All Episodes
Previous Next
May 24, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
26:55
Dr Lee Merritt - Covid Vaccine Shedding Hurting the UN-Vaccinated!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey everybody, Alex Newman there with The New American, and one of our guests just was incredibly popular with you guys, the viewers.
That's Dr. Lee Marich.
We've had her on a couple times, and every time the videos just go wild.
Many, many, many millions of views now on those, so we thought we'd bring her back.
What really sparked my interest in having her back immediately was this whole question of Vaccine shedding.
Are the people who are being vaccinated shedding something that is affecting other people?
And when I first heard this, I was like, man, that sounds a little bit out there.
Then I saw a panel of doctors that included Dr. Merritt, who, for those of you who don't remember her, she was the former leader of the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons.
Just an incredible doctor, has done bioweapons research, has worked for a long time for the U.S.
military.
in medicine, just an absolutely incredible background.
And so she was on this panel with a number of other doctors, some of whom I know personally,
who we've interviewed here on this program, and they were talking about this.
And then somebody sent me a document from Johns Hopkins University where they were talking about making these self-propagating vaccines that basically you would vaccinate a small group of people and then they would shed something and get everybody else vaccinated.
So I wanted to start with that, but there's so much going on.
I wanted to ask about Dr. Fauci.
Now they're recommending that children 12 to 15 be vaccinated.
So we'll try to get to all that today, but first let's bring on Dr. Merritt.
Dr. Merritt, thank you so much for being with us.
And tell us what you know about this whole question of vaccine shedding.
Do unvaccinated people have something to be concerned about when it comes to being with vaccinated people?
Well, it sure looks like it.
I mean, you know, they used to tell us in medical school to listen to patients.
Now they're telling us, and especially listen to mothers, now they're telling us, oh, no, don't listen to that.
Just we know what's right.
You know, you can't possibly know the truth.
But really, if you listen to what people are saying, They're very compelling stories.
And that's what the point is.
This isn't something we're making up.
It's where doctors and people talk to us.
So a person is unvaccinated, goes to work in an office where everybody else around them is vaccinated.
The first story I heard was that they just kept getting a flu-like illness.
And I thought at the time, like you, I thought, I don't know how this could be shedding anything or transmitting anything.
I talked to Judy Mikovits and she said, no, but it might be that the vaccine is activating latent viruses in the bodies of the recipients
and that they're shedding that and so they're immune to it but this person's
constantly bombarded with these viruses are being activated and that
was my first thought and that's what I kind of passed on but then we
started to see the bleeding. Now about the same time that this started being
reporting I was actually you know I was struck by that doctor down in
Florida that died of the hemorrhage to the brain who died with zero platelets.
I mean, this is not something you see.
And one of the points about VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, is you're supposed to look at unusual events and recognize unusual patterns.
Well, we're seeing that, but they're not paying attention to it.
They're not doing anything with that data.
So, I pulled all the data with some help.
And I looked at all these cases of sudden bleeding, lots of vaginal bleeding, miscarriages, lots of bleeding in postmenopausal women that took the vaccine and start bleeding, hadn't bled in years.
And then we have the blood clots and there's just a lot of stuff, little simple things that just kind of, they make you kind of perk your ears up and say, what's going on?
People that can't stop the bleeding from the injection site.
I've given lots of injections over my years, as many nurses have, and I've never seen this.
You might bleed for three hours from a little injection site?
Are you kidding me?
So, something is happening.
That's number one.
And it has to do with bleeding.
The second thing is, now we're having all these cases, and I literally had three in a day.
One was, I was on a radio show with someone, post-menopausal woman reporter, and three guys in her office got vaccinated, And she started bleeding that day.
Now, I didn't get it, but again, I wasn't at her side.
It was a small area, and she'd been there for a few days.
It's been going on.
Another one was a small child that was in a house of unvaccinated people, went over, spent the day with a neighbor, and the neighbors had recently been vaccinated.
Kids come, gets home, gets sick, has nodes pop up in the neck.
Again, none of these are kind of very consistent all at first, And then you start hearing of little girls starting to bleed.
They haven't had their menarche.
They haven't started having normal menstrual periods and they're starting to bleeding when they're around vaccinated people.
They've not been vaccinated.
A pregnant wife, friend of mine, second trimester, which is not when you usually have problems and lose babies, she's been doing fine.
School teacher goes back to work around vaccinated people, starts having bleeding and cramping, you know, Comes home and it stops and we stop it, but you know, that's what I'm saying.
It was over and over and you're seeing it's particularly women, but we've also had reports now of men having scrotal rashes, testicular pain, something is going on.
These are unvaccinated people and they're showing the same kind of things that we're seeing in vaccinated people to a lesser degree.
It's more focused on the vaginal bleeding.
Okay.
So what's going... and just kind of flu-like illness.
Now, here's the here's the clincher.
One of my friends who's an orthopedic surgeon, he has a buddy, older person, took the vaccine because he lives with his elderly mother, thinking that both of them have been fine, but he thought he would take the J&J vaccine as a protection for her.
He gets sick for three days and she dies of COVID.
She hasn't been anywhere except around him, okay?
You hear these stories, they're hard to talk away.
And that's what we are.
We're trained as physicians to listen to histories and, and, and, and understand what they mean.
You know, that is what we're supposed to do.
And I'm telling you something is happening here.
So when we, when we think about this, one of the things that struck me is when I look at the past, when somebody mentioned the term, and I, I can't remember where I first heard them.
Somebody mentioned the term self-disseminating vaccines.
Even I, in my suspicious mind, Did not anticipate that we'd actually been developing vaccines that could be given to other people.
Well, they claim it was for animals.
Okay.
But I went back in and I'm going to tell you, there's a long, sad history of trying to get vaccines to depopulate certain populations.
In 1947, there was a guy named Burnett, Sir Macfarlane Burnett.
He was knighted.
He was a Nobel laureate, but he tried to convince the Australian government To work on bioweapons to cut down on the overpopulation of Southeast Asia, that could be a threat to Australia.
The big one, and there's a lot that goes along with this about whether or not we really have emerging infectious diseases, which is the reason for this whole process.
But in South Africa, we know that probably with U.S.
help, Dr. Woutan Basson, I don't know if I'm pronouncing his name right, but he was part of the 7th Med Battalion of the South And during the period of time between 1981 and 1994, it was called Project Coast, and I just tell your listeners to look at it themselves.
He basically was working on racial-specific bio-bombs against the black population.
They did multiple things.
There was a guy from Los Angeles, Larry Ford, who was an OBGYN doctor, who would show up in South Africa with these pathogens.
He taught them how to make tactile bioweapons so that you contaminate an area and transmit it.
But here's the kicker that I found.
By 2015, again in Australia, interestingly, they claim that there's an overpopulation of certain mouse species that's carrying some virus that might infect humans.
This is theoretical, might infect humans, by the way.
You know, again, the whole argument for a lot of this self-disseminating vaccines was convincing us we had Epidemic, emerging infectious diseases coming out of deepest Congo and places like this.
But it turns out that all that started happening about the time that Walter Busan was in South Africa doing this bioweapons research, probably offshored from other places.
So I'm a little skeptical about what's happening, but the bottom line here is they have a self-disseminating process.
When you look at what they use for animals to get rid of the mouse population, they developed vaccines that would I won't go into all the details, but when you read these scientific papers, it duplicates what SARS-CoV-2, what we're learning about the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and this whole thing.
It's in a fairly benign virus, the coronavirus theoretically, an adenovirus vector, a diminished adenovirus vector used in the Johnson & Johnson, for example, in the AstraZeneca.
How they've created these in animals is how they've created these in us.
And they went out to the mice, and they know that they can't just vaccinate a few mice.
That won't work.
You have to have them shed to other mice to sterilize a population.
So they give them a vaccine that they will give off in their secretions, okay?
Breast milk and other bodily secretions.
They bump up against other mice, it gets on them, and then they get infected with this.
They create it.
And it goes down two or three passes.
After that, it stops.
So they don't want to kill, I guess, all the mice because that's not biologically good, but they want to diminish the population so it doesn't spread disease.
So they've timed it so these things kind of fizzle out after a while.
And the way that these things worked in the mice, they destroyed the female ovaries.
That's what they did.
Now, I'm sorry, I can't, and if you look at in 2021, in February of 2021, the NIH is just running a study to look at, what do they call it?
I've got it right here.
Uh, no, maybe I don't.
Well, they're doing a study to look at whether or not ovaries, uh, what do they call it?
It's like ovarian reserve.
That's it.
They're looking at vaccinated and unvaccinated people as a result of these vaccines, these so-called vaccines, which are really experimental, unauthorized genetic agents, if we're going to call them what they are.
They, they're looking purposely to see what's happening to women's ovaries.
Why are they doing that?
In other words, I think they know a lot more than they're telling us.
And it's a widespread problem.
People are very concerned about it.
They should be upfront about it.
The other thing to say is that we now know that this spike protein itself, in fact, not the whole spike protein, but an S1 subunit of the spike protein, can reproduce all the symptoms of COVID.
You don't even need a coronavirus.
So if you notice that one of the big controversies going on right now is why can we not isolate the virus?
Where's the isolate?
Why can't CDC give us an isolate?
We hear this lab guy in California saying, hey, you know, we tested all this virus, or we tested all these samples coming out of people's lungs that presumably were dying of COVID or had COVID, and we can't find anything but influenza A and influenza B. Okay?
So just as a food for thought, here's a possibility.
There never was a viral outbreak.
It was a bioweapon release of a spike protein or a subunit of the spike protein that could be passed on tactilely, like could be spread in an area.
Maybe aerosolized, but spread in an area.
Think Wuhan, Lombardy, and New York City.
Because have we seen it spread?
If it really were spread like they told us it was spread by airborne, why did we not see other cities go down?
We didn't do lockdowns until it was already diminishing.
That doesn't explain what's going on.
There's a lot of, there are more unknowns than knowns.
If you look at it from the perspective of just a standard viral outbreak with an unusual virus.
But if you look at it as a bioweapons attack at three cities, maybe, maybe New York, maybe, maybe not, but, but at least look like Lombardy and, and Wuhan for sure.
And I think New York too.
You might've sprayed this stuff around and then a few generations pass it down.
You pass this through, maybe two or three passes through humans.
And then which, what do you see?
We see a standard flu season curve.
It all was coming down.
There was nothing going on.
It was really coming down.
In Israel, for example, it was coming down to almost no deaths, and then they started the vaccine program.
Now, what's the vaccine program?
They're literally giving you the genetic material to build this spike protein in your body, in all sorts of cells.
It goes everywhere.
It doesn't just sit in your arm.
It goes all over.
And it produces the actual pathogen in your system.
And then, it can potentially, apparently, shed.
I don't quite know how it gets from there to you, but here's a story that's hard to talk away.
I pulled all the various studies on all these bleedings, and there were 104 cases of thrombocytopenia, this rare disorder, right?
And what we call thrombocytopenia in medicine is not this.
This is killing people in spite of Aggressive medical treatment, which that doesn't generally happen in the real disease.
So, a one-month-old baby is breastfeeding.
Mother takes the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.
The baby dies at one month of thrombocytopenia.
That alone should have caused a stoppage of this, in my opinion, because you can't just talk that one away.
What happened there?
I hope they're very seriously looking at that.
So again, kind of sounds like the mice.
They knew it passed down in the mice breast milk, right?
That secondary pass.
I personally think this is looking like it was programmed to do this.
I'm just going to come out and say it.
And I have to say, I'm not the only one that's coming to this.
Michael Yadin, former chief science advisor from Pfizer.
What did he say recently?
You know, I remember talking to you a long time ago on our first interview, and I said, these smart guys like Fauci and all these smart people in the universities, they can't all have been wrong about everything on accident.
That just doesn't happen.
Well, now I hear Michael Yadin say, just look out your window and ask yourself, why is the
government lying to you about even simple things? And he says, the answer is, they're trying to kill
you and your children. They're coming after you and your family. And that's Michael Yaden, former
science officer advisor, not a lightweight. So, yeah, it's all terrifying. So it's like,
yeah, you know, one of the things that came to mind while you were talking is we reported at the
New American probably six or seven years ago now, every single bishop in Kenya, every single
Catholic bishop in Kenya reported on some results of some vaccines that they had sent to laboratories
all over the world.
Every single one, it seems, and this was even published in some scientific literature, was laced with beta-HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin, And every single bishop in the entire nation of Kenya said, guys, this is a covert sterilization program.
This is not a tetanus vaccination program.
Stop taking these shots.
And actually, that was one year after the UN Population Fund had come out and said that Kenyan women were having way too many babies and that we needed to stop them from producing I think it was 4.1 or 4.2 babies per woman.
We needed to bring the population down.
And of course, Bill Gates funded this World Health Organization vaccine program that ended up being exposed as a sterilization program.
They also said that they had seen similar things in Nicaragua and the Philippines.
So something very fishy is going on.
I want to ask about Fauci.
He's been in the news a lot lately because Rand Paul finally dropped the bomb.
We've been reporting on this for a while.
But Rand Paul finally dropped this in an open congressional session.
He said that he asked him about the gain of function research that he had been financing in China, in Wuhan and other places.
Another thing that just came out in Congress.
was that Fauci admitted that less than 60%, maybe as few as 50% of his employees
actually took the COVID shot.
This was just a few days ago in testimony from a question from Senator Burr.
And yet now they're recommending this for children ages 12 to 15.
What do we make of this?
And what are some good next steps?
I mean, should Congress be holding hearings?
We need a special prosecutor?
What do we do here?
Well, I mean, the first thing to say is the simplest, and that is there is no ethical world
that it is right to vaccinate children that don't die or get really sick with this disease.
Worldwide, the death of children, I mean, you're less a chance of your child dying of COVID than of getting hit by lightning.
That was out of Oxford University.
1.9 million children plus, over 1.9 million children in Sweden last year, didn't wear a mask, didn't social distance, Went to school, didn't miss a day, and not one died.
So on what immoral basis they can come up with, that is, there is no justification anywhere to vaccinate them.
Now, having said that, there hasn't been a justification for vaccinating children against mumps for the very same reason.
But the mumps vaccine didn't appear to be killing people like this is.
This is even worse because there's young people dying from this.
There's no question.
And I looked 10 years in VAERS.
I went back to 2009 to 2019.
There were about 1,500 deaths.
We all told for 10 years, there were 1,500 deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
We almost have 4,000 in four and a half months of the COVID.
It's 97% COVID and VAERS.
So there's something really bad.
And to send this to our children is just criminally immoral and should be, should be prosecuted.
It violates everything and it violates the Nuremberg principles.
But the, The issue about Dr. Fauci, and not to say I told you so, but I did try to write this up.
I had this in February of 2020.
I wrote up a timeline.
I showed where this came from.
I sent it to Epoch Times.
I sent it around to multiple magazines.
Got no traction.
It was like a hot potato.
Nobody wanted to touch it.
But now it's coming out, because truth always comes out.
And it's the fact is that we know that Dr. Fauci funded, they're talking about Wuhan right now, but let's talk about Ralph Baric.
This whole thing started, he gave $10 million from NIAID to Ralph Baric in North Carolina.
He's Mr. Bat coronavirus.
And he talked on his site when I looked at it in February, how he was going to basically mix it with different dialysis.
He's going to look at it.
He was talking about upregulation.
Okay.
And, and then, Maybe somebody—this is now speculation, I can't say this—but maybe somebody tapped Fauci on the shoulder and said, hey, you can't fund him.
That's illegal, because we've made that illegal.
So Fauci and the guys at the NIH agreed to give Ralph Baric a pass because he had theoretically started his research before the ban was put on gain-of-function research.
So gain-of-function research is just simply you take a native wild virus that doesn't hurt anybody and you upregulate it to make it deadly to humans.
That's a bad thing.
Well, and this was also, by the way, concomitantly going on in Winnipeg at the only level four bioweapons lab in Canada at Winnipeg.
And Dr. Xi, who was a Canadian, I mean, who was not Canadian, she was a Chinese People's Liberation Army researcher, was working with Frank Plummer in that lab.
And he brought some specimen back in 2012.
This has been going on for a long time, and they had been working on it for a long time up there, too.
So this didn't just start recently.
Well, when this whole thing, when I think when Tony Fauci was told, hey, by the way, that's illegal, I think he offshored it.
I think this is what we saw with Walter Busson in Africa, that it was probably not him that started this program.
It was he offshored somebody else's program that didn't want it on their shores, like our people, or somebody's people, the British, who knows.
And then, you know, so we sent, then Fauci made a, there was a grant, and it was seven, I think it was $7 million total, to Chinese research on bats.
And he claims he didn't send it to the Wuhan lab, but it was sent, the first half of it, 3.74 million or something, was sent for work on wild coronaviruses.
But it was out of the people, it was the same virologist they're working in the Wuhan lab, come on now.
And then, In 20, I think it was 2019, the second half of that grant went to upgrade the Wuhan lab for continue this research.
So he's just lying through his teeth.
I mean, that, that happened and people can look at that.
So there's a lot of, of blame to go around.
And I, I, I think, I don't think even, I mean, there's so much more that we can talk about, but you know, Frank, the other thing I will tell you.
It's just unbelievable that the lab person that worked with Frank Plummer in 2019 was caught sending back some specimens to China, and the virology community got all excited about that, and it was investigated, and all that happened, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police came to the lab and escorted her and her husband out.
No investigation, no sentencing, nothing.
And so then they go back to China, and I don't know if we've ever heard from them since, but in any case, they're out of where we can investigate them.
And then Frank Plummer, who actually is at the heart of this too, who was down in Africa giving a speech in February of 2020, he's my age, he's in good health, he suddenly drops over of a heart attack.
He can't be reached.
I think there's another guy in the Winnipeg lab that's missing.
In other words, somebody's cut their trail.
There's, there's, there's something bad going on here.
And, um, I think, I think the role of Fauci, since I talked to you last, I've come up with this conclusion.
Fauci is not, it's not his money that put into this, obviously he's, you know, I remember, like I say, I fell asleep in front of him when I was an intern in 1981.
So this guy from 1980, this guy came to the NIH and he became the chair of the NIAID like in 84 or something.
So he didn't come with money.
He's gotten money now, but not at this, not at the rate that this has been sucking up the dollars.
He's the bag man, in the mafia term.
He's the bag man.
He's the guy that the Gates Foundation, maybe the Rockefeller Foundation, various different foundations, all fund their money into this central guy.
And what Dr. Fauci has done, he has bought obedience, essentially, by, you know, it's like the mob guy, the bag man, takes care of the capos.
I think I got the right term, right?
with the coppers are the guys that actually carry out the gambling stuff and whatever,
and if they don't pay, and he sends out not his own money, but the mob boss's money to
take care of them as needed, and then they are supposed to do their things, or he goes
out and roughs them up a bit or withdraws the money, which is kind of what's happening.
If you have a university program now, you've become dependent on the $800 billion that's
crossed Dr. Fauci's desk since he became the chair in 1984.
$500 billion for HIV research alone that he can also give to people like Governor Cuomo or whatever, you know, to keep the governors in line.
And I'd like to see if all the five governors that made hydroxychloroquine illegal got special funds from the NIH.
HIV fund. Somebody should look into that. I'm not good with running money dollars,
but that should be looked at. But these guys do that sort of thing. And so if you're a university
now, you've expanded considerably over the last 20, 30 years because you've been getting these
research grants from the NIH, but now they're threatening to take any of your money away if
And playing ball means you don't talk about ivermectin that decreases death rate by 73%.
You don't talk about hydroxychloroquine, dittos.
You talk about remdesivir and you do all these kind of viral, you know, these antivirals that are really not very useful and you don't ever talk against the vaccine.
So that's why the universities are bought.
And that's why you have to ask yourself, where's the medical profession in all this?
They're watching.
How can the university of any state name you want to put in there condone vaccinating children with these experimental agents, these experimental genetic agents that have never been tried on children before?
You tell me that and I'll, you know, you have, I'd like to see somebody look me in the eye and tell me how they justify that.
Some big university professor, because we're in a crux here.
I'm just going to close by saying this.
We are in a, A crux where medicine either decides we are here for the patients or we're here for some evil program run by the federal government and their minions.
I, you know, this is where we are and this is where the Germans were in 1937 and we'd better wake up and get off this, get off this immoral bus before it drives over the cliff because it's going there rapidly.
We cannot be ignorant of what's going on now.
Yeah, I keep hearing Nuremberg pop up over and over and over again.
It sounds like we may be needing something like that going forward here.
In the last couple minutes that we have left, Dr. Merritt, please tell us, where can people keep track of your research?
What's the best website to find up-to-date information on all of these topics?
And can you please give out your website so people can track you down?
Since this all started, and I got cancel cultured, I've kind of got my new website going, so I called, it's three words, themedicalrebel.com.
You have to put the T-H-E there, so it's themedicalrebel.com.
But anyway, when you go there, there's a big red bar on the right, and that big red bar is for COVID information, where to get hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, all the questions you might have.
I keep updating it.
I'm actually going to be running a seminar.
You can find information on my site later.
It's going to be in June.
I haven't got a date yet, but that's where you can ... and I also steer you to where you can find treatment in your state kind of thing.
There's several doctors that are doing this.
There's lots of information there.
And then I've got a lot of videos.
I've got our video on the front page.
Excellent.
Well, Dr. Merritt, thank you so much for your courage and for sounding the alarm on all these issues.
We will check back in with you in the not-too-distant future to see what else you've learned on this vaccine shedding, on Dr. Fauci, and on what's going on with the adverse events that are being reported.
We really appreciate your time.
Folks, go check it out, The Medical Rebel.
Go there and share that with your friends, with your family, people who might be concerned about COVID, people who might still be thinking about taking this vaccine.
They're not going to get this information from CNN or Fox News or ABC Fake News or CBS.
The only way they're going to get it is if you copy and paste this link into an email and send it to them.
So thanks again for watching, folks.
We sure appreciate you all.
Thanks again, Dr. Merritt.
▲
Export Selection