All Episodes
Previous Next
June 2, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
59:51
The Bioweapon is the Vaccine Spike Protein, Not Any Virus - Dr. Tom Cowan, June I, 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to another Subscribestar question and answer.
Although usually I don't answer any questions, but today I'm going to try to answer questions.
I was going to just answer questions, but somebody sent me a very interesting interview, which I am, it's only about eight to nine minutes, so I'm actually going to play it in its entirety.
Because I think that will give me something to, that's I think very interesting, a few points that I want to make.
Before that, we just finished, I just finished doing a couple of talks for, I think it was called the Advanced Medicine Seminar.
It was organized by Dr. Bhuttar.
So some of you may want to check that out.
I'm not sure if we have a link for that somewhere.
And I hear that the interview that I did for the series called Endgame is now available.
I think that ran last night.
So if anybody wants to check that out.
And as always, if you Have any feedback you want to give me on either of those two?
I would love to hear it.
I don't think there's any other messages or announcements.
So with that, let me see if I can use my newfound technological prowess to share my screen and let you hear this interview.
I just want to say before that you'll probably hear some things which you will be surprised that I would play this.
Like, I'm not sure.
I'm surprised that I would play an interview of somebody whose first words were, I'm pro-vaccine.
And there's a whole lot of other things that I would say that I don't agree with.
But if you can just sort of get through that for a minute and just hear the whole thing, I think there'll be some interesting things to talk about, which is what I will try to do.
So let's try this out.
Share screen.
Click on the interview.
Press share.
We go to play.
In 2047, a colony of scientists Go to one minute and 25 seconds.
But you want to know what you don't know if you're going to put something into your kids.
We follow the science care, but always making sure that the science is done properly and that we follow the science carefully before going into.
I don't know if you're going to put something into your kids.
Okay.
Let's bring in Dr. Byron Bridal.
He's an Associate Professor of Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph.
Doctor, you've been very, you know, Very open on this whole issue, and you're not an anti-vaxxer by any stretch, but what do you think about this inflammation in the heart, and is it an actual threat?
Yeah, thanks for having me on, Alex.
Yeah, as you said, I'm very much pro-vaccine, but always making sure that the science is done properly and that we follow the science carefully before going into a public rollout of vaccines.
I hope you'll let me run with this a little bit, Alex.
I'll forewarn you and your listeners that the story I'm about to tell is a bit of a scary one.
This is cutting-edge science.
There's a couple of key pieces of scientific information that have become pervy to just within the past few days.
That has made the final link.
So we understand now, myself and some key international collaborators, we understand exactly why these problems are happening.
And many others associated with these vaccines.
And the story is a bit of a scary one.
So just to brace you for this, but I'm going to walk you through this.
The science That I'm going to be talking about.
I don't have the time here to describe exactly the scientific data, but let me assure you that everything that I'm stating here or that I'm going to state right now is completely backed up by peer-reviewed scientific publications in well-known and well-respected scientific journals.
I have all of this information in hand.
I'm in the process of mildly trying to put it all into a document that I can hopefully circulate widely.
So your listeners are going to be the first to hear the public release of this conclusion, and I can buy it.
It's very ominous.
So this is what it is.
The SARS-CoV-2 has a spike protein on its surface.
That spike protein is what allows it to infect our bodies.
That is why we've been using the spike protein in our vaccines.
The vaccines we're using get our cells in our body to manufacture that protein.
If we can mount an immune response against that protein, in theory, we can prevent this virus from infecting the body.
That's the theory behind the vaccine.
However, when studying the disease, severe COVID-19, Everything that you just described, heart problems, lots of problems with the cardiovascular system, bleeding and clotting is all associated with severe COVID-19.
And looking and doing that research, what has been discovered by the scientific community is the spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system.
If it gets into circulation.
Indeed, if you inject the purified spike protein into the blood of research animals, they get all kinds of damage to the cardiovascular system.
They can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to the brain.
Now, at first glance, that doesn't seem too concerning because we're injecting these vaccines into the shoulder muscle.
The assumption, all up until now, has been that these vaccines behave like all of our traditional vaccines.
That they don't go anywhere other than the injection site.
So they stay in our shoulder, Some of the protein will go to the local draining lunch mode in order to activate the immune system.
However, this is where the cutting edge science is coming, and this is where it gets scary.
Through a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency, myself and several international collaborators have been able to get access to what's called a biodistribution study.
It's the first time ever that scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA vaccines go
after vaccination.
In other words, is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle?
The short answer is absolutely not.
It's very disconcerting.
The spike protein gets into the blood, circulates through the blood in individuals
over several days post-vaccination.
It accumulates, once it gets in the blood, it accumulates in a number of tissues such as the spleen,
the bone marrow, the liver, the adrenal glands.
One that's of particular concern for me is it accumulates at quite high concentrations in the ovaries
and then also a publication that was just accepted for, a scientific paper just accepted for publication
that backs this up looked at 13 young healthcare workers that had received the Moderna vaccine,
which is the other messenger RNA-based vaccine we have in Canada.
And they confirmed this.
They found the spike protein in circulation, so in the blood of 11 of those 13 health care workers that had received the vaccine.
What this means is, so we have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein.
It is a toxin.
It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation.
Now we have clear-cut evidence that the vaccines that make our bodies, the muscles or the cells in our deltoid
muscles, right, manufacture this protein. The vaccine itself plus the protein gets into
blood circulation. When in circulation, the spike protein can bind to the receptors that are on our
platelets and the cells that line our blood vessels.
When that happens, it can do one of two things.
It can either cause platelets to clump and that can lead to clotting.
That's exactly why we've been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines.
It can also lead to bleeding.
And of course, the heart's involved.
It's a key part of the cardiovascular system.
That's why we're seeing heart problems.
The protein can also cross the blood-brain barrier and cause neurological damage.
That's why also in the fatal case of the blood clots, many times it's seen in the brain.
And also a concern is there's also evidence of a study, this has not yet been accepted for publication yet, this one.
They were trying to show that the antibodies from the vaccine get transferred through breast milk.
And the idea was this may be a good thing because it would confer some positive protection to babies.
However, what they found inadvertently was that the vaccines, the messenger RNA vaccines, actually get transferred through the breast milk.
So it's delivering the vaccine vector itself into infants that are breastfeeding.
Also, what this now we know spike protein gets into circulation, any proteins in the blood will get concentrated in breast milk.
Looking into the adverse event database in the United States, we have found evidence of suckling infants experiencing bleeding disorders in the gastrointestinal tract.
Okay, let me pause you there because I've only got 45 seconds left.
So this has implications for blood donation.
Right now Canadian Blood Services is saying people who have been vaccinated can donate.
We don't want transfer of these pathogenic spike proteins to fragile patients who are being transfused with that blood.
This has implications for infants that are suckling and this This has serious implications for people for whom SARS-CoV-2 is not a high-risk pathogen and that includes all of our children.
In short, the conclusion is we made a big mistake.
We didn't realize it until now.
We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen.
We never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein.
So by vaccinating people, we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.
Some people, this gets into circulation, and when that happens in some people, it can cause damage, especially in the cardiovascular system.
And I have many other, I don't have time, but many other legitimate questions about the long-term safety, therefore, of this vaccine.
For example, with it accumulating in the ovaries, one of my questions is, will we be rendering young people infertile?
Some of them infertile.
We'll stop there.
I know it's heavy hitting.
I'm up against the wall.
I need like.
Um, so if somebody could tell me whether they heard that.
I heard the raise the volume on the video.
Yes.
Okay, so let me go through that a little bit.
My first reaction when I heard that I was just said this this morning is All I can say is, it just brings home the point that these viral immunologists really live on a different planet than I live on.
So let me go through that a little bit.
He says at the end, quote, we never knew the spike protein was a toxin.
That's unbelievably naive.
Unbelievably naive is all I can say.
He says, we never thought that vaccines could travel anywhere besides the arm that they were injected in.
In other words, You put it in the shoulder and somehow, by some miracle, the components of the vaccine, all the solvents, and all the aluminum, and all those components of the cell culture, somehow they're going to stay in your shoulder.
And I don't know what planet that comes from, because we know that the aluminum in the vaccine, for instance, accumulates in the nervous system, including in your brain.
There, of course, is no SARS-CoV-2.
We already know that.
There is no blood-brain barrier.
We already know that.
And what I really wanted to say is what this tells us more than anything is the story that I've been saying all along which is becoming clearer and clearer.
All of these experiments that were now big time in the news as far as what were they doing in Wuhan, what were they doing in Fort Detrick labs, what were they doing with these so-called gain-of-function experiments, Well, it's actually very simple.
They were making bioweapons, probably toxins, probably figuring out how to create something like a spike protein, which would be a serious toxin for any human being who it was introduced in.
Once they figured that they had the toxin, and then they figured they had a delivery device that would make the toxic sequence stable.
And again, I've been through this, but the technical problem that they've always been dealing with, which I'm not even sure really that they've solved, is mRNA only lasts nanoseconds.
And so they had to, the whole technology, the whole The process was how to stabilize and protect this mRNA so that it would continue to make this obviously toxic protein, which they've probably known about for decades or at least a long time.
How could they make it stabilize so that it would produce a lot of this toxin immediately and then over the years?
So whether they've solved that problem, it seems like maybe they have to a certain extent.
As I've said, it goes against biology.
So it was a tough thing to solve.
But Apparently, they're able to make it so that the mRNA sequence stays around and the spike protein stays around, it doesn't get degraded, and then it does all the things that this fine gentleman, viral immunologist, suggests it does, which is cause endothelial damage, clotting, bleeding, neurological damage, sterility, infertility,
And a whole lot of things which I probably didn't mention, but the point of it is first came the spike protein and the delivery system.
And then if you follow the logic, you would say, you would understand that they would then say to themselves, okay, we're going to deliver this spike protein in a stabilized form into human beings, essentially to make them sick.
How are we going to get away with this?
Because if people start finding spike proteins in their bodies, they might actually ask, might, how did this spike protein get into me?
Well, we injected it into you.
Why did you inject a spike protein toxin in?
And then comes the virus cover story.
The virus was always the cover story.
The engineered virus with its toxic spike protein.
The wild virus with its natural spike protein.
This became the quote natural way.
It's not us who did this.
The virus, the wily virus, that's the one that has the spike protein.
That's how it got into you.
We're just trying to make you immune to it.
So we have no choice but to inject you with the spike protein Because that's the defining thing of SARS-CoV-2.
So end of story.
We have the perfect cover story and basically the whole world bought it.
And that's essentially what I've been saying all along.
We just have a little bit more details now.
So hopefully the reason I played this is to go through that and Again, just to point out, it's just so hard for me to imagine the naivety that somebody would just be incredulous that somehow they would be injecting us with a toxic protein.
Like, who would have thought?
So with that, let's see if there's any questions.
So the third one, the first two are not really questions.
So again, this is your chance.
So please, I don't see many questions.
Great webinar.
I emailed Byram to thank him for coming forward.
He has gotten in trouble, but also gotten some support too.
He sent me a PDF and email.
I will forward it to Asher's for you.
I would love to see the PDF and I don't think he'll ever accept what I just said, but There you go.
Thank you for this webinar. On the high wire, a reporter went to random people on the street and
tested if the reports of magnets sticking to the vaccinated people to be true.
One third were true of those interviewed.
What do you think is causing this?
A nano chip or heavy metals accumulated at the injection site?
I actually saw that clip too, or at least, yes, I saw the high wire clip.
And I think it was a little more than a third.
I mean, I have no idea, but it's obviously something metallic.
And I think iron, as far as I know, I could be wrong about this.
It's the only thing that's really will interact with magnets like that.
So there must be something iron something magnetic in that.
It's interesting that you know, I've been saying for a while that there are very unconfirmed reports that there are many different types of ingredients in all the different in the same vaccine.
Some of may not even have any quote active ingredients.
So, I'm not surprised that it's not 100% of the people have the same thing in their injection.
Sounds like deliberate population control could be.
So, how does it come from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated?
How to protect from that?
Why do I feel weird after time with vaccinating?
Again, you know, we We've gone over this a few times, and at this point, there's really no answers.
The whole question is, it would be very difficult to imagine a simple, naked, meaning not inside any other living system, protein being transferable from one person to another.
That's hard to imagine.
But again, the whole technology that we're dealing with is how to stabilize these sequences of mRNA, and how to stabilize these proteins, so that they don't get instantly degraded, you know, in the body or even in the air.
And that is a difficult technological problem because that's not how it works in nature.
Foreign proteins need their, they're shaped by the water environment that they live in.
The water shapes the protein and makes them viable, makes them able to do the, to participate in the reactions that they do.
Without the water, they just disintegrate and become nothing.
So whether they were able to put them in some sort of envelope that doesn't degrade and transfer from one person to another, at which time it then does degrade and the mRNA is expressed.
I mean, I have no way of knowing that.
That would be something that we would have to actually find out whether you can.
I mean, the way to do that is to measure the spike proteins after people, concentration after people get an injection.
And then take people who are not injected measure their spike protein level.
At that point, and then if they want, expose them to people who are injected and see if the spike protein level goes up.
I'm not sure if that's even technologically feasible.
My guess is there are assays for spike proteins that one could use, and so you could answer that question, and then we would know.
Whether that's going to happen, I don't know.
Why do respiratory diseases follow seasonal patterns?
To a certain extent, I would say I'm not sure that that's true, but let's just say it is because it does seem like people get sick more in the winter with sort of what we call respiratory symptoms.
And of course, there's a lot of reasons for that.
You know, when you're in the summer, you're out in the sun, you tend to be healthier and more active.
And that's the time, essentially, when you're sort of accumulating.
And then you go into a rest period during the winter, sort of all animals do that.
And then come, you know, at the end of the winter, which is the time when people get sick going into spring, you do a detoxification elimination program to clean out the old stuff and get ready for the new year's abundance.
And so that's the time when we see the mucus coming.
And I would say, the important part of that question is to switch your thinking from respiratory diseases to helpful respiratory processes.
And then you could see why the old concept of spring or late winter cleansing, or even early winter cleansing to get you ready for your sort of more sedentary period would be a good thing.
There's probably effects from decreasing sunlight and maybe decreasing fresh food
and other sort of simple environmental influences which affects how often and in what way we get sick.
So wondering if you have any thoughts on the possibility of these genetic modifications to those taking the
injection, being transferred to others around them
who didn't take the injection through resonance.
Again, if this does happen, and one of the ways of finding out whether it does would be to measure the level of spike proteins, as I just said.
Then the next question would be to find out how this transfer is taking place and whether it's through some stabilized lipid nanoparticle, whether it's stabilized adenovirus vector, or whether it's some sort of energetic resonance would be the next step.
And I could imagine any of those three being the case.
Are you aware of any studies exploring the relationship between I don't think I'm aware of any studies.
I'm not sure what millimeter wave, our radio frequency exposure combined
with environmental toxins, including the injection of mRNA into injection recipients.
I don't think I'm aware of any studies.
I know a lot of people have suggested that there is an interaction between millimeter waves
and some of the things which are alleged to be in the injections, which are probably are in the injections.
And I think that's it.
And I wouldn't be surprised if there's some sort of energetic resonance or some receiver phenomena going around, going along with that.
Thank you for pointing out that love is the answer.
Love is the answer, although I would say a little bit of critical thinking doesn't hurt.
As a health care provider, when might we know how to help those who have been injected?
I'm.
I'm not sure how we're going to know that.
I don't think, you know, in all the panels that I'm on and all the things that I've heard, I don't think anybody has a really good handle on how to quote treat somebody who's had an
injection.
And partly is for the obvious and simple reason, if you don't know what's in there,
it's hard to know how to help them.
I would say the usual detoxification, healthy living ways are the place to start.
I've already talked about the shedding thing.
I've yet to find any correlation identified between the COVID catastrophe in 2020 in Lombardy, Italy
and the alleged ties to the 2020 US presidential election debacle in Lombardy, Italy.
A penny for your thoughts.
I don't really know anything about that.
So I'm going to pass on that.
Next question.
A naturopath we know has again spread the idea that the spike protein can be carried or spread through the breath.
Do you feel this has any validity?
I would doubt it.
But again, the possible mechanisms are stabilized mRNA sequences or spike proteins in lipid nanoparticles, Don't all medical injections go everywhere?
Of course they do.
adenovirus part of Johnson & Johnson, or as a kind of resonance thing,
I think it's very unlikely to be spread in the breath.
Don't all medical injections go everywhere?
Of course they do.
For this immunologist to suggest that somehow you can inject something in somebody's arm
and it doesn't go anywhere else is beyond ridiculous.
Do I think that the COVID nasal swabs are contaminated with the spike protein or nanoparticles?
I don't have any...
Real confirmation of this?
But my guess would be yes, although I would love to see some evidence that that's true.
I've even heard suggestions that even the masks may be contaminated.
So there may be a lot of ways they've been trying to deliver spike proteins into human beings, not for any
benefit to us.
Are there any independent analysis done on coven injections to confirm and verify the shots ingredients and technology.
Not that I know of.
How do we know it isn't just saline?
As far as we know, some may be, and I haven't seen any independent evidence or facts or laboratories saying exactly what's in there.
I don't think I need to answer any more shedding questions.
What will it take for the CDC to stop giving these vaccines?
I don't think that's ever going to happen.
That's their business.
I finally, I think it got it right with the source of this quote, which I think is Upton Sinclair said, never try to convince somebody of something who makes their living believing the opposite.
Can you share your thoughts on Lyme's disease?
I talked about this last time, I think.
So, the conventional theory of Lyme disease is there's these ticks, especially deer ticks, which are the tiny ones, and they have become infected with a spirochete whose name is Borrelia.
And when the tick embeds itself into you and I think they suck your blood or they inject something in that, that they also inject the spirochete, which is a type of bacteria that's very similar to syphilis.
It's in the same family.
And then you become infected, similar to how you would become infected with syphilis, we say.
And the spirochete then reproduces itself and sets up infections somewhere in your body.
And then you get the symptoms that we call Lyme disease.
So that's the story.
Now, there's some interesting things about that story.
So, one of the things is the way traditionally that syphilis has been diagnosed is with an antibody test.
I believe it's called the RPR test.
So, similarly, People thought, well, I'll look for antibodies to this spirochete and the antibody test will show us whether the person has Lyme disease.
I just want to also point out that this is another example of this sort of satirical stuff that I say.
When they say antibodies mean you're immune to the organism, as in mumps or measles, In other words, if you have antibodies, that means you will never get mumps or measles again.
That's the whole point of antibodies.
With HIV, hepatitis C, and syphilis, and then Lyme disease, spirochetes, If you have antibodies, now for some reason it doesn't mean you're immune, it means you're infected with a deadly pathogen which is going to do you in.
Now if you ask why does in some cases the antibodies mean you're immune and in other cases it means you're about to succumb to the infection, In some ways, there's no answer, but of course, the answer is, well, that's because those pathogens, meaning HIV or hep C or syphilis-backed spirochetes, are too aggressive or too wily or somehow know how to evade the protection that we have from antibodies.
how that occurs in a simple quote virus like HIV, nobody really knows. And then they spend the next
40 years trying to figure out how the HIV virus got so smart that it could evade antibodies.
And 40 years later, essentially nobody has a clue because they're essentially studying nonsense.
The reason I point that out is because for some reason, a semblance of actual thinking has
invaded the Lyme conventional doctor community. And they somehow came to the conclusion
that antibodies for Lyme disease mean nothing.
I don't know why they just picked on Lyme disease and why they don't say antibodies mean nothing for all the other ones.
But if you go into a conventional infectious disease person, and you say you have symptoms like Lyme, and then you show them an Igenex test or some other test, that's an antibody for Lyme disease, and you use this as proof that you have Lyme disease, they will throw you out of the office and tell you what an idiot you are.
Because everybody knows, they'll say, Antibodies don't prove you have the disease.
Of course, the next person who has HIV, they say, yep, you have antibodies that proves you have the disease.
It'd be nice if you had a tape recorder and you could play what the guy or the woman just said.
But unfortunately, most people aren't bold enough to do that.
But anyways, that's the reality.
So that's why it's common knowledge that There is no blood test or any other laboratory test which actually tells you whether the person has Lyme disease.
So, it's called a clinical diagnosis, which means you hear the symptoms and then you decide, based on the way you see the world, whether the person has Lyme disease.
Now, just to be clear, I'm not saying that the people don't have symptoms and are not sick.
That's not what I'm saying at all.
The question is whether it's a spirochete.
So it was probably about five months ago, because I moved to a place where seemingly everybody has Lyme disease, and everybody kept asking me.
So I decided to look through the medical literature and see if there is even one study Where any study, I'll use this word which you're probably sick of, isolated a spirochete from any tick or any person with Lyme disease, purified it, and then exposed any animal or person to isolated purified spirochete and gave them Lyme disease.
And I'm sure this won't surprise most of you, But as far as I can tell, there is no such study, not one.
There is no independent confirmation that this spirochete is causally related to any disease called Lyme disease.
Now again, we need to separate the symptoms called Lyme disease from the spirochete, which is a Borrelia, And make sure that we're not saying there's no they're not sick or it's all in your head.
That's not what I'm saying.
I'm just saying nobody has proven that it's from this spirochete.
Now, just let me say, I was more or less happy for it to be from the spirochete, if that's what it was.
Because you could even make the case up, because I do think that parasites can make people sick, or worms can make people sick, and amoeba can make people sick.
So a spirochete is actually not quite a bacteria, it's certainly not a virus.
So I was certainly open to the possibility that a spirochete is more parasite-like than a normal bacteria.
And so I was open to the possibility that, yes, somebody had isolated a spirochete from a tick or a person, infected and exposed an animal or a human to it, made them sick, and that would have been the story.
But that doesn't exist.
The closest study I found was there was a person who had symptoms of Lyme disease.
This was some sort of peer-reviewed medical study.
And they examined, I don't remember what fluid, I think it was their blood, and they found an example of the spirochete.
So at least there is actually a spirochete present.
At least in this one person, that doesn't mean it causes their disease any more than firemen found at the scene of fires proves that they caused the fires, or any more that strep living in your throat proves that your sore throat was caused by strep.
That's clear.
But at least they found the bacteria, which I'm not surprised at.
The spirochete bacteria could be there to clean up the debris.
Just like all the rest of the bacteria.
And then they did a some sort of an analysis of the genetic sequence of the spirochete.
And they found a tick in the area where the person lived, who had the same sort of genetic sequence, not the spirochete.
And that was the best proof they had that the spirochete caused Lyme disease.
So that's not very convincing to me because we don't really know what sequence they were testing or whether it really only came from the spirochete or whether it came from something else.
So there's a lot of unanswered questions about that.
So the question then is, and two questions, what could be making these people sick and why do antibiotics like tetracycline sometimes seem to help?
No, sometimes they don't.
But sometimes they do.
I would say, I don't think I know for sure what is making people with Lyme disease symptoms sick.
In fact, I know I don't know for sure.
But I do know that a lot of biting and sucking insects Inject all sorts of toxins in us.
My guess is they inject some sort of toxin which thins the blood, at least locally, that makes it easier for them to suck your blood.
And that's probably the source of the rash.
So you have thin blood, there's probably some enzymes that that breaks down the tissue, and then you get a rash.
And next thing you know, then they give you antibiotics because you have Lyme disease, And some of the antibiotics like tetracycline have a strong anti-inflammatory effect.
And so that might solve the problem.
Other times the antibiotics actually then compound your problem by giving you yet another toxin.
And now you have chronic Lyme disease because you We're bitten by ticks, number one.
Probably there's other reasons, including there's some rumor that ticks actually concentrate glyphosate, so now they've injected glyphosate in you, and then you get symptoms to try to eliminate these toxins.
Unfortunately, the doctors call that an infection.
They give you an antibiotic.
Do you have any doubts about the story you are weaving here?
No?
If yes, what are your doubts?
I don't really have any doubts.
situations actually turn into chronic disease.
Do you have any doubts about the story you are weaving here?
No, if yes, what are your doubts?
I don't really have any doubts.
I'm happy for people to say very specific criticisms or comments or no, I found the virus from a living person.
a living person.
Here's the study that shows it.
I'm happy to look at that.
And then I won't have doubts.
I'll just change what I think and say.
Or here is the reason why a cell culture is valid.
And they can give me all sorts of reasons.
I'd be happy to look at that.
And if they're actually true and accurate, again, I wouldn't have any doubts.
I would just change what I think.
Next question.
Do you have any suggestions or texts or books on structured water?
I want to learn more.
There's a book by Carla Newday.
N-U-D-A-Y.
I can't remember what the name of the title is.
That's an interesting book on water.
Obviously, a lot of Jerry Pollack's books are sort of the textbooks on water.
If you really want to get into it, Gilbert Ling is the biologist who I mentioned a lot, who wrote a lot about water and structured water.
And there's a lot of other interesting places, but I can't think of any other books right now.
Since rank poisons in the environment can be absorbed into living tissue,
is it possible that injected people are excreting?
Some concentrations in their sweat, breath, et cetera.
Yes, I'm sure they are.
Remember the talk claim of stuff being shed in the polio vaccine diapers.
There is definitely all kinds of toxins and toxic waste products being shed in all of our bodily fluids and our feces and our urine.
And it's not good to eat other people's poop or even animals.
Or smear it on your skin or any other way of ingesting it.
I hear in Germany, the injections will be mandatory in September for ages 12 and up and in January for anyone over six.
How can we stop this in the US?
I mean, that's a good question.
And it's a political question.
And I don't know that I'm very good at political questions.
I think that if the numbers that I hear, which is there's 30% who took the vaccine, 30% who will never take the vaccine, and 30% who are on the fence, 30% of 300 million, that's, well, some 90 million, I think.
Somebody would check my math.
That's a lot of people to coerce, herd, bully, Intimidate, etc.
It's pretty easy to bully and intimidate 10 people, or 100 people, or 1,000 people, or maybe 100,000, or maybe a million.
90 million people, if that number holds a tough number to intimidate.
So let's hope that's what happens.
Well, that meaning those 30 million stay strong.
Where did the spike proteins come from?
best we could know because we don't really know, but they were engineered in laboratories
to be the toxin that would cause the things that we're seeing.
At the medical conference, you talked about your model for what we are and what we're made of,
which is not only profound but revolutionary.
Can you share that with us today?
I don't think that's a good idea today.
I will do a whole webinar on that.
So can the spike protein be measured?
Uh, I.
I think so.
The other day I heard Andy say, and Andy's most trustworthy guy about these things that I know of, that there is no paper that has measured the amount of spike protein in any biological fluid from any sick or injected person.
This guy today seems to think that's not the case.
And he's saying that this is research that has just come out in the last four days.
So it wasn't like Andy was saying it can't be done.
He just hasn't been able to find where it had been done.
And I'm sure if he was presented and I was presented with references that show that you can and have been measured, That would be a valuable tool to then we could actually find out whether there's the people who are exposed to people who are injected actually make more of this protein and whether they have actually perfected the technology so that they can make you make this spike protein.
We could solve these problems if we knew we could simply measure.
They seem to be able to get this spike protein into people prior to the vaccine rollout.
Is it scientifically possible to have stabilized the spike protein within the lipid nanoparticle on the end of a PCR testing swab?
It's possible.
Or would it degrade too fast to make this a viable mechanism to make people sick?
I don't really know the answer to that, but it certainly seems possible.
We know there are no isolated viruses and the PCR test is based on faulty isolation process.
With that said, what are they testing in people who test positive?
PCR tests are more positive in people who have more breakdown.
Remember that the primers, the sequences they're testing for in a PCR test, are known to also originate from human cells and microbial cells.
Whenever you're sick, you break down more than if you're not sick.
If you look at the amplification cycle math, and somebody could check me on my math here, but if you start with three particles and you do 10 cycles, you get something like 59,000.
If you start with 10 particles and you do 10 cycles, you get billions of particles.
So the initial amount of genetic material will have a big impact on whether the test will eventually be positive or not.
So if you start with somebody who's very sick, they will likely have higher amounts of genetic material in their sputum and respiratory secretions.
And then when you amplify that, you're more likely to get a positive result.
In other words, a PCR test or its cousin, the viral load test, is simply a measure of whether you're breaking down, i.e.
whether you're sick, if that.
A lot of times it's not measuring anything, really.
It's not even a test.
It's a manufacturing process.
So, but that's why when you see somebody with a high viral load, it's not that they have a lot of virus, it's that they're sick.
And then if you do something and they get better, meaning they break down less, the viral load will go down.
There is no room in that test.
There is no part of that test that's actually looking for a virus unless you had isolated the virus, shown the sequence of the virus, shown that the PCR primer could have only come from that virus and nothing else that was possible in the sample.
Only then could you use that test and only if you had a A way of testing the false positives and false negatives.
None of those are the case with a PCR test, which is why it's not a test at all.
It's a manufacturing process.
Some people are asking whether Thank you.
The Russian and Chinese vaccine are less harmful, and I don't know about those.
I don't really know what's in them.
I assume they're similar technology, but I actually don't know the details, so I should pass them in.
Do you know anything about the supposed variant going through India?
There's no variants because there's no virus.
There's a lot of people dying in the hospital.
A lot of them are on ventilators.
Now, interestingly, you know, I talked to Indra Singh, or not talked, I corresponded.
And it was definitely his opinion.
And I actually saw videos of a person on a bicycle going around some of the cities where these cases and these serious illnesses are happening.
And literally, there's a 5g emitter on about every third or fourth building.
So the people who say there are no 5G millimeter waves in India haven't looked up in the sky because they can actually see them.
So my guess is that's what they rolled out.
That plus it's often the wealthier people who have had the vaccine who are actually dying.
And that's what they mean by the variant.
There is no variant of an imaginary virus.
There's a question about SM-102 which says the Moderna vaccine says it listed on the box.
It says it causes cancer.
I've heard a little bit about that, but I don't know many of the details, except it's not something that I would ever inject into myself.
Do I have any thoughts on acupuncture?
I think it's good and a whole lot better than conventional medicine.
Yeah, this is a question about the Brachygene.
And I went over the BRCA gene in the cancer book, there is no evidence that the cancer has anything to do with genetics, there's no evidence that BRCA increases any risk of cancer or any outcome from cancer.
And I have the papers that go over that are actually in my cancer book.
So I would look there.
I would not, what would I do if I had this diagnosis?
I would not do the test, so I wouldn't have to worry about the diagnosis.
The test is meaningless.
Cancer is not a genetic disease.
There's a question about a guy's, person's mother who's 90.
who's doing well, who occasionally has some inflammation in her feet, what would be the
best thing? And I would say, as they say in Yiddish, mazel tov, if that's all you've got
when you're 94 is some inflammation in your feet, I would probably soak them in Epsom
salts and thank the Lord for having lived such a long and healthy and hopefully productive
and active life.
Thanks.
Bye.
Here's an interesting...
Have they characterized a spike protein to prove that it exists? It's an interesting question.
They say they have the sequence, and you can build a sequence in the laboratory, and then you can put it into a protein synthesizing apparatus and make the protein.
So I've never thought about that, but my guess is that they can make this synthetic protein,
and so it probably does exist.
Do I no longer think that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is just an artifact of the lipid packet
membrane being degraded in preparation for the electron microscope?
Thank you.
Basically, when they show you the spike protein in an electron microscope from a cell culture,
they got it because they took these inevitable little particles made of protein and some
genetic material. They digested the protein coat, and so then they look like little spikes,
and they show you those as the so-called SARS-CoV-2 virus, and that's where they got it from.
Thank you.
Last question.
Do I think that biological impedance analysis, which claims to measure intracellular and extracellular water, is a valid measure of those things?
I don't know a huge amount about that, but I think it's an interesting measurement of those things.
There's also a test called phase angle.
Which essentially measures the bond angle between the water molecules, the hydrogen and the oxygen.
And that's as close as we have to a measurement of the coherence of your water in your actual tissues and cells.
So there's a lot of innovative ways we're trying to actually measure the type of water, the coherence of the water, the structure of the water.
As you're living in a non-invasive ways.
And that would be a good thing to be able to get a handle on that.
Uh, so that we actually could work with it and see what interventions, if any, whether drinking water, using water, wine, taking sea plasma, actually improve the coherence of your water in your tissues, because that would be sort of the Holy grail.
▲
Export Selection