All Episodes
Previous Next
June 8, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:21:14
Need to Know (8 June 2021) with David Scorpio and Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm very pleased to be joined today by David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina.
We are here to share with you all the news you need to know.
We begin with Democrats in defunding the police cities, growing desperate with a rising wave of crime.
Democrat politicians sided with BLM, Antifa, Thuds, and other anti-cop radicals are feeling the consequences of their knee-jerk reaction to the protests.
Thoughtless decisions to defund the police departments has resulted in experienced officers retiring early or resigning in protest at unprecedented levels of funding.
Coupled with Biden's lawless rhetoric and an anti-police DOJ led by Merrick Garland, Democrat-run cities now suffer a significant escalation in violent crime.
Liberal politicians are, if they have a brain, quickly replenishing police budgets.
Mayor Bill de Blasio, for example, stated he'd reinstate $92 million to rebuild a precinct he considered DOA during the BLM riots.
The anti-cop Democrats stood shoulder to shoulder with looters, arsonists, and street thugs engaged in attacks on NYPD officers at the time.
More than happy to strip police funding and kneel with rioters for photo ops.
The NYPD suffered a 75% increase in officer departure since the Democrat mayor backed rioters against law enforcement.
272 officers left in a single month.
22 officers left in a single month. 2020 departure stood at 2300 above 2019 attrition. Criminals
have taken full advantage. There's a.
There's a 30.4% increase in crime in April of 2021 compared to 2020.
Larceny up 66%.
Felony assaults by the same.
These are the tip of the spear.
According to the Law Enforcement Think Tank Police Executive Research Forum, nearly half of all police departments polled in 2020 suffered defund-the-police effects.
Minneapolis was at the core, led by the more extreme Socialist Democrats, slashing the budget by $8 million.
Minneapolis, like Chicago, has been plagued by gun violence ever since.
Early data report indicates a 250 percent increase in gunshot victims, robbery incidents up by 59 percent, rape by 22.
Local officials returned more than six million of the money taken away after citizens had to bring lawsuits against the city for not providing the law enforcement that citizens were paying for.
Democrat strongholds like Baltimore appear to be following a subtle refund of police movement too.
But the problem many face is that experienced officers have retired or moved to Republican-run municipalities where their efforts are more appreciated.
Everyday Americans are keenly aware the anti-police messaging coming out of the White House only exacerbated the situation.
Roughly 73% of Americans recognize crime rates have spiked in the absence of former President Trump's law and order leadership.
Get this.
In 71% white King County, Washington, home of Seattle, almost all firearm violence in 2020 was committed by non-whites.
Imagine living in Seattle, Washington, if you are a citizen of King County, which has been renamed To honor Martin Luther King Jr.
in 1986 because William Rufus Devane King, for whom it was originally named, once owned slaves.
So 71% white county.
The 2020 King County Firearm Violence Report was released now from the prosecuting attorney's office.
It matter-of-factly states 76% of shooting victims are non-white, 55.19% being black.
80% of those charged are non-white, about 54% being black.
King County, however, is only 6% black.
Whites who represent a vast majority of Seattle and King County are a peaceful, docile people.
Gun crime in Seattle and King County has a color.
Racially speaking, it ain't white.
And of course, that's true all over the country.
Meanwhile, Gavin Newsom is in trouble in California.
He's trying to bribe voters with offers of free stimulus money But he may be in for a rough ride this summer.
There have been shutdowns of electric grid over and over.
Californians know the government has been dealt a bad hand, isn't responsible for the hot weather, the failure of companies like PG&E to cut trees near power lines, which of course is absurd.
Nevertheless, Californians are likely to remember their governor referred to shutoffs as the new normal.
In 2019, before reversing course and blaming utility companies for the problem.
Also, many voters are looking for someone to blame when things go drastically wrong.
There's no way to accurately predict the result of the upcoming recall.
What can be said for sure is Democrats who are confident of winning may be in for a surprise.
If Newsom can't show better leadership skills than he did during the COVID-19 pandemic, even his handouts may not be enough to keep him in power.
According to California law, if Governor Newsom cannot win at least 50% of the vote, he will automatically lose his governorship to the person who got the most votes in the recall election, even if that person does not get 50% of the vote.
In any case, it's certain to be a Republican.
Pretty damn interesting.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
So are they saying that the recall election is definitely going ahead?
Because I had heard that they were trying to get rid of a lot of the signatures and say that the signatures are invalid.
So is that a done deal?
Scorpio, I'm not certain, but my belief is it is going to go forward, yes.
They had so many extra signatures in anticipation of the nonsense you're describing.
Right.
I mean, we'll come back to verify, but my belief is that it is moving forward.
Okay, well it's funny if you want to make sure every vote is accurate, that's destroying democracy, but if you toss out signatures on a petition, that's perfectly acceptable.
It's such a double standard.
You know, it's funny, Newsom's doing lots of things to try to save his own ass now.
You know, they're lifting the mask mandate middle of June, and all of a sudden, COVID's just going away, you know, because his ass is on the line, you know, it's really quite amazing.
But we'll see, I hope he gets his ass tossed out, but I don't think, what's his name, Bruce Jenner's gonna be the man to do the job, quite frankly.
Kaitlin, you mean Kaitlin?
Well, that's what he calls himself now, but if you listen to him talk, it's still Bruce, man.
He doesn't really sound like a woman.
How far did he go in his transformation?
Did he get lopped off?
I don't think so, because apparently he's quite open about still having sex with women.
He's not a homosexual.
Oh really?
That's pretty damn interesting.
Michael, go for it.
Too much information.
I don't even want to know about Bruce slash Caitlin.
about Bruce slash Caitlin. Yeah, so, so yeah, the stories about
the cities exploding in crime after demonizing the police, that one of the guys who wrote one of those stories, Paul
Kersey, and there's another guy named john Derbyshire, both of
whom consistently cover the hypocrisy that we're seeing all the time about race relations in the United States, and all
the blaming of whites.
And they're consistently published at Unz Review.
So that's Paul Kersey.
And John Derbyshire, that's one of the few sources of straight up correct racially categorized information that you're going to get.
So let me get this straight, that these cities have demonized the police by staging false flag events, and then they've flooded the media with these allegations of racism, and that makes the cops' jobs all that more difficult.
So you get cops either quitting or being replaced by rookies, or you get cops unwilling to do their jobs because they're a lot more dangerous than they Used to be.
And now these people are freaking out about crime exploding in their cities.
Isn't that like unprecedented levels of stupidity?
Of course, I don't think it's just stupid.
As we know, it's part of an agenda.
And of course, nothing would please me more Well, that's just an expression, of course, but nothing would please me more than to see Gavin Newsome, nuisance, but he's much worse than a nuisance, thrown out of office.
I think a proper thing to do after he leaves office is for the local courts to sentence him to community service cleaning up all the human waste on California city streets.
Deborah Tavares says that PG&E, the California utility, is a Rothschild-owned utility.
So, you know, if the cutoffs of electricity are going to figure into their overall agenda of taking California or depopulating it, you can bet they'll do it.
They'll make up some reason for it, and they'll do it.
Michael, that's fascinating because you had the destruction of all the homes, you know, and these bizarre events that appear to be directed energy, somehow related to smartphone, where PG&E was sued for responsibility.
That should be a Rothschild operation makes much, much more sense.
And Scorpio, I was sure you're going to want to come back and talk about defunding the police.
Give us your thoughts.
Well sure, and it's interesting, Mike was making comments about the regular shutdowns of the power grid is going to be the new normal.
The reason they're telling you that is because once they start to actually convert to green energy, they're not going to have any choice because they damn well know you can't power major cities with windmills and solar panels.
It's a joke.
And, you know, I guess, Jim, I'm just wondering, when is the public going to realize that these people are intentionally trying to lower the value of our society, take the value down in every way imaginable, and this defunding of the police is just one facet of that to, you know, obviously create a higher crime rate, more problems, and just a lower quality of life for people. When are people going
to realize they're doing this on purpose?
I mean, there's plenty of incompetence as well, but it's on purpose because, as Michael said,
it's part of a covert agenda. And I think the day that the public catches on to this,
you're going to see some major fireworks. And I think that day of reckoning is coming soon.
What are we supposed to be reimagining?
You know, they want a federal police force?
I mean, that would be terrible.
That's what you have in fascist or totalitarian countries.
Is that the Democrat plan?
Remember, when they talked about defunding the police, they never told us how they were going to compensate, how they were going to maintain law enforcement.
Are we just getting rid of law enforcement?
I remember when they were surveying residents of Harlem in the arrests, what they thought about defunding the police.
And they were saying it would be suicide.
Yeah, exactly.
That phrase, reimagining the police, is only one of the latest that they've come up with.
They're constantly coming up with these deceptive linguistic phrases like that.
Yeah, it's just ridiculous.
Meanwhile, we have Jovan Hutton Pulitzer explaining that they actually wrote the code, deliberately left it broken.
This is pretty fascinating.
The opposing side of this battle for election integrity may not be a light worker who vibrates higher than all other humans.
And from what I've seen, does not seem to shoot light beams out of either eyes, but he sure does have success and patents out the wazoo.
May be the most successful, relevant inventors of all time.
He has, in an effectiveness and usefulness review of top technology inventors and their patents, the intellectual property professionals put Hulitzer in the number one inventor position with an astounding 4,790% over industry average for patent citations compared to Elon Musk, who came in second.
At 987%.
He's done a huge amount on scanning machine-readable codes, how machines interact with ballots and voting machines, has patents as part of licensed portfolio to almost all 15 billion mobile devices on the planet.
He has concluded something went horribly wrong with the 2020 election.
The voting machine code was written in a way and was designed to allow certain chosen ones to win and rule over people unethically.
He goes on to share, the voting machines and the code used were broken and kept that way so it could be put to advantage.
The corruption was uncovered in the 2020 election.
Fortunately, Pulitzer has a mechanism to unwind the election and identify the invalid ballots included in the current tallies.
Although Trump didn't initiate the executive orders we requested, it does appear that the current Arizona 2020 Maricopa County election audit is based in part on Pulitzer's techniques.
Other efforts in Pennsylvania and Georgia are considering adopting them as well.
Those on the left, of course, are doing all they can to disparage Pulitzer because he's a threat.
His idea of verifying the paper ballots are unique and genius.
Given the chance, Pulitzer may save the Union by providing actual, verifiable results of elections across the country from 2020 and into the future by focusing on paper ballots.
Of course, we know the actual election outcome.
Sydney provided it with us at the time, where Trump was virtually a red wave from coast to coast, taking California and Minnesota, as I had predicted, with 410 electoral votes.
Meanwhile, the LaRouche Political Action Committee is very concerned about how they have been politicizing January 6th to try to trash Trump.
The intent is still to prosecute Trump, preventing him from running again.
A January 6th commission, which I'm glad to say has now been defeated, like the first 9-11, would be a frame-up, a witch-hop, and cover-up to distract blame from the actual perpetrators.
Where, without any doubt, the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, is the primary figure.
The focus should be on the Director of the FBI and other intel agencies, known to have informants in Antifa, Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and more, as to who inspired and was involved in the riots, where we had the New York Times reporting in advance it was going to happen.
Removing any element of incitement from Donald Trump's speech where no one had less motive to disrupt the discussion that was ongoing at the time of evidence of voter fraud and election theft.
According to the Capitol Police, despite requests, the National Guard was not deployed because of intervention by House Senate leadership.
Reaffirming my conclusion, Nancy Pelosi, as Speaker of the House controlling the Capitol Police, was the one who orchestrated this entire event.
LaRouche is also interested in, in QAnon, ways in which it may have been infiltrated, why it should have been declared to be a domestic threat, what steps did the FBI, DHS take to infiltrate Q, what was involved in that op, all very nasty, dirty stuff, totally political.
Scorpio, your thoughts.
Well, it's interesting, Jim, you know, whenever they bring up the voter, you know, the election issue, every network says the same thing.
And this is a further indication of a centralized script and the use of psychology and psychologists to, you know, control people's minds.
They always say Trump's big lie.
And, you know, Trump's big lie about the election.
And that's always how they preface it.
It doesn't matter what network you're looking at, what mainstream media outlet, it's always that they preface it with that one thing.
And it shows that, you know, they had a committee of psychologists come up with this term as it's sort of like a branding, whatever the topic comes up, Trump's big lie.
And that way, it's always encapsulated into that box.
And Jim, I think this is going to be hard to keep putting more fingers in the dike here because a new little leek sprouts out every few days.
Honestly, I think it's the overwhelming majority of Americans already see that, especially people, you know, that voted for Trump.
But I think more and more just people that are sort of fence-sitters have the sense something's seriously wrong.
And I don't see any way to turn the page back.
I really don't.
New information comes out every day.
Once you look into the information, it's overwhelming.
I don't see how you can deny it.
And the mainstream media is just making themselves look more and more like a bunch of overpaid liars.
Well, you made a wonderful point about, with regard to the recall, they're scrutinizing every single signature with a microscope to try to disqualify it, when in relation to a Trump election, they don't want any examination of any of the ballots whatsoever.
What could be more obviously blatant and fraudulent?
Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah, the word for that is, in all caps, hypocrisy.
That's easy to see.
Those are good observations Scorpio just made about the phrase, Trump's big lie being parroted anytime the mainstream media deals with the election issue or anybody claiming that it was not perfectly full of integrity.
That's an impressive record that this guy Pulitzer has with patents and inventions.
And I remember seeing a video of him several months ago talking about certain fold patterns that you would always see in mail-in ballots.
But as a general rule, I'm not sure how to think about the various stories about recounts of the 2016 election, even though that election was Most obviously rigged like none we've ever seen before in this country that I think.
For the last, even though that's the case, for the last five years or so now, we've been served a non-stop diet of looking forward to something good happening that's just on the horizon.
You know, to get people that are not on board with the New World Order, hoping for some Great event that will turn the country back to a viable functioning entity and punish the people deserving of punishment.
But every time something like that gets floated, it doesn't happen.
So, you know, while it's good to be optimistic, I can't Shake this feeling of being played if we continually buy into this narrative that things are going to be set straight at some point in the near future.
And personally, regarding Trump specifically, Trump to me has built up too much of a downside for me to personally ever actually trust him again.
You know, between service of anything Israel wants, pushing these depopulation injections, abandoning people like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange, and the people being arrested for the January 6th Capitol protest.
I'm just not, I'm not a Trump guy.
Okay.
Well, I think there's a lot of prudence there in what you're saying, Michael.
I think you meant 2020.
You said 2016.
It was rigged for Hillary, but Trump won anyway.
I agree with you about all these promises.
Now, what he noticed was ballots that don't have a fold cannot have been mailed because to be mailed, they'd have to be folded.
So that was one technique that was being used to show they were invalid ballots.
Scorpio, your further thoughts?
Well, I think Michael made a good point just now that, you know, the election fraud, it's not just about Trump.
It's the fact that, first of all, a lot of elections are rigged.
I think that's just the tip of the iceberg, number one.
And, you know, I think we need to recognize that.
And secondly, I don't think, Mike made another good point, I do not think that reform or some kind of major change is going to happen from within this government, the cabal of international Jewish bankers is too strong.
They've bought off everybody at the top in the key positions.
There's mid-level people that are good people that are trying to do the right thing,
but they ultimately don't have enough power to make anything happen.
And the problem is that once, if there's any kind of major change at all,
the whole thing falls apart.
So they're going to do everything they can to keep everything status quo and keep it going as they move forward in an agenda that's going to become increasingly unpopular amongst the population as more and more people start to get a clue that these people do not have our best interest at heart.
There's no doubt about it, Scorpio.
You're 100% right.
I couldn't agree more.
Meanwhile, Trump is demanding a Pennsylvania election audit.
Roe Bolver explains why they believe he's right, that it was stolen.
As Trump and his allies hope to get the bottom of election fraud in Arizona, he has set his sights on a new and even more important target, Pennsylvania.
President Trump is demanding the Republican-controlled Pennsylvania State Senate conduct a forensic audit of their 2020 election, similar to what's taking place in Maricopa County.
As they gear up, it's useful to revisit Revolver's groundbreaking statistical work suggesting foul play in the Keystone State.
We find considerable evidence consistent with the possibility of election fraud and vote counts in Montgomery County.
We examined a highly anomalous update to mail vote totals in the New York Times Edison data, which enormously benefited Biden and looked suspicious in a number of dimensions.
Our results are suggestive of a new and highly suspicious batch of mail ballots being added to the count.
Here's what they found.
Thursday, November 5th at 9.09am, a large batch of 90,022 mail absentee votes was added that had over 95% for Biden.
But total votes go up by only 9,534, implying that in-person votes actually went down by 80,488.
had over 95% for Biden, but total votes go up by only 9,534, implying that in-person votes actually went down by 80,488.
In other words, they seem to have taken 80,488 of the new mail-in ballots and replaced in-person ballots
there by, no doubt, all of which had been for Trump, by the mail-in that were all for Biden.
The new batch looks nothing like existing mail ballots.
It has a level of support for Biden over 95%, statistically impossible to come from the same distribution counted up to that point, which was about 75%.
Every comparison of pairs of candidates shows improbable changes.
Irrespective of the old distribution, the new batch was extremely unlikely in its own terms, showing a ratio of support for a third-party candidate relative Trump 20% higher than virtually every county in America.
The last fact is consistent with aiming to get Biden's vote share high, but not impossibly high, while simultaneously not giving any more votes to Trump than absolutely necessary.
The distribution being removed from the in-person count is even more implausible, Turning out to be, when they're replaced, 98.1% for Biden.
On the basis of our analysis, we conclude foul play is the most compelling and parsimonious explanation for the voting anomalies.
Thus, we offer the following interpretation.
Sometime after election night, a very large bat of mail ballots were counted that show an enormous advantage for Biden Looking nothing like mail ballots counted up to that point.
They look implausible on their own face in terms of relative vote shares of Libertarian and Republican votes.
The update is difficult to reconcile with simple data errors like genuine mail ballots being misclassified as in-person.
They represent strong circumstantial evidence suggesting fraud in mail votes in Montgomery County.
No doubt about it.
This really emphasizes or reiterates points we've already made.
Perhaps a brief comment, Scorpio.
You know, it's just amazing that we're supposed to believe that 95% of the votes went to Joe Biden.
I mean, that's beyond the pale.
There's no way that would happen in a real election.
And it just shows you the desperation they have to, you know, I guess the landslide for Trump was so overwhelming, they had to cheat on the level where 95% of the votes coming in are for Biden.
It's fallacious.
It's absurd on its very face.
And that's why the media keeps repeating it over and over and over, you know, as an attempt to, you know, beat the propaganda into your mind.
If you hear it enough times, it becomes reality.
And this really is like an old Stalin-style election here, you know, you vote for Joe Stalin or else.
And it's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes.
Yeah, you got it right.
The Democrats are just crushing democracy and the Constitution, and they don't give a damn.
They frankly don't give a damn.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, it is absolutely stunning when you study these things, and we have been studying them for the last six months or more, the degree to which that election was rigged.
You know, there are a lot of just Trump-hating people out there, but I doubt that Joe Biden got a fourth the number of votes that Trump got in that election.
It seems like we've covered some news story about election fraud almost every week, and there have been so many occasions.
Every time you turn over a stone, as we said before, you'll find some sort of Vote fraud or electronic rigging.
And we said, you know, we've covered a lot of these things in the last segment.
I certainly hope that something will come of these efforts in Arizona and maybe it'll develop in Pennsylvania.
But I'm just not holding my breath.
Well, imagine the prospect of them using Dominion voting machines in the future.
I've even been told they may use Dominion voting machines in California for the recall.
Yeah, I've heard that.
Good God!
Unreal.
Absolutely unreal.
Meanwhile, Alan Dershowitz.
Trump's enemies are weaponizing the law against him.
While I do not always agree with this guy, he is a brilliant constitutional attorney.
In this case, it seems to me, makes excellent points.
I think what he did, and now he's talking about Trump's speech at the Ellipse, Was protected as president by executive privilege and by the First Amendment.
This is an attempt to use the law as a weapon.
I don't think there was any legitimate basis for criticizing Trump at the lips, but nevertheless, of course, Democrats have sought to turn it into impeachable offense.
He added legal actions are often political, such as grand jury taking place in New York where Attorney General Letitia James Ran for office on the campaign promise of getting Trump.
Tershowitz said he also think there'll be more lawsuits as political-based legal actions are growing more extensive from both parties.
It's wrong when either party uses it, the law, as a weapon, but it's being used now extensively, broadly, and in an overreaching way against the former president.
If you don't like the former president, don't vote for him.
Don't vote for the people he supports.
That's your political right.
But bringing lawsuits makes very little sense.
Trump would have little recourse through filing countersuits, but he could bring what's called Rule 11 to issue, it suggests, sanctions that require those suing him to pay legal fees and sanction lawyers who bring actions against him.
I'm not necessarily in favor of that, but it is a legal recourse.
Meanwhile, those who have supported Trump are being blocked from speaking in the nation's universities.
Dershowitz said this is the first time he's seen that happen.
I'm old enough to remember Kennedy and Nixon was a very divided election, but we never had these kinds of recriminations.
Today we do.
Dershowitz also discussed a report about USA Today filing a subpoena from the FBI demanding records that identified people who read a story in February about a shooting in South Florida where two agents were killed and three were wounded.
The parent company, Gannett, has filed motions to quash.
This is pretty damn peculiar.
Free press includes not only the right of newspapers to publish, but the right of everybody to read or not.
I helped rescue a guy from the Soviet Union in the 1970s, said Dershowitz.
He had no place to go.
He lived in my home with my family.
I took him to Harvard Square and showed him a bookstore.
He couldn't believe it.
You could buy a book without them keeping a record of what you bought and what you read.
Oh, my God!
This is America!
This is great!
In the Soviet Union, you can't read a newspaper.
You can't read a book without them having a record.
We don't want to ever see that happen in the United States.
You have a right to read what you want.
But, of course, it's changing very fast.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
That's actually a very interesting story about the guy from the Soviet Union and it's sad to see America moving so quickly in that direction.
Of censorship, control of information, and controlling the parameters of the conversation.
You know, this is exactly what the Soviet Union did, but a lot of people don't see it.
And, you know, it's interesting how, you know, first there was Michael Cohen, Trump's attorney, was raided and they took his documents even though you know, a relationship between an attorney and a client
has always been sacrosanct. It's always been a line that you can't cross, but they did it and they've
done the same thing to Giuliani.
Went to his home and, you know, took a bunch of documents, just in a desperate attempt to find
something to destroy Trump's reputation with and make sure that they have Democrat rule in
Um, you know, this is, these are fascist techniques, whatever you want to call it, communist techniques.
They're the techniques of a, of a power hungry state that will stop at nothing to fulfill its agenda.
And I think it's time people realize we do not live in a democracy.
That's all a facade.
And a joke now, and it's going to become more and more clear as Grouper Joe and Company, his band of Zionist Jewish international banking-compiled Jews, ramrod some very unpopular things down the Americans' throats, and do things that are not going to benefit the country one single bit.
I think everything they're doing is designed to wreck the country.
Yep.
Destroy it economically, politically, legally, morally, in every possible way.
It's as destructive agenda as I could imagine.
It had to be very carefully designed, constructed for precisely that purpose.
Michael, your thoughts?
Totally agree.
That's an interesting story in terms of Freedom and tyranny, I suppose, but Alan Dershowitz has got a long way to go before I don't consider him just a scumbag egotist who loves being a public figure and he'll step in on
On high profile figures like this anytime he gets a chance.
Something I don't understand at the bottom of slide 27 when he starts talking about this USA Today story about USA Today fighting a subpoena from the FBI.
How does that fit in?
Is that is that a principle that he's talking about that you can't?
The government should not go into any records like that.
I just don't understand how that fits into that story.
Well, he said to find a subpoena for records that The word should be identified, that I identified people who read a story about a shooting in southern Florida.
I mean, it seems very odd.
I agree, Michael, it seems very odd.
But that appears to be the upshot, that they were supposed to be, what, I don't know, online viewers?
I mean, that's pretty peculiar.
Yeah, that is strange.
I mean, it's odd that in the first place that USA Today, or the FBI for that matter, would care who read a story in February about a shooting.
I agree.
I just don't understand what that has to do with anything.
Michael, we admit we're baffled.
Very good.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Get this.
I find this profoundly disturbing.
Top doctors discuss the depopulation agenda and much more.
Look at this.
And Michael, I believe you brought this to my attention.
Those who are being targeted for elimination, 39% African Black, 54% White and Non-African Black, 10% Latin Asian and Fin, 0% Ashkenazi or Amish.
Very disturbing.
Suggesting there's a racial element to the mRNA vaccines that are going to be very destructive based upon race.
Meanwhile, There was far more research than Fauci claimed.
The U.S.
gave over $800,000 to the top-level laboratory in China, from which some believe the Chinese Communist Party virus escaped.
Internal emails are revealing it.
Actually, I have up to $3.7 million previously under Obama.
The total amount, however, is different from Fauci, Tony the Rat, the world's greatest mass murderer has allowed in the past.
We had a modest collaboration with respectable Chinese scientists, world experts on coronavirus.
We did that through a sub-grant from a larger grant to EcoHealth.
The newly released emails show one chain involving Fauci in April of 2020 were a top Official Dr. Emily Erbding informed Fauci and others a new grant from EcoHealth was for $3.6 million.
Of that, about $750,000 would go to the Wuhan lab.
This is higher, but not extraordinarily higher, than I originally indicated.
Hank Auchincloss, another agency official, wrote to Fauci, Another message about the same time was giving strongly concerns by Matt Gaetz, who's of course now been hounded and hounded and hounded, regarding U.S.
funding for the bat coronavirus research in China.
This very well may explain exactly why.
Matt Gatz has been put in the sights.
Fauci and Collins were told that multi-country study in question, including sites in China, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Burma, was given 3.7 million over six years, that Wuhan received about 826,300 and would get about 80,000 more.
26,300 and would get about 80,000 more.
More by phone.
These new documents show funding for the Wuhan lab was greater than the public has been told,
reported Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch.
Fauci's existing grant funding went for appropriate research could only be done properly in China, which sounds like an absurdity on its face.
John Kennedy, the Republican of Louisiana, observed, clearly the bats that have the coronavirus are in China.
They are not in Fairfax, Virginia or New York.
That's where the bats are, Fauci told Kennedy.
Some experts say the funding went for gain of function.
Kennedy asked how Fauci was sure that Chinese scientists did not shield their true work.
We have seen the results of the research done and published, and the studies are public.
None of that was gain-of-function, said Fauci.
Here's, I think, a complete capture.
I don't always create bioweapons, we have, Fauci, but when I do, I make sure I have a patent on the cure.
I think that's pretty close to the reality.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, I'm not sure.
I think the Wuhan lab story is a limited hangout.
Because first of all, there's so many of these bioweapons labs in the United States, Fort Detrick, Maryland being the most famous one of all.
But there's many others, and there's even an island, I'm blanking on the name of it, off the East Coast, where they develop this kind of stuff too.
There's 50 or more labs just like this in the United States.
And it's clear to me that this was a worldwide event coordinated years in advance.
And, you know, I believe that China and America are in deep collusion here because they, you know, these corporate overlords, the cabal, whatever you want to call them, they want to export the Chinese system worldwide.
And this has been a great step in doing that.
And you know China already has a COVID passport system that's in place in China.
Um, where, you know, you cannot enter a public building without proof of being, you know, vaccinated or COVID negative.
Uh, the little green check on the phone, it's all through the phone.
And President Xi has already went to the United Nations and, uh, offered to help build this plan or this, this system worldwide.
And so we're seeing this sort of development happen very quickly.
And, um, At the highest levels, you know, China and the United States are in bed on this one, 100%.
Of course, a lot of mid-level people are unaware of that, but the people above them certainly are.
You're talking about a massive worldwide tracking system.
I mean, it would be 100% total planet Earth.
That's very scary.
And you can well see China proposing it to the UN and the UN enthusiastically endorsing it.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, Scorpio.
I think you were trying to remember Plum Island.
That's it.
Yes.
Thank you.
East Coast.
I want to go back to slide 30 that you went over briefly.
That, and explain it just a little bit more.
That slide that you see there is part of a slideshow that was recently given by Dr. Leigh Merritt, who is an incredible mind, and her overall slideshow was bringing everybody up to date on the research that's been done on self-spreading vaccines.
Like, or population control vaccines that they were ostensibly looking at in various types of animal populations.
For instance, if you have a rat infestation, there's no way you can catch Or destroy all the rats, but if you can catch a few of them and put something into them that they then take back to their populations and spread it, that's what kind of research that's been going on.
Then she progresses to the connections with the spike protein as being specific to the human animal, And the varying propensities for the different races to be harmed by that spike protein on coronaviruses.
And that slide that you see there is the genetic susceptibility of these spike proteins with the various races.
And I thought it was incredible that the highest The highest population that they affect is whites and non African blacks, which you know we've spoken many times before about white genocide going on.
When she stated the last one there, Ashkenazi Amish, she specifically said Ashkenazi Jews are not subject, not susceptible to that at all.
And I thought that was quite significant.
Oh, I think it's, I think it's stunning.
I think it's stunning, Michael.
Absolutely stunning.
I mean, that's a huge, huge revelation.
Scorpio, would you not agree?
It's shocking and it really tells you what the plans are for the future, guys.
I think people should be very concerned about this.
And these people aren't playing around.
They really do want to kill as many people as they can and keep themselves perched on the top levers of power worldwide, using Israel as the platform to do so.
It's shocking, but... This is a nice illustration of the Talmudic belief in Jewish superiority and the other races only exist to serve the Jew.
Yeah, Michael, your view.
Earlier in that slide show, she also had a slide of a statement that was in the project for the New American Century document in the years, what was that, 98 or 99, just before 2001.
And we've spent a lot of discussion about that particular group.
And how heavily populated it was with Jewish neocons.
But it has a specific statement in it about race-specific bioweapons.
So that was also in that slideshow.
And for those of you who I highly recommend seeing that whole video, and it's uploaded at the Jim Fetzer BitChute site right now under the title Population Control.
Michael, thank you.
Thank you. That's terrific.
Meanwhile, a Stanford epidemiologist, Fauci's credibility is entirely shot.
A Stanford epidemiologist has called out Fauci's flip-flopping from the beginning, saying the science didn't change, Fauci did.
I think his credibility is entirely shot, Stanford professor J. Bhattacharya told Fox News.
On the Ingram angle, he noted Fauci's changing messaging during the pandemic.
In the early days, he was quite sensible.
He understood immunity, the necessity of not panicking the population.
Then something happened in late February where he flipped on a dime.
It wasn't the science changing.
Something else happened where he just changed.
Calling out Fauci's rookie mistake and overestimating the COVID-19 fatality rate at 2%, according to in-mails from March 2020, when that was misinformation for the public.
He made a rookie mistake, no epidemiologist should make.
He conflated the case mortality rate with the infection mortality rate.
That's many, many times more people with infections than were caught, especially back then.
He should have known.
He added the 2% numbers way higher than what's actually true for COVID, estimating a 0.2110 of it mortality rate, an order of magnitude lower.
It's just an enormous mistake.
I think it's really unfortunate we have this person who just didn't really have the expertise to lead the response, yet we somehow venerated him.
Mask guidance were just a sample of Fauci's misleading the public again, not supported by actual science.
Yes, you should change your mind when the science changes, he concluded.
What is the science that changed and convinced him that masks were the most effective way?
Meanwhile, it's worse than we thought.
Fauci and top U.S.
doctors caught They conspired to disqualify hydroxychloroquine as a COVID treatment, and millions have died as a consequence.
You'd think that researchers would concentrate on prophylactic and therapeutic solutions to the disease, since it's a death sentence for the elderly, the obese, and those with pre-existing conditions.
They have forced children to avoid school, mask up, and get vaccinated.
One would think, after all this time, there'd be a consensus in the hospitals, in the nursing homes, and in other centers on how to treat a COVID-positive patient or resident, but it's not the case.
There is still no agreed-upon treatment plan for elderly patients.
The CDC and Fauci ignored treatment plans for coronavirus unless the person was under severe distress.
Cardiologist and professor of medicine Peter McCullough testified in Texas he sees patients 85% could be given multi-drug treatment plan and recover from the disease with complete immunity.
The pandemic could have been over by now If those who had tested positive had been immediately treated before they felt ill enough to be hospitalized, thousands could have been and still can be saved if the treatment protocol he and other physicians used were not suppressed.
Fauci, the CDC, and the WHO, however, suppressed their effective treatment plan.
This is talking about CDC and Ivermectin.
Fauci also responded in a February 24 inquiry, noting China had been reporting about its clinical studies with the drug.
Is there any indication, data substantiate this came from China, attached that hydroxychloroquine can decrease COVID-19 in functions and lend to disease, wrote a Maryland pharmacologist.
Fauci made sure to control the treatment guidelines, advising against both chloroquine and ivermectin.
He also canceled the first large-scale trial of hydroxychloroquine in early disease after only 20 of the expected 2,000 subjects were enrolled.
What does this mean?
There was a conspiracy between five authors of a paper in Nature and the heads of NIH, NIAID, and Wellcome Trust to cover up the lab origin of COVID.
There was a conspiracy involving Dessack, Fauci, and others to push the natural origin theory.
There was a conspiracy involving Dessack to write the Lancet letter and hide its provenance to push the natural origin and paint any other ideas as conspiracies.
Farrow was intimately involved in both large hydroxycholine overdose trials in which about 500 subjects total died.
Farrah, Fauci, and Collins withheld research funds that could have supported quality trials of the chloroquine drugs and ivermectin and other repurposed drugs that might have turned it around for individuals named here.
Fauci, Daszak, Collins, and Farrah intimately involved in creating the pandemic.
That's their conclusion.
Scorpio, your thoughts.
And I know, of course, you are skeptical about the whole origin theory.
Just tell us.
Well, you know, let's just be clear.
These are not mistakes on the part of Anthony Fauci.
He didn't make a boo-boo.
He knew exactly what he was doing.
And he was part of this cabal.
You know, he was following orders to force A pandemic upon the world and make it seem as bad as possible.
And that, you know, people are just dropping like flies on the streets and you better get that shot immediately.
This is all very deliberate.
There's no accident.
And, you know, they even suppress the idea, too, or the findings that ivermectin not only would cure you of so-called COVID, but prevent you from getting it in the first place.
Same goes for hydroxychloroquine.
and hydroxychloroquine was was absolutely demonized by the mainstream media and many stories were
written about how dangerous it is it's very it's untested we just don't know you know and amy
goodman even did a whole segment about how hydroxychloroquine is dangerous and it causes
heart palpitations so we just can't even think of using it uh you know
You know, it's funny they're talking about heart palpitations.
I thought we were dealing with the deadliest pandemic in a hundred years.
We're talking about heart palpitations?
I mean, my God, the desperation of this is just absolutely shocking.
And, you know, again, this all goes back to this idea that this is a pre-planned event.
And I do think it was possibly developed in a lab.
I just don't think that it necessarily happened in China, if that is what happened.
I don't know because, you know, they've lied to us about everything this entire event.
So it's hard to know what this really is or how it was spread, how it was making people sick.
And, uh, you know, most likely it was just a bad, a bad flu, uh, that may have been tampered with and deliberately spread around.
But, uh, the idea that the Chinese did it on their own with the help of Anthony Fauci, it's a lot bigger than that.
And they might be setting up Fauci to be the fall guy.
But the real question is who was pulling his strings?
That's what we need to know.
Well, there's no real doubt that they just reclassified the flu as COVID-19 to generate millions and millions of cases.
There were like 30 million cases of flu last year, and this year only 2,000.
So the suggestion could be make COVID cure the flu, but really it's just reclassification.
John Rappaport, Edward Hendry have been quite brilliant about it.
Michael, your thoughts.
That's great stuff from that Stanford researcher, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.
He was one of the three world-renowned specialists behind the Great Barrington Declaration.
It's called Great Barrington because that's where they met in order to make a statement to the world.
I think that was in July of 2020.
And the gist of it is that we're doing this all wrong and that none of these lockdowns should be in place and none of the None of the data that's being compiled around the world shows that this is anything nearly as dangerous as it used to be, and more harm is being done from the measures taken by it than the disease itself.
So, they didn't go way out on a limb, but it was a good statement at that time, and he was one of those three doctors.
Like we've said before, I agree with Scorpio.
The controversy About what happened in the Wuhan lab and whether a virus escaped there is, to me, like a controversy about who gave Adam Lanza all the weapons with which he killed 26 people, when in fact there was no Adam Lanza in the first place.
On the other hand, there are various positions that Tony the Rat Fauci has taken since the pandemic was imposed on the world that have definitely caused thousands of deaths unnecessarily.
So, Fauci personally has a great deal of blood and injury on his hands.
Scorpio mentioned that he was following orders, and that's how I see it too.
I see Fauci as the media point man for a global criminal cartel In the drug and medical world, and that includes our regulatory agencies, the FBA, the CDC, and of course the global agencies like the WHO.
They're all a huge criminal cartel in my mind.
Well, when you put together PG&E being Rothschild, when you put together the Ashkenazi Jews are not affected, Fauci would appear to be a stooge of the Rothschilds.
The whole thing is looking increasingly as though it's a Rothschild pandemic that's intended to depopulate to benefit a master race.
That is the emerging interpretation here as I see it.
Well, we shall expand upon it.
Meanwhile, the EU looked at importing 70 million Africans by 2035, says a German member of the parliament, denouncing the disastrous new migration pact.
This is a clergy plan again.
A leading figure and alternative for Germany tipped for victory in a German election this week.
Gunnar Beck is attacking the EU's deeply dangerous migration pact before it's enacted under cover of a feel-good summer.
As Germany's super election year focuses on the state of Saxony-Anhalt this Sunday, the disruptors in the nation's biggest opposition party are poised for a shock win as its anti-immigration message resonates in the heartland of former East Germany.
Sitting atop the most recent opinion poll, with 26 and just having announced as two lead candidates, both supporters hardline on immigration.
They're not about to soften their message.
And here you see the distribution of the various parties.
And AFD, the second of the two, is the one that leading anti-migration party.
Senior figure Gunnar Beck said a strong election result would prove a useful weapon in his party's battle against the EU's controversial proposed pact on migration and asylum that looks to enlist its members in a centrally run redistribution of asylum seekers across the bloc.
I have myself been working on the EU migration pact for some time, and for me, the enactment of such a pact would be disastrous, because the EU not too long ago was talking about importing up to 70 million Africans into Europe by 2035.
In my humble opinion, this is not what we need to modernize our economy.
And while the figure seems high, when members of our migration-packed campaign, including delegates from Denmark, Estonia, France, and Belgium, met with the Commission just last year, that migration figure was brought up.
But no one at the Commission chose to deny it.
Meanwhile, even RT is reporting we should be doing this too, where Brits get envious of Denmark after Copenhagen passes a bill to deport asylum seekers for processing.
Some politicians, such as former European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, believe an influx of younger workers from Africa is a solution.
When you stop and ponder and think about it, of course, the reproduction rate is going to be greater than those of the natives, and therefore you're going to have a very successful clergy plan implemented in Europe.
Germans appalled by sleaze, COVID misery, and a static economy are ready to turn on Angela Merkel after 16 years.
Is that in the offing?
The victory by this anti-immigration party could have an impact.
It would prove no small embarrassment to the ruling establishment.
We'll be facing September election without Angela Merkel face her own internal battles as some members urge a tilt to the right under the leadership of charisma-free Armin Laschet.
At least for the town being, however, this party will take the win.
And while it will irk the party to be denied the seat of power, at least its supporters can be sure they are making a difference.
This seems to me to be rather telling, Scorpio, your thoughts.
Well, I think Angela Merkel is the poster child for election fraud in Europe.
I don't buy it for a minute that this woman was elected for 16 years when all she's done is destroy the country and transform Germany into a place that Germans don't even recognize now.
You know, I know some German expats here and they're just absolutely disgusted by the transformation of their country.
Uh, and so maybe it's just more like, you know, her time has come.
It's time to put a new face on the, on the poster here to make people think we have a democracy and put the next stooge in place, the next controlled puppet who will do further damage.
And that seems to be how things are actually working.
And, uh, and Jim, you know, uh, this idea of importing 70 million, uh, blacks.
From Africa into Europe is beyond insane.
It's beyond the clergy plan.
I mean, we're talking about simply replacing the population and making white people a tiny minority in Europe.
And especially if you consider I don't know if this is true or what's going to happen with the vaccine, but you know, the vaccination rates in Africa are actually very low.
And You have to wonder if they're already planning on a huge drop in population from these people who are vaccinated and, you know, and just simply putting new bodies in place and at the same time making Europe into something that's unrecognizable to Europeans.
And you know, let's face it, Africa is a massive, massive country or continent.
I'm sorry, continent.
And it's massive.
And there's so many natural resources there.
There's no reason why blacks from Africa need to be moving to Europe.
When the steps could be taken to help them create viable societies in their own continent that's absolutely rich in natural resources.
But I believe the elite have plans just for using that as sort of a bucket to scoop natural resources out of at a cheap price, rather than helping those people create viable civilizations.
Scorpio, this is disturbing on so many different levels.
Having published a book on the evolution of intelligence, what you're doing is inverting what nature had produced by the natural evolution of the different races and taking the least cognitively competent element and putting them in the most sophisticated environment.
I mean, this is a recipe for catastrophe, complete and utter catastrophe.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, you said it.
There's the modern working out of the Kutunov-Kalergi plan.
And it's a plan to control the population, and Kudino Kalergi himself used the term mongrelize when he was talking about blending the white and black races.
And, of course, he also specifically said that the superior Jewish race would rule over this mongrelized race.
They we've said this before for they've had, I don't know if they give it away every year or every two years but there's a prize for the person in the public sphere and the political sphere, who's done the most.
to further the goals of the Kudinov-Kalergi Plan.
It used to be called the Kalergi Prize.
They changed because that was too obvious.
They changed the name to the Charlemagne Prize, and our good friend Angela Merkel is a winner of that prize.
I'm not sure in what year, but I think it was like 08 or 09, something like that.
The story about the AFD, the Alternative for Deutschland party, it's a good sign overall that if they're able to gain some higher level of political power, I see those people, that particular German party, as what we would call the populist party in Germany.
And as you would expect, just like populism is here, It's constantly demonized as being racist, or especially in Germany, neo-Nazi, when they're actually people who know about this nefarious immigration plan as a method of country and culture destruction and are doing what they can to stand up against it.
Nice points.
Yes, yes.
Meanwhile, a shipping company has abruptly cut off guns and ammo across Canada.
This is a very disturbing development.
J.R.
Cox, the owner of the Shooting Edge in Calgary, the city's first indoor shooting range, has been in business over 20 years as one of the hubs.
Their relationship with a shipping service provider came to an abrupt halt last week when CANPAR decided, without warning, to suspend all firearm and ammunition-related delivery services across Canada.
In my opinion, this is very disturbing and indicates events are going to take place in Canada that are going to be very bad, very severe.
Meanwhile, a string of Chinese cargo ships are lined up and anchored outside of Long Beach Port.
This is pretty damn strange.
There were over 60 container ships moored and anchored yet to be unloaded.
I thought the U.S.
was limiting imports from China.
I thought the tariffs were still in place.
Very little importation.
He explained why freight transportation is so expensive.
Supply and demand.
They're running 24-7 freight from China.
What has the Biden administration done to cause this?
Why are we destroying American manufacturing and jobs with a flood of China goods?
I imagine your readers would like to know the answer.
Meanwhile, Russia's Wealth Fund is ditching all U.S.
dollar assets for gold, euros, and won this month.
Russia's National Wealth Fund will abandon all U.S.
dollar assets, increase the holdings of gold, euro, and Chinese yuan, said Russia's finance minister.
Like the central bank, we've decided to reduce investments of the NWF in dollar assets.
The sale of dollar assets will take place within a month.
After the announced change, the fund will hold 40% assets in euro, 30% in yuan, 20% in gold.
Also, 5% of the British pound in Chinese yen.
Kremlin spokesman confirmed the decision Thursday.
The de-dollarization process is constant.
In fact, it's now visible to the naked eye.
This would mean selling 40 billion for gold, yuan, and euro, the economists announced.
That's 40 billion in U.S.
dollars.
The decision itself is being described as a very political one, coming just two weeks ahead of the June 16 Biden-Putin first summit meeting.
The message is, we don't need the U.S., we don't need a transact in dollars, we're invulnerable to more U.S.
sanctions.
The analyst said, however, the impact of the decision would be limited since a transfer will happen within the central bank's reserves.
The de-dollarization is unlikely to involve any open market transaction.
The NWF holds Russia's oil reserves.
Its total value is $185.9 billion, first created to help support the pension system.
Russia has started to reduce U.S.
dollar assets following a myriad of sanctions from the West against Russia beginning in 2014, where the Biden administration has imposed more sanctions citing alleged interference in the 2020 elections and cyber attacks against the U.S., which is complete hokum, but it's going to have a bad effect.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, this is further fallout from what I believe to be the biggest geopolitical strategy mistake of the 21st century, which has been to push Russia away, demonize Russia at every turn, and to push Russia into the arms of China.
Um, you know, it really does seem that, uh, in some ways they're trying to intentionally create, uh, the proper pieces on the chessboard for a World War III scenario as a backup plan, uh, in case COVID, uh, narrative falls apart, which it seems to be doing.
And, you know, why should the Russians use the dollar?
I mean, we blame the Russians for everything imaginable, even these ridiculous hacks.
And can you believe that they called, you know, one of the hacking companies R-Evil?
Like, it's like, all you got to do is add a D and you've got Dr. Evil.
You know, I mean, come on.
This is right out of a James Bond movie.
It's so childlike.
But, you know, Russia and the United States would actually be very good allies.
They should be allies, but that's just not on the cards.
And it's America that's done all they can to create the animosity, especially moving NATO forces closer and closer to Russia's border.
In fact, Russia's really shown incredible restraint, and they're holding their cards close to their chest here as things heat up.
Michael, your thoughts?
Um, yeah, that Canada gun story reminded me that I thought it was a good example of the fact that we don't actually live in a representative republic anymore.
This is Canada, but the same thing applies.
Of course, we live what we live under is a global It's a corporate oligarchy that's run by a very tight-knit group of directorships and boards and at the top probably ends with some small entirely evil group at the top of that pyramid.
Probably the group at the top of that pyramid are the ultimate owners of the central banking system of the world.
I don't know what to make of the Chinese container ships sitting out there.
I haven't put much thought into that because I haven't heard of it before, but that's strange.
It looks like Russia is doing what it can, kind of like what the United States did around the economic collapse of Russia In 1989.
And what they are doing, it looks like to me, is doing what they can by divesting themselves of all American dollars.
They're both protecting themselves from a coming crash and hastening that crash, and they'll be in a much better position in the global economy overall When America does the American dollar does hyper inflate and crash and most analysts think that that's on the very close horizon.
Well, this is only a conjecture, but a friend of mine with good Intel connections believes that the Chinese ships may be loaded with weapons to attack America.
That's his conjecture, that they could have rocket batteries and the like.
Very disturbing thought, but it's a damn peculiar situation, Michael, and I couldn't agree more.
Very puzzling and disturbing.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Here we have another police shooting in Minneapolis this time during an attempt to arrest a black guy.
What is Minneapolis?
The Bronx of the Northwest?
I didn't think the black population was that big in Minnesota.
My tinfoil hat may be on too tightly.
But I think these incidents are more false flag than real thing.
They're happening too often in an area known more for Mary Tyler more than Spike Lee.
I think the powers that be want to create the illusion of a race war nationwide, including places you wouldn't normally consider to be hotbeds of police black people tensions.
George Floyd incident happening in New York City would not have created the worldwide shit storm it did when it was set up in Minnesota.
Didn't you used to live, work in that area?
Is there a large black population there?
Is there a large subset of stereotypical inner-city dwellers?
Ask Beverly, who has a wonderful woman, highly intelligent, one of my best correspondents, who happens to be black.
And she's, of course, completely correct across the board here.
Meanwhile, as Benjamin Franklin observed, it is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.
Just if you want to know how bad it gets, Amazon has banned six of the twelve books I have published, six books I have published at moonrockbooks.com, of the twelve books that have been published there, not only on Sandy Hook, but The Boston Bombing, The Moon Landing, Orlando, and Dallas, Charlottesville, and even Parkland, too.
Outrageous.
Amazon has banned.
They don't want you to read them.
Maybe you might want to find out why.
Meanwhile, I've made available for free the content of a False Flag and Conspiracies Conference 2020 held on the 5th and the 6th of December.
Go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com and check it out.
Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people, the secret of tyranny in keeping them ignorant.
Final thoughts.
Scorpio, yours.
Great comment from Beverly.
Jim, you know, whether or not this story of the lab origin of this virus is true or not, you know, there needs to be a worldwide condemnation of these laboratories.
Why in the world are governments working on Developing more virulent strains of viruses and bacteria and other things to kill people.
These labs need to be raided in the middle of the night, seizing all of their documents, arresting everyone involved in them and putting them all on trial and get to the bottom of what is really going on and what the true purpose of this is.
I believe that this is a very deep rabbit hole and they've been working on different ways to kill people.
And you know, this is a worldwide phenomenon and it needs to come to an end.
We could have a very different reality if we stopped allowing this type of, you know, Dark behavior and dark research, but of course I'm not naive enough to think that's going to happen anytime soon, but you got to start somewhere.
The public needs to call for a closing of all this stuff and these people need to be arrested.
Michael, your final thoughts?
Yeah, I agree with Scorpio.
They've been working on a reduction of the human population for a long time and looks like they're finally pulling the trigger with this pandemic and what they call a vaccine.
I want to harken back to that video that I mentioned about four doctors that's on the Jim Fetzer BitChute site under the title of Population Reduction and read two short Quotes from that video, and I encourage everybody to watch the whole thing.
The first is by Dr. Lee Merritt, whose slide we were looking at earlier, and she says, I spent 10 years in the military, and I missed all the wars, but this is my war.
This is a viral war.
I didn't expect to be in this, and when I think about it, Right now, it's my opinion that if you don't look at this as a planned program of depopulation, then you're not going to come to the right conclusions for how we deal with this.
And if you think this is all by accident, you are sorely mistaken.
And the other quote is from Dr. Larry Palevsky, You must realize that something dangerous, something nefarious, something evil is happening.
And if you don't believe us, then you may need to have your own experience.
But you can never say that you weren't warned.
Our hearts are breaking if you go ahead and allow your children to take this injection.
For a condition that's not caused by a virus, it's caused by a man-made spike protein.
For an injection that's not a vaccine, that will only cause great damage and potentially death and probably infertility to your children.
All for the sake of being accepted by a society that hates you and wants you dead anyway.
You heard it here.
David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador, Michael Ivey, Asheville, North Carolina, I'm telling you like it is.
This discovery that COVID has racial properties That Ashkenazi Jews are immune, that whites are the principal targets is devastating news.
When you put together PG&E being a Rothschild entity, that Tony Fauci and Joe Biden and other of these key players, Angela Merkel, are Rothschild stooges, that this whole thing is fraudulent.
That you have Germans who look at Germany and no longer recognize the nation.
That clergy plan is alive and well.
It's happening there.
It's happening here.
Before you know it, you will be unable to recognize America.
I'm sorry to say this is a bad day for the USA, but we're bringing you the truth you need to know.
Think about it.
Treasure the moments you have left with your family and friends because they may not be many in number.
Thank you for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection