All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 16, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
51:31
The Science of mRNA Vaccines - Dr. Tom Cowan
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Next thing was I had a conversation at dinner the other last week.
And it was with a group of people who are extremely savvy about the whole vaccine issue, or sorry, vacation issue.
And they were talking amongst themselves about whether they, I guess would say, would believe that These new MRA vacations actually are a form of genetic engineering.
And of course, they read a lot about it.
And some of them thought there was there was good evidence for that.
And some of them thought there wasn't good evidence.
Some of them read there.
This is what they're about.
And some of them read this was what it was not about.
And so they were having a tough time coming to a conclusion or consensus about what the reality was and which part was fake news and which part was real science.
And so I listened to some of this and I asked them the question, and it's the same question I think I would ask all of you, which was just a very simple question, which is, do they know what the Blanking on the word here, the central dogma, sorry, the central dogma of genetics is.
And to my, I guess, surprise, although I can't say I was shocked, but to my, let's just say my surprise, none of the, say, five or six people, I think including my wife at the time, actually either heard of the central dogma of genetics or certainly didn't know what it was.
And I thought that right there is the problem.
Because if you don't know, and I mean really know, what the central dogma of genetics is, there is no possible way that you can decide what the truth is about mRNA vacations.
Now, I'm not saying that I blame anybody for not knowing this, But again, it's like trying to have a conversation about baseball, but you never heard of a bat or a ball.
And if you don't know what the central dogma is, you can't be part of this conversation, really.
And so you have to leave it up to the experts.
And then, of course, the experts, in quotes, will disagree, and they'll give you all kinds of stuff, most of which you won't understand.
And so I decided right then That one of the things that I might try to do is to get people to understand the central dogma, and then why the central dogma has been modified, and how once you know that, you will have no doubt in your mind what a mRNA vacation is all about.
So that was what got prompted me to do this.
So, what do I mean by the central dogma?
And before I get into that, I just want to say that I'm going to say some stuff here, and I may put a few comments in, but basically I'm going to tell you the story that we're told, we being medical doctors and so-called scientists or geneticists, And it's not necessarily the true story, but it's the story we all believe.
And I may make some comments about what the real story is.
But, and I'm going to say something first that I actually haven't confirmed myself, but I've heard this is true, that even the double helix picture of DNA was actually, which was created, I guess you could say, or discovered by a guy named Francis Crick.
And the story that I heard is that Francis Crick actually heard this from a dream his wife had, or an imagination.
I think she was some sort of artist.
And that doesn't necessarily mean it's true or it isn't true, but it's a curious way of doing science.
So let's go over what the central dogma is.
The central dogma is we have genetic material that supposedly resides in our nucleus of our cells.
The genetic material, this DNA, is formed in a double helix.
I'm sure all of you have seen pictures of this.
And it's composed of base pairs, which are basically the same as nucleotides, although nucleotides have a sugar and a phosphate attached to the actual base pair.
And the base pairs are like letters in an alphabet.
Except the DNA code only uses four letters.
The letters are A, T, G, and C. And A always matches up with T, and G always matches up with C. And so, it's basically like a zipper.
And so, in order to have a zipper work, you have to have both sides of the zipper.
And one prong of the zipper is A, and its complementary prong is T, and then the next one might be C, and the complementary prong is G. And then these base pairs are in a string, so you may have A-T-C-C-G-G-C, and you have a whole long string of those, and those are called a gene.
Now the central dogma, which was formulated at the beginning of the discovery of genetics, said that this DNA is transcribed into something called mRNA, otherwise known as messenger RNA, and that process happens in the nucleus.
And the process of DNA being transcribed into messenger RNA is called transcription.
The way that happens is the DNA unzips, so you have A-T-C-G, and it unzips, and the A-C forms a new copy of A forms T and C forms G, and that new strand, which is the complementary to the first strand, is called messenger RNA, so it's single-stranded.
Made in the nucleus.
Now that messenger RNA then gets out of the nucleus and it goes into the cytoplasm.
And here is an interesting aside because we're told that the messenger RNA goes out through the pores in the nuclear membrane.
The problem is nobody has ever been able to find the pores in the nuclear membrane.
All you see is an artifact on electron microscopy.
But that's an aside, so let's forget about that for now.
But anyway, so the DNA separates, then it makes a complementary copy of itself through the process called transcription.
That single strand is called messenger RNA.
It goes into the cytoplasm.
Where at a certain place in the cytoplasm, it is translated into protein, which is the complementary copy of the mRNA.
So the DNA is A-T and the mRNA is T-A.
And then that gets translated into A-T.
I think I got those letters right.
And so the protein essentially is an exact copy of the original DNA.
And it just went through a side path.
And so those base pairs become the essentially form the amino acids, which forms the primary sequence out of which the protein is made.
And the primary sequence we're told Determines the shape and the function of that protein which determines basically how living organisms function now the central dogma part is that We were we thought or This was discovered somehow or I don't think it was discovered.
It was the theory.
Let's say the theory is That this is a unidirectional process In other words, DNA creates RNA creates protein.
DNA to RNA, messenger RNA, is transcription.
RNA to protein is translation.
And there is never protein makes RNA.
There is never protein makes DNA.
There is never RNA makes DNA.
So this is a one-way street.
And that was the foundation of genetics and cell biology.
And so in order to change the protein, you had to change the DNA, which then gets coded into RNA, which gets coded into protein.
And that's how it's that's how it works.
Or at least that's how it was supposed to work until The early 80s, maybe the late 70s, when it was decided, in my view, as I've explained, without any evidence, because the HIV virus, the human immunodeficiency virus, was never isolated or sequenced, which I've gone over.
But let's forget about that for a minute.
I know these are a lot of things to forget about and say, what they discovered was, That there was people with this disease called AIDS.
They discovered that some of them, not all of them, had antibodies to a, quote, virus that they thought they discovered.
I won't get into that.
There was essentially in the beginning three antibodies, and I won't get into the other two.
But the problem they had was that This HIV was an RNA virus.
And the question was, how does an RNA virus insert itself into the DNA?
Because that's against the central dogma.
RNA never becomes DNA.
That's what we thought.
So, essentially, and I'll use this word very decidedly, they decided that there is a process by which you could reverse this central dogma, and it was through an enzyme called reverse transcriptase, and that's the RT part of the RT-PCR test.
Now, you can imagine why they called it reverse transcriptase, because transcription was thought to be DNA becomes RNA, and this virus had an enzyme that reversed that, and the RNA became DNA, and so they called it reverse RNA to DNA transcription, transcriptase, ace means enzyme, so enzyme that reverses the central dogma.
And these were called retroviruses.
Why retroviruses?
Because they reversed the normal virus.
Now, I want to point out, just as another aside here, that the theory, and it is a theory, that the way viruses work is they are pieces, well, let's say viruses before RNA viruses.
So we're talking herpes and chickenpox.
The way they work is they are pieces of DNA encapsulated in a protein.
The virus hooks on to the cell, injects its DNA into the cell.
It somehow finds its way to the nucleus through these mythical nuclear pores, which apparently are two-way streets, which nobody has ever seen, but that's an aside.
And they co-opt the genetic mechanism of the nucleus,
kind of like a medieval sort of slave lord.
So it, but anyways, I'll just forget about that for a minute.
So anyways, the virus injects its DNA into the cell, it finds its way to the nucleus,
it overcomes the mechanism of the cell, and so the DNA gets inserted into the genome
of the host, whereupon it proceeds to make multiple millions, thousands of copies from itself.
It then goes out of the nucleus, back into the cytoplasm,
and buds out of the membrane of the cell, and has gone from, you know,
one or 10 or a thousand viruses to a million or 10 million.
Now, the reason I say that's a theory is because nobody has ever seen this.
And the reason they haven't seen it is because you can only see viruses with electron microscopes, which by definition are looking at, quote, dead viruses, even though nobody actually thinks viruses are alive in the first place.
But the point of it is, you can't see a dynamic process, as in the entering and making more copies and then re-emerging.
All you can say is in the beginning there were 10 copies and at the end there were a thousand.
So we think this is the way that happened.
So the problem was how does an RNA virus do this?
And so they came up with the discovery that there's this enzyme that converts the RNA into DNA.
And it's the DNA that gets inserted into the host's DNA, and then it reproduces itself, making more copies of DNA and making more RNA, which then goes out into the cell and buds off.
So the discovery of reverse transcriptase solved the intellectual theoretical problem of how the heck does an RNA virus cause disease in the first place?
And so the answer was that it's through this mechanism of reversing the central dogma through an enzyme called reverse transcriptase.
As we all know, this coronavirus is supposedly an RNA virus, so it has to go through the same process.
So here's the interesting thing.
At the time, in 1984, When they said we found an antibody to this reverse transcriptase, that was considered proof that there was this RNA virus, because at the time it was thought that reverse transcriptase doesn't exist except in RNA viruses.
In other words, there is no reverse transcriptase somehow floating around in a normal cell, in a normal cytoplasm, in a normal nucleus.
That it was the, you know, the signature of an RNA virus, because only an RNA virus had learned how to make this enzyme that would reverse this central dogma.
Now, 40 or so some years later, every virologist, every scientist who knows anything about this, knows that that's simply not true.
That reverse transcriptase is actually a part of normal cells, and it's part of the interplay of RNA and DNA, and there is no one-way street.
And that's crucial to the understanding of this, Because if reverse transcriptase is a normal enzyme found in normal cells, found in healthy cells and in healthy people, then there's no reason why new copies, new pieces of RNA won't be converted into DNA
In fact, one could say that is the entire basis of genetic engineering.
You could do this by inserting a piece of DNA directly into the host cell or even the host nucleus.
But another way to do it is to simply introduce mRNA into the host tissues, the host cells, and you have essentially a 100% expectation that because there is reverse transcriptase in every normal cell, as far as we know, it will, by definition, get converted into DNA.
And so therein lies the key to the understanding of this puzzle, because that's exactly what the mechanism of an mRNA vacation is, is to introduce mRNA, know that the tissues, the cells have reversed transcriptase, They will convert this into DNA, which will then get inserted into the host DNA, exactly like the process of genetic engineering is.
And so the host, i.e.
you, will end up being genetically engineered.
Genetically engineered simply means You've now inserted, in this case not directly, but through the mRNA conversion into DNA process, your DNA has been altered.
You will then be able, you will then At least possibly, and maybe probably, start putting out new copies of this altered DNA, and you will start making proteins based on this new DNA copy that has been inserted into your genome.
In fact, I would argue that's exactly how they expect it to work.
And so that should hopefully answer people's questions of, is this a type of genetic engineering?
I mean, that's the whole point.
And is there a mechanism that we can understand that would lead us to think this?
That's what I just described.
This is a well recognized mechanism.
The details of how to do it and how not to have the cells degrade the RNA first, etc.
That's the part that's this sort of technically tricky part.
But that that is the intention.
There can be no doubt.
Now, I just want to also add that people have brought up this question of Well, if they're doing a vaccine or a vacation, sorry, against the coronavirus, that must mean they had the coronavirus to work with.
Obviously, that's what people would think.
So let me just read you then what Pfizer says about their mRNA coronavirus vacation.
And you'll see for yourself whether they actually have the virus to work with.
So here's something that they said a while ago, and it's again quoting from the Pfizer website, quote, to build an mRNA vaccine, scientists do not need the actual virus.
And then in a communication with I think the the head of publicity or Our public relations from Pfizer, when they were asked certain questions, here was their responses.
Quote, the DNA template used does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person.
In other words, they have no copy of an isolated virus from any infected person.
And then later they say the DNA template SARS-CoV-2 Gene Bank MN9089473 was generated via a combination of gene synthesis and recombinant DNA technology.
This is basically the tools of genetic engineering.
Here I'm again going to compete with JP Sears a little bit.
As I say, there is one thing good about this vacation.
That at least then you don't have to worry about eating GMO food because you yourself will have been GMO'd yourself.
Now, the other thing that's important to realize about this is this process of being able to change your DNA through the use of the intermediary of mRNA is essentially like putting an operating system into your cells and tissues.
Now, that word has been criticized as being inappropriate and as part of some sort of hoax that people are doing in order to get people to not want to take their vacations.
But it's also interesting to look on the Pfizer website and to see what do they actually say about their mRNA vacation.
And again, I'm going to quote from the Moderna, sorry, the Moderna website itself.
Quote, recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a
computer.
It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs.
In our case, the program or app is our mRNA drug, the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.
So all I can say is that if the idea that an mRNA vacation is part of an operating system is a hoax,
Apparently, Moderna is in on the hoax.
And this is also why, to finish with this part, why David Martin wrote a very concise and brilliant, I would say, piece that none of us should actually refer to this as a vacation, because a vacation is typically something that Either is a quote live virus, which is an interesting term because viruses aren't alive in the first place, or is a protein antigen part of the virus.
So this has nothing to do with that.
And the second thing about what we normally think of as a vacation is that it has to do with having you develop immunity to this virus.
Now, there's nothing like that in either of these two vacations.
They haven't been tested for immunity.
The only thing they've been tested for is whether they reduce symptoms, which could happen for a lot of reasons and with a lot of different explanations.
And the third thing we think about with a vacation is to stop transmission.
And as Fauci and others have said, There is no evidence, and the reason there's no evidence is because it's never been actually tested, that either of these vacations will stop the transmission of anything, or particularly anything they haven't actually found yet.
And so, the typical definition of a vacation being something that comes directly from a virus, or is a virus, and it has to do with developing immunity, or That has to do with stopping transmission.
None of those have even been investigated.
All they have is a platform, a kind of genetic engineering approach that will, in some people, maybe reduce symptoms and in a whole lot of other people increase symptoms.
So that's where we're at.
And hopefully, now that you know the basics of the science, you can look up for yourself, whether I got all this right and where this all came from.
And you can all be in a position to decide for yourself, which is really what I'm hoping to happen.
The only other point I wanted to make before I hopefully go into questions, and I'm not sure I'll be able to actually see the questions, but if I can see them, I'll try to answer them, is what does it mean, so people say to me something like, Tom, if you say they haven't found the virus, how come they now find mutations of this virus, some of which are considered to be More deadly, more transmissible, less deadly, or who knows?
So how is that possible, if there hasn't been a virus isolated, that you can find different variations or mutations of the virus?
Now, it's actually very simple, as I've explained many times.
The way that this so-called coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, has been found, the same way all the other RNA viruses have been discovered, is they take an unpurified sample from a person who's sick, sometimes in a nonspecific, sometimes in a specific way, or they take a previously cultured laboratory sample.
Sometimes they start with an actual person.
Sometimes they start with the laboratory culture.
So they don't purify it.
They don't isolate anything.
They inoculate this onto tissue.
They starve and poison the tissue.
The tissue breaks down into thousands, maybe millions of different genetic particles or particles that have genetic pieces in them.
And then they use The PCR technology with primers to look for certain snippets of this genetic group.
And they find some, and then they put that in a computer model, a computer program, sorry.
And they do something called alignment.
And again, to understand this, it's very similar to if you found if you're making a Your goal is to make an exact copy of a Lego castle and you find a few pieces of it and then you put it into the computer program and it generates the entire castle.
Now you can imagine that depending on the alignment and depending on how you program the computer that everybody will come up with a slightly different castle because it turns out the castle doesn't exist in the first place.
And so you can't make an exact copy of something you never found and have isolated in the first place, which is why at last count, I think there's a reported 6,000 different variations of this particular virus.
Because just like there's 6,000 different variations of This castle or unicorns because nobody has seen the actual real unicorn or castle.
And one of the ways of thinking about this, and why they're called a the in silico genome of an in silico virus, which means it's a computer generated in silica, so to speak, a theoretical virus, is whenever you have theoretical Products, you call them models.
And so then you end up with competing models, which are called different genetic variations with different mutations, because you look for a different primer sequence.
So you found it, because pretty much all the sequences will be there if you turn the PCR cycles up enough.
And then you put that into the computer and it generates a different, quote, virus.
And to think about this, there are, you know, last count, I think 800 or so different variations, or maybe it was 89 different variations of the HIV virus.
There's over 6,000 of the coronavirus.
And anybody want to guess how many different variations there are of a schnauzer dog?
And for those of you who guessed, there's one.
You would be correct, because everybody knows what a Schnauzer dog looks like, because they've seen it.
And since nobody has seen an HIV or a coronavirus, they have to make up different models.
And everybody has a different model.
So you get 6000 different models.
And so this is just another aspect of the failure of science really, and the isolation and characterization of the virus.
So that's probably enough of an introduction, and now I wonder if I can actually see the questions.
The first question says, once the cell produces the new DNA based on synthetic RNA, what is supposed to happen to combat the virus?
What happens in the body?
So of course, we all know there is no virus, so it's hard to answer that question, but I'll answer it from the point of view of what conventional vacationology would say.
They would say that you're putting a synthetic piece of the spike protein, which is the characteristic protein that allows the virus to attach to the cell membrane, As we all know, the spike protein sequence that they're using is not at all unique to this virus.
In fact, at last count, it was identified in 180 or so different sequences in the human body, the human genome, or in microbial DNA, like fungus and bacteria.
So it's by no means unique.
But the theory is you take this sequence, which is unique to this virus, and which is necessary for the virus to inject its contents into the cell, which I tell you I have grave doubts as to whether that's ever happened because it's simply a theory which has never actually been seen.
Let's forget about that.
So then it goes in and it gets reverse transcribed into DNA.
Then you make proteins called antibodies to neutralize the effect of this spike protein.
And so then you become quote immune against the virus because you're immune or have the ability to neutralize this spike protein from attaching to your cells. That is a
wild and unproven theory in my view, and over the next months and weeks I will be getting into
more and more of the details of why so many of these things which we consider settled
proven facts in science, if you simply look into the real details, they are not
facts at all.
And for any of you who want to get started on this, I would advise you to go to YouTube videos by a biologist named Harold Hillman.
And there you will find things and learn things that will make your head spin as to what of the things that we thought we knew just are not true.
Now, the second question I got is, are COVID-19 symptoms new?
Is there, and along with that, this thing about loss of smell and taste, is this seen in the EMF literature?
So as far as I can tell, most of the symptoms, the people who are called COVID-19, most of them have nothing that's new.
It's the same old reason that people get sick as who've always gotten sick.
Pneumonia and all kinds of reasons they get sick.
But I'm also convinced, and I'm convinced mostly from personally talking to some physician friends who are working in ICUs and working in ERs and working with sick COVID patients, that there is something new, and we wrote about this in our book, and that it's based on a combination of toxic factors and everything from Cyanide poisoning and air pollution and fear and lots of, you know, chemical exposure.
But in particular, a new kind of toxin in the situation in our environment called EMF poisoning from millimeter waves.
And the answer is yes, both of these symptoms, loss of smell and taste, while they can be from just having a plugged up nose and they can be a part of what we would call the flu or pneumonia or respiratory viral infections in the old days, they also absolutely can come because of EMF or radiation poisoning.
They're a classic symptom of, you know, exposure in places like Chernobyl and et cetera, because the EMF exposure has a direct toxic
effect on your nervous system, and the whole phenomena of smell and taste are basically
neurologically mediated symptoms.
So the answer to that is yes, and you can find references to that in the literature.
And here's some other.
How is it they create a flu vaccine each year when they don't have the
strain of Okay, let me read that again.
How is it they create a flu vaccine each year when they don't have a strain?
I'm not a vaccine or vacation manufacturer.
But I think basically what they do is the same thing.
They say they do essentially a genetic analysis of either some people who are sick or some cultures.
They find different genetic pieces.
They put that in a computer and end up with a genome.
They say that they found which part of this imaginary virus, which is actually a particle that's being generated from our own tissues, They make they say this is the the sequence that's responsible for causing disease and then they make a
Essentially, they inject that with other adjuvants and other products into you so you will make supposedly antibodies against that particular antigenic piece of the virus, which was never actually isolated and which, as I've said over and over, is undoubtedly is a breakdown product of your own tissues.
The next question, does this vaccine actually fall into the vaccine category or is it a synthetic pathogen?
As I said, if you look into the actual definition, at least the historical definition of what a vaccine is, it was either a live virus, which is a misnomer, or it's an antigenic protein from a virus that's designed to create immunity to the virus.
And to stop transmission.
The ability to create immunity to anything has not been studied with these vacations, nor has the ability to stop transmission.
And it's no accident that they don't study these, because there is no virus that has been isolated or characterized, so it would be impossible to find a A protein or antibody that's specific to this virus, which they haven't found, nor to stop it's the transmission of an illness, which is not based on a virus.
Here's another one.
If no virus, what is causing extraordinary number of deaths and symptoms connected with COVID-19?
The first part of that question is, is there really an extraordinary number of deaths?
That's an interesting question to answer because if you actually look at the statistics published by the CDC, at least generally up till now, people have been have a very difficult time proving that there is an extraordinary increase in the number of deaths or symptomatic people.
However, I have said since the beginning, and partly I've got this from listening to people like Mr. Gates, who maybe know something about what is actually happening here, that the prediction that somewhere between 10 and 15% of the world's population will actually die in this or the coming pandemics, And if you do that, run the numbers, that would mean 30 to 50 million people in the United States.
I'm not saying that this is correct.
But I have all along been very worried that because there is a new and lethal toxin involved here.
And again, it's not just one but a combination, but there is a new kid on the block called military grade millimeter waves.
And Depending on the exposure and you will have an unbelievable possibility for causing disease and death.
So I've actually been predicting this since the get-go.
So it's no surprise to me that there may end up being a lot of people who don't do well or even die as a result of what we're calling COVID-19.
I have been on the record from the beginning saying this.
And that's why, to me, it's so important that we get this right, because just like what we had with scurvy, if you don't understand the cause, there is no possible way to figure out the treatment or how to prevent the death and disability that may happen.
Here's another question.
What medical professionals agree with you?
Well, my friend Andy Kaufman does, and there's a whole lot of other ones.
I don't want to name names, but hopefully more and more.
Here's a question.
Do you consider that cellular activity is orchestrated by the etheric body?
So, those of you who know me, even though you know that I'm very familiar with anthroposophical terms, that I typically don't use them, at least not publicly and rarely in my writing.
And the reason for that is I try to make what I'm saying as clear and understandable to as many people as possible.
So, but to address this question, the etheric body in anthroposophical terms means the water body.
And so I have said and written about, and it's in my book on Cancer, Cancer and the New Biology of Water, that we are basically made of water.
Our tissues are organized water.
And the way that EMFs, for instance, work is they disorganize your water.
And that creates a situation where your cells, your tissues cannot act as proper receptors.
So essentially, you become an out of tune radio that can have at least less if not no connection to outside input.
And therefore, you are dysfunctional and on the road to disease.
So yes, that's the first step in the organization of physical substance.
It's all done through the water.
I would encourage people who don't know what I mean by that to watch the podcast interview I did with a woman named Veda Austin, where she shows this formation that water can do based on thoughts and based on pictures.
That is sort of primal organization of the physical matter Next question, are there resources to mitigate the effects of the EMFs?
So next week we're going to have an interview with somebody who has a EMF mitigation device that I think is very promising.
It's very difficult to test these things, to know Which ones actually work?
And I've been trying to be extremely cautious in my recommendations because I don't want to lead people astray.
I think that by any stretch, by any way of looking at it, the most important thing is avoidance of all unnecessary EMF exposure.
I think people should absolutely consider not using wireless devices at all.
And just to use a wired computer.
And basically that's the kind of computer access I think is the only it's, I wouldn't even say that's completely safe, but it's certainly a good step for, for anybody to do.
I fully understand that not everybody is going to do that.
But I think, especially if you're having any trouble at all, that's something that you might want to consider.
And as time goes on, strengthening your water, we're going to be talking more and more about actual strategies to mitigate the effects of the EMFs.
Next question, why do vacations tend to provoke the very sickness they're supposed to immunize against?
All of these vacations essentially introduce toxins in you and their goal is to stop you from reacting against, well, to stop you from having what are best termed detoxification symptoms.
In other words, if you think about what is measles, so first of all, we know that in the German Supreme Court decision, Nobody could prove the existence of this virus at all, let alone proving that it causes any disease called measles.
So we actually have no scientific evidence that this so-called virus even exists.
Now, it's also true that you can't prove something doesn't exist.
That just isn't possible.
But at the same time, we haven't proved that it does exist.
So But it's also interesting and true that if you give this measles vacation to a whole population of children, they will tend to look like they have less of this acute disease.
And I actually think that that's actually a relevant observation.
So what happened here?
Basically, when you think about it, the only time that these vacations Actually less than the incidence of an illness is when the illness is actually not an illness, but it's a maturation process.
In other words, it's similar to a snake shedding its skin.
You wouldn't say, well, the snake, because it has to lay still for a while as it sheds its skin, and it could get eaten, and it's in a vulnerable position.
Therefore, I am going to stop all snakes from shedding their skin, because as far as I know, and I'm not a snake expert, you'd end up with a lot of dead snakes.
Children go through maturation processes.
They have cleansings of their tissues.
They essentially are cleaning out their water.
And it's almost always a harmless process.
And the reason that we know that this is a maturation process is children who go through things like measles and chickenpox have less chronic disease for their entire life, including arthritis, heart disease, cancer, brain cancer, and a few other things.
So we know that this is a healthy, Detoxification slash maturation process.
So it's no surprise to me that if you somehow hook up the products of what is happening to somebody who is going through that process, in other words, you take some of their mucus, and then you attach that to various toxins, like potentially aluminum or glycerol or mercury or etc.
That you might somehow convince that person not to go through that process, in which case all you've done is turn a essentially harmless situation into a potential lifelong bout with illness.
And as we all know, Children now, 54% of them, have a diagnosis of a chronic disease.
This is up from, say, 10% in 1984 or so.
This has been publicized over and over again.
And this is exactly what you would expect from a mass vacation program.
Final question.
What do you recommend for detoxing from a vacation?
I would say choose to go to a place that you really like, hopefully in nature, because I'm not sure there is a way to detox from this particular vacation.
As far as I can see, your only strategy here is to avoid it like the plague.
So with that, I again, I just want to apologize for my
▲
Export Selection