All Episodes
Previous Next
March 20, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:19
Tom Cowan - Viral Cultures - Livestream from Friday, March 19th, 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thanks everybody for joining me again.
As far as announcements, the most important one I think is that we still are a go for the session with my friend Stefan Lenka next Wednesday.
That's the 24th, I believe at 11 a.m.
Yes, 11 a.m.
Eastern Standard Time and that's on Subscribestar.
And so if you go to Subscribestar and I think Escher or somebody will put a link to that.
I think there on the home page there's a way to sign up for that.
There it is on Subscribestar and we really are hoping everybody joins us on that.
It's going to be a great way to share information and to Speak more freely.
And in the future we have commitments from Andy Kaufman to do a session on Subscribestar and another friend of mine named Leslie Mnookian.
And Leslie was the, I think, producer or director or maybe both for the movie The Greater Good.
And Leslie has a lot of information about How to report injuries from vaccines.
What injuries are actually being reported or not reported from this injectable device mistakenly called a vaccine.
She will be joining us on a Subscribestar event as well and we can ask her a lot I think she'll even have information about what your rights are and strategies for avoiding essentially being persecuted for not getting a test or not getting an injectable experimental device.
And I don't think there's any more announcements.
So let me get into what I wanted to discuss, hopefully pretty briefly, because I see some interesting questions here, and I want to get to as many of those.
But unfortunately, in certain circles, there's still this question going around about the difference between isolation versus the quote, gold standard, which is referred to as the viral culture.
And let me just go through that, and I know I've been through this, I don't know how many times, so probably a lot of you have heard it, and some of you may even put it on mute, or I guess muting me.
Isolation means, and by the way, the reason this is so important is if you don't isolate a thing, remember a virus is a thing like a table or a chair or a frog or a lamb, We're not talking about a thought or a feeling or an interest.
We're talking about a thing.
All things essentially can be isolated.
I can't think of anything that can't.
To a certain extent, you can even isolate the sun, which is kind of a thing.
But anything can.
And if you haven't isolated the thing, you have no idea what the thing itself is made of, and you have no idea what the thing does.
So this whole issue is really revolving around isolation.
Isolation means to separate one thing from everything else.
And that would mean you take somebody who's sick, and you do various simple and very doable experiments like macerate, filter, centrifuge, Suck out the band, show under electron microscope you have the thing.
Then you can characterize the thing.
You can prove that other labs can do the same thing and same procedures and get the same thing.
And then you can even see whether that thing causes certain troubles or not.
So once you do that you would know what you're working with and that's really the whole story.
Nowadays, and I see writers and different critics of me and other people saying, but how can you say that the goal that a viral culture isn't a isolation?
So here is how they do a viral culture.
They take some tissue, usually, sometimes it's just a previous culture.
But let's say the best way is they take The snot or the lung fluid from somebody who's sick in this case, they may grind it a little bit.
They may filter it a little bit.
That's not purification or isolation.
Then they mix that in the original measles experiment, they mixed it with milk.
And you have to remember that the game we're playing here is find the little particle that has a protein coating and a genetic material on the inside.
So if you mix it with any other source of genetic material, you have immediately blown the isolation experiment and no matter what happens after that, it's no longer valid.
When you read the original experiment, which they're all essentially done the same way, they say, quote, after swabbing the throat, the swab was immersed in two milliliters of milk.
Milk is a source of rich genetic material.
They mixed it with penicillin and streptomycin.
Nowadays, they mix it with genomicin and amphotericin, both of which are kidney poisons.
And then in the original measles experiment, they mixed it with Bovine amniotic fluid 90%, beef embryo extract 5%, horse serum 5%, antibiotics phenol red, and soybean trypsin.
So now, including the Vero cells, which is the monkey kidney tissue, we have five different sources of genetic material, and then it all breaks down because it's starved and poisoned.
That's what That's called putting it in minimal nutrient medium.
When you do that and you mix it with nephrotoxic, meaning kidney toxic antibiotics, naturally the kidney tissue will break down and you'll release genetic material from the milk, from the horse serum, from the bovine amniotic fluid and the beef embryo extract and the kidney tissue.
And then in the original experiment, they said, You cannot distinguish the breakdown products from this mess, from an un-inoculated specimen, which means even if you don't start with anything from measles, you get the same result.
That should have been the end of virology.
In other words, all this genetic particles are coming from the breakdown products of one of these five sources of genetic material.
We don't know which one.
But we know that's the case.
Therefore, any cytopathic, meaning breakdown effect on the kidney tissue, must have come from the technique of the culture, not from the original virus.
And I would actually say period.
So in this experiment, they disproved the idea of pathogenic viruses.
They then go on to say that we can't tell the difference between the breakdown products of The tissue culture versus a pathogenic virus.
And 63 years later, in that paper I read, they say clearly there is no way a virologist can distinguish the breakdown products of any of these five sources of genetic material from a pathogenic virus, period.
So anybody who says that a viral culture, which is actually a misnomer because it should be a tissue culture, not a viral culture, says that this is the gold standard for the purification or isolation of a virus, I can only say simply either doesn't, has never read what a viral culture is, or doesn't understand what a viral culture is, or Again, tissue culture, or they have some reason for not wanting to admit what any human being can see as the obvious fallacy in that argument.
And every single paper that people have said that say the word isolation and purification, or the characterization of the genome, have all started with that type of tissue culture, Which I would contend makes the entire thing invalid after that.
So I hope that that is as clear as I can make it.
And I think with that, I'm actually going to go on to the questions.
So we really spend the rest of the time not going over the same thing, which I've gone over many times.
So let me just start here.
So good morning.
How can we measure radiation in our bodies?
How does radiation affect cells and lungs?
And why do people have, with this illness, difficulties to get oxygen that is available in the air?
Hypoxia.
Can wearing a mask cause hypoxia also?
I cannot wear masks, almost pass out if I wear too long.
Hard now in California with the mask, quote, mandate.
So, radiation damages tissue.
We're told that there is a strict delineation between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, and I'm not sure I'm really capable of going into the exact difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation.
There are strict definitions of that, but what I can tell you is There is no strict delineation or not nearly as much as we think.
There are a spectrum, a spectrum from x-rays, which are, I would say, at least partially, if not predominantly ionizing, meaning breaking down tissues.
That's one side of the spectrum.
And on the other side of the spectrum is sunlight, which is mostly used as a nutrient, particularly by the mitochondria and certain wavelengths of light in particular.
Although I have it on some interesting evidence that there are even information in the light of the sun that we haven't even began to explore, which I think is entirely possible.
So And but we all know that the sun also has some of its wavelengths has a kind of ionizing effect as well.
So the reality is any kind of electromagnetic field probably has components of both.
When you get into pulsed, single wavelength, high intensity fields, which is what all man-made radiation is, And the reason for that, as I said, is if you want to make a radio work, it has to be high-intensity pulsed, not broad-spectrum, low-intensity like the sunlight.
That doesn't make a device work.
So the devices are run off of very specific and pulsed frequencies, and that causes damage to the tissue, and it seems like particularly the lungs.
Once the lungs are damaged, then there's two effects.
One is that it seems like certain electromagnetic field spectrum, and particularly that which we call 5G, it seems like it affects the bioavailability of oxygen in the air.
And by the way, there is some evidence that, you know, a couple hundred years ago, there was 21% oxygen in the air.
Now it's down to 19.
Due to excessive burning and other other effects.
So we're already dealing with a low oxygen environment.
And by the way, the oxygen is used in a process called oxidative phosphorylation, which is the predominant way that tissues generate what is erroneously called energy, but let's just say energy for now to run all of our metabolic processes.
So The combination of damage to the lungs and a reduction of the bioavailability of the air, both of which come from man-made electromagnetic fields, could result in a disease characterized by hypoxia.
And then, without going into the specific studies, there have been a number of studies that seem to have shown that, you know, OSHA years ago said Um, said that, uh, people who wear masks actually do have lowered, uh, oxygen levels in their, in their tissues.
And so that we don't think you should wear masks.
Uh, and in fact, it's illegal to wear masks for more than a certain period of time.
And somehow that's all been forgotten.
And now people are wearing masks for hours and hours of the day.
And even though I don't have any specific research to document this, I think one can sort of assume, or at least hypothesize, that it's possible that that will lower the oxygen in your tissues, and that combination of lowered oxygen bioavailability in the atmosphere, damage to the lungs, therefore the lessening of the absorption of oxygen, and the wearing of masks is a horrible combination.
Because that's going to result in certain people in a lowered oxygen state, which is absolutely a hallmark of this current disease.
So next one is a great question.
I'm glad to try to answer this.
There is a widely told story about there having been a cancer-causing SV40 monkey virus inadvertently included in polio vaccines that were given to entire baby boom generations in the Due to the vaccines having been cultured on monkey tissue.
What is your take on that story?
Again, that's a great question.
So what is SV40?
S stands for simian virus number 40.
So not only do we say, have I heard that it was inadvertently placed in polio vaccines, but that it was placed there by people with dastardly intentions To quote, give us all cancer.
And I would say there's a number of pieces of that story, which are decidedly not true.
And I would actually say that anybody who spreads that story simply doesn't understand what a viral culture is.
So here's how that happened.
The polio virus, well, polio, the tissue, was inoculated on Vero cells, meaning monkey kidney tissue, in exactly the same way I just described.
Naturally then, with the addition of the horse serum and the embryonic fluid and all the rest, and the antibiotics and the starving of the tissue, that monkey tissue broke down into thousands and maybe millions of different kinds of genetic particles.
So at some point, they started counting those particles.
So that particle is simian virus number one.
This one is simian virus number two.
And then they got all the way up to simian virus number 40.
And that one may have been more predominant than all the other ones.
And so they said, either that's a contaminant or somebody put it into the vaccine.
Now, a live viral vaccine is simply taking the results of that tissue culture, as I just described, cleaning it up a little bit, you know, getting some of the little pieces filtered out or so, and adding a few other stabilizers and other toxic ingredients, and then just injecting that in people, like children.
So there was no intention of injecting a simian virus number anything in people.
It's simply that if the goal was to get this thing called a poliovirus, and the poliovirus is identical to the simian viruses, there is no possible way to get the simian viruses out and leave the poliovirus in.
So as a result, they had no choice But to inject the whole mass and hope nobody's caught on, that they were injecting just the dead and dying degradation products of monkey kidney tissue.
Now, that simian virus doesn't cause cancer any more than any other virus so-called causes any other disease.
If you doubt that, then show me the evidence that a simian virus isolated causes cancer in anyone. Now I
will admit that if you inject the products of a tissue culture as I just described into
people, they will in fact get sick and they might in fact end up with cancer. In fact I would say that
is what we call a vaccine and I would even go so far as to say that's the whole point of a
vaccine which is to make people sick and they do it by the injection of the products of tissue
cultures. So In a funny sort of way, you could say that worked, they made people sick, but they don't make a spreadable virus.
And it's not the simian virus that makes people sick.
It's just the results of this toxic tissue culture.
So that's the story on that.
Let me just say another thing, which I forgot to say in the beginning.
Because somebody has asked me over and over the last few weeks, what about so-called antivirals?
Including, you know, natural antivirals, like there's a lot of herbs which are presented as antivirals.
And I even presented evidence a while ago that, you know, our sort of flagship product, one of my main Research interest as far as plant medicine called Strophanthus actually has papers on it saying it's an antiviral.
What does that mean if I say that viruses don't cause disease, aren't alive, don't reproduce in the way we say, and the whole thing is basically a bunch of baloney?
So how do I reconcile that?
It's actually very simple.
Anything that's called an antiviral, what it's actually doing is protecting the tissues.
So in other words, if you take somebody's snot and you put it on a Vero cell and then you poison it and then it breaks down, if you put Strophanthus extract in that culture, that same amount of poisoning, you'll get less breakdown of the kidney tissue.
And then you'll say, oh my God, that was an antiviral.
Because you get less breakdown, therefore less viruses, and then you erroneously think that you've inhibited the reproduction or the growth of these viruses.
You've done no such thing.
What you've done is protect the tissue.
Strophanthus essentially helps you get more oxygen, and it helps the metabolic processes of oxygen utilization in the tissues.
Therefore, you will get less breakdown of the tissue, When you try to poison it, therefore less genetic particles, and therefore you will think that that's an antiviral.
The same thing happens with vitamin C. There's no virus killing effect of vitamin C, because there's none needed.
But vitamin C is a strong detoxifier and protector of the tissue.
And if you do that in a culture, you will see less of these particles, And you will erroneously think that you've had an antiviral effect.
So that's what we mean by an antiviral effect.
So people say you can hear me and it sounds good.
So that's good.
Next question, is it possible to isolate exosomes?
The answer is yes.
And that's one of the answers to people say, well, the reason you have that no pathogenic virus has ever been isolated from a human being is because you can't isolate things that small.
And that's simply scientifically incorrect.
It has been for 70 years.
So there's at least three things of approximately that size and that consistency, which have been regularly, consistently, and easily isolated.
And those are bacteriophages, which is what happens when bacteria are stressed.
They break, they essentially coalesce into a kind of spore, and they have the same shape, essentially, and size as what we call viruses.
And many of those have been isolated The giant virus that Stefan isolated was is also similar and exosomes.
So the issue is not that we can't isolate that size or consistency particle.
it's that they're just not there.
So is there any research uh Bye.
I'm not aware of that.
Andy Kaufman may know the answer to that.
I'm not aware of that.
I know there's a lot of research into what these exosomes.
increase the human recipient susceptibility to certain diseases or syndromes? I'm not aware of
that. Andy Kaufman may know the answer to that. I'm not aware of that. I know there's a lot of
research into what these exosomes, exosome remember are just products of the breakdown
of our own tissue. They're little packages essentially of genetic material that our
tissues or any animal tissues, probably I don't know for sure, but probably plant tissues as well,
make when they're poisoned or stressed.
They may have some function as communication devices or something like that, but I'm not aware of any specific
information about that.
Can the entire genetic sequence of an exosome be extracted as a whole without the
use of computer software?
I think that's probably the case.
It's done with something called Sanger sequencing.
I'm not sure if that has been done, but my guess is it has.
Again, Andy would know more about that.
And it's possible.
And then you just go laboriously Nucleotide by nucleotide and you go through the whole thing.
Once you've isolated, purified it, then you know that that's the only genome you're dealing with.
You can go end-to-end, sequence it one end to the other.
That is what Stefan did with his giant virus from a sea algae.
And then you know for sure that that genome came only from that exosome or that giant virus or that bacteriophage.
And as far as I can tell, the reason they say they don't do that is it takes way too long.
And anyways, this virus was going to kill us all before we could get get to that.
So now we can do it in two and a half days in a computer, except they don't do it anything like that.
And they're not actually dealing with this a real virus.
Somebody then asked, and I won't read the question about the this Dutch I don't know if he's called a virologist.
I think he's a vet who was on a bunch of shows or maybe one show talking about the dangers of the vaccine because if you vaccinate people during an epidemic or a pandemic, you're going to select for all these mutant virus strains of the virus and you're going to make the whole thing worse.
And I don't believe that at all.
I think that was mostly a very clever and strategic disinformation strategy by a really good actor, it seemed to me, who didn't talk about all the other vaccines, the polio vaccine and all the other vaccines, which have been killing people for years.
As far as I could see, he's only focused on this one.
And so here we have a situation where now millions of people have already done this so-called vaccine, so presumably we're well on our way to having more mutant strains, which then will presumably lead to more lockdowns and more vaccines to protect us from all these deadly mutant strains and these so-called gain-of-function mutants, which frankly don't exist.
And that's why Me and Andy and Stefan are so determined that at the end of the day, saying there's no virus, there's no pathogenic virus, there's no SARS-CoV-2 virus, it's never been isolated, viral culture is a fraud, PCR test on something that you haven't isolated is basically a fraud.
That is the only show in town because that's the only way we're going to stop this.
Everybody who thinks that there's going to be mutants strange, variants strange, is just buying into the whole narrative and we're going to be dealing with for the rest of our life.
So I think that was a horrible mistake to tout that as somehow beneficial to our cause.
So there's a question on chickenpox by parties, but I've gone through this so many times that I
I just don't think we need to go over that.
Thank you.
Bye.
How do we oxygenate water without spending thousands of dollars?
Does just doing it with a vortex oxygenate it?
And I can't really say that.
I don't know any specific, you know, data or information that would tell us that.
Um, I think that the, you know, again, I can only say that the best water is water that by its own forces emerges from the ground.
It has no exposure to any toxins, no pesticides, no fertilizers, no fluoride, no chlorine, nothing that was put in the ground.
Uh, it emerges flowing upwards from the ground in vortex patterns.
Which does oxygenate it, and then out of its own pressure and forces flows out of the ground.
And that's basically spring water, and that's the best water to drink.
The next best is if you take any water that you can and put it through the whole four-step so-called ophora process, which is get whatever poisons are out of there.
Uh, re add minerals, which the minerals are also taken up when the water goes through the soil and the rocks on its way out of the earth.
So that's a mineralization process.
Um, and then it's a moving in this vortex pattern, which oxygenates it.
And then it's exposed to the forces of nature, which further structure.
And anything you can do to recreate that pattern is good.
And I'm also going to put in a plug for our new product which is called Marine Plasma, which is basically the effluent of phytoplankton living in the ocean that are in a continuous vortex pattern in the ocean.
So the plankton are eating the seawater replete with all the trace minerals and all the minerals that are found in the ocean, which is a sort of reproduction or Recreation of all the minerals found in us.
And then all of that seawater and all of the things that are in there are essentially put through the phytoplankton.
And we essentially eat the waste products of the phytoplankton, which I would argue is one of nature's richest and most beneficial foods.
And I think that will help mineralize people and help structure the water in your own tissue.
And I would really strongly encourage everybody to include that in their daily practice.
Here's a question about, since we don't know exactly what is causing the cytokine storm,
Do we understand the mechanism of action of how hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are helping patients?
So, first of all, I'm not so convinced that hydrochloroquine, at least at certain doses, is helping patients.
And I'm also not so sure that ivermectin is either.
I'm open to the possibility that it is, but I'm not convinced yet.
The mechanism, though, is simple, at least with chloroquine, which is an anti-inflammatory.
That's why it's used in things like rheumatoid arthritis and lupus and other hyper-inflammatory conditions.
Hyper-inflammatory means the body is making lots of inflammation.
And in fact, I would encourage everybody to get away from that misleading and abstract concept called a cytokine storm.
Because again, if there's no pathogenic viruses and bacteria, we don't actually have or need an immune system.
So let's stop talking about an immune system.
And basically what's happening is if you get poisoned, and if you're starving, And the poison can come in a lot of ways, including an injectable device or radiation or breathing in cyanide or any combination of the two.
Your body will say, I don't want that poison in us.
And so it will do the only mechanism it knows how, which is if you breathe in cigarette smoke debris, you make an inflammation called bronchitis to get it out.
The inflammation called bronchitis is not the disease, it's the therapy for poisoning yourself with smoke.
So if you poison yourself with a vaccine, then you make an inflammatory reaction, erroneously called a cytokine storm, to try to get those toxins out of your body.
And the same thing happens if you break down the tissue because of radiation exposure, Your body will try to make an inflammatory reaction to get that out.
Now, that inflammatory reaction can actually kill you.
And so if you give a strong anti-inflammatory, if that doesn't kill you, which hydroxychloroquine most certainly can, but if you give it at a low and appropriate dose for a short time, it might reduce the inflammation and you would seem better.
I suspect that ivermectin has a similar effect, although it might work through parasites then, because that's what ivermectin is, an anti-parasite drug.
So if you poison the tissue, the parasites come to clean up the debris.
And sometimes there's too many of them.
And so you start getting symptoms based on the overgrowth of parasites.
And so now you have two problems.
You have the poisoning of the tissue.
Well, three problems.
A, you have the poisoning of the tissue.
B, you have the inflammatory response to get rid of the poisons.
And three, you have the growth of parasites to deal with the poisons in the first place.
And if you reduce the inflammation and kill the parasites, you will seem better.
But the problem is how do you get rid of the poison?
So the whole thing.
Will not resolve.
It will just come back in some other form at some point.
So the only way to really deal with this is to, A, not poison yourself in the first place,
and then use the five channels of getting rid of toxins that we've talked about before,
which is bowels like edemas and things like that, and urine like water,
and sweating like the sauna space sauna, and then white blood cells,
or otherwise sometimes bacteria, which help eat up the debris,
and then finally you make antibodies to neutralize the poisons.
So here's a question.
Could you explain the common symptoms that we understand relate to what we thought were viral infections such as herpes?
Thank you.
So again, what's happening here is there's some sort of combination of nutrient deficiency.
In the case of herpes, you have a weakening of the connective tissue.
So In other words, the people are collagen and vitamin C deficient.
And then there's usually some sort of inciting emotional or psychological or physical toxic event.
And so then the body says, I'm going to essentially eliminate these toxins.
At the same time, it has weeping, it has Compromised tissue because you're collagen deficient usually because people don't eat bone broth And have other collagen rich foods.
They also another cofactor in the production of collagen is vitamin C So their collagen and vitamin C deficient their tissue on their skin breaks down and then they ooze out poisons either that were provoked either by a psychological or a emotional or physical exposure, and that's what we call herpes.
And one of the reasons I think this is true is, well a couple reasons.
One is you cannot isolate a herpes virus from a patient with a herpes lesion, and therefore you can't prove that the herpes virus was Even present or certainly not the cause.
There is certainly no study that shows an isolated herpes virus causes those identical symptoms in any human or animal study.
If you disagree with that, then you have to find the study not done with the tissue culture, simply the isolation of that virus, showing that that virus was not the breakdown of your own tissue, But some exogenous virus that then causes disease.
And you will not be able to find that.
So we know it's something else.
And the second reason I think that's true is over my years of practice, whenever I saw somebody with a recurrent herpes, I would say, the main thing you have to do is make sure you're not collagen or vitamin C deficient, that you have enough minerals, And my expectation and the result was most people never had another herpes attack in their life.
and none of those are quote antivirals.
This is a long question about is sanitation techniques obsolete if there's no viruses or bacteria?
The answer to that is absolutely not.
And let me just give you an example of that.
One of the main examples that people use to essentially tell me that they're sure that germs cause disease is the very famous example of this Dr. Semmelweis, I think in Austria or somewhere.
Not sure if it's Austria.
So that is used in all medical schools and all, you know, discussions.
Didn't that prove that bacteria cause disease?
So here's what happened.
At that time, we're talking, I don't know, 1600s, 15, 14, 17, I don't know, somewhere around there.
The doctors would do autopsies.
And so we're talking about dissecting people who died.
So obviously they were sick.
And we don't know what they were sick from.
They used embalming chemicals.
They would do their autopsy, have blood and tissue spattered hands that had all these toxic chemicals that were used to embalm the dead people's body, they would
go right from there without washing their hands and stick their hands into a delivering mother's
open cervix. Sometimes then the mother would get sick and have uterine fever and die.
So doesn't that prove that bacteria cause disease? So in here you get into something that people say
all the time.
So I'm not denying that people who go from doing autopsies with embalming chemicals, that that's a good thing to stick your hands in an open cervix.
In fact, I would go so far as to say, that's not a good thing to do that.
Because first of all, there's something like, you know, serum sickness, if you, you know, if you transfuse blood from one person into another, that's not matched, you can make them sick.
You're talking about toxic chemicals, you're talking about dead person's tissues, and foreign and toxic proteins.
that come from the rotting flesh and you're sticking those right into a cervix
and you have no idea that the pathogenic part of that is a bacteria.
The only way you could say that is as always, if you had isolated a bacteria and not had the dead tissue
and not had the embalming fluid and not sticking all that stuff into the uterus.
And as far as I know, and I'm sure of this, that study has never been done.
Now, there most certainly will be bacteria in that mess because as I've said a million times now,
the role of bacteria is to eat dead and dying tissue.
So the person just died, I'm sure there'll be lots of bacteria in there.
and even bacteria actually make toxins too.
So just like I don't think it's good to be bitten by a snake or a lizard or a tick or even sometimes mosquitoes, because they all have toxins.
I don't think it's good to ingest botulism toxin, which is the toxic protein made from a botulism bacteria.
Now, that does not prove the germ theory, that just proves that sanitation, meaning we shouldn't be eating poop in our water, because poop has all kinds of things from animals, which we would be better off not eating.
Especially if you don't properly take care of animals.
And that's exactly the situation in the cities when all these people were getting sick because they were misfeeding, mistreating their animals, feeding them all sorts of crap and chemicals.
And all that was coming out in the poop.
And then they were drinking it and they blamed that whole mess on bacteria, which if you isolate the bacteria, you would never be able to prove that.
So yes, the sanitation was great.
We should all drink, you know, clean water and clean food.
And I don't mean bacteria-free water or bacteria-free food.
I mean not toxins and not breaking down proteins and all those other things which actually do make people sick.
So here's a question.
Why does a segment of RNA showing up in a PCR test allegedly called a positive test result often seem to correspond to symptoms of this alleged disease?
So the first challenge I would say is I don't think that's proven that a positive test correlates with anything.
So that's the first thing I would say.
You have to be very careful before you say that.
Now I would say though that if you do a so-called viral load on like an AIDS patient or even a hep C patient and maybe even a COVID patient, the higher the viral load And again, I would be very cautious about this.
The more possible it is that the person is actually sick.
Now, why is that?
Well, because anytime you're poisoned and sick from whatever cause, you will have more breakdown products of your tissue, meaning more viral particles, and that will be more likely to show up In a test looking for viral particles.
And so the test is only telling you that you're breaking down from something and we have no idea what you're breaking down from.
Now it's also possible, although I would say unproven, that certain kinds of poisoning like glyphosate poisoning, cyanide poisoning, nutrient deficient poisoning, EMF poisoning, They all might affect different parts of your tissue, so you would get different breakdown products from that.
And so you might even be able to say, this kind of breaking down, this kind of genetic debris, that correlates with this set of symptoms and this kind of poisoning.
And so you might even be able to generate a test which has something to do with that.
Although again, I would be very cautious on that because I don't think that's been proven.
You might be able to say, that just means you're poisoned in a certain way.
You have more breakdown than the next person, which is exactly what I'm saying.
So all that test is doing, it has nothing to do with the virus, nothing to do with a unique piece of a unique virus that has never been proven at all.
All it is, is you're breaking down more than the next person.
So if you do something to stop them breaking down, their viral load so-called goes down.
Nothing to do with the virus, everything to do with you're just breaking down less.
So here's something that says, I read a scientist saying that the shot will breed super strains in the person.
And that person will shed and be a risk to others near them.
That can't possibly be because the virus doesn't exist.
So there can't possibly be strains of something or variants of something that doesn't exist.
It's perfectly reasonable to think that giving somebody some toxin from some injection will cause them to break down even maybe different kind of particles.
Which will get the virologist to think this means there's variants.
Although we could get into what variants, how they really come.
That's a whole other story.
But you could say these are slightly different kinds of genetic breakdown.
That is not a virus.
That is not a variant.
They're no more contagious or causing illness than anything else.
Or any other virus, I should say.
So how are they coming up with all these details about it like it attaches to ACE receptors?
They just make it up.
It turns out, you know, the whole concept of a lipid bilayer membrane with receptors embedded in the membrane has never been proven.
For those of you who want more information about that, I would read the entire chapter by Harold Hillman, where he debunks the whole concept of any receptors in any lipid bilayer membrane.
So they basically have theoretical studies and x-ray crystallography picture of certain proteins attaching to certain other proteins or so-called receptors and they essentially extrapolate from there, say they must have been on the cell membrane and they must be an ACE receptor because It has something to do with, you know, ACE proteins and that must be coming from a virus which they never isolated.
And if you actually read the study and look at how they came up with that, it just makes
you shake your head.
So here's a question about topics of resonance with regard to contagion that I touched on
in the book.
So the way that I would conceptualize this, by the way, it's Harold Hillman.
Anybody who's interested in real biology needs to get Harold Hillman's books and watch his YouTube videos.
It will change your life.
So the way I would say it is you take something like measles, you start by saying, okay, we know it's not a virus.
That's for sure.
The virus has never been isolated from those people.
Therefore, it's never been characterized, never been shown to cause disease.
So what is it that people seem to transfer between each other?
Now, Again, as I keep saying, one of the problems with talking about this is, since all of the research, and I mean all of it, has to do with finding the virus and understanding that, and none of it has to do with, well, we know it's not the virus, so what else is happening?
Therefore, there's very little sort of published research that I can rely on to answer this question.
But since we know that measles is a maturation process, measles is a way that we detoxify, measles is a way that children adapt to their particular environment, it's not such a stretch for me knowing that in the example of, you know, if you put 20 women in a room for six months, they all menstruate at the same time.
That's what I mean by resonance.
Human beings share a lot of things that are not viruses.
They share feelings, they share thoughts, they share their life.
They even share things that have biological significance.
In fact, if you tell an appropriate joke, which I've been trying to do for years, You can actually make people all have a similar physiological response called laughing and oxygenating their tissues better and actually feeling better.
That's the whole goal of laughing.
Now, it makes sense to me that if one child decides, I can do this, it's time to do the detoxification process so I can Essentially get on with my life and be healthier for my whole life.
Another child might see the courage or catch the courage in that and actually do the same thing.
And once they do it, the world can sing together and do this process.
And since it basically hurts nobody or very few people, especially people who are well nourished and cared for emotionally.
They all go through it together and they're all better off for it.
And I think that's how biology works.
not this imaginary theory of imaginary viruses.
So just confirming that now I think that all the particles resulting from CPE
are simply fragments of the dead cell that That is correct.
Why are people losing smell and taste?
Partly because they're sick, and that happens anytime you're sick.
And partly because there might be some electromagnetic field poisoning that actually is toxic to your nerves.
And since smell and taste are neurologically based, then that might be a source of that.
What do I feel is a good source of magnesium?
I can't emphasize enough that We worked really hard on getting this marine plasma because I don't think that we should take minerals that haven't been processed through some sort of plant or maybe an animal like bone broth.
So the two best sources of minerals that have been processed through plants are shilajit, which is basically process is essentially pressurized plants for hundreds or thousands of years.
So that's essentially mineral residue from plants and minerals in the ocean that have been put through phytoplankton So that all the proteins and all the minerals come out.
And the key is this is in a bioavailable form.
And so this is how human beings are made to absorb minerals, not through eating rocks.
That's not how we do it.
Trying to look for the final question.
Thank you.
Just so a lot of them have to do with what to do about the This injectable device, sometimes erroneously called a vaccine, should you get, what happens if you got one?
What happens if your family got one?
I mean, I don't think any of us should be walking around demonizing or scared of people who have had the injection.
They're going to be all around us.
I have no evidence right now that they can make us sick.
I certainly think it's possible that they are shedding Proteins which I would rather not be exposed to but how much of that is a real issue?
We have no idea so we don't want to get into a demonization thing and I also don't know any reliable way to quote detox from this injectable device As far as I know that doesn't exist.
We've never dealt with that and So basically the only solution is to avoid it and tell your friends and family members to avoid it.
I don't think at this point until we have further evidence that there is something spread from this injection that we have to blow that out of proportion.
It's certainly not a good thing for that person because it will change their biology.
How much it's contagious I think we have to remember, as far as the whole concept of contagion or contagious virus and genetic engineering, is that luckily God made it so there aren't contagious viruses.
Therefore, you can't make a contagious virus, no matter how many functional gains or gain-of-functions They've been working on this for 30 years and they can't figure it out simply because it doesn't work like that.
They've been trying to make genetically engineered stuff.
They can make genetic engineered products that make us make proteins or make proteins in certain animals and plants, that's for sure.
But whether they can take over our biology I have a feeling it just doesn't work like that, and so we don't have to think it's going to come from somebody else.
And obviously, we'll keep track of this, and I may end up having more information, but that's my understanding at this point.
So that's always a lot of talking, and I thank everybody for listening.
Remember, next week, 11 a.m., March 24th, We have the great opportunity to hear Stefan on viral theory and answer a few questions.
And there will be more coming.
Everybody should look into the marine plasma and Strophanthus as tissue protection.
And I think that's it.
Thank you, everybody, for listening.
▲
Export Selection