All Episodes
Previous Next
June 16, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:29:36
Need to Know (15 June 2021) with Michael Ivey and Monique Lukens
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm delighted to be joined today by Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina, and Monique Lukens from Los Angeles.
We're going to share with you all the news you need to know, the latest updates we have, beginning with an interesting development relating to the allegedly fatal shooting of Ashley Babbitt by a Capitol Police officer, Judicial Watch has been trying to find out the identity of this individual.
The normal course of action is to quickly inform the public of details, but the lack of transparency in the killing of veteran Ashley Babbitt is unprecedented and obviously political, observed Judicial Watch President Tom Pfitzen.
We may now know why.
Red Pill has revealed that it appears to have been a special agent by the name of David Bailey, who happens to be black.
He's a Brazilian immigrant and a Black Lives Matter militant who had threatened to kill Trump supporters on Facebook for months.
I mean, this is fairly astonishing.
Earlier, Redfield Media identified Ashley Babbitt's killer as a U.S.
Capitol Special Agent David Bailey, same man who let U.S.
Representative Steve Scalise get shot nearly to death in 2017.
Now, how's that for a non-coincidence?
Rhett Pilt has now uncovered evidence confirming our previous reporting through self-incriminating Facebook posts revealing him as a Brazilian immigrant who pledged his allegiance to Black Lives Matter.
Some background.
On January 6th, unarmed 14-year high-ranking Air Force veteran and patriotic Trump supporter, so we are told, Ashley Babbitt was shot by a U.S.
Capitol Police officer while protesting.
She was breaking through a window inside the Capitol.
The thin blue line shot her at point-blank range without warning, no question about it.
Mark Schaap commented, I understand there's a 16-year-old woman who was shot.
Now, maybe she was doing terrible things and deserved to be shot.
We're the party that talks about law and order and respecting cops.
Meanwhile, you have a tweet from Eric Erickson, shoot the protesters, waive the rules, impeach, waive the rules, convict, waive the rules, deny the ability, run for election again, all directed, of course, against Donald Trump.
The Capitol Police refused to release the name of the officer, diverted attention away from his crime.
The law now appears to be illegally flaunted when Republicans are victims.
Here we have the D.C.
Council passing a police reform bill that requires a city to swiftly make public the names of officers who use force on citizens, then which deadly force is obviously an example.
It turns out that the shooter was Special Agent David Bailey, a black male U.S.
Capitol officer with short black hair, wears an unmistakable white and black bead wristband.
Now, that sounds curious, but it turns out to be important.
Bailey has been in the spotlight before.
Seen sporting the wristband many occasions, including when the media was celebrating him for his incompetence in allowing a deranged leftist gunman to open fire on congressional Republicans during a baseball practice in Virginia in 2017.
His only job that day was serve as Steve Scully's personal bodyguard.
Nevertheless, in spite of his failure in that capacity, he was awarded both a Medal of Valor and the Badge of Bravery.
Here you see him receiving these recognitions.
And if you look at his right wrist, you'll see he's wearing this beaded hand wristband.
Now, it's significant because we have video then of the shooter at the very top.
Look at the sequence across the top, wearing that beaded, you know, bracelet around his wrist.
Either through sheer incompetence or wicked malice, Special Agent Bailey has allowed the shooting of a high-profile Trump-supporting U.S.
representative to start And now appears to have been involved in the shooting of Ashley Babbitt, who is protesting in the White House and who may or may not have been a Trump supporter, but was clearly appears to have been a victim, assuming, of course, this was not a fully staged shooting, which I have, alas, been suspicious is in fact the case.
Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah, aside from the odd circumstance that a Brazilian immigrant would be this involved in this and have a cherry job like that with the Capitol Police, it's suspicious to say the least.
We've been through in weeks previous the evidence that would indicate that the entire Ashley Babbitt killing story is another false, scripted, acted out event.
And the fact that he was also involved in such a close manner with the Steve Scalise shooting is extremely suspicious.
It's not like that just happens overnight.
And another thing that came to mind is that it seems to be a consistent methodology in the aftermath of false flag events that after a few weeks or months pass by, the people who write these scripts write up some narrative about a big controversy that is like a surface controversy that leaves the main narrative of the false flag intact.
One example would be like with 9-11 it was finding out that oh no the funding for 9-11 came from Saudi Arabia and that was a big Big controversy for a long time, but it left the whole 9-11 story intact.
And we could go there with Pulse Nightclub too, but I think that's going to be later in the show.
Well, I think that's an excellent observation, Michael.
Monique, your thoughts?
My thoughts at first were, what's going on?
Because I'm almost convinced that Uh, the Capitol incident was staged.
Obviously, you have a recording of that on BitChute under the title, What Happened at the Capitol on 6 January 2021.
21 minute expose.
Anyone who hasn't seen this must, because it really looks like Ashley Babbitt is moving around.
There's just weird gestures that are being made from, it looks like crisis actors.
So I thought, well, if it wasn't true, If there is a possibility that it was true, what about this gentleman that you're bringing in now?
Well, I went to his Facebook page right away, Doctor, and he looks different.
I don't know what he's looking like today, but I think it was two days ago, he looked like he was praying.
Regarding the bracelet, That he had on a talk about a false flag there like with 911 you had the identification of one of the terrorists next to the explosive material.
Four years later, you have the same bracelet.
I mean, I'm not saying maybe he's proud of that bracelet.
Maybe it's his lucky bracelet.
But, you know, for him to be identified like that, it's almost like crying out, like, here I am.
I wouldn't be surprised.
Because he is black, maybe that has something to do with it too, that BLM shows that we are all powerful in a discreet way.
And again, this has nothing to do with people of color.
I completely respect everybody, but I am very concerned about this political organization.
They have not denounced violence, they have united with Antifa, and they are racist themselves.
Calling people white privilege, white fragility, talking about whiteness.
This is wrong.
This is division.
It's not the United States of America.
The last thing I wanted to say with regards to did it happen at all, did anyone ever see the obituary for Ashley Babbitt?
Because I didn't.
So can anybody make mention of that?
That's really good.
You know, I have a wonderful colleague who does research on obituaries and in relation to Las Vegas, for example.
She found all the obituaries were based upon persons who died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death.
And in the case of Parkland, they forgot to put up the obituaries!
They just forgot to put them up!
Which is pretty easy when you're faking things, because there's no actual death to report.
So, Monique, I like all your comments.
Did you want to add, Michael?
I was just going to say that I think that did occur, although I can't remember having seen Ashley Babbitt's obituary, but I know that they also staged a funeral.
That's common in these things to script a funeral in and then to script some angry comments from the parents, things like that.
Well, this is truly sad, and all I could say on the flip side of things, the good part is, if it didn't happen, nobody was harmed, then wonderful.
Although, wasn't there one person who really did pass away?
A police officer?
Yeah, but he was supposed to have been hit on the head with a fire extinguisher.
In fact, he actually died of natural causes or from heart attack.
But it's like white people should be upset if nobody died at Sandy Hook.
You ought to rejoice.
That means 20 children and six adults did not die.
But people react with horror at the idea they didn't die.
I mean, the reaction is very odd and completely the opposite.
I do want to make one more mention before you go to the next story.
When they first found out about the Capitol incident and Miss Ashley passing away, well first, I won't say who I got this from, but an email stating that if black people had gone in and done that, you know, there would have been More casualties or something like something just saying if it had been a different color, then there would have been more, you know, come down on them something like that.
And I just said, you know, can we at least honor the fact that somebody passed away for who fought for this country and she was a mother and a couple days later I get the response saying I stand with my initial conviction or something like that.
I mean, Where is our society coming to if we can't just, like, grieve for a person?
Why does it always have to be any more about the color of someone's skin?
Or, you know, if they're arrested or not?
I mean, I understand that there's statistics and whatnot, but is that really the right thing to do to automatically put that in there?
When, I mean, I truly felt that people had passed away, and it makes me upset.
And I would just ask if anybody who's a person of color watching this to please stand up to this, because you're being exploited.
You are.
Even if you're, even if like some great things are happening because of, you know, getting more attention on repression, that has happened.
It's, you know, who wants to be exploited?
If the shoe was on the other foot, I wouldn't want that for myself.
How about you, Doctor?
How about you, Michael?
You're making wonderful points that are reflective of the politics of identity that the Democrats have embraced wholeheartedly.
They want everyone now to be judged by the color of their skin and their gender, and it's as though nothing else matters to the Democrats.
I mean, it's absolutely stunning, and it's so undemocratic, Monique.
It's so un-American.
Because now we're reversing all of our decades, all of our efforts to oppose discrimination, to promote segregation, to adhere to equal justice under the law, to a colorblind society, and the Democrats are now seeking to reverse all of that.
I think your concerns are 100% well-founded, and it's outrageous and stunning.
And to the vegans who have gone this route too, I would have thought that they would be more open-minded, but unfortunately a lot of them have fallen into the program.
I say that because if you're a vegan, you're concerned about, you know, other creatures, and so I would hope that you would be more open-minded about these things, but many that I talked to, they were in full alignment with BLM, but what I want to state here is They're always saying, and I'm a vegan, they talk about speciesism, and if you don't know what that is, it's about, like, being kind to your dog, but not being kind to a pig, because you put him in a skillet.
So, it's like, you know, if you want to go one more step above the racism, you know, it's the speciesism.
And so I look at that, you know.
I'm not a fan of cockroaches.
Most people aren't.
But if I can, I'll put out the cockroach outside.
Because, you know, even he or she is going to feel pain if I stamp on it.
You are a very dear person, Monique.
Wonderful.
Meanwhile, Arizona audited.
It's a hand-count milestone.
A Republican-led hand recount of ballots cast in Arizona's most populous county hit a major milestone Monday when counters finished tallying all the regular ballots cast in November's presidential and U.S.
Senate election.
Can Bennett, Republican former Secretary of State, monitoring, actually recounting the 2.1 million ballots, said all that remains are a small number of boxes filled with braille, large type, oversee military and duplicate ballots.
In other words, unusual types of ballots.
Bennett hasn't given a count for the remaining ballots, but there are a tiny fraction of the hundred boxes that were toted in, where we're awaiting the results.
He said the formal hand recount ordered by the Senate President Karen Fann will be completed by the end of the month.
Now that the main counting is complete, workers have been reassigned to help photograph each ballot as part of a second stage of the review designed to ensure that no phony ballots have been slipped in.
This is absolutely brilliant what they're doing.
They've not released the results yet, but we can expect to have them in short order almost certainly by the end of the month.
Where the Arizona Senate Republicans issued a subpoena to take control of the ballots, voting machines, and election data after President Trump rightfully contended his loss in Arizona and other battleground states was marred by fraud.
Joe Biden allegedly took Arizona by about 10,000 votes, but I predict it will turn out that, as a matter of fact, Donald Trump carried Arizona by a million.
Meanwhile, it's bizarre, but not surprising, that the Biden Department of Justice wants to intervene with Arizona's recount.
Very embarrassing.
You know, Christina Bob has Tweeted, AZ Attorney General Mark Brunovich steps up big time to support the AZ Senate.
Sends letter to Attorney General Garland saying, my office is not amused by the Department of Justice posturing.
He will protect state sovereignty.
Here's the whole letter.
Late last week, you made troubling comments about the ongoing efforts of states to ensure election integrity.
Your statements displayed an alarming disdain for state sovereignty as defined under the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and the election provisions of Articles 1 and 11.
Your comments followed a May 5th letter from Kamala Carlin of the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division on the subject of the Arizona Senate's oversight of the Maricopa County audit.
The letter appeared more interested in supporting the hysterical outcries of leftist pundits on cable television than the rule of law.
My office is not amused by DOJ's posture.
We will not tolerate any effort to undermine or interfere with our state Senate's audit to reassure Arizonans of the accuracy of our election.
We stand ready to defend federalism and state sovereignty against any partisan attack or federal overreach.
It's important to remember that the states created the federal government, not the other way around.
America's founders intentionally restrained the federal government's constitutional boundaries to ensure each state could flourish in unique ways.
Today, our federal government has largely forgotten the founders' intent, but my office has not.
There are no issues more important for states to prioritize than the integrity of our elections.
This is the cornerstone of our republic, binding together the people's trust in the whole of government.
Today, we see mistrust in our elections from Americans on all sides of the political spectrum.
This should not be a partisan issue.
States can and should take every opportunity to reassure all citizens that their vote counts.
My office looks for ways to work alongside the federal government to uphold our laws within the constraints of the Tenth Amendment and the election provisions of Articles 1 and 2, not 11, 1 and 2.
As I have demonstrated several times, however, Arizona will not sit back and let the Biden administration abuse its authority, refuse to uphold laws, or attempt to commandeer state sovereignty, signed by the Attorney General of Arizona.
Meanwhile, Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers had a similar message, threatening jail time for Garland if he lays a finger on Arizona ballots.
I love this.
Don't touch Arizona ballots or machines unless you want to spend time in an Arizona prison.
I love it.
Michael, your thoughts?
Wow!
I had not seen that letter from the Arizona Attorney General yet, but it stands on its own.
That's terrific stuff you laid out there.
As we've said before, all of this stuff that keeps popping up is like a snowball rolling downhill.
Every stone you turn over, we find more evidence of election rigging.
It's interesting that these developments keep Appearing and keep turning up.
And what are we eight months out now from the election itself?
It's just an interesting progression of events and nobody knows exactly where it's going to go.
But I certainly think that those people in Arizona have a lot of courage and a lot of moxie for firing back at the Department of Justice like that.
I love it.
Yeah, those are great comments.
Modique, your thoughts?
When I hear Maricopa County, I have nice memories of going down there.
I was doing some acting classes in Arizona, and actually, I was visiting an ill friend in Maricopa County.
Yeah, that comes to mind at first, and then I think, wow, what kind of leadership they have.
Yeah.
doing this after the fact, more so than any other state.
Just wonderful letters from both of them, especially what was her position again, the
one who said you'll be arrested if you tamper?
Yeah, well, she was a state senator.
Okay, well, I mean, just that needs to be verbalized because this is serious.
Again, even if you don't like Donald Trump, even if you're skeptical of him and his motivations for the injection, if he won, and you have to honor that, You can then go for any crimes he may have committed, but you can't go with somebody else who we already know was, you know, tussling around with the CCP.
So, I also want to encourage people from other states, like in California, I was given this information to contact Governor Newsom's office.
I don't know if you know all this, Doctor, but it has all the allegations and questions of California.
You probably can't see that.
Yeah, no, we actually can.
Yeah, good, good, Monique, good.
Yeah, so I'm going to actually give that to you, and I would request anybody in California to call all of your state senate members and to Tell them to look into this.
It's a California election integrity project.
And the last thing I wanted to ask you, if you can just make mention, since we are talking about Donald Trump, I did see a YouTube video the other day.
Did he partner with Gabi and Bill Gates?
I'm still just a little bit confused about all of this, if you want to make mention.
Has nothing to do with the election, though.
That doesn't ring any bells, Michael.
Is that suggestive to you?
It does ring a bell, but I don't know the details of the story.
Someone high profile, and it may have been Donald Trump, did partner with Gabby within the last 48 hours, yes.
Toward what end?
What is it to accomplish?
I don't recall the details of the story.
I just sort of heard it on the side while I was doing something else.
Okay, because I do have the video here, but this was from a while ago.
What's the upshot, Monique?
What would be the objective of the partnership?
Again, I'm very concerned that he's involved with this.
He called, he said, do you think you could do something maybe around the Oval Office or right by the Oval Office?
I said, why not?
It happens to be right behind me.
As the coronavirus has shown, there are no borders.
It doesn't discriminate.
It's mean, it's nasty, but we're going to all take care of it together.
It's great to be partnering with you.
We will work hard.
We will work strong.
Send my regards to Boris and good luck.
Let's get the answer.
My concern is that it's killing people, this injection, that's my concern.
When was that recorded?
Let's see, because I missed the first few seconds when I didn't have the volume up.
Let's see here, hang on, I'm getting this up.
Operates with great transparency and I don't know.
It was during his presidency, though.
I don't know if it's early on, or was it recent?
Is this recent in relation to- No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
I'm just putting it out there that my concerns still are that he had the military engaged and ready to go with like a half of a billion syringes here, and I still want to know what that is all about.
Good, good, good.
Monique, I love it.
I love it.
I think bringing that in is terrific.
Here's something you're not going to believe.
Could this possibly be real or is this satire?
A UK charity teaches staff white women reporting rape by black men are thereby supporting white supremacy.
In the wake of sex scandals that have rocked the British charity, training documents that privilege white women are supporting the root causes of sexual violence.
If they want black men, they're called here bad men in prison.
In other words, if a white woman is raped by a black man, then if you complain about it, if you report him, if you want him to be prosecuted, Then it turns out you're legitimizing criminal punishment, harming Black and other marginalized people.
I'm telling you, this sounds completely idiotic.
The PowerPoint recommends staff read Me, Not You!
The Trouble with Mainstream Feminism by one Allison Phillips, a professor of gender studies at Sussex University.
It includes a thread summarizing the main themes of the book, including white feminist tears deploy white woundedness and the sympathy it generates to hide the harms we perpetuate through white supremacy.
Here's part of the book.
I can't comment on the Oxfam training material.
I haven't seen them, but my book is grounded in a long tradition of feminist thought and politics that sees criminal punishment as part of the problem and not the solution.
I would never tell a survivor of sexual violence what to do, but I would like us to have better choices in criminal punishment, media exposure, or silence.
Here's the woman who says white feminists need to ask themselves whether they're causing harms when they fight sexual violence committed against themselves.
The charity was warned the document, compiled by its LGBT network and seen by The Telegraph, could breach equality laws as it suggests reporting rape When it's committed by black men is contemptible.
Naomi Cunningham, a discrimination and employment law barrister, says a document may breach the Equality Act, which bans harassment in the workplace on the basis of sex.
A message seems to be that a woman who reports a rape or sexual assault to the police and presses charges is a contemptible white feminist.
I think any woman could make an arguable case this has created or contributed to an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment, which is how the Equality Act defines harassment.
The Telegraph concluded with the following rightly furious words from feminist writer Julie Blindell.
Calling women who've been traumatized by male sexual violence or campaign against it privileged because they're white is staggeringly offensive.
To further claim white women give more power to the police by reporting their rape host loses sight of the fact that if sexual predators did not face serious consequences, they remain a danger to all women.
Does Phipps imagine that when white privileged women demand that sexual harassers be removed from a workplace, they do not care if these women go on to rape impoverished black women?
And suggesting white women are racist or harm black and marginalized people when they speak out about rape is nothing more than a warning for them to shut up!
Is nothing beyond this critical race theory-induced madness really good questions raised?
This just dumbfounded me to discover.
Michael, your thoughts?
Great comments by the feminist Julie Blendell to close that.
article, those are right on. And the first part of it, I was just
thinking, wow, talk about Stockholm syndrome. It does sound so idiotic, that it makes you wonder if it's satire,
but it apparently is not. I don't know. I don't know. Much
about the, the, I don't know much about the Oxfam organization
NGO, but if if that is real, and it evidently is that they're
promoting ideas like that. I'm, I'm I would be willing to bet that Oxfam is a Rothschild-funded NGO, so you wouldn't expect them to stray from the Rothschild International Jewish agenda of degrading all white Christians and white Christian culture.
The critical race theory, as we've observed before, is critical only in one direction.
And that's the direction of white people.
This is a form of insanity.
I mean, it's hard to believe.
Monique, your thoughts?
Yes, well, Michael, I just wanted to make a quick comment.
When you say Jewish, I would like you to say the radical side of it, because there are plenty of people that would never do this.
Really upsetting to see this as a female, because Because I've actually seen it.
Starting with the Kobe Bryant case, when he passed away, there was somebody that I knew, and she, when I brought up the fact that everyone was honoring him, you know, but he had done this before, and we all know what he was accused of, and she automatically started saying that she was a white slut, after money, I mean, again, just like 15 minutes ago when I was talking about, you were talking about the colorblindness.
This is something that should not be categorized by your skin color.
Just like the last episode when I said that I was a proponent for finding out what happened to Maitrese Richardson when she was found, she had her clothes strewn about her.
I don't care what her color was.
She was degraded.
She was not found alive.
Her parents, her mother called when she was up in the paddy wagon going to the jail.
Said, you know, are you gonna let her out now or later?
Because I'll come now.
And they said we'll let her out in the morning and they didn't.
And then they totally messed up her case.
The Malibu Sheriff Department.
And I rallied for her because she was a female that didn't deserve that.
If her clothes are strewn about, we more than likely know what happened.
But the law enforcers said, oh, well maybe water took it off.
Or animals took it off.
Animals?
And there would be teeth marks.
Water?
Where was the water?
She was completely mummified.
I mean this makes me cry that we've got into this place in this well at least it's not in this country it's over in Great Britain but I mean I will say that women have been used For eons, when there's wars, look at Bosnia-Herzegovina.
That war, all the women were raped, whether you're Christian, Muslim, they were doing that to one another.
And this is a race war, in order to complete total division, so that our country can collapse, so that people can hate our country.
Now, let me...
Take a break here for a moment.
That was a wonderful statement.
I just want you to know.
Very impassioned and right on the mark.
Thank you.
There was a film a while ago.
Wasn't a black man falsely accused of rape?
Now, then that's when it's bad.
What was that?
It's a classic film.
Black and white.
The lawyer in the courtroom.
Yeah.
You know what I'm talking about.
A mockingbird to... Yeah, to kill a mockingbird.
That's the basic plot of that.
Yeah.
Now, if we're doing it for that reason, then, well, of course.
Monique, I'm very intrigued by your bringing up this rape charge against Colby, because I've done research, and the crash of the helicopter was staged.
They took some stuff out there and they dumped it on a road.
It wasn't even Colby's chopper that crashed.
We have a report of him being seen in Columbus, Ohio.
I mean, could he have been seeking to evade the legal charge?
It appeared it had to do with introducing the coronavirus, that Kobe means crown, and I mean, there's a lot of symbolic aspects that suggest this was supposed to augur or initiate The pandemic that, you know, was a symbolic ritual to tell us what was coming.
And then if we do nothing about it, we're supposed to be responsible.
But I'm very intrigued by this allegation of rape against Kobe.
Well, I mean, this happened years ago.
You know what I'm talking about, right?
It was in a Colorado hotel, and she worked there.
She was 19 years old, and apparently he took a liking to her.
She went to his room, which, you know, I mean, not the best choice.
Inadvisable, yes, but still not the same thing as an invitation to forcible sexual intercourse.
Exactly, exactly.
Where it seems like there was blood on, I think, both of their shirts.
I think that's a report that I read.
So, yeah, it's hard to believe anything these days anymore, but, you know, that was quite a while ago.
So, well, probably unrelated to the staged crash.
Yeah, yeah.
But I mean, just the fact that this person had called her a white slut after his money, you know?
And it's like, what about your sistership, you know?
So I don't talk to that person anymore because we're not on the same page, obviously.
I don't care what your skin color is.
If you have been violated, you have been violated.
Because if a white man did that to a black woman, it's like, what am I gonna say?
Oh, well, you know, You know, just be quiet.
He's superior.
He's taking care of you.
I mean, what?
What?
No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
We have to stand up for ourselves.
We can't be taken advantage of just like we are in this whole coronavirus episode.
I mean, I feel like the fact that we're even discussing that we could have mandated vaccines And you know that you can't go to work unless you have a swab up your nose that goes near your brain barrier.
I mean, this is violating itself.
This is medical rape.
So, and- I love it.
People of all colors need to be upset about this.
Monique, I love your passion, your sincerity, and your knowledge.
This is just wonderful.
Now that wasn't satire, but take a look at this.
A half-black man ordered to pay himself reparations.
As we all know, Barack Obama has made it clear he hates white people, including the grandmother who brought him up, and his mother, both white.
But Obama is half-white.
So under the terms of reparations, white people have to pay black people money.
He needs to pay himself and apologize to himself for being half-white.
Question!
Does he have to pay reparation to Michelle?
And do his kids, who are a quarter white, need to pay reparation to their mother?
Do black Americans have to pay reparation to Japanese Americans for the World War II forced incarceration?
Should Planned Parenthood pay reparation to the families of the 117,000 black babies they killed in 2019?
If you must pay for slavery, why not pay for killing?
Should black Americans pay reparations for the families of the white soldiers who fought to free them in the Civil War against the Democrat Party-sponsored slavery?
Should the Democrat Party pay reparations for its support of slavery, creation of Jim Crow and segregationist laws, as well as suppressing black votes?
Lots of serious questions for a silly idea.
I was recently asked if I was happy having a racist president.
I said, of course not.
We replaced him with Donald Trump, coming from the Babylonian bee.
Meanwhile, local half-white, half-black man Michael Preston has been ordered to pay himself reparations since half his ancestors were oppressed and half were oppressors.
Wait, what he said after he received a letter from Governor Gavin Newsom's office informing him he owed himself over $25,000?
Okay, I guess.
He then went down to the bank and ordered a transfer to himself.
He was a little short of the total, so he made it an installment, sending himself several payments totaling $25,000 he owed for himself for his ancestors oppressing his other ancestors.
We'd like to thank Mr. Preston for atoning for the guilt of his ancestors, said Governor Newsom.
Because of them, he has a unique place of privilege in life and has a leg up on his fellow citizens who are oppressed because of things that happened hundreds of years ago.
Today, he has made that right.
Well, until we ask him for more reparation later, frankly, it's never going to stop.
We'd also like to congratulate Mr. Preston for receiving the reparations long overdue his ancestors today because of what happened.
Preston said he'll pay whatever to himself going forward as long as the state just leaves him alone and lets him live his life.
This is fascinating.
This is from the Babylonian Bee, and I'm sorry to say, while it's satire, it's too close to truth.
We all know good satire has to be rooted in the truth.
Meanwhile, CDC caught lying about hospitalization rates for unvaccinated teens and latest propaganda scheme to push more vaccines.
In an effort to get as many young people as possible injected, the Center for Disease Control is fabricating data about hospitalization rates that scare parents into stabbing their children.
The CDC under career criminal Rochelle Walensky is claiming a spike in teen hospitalizations
associated with a virus, which can only be fixed the private corporation claims.
Remember, this is not even a governmental entity by jabbing all children over the age of 12.
The truth, however, is there's no spike in teen hospitalization.
Worse yet, children have a near zero risk of even testing positive
or having any noticeable symptoms.
So vaccinations are all but useless for them, as well as actually being harmful.
Walensky and her crew, however, aren't going to let truth get in the way of their injection agenda, so the CDC is pushing needles on every American using every scare tactic in the book.
I'm deeply concerned by the numbers of hospitalized adolescents and sad to see the number of adolescents who require treatment in intensive care units or mechanical ventilation, Walensky said in a statement filled with feigned concern for children.
Until they're fully vaccinated, adolescents should continue to wear masks and take precautions around others who are not to protect themselves, their family, friends, and community.
This is just beyond belief.
Meanwhile, the CNN parrots false CDC claims, pretending to care about American children.
Not to be outdone in the lying department, fake news giant CNN was quick to pounce on the CDC fake news, warning in its breaking news section children aged 12 to 17 will die if their parents fail to get them injected with one of Donald Trump's Operation Warp Speed vaccines.
The only people who are not falling for any of this tripe are those who actually look deeper than the headlines, which in this case show CDC is manufacturing fake numbers to spread fear.
But CDC's own data show hospitalizations among all groups have plummeted over the last six weeks.
Turns out they picked arbitrary start and end points, an old trick they've used with mass studies, coinciding with a period of increased hospitalization among all age groups, including those with high vaccination rates.
Conveniently, the CDC pulled data from March 1, 2020 and April 24, 2021.
The latter date being one of the hospitalization peaks, likely from people getting injected with the toxic poison they were falsely told would keep them safe against the virus.
Hospitalization for sickness across all age groups were up a whole lot more back in December, when the injections were first released.
Walensky was not pretending to cry then about the poor teens she says are now dying because they haven't been vaccinated.
Old thing is a ridiculous circus act.
If you've not figured that out by now, none of these clowns deserve any airtime, let alone a headline, yet they continue to ram down American throat the idea the only way to save yourself is to get a needle.
It's quite evident the pandemic in America is over with, never affected children, even during its peak.
However, That pandemic of lies, fears, panic, and emotional abuse is continuing indefinitely until Pfizer and Moderna satiate their rapacious appetite for children's blood.
Who will defend our children?
And really, it's their insatiable appetite to make big bucks on a fabricated fantasy pandemic.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I guess.
Don't get me started on the CDC.
That's a really good article.
Dr. Tom Cowan calls the CDC the Center for Deception and Corruption.
The CDC is a private for-profit corporation masquerading as a government official medical agency.
It's listed.
What is the listing of corporations?
Is it Dun & Bradstreet?
It appears to be a public relations firm for Big Pharma.
It's exactly that.
It's like a wing of Big Pharma.
They receive a huge amount of their overall operating budget from the pharmaceutical industry, and they own God knows how many patents on vaccines.
So, you know, you're not going to get any truth out of them.
If you want to know how deep this rabbit hole goes, one of the things that's occurred in the last year is that people have started paying attention to the details behind virology.
And that's a whole other subject.
I won't get into it right now.
Dr. Cowan says that modern virology exists somewhere between misunderstanding and outright fraud.
And I would say it's 90% outright fraud.
Monique, your thoughts?
I've read part of Dr. Cowan's book as well.
So he's on the terrain theory, correct, Michael?
Because I go like in and out.
He doesn't actually believe in a virus.
It's all the poisons that are being excreted out of your cells, so...
He's more into the terrain, correct, Michael?
Because I've gone in and out of the book, right?
Yeah, yeah, that's correct.
As a general statement, he would fall into the terrain side of things, but it's not correct that he says he doesn't believe in the virus, because viruses are particles that have been defined as viruses.
What he wouldn't agree with is The viewpoint that those particles function is to cause disease.
Thank you for correcting me, and I do know that he recently stated that the spike proteins in the ejection is a bioweapon, so that makes complete sense.
Lonely Desert Boy, who has some great pieces online, he calls it The Center for Disease and Control, so very close to your response there, Michael.
So I'm really alarmed that media and even school districts are not giving the attention to the people, and now children, who have passed away or are seriously injured from this injection.
When they have talked about the people who have passed away from COVID, or as we know in many cases, with COVID, or did they have it at all?
I mean, we don't know.
You know, when you pass away from a motorcycle accident and you're labeled dying with COVID or from COVID, I mean, this This is of a concern.
Again, it goes back to the whole thing, just with like colors, like, why would it be okay for one color to be raped and not another?
You know, it's just, why is it okay for somebody to pass away from a virus?
But I mean, it's not okay.
But anybody who passes away from the injection, like, they don't want to discuss that.
It's not right, okay?
And with regards to, I do want to mention about the Chinese virus, I do believe we should call it the CCP virus, and we should also call it the American trader virus.
Because there are many people involved in this, one of them probably Anthony Fauci.
And what else did I want to say about this?
Oh yes, I wanted to make mention, I only heard the audio because I didn't have time to see all the video, but there's something on Bradyon where there's someone who goes through the disappearances of People who are passing away from this injection.
So if you want to look that up everyone.
Removes 150,000 deaths from the Avirus system?
Wow!
150,000?
And you know, Monique, it only reports 1%, so you can add two more zeros.
That sounds like we're into the millions of deaths here from the vaccine.
That is stunning!
And he goes through how each case has a number.
And again, I was only hearing it the audio.
I wasn't seeing it the visual because I was resting.
But he said, well, like, look at this case number that we found here.
And then when I look for it again, it's disappeared.
And then some of the disappeared ones I think popped back up.
So who knows what the CDC is doing except for the fact that they're absolutely heartless.
I saw a video from a while ago.
They were pushing some new vaccine or an adjuvant.
How do we say that when it helps?
That's correct, adjuvant.
Thank you so much.
So they were going to have a vote on something.
I'll have to dig it up.
And there were questions about it.
And one of them said, oh, well, about, like, double injections.
And she's like, oh, well, you could do, like, one arm and then another arm.
Like, that's going to make a difference.
It goes into your body, period.
And then, it's a unanimous vote, this thing passes, and one of the voters, I think he was a doctor, he's like, well, I'm glad for this progression, but I do have one concern about that myocardial infarction signal that it's given.
And they're like, oh, well, we'll be looking into it, we'll be doing the research.
What?!
You just passed it unanimously!
And now you're gonna do it?
I mean, this is ridiculous!
This is genocide on our society, even before COVID.
So I'm just, I'm so upset about this.
And I wanted to say something from before the last topic, but I'll get into it in a different topic, because I've spoken enough.
Perfect, Monique.
Yes, yes, yes, it appears these injections are causing heart attacks in teenagers!
Heart attacks in teenagers!
And the school systems are putting money up front for more vaccines, and they have plans.
There's one district out there that has plans to inoculate children two years old and up.
They believe that that's going to pass, and I wouldn't be surprised if it does pass, because it is the Center for Deceit and Control.
Thank you.
Why don't you elaborate on that as a comment on this story?
The truth about Foushee, your conspiracy theorist friend, was right.
The release of Foushee emails has given birth to hundreds of great memes, maybe none so great as the meme showing Kermit the Frog sitting on a log playing a banjo, singing with the words, here's a little song I wrote called, your conspiracy theorist friend was right, and you owe them an apology.
The meme is not only hilarious, it's true.
For much of the last 15 months, the media and left treated Fauci as a demigod, a hero of the pandemic, a man beyond reproach.
Any criticism of Fauci or his mischiefs was treated as misinformation or a conspiracy theory.
The media vilified anyone who dared to question Fauci and Big Tech silenced.
All who disagreed with him.
For the last 15 months, anyone who questioned the efficacy of wearing masks was ridiculed as being anti-science and a COVID hoaxer.
It's clear, however, that Fauci himself questioned how useful masks would be in stopping the spread of the virus.
An email obtained by BuzzFeed in a freedom of information filing, Foushee wrote,
masks are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are
not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection. The typical mask
you buy in a drugstore is not really effective in keeping out a virus, which is small enough to pass
through the material. While Foushee was privately questioning the efficacy of masks, in public he
was one of the most ardent and forceful voices in favor of masks. Masks mandate, even defending
wearing masks after being vaccinated in his exchange with Senator Ron Paul.
Indeed, Paul was roundly criticized by the media and the left for his sharp questioning of Fauci during the pandemic.
One of his Senate colleagues, Sherrod Brown, a Democrat, went so far as to return to Rand Paul as a lunatic for daring to refuse to wear a mask, even though Paul had COVID antibodies as a result of having been infected before.
Since the revelation of the Fauci emails, I don't know of a single outlet or Democrat who's apologized for Senator Paul for publicly taking the same position Fauci took privately.
I don't doubt how she started off with a best of intentions.
I doubt it.
The author doesn't, but I do.
In the beginning, all of us, from medical professionals to scientists to politicians and average individuals, were doing our best to make sense of the pandemic, unfortunately.
It's clear at this point, somewhere along the line, Fauci began enjoying his fame as he became the public face of the fight against it.
At some point, his desire to get it right and stick to the science took a bad seat to his desire to enjoy his moment in the spotlight.
Fauci the scientist quickly morphed into Fauci the pop culture icon, throwing out the first pitch in a Nationals game, gracing the cover of magazine, becoming a fixture on television.
At a time when the country needed serious people who were committed above all else to making policy decisions firmly rooted in science, what we got instead was a reality TV facsimile of an expert.
A man who went from privately cautioning colleagues about whether masks would be helpful at all to a man who went on national TV and said wearing two masks was just common sense.
And here you can see the relative size.
I mean, the Micron is so small, it cannot possibly be filtered out by the mask.
All the maskology was complete and total nonsense.
Wearing a mask is just loony tunes, observe Minnesota State Senator Dr. Scott Jensen, who blew the whistle on how hospitals were being paid $13,000 for every patient they had, but it's COVID.
And 39 for everyone they put on a ventilator, which virtually guaranteed their death.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, we haven't been calling him Tony the Rat all these months for nothing.
There's lots of names that people have made up for him.
Dr. Fraudgy, Dr. Fauci, things like that.
On the term conspiracy theorist, those of us who have been that for 20 years or more.
Just look at it as a badge of honor these days to even be considered that.
And in that regard, I have a small little anecdote here.
There's a woman here in North Carolina whose name is Maureen McDonald.
She runs an organization called Millions Against Medical Mandates, and she's plugged in with a lot of the truth telling doctors like Sherry Tenpenny and Lee Merritt.
And carry my day and several others.
And so I was talking to her.
She was sitting at a table.
She was with two other women and they were planning out some stuff that they were doing.
And I walked up to him and I said, you guys are doing the Lord's work.
Either that, or you're a bunch of conspiracy theorists.
And Maureen answered, well, these days you have to be a conspiracy theorist to do the Lord's work.
Nice.
Very nice.
And I have an article, by the way, on UNZ that's received around 950 comments.
What's wrong with conspiracy theories using JFK and 9-11 as examples?
Everyone really ought to check it out because I explained that because they're theories, they can be appraised by the same standards that apply to theories in science, which is my area of expertise.
What's wrong with conspiracy theories?
Unz, U-N-Z, review.
Monique, your thoughts.
Well, you know, theory is part of the scientific method, so in a way, we all are scientists and should be applauded for that, right?
If you don't know what the scientific method is, then you better look that up quickly, because you should have got that in school.
Good point.
Right on.
So with regards to mask wearing, I know that right now we have to really pay attention to stopping this, in some cases, lethal injection, but I still feel that we do need to put an emphasis on The dangers of the mask over long periods of time.
Maybe not so much if you're just going into a store and taking it off, which I don't want to do.
Unless it's an absolute emergency, I say no.
That's for my religious and medical convictions.
but there is a consultant neurologist and neurophysiologist who has a PhD in pharmacology
with special interest in neurotoxicology, environmental medicine, and neuroregeneration
and neuroplasticity.
That's a lot of credentials.
Her name is Dr. Marguerite.
The last name is spelled G-R-I-E-S-Z, maybe Greece, hyphen, Brisson, rather, B-R-I-S-S-O-N.
Look her up because she is stating that wearing a mask over one's mouth and nose
creates an oxygen deficiency and an increased intake of carbon dioxide.
Uh, she- She said depriving the developing brain of needed oxygen causes brain damage that cannot be reversed.
So I read this article on greatmountainpublishing.com which is a publication by Edward Hendry and that came out on June 12, 2021.
You're gonna wanna look that up because when we're allowing workers
that are doing manual labor, and I had a friend, he was always complaining
about having to wear the mask eight hours in a stuffy, like basement type situation,
loading or loading, unloading.
I mean, he could have affected himself more than he thought, and he actually hurt his knee while he was doing that, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was because he couldn't get enough oxygen in to, you know, get the full oomph that he needed for his physical labor.
And then, of course, the children that are in the seats going to the school, I mean, they have to talk, and, you know, I mean, that's I'm just so upset that people can't see through this.
This is part of the genocide, everyone.
It truly is.
Take the mask off.
Monique, you're 100% right across the board.
I've republished many of Edward Hendry's articles on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
I must have a dozen about the hazards and dangers of face masks, especially for children.
That having children wear face masks is actually a criminal act, as you observe correctly.
It brings about brain damage.
It kills brain cells, which, unlike skin cells, do not regenerate.
So there's an expectation here that between the masks and the vaccines, which are bringing about the spike protein that includes prions that are responsible for mad cow disease, we're going to have an exponential increase in cognitive incompetence in the future.
It's going to be devastating.
Included, by the way, among those who point out that masks are inappropriate and not advised for use is the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, which is the most important medical scientific organization in the United States.
Check it out, jamesfetzer.org.
And doctor, I do want to state that people who are differently abled have quite a History of being exploited in the workplace.
So the more people that we have that are going to be affected by this, the more they may be willing to comply because they're not going to have the capabilities to push back on what's right.
I mean, we can see our country right now.
So many people are just Complying.
Well, it's fine to comply when it's legal and when it's good, but not when it's going to kill you!
Move on.
Thank you.
You're 100% correct.
100% correct.
Meanwhile, GOP senators push for a Hill veto power over a future U.S.-Iran deal.
Frankly, pulling out of the Iran deal was a bad move by Donald Trump.
Iran hasn't been pursuing nuclear weapons Iran has the greatest history as a peace-loving nation of any great nation on Earth, having not launched a war of aggression against any other state since 1775.
Think about it.
The bill led by Ron Johnson, who I generally admire, would give the Senate veto power over any attempt
by the Biden administration to reenter the 2015 US-Iran nuclear deal,
which was dissolved when former Trump withdrew from the pact in 2018.
It was bad that he did that then.
It would be good to resume the deal, but Iran isn't trying to develop nuclear weapons in any
case.
Meanwhile, the Secretary General asserts NATO won't mirror Russia,
but will exponentially outspend and surround it with battle groups.
That's certainly a recipe to ensure international stability.
Just hours ahead of the NATO summit on June 14th, the military block secretary,
General Norway's Jen Stoltenberg told CSNBC that NATO will continue to expand its military capability,
but will not mirror its arch adversary, Russia.
And indeed without meaning in the least to do so, he spoke the truth.
For a while disingenuously stating the alliance he has is pursuing a dual track approach
to the nation whose government he routinely accuses of his, in his terminology, an authoritarian pushback
against the rules-based international order and approach of defense and dialogue, note the sequence,
he immediately segued into boasting.
And that's exactly what we do when we now have implemented the biggest reinforcement
of our collective defense since the end of the Cold War.
And we'll continue to strengthen our collective defense with high readiness, more troops and increased investment.
Nothing related to dialogue there, unless it's a give-and-take of threats and being threatened.
The word's biggest reinforcement of our collective defense since the end of the Cold War, or worth being italicized.
30 years after the formal dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, and of the Soviet Union itself, the alleged race on detriment for NATO's very existence, The Bloc chief nevertheless proudly announces the largest military reinforcement in the entire interim.
After years of cutting defense budget, our members are now investing more.
Again, he's perfectly correct, but not in the sense he intended.
Russia's military budget was slightly under $62 billion last year.
This year it's an estimated $42 billion, almost a third lower.
The Pentagon budget, however, at a prospective $753 billion.
Will be an increase over that of this year in the highest in absolute dollars in the history of the United States or any other nation.
With a military spending of other NATO nations added, the bloc will spend comfortably in excess of a trillion dollars for defense and very little for dialogue.
24 times what Russia is spending for defense.
NATO is indeed not reflecting Russia's aggressive military buildup, except in a grotesque, distorting mirror.
He also asserted, though, NATO would not deploy land-based nuclear-capable missiles.
It never has before and never spoken of doing so.
We will make sure we are responding to new Russian military buildups, including with nuclear weapons.
He also praised sanctions against Russia over the annexation of Crimea.
And as a rehearsal of what will be heard tomorrow, and an occasion NATO is not even remotely interested in either dialogue or defense, he issued a statement one would be hard-pressed to recall even being dreamed of during the Cold War.
Perhaps the most important thing we have done is that for the first time in NATO's history, We have combat-ready troops in the eastern part of the alliance.
New battlegroups are deployed to the Baltic countries and Poland.
We have tripled the size of the NATO Readiness Force.
If a person could, after the manner of the H.G.
Wells novel, travel in time and tell people in 1961 or 71 or 81 or 91 that the head of NATO, which has expanded from 16 to 30 members, all 14 new in Eastern Europe, would make such a statement 30 years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, He or she wouldn't be treated as a prophet or a clairvoyant, but as a madman and a misanthrope, which is what every engineer of ever-expanding, ever-more-aggressive, ever-more-dangerous NATO is.
Absolutely stunning stuff.
Michael, your thoughts?
NATO has just gone full-blown lunatic.
Yeah, what I thought while you were reading that is that NATO is the military version of the financial version that's taken over the world on a globalist scale.
Like I've mentioned before that we're not, we're no longer really ruled by the, the national,
the people who are elected to be part of the governments, the governments
are now a lower level of the pyramid.
And above them are the global corporations.
And it seems that the same thing has occurred with NATO, that they're no longer a group, a collective of independent nations with militaries.
Now they've got a structure above that, that tells all those independent nations what they want done.
And it seems like the the controllers of these national militaries, not the the individuals themselves, but those above them, are hell-bent on creating a war between the United States and somebody.
It could be one of three or four different people out there, but the biggest Candidates are naturally China, Russia, and Iran.
So I think that they want to bring about another really bad war to further destroy any expectation of the old system continuing into the future so that they can have a clean slate to implement the one that they think they want.
I think those are very astute comments.
Monique, your thoughts?
Well, that's a lot of money for security and the fact that Russia has invested so much less.
I mean, it would make sense for an organization that is in control of so many different countries to have a bigger budget, but there does seem to be some sort of underlying scheme about it, if you would.
It sounds like New World Order to me, and quite frankly, I still believe that we should be speaking out.
I think it's our duty, but I feel that we are in that Book of Revelation time.
regardless of what your religion is, I truly feel that there's just too many different
parallel things going on, especially that Mark of the Beast.
Oh my goodness gracious, that what is his name?
That Klaus Schwab, I'll have to give that to you, of the World Economic Forum.
He said a few years ago that in 10 years, we'd be having rain chips.
So, you know, and like most of us would.
So it's concerning to me because I'm a peaceful person.
And speaking of Russia and Tolstoy, one of the first people that I found out
was a vegetarian from the past.
You know, he came from a noble family of people who were in war,
but he saw the carnage when he himself was in the military.
And that's why he became a vegetarian actually.
I visited his, his, um, Where he lived in the winter of 2006.
I went over there meeting a vegetarian.
That was pretty brave of me.
What you will do for love didn't work out.
But anyway, I'm just really saddened by this and I just wish that the world would wake up and that we could do something about this collectively.
Because if we don't do it collectively, I don't know what more I can do in all of us and getting the word out.
Very, very well said, Monique.
Very well said.
Meanwhile, the enduring false narrative about the Pulse Massacre shows the power of media propaganda.
Now, this is from Glenn Greenwald.
In my opinion, frankly, Glenn ought to know better.
You notice the Pulse Club was painted from white to black because the permit for the club expired three years earlier.
Glenn Grinwald talks about the 5th anniversary numerous senators, politicians, and activist groups commemorating by propagating an absolute falsehood, namely that the shooter Omar Mateen was motivated by anti-LGBT animus.
The evidence is definitive and conclusive.
This is false.
Mateen, like so many others who committed similar acts of violence, was motivated by rage over President Obama's bombing campaigns in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, chose Pulse at random without even knowing it was a gay club, Yet this media-consecrated lie continues to fluster.
Turns out Glenn Greenwald himself is a gay guy.
I would like that he knew more about the fraud presented to us as the mass shooting at the Bowls Club.
Rather than acknowledging it was anger over his relentless bombing raids in the Muslim world, Obama immediately declared that anti-LGBT hatred was the real cause.
This was an attack on the LGBT community, he said, adding, and hatred toward people because of sexual orientation, regardless of where it comes from, is a betrayal of what is best in us.
Chad Griffin, then head of the largest LGBT advocacy group, Human Rights Campaign, claimed the maniac who did this was somehow conditioned to believe that LGBT people deserve to be massacred, that they are less than in this society.
In the immediate aftermath, it may have been reasonable for the public to speculate that Mateen, given his professed support for ISIS, chose Pulse because it was a gay club.
That belief neatly played into the liberal political agenda of highlighting anti-LGBT hate crimes.
And also comported with a dual stereotypes of the gay hating Muslim in the closet gay man who harbors self-hatred ending up directed at other gay people.
The storyline was instantly consecrated when politicians and LGBT groups seized on this claim and ratified it as unquestionably true.
But journalism is supposed to function on evidence, not speculation.
There never was any evidence supporting the storyline he was driven by hatred for LGBT.
The evidence that was available suggested the opposite.
Meanwhile, I have a whole book about it, From Orlando to Dallas and Beyond.
Living in a False Reality for Even Hillary is played by doubles.
Check it out.
Do Americans live in a false reality created by orchestrated events?
Our nation's leading public intellectual is thereby responding to our work on Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing.
But the extent and depth of deception by the American government with regard to the American people has no bounds.
We even have a candidate for the office of president resorting to the use of body doubles to keep the public from learning the dire state of her health, which is copiously documented here.
This is not theory.
This is fact.
The people are being played with the complicity of the mainstream media.
From Orlando to Dallas, Americans are being confronted with the recurrent use of photoshopped images and fabricated narratives of stage events involving the use of what are called crisis actors and even phony doctors playing roles to fool the public.
The Orlando Regional Medical Center has now announced it's not going to be charging for its services in response to the greatest mass shooting in U.S.
history, as though this were an altruistic act.
But because the shooting was staged and no one seems to have died, there was no one to bill.
The fakery has gone international in spades, where a sequence of events from Charlie Hebdo to Brussels to Paris and Nice are demonstrably fabricated, where the truck massacre in Nice has reached new depths of deception through the use of mannequins to impersonate victims of a non-existent crime.
When will the public awaken to the reality we are being played for the sake of promoting political agenda?
Television and newspapers today have become nothing more than instruments of propaganda and disinformation.
George Orwell had it right.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, that's a disappointing article by Glenn Greenwald.
I thought he was kind of coming into More truth-telling over the last couple of years since he got kicked off of his mainstream media job.
But to me, that is a classic limited hangout, and it goes back to what I was saying earlier about the people who script these events coming along later with a big controversy about it that deals with some aspect of it on the surface while leaving the whole story, the whole narrative, Alone.
And in this case, all he's talking about is the motives of the killer.
Whether his motives were that he hated homosexuals, or he was getting even for American policy in the Middle East.
That's what that whole article is about.
When it's and I've mentioned this before, it's like making a big controversy over who who gave the guns to Adam Lonza at Sandy Hook when there was no Adam Lonza at Sandy Hook.
And here it's the same thing.
There was no there was no shooting at the at the Pulse nightclub.
But here we have an article of what it's been five years later about what his motives might be.
That's very disappointing.
Greenwald is posing as a muck-breaking journalist here, calling a mainstream media story about his being an LGBT hater the motivation, but he's leaving the narrative of the shooting completely intact.
Those are really astute observations, Michael.
Monique, your thoughts?
Well, you had me on the show yesterday and I had never heard that the Pulse nightclub could have been completely staged.
You know so much more than me, but it certainly looks like it could have with the video footage you were showing.
Again, I'm just really concerned that People can exploit agendas in this way.
I mean, I'm glad if nobody passed away.
That's the positive side of things.
But again, if you're an LGBTQA plus person, You're being exploited.
And again, I don't care who you are.
If they're using whatever you consider yourself to be in an exploitative way, you should be up in arms!
I know during this time of COVID, the LGBTQA plus community has been used a lot, especially for the trans agenda.
And I mean, I've known people who are trans for years now.
Believe it or not, I did an internship with RuPaul back in the day.
He was on the radio and I was into dance music.
I was a radio DJ in South Jersey and whatnot.
I used to dance at nightclubs, drug-free, but I loved it!
I loved it, you know?
And being in acting, of course, there's a lot of men that are gay or trans and, you know?
I mean, I don't know what to say.
If that's who you think you are, then that's who you are.
But to exploit the agenda...
For whatever your reasoning is, especially during this COVID time, you gotta wonder.
I mean, many people are saying it's because of the transhumanism agenda, which I'd be like, nah.
But right before this happened, I saw it was like the Church of Transhumanism up in Silicon Valley.
Look that one up.
So it's very likely that the nuclear family continues to be disrupted and which is a shame I believe you know if you don't want to be a part of the nuclear family then that's fine but don't like make it out to be like it's some sort of bad unit because there are quite a number of people that are happy having a family so that's that's what I wanted to say
And where are we going to be if we don't have reproduction of the species?
I mean, it's just ludicrous.
If we're all gay or lesbian, then there aren't going to be any successors.
They're not going to be little gays or lesbians.
There aren't going to be any children at all, which is part of the absurdity of the overall view.
But I think your impassioned comments, Monique, are spot on.
Absolutely spot on.
Meanwhile, We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Live!
Need to know at gmail.com.
Even Benjamin Franklin, one of our founding fathers, emphasized, it's the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.
Take nothing for granted.
Don't let yourself be played.
And notice how Amazon is playing its role to keep the truth from the American people by doing its best to ban every book that exposes what really happened.
Whether it's about Sandy Hook or the Boston bombing or the moon landing, Orlando, Dallas, Charlottesville, or Parkland, they have banned them all.
You can nevertheless find them, if not at amazon.com, at moonrockbooks.com.
Moonrockbooks.com.
And if you want some current research about false flags and conspiracies, go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
You can download all of the presentations for free, compliments of me.
Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people, the secret of tyranny in keeping them ignorant.
Final thoughts.
Michael, yours.
I'd like to go back to a couple of short statements that I read earlier by Dr. Lee Merritt and Dr. Larry Palevsky, two of the most high-profile, truth-telling doctors about this whole situation.
Dr. Lee Merritt says, this is what I think about this.
Right now, if you don't look at this as a planned program of depopulation, Then you're not going to come to the right conclusions for how to deal with it.
And if you think this is all by accident, you're going to be sorely mistaken.
Larry Pilevsky says, you must realize that something dangerous, something nefarious, something evil is happening.
And if you don't believe us, then you may need to have your own experience.
Our hearts are breaking if you go ahead and allow your children to take this injection for a condition that's not caused by a virus.
It's caused by a man-made spike protein for an injection that's not a vaccine that will only cause great damage and potentially death and probably infertility to your children.
All for the sake of being accepted by a society that hates you in the first place.
Well said.
Great quotes.
Monique, your final thoughts?
That's something that you said that, Michael, because when this first happened, the whole COVID venture, I was using that word nefarious and people are like, Oh, don't say that.
Or, you know, the whole conspiracy theory.
But, um, It really has been nefarious.
I mean, the fact that people were right away put on ventilators, the fact that deaths are disappearing on, you know, an official website, the fact that death certificates changed, the fact that people couldn't visit their loved ones.
I mean, come on!
It's so evident.
And we can't just allow this to fade in our memory, even if it's stopped right now.
There needs to be people that are held accountable.
And I do want to go back to when I was talking about people who, you know, women with the sexual assault.
Um, I don't know if I made such a great comparison.
I, you know, I said if a black woman was raped by a white man and you know, they're like just saying, Oh, well, um, uh, you know, be quiet.
Like, you know, he's, he, he, he's good or whatnot.
I maybe not the best comparison, but I do want to say that one of the reasons that I didn't, uh, vote for Hillary Clinton was because she was trying to keep The victims of her husband alleged victims Quiet, you know, and I don't know if there were any black women involved in that.
I don't think so.
But um, you know, it's just It's it's not right.
I don't want any woman doing that because of whatever the status of the man is You know his position his race It makes no difference.
It's her body.
It contains her Her spirit and soul as far as I am concerned.
And we need to preserve it.
We need to, you know...
I don't know.
I believe that we should all just behave and then go up into God's light at this point, because I personally don't want to bring anybody else into this world.
If you want to, that's fine.
That's what I was saying with the nuclear family.
But I feel we're...
I feel there's a lot of pain.
There's a lot of joy down here too, but that's how I feel.
I'm tired of these political agendas.
I want the truth.
I want people to be truthful to one another.
Honesty is really the best policy.
It really is in the long run.
Thank you.
Wonderful.
Well, I was simply making the observation from the point of view of evolution.
Without reproduction, a species becomes extinct.
I can't say how much I enjoy having colleagues like Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina, and now Monique Lukens from Los Angeles.
This is just sensational.
If you don't want to be played, you gotta get familiar with the evidence.
Monique has shown to her it's a revelation to discover that Orlando was a fraudulent event.
But as we showed in yesterday's program, you can see it was fake.
It was phony.
It was a fraud.
To broaden yourself, go online.
Go to 153news.net, for example, where you can still find the programs, How to Spot a False Flag, Part 1, and How to Spot a False Flag, Part 2.
There's a successor version I did with Dr. Katherine Horton.
The particle physicist from Oxford who's been leading the fight against the targeting of individuals using directed energy weapons in four parts that you can find on BitChute.
How to Spot a False Flag, Part 1 through Part 4 with Dr. Katherine Horton.
Watch one or the other, or if you have the time, indulge yourself, watch them both, because Dr. Horton makes wonderful points, just as Monique has been making wonderful points here today.
Don't let yourself be played.
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin.
Thank you for joining us today.
Back tomorrow with more of the news you need to know.
▲
Export Selection