Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 10, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

01:20:39

Need to Know: The Fetzer Report Episode 127 - 09 February 2021

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin.
	We're on the day of the beginning of the impeachment trial for Donald J. Trump.
	I'm delighted to be joined by David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina, where Michael, I'm tickled to just discover, was a student of philosophy as an undergraduate.
	Great benefits there.
	♪♪♪ Meanwhile, the New York Times reports the FBI and Capitol
	Police were aware of violent threats days before the Capitol riots and were warned about a looming war.
	The impeachment trial to begin today is charging Trump with willfully inciting violence against the government of the United States.
	It's pretty obvious for anyone who reviews it, they discover there's no justification for that allegation.
	But it turns out that, as even the New York Times is reporting, there were thousands of social media posts before the assault which documented how the rioters saw the Capitol and the lawmakers certifying the election results as a specific target.
	Obviously, if this was previously planned and it's documented, Donald Trump cannot have incited an event that was already planned to take place, and which in fact, it turns out, was already in progress before his own supporters who attended his talk at the Ellipse had arrived at the Capitol.
	Even the FBI is aware of threats, where the Federal Bureau of Investigation took them seriously enough to establish a 24-hour command post at both a local Washington field office and its headquarters not far from the Capitol and put two tactical teams on standby, which it had not done for the previous two marches by Trump supporters on November 14th and December 12th.
	Protesting the election results.
	In other words, they didn't expect any problem with the Trump supporters, but they had indications from other sources there might be a problem.
	Former Capitol Police Chief Stephen Son, who resigned in the aftermath, stated, We looked at the intelligence.
	We knew to have large crowds and potential for some violence, but I have nothing indicated we have a mob attempt to seize the Capitol.
	He sent an eight-page letter to Speaker Pelosi on February 1st, Perfect hindsight does not change the fact that nothing in our collective experience of our intelligence, including intelligence provided by FBI, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security, and DC Metropolitan Police, indicated that a well-coordinated armed assault on the Capitol might occur on January 6th,
	He also stated that before and during the Capitol riots he requested assistance from the National Guard six times, but his requests were rejected or delayed.
	Meanwhile, Mark Meadows Trump's Chief of Staff has reported to Bartiroma that the President offered to provide security to make sure that they had plenty of National Guard.
	Even in January, as many as 10,000 National Guard were told to be on the ready by the Secretary of Defense.
	There's all kinds of blame going around, but not a lot of accountability because he offered the security on January 6th, but was turned down.
	Scorpio, your thoughts?
	Well, this is amazing, Jim.
	This clown show known as the impeachment trial reminds me of a kangaroo court or a Stalinist show trial.
	It's disgusting on so many levels, and I don't see how you can even try a president who's no longer in office.
	I mean, why don't we try or impeach George Washington for owning slaves, for God's sakes, you know?
	And, you know, it's interesting, Jim.
	They're charging some of these rioters with conspiracy, which I find to be very interesting because I thought conspiracies don't exist, and you're a nut if you believe in any kind of conspiracies.
	So what they're really telling us is that only government-prescribed conspiracy theories are legitimate.
	Anything else is verboten.
	And the other weird thing I'm hearing is they're trying to blame President Trump for the lack of security at the Capitol building, which I don't think it's the President's purview to decide how many people are.
	I don't think the President runs the Capitol Police, obviously.
	And it's interesting, as the article points out, that as many as 10,000 National Guard troops were told they may be needed in early January.
	So this implies malice of forethought and possible conspiracy.
	Well, you're right on all counts, and in fact, Nancy Pelosi controls the Capitol Police, and it's obvious this was a conspiracy involving Nancy Pelosi, the Capitol Police, and the mayor of Washington, along with Antifa members, about the word conspiracy.
	Conspiracy, too, is the most prosecuted crime in the United States.
	It involves just two or more individuals coordinating to perpetrate an illegal act.
	So that the effort to denigrate conspiracy theorists is those who are investigating crimes that the government itself perpetrated and therefore does not want to be exposed.
	So your points are impeccable, Michael.
	Yeah, this New York Times article strikes me as being classic limited hangout methodology in which they talk about some minor inconsistencies in the stories of the events at the Capitol while leaving the central false background story intact.
	It's my understanding that there's now to be a four hour debate on whether it's even constitutional to move forward with this impeachment trial in Congress.
	And what that made me curious about is what the price was going to be to the American public for all these parasites to be paid while they're going through this totally vacuous propaganda exercise.
	Great point.
	Well, Michael, what I think actually is this is going to be highly edifying for the public about the nature of the Constitution because there's so many issues to be made.
	Just before coming on with the two of you, there was an announcement on MSNBC, to which my wife is addicted, that The House managers have offered their rebuttal, their brief, in response to the allegation that it's unconstitutional.
	But yes, that will be the subject of debate for four hours today, and it should be fascinating.
	Meanwhile, Trump just broke his silence and destroyed the Democratic Party with a single statement.
	Even after kicking Trump out of office, Democrats aren't done with their crusade to destroy him.
	They're now moving ahead with impeachment.
	If they succeed, it won't do much as he's already out of office.
	But, and this is the whole goal, It would preclude him from ever running for public office again.
	The Democrats don't want him to clean their clock in the future as he did in 2020.
	They're doing everything they can to explain away the fact that Trump told his supporters at the Ellipse to protest peacefully and patriotically by claiming his call for peace was cancelled by him telling them they should fight like hell.
	If they succeed, their hypocrisy will be clear, as they never want to call for Democrats using similar language about Black Lives Matter protests that turned violent to be charged.
	In Trump's response as legal team, and they seem to me to be very good, Have argued that the Senate cannot try a president who's left office, he's just an ordinary citizen.
	That any attempt to prevent Trump from serving in future public office would constitute a bill of attainder.
	That's fascinating.
	They also state Trump's claims that 2020 election was fraudulent is speech protected by the First Amendment.
	And that Trump rejects the House's claim that his assertions of election fraud are false.
	The response also argued that Trump's fight like hell statement had nothing to do with violence at the Capitol, but the need to fight for election security in general as evinced by the recording of the speech.
	Meanwhile, Maxine Waters is going to play a big role in this impeachment trial.
	Both sides are going to make extensive use of video.
	When it's their turn, Trump's lawyers will play a video of Democrat politicians making incendiary comments that could have incited violence, including Maxine Waters in 2018 asserting, let's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up.
	And if you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, in a gasoline station, You get out, you create a crowd, and you push back on them.
	You tell them that they're not welcome anymore.
	Water is declared during the fight over Trump's zero tolerance policy at the border.
	Maxine is now trying to downplay her comments, claiming she never intended to incite violence.
	Absolutely, I can say that.
	As a matter of fact, if you look at the words that I use, the strongest thing I was to tell them, they're not welcome.
	Talk to them, tell them they're not welcome.
	I didn't say go and fight.
	I didn't say anybody was going to have any violence, so they can't make that statement, she claimed.
	It's not true.
	Waters implored Democrats to push back on Trump officials and get in their face in public.
	It's true.
	Waters used figures of speech common to American politics, but so did President Trump.
	That's the point.
	Republicans and Trump's lawyers will argue the Democrats are impeaching Trump for constitutionally protected speech.
	And of course, there are many, many examples in the far more serious context of the BLM and Antifa-led riots looting and arson in cities across the nation like Minneapolis, Portland, and Seattle.
	It seems to me the Democrats don't have a case at all, whatsoever.
	Scorpio, your thoughts?
	Well, Jim, not only do they not have a case, there's no way they're going to get 67 votes.
	Everyone knows that going into this.
	This is just a show trial, as I said earlier, nothing more.
	And, you know, Maxine Waters is completely out of her mind, and she should be removed from office because, first of all, she does not live in her district.
	She lives in Brentwood in a mansion with her husband, who's a banker that's been involved in a lot of corrupt dealings over the years.
	And, you know, the way she claims residence in her district is that her daughter has a house that she stays in part of the time in Maxine Waters' district.
	But meanwhile, Maxine Waters lives in Brentwood, of all places, you know, a white neighborhood of privilege.
	So, you know, these people are criminals and they're gangsters.
	And we just need to start looking at these government officials.
	These are not politicians.
	They're criminals.
	And they're running a scam on all of us.
	Uh, and of course, you know, uh, about those statements that Maxine Waters made and all these other women.
	I, you know, frankly, I could care less.
	Um, you know, if you have a country with free speech, uh, people are going to say things that you don't personally like.
	And so it's time to put on your big boy pants and not worry about it.
	I mean, my God, uh, I don't know what happened to Americans to make them to such sensitive little babies.
	That, you know, everything that's said is, you know, a potential to ruin your live and to be canceled and shut down.
	Of course, I believe this all relates to the system they want to bring in, this Chinese social credit system, essentially, where what you say is monitored very carefully.
	And if you say the wrong things, you get points deducted from your credit report.
	Very, very dangerous on so many levels, Jim.
	And, you know, the other thing, this idea that we have to accept the election no matter what.
	Like, we don't have the right to accept this election.
	Well, I mean, that's banana republic politics right there.
	That's El Generalisimo telling you that, you know, you better accept the election results if you know what's good for you, you know.
	So, I think we're going to see incredible tyranny revealed under this president, and they're just getting started.
	Well, and it's so hypocritical.
	The Democrats have never accepted the outcome of the 2016 election.
	They've been emphatic about it.
	And even in relation to 2020, Hillary was still telling Joe Biden, never concede.
	So, I mean, it's just grotesque.
	Your points are simply spot on, Scorpio Michael.
	Yeah, in my previous When I used the term that this was a totally vacuous propaganda exercise, I meant the entire impeachment effort the second time around that we're seeing right now, not necessarily the debate on its constitutionality.
	There are always some silver linings involved in these ridiculous situations and the fact that They know that they don't have the votes in order to have a conviction, yet they're doing it also.
	Anyway, makes it a totally vacuous propaganda exercise.
	And why the hell would the Democrats choose somebody like Maxine Waters to head up the impeachment trial?
	Maybe they need somebody like a black female, somebody that's other than a Jewish lawyer.
	To do it, so they always have a front man, so to speak.
	Like Scorpio said, these are criminals and gangsters.
	I love that graphic at the end of that segment that shows the rank hypocrisy of the Democrats, and I'm still wondering what the real point is.
	Somewhere, there's a real point to this in continuing this public vilification of Trump.
	I suspect that it's the propaganda push to demonize the white Christian population and to make people accept the idea that such people as us are domestic terrorists.
	Well, Michael, I think the point is, number one, if they could, to get him censured so he couldn't run for office again and clean their clock, as he did... Well, that's what I would consider a surface reason.
	Number two is simply to distract from all the bad policies that the fake Biden is enacting by all his executive orders.
	But number three, Maxine isn't leading.
	It was simply the point that the defense is going to put her front and center because she's been so outrageous with her statements that Trump looks clean as a hound's tooth by comparison.
	She's not leading, and I think the Democrats would just assume she weren't available in any way, but they're going to play up the video, which may work pretty well.
	Meanwhile, we have had a big shift in the Democrats' tactics for the second impeachment.
	During the first, they called a lot of witnesses They're claiming now they don't need that because this is based upon a public crime, says Richard Blumenthal, who is, in my opinion, among the most corrupt of all the members of the United States Senate.
	His intent was unhidden.
	So I think there's a danger, as there always is, for a trial lawyer and prosecutor to over-try and add more witnesses that prove the obvious.
	Meanwhile, you know, what happened over the Ukraine call, of course, was the three crucial witnesses all acknowledged that there was nothing illegal about the call, that they differed with him on policy.
	And since the Constitution gives a president virtually complete authority to conduct foreign policy with the advice and consent of the Senate, there was no case to be made.
	In this instance, they're claiming it's all so obvious because this was a public trial, a public crime.
	But when you look at the evidence, when you look at the words, what the president said, that this should be a peaceful and patriotic protest, There's nothing to justify incitement, and there most certainly was no effort to perform an insurrection, which has to do with overthrowing the government of the United States.
	We do get reports that both sides would like to wrap it up fairly quickly.
	If they want to call witnesses, that prolongs it for sure.
	And I think you're talking about pushing into the next week, the week after that, perhaps, because both sides will then have that option available to them.
	The witness debate last year consumed Trump's first impeachment, which lasted nearly three weeks.
	Senate Republicans chose to punt the question of whether to bring in witnesses to the end of the trial, and then only two Republicans, Mitt Romney of Utah and Susan Collins of Maine, Join Democrats in voting to allow officials like John Bolton to testify, leaving them short of the 51 votes needed.
	Democrats, Senators argued outside witnesses were needed with regard to the conversation with the Ukrainian president, but claimed their own lives were put at risk by rioters and watched Trump's response in real time.
	This is a unique situation in that we're all witnesses as well as victims.
	But it's silly.
	There are as much victims as was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who wasn't even in the Capitol building.
	Scorpio, your thoughts?
	Well, the whole premise of this so-called impeachment is absolutely bizarre.
	And really, what they're saying is that President Trump led a conspiracy to create this riot, and the facts just aren't there.
	I hope that Trump's team calls endless witnesses, people who are at the event, whoever they can find, and just drag this on for as long as possible, quite frankly.
	Because the longer it goes on, the worse it makes The Democrats look, quite frankly.
	And, you know, this Richard Blumenthal character, you know, this has totally gone down the rabbit hole, but this man claimed to be a Vietnam vet, combat veteran.
	And it turns out he was not a combat veteran.
	He lied about it.
	He had some kind of desk job somewhere.
	He was, and he claimed he was some kind of combat veteran.
	That's a true crime, I believe, to say that you're a combat veteran when you're not.
	But, of course, this has completely gone down the rabbit hole.
	Nobody talks about it.
	And it says a lot about this man's character that he would lie about something like that.
	It's absolutely disgusting, quite honestly.
	And, of course, we got, you know, all this stuff, Jim, is a one-way street.
	You got two sets of rules.
	And this is just hypocrisy on display.
	Well, Scorpio, you're certainly right about Blumenthal also, you know, was covering for the Sandy Hook false flag, which Barack Obama orchestrated using Eric Holder to fake a mass murder to promote gun control.
	So, you know, these guys can't come clean about anything, and their whole careers are built upon lies and fabrications and prevarication.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	I'd like to bring up a touchy issue, starting with a historical point.
	In 1973, Senator William J. Fulbright appeared on the Face the Nation show, and at that time he made the statement that 80% of the United States Senate was controlled by, in the pocket of, Israel in the Israeli lobby.
	So that was 1973.
	Now we've got Jerry Nadler, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, Richard Blumenthal, Brian Schatz, Jamie Raskin as the impeachment manager.
	Is anyone seeing a pattern here?
	Back five years ago, Charles Bausman, who opened the great website called Russia Insider, published an article in January of 2015 titled, It's Time to Drop the Jew Taboo.
	It's time to talk about this.
	It's time we openly discuss the incredible control that this one ethnic minority has over our government and lots of aspects of our lives and how they exercise that control through bribery, threats, and blackmail.
	Well, there's even more to it, Michael.
	I mean, you're spot on.
	Cynthia McKinney may have been the first to reveal the pledge.
	She actually told to me that after she talked about the fact that all new members of Congress are asked to sign a pledge to put the interests of Israel ahead of those of the United States, Where those who decline find their finances dry up, that they're confronted with a well-financed alternative candidate next time around, or that their district is redrawn in the meanwhile and they no longer have a seat.
	Cynthia was able to overcome those obstacles to serve six or eight terms in the House, but even as notable a figure as Dennis Kucinich, whom I regarded as the smartest member of Congress at the time, was not.
	So that a few years back, a friend of mine asked me, did I know how many members of the present Congress have not signed the pledge?
	And I acknowledged I did not.
	And he held up one finger of one hand because it was at the time only one member of Congress who'd failed to sign the pledge.
	And when you ponder why Israel, which controls our mainstream media, as I have endlessly reported, turned on Trump after his generosity.
	I guarantee you this is all about Iran.
	Trump would not bomb Iran.
	And when they realize that, they turned on him.
	They know Biden is feeble.
	He's probably not going to be around long.
	And we already find that the Zionist appointees he's making, such as this guy Blake and his Secretary of State and putting pressure on Iran, To stop processing uranium before the sanctions are removed, which is absurd.
	The sanctions themselves are violations of international laws, forms of collecting punishment that are proscribed by the Geneva Conventions and the UN Charter.
	So it appears to me you're absolutely spot on, Michael.
	This is really disgusting and it's an Israeli power play taking place here, flexing their muscle.
	Jim, can I just add one thing to what Michael said?
	Of course.
	Yeah, Michael, you hit upon something so incredibly important.
	Great job.
	And, you know, let's also throw in the mix here that what Biden's already appointed 10 or 12 cabinet members that are all not only Jewish but dual citizens.
	Okay, which brings in a whole other element to this conversation is like, to what country do these people hold loyalty to?
	That's something that really needs to be discussed.
	I think a lot of them actually have their loyalty to Israel first.
	For example, you know, Sheldon Adelson, the great Jewish casino owner, gangster essentially, when he died, he wanted his ash ship back to Israel to be buried.
	He didn't want to be buried in America.
	And I think that says a lot about where the hearts and minds are of these people.
	They're not loyal to the United States.
	In my very first political speech, which was on April 15, it was Tax Day, in Washington, D.C.
	on the grass outside the Capitol, it was a Ron Paul Freedom Rally.
	I gave an address in which I explained In relation to 9-11, how dual citizens have been occupying the Department of Defense and were profoundly involved here, and that it should be against the law for any dual citizen to hold a policy-shaping or decision-making position because you cannot know that their loyalty to the other state does not outweigh their loyalty to the United States.
	2008.
	It was published under the title 9-11 and the Neocon Agenda.
	And if you're lucky, you can still find it online.
	Meanwhile, Trump team lays out the impeachment defense ahead of the Senate trial.
	The attorneys are going to argue the Senate has no jurisdiction to try a former official.
	That the charge against the 45th president is deficient, that their client was deprived of due process, and has had his right to free speech violated by the article of impeachment.
	It's a 78-page trial memorandum.
	Positing that the Senate taking up the impeachment amounts to a bill of attainder, an act the Constitution prohibits the legislature from taking because it would amount to inflicting a punishment without a jury trial.
	The defense also contends the incitement accusation is contradicted by the plain text of the transcript of the President's January 6th speech.
	House Democrats, joined by 10 Republicans, voted to approve a single article of impeachment against Trump for the incitement of insurrection, making him the first president to be impeached twice.
	The trial memo, which is very, very good, and I like these attorneys, The article of impeachment presented by the House is unconstitutional for a variety of reasons, any of which alone would be grounds for immediate dismissal.
	Taken together, they demonstrate conclusively that indulging House Democrats' hunger for this political theater is a danger to our republic, democracy, and the rights that we hold dear.
	The trial is set to begin less than a month into the presidency of Biden.
	Trump's attorneys condemned the violence that took place during the breach, pointed out the president had done the very same in the remarks he gave later that day.
	The trial is representative of Trump's enduring hold on Washington as House and Senate lawmakers prepare to engage in hours of presentation.
	Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer reached a deal with Senate Republicans yesterday on the framework for the trial.
	There will be four hours of debate today about whether the trial ought to be dismissed.
	Several weeks ago, 45 Republican senators voted to reject holding it on the grounds it's unconstitutional.
	Each side will then get 16 hours to present their cases starting at noon, followed by four hours of senators to question both sides.
	Should witnesses or documents be subpoenaed more time may be allotted, but that will only happen if there is a vote to move forward after the presentation of the evidence that it's inappropriate to proceed at all.
	Scorpio, your thoughts?
	It certainly is inappropriate because, you know, if you look at the section in the Constitution that talks about impeachment, it says it's used to remove a president from office.
	So, you know, the president's not in office anymore by all accounts.
	And so this is a big waste of time.
	And this, I hear this thing repeated a lot.
	Oh, we can walk and chew gum at the same time.
	What a load of crap that is.
	Because look, the bottom line, there's so many hours in the day in which people can work.
	And so they're making this their top priority to essentially vanquish one of their political enemies rather than dealing with the business of the nation.
	It shows what these people are all about and it shows where their priorities really are too.
	And it also it's further indication that they're not all this that worried about this whole COVID epidemic.
	They know it's a scam and they know it's a power grab and they're behaving accordingly quite frankly.
	And Jim, you know that the photograph that accompanied that article, I couldn't help but notice that, you know, that's razor wire on top of the fence, not barbed wire.
	So it's like, you know, barbed wire isn't good enough.
	That's not secure enough.
	We need razor wire, which is a substantial step above just regular barbed wire.
	I think it's very symbolic about the mindset of these people and how much they truly despise the average American.
	And, you know, this notion that we have domestic terrorists in our midst, it's essentially a declaration of war upon the American people, a declaration of war upon dissent.
	I think they were so devastated by the massive outpouring of votes for Trump, where he won by a 4-1 margin.
	They're trying to do everything they can to disgrace him, to minimize, and they're doing all kinds of unethical and improper, which of course has become their standard stock in trade for the past 10 years or more.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Well, that was a good article about the impeachment process and it pretty much speaks for itself.
	I thought that I had while you were reading it was that it's the most concerning thing to me is that this is essentially the next example of the ongoing death of the rule of law in this country.
	And it's been happening for quite some time.
	I would include your Sandy Hook trial in that one.
	Parties that hold overwhelming evidence to establish their case are prevented from presenting that evidence.
	The comment that Scorpio just made about the razor wire fences that they've constructed around them in DC reminded me of my personal working hypothesis about this.
	I always tend to try to get an overview and feel like intuitively what the real reason is for these things.
	And my working hypothesis is That they intend to impose some sort of grid down situation as the next few months proceed, and they're actually anticipating crowds of armed people coming to get them.
	That's very, very interesting.
	What I happen to like about all this is that the issue is so simple.
	Revolving as it does about the words incitement and the word insurrection.
	That the average American can actually get his mind around it.
	I mean, usually the cases are so complicated.
	Take the Ukraine phone call.
	The average American really is at a bit of a loss to sort it out.
	They have feelings, and they realize they thought this was all contrived, which of course it was.
	But in this instance, it's going to be very clear and obvious that there was nothing to it.
	It was all politically driven by the Democrats.
	And a clear violation of the law, where I think Michael's made an impeccable point.
	This is another manifestation of the decay of the rule of law in the United States, which has become all too thoroughgoing, and where the Democrats are setting an atrocious example by their failure to follow the Constitution and its clear provisions, including Which we haven't mentioned yet, that it states, if the President is being impeached, then the Chief Justice of the United States shall preside.
	The Chief Justice has declined to preside.
	Therefore, it cannot go forward as a constitutional process.
	And indeed, Patrick Leahy, whom they've sworn in, is an anti-Trump Democrat, which is further revelation that this is a complete political crock.
	That it's just a fraud, as so much else associated with the Democrats has turned out to be.
	Meanwhile, and some of us may regard this as too little, too late, Supreme Court to consider 2020 election challenge lawsuits in its February conference.
	According to a case listing, they include Sidney Powell's Michigan case, the Trump campaign's Pennsylvania lawsuit, and Wisconsin lawsuit, and the Pennsylvania lawsuit brought by Mike Kelly, and Lynn Wood's Georgia case.
	So notice, we got Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, the four that were all covered by the Texas suit, that they declined to hear Where the Chief Justice was reported by Lin Wood to have been overheard telling Associate Justice Stephen Breyer that he'd make sure that mother effer did not get reelected.
	All cases allege some form of unlawful election-related conduct affecting the outcome, including expansion of mail-in balloting by officials, changing the rules in contravention of state election law, lack of adequate security around mail ballots, issues with machine vote tabulation, and denial of meaningful access to poll watchers.
	The Kelly petition asked the court for an injunction prohibiting the executive respondents from taking official action and so forth.
	The suits similarly called for emergency injunctive release for expedited hearing and blocking certification, but of course those were ones the court turned down.
	Our legal issue remains important in need of the Court's review.
	Attorney John Eastman told the Washington Examiner, referring to Pennsylvania's conduct during the 2020 election, the Supreme Court has kept its distance from Trump's election challenges.
	In December, it rejected a lawsuit filed by the Republican Attorney General of Texas and backed by Trump, seeking to decertify the election results in four states.
	If at the February 19th conference, 10 days hence, the court decides to take up any of these election lawsuits, get this, they most likely won't be heard until October.
	Well, that's going to do a hell of a lot of good for the American people.
	They won't be heard until October.
	Scorpio, your thoughts?
	Well, I think the reason they're going to delay it so long, of course, is that by that point, it's going to be far too late to matter.
	And this isn't going to be allowed to go anywhere.
	You know that, you know, at least a couple of these judges are blackmailed.
	And this simply won't be allowed to go anywhere, Jim, as the cover of national security, among other things.
	So it's a little too little too late, unfortunately.
	You know, and it's breaking my heart to see the Supreme Court destroy itself in the eyes of the American people.
	Because we all recognize it had an obligation to take up the Texas lawsuit, which it declined to do on improper reason.
	Talk about undermining the rule of law, Michael.
	We could hardly have a more stellar example.
	Your thoughts?
	Yeah, the first thing you said to that story, Jim, too little too late indeed.
	And it gets back to my earlier issue.
	John Roberts' name appeared on the infamous Epstein flight logs.
	And so here we have again, an implication of the Israeli blackmailing of key people in our government.
	Does anyone actually expect them?
	To vacate the election and give it to Trump or declare a new election?
	You know, I would gladly take bets and give good odds on that one.
	To me, this is just the Supreme Court in a kind of a publicity move to cover their asses.
	Not even going to be heard until October.
	Yeah, I agree.
	This is insulting.
	I mean, it's adding insult to injury.
	They injured us by not taking the case, the Texas case, at the time, which would have made a difference.
	And now they're insulting us by claiming they're going to take up cases but not hear them until October.
	Give us a break.
	Honestly, they play us for sass.
	But even we are not.
	Jim, can I add one more thing, just briefly?
	Of course.
	Uh, you know, on the bright side, this is revealing to the American public what, uh, how the whole system is rigged to You know, to the benefit of a very small group of conspirators who have an agenda that they plan on forcing down the throats of the American people.
	And you know, the whole thing that happened with the GameStop Wall Street thing is another example.
	Here, some big Jewish hedge funds were losing billions of dollars and they pulled the plug on the system.
	They said, oh, we got to stop this.
	Shut it down.
	No more, you know, trading.
	Excellent, excellent point.
	Scorpio, I'm very pleased you added that.
	to recalibrate their positions.
	So we're seeing more and more examples of how we're living in a rigged game.
	And I think they're gonna have no choice but to continue revealing this
	as they try to seize more and more power, Jim.
	Yeah, excellent, excellent point, Scorpio.
	I'm very pleased you added that.
	We'll be right back.
	Meanwhile, Simon Parks has been making revelations.
	Very short update.
	I wanna talk a couple of things, one about Britain.
	So big question about America is when something going to happen.
	I had a number of interesting conversations with a number of interesting people and it's becoming apparent and I didn't pick this up and be quite open about it.
	I didn't pick it up, but I'm picking it up now.
	President Trump doesn't want the history books in 20 years, 50 years, 100 years, 500 years.
	He doesn't want the history books to have him down as the president that staged a military coup to remove a democratic elected president.
	The military don't want to be remembered as the military that overturned a government militarily Now the situation in Burma, Anmar, was an interesting dry run in the sense that the good guys were looking to see how the world viewed a military takeover and the feedback coming from that is that it doesn't go down so well.
	Right, there are three or four court cases and there's one coming up in the next week which I've got a ton of good evidence that the Trump team have got.
	Sidney Powell and several others.
	Lin Wood and a few others have got.
	And there was that wonderful two-hour presentation which has gone the rounds and I put it on my website.
	And that's actually admissible court evidence.
	That's actually evidence in court.
	We know that one district judge or circuit judge has said that Dominion machines are fraudulent and that's allowed them to push on further.
	And what I'm picking up is the United States military are not happy in taking out Biden or Clinton or anybody else unless they've got something from some court or other so they will turn around and say look we weren't staging a coup we were staging something to save the republic and we were acting on the court's actions Because in a so-called free democracy the court system is the one that's independent and makes the decisions which ultimately govern the whole law or rule of a country.
	I know it's like different in America's you have the Constitution and what courts do is they will judge actions against the Constitution.
	They won't say is the Constitution right?
	They'll look at something and say does that follow the Constitution?
	And so much easier for the military or Trump or anybody else to say I did what I did because these courts clearly said there was something that was totally corrupt and we had to act on it.
	Now, it doesn't mean it's got to go all the way to SCOTUS to the Supreme Court.
	It doesn't mean that.
	What it means is there has to be something concrete at a courtroom level.
	that even if that is prevented and stopped by a higher court then the good guys can say this is what this court said it was prevented from being developed so therefore what they said must have been true because higher forces are holding it back therefore we will act to protect what this court has said now if it does go to SCOTUS There are enough justices there to give Chief Justice Roberts a run for his money.
	Chief Justice a run for his money?
	But if they're not going to hear it until October, it doesn't make a damn bit of difference, as Farbian said.
	So I'm very distraught by this.
	I have regarded Simon Parks as one of the most reliable sources about what's actually going on behind the scenes.
	And I regard this as an absolute betrayal.
	The military had to act to restore the Constitution.
	We know the courts are corrupt.
	And this, in my opinion, is a stab in the back to the Republic.
	I don't like it one bit.
	Scorpio, your thoughts?
	Well, I'm not quite as favorable about Simon Parks as you are, given his bizarre claims
	he's made about being abducted by aliens and having sex with cat creatures and having hybrid
	children and the greys coming into his room at all hours of the night.
	Not to disparage UFOs and the possibility of that, but I just think that if you have
	all that happen to you, plus you have the secret intel on Trump, to me the credibility
	gets a little thin.
	And unfortunately, you know, I don't think, as I said, nothing's going to happen.
	I think that we have all of our major institutions are compromised right now.
	And I think the one good thing that will come of this is that it's going to become apparent to more and more people that we lived in a rigged game.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Yeah, Jim, I'm happy to hear you say what you just said before Scorpio talked.
	Personally, I've lost any Hope that Simon Parks is someone to be trusted.
	Here I had to stop myself from laughing at two or three points in what you just played because he's using the exact same methodology that he's been using.
	Here we have him giving More reasons, more excuses why nothing good has happened and once again pushing out the expectation for something good to happen to sometime in the future and giving up more reasons for it.
	Yeah.
	I got to admit, I'm almost completely disillusioned at this point in time and gravitating to the conclusion that if the American people don't pick up the problem, which may mean by taking arms to oppose a tyranny being imposed upon us, it may have no solution whatsoever and reduce us to the status of serfs and slaves.
	I see it coming.
	Yeah, that gets back to the statement that there are no white hats other than us.
	Yeah.
	And let's not forget that there's 80 million people ready to be red-pilled.
	And as they reveal their tyranny and their scams and their hypocrisy, each day more and more people are going to come over to our side.
	I really do believe that.
	Well, that's the most positive inference I can draw from our conversation.
	Your comments were spot on.
	Meanwhile, the Super Bowl began in a very bizarre fashion.
	I could hardly believe it.
	Did Biden get booed?
	They make a creepy video appearance at the Super Bowl and tell Americans to wear masks and get vaccinated.
	I don't think anyone wanted to hear that.
	There were only 22,000 fans and a lot of papier-mâché figures.
	The Bidens barged in, made a creepy video appearance before kickoff to lecture Americans about social distancing.
	Americans just can't get on with their lives because the Democrats have to drone on and on about COVID every second of every day.
	Joe Biden and his handler wife, Jill, made a video message from their Delaware basement bunker that played on the Jumbotron as if people watching football and drinking beer wanted to hear from Dementia Joe.
	With all our hearts, thank you, Jill Biden said to the health care workers in attendance.
	Let's remember, we can all do our part to save lives, Biden said.
	Wear masks, stay socially distant, get tested.
	Meanwhile, it sounded as though people were booing Joe Biden and his video message as it was being played.
	I also thought it was very strange that the Super Bowl kicked off with Alicia Keys singing the so-called Black National Anthem with every voice and sing along with a poet.
	She was tasked with a virtual performance of a 121-year-old spiritual song come to be known alternatively as the Black National Anthem after being introduced in 1899 for Abraham Lincoln's birthday.
	The poem, read in 1899, was set to music in 1900.
	Many may have thought it was beautiful.
	Frankly, it just didn't make sense to me.
	I found this really rather bizarre for a Super Bowl.
	Scorpio, your thoughts?
	It is absolutely bizarre, Jim, and I think we need to realize that they've reduced sports, NFL, NBA, all the big sport leagues, to a tool of social engineering, essentially.
	And they're not giving people what they want to see.
	They're trying to shove down a belief system down their throats and make them become social justice warriors.
	And I think this is a huge mistake.
	I think we're going to see the interest in sports decline astronomically.
	Who wants to see this?
	If you're there to see a football game, who wants to see this crap?
	I think pretty much nobody.
	And you know, it really was a big brother moment seeing Sniffer Joe tell people to wear masks.
	And I heard allegations that the crowd was actually booing when they put him on the giant telescreen.
	It really was a big brother moment.
	And, you know, people got to realize they plan on keeping this masking thing going for four or five more years.
	And you got to ask yourself, are you ready to wear a mask for five years because Sniffer Joe told you to?
	Well, I don't think so.
	And remember, the whole point of this masking, and that washing your hand 20 times a day, and, you know, spraying everything with disinfectant, is to shut down our natural immune systems.
	Because when you breathe regular air, you're breathing in viruses, bacteria, mold, fungus, dust, pollen.
	And all these things trigger your immune system to fight, fight, fight.
	And if you shut that down, and plus start taking a yearly vaccination, People aren't going to have much of an immune system left, and our controllers damn well know it, and that's what they're planning for, Jim.
	Right, and then they'll be killed by the natural environment that they could have coped with perfectly well had it not been for the masking, social distancing, excess sanitization, and vaccination.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Yeah, I think it's instructive for people to actually watch that, what was broadcast there that that story was about on the Jumbotron.
	Because that Super Bowl statement right there was one of the most egregious pieces of totalitarian propaganda I've ever seen.
	It reminded me of George W. Bush's famous statement about his role being to Catapult the propaganda, and that's exactly what they were doing through the use of the large Super Bowl audience.
	And Scorpio's earlier statement about more people waking up as a result of these events is extremely applicable here, because people are tuning in.
	To this particular event to see sports, not any kind of political bullshit.
	And I think a lot of people will start to understand what's really happening and what tyranny is being imposed on us with a grand deception of a pandemic with Sniffer Joe coming on there telling everybody to get their vaccines.
	And even some of the footage was extolling Black Lives Matter.
	I couldn't believe it.
	It was right there in your face.
	You couldn't escape it.
	I think Scorpio's right.
	A lot of people are going to begin putting two and two together and not like the outcome.
	Get this.
	I was just sent this yesterday.
	In 2008, Dr. Anthony Fauci co-authored a paper about the Spanish flu epidemic that rates as the most devastating modern pandemic.
	It swept the entire planet in the wake of World War I, brought about millions of deaths.
	In studying the major and actual pandemic, what did he and his colleagues find?
	They discovered that most of the victims of the Spanish Flu didn't die from the Spanish Flu.
	They died from bacterial pneumonia.
	And the bacterial pneumonia was caused by, wait for it, wait for it, wearing masks!
	Wearing masks!
	Maybe now we get a sense of why Dr. Fauci in 2017 was claiming Trump would be challenged by a surprise pandemic, when it couldn't be a surprise if he knew about it in 2017.
	And when he was the guy responsible for preparedness, how could he have not prepared us?
	We also know, of course, 90% or more of the positive test results are fake, just testing fragments of old COVID from having had a cold in the past.
	We know the mask can't possibly help us because the size of the virus is so tiny.
	The mask can't screen it out.
	We also know we're getting irreversible brain damage.
	Irreversible brain damage.
	Such as COVID-19 masks are a crime against humanity and a form of child abuse.
	We're well getting started to fulfilling the Diegel projection.
	That the transformation of American society that will take place in the next few years will take us from a population of 326,620,000 in 2020 to fewer than 100 million.
	626 million, 620,000 in 2020, to fewer than 100 million.
	That's a loss of 226 million Americans who will be dead by 2025.
	Scorpio.
	I think all the pieces are here.
	We knew it before, but that revelation about Fauci's own research on the Spanish flu, I think is devastating.
	Yeah, and you know, I really want to dig deeper into this Spanish flu.
	There's a lot of things that don't add up about it, Jim.
	Because first of all, they're always saying that 50 million people died.
	I don't see how they could possibly calculate those numbers, especially on the tail end
	of World War I.
	I don't see how you can calculate those numbers back then.
	I don't believe the figures.
	Secondly, I believe that the Spanish flu very well may have begun by an experimental vaccine
	they were giving American soldiers as they went off to war.
	It coincides with the so-called outbreak of this event.
	This is very suspicious.
	And then, of course, yes, the masking.
	People develop bacterial pneumonia as the result of re-breathing their own bodily waste
	products.
	It's totally contrary to nature to not expel the things that are supposed to come out of
	your breath.
	And re-breathe them.
	It's like putting your mouth up to a tailpipe of a car.
	It's not a good idea.
	And I'll just tell you, just on a personal level, I'm seeing these people that wear masks.
	They're getting very angry.
	And they're getting sort of a crazed look in their eyes.
	And they're not aging well.
	They're not looking healthy.
	It's very sad.
	And I just hope people stop killing themselves by wearing masks.
	They are designed to kill us slowly.
	I have no doubt whatsoever.
	Michael?
	I had previously seen that report about Tony the Rat Fauci and what he and his team had decided about the The pneumonia being the cause of most of the deaths and what's called the Spanish flu.
	We've learned to identify the word flu with virus.
	So the Spanish flu is a misnomer.
	And it wasn't a viral pandemic.
	And in fact, in all likelihood, based on my studies, and this is my favorite point of study these days, in all likelihood, there is no such thing as a viral pandemic.
	The understanding of what viruses are and what their function is has been misunderstood since they were first identified back in the early part of the 20th century.
	I also have, back to Fauci, I also have housemates here who are addicted to 10 BC like you do, Jim.
	And just before we started this show today, I went in there and saw Fauci on the TV screen, you know, being held up as the great expert.
	And he was actually on a broadcast.
	The subject matter was the impeachment.
	So I don't know why he was on there.
	He was probably saying, what a great thing it'll be now to have Biden as the Commander-in-Chief because now he can do all the genocidal things he wants to do.
	Yeah, do all the things that Fauci wanted Trump to do that Trump wouldn't do because Trump knew a bit better.
	Frankly, I believe Trump was going to reverse all this.
	Now I'm terribly worried it won't happen and that we're going to be left to die on the vine because of the mess that this bastard is being Promoting, meanwhile, an extremely thoughtful piece by Roger Simon, Moral Narcissism and the Show Trial of Donald Trump.
	Discussing the Democrats' impeachment trial in legal terms is a ludicrous waste of time.
	Anyone literate in the English language can see the concept of impeaching a post-president is entirely absent from the U.S.
	Constitution.
	Removing someone from office who's no longer in office in the first place is a serial comic oxymoron straight out of the theater of the absurd.
	What is actually going on is Trump derangement syndrome taken from a neurosis to some kind of bizarre psychosis with overtones of obsessive-compulsive disorder.
	The level at which this trial is worth examining, therefore, has a psychoanalytic, not a legal, tilt.
	It raises, once again, the question of why the Democrats and their media cohorts despise Donald Trump so much.
	Yes, I know they fear his political comeback above all things and wish to extinguish it, but what is it on a deeper level that makes them believe this man to be such a monster that they're going full Stalinist and conducting what Rand Paul aptly called a show trial?
	Allow me to be a tad self-referential because I think at least to some degree the answer can be found in my 2016 book, actually written before Trump won the nomination with few specific references to him, I Know Best, How Moral Narcissism Is Destroying Our Republic, If It Hasn't Already.
	The narcissism I was referring to is not the traditional kind based on the Greek youth narcissist's fascination with his own image, but a narcissism of ideas, of moral self-description.
	I explained it this way.
	What you proclaim, what you say you believe, is what makes you good, what makes you important, not the actual results of those beliefs which are irrelevant.
	Biden's current recent cancellation of the Keystone Pipeline could be described as a purely morally narcissistic act, proclaimed as if something significant for the environment, where in reality all it does is put people out of work and give comfort to our enemies as America becomes more energy dependent.
	Ironically, it also has negative environmental repercussions, forcing the oil to be transported by more risky rail means.
	John Kerry is a moral narcissist par excellence, jetting around endlessly in his carbon belching private plane to save us all from climate change.
	Moral narcissism fits today's liberals and progressives to a T. Living millionaire and billionaire lives that make hypocrisy the understatement of all time, while disdaining the working class, their needs and values to a degree that would embarrass Marie Antoinette.
	Donald Trump undermined all that.
	He makes and made plenty of proclamations and certainly loves his private planes, but he's all about results.
	In fact, he makes a point of delivering on his promises, the exact antithesis of standard operating procedure in Washington.
	Where politicians send us endless emails and texts, almost always asking for money, about what they say they believe or are planning, but almost never about what they have accomplished, as if we don't and shouldn't care about that.
	It's the way the game has been played in DC for ages, quite comfortable and insular when you think about it, and self-replicating.
	No wonder Trump is loathe.
	He also made things like improving the economy seem remarkably easy and quick.
	Just remove excessive regulations and lower taxes.
	Actually common sense.
	When it's supposed to be so complicated and arcane, only wise politicians and economists could do it over many years.
	Although nearly pervasive in the Democratic Party, moral narcissism is not exclusive to it.
	A number of Republicans fit the description as well, and you can almost be certain they will be among those voting to convict Trump in the show trial.
	These politicians, both sides and the media, ...are particularly angry because as narcissists, moral or otherwise, they have a great need of fans, people to admire them constantly and make them feel alive.
	Trump ruined that to a great extent by unmasking them as phonies.
	Rage and vengeance were and are the natural response.
	In a less overly psychological realm, it's not inconsequential that he made his money before coming to Washington.
	They usually make theirs during and after.
	Trump even had the temerity actually to lose half his fortune while serving, at the same time donating his salary to charity.
	How off message is that?
	Imagine if that became pro forma for our public servants.
	So it's a twofer or even a threefer, or is it a quinella when it comes to hating Trump?
	Whatever the case, let the show trial begin.
	Scorpio, your thoughts?
	Well, you know, I think the reason for the deep hatred of Trump is really, it's because Trump sort of tapped into an inner core of American consciousness, an inner core of the root or the seed of the American ideology.
	And that scared the globalists very, very deeply.
	And because, first of all, it's sort of a return to nationalism, this idea of America first, To stop illegal immigration, to bring jobs and manufacturing back to the United States.
	These are all things that would benefit the average American, of course.
	And his sort of common sense approach, this speaking in terms that the average person could actually understand, instead of, you know, talking over their head like, you know, these elite so-called globalists like to do, speak in these terms that nobody can really understand.
	And also, you know, Trump sort of brought this common sense logic to things and showed that these problems could be solved fairly easily.
	And these are all things that struck a deep fear and an abject hatred in the hearts of these globalist traitors.
	And I would just say too that, you know, narcissism is actually a term that's usually misused by people.
	Because narcissism, if you look at the psychological definition, it usually entails someone who has a deep self-hatred as the result of some kind of childhood trauma.
	And the narcissism is an overcompensation for the self-hatred that they feel.
	And people like John Kerry, Are actually far beyond a narcissist.
	This man is a member of a death cult, you know, the Skull and Bones.
	And he's a psychopath that's intent on mass genocide.
	We need to see these people for who they are.
	These people plan on killing millions if not billions of people worldwide.
	And as strange as that sounds, it's the absolute truth.
	Those were just stunning and brilliant remarks, Scorpio.
	I just love every word you said.
	Just spot on.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Yeah, I thought that was great writing in that piece.
	A serial comic oxymoron straight out of the theater of the absurd.
	It's a psychoanalytic examination of the motivation behind this, what I called earlier, a totally vacuous propaganda exercise.
	But it asks the very same question that I was asking earlier, and it answered basically, what is this?
	What is behind this?
	And the article, Which is very good.
	Answers it with a psychological answer.
	But personally, I think there's a realpolitik reason for it that I haven't quite been able to formulate yet, but I think Scorpio's on the right track when he's identifying the cultural and ideological reasons that the controllers who are trying to overthrow the United States and the rest of the world
	for that matter, the reasons that they fear that cultural and ideological
	stuff.
	I think that's the primary reason going on here.
	It reminded me, and this gets back to the silver lining in waking people up,
	reminds me of the story about the Russian immigrant who came to the United States after
	the collapse of the Soviet Union.
	And the statement that he made was that back in Russia, We all knew that everything on our TV sets, everything coming from the government, was egregious false propaganda.
	But here in the United States, people still believe it.
	Well, I think there's going to be a lot of people not believing it, and I'm seeing it around me.
	That is definitely a silver lining.
	I gotta say, this conversation with you guys has been one of the highlights of all of the shows we have done.
	Just sensational.
	Meanwhile, send us fan mail, pro or con.
	We want to hear from you.
	Live need to know at gmail.com.
	Live need to know at gmail.com.
	Here's a commentary from a correspondent.
	Jim, these democrats have lost their minds.
	They are collectivized and stick together in their massive lies.
	They turn everything upside down, turning their evil good and Trump's good evil.
	They are habitual deceivers and liars and are acting just like the Kazarians.
	They do all the things they abuse Trump and the good guy Republicans on.
	A number of Republicans have joined forces with them out of fear of the new world order globalists.
	The C.O.L.
	money changers, a.k.a.
	banksters.
	The R.K.M.
	Their collective lies are so absurd, only dumbed-down folks who want government handouts are naive enough to believe what they lie about is true.
	This current reality of the Democrat lies and mass delusions is so absurd, I would never have believed this depth of mass mind control of Congress was even possible.
	Just shows how 55 plus years of coordinated mind control can produce a culture of believed lies and false narratives.
	Meanwhile, I have reported the crack in the scenery here, which appears to be a giveaway that they're on a set.
	Notice we have both a fake Biden and Nancy Pelosi.
	A correspondent, however, suggests to me that it may only be a door I find this not overly plausible, but it's not impossible.
	I wrote back and said, well, that would mean the painting, but notice also the fireplace would have to be a part of the door, which I don't accept at all, but I want to point out That here's an alternative that could be raised in form of debunkery.
	Meanwhile, if that's not sufficient to convince you everything is fraudulent, look at this.
	I'm going to show you how to get rid of a fake ID.
	They're really showing themselves to do really well.
	Come on, man!
	Let me say that I find that video utterly fascinating for multiple reasons.
	The plane appears to be a commercial plane.
	Maybe it's used in movies in the past to simulate Air Force One.
	I do not believe it is Air Force One.
	The seal of the president looked wrong.
	It looked counterfeit.
	But in my opinion, the biggest tell is this.
	Those were not military figures saluting him.
	Those were firemen.
	They're faking to cope with the point I've been making, that he's walking past the Marines and the Marines are not saluting him.
	Here's another pastiche of the real Joe and the fake Joe.
	Various differences in their skull, their forehead, their face, and so forth, which confirms the point I've been making since the first debate.
	Meanwhile, this is particularly disgusting.
	We have a photograph of Chuck Schumer on Epstein's Orgy Island.
	I mean, look at that!
	This is surely an additional reason they want Trump out.
	They don't want to be exposed.
	Meanwhile, if your mind's ajar, you might want to check out my conference, False Flag and Conspiracy 2020, on the 5th and the 6th of December.
	The archives are available now.
	Go to falseflagconspiracy2020.com.
	Two dozen presentations of very high quality.
	Remember, The secret of freedom lies in educating people.
	The secret of tyranny, in keeping them ignorant.
	Our final thoughts, Scorpio.
	Well, Jim, that video you showed was interesting.
	I'd like to see it again, just to analyze it further.
	But isn't it convenient that this Sniffer Joe character gets to walk around with a mask on most of the time, and sunglasses on, so you can't really see his face?
	And one thing that really struck me was how bald he was in the back.
	I've seen other Groper Joes.
	I don't know how many Groper Joes they have out there now.
	But I've seen other Groper Joes that weren't nearly that bald just a few weeks ago.
	So this is really odd.
	And the way he stumbles going up the steps.
	The whole thing was just bizarre.
	I'd really like to watch it again.
	And, you know, I always suspected that Chuckie, Chuck U. Schumer, was some kind of a pedo.
	I mean, just look at his face.
	He's a disgusting-looking individual.
	He has that creepy vibe to him, just like Mitch McConnell does, and Adam Schiff, and Jerry Nadler, and that Blumenthal character.
	These are creepy-looking individuals.
	There's really something wrong with these people.
	And, you know, they say you can't judge a book by its cover, but Uh, that might be true in some cases, but you know, the, uh, the face of Dorian Gray, uh, is another example of how, uh, what you do is reflected in your face over the years and Chucky baby Schumer is a great example of it.
	Michael, your final thoughts?
	Oh, good reference, Scorpio.
	Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray.
	That's always a great analogy.
	That's, you know, what you just showed us there is yet more of these anomalies that we've been talking about all along, and I still haven't come to a good understanding of what this is all about.
	On the one hand, we're seeing People that we did have trust in, like Simon Parks, collapsing around us.
	And on the other hand, there are these persistent anomalies.
	So, let's see what's going to happen.
	As a final word, I'd like to read an excerpt from a now famous video interview done by Katherine Austin Fitz.
	It's up there at the Jim Fetzer BitChute site for anybody to take in the whole interview, but she says, this will take me about a minute to read, what the banking oligarchy is trying to do involves all the money on the planet.
	It's messy and the challenge that they have How is, how do you market a system that if people actually understood it, nobody would want it?
	And of course, the way you do that is with a healthcare crisis.
	Because if a few people want to control the many, the question becomes, how can you herd all the sheep into a slaughterhouse without them realizing it and resisting?
	The perfect thing is to have invisible enemies.
	We had the war on terrorism with invisible terrorists and now a virus is perfect because it's invisible.
	You don't have to prove that it doesn't exist because it's, I mean, you don't have to prove that it exists because it's invisible.
	Invisible enemies are always the preferred ones if they're scary.
	The second tactic, which is very effective, is divide and conquer.
	If you can turn men and women against each other, black and white, and immigrant against non-immigrant, you're going to need the government to be between those people and the others.
	So whether it's divide and conquer or invisible enemies, It's always with the purpose to impose fear, to get people to go along with these things.
	And an invisible virus allows you to impose incredible control mechanisms.
	You can institute extraordinary amounts of those control mechanisms, all within the pretext that we're protecting you from the invisible virus.
	End of quote.
	Well, this is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina.
	I think you are getting today as good as it gets when it comes to contemporary analysis of what's actually going on.
	If you don't get it now, watch it again, because your future And that of your nation are at stake.
	If you don't want to live the rest of your life as a serf or a slave or suffer irreversible brain damage, you better figure out what's going on and figure it out fast.
	And I say we are not going to wait until October for a hypothetical Supreme Court hearing where a decision might not be issued for yet another year.
	The Supreme Court has failed the American people, failed the American people.
	There is no doubt about it.
	There's no going back.
	I say, prepare yourself for what now is appearing increasingly inevitable.
	That the only way the American people are going to be able to restore freedom and liberty to the United States is if they do it themselves.
	Stock up on supplies, be prepared, ammo, guns, whatever you need, because a dark storm is on the horizon.
	Thanks for joining us today.

▲