All Episodes
March 2, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:15:38
Need to Know (1 March 2021) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm very pleased today to be joined by Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and by Chris Weinhart from Detroit, Michigan.
We are here to bring you all the news you need to know.
It begins, of course, with CPAC.
Trump started out ruling out a new party, even though I think it's still a good idea, the Patriot Party, given that Republicans, conventional like McConnell, seem to want to revert to their country club style and their rich friends from the boardroom.
But he ruled it out.
He's not going to do it.
Fake news, he said.
We have the Republican Party.
It's going to unite and be stronger than ever before.
I am not starting a new party.
He said it would divide the electorate.
Wouldn't that be brilliant?
Start a new party and divide our votes so we can never win?
No, we're not interested in that.
He also tore into Biden and his GOP critics during his first post-presidency speak.
It lasted well over an hour, went against Biden over topics ranging from immigration to the pandemic to trade to transgender rights.
He labeled Biden's administration anti-jobs, anti-family, anti-borders, anti-energy, anti-women, and anti-science, all of which appears to be completely right.
He was also focusing on immigration at the border.
They may be killers.
They may be rapists.
They may be drug smugglers.
You take them and you release them into our country, which is what Biden is doing.
Also, he objected to Biden claiming that he had introduced a vaccine when Trump had done it.
I handed the new administration a modern-day medical miracle.
I'm not happy about the vaccine, but Trump certainly did it.
He also used his speech to target his GOP critics, including Republicans who supported impeachment, Adam Kissinger of Illinois, Mitt Romney from Utah, particularly after Liz Cheney, who is number three in the House, and the warmonger, the person who loves seeing our troops fight Liz Cheney.
Hopefully they get rid of her at the next election.
If Republicans don't stick together, the rhinos we're surrounded with will destroy the Republican Party.
Prior to his speech, Trump won the CPAC poll that found 55% supporting him to be the nominee in 2024.
Running second was Florida Governor DeSantis with 21%.
And South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem at four.
Where both of them are pursuing Trump policies.
They've gone against the lockdown.
They've gone against social distancing and face masks.
Almost 7 in 10 of the poll's participants said they'd like to see Trump run in 2024, compared to 15 who said not and 17 unsure.
97, 95% said they want the Republican Party to continue with Trump's agenda and policies.
Only 3% suggesting they should change direction.
Too uncertain.
If Trump were not a candidate, then they showed DeSantis with a wide lead at 43%, Noam next at 11, followed by Trump Jr.
at 8, Mike Pompeo and Ted Cruz at 7.
Meanwhile, mail-in ballots and voting machines have been banned in France.
I think a nice reflection of the reality that they have been used to steal elections time and time again.
Carl, your thoughts?
So I'm glad that there was an event.
And what I don't like about the rhetoric is it's still the false left-right paradigm where Trump goes in and calls these people bad or anti.
What we really need to happen is for these people who are running the empire to be Asserted as criminals centered in war and money, and constant lying, that we can calculate the damages of annual millions killed, billions harmed, and tens of trillions looted.
The idea of a Patriot Party?
I would predict that that's going to happen, but it's not possible yet until we have these looters and liars arrested and removed from power.
You know, Trump did talk about the vaccine, and I hope that's just code for the military.
And the idea that anything is going to change in 2024, well, something would change with those Dominion voting machines, just to be ensured that we're no longer the USA, but the CSA, the Communistic States of America.
And good for France.
I would like to dig into that further to see exactly what they're proposing.
I didn't get to dive into that one.
Unless We have to make sure that the parasites just haven't told us they're fixing something and then they're just replacing it with something else that they can own and dominate.
Well, if you wonder whether we're living in a Stalinist society, the Wisconsin State Journal did not have a word about the CPAC.
Conference, even though it was the greatest political event of the weekend and normally would receive tremendous coverage, this is like the old days of Stalin, where if someone fell out of favor, they'd simply erase them out of a photograph.
They no longer exist.
They become a non-person.
The Democrats would prefer Trump be a non-person, but it ain't gonna happen.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I can say they probably have those sentiments for the citizens as well, that they'd rather that any resistance be non-persons or deemed terrorists or domestic threats or things of that nature.
Anybody that questions the Biden coup or the technocratic hostile takeover is definitely a public enemy, number one, even though they are in fact the public.
So, I think it's kind of interesting.
I have to agree 100% with what Carl said.
And in fact, I was almost going to say just what Carl said and let you go to the next segment because that's such a tough act to follow in terms of him nailing it on the head right there so specifically and precisely.
Until justice is served, yeah, I don't think that really any of this matters in itself theater.
This is like the right-left cesspool.
Yeah, I think at some point in time, the people are gonna have to start forging
their own grassroots alternatives, devoid of these puppets that they're putting out there.
And if you notice the popularity that seems to be rising, it's anybody that resisted against the UN colonization
model or the CDC protocols that are pretty much dictated
by the Royal societies and their henchmen and lackeys.
So yeah, it's pretty crazy to see how many people are involved in this hoax
and in this asset stripping operation.
Uh, it.
It truly goes to much higher levels and many different levels, and it's been departmentalized, but this all ties together, whether it's the COVID or the manipulation of markets or, you know, repo markets, things like this, currency resets, you name it.
So, yeah, that's pretty much all I got on that.
I know it was kind of a little bit all over the place, but Yeah, a lot of stuff going on here, and I think it's not a coincidence.
No, it's nice you're tying things together very well, Chris.
Meanwhile, will the stimulus checks be small even though the bill is huge?
Look what the Democrats squeezed in.
John Kennedy, a very fine senator from Louisiana, observed that the profligacy is mind-numbing.
The motto of the Biden administration seems to be, we can't spend too much.
He aimed some controversial marks at the controversial elements of the American Rescue Plan Act.
$750 million for the global response to COVID-19.
$270 for arts and humanities.
$200 for museums and libraries.
$100 for an electric train in Silicon Valley.
This isn't a coronavirus bill, the Louisiana senator announced.
It's a left-of-Lenin neo-socialist wish list.
I haven't seen a Republican yet who's found something in there they agree with, declared House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.
I think all Republicans believe in three simple things.
They want a bill that puts us back to work, back to school, and back to health.
This bill is too costly, too corrupt, and too liberal.
It looks as though it could meet a wall of unanimous GOP opposition.
The Republican Study Committee, in fact, issued a fact sheet showing Democrats are hoping the public won't find out about, where Jim Banks, its newly elected chairman, said Democrats have added items of special interest for a number of liberal goodies, which is most certainly the case.
Meanwhile, a poll shows that Democrats think Trump supporters are the biggest threat, where fake news is driving the leftists insane.
This is bizarre.
What is the greatest issue or problem confronting the country, according to the Democrats?
Trump supporters.
A new poll showed the left's biggest fear is not the pandemic or the economy, not war with China or Iran developing nuclear weapons, but Trump's supporters.
Their obsession with their allegation of fake news continues to drive Democrat hatred of the former president and his followers.
They even Trump supporters even exceeded racism as a top concern among those surveyed on the left.
The party that claims to uphold equality remains more concerned for their political agenda than people of color.
At 82% Left's concern with Trump supporters stood at more than double concern with capitalism at 39.
It's interesting Democrats don't fear capitalism when it comes to priorities.
The real hatred is for any leader who stands up to their agenda.
This may explain why Democrats continue to introduce a resolution to investigate white supremacy and call the GOP enemy combatants.
Despite Biden's calls for unity, the only thing unifying the left is its hatred of American values.
I think this is fairly stunning, actually.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, it's pretty funny.
First you have Joe Biden, whose campaign promise, vote for me and I'll get those $2,000 checks to you right away, just forgetting about that and the typical political hypocrisy.
And then this polling.
This is just so much more of the stupefication of the American people with these words.
Saying that they're, the polling asks, what is a problem?
And Trump's supporters, what do you mean by that?
Are you alleging in the question that this is some sort of dictatorship and some sort of cult of personality?
And then the idea that racism is a problem.
And then the real problem is the capitalists that are anti-capitalists that are rigged casino Elitist .01 percenters who are looting us by the trillions.
And so, this idea that until the American public demand arrests, we're just going to get played, and it's going to be a false left-right paradigm, it's going to get people divided and conquered, and that's all that we're ever going to have until the American people demand arrests, or until, unless something happens sometime this week or sometime this month, We really will have a Civil War breakout in this country.
Well, I think this is all grist for your mill, Chris.
Give us your thoughts.
Well, I definitely have to say I agree with Carl once again on this.
I think the people are getting fed up with this charade.
I think that they're understanding that there's more than one thing that's going on wrong in many places and are starting to tie pictures together.
Yeah, I think that Biden's credibility is hemorrhaging greatly.
I think that his public support has never been there.
So it's real hard to manufacture that.
Maybe they were hoping to pivot that behind the office of the president.
And I think this media optic is failing greatly.
And I think eventually they're gonna have to fess up.
But I don't know, maybe they won't.
I mean, these guys have been doubling down on bullshit for the last four years and then some, you know, trying to get us into war with Russia over stuff that was fabricated by the United Kingdom and Israel.
And really, I think that both sides, left and right, have sold out to Israel and I think, you know, are part of this UN colonization model.
Until they really break from that, I don't have much hope for the political paradigm.
I think most of these perspectives and these absurdities are ascribed by think tanks and NGOs and high-level operatives at the CFR and AIPAC.
And really, these puppets are the ones that deliver these type of theatrics to us.
And of course, being in the fits of despair, it's very easy to get thrown into the emotions of these type of things, because they are very real problems that are created from this type of situation, and people are facing some very real struggles.
But unfortunately, I don't think the COVID thing is really one that is a main priority.
Certainly not in the sensation that they put it in.
And I think it was a political football.
And I think it's being proven as such and being exposed as such.
So I think they're really trying to go after any sort of dissent and dehumanize it in the way that they always have.
Very good.
It is certainly bizarre.
Oh, here is a nice comment, by the way, on the story.
Easily solve the problem.
They can admit the fraud they committed in 2020 regarding the presidential election.
Select senators, representatives, and governors.
Then take Biden-Harris out of office and allow them to slink away to join the criminals who did this.
Charge the criminals, involve all of them, and actually put convicted ones in prison.
Celebrate the return of the rightful President Trump as our leader and get out of his way while he corrects the crazy destructive things Biden, Harris, Kerry, and Rice have done in the past 33 days.
Seems like a year of pure hellish nightmare.
Trump is fast and hopefully can turn things back quickly.
Take Biden admin out fast before he does more major damage to America and Americans.
And charge Kerry with a Logan Act of treason as he actually did it over almost four years with his messages with Iran after Trump began president.
And the ones who arranged that he do those actions, Like Obama, Biden, and probably Soros?
Charge and prosecute them all.
Meanwhile, of course, we know what actually happened in the election.
Seen in Germany before the Dominion servers were seized, Trump carried all but a handful of states 410 electoral votes, Biden 128.
I think that's why France has moved to get rid of voting machines and only have paper ballots.
Leahy Han hears that authorities, new extremists, might instigate violence at the Capitol riots.
Most interesting is that he presided over the faux impeachment after the Chief Justice declined because it was an unconstitutional event.
During a meeting of the Senate Homeland Security and Rules Committee, Leahy asked former Capitol Police Chief Stephen Son why police weren't ready for the swarm who breached the Capitol.
I really wonder why we didn't take this seriously enough to prepare for them, Leahy said.
The hours it took to bring in the National Guard?
You said there wasn't enough intelligence there?
But in the same letter you stated the intelligence assessment, I'm quoting here, indicated members of the Proud Boys, white supremacist groups, Antifa, and other extreme groups were expected to participate in the January 6th event, and they may be inclined to become violent.
How much more intel do we need than that?
Leahy also asserted he believed the attacks were coordinated.
I look at the lives lost of police who fought and protected our capital.
We saw this as violent, I would say planned and organized attack on the United States and the government by domestic terrorists.
I hope they all will be prosecuted as fully as they can.
What he says there obviously contradicts the idea that Trump had incited this at his speech at the Ellipse that day, which didn't conclude until 1-11.
But nevertheless, Leahy adds, completely gratuitously, without any warning, because Trump urged his supporters that day to fight and show strength, he deserved blame for the riots.
Very embarrassing.
Meanwhile, Ron Johnson, my senator here in Wisconsin, of whom I'm quite proud, shared a Capitol Ride eyewitness account from the Center for Security Policy from analyst J. Michael Waller, where the vast majority of Trump supporters on Jan.
6 were actually in support of the Capitol Police, The violence wasn't by small groups who were not sincere Trump supporters, but were feigning to be.
The pro-police crowd went from disbelief and confusion to anger when the violence started.
When the last five pages of his report is entitled, provocateurs turn unsuspecting marchers into invading Bob.
Johnson added he has a long list of questions he gave to the Committee Chair Gary Peters from Michigan, but his questions may not get answered.
Peters recently stated Trump violated his oath of office by inciting a violent, deadly attack on the U.S.
Capitol and our democracy, just adhering to the Democrat slogan, which is not founded in evidence, which was thoroughly refuted, During the impeachment, especially on the fourth day by the Trump team, one federal partner did know something.
The Washington Post reported the FBI's field office in Norfolk warned law enforcement on January 5th.
I repeat, on January 5th.
That extremists could attack the nation's capital.
The warning included knowledge of conspirators distributing a map of the city's tunnels and meeting points where they could gather, which appears to have taken place at noon that very day.
So in June, July, August, when riots, looting, and arson was taking place across the nation, Joe Biden was asleep.
But when we had an intrusion to the Capitol, all of a sudden this violence is a threat, That must end now.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, we're really looking at this global shadow government that does operate in the backgrounds and is connected to the power centers in Rome, London, and Washington D.C.
with those three obelisks with those bloodlines in the background.
That is on one side and that's the side that is in power versus what we can quantify as Trump likely getting 410 electoral votes and the will of the American people to see a glimmer of hope to at least to have played defense against these liars and looters, these imperialists, these parasites.
In that article about Leahy, I hope he gets his wish that the people who were behind it gets prosecuted, including him.
Because he either knows, or should have known from his position of responsibility, that those mall cops let these people in.
They opened the gates for them.
So who gave those orders?
And then is it true that it was Nancy Pelosi herself who declined a National Guard support three times?
And then Leahy gives a quote saying, oh, nothing is going to matter until the hate is is removed.
No, no.
During the summer, you had the National Guard on the steps.
Nobody is going to go against them.
No one is going to go against them.
So it's all just going to be crazy and tragic comedy.
And man, I hope we can get this resolved and for people to stand for the brighter future of all of our human beings, especially the youngest ones.
And you got that so right, Carl, and I don't think I've heard a single Democrat acknowledge that Trump offered 10,000 National Guard troops for security if they so requested it.
But of course, they don't want to admit that because it would exonerate him from responsibility.
They want anything but.
Carl, your thoughts?
You mean Chris, right?
Yeah, no problem.
I wasn't sure if you wanted to go back to Carl or not.
Yeah, great points, Carl.
I agree with you on a lot of that stuff.
Yeah, no doubt.
I think the people are starting to see through this two-party charade and this theatric and really see who's behind it.
And I think that Leahy and others are probably very knowledgeable of who arranged that situation in the Capitol quote-unquote riots.
Thank you, Chris and company.
Love it.
this situation like they probably did with the governor being kidnapped quote unquote here in Michigan as a
political opportunity to further clamp down against any sort of resistance, and to really put people on eggshells
when they should be on the offensive.
Thank you, Chris and company love it. We love.
Thanks.
the addition to the team.
Meanwhile, breaking special counsel John Durham abruptly announces his resignation from the U.S.
Attorney's Office.
This actually is pretty conventional with a new incoming administration, but he's going to continue his assignment investigating Crossfire Hurricane My career has been as fulfilling as I could ever have imagined when I graduated from law school back in 1975, Durham said in his statement.
He'll continue his work investigating the FBI's operation to uncover Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.
Whether the FBI's operation to uncover Russian collusion with the Trump campaign was politically motivated, for which there's an overwhelming amount of evidence, These people should be indicted.
It was the greatest political crime in the history of our country, including Obama, including Biden, former President Trump said on Fox at the time.
Former U.S.
Attorney General Barr elevated Durham's status to press of counsel, a move many perceived as an attempt to protect the investigation from interference by the Biden administration.
Meanwhile, more for the Blaise, Trump turns on AG Barr after report claims he knew about a probe, launching a probe into it.
Glenn Beck has reported why Biden nominated Merrick Garland as Attorney General.
Was Garland's nomination just meant to be a slap in the face to Republicans since he'd been refused They held off confirming him as a nominee for the Supreme Court?
Glenn Beck thinks there's a lot more to it.
Given how focused Democrats are on rooting out vaguely defined right-wing extremism, Garland's work supervising the prosecution of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing suspects give us a hint.
He said he's all for, this is Glenn Beck, stopping dangerous extremists, but could not help noticing how Garland isn't talking about any of the destruction that happened over the summer.
I am all for justice.
I'm all for making sure we catch the bad guys, as long as the bad guys are not defined to be on only one side.
Merrick Garland said there was no comparison between what happened on January 6th and what happened over the summer.
That's because the Washington elites see themselves as better than somebody who owns a taco stand.
I don't.
The Constitution doesn't.
They are the same crime.
And of course, the criminals, if you want to talk about incitement, included very prominent spokesmen for the Republican Party, including Kamala Harris herself, Maxine Waters, and even Nancy Pelosi.
Chris, I mean, Carl, your thoughts.
Well, for Durham, he has had over four years now since the illegal prosecution of General Flynn and the threat to arrest his son if Flynn didn't cooperate.
The only one guy who got busted, this Clinesmith guy from the FBI who admitted to altering his 302 report over the interview that he conducted with General Flynn with the conclusion that there was no violation of any crime from the incoming National Security Advisor, and then he gets slapped with probation for doing that with that destruction.
So we just, so four years plus with nothing going on, that is just on its face more swamp, more empire, more Orwellian anti-justice department, non-justice department.
And despite the hints and the promises and the still impressive political theater of things like Joe Biden getting on some airplane with a tail signal that isn't Air Force One and riding up in some dirty, I don't even know, 10-year-old vehicle, and then supposed to be U.S.
Marines, but they're just guys in costumes.
They're firemen, Carl.
They were firemen.
How embarrassing bad is that?
I mean, you know.
I mean, that gives me hope.
But until something breaks, this is just going to be more of this guy promising, Garland promising justice when he does the opposite.
Yeah, Garland looks like a real slimy guy, really disgusting.
And you're right, Durham certainly ought to have brought convictions or indictments long before now.
Chris, I'm sure that's your sentiment as well.
Yeah, I'm pretty much right there with you on that.
I think, like I said, these guys have no fear.
They have no concern that they'll ever be investigated by the media or any sort of serious retribution from the citizens for their, I don't want to say failure to serve the public, but let's just say flat out betrayal of it in terms of their service.
I think that really this four years has been a lesson that people should learn from just like the last eight years and just like any four year administration of these president They run on one thing, they deliver another when they get the job.
And it's always somehow or another, the people that get screwed and pay the price and bear the collective guilt and most importantly, the collective punishment for the misdeeds of the 1%.
And of course, this theater is part of it.
You know, it's the systematic frustrations of justice.
It's to really get people to become radicalized.
And then when they do, they use the authoritarian state to put those people down.
Yeah, I think you got it exactly right.
Well, you're not going to believe what I'm about to report now.
Eat celebrity meat.
Bite Labs grows meat from celebrity tissue samples and uses it to make artisanal salami.
How disgusting is this?
This is a form of cannibalism.
Take James Franco.
He's sexy.
He's artsy.
Let's make him salami.
The Franco salami must be smoky, sexy, and smooth.
Franco's meat will pair with lean, strong venison or Jennifer Lawrence, a different type of hunger game.
The J-Law salami will be complemented by a mixture of rabbit and pork, a charming and confident flavor profile.
The J-Law salami is coarse ground in a rustic style, smooth with notes of honey and spice with orange zest and zinger.
Or Kanye West.
Always push the boundaries and tapes.
The Kanye salami will pull no punches.
Heavy and boldly flavored.
Pure Kanye West meat will blend with rich coarse ground pork.
Or the Ellen DeGeneres Ellen salami.
As a salami, we see Ellen salami composition blended with ostrich.
Black pepper and garlic with a playful kick of mustard give the Ellen salami a highly approachable and well-rounded flavor.
I'm telling you guys, this is disgusting beyond belief.
I've got to stop and get your comments on this.
I mean, it's so outrageous!
Carl, your thoughts?
It is in your face, and I encourage people to understand that this is their agenda.
Their idea of asking you, who else do you want to eat?
If you take a look at Jim's work with Pizzagate, or if you watch the documentary, Fall of the Cabal, You'll be able to see that this is tied to the white rabbit of adrenochrome.
And if you understand, if you project out the totality of evil, well, okay.
I have published research that demonstrates that our monetary system is a debt system, and these people literally create as much monopoly money as they want.
So once you have all of the money, you buy the media, you have the political power, and yet you still want more.
Aren't you going to deconstruct human beings to see exactly how much torture and how much sadism you can get out of them?
I think that this really is who they are and that is just going to get worse because these people only roll in one direction and the American opportunity and calling is to stand up and demand that the empire be ended.
However, whatever avenue people see best protecting children, fine.
The money, fine.
The looting, the lying, the wars, fine.
They have to get up to the level of demanding arrests or we're just going to get more of this stuff shoved, literally shoved down our throats.
I think we're moving in the direction of Smith's modest proposal of eating our children in a time of starvation.
How grotesque can you get?
Chris, your thoughts?
Is this on Rev Radio or is this just on your website?
This show just goes on to, you know, the need to know.
I mean, it's okay.
I just want to make sure because I only have three words really.
What the fuck?
You know, that's pretty much it.
You know, I mean, I think we just leave it there.
I mean, this is pure evil.
And I just have to say, they're trying to really take humanity and, I guess, symbolically, or if not ritually, turn people into cannibals, just like they did with anything from, say, Christianity on to Lord knows what.
So, Yeah, these people have been doing blood libel for a long time and a big part of this whole thing is shoving it in people's faces to demoralize them and to gaslight the critical mass.
Yeah, to gaslight the people that know better and to really piss off the eyewitnesses and the victims and to really provoke those that don't know better into thinking that such a suggestion could be outrageous and those suggesting it could have no decency.
It is just grotesque!
I mean, grotesque!
Meanwhile, we have a morbidity and mortality report from the Center for Disease Control, where outbreaks related to kindergarten through grade 12 have been rarely reported.
In-school transmission risk, however, has not been well described.
Among 17 rural Wisconsin schools, reported student mask wearing was high.
The COVID incidence among students and staff was lower than in the county overall.
Among 991 cases identified in students and staff, only 3.7%, only 7, were linked to in-school spread.
What are the implications with masking requirements and student cohorting transmission risks within schools appears low, suggesting schools might be able to open safely with appropriate mitigation.
But of course, they're promoting the use of masks.
They're showing it was minimal.
But when you have individuals who are non-symptomatic, the prospect is virtually nonexistent anyway.
You're not transmitting or contagious if you're showing no symptoms.
Meanwhile, we have a report about face masks that suggests they're unsafe, ineffective, and immoral regardless.
Nine potential and proven dangers?
Cavities.
New York dentists are reporting half their patients are suffering decaying teeth, receding gum lines, and seriously sour breath from wearing masks.
Facial deformities, masking children triggers, mouth breathing, which has been shown to cause long, narrow faces, narrow mouths, high palatial vaults, dental malocclusion, gummy smiles, and many other unattractive facial features.
Acne vulgaris.
Moisture and germ collection in the mask causes facial skin lesions, irritant dermatitis, or worsening acne, which stresses the immune system, can lead to permanent scarring, and has been linked to depression and suicidal thoughts.
Children also develop hepatitis and bacterial infection that produces red sores and can lead to kidney damage.
Increased risk of COVID-19.
Let me emphasize, increased risk.
Masks used by the general public could be associated with an elevated risk of COVID-19.
By wearing a mask, the hexyl viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves, and travel into the brain.
Bacterial pneumonia.
Reports coming from my colleagues all over the world are suggesting that bacterial pneumonias are on the rise as a result of moisture collecting in face masks.
As we previously reported, Dr. Anthony Tony the Rat Fauci and his colleagues did a study of the Spanish flu, which brought about millions of deaths worldwide and discovered most had resulted not from the flu, But from bacterial pneumonia, which they suppressed, but was in fact brought about by wearing face masks.
Immune suppression.
Masks are often worn by criminals to hide their identity while perpetrating thefts, violence, rape, murder.
They produce subconscious anxiety and fear, which activate the flight or fight nervous system, which downregulates the immune system.
Germophobia.
Masks create an irrational fear of germs and a false sense of protection from disease, leading to antisocial or even hostile behavior toward those not wearing a mask.
Toxic.
Many if not most face masks and face coverings, including cloth, are made with toxic and
carcinogenic chemicals, including fire retardant, fiberglass, lead, NFE, felsite,
polyfluorinated chemicals, and formaldehyde that will outgas and be inhaled by the wearer.
Psychologically harmful. I believe the real threat right now is that what we're doing to
sabotage the mental, emotional, and physical health of our children, whose development is
dependent on social interaction, physical contact, and facial expressions.
Between mask wearing and social distancing, I fear the impact on children in particular may be long-term, if not permanent.
I have, as a consequence, sent letters to the local newspapers here in Madison, the Capital Times and Wisconsin State Journal.
Everyone needs to sound the alarm as widely as possible, especially with mayors, teachers, school principals, state legislators, and your federal members of the House and the Senate.
So I recommend you write to all of them, or as many as you can, something like the following.
Those of us who have looked into the matter are baffled that the MSM has not published warnings to the public about the risks associated with mask wearing in response to COVID-19, which is especially harmful to children and young adults.
These effects include brain damage, Because depriving brain cells of oxygen leads to their irreversible death.
Dental problems to teeth and gums, where mouth breathing causes facial distortions, long narrow faces with dental malocclusion and gummy smiles.
Contact with the face causes facial skin lesions.
Irritant dermatitis and worsening acne, which stresses the immune system, can lead to permanent scarring and has been linked to depression and suicidal thoughts.
Children also develop impetigo, a bacterial infection that produces red stores, which can lead to kidney damage, and increases, in caps, the risk of COVID-19, because exhaled viruses cannot escape, concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves, and travel into the brain.
Masks also create an irrational fear of germs and a false sense of protection from the disease, leading to antisocial or even hostile behavior toward those not wearing them.
These are not my opinions, but findings from much ado about corona.ca20reasons and a site of the NIH, actually.
Let everyone know before we further damage our kids.
Thanks.
This is serious stuff.
And I was pondering how everyone could do something to benefit the cause.
You can find those articles cited on my blog.
If you click on the name, you'll get the original link.
I'm encouraging everyone, Carl, to write a letter to everyone they can to warn them of the potential damage to our children, which potentially is going to be devastating.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, I saw in that article that 92% of the kids were wearing masks, which gives me hope, because that means that, unlike in our school district, which is still closed, they threaten $1,000 fines and a year in jail for every incidence of violation.
So if they have a choice then perhaps they will see for themselves as they are in school in person, that they are fine because they're not going to get sick.
And if there are some people are wearing the masks and if those.
Bad effects do occur.
Everyone's going to see that as well.
And the kids are going to talk among themselves.
So this, uh, our opponents really are in my assessment, after 44 years engagement, they're hyper intelligent and they're putting us on slippery slope after slippery slope.
And this is a full court press for them to win the game before they're discovered.
So they're telling us it's okay to eat people.
Well, okay, then if they get that, then it's okay to eat kids.
They have this transgender health secretary saying it's okay to choose your sex for kids, young kids.
It's okay for them to choose their sex.
Alright, so then it's okay for them to choose sex too, right?
Is that their argument?
I think that it is.
So we'll see.
I know in Northern California, where I'm at, is that the chat among the teachers is all 100% that I see is all pro-vaccine, and I hope that the vaccine will allow them to get back to their normal lives of in their schools and in their classrooms.
And again, I'll put up resistance.
And at the end of this week, if I don't see any sign for a breakthrough, Then I'll have to organize and communicate to our teachers and find out who is willing to at least co-sign a letter to our school board and all our leaders.
And I'm just going to stick to the one topic that I know for sure is that for them to threaten us with fines and jail is illegal under California law.
They've had 60 days of emergency authority and now we're over a year into it.
Yeah, it's just ghastly.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I think that we're finding out, really, the breadth of our legal system, the controls that it has, or the extent to which the corruption goes, whether it's, like I said, the UN thing, or locally, or some of these mandates that are being forced on people, as they say, people being fined for these things.
I don't think there's any constitutional basis for these things, and many courts of law have proven this, but somehow or another, this is still a thing somehow.
So, I don't know when people are going to start calling these people out, these Democratic governors and these people pushing this whole charade out, because it is really a depopulation and dispossessing tactic that is being utilized for political gain, and more importantly for passive-aggressive manipulation and resistance, or against resistance, I should say.
So this is, this is something like Carl said a multi level operation that people are, are
delivering on to others, where they pretty much put the, the people who should be righteously
outraged on the defensive like I was saying, and it's, it's a tactic they've always used
where they pretty much just gaslight the victims, and nothing new under the sun.
These people really have a lot to gain and more importantly, a lot to lose.
If they ever get called to account for what they're doing.
So of course they got to maintain the illusion of safety, the optic of diligence and the perception of justice.
But I will say that, uh, confidently say that these cannibalistic pedophiles are, are certainly, uh, assured to keep you or are intended in keeping you and your children safe.
So you can all rest assured and count on that.
You don't have to worry about these guys just.
Nice.
for their sensationalized perception management operations and just go back to sleep. Democracy
is something that does not exist in America. Popular sovereignty is being destroyed and these
are the people that are doing it. Anybody that's calling out this invisible enemy is your very
visible enemy and you need to make that distinction. Nice.
Meanwhile, patriots are using 1984 to defeat cancel culture.
If you haven't read 1984, read it.
Don't say I already know Big Brother is watching you.
That's not the critical part of the novel.
The story of a society structured so the elites in control will remain in control forever.
They control using constant surveillance, keeping everyone on the verge of starvation, eliminating any activity that brings joy or hope or enlightenment, generating focused anger at enemies of the people, and enforcing cult-like worship of an all-benevolent leader.
But that's not the most important part.
The most important is that they control people by controlling information.
The citizens of the fictional place of Oceana are told each year under the guise of Big Brother.
They have set new records for production, beating all projections.
Any record that says otherwise is characterized as an error, or labeled as blasphemous.
The Ministry of Truth then corrects the record.
This revision of truth in history applies to other situations as well.
For instance, if someone is recognized in one of Big Brother's speeches as a war hero, but later falls out of favor, any record of the speech that cites that individual as a war hero is in error, and records corrected to reflect the new truth.
Sound enough like cancel culture to you?
Sometimes a person poses such a threat or is so offensive to the sensibilities of the totalitarian Big Brother, a person is killed and then determined to have never existed.
In that case, every record that that person ever existed is removed from the records and sent for incineration in the memory home.
In the U.S.
today, we see this happening with Confederate statues.
Now the craze for destroying and memory-holding history has expanded to include the Founding Fathers.
What's next?
The U.S.
Constitution?
By controlling the past, Big Brother is always right.
He's always good.
The lives of the people are always improving.
Oceania is at war with Eurasia and always has been.
So if you think you remember something else, You are mentally ill and need to report for treatment at the Ministry of Law.
So ask yourself, who controls your information?
If you wanted to see exactly what Biden said when Trump closed the U.S.
border to travel from China to stop the spread of COVID, where would you look?
If you wanted a list of politicians who flew on pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's airplane, how would you get that list?
What if you clearly remember something embarrassing to someone in power, but can no longer find the evidence and the experts tell you you are lying?
What do you do?
We may not actually live in a world where the government controls every record of the past, not yet, but we do live in a world where the opinions of those in charge of managing information have become the only acceptable opinions.
A few clicks on a computer can banish a dissenting voice.
A few more can label anything this person said as a lie.
A few more get fired from their job and forced to the margins of society forever.
The book 1984 is being used by conservative patriots as a manual to fight the totalitarian movement led by the Silicon Valley Democrat Party nexus and the radical agenda of socialist group thing.
We need to question the information we're spoonfed.
Every news story needs to be looked at carefully to understand if we're actually getting the truth.
and determined what the actual truth is. The more our modern day ministry of cancel culture attacks
conservatives and religious patriots, the more important to look for alternative sources.
Look for information that isn't in the news but should be.
For statements by officials that are carefully worded only to be misinterpreted when
they're reported and amplified upon when they're retold. Don't believe you're simply wrong
because other people have been fooled by the voice of the crowd. By controlling the past, Big
Brother controls the present and therefore controls the future.
By remembering the real past, using logic and critical thinking, rejecting emotionally-laden wording, doing your own thinking and encouraging others to do so, too.
You helped reject Big Brother's vision for the future.
The vision of Big Brother's future, as described by one of the ever watchful thought police?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.
That's exactly right.
Carl, your thoughts?
Great article, and that is everything summarized in what we're seeing.
So we're already seeing corporate media reporting Joe and Kamala as kind of the big brother, perfect people, role models, loving you.
And that very first story that we did with the poll, which is fear-mongering about Trump supporters as if they're just And they've already talked about the need of re-education camps and getting a list of Trump supporters for those re-education camps.
So corporate media already is that.
They already push as hard as they can in order to promulgate this one-party system in the United States in order to crush out the last global dissent for them to have their one-party system.
The news from corporate media then goes directly to our children in public education texts.
And as a National Board Certified Teacher, six years ago now, I wrote an article series, a small book titled Public Education.
Bullshit to train stupefied work animals, where I just go to the textbooks and abundantly prove that they are intentionally misinforming people, that these PhDs are nothing but chosen and polished liars, the same way that you would have somebody with the title of a senator or a congressperson or a president.
Just being a spokesperson for evil.
So the cancel culture, it's true more than we know.
Who knows how many previous cultures have been cancelled by these elites, and then they change the history books to tell us whatever story they think will sell the best.
And this brave new world of 1984 is ours unless people take the option to demand arrests.
And many of us have an oath to the United States Constitution to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
And that is the test.
It's as though the Democrats took 1984 as their playbook.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, Carl's on fire tonight, man.
I agree with you, Carl.
Great stuff there.
Yeah, I think that was it Franklin said something about those that exchange liberty for security deserve neither.
And I think that really in America, we're seeing over the past century, independence being traded for convenience.
And I think that that has really been a A weak point for humanity to fall into that trap because it does create an abusive relationship, a codependency or a dependency upon the state or this logistic infrastructure that is being provided by the oligarchs and certainly not one that can be used for the independence of man and the cultivation of land or the production of goods or the free market exchange of ideas or even
Products.
So yeah, this is amazing to see how censorship is being used these fact checkers that are coming in and you know debunking and experts that are obviously holding immense vested interest dictating the conversation that could the problem the reaction the solution and each step seems to push humanity further and further away from their constitutional liberties or free markets or things like this.
So, one thing I like to point out about the Orwell quote in Oceania and Eurasia, the war was never meant to be won, but to remain perpetual.
So, I think that's something there too.
And this is a big war on the human independence as well as the human imagination.
And that's why fear is important to do this as well as perception management.
So, these are like trauma-based mind control things that are being used or tactics.
And like I say, this is not the nature of the A constituency being served by their elected officials.
This is the nature of master and slave, and I think we really need to reevaluate the situation before we continue supporting it.
I think those are very perceptive comments.
It's just astounding what's going on here.
Meanwhile, Syria got bombed quicker than you got your $2,000 check.
Biden's in office for only a little over a month and is already bombing someone.
U.S.
carries out airstrikes in Syria on Iranian-backed targets.
Caitlin Johnson writes, Americans, $2,000 checks, please.
Government, sorry, did you say airstrikes on Syria?
Americans, no, $2,000 checks.
Government, okay, since you asked nicely, here's your airstrikes on Syria.
Meanwhile, the Syrian government denounced the U.S.
airstrike on the border with Iraq as an act of aggression contrary to international law, which it most certainly is.
Syria is a sovereign nation.
As President Joe Biden told reporters he ordered the strike as a warning to Iran, the Syrian Arab Republic condemns in the strongest terms the U.S.
aggression against its sovereignty, the foreign minister in Damascus said on Friday.
Uh calling it an act of cowardly aggression and flagrant violation of the rules of international law and of the UN Charter, which is unquestionably the case.
Washington said the airstrikes targeted Iranian-backed militant groups Near the town of Al-Bukamal on the Syrian-Iraq border was retaliation for recent rocket attacks on facilities in Iraq used by U.S.
troops and contractors stationed there, which I believe were fired by Israel in an attempt to implicate Iran so the United States could make precisely such a strike Iran has denied any responsibility for the attacks, and I'm sure the Skia Group has claimed responsibility.
But as I observe, I believe this was an Israeli op.
Meanwhile, China mocks Biden's Syria bombing.
America is back.
China's state-run Global Times newspaper mocked President Joe Biden Friday, quoting his declaration, America is back, in a headline about his decision to bomb Syria on Thursday evening.
How appropriate is that?
China's got it right, and Biden deserves to have his feet put to the flames.
Carl, your thoughts?
As a teacher of U.S.
government and history, and this is my one published paper, is that war is illegal.
We've had two world wars.
There were treaties after both of these wars.
A treaty under Article VI of the U.S.
Constitution is U.S.
supreme law, and these, after World War I or World War II, the treaties are as clear as you can possibly get.
You cannot use war In foreign policy, the only acceptable reason is a very narrow definition of self-defense.
So, to say that it's bad or unwise or cruel or whatever, these people should be arrested.
They should be arrested.
All of our families have sacrificed dearly to win those treaties so that we can stop these psychopaths, but yet this show does go on.
And Jim, I think you're right.
Without any additional information, I think we need to always suspect a false flag attack first.
And for people who are unsure how that would work, is that Israel would just go ahead and paint some warplanes in U.S.
colors and use them, and then just use Operation Mockingbird corporate media to just go ahead and report it.
And if people want to know that there is a historical basis for this conclusion, Just go to Operation Northwoods, which President Kennedy refused to do, which part of that planning was the U.S.
military saying, look, all you got to do is paint up your warplanes, your warships in somebody else's colors, and then just sell it as the other side.
And then that'll be the justification for a war in self-defense.
So it's used all the time.
And if people, people really do need to look at a false flag attack first and foremost with any of this.
I think that's exactly right.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I have to point out that Israel does have a long track record of being behind, or at least the IDF and Mossad have a long track record of being behind, let's say Northwood type operations where they used airliners like Lufthansa airliners in the 70s to really gin up hatred against the Muslims.
Using the uninterruptible autopilot system to land planes and foil quote-unquote hijacking attempts.
I can think of a good half dozen times that they've done that just to that airliner alone.
It led to the Von Bulow case, as you know, and Dershowitz being involved with that.
You know, he got framed for basically murdering his wife or whatever for an insulin dosage, but arguably he was taken out of the headlines for his sentiments on his ownership with Lufthansa and tried to remove Boeing uninterruptible Uninterruptible autopilots from his planes.
And of course, these were the same things that could have arguably been used with 9-11 if planes were in fact behind hitting those towers, or possibly they could have been something else.
So yeah, I think there's a lot of connections, let's just say, between these false flags, these operations, and the qui bono.
If you look at the means, the motives, and the opportunity, I have to say that these guys probably should be the first place you'd go looking, logically speaking.
You know, if you can follow the Quibono, that's probably a strong thing.
You know, you can see Israel is the common ally between all these Cold War 2.0 enemies, but they're the ones profiting from all these transactions in the middle, the UK and Israel.
So I have to say that war is a racket, and I think these guys are going to play both sides just like they did in just about every world war that we've seen, or any major war that we can recall in recent history.
So, whether it's the IMF World Bank countries versus the BRICS or, you know, Russia versus the United States in the Cold War 1.0, these guys really are hell-bent on creating this theatrics that is the great game, as Kissinger calls it, and sadly they think we're going to be in this.
So, I think that the best way to avoid that type of blind obedience and, let's just say, Control would be to know what you're facing and know who's doing it to you.
And I think that your participation is something that could be avoided in terms of this, if you're smart enough to realize who's doing it to you.
Very, very nice.
Both sets of comments.
Meanwhile, what the NRA's win in a Left Coast case means for the fight against the gun grabbers.
Unless they're familiar with this case already, most folks have never heard of Edmunds, Washington, let alone realized how the court case they lost helped strengthen our Second Amendment rights.
How's a community of 39,000 on the outskirts of Seattle in the national news simple?
They rolled the dice, trying to pass a local ordinance affecting the rights of gun owners.
They lost.
The municipality tried to regulate how guns can be stored in private homes.
The Court of Appeals for the State of Washington unanimously ruled Edmunds, Washington violated state law when it instituted rules for how people must store firearms inside their own homes.
Ordinance conflicts with a law that blocks localities from making their own gun regulations.
Second Amendment activists advance so-called gun preemption laws to protect gun owners from having to navigate a patchwork of local regulations.
Gun control activists have objected to such laws as being too restrictive.
The Second Amendment Foundation and National Rights Association, which jointly filed the suit against the ordinance, cheered the ruling.
Today's ruling is an important victory for the people of Washington, said the NRA Washington State Spokesman.
Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, told the Washington Free Beacon the win will also help the cause of protecting preemption nationally.
Uncontrolled advocates have pushed cities and localities in Washington And across the country to pass gun restrictions in an effort to test the limits of preemption laws.
They've had little success at circumventing or overturning them thus far.
And Gottlieb said Monday's win will only strengthen the legal case for state preemption laws.
It set a precedent for cases elsewhere with nearly identical laws on the book, like Seattle, where similar cases before the courts.
Their side isn't afraid to fight for the kind of America they want us to live in.
We need to be at least as committed as they are.
Time to cowboy up.
The NRA has been doing its part, but the rest of us need to take our role too.
If you want to stir up the fire in your belly by seeing what faithful and courageous people can do when they believe they're called for such a time as this, we've got you covered.
Does your state honor the Second Amendment as the only requirement to carry a firearm?
In this video, N.A.G.R.' 's Director of Communication, this is the National Association for Gun Rights, Chris Stone discusses what constitutional carry is and how the passage of constitutional carry in Utah and Montana this month constituted a big win for gun owners.
Carl, your thoughts.
I like that picture of Chris Stone.
It looks like a guy who's finally got a victory in this war, and that is important.
So this Second Amendment contest is that Americans really need to stand for this, especially after election fraud, to by no means give anything more away with the Second Amendment.
H.R. 127 is proposing that for every firearm Americans must purchase $800 of insurance a year and to be registered.
The registration is so that they can come and and later have a list of who to take guns from and they haven't done that yet because too many of us have them.
So the history lesson is that the First Amendment came first, which we see under attack today.
The ability to speak versus what we see, this push for a one-party system, to be afraid of Trump supporters, to put them on re-education lists, the ability to meet, the ability to have business instead of being freaked out about being able to earn a living, to be able to meet in churches or pubs and taverns.
And then the Second Amendment, In the original American Revolution 1.0, it began when our own government went after our guns.
They went after the stored guns, which included cannons.
So if you hear the argument that somehow having the purpose of the Second Amendment is to outgun The military, so that they will not attack and especially with mercenaries that they had in the first American Revolution, which you also hear things that maybe America needs to bring in the UN if the Trump supporters get out of line.
We are in this war, and Americans do need to choose a side and stand.
And the choice is so simple.
Either you stand for the United States Constitution, having fair laws and a fair playing field.
Otherwise, you're going to get turned into salami from Ellen DeGeneres.
How disgusting is that, Chris?
Your thoughts?
Well, I tell you, man, that's something.
Yeah, Carl makes some great points there.
I think that if you look at the absurdities of the dialogue, it's almost like a mechanism to control it.
You know, bargaining tactics, so to speak, where we're going to extend most of your political energy or most of your spiritual energy in arguing whether a mask is helpful or not.
And arguably speaking, the absurdity of it being efficient is the argument in itself and lack thereof.
So, you know, the whole point is to get you focused on things that are, I don't see fundamentally irrelevant but to them they are, while they deliver in all these other agendas that are part of this control system so this is part of slave training this is really about a control system by the 1% to really to put the screws to all of humanity.
So this is why these drone strikers want your guns, and you got to ask why.
I mean, there's got to be some historic contempt or guilt or sense of retribution that could be coming to them in the back of their own minds from the common man in the disenfranchisement that they've been putting them through, the systematic dehumanization that they've been putting us through.
This is something that is going to build a righteous and eventual outrage That they're trying to really duck and obfuscate or steer away from it ever happening and put the oppressed on eggshells, like I say.
So this is a part of the show, part of the theatrics.
And this is really how the authority uses power without firing a shot,
but to put this element of fear on people.
They did the same thing after World War II with the Stasi, and they're trying to do the same thing now
with this technocracy.
And if you think about the number of constitutional rights that technocracy violates,
I mean, you could literally go down on the bill of rights, and I don't think there's one single one
of those bill of rights that is still protected and applied to American life
with these asymmetrical surveillance that is being put on us by the intelligence agencies
funded by the central banks and by these black nobility families,
the bloodline families that are running the economies of the world.
Nice, Rory.
Thank you.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Here's a comment from a follower.
What's been very sad to me is the number of the years law-abiding American citizens who want our republic and its constitution to continue as set up by our founding fathers are now viewed as criminals by the left.
An offshore criminal cabal has been able to turn the alphabets, meaning CIA, FBI, and
so forth, against us to track us and spy after hijacking them.
It's now apparent these hijackers of our great nation hate it and want to destroy it, but
they don't seem to understand this will also adversely affect them and their families and
futures too.
Yes, how sad it is that law-abiding American citizens who want the U.S.
Constitution and Bill of Rights enforced are considered the enemy by those who hijacked America.
It is the stateside hijackers of our great republic who are the enemy with him.
I certainly hope the rigged, crooked election the Democrats stole will be corrected and President Trump will restore to office as he rightfully should.
Meanwhile, I've been encouraged for some time to watch a film called Idiocracy, about how the stupidest members of society can take control.
I think we're very close to that with the Democrats in control now, because their actions are monumentally moronic.
So I highly recommend Idiocracy, just for a contrast.
I'm no longer on Twitter, having been banished, but I am on Telegram, where you can find me at t.me slash Jim Fetzer News, t.me slash Jim Fetzer News, up to 125 subscribers so far.
More of you who want to learn about recent research on false flags and conspiracies Bear in mind, on the 5th and 6th of December, I brought together 24 experts.
Brilliant presentation.
Check it out at falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
Falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people.
The secret of tyranny, in keeping them ignorant.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Carl.
Well, Americans do need to take a stand.
I was trying to remember the name of this history professor who I took online courses with.
His first name was Rufus.
He was in the Midwest.
He died about five years ago.
He was a classical historian.
And he said that the test of American democracy is that he would predict that in 1,000 to 2,000 years time, when students, high school age students, are taking a history course, they'll take a look at the blip that America was for 250 years or so, and the students will just ask their professor, hey, is this America thing that we just looked at, is that going to be on the test?
Or can we just forget about it?
And unless we devolve down to idiocracy, and then we'll all just be too captivated to be watching the show, oh my balls, or ouch my balls, whatever it was in idiocracy.
So if people haven't seen it, I do recommend it.
It is good for a laugh, and that is kind of what our masters want to push us to.
But I think that they would prefer a more intelligent and capable group of minions as their work animal slaves.
Is it thought-provoking parody?
Yes.
Fascinating.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think you're spot on with the idiocracy sentiments, and I think that there's been a systematic assault, a full-spectrum assault on the cognitive abilities of humanity for the last few decades by this group, and using, in many cases, military or military-type apparatus to do so, whether you're talking chemtrails, 5G, some of these things like that, GMOs.
These are DARPA things, even Palantir, the social engineering, social media stuff, This is all stuff that they're doing for control.
And I have to say that most people are oblivious to this.
And in this age of information, information is power.
And these people have actually fundamentally readjusted an economy to use your data as the center core, the pinnacle of this type of economic Operation, where it used to be labor or where it used to be other things like that primarily labor or resources.
Now it's going into like data, and I think that it's to control humanity and to put us all into a giant human skitter boxes.
So I think that this is really more than a national or a multinational thing this is like.
Humanity versus technocracy and I hate to sound like such a Luddite, but I really think that we need to maybe take a few steps back or at least slow the pace down in terms of this technocratic development that these guys, these oligarchs have us all racing towards under this concept of national security or whatever they may call it.
This political theater is certainly an absurdity that is funded by these people stealing trillions from humanity in terms of unfair wages.
And this is absolutely the point.
If everybody's so enveloped in these type of controlled opposition dialogues or these theatrics, they lose sight of these other things that are truly, I don't want to say important, but yeah, I guess kind of they are.
I mean, in this day and age, most people can't even afford to work just one job.
They're working two, three in a gig economy, and that's not an accident either.
These mega city initiatives, not an accident either.
Asset stripping operations, buying up all the property with Federal Reserve money.
Funding these military operations through the mainstream media with Federal Reserve money.
Running out the mom-and-pop shops.
This is a full-spectrum assault and humanity is going to have to line up together with each other and set aside the two-party bullshit and really line up to defend themselves and their property, more importantly, and their Constitution.
Because these guys are certainly not going to give it back.
They're certainly not going to do you a favor.
They're certainly not going to keep you safe.
They are seriously trying to kill you and depopulate you and using these inversions as the means to do so.
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and Chris Weinert from Detroit for the excellence of their commentary.
Exceptional, which is the rule here.
Let me say, among the more perceptive observations about Trump's address to CPAC was that he referred to Joe Biden as the chief executive officer.
A republic doesn't have a CEO, but a corporation does.
That suggests what we've been reporting about the corporation of 1871 being folded, such that Biden and Harris were inaugurated as the president and vice president of a defunct corporation is correct.
He also spoke repeatedly that we're not done yet.
It appears now that the time frame may have to be adjusted.
I don't foresee resolution on the 4th of March, but I'd sure like some clarification.
It appears that the military is willing to take out the corrupt occupants who have violated the Constitution, but perhaps Require constitutional means for replacing them to whip an election that could be held in a single day but would require preparation to take place with paper ballots and hand counts getting rid of these machines.
In the meanwhile, I would encourage you to mitigate the damage done to our children by the use of masks.
Go to my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
Check out those articles I've cited you.
There's massive scientific evidence that they are seriously damaging to our children.
Write everyone you can.
Teachers, principals, mayors, Your congressman, your senator, your state legislators.
It may be that more success or progress can be made in correcting these improprieties, which are harming, seriously harming our children by working at the level of the state than that of the nation.
Consider it, because really, the future of our children depends upon it.
Thank you for joining us today.
Export Selection