All Episodes
Previous Next
April 30, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:19:35
The Real Deal (29 April 2021) with Danny Cirrus: Miles Mathis on Chauvin Trial
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer on The Real Deal, where I'm very pleased to have joining me today, Danny Siras, who is longtime law enforcement.
Danny and I have done any number of shows together.
Danny does a brilliant job of sorting things out from a legal and law enforcement point of view.
Today we're going to review Mild Mathis' take that the whole Chauvin trial was fake.
I mean, it's a completely fascinating hypothesis.
Meanwhile, it turns out the latest report that the Biden Department of Justice had a secret plan to arrest Derek Chauvin had he not been found guilty.
This, in my opinion, is a little bizarre.
The Biden Department of Justice had a plan to arrest former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin in court and charge him with civil rights violations if the jury were to find him innocent of murder.
In other words, social justice trumps America's right to due process.
Danny, I find this profoundly disturbing.
Leading up to Chauvin's murder trial, department officials had spent months gathering evidence to indict the ex-Minneapolis police officer on federal police brutality charges, but feared the publicity frenzy could disrupt the state's case.
So they came up with a contingency plan.
If Chauvin were found not guilty on all counts, or the case were to end with a mistrial, they would arrest him at the courthouse.
Their secret plot saw DOJ investigators collaborate with their state counterparts at the Minneapolis U.S.
Attorney's Office to arrange to charge Chauvin with a criminal complaint.
It didn't require a grand jury.
Following his arrest, they would have asked a grand jury to indict him.
The sources said these discussions were part of a contingency arrest plan to ensure Floyd's murderer did not walk free.
Notice how they're begging the question, Danny, by presuming he was guilty of murder when the evidence, in my opinion, overwhelmingly supports Floyd died from a drug overdose, evidence we've reviewed several times now.
Amid fear such a verdict would have prompted fresh riots and chaos in Minneapolis.
Ultimately, of course, it did not have to be used after he was convicted.
And here, of course, are the convictions of second degree murder, unintentional killing while committing a felony, third degree Perpetrating an eminently dangerous act and evincing a depraved mind and second-degree manslaughter, culpable negligent, creating unreasonable risk.
At the very worst, it would appear to me, Danny, what count three would have been the only reasonable or even remotely reasonable, especially when you consider that the judge Even ruled that Chauvin's knee had not even been on Floyd's neck, but only on his shoulder blade, and disallowed the prosecution from continuing to insist it had been on his neck.
What do you think about this?
I find this quite bizarre.
Well, yes, sir.
I mean, bizarre.
I don't know if that even covers.
I'm running out of words to to cover this.
But, you know, I'm going to go right into it and say, you know, this trial was nothing but a show trial.
And the reason why I'm still going to keep saying that Is because of the deep analytics we've done on all the evidence on the whole George Floyd, what I call false flag operation.
You know, anybody that's looked at any of the evidence at all, including the famous choking video, if we go back to, if that's what we're going to still call it, we can clearly see that it was spliced together and done over different takes.
Uh, including a scene where we can see, uh, the, whoever that actor was, who really wasn't George Floyd.
It was somebody else that they put in there.
They're calling George Floyd, uh, the porn star.
Uh, we've identified him as a porn star, uh, using the name George Floyd.
But what we found is we saw there was a place where the police actually removed his handcuffs when they, uh, positioned his body before the choking scene and then placed the handcuffs back on him again.
And we all know in real life, once a suspect's handcuffed, the handcuffs don't come off until he gets into central booking or into the jail or whatever the jail situation is in that city or that town.
So I, you know, it's elaborate to see all this stuff on the news going on, sir, but I don't believe that it was a real trial at all.
I believe the whole thing was for show, top to bottom.
It was an operation to manipulate the public to start these controlled riots that are paid for by, you know, the elite, the globalists, whoever.
And I believe the riots are and those the people committing the riots are in place and many of the provocateurs are being paid by the globalists.
I think this is an entire control operation by the elite to, you know, sway or control the American people.
Well, Danny, that's all pretty fascinating and leads us to consider what Miles Mathis has had to say, where he's talking about things you may not know about the Chauvin trial, where he's going to assess the whole thing.
I mean, it was a Hollywood production from A to Z. I believe he doesn't even think there was a courtroom in which it took place, but rather a television set.
Let's take a look, Danny, at each of these and talk about number one.
Chauvin tried to plead guilty to third degree murder, but we're told U.S.
Attorney General Bill Barr wouldn't accept the plea.
Ridiculous, because the U.S.
Attorney General has nothing to do with accepting the plea or not.
This is just legal storytelling for the unwashed.
Chauvin was being tried by the state of Minnesota, not by the feds.
That's why it was called State of Minnesota versus Derek Chauvin.
And even if it had been tried in federal court, the plea would be accepted by prosecutors, not the attorney general.
Your thoughts, Danny?
Well, I totally agree, sir.
I mean, I read that brief.
I thought it was brilliant.
You know, he picked it apart way in more depth than I have.
But right off the bat, Uh, it's pretty amazing his, uh, the conclusions he comes to on who was operating this, you know, myself, I don't know who actually was operating it.
So, you know, he could be right.
Don't know.
Uh, you know, but I totally agree with what he's saying.
This thing, sir, this thing was a show trial.
I'd like to add that I've talked to many law enforcement that are still in and people have to understand that law enforcement, current law enforcement.
They're controlled by their pension, sir.
The whole job is about the pension.
If it wasn't for the pension, they'd probably all go off and do something else.
So a lot of guys that are on the job right now, they're not going to speak out.
They're not going to say anything, but I can tell you right now, I was talking to a high ranking officer the other day for, he was a pretty ranking officer in a big department.
We'll leave it at that.
They don't believe, sir, what's going on.
Okay.
Some of them have seen your reports.
They know what's going on.
They, they believe the same that this was an operation and they don't believe any of this, but they're not going to come out and say it.
They're not, none of them are ever going to say it.
So there's a lot of people that believe what we're talking about.
They're just not going to come out and say it.
That's fascinating, Danny.
Here's his second point.
It was the first criminal trial in Minnesota to be entirely televised and the first in the state court to be broadcast live.
Since the state had previous statutes against televising trials, that's why they never had, we should be told how and why that statute was bypassed.
Did the legislature pass a variance?
No.
Did the judge decide on his own authority?
No, because he didn't have the authority.
That decision is not invested in judges.
That by itself indicates a whole trial was faked by the CIA.
Only fake CIA trials are televised, as I have established in many previous papers.
Your thoughts, Danny?
Well, yeah, I mean, that makes total sense.
I mean, who else could have pulled it?
I mean, he's basically pointing out how they're bypassing the laws and the rules that are in place in the state.
And if you think about it, sir, the average person is not going to know this, that sees this around the country.
They're not going to know all the intricacies of the law in that state on putting on trials.
So I would say he's right on the money, exactly.
Here's point three.
Special Agent James Ryerson of the Minneapolis Bureau of Criminal Apprehension testified in cross-examination by the defense that normal procedure was not followed in the Chauvin case.
He admitted normally the BCA, that's the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, investigates the case and writes a report.
Which is then delivered to the proper authorities who then decide whether or not to press charges.
But in this case, charges were brought immediately before any state investigation was initiated.
Of course, this indicates the entire event was pre-planned and rushed to the newspapers and then to trial for political purposes.
Although the page on the trial at Wikipedia mentions Ryerson's testimony, it conspicuously fails to include this key point, Danny.
Well, yeah, I mean, you know, they're forgetting to also mention in there, he didn't put in there, I'll point out Operation Mockingbird, which we, you know, we're all familiar with Operation Mockingbird and we know who runs Operation Mockingbird and who can control the media.
And put on a false flag event and get it posted on TV like it's real, i.e.
Sandy Hook or any other of these events that we've seen.
So, that 100% makes sense to me, sir.
I think that's a very good analysis.
Here's his fourth point.
In a similar cross-examination, it was admitted that 50 BCA, 27 FBI, 440 reports, and 400 witnesses stood against Chauvin in trial, including his entire department and his police chief.
Why would 27 FBI agents be involved?
Again, this wasn't a federal crime.
The FBI had zero jurisdiction.
Unless it was a manufactured event.
It also didn't require 50 bureau criminal apprehension officers or 440 reports.
It required one report filed by a handful of officers.
Also, it's quite abnormal for a police department in chief not to support their own officer, especially in a case where a heavily drugged victim was involved.
Despite that, Within a month of the incident, long before a trial or investigation, Chauvin's chief, Madaria Arradondo, called him a murderer in the press.
Arradondo also appeared on 60 Minutes within that month.
That's rather shocking all by itself, Danny.
I mean, this is one of his own officers and he's taking for granted, convicting him in the eyes of the public by calling him a murderer.
That I find quite outrageous.
Well, I mean, that just shows you more of the fakery.
I mean, going back to headline one, you know, Bill Barr had nothing to do with this.
But yet, they tried to bring him into it, saying that he had made a decision on it.
It had nothing to do with his case.
It wasn't a federal case at all.
And that's a great point that he brought out.
What was the FBI doing involved in this?
They had nothing to do with this.
And it was not their jurisdiction.
So all of a sudden, when the when the trial comes around, the FBI is involved.
And then again, the chief coming out and throwing his own officer under the bus like that, that would never happen, sir.
It's not going to happen, even based on the fake video.
You know, you wait for the evidence to come out.
No chief of police would ever do that.
So this this entire thing was a setup.
It was a staged play, like on a stage.
It was crafted by a bunch of actors.
Sir, none of this stuff is real.
I mean, he's right on track.
This is a really brilliant analysis, in my opinion.
Here's his fifth point.
Yes, it was admitted during the trial that Floyd had three times a fatal dose of fentanyl in his system at the time.
So Chauvin's department in chief had plenty of cause to support him.
And yet they lined up to testify against him, even though they weren't present at the event.
Very strange.
Once again, it supports a thesis.
This was all staged.
Your thoughts.
Oh yeah, I mean, there you go.
I mean, it was a staged event.
You know, it's amazing how they're using this to clog up the news cycle and the timing.
I still think, sir, the timing of this trial has to do with trying to take the public's eyes off of the recounts and all the election fraud that's popping up around the country, and particularly in Arizona.
It's just nothing more than a distraction piece that they launched.
Yeah, I'm inclined to think that's also true of the Brown case in North Carolina, where the lawyers' report has it.
He actually tried to hit several police officers with his automobile before he was shot, which is something that's not being reported to the public, at least not until now.
6.
Eric Nelson, Chauvin's alleged attorney, was almost asleep during jury selection, paying no attention to the process.
He let the prosecution select whomever it wanted.
Again, this indicates a hoax, since jury selection would be vital to any hope for an acquittal.
But Nelson clearly knew it did not matter.
The whole thing was scripted, so objecting to jurors would have been a waste of time.
Danny.
Yeah, exactly.
I don't think there was a courtroom at all.
I mean, they never showed any jurors.
They never showed anything.
I think it was inside of some sort of a sound stage and not in any sort of a courtroom whatsoever.
I mean, sir, we called this from the beginning when this started, you know.
Pointing out other show trials from the past.
I mean, this is a brilliant analysis.
This whole thing was a joke, and you know what?
I'm not really liking the guy that wrote this.
I mean, he's got some brilliant points in there.
I'm just going to keep saying it.
I totally agree.
I'll tell you, Danny.
Yeah, some of his stuff is simply unbelievably sensational, and this appears to be a good example.
Nelson failed to ask for a change of venue, which allowed the jurors to come from Minneapolis.
This would almost guarantee prejudice.
Another indication of the trial was scripted.
No real defense attorney would fail to object and file motions at this point.
I mean, this is such an obvious move the defense would make to get a change of venue that he didn't file for one, Danny.
That's very peculiar and suspicious.
You know, sir, we point out anomalies all the time in reports we do on these false flags that we see around, okay?
And you have me on to analyze and bring out these normal procedures or abnormal procedures.
And as we go through the videos, we point those out, okay?
That would never happen.
One big point I'll bring up again is the still photo that we pulled out of the video of George Floyd not being handcuffed while he's laying on the ground and they're positioning his body.
That would never happen.
Well, this is just a wonderful breakdown of court procedures that would never happen, okay?
This would never happen if this was real.
So, I just hope the audience that's following along realizes Great point.
what these things don't happen in a real trial. So think to yourself, why are all these procedural
errors and things that never happen? Why are they happening in this case? That's something that
everybody needs to keep in mind. Great point. Here's number eight.
Nelson's chief witness for the defense just happened to be a white guy from South Africa.
Brilliant ploy by Nelson, right?
Calling up this pathologist from a famous apartheid state to defend Chauvin.
In fact, this David Fowler already had a reputation as a racist coming in.
Since he was also involved in the case of Anton Black in 2018, this should tell you that, as usual, Chauvin was being prosecuted from both tables, proving once again the whole thing was staged.
Danny.
Yep, that's, there you go.
That's another key thing.
And in a real trial, I don't think they would have brought in that person.
There's plenty of, there's other people that they could have brought in.
This is just, this is a case of them overdoing it.
Overdoing it like they would do it in a play or a movie.
Just another procedural error.
A brilliant analysis, sir.
Number nine, this is very consistent with our previous analysis of the videos.
In the video, we see that when the ambulance arrived, two guys in khaki bulletproof vests, khaki short-sleeved shirts with brown pockets and brown pants and caps get out rather than the EMTs.
This is a huge red flag and oversight by the directors.
Those uniforms are state troopers, not Minneapolis Police or EMT.
Why would state troopers be getting out of an ambulance?
State troopers are not EMTs.
Their job has to do with the roads and motorists.
Danny, this is really stunning!
I mean, the fact is that the EMT should have been there and have begun performing resuscitation measures as he lay on the ground, not lift him up and put him on a gurney and put him in an ambulance without receiving any medical care whatsoever.
I think this is a really telling point.
Well, you know, sir, I ran that video by Uh, a couple of medical professionals as well, asking them what the procedure would be, uh, at that moment, actually two come to mind.
One is a doctor and one is a paramedic.
And I said, could you just look at this clip for me and tell me what exactly is going on?
And the first observation was where's the medical trauma bag.
Okay.
So when the guys get out of the ambulance in the khakis that you're talking about, that look like they're almost wearing a police type uniforms.
Okay, they're out of place.
That's not what they wear in the area, by the way.
What does not make sense is they have no medical equipment.
So I want your audience to really understand this, okay?
When a paramedic gets out of an ambulance bag, they all have medical equipment.
They have a bag called a trauma bag.
And I can show several videos around the country of gunshot victims, all kinds of different victims that need help.
Where both paramedics get out and they have a trauma bag or you will just call it a medical bag that has emergency life-saving devices in it.
Okay.
And neither one that got out of the ambulance has any equipment on them at all.
Not even a band-aid.
Now, the other observation was that when they bend over to check him, they don't even check his airway.
They check that one guy slightly reaches for his pulse on his neck and then nothing else is done.
They don't try to bag him.
They don't try to get air to him right away.
They should be bagging him and trying to resuscitate him and getting him oxygen.
They would stabilize him right there on the spot and start life-saving measures if they needed it.
They don't do anything, sir.
They literally don't even put a band-aid on him.
Okay, so if they checked his pulse and could see he wasn't breathing right away, they would have started life-saving procedures.
They would have bagged him, okay, and they'd start an IV.
They do whatever they need to do to get him going.
They don't make one iota, sir, of effort to do anything to save his life.
They literally just pick him up, throw him on a gurney, okay, and throw him in the back of the ambulance.
And you can see they even struggle to lift the body because the handcuffs are on him again behind his back.
And as they're lifting him onto the gurney, his handcuffs are getting caught on the gurney.
And they're having a hard time getting them on the gurney because his arms are binding up.
Okay?
They would have removed the handcuffs, sir, at that point and then a minimum cuffed him to the front or cuffed him to the gurney.
But yet they continue to struggle and lift the body.
This shows to me, sir, that they're actors.
Okay, they're actors.
Real professionals would not do this.
Again, this is so important.
The absence of all the medical equipment.
There's no life-saving medical equipment in the scene.
Ever.
None.
Okay?
The absence of police procedure to remove the handcuffs when the guy is unconscious and they need to apply life-saving.
At least move the handcuffs to the front.
That would never happen, sir.
Never.
They made major, major Hollywood blunders on this.
I'm telling you, this entire thing was a scripted, Hollywood-staged play.
Danny, I think that's among the most telling of all the points he makes.
It's absolutely devastating.
There was failure to sequester the jury, which should have caused a mistrial.
I agree.
I thought it was bizarre the judge didn't sequester the jury.
And let me throw in number 11.
Despite failing to sequester, the fake judge issued a gag order on the trial.
A gag order on a trial that's supposed to be fully televised?
Make sense of that.
Danny.
Well, that makes no sense at all.
I mean, sir, they sequester juries for, you know, smaller families.
I mean, it happens constantly around the country.
Why would you not do that on a high profile trial like this when the whole world is supposedly watching?
I mean, that makes no sense at all.
And then the gag order, like you said, how in what world does it make sense that he puts a gag order on something that's on National TV and the whole world is watching.
Man, I really hope, sir, our audience is focusing in on these trials.
This is getting to be a joke the farther this goes on.
He's doing a brilliant job of this, I agree, 12.
We're supposed to believe Chauvin was evil enough to choke Floyd to death while he begged for air, but not evil enough to confiscate the cell phone or camera of the person standing right in front of him filming the whole thing?
If you had just killed someone, either accidentally or on purpose, would you happily allow someone to film it and then watch them walk away?
That's a pretty good point, too, Danny.
Well, you know, the bystanders, sir, you know, I'm going to keep pointing out everything that we did.
The bystanders we never could identify.
There was only one.
Okay, now this is critical sir.
There's only one person in that whole shenanigans show that they gave a name to one of the bystanders and it was the female that had that rag around her head.
She was kind of heavyset female and she was known to be seen holding a camera filming and yelling with the other black the younger black guy that was standing next to her and we never got a name for him, but we did get a name for that female and I ran that female through all the databases, sir.
They actually gave her a name and they gave her a story.
They said that she was a firefighter.
Okay.
Well, I guess what?
Firefighters have licenses and they have credentials.
They're very easy to look up.
Well, guess what?
She was a ghost.
She didn't exist.
She didn't work for the fire department that they said she worked for because I checked.
Okay.
And the name was fake, sir.
Okay.
That's very important for people to understand every single character that they handed out on this case turned out to be a fakery and the witness was a fake.
And why would they have a think about it, sir?
Why would they have a fake ghost witness in there with a cell phone, turn around and tell the world that she's a firefighter.
Okay.
And give out a name, but yet she comes up as no firefighter and she comes up as in a ghost is not a real person.
I want that to settle in people really to think about that.
I think it's sensational how you've done follow-up research that can corroborate what Miles Mathis has asserted here.
13.
The films don't match.
In the grainy film from behind wide angle, where all four cops are on Floyd, we can see that no other people are filming or witnessing this at all.
And I mentioned in passing, Danny, in some of the videos you see diesel for sale at 99 cents a gallon, which hasn't been true in Minneapolis, I understand, since 1987.
Well, you know, that's a great point, sir, because this, you know, this is almost following our analysis of what we did on the video, on the choking video.
And to point out what he just said, you know, we, we had the video clip, a few of them of across the street, the footage, and we broke that down as well.
And all those people that were standing up, supposedly standing on the curb, weren't there.
All of a sudden they were gone when that angle came in from across the street, when you can see the officers.
But there's some other critical things that came out of that video.
Okay.
And I don't know how much in depth you want to go into that but I need to point this out.
There was one scene where the four officers have the fake George Floyd on the ground, and the body position is wrong.
Okay, his head is now down at the tire instead of sticking out past the bumper.
Okay.
Yes.
And the other, that's a, that's an important thing.
The body position should be exactly the same as the angle from the bystanders would see from, from the curb there from the sidewalk.
But now his head is down past the tire and not even sticking out towards the back of the bumper, like in the choking video.
So how did they move his body?
And then the other problem is, is the George, there's a scene on there where George Floyd or fake George Floyd, whatever we're calling him, Is about 50 to 75 pounds lighter and his skin is looking a little plasticky and all of a sudden he's starting to look like a mannequin.
And I think you were the one that pointed that out and it's not even a real body.
They're using a fake body in that scene.
It's almost laughable, sir, how this was put together.
And just again, what a brilliant analysis this guy is doing.
I agree.
I agree.
Fourteen.
In trial, during the trial, the prosecution admitted the time reported all over the world of nine minutes and change.
Wasn't even close to being accurate.
They dropped it to four and no one blinked an eye.
Danny, the original time was eight minutes and something that actually corresponded to the time of the purported first hit of the Flight 11 on the North Tower on 9-11.
It's a bit ridiculous how they throw all this stuff around effortlessly to let those who know what's going on, you know, see before their very eyes the fraud and fakery that's being presented to the public, which is swallowing it hook, line, and sinker.
Yeah, well that's, that's, you know, sir, it goes to show you that, you know, people are so busy With their jobs and, you know, trying to earn money and, you know, focused with their families or, you know, daily routine that that most Americans go through.
So it shows you how controlled Operation Mockingbird is.
When they put just a few things on TV and people get a few minutes of news every night and they see something, they believe it because they know the average person, sir, is not going to check out any of the facts.
They're not going to check in on any of the evidence.
Fox News isn't going to show any of the things that we're talking about.
They're not going to show, you know, all the reverse angles of the video showing that there was a...
Fake body and all the different anomalies that we pointed out.
They're not going to show that.
Okay, so they can throw all these outrageous details in there that make no sense at all.
And why is that?
Because they know, sir, the public is never going to check out the details, which is why the reports that you post are so incredibly valuable to the public, because they're pointing out fraud after fraud after fraud on each and every one of these events.
Each and every one of these events are turning out to be what's known as a false flag staged event.
And this is just more evidence to show how fake this thing is, sir.
It was a completely staged event, staged by your guesses as good as mine.
And we know it was fake based on all the anomalies and the evidence.
This is just yet one more piece out of hundreds of pieces, sir, to show that this whole entire event, I'm going to say it again, was a staged play, a false flag.
Well, Danny, you've just done a brilliant job in contributing to my efforts to investigate these matters, for which I'm eternally grateful.
15 is one that struck me like a silver bullet right off the bat.
Chauvin was charged and convicted of three separate crimes for the same event, second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter.
That makes no sense.
Only one man is allegedly dead, so he can't be charged for three murders or manslaughter there.
The prosecution would be expected to pick one.
It would be like stealing one car and being convicted of grand theft, auto, petty theft, and conspiracy to commit theft.
I think that's a wonderful point.
I found this puzzling from scratch when they came in with convicted on all three counts.
Well, it doesn't make any sense, sir.
You know, manslaughter is an unintentional death, okay?
And for them to say the murder charge makes no sense whatsoever because it's almost impossible to convict a police officer of murder.
You gotta prove, sir, that he woke up that morning And the whole day he had planned to go out and kill this particular black man on this supposed call that he was going to get.
There's no way to prove that he intended to kill anybody.
Of course, you can't prove that because officers don't walk around during the day as murderers with, you know, forethought and planning to kill somebody.
OK, at best, if this was a real event, At best, they would have had an involuntary manslaughter charge on this.
That is the absolute most that they could have possibly come up with in a case like this, sir.
The murder charge is just, all that stuff is thrown in there for show, sir.
That's it.
The second degree does say unintentional, but it's a death that's unintentionally caused during the commission of a felony, which presumably would be improper treatment of a suspect, abuse of authority, or something such.
Meanwhile, here's number 16.
As of today, April 21st, Wikipedia still states, Chauvin knelt on Floyd's neck for nine minutes and 29 seconds.
For part of the time, two other officers knelt on Floyd's back.
During the final two minutes, Floyd was motionless and had no pulse.
But they later admit that, in the trial, the nine minutes claim was dropped, and how could they know Floyd had no pulse during the final two minutes?
Did we see anyone taking his pulse?
No.
Do you think Chauvin took his pulse, found none, and then continued to kneel on him for two more minutes, just for fun?
They later created video of someone reaching into Czech Void's pulse while Chauvin was still kneeling on him?
Does that make any sense?
The paramedics are going to arrive and help Czech Void's pulse while Chauvin is still murdering him?
Anyone who bought any of this needs seriously help.
And I, as I mentioned earlier, it turns out he wasn't even kneeling on his neck, but on his shoulder blade.
And it was a technique that the Minneapolis police had been taught, trained to use to subdue an uncooperative suspect, Danny.
Well, I agree, sir.
He was on his shoulder.
He wasn't on his neck because the guy, the guy was talking.
Okay.
And what a, what a brilliant analysis he just did because we discovered that, you know, they got out of the ambulance.
Okay.
And I would challenge anybody to watch the video.
Uh, when you see it, there's no medical equipment.
They didn't even bother to check.
There was a quick, he had two fingers.
He put on, it looked like he put on his throat.
He literally touched him for a few seconds.
That's not even long enough.
If you measure the time.
It's not even long enough to feel for a pulse and you know, it takes a little while to register a pulse beat, okay?
So, you're going to check for more than a split second and he's got no emergency equipment, nothing to do.
How did he know when he got out of there?
He was getting out of the ambulance like he was there to do a body recovery.
He wasn't there to save a life.
Like a paramedic or an EMT would done.
Where's this trauma bag?
How come on this particular day, sir, every single emergency scene, go to any paramedics on YouTube, any video you can find, and you'll see how they get out of the vehicle and they have a trauma bag.
And they have all their medical equipment, and it's right there next to them, where they're working on a patient.
Okay?
On any scene in this country, you'll see that.
Even in other countries.
But yet, on this particular day, with this particular suspect, it's the one day of the year that the paramedic forgot his trauma bag.
Somehow, he had a bad night.
And he happened to forget.
Oh yeah, I don't need a trauma bag today.
Come on.
How about the other guy?
He had no equipment either.
There were two of them.
What happened to his medical equipment?
Where was his bag?
How come they never even attempted any life-saving?
They throw him on the gurney and they whisked him away.
Why would they pick him up and throw him on a gurney without trying to check to see if he was stable?
They didn't check his vitals.
They didn't check anything.
No blood pressure cuff was put on him.
Nothing.
I'm hoping, sir, that your audience is getting through to show that this is fake.
This is complete BS.
I think it's coming through loud and clear now.
Number 17 is one of the few where I think Miles may have made a mistake.
Chauvin posted a bond of a million.
Where would a police officer get a million?
A bond, I think, typically only requires 10 or 15 percent.
So it would have been a hundred thou or 150, I think, for a million dollar bond.
But we would still have the question of where he would even get that sum of money.
I mean, it's just further indication that this thing was being orchestrated behind the scenes.
Well, you know, it is normally 10%, I believe.
You know, it could be more.
That's up to the bail bondsman.
You know, they post the bond.
You know, that's different around the country.
But here's what I'd like to post.
You know what?
During this show trial on television, OK, I'd like everyone to To think about this, sir.
You know, we saw who this Chauvin fake actor was that played the police officer.
Okay.
And I will bring out more about him as we go through this, but we saw him in the video.
Okay.
We saw him clearly choking.
We saw him walking around.
We saw his height.
We saw his face.
We saw his ears.
We saw everything.
I'd like to point out, sir, the actor that they used in the trial on television is not the same person.
I mean, this is the time to talk about this.
It's not.
He was shorter, he was heavier set, and his ears changed, sir.
His ears.
Now, did he have surgery when he was in jail?
No, he didn't have plastic surgery.
You can't change your ear pattern.
Ears, sir, are like fingerprints, okay?
Everybody has a different set of ears, okay?
It's just the way it is and I'm sure you can testify to that.
So, you know what?
Did he gain weight?
Did he lose height?
Okay?
It's not the same person, sir.
It's not.
The guy that we saw in the video, in the choking video, is long gone.
Who knows?
He's probably mowing his lawn in Hawaii, you know, laughing.
With a different, you know, haircut or whatever, onto his next job as a crisis actor.
And they put in, you know, whoever they put in for the show trial.
Again, think about it.
It's not the same person, sir.
So why would they switch bodies and put a fake actor or a second fake actor?
Why didn't they just use the real, the fake one that they used, the real cop or the fake cop?
In the choking video, why do we have a different person that they show us on TV and in jail than we saw choking the fake George Floyd that day?
Let everybody ponder on that, sir.
Nice points.
18.
The prosecution was taken over from County Attorney Michael Freeman by State Attorney General Keith Ellison.
Ellison's participation was announced by Governor Tim Walz.
Why were the Governor and Attorney General getting involved?
They have no jurisdiction over this local crime.
I have told you before why this is done.
When the CIA runs an event, they don't like to work with locals who may be honest.
They demand to work with top officials whom they already own.
Well, yeah, that's a brilliant analysis, sir.
I totally agree.
Again, you know, he's just pointing out, like we do with the videos on these different crime scenes, he's pointing out procedural error after procedural legal error.
And it's a brilliant analysis, sir.
It's just, I mean, I'm even learning some things here that I haven't picked up on.
This is really a brilliant write-up, sir.
19.
Ellison, half black and half Hispanic, allegedly converted from Catholicism to Islam, indicating he's an intelligence asset.
The entire Nation of Islam project has always been a CIA front.
Ellison has been involved with the Nation of Islam back to 1989, defending Louis Farrakhan against racism and anti-Semitism.
He later denied he'd ever been a member.
I actually have a certain affection for Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, Danny.
You know, they've done any number of things I felt were very courageous, including featuring Christopher Bolin as a speaker about 9-11, which no mainstream organization would do.
So I have mixed feelings about this.
And Ellison, however, is an asset.
Of that, I have no serious doubt.
Your thoughts?
Well, that's just an interesting detail, sir.
That's something I can't speak on.
I'm not an expert at that in that arena on that particular suspect or subject, excuse me.
But yeah, I think that is very interesting.
And you know, at that point, it just goes to show, sir, that this was in the control of the elites.
And it's just another procedural that would not normally happen, you know, in a regular case.
That's what it's showing.
It's just one more piece adding up.
20.
Ellison had previously been involved in a very questionable event when he spearheaded an ethics complaint against a fellow state representative requesting specifics of the Holocaust I've done that myself, Danny.
Fortunately, the House Ethics Committee failed to censure the man, ruling that a member had the right to speak even when stating things that were offensive or even false.
That, of course, is consistent with the First Amendment, though it's frequently misunderstood.
Allison failed to pay income taxes in five years between 1992 and 2000, and the IRS filed a lien on his home.
Nevertheless, he won a seat in the House of Representatives in 2006.
He continued to get reprimanded and fined after 2000 for unreported campaign contributions, late filings, discrepancies in cash balances, misclassified disbursements, Ironically, he was twice sued by the Minnesota Attorney General at the time.
Now, this is all just background on Ellison, who is well known as a radical.
This is a guy who endorses Saul Alinsky's rules for radicals.
Here's more, 22.
Allison has survived multiple accusations of domestic abuse from two girlfriends.
Although the second occurred in 2018, no one bowed to the now-required advice to always listen to the woman.
Meaning, he seems to be getting along with an awful lot, suggesting, even though there are serious questions that could be raised about his integrity and character, that they haven't made a difference to his advance in the political system, to the position of being Attorney General of Minnesota.
23.
Minneapolis paid $27 million to Floyd's family before the criminal trial and even before the civil started.
Again, it was a settlement to avoid trial, not a fining by a jury.
We aren't told what the family was asking for in the suit, but 27 mil is a huge amount to avoid a civil suit.
They could not have hoped to cover up the case since they knew the criminal trial would be a huge one.
So as usual, this makes no legal sense.
We can only assume it was another theft from the treasury.
In my opinion, Danny, this was hush money to the family.
To keep them quiet from revealing facts about George Floyd that were inconsistent with the official Democrat political narrative.
Your thoughts?
Well, you know, this brings me back to a show I did with you not so long ago where you had had a caller call in.
And I can't remember the name of the caller that particular day, but, you know, he was saying in his opinion was the $27 million, supposedly, that was reported.
Actually really given to the family, or was this just another tidbit that was posted in the news to try to further this fake story?
You know, because again, why would they award a family any money up front?
Knowing the trial is coming.
That would not happen.
That doesn't make any sense.
So this 27 million, where did it come from?
Did it even really happen?
You know, what family, sir?
There's no family.
I'm going to go back to it again.
Okay.
This whole thing is fake.
The George Floyd family is fake.
Okay.
That's not really his family.
The real George Floyd died two years before this even happened.
Okay.
We got that from his attorney.
So the actor George Floyd, the porn star, who knows where his real family is?
We don't even know what his real name is.
So again, this is just one of those details that's thrown out there to try to make the story seem real.
I don't believe this detail at all, sir.
Nice, nice, Danny.
24, 25, and 26 go together.
One of the witnesses against Chauvin was a professional MMA fighter who just happened to witness the entire event.
That's convenient, isn't it?
Unfortunately, we don't see him in the films.
Another witness who just happened to be there was an EMT with the Minneapolis Fire Department.
She had not been called to the scene, but was just walking by.
What are the odds?
She's also not in the films.
Another witness was Charles McMillan, who claimed to have had a conversation with Floyd while he was in the police car, except that With multiple officers present, McMillan would never have been allowed to speak with a person in a cruiser.
That runs completely against policy.
Danny.
Well, I don't see how there could have been any conversation in a car, sir.
You know, this is an important detail.
When he was arrested, Or let's say placed into custody is the technical term.
They pulled him out of a Mercedes type of van, which was across the street about 50 yards away from this choking scene.
And I believe it was done in different takes.
But excuse me, the officer puts handcuffs on him when he's sitting on the ground.
He appears to be OK.
That video is still available online.
You can see it.
And they walk him.
Very calmly across the street to the to the car.
They're going to transport him.
It's like an SUV, I guess.
And when they go to put him in the car, OK, the first the first tidbit that this thing was fake is there's a 24-7 looped camera across the street that's on them the whole entire time.
And it's very strange that the car is across the street and then they walk from that location over.
It's just kind of a strange way to park your car when you're on a call.
That far away from the business where you're going to the call.
But let that be, that's the way it was.
But when they walk him over across the street to the cruiser, you can see one of the officers opens up the door.
And as soon as they go to place him in the car, he goes limp.
That's the term for it, where he lets his body and his legs go out and he drops to the ground.
Okay?
And what's really interesting about that surveillance video, sir, at that same time, is that the surveillance video cuts off.
It's edited.
And then they go into something else.
So why would they edit the video and cut the surveillance video off?
Right at the critical time when the body goes limp and we don't get to see anything else after that.
After that, it's basically a narrative that we get, you know, and then they don't want us to see anymore.
It's a telltale sign, sir, that this is just, you know, it's just nothing but fakery.
It's a hoax.
It's a stage play.
It didn't happen.
It's just one of those details that points out that this whole thing is fake.
27 actually follows up on observations you've already made.
Others who testified were two Hennepin paramedics who say they were called to the scene, detected no heartbeat, were unable to resuscitate, except this contradicts a video originally released which showed no such person stepping from the ambulance.
Those who get out are wearing state trooper uniforms, not EMT.
Well, sir, They, you know, they just they just hang themselves in that statement.
You know, no, no attempt to resuscitate.
Well, sir, they have to have the equipment to do that.
Okay.
And again, we kind of laughed about how, you know, They forgot on this given day to have their emergency trauma bag with them when they got out.
There was no attempt whatsoever.
I mean, if anybody looks at that video, I've seen it so many times in combing through and looking for evidence.
He takes two fingers and reaches down and places it on his neck.
Okay.
It doesn't even look like he gets the right spot and it literally he touches him and then removes his fingers.
There's nobody.
They can check for a pulse that quickly.
It'd be impossible to do it, okay?
He had no equipment and there was no attempt to resuscitate.
There was no attempt to check his airway.
There was no attempt to do anything to stabilize the body whatsoever.
They do that right on the spot, sir.
And there was none of that.
They just picked him up with handcuffs and struggled to get him on the gurney.
There were so many blunders in that video, sir.
It's amazing that they even had the nerve to post that video for professionals to take a look at.
To pick apart.
I mean, it was amazing.
You'd think that they'd have better consultants in there when they put these false flags together to say, no, that's not how it works.
That's not how it works.
Stop.
Run it again.
And they would do it again.
It's more real, sir, on television.
During a sitcom show or any of these emergency shows that are on TV are much more real than this.
This was just full of hocus pocus and bakery.
My wife loves those shows, so I wind up seeing quite a few of them.
I think this is one of the most devastating refutations of the claim that it was an authentic event.
28.
Among them, those not called to testify were Chauvin's neighbors, who had no idea he was a police officer.
If your next-door neighbor were a career police officer, don't you think you might see him in uniform occasionally, on the way to or from work?
I mean, Danny, that's kind of surprising, isn't it?
They had no idea their neighbor was a police officer?
Yeah, you know, sir, this is a good time to bring up a point.
Okay.
Yeah.
Your neighbors all know.
Okay.
They see, you know, the occasional bringing the car home, depending on, you know, how far you live, of course, from the agency you work for.
It is possible.
There are several officers that live, you know, far away from their agency or their department, but people know your neighbors, your neighbor on the left and the right.
They definitely know because you know, your neighbor and it always comes out.
But you know what I'd like to like to point out, sir, is we did a background on Chauvin.
OK, so I really want people to think about that.
We did a background check on him.
All right.
And it turns out that Derek Chauvin lives in Florida.
OK, we found his house.
OK, and this is important.
We got a picture of his house where he lived with his wife.
OK, the real Derek Chauvin.
And we found out he was registered to vote in Florida and then he voted in Florida for the election.
Okay.
So this whole thing that his neighbor didn't know he was a cop.
Well, guess what?
He didn't know because the neighbor is fake.
Okay.
And Derek Chauvin didn't live there.
Okay.
He does not exist, sir.
This is a rabbit trail story.
Okay.
He didn't live in that neighborhood.
Didn't own a home in that neighborhood.
The real Derek Chauvin lives in Florida.
We haven't been able to locate the real Derek Chauvin.
We don't know what happened to him.
We don't know what happened to his wife.
We couldn't identify even get a photograph of them.
I still been looking for that for ages could never find them, but there was only one registered.
Okay.
And he was not a police officer.
I'd also like to point out, sir, that police officers have a law enforcement credential.
Okay.
And we'll leave it at that.
And when I look through the records, I don't see it.
So there's something weird in this case.
And this is just one more anomaly.
Why was he registered to live in Florida?
Why did he vote in Florida?
I'd like people to think about that.
This is just a complete fabrication to try to add credibility to a fake story.
29 is another nice point.
The same medical examiner who did the autopsy of Jeffrey Epstein just happened to do the autopsy of George Floyd.
Strange, since Michael Badden, the figure in question, was not from Minneapolis, not hired by the city, We are told he was hired by Floyd's family, but this is suspicious in the extreme, since Biden was not only the coroner for Epstein, he also gave testimony in the O.J.
Simpson trials.
He gave conflicting testimony for the civil and criminal trials, making himself look like a fraud.
He also testified in the Phil Spector trial, where he hid that he was connected to Spector through his wife.
Biden was also chairman of the House Select Committee on Assassinations medical panel Which concluded, they reconstituted the whole back of JFK's head and moved a shot to the back of the head up four inches, Danny.
I know this for a fact.
That medical panel report was totally fraudulent, not even consistent with the Bethesda autopsy report, which itself was inconsistent with the original and authentic reports from Parkland of a fist-sized blowout at the back of the head.
What's a medical panel for the HSCA completely covered up?
So, Miles adds, another major spook involved here.
I would have to, based upon my own independent knowledge of this figure, concur.
Your thoughts?
Well, as you read through that, sir, that's a great, it's a great analysis.
I mean, this is really, I keep saying, I know it's probably getting tiring, but your audience is figuring this out.
You know, you have an extremely sharp audience, sir.
It's not the normal, it's not the normal listener.
The normal majority.
Okay?
And people that listen to your reports understand when you go through this, he's fake.
He's obviously a person that's under their control.
And anytime they need to control a particular event, they pull this guy out of their hat.
I mean, just look at what he's been involved in.
Okay.
It's just one coincidence after another.
I think not, sir.
I mean, this just goes to show to the control of this event.
It's a false flag.
So it's the same characters over and over again.
Well, 30, 31, and 32 indicate how flimsy was the prosecution's case.
They were putting it together like a patchwork quilt.
Another person who testified for the prosecution was Susan Neth, a chemist, who claimed she tested the pills found in Floyd's car.
She testified they were less than 1% fentanyl, about 2% meth.
Ridiculous.
Who's ever heard of pills like that?
What would be the point of concentrations that low?
You would have to take dozens to get high.
Meanwhile, Hennepin chief medical examiner Dr. Baker testified that Chauvin's kneeling on Floyd's neck to the point of death left no signs of injury and could have not have restricted airflow or blood flow to the brain.
Really?
His report was that Floyd died of a heart attack, which is why the prosecution hired Dr. Rich to say the opposite despite not taking part in the autopsy.
You can see why CIA doesn't like to work with locals.
Danny.
Well, that's that's exactly right.
I mean, it's just one more anomaly, sir.
That doesn't make any sense.
You know, that's not my expertise right there.
But, you know, as just reading the facts in this case, that's just one more controlled anomaly that would not happen.
I mean, it's just one more piece of the puzzle that shows the world how just how fake this thing was.
33.
The defense rested after only two days of testimony, calling only seven persons to the stand.
34.
One of the witnesses for the defense was Shawanda Hill, allegedly riding with Floyd in the SUV.
She says, despite being caught passing a bad bill, a $20 counterfeit, he went out to the car and went to sleep right in front of the store with CUP employees.
That's where he'd pass the fake 20.
Yelling at him, they'd call the police.
That makes sense, right?
I mean, Danny, that's pretty odd all by itself.
Makes no sense whatsoever, sir, at all.
Meanwhile, 35 were told Minnesota sentencing guidelines suggest 12 and a half years for Chauvin.
What?
Guilty on three charges of murder, manslaughter, and guidelines suggest 12 and a half years?
Again, none of this makes any sense. 36.
We're supposed to believe that local, state, and federal authorities were fine with huge numbers of people gathering on the streets demanding conviction and threatening violence?
This is called jury intimidation, and it is against the law.
Maxine Waters and others threatening violence is against the law.
So why was nothing done?
It would be quite easy to call up the National Guard, but that was not only not an action taken, but not even considered.
Why not?
Because this was a CIA event.
Most of the people on the street were theirs, including Waters, so it was known nothing would happen.
The trial outcome being staged was a known event, as was the planned response.
Danny.
Just brilliant, sir.
I mean, brilliant.
You know, the National Guard would have been called.
This whole thing, it's just getting worse by the minute.
I'd really like to meet the guy that wrote this.
I mean, just to shake his hand.
None of the normal stuff was there at all.
And that one is just devastating.
That's a devastating point he just made.
He's actually a rather elusive fellow, but quite brilliant.
37, 38, 39 tie together.
Derek Chauvin has military ties, formerly being military police.
Windermere, Florida, is on his location list, which may tie him to the Naval Air Warfare Center.
Derek Chauvin's wife, Kelly, was beauty queen Mrs. Minnesota, but Intellius and other big computers don't know she's related to him.
His relatives there are listed as Michael, Arthur, Robert, and Deborah Chauvin, and Carolyn Polenti.
Carolyn is Derek's aunt, and she is related to Werner, Lieder, Mozart, Vanburg, Spies, Teft, Fulmer, Ennis, and Tolman.
Tolman is a Jewish name, so is Spies.
They may all be.
The Michael Gerard Chauvin related to Derek is likely his father.
He's 66, has lived in Fairfax, Clifton, Chantilly, Falls Church, McLean, Arlington, and Reston, Virginia, which is the front porch of Langley, Virginia, where the CIA headquarters is located.
He's never lived in Minnesota.
Well, you know, that goes to show that I found that Derek Chauvin, the real one, lived in Windermere, Florida.
That's where That's where I found his house, his address, he pays his taxes there.
You know, so what, what the heck is he doing in Florida, paying taxes, property tax in Florida, but yet living or working as a police officer, supposedly in Minnesota, sir, it makes no sense at all.
That's just devastating facts to show that this, this whole thing was staged.
This Michael Gerard Chauvin of Reston has been in the news before.
He was arrested in 2011 and charged with tax evasion in the amount of $670,000.
of $670,000.
He supposedly had a landscaping business in Reston.
I guess he was trimming the hedges at Langley for the CIA.
You have to laugh.
Despite being a landscaper, he lived in a $2 million home with his wife and somehow racked up that staggering sum of $670,000 in back taxes as a landscaper.
Obviously, this story is another fake run by the CIA for their buddies at the IRS.
Danny?
Yep, 100% agree, sir.
You know, I say it, I'll say it again.
Records don't lie.
Everybody in life is born.
They have a birth certificate.
When they die, they have a death certificate.
And they do multiple things in their life that require licensing.
And they leave a digital fingerprint now everywhere they go.
Okay?
And it's very easy when you look into a background of somebody to look at their digital fingerprint as they go through their life.
And when you look at a regular person, you see a regular life, you see that digital fingerprint, i.e.
if I looked at your background or your neighbor or whoever, that, you know, certain things come up that make sense.
When you look into the background of this guy, none of it fits, none of it makes sense.
I say he's right on the money here.
Danny 41 is really fascinating.
Looks like Derek's mother is Michelle Chauvin, née Trainor.
She has all of Michael's locations, plus West Hollywood, California, and Washington, D.C.
Her brother, or ex-husband, is William Trainor, also of McLean, Virginia.
His father is also from there, and they are related as Schwiders, including Charles Schwiders of the NIH, including indicating the Floyd fake may be linked to the COVID fake acting as misdirection therefrom.
Does this link us to Trey Traynor of the FEC?
Possibly.
Given the locations, it probably also links us to Lieutenant General Bernard Traynor, Counsel of Foreign Relations, also of McLean, Virginia.
In fact, I did find a link through Kathleen Trainor, who is both on the list of Bernard and Michelle's relatives.
This is huge, because although Bernard is dead, this does link Derek Chauvin to the Council on Foreign Relations, and these Trainors also link us through my life to the surnames Israel, Son, Walensky, and Zimmerman, giving us Jewish links again.
I'll add 42.
Also possibly of interest here is that the mother of Eric Baron de Rothschild was Mary Chauvin.
Their grandson Robert married Deborah Cohen of Massachusetts.
These Chauvins are French counts, but they also live in the U.S.
My educated guess is that Derek is one of them.
A Rothschild linked to Floyd hoax would surprise no one, and the Chauvin de Trouille are Jewish.
Your thoughts, Danny?
Well, sir, I only wish that we had music to go with our report in the background.
You know what I mean?
We need some kind of Hollywood, you know, type of music to kind of showcase that statement.
You know, as soon as you read something like that, it matches what we found.
You know, I'd like to point out when we looked at Derek Chauvin in Florida, we couldn't get any photographs of him.
OK, there was a Facebook page, but it was taken down.
Which I find very strange.
And so was his wife's at that time.
And I'm like, why can't we get a photograph of this guy so we can do some kind of an ID match?
But yet we couldn't find a photograph.
Okay.
Which suggests to me that this was set up ahead of time.
They didn't want us to have a photo of the real Derek Chauvin so we can match it up against the actor that we saw in the choking video.
And this is just one more piece of the puzzle, sir, to show who's involved in this.
And how they would be able to get away with it because of who they are.
This is brilliant, sir.
Very, very good.
And you see how deeply Miles Mathis digs.
43.
At the Minneapolis riots, jammers were installed to prevent live streaming.
Jammers are high-tech devices that jam Wi-Fi.
Local police departments do not have them.
This is indication the CIA didn't want any more proof posted on Bitshooter elsewhere that the riots were staged and provocateur.
They didn't want you to see what we already know from months of posts.
These riots are led by white guys in backpacks and earpieces.
They pose in black hoodies as Antifa, but they are actually agents.
44 all add in.
Many of those calling the Floyd murder a hoax on BitChute and other sites are black people.
Many of those posting videos and analysis are black people.
So this is not a race issue.
Danny.
You know, if this was a real, a real situation, sir, we would have seen real live ammunition and bullets.
You know, no, nobody's going to allow their city to burn to the ground.
Uh, and allow this to happen.
So what I'd like to do is point out two particular places that I know followed.
And there was, there was, there's a city up in Idaho.
And I think that you might've covered that in one of your reports.
I saw the video of when Black Lives Matter came to town to burn the town down, supposedly.
They had made threat after threat, after threat.
That they were going to come and burn the white town down, you know, for this George Floyd thing.
But what had happened is a local militia and militias are heavy in the state of Idaho.
It got together.
There were hundreds and hundreds of men lining the streets with body armor and their long arms.
OK, they all were dressed out with, you know, they had handguns, they had long arms, and this has all been documented.
OK, so when BLM got off the bus, they were met by this, you know, this crowd of people that were armed heavy.
And there was a famous picture of a photograph where they met the BLM leader on a street corner.
And you know, I'm not going to repeat what I was told that, you know, they said to him at that particular moment, but it kind of went like, if anything happens, you're the first one that's going to get it.
It went along those lines.
And what happened was with that firepower, sir, there was not one, not even a water glass broke, nothing happened.
It became uneventful.
There was no events whatsoever.
As a matter of fact, the only incident I think that was recorded was a man that was standing in the street, yelling obscenities at a few cars that drove by.
Other than that, there was nothing that happened.
They left town, okay?
When they got on the bus and left town, they called everybody, yelled out the window, white racist with guns, and they left town and that was the end of it.
And then there's another incident that happened in South Dakota, okay?
And I don't remember the name of the city, but what happened is, When the BLM buses showed up, okay, they were in their luxury buses.
Who knows who paid for those buses?
But when they got off the bus, sir, there were armed militia standing there again with body armor and long arms, okay, to greet them.
And in this particular case, they turned around and saw the guns.
BLM got back on the bus and left.
And they actually canceled their protest in this town.
So anytime there's a threat, okay, from a credible threat from real guns of them being shot, sir, They go the other way, okay?
They didn't have real National Guard on the street because they're a real National Guard with real guns and real bullets.
And they were doing their job, instructed by the governor to protect lives and property.
They wouldn't have gotten away with all these staged riots that they put on.
That's how we know this is fake.
If this was real, sir, they would never be allowed to carry out the violence and the damage that they were allowed to do without being shot.
It's just the way that it is.
Excellent.
Excellent points, Danny.
45 and 46 go together.
In the body cam footage released months later, which contradicts early footage, Floyd's last words were, I love you, Mom.
Tell the kids I love them.
I'm dead.
Brilliant script writing, right?
George Floyd is said to be six foot six tall.
He played college basketball and his height is listed in a porn video as well, except that in the initial video of his arrest, one of the officers is taller than he and the other is the same height.
Neither of them look very tall.
The man in the video doesn't match the pictures or descriptions we've been given of George Floyd.
I totally agree, sir.
It's just a switch for the bodies.
It's not him.
This is just a cast of characters in a play.
Brilliant observation.
Here are two more that are quite devastating, 47 and 48.
Floyd's funeral also makes no sense, as you will realize if you watch the footage.
It looks like a funeral for some kind of royalty, with three white carriages drawn by five white horses.
Where did all the money for this come from?
Yes, the family won millions later, but they didn't have the money yet, and wouldn't have known then they would win a settlement at the time of the funeral.
Plus, The Obama Foundation Twitter page tweeted a post about George Floyd for the first time on May 17th, 2020.
Unfortunately, the event didn't take place until a week later on May 25th, so there was prior knowledge proving a fake.
We saw this heavily at Sandy Hook, where many places jumped the gun, Danny.
They had donation websites up for the event the day before it occurred.
Even the alleged shooter, Adam Lanza, was reported to be dead in the Social Security Death Index on the 13th of December 2012, when the shooting didn't take place until the 14th, making his feat in killing 20 kids and six adults the following day all the more remarkable.
You know, I'm glad you brought that up, sir.
It's almost like you were reading my mind, because it reminded me of the Sandy Hook, where they got caught posting the... Was it the GoFundMe?
And they had some of the donation pages up.
The day before the event happened.
How did Obama know ahead of time that this was going to happen?
That was yet another screw up, sir, to show that this was some kind of an operation.
You know, here's a fact that I brought up on another report.
I have a friend that recently had gone to Houston, Texas, and he just was touring it with some family and some friends.
And he thought to himself, you know, I'm going to go check out this George Floyd funeral.
So he went to the place where this happened.
He spent some time walking around and he asked a couple of groundskeepers, hey, I would like to see George Floyd's gravesite.
They were hesitant in showing him where it was.
And they finally told him, well, you know, we've had some death threats.
And he said, well, I'm sorry to hear that, but I'm here just to see the gravesite, if you don't mind.
So finally, they pointed him to a building.
I guess you want to call it a mausoleum or whatever.
And they said they put him in that mausoleum right there.
I have a photograph of the mausoleum.
The gate is open.
He went inside and he checked every name that he could find that was marked and every grave site was marked.
Well, guess what?
There was no George Floyd.
Are you surprised, sir?
Couldn't find him anywhere, anywhere, anywhere.
And when he went back to ask, there was no comment.
He's not in there.
So they put him in a mausoleum and for security, they didn't post or put his name up.
I think not, sir.
This thing is fake.
Nobody ever bothers to go and check out any of the facts.
The more a person goes on the ground and checks out the facts, one after another, sir, nothing adds up, okay?
Nothing ever comes out.
This thing is a complete fabrication.
Here are three more points that Miles Mathis makes. 49.
Chauvin had allegedly been in the department for 19 years, being 44 at the time.
We're told he was the ranking officer on the scene, which is why lower ranking officers are claiming they were only following orders.
But when we look at his shirt, we see solo signals or signs of rank.
No sergeant chevrons, no lieutenant bars, nothing.
His bios also give him no rank other than officer.
50.
Floyd's alleged girlfriend, Courtney Ross, just happens to provide us with a link to the other black man shot in Minneapolis recently, Daunte Wright.
Floyd and Wright were allegedly killed by cops 10 miles apart, and Ross knew them both.
She was a girlfriend of one and the teacher of the other.
Just a coincidence, I'm sure.
White girls in Minneapolis are apparently tight with all the blacks in the city.
M. Ross is a really poor actress, like all the others we see in these fakes.
She pretends to cry, then suddenly laughs the next moment.
And of course, Danny, you and I have done a rather thorough dispatch of the Daunte Wright, where the policewoman of 26 years experience allegedly mistakes her taser for her handgun, her handgun for her taser.
No sound of any shot, no recoil, no reloading, no impact of any bullet.
And the other cops are just astonished when she steps back and says, shit, I shot him, which was news to them.
51.
George Floyd, 47, is listed at instant checkmate, but his only locations are in Texas.
No locations in Minnesota.
Notice his age.
The computer doesn't know.
He died at the age of 46.
Really stunning stuff, Danny.
Further thoughts of yours?
Well, sir, you know, I just I'm so grateful.
You know, I was kind of trying to before I met you, sir, I was kind of out on an island by myself.
You know, I don't have a YouTube channel.
I'm not a public figure.
I'm just a guy that, you know, does research on my own.
And, you know, that's how we met.
And I just started giving my research.
But you you have the public platform, sir.
You have the background.
You're a PhD, sir.
Everyone knows.
About your credential and your background and all the different events that you've exposed.
And not only have you exposed them, sir, you've exposed them with the evidence, which is one of the things I like about you and all these, you know, it's one thing just to tell a story.
There's a lot of storytellers out there.
But you just present the facts and the evidence over and over and over again.
And I'd just like your audience to think about all the evidence that's been presented to show how fake this is.
And the other side is never going to come out.
We've talked about this many times before.
They're never going to come out and say, well, you know, Dr. Fetzer got us again.
You know, better luck on the next event.
They're never going to admit it, sir.
There's never going to be a news source.
If somebody listening to this is thinking that, why isn't Tucker Carlson talking about this stuff?
Why don't we see this on the local news?
All of the mainstream media is under what's called Operation Mockingbird.
I'd like everybody to Google that.
There's plenty of videos online you can find.
About Operation Mockingbird.
It's never, never going to change.
They're never going to admit into any of these false flag or controlled operations.
And this is the best we can get.
You were seeing some of the cutting edge evidence to show that this event was highly staged.
Okay.
It was concocted.
It was written like a play.
They had it ready to go.
They launched it.
Okay, they carried it out, and the trial was nothing more than the aftermath of the original operation to keep the thing going, to have an excuse to keep these riots going in these different Democrat cities to control the people.
That's what this entire thing is.
It's a controlled operation.
It's still ongoing to this day, and the same people that wrote the play, carried out the whole entire script, and run the riots, and pay, and run the provocateurs on the ground in these different cities, are in control today.
Danny, I can't tell you how much I value your contributions here to the analysis of these issues because of your background, your intelligence, your perceptivity, your articulation.
You nail it again and again and again.
What I would say as an overview is that even if you took away a dozen or more of the points that Miles Mathis makes here about background, things that weren't obvious that haven't appeared already on television, There's more than enough here to knock it out of the park.
Miles Mathis has done a brilliant job.
And Danny, you and I have just confirmed the Derek Chauvin trial was a fabrication from beginning to end.
It had a clear political purpose to promote the Democrat agenda.
They want to use it To excuse away the rioting and the looting they're using to destroy American cities and to undermine confidence in law enforcement.
I believe their objective is to turn the United States into a lawless, chaotic mess where tribes and gangs and militias are all a war of one another, and America no longer has a significant Roll to play in world affairs.
Easy for the taking.
We'll delve into some of these issues on another occasion, Danny.
I just want to say, as the host of The Real Deal, thanks once again for a simply brilliant, penetrating performance, Danny.
I'm so much in your debt.
So I thank you and everyone out there for watching.
We shall continue to do our best to bring you the truth about what's going on in your America.
This ain't the country in which I grew up, my friends.
▲
Export Selection