Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 17, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

01:55:21

The Raw Deal (17 February 2021) with Jeffrey Sikes

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Yes, we are.
	on you, gets your friends and neighbors too. There'll be nobody left behind to grieve,
	and we will all go together when we go. What a comforting fact that is to know,
	universal bereavement, an inspiring achievement.
	We'll all go together when we go. All suffused with an incandescent load.
	No one will have the endurance to collect on his insurance.
	Lloyd's of London will be loaded when they go.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal for today.
	We're going to be discussing a variety of issues related to communication, which is a very important issue here.
	I awakened today to find that my Twitter account had been completely abolished.
	I had around 5,000 followers.
	I was following 50.
	I was very energetic about getting out the latest studies and reports, the important news.
	Today, of course, we're finding ourselves completely dumbfounded by the massive censorship.
	I think the re-emergence of Parler is a very positive sign, and I myself just moved to Telegram We can find the telegram method of addressing is a little different, but it's pretty simple, all things considered.
	If I can pull it up here, it's t.me slash Jim Fetzer News, JFN being capitalized, Jim Fetzer News.
	Now, I believe that Parler and Telegram are going to overtake many of the other networks, but I have a guest today who's introducing a channel of his own.
	His name is Jeffrey Sykes.
	Jeffrey, I want to welcome you to The Raw Deal.
	Well, Jim, thank you.
	It's great to be here today.
	I appreciate you having me on the air to talk about Sign.com and some of the Some of the things that we're doing that we feel like will change the internet and be game changer for people out there for freedom of speech.
	So, thanks for having me.
	Yes, yes.
	Tell us more about the big picture with regard to Find.com.
	All right.
	Find.com, F-I-N-D.com is a new search and social media platform that will be launched soon.
	What's special about Find is that it has all the features of Google, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter all built into one app.
	And we're very strong and solid on freedom of speech, freedom of the press, protection of your privacy, you know, all of the important Bill of Rights issues.
	And we're not just going out there with a platform, you know, something new here.
	This has been in development for years.
	We're going to bring some amazing new technologies to the table.
	You know that the public is going to love.
	So find.com.
	It's going to be a real game changer.
	And I'll tell you, we've got a lot of great people that are helping us behind the scenes or public figures.
	You know the appropriate times we can let people know who some of those folks are.
	But they wanted us to build momentum and build excitement for the public.
	We recently launched a GoFundMe GoFundMe page.
	And if you go to find.com, it tells you about what we're doing.
	It has a link to that.
	But you know what, Jim?
	The public's got to care about this.
	They've got to want it.
	You know, FIND is in a public company.
	That means that as it goes forward, it can build those multi-billion dollar resources and that stock to truly go head to head with Silicon Valley.
	So this is the we the people platform.
	And if the public supports it and loves it and helps push it forward, You know, this idea of finally having some place that's not censoring people?
	Bond.com is that.
	And I predict that the crowdfunding effort, as it gets out to millions of people across the nation, will break all prior crowdfunding records.
	So tell me, is this like an alternative to Facebook?
	You're saying it combines the features of various different platforms out there now, which are subject to massive censorship.
	And the key to find.com is that it will be censorship free.
	Am I understanding exactly your direction?
	Yes, absolutely.
	And let me tell you the backbone behind why we feel that way.
	You know, freedom of speech is the First Amendment.
	I think as an American company that we should be shining America's light out into the world.
	I don't know why our Silicon Valley companies Are not doing that because they're American, you know, they're American companies.
	But, you know, there's been a lot of talk about this Section 230.
	This, you know, these regulations that regulate, you know, town square public platforms.
	And, you know, here's how I feel about it.
	You know, Section 230 just says that the bar owner is not responsible for what people are talking about in the bar.
	That's not inherently bad.
	So I don't think we have to repeal that.
	But I did have a conversation recently with Alan Dershowitz on email that what needs to happen is Section 230 needs to be tied to the First Amendment.
	And what that means is, is if somebody, if you're a digital town square platform, you know, a public platform, and you ban content from users that are constitutionally protected free speech, or you, or you remove content, you know, that's constitutionally protected free speech, That you then lose that liability shield.
	So I think that's the right way to do it.
	And we're going to do that from day one, you know, because we feel very strongly about it.
	So we'll remove the bad stuff, you know, pornography, you know, really graphic violence, those sorts of things.
	But anything that is constitutionally protected free speech, we will honor that and absolutelyfund.com will always be that platform that does that.
	So, how far have you gone?
	Are you up?
	Are you in business now?
	Or is this still in the promotional, planning, marketing stage?
	All right.
	So, here's what we've got going on on this end.
	Like you said, the Find app, when you open it up, it's got four areas.
	You'll have an amazing internet search.
	I'll tell you about that in a minute.
	It has something amazing called multi-search.
	It's going to change how people search the web.
	We have Find Videos, which is a YouTube sort of service where you can live stream or post videos and other things.
	I'll tell you more about that in a minute.
	It'll have Find Social, which is just like Facebook.
	It's going to allow you to connect with family and friends and do all those marvelous things we've loved out of, you know, out of Facebook over the years.
	The good things from Facebook.
	And Find Echo will be a service like Twitter for people to be able to post short messages, you know, out to the world.
	Once we get through crowdfunding here over the next few weeks, within the first 30 to 60 days, we'll launch FindEcho, which is our Twitter, our version of Twitter, and then the rest of the platform will come up as we head into summer.
	So we have those on a rapid prototyping is what it's called, and we'll have version 1.0s of the Internet search and the Facebook, you know, and the video site up by summer.
	But let me give you some details.
	And I'm going to tell you what makes FUND different.
	Because you can't just go out there and say, hey, I'm going to be a free speech platform.
	You know, you actually have to bring some technology that the public's going to love.
	And I'm going to tell you what some of them are.
	With multi-search, right?
	And I got to tell you this, I dreamed multi-search about three or four years ago.
	I woke up, I programmed a prototype.
	Everybody that's seen it has fallen in love with it.
	But here's an example of what it'll do.
	In multi-search, You can make what's called a find engine, which, you know, call it a search results box.
	And let's say you like photography.
	So you put in that, that it'll only return results from, say, the 789 photography sites that you like.
	So, or you can put it in several results boxes, you know, one site per box.
	You can put it all in one.
	But then when you go do a search on your find engine, you're only getting results from sites that you like.
	Right?
	So now you can save that find engine.
	And guess what?
	You can now text it or send it out on social media and other people can save your find engine and use it too.
	So you've now made search social, right?
	Which is something that Google's never accomplished.
	So, so the amazement of multi-search, I mean, people will never ever be happy again of having 10 curated search results from one of these, you know, tech giants.
	But on top of that, they'll have full control You know, if they want to dig deeper and make their own findings, they'll be able to do that.
	I will tell you when the public sees the interface just on our default, you know, it's an explosion of information.
	It's like nothing you've ever seen.
	You never lose your place.
	You can view sites within the search results.
	It's just an amazing thing.
	All right, so that's just the internet search part of the find app.
	So let's talk about the video site.
	It'll be similar to something you might have seen with YouTube.
	That is a wonderful place for content creators to make You know to really build a business So our focus on fine video is on the content creators, and here's what we'll do for them We'll give them Android and iOS apps that they can go sell in the App Store That is just their channel.
	They can make whatever they want.
	We're not going to participate that in any way We'll also give them On the platform, you know where they post videos, web pages where they can put their own content there with images and text and documents and whatever else they might want to put there on their channel.
	We'll also give them an online store.
	That online store can be whatever they want to sell or we can partner and do some product on demand and for t-shirts, hats, cups, stuff like that for their channel if they want to do that.
	And then lastly, we'll put the Patreon model in there where they can have people support them.
	You know, and lastly, you give them customer service where they have a phone number with somebody on the other end that can help them, you know, because they're building businesses.
	Content creators make businesses.
	And when you do this and you focus on those content creators, they bring their millions of followers to your platform, right?
	Because now they don't have to worry about being censored and they have a great platform to truly build a business.
	So that's some of the innovation we're bringing to the table.
	This has been well thought out.
	The technologies will be amazing.
	We'll have the tens of thousands of servers to run this on.
	And I just, you know, Fun.com will be an amazing transformative thing for the Internet.
	Well, Jeffrey, I'm just delighted to have you here to give us all this information about it.
	Where can people go to learn more or to support your effort?
	Well, you know, like we said at the beginning of this, people have to care about this issue, Jim.
	They need to go to FIND.com, F-I-N-D dot com.
	They need to donate.
	It's very important.
	There's people watching us right now.
	They want us to build that excitement.
	And, you know, as people do that, this crowdfunding can be historic.
	The average donation on our crowdfunding from the first few days is $51 per person.
	So that means the person given $5 is offset by somebody giving $500, right?
	So when this scales and millions of Americans find out about this, as we go through the next few weeks, it's going to break completely crowdfunding records.
	But it starts with people right now going there.
	You know, when you go to the Fund.com page, it'll tell you what we're doing.
	Click the link for GoFundMe.
	Donate.
	Tell your family and friends about it.
	It's the most important thing we can do.
	You know, if America wants a great platform that supports freedom of speech, they're going to have to get behind it.
	And it starts with them, you know, supporting the crowdfunding campaign.
	And that will lead us wherever else we need to go.
	I had a conference call right before this radio interview setting up those tens of thousands of servers that's going to run Find.com.
	So, you know, we just need the public to be out there getting behind it and letting all their family and friends know, church groups, PTAs, Anybody you can tell about this, let them know about FIND.
	Jeffrey, I can't thank you enough for coming on today to give us that pitch about FIND.com.
	It sounds fascinating.
	I'm really glad you could join us today.
	It's been a pleasure to feature you, to explain what you're doing.
	I can't thank you enough.
	Now I need to turn to the latest We have of the news going on where Kamala Harris is now assuming the customary role of president by calling various heads of state.
	It's very strange what's taking place.
	Because these are the sorts of activities normally performed by a president.
	She has called multiple heads of state, President Macron on Monday.
	She's calling numerous, no mention of Joe Biden.
	It's pretty obvious, I think, this guy Is disappearing into the woodwork maybe never to be seen again.
	Everyone ought to be troubled by what's going on.
	Harris expressed her commitment to strengthening bilateral ties between the US and France and to revitalizing the transatlantic Alliance.
	She and Macron agreed on the need for close bilateral and multilateral cooperation to address COVID climate change and support democracy at home around the world.
	They also discussed numerous regional challenges, including those in the Middle East and Africa and the need to confront them together.
	But there was no mention of President Joe Biden.
	Meanwhile, we have fascinating results of recent polls about sentiment regarding Donald Trump.
	Where his enthusiasm for the former president, whom I believe is going to continue in office, remains simply overwhelming.
	Agreed Trump should be removed from the office for promoting unrest, this is in relation to the impeachment and so forth.
	Trump supporters, 1%.
	Democrats, moderate Democrats 92, liberal progressive 92.
	So you got that massive, you know, polarization here.
	Support Trump's contesting of the election results, 91% among Trump supporters, 3% among moderate Democrats, 1% liberal Democrats.
	Agree Trump should be the 2024 Republican candidate, 92%.
	Trump supporters.
	Traditional GOP now is closer to half, or even actually 41%, which is very, very troubling, but indicates the fact that traditional Republican Party is not the party of Trump.
	Where moderate Democrats, only 2%, six liberal progressive, of course, they don't want to face him again.
	Here's some overview.
	Just one percent of Trump Republicans versus one in four traditional think Trump should be removed from office.
	So this was just before the impeachment.
	And I guarantee you he has strengthened his hold on his followers by beating that ridiculous attack.
	Traditional Republicans are split over whether the party is better off because of Trump.
	Ninety six percent of Trump Republicans, however, say it is.
	Trump Republicans are more than twice as likely as traditional to want him as their 2024 nominee, twice as likely to support protesters about the, you know, the theft of the election.
	Traditional Republicans are five times as likely to disapprove of the president's behavior.
	The Trump Republicans are still a large enough group to stay and dominate primary politics or walk away if Trump is cast out, which would weaken the GOP's forced posture against Democrats, no doubt.
	What they are saying?
	The monopoly Trump had on the Republican base for the last four years is a little more frayed than any time in recent history.
	This is from pollster Chris Jackson, senior vice president for Ipsos Public Affairs.
	A substantial chunk doesn't necessarily think their future goes with Donald Trump.
	But if not, where in the world would it go?
	The big question is, is having a small but committed base going to be more valuable than a large but less committed base?
	I think there's no question but what Trump supporters represent the largest political entity in the United States today.
	Anyway, you cut the pie, slice the cake, Trump supporters, look, the guy got around 90 million votes.
	I mean, we've got anywhere from seven estimates go anywhere from 73.
	73, that's the low, to 90 million votes. And I would estimate, you know, there are 100 million
	Trump supporters. And then if he were to create a new party, if he were to sign on with the
	Patriot Party, you'd instantly have a trifurcation of American politics because you'd have the
	traditional Republicans reverting to their country club Wall Street Journal,
	you know, small government, cut the budget stance, which has not served them terribly well in the
	past, in certain Then you have, of course, at least in the recent past, vis-a-vis Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.
	And then you have, of course, the Democrats going full socialist-communist, where Biden is now about to issue a major attack on our Second Amendment rights.
	That's completely outrageous.
	I can't think of anything more likely to exacerbate tensions than trying to go for the guns.
	We have further comments here about this poll result.
	Republicans across the U.S.
	are siding with President Trump against Mitch McConnell big time.
	According to a new Axios-Ipsos poll, the majority of Republicans still think Trump was right to challenge his election loss.
	They support him and they do not blame him for the Capitol mob and want him to be the Republican nominee in 2024.
	Why it matters?
	The survey shows why Trump could run again in 2024 and possibly win if he isn't convicted or banned from holding federal office by the Senate, which we know has come and gone.
	It also shows a peril and opportunity for institutionalists like McConnell trying to reclaim the GOP.
	In my opinion, Mitch McConnell slit The party, the throat of the traditional Republican Party, by declaring that Trump was morally and practically responsible for what happened at the Capitol, when we have massive, overwhelming evidence that he had nothing to do with it.
	There was certainly no form of incitement from anything he said.
	And for McConnell to make those remarks suggested to me he hadn't even bothered to watch the presentation by the Trump defense team.
	Embarrassingly bad.
	In addition, In addition, this poll helps to explain why a majority of House Republicans voted against certifying the election and against impeachment.
	Of course, because they were aware that the election had been the outcome of a massive theft, the largest ever in American history, and where, you know, the evidence, it was the presentation of the evidence of the theft of the election that was disrupted by the Capitol intrusion precisely as Nancy Pelosi had planned.
	I have no doubt whatsoever this entire scheme was dreamed up by Nancy in order to disrupt the presentation of the evidence that she had the cooperation of the mayor of Washington We have video of having Antifa members being bust up to the front of the Capitol.
	We know that Capitol Police took no special measures.
	There is actually a reduction in the Capitol Police presence there, even though the head of the Capitol Police, who's now been canned, In a stunt, as though he were responsible, explained he'd made five or six requests for additional support, all of which were turned down.
	And I have no doubt that was by Nancy Pelosi, because she had it all rigged for this massive intrusion.
	Meanwhile, between the lines, there's a deep schism in the GOP with a 50% majority considering themselves traditional and 36% calling them Trump Republicans.
	Former is often called establishment Republicans, where CNN's Chris Cuomo derisively labels the latter group re-Trumplicans.
	But the fact is, you see, that Trump reached out far beyond the Republican base and he brought in many Democrats.
	I remind you, after the Republican convention, C-SPAN had set up two lines.
	They set up a Trump line and they set up a Democrat line and a Republican line.
	And everyone, everyone who was calling in on the Democrat line was saying they were going to vote Republican, all of them.
	In order to deal with it, they had to change the lines to Trump versus Biden to get any Biden supporters on the air.
	No one turned out for Biden at any rally.
	He couldn't get 10 people together in a parking lot.
	It was embarrassing, embarrassing.
	No wonder he hid in his basement.
	But he told us exactly what they were doing.
	He told us they had assembled the greatest voter fraud operation in American history.
	He told us, I don't need your help to be elected only after I occupy the office.
	And of course, that's exactly what happened using the Dominion voting machines.
	Now, when we return to the division within the Republican Party, Remember, I'm convinced that back in December of last year, that we had a report from Rasmussen that 40% of black likely voters were going to support Trump.
	40% of black likely voters.
	We all know the Democrats count on 85, 90, 95% from the black community or they can't win elections anywhere.
	I believe that was a trigger That was followed by the whole coronavirus phenomenon so they could justify mail-in ballots, which even third world countries don't allow because they're so open and amenable to the theft of elections.
	And we found ours descend exactly into third world status between Dominion voting machines and trucking in additional ballots and using mail-in ballots, many of which weren't even creased, meaning they hadn't even been put into an envelope.
	They were able to steal the election.
	But it's not going to stand.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back with more of the latest news right here on The Raw Deer.
	This is The Raw Deer.
	I'm listening to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	What the heck is the truth, Jihad?
	Hey, I'm Kevin Barrett, host of Truth Jihad Radio.
	Federal prosecutors, Department of Homeland Security agents, and curious passers-by often ask me, just what is this Truth Jihad thing anyway?
	Well, everybody knows what truth is, but Jihad is a misunderstood term.
	Jihad means effort or struggle.
	The greater jihad is the struggle to be a better person, while the lesser jihad is the struggle to defend the community.
	Prophet Muhammad, peace upon him, did say that the best jihad is a word of truth flung in the face of a tyrant.
	And that's what we do here at Truth Jihad Radio!
	Every Friday, 8 to 10 p.m.
	Eastern, 5 to 7 Pacific, right here on Revolution Radio!
	Find some comfort at Willow's World.
	A variety of news, commentary and poetry at Willow's Poetry Corner, where there are comfy cushions and a tempting selection of delectable comestibles.
	A show that's quirkily and quintessentially British, with a unique twist, featuring Willow Andresen, your host.
	Join Willow, Mondays and Thursdays, 2 till 4 p.m.
	Eastern Time, Studio A.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio,
	and now we return you to your host.
	Well, there are going to be vast ramifications from the failed attempt to impeach Donald Trump,
	where the Trump team just eviscerated the prosecution on day four, demonstrating that
	Democrat after Democrat had used language that was more insightful than anything Donald Trump had
	to say.
	He may not have emphasized sufficiently the timeline here that Donald Trump spoke until 1.11.
	I watched the whole thing.
	It was a very fine, very typical speech while accenting evidence of vote fraud.
	It was at the ellipse, a mile and a half from the Capitol.
	So it would have taken Trump supporters longer to reach the Capitol itself than the intruders who were already actively engaged.
	And we know, of course, how much this was an organized event, where even the New York Times has reported that.
	They were, it was being planned on Facebook and Twitter weeks, even weeks in advance, which of course reduces the whole incitement claim to rubble.
	And they did a very skillful job of exposing how the Democrats had used a professional, no doubt a Hollywood or even CIA company, to edit the video to make it look as though Trump had said things that he had not actually said understood properly in context and not said things he actually had said, which put them in context Going all the way back to Charlottesville, where Charlottesville was an attempt to transform Donald Trump from his America First policy, namely putting American taxpayer resources to benefit the American people, our infrastructure, our economy, and the like, first.
	Into a form of American nationalism, which is, that's okay.
	It is a form of nationalism.
	Into a form of white supremacy into being a variant of neo-Nazism so that Terry McAuliffe, who was then the governor of Virginia and a buddy of Hillary, had the mayor of Charlottesville have the Charlottesville police stand down so he could use the Virginia State Police to channel them into a violent confrontation With Antifa and Black Lives Matter members who've been bused in by George Soros even on the same bus.
	So, you know, they were peaceful, but the situation was state managed.
	And then, of course, we had the collision occurring, you know, a few blocks away that where there were two different cars, two different drivers, two or even three different takes.
	Where the woman who played the role of Susan Brough, who's supposed to be the mother of Heather Heyer, also played the role of Donna Soto, the mother of Victoria Soto, a teacher at Sandy Hook.
	This is how bad it is, how much they rub our faces in it.
	Meanwhile, of the 10 Republicans who voted to impeach Trump, seven are already facing primary challenges.
	Seven out of the 10 Republican lawmakers who voted in favor of impeaching former President Trump are already facing primary challenges in their congressional seats.
	Newsweek indicates that the pro-impeachment GOPers have been publicly scolded, pushed to resign, and warned that local organization will mount a strong effort to oust them from office.
	I agree with all of this.
	The report profiles primary challenges already forming for David Valadao of California, Liz Cheney of Wyoming, who's actually number three in the House Republican leadership, Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, Dan Newhouse of Washington, and Anthony Gonzalez in Ohio.
	Another Republican has created an exploratory committee and a potential bid for Representative Tom Rice's seat, and local GOP organizers have vowed to recruit someone to go after Representative Jaime Herrera-Butler's spot in Congress.
	This is all very, very good.
	Kensinger was very outspoken with the formation of a new PAC, fighting to take back the GOP from Donald Trump, which is about as idiotic and pointless as it could be.
	Talk about Don Quixote jousting with windmills.
	The party that always spoke about a brighter tomorrow no longer does, according to Kissinger.
	It talks about a dark future instead, hoping, giving way to fear.
	Outrage has replaced opportunity.
	Worst of all, our deep convictions are ignored.
	This is completely ridiculous.
	Kissinger has a history of struggling to comprehend basic concepts, having once chastised Trump for sharing a story about a civil war-like fracture in the country.
	Yet, here he is tearing the country apart with another impeachment-style witch hunt.
	Kissinger, it should be noted.
	Kinzinger, it should be noted, along with an aide to former House Speaker Paul Ryan.
	was among the first recipients of the infamous Steele dossier, according to court memos back in 2018, which you'll all recall was drafted by a former MI6 agent out of the UK in the employment of Hillary Clinton and the DNC Which the corrupt Department of Justice and FBI promoted as though it were a serious document when it was actually opposition research and really belonged in the fiction section, should not have been taken seriously as though it were fact.
	We also have Liz Cheney very much in the hot seat, where several lawmakers are calling for her to resign following her vote to impeach the president.
	She is weakening our conference at a key moment for personal political gain and is unfit to lead, said Matt Rosendahl, a Republican from Montana.
	She must step down as conference chair.
	Representative Matt Gaetz, who's a Florida eviscerated Cheney, saying her legacy in Congress is simply to frustrate the agenda of President Trump and sell out to the forever war machine.
	I think all of that is wonderful.
	Meanwhile, we have the majority of Republicans wanting Trump at 24.
	This is a more recent poll now, post the impeachment effort.
	53 percent, despite some GOP lawmakers doing their best to distance themselves from former President Trump.
	The vast majority of Republican voters want to see him play a big role in the future of the party.
	53% want him to run again in 2024, far outpacing his second-closest challenger, former Vice President Mike Pence, at 12%.
	This is according to a Politico morning consult survey, which also shows a former president's son, Donald Jr., has 6% tied with former U.N.
	Ambassador Nikki Haley, whom you'll recall sought to promote herself by saying we'd made a mistake in following Donald Trump.
	I say good luck with that.
	Meanwhile, Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio were trailing behind them at 4% and 2% respectively, followed by Tom Cotton, Josh Hawley, and Tom Scott, each at 1%.
	I think Josh Hawley of Missouri has a great future in the party.
	And of course, I think we're all aware when Trump went down to West Palm Beach, he received a wildly enthusiastic response from the crowd.
	Meanwhile, and this is also an interesting development with Senator Richard Byrd of North Carolina, who voted against having the impeachment on the grounds it was unconstitutional, and then went ahead and voted to convict.
	Retiring?
	The North Carolina GOP chairman believes Laura Trump may be the candidate to beat if she were to run to fill his seat.
	That's pretty damn interesting.
	She would have immediate attention and interest from across the state.
	She did a fantastic job representing the president when she was down here as a surrogate throughout the last four years and campaigned very hard for him in 16 and 20.
	She's very beloved down here in North Carolina.
	Everybody at this point is just waiting to see what she's going to do.
	There were rumors of Trump making a run for the Senate.
	Rumors of her potential run for the Senate percolated as recently as last year, when Lindsey Graham reignited the conversation, touting her as a replacement for Barr, where Donald is her father-in-law.
	Graham said Laura Trump is the future of the Republican Party and preemptively threw his support behind a hypothetical run.
	The biggest winner, I think, of this whole impeachment trial is Laura Trump, Graham told Fox.
	My dear friend Richard Barr, who I like and have been friends with for a long time, just made Laura Trump almost a certain nominee for the Senate seat in North Carolina to replace him if she runs, which I greatly encourage.
	I think that's a terrific idea.
	Meanwhile, the New York Times is reporting that the anti-Trump Republican Adam Kinzinger is unwelcome in his own family, in his own family.
	A New York Times report indicates anti-Trump Republican Adam Kinzinger has not only been censured by his own party, but is being shunned by members of his own family.
	He's been on the offense of late, urging the Republican Party to cleanse itself of former President Donald Trump, which is about as stupid an idea as it gets.
	The man who, as a candidate, received more votes than any other candidate in history, because we know the alleged number for Biden is a fake number.
	I'm talking about real legitimate votes.
	More votes for president than any other candidate in the history of the United States, and he wants to cleanse itself, separate from, dissociate with?
	Absurd.
	He is one of only 10 Republicans in the House to have voted in favor of impeachment.
	The Times in a piece they titled Adam Kinzinger's Lonely Mission.
	Noted that the anti-Trumper received a two-page handwritten letter from 11 members of his family.
	Oh my, what a disappointment you are to us and to God, they wrote.
	You have embarrassed the Kinzinger family name.
	The profile references his quest to restore the Republican Party following the successful four-year term of former President Trump.
	He views the party as having relied exclusively on the politics of fear.
	But I think that's just ludicrous.
	That's a gross misrepresentation of Trump and what he stands for.
	We just fear, fear the Democrats, fear Fear the future, fear everything, and it works for an election cycle or two.
	The problem is that it does real damage to this democracy.
	Kinzinger seems unaware that the Democrats' entire platform of 2020 was running against Trump.
	It was they who were the party of fear, not Donald Trump and not the Republicans.
	Embarrassingly bad.
	Meanwhile, we have a breaking news report.
	The man who made political commentary on the air, a subject of constant discussion in the media, Rush Limbaugh, has died at 70 after his battle with lung cancer.
	We knew it was coming.
	It was my dear friend here in Madison, Rolf Lindgren, Who introduced me to Rush Limbaugh.
	When Rolf and I, before the coronavirus crackdown, began depriving us of everything we enjoyed doing in life, and I would go out to lunch, and frequently he'd have Rush on the radio, and I'd get a good dose.
	I was very impressed with a man's intelligence, his articulation, He was a serious and very astute political commentator.
	So let us all pay respect to Raj Limbaugh, who I believe made a real difference here to the political discourse in the United States.
	Meanwhile, the Democrats are going all out to beat up on anyone who has supported Donald Trump, and especially anyone of prominence, where Ellen Wood is now the latest on their target list, enlisting an army of patriots in a battle to retain his law license.
	Atlanta attorney Ellen Wood took to social media Saturday with a dramatic plea.
	I need the help of we, the people.
	Wood, famous first as a defamation lawyer, and now as a proselyte of former President Donald Trump's, here, according to this story, unfounded claims of election fraud, except it's quite the opposite.
	Anyone who reviews, for example, the Texas lawsuit knows that they were far from unfounded So we're talking about basically a hip piece, but LLoyd Wood has been magnificent in speaking out and pointing out that the decline of the Supreme Court
	To hear the Texas sued on the ground that Texas had no standing was a legal absurdity.
	Obviously, Texas had standing.
	You and I have standing about how other states conduct their elections, because if they allow votes to be received after the deadline of 8 p.m.
	on election day, which the Supreme Court itself has already ruled is illegal, Not to mention, if they abdicate or violate their own constraints about how ballots are to be properly certified by matching signatures, verifying postmarks and the like, they were actually receiving tens of thousands upon tens of thousands of mailing ballots that had never even been requested by the purported voters who cast them.
	I mean, it was outrageous.
	So, anywhere you read, anytime, that the discussion of the election fraud having been unfounded, you know you're dealing with propaganda.
	He's just received a nearly 1,700-page document from the State Bar of Georgia threatening to end his 43-year legal career.
	The Barr's disciplinary board said it had initiated a grievance against Wood over his conduct in connection with his attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
	On the Internet Messaging Service, Telegram, where I myself now have a channel, Jim Fetzer News, where you can access me.
	And I've just begun posting and only created Jim Fetzer News on Telegram this morning, just before coming on the show.
	You can check it out at t.me slash t for telegram dot me m e slash Jim Fetzer News.
	You can access where I've only been able to put up a half a dozen stories so far, some of which, however, are very substantial and to which I shall turn as we proceed in our conversation today on the Internet Messaging Service Telegram.
	Wood enlisted an army of patriots to investigate his accusers, to scrutinize their social media posts, their political affiliations or connections and clients, anything that would challenge your competence, qualifications or objectivity.
	You may recall perhaps the most important tweet that L. Lynn Wood put out after the Supreme Court wrongly declined to hear the Texas case.
	Was that the Chief Justice, John Roberts, had been overheard conversing with Associate Justice Stephen Breyer that he would make sure that mother effer didn't get reelected.
	This is a Chief Justice of the United States.
	This is about as scandalous as it gets, frankly, that the Chief Justice of the United States In violation of his solemn duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic, should himself be a domestic enemy of the Constitution of the United States.
	I mean, this is despicable behavior by John Roberts.
	Ellen Wood also has posted a lot of other stunning revelations.
	And remember, This man is perhaps our nation's leading defamation attorney, so he's most certainly not going to publish anything he cannot prove to be true.
	Mind you, truth is an absolute defense against defamation, libel, and such.
	An absolute defense.
	And L. Lynn Wood would never, never issue statements like this unless he could prove them to be true.
	And I'll just say about the State Bar of Georgia, these State Bars, based upon my own experience, appear to be corrupt to a large degree.
	I think the exceptions are going to be few and far between.
	For example, in the case of Dzhokhar Sarinov and the Boston bombing, Or images of Zolker and his brother Tamerlan were photoshopped into footage from the Marathon bombing, because they weren't even there at the time.
	And where their aunt Merritt spoke to me and explained how she knew they'd been photoshopped, in particular because Tamerlan was shown clean shaven, but he actually had a beard at the time.
	What was crucial about the images of them being photoshopped in is that they were careless and didn't ensure the backpacks they were wearing corresponded to the backpacks that the FBI identified as having exploded during the marathon as part of the bombing in which they had no part whatsoever.
	Because both of the backpacks that exploded were black nylon, relatively compact backpacks that had a white square sewn on them, no doubt to identify them from other backpacks as having explosives contained therein.
	Those who have studied the case, as I have studied the case, know that in fact it was One of these private armies, like Z in Blackwater, that conducted these operations, where their personnel were wearing khaki trousers, black jackets, black skull caps, with the image, with their motto, violence does solve problems.
	We have photographs of two of them, one wearing one of the backpacks with a white square in the vicinity, moving to the location where it exploded, but running away, no longer wearing the backpack.
	This was those who were actually responsible.
	where you can find plenty about this and other false flag operations
	by going to Jim Fetzer News on Twitter, t.me slash Jim Fetzer News,
	because I already put up how to spot a false flag part one,
	and how to spot a false flag part two, because you need to know if you're gonna come to grips
	with all of the bullshit being published by the mainstream media,
	you need to have the ability to cut through the crap to sort out what's really going on.
	And I am here for precisely that reason, to extend my role, formerly in the classroom for 35 years,
	offering courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning,
	to a larger classroom worldwide, but especially here in the United States,
	where we have been subjected to so much nonsense, so many stage events.
	All of which were brought to us compliments of Barack Hussein Obama, who in 2012, just in time for Sandy Hook, brought us the Smith-Mutt nullification, where the Smith-Mutt Act of 1948 precluded the use of the same techniques of propaganda and disinformation, including staged events.
	Riots and uprisings, such as we saw at the Capitol, legalized those kinds of events by the Smith Modernization Act of 2012, just in time for Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, even the moon landing, though I'm convinced the reason they have banned All of my books on those subjects, including On the Moon Landing, is because I have a section there of brilliant essays dissecting the mythology of the death camps in Germany at the end of World War II.
	Yes, You may be surprised, but the Holocaust narrative is an example of politics trumping science, because all the objective evidence shows that it was a maximum of some 286,081 something such that the International Committee of the Red Cross calibrated and actually died in all of those camps.
	They were labor camps.
	They were not extermination centers.
	And where, yes, they used Zyklon B to kill body lice on the inmates, since body lice was spreading typhus and dysentery in the camps, and you cannot get work out of a corpse.
	If you take a look at that book, perhaps my favorite of all of these I've edited for Moonrock Books, you'll see on the back cover a photograph of the UK soccer team at Auschwitz.
	What?
	You didn't know there was a soccer team, a UK soccer team at Auschwitz?
	Did you know that the camp had not only a woodworking shop and a concert area, but it had a hospital with OBY, GYN, OB facilities?
	And that a couple of thousands of babies were born in these camps, which contradicts exactly what happened there.
	Check it out at moonrockbooks.com before they destroy your ability to learn the truth.
	Believe me, it's monstrous here.
	Meanwhile, we're going to take calls the second hour.
	The number 540-352-4452.
	number 540-352-4452. I repeat, 540-352-4452 right after the break.
	Thank you for listening.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	I'm listening to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	In breaking news, a visiting Syrian diplomat reported today that their population is evolving
	rapidly and advancing into a fifth dimensional consciousness.
	They are seeking peace with all cosmic cultures, which may mean that the Earth will be asked to join the prestigious Galactic Federation of Light Alliances.
	Please join Debbie West and Michael Hathaway on Lost Knowledge, Saturdays 3 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time in Studio A for the latest breaking news on the Star Visitor's peaceful contact and the ongoing project of cleansing the Earth.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	This is Thomas, a.k.a.
	A Mad Painter.
	I'd like you to join me Monday nights, 10 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time for Open Canvas.
	Don't forget to bring an open mind.
	Yes, folks, that's right.
	Bring an open mind to an open canvas.
	Again, that is Monday nights, 10 p.m.
	Eastern.
	UFOs to government corruption.
	This is Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
	You don't need to expect us.
	We're already here.
	To be continued...
	To be continued...
	Collision Courses, ba-ba-ba.
	Schedule B on Revolution Radio every Saturday night, 6 to 8 p.m.
	You get outer space.
	You get honest answers, real researchers, truthful answers, and a place to engage with questions.
	Take part in the discussion.
	Revolution Radio on FrigginSlips.com hosts Collision Courses every Saturday from 6 to 8 p.m.
	Eastern, 5 p.m., 7 p.m.
	Central, 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. Mountain Time, and 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
	Pacific Time.
	♪♪♪ The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs,
	and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the
	opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your
	host.
	I got a couple more stories for you while anyone works up the effort to give us a call.
	Remember the number 540-352-4452.
	540-352-4452. One of the stories is Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum has said,
	540-352-4452.
	he's tweeted, the World Economic Forum, he means is, he says are, working with the Biden
	administration to ensure that most people will survive the coming food shortages.
	Now, you better pay attention to that.
	If he says there's a coming food shortage, then food shortages are coming because they're going to be orchestrated.
	They're going to be arranged.
	Citizens who have up-to-date vaccination documents will receive regular packages of plant-based protein products.
	Wow!
	Doesn't that sound like fun?
	Yummy!
	Meanwhile, Bill Gates says Westerners must switch to eating 100% synthetic beef, while he buys up record amounts of farmland and monopolizes global food production.
	It's okay when we do it.
	This is very, very serious.
	Paul Joseph Watson says the Great Reset tastes like bean burgers.
	Bean burgers.
	Now, what you want to bear in mind is, when I asked a dear friend with good intel connections about how they were going to reduce the US population from 300 and 30 million today to fewer than 100 million in 2025.
	You know, given, of course, we've got the masks, which are killing us slowly, but apparently not fast enough.
	So they want us now to wear multiple masks.
	I mean, how bad is that?
	And the shots, of course, kill you much faster.
	Well, remember, the Catholic priest warned us that it's the second shot that's killing.
	I have reports of a couple of thousand dead already.
	Not only that, but he said starvation, starvation would be the key.
	And I think he's got it right.
	They're going to control the food supply.
	They're doing these fake things by shutting down work plants, using the phony test to create the impression that meatpack workers have the virus and therefore can't be engaged in packing meat.
	Well, I certainly have no enthusiasm for pant pant blaze products.
	My wife just brought home a couple of steaks yesterday from the store for which I congratulated her, which we're going to enjoy tonight with baked potato.
	I'm telling you, this idea of trying to reduce our lives to misery.
	Remember, the Great Reset has as its objective our surrendering all of our property and assets.
	Bear that in mind.
	They are telling us that this is, you know, thematically represented by it's 30-30, I don't own anything and I'm happier than I've ever been.
	What complete another crock of shit could we ever be issued out?
	It's absolutely stunning.
	Well, where this event in combination is going to, you know, starvation is going to occur because they convinced the meat packers that since they had COVID-19 based upon a false test, they had to shut down the meat packing plant and where they've killed, you know, hundreds of thousands of chickens and lots of hogs and all this in the United States to combat allegations of COVID.
	Well, that's pathetic.
	That's bad.
	We have to resist this if we don't want to live the rest of our lives as slaves, because they're going to offer for all of those who are out of work, don't have a source of income, and where these stimulus checks are really intended to make us more dependent upon the government, more dependent upon the government just to survive, They will pay off our mortgages, our credit cards, our student loans if we are willing to surrender all of our property and assets and in return we'll get a guaranteed stipend from the government and be able to rent a small cubicle, a couple hundred feet, to live out the rest of our lives as serfs and slaves.
	And if we don't adhere to the vaccine regimen they want to impose, We'll be sent off to a FEMA camp and incarcerated as a public health menace.
	And if we still continue to resist, they will separate our heads from our bodies using guillotines made guess where?
	Yes, in China.
	Meanwhile, and this is the latest on my blog, bought and paid for.
	Biden's long history pandering to the Israeli lobby.
	This is a really stunning, thorough piece.
	I have often reported here that it was clear to me that Israel wanted Trump out and Biden in.
	And it was obvious knowing that the mainstream media is completely dominated by Israel.
	How many times have you heard me observe that I have a panel of 100 executives from CNN, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen, that I have another panel A hundred executives, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
	Then I have another panel, a hundred executives from the New York Times, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
	And it occurred to me, given that the media is so thoroughly, massively, unqualifiedly anti-Trump, and so thoroughly, massively, unqualifiedly pro-Biden, even to suppressing the content of the Hunter Biden laptop, Which would have made it preposterous to think he had a ghost of a chance of winning where they put out fake polls and then of course manipulated the outcome, none of which was real, where Israel clearly was upset with the Donald.
	Why?
	Because he wasn't willing to bomb Iran.
	Remember, this guy's been a peacemaker.
	He has arranged peace agreements between Israel and multiple Arab countries that make war in the Middle East far less likely to occur, where the Israelis are unhappy about that, where I became convinced that it was for this reason.
	But now we have stunning confirmation From the Covert Action Magazine.
	While Democrats accuse Donald Trump of being a Russian agent, they don't seem to care that Biden is a bought-and-paid-for agent of the Israeli lobby.
	Listen to some of this.
	In the late 1980s, Rani Amiri, an independent commentator on political affairs, challenged then-Senator Joe Biden on his stance toward the Israel-Palestine conflict following a campus speech that Biden gave, asking him Rather than succumb to the influence of various lobbying groups in Washington, such as AIPAC, the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee, which promotes the views of Israel's right-wing Likud party, and the untold amount of money they use to dictate policy.
	Wouldn't it be more prudent to examine the real effects that collective punishment, daily humiliation, and countless civilian casualties inflicted by the Israelis have on an unoccupied population and use that understanding to formulate a more rational approach toward the Palestinians?
	According to Amiri, Senator Biden responded by walking directly from the podium to where he stood and nose to nose.
	Tried to refute his analysis about the influence of the Israeli lobby and the heavy-handed approach employed by Israel toward the Palestinians.
	At the end of the exchange, Biden turned, put his arm around Amiri's shoulder and addressed the audience.
	If this was not such a fine, articulate and sincere young man, and he implied that my vote had been bought, I would give him a swift kick in the ass.
	The audience roared in applause, and Amiri sat back down to his chair, defeated.
	However, a friend rose up to defend him, telling Biden, if my father heard you say such a thing, I believe he would have done the same to you first.
	Let me add a few more comments here before I bring in Paul.
	Bought and paid for.
	Amiri's remarks obviously hit a sore spot in Biden, which remains relevant today over 30 years later.
	During the 2020 presidential election, pro-Israeli Political Action Committee PACS provided Biden
	with 3,830,209 compared to 955,174 for Donald Trump, indicating that Biden's vote on the Arab-Israeli
	conflict had indeed been bought, as it has been for many years.
	The Jewish Democratic Council of America, a Jewish lobby group that promotes Democratic Party candidates, proclaimed no candidate for president either party has ever run with as long and as strong of a pro-Israeli record as Joe Biden.
	Characterizing Biden as a minch, A mensch, which is a Yiddish term for a man who does good deeds.
	The Jewish Democratic Council of America pointed out that Biden, as vice president, supported unprecedented levels of security assistance to Israel, helping to shape the record $38 billion 10-year moratorium of understanding, memorandum of understanding between the US and Israel, signed in 2016.
	I mean, really.
	And here's a photograph of Biden with Bibi observing, too, that during the 2014 Operation Protective Edge, which left more than 2,000 Gazans dead and 10,000 wounded, Biden was a key advocate securing support for life-saving technology like the Iron Dome, David's Sling and Arrow anti-rocket and missile defense systems, and much, much more.
	Paul, you're welcome to join the conversation, my friend.
	Meanwhile, this is from an article on National Vanguard titled, Importing Alien overlords.
	I'm paraphrasing.
	Recently, the establishment stooge Mike Lee shepherded through on a cowardly voice vote a bill that would inundate America with even more Indians who will work in our tech sector, of course, harming innumerable white families, including white children who depend on their parents to have good paying jobs.
	If you think that the high-tech elites want Indians to man these jobs because they are better qualified, think again.
	It is nothing more than adding numbers to the anti-white army that has been the policy of this government for 30 to 40 years and more.
	And get this, the bill has the line name of fairness for high-skilled immigrants.
	Never mind, you know, the idea that why should our legislators be concerned with fairness to people in other countries who aren't even here?
	It's ridiculous.
	It's like Ann Coulter pointed out early on that the American people are sick of our government and our elected representatives having policies that are concerned with non-Americans in many cases who aren't even here yet.
	Why should we even want to bring them here?
	So continuing with the brief of this brief article, it says here, this is a no holds barred, vicious undermining of our demographics, our jobs, our wealth and our living space.
	And take it from me who I live in the Bay Area.
	If you want to be overrun, With Indians and gooks, I would say good luck, but you're the enemy of the American people, if that's how you feel, and you're my enemy.
	I can't stand these people, and if you think that I'm some kind of wacko, weirdo, racist, come out and live with a population, to my eyes, that's a minimum of 50% or more Indians and Asians.
	You tell me how much you like it.
	Continuing with the article, it is estimated that over 90% of professional employment based visas will now go to Indians.
	OK, and here's an interesting little thing from the article.
	It says there these Indians, by the way, it's worth pointing out, are the product of a millennia or more of jealously guarded color line of caste.
	And by the way, people that don't know anything about the caste system in India, it's basically been race based and color based.
	But of course, these new immigrants will probably wind up being the first to tell you that such things are the epitome of evil and racist.
	Think Priti Patel or Neera Tanden or Nikki Haley and many others who have voiced their recent anti-white sentiments.
	So the article goes on.
	There's several more paragraphs.
	I could read more excerpts.
	You get the idea.
	These are the kind of things that are not talked about in the mainstream press.
	You know, where I work, they give away USA Today.
	There's always copies of USA Today on the table for guests to take, and I usually will take a look at it while I'm there.
	On another show, I'll actually read some highlights and some excerpts of headlines from USA Today, but there's nothing more vomitous.
	Everything wrong with this country, you can find in the headlines and the excerpts from a paper such as USA Today.
	This is the thing that we have to get rid of, this completely anti-American Zionist Jewish press that has nothing but our demise in mind as far as its aim and its goal.
	All right.
	I'm out of steam right now.
	Thanks for hearing that.
	That's all good stuff, Paul.
	I mean, I think the complete domination of our of our mainstream media by Israel Is absolutely reprehensible and must not be allowed to stand.
	It's going to require a president with balls of steel to take it on.
	But I actually, my personal opinion is we have such a man in Donald Trump.
	I think he has shown himself to be a master at dealing with the deep state and that we're in the midst of What is going to turn out to have been the greatest sting operation in world history.
	We don't need to debate its merits now, because I know you're far more pessimistic and skeptical about that taking place.
	I will add, by the way, just a couple of observations, however, that bear upon the point.
	The Biden people took an entourage of 25 vehicles to the Pentagon.
	You may recall, I've reported already, that the Pentagon has declared that Biden cannot step foot on Pentagon property.
	Well, he took this massive entourage and where did they go?
	To the Visitor Center!
	To the Visitor Center.
	How bad is that?
	Any American, of course, even Joe Biden, as a foe, President of the United States, can go to the Visitor Center.
	So I think that in and of itself is another confirmation that he's not recognized as President of the United States.
	And where I believe that the military, which is very strongly committed to upholding the Constitution, is in fact in charge.
	I believe he did sign the Insurrection Act on the 9th of January, three days after the staged insurrection at the Capitol.
	And I'd be interested, by the way, Paul, in your observations about the events involving the intrusion and the impeachment and the performance of the Trump team.
	Because in my judgment, Alan Dershowitz was right to give them an A plus for their performance on Friday, where they completely eviscerated the prosecution case against him.
	Yeah, well thanks for that invitation to give my opinion.
	I sort of pretty much did the other day on Monday, you know, when I was talking about it as a charade.
	And yeah, of course, they did a quote-unquote good job.
	I saw a lot of clips of the video that was played and I agree with your take on it.
	But in my opinion, it's quite beside the point.
	It's exactly the kind of thing the American people don't want and are sick of, which is partisan politics.
	All I had to do was look at something that was paper online somewhere where they showed photographs side by side comparison of Democrats and Republicans in the Senate that voted for or against the impeachment.
	And it was just like Team A and Team B. You know, it was like Budweiser versus Coors.
	OK, it's so disgusting that we have in this country two different supposedly opposing parties.
	And neither one of which, you know, you can make the case has the interest of the American people at heart.
	So the appeal of Donald Trump is obvious.
	The question is, is he real?
	Was he real?
	And is this whole thing a big charade and a big fake?
	You know, that remains to be seen.
	I hope, I hope what you say is true and I hope it comes true.
	But I'll state for the record for everybody listening that in my opinion, which is all it is at this point, it's an opinion.
	That I have a better likelihood of being invited to speak at the AIPAC convention as a featured presenter than Donald Trump has of being president again and implementing policies that are in the interest of the American people.
	Not unless it's somehow by force and he actually has military allies that will go ahead and and essentially arrest and bring down these deep state operatives
	and their instruments, such as the press.
	Well, I'm glad to get your, I'm glad to get your opinion on the record once more.
	Meanwhile, we have finally the resolution of the last remaining House seat, which had been contested, where the Democrats have finally conceded New York's 22nd Congressional District as a new owner, and her name is Republican Claudia Tenney.
	Her win was announced Friday when a New York State judge ruled that current election results put her in the lead by a mere 109 votes.
	The win brings a final count in the House to 222 Democrat seats and 213 Republican.
	The narrowest margin to ever be seen in the lower house and one expected to grow slimmer come 2022.
	In fact, I have no doubt that if we can get a legitimate vote, the Republicans will have overwhelming victory in the House of Representatives and virtually Every other contest that may be up in 2022, which will include a number of Senate seats, I think that everyone is so repulsed by what this Biden administration is doing
	Whether or not it's real, what it's being reported as doing, that it verges on the grotesque, not only opening the floodgates to millions of immigrants who are being treated better than American citizens as they flood across the border illegally, Everyone supports legal immigration, of course, but the Democrats are making a mantra out of illegal immigration because they expect they're going to vote Democrat, and they're attempting to change the demographics of American society in such a way as to make it more Democrat-friendly, which of course they wouldn't need to embark upon
	If they actually had won the election with some 80 million votes for Joe Biden, which is about as much of a fantasy as anyone has ever concocted in the history of the world.
	Yes, Paul.
	Jim, please.
	So, OK, you know, everything that you say in many ways is accurate to an extent and it's well meant, but it's completely beside the point.
	They're not attempting to change the demographics.
	They are.
	They are browning and blackening America.
	That's their only goal.
	It's racial.
	They don't care about voters.
	It has nothing to do with getting more Democratic voters.
	Nothing.
	This thing is racial.
	It's always been racial.
	I don't know how many times I can make that point.
	It's racial.
	That's all it is.
	It's never been anything other than that.
	And you just can't help but I mean, it's just a reality.
	It's in our face, okay?
	They control everything, including, as they just demonstrated, the elections.
	And what are they doing right away?
	Did you hear about this bill that was recently passed?
	No, nobody's hearing about it, but there it is.
	It's just another, you know, removing, you know, another plug from the dam, okay?
	So check this out.
	Here's a quote from this guy, from this article, right?
	Hang on one second here.
	I'm going to find... Sorry, but I'm scrolling through it here.
	Excuse me for this delay.
	Oh, here it is.
	So this guy apparently... What the heck is his name here?
	Doggone it.
	I'm sorry about this brief delay.
	What's the point of the bill, Paul?
	Just tell us a bit about the content before you find the detailed citation.
	Give us the... What's the point of the bill?
	To allow more H-1B visas here more to remove the caps.
	Okay, there were caps on these things.
	Basically, they're just getting rid of the limits.
	I mean to me.
	Okay.
	Here's a quick little for instance.
	It's just a personal thing that occurred the other night.
	I got relieved by a guy and like so many people that relieved me or that I relieve he's a non-white foreigner.
	Turns out he's from Ethiopia.
	He's a nice guy.
	There's actually quite a little Ethiopian community here in the San Jose area been for a long time.
	And we started talking and you know, I said, well, you know, so how did you end up, you know, getting here?
	And he told me something that I never even heard of, but you know, it's real.
	He said, the diversity lottery.
	I said, what, what the hell is a diversity lottery?
	He goes, well, they don't have it anymore.
	I go, they should have never had it.
	I'm telling you right now, a lot of Americans are sick of all this diversity, you know, and he started, I mean, it was on good terms.
	He started laughing with me, right?
	But why do we need, why would we have a quote, diversity lottery?
	Well, apparently we did, because that's how this guy got here.
	We don't need any more Africans or Indians or Chinese.
	And the idea that they're being brought here to become voters is ridiculous.
	They're being brought here to basically destroy the demographic core of our country and reduce us to a minority.
	That's what their stated goal is.
	And it's never been anything else.
	Well, what you're saying, Paul, as I understand you, is really you're talking about a war against whites in America, that it's a racial war.
	And we certainly see signs that would tend to support that conclusion when they talk about the diversity of the Biden cabinet, because it's the group that is most prevalent in the U.S., not represented on the Biden cabinet is Ordinary white Americans, particularly white American Protestants.
	I mean, it's really bizarre.
	And I think there's a lot of evidential indicators that they are conducting, in essence, in the name of identity politics about the most un-American agenda one could possibly envision.
	Frankly, I do not believe America was suffering from systemic racism in the past, that this was all ginned up in order to promote identity politics.
	And the candidates on the left were on the verge of our break, Paul.
	So knowing that it takes you longer than it would for the break to come in to make any of your points, I will bring you back.
	After we have the break, which will take place, I would guess, right about now.
	Or close to it.
	Yeah, go ahead, Paul.
	Go ahead.
	I can add this.
	I can add this sentence here because I found it.
	It said, so for example, you know, during this debate, here's what it said.
	During the passage of this bill to let even more Indians in, some idiot called Tom Malinowski, who apparently is an elected official of some sort, said, quote, we can self-confidently open our doors.
	But the reality is, and this is my comment now, is that most Americans want to shut these doors.
	You said something a few minutes ago.
	You said most Americans are in favor of legal immigration.
	No, they're not.
	We want it to stop.
	Poll after poll has showed it.
	Ann Coulter pointed this out in her book.
	Americans are opposed to immigration, period.
	We don't want any more immigration.
	We don't need it.
	We do not benefit from it.
	Well, Paul, that's just slightly odd for the following reasons.
	We're all immigrants here, except for the Native Americans.
	All of us are immigrants.
	I would find that poll result a bit difficult to appreciate.
	Yeah, go ahead, Paul.
	I know you're on a roll and you don't like alternative opinions, Paul, but there it is.
	That's my opinion and I'm God damn sticking to it.
	You got it.
	So don't don't piss me off again, my friend, or I will continue this as a monologue.
	Go ahead.
	I know you're saying you got all these polls showing Americans don't even like legal immigration, and I'm saying that's at least faintly absurd.
	Why would they?
	It doesn't make any sense.
	It's not anything they think about, okay?
	Nobody says, oh, you know, what I need today is more immigration.
	Nobody thinks about this stuff.
	It's being done to us, and there's reactions, and I don't, quote, have all these polls.
	But I have read and seen of them, and I believe, based on the sentiment of people that I've spoken with over the years, including regular people, not racists like me, okay?
	The bottom line is this has been ginned up, and they're doing it on purpose, and again, the whole reason Donald Trump was popular was his stance on immigration.
	This was clear from many polls, and like I said, Ann Coulter and others made this a point in many of her talk show appearances.
	There isn't any other reason he was popular besides, of course, the idea that he was an outsider and he was going to drain the swamp and he was going to bring back jobs.
	That was obviously important.
	But Americans in every part of the country are feeling the effects.
	OK, they are dropping these people in every single part of America.
	How on earth would you explain nearly 200 plus thousand people of color in Minnesota?
	All right.
	It just wouldn't happen naturally.
	Paul, I agree with a lot of what you say.
	I find most of your positions reasonable, but sometimes you just go a tad far from me, and I disagree, and you come back a little too intensely.
	Meanwhile, we have a third party joining us.
	I'm very pleased to have Scaredy Cat join the conversation.
	Scaredy, you're on.
	Hi, Jim.
	Hi, Paul.
	So, hello.
	So, the point is, how do we Help get white boys into good engineering degrees and positions at university.
	How do we strengthen white families?
	So Paul, you please write your book and remember I told you I'd pay you $5 for your first five pages?
	So I'll give you a little bit of more bad news.
	So my cousin in New Jersey just sent me a little note, all proud that his son Just gained admission at Johns Hopkins University as an engineering student.
	And he's following in the footsteps of his elder sister.
	So that's my nephew and his elder sister is my niece, who is already a medical student to be a doctor at Johns Hopkins University.
	And their father, who is my cousin, was a practicing doctor in Bangladesh who came here.
	So why did they come here?
	Well, it's good, but I'm annoyed.
	Why are the original American families, you know, Europe's descendants?
	I'm presenting that to you as bad news, because all the white families are falling apart, and they don't know whether their children are girls or boys, or the teachers are pushing that on them.
	Well, and among other things, but the other thing that has gone on and again, Jim, I would just I would just counter with this.
	I just don't think you, like a lot of people, have just not heard or experienced contact with this material as much and as long as I have to see the very clear picture.
	I mean, how many times have I heard and read these stories out here, including meeting people personally?
	That were required to train their replacements.
	Okay.
	And there was indeed, and there probably still is a program in which this is being done.
	In other words, you have a perfectly functional, operative, profitable business company over here making some product or doing something.
	And they decide they're going to get a new diverse workforce from overseas.
	And literally they tell the American workers in many cases, of course, who are white, sometimes other races, but they're Americans.
	So here's the deal.
	You stick around for the next four to six months and you help train these people and you get a nice little severance package or, you know, you can resign now and you won't.
	Okay.
	I've had this confirmed to me first person.
	Okay.
	And again, there's, there's organizations that have facilitated this in addition to, as I, as I mentioned before, starting back in the eighties, there was literature, the John Birch Society used to put this out.
	There was literature from the State Department and the U.S.
	Chamber of Commerce telling companies, hey, this is how you can relocate your operations overseas.
	OK, this was being pushed and promoted because it was the deconstruction, the deindustrialization of America.
	That's what it's about.
	And of course, America was and is white people for over 200 years, not 20 or 30 years, over 200 plus years.
	We had an identifiable demographic core, a super majority.
	In California, 89% of the population was white in 1970.
	Can you imagine that?
	In California, as recently as 1970, it was nearly 89% white.
	All right?
	This is what they seek to destroy.
	And the bottom line is that they're doing it not just here, but in England and Germany and France.
	France already has more non-white babies, more foreign babies born.
	The native French babies at this moment.
	Okay, France is finished in most people's estimation.
	Will France still be France when it's 60 or even 70% North African Muslim and African?
	Will it still be France, Jim?
	I will never ever apologize for this so-called racist stance that I have because all it is is racial consciousness and racial awareness, which they wish to destroy in us as a precursor to destroying us biologically.
	Well, I think you're mostly right, Paul.
	It's not that I think you're mostly wrong.
	I think you're mostly right, but there are just issues here, such as whether legal immigration is a good or a bad thing.
	I think it has to be controlled.
	It had a lid on it, but since America is a nation of immigrants, except for Native Americans, I just think it's very odd to suppose Americans would oppose legal immigration as a matter of our history.
	Let me invite Scaredy Cat's thoughts.
	I know yours, Paul.
	I'm inviting Scaredy.
	Scaredy.
	OK.
	OK, so Jim and Paul, Here's another example.
	So I was horrified when President Trump's travel ban, I think it was about three years ago.
	So I was totally aghast and just worried about all the people who came out, as they say, from the woodwork into the street, complaining against President Trump's travel ban, because the most obvious thing, like the duh of it, was where were all these people when the other presidents, President Stinky B.O., Obama, was bombing all these countries.
	They were perfectly happy little countries.
	And they had, you know, schools, they had hospitals, they had prisons for their criminals.
	And, you know, prospering happily.
	And nobody, those eight years of president, I'm not going to call him president, just Obama, stinky Obama.
	Nobody complains.
	All the left and all these, quote, you know, high moralistic people who are moralizing Today, we're not a peep out of them.
	But as soon as President Trump, just in order to protect America, just announced a temporary travel ban.
	These millions of people were in the streets.
	And I'm ashamed to say, you know, people, Muslims, they joined in because it could only when you analyze it in the In a calm state, it could only have happened with Jew culture's money.
	And I'm very ashamed to say that the Muslims, American Muslims, joined in on that, because they were like, it was a ruse to have them join in, because they're thinking, oh, Muslims are so mistreated in the world, we're being bombed.
	But the whole point is that it was wrong to join in to the travel ban protest.
	Because the travel ban was being established in order to protect America.
	That's right!
	That's right!
	It wasn't actually...
	It wasn't actually a Muslim travel ban.
	It was a ban on travel from countries where there was a lot of terrorism taking place.
	And it should be obvious it wasn't a Muslim travel ban because the most populous Muslim countries, such as Indonesia, were not being banned.
	So it was all a matter of political spin.
	I do think it was one of the instances where Trump Lost his mastery of the media and the way in which he presented it to allow it to be spun in such a way as to appear to be a negative racially based, which the Democrats and their allies in the media have endlessly repeated to try to make him out to be a racist when I'm convinced there isn't a racist bone in his body.
	So scary.
	Say a few more and then Paul, of course, is eager to get back into the fray.
	Okay, so another story for Paul.
	Again, I was horrified at this.
	And this is again back to my family.
	So, I have a distant aunt, through various marriages and so on, in Canada because her husband is a doctor.
	And they, long time ago, maybe 40, 50, 60 years.
	So, what I was horrified at was she was telling me on the telephone how proud she was That her daughter, so her daughter is my generation, but a little bit younger, maybe 10, 15 years younger.
	She's a school teacher, I think, probably high school teacher.
	And she was saying what a nice teacher her, her nice teacher, her daughter is that this, this young woman is a great teacher.
	And her children, her students even call her mom.
	I immediately had a pit of my stomach churned, because I'm thinking, if she's such a great teacher, why doesn't she join her students up with their moms?
	Obviously, this is a child to be sorry for, in a pitiable state, who is clinging to her as mom.
	Well, that's a terrible thing for a teacher to do, is to usurp the mom's position.
	She should go back and go and heal that family.
	You see what I'm saying?
	So these Muslim families are intact by the grace of God because they have not become so modern.
	But I resent how they are not helping the whites who have constructed the prosperous country into which they have immigrated.
	So those are three stories for Paul.
	How I am on the opposite side of what is like the common seeming position in the Jews' media.
	Go ahead.
	And you're not on the opposite side, but I find it interesting some of the situations that you bring to light and then the questions you pose.
	I want to ask you, though, just I'm curious of your accent because it definitely sounds to me one of two.
	I get sometimes I think it's Persian and other times I think it could be French.
	You want to tell us where your accent is from?
	Bangladesh.
	Bangladesh is, we call that one of the countries of the subcontinent, which is mainly India.
	Next one is Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal.
	I can hear that.
	I can hear that now that you say it.
	But for the longest time, I could have sworn that your accent was Persian.
	But here's the thing.
	You said something about, OK, you're you're troubled or, you know, you don't like the fact that they're, quote, not helping, you know, the whites.
	All I can think of when I hear stuff like that is, you know, we don't need any help.
	Okay, that's the bottom line.
	Nobody, no decent person, including myself, is opposed to all these people and all these families in other countries having a functional, thriving, you know, prosperous society of their own, okay?
	But the problem is, is you've got France being overwhelmed, where in many cases these, quote, Muslims have one, two, or three wives, and produce as many as eight to ten children.
	This is a this is a known deal.
	Meanwhile, the average couple in France has less than two.
	Now, you know, be that as it may, the bottom line is you have to ask yourself this.
	Is somebody from North Africa or somebody from Arabic country?
	Are they French?
	Right.
	It doesn't make any sense.
	And Jim, I just want to just quickly say this and then I want to move on.
	I really my stomach just turns when I hear anybody, including yourself, using the enemy's talking point of we're all a nation of immigrants.
	This has been dealt with so many times as long as go back in the 90s.
	There's some good articles on this that a lot of them are not that lengthy.
	This is the sales pitch campaign such as diversity is our greatest strength and all kinds of other ridiculous nonsense that doesn't mean anything.
	All right.
	The bottom line is you could go to any place on Earth that has had population shifts and you could say immigrant or not immigrant.
	The bottom line is that we're a nation for the most part.
	Of settlers, okay?
	All the hard work in this country has already been done, all right?
	There's plenty of whites here that didn't come to any social handouts, that didn't have roads and schools and bridges and automobiles and computers.
	They had to clear the land and grow crops, and in many cases their survivability was based upon the grace of the soil and the weather, and whether or not in many cases they could ward off Indian attacks.
	If you actually read some of the accounts, Of the French and Indian Wars.
	They were horrific.
	Okay, so I can't stand it when people say such things as we're a nation of immigrants.
	If that is what you need to say to deal with all the shall we say the the points in the debate because the bottom line is this is we were a nation of majority white immigrants and I made this case back in probably the late 90s when I called it to regular terrestrial radio.
	It's not that we're opposed to immigration.
	We're opposed to non-white immigration because they're not us.
	And many people at the time and still do recognize it's being done on purpose to essentially undermine our country, undermine our culture, because you're going to have competing racial interests when you have a super majority.
	Like, for example, my brother on a blog spot made a great comment one time.
	He asked a question.
	He said, is there such a thing as a Chinese supremacist in their own country?
	Or Japanese supremacist in their own country.
	And then he asked that these people are likely laughing at America and our quote racial problems.
	The bottom line is we're being demonized by Jews.
	And the biggest mistake we made as far as immigration is starting in the late 1800s all through the early 1900s.
	We let in millions of European and Eastern European and Russian Jews millions.
	That was the death of this country.
	Meanwhile, we had the Chinese Exclusion Act going, which In my opinion was a great foresight of our ancestors to put that in.
	Because I mean, all you got to do is look across the ocean and see that there's now there's over a billion of them.
	That's a threat to our country.
	Every group, every race, every community needs its own living space, and they need to be secure in that living space.
	Otherwise, it's going to be overrun by others.
	That's the nature of nature.
	Thanks for that.
	Well, I respect your opinion, Paul.
	That doesn't mean I agree with it.
	I often do, but not always.
	And I think you have a much more race-based analysis of history than I have ever embraced.
	I find some of your arguments rather Fascinating, and a lot of the facts you raise are true, but I just am not quite as sympathetic to your attitude about whites and race in America as are you, and I think most Americans would be a bit more qualified than subscribing, though I agree
	About the threats of intrusion of mass numbers of immigrants that aren't being assimilated.
	I believe every nation should have a common language that anyone who immigrated to the United States has to learn English That there should not be areas or regions of the United States where you can grow and live a whole life and die and never speak a word of English, which is true not only of certain areas in Little Havana in Florida, but in regions of Minneapolis and so forth.
	So, you know, I believe in the forms of national unity, where if you don't speak the common language, how can you possibly communicate and cooperate to achieve common goals?
	And I agree with you, too, that many of these groups actually Aren't really interested in in America and in my opinion that would mean they ought not to be admitted to immigrate here to migrate here and that there ought to be many more controls and requirements.
	Even Mexico has a far superior immigration policy to the United States in Mexico.
	You must satisfy at least the following two conditions.
	You must be able to show that your immigration would mean you have something to contribute to the good of the country, in that case, Mexico.
	And second, that you have the financial resources to sustain yourself and wouldn't become a burden upon the state.
	With the implementation of those two simple principles as a policy for migration to the United States, Most of the problems we're encountering here with immigration, I believe, would be resolved.
	Skerrity, if you want to pick up Paul's, you know, fashioning his response.
	Skerrity, your thoughts?
	Yeah, Jim.
	So, I'm up against a brick wall, wall Paul, they write.
	Paul, when you say we don't need help, so it's like talking, talking should have the
	purpose of figuring out what to do.
	You know, otherwise it's just like tying a bow and the two ends of the ribbon, the right hand going further right, the left hand going further left, and not the knot or the bow not being tied.
	It's just a waste of time.
	Well, not a waste of time in the sense that initially, so when points are initially brought up... I respect you, Paul, that's why I'm talking, otherwise I wouldn't bother.
	I would be learning how to sing another song or something like that.
	Thank you.
	So the point is, when the subject is brought up, a difficulty or a problem that we can now see, it's been brought up and now we can see it's a problem, the talking should have at least a small step of what we can do.
	Like who do we get to write the immigration law?
	You know?
	Okay, so, but here's the thing, Skarity, and again, I mean, this could be a four-hour show
	two times a week easily, this topic, but the immigration laws are already in place.
	They're not being enforced.
	And not only are they not being enforced, but they're being undermined.
	This is clear as day, and this has been covered in so many articles, including books, and Ann Coulter's book, Adios America, as an example.
	You know, it's an agenda that has nothing to do with immigration, immigration reform, immigration law, etc.
	It's an agenda that's being done to white countries and only white countries.
	And this case is so easily provable once you, you know, have enough contact with the subject material.
	And when I say we don't need any help, it was a general statement.
	But the bottom line is white people, unfortunately, and this is not racist or superiority, it's just the way it is.
	We provide the standard of living and the civilization that others aspire to, and people come here to have a better life.
	That's it.
	There isn't any country where white people want to go and make a better life and have an economy and a job and a house and a car and freeways and roads and schools and all that stuff.
	White people go to other places basically for climate.
	They're essentially weather refugees, and then also for cheaper living.
	People go to Mexico and Central America to make the dollar go further.
	But no American family starting out wants to go to China, or India, or Bangladesh, or any other place to make their life better, because it is not any better.
	People want to come to the West, which is Europe, Canada, Australia, and the United States, because by third world standards, we are relatively uncrowded, and we have a high standard of living, and we have a lot of amenities that they can take advantage of right away, including welfare, including food stamps, and so on and so forth.
	Just briefly, there's another article that I just recently read on National Vanguard.
	Some 25-year-old black man died in the usual black circumstances, right?
	Ridiculous.
	Not a loss, really.
	But he left behind eight children, okay?
	And guess what?
	They were already on public assistance.
	Each one of his children under the current Social Security laws was already getting $800-and-something a month.
	So this man, who did indeed happen to be together with his wife, right?
	They were managing a household income of $7,000 or $8,000 a month for not even working, right?
	And so now that he's dead, these children are going to be entitled to even more money.
	And the question is, do we need all these blacks, right?
	We're basically subsidizing this unproductive lifestyle.
	And plus, do we need to be importing them from Africa?
	Because they're not who built this country.
	And the bottom line is they have very high rates of criminality and other problems.
	So it's just a matter of there's a reality that has to be dealt with.
	And you can't always be nice about it.
	I'm a nice guy, but we need to have a policy, a national policy that has at its heart the racial interest of the majority population.
	Otherwise, we're going to be destroyed.
	That's it.
	There's no other way around it.
	And I'm sorry, but that's just the hard facts.
	Paul, we're entering the home stretch.
	I'd like Scaredy to take a minute or two for a summation of her views, and then I want to reiterate what has happened to me with the social media.
	Scaredy?
	So, Paul, it's just your turn to be clobbered.
	That's it.
	So, a couple of centuries... See, and this is Jew culture doing it.
	So, a couple of centuries ago, The our earth's superpowers were Muslim emperors, Muslim kings, especially the Mughal dynasty.
	Even we have remaining in the English language, you know, somebody who owned a lot of cars.
	Oh, he's a car mogul.
	The Mughal dynasty, who are the Muslim kings of India.
	And, you know, so through the East India Company, East India By the way, that's Bangladesh, of course.
	That's the eastern portion of the subcontinent.

▲