All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 23, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
52:38
The Foundations and Flaws of Viral Theory - Dr. Tom Cowan
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So there's two.
What I wanted to do today was give a short presentation on the foundation of viral theory.
There's also a chat section where you can apparently talk to each other or talk to each other.
And then there's a question and answer section.
So after my short presentation, I will be taking questions and hopefully giving reasonable answers to them.
Um, so the first thing is I wanted to say why that I'm, uh, this was supposed to be a, uh, YouTube live stream and then it got switched into this format.
And all I know really is apparently, uh, I got sent to the principal's office this week.
Um, and so then I went, uh, the YouTube principal, um, called for me or something, did something.
And so we had to switch it to this format.
But I thought as long as we were dealing with principles, that I would actually talk about the principle of viral theory.
Before I get into that, though, I just want to say that since the last time we spoke last week, last Friday, I think it was, I actually made a discovery through a very careful experiment that I had done.
And this may be a little immodest on my part, but I actually think that I may be in line for some sort of prize, maybe even a Nobel Prize in medicine for this discovery.
And I'll just tell you what the discovery is, and then I'll explain how I, the experiment that I did to prove this.
So I discovered that paper, you know, regular pieces of paper, sort of like this, are actually alive, or at least alive-ish.
And the reason I know that is because it turns out that pieces of paper can reproduce themselves.
And as far as I know, that has never been discovered before.
And I don't even know if anybody ever thought of it before.
So I had this idea and then I went and proved it.
And so that to me is a revolutionary discovery.
So I wanted to just outline how I made this discovery.
So basically what I did was I went to a house in the neighborhood.
And I spent a number of hours carefully searching the grounds to see if there was any stray pieces of paper on the grounds.
Now, there was one piece, I think I found it, although it's hard to tell whether it was a leaf or a piece of paper, but I took very careful photographs so I could document that there were no pieces of stray paper on the outside of the house.
So we have that documentation.
And then I went away for a few days and I came back three days later and apparently somebody had put some grenades or something or a bomb or I don't know what and they actually blew the house to smithereens.
And there, to my shock and surprise, was literally hundreds, if not thousands, maybe even more, pieces of paper lying on the grounds all over and around the house.
Now, some of them were different sizes and different colors and some were newspaper and some were, you know, like copy paper, et cetera, old books, paper from old books, that kind of paper.
But I wasn't to be fooled.
And I knew that there was a piece of paper, that one piece of paper that I had discovered, that must have got into the house, reproduced itself, and then exploded the house because actually nobody had seen the grenade or the bomb.
So the paper exploded the house to smithereens and made millions of copies of itself so that it could go and destroy the next house.
So there you go.
Rock solid proof that paper is alive-ish and can reproduce itself and do huge amount of damage to houses.
Now you may be wondering why I said that.
I'll get back to that in a minute.
But I wanted to then say to compare that maybe and contrast that with what we know about viral theory.
How do viruses work to cause or create infection?
Or at least how every medical student, how every biology student, Every, I think, high school student, and now maybe every junior high school student, learns about how it is that viruses cause disease.
Now, this is the theory that, again, we all learned, and as I've also pointed out, it was about the only thing I knew about virology coming out of medical school.
So, here's the way it works.
You have this person who's sick, right?
Like they have a cold or pneumonia or the flu or some kind of respiratory, let's say, you know, symptoms.
And then you go looking for the virus, but you can't find it.
So then, So, well, let me go back a little.
So here's how it's supposed to work.
Let me stop with the comment on it first.
So you have a virus, and it's in a respiratory secretion, and the virus gets introduced into another host, in other words, another person.
This virus then finds other cells, and then a part of the virus That's sticking out from the virus, right?
So we have a virus, which is a piece of genetic material, either DNA or RNA, and it has a coating around it, which is made of proteins.
And then protruding from this protein coat is a erect attachment, right?
In the case of the so-called Mexican Vir virus, It's called the spike protein.
So the spike protein is a erect attachment on the outside of the virus, and it attaches itself to a receptor that is embedded in the cell membrane, which is a lipid bilayer of the host.
In other words, you.
So this virus, with its erect protein protruding out from its shell, so to speak, forcibly attaches itself to the receptor on the cell membrane, the coating of the cell, and then injects itself, at least the most important part of itself, which is its genetic material, into the interior of the cell.
Right?
Therein, once it's in the interior of the cell, it, so to speak, has its way with the cell.
It forces the cell to reproduce itself hundreds, thousands, maybe millions of times by co-opting the machinery, the genetic machinery of the cell.
Once it has co-opted this machinery and made millions or thousands of copies of itself.
It then buds out of the cell membrane, taking a piece of the now spent and destroyed cell with it, and emerges victorious, right?
Victorious out of the cell in millions of copies to go on and and infect and claim its next victim.
Now, if you followed all that, you can sort of see that the imagery of that, if I embellished it a little bit, is not actually too much different than what most of us would describe as either a warlike or maybe a almost a kind of a rape scene.
And I think that is the image that we've all learned about is basically the life cycle of a virus.
So this is a very disturbing image, and one can only imagine where they came up with this.
Now, the interesting thing about this is we might want to ask, is any part of that actually true?
I mean, or what is the evidence that any part of what I just said is actually the case?
And that this is not just some story made up by pretty strange people who decided to, to use a sort of warlike or, you know, abuse image, and essentially graft a virus onto that image?
Or the other way around?
So I tried to look as to see which part of this one can actually verify, say with photographs.
So let's take this one step at a time.
So the first thing is in somebody's mucus, there is a virus.
Now, as we all know, who've listened to me for weeks and months, nobody, and I mean nobody, has found Any virus in somebody's snot without putting it through the culture process?
Nobody.
There is not one picture.
So we have no confirmation of the first step that there was a virus first that was then introduced into the cell.
The second thing is we're told that there is a Certain protein called a spike protein protruding out on the outside of the virus.
Now, we see a lot of computer animations, we see a lot of drawings, we see a lot of covers of Time Magazine, we see a lot of covers of New Yorker with this, but As far as I've looked, I don't see any actual photographs of this in a real virus.
Now, some people may object to that and say, we have electron microscopy photographs that look sort of like this.
And let me just make a comment about electron microscopy to address that issue.
So if I was to ask you, or here's another quest we have, which is to understand what your hand is made of and what your hand does.
That's our quest.
Okay, so the first thing we're going to figure this out is a I'm going to cut your hand off your body.
And then I'm going to put it in an enzyme bath to dissolve most of the soft tissues.
And then I'm going to freeze it to 150 below zero Celsius.
And then I'm going to cut it up with a knife in random cuts.
And then I'm going to bombard it with an electron beam, which kills everything.
And then I'm going to put it in a dye made of heavy metals.
And the only things that will actually show up are the heavy metals staining the tissue of whatever is left after that destructive process that I did.
How many of you would think that you could actually, A, get an actual reproduction of what a hand looks like, or B, have any idea from that mess what a hand actually does?
So could you actually show that a hand is used to caress your friend or your child?
I don't think so.
In other words, the whole process of looking for this spike protein protruding off the side of a virus is done with a highly destructive process, which is guaranteed to create artifacts, in other words, images, which have literally No relationship to what that thing did or looked like in real life.
Okay, so then we move on.
So we know we don't have a picture of this, an accurate living three-dimensional picture.
All we have is a two-dimensional photograph of some particle with a bunch of protrusions off it, and we don't know what that is at all.
Now, the next step, we see it attaching to a protein called Neuropilin-1, we're told, which is part of the ACE2 receptor embedded in the cell wall of the cell.
Sorry, yes, embedded in the cell wall.
Now, here's another interesting thing.
What is a cell wall?
Well, it's a lipid bilayer, which means it's a sandwich Protein, fat, or lipid, and protein.
At least that's the lipid bilayer model.
But it could be a fluid mosaic model, which is a whole other description of what the cell membrane actually looks like.
And it turns out there's actually 17 different models of what the cell membrane looks like and is composed of.
Because nobody has ever seen it.
All they see is a line with heavy metal stain on both sides, which is not too different than you would see if you took just about any protein and impregnated it with this heavy metal stains.
You would see beads of heavy metal on both sides.
And there is no three-dimensional structure.
Nobody has ever proven That that is a lipid bilayer, that is a theoretical construct, which I will get into very much more detail later.
But supposedly this cell membrane has embedded in it receptors, which is where half of the medicines in standard medicine supposedly work.
Opiate receptors, serotonin receptors, all of these embedded in this cell membrane.
Now, the interesting thing is, as far as I can see, there are no pictures of these receptors embedded into any cell membrane.
And of course, the reason they give is, well, in the way they prepare the slides, those dissolve these receptors, so you can't see them.
But any reasonable human being would then say, so where are the holes?
If you had this thing embedded in the cell membrane, and then you dissolved it, you should see a hole.
And there aren't any holes.
All you see is a smooth line with a bunch of heavy metal droplets on each side.
You see nothing protruding out from the cell membrane.
So where's the receptor?
And so I now have a challenge, which is, if anybody can show me a picture of a spike protein attaching an actual photograph to a cell,
an ACE2 receptor embedded in a cell membrane, we will give you a 50% discount for anything in
the Dr. Tom Cowan.com store for the next month. And if Asher is listening, I don't think you
have to get worried because sometimes as he worries about these things.
Because as far as I can tell, there is no chance that anybody will have this picture.
Because it doesn't exist.
Nobody has ever seen it.
So we will get into later, why do they know, or what makes them think these receptors, if they actually exist at all, are embedded in the cell membrane?
And basically, they do subcellular fractionation.
Now, that's a big word.
And what does that mean?
Well, they take a cell and they put it in a blender and homogenize it, sort of like you would homogenize milk.
And then they look for the pieces.
They assume that since they found something that has a lipid in it, and there is a model of a lipid bilayer membrane, therefore this lipid receptor must be in the membrane, so therefore it is.
I also want to point out That whenever you have, if you ask yourself the question, how come there are 17 different models of what a cell membrane looks like?
And there's only one model of what a Ford Mustang car looks like, or one model of what a Schnauzer looks like.
That's a dog.
There's, of course, different kinds of You all know what I mean.
Obviously, the answer is Because schnauzers exist and anybody can take a picture of it and they basically all look the same.
And the same thing with Ford Mustangs, all the cars look more or less the same.
And since nobody has ever actually seen this lipid bilayer or fluid mosaic model or any of the other 15 models, one is free to use one's imagination and make up whatever nonsense you want.
So anyways, So then we go in and then this supposedly the spike protein attaches to the ACE2 receptor.
It injects its business into the cell and then co-ops the genetic machinery of the cell, makes millions of copies for itself.
And then it emerges victorious through the cell membrane, taking pieces of itself as sort of the prize.
And then you have a million new copies of the virus.
Now, I would say this is exactly the same line of thinking as you had basically no pieces of paper on the outside of the house.
And then you put the paper in something, which by the way, has the exact same kind of genetic material as the virus.
So in other words, you put the paper in the house and then you blew the house to smithereens
and that proves that the paper reproduces. So in viral theory, you have this piece of genetic
material and you put it on kidney cells and then you blow up the kidney cells with toxins and
starvation and you put some fetal bovine serum in there, which also has the exact same kind of
of genetic material as the kidney cells and the virus.
And then you blow up the tissue, and what emerges is a million copies of this and many other so-called viruses.
And that's how they proved viral theory.
So the second challenge is if anybody can show me a video, right?
So that's what happens.
Attach to the receptor, inject itself in, take over the machinery, emerge through the cell wall.
If you can show me a video of all that happening, we will send you a code 50% off everything in the Dr. Tom Cowen And again, Asher, don't worry because nobody will show that video.
Now, you occasionally see, as they say, viruses, which are just pieces of genetic debris, quote, budding off the cell membrane or budding out of the cell.
Of course, you don't see the intact cell because the cell has been, like our house, blown to smithereens.
So all you see is one piece of genetic material next to another.
You have no idea whether that's coming in, going out, or whether they're just debris that has been blown up.
And the whole thing just reeks of sloppy science that's dogma that has been passed down for 50 years with literally no confirmation or experimental evidence that anybody can present And I think I'm going to stop there.
We're going to go into, as time goes on, just what a cell membrane is, and how do I know that, and how can you prove whether it exists or not, and all these various components of this, and even more about what an electron microscope sees and what it can't see, because basically what it's seeing are artifacts.
And so as we flesh this out, my intention is to show you basically just how unscientific this science models are, and how we have been dramatically led astray through people presenting scientific dogma Which is basically just dogma.
And if you actually carefully ask for facts, videos, pictures, control experiments, there is literally none to be found.
So with that, I went a little bit longer than I thought.
I will try to look at the questions and see if I can address some of these.
So apparently we're, Being able to be heard in the UK, which is good.
Next question, was viral theory invented to cover up for illnesses caused by EMF radiation?
I'm gonna move this over here.
A viral theory was invented in the early 50s by a guy named Embers.
Viruses that they could isolate, because they could isolate some of these particles from certain tissues like sea algaes, or if bacteria, when they're stressed, they coalesce down and form what are called bacteriophages.
And they could see those, they could then isolate and purify those, and then they could See if those cause disease in any animal or people, and basically they found out that they couldn't.
And so then a guy named Embers came up with a theory that the viruses basically inoculated themselves into the cell, and he proved this in exactly the way I said.
He took unpurified stuff and he inoculated that on tissue.
He then poisoned and starved the tissue so it broke down.
Unfortunately for him, The as he actually pointed out, the tissue has the same components as the virus as far as DNA.
So he got confused and all of virology has been confused because all of those particles that we see are breakdown products of the tissues.
Next question has to do with whether there is an engineered virus.
And something to do with gain of function.
And all I can say, and I'm going to get into that more now, and I think Andy Kaufman and I are going to do a whole sort of seminar or webinar on this.
But anybody out there who still thinks there is an engineered virus, you please show me the isolation of this engineered virus, because I can guarantee it's not there.
There is no more evidence for an engineered virus spreading throughout the world than there is a normal virus spreading throughout the world.
None.
Now, it's not to say that people aren't trying to engineer viruses, or at least make bioweapons using genetic material.
In fact, I would argue that that is actually what a vaccine is.
A vaccine is a bioweapon of genetically engineered stuff to essentially make people sick.
So they've been doing this forever.
The idea that there is an engineered virus circulating throughout the world, in my view, is pure nonsense.
And the sooner we get rid of this essentially toxic idea, the better.
Because there is no more evidence for this than the normal virus.
Here's another question.
I'm not sure if you can see it.
But it's a little bit of a blur.
It's a little bit of a blur.
Could you address why this is supposedly so contagious?
It's not contagious.
There is nothing about this illness that's happening now that's contagious.
If you disagree with me on that, show me a study showing an isolated virus causes disease in any other animal or person because it doesn't exist.
And the other thing, we need to be extremely rigorous in our thinking.
Because if you say that a lot of people in the same place get sick, therefore it must be a virus, then I don't know how you explain a lot of people got sick in Hiroshima, and as far as I know, there was no virus.
And the same thing happened with Chernobyl.
They blew off this nuclear reactor, and then it started sort of spreading throughout Eastern and then Western Europe.
One person after another got sick.
So that looked like it was contagious.
But as far as I know, no rational human being thinks that was a virus.
The same thing happened with scurvy.
One sailor after another got sick.
Their teeth fell out.
They went into heart failure.
A lot of people died.
They went to a port.
Then the next crew of shipmen got the same thing.
For a hundred years, they thought it was a virus.
Then somebody ate a lime or a lemon.
The whole thing went away.
And the point is, there are huge consequences to being wrong about this whole viral theory or contagious theory.
And until somebody proves it to me, In the way that any rational scientist would prove it, which is to isolate the virus in the way that I've described over and over again, and show that that makes an animal or a human sick, I simply don't buy it.
So I'm going to skip the vaccine questions because we went over that last time.
Here's a question.
Does this new perspective affect my opinion of homeoprophylaxis?
So a lot of people ask me, so do I believe that, for instance, giving people measles vaccines has lessened the incidence of measles?
That's a good question.
Because it needs to be fleshed out a little bit.
Because to a certain extent, even though I vehemently disagree that measles vaccines have lessened the complication or the death rate from measles, that there's no evidence for.
But in my take on the situation, it has lessened The number of children in particular who go through the process of what we're calling measles.
So why would that be?
So first of all, we have to understand what measles or any childhood illness or infect any so-called infectious disease is.
And I know I've used this same example hundreds or thousands of times, but it's you get a splinter in your finger and you don't take it out and then you get pus and this pus is the therapy for the splinter and gets the splinter out.
So in that situation, the splinter is the disease and the pus is the therapy.
Period.
You can then say, graph that same line of thinking into so somebody smokes or breathes in sort of toxic debris, which unfortunately is the case with all of us.
And then your body does the only reaction it can to get rid of that debris that you've now breathed in your lung.
And I want to emphasize, This isn't a way of dealing with it.
This is the only way, which is you get fever to liquefy your tissue water, you make mucus, and you cough, and you flush out the debris from your lungs.
That process, which unfortunately we call bronchitis or pneumonia, which unfortunately we call the illness, is actually the body's not only a way it cleanses its tissue, it's the only way.
Now, unfortunately, because medicine, doctors, etc, don't understand that they think that is the disease.
It's literally the same thing with chickenpox or measles.
So measles and chickenpox are part of the maturation process.
It's sort of like a snake shedding its skin.
In order to grow into a fully present human being, and you could put this, we have a soul and a spirit, and it has to interact with the body, and it gets an inherited blueprint of the body, And it has to make it its own.
So it uses fever and it remolds the body, just like you would remold clay to make it an instrument for your humanity.
And that process of remolding and casting out what that which you don't need, is what we call childhood disease, period.
And one of the reasons we know that is if you stop a child or children from going through this maturation process, what you see is children who essentially don't fit properly in their body.
Now, they manifest that in any number of ways.
Some of them have eczema, so it's chronic.
Some of them have asthma, so it becomes chronic.
Some of them have what we call ADD, which is basically pure, I don't fit in my body, so I'm sort of trying to rearrange myself to figure out how to fit.
We also know, without any doubt, that children who don't go through this maturation process have any number of chronic diseases increased throughout their whole life.
For instance, they have more brain cancer, they have glioblastoma, they have overall more arthritis.
They have overall more heart disease.
They have overall more of every chronic disease that you can possibly imagine.
So in other words, this measles process is not a disease.
It's a maturation process.
Now, given that, it's perfectly imaginable to me that you could take some characteristic of this measles process, like you could take some of the secretions of the exudate from the lesions, and then you could mix that with some very deadly, harmful poisons.
I mean, every poison is harmful, that's the definition.
And you could suppress Yes, you can stop it.
or thwart the ability of that child to go through that process. That is what we're doing with the
vaccine. We are thwarting the child from going through that process, which is what they need
in order to be fully conscious, fully actualized, fully healthy human beings. So yes, you can stop
it. And as we all know, if you take a group of, in a population of children, and you go about
foolishly stopping them from going through these maturation processes, you end up with numbers like
before they did that, 10% of the children had a chronic disease.
After you do that, the numbers are something like 54% of the children will now have a chronic disease.
ADD, asthma, eczema, all these things that come because the children simply do not fit in their body because they were thwarted, prevented from going through what is a normal maturation process.
The questions that are really long are hard for me to answer.
So here's an interesting question.
Do I no longer believe in the immune system and what about products like Immunity Matrix?
How do they work or do they work?
So I just want to say, like any hopefully normal human being, I hope I'm still normal, I'll let you guys be the judge of that.
Anyways, let's just assume for now that I'm a normal human being.
I, as I go along, I learn more things and discard what I used to know and move on.
I think that's just how it's supposed to be.
And as I've said over and over again, in every, every book, including the Contagion Myth, every book I've ever written, every lecture I ever gave, I have made mistakes.
Every single one of my mistakes, every single one, was because I believed the dominant narrative more than I should have.
Most of them, I had this inkling at the time, like, I don't think this is really accurate, but I just didn't want to take it on at the time.
And there are still some of those even now, but hopefully As I learn more and study more and think more and understand more, I can take on more and more.
So the question, do I anymore believe in an immune system?
The answer is no.
Because what do we need an immune system for if there's no viruses and bacteria to become immune to?
Why do we, what do we need an immune system for?
And in fact, in the coming days, I'm going to dissect just some of the components of this so-called immune system and to show just how crazy the whole concept is.
So what about something like Immunity Matrix?
Because it actually seems to help people not get sick.
And it's very interesting because just because there isn't an immune system and maybe it's a misnamed product doesn't necessarily mean it doesn't work.
So how would it work?
Well, one of the main components in there is mushrooms.
So let's review.
Why does somebody get sick?
They get sick because they put cigarette smoke or debris or thoughts or emotions or poisons or arsenic or glyphosate or EMFs or you could name a million different toxins that then your body has to eliminate.
There's no other choice.
It's either that or get worse for life.
So you can then the real process of medicine is looking out into nature and saying, so how does nature help detoxify poisons?
And one of the answers is, well, they bring mushrooms or fungus into the area and the fungus The mushrooms bioremediate the toxins.
Some of them are even so good at it that you can have an oil spill on a beach and you can throw, I don't remember which kind of mushrooms, and the mushrooms will eat all the toxic oil spill.
And then interestingly, I haven't done this, not sure I would actually, but I've heard that you can actually eat the mushrooms.
And so that's a brilliant model for what we need to do.
Now, if you can do that by introducing so-called medicinal mushrooms and let them eat your toxic debris, then you wouldn't have to go through that process that we call bronchitis.
And so it would look like somehow it did something to your immune system, had nothing to do with any virus or bacteria Or even antibodies.
It has all to do with you have been subjected to poisons, which we all are.
And these mushrooms can help you digest them.
Very simple, straightforward.
It works.
It's been used for thousands of years.
And if we all survive, it'll be used hopefully for another thousand years.
So when people ask questions like under terrain theory, how do you treat a long-term persistent
infection without the use of antibiotics?
So, one of my basic points here is, we have to stop using this word.
So, in other words, rather than saying you have a long-term persistent infection, you may have long-term persistent symptoms.
In other words, the example they used was bacterial vaginosis.
In other words, you have essentially a toxic discharge from your vagina.
So the key here is this is not an infection.
The only reason the bacteria are there, if they are there, is to biodegrade some kind of toxin that's in your vagina and then help you get rid of it.
So if you don't want those bacteria, because the problem then becomes these bacteria sometimes create their own toxins, and sometimes they create, you know, their own toxic environment.
So now you have two problems.
But the original problem was, so you have some sort of toxin introduced into your vagina, what could that be?
It could be birth control pills, it could be spermicides, it could be any number of things.
That you have to find out for yourself.
It could be toxic water you're bathing in.
So, you eliminate the toxin, then that allows the bacteria to biodegrade the dead and dying tissue that were essentially poisoned.
Once that happens, then it will restore itself to normal.
There was no treating of any persistent infections.
Now, the art of medicine is trying to help people do that.
So yes, vitamin C helps detoxify.
Fasting helps detoxify.
Lots of things.
Probably homeopathic medicine helps detoxify.
So any natural medicine that is actual realistic and based on a realistic conception of what's happening here, which is that you're working with the healing processes of the body.
You're not killing infection.
That will never work.
And all we know that what happens with that, you kill the bacteria, they come back again and again and again.
And if they don't come back, you end up with the worst problem Because now you have dead and dying tissue, which you can't biodegrade, and now you've got a real problem.
And that's essentially one of the ways that the whole degenerative process of cancer comes about
because people stop this regeneration process and it just gets worse and worse.
Now here's a question which I'm sure is on all of our minds and every you know this comes up a lot
and I would say that this is not quite my wheelhouse because the question is any sources
or suggestions for people who will be mandated to take the vacation or at their work or lose their
job?
This is obviously a tragic Tragic isn't a huge understatement.
All I can say is hopefully you will stay tuned and we will, I think, hopefully be finding people who have answers to that.
All I can say is right now, this erroneously termed vacation, and I think everybody knows what I mean, Has nothing to do with what a traditional vacation is, which means some product from a virus that A makes you immune and B stops transmission.
Neither of those have even been investigated, let alone proven.
So this is pure and simple, a kind of injection of a genetic product meant to do a, your own kind of genetic modification and function as an operating system And for those of you who don't understand what I mean,
please watch the webinar or video that I did last week.
Again, this is a question which I'm going to partly, well I'll read it, which is what is causing people to get sick and to
die?
And I'll see you next time.
First of all, I wrote a whole book about this called A Contagion Myth.
I hope everybody buys it.
I hope everybody even buys it this week or even today.
And actually, I hope you buy it from Barnes & Noble.
because if everybody, for instance, bought two copies of the contagion myth,
my guess is within the week, we would be the number one bestseller on Barnes & Noble,
which is the only big book selling website that's still ranking the book.
And a lot of things, if you believe in what we're doing here,
if you wanna support our mission, that a lot of good things will happen.
People will have to pay attention and actually review the book if it becomes,
one of the nationwide bestsellers.
So I'm not saying this so much out of personal interest, I'm saying that if we band together
and everybody adds a little bit to this effort, we will essentially force people
to pay attention to these ideas.
So what is making people get sick?
Interestingly, the same thing that makes the tissue culture in this phony viral culture, viral theory experiment do.
People get sick because they're starved and poisoned.
Now, We should think of the word poisoned in the broadest sense, because I include physical poisons, electromagnetic field poisons, arsenic poison, cyanide poisoning, glyphosate poisoning, and toxic thoughts and emotion poisoning.
In fact, nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised if those are at least in the top three.
Because we're basically living in a culture whose essence is fear, hatred and lies.
And that is a toxic environment.
And anytime you introduce a toxin into a living system, either it will kill them, or your body will try to expel that, which is the process we call being sick.
And there's nothing more tragic than the misconstruction of this cleansing process being erroneously
called being sick.
So I'm going to, uh, final question here, um, Um, and again, I would say maybe I'm not the person to answer with.
Yes.
But I do have an answer, which I am very hopeful about, even though you've probably heard me.
I'm not always so thrilled about the word hope.
But the question is, why are politicians and health officials not questioning the dogma?
Do you have any hope that the members of the Biden administration will be open to this knowledge?
And basically, the answer is no.
I don't know why people don't question the dogma.
I only can harken back to the words of, I think it was either Will Rogers or Groucho Marx or Mark Twain, one of the three.
Somebody can send it to me.
I'd love to hear which one of those.
And he said, one of them said, never try to convince anybody of anything who makes their living believing the opposite.
And to go to a virologist and say, the whole foundation of what you're doing has no scientific basis, you should go home and be a plumber, get some honest work, is going to be a really hard sell.
But just in this past week, I have been part of an effort by somebody that I'm sure many of you are familiar with named Stefan Lenka.
And I would say he with a little bit of my like cheerleading support are about to embark on the precise experiments, which will show that there is no virus.
There is no viral theory as I explained.
All of this is just a basic somewhere between a misconception and a fraud.
We will demonstrate that without any shadow of a doubt.
We will publish the research, publish the studies.
We will film the studies and document what we're doing so that forevermore there will be no doubt that all of this stuff that we've heard about the A nasty virus about to decimate us all is just a spell and a made-up story.
And I'm talking about natural viruses, engineered viruses, it's all the same.
It's a made-up story that has no place in the future of humanity.
And with that, it's three o'clock.
I know I started a little late, but I think that's probably a good time.
I appreciate so much everybody's feedback and well wishes.
I appreciate you tuning into these events and giving me the opportunity to explain myself.
And even though I'm sure there's some things in a few months that I will correct, I just keep pushing on with trying to get lower, deeper and deeper in what is going on and hopefully I'll be able to give All of us, including myself, more information on what I find.
▲
Export Selection