All Episodes
Previous Next
April 22, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:04:46
Truth vs. NEW$ (20 April 2021) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett and Holly Seeliger - HOUR 2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back folks to Truth vs. News.
I'm Donald Reiner, producer here on April 20th, a Tuesday, just before the verdict is coming out on the COVID trial.
We've got all kinds of things happening.
It looks like it's all about control all over the place with this and COVID and other things, so go ahead.
Well, if we get to trial, we're going to respond to it, Don, yes.
William DeBerg has published a brilliant piece.
You can find it on my blog, The Pandemic That Wasn't.
Many have argued since its inception that COVID-19 wasn't a great pandemic.
An outbreak on a cruise ship gave us evidence that, in fact, the fatality rate, 1.8%, was higher than for the flu, but lower than for SARS or MERS.
Turned out, on the cruise ship, the median age was in the 60s.
They had limited medical treatment, so the age-adjusted risk was only 0.05% in the normal range.
We're Genevieve Breon of Johns Hopkins Public Research showing there were no excess deaths in the U.S.
in 2020, really reclassifying deaths from other causes.
Easy to argue with this or that projection, but as the saying goes, one cannot cheat death.
Now we have macro trend showing the annual death rate is unassailable evidence that there was no COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.
The death rate for the entire world remained the same in 2020 as in 2019.
is in 2019 7.6 per thousand or 0.76 percent. Nor did death rates for individual nation
change by more than a couple of hundredths of a percent.
He goes through all of these in a cross-check of a dozen nations, Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Russia, Sweden, UK, US, New Zealand, None had its death rate changed by more than plus or minus 0.01% from 2019 to 2020.
So where was the pandemic?
Obviously, what's going on here was a reclassification of cause of death.
For example, there were 38 million flu deaths last year.
This year, less than 2,000.
All the rest became COVID.
In the U.S., everything from heart disease and ammonia to the normal flu, even gunshot fatalities were attributed to COVID.
Did some individuals die because of exposure?
Quite possibly.
Were some indirect deaths?
Suicides elevated because of lockdowns?
Quite likely.
But did they cause a spike in deaths or life insurance premiums?
No.
Ben Swan did a brilliant job of reporting on it.
One can presume there was, at the minimum, a conspiracy of government officials, media, and medical establishment to push the COVID pandemic fantasy on the public in many nations.
We even have a leaked document about it in Germany.
Why?
Well, there's been an enormous transfer of wealth worldwide, from poor nations and individuals to mega-rich elites in the West, since it was promulgated.
There's been a dramatic loss of personal and public freedom in much of the world as well, tightening the grip of the elites.
One end goal was to vaccinate most of the world's population, whether because of hidden content and the purpose, genetic engineering, because of vaccination passports, vaccine passports, or for the purpose of depopulation, reducing the world's population.
A funny thing happened on the way to the Elite's Great Reset, however, because there's been a leveling off of Americans who are willing to get vaccinations.
It looks as though the remainder of the American population, overwhelmingly below the age of 50, has finally begun to fear the vaccines more than COVID itself.
The large minority, or even a slight majority, After a year of intimidation and propaganda, including fake stories about mass graves in Central Park, large waiting lines at hospitals, and COVID roulette parties, reject the elite's offer of vaccination salvation in favor of non-vaccination damnation.
That throws a big monkey wrench into their machinations going forward.
Ultimately, the outcome of the battle for tyranny versus liberty boils down to the balance of fear, as so aptly put by John Boswell Barnum in 1914.
When the people fear the government, you have tyranny.
When the government fears the people, you have liberty.
And a large percentage of the American people reject getting vaccinated against a non-existent viral pandemic, promulgated for nefarious reasons by American and world elites, offers hope that liberty may yet prevail in the COVID war.
Scott, your thoughts.
Well, I think people are simply looking around and seeing that the COVID-19 alleged flu is not infected and not killed and not caused a debilitating population die off and that the countermeasures, the mask wearing, the shutdowns, the economic shutdown and the retardation of children from shutting down the schools and indeed the traumatic harm psychologically, emotionally of children as a result of this.
The infection of staph infections and other diseases or viruses or Empatigo is related to children wearing these masks.
All of this is showing that whatever this was or is is far less threatening than these shutdown measures and indeed the vaccination with people dying and all this.
I think people are waking up and I think it's a combination of they're ashamed of themselves for not having the backbone and the vigor and the fury to say, hell no, we're not shutting down our society.
People, I think, are remorseful and feel guilty about not standing up at that time.
And that's adding to a certain degree of a Stockholm Syndrome.
But I think the overall leadership cast in this society, the real bold and aggressive people, are either moving out of the states that have these draconian measures, or they are rising up and overthrowing these claims to power that have already been overthrown at the court level.
So, again, I think we're witnessing the end and the death of the COVID-19 hoax, but of course they're going to try and usher in a new one probably in August-September when, you know, people start naturally dying of flu.
That's the real thing, too, as your insurance analysis last week showed, Jim.
The flu and all the other sicknesses and colds, suddenly those are all absorbed into the new COVID-19, and yet the numbers of death and It is sad to say it's all a fantasy.
the numbers haven't changed. So the whole entire thing is fraudulent as far as I'm concerned.
It is sad to say it's all a fantasy. Holly, your thoughts.
Well, I am happy to hear that the governor of New Hampshire has recently lifted the mask mandate.
That's the government mandate, but a lot of corporations are still opting to have the mask mandate.
So I'm not exactly sure if it was DeSantis or one of the governors did put out an order saying that these private businesses cannot discriminate and require a mask.
So I think that has to follow up because we are still seeing So many of these major corporations who are going along with this were still saying, well, it's corporate policy, you still have to wear a mask and they'll be the ones pushing the COVID vaccine passport as well.
And it's actually good news.
it still appears as though at least a third of the US military is opting out of getting
any of the latest vaccines.
So that gives me some hope.
And I did hear it the other day on the radio, there was an ad targeting people of color.
And it said that, well, I know the person speaking on the radio ad, which of course our federal money,
that huge trillion dollar, what, three, four trillion dollar infrastructure bill
included a lot of advertising for the mandatory job that they're trying to push on people.
And it said, I know people of color are wary of getting the vaccine through historical bias, but there are Black scientists and people who worked on the vaccine, so you shouldn't be concerned.
You should get it.
So they're really targeting certain groups of people, and it does give me some hope.
I do think that they're over-ordering the vaccine, and not as many people are actually getting it.
I don't really believe the mainstream news numbers, but it seems like they have already targeted some of the The lower hanging fruit and then it will be harder to target more and more people, the rest of us who are still wary.
Oh yeah, I think you're exactly right that they're exaggerating the numbers, Don.
They're exaggerating the numbers in that Diamond Princess cruise ship where they had their initial problems.
That was the first cruise that had just installed something in that Diamond Princess and installed 5G there on that boat and that was the cause of a lot of problems.
5G.
They had 5G on the cruise ship?
Yes, that was the first ship to do it and sailed.
Wow.
The radiation that you get here, they start poisoning the body and they create some symptoms which are to rid the body of a poison and those symptoms are similar to cough and things.
Yes.
It's mistaken there and so that is It is 5G that's causing problems, you know, a lot of other things to show that COVID is a capture for all kinds of things, like flu going down, everything else.
And it's not a pandemic as such, it's created, and it never isolated the virus.
And also in the vaccines now, we have seen that the middle organism is moving in the vaccine.
So it looks like it is genetic engineering trying to increase the population.
Thanks Don.
Yeah.
You got it.
You got it Don.
Amen.
Meanwhile, this is fascinating.
Laboratories in the U.S.
can't find COVID-19 in 1,500 positive cases.
Get this.
A clinical scientist, an immunologist, virologist at a Southern California laboratory says he and colleagues from seven universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud.
The reason?
Not one of 1,500 samples of people tested positive could find COVID-19.
All people were simply found to have influenza A and, to a lesser extent, influenza B. This is consistent with the previous findings of other scientists, which we've reported upon several times.
Dr. Derek Knauss, when my lab team and I subjected the 1,500 supposedly positive COVID-19 samples to Coase-Pops, you know, let's put them under an electron microscope, we found no COVID in all 1,500 samples.
We found all 1,500 were primarily influenza A, some influenza B, but no cases of COVID.
We did not use the bullshit PCR test.
When we sent the rest of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a couple labs at the University of California, they all came back with the same result, no COVID.
They found influenza A and B. Then we asked the CDC for viable samples of COVID.
The CDC said they can't give them because they don't have those samples.
So we came to the hard conclusion through all our research and lab work that COVID-19 was imaginary and fictitious.
The flu was only called COVID, and most of the 225,000 deaths were from comorbidities, heart disease, cancer, diabetes, pulmonary emphysema, etc.
They got the flu, which further weakened their immune systems, and they died.
Deeply hidden in an official document on COVID-19, the CDC ruefully admitted as early as summer 2020, it does not have a measurable virus.
About, for this purpose, scientifically totally debunked but still shamelessly abused a PCR test the CDC wrote under the heading limitations.
The detection of viral RNA cannot demonstrate the presence of an infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is a causative agent of clinical symptoms.
In addition, this test cannot exclude other diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
In other words, We cannot prove people who get sick and are hospitalized and occasionally die were sickened by a new coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2, nor can we prove it caused them to develop a new disease called COVID-19.
It could just as easily be a different virus and a different disease, since all the symptoms, including severe pneumonia, correspond seamlessly to what flu can cause historically in vulnerable people.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's a duck.
In late 2020, there was a similar indication in Germany.
A team of Canadian investigators, too, submitted no less than 40 public access law requests for proof that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated.
Not one of the agencies or authorities was able to provide that evidence.
Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Sally Fallon Morrell recently published a statement on the continuing controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus is isolated or purified.
Based on the Oxford definition of isolation, the fact or condition of being isolated or secluded, a separation from other things or persons, standing alone, common sense, the laws of logic, and the rules of science dictate That any unbiased person must come to the conclusion the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated and purified.
As a result, no confirmation of the existence of the virus can be given.
The logical and scientific implications of this fact are that the structure and composition of something whose existence cannot be proven, cannot be known, including the present structure and function of hypothetical spike or other proteins.
The genetic sequence of something that's never been found cannot be known, nor can the variants or mutations of something whose existence has not been demonstrated.
It is therefore impossible to show SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID-19.
Not surprisingly, the world's largest biotech company, China's BGI, launched a new PCR test that can simultaneously test for influenza A, B, and corona.
Apart from the fact acknowledged through various lawsuits that the PCR cannot Prove infection with any virus.
BGI's explanation that both diseases are so difficult to distinguish from one another, they only need one test, says more than enough.
Maybe there is no difference at all.
COVID, just another name for old familiar flu viruses.
Just another marketing trick.
With worldwide government-controlled 24-7 fear propagated by the mass media, most people have come to believe there's a life-threatening virus that makes people sick much faster and more severely than seasonal flu.
However, even the latter is demonstrably not the case.
Influenza A has been the leading cause of death from pneumonia in the developed world for years.
Send people designated as severe COVID patient to a few ICUs, put cameras on them constantly, instruct a few physicians they should only discuss the worst cases and you have your televised pandemic.
The argument we're doing it because otherwise care will be overburdened was undermined by government itself some time ago by rejecting officer of additional ICU beds or staff because it was not necessary.
Now that it's also the official figures that show after the normal transitional fuel season, nothing is wrong.
Even according to EU statistics, there's a significant lower mortality.
Society, if it really was about virus and public health, should immediately go back to normal, start repairing the huge damage caused by government policies.
However, As you know, that will never be done because this carefully planned pandemic hoax is carrying out an ideological agenda, the Great Reset, which aims to largely demolish the society and economy of the West and then subject it to a global technocratic communist climate vaccine dictatorship in which all our freedoms, civil and self-determination rights will be done away with once and for all, at least.
That was their plan.
Scott?
Well, I don't think they calculated that there was a population in America and the world that would die before they got a vaccine that was riddled with problems as this one.
And that's the very real population that defines the direction of civilization.
And those are the builders and the creators and the industrious ones and the The leaders that value liberty and freedom, that are individualistic, that are not part of this socialist mob, glob, blob mentality of who don't have any identity in the first place.
All those people are running to get the vaccine because they're so miserable and insane in the first place.
But those of us who are not are laughing and saying, no, we'll fight to the death and kill anybody that tries to come in and force us to get a vaccine.
So everybody that's getting it are Democrat, leftist, liberal, socialist idiots, you know, who are just going to die off in the next amount of time.
That could have a very deep population effect on the United States.
But I think it is planned.
I think it's part of the Agenda 21 agenda, of course, which is to reconsolidate the American population into zones and remove people into a city, megacity living like China has done.
And the agenda 21 is extraordinarily disturbing because it outlaws everything from hoofed animals
to golf courses to anything that's quote unsustainable.
That really is behind this world communist globalist agenda.
But I think it will always fall miserably short because when push comes to shove,
the American patriot leader, warrior, independent mind, and fellowship will always stand up
and reject these actions of totalitarianism.
You saw it in Canada when the pastor stood up and yelled and said, get out, get out, get out to these police Nazis that came in and he was from Poland.
I think that spirit, it permeates all of the American society.
It certainly permeates the 80 million that voted for Donald Trump.
And I think you will only see that grow bolder and louder, more aggressive.
And they will not be tolerating being pushed around by police, or Black Lives Matter, or Antifa, or Democrats, or all of the above.
When it comes to civil war, the Americans are better than any other people to stand up and fight it.
And I think with the composite of Americans as well, the Vietnamese, the Chinese who are here, the white Anglo-Saxon Caucasians, as well as You know, some of the others, the Sikhs and such, I think you have a composite population of people that have suffered from foreign lands, suffered communism and socialism, that will not allow it to come to their American dream here in America.
And that's what the Democrats have miscalculated too, that there are immigrant populations here that have experienced socialism, Very good, Scott.
that are looking in abject horror and outrage at these children idiots like a Ocasio-Communist Cortez
who are bellowing this, no, no, this isn't cat shit rolled in powdered sugar.
This is the perfect candy bar that would lead to bliss and happiness.
And they're looking like, no, we know exactly what it is.
It's death wrapped in a false legal justification, Jim.
Very good, Scott.
Holly, your thoughts.
Just a comment quickly about what you're talking about, the disease and trying to isolate the virus
and stuff like that.
I had done some reports on my YouTube channel back in 2018 and 2017 about Bill Gates saying that it was the 100th anniversary of the Spanish Flu.
We should all expect a new pandemic to spread across the United States and I'm hoping to try to save some of that so that people can see that all of this was another agenda that was planned.
And I also think the idea of people are starting to wake up to the idea, like you said, with Dr. Tom Cowan and so many other doctors coming out.
You've interviewed Dr. Judy Mikovits before, people who talk about germ theory versus the terrain theory and to look at, obviously I'm not a doctor or a scientist or anything like that, but people have talked about dis-ease within the body and the terrain theory and how people, it is like Scott connects it too, it's about personal responsibility after a while.
Your own self-care, your own health is your responsibility and to rely upon the Rockefeller allopathic medical model of them just masking symptoms and not getting to the root of the problem of terrain and toxins within your body should be a wake-up call and I think a lot of people are waking up to it and so I think that's why they've had to push it so far because The germ theory, I think, is starting to fall apart before their eyes as people start to question, why is the United States spending a record amount of money on healthcare, and yet we have shorter lifespans, we have more health problems, we have record amount of people on pharmaceutical drugs, and none of this is an actual treatment.
It's only a mask.
Of symptoms at best.
So, I think that that's why they've had to push this so hard.
And when you look at the vaccines, people are waking up, people have been talking about for decades, the connections to autism and which is brain damage or encephalitis of the brain.
And people need to look at that and have questioned that.
Parents have been gaslit about that for decades.
questioning why their children seem injured after these vaccine schedules which are pushing 50, 60,
70 doses of vaccines at this point. They can't push it anymore. It's going to fall apart and
I think one of the good things we will see people who do survive and I really do hope
everyone can make it through this with the vaccine is that this was not a cure.
They're already telling people you're going to need another dose.
You're going to need, you know, you're still not going to be able to travel.
You're still going to have to wear a mask.
You're still going to have to social distance.
You're still not going to be able to see your family.
So what are people getting these jabs for?
Well, it looks like with the CRISPR technology, Moderna, a lot of this is an attempt to actually patent people.
And if you look at the patents for this, this is massive and there's huge repercussions to actually these corporations patenting people.
So it's not about just a birth certificate or a social security number at this point, it's about control of your genetic makeup.
So that's hopefully something else people will start to look at and wake up to as well.
Paulie, those were wonderful, wonderful observations.
Not only do we have conclusive evidence there isn't actually a coronavirus, it turns out that lockdowns destroy all competition to the companies owned by the 30 Illuminati families.
Get this.
Jean-Luc Montagnier won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2008.
He said COVID-19 was made in a lab containing strands from the HIV virus.
We actually know more about it now.
What's key is epidemiological studies show 70% of Americans and people around the world are deficient in vitamin D.
Scientific studies show we could reduce COVID death rate by 80% by giving everyone minimal doses of vitamin D3.
Also, Invermectin and HCQ have clearly shown an ability to cure COVID.
Would you support adding vitamin D3 and Invermectin and HCQ to the standards of best medical care for COVID?
Would you support criminal charges, hefty fines, and possible civil court cases against any doctor, clinic, or government official?
Or resist using cheaper and more effective treatments like vitamin D, Invermectin, and HCQ, and instead push as expensive and ineffective treatments to enhance the profits of Big Pharma?
Donald Rumsfeld, on September 10th of 2001, admitted neither he nor the Pentagon Comptroller Dov Zorkheim, who's a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen, could trace a $2.3 trillion missing from the Department of Defense budget.
On September 11th, the following day, the Pentagon was attacked, killing over 50 civilian and military auditors who had been trying to figure out what happened to the missing trillions.
Would you support the release of all crime scene photos from the interior of the Pentagon so we could determine what happened that day?
There was a ComEx vault containing gold and silver billion in the basement four levels down at WTC4.
Were you aware a billion dollars in gold and silver went missing from that supposedly secure vault the night before 9-11?
Does that convince you and many Americans in elite New York circles knew 9-11 was going to happen?
The BBC even announced the collapse of WTC7 23 minutes before it actually fell down.
BBC had been told by the then Rothschild-owned Reuters news agency Building 7 had already collapsed.
The building had been hit by debris from not the south but the north.
But the fires had been put out for several hours.
How could a 47-story steel frame structure have fallen in 6.5 seconds?
Would you support a criminal investigation into the death of the 3,000 who died on 9-11?
Do you know that Rabbi Zockheim, the controller, was president of SPC International, which had a device called the Command Transmitter System that allowed the user to electronically and remotely control up to eight planes at once?
So there was no need to have hijackers aboard the planes?
Do you think he needs to be investigated for murder in relation to 9-11?
The North and South Towers had 47 massive steel core columns, 236 external, for a total of 283.
For buildings to fall straight down at nearly freefall speed, all 283 connection from the columns to each of the 110 floors had to be cut.
This, however, is based upon a false theory of their having collapsed, which did not happen.
They were blown apart in every direction.
Massive source of energy that appears to have been nuclear.
Dr. Mark Skidmore has demonstrated at least $35 trillion has gone missing from government accounts since 1998.
Would you be willing to support a grand jury criminal investigation of the missing trillions?
COVID-19 was designed to kill the economy so you could blame the virus and not the bankers who have robbed us of tens of trillions.
David Rothkopf was a managing director of Kissinger Associates in the 1990s.
He wrote the book Superclass, in which he said the world was run by 30 families and their 6,000 minions, but 30 families are the new world order.
Lockdowns destroy all competition of the companies owned by the 30 families and their 6,000 minions.
Do you not see that lockdowns are integral to the New World Order plan for the Great Reset, which will forever reduce everyone to slavery who is not a member of one of the 30 families?
Would you support congressional investigation of the 30 families, their 6,000 minions, and the New World Order for the lockdowns destroying the American economy worldwide?
The kings of ancient Sumer and Babylon painlessly ended depression by cancelling debt, but Bible writers called it a jubilee, since the self-appointed elite stole tens of trillions from the taxpayers.
Don't you think it just we arrest the guilty, seize their assets, and use them to fund worldwide debt cancellation?
We'll probably need to declare martial law when our cities are being burned by rioters in search of food.
The junior military officers could easily turn martial law into a justice-based military coup and arrest the bankers who stole all those tens of trillions from us, seize their assets, and fund worldwide debt cancellation.
Do you think worldwide debt cancellation funded by seizing the assets of our criminal elite is a good idea?
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, of course, there's a lot of talk already about this scenario being initiated with the military stepping in, and Trump's re-ascension, and the reset, and the Janara Scenario, and all that stuff being talked about.
It's a very real possibility.
Coming back to your 9-11 analysis, Jim, we know that the laws of science and physics disprove the official government narrative.
So, We've got a book on that that Robert David Steele and a variety of experts contributed to.
People can go to shellgamewhistleblower.com and it's right there and they can download it.
And that analyzes all of the different elements and aspects of 9-11.
And of course, Dov Zachheim was my boss at Booz Allen Hamilton.
Doug Zachheim was in charge of all the terrorist financing operations at U.S.
Central Command.
Doug Zachheim was in charge of the relationship between Eric Holder, Lanny Breuer, Covington and Burling, Michael Chertoff, and the various terrorist financing shenanigans that were going on with Union Bank of Switzerland, the Saudis, the Qataris.
Because Dov Zakheim's son, Roger Zakheim, was given a job at Covington & Burling, the law firm that also insidiously sidled up to Michael Flynn and converted him to take a plea deal.
Until I gave the material to Sidney Powell and told her and General Flynn's brother Joseph Flynn to take it to General Michael Flynn, and they did, and he fired Covington and Berling and hired Sidney Powell.
That's why he got off.
That's why he's not sucking his thumb in a fetus position in a jail cell is because Scott Bennett rescued his ass by giving him the real information about Covington and Berling, his lawyers, and Kellner, and all of these clowns.
They neglect to talk about that for a variety of reasons, but that's the truth.
We all know it.
And I won't go into all the details of that, but there is a large insidious network and group of cabal criminals, Jim, that have been engaged in a lot of these activities.
And I think the American public, because of the Internet, because of the rise of the alternative media and the rise of real voices who have honor and will cherish this country and die fighting because of their oath to this country, All of these acts of criminality and sedition are going to be exposed and overthrown, and there could be a jubilee, not necessarily of only money, but a jubilee of freedom, where the CNNs and Brian Stelter and Fox News beta mails and all of these information liars and manipulators are really overthrown.
So I think there's a great awakening happening in America because of all this.
Paula, your thoughts?
Well, I do think that there are a lot of connections to 9-11 and other events over the past couple years, even what we are seeing right now, and I think a lot of this does.
I always look at what the banks are doing, central banks are doing, finances, specifically gold and silver.
Markets are absolutely nuts right now.
The spot price of gold and silver is extremely low here in the United States and with these major banks.
Meanwhile, we see countries like Asia and China and Southeast Asia and Russia and many countries.
We even see Texas starting to invest in gold, starting up their own gold reserves.
So, I do think we are going to see a switch from the fiat money system to a gold or silver-backed currency.
Again, it depends on who is willing to fight for it.
We do see Russia, they've talked about having a silver or gold-backed currency, again, with the investments that they've made with tangible assets.
And when you talk about 9-11, we know about all of the gold and silver bullion that mysteriously
disappeared right before these towers were hit.
There were many, many COMEX gold and silver bullion bars that went missing.
All of that missing gold and silver went, it seemingly disappeared.
A lot of that was supposed to go to Japan.
Japan was trying to ask for their gold and silver back.
And I don't know this for sure, but I believe there was another attempt for Japan to try to get their gold and silver back.
And that's when I was told Fukushima happened, as well as another attempt to try to distract or attack the country.
Of course, we know Libya, they wanted a gold-backed currency, Iraq was talking about a gold-backed currency, and anyone who really tries to get tangible assets with their natural resources and their own labor of their own country We see these fights happen.
So I do think this is also tied in with the cryptocurrencies that we're seeing.
Bitcoin and all these cryptocurrencies going nuts right now to try to distract people from the low gold and silver.
And we are seeing with this Green New Deal that particularly silver and copper, these other precious metals, will be used.
They need it for the infrastructure to make all these batteries.
And it also explains why we see major instability in Africa and South America right now as
these mines are stripped. So I do think the lockdowns and all this COVID stuff was also
another attempt to obfuscate from the fact that American citizens want sound money as well, want
gold or silver backed again.
Excellent, excellent, excellent commentary. Meanwhile, may I say what may be the most
important article I've ever published.
What's wrong with conspiracy theories?
The public has been fed an endless stream of attacks upon conspiracy theories, which we're told are supposed to be very bad for human beings and other living things.
But precisely why is almost never explained.
When you consider that our political parties and mainstream media indulge
themselves in conspiracy theories, such as the claim that Russia interfered with
the 2016 election, otherwise Donald Trump could never have been elected.
Or alternatively, that Dominion voting machines were used to steal the election
of 2020, and otherwise could not have been defeated.
Or in the first instance, promoted by the media in spite of virtually no evidence
at all, and in the second, denied thereby in spite of massive supporting proof.
Both are conspiracy theories where one appears to be true and
the other appears to be false.
Since at least some conspiracy theories less appear to be true,
we need to be able to tell the difference.
Even university professors have shown a decided aversion to conspiracy theories, buying into the stereotypical conception that the key characteristic of conspiracy theories is That they are unfalsifiable.
A tip sheet for one college, for example, makes a declaration that the main problem with any particular conspiracy theory is not that it's wrong, but that it's inarguable.
Not that it's false, but that it's unfalsifiable.
Because it's unfalsifiable, a conspiracy theory is not provable or disprovable.
If that were true, it would certainly count against them, making them akin to theoretical affirmation about the existence of God, as a classical case, or the existence of a universal force, a la Star Wars, more contemporary.
But is it actually true?
A study published in Frontiers of Psychology, what about Building 7, suggests that those often characterized as conspiracy theorists are more skeptical of what they are told by the government official accounts than they are enamored of specific alternatives and are more open-minded in the interpretation of evidence.
They are less inclined to defer to officials as authorities, more inclined to look at the evidence, which even hints at the study of alternative theories of events like 9-11 might be an effective method to teach critical thinking.
Since conspiracy is only required two or more persons acting in concert to bring about an illegal end, and turns out to be the most widely prosecuted criminal offense in America, Why should conspiracy theories be all but banned from public discourse?
We know the criteria to employ in the evaluation of scientific theories.
Why should they not be evaluated by the same standards or criteria of adequacy which classically include The clarity and precision of the language in which they are expressed, their scope of application for the purpose of explanation and prediction, their respective degrees of empirical support on the available evidence, and the economy, elegance, or simplicity with which they satisfy those criteria.
Since conspiracy theories are theories, why should they not be evaluated by the same criteria where the testability of a theory depends right off the bat on the specificity of its language?
Various accounts of scientific reasoning posit a series of stages of inquiry beginning with puzzlement.
Something doesn't fit into our background knowledge and invites attention.
Speculation, during which alternative possible explanations are articulated for consideration.
Adaptation, where the strength of the relationship between the hypotheses and available evidence is evaluated.
And explanation, where When the evidence is settled down, the best supporter of the alternatives may be accepted in the tentative and fallible fashion of science.
It ought to be apparent already that the official account cannot be reconciled with available evidence, and our serious thinkers, I surmise, can excuse themselves only by ignoring 9-11 entirely.
And here we have a key to why some prominent conspiracy theorists are relatively easy targets of public attack.
Alex Jones, the paradigm of the category, often does excellent work in drawing attention to puzzling cases where what we're learning does not fit into our background knowledge and understanding.
And he's equally good at speculating about possible explanation, but he does not have the aptitude or the ability to carry their investigation further.
We're starting out the difference between authentic and fabricated evidence can play a crucial role at the Pentagon, for example.
A key piece of fuselage from a Boeing 757, which the media has frequently cited, did not come from Flight 77, but from an earlier crash near Cali, Colombia in 1995, where the salvage was done by an Israeli firm and then planted on the lawn that day as proof a plane had crashed there.
When Ilhan Omar made the observation some people did something in relation to 9-11, for example, her remark qualifies as true but trivial.
It cannot satisfy conditions 1 or 2, much less 3 or 4.
When the 9-11 Commission, by contrast, concludes that 19 Islamic terrorists commandeered four commercial carriers and attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Under the control of a guy in a cave in Afghanistan, however, the content and thereby the testability of what has been asserted increases substantially.
The government, however, has not been disposed to revise its official narrative.
even though a half a dozen more of the 19 suicide hijackers turned up alive and well the following day
and made contact with media in the UK, as David Ray Griffin observed by making his first argument
in his magisterial study, the 9-11 Commission Report, Omissions and Distortions.
Even though we know the theory advanced by the commission therefore cannot be true,
the government has remained on move.
And when consideration is given to Building 7, for example, a 47-story building in the World Trade Center complex, which was not hit by any plane, but came down to what has been characterized as a classic controlled demolition, it raises a specter of a conspiracy theory, even though its collapse has the characteristics of having been a controlled demolition, abrupt, complete, symmetrical collapse into its own footprint, Leaving a debris pile equal to about 12% of the height of the original, where even the owner of the WTC, Larry Silverstein, confirmed to PBS the WTC7 had been pulled, which means, of course, to bring down by a controlled demolition.
Nothing about this account violates any of those criteria 1 through 4.
What matters, however, is not the specifics of whodunit, but that the situation with regard to conspiracy theories is not at all as popular belief would have it.
Not only are they not unfalsifiable, but the application of scientific reasoning has produced significant results which have led to the identification of the probable perps.
Philosophy, through teaching logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, has much to contribute to the public good.
There is nothing wrong with the conspiracy theories that warrants no neglect by philosophers.
On the contrary, because most students have a keen interest in knowing the truth about JFK, 9-11, and a host of other politically significant but controversial events.
There's a wealth of material to work with, and faculty, philosophers especially, would come down from their ivory tower and engage with real-world events.
A striking illustration of the difference it makes for public affairs may be found in the attacks upon Marjorie Taylor Greene, whom the Democrats as a majority party removed from her committee assignments because she was raising too many issues they did not want to address about Sandy Hook, Parkland, Las Vegas, California wildfires, and more.
Having done research on all of these, I composed an assessment where it turns out that on every one of the issues about which she was being attacked, Marjorie Taylor Greene was either clearly in the right or supported by the weight of the evidence.
Most of her assertions, of course, qualified in the minds of her critics as conspiracy theories.
But if they paused to consider the evidence with regard to each of them, they would have been impressed, provided only they had an open mind.
And there's the rub.
As James Files, who may or may not have been behind the picket fence on the grassy Nolan for me, when the government commits a lie, it's stuck with it.
Which, of course, resonates with the failure of the government to change its position about the 19 Islamic hijackers in 9-11 or Lee Oswald as the lone demanded gunman on 22 November 1963.
Which means, in turn, that the government is not operating on the basis of principles of science or rationality, where the discovery of new evidence or alternative hypotheses may require That we reject hypotheses we previously accepted, accept hypotheses we previously rejected, and leave others in suspense.
The government operates as an authoritarian source of politically infallible knowledge, where to admit mistakes would weaken its grip on the body politic that it governs.
And reflecting upon the treatment of Marjorie Taylor Greene, it struck me like a silver bullet Conspiracy theorists are investigating crimes.
No wonder they want to silence us.
The government was involved in the assassination of JFK.
The government was involved in 9-11.
The government was involved in Sandy Hook Parkland in Las Vegas, too.
Think of the genius of it all.
The perps themselves are in the position of dictating to the public who is credible and who is not when it comes to investigating crimes in which the government itself is complicit.
It turns out, therefore, the answer to the question we ask, what's wrong with the conspiracy theories, could not be more obvious once they are properly understood.
We should all be conspiracy theorists.
The nation can only benefit from sorting out true conspiracy theories from false.
Scott, your thoughts?
It's a tremendous article, Jim, that encapsulates what we've been wrestling with for the past 20 years.
And I think Marjorie Taylor Greene rising up As a voice, a lone voice in the wilderness, with her instincts as a woman, as a mother, a wife, is laudable.
And it's sad and sickening that we have so many beta males and cowards and effeminate weaklings in the male population that they don't stand and support her or do similar actions.
But I think women have a particular sensitivity to the level of Danger and disintegration that is rapidly devouring the body politic like a cancer.
And she is fearlessly and boldly proclaiming these things and asking questions.
She's not assuming to be an expert in this, but she's fearlessly saying there are some anomalies, there are some impossibilities, there are some physical contradictions that are well established in the laws of physics and mathematics and probability that we have to attend to and understand and analyze if we're about truth.
And that's what she's about.
That's what most of us in this country are about.
But there's a lot of material that needs to be brought out.
The 9-11 event was the greatest crime in the history of the world.
All of the parties that have been a part to it have done global war crimes, you know, destroying the countries of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, attempting to do Syria, attempting to do Iran.
Charging Iran too with components of the 9-11 attack was nonsense.
I was in Iran in 2018, and I saw a lot of interesting evidence and materials that were presented to me by certain people in Iran, as well as with some other people that were with us, and it overwhelmingly shows that the United States and Israel participated in a great false flag attack to justify a political juggernaut that accelerated a military-industrial complex.
And that's why people like General Michael Flynn, I think, are dirty in a lot of this, because he played a part in this.
He played a part and has admitted to, I was part of the systems and I was designing systems to track down bin Laden, when the overwhelming evidence is that bin Laden was dead in Dubai from kidney dialysis, General Flynn.
And what about the shell game report that Mattis and you got?
And he also represented Turkey.
The Wahhabi Salafi terrorist group of the nation, Turkey, Michael Flynn was working for, was a lobbyist for.
So he's dirty.
There's a lot of controlled opposition going here.
Everybody has a chance to become healed with knowledge, but if you worship your ignorance like a religion because you want to continue getting a paycheck, you have sold your soul to the father of lies.
And I include Dinesh D'Souza on that, because that piece of garbage confronted Marjorie Taylor Greene and started saying, so you don't believe any of the conspiracy stuff, you believe that it was Arabs that jumped on the plane and committed the 9-11 attacks, right?
Right, right?
So Dinesh D'Souza is trying to advance this false conspiracy theory that a bunch of Arabs jumped on a plane and crashed their plane into the 9-11 Twin Towers, And impossibly imploded one of the greatest buildings that should never have burned down because of the number of asbestos pounds that were poured into it.
Dinesh D'Souza, who claims to be a conservative, is attacking and questioning and trying to extort Marjorie Taylor Greene by admitting physical impossibilities like the Pentagon attack and the absence of a plane.
And I drove by the Pentagon the next day, Jim.
I was going up to Catholic University and I was driving along George Washington Parkway and I looked and there was a big blue tarp covering a hole.
There was no plane, there was no wings, there was no luggage, there was no wheels, there was no engine, there was no plane, there was no ripped up grass, there was no yellow caution tape surrounding the skeleton of an aluminum plane, which would have happened if there was a plane.
All of this indicates Massive, massive deception operations, false flag attacks.
What we have in America is a walking zombie, dead corpse.
And I think the soul of the America, which are the truthful people, the bold people, We are having that transcendental out-of-body experience and separating ourselves from this monstrous cannibalistic zombie which parades itself as this ridiculous notion of the human rights defender, defender of democracy, and all of this nonsense.
That we've been going around parading ourselves at, yet we've been doing the opposite.
We are a nation of government, a government of hypocrites, a military of hypocrites and cowards, because I don't know any military, except a few people, that came out and fulfilled their oath when they raised their hand that 9-11 was a false flag.
I don't know any.
I didn't know about it, and I didn't really study it until I was in prison.
When I was in prison with some very smart guys, that's where I discovered a lot of this material.
And what I did, my world went from black and white to full color.
And it's an awakening you can never recover from, but it's an awakening that every American has a choice, and they have to face.
You either live in the world of black and white death, or you come to the realization of a full-color life, and you expose and attack and defend against these lies and liars, because they will only continue and make it worse.
Jim?
What you say resonates with Plato's Allegory of the Cave, where you discover that you've ever before only been watching shadows and images cast on the wall.
When you get outside, you discover there's a whole world out there.
It was like going from black and white to color, just as you described, Scott.
Holly, your thoughts?
I just want to say thanks.
I'm really honored to be working with you, Jim and Scott.
Both of you guys have worked so hard to expose false flags over the years and to blow the whistle.
We need a lot more people like you and your work and your sacrifice.
All of this is definitely not for naught.
We saw so many false flags and events during the Obama administration and people just didn't want to speak up.
We were told that we are racist or horrible people if we spoke against the Obama administration
with these constant events, which have ramped up over the past 20 years,
the psychological war against American people, which have gone on for decades now,
but really just the past 20 years and even the past couple of years, it's gotten insane.
And I really think the dislike for Biden is so palpable at this point
that people are questioning the whole thing now.
And like Scott said, once people have woken up to one of them,
you start to question everything.
And the fake news is so obvious to people now at this point.
I think it is actually even acceptable in a growing number of circles now
to actually start talking about all of these false events and how it is used as psychological war
to take away our freedoms, to cause these unjust wars and to destroy America's culture and America's economy.
We're seeing it from all sides, bodily integrity at this point.
So I just wanted to say thanks to you guys.
And I know I can't imagine how hard it's been to really just be trying to wake people up.
And I do think that this work is paying off and it will pay off, it's slow.
Those are wonderful comments, Holly.
Don, do you have an update for us?
The verdict is in, and Chauvin has been found guilty on all charges of manslaughter and second and third degree murder.
Guilty.
What do you mean?
He's been found guilty on all charges?
That's what it says.
Chauvin found guilty of all charges.
That's the headline.
That's just insane!
That's America!
Completely contradicted by the evidence.
That's just ridiculous, beyond belief.
Who needs evidence?
We got a job to do here.
He's been found guilty of manslaughter, third-degree murder, second-degree murder.
Yeah.
Well, I'll say one thing, there's then no justification for any riots.
That's right.
I mean, presumably Maxine Waters is going to go out and lead the cheering squads for justice in America, no matter how absurd the verdict.
Don, this is really disillusioning.
Scott, your take about this?
Well, I was looking at the jury, you know, the prosecution, what it had to prove And this verdict is inconsistent with what the jury would, you know, what the prosecution had to prove.
It essentially had to prove that Chauvin intentionally inflicted bodily harm upon this person to hurt them.
It's almost like you want to torture someone.
Whereas in the Chauvin behavior, he was a police officer trying to subdue someone who was already under arrest.
He was resisting arrest and he had to apply the necessary force to subdue the individual to get him in the back of the car.
So that's not the same as someone grabbing someone off the street, throwing them on the ground and kneeling on them and killing them.
This is a police officer doing a duty to subdue someone that was out of control.
So the whole charges, I think, will be, again, I think it'll be thrown out based on mistrial, based on the propaganda of Maxine Waters and Joe Biden, saying they, I hope that, I pray, I don't think Joe Biden's prayed to the true God in his entire life, But I pray that they're gonna come to the right verdict.
All of this creates an atmosphere of mistrial, that it'll be thrown out upon appeal, but...
It also, if it's real, it represents the scapegoat.
Chauvin is the scapegoat in this attempt.
They're doing what the Supreme Court said, right?
We're throwing out Trump because we don't want riots.
So they're doing this because they don't want riots, and wouldn't it be interesting if they rioted and burned and looted and raped and pillaged nevertheless?
If they rose and started acting like a bunch of monkeys on cocaine and started doing all sorts of acts of destruction, wouldn't it be interesting?
Despite this trial, despite this verdict, you may still have people, you know, acting aggressively and triggering riots and stuff.
Then you really would see a backfire effect by people saying they obviously want a riot more than justice.
Jim?
Holly, give us your thoughts.
I still think we will see events, only the mainstream news will brand it as a celebration.
People went out and celebrated and things got out of hand and there were fires and looting and stuff like that.
There's already schools, Minneapolis closed a lot of their schools, their colleges and schools ahead in Expecting riots and events to happen.
So people are definitely going to be out there in the streets and this will probably continue through the weekend.
This happened in several states.
They already closed schools.
Expecting people to riot or they're not going to call it riot now.
Like I said, it's going to be a celebration now that's going to get out of hand.
So that's my guess.
Well, I'm fairly for.
This is obviously a contradiction of reason, rationality, law, evidence, justice.
Bizarre.
I do believe it will not give a motive for rioting and looting, but that wasn't really the issue.
It was guilt or innocence.
Clearly, there's no way, given the evidence, he could have rationally been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Don, I'm so glad you had that late report for us to come and hear before the end of our show today.
Give us your final thoughts and take us out.
But anyway, this is only in America that you can have things go this crazy here.
America's come off the wheels, I think.
We're headed for oblivion.
We could have a psychedelic problem here, Lieberman.
What a day it's been here, April 20th with the verdict in and other things.
Thanks for joining us on this week's Newsy on Truth vs. News here.
And I'm Donald Reiner, your host, and it's been quite the day, and we'll see you next week.
and share this with your friends like it really is important.
Go ahead get another story in or two here if you want.
Biden claiming to end America's longest war is grossly misleading.
We're going to have all kinds of troops left behind from the contractors.
He wants to move it from the 1st of May to 9-11, the 20th anniversary, but the Taliban have already warned they're going to be unforgiving of American troops left after the 1st of May.
Biden tried to rationalize.
We were attacked.
We went to war with clear goals.
We achieved those goals.
Bin Laden is dead.
Al Qaeda is degraded in Afghanistan.
Time to end the forever war.
Bin Laden had nothing to do with 9-11.
He was an officer in the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman.
He died of his medical maladies, as Scott implied, on the 15th of December 2001.
Their mission now will be to find and attack the most dangerous Qaeda or Islamic State threats, current American officials said, by a shadow combination of clandestine special operation forces, Pentagon contractors, and covert intelligence operators.
I tell you, these people are going to be subject to a slaughter.
The Taliban have withheld what they can do.
As of January, more than 18,000 contractors remained in Afghanistan, when the official troop total had been reduced to 2,500.
This is going to be a very unhappy development, believe me.
No one in Afghanistan ought to be eager to stick around.
Here's the Taliban promising a nightmare for U.S.
troops in the final months of the Afghanistan war, given we're not withdrawing by May 1st, and believe me, They can deliver.
Meanwhile, Putin has shut the door, closed the Kursk Strait between Crimea and Russia, blocking foreign warships.
We also have massing tens of thousands of troops on the Ukrainian border.
Somewhere between the Ukraine and the Middle East, we're likely to see all hell break loose here in short order.
Scott, a very brief comment.
I said this was going to happen on my press TV report, which should be played.
I would say that the Chinese are going to enter into the Afghanistan relationship and fill the vacuum and accelerate the U.S.
departure by participating in the war against the United States and the mercenary guerrilla operations.
So any activity that continues American presence in Afghanistan or Iraq is going to result only in the deaths of Americans.
And people are not going to be supportive of any sort of conflict, Jim.
Holly, a final thought?
Just a quick mention about Ukraine and Russia and the United States.
There was a report coming out of Russian TV and Russian news saying that they have been working with the country of Belarus and they claim that a U.S.
CIA people were found in Belarus trying to Institute a coup to take out Lukashenko recently.
So pretty interesting, the United States getting their fingers into Belarus, especially after Lukashenko said he would not institute lockdowns.
He was not interested in the COVID virus agenda and he told people to drink vodka and play hockey if they got sick.
So I think we're seeing a lot of Color revolutions in the area, and like Scott said, as if the United States pulls out formally out of Afghanistan, it will create a vacuum where China and other countries come in as they are instituting the BRICS or the One Belt, One Road initiative at the same time.
I have no doubt the U.S.
has long not been the good guys on the American stage, but the bad and the whole world sees it.
Don, take us out.
Oh, you're so right, Jim.
This is just something else.
▲
Export Selection