All Episodes
Previous Next
May 11, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:26:40
Need to Know (10 May 2021) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm delighted to be joined today by Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and Chris Weinert in Detroit, Michigan.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know Where we begin with, it appears as though the Democrats are manipulating the census data just as much as they have the election.
They've added 2.5 million more to blue state population to ensure they'll keep some seats when their margin is razor thin.
This is profoundly troubling.
The December revisions in population estimates under the Biden Census Bureau have added 2.5 million blue state residents and subtracted more than a half a million red state.
This is very bad.
Is it a mere coincidence?
I think not a chance.
These population estimates determine how many electoral votes each state receives and the number of congressional seats they hold in the House of Representatives, where the Democrats have a six-seat majority with five seats currently vacant.
So a switch in 2022 could flip the house and take the gavel from Nancy Pelosi to the Republicans.
Kevin McCarthy.
The original projections for reapportionment had New York losing two, Rhode Island another, Illinois perhaps two.
Instead, New York and Illinois lost only one and Rhode Island none.
Meanwhile, Texas was expected to gain three, Florida two, and Arizona one.
Instead, Texas gained only two, Florida only one, and Arizona none.
Was the Census Bureau count rigged?
Was it manipulated by the Biden team to hand more seats to the Democrats and to get more money?
Is the Pope Catholic?
The evidence is now only circumstantial, but look at the data.
It leaves no doubt about it.
Number one, New York.
We've been tracking the annual population migration changes between states since the last census in 2010.
Over the past decade, New York lost about 1.3 million residents on net to other states.
Still, this is a population loss that's the equivalent of two, maybe three, congressional seats.
Yet the final numbers added approximately 860,000 more.
That's roughly twice the population of Buffalo and Rochester combined.
This is the state that has lost by far the largest population over the past decade.
Number two, many deep blue states had 2020 census numbers significantly revised upward from their December estimates.
Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Surprise, surprise.
Number three, many red states had 2020 census numbers lower than their 2020 estimates.
Arizona, North Carolina, and South included.
Number four, Going back to the 2010 Census, the final headcount in every state was within 0.4% of the original, 30 of them within 0.2.
This time around, completely different.
19 states more than 1% off, 7 more than 2% off, New York more than 3.8% off, New Jersey more than 4.5.
than 2% off New York, more than 3.8% off New Jersey, more than 4.5.
Funny business just reaming here.
Number five, virtually every one of the large deviations from the estimates favored the
Democrats.
Surprise, surprise!
Only five states in the 2020 census were within the same margin, 0.41, that all states were within from the 2010.
Maybe the 2010 estimates were abnormally accurate.
Maybe the 2020 estimates were abnormally inaccurate.
But the Census Bureau has some explaining to do.
It looks dirty.
I don't have any doubt about it.
I don't think anything is left of the imagination here.
Carl, your thought.
On its face, it is going to be dirty.
And these are the rogue state criminals who are still in charge.
And until we have 0.01% arrests for these obvious and ongoing crimes centered in war and money and lying, we're just going to get one crime du jour after another.
And if you take into account the election fraud, well, of course, I wouldn't be surprised if the census actual numbers are the polar opposite of what they're claiming.
I think you got it exactly right.
These are election criminals.
They're stealing America.
That's what they're all about.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, that's a big thing.
With this type of coup, it's really essential to control the perception management as well as to put the base on fear with an alternative crisis, whether it's an economic crash or a plandemic.
You know, they use this business model with the Gladio program and many others since the end of World War II, if not time infinitum.
So yeah, this is the group, the cabal, the empire that exceeds empires and really They are pushing a lot of these things, you know, with the census is like a metric for them to utilize the demographic that they have to deliver the vax to, or they have to quarantine with the COVID initiatives, or even for that matter to manage in terms of the tug-of-war situation between the two-party system, we'll say.
And I think a lot of this stuff is also theater, whether it's the election results or things like that.
They definitely manufactured the consensus without question in tribute to Joe Stalin.
It's not who wins the votes or gets the votes it's who counts them so ultimately I think they've really infiltrated those crucial positions, and it really.
Let's just say you entered their own lead pipe diplomacy into the shadows of that realm.
So we've seen that in 2020 with this whole thing and just their extensive efforts to really gaslight or to call the claims baseless, which are obviously very, very well substantiated.
It should just show you that what they're all about.
They just pretty much invert, they gaslight, they use emotion and certainly don't really care about statistics or data or any sort of truth whatsoever other than to weaponize it.
So Yeah, this is really, I think, about using Joe Biden to rack up even more national debt.
And he's spending money like a drunken sailor.
And really, this UBI thing is going to crash the economy in so many ways, it's not even funny.
And it's going to turn people into a socialist type of dependence instead of an actual providing, production, producing type of environment that capitalism used to be under.
So, yeah, we're seeing a transition into this new type of technocratic feudalism.
And I think this guy's brought in to do exactly that.
And it's all by design.
They're deliberately running us into the ground.
They're deliberately overspending.
They're deliberately manufacturing, manipulating everything.
It's just catastrophic.
These things are so obvious, too, Fetts.
Like, I mean, everything.
I don't know what the American people are looking at, because, like, I mean, you and I see it plain as day.
We're screaming our head off with our hair on fire, saying, look, look, look, every day, you know?
But, like, these guys, they just, they're going down with their shit.
They're double down on their own BS.
Here's a positive development.
I'm glad every now and then we have some good news.
dog there. Yeah, she's upset by it all too. We are. Yeah, very good. Here's a positive development.
I'm glad every now and then we have some good news. Glock wins, Biden loses and major liability
suit affecting the second amendment. Glock, the Glock 19 was the best selling pistol on
gun broker in 2020 and they have won a lawsuit.
God didn't deliver with Joe Biden, who recently begged the Lord to help him erase the congressionally approved immunity that gun makers have from lawsuits.
How outrageous is that?
In a little notice decision with a major impact, a federal judge in Arizona ruled in favor of Glock and dismissed a suit brought by the Brady campaign to prevent gun violence on behalf of a man who accidentally was accidentally shot and paralyzed.
U.S.
District Court Judge Susan Brnvich upheld liability immunity granted in the Protection
of Lawful Commerce and Firearms Act passed in 2005 to block gun makers from a potential
tidal wave of industry killing lawsuits.
Brnvich, nominated by former President Trump and the wife of Arizona Attorney General Mark
Brnvich, dismissed multiple claims in the suit that the act's protections were illegal
writing, the statute is constitutional.
These attempts to hold manufacturers responsible for the criminal and negligent misuse of firearms
are misguided and are attempts at legislation through litigation.
The BLCAA law was passed with a bipartisan majority in both chambers of Congress to keep activists from attempting to bankrupt firearm manufacturers by tying them up in court with unfounded claims.
This demonstrates why protecting the legislation against attacks by Biden and gun control factions in Congress is critical.
The suit was filed against Glock, an Austrian gunmaker, on behalf of Carlos Tavioso Jr., who was in a car with others returning from a church retreat in 2018.
Another teenager found the 9mm pistol in the car.
Apparently thought it was safe because the magazine holding the bullets was missing.
However, there was a bullet in the chamber.
When she pulled the trigger, it had Taviesso paralyzing him.
The suit charged that Glock, the number one firearms manufacturer in U.S.
sales, did not have adequate safety features on the gun warning that Lye Brown was in the chamber.
The pistol does have a chamber indicator but the suit said the gun was defective because it did not include other warnings or safeties.
Glock said it was covered by the Immunity Act because the shooting was a criminal act, actually a negligent act.
A fair reading of the PLCC, though, shows Congress intended the scope of the preemption to include claims like the plaintiff's.
The plain text of the act extends preemption to plaintiff's tort and product's liability.
It's unambiguous terms bar any civil cause of action, regardless of the underlying theory, when a plaintiff's injury results from the criminal or unlawful misuse of the person or a third party, unless a specific exemption applies.
Here's the actual order, the decision issued by the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.
Good news!
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, that is good news.
This was just a pot shot at the 2A, and if you think of other Other things.
So this is a sidearm, a handgun, a pistol, and the person who picked it up is incompetent and untrained.
So this would be similar to if somebody picked up a, oh I don't know, a fork and stuck it into an electrical outlet and wanted to sue the manufacturer of that equipment for not adequately putting a warning sign on the electrical outlet.
That's similar to that.
And Biden, he's funny.
So he says that gun manufacturers are the only industry immune to lawsuit, except for the vaccinations that he promotes.
Yeah, nice points, Carl.
I mean, it's absurd.
Yes, Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I was going to say something similar.
I wish he'd go after Big Pharma with the same fervor that he's going after these weapons manufacturers because arguably speaking, this is an entirely different apples and oranges thing because most of the people that injure themselves in a Big Pharma incident are being pushed into this by some sort of duress or pressure being instituted on by the government itself and by the World Health Organization, CDC, under malevolent or false or insubstantial or baseless claim information.
Arguably speaking you could say maybe there's more of a there there than that but uh you know him going after a gun manufacturer because someone doesn't know how to use it or doesn't know how to make sure it's it's not uh unloaded before they squeeze a trigger or whatever uh I think that really that's something that uh should be a caveat and sure if you pick up a weapon you know you should understand that these are the risks that you take So maybe he could be more prone for encouraging gun safety or education or something like that instead of complete disarmament of the people, which seems to be more of his agenda.
And if you think about it, you know, if you want to disarm anybody,
why not disarm the Rothschild national armies that are using the United Nations and NATO
to pretty much go around and secure all the world's resources
under this oligarchy or this cabal, and doing it under the guise of national security,
peace, or democracy?
Why not investigate some of these guys that are looking into this,
that are really going after and killing tens of thousands of people, or even as drone strikes?
You know, him and Obama seem to really like those things a lot.
So yeah, I think that, you know, you can maybe even investigate
who's running out the mom and pop shops with the Walmart or the Fangs business model.
But I think he'd probably be looking into himself again, just like you could probably look into things like GMO safety or, you know, who profited from the war on drugs or tough on crime or three strikes rule or things like this for profit prisons.
You know, this is a guy who's really made an entire career and billions and billions of dollars from disenfranchising American citizens from not only their right to produce goods in America, but also To exercise their constitutional rights.
So this is a guy that was really behind, secretly, the outsourcing of American labor through the NAFTA and CAFTA, Permanent Organization to Trade with China initiatives, where the U.S.
banks and the international banks funded these type of transitions of American labor and American production into China, who is now one of our major competitors for the primary reserve currency.
You know, the more I learn of Biden, the more I detest the guy.
I mean, he's just repulsive at every single level.
I think it's the point.
I think it's the point.
You know, they picked a scum of the earth like Hillary Clinton.
They couldn't run her again, so they had to find this guy.
You know?
To trigger you.
That's it.
It's the trigger of both sides.
Trump does the same with the other side.
I mean, it's nauseating to have individuals of this low character.
I mean, these are despicable people.
They make the leaders of our nation.
This is just a disgrace.
And it infantilizes the entire intellectual conversation of the two-party discourse.
You know, it's absolutely by design.
That's a great point, Chris.
Well, not only did they steal the election, not only are they manipulating the census numbers, but they're conducting fake investigations to discredit Rising Republican stars happened in Missouri.
Investigation finds massive wrongdoing by prosecutor in case against ex-Missouri governor.
Missouri's chief legal disciplinary officer accused St.
Louis top prosecutor of sweeping misconduct in the failed prosecution of former Governor Eric Greitens, saying she lied to judges in court filings and testimony, withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense, misled her own prosecution team, and violated the constitutional right to a fair triumph.
St.
Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner, one of the early local prosecutors bankrolled by liberal mega-donor George Soros since 2016, engaged in, get this, 62 acts of misconduct that resulted in 79 false representations.
Karen Gibson is now dismissed criminal prosecution, according to Chief Disciplinary Counsel Alan Pretzel's memo obtained Wednesday.
Probable cause exists to believe the respondent is guilty of professional misconduct, Pretzel declared in a 73-page memo that repeatedly accused Gardner of withholding evidence of innocence and providing a false portrait to the court, the defense, and even her own prosecution team.
Pratzl also accused Gardner of lying during the disciplinary proceedings long after the case was dismissed against Wrighton's a former Navy SEAL and rising Republican star who was forced to resign as governor in 2018 less than two years after being sworn in.
The disciplinary action against Gardner follows the 2019 indictment of a former chief investigator, ex-FBI agent William Tisoby, on seven felonies alleging he committed perjury and evidence tampering.
Gardner also remains under criminal investigation by a special prosecutor as Tisoby awaits a trial that's been delayed by the pandemic.
Unraveling of the criminal case was highlighted in an investigative report last year, prompting some to compare Gardner's actions to the FBI now-confirmed misconduct during the pursuit of then-President Donald Trump during the Russia collusion probe.
Pratzel concluded Gardner had violated her responsibilities as a lawyer and as a prosecutor, essentially suborning Tisoby's perjury by failing to take reasonable remedial measures when she knew Tisoby was giving false answers to questions.
She offered and elicited false testimony when questioning Tisabe during a deposition ordered by the court and also provided inaccurate information to a fellow prosecutor during a private session in the judge's chambers that later led that prosecutor to make false statements to the court.
Gardner, St.
Louis' first Black chief prosecutor, filed an initial response to the allegation, suggesting, of course, race and politics were involved in the disciplinary action, but acknowledging she made mistakes.
In hindsight, were each and every one of Ms.
Gardner's actions in the intense, fast-paced guidance, investigation, and prosecution perfect?
No, but that is not the measure or purpose of the attorney discipline, her legal team wrote.
She claims she's been the target of attacks for her tireless and courageous efforts to reform the criminal justice service system and was being treated differently compared with other attorneys.
Yes, she was given preference.
My God, this is outrageous.
Attacks on Ms.
Gardner have taken many forms, ranging from overtly racist emails sent to her office to investigations and lawsuits against her, her reply alleged.
She also showed her continued contempt for Gritens calling him a Republican golden boy.
Gardner has been the object of frequent controversy and criticism, including as the focus of an ongoing special prosecutor's criminal investigation in the Gritens case was recently removed by a court in the prosecution of a St.
Louis couple accused of brandishing weapons during last night's Black Lives Matter protest when hundreds of protesters came onto their property, trespassing Threatening to burn down their home, they simply showed weapons.
One an AR-15, the other a handgun.
They were acting in self-defense perfectly, ethically, and legally, and this cretin had them prosecuted.
It was outrageous.
She has frequently used race as a defense, even filing a lawsuit under the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 last year, alleging St.
Louis Police Union had mobilized a thwarted effort to reform criminal justice and denouncing the White, ethically conflicted special prosecutor, as though her race were appropriate, investigating her antisemite.
That lawsuit was thrown out in September.
Pretzel's memo, however, provides the most direct and serious threat to her hold on the St.
Louis Prosecutor's Office.
Disciplinary action, if upheld by a hearing panel in the Missouri Supreme Court, could range from public admonishment to loss of her law license, the latter of which could end her tenure as a circuit attorney.
If she doesn't deserve to lose her law license, I can't imagine whoever would.
The disciplinary memo cited a litany of violations of rules designed to ensure ethical behavior by lawyers and prosecutors and fair trials for defendants.
It alleged she made false statements in court filings, engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, and harmed Garten's right to a fair trial by keeping required evidence of innocence from the defense.
Gardner violated the rules of criminal procedure and court orders by concealing discoverable and exculpatory evidence, the memo stated.
No doubt about it.
This is a splendid example of George Soros' conception of justice, where, remember, he stated emphatically, before he dies, he wants to destroy America.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, this is a hopeful story and hopefully the tables are being turned.
So with this smear campaign against the governor, and the only hope that we would have with this is that if we get the truth and this is a breakthrough and not just another hopeful case.
Regarding the last point, Chris, thanks for making one of my ongoing points that we really need to flip the script on these people, that it isn't somebody else who needs to be sued for an illegal use of a firearm.
It is U.S.
presidents that needed to be prosecuted.
And then, Jim, I wanted to tell you that you needn't be so upset about Joe Biden.
At least we can be thankful that all the virtuous genes passed down to his son, Hunter.
Indeed, Carl.
An excellent point from the point of view of genealogy.
Love it.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, can we call that baseless virtues?
I don't know, man.
That'd be a pretty interesting terminology there.
Yeah, I don't think they really have much in terms of those things, ethics, virtues, or anything like that.
I think that's why they do what they do.
But they understand the value of these things in terms of political gain, and that's certainly something they rely on entirely.
So, Yeah, they're there to emotionally provoke the disenfranchised that have been systematically underserved by their party in the first place, but they like to put it off on other people and try to blame it on fellow people that are getting screwed through the two-party political AIPAC CFR system in the first place.
It's interesting to see.
You know, I wouldn't be surprised if this girl, I don't know if Gardner is a, you know, a Rhodes Scholar or a Jesuit educated person or something like that, or maybe a Fulbright Scholar, something like Clinton or these bar lawyers are from London.
These guys are all part of a different theater, a different show, where they're using this type of sensationalized disenfranchisement and systematic frustration of justice in this way as operatives for this purpose.
Short term long term as well.
I think that they've been brought in since like the Ferguson thing in 2012 into Missouri to do what they've done there in that state.
Holly would be another thing on the other side.
I think is an example they're setting up.
You know they build this these people 10 years back and then bring them into the spotlight 10 years later as they get more political momentum and recognition.
So yeah, I think that maybe that's kind of what's going on here with this lady.
She's trying to make a little bit more of a name for herself.
I think that really Soros has a.
An interesting strategy of attack on America because he's not really necessarily going after the traditional power structures.
He's going after more of the community level power structures that are, you know, not like in D.C.
or like going after congressmen or judges or things like that.
They do that as well.
But now they're actually going to the municipal level and the smaller levels with these city prosecutors and and things like this.
So it's really interesting to see not only the 50 state solution, Being atomized into like what the 1500 megacity initiatives or the sanctuary city initiatives that they were talking about for a long, long time.
There's a lot of money beyond Soros that's coming in for this.
And Soros is probably, you know, the mastermind that people like to ascribe it as the culprit behind this.
But there's a lot of infrastructures that are put in place for this very purpose, brought in by Rockefeller, things like that through the Trilateral Committee and through educational institutions in America.
So beware of that as well.
Excellent, excellent.
Yeah, absolutely.
Meanwhile, Melinda Gates reportedly furious over her relationship between her husband Bill and Jeffrey Epstein.
There's a division of opinion here about exactly what's going on.
A new report claims Melinda Gates was very uncomfortable with a meeting between her husband Bill and late accused pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Most of us think he's not late at all, that he's sipping Mai Tais, possibly on his own island in the Caribbean.
The meeting allegedly caused major problems between Bill and Melinda.
The Gates announced their intent to divorce on social media this week.
According to a Thursday report from the Daily Beast, who broke the story, the couple met with Epstein in 2013 in New York City.
Gates was Microsoft chairman at the time.
Following, Linda reportedly told her husband she was furious at the relationship between him and Epstein.
Felt incredibly uncomfortable.
Gates' friendship with Epstein, who for years was accused of molesting scores of underage girls, still haunts Melinda, according to friends of the couple who spoke with the Daily Beast in light of the pair's divorce announcement.
Bill also reportedly met with Epstein several times beginning in 2011 to solicit donations for a charitable fund.
Isn't that a terrific cover?
Three years after the late accused pedophile pled guilty to soliciting a young girl.
He also reportedly rode aboard Epstein's private jet known as the Lolita Express in 2013.
Bill has previously said he never had any business relationship with a late billionaire financier and never had any private meetings.
In 2019, Bill said, I met Epstein.
I didn't have any business relationship or friendship with him.
I didn't go to New Mexico or Florida or Palm Beach or any of that.
There were people around him who were saying, hey, if you want to raise money for global health and get more philanthropy, he knows a lot of rich people.
Every meeting where I was with him were meetings with men.
I never were at parties or anything like that.
He never donated money, anything I know about.
It also noted Boris Nikolic, Harvard Medical School grad and former advisor to Gates, was mysteriously named a backup executor in Epstein's last will and testament.
Pretty remarkable for a guy with whom he didn't have a real friendship or business relationships.
Reportedly acted as a go-between.
Meanwhile, damage control.
Melinda claims she warned Bill Over-convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein escapades.
Listen to this.
Something interesting is happening, or it's just a red herring for the goyim?
Who knows?
But hurry to a recent article from Legacy Media.
Melinda Gates, who is single now, in case you're interested, was feeling uncomfortable about Bill meeting with Epstein.
Who knows?
Maybe Ghislaine Maxwell made a deal and is singing like a canary, and Melinda ain't going down with a ship.
Or maybe the divorce is not about Bill and Melinda, but about an asset shifting.
Let's see if Melinda gets a lion's share of the asset while Bill holds on to the paper wealth.
If you want to dump half your stock without freaking out the market, a fake divorce would be a great cover.
Again, this divorce may be a huge sign a massive stock market crash is incoming.
Back to our story.
The respective meeting Melinda's complained about took place back in 2013 or eight years ago for Gen Z-ers, which is rather strange on her part.
I mean, why wait so long, girl?
According to what we know so far, Bill, the philanthropist, vaccine poop, population control obsessed billionaire, has met with Epstein at least six times, including when he was a convicted pedophile.
Bill not only blew the Lolita Express, his private jet, multiple times, he also visited Epstein at his mansion in New York more than once.
All this is mainstream information, as in, this is what they admit to being true, or to put it bluntly, this is the least, the absolute minimum we know about Epstein's Mossad-backed blackmail operation and Bill Gates.
Remember who the Maxwells are.
Now, if you ask me, There was only one reason to be friends with Epstein, and it wasn't for financial advice.
Speaking about Epstein, I wonder which year it was that Bill started preaching about climate change, drinking poop water, eugenics, and similar crap.
Because you can't bribe or threaten violence with the ultra-rich.
Blackmail is far more effective.
And that was Epstein's schtick.
Jeffrey Epstein was probably the pimp for a U.S.-Israel government honey trap, same-sex, child sex, blackmail operation that most likely included several of the following.
U.S.
Department of Justice, FBI, U.S.
Central Intelligence, Israeli Mossad.
He wasn't the first such pimp to die by suicide.
The previous most high-profile to die by suicide was Craig Spence.
Facts like these have been known for many decades from first-hand accounts and published in books, newspapers, and other articles.
The legacy media are unanimous in refusing to actually inform their viewers about these events.
They protect the perpetrators among the ruling elites, because they are also perpetrators of these crimes.
It's funny, yet very telling in regard to who lords over us, that a country running around as a global moral authority, in a country running around as a global moral authority, being a wealthy Jewish child molester is a state-sanctioned activity.
A preposterous story about Epstein hanging himself in an anti-suicide cell on a tailor-made horizontal suicide bar while under an international spotlight, guard sleeping, cameras broken, then apparently lost, was truly humiliating for the American people, or basically, told by the elites.
We don't care what you think or what you know.
What are you going to do about it?
And the answer is nothing.
Then we had the stolen election, and now the country is circling the drain because people are too lazy or too stupid to get off their damn couches.
I think that's quite brilliant.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, that is brilliant.
That has some attitude to it.
So, first of all, that first article was corporate media virtue signaling, and oh, Melinda's haunted, is she?
And she cares about charities, does she?
Well, let's go ahead and take a big picture of that because Americans are being looted all the time for that by published research and taking a look at the CAFRs for the state of California, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
So, a similar story of charity helping the retirees, paying the pensions of retirees.
We're told that According to our own data from the state of California, the last time I looked, they take $600 billion out of our paychecks to invest to pay for the retirement accounts.
But then if you go ahead and look in the books, you see that, oh, so the pension costs $20 billion a year, and the retirement account is only paying a net of $1 billion?
So we invest 600 billion and we get one sixth of one percent.
So I couldn't believe that.
I thought it was a bad year.
So I looked back 10 years and in some years the returns were negative.
So this is the story that we're told again and again and again.
These are charitable people.
They're helping the poor and the needy and it's just looting.
I had followed that up.
With that St.
Louis D.A., I called up the Los Angeles D.A.
and said, look, so here's the data, here's the situation, here's the documentation.
Tell me how this isn't fraud when they're saying that they're paying for the retirement accounts when it's one-sixth of one percent.
And the D.A.
flat out wrote back and says, well, if they say one thing and they're doing another, but in this report they actually tell the truth, that isn't fraud.
And then he refused to answer any follow-up questions, to cite the law, and to give some, you know, some case history with that about how every public statement wouldn't be fraud.
Carl, it's just breathtaking the way the public is being played for suckers and saps.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, it's kind of interesting to see, like I talk about all the time, these robber barons, you know, the Charles River Boston Brahman folk, the Harvard Trust folk.
No offense, Carl, I know you went to Harvard, but I certainly know you're not one of these folk.
But yeah, these guys really have used a lot of things like educational institutions, the military-industrial complex, even DARPA, to extort not only, what, $150 trillion from the United States to the Department of Defense, HUD, things like this, But also worldwide through guys like Larry Summer through the IMF World Bank and things like that.
Look what he did with Russia and the Yukos and Gazprom scam alone.
That's just one country, one time.
I think they paid like $3.2 billion in settlements just for that.
I'm talking about Harvard.
And then I don't know how much IMF had to pay.
But anyways.
Yeah, these guys all travel hand-in-hand.
They're very synonymous with the Mossad, the Deep State, the CIA, the intelligence agencies, the hedge funds as well.
BlackRock is a prominent one as well, running a lot of these type of convenient cover fires or these solutions for the manufactured pandemic that we're facing, which is truly a cover fire for their economic misdeeds and Big Ponzi falling apart into a million pieces.
Just about every market that they could possibly imagine Has been set up like a Ponzi scheme by these guys through legal crime, and they have taken away not only that money I'm talking about in terms of national wealth, put it on our debt, but also have rendered rendered us obsolete in terms of labor supply in wage stagflation and things like this.
So, I mean, these guys have used so much economic sorcery to render us homeless in our own lands, basically, is what we're seeing now.
How many people are being run out of their own houses, run out of their small businesses by the DARPA Fangs business model?
You know, this is amazing to see.
And another thing I have to add, you know, Epstein was a Wrangler back into the 70s.
I think he was one of the guys that helped recruit Brooke Shields as a model back when she was a child, and Lord knows whatever else they did with that poor girl.
But I have to say the fashion industry has been notorious just like Dynacorp and many of these military contractors have been for child trafficking a long history every decade.
And they're also involved with many of the prostitution rings that involve themselves with the deep state Hollywood in DC.
So this is the big Ponzi schemes all being blown out into the open.
And hopefully these people will get what they deserve.
You know, Bill Gates, how many people has he crippled from his bullshit vaccine in India alone?
Not to mention, how many lives has he ruined?
How many children's lives has he ruined from just being the creep that he is?
So I'm glad to see that at some point in time that maybe this is, you know, justice serving itself in the slightest of ways.
But you know, maybe it's just a way to keep Melinda and Bill from having to testify against each other.
I don't think you can testify against the spouse, so maybe there's some strategic value that they have from this.
Maybe she'll protect the money that he's gonna get, you know, should have taken from him for these war crimes.
I don't know.
Maybe I'm just thinking out loud, but these are some things that cross my mind.
Carl?
And Microsoft was recently discovered to be connected to the election frauds with Dominion.
So if that is the case, then if you had a divorce, then Melinda could go ahead and in the amical settlement, she could take the stock and go ahead and dump it and sell it for the higher price.
Because if Microsoft is implicated in Dominion's election fraud, then Microsoft stock would be worthless.
Good point.
Yeah, I think those are both good.
If they get divorced, though, she could testify against him.
So there would be the benefit as long as they remain married.
Remain married if you don't want to testify.
Right.
Yeah.
But discovering this back door to Microsoft's and the Dominion machines, I think, is a serious development with potentially major ramifications.
And think of it like Microsoft in competition for the Jedi and the cloud contracts and the Nightingale contracts, where they're going to manage the privacy of our health insurance data, supposedly.
And then, of course, deliver solutions for these pandemic hoaxes that are conveniently released through Wuhan, arguably through the Harvard Trust and Lieber and them guys, right?
Yeah, there isn't any privacy.
That's just a joke.
That's another pretense foisting off on the American people to believe their information is secure when it's anything but.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Get this.
So, Maricopa County, Arizona, they just finally admitted they didn't have the password for the machines.
Which means they didn't have the password for the elections.
Which means they had no control over the machines for the elections.
This is criminal, folks.
More to come.
More to come.
Meanwhile, Dr. Fauci funds the organ trafficking of aborted babies, helping researchers graft baby scalps onto rodents.
This is just disgusting.
Under the direction of Dr. Anthony Tony de Rattauschi, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease has engaged in the most unethical Machiavellian research of the 21st century.
This research rivals the work of Dr. Joseph Mengele, who led horrifying medical experiments on twins to help the Nazis justify the Holocaust.
And, of course, here they're taking for granted the official narrative, not delving into whether the Holocaust were real or mythical.
I encourage anyone who wants to know more, go to JimTheConspiracyGuy.com and scroll down.
It may be show number 23.
About the end of World War II and how we have been played.
For years, Fauci was a point man for coronavirus gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.
Working with Peter Zak at EcoHealth Alliance, Fauci spent millions in taxpayer money to Chinese virologists to advance various Chimera research that was previously banned in the United States.
This unethical research was justified to develop new vaccines for the world.
Now, Fauci is part of a global push to restrict human freedom, holding people down until they submit the MRI biohacking vaccines that Dr. Sherry Tenpenny has explained are perfectly designed killing machines.
But that's not all of Foushee's Machiavellian ways.
Developing virus chimeras that exploit humans isn't the only sadistic research Foushee helped finance in the 21st century.
An investigation by Center for Media Progress, CMP, finds Foushee also helped fund university-level research that harvests live livers and scalps from aborted babies.
The NIAID, that's the Institute of Health Division over which Fauci controls, uses taxpayer money to fund the fetal organ trafficking industry while procuring fecal organs for the creation of human rodent chimeras.
Scientists at the University of Pittsburgh have been attaching aborted baby scalps to mice torsos to conduct medical experiments on human immune systems.
These acts are crimes against humanity, as aborted babies are carefully selected and strategically harvested to create chimeras for medical experiments.
Does this morose immune system research coincide with the gain-of-function virus research that was used to exploit humans and develop vaccines?
After all, aborted fetal cells are used in vaccine research.
In fact, they're ingredients in these so-called vaccines.
The University of Pittsburgh is a hub for some of the most barbaric experiments carried out on late-term aborted human infants, experiments funded by the United States government, explains the narrator of the CMP video.
At the same time, the university sponsors the local Planned Parenthood abortion business in what looks like an illegal quid pro quo for fetal body parts.
The University of Pittsburgh is now revealed as a central hub for human rights abuses, where the traffic and experimentation of aborted baby organs takes place in the light of day.
The operation is taking place because the university received a large grant from Fauci's office.
The macabre research was revealed in an undercover sting operation by investigative journalist David Dalladin, whose testimony brought before the Pennsylvania State House of Representatives exposes Fauci-sponsored experimentation on aborted baby parts.
The video reveals evidence from within the University of Pittsburgh, where researchers developed a protocol to harvest the freshest, most pristine livers from five-month-old aborted babies in order to isolate massive numbers of stem cells for experimental transplantation into adults.
Footage shows University of Pittsburgh researchers poking and prodding an aborted baby to test reflexes to make sure it was still alive for organ procurement.
Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania is under federal investigation for using abortion doctors at the University of Pittsburgh to maintain a steady supply of fetal organs and tissues.
During the live abortion process, a premature baby is carefully selected for labor induction.
The baby, still attached to the umbilical cord, is cut open, and abortion specialists extract the live liver.
The protocol is funded by a $3 million grant from the National Institutes of Health, which has also funneled the university another $1.4 million to continue trafficking aborted fetal kidneys that NIH needed in order to continue grotesque fetal tissue research across the United States.
This is completely appalling.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, well we have the extreme of the first story being the brightest hope that we have in Arizona for this election fraud proof and I hope that comes in the next week or so.
That could be the game winner we've been waiting for.
And then descending into the macabre So I have a practical point and then a theoretical point.
So the practical point is we know that Fauci is connected to Wuhan and this gain of function is really creating a bioweapon.
And then that's connected to Gates and then that's connected to whatever that planning conference was for a pandemic, which was about a month before the actual pandemic.
And then you get this virus.
So this is all connected, and it's all evil.
Now, with regard to the question of evil, that evil, as we observe, and as we talk about, and as highlighted, and as a theme, these are parasites, essentially.
They want to suck life out of the living, and the giving, and the creative.
So that's what they are.
They're essentially parasites.
And if we get the truth, I think that we're going to find out that what also is connected to this evil is some kind of an AI, a hyper-advanced AI.
Because we know that in the history of humanity, we've been owned, we've been outplayed, we've been outsmarted by some hyper-intelligence that comes somewhere.
If it is an AI, I can understand the total lack of empathy and the pure mechanical function of trying to rip life apart to become God, which is also what evil wants.
Evil wants to go ahead and be able to control life, to manage life.
To use life as livestock and to suck life from it.
So that second story, as horrible as it is, that is probably just the introduction of the real evil that is going on with Chimeras and clones and whatever other experimentation they may be doing.
Upsetting to me personally, because the University of Pittsburgh has a wonderful Department of the History and the Philosophy of Science, and I've spoken there on several occasions, participated in conferences held at the University of Pittsburgh.
In many ways, a very fine institution, so I found this personally highly distressing.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, and I hate to bring it to you, but the University of Pittsburgh was a notorious place for the Judeo-Masonic people like Carnegie and Mellon and some of these other guys, even Westinghouse, I think, before them and Breckenridge as well.
So these guys have been there for a long time using the University of Pittsburgh in this way to develop these things, whether it's Bethlehem Steel or some of these things in terms of the medical community and then what they're doing with this Chimera mutant experimentation thing.
This is certainly beyond ethics, beyond any sort of pragmatic use.
I think that these guys have crossed a Rubicon in terms of hubris, and I do believe that this is something that would probably bring the natural wrath of God.
You know, I'm not going to get all religious with people, but I do think that what they're doing, these people have always tried to not only provide humanity with the concept of religion in itself, but also have secretly used these religions to accumulate massive wealth and massive power, while working some sort of agreement with a platonic demiurge, Or something of the nature.
I mean, certainly trying to serve pure evil in terms of exploiting God's creation in humanity.
So yeah, these guys have used these type of things many times, and they try to develop this breakaway civilization, as they've been doing.
And they use the common man as a guinea pig, and they run their sawbones type of technologies, soft kill measures on us.
As you can see with things like GMOs or this quote unquote vaccine or chemtrails or 5G or even the duress they provide with the economic or political scenes that they have.
So I think that really the engineering that they're trying to bring on is really to try to break people to demoralize them from their ethical and moral codes.
And really they've done the same thing with the abortion argument in terms of polarizing it or turning it into a binary argument of disinformation or half-truths, you know, putting into relegating it into the pro-life and legitimate rape type arguments that they've used.
Arguably there's quite an industry that's accumulated a massive amount of wealth and a massive amount of material for this type of science under the guise of this political football that they've used it as.
So there's a big, big business that's behind the quote-unquote abortion side on one side and the other.
This is truly interesting to see it, you know, being blown out into the open as well, because it is a very crucial thing, these stem cells, not only for, like you say, the gain-of-function thing in the vaccine, but also in terms of, like, surgery recoveries, or gene therapy, or tulamere, or life extension technology, or cancer treatments.
So this is a big, big thing that is not really discussed by your mainstream media at all.
Well, it's distressing that child trafficking on the one hand and organ harvesting on the other are two of the big money makers in the world today.
I mean, that's just outrageous.
Yeah, the only industry that's actually working right now.
Unbelievable!
Unbelievable!
These guys need to be lined up and shot.
I couldn't agree more.
WHO SAW THIS COMING?
WHO REJECTS WORLDWIDE VACCINE PASSPORTS, THOUGH NOT, I DARE SAY, ON THE GROUNDS THEY CLAIM.
IT APPEARS TO BE THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY WAS UPSET THAT IT MIGHT CUT INTO THEIR PROFIT MARGINS.
The World Health Organization emergency committee recommended proof of vaccine not be required as a condition of international travel, maintaining its stance on the issue under growing debate.
The independent expert cited limited evidence on whether vaccines against COVID-19 reduce the ability to transmit.
And a persistent inequity.
How often are we seeing this word now, equity or inequity, in global vaccine distribution?
States should recognize requiring proof of vaccination deepens inequities and promotes unequal freedom of movement.
In the U.S., the prospect of vaccine passports has already received strong pushback from the governors of Florida, Ron DeSantis, Texas, Greg Abbott, Mississippi, Tate Reeves, and some states like Arkansas are drafting legislation to ban such restrictions by state and local businesses.
Hawaii, by contrast, is full steam ahead to create its own vaccine passport.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki even walked back initial talk the Biden administration had supported vaccine passports.
The government is not now nor will be supporting a system that requires Americans to carry a credential.
There will be no federal vaccinations database, no federal mandate requiring everyone to obtain a single vaccination credential.
The administration wants to protect Americans' privacy and doesn't want vaccine passports used against people unfairly.
What gave the WHO panel pause on advocating such a move was limited evidence vaccination actually reduces the transmission and not everyone can or will get vaccinated.
But I tell you, the real power here is the airline industry didn't want to see its profits affected.
The science is definitely not settled, and there are huge concerns about not only privacy but personal freedom.
Yet, Dr. Anthony, Tony the Rat Poushy, and other agenda-driven politicians and health officials are acting as if the vaccine were all-important and that everyone would receive it.
The WHO seems to at least have some understanding this is not how life on Earth or individual governments actually work.
Any restrictions on international travel mean restrictions on commerce.
With last year's worldwide shutdown, the hardest hit parts of the world were those that could least afford it.
Developing countries and third world countries reliant on tourism and international commerce, who has already come out against the efficacy of lockdowns because of the economic impact.
Locking down borders via vaccine password would produce the same result.
In October 2020, New York Post published.
We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as a primary means of control of the virus.
The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is the Bayou time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we'd rather not do it.
Tight restrictions cause significant harm, particularly to the global economy.
Lockdowns just have one consequence you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer.
Meanwhile, here's a conversation between a vaccine activist and members of the Amish community.
Why isn't COVID affecting you people?
Answer?
We don't have TV.
I think that's right.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, with the first part, with the WHO rejecting vaccine passports, Canada had the same thing, where at first they say, and we've all seen this story before, where at first they say that we strongly reject this.
And then the story evolves, and then they say, well, we really should consider some expert advice on this, because corporate media would report some experts saying the exact opposite.
And then the American media has a favorite phrase for this, In this intermediary time called mulling it over.
They're mulling the idea of vaccine passports.
And then if they want to do it, they'll just call it the new normal and then just go ahead and push it.
Now, Jen Psaki, I remember her as a lackey for a spokesperson for the State Department.
She got run out because she was so laughable.
In the Obama administration, I had a couple of articles On her just telling the most laughable lies and just being outed by the media in the press room for that.
I don't remember the details, but it was so funny I had to go ahead and write about it.
And regarding the Who, the Who is part of the UN.
The UN is the Chimera creation.
of the rogue state winners of World War II to virtue signal for world peace while they engage in these ongoing neocolonial wars.
And I speak from experience of having helped create two UN summits for heads of state as one of about 100 leaders in the citizens lobby results for ending poverty.
And these leaders of the so-called developed, the so-called former colonial nations, they just operate a neo-colonial empire.
They reneged on all promises to end poverty and have done so from the collective international level since 1969 to engage instead in what was the economic hitman premise.
They're just economic hitmen at the UN.
It's so distressing to see these mediocrities and scum running the government of the United States and representing us to the world.
Outrageous.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, the common man cannot even understand, possibly fathom, the extent of the ruthless ambition that these people possess in terms of their endeavors, as well as their sinister nature.
So it makes it hard for them to comprehend the true level of complicity that's involved with this type of organization and control through this departmentalization process.
So I'd say that these guys that are doing this, they really are beyond malice aforethought in terms of their offerings, in terms of their creation of these dispossession tactics, and as well as this whole pandemic asset stripping operation.
So really, as the resistance is calling this out for the sinister nature of what it truly is, you know, whether it's quarantining the healthy, trying to put this thing out, this operating system called a vaccine or whatever, You know, the economic reset covering being cover fire for this or this being cover fire for that, I should say.
This is really, you know, I don't think they were counting on this many people really gathering this type of momentum and this type of outrage this quickly.
And really in perspective, you know, you look at these type of lies that they've added up and this is the, you know, a series of departmentalized big Ponzi schemes just collapsing upon themselves all at the same time.
This is these guys hemorrhaging credibility and really all hands on deck in terms of,
you know, them putting, doubling down on the bullshit really.
Cause that's all they have left to do really at this point in time is to just bullshit people.
And while I think that their credibility is hemorrhaging and ultimately it's going to catch up with them.
And when it does, maybe we'll have a chance at really a free market
or a fair world or an honest wage once we really sort these guys out.
What a great thought.
How nice that would be.
Meanwhile, Tucker has outed Frank Lutz as a Democrat who's been managing focus groups for the Republicans and leading them down a primrose path toward Democrats' agenda, including with regard to immigration.
Tucker called him out, so Lutz has replied by blaming Tucker's criticism on his presidential aspirations, which is frankly rather absurd.
Tucker realized he can make any accusation he wants, and To that cadre, because he's very popular among a certain segment of conservatives, said Lutz, who, in my opinion, is disgracing himself.
I think Tucker is running for president.
I think that's what he's going to do.
I think he's going to try to demonize and destroy anyone who might stand up against him.
And that's all this is.
As though Lutz were standing up against anyone.
Earlier this week, Tucker reported a tip Luntz was renting a room to House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy in his Washington, D.C.
apartment.
He alleged McCarthy's actions violated ethics rules in the House about receiving gifts, since Luntz has worked for Google.
Below is a transcript from the Fox segment.
Over the weekend, we got a call from a source who said that, in fact, Frank Luntz and Kevin McCartney are not simply friends, they're roommates.
Kevin McCarthy lives in Luntz' apartment in downtown Washington.
That's what we were told, and honestly, we did not believe it.
The top Republican in the House lives with a Google lobbyist?
Come on.
Even by the sleazy and corrupt standards of politics in Washington, that didn't seem possible.
In fact, it sounded like a joke.
This morning, since we heard it, we called to check with Kevin McCarthy's spokeswoman, and when we raised this, she all but chuckled at the suggestion.
No, when he's in Washington, she told us Kevin McCarthy rents hotel rooms or sleeps in his office at the Capitol.
Tucker continued, he certainly isn't living with Frank Luntz.
Okay, that seemed logical to us, but we did press a little bit because we got the tip from someone reliable and we wanted to be sure.
So the spokeswoman said she'd get back to us.
Two hours later, we got this text.
Quote, following up on our conversation from earlier today, because of the pandemic, McCarthy has rented a room in Washington at a fair market price from Frank.
What's denied any wrongdoing?
I'm not a lobbyist.
I root to Google on language.
I don't advocate for them.
Prior to this segment on Lutz, Tucker referenced an Axios piece where Lutz said, Republicans are more pro-immigrant than elites realize, to which the Fox News host ridiculed Lutz for not supporting law and order.
Lutz said, Trump voters support the Dream Act and the ability of these people who are brought here, the ability to earn a path of citizenship.
He added, we need these people.
Frank Luntz doesn't want to debate it, Tucker said.
He wants instead to pretend that his personal opinions are established fact and that the Republican Party had better listen to them and obey.
It's a non sequitur whether or not Tucker might run for the presidency.
As of now, there's no indication.
In August, the Fox News host told Mediate's podcast, The Interview, he never wanted to be involved in an effort to run for the presidency.
That it's hard to imagine he could be a legitimate candidate.
He said in 2019 at the National Conservatism Conference that he would never run for president.
Lunge is sidestepping and avoiding any criticism with a cop-out.
It's a hallmark example of an elite GOP ally That's a fascinating article, isn't it?
to prove their unworthiness to fairly engage in discourse with dissenters.
Tucker's occupation entails reporting on elites like Luntz, but Luntz sees it differently,
obviously self-serving to protect himself. Carl, your thoughts?
That's a fascinating article, isn't it? So Frank Luntz is projecting the demonization
of somebody else when it's he who is doing the demonizing, and then he lies saying that
Tucker might want to run for president without any evidence.
And I think what we're getting is a hint of our opponent's ability or their attempt to begin framing the Trump presidency if they should get away with the crime of the century there.
So they're saying that Tucker Carlson would run for president just because he feels like it, and just because he appeals to a certain section of conservatives.
And I think that's what they want Trump to be seen as.
He just had money, and he just appealed to a certain minority of conservatives, so he ran for president, and he won once.
And he was a terribly criminal person, and the Russiagate, and everything was all true.
In addition, I wanted to point out that in similar vein, if you heard the Democrats going up into the election and even after, their current frame for conspiracy theorists is, and I've heard this a few times, is that they're framing anybody as a conspiracy theorist as Well, every family has one.
You know, the crazy uncle who talks conspiracies at family gatherings.
They're basically harmless.
And then if it's Kamala doing the storytelling, she'll go, Carl, that was wonderful.
That was wonderful.
Let me just add that I have had a piece on Oon's review entitled, What's Wrong With Conspiracy Theories?
It's drawn over 700 comments.
It's apparently hit a nerve.
And I'd encourage everyone to check out on UNZ Review.
What's wrong with conspiracy theories?
Many there who are attempting to defend the official narrative of 9-1-1, 9-11, even though it's hopelessly indefensible.
Chris, your thoughts?
All right, since we're on the subject, what's wrong with conspiracy theories?
I'll start another one.
Let's say that maybe Tucker Carlson, like Donald Trump, comes from a family with a long background in the intelligence community, as well as with media relations.
In the case of Tucker Carlson, DARPA, in the case of Trump's family and HUD development projects through CDO and REID, In case of Trump.
So, long connections with the mafia in terms of Trump, but we'll say in the case of Tucker Carlson, his dad was I think one of the members of like the UPI as well as the Radio Free Europe and also the American, was it Ministry of Information or something?
The thing that Reagan had going on, it was like information department thing that he had going on in the 80s.
He was also made an ambassador by George Bush Sr., Tucker Carlson's father.
So, This guy has long connections with the Boston Brahmin and the intelligence agencies, and I'd have to say that really this is probably part of a script that they're putting on here and enacting, whether it's the persecution of Donald Trump for the molehills and the ignoring of the mountains, or whether it's the Tucker Carlson flip-flop from being a CNBC guy after 9-11 into this full far-right conservative, neoconservative Zionist guy that you see on Fox.
So, Ultimately, I think one way or another, Israel wins and America loses, no matter who wins this Trump and Biden dispute.
Wow, that's fascinating.
Absolutely fascinating.
Meanwhile, The battle for the soul of the GOP.
Representatives Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene tear into their own party at a rally at Florida's The Villages as he raises stakes in a Republican civil war with their America First Tour.
Firebrand Republican Representative Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene have torn into their GOP colleagues at a red-meat-filled rally in an ambitious attempt to force party leadership to fall in line with their pro-Trump faction of the party.
Gaetz and Greene kicked off their barnstorming America First Tour with an event Friday at The Villages, Florida, the massive retirement community known as a fierce Trump stronghold.
We've got this battle going on right now for the soul of the Republican Party, Getz told the roaring crowd of senior citizens.
Maybe we're the leaders, Marjorie.
Maybe they should follow us.
Today we send a strong message to the weak establishment of both parties.
America first isn't going away.
We are going on tour.
It comes as House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who's focused on winning back GOP control of the House next year, faces tough decisions about whether siding with a populist faction represented by Gaetz and Greene will help or hurt the party in the midterms.
As soon as next week, McCarthy is expected to lead the party to an inflection point By calling a vote on whether to dump Representative Liz Cheney, who's outspoken in condemning Trump's election fraud claims from the No.
3 House leadership position.
Mark my words, Liz Cheney is gone.
Gates, a third-term Floridian and greener Georgia freshman, have attracted more public attention lately than most junior members of Congress.
Now they're hoping to harness their high profiles to rally the party base and strike fear into their leadership.
At Friday's rally, Gaetz and Greene did lob attacks at standard nemesis, including Democrat Representative Maxine Waters and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Greene reiterated her call to impeach President Joe Biden.
But the rally was extraordinary in the amount of time the duo spent tearing into their own GOP colleagues, though rarely by name, with the exception of Cheney.
If Liz Cheney could even find Wyoming on a map and went there, she'd find a lot of very angry cowboys who are not happy with the fact she's sort of for every war, said Gates, referring to Cheney's home district.
I don't go to the Republican retreat because I, like the Republicans, have been in a constant state of retreat, said Gates, referring to the annual House GOP retreat held last month in Orlando.
I'm ready for an advance, not a retreat.
They go to the retreat and basically the whole retreat is Kevin McCarthy fighting with Liz Cheney.
Why did they not listen to us like three, four months ago when we said this is not going to work?
When somebody's fundamental view is that we don't need to work on election integrity, we don't need to worry about the crisis at the border, we could find four more countries to invade before lunchtime tomorrow, that person should not be the spokesperson for the Republican Party, Gates said, of Cheney.
We've got going this battle for the soul of the Republican Party, told the crowd.
Green said she had a list of Republican colleagues who supported a removal from committee assignments.
Gates addressed a sex trafficking allegation against him as he took the stage, saying he's a marked man in Congress, perhaps a wanted man by the deep state.
We voted to kick her out a few months ago, Green Additive Cheney.
We were ahead on this.
We don't understand why it took leadership and everybody else so long to get to this point, but that's a problem, isn't it?
It's no longer a blue team against a red team in politics.
It's the establishment against the rest of us.
Gates and Green have been at the center of recent high-profile controversy.
The Justice Department is investigating whether Gates violated sex trafficking laws and had sex with a 17-year-old girl, and McCarthy has suggested he'll take action if Gates were to be indicted.
Gates addressed the allegations as he took the stage, saying he's a marked man, perhaps a wanted man.
He has denied the accusations, which were described by people familiar with the investigation.
He hasn't been charged with any crime, says he's absolutely not resigning.
A memo leaking green described a proposed America First caucus hailing Anglo-Saxon political traditions and warning of immigration threat to the U.S.
unique culture, prompting McCarthy to denounce nativist dog whistles.
Inside the ballroom, the supporters danced and clapped to Laura Bannigan's Gloria and ever 1980 hits and waved their arms.
Some 300 supporters, mostly retirees, packed into a hotel ballroom.
A long line trailed outside with people who couldn't get in once the ballroom reached capacity.
The Village is the fastest growing U.S.
metro area last year.
It has been a Republican bastion for decades.
is often a must-stop destination for Republican presidential candidates.
From January 2019 through last week, Gates' 209 weekday appearances on the three major cable TV networks, nearly all on Fox, were exceeded by only five other members of Congress, according to Media Matters.
His congressional and personal Twitter account boasts at least a million followers apiece.
The really powerful people in this town are the ones who can go on television and make an argument, Gates told the producers of The Swamp, a 2019 HBO documentary.
And that's power that leadership can never take away from you.
Green, in Congress since January, has 400,000 Twitter followers, but has made no daytime appearances on the three top cable networks.
She has appeared on the Trump-friendly One America News and Newsmax TV.
She also reported raising $3.2 million during this year's first three months.
That's more than double the $1.5 million the typical House and Congress spent on the entire 2020 election.
Gates reported raising $1.8 million through Mars.
Now, a very sophisticated commentator observed to me, Marjorie Taylor Greene is a good ally for Matt Gaetz.
He's clearly the victim of an Epstein-style operation, but with a clear goal of financial extortion as well as political ramifications.
With MGG's support, he should emerge from this fight with flying colors, with which I agree.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, that's an interesting article as well.
I was interested in the spin of the article, which seems to try to divide To conquer within the Republican Party you have the red meat filled rally without any facts of actually what this rally is all about and the main topics of it or linking to the source of the rally.
So this is again just a narrative, a story that's told to the American public by corporate media without giving any of the source material.
And the two representatives in Congress say, follow us.
Is this this is about some cult of personality rather than the actual issues?
And contrasting this rally and the tour with the GOP House retreat.
So they're clearly saying that there's a division within the party.
They ignore the election fraud.
They say that they were there to lob attacks.
Again, no facts, no data, no actual arguments.
And then going back to the Congresswoman's incendiary remarks without allowing people to see them.
And then painting the whole thing as for retirees and saying that they played the song Gloria and other 80s hits and they probably took the worst picture that they could imagine out of all the ones that they took.
We're in the very center, you have two people just, you know, looking at their phones.
And part of the problem that they do point out is that it does cost over a million dollars every two years for these representatives to get into Congress, and that is part of the huge problem of the money in here.
And it's so easy to understand that these candidates get pushed forward with money, and then corporate media goes ahead and promotes these candidates.
Carl, that was a wonderful critique.
are in trouble, or in the case of Missouri, you go ahead and just get the DA on them
and force them to go ahead and resign.
So it's a horrible situation with the status and this is a sign of rebellion
and hopefully we'll gain some headway.
Paul, that was a wonderful critique.
Chris, your thoughts.
Yeah, I'm a little bit jaded.
So I'm gonna have to say that I think most of this stuff is a political theater, a charade
that is kind of being manufactured so that basically the left is taking Joe Biden
and the right is taking the Donald Trump.
And basically, I think the Republican Party has kind of chosen more of the mainstream, deep state, big business type choice rather than going for a populist movement.
And just as the Democratic base has, too.
So it really comes down to which base is serving which corporate interests.
And I think that really there needs to be some sort of a...
An ethical standout.
And maybe this is it.
And maybe this is what's coming from from these two people who seem to be the only two Republicans that have some sort of ethical integrity.
Maybe McCarthy would be a third one.
But, you know, I haven't really seen too many more other than them three in Congress that have done anything impressive in terms of Republican Party.
And it's a hell of a lot more than I can say for anybody in the Democratic side.
So that's certainly, you know, to me, it seems to be more like a race to the bottom where people are forced to pick a side based on their their binary programming or indoctrinations.
And really, I think America deserves more.
And I think that once and only if we really make the conscious effort to remove AIPAC and the CFR from controlling these candidates with big money in the way that they do, I don't think we'll ever have a chance at really serving the popular will of the people or the democratic process.
because these guys will always be buying candidates and rigging voting machines and just, you know,
loopholing the entire process until they're actually prosecuted and punished for doing so,
which they are obviously caught doing now, but somehow or another, every time they get caught,
they just pull this bullshit out and everybody focuses on the drama, the minutiae, the emotions
instead of the actual facts, and then all is lost.
Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful.
Meanwhile, Taliban attacks are repelled in multiple fronts as the fighting escalates.
The Taliban really are distraught with the United States for failing to pull out on the 1st of May, as was agreed to in negotiation with the Donald Trump administration.
We got a lot going on now where the Taliban, I think, are going to I'm not at all sure I agree with this, but it's his position.
The war is not over.
I get that people are tired of fighting it, but it's not over.
He says the US is likely to be drawn back into conflict in Afghanistan.
I'm not at all sure I agree with this, but it's his position.
The war is not over.
I get there are people are tired of fighting it, but it's not over.
It won't be over in our lifetime.
Why the hell we should even have been there is a good question,
because Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9-11.
15 of the 19 alleged Islamic terrorists turned out to have been from Saudi Arabia.
None was from Afghanistan.
None of the planes actually crashed on 9-11.
And Osama was our man in Afghanistan, so what we're really seeing is a lot of poppycock going on here.
The war was over.
We had no point being there.
We've been looting Afghanistan's mineral resources, especially the largest deposit of lithium outside of Bolivia.
Where lithium is used in components in computers, triggers for nuclear weapons, and for electric car batteries.
That's why we're there, as well as protecting the poppy crop.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, the headline of that article kind of slanted it that the Taliban attacks.
These are the people who were called freedom fighters when it was the Soviet Union who had invaded and occupied that country.
And again, to go over the history for this, so after 9-11, the U.S.
went to the U.N.
Security Council when they passed two legally binding Resolutions saying that the nations should cooperate, arrest the perpetrators of 9-11, and then put them on trial.
Instead, what the U.S.
did is demanded entrance into the country to raid their camps, and the Taliban government, and you can go back to a long history where in when the when the Soviet Union was In Afghanistan, and the U.S.
was assisting the rebel fighters, including Osama bin Laden, to be able to get the Russians out, they promised the Afghans that, when we defeat the Russians together, we will help rebuild your... And then when actually they did win, the best comment I heard from an Afghan, that the U.S.
just withdrew and threw the Afghans away like a used condom.
Yeah, Osama was our man in Afghanistan.
He was instrumental in getting the Stinger missiles into the hands of the Mujahideen.
They used to shoot down the Soviet helicopters and planes.
He was actually an officer in the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman.
An official of the agency visited him in a hospital in Dubai shortly before his death from his medical maladies in Afghanistan, where he was buried in an unmarked grave.
There were local obituaries.
He died on 15 December 2001.
Fox and CNN both reported his death on the 26th of December 2001, where Barack Obama found it politically expedient to resurrect him and have him die again a decade later so he could position himself as having successfully taken out the most wanted man in the world, but it was all a complete ruse, totally fabricated and fake.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I see a lot of parallels between the COVID thing and the Al Qaeda and the ISIS and the Mujahideen concept, this phantom enterprise, this Golem force that has been created by Israeli secret intelligence services, UK and US intelligence services as well.
I think that really, well, if you get into some of the things that you guys brought up as well some great points, I have to add to them.
You know, I think the first thing they did was try to bring the abscan biometric databasing system into Afghanistan after the December raids in 2001.
And really, that's what they were trying to do is inventory these citizens and bring them into some sort of a database or, you know, to account for them in terms of the World Bank IMF credit system, we'll just say.
And more importantly, like you say, they're victims of geography and resources as well.
They're right on some really crucial trace minerals that are very valuable to the upcoming tech push.
And also they are right in the middle of a geographical goldmine in terms of the One Belt One Road land race for using the Chinese and Indian populations to produce for the Israeli trade initiative that they've been trying to deliver.
So I think that the United States is being pivoted against China in terms of who can deliver this for Israel.
And just like they do with most of these enterprises throughout history and that lead into wars, They pretty much hire both sides to really compete for the same service, and they keep which one serves them best, and destroy which one serves them worst, and ultimately they blame it on each other's side.
And they work the Cold War, play the ends against the middle like they always have.
These are the guys that they understand.
They have been the ones, the locusts that have created and destroyed many empires in human history that have ended in Afghanistan.
So this has been a point of pride as well, too, as far as conquering this region and breaking the wilderness and putting their order on.
Nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you, Zen Fan Mail, BrewerCon to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
Live.
Need to know at gmail.com.
Remember, they're all pedophiles.
The choice to know will be yours.
It's outrageous, but unfortunately, it appears to be true.
Meanwhile, remember, Deagle has now modified its rejection from 99 million still alive in America in 2025.
They've dropped it to 65.
Think about it.
Pause and consider before you get your shot.
Meanwhile, if you want to know what's going on, go to falselyconspiracy2020.com.
I've made all the presentations free to the public at no charge.
falselyconspiracy2020.com.
Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people, the secret of tyranny in keeping them ignorant.
Final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
Yeah, with that list of the pedophiles, I do recommend that people go to Jim's work on Pizzagate to be able to see the documentation.
And as well, I recommend the documentary series of Fall Cabal.
And there was a connected point that I didn't bring up when we're talking about this evil trying to deconstruct life.
The Adrenochrome is what evil sucks on as vampires to give them some life as well.
And there's a lot of history and science to that as well.
So, as we are now in the middle part of May 2021, again, the brightest spot is what's happening in Arizona.
If we could have a breakthrough there to be able to demonstrate certain election fraud, then that'll be a domino that will then cascade and hopefully will be a game-ender.
And until then, Those of you who are viewing and listening, you just gotta hold the line and you gotta stand strong with facts and faith in whatever proportion it works for you.
All the facts are on our side.
The other side has nothing but lies, bravado, and bullshit that they repeat on corporate media in those suits to try to propagandize and to lull us into sleep.
Stand and we'll see what evolves together.
Chris, your final thoughts?
Yeah, you're obviously seeing an extent of perception management that a minority is trying to impose on a majority.
And the gaslighting tactics are pretty much expiring in terms of credibility or logic.
So ultimately, these people that are doubling down on deception need to quadruple down on it to go further, because if they get caught doing what they're doing and what they've done, the people that really gave them the benefit of the doubt will pretty much exhaust that that luxury with them.
And I think they're going to meet a pretty swift judgment in terms of the Court of Public Opinions, we'll just say.
And I'd have to also say that the media says one thing, but the word on the street says another.
So when these type of disproportions start to add up in the minds of many people and they start to realize the strength, not only in numbers, but what has been done in terms of gaslighting them or deceiving them, I think they're going to be righteously pissed off.
And I say that the more these guys keep stretching this thing out and keep doubling down on the bullshit, The more upset that the people that are righteously disenfranchised are going to be.
And more importantly, the people that are being used as operatives by these folks with with half-truths and weaponized inversions are going to probably when they wake up be upset as well when they figure out what's really going on behind the VAX agenda and this whole thing and the UN depopulation agenda.
Yeah, so I think that ultimately if anybody has any sense for a moral high ground, I think that really you got to get to the facts here first and ultimately the facts are going to be snuffed out by these criminals as they always have been and that's a big part of their success and ultimately will be a big part of their failure too.
Well, my whole career as a professor of philosophy, offering courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, has been to foster independent thought.
And here you see today, with Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, with Chris Weinert from Detroit, Michigan, as exemplary illustrations of independent thinking as you could possibly have.
Just to preserve a few opinions of my own, I take exception to the idea that the two parties are really two sides of the same coin.
Why would they have had to invest so much time and effort to steal an election from the Republicans if they were just another version of the Democrats?
As I see it, the Democrats have gone full socialist Communists are using all the techniques to corrupt a society, to manipulate outcome, as have ever been seen in the history of the world, and they're being applied right here in the USA today.
I also would add, in defense of Tucker Carlson, look, I watch a lot of television.
I check out a lot of different points of view.
It's of necessity, so I know what's going on.
There is no more truth teller on television today than Tucker Carlson.
His early monologues of last week have been sensational.
He's flawed.
He's a human being like the rest of us.
He doesn't really have sufficient appreciation for conspiracies.
But if you were to watch only one show a day, I tell you, you should watch Tucker.
Meanwhile, I want to say it's such a joy and pleasure to be here.
With Carl Herman and Chris Weinert.
I'm very glad you joined us today.
Back tomorrow with more of the news you need to know.
Thanks for watching.
▲
Export Selection