Jan. 29, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
12:51
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| So I woke up this morning and ended up seeing a article on, I don't know where it was, some news feed. | |
| It may have been from the San Francisco Chronicle or it may have been from other news source. | |
| And the source with the story was basically an interview with Somebody named Dr. Chu, who I think is the head of some virology center at UCSF in San Francisco. | |
| So he's apparently a big shot in virology. | |
| And there were some things in that article that I agreed with and some other things that I didn't agree with. | |
| So I thought I would discuss it for a minute. | |
| Basically, the thrust of the article was expressing this Chu's concern that in his lab, which is one of the leaders in the world for sequencing this SARS-CoV-2 imaginary virus, that he's finding up to 25% variance, in other words, mutated viruses, And that is a huge concern to him because he sees no national effort to track these variations, these mutations, to find out whether they're more deadly or more infectious or less deadly, and that there is no concerted effort to collate and act on his findings. | |
| So again, his finding was that in his lab, which is apparently one of the leading sequencers of the SARS-CoV-2 genome in the world, he's finding up to 25% of the viruses have new mutations, are a variant, and this is of grave concern to him. | |
| Now let me just dissect this a little bit because I know that when people hear and read things like this, they get concerned. | |
| They think this guy is a top level virologist and Tom is just Tom. | |
| So what does he know? | |
| And maybe he's wrong. | |
| And isn't it this clear evidence that this chew is actually working with and finding viruses? | |
| And then finding variants of these viruses. | |
| So let me go through exactly how Chu has come up with this. | |
| And then I have some questions that I would hope people, including reporters, should ask this Chu. | |
| So basically, here is the process. | |
| He takes samples either from people who We're diagnosed with a PCR test is having COVID, although more likely he's receiving cultured samples from labs all over the United States and maybe the world. | |
| I don't actually know which of those two, but really it's the same. | |
| And so then he's looking through this, uh, this debris, which is, as I have said over and over and over again, He has never isolated any virus. | |
| He has never purified any virus. | |
| He's simply looking through the debris either generated by people who are sick or generated originally by people who are sick and then cultured in the laboratory. | |
| This is exactly akin to looking through your garbage. | |
| So you generate garbage based on whatever came into your house this week. | |
| And clearly, and obviously, at least for me, the garbage that we have on January 24th is at least slightly different than the garbage we had on June 24th. | |
| Because then there were more greens and maybe more fresh food. | |
| And now there's more carrots and rutabaga. | |
| And a whole lot of things are different. | |
| So basically then you have this ground up garbage. | |
| That's the sample that he's looking for. | |
| He's working with not anything that's purified or an actual virus. | |
| He looks through these samples and lo and behold, he finds different genetic sequences now than he found in June, July, September, or even December. | |
| And so, and there's also other reasons why you're looking at genetic sequences that are generated by the breakdown products of people's tissues and cells. | |
| Now, they also were probably exposed to different kinds of toxins now than they were in December or June. | |
| So it may have been more glyphosate. | |
| It may have been more electromagnetic field poisoning. | |
| It may be more fear. | |
| It may be more carbon dioxide breathing in because of mass. | |
| There's a whole lot of differences that would generate slightly different garbage now than there was in previous months. | |
| Then those pieces of the garbage are entered into a computer program, either a next generation sequencer, or some other in silico, which means in the computer, or otherwise known as theoretical, otherwise known as imaginary sequence. | |
| At no time, at no time, did he isolate the virus and, and sequence the entire virus as has been done by virologists for decades. | |
| That was never part of this equation. | |
| You simply put this garbage debris into a computer, and lo and behold, it generated a different variation than it did in December or June or July. | |
| This process of generating these sequences is called alignment, and people can essentially program the computer To align it in many different ways, which is why currently, at last I looked, there are 397 different variants of this SARS-CoV-2 virus, because you're basically looking at different people's garbage and different alignment processes, because nobody has a real virus or a real genome. | |
| And as I've said over and over, the reason we have 397 different variations of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and only one variation of a Ford Mustang or a Schnauzer is because Schnauzers and Ford Mustangs actually exist and can be studied and characterized and SARS-CoV-2 viruses don't, haven't been. | |
| Now, the other way they generate these variants is they mix the original debris from somebody who is possibly sick with a certain disease and then they culture that and add it to other genetic material that is exactly the same genetic material as the SARS-CoV-2 virus or any virus. | |
| Specifically what I mean by that is they add the original unpurified sample to a culture containing They also added to a vat containing bovine fetal serum, which has the DNA again exactly like the DNA and genetic material. | |
| There's no DNA in a SARS-CoV-2 virus, but it also has pieces of RNA Which then break down into the brew. | |
| And so you end up having no idea where any of these sequences originate from. | |
| And then the variants come because the more you culture it, because the RNA is so unstable, you generate more and more different sequences just through the process of heating, cooling, culturing it over and over again. | |
| The more you do that, the more variants you generate, and the more you think you have found different mutations, and the whole thing is basically just smoke and mirrors. | |
| So the questions that everybody should be asking this to, including reporters who seem not to know anything about this, is, so, have you ever actually isolated and purified the virus so that you know That all of this genetic material that you're working with could have only come from the virus. | |
| The answer would be a resounding no. | |
| And so that makes the entire project that he's working on basically scientifically invalid. | |
| The second question I would ask him is this genetic material that you're finding that you say are variants of the original genome. | |
| At any time in this process, did you ever mix the genetic material from the sample with genetic material from any other source, such as bovine fetal serum or monkey kidney cells? | |
| If the answer is yes, which it is, Then how could you possibly know where this sequence that you're saying comes from the virus actually originated from? | |
| The answer is he has no idea. | |
| And the third question is, isn't it true that the more you culture it and the more cycles you put this So those are the things that I disagree with. | |
| of the fact that mRNA is so unstable, you will generate more and more aberrant different | |
| copies of mRNA, which will make you think you have variations of the original sequence. | |
| Isn't that true? The answer is, of course, that it is. So those are the things that I | |
| disagree with. And I said in the beginning, I have two things that I agree with. The first | |
| is he made the comment that unless we know precisely what we're working with, as far | |
| as the cause of sickness, we have no way of actually remediating the problem. | |
| I wholeheartedly agree with that. | |
| That's why we should stop looking at these imaginary viruses and try to find out actually why people are getting sick. | |
| Is it the water? | |
| Is it the air? | |
| Is it the electromagnetic fields? | |
| Is it the fear? | |
| Is it social isolation? | |
| Is it carbon dioxide poisoning? | |
| Is it cyanide? | |
| These are the urgent questions that need answers right now. | |
| And the final thing is, he said we have an urgent need for changing the funding of the investigation of this illness. | |
| And I couldn't agree more. | |
| And I hope that if somebody Whoever is funding these labs, like Mr. Chu's lab, should take this to heart and consider stopping the funding. | |
| And if he wants to keep going, he could do it by having bake sales. | |
| So that's my message for today. | |
| I hope everybody understands this very clearly. | |
| This is not a new revelation, not something that should make us lose heart. |
Export Selection