single thing and rebuild into a communist paradise.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, strong article.
So, taking one step back to that Second Amendment thing, we stand as Americans with the ideals and the Declaration of Independence that we have natural rights given to us by our Creator, and it's the job of the government to defend and support those rights, not do the Orwellian opposite to harass and attack us for our natural rights.
Now, to that article, The university system is exactly what it says.
It's a uni-verse.
It's one voice, one eye.
And when we get the truth, there's going to be a control system that we'll discover has infiltrated all of the major universities for some of these talking points.
As an undergraduate at UC Berkeley in 1983, I didn't know what I was looking at, but I was hit by The gatekeeping system to keep independent, powerful students out.
I had designed a major for ending poverty.
I was already lobbying with the lobby group results with national leaders.
I was pitching bills.
I had read reports, government reports, that my professors didn't even know existed that were more current than the data that they held.
I was shut out, and it was exactly as that student said, through grades.
My papers would be typically destroyed, and at that point, I knew that anything that I wrote would receive the lowest grade possible at the time, a C-.
And then, as a graduate student at Harvard's Graduate School of Education, again, I felt that I was gate-kept out, just receiving the lowest grade possible.
At that time, through grade deflation, it was a B-.
So I'll be very interested once we get all the truth to find out how our masters have infiltrated the university system and how they controlled it for that current story that was that was great to present.
Well, this report is calamitous from my point of view.
I spent 35 years offering courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning.
I even wonder whether I would be allowed to teach such courses today.
The situation is that bad.
I would tell my students at the opening talk that if you came here to take one course, this is the one course you should take.
And that was true because it would make them more effective in everything they dealt with in life.
But today, I wonder, would I even be allowed to offer such a course?
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, I had never had much respect for the poison ivy league diploma mills, and they are now infected with the cancel culture to an extreme degree.
What people don't realize is that the Civil War had nothing to do with slavery.
It was 22 northern states with 20 million people having legislative control over 13
southern states with 10 million people, and they passed the Morrell Tariff, which was
a 39% export fee on all southern cotton and tobacco products.
So basically it was one group of bandits that were run by the UK bankers in the north, trying
to extort the people in the south, and that's what basically the war was about.
As far as slavery, it existed in absolutely every culture.
The Aztecs had cookbooks on how to cook slaves and several times a year they'd kill 10,000 of those slaves that they had captured from other tribes and have a big festival eating the other natives.
The very first banning of slavery anywhere in the world was in Pennsylvania in 1780,
then in Massachusetts and New Hampshire in 1783, Rhode Island in 1784, Ohio in 1802,
Illinois and Indiana 1816, Maine in 1820, on and on and on.
Lincoln never freed a single slave in the slave zoning north states of Missouri, Kansas, Kentucky,
Maryland, Delaware, or the District of Columbia.
Had absolutely nothing to do with slavery.
And the United States was a leader in ending slavery.
We ended the importation of slaves in 1808.
France was the first European country, and that was in 1803, and then Britain in 1805, but they didn't End slavery in their own country, they did, but not in their colonies.
So they continued to have slavery up until the 20th century, and now we have estimates of at least 40 million human traffic slaves and probably closer to 60 million worldwide.
So why don't we deal with the real problem, which is the slavery that exists today, instead of going after the phantom slavery that white American Christian men were the first in the world to end?
You and Carl are just on fire today.
This is fab-silly fantastic.
I love it.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Efforts are being made to indoctrinate our youth are astounding.
Listen to this kid completely dondinate the agenda in under five minutes.
This is a wonderful speech and presentation by a young man who is 14 years old, as I recall.
Just absolutely sensational.
Meanwhile, we now return.
A University of Florida lab has found dangerous pathogens on children's face masks.
This is a pretty fascinating story.
Gainesville parents concerned about harm caused to their children Wearing face masks all day in 90 degree Fahrenheit weather sent six masks, five worn by children aged 6 to 11 for 5 to 8 hours at school, one worn by adult, to be analyzed for contaminants at the University of Florida's Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center.
Of the six masks, three were surgical, two cotton, and a polygator.
Masks that had not been worn in a t-shirt worn at school acted as control samples.
Five of the masks were found to be contaminated with parasites, fungi, and bacteria.
One was found to contain a virus that can cause a fatal systemic disease in cattle and deer.
Other less harmful pathogens that can cause ulcers, acne, and strep throat were also detected.
None of the controls were contaminated with pathogens, while samples from the top, front, and bottom of the t-shirt found proteins that are commonly found in skin and hair, along with some commonly found in soil, indicating it in fact had been worn.
Amanda Donahoe, a mother of three elementary school children, teamed up with other parents to send the masks to the lab because their sons broke out in rashes from prolonged mask wearing.
Our kids have been in masks all day, seven days an hour.
The only break they get is to eat or drink.
Donahoe said while students do not have to wear a mask outside since April, masks were still required when they were within six feet of each other and to be worn on school buses.
Superintendent Carly Simon at the Alachua Public Schools in Gainesville did not respond to a request for comment.
The director of the CDC claims kids should continue to wear masks and social distance until they're vaccinated.
Ron DeSantis, however, signed an executive order on May 3rd, suspending all COVID-19 emergency restrictions, including mask wearing.
Some school districts, however, like this one, kept their mask policy in place.
The CDC says masks are still required on planes, trains, buses, and at airports.
In an updated June 17th guidance, masks are no longer required in outdoor areas of a conveyance, like a ferry or the top deck of a bus.
Fully vaccinated individuals may resume everyday activities done prior to the pandemic without mask wearing or physical distancing.
People are concerned fully vaccinated two weeks after their second shot of a messenger RNA vaccine or a single-dose Johnson & Johnson.
As I've reported here before, Sherry Tenpenny has explained that these mRNA vaccines are perfectly designed killing machines.
We have other experts who are predicting that everyone who is vaccinated will be dead within five years.
This is all profoundly disturbing.
Meanwhile, Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, this is disturbing.
My school district, as a teacher, I have a current grievance associated with the previous district policies regarding the requirement to wear these whatever face coverings.
I had asked our school district So you guys are supposed to be OSHA and Cal OSHA compliant, right?
And the assistant superintendent of the district for HR says, yes, of course.
So can you please explain this to me?
How is whatever face coverings compliant?
with OSHA safety standards for a pandemic virus.
That's not compliant, is it?
She said, no, it isn't.
But then when she wrote a report, she said that she gave two paragraphs of lawyerees in an official response, claiming that they were superior, whatever face coverings were superior in this obfuscating language, but that was the claim that they were exceeding OSHA and Cal OSHA safety standards with their orders.
Therefore, that's why we needed to follow them.
I've been challenging that since then.
We have the recent G7 leaders hanging out together where they're socializing among themselves,
just buddy up right next to each other, no masks, while the servants are in the background
carrying their trays of hors d'oeuvres and drinks and collecting glasses all masked up.
You have Kamala Harris celebrating Juneteenth at a table with about 30 people with colored help in the background wearing their masks.
Uh, so you have a, I think it's the Ascot Club at the UK, where all these, uh, the upper class are hanging out together in their tuxedos, no masks, while the rest of the kids in public school have to keep their distance and put on their mask.
So this is, this is torture.
It is illegal, it is tyrannical, and it is literally in your face.
And the parents and the community members are getting a fair test of how they're going to respond.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, if you put on a blood level oxygen monitor and put on a mask, it only takes about two or three minutes for you to get below the 18% OSHA minimum standard for oxygen.
So they're definitely violating the OSHA law there.
It's another form of humiliation and another form of Trauma-based mind control forcing you to accept anything that they'll give you in the way of a solution to that, which would include the vaccinations, which is the real object of this whole thing.
They could care less about masks or social distancing or contact tracing.
What they really want to do is jab everybody.
And surprisingly enough, if you get a jab, you can fly.
Oh, well, guess what?
Sadly, four members of our pilot community passed away recently.
Our thoughts are with their family.
Yes, in less than a week's time, four BA pilots have expired, and since 80% of their pilots have already been vaccinated, we may be facing a severe end of the jet age due to the bioweapon that's disguised as a cure.
Yeah, they're not going to have any pilots to fly the aircraft, right, Joe?
They're not going to have any pilots?
Go ahead.
They won't.
They won't have any attendance.
They won't have any ground crew.
They won't have anything.
They completely decimated.
And what about the Methodist Hospital in Houston with 26,000 employees where 99% were vaccinated as of last week and 170 of them were fired and they filed a lawsuit and a crooked attorney filed a defective injunction and a crooked judge Overruled it and so now we're faced with another six month lead time before we can get into a Supreme Court ruling or an appeal that could actually overturn mandatory vaccines, which is their whole object.
They're trying to force the FDA approval 100% approval instead of just the experimental use approval.
The experimental use was supposed to continue until July 19 to 2023 and now they want to up it to this year so that they can go ahead and say now it's an approved drug and now we can make it mandatory.
It's absolutely insane.
Yeah.
All the damage that's being done, Joe.
I mean, this is insane.
It's just incomprehensible until you realize the monstrousness of the, you know, the way in which the big pharma and the World Economic Forum are seeking to dominate the world.
Here's an interesting piece of leaked audio Joe Manchin called with billionaire donors, a rare glimpse of deal man.
This is a very complicated story.
I'll give you just a few highlights.
The meeting was hosted by a group called No Label, a big money cooperation founded by former Senator Joe Lieberman that funneled high net worth donor money to conservative Democrats and modern Republicans.
Manchin described an openness to filibuster reform at odds with his most recent position that some Democrats hoped for enacting their agenda.
The call included several billionaire investors and corporate executives.
The meeting was led by Nancy Jacobson, co-founder of No Labels.
Yeah, I'm doing a radio program, but... Okay.
Are you okay, Joe?
Are we good?
Are we good to go?
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yeah, Jim, you could mute Joe.
I don't know if he can do it himself on his phone, but we can do that.
No, no, no.
I just had a brief interruption.
I was talking to him.
Go ahead.
Okay.
The wide-ranging conversation went into depth on the fate of the filibuster, infrastructure negotiations, and the failed effort to create a bipartisan commission to explore the January 6th storming, which frankly the Democrats were counting on in order to put pressure on the Trump supporters as white nationalists using the Capitol again and again and again in spite of the fact that it was orchestrated by the FBI, as Tucker has been brilliantly exposing and as Glenn Grunewald is Pursuing.
Manchin told the assembled donors he need help flipping a handful of Republicans from NODES on the January commission to strip the far left of their best argument against the filibuster, which is a crucial priority for the donors because it bottles up progressive legislation where to hit their bottom line.
When it came to Roy Blunt, the moderate Missouri Republican who voted no on the commission, Manchin offered a creative solution.
Roy Blunt is a great, just a good friend of mine, a great guy.
He's retired.
If some of you all who might be working with Roy in his next life could tell him, that'd be nice and it'd help our country be very good for Get him to change his vote.
We're going to have another vote on this thing.
That'll give me one more shot at it.
Manchin appears to be suggesting the wealthy executives on the call could dangle future financial opportunities for the outgoing senator to change his vote.
Senate ethics rules forbid future job negotiations if they create a conflict of interest, or even the appearance of a conflict of interest.
Manchin, notably, doesn't suggest they discuss a job, but rather says people who Blunt might later be working with would be likely to have a significant influence, reflective of the way future job prospects can shape the legislative process, even when unspoken.
A commission, Manchin tells Snow, labels as important in its own right, necessary to determine how security failed and what former President Trump's role was in the riot, if any.
But it's also critical to maintain support for the filibuster.
The January 6th commission got 56 votes, four shorter than 60 needed.
A thorough embarrassment for those like Manchin who claim bipartisanship is still possible in the divided Senate chamber.
Manchin told donors he hoped to make another run at it to prove that comedy is not lost.
Let it pat to me a Pennsylvania Republican who missed the vote.
Would have voted for it had he been there.
Only three more votes would be needed.
What I'm asking for, I need to go back to find three more Republicans.
Good Republican senators will vote for the commission.
So at least we can tamp down where people say, well, Republicans won't even do the simple lift.
Common sense of basically voting to do a commission that was truly bipartisan.
But it would have been a propaganda operation.
The group is passionately supportive of the filibuster.
When multiple donors quizzed Manchin on his stance, the senator displayed an openness to reforms that is at odds with his latest public statements.
In spring, he said he could support a talking filibuster requiring the minority to hold the floor.
Rather than putting the onus on the majority, after an uproar from Republicans, he penned a Washington Post op-ed saying he would not weaken or eliminate the filibuster, which optimists noted left room for reforms that strengthened it in spirit by forcing more partisanship.
When June, he told CNN, asked if he were committed to maintain the 60-vote threshold, he wanted to make the Senate work, a sentiment he repeated each time he was pressed.
Once again, he followed with an op-ed, this time in the local Charleston Gazette mail, saying he had no intention of weakening the filibuster.
He's open to filibuster reform on the cause notable, given it flew in the face of many attendees' hopes.
He asked about a proposal to lower the threshold to beat back a filibuster to 55 votes.
He said it was something he was considering, then quickly referred back to his earlier idea of forcing the minority to show up on the Senate floor in large enough numbers to maintain the filibuster.
That's one of many good, good suggestions I've had.
He's set up lowering the closure total from 60 to 55.
He went on to discuss the last time closure was lowered in the 1970s.
I look back to when it went from 67 to 60.
And also what happened, what made them think it needed to change.
So I'm looking at it.
I'm just not open to getting rid of the filibuster.
I think going from 67 to 60 was already a mistake.
Manchin acknowledged he publicly had drawn the line at 60, but said he was open to other ideas.
Right now, 60 is where I planted my flag.
But as long as they know I'm going to protect this filibuster, we're looking at good suggestions.
You said basically I think it should be 41 people have the force to the issue versus a 60.
We need to be affirmative.
So fine, 41 in the negative.
I think one little change that could be made right now is basically anyone who wants to filibuster should be required to call to the floor and basically state your objection while you're filibustering.
State what you need to change.
I'm troubled by all of this.
The Zoom call also featured a lengthy discussion about campaign financing.
As far as members of Congress, I mean, we did over $500,000 for Representative Fitzpatrick, which took us two weeks to put that together, adding the group planned and raised direct some $20 million in hard dollars this cycle, referring to money that goes directly to a member of Congress's Political Action Committee.
It's dollars that they control.
Hard money dollars, said Andrew Bursky, another co-founder of No Labels, the founder and managing partner of a private equity firm, Atlas Holding.
It would be illegal for an individual donor to give a $50,000 check.
The money could theoretically be bundled for multiple donors.
Manchin talked at length about paring back the initiative and bringing Republicans on board.
This is on the infrastructure bill, zeroed in on energy-related proposals including opposition to direct funds for Electric energy charging locations and the need to finance carbon sequestration plants to enhance coal-fired power plants.
I'm not going to sign off on reconciliation giving up on partisanship until you give it a try," he said, eschewing the procedural motion that would allow Democrats to pass the infrastructure legislation without any Republican votes.
I wasn't overly happy about this mansion revelation.
saying the government never built gas filling stations for the rollout of Henry Ford's Model T,
a shift to electric should be cars should be no different.
The government should instead offer low interest loans and other tax incentives to the
private infrastructure, private sector to build out infrastructure. I wasn't overly
happy about this mansion revelation.
Carl, your thoughts? Well, it's an interesting article and with the immediate narrow focus of
the topic of the article, the senator mentioned does give a wink wink to how it works is that
when these public servants retire to spend more time with their family, they pick up consulting
jobs with these people who they did favors for.
And if you think about Hunter Biden with Burisma receiving that money, and Vice President Biden at the time going there and Doing the quid pro quo of saying, okay, so this billion dollars of aid that we have here will offer you that in exchange for firing the prosecutor investigating hunters.
The company for which he is a board member, Burisma Energy.
So this is how these people roll to pay back for services done.
And another thing that you need to understand as somebody who worked as a volunteer lobbyist for 18 years with the Citizens Lobby results for domestic and foreign policy to end poverty, the committee chairs They get to be committee chairs by going on the Sunday political talk shows and pimping for the empire.
If they're willing to sell their soul for the agendas of the forever lie-started illegal wars of aggression, for the bankster looting, And then just sitting back for election fraud, they get to be the chairs of the committee.
They decide what bills they see so that they can get past what they want to get done for the empire.
And then those are the people who, when they're done with their public service, they get paid big for consulting fees.
Yes, yes, yes.
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, yes, amazingly enough, Arizona finished their hand recount of 2 million votes on Sunday, and they've had 20 states visit their facility and review their auditing process, and they are in the process of Overturning a whole bunch of elections, not just the presidential election.
Interestingly enough, DC Patriots today had an article called, Nevada officials threatened petitioners of election audits with Class C felonies.
So this is the extent that a Democratic Secretary of State will go to, to keep from finding out that they have an illegal senator, and they have illegal U.S.
House of Representatives, as well as an illegal president.
And this whole thing could be overturned pretty rapidly.
I don't know if you've seen it, but Mike Lindell has a series of programs, documentaries that he's done, and his latest one
was absolute interference.
And in that, he said that over a million MAGA votes were flipped in Texas along with a number
of Texas U.S. House seats and Texas Senate and House seats.
So if we end up reshuffling the- That's to keep the Democrats in control of the House.
And it's been approved by the RINOs because they want to keep it pretty close to a 51 to 49
dynamic so they can pick whoever they want.
And the Rhinos get to pick who they want in the primaries.
And then they just, they just trade power because they're all on the same team.
Foreign minister and outgoing president congratulate head of judiciary on his victory with 62% of the vote.
Hardline cleric Ebrahim Raisi was declared the winner on Saturday of Iran's presidential election, a widely anticipated result after many political heavyweights were barred from running.
Rossi was elected president with 61.95% of the vote, according to figures released by Interior Minister Abol Rahman Fazili.
The three other candidates conceded defeat earlier on Saturday.
Voter turnout was 48.8% of the more than 59 million eligible record low for a presidential election in the Islamic Republic.
But frankly, that would have been a record high in the United States.
I resided in Duluth, which had the highest voter turnout in the country.
And it was only something like 40%.
I mean, this is amazing.
In Iran, they have a much better turnout.
Despite the figures, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei said the turnout had demonstrated public support for the establishment.
I congratulate the people on their choice, said outgoing moderate President Hassan Rouhani, who has served the maximum of two consecutive four-year terms.
Iran's foreign minister said Saturday that Rassi was the country's new elected president.
Everyone would work with him from now on.
Rassy 60 is set to take over at a crucial time.
Turkey and the United Arab Republic were the first to congratulate him on his victory, stating, my belief that cooperation between our two countries will strengthen during your presidency.
I'm ready to work with you.
Said the Turkish President Erdogan in a letter.
Erdogan added he looked forward to visiting Iran after the COVID-19 pandemic.
We wish for the Islamic Republic and our bilateral relations stability, continuity, and prosperity.
Vice President de facto Dubai ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid said in a statement tweeted by Dubai's media office.
Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Sayyid also sent a message of congratulations.
The head of the Iranian judiciary, whose black turban signifies direct assent from Islam's prophet Mohammed, Rassi is seen as close to the 81-year-old Khomeini, who has ultimate political power in Iran.
Friday's voting was extended two hours past the original midnight deadline amid fears of low turnout.
Many voters chose to stay away from the field of some 600 hopefuls, including 40 women who had been winnowed down to seven male candidates, with an ex-president and former parliament speaker both excluded.
Three of the vetted candidates dropped out of the race two days before the election.
Populist former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, one of those barred from running by the Guardian Council of Clerics and Jurists, said he would not vote, declaring in a video message, I do not want to have a part in this sin.
Rassi's victory was effectively confirmed on Saturday when he received the congratulations of the incumbent and three other candidates.
On Election Day, pictures of often flag-waving voters dominated state TV coverage, but away from the polling station, some voiced anger at what they saw as a stage-managed election aiming to cement the control of hardliners.
Whether I vote or not, someone has already been elected.
They organized the election for the media.
Enthusiam was dampened further by spiraling inflation and job losses in the COVID-19 pandemic that proved more deadly in Iran than anywhere else in the region, killing more than 80,000 people by official count.
To opposition and human rights groups, his name is linked with the mass execution of political prisoners in 1988.
The U.S.
government has sanctioned him over the purge, although Rassi has denied playing a part.
Asked in 2018 and again last year about the executions, he denied playing a role, even as he lauded an order he said was handed down by the Republic's founder, Ayatollah Khamenei, to proceed with the purge.
Actually, Israel has declared that they're going to have to attack the Iranian nuclear program because of his election and we already have a major Iranian nuclear peaceful power plant shut down apparently because of Israeli interference.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, so we are in World War III, and it's just that we have so little information about what is actually going on.
So, outside of Iran, the heavily concentrated population of Iranians, more than any other place, is Los Angeles.
I've spent over 40 years of my life in Los Angeles, and have a lot of Persian friends who I talk with.
They call it tarantulas.
So, for them, they have no idea what's going on, and some of them are pretty heavily connected.
They know that the political front is theater.
You know, the history from 1953 to 1979, through Operation Ajax, the CIA overthrew Iran's democracy to put in a puppet, the Shah, in order to maximize the oil profits and control of the petrodollar.
And then from when the Shah left to the United States and the United States refused to extradite the Shah back to Iran for crimes against his own people.
And we had from 1980 to 1988 the U.S.
backing Iraq's attack on Iran that killed up to a million Iranians.
So the Iranians They understand the severity and the destructiveness of the American empire.
And they have no idea what's going on behind the scenes, who's who, who's playing what.
But what I heard many times from my Persian friends is that they hope whatever double and triple crosses are going on, that the Persian leaders stand for the Persian people in the end, so that Iran would not get Iraq'd.
Yes, yes, yes.
Very good.
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, amazingly enough, they made the big discovery in the North Sea of oil in 1969, but the oil was not economically recoverable at $3 a barrel.
So in 1973, we had OPEC, which was organized by Kissinger, shut down, do an embargo and shut down the oil, and they were quickly able to drive the price up to $12 a barrel.
After that, they started drilling oil in the North Slope, and they needed to build the Alaska Pipeline, but that oil wasn't practical in 1979 at $15.85 a barrel.
So, they had the Iranian Revolution, boycotted all Iranian oil, and they were able to drive oil up to $39.50 a barrel.
So basically what we've done is we've used Iran as a pump and dump to keep their oil off of the market so that we could put in alternate sources that were western controlled and we've done the same thing with Venezuela with taking their oil off the market and it's absurd that we've done this with the pipeline coming out of the Canadian tar sands because that oil is being constantly produced it's being constantly outgassed and and it's
expunged around the planet, and if we're not capturing it and using it, then it becomes an environmental hazard.
So oil, like we mentioned in a previous discussion, is an apogenic product that has been on the planet before there was any living organisms, and it will continue to have a billion year supply.
We just need to make sure that we're using it in the wisest way possible.
But bottom line is, yeah, poor Iran has been the whipping boy repeatedly when they needed to drive up the oil prices so that they could come up with alternative locations for drilling.
It's absurd.
Wonderful, wonderful comments, Joe.
Very, very good.
Meanwhile, we have the New York Times retracting false claims.
It's a huge victory for the Babylon Bee, but also for common sense and fair reporting.
Dolan celebrated the victory, stating the Times used misinformation to smear the Babylon Bee, which tends to be satirical, by the way.
We don't have to take this nonsense lying down, remember that.
We reported recently how the Times was issued a legal threat by the satirical news website over their false reporting that suggested the Bee was promoting misinformation.
Well, if you thought the Times was dumb enough to ignore the threat and let the issue go to court, you might be surprised to learn the far-left news outlet has actually caved and admitted they were in the wrong.
In March, the Babylon Bee was censored by Facebook, prompted by a story in the Times claiming the Bee was a far-right misinformation site, claiming it promoted misinformation under the guise of satire.
Here's the original defamatory plea.
Seth Dillon, the CEO of the Babylon Bee, recently demanded a retraction and they got it.
The Times first changed the article to claim the website had been accused by Snopes of promoting misinformation, but failed to acknowledge that even Snopes had retracted the false claims.
Now, though, the New York Times has accepted fault.
Dylan made the information on Twitter, sharing the content of an email from Dana Green, senior counsel of the Times, admitting fault.
We have carefully reviewed the concern raised in your letter and, in response, have removed the reference to the Babylon Bee from the article and appended a correction.
Meanwhile, this is a piece that one would only like to believe is true.
I'm fearful, apprehensive that it's not.
It gives a detailed description of the hanging of John Brennan in such detail that you want to think it's true.
This is shared claiming that Hillary has also been put to death.
My name is John Stone.
I'll tell you something only a handful of people have known, crucial information.
John Brennan shared Hillary Clinton's macabre fate, death by hanging after a military tribunal convicted him of murder and treason.
Unlike Hillary, who remained steadfastly silent until the moment the noose was slipped around her neck,
a loudmouth Brennan cussed out the guards who offered him a last meal, which he declined,
berated his military police escort, and rebuked a small assembly of military
and civilian personnel who'd gathered near the Windward Point Lighthouse to witness his death.
Brennan has scarcely shut his mouth in the weeks between conviction and executions
that had get most south.
Soar is speaking on condition of anonymity.
He told Real Raw News, Brennan availed himself of every opportunity
to express contempt at the US military and the citizenry.
Brennan spent much of his incarnation deriding Donald Trump, calling him society's great mistake
and a threat to national security.
He said Trump ought to have been aborted.
His swaggering bravado, however, did not stop Gitmo staff from escorting him to the gallows early that morning at precisely 8 a.m.
He climbed atop the same apparatus used to execute Hillary less than two months prior.
Shackled at the wrists, bound at the ankles, he stood on the trapdoor that would swing open beneath his feet when Vice Admiral John Hannock ordered the five-man execution detail to push the circular button affixed to the lattice framework.
Vice Admiral Hannock reminded the detail to press the button in synchronicity after and only after he issued the execute command.
Only one button would trigger the ghoulish device.
No soldier would ever know if his button ended Brennan's life.
You are all pussies and cowards, especially Admiral Hammock.
I don't see the three cowardly officers who passed sentence on me here.
Either.
Where are they?
No stomach?
Where's Trump?
I figure he ain't got the testinal fortitude to watch his handiwork in action.
He's an effing pussy.
You're all cowards and liars for following him.
Get this over with.
I ain't scared of shit, Brennan said as an MP slipped the noose around his neck.
Vice-President Hannock approached the gallows, tilted his head to meet Brennan's menacing stare.
This is not about Donald Trump.
This is about you and your actions taken in the name of evil.
Trump just had the guts to get the ball rolling, but one way or another, with or without Trump, your fate was sealed the moment you participated in the murder of innocent civilians.
Trump may have been the catalyst, but you're here because, frankly, you're one evil son of a bitch.
As I say, I would like to believe that's true, but I'm having a hard time with it.
Brennan reported, the execute command was given, the door beneath his feet swung downward,
his neck snapped and the rope was cut, his lifeless body lay motionless on a patch of
grass, a military physician fell for a punch and it reared him dead. Today, Trump has, justice has
been served. As I say, I would like to believe that's true, but I'm having a hard time with it.
Carl, your thoughts? Well, first, to put it into a little more context, is that with Iran,
the importance of need-to-know news is offering you a choice for facts that would give human
beings a chance, finally, against these psychopaths, or the other choice is to listen to the president
of the United States, so-called President Biden, say at the G7 that the U.S.
never interferes in the elections of other countries.
And it would be horrible just to have that unthinkable thought that the U.S.
ever Would.
So the killing of humor with the Babylon Bee is that they gotta do that.
They gotta kill humor.
Comics have some sort of a statement like there's no horror that humor cannot destroy.
And to classify it as misinformation is certainly something that they would try to do.
They'll get laughed at for that too, but they're going to try it.
Now that last story, that also is interesting and I'm glad that you included it for the public consideration, Jim, is that as a Also as a credentialed history teacher, so as a trained historian, is that that's testimony without any documentary evidence, without any photographic evidence, without any physical evidence.
And yet, if White Hats are in control and have already taken down the top people and had trials, it would be similar to that.
It would be in a military tribunal.
That would be perfectly understandable.
And then just go ahead and execute those guys.
That would also explain what we've seen with some of these actors, like Biden, having these face masks on, at least for what we can tell in the photographic evidence.
So, who knows?
It may be true.
Who knows?
It may be true.
I don't know if Joe is able to join us at this moment because it seems to be... Go!
Go for it!
Go for it, my man!
Yeah, I was doing my research.
Project Veritas has a very interesting slander suit going against New York Times, and they're losing.
So they are very worried about being in court, and especially against somebody like Babylon B, that's obviously satire.
So I don't care how much Scopes discredits them, satire is not even close to being fact.
Amazingly enough, We had a 9-1-1 commission that included Jamie Gorlick, who was the person that placed the block between the CIA and the FBI, which supposedly was the cause of the intelligence failure.
But John Brennan was also the Saudi station chief And was in charge of approving the sketchy visas for 16 of the 19 supposedly hijackers.
So if they don't have enough stuff to hang that man, I don't know who could be hung.
Certainly he qualifies as worse than anything Benedict Arnold ever did.
Yeah, I think that's wonderful, Joe.
I like that.
Okay, meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broercon, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Here we have a very interesting development that the Dunblane Massacre appears to have played a role of being a model for mapping out Sandy Hook, which was in fact a two-day FEMA exercise presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
I was fascinated to learn about it.
It took place at the Dunblane Primary School near Stirling, Scotland on 13 March 1996.
Thomas Hamilton shot 16 pupils and a teacher, injuring 15 others before killing himself.
The deadliest mass shooting in British history.
Get this!
Public debate about the killings centered on gun control laws, including public petitions for a ban on private ownership of handguns, and an official inquiry which produced the 1996 Cullen Report.
In response to this debate, two new firearms acts were passed, which outlawed the private ownership of most handguns within the UK.
Here you can see a video about it on my BitChute site.
Go to BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
Check it out.
Fascinating.
I believe this was used as the model to script Sandy Hook, where nobody died.
Meanwhile, no, Amazon has banned six of the 12 books we've published at moonrockbooks.com.
Not only about Sandy Hook, but about the Boston bombing, about the moon landing, Orlando to Dallas and beyond, political theater in Charlottesville, the Parkland puzzle, how the pieces fit together.
If you want to learn the real history which the country, the government, Doesn't want you to know.
Go to Moonrock Books.
Five of the six are still available there now.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
Well, with that UK false flag shooting event at an elementary school, that was in March of 96.
And then the Cullen Report was done in 1996 as well, so that's a maximum of nine months to get the people together to do all the research, interview all those people, to write it up, and sounds like they had that prepared ahead of time.
Stand strong, Americans.
Stand strong in the facts, stand strong in your faith, whatever else helps you to be able to engage in this third world war where we have this hidden, psychopathic, parasitic group of people that are desperately trying to remain concealed.
These people are parasites.
They're a type of vampires of energy, of money, of control.
And just the opposite, the opponents of that are us.
We just want to have the facts.
We just want to have humanity unleashed to be able to have creativity for the first time in known history.
And we're seeing one side is going to have you be masked, silenced, not even being able to have a sense of humor or to print anything as satire and to be culled by these psychopaths or stand up and then let's see what the truth will bring.
Very good.
Joe, your final thoughts?
Yeah, amazingly enough, just a couple of months after the Dunbane shooting in Scotland, you had a shooting at Port Arthur, Tasmania, where a crazed gunman on April 28, 1996, killed 35 people and resulted in arms confiscation through all of Australia.
So, is it just, you know, maybe they needed a reinforcement for the model that they had for Sandy Hook?
And then, of course, the Pony Christ Church shooting down in New Zealand to confiscate all the weapons there, and that was outrageous.
That was a cartoon, the video that was put out there.
Joe, I didn't mean to cut you off if you wanted to add a few more words.
Yes, one more word.
This is a graffiti that was popular during the 70s.
If the opposite of pro is con, What is the opposite of progress?
Congress?
Gentlemen, I rest my case.
Well, it's such a delight to have such alert minds who are really articulate as Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and Joe Olson from Houston, Texas.
I would mention that the mayor of Boston at the time went on a show that was hosted by Andy Rooney's daughter just a month before Sandy Hoak and explained that he was A good buddy of Joe Biden, that the Vice President assured him that gun control in the United States would be a done deal by January.
Andy Rooney's daughter was just dumbfounded and said, what could possibly happen to make gun control pass so fast?
She didn't know, but obviously he was talking about Sandy Hook.
Barack Obama signed 23 executive orders to constrain our access to weapons on the 16th of January, 2013, just a month and two days later.
Anyone have any doubt about it?
That this was an arranged event to compromise our access to weapons?
To promote the gun control agenda by a phony event, and then they had to ban the book that blew it apart.
They cannot let you know.
That's why we're here, to share with you all the news you need to know.