All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 11, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
55:09
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report Episode 84 - 10 December 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin with Carl Herman from San Ramon, California.
We're missing David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador.
We hope that he will join us as we proceed, but we need to bring you the news you need to know.
♪♪♪ We begin with the Supreme Court hearing the Texas election
case.
More good news.
The South just rode in like the cavalry.
Here's a brief comment about it.
Late Sunday, the state of Texas filed a lawsuit directly in the Supreme Court against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, with the intent to block those states from casting their electoral college votes for Biden due to the unconstitutional nature of mail-in ballot use against legislative approval and requirement.
17 other states have filed an amicus brief in support, including Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia.
As noted in the support of filing, the states have a strong interest in preserving the proper roles of state legislatures in the administration of federal elections and thus safeguarding the individual liberty of their citizens.
A true patriot keeps the attention of his fellow citizens awake to their grievances and not allow them to rest till the causes of their just complaints are removed.
Observe Samuel Adams, one of our most notable founding fathers.
We're going to take a discussion of this preliminarily.
Carl, please give me your views.
The argument brought to the court, I thought, was brilliant in its simplicity.
It's basically saying, look, we're not arguing election fraud at this time, at this venue.
What we're arguing is the constitutional question that this did not have a 14th Amendment protection of everyone's vote being equal because This was a dictatorial practice of the governors of state to change the rules of the election.
It did not go through the legislative process, and in the United States of America, we are not a dictatorship.
I think you're completely right, Carl.
That's very elegant, and as we are going to surmise as we proceed, where we have the excellent commentary from a retired professor of law, John Remington Graham, Citing the previous case of Foster v. Love of 1997, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously 9-0 that any ballots or votes cast after midnight the day of the election are illegal, improper, and not to be counted.
I believe, by his assessment, that is the instruction that will be sent back to the states.
We'll discuss alternatives, but that would exclude, then, any improperly cast ballots past midnight, which I guarantee would assure that, in fact, the outcome of the election would be the opposite of what has been reported.
We will return to this question.
Meanwhile, protecting individual rights, can COVID vaccines be mandated?
Everyone has questions about the vaccine.
Will they work?
Will they be safe?
Last but not least, will they be mandated?
Many people are wondering how they can protect their rights to body integrity, free exercise of religion, privacy, parole right, and the right to refuse unwanted medical intervention.
This is becoming extremely important.
Here are some of the reports from the Children's Health Defense.
Compulsory vaccine violates fundamental human rights, notably the right to prior, free, and informed consent for medical intervention.
Common law, state law, and federal statutes, the Nuremberg Code of 1947, the 2005 UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights establish the necessity of informed consent.
COVID-19 must not become a pretext for forced vaccination.
The legal edifice showing up compulsory vaccination rests on a Supreme Court decision more than a century old.
Subsequent lower court decisions on vaccine mandates differ radically from what the Supreme Court then envisioned have led to Results that fail to safeguard health and individual rights.
20th century progress in sanitation, hygiene, refrigeration, and the provision of clean water produced dramatic declines in infectious diseases, which have little to do with vaccination.
Vaccines cause injury and death that are far from rare or one in a million.
A 2010 study commissioned by the Department of Health and Human Services reported at least one vaccine injury for every 39 administered.
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System does an extremely poor job of capturing adverse events with fewer than one percent Reported.
The CDC refuses to take recommended states to strengthen that data.
A flawed and corrupt regulatory process enables vaccine safety shortcuts and fraud.
No clinical trial for vaccines given to babies and toddlers has used an inert placebo control group.
Most trials have followed young recipients for only a few days or weeks.
Under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, vaccine manufacturers and health care providers cannot be held liable for vaccine injuries from federally recommended vaccines.
The Act allows companies to escape scrutiny and document discovery associated with litigation.
Under the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, manufacturers, healthcare providers, and government officials will be immune from liability for potential COVID-19 injuries and death.
Compensation through its Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program is likely to be minuscule.
HHS has a statutory obligation to study vaccine injuries, improve vaccine safety, and report biannually to Congress, but has not done so in over 30 years.
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, also created in 1986, pips vaccine-injured claimants against HHS in an adversarial and usually unsuccessful process.
In over three decades, the program has compensated only a third of the petitions filed.
Even so, compensation exceeds $4.4 billion.
Vaccine-induced immunity, if it occurs at all, wanes over time, sometimes rapidly.
Outbreaks of conditions such as measles, mumps, pertussis, and chickenpox in highly vaccinated populations are not uncommon.
Herd immunity and disease eradication cannot reliably be achieved through vaccination.
American children have never been sicker.
The passage of the NCVIA enabled an explosion of liability-free vaccines into one of the most aggressive childhood vaccine schedules in the world.
Over half, 54 percent, Of American children now develop at least one chronic health condition.
Many have multiple health challenges.
COVID-19 vaccines include gene-altering and inflammation-promoting technologies that may create genetic changes that are passed to future generations.
Lawyers must not provide cover for liability-free medical interventions that carry profound, unknown, de facto experimental risks.
Carl, that's a wonderful report.
Here we have, by the way, a leading expert critic of vaccines.
Medical school should be renamed pharma school.
Doctors only learn to trip symptoms with drugs while ignoring the cause.
Real help won't be found inside a doctor's office.
Brandy Vaughn found dead December 8th of 2020.
Carl, that's a profoundly disturbing occurrence.
Your thoughts?
The United States of America functions on the precept that we human beings have natural rights, and it is the job of the government to protect those natural rights.
Allowing a government in order to inject you with whatever?
No.
This is a red line.
It's on its face.
You cannot do that in this country.
The act, the NCVIA, made a deal that in order to be immune from lawsuits, they needed to have a safety report twice a year to Congress.
And as stated, it hasn't been done in over 30 years.
So our opponents are basically saying, these vaccines are so safe, you don't even have to test them.
So it's just an Orwellian system, and this is one of a hundred areas where patriots must stand.
It's stand or die.
Carl, I agree with you 100%, and they have actually leapfrogged primate trials, animal studies here, which means they're going directly to human beings without any assurance.
It's not going to have profound adverse effects, and I'm very confident we're going to find immediately people are dying.
I've had reports of their faces being frozen, all kinds of terrible, terrible effects here.
But Big Pharma stands to benefit by billions of dollars in profits, so they're going to move ahead, regardless of the consequences, because Congress, in its infinite stupidity, granted them immunity from liability, just outrageous in the extreme.
I think this is going to become a major national issue.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
governments and states are bringing antitrust action against Facebook.
Federal regulators asked Wednesday for Facebook ordered to divest its Instagram and WhatsApp Michigan services as the government in 48 states and districts accused the company of abusing its market power in social networking to crush smaller competitors.
It's really critically important we block this predatory acquisition of companies and restore confidence in the market.
Said the attorney assigned to the case.
In its lawsuit, the FTC is seeking the separation of the services from Facebook, saying Facebook
has engaged in a systematic strategy to eliminate its competition, including by purchasing smaller
up-and-coming rivals like Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014. Zuckerberg, moreover,
has been caught in a massive illegal plot to overthrow the election, where he paid ballot
counters and judges.
Carl, this is outrageous.
I think the American people are going to be furious when they figure out what Facebook has been doing.
Yeah, that's the whole thing, is if people are going to look up.
And I invite our listeners to take on looking at the whole world as if it's a global oligarchy.
engaged in colonial control, and all of us are the colonists.
We in America may be like in the Hunger Games, the Capital District, where we have more, but all of us are being played.
It's an oligarchy, and their job is to extract the maximum amount of work and wealth from us, and just as the Georgia Guidestones say, they do want to cull the slave population down to a manageable number, because we Nicely said, Carl.
threat to them if, as you say, if Americans ever found out, then it's game over.
And the other appropriate response, besides seeing this as a global colonial operation,
is for we the people to demand the rest of these leaders for obvious crimes in about 100 magnitude areas
that annually kill millions, harm billions, and loot trillions.
Nicely said, Carl.
Very.
Meanwhile, YouTube has begun removing claims of election fraud.
This is incredible!
They are taking down anything that's claiming there was ballot stuffing, vote switching, you know, and adding ballots illegally.
Facebook paid a billion for Instagram, boosting the social network.
This actually was From the earlier, sorry to say, that it got switched here, Zuckerberg vowed both companies would run independently, but over the years services have become increasingly integrated with users able to link accounts and share content.
Facebook Started to integrate, most recently using the chat function with his messenger service.
Such integration would make it more difficult, if not impossible, to break off the companies.
Meanwhile, we know that the action... Carl, I gotta...
Something going on here.
Here we go.
YouTube, purchased by Google in 2006 and operating under the Alphabet umbrella, announced the decision in accordance with its community guidelines that prohibits spam, scams, or other manipulated media, coordinated influence operations, any content that seeks to incite violence, as though knowing the truth about the election and whether or not it was fraudulent or stolen, Would justify the suppression.
The company justified its decision on the so-called safe harbor deadlines and dates at which states are expected to certify their election results.
Given that, we will stop or start removing any piece of content uploaded today or any time after that misleads people by alleging that widespread fodder error changed the outcome of the 2020 US presidential election.
In line with our approach toward historical U.S.
presidential elections, the San Bruno, California-based YouTube wrote, for example, we will remove videos claiming a presidential candidate won the election due to widespread software glitches or counting errors.
Carl, there's a massive evidence that substantiates it.
The action is likely to reinforce and amplify calls to remove Internet and technology companies' liability protection under Section 230 of the 1996 Communication Decency Act.
Enacted at the beginning of the era, it was intended to keep pornography from reaching minors, but It's been interpreted to treat internet companies as public forums, merely an electronic voting board, but for user content and shield from liability, which was appropriate before they began massively censoring.
Decision-censoring content make them no different than a publisher.
They do not deserve the protection.
In addition to removing the misleading videos, it will be connecting people to authoritative information.
Carl, this means they're going to dictate to us a difference between the true and the false.
I mean, it's insulting beyond belief.
Facebook, YouTube has no privilege to access the truth.
The most sure guarantee of finding the truth is allowing open public debate and rational discourse, citing evidence which they are suppressing in a totalitarian fashion.
Outrageous.
And it's going to take lawsuits to back them down.
I mean, there is the flood, and that's why I'm feeling good about this, is that Q said, drip, drip, drip, flood.
And it is ridiculous.
The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States
promotes free speech exactly how you laid it out.
Let the people talk.
Let them discern what is objective data from lies.
And then let people have whatever position they want, whatever policy position they want.
But it's a clear violation of Section 230.
And then you have the problem of going against the lawyers of these giants.
And I have read that they are being sued.
One of the biggest suits that I'm interested in is in Germany.
And an American lawyer who's bilingual in German is bringing a defamation lawsuit for, it's like the lead scientist in that nation who was speaking out against COVID.
I'm probably butchering some of these details.
But this physician is being censored and the lawyer is bringing the case saying, all right, so you're saying this national hero who was the lead voice of bringing the country back from the 2009 I think it was the avian flu, is giving disinformation, and that's why you're censoring him?
Okay, go to court.
Prove it.
And that brings the burden of proof on them.
So we'll see.
It is a flood.
It's getting crazy, buddy.
Oh, Carl, yeah.
I mean, YouTube and Facebook and even Twitter have abused their position grossly.
How amusing!
Antifa is again attacking police and erecting a new autonomous zone.
Looks like a three-year-old built it.
This is in Portland.
Law enforcement said Tuesday they were at the property to assist allowing the new owners access.
It marked the second time law enforcement had visited the property.
They were there to prevent people from being evicted out of a red house on Mississippi Avenue.
Earlier, police had raided the house and seized guns.
Seven persons were arrested.
Antifa now erecting a new autonomous zone.
Looks like a three-year-old built it.
No offense to three-year-olds who are probably brighter than this crew of folks behind the effort, but remember when you build a fort out of your blankets and mattresses as a kid?
This has the same fine construction quality.
Protesters for a month, remember, camped at the house in an adjacent empty lot to oppose the removal of the house's occupants, a black and indigenous family that's lived there for decades but had been foreclosed.
Police said they received numerous complaints from the neighborhood about the camp.
Police received more than 80 calls for a variety of issues, including fights, shots fired, noise, and threats.
Law?
What law?
New owners?
Antifa is throwing a tantrum because the laws don't apply when they don't want them to.
Police are warning they may come back and use force.
You don't have to give them a warning.
These people assaulted you with rocks.
All involved should be under arrest.
This is insane when the police have basically pled with radicals to behave themselves.
But remember, according to Joe Biden, this isn't organized at all.
It's just an idea.
Carl, I mean, they're still at it?
Apparently they didn't have enough and a new round is required.
So this might just be the show, as Q said, where people need to see how bad it really was and is.
Portland's police department, they have a voice and a choice.
The people of Portland, they have a voice and a choice.
And this all can be solved either through the police department taking coordinated action
or asking the state for help with the National Guard or asking the feds for help.
So we'll see how people want to play their cards.
Well, it's embarrassing that Antifa is still at it and all the more reason to remind us
of the absurdity of the idea that the American people elected Joe Biden and Kamala Harris
president and vice presidents.
Simply absurd!
We'll be right back.
Donald Trump has declared, very appropriately, our nation is at war.
We will never surrender.
This is from the SGT Report.
I spent nearly two hours today covering the very latest with Robert on the Crypto Beatles channel, and I want to share it with those of you likely to miss it.
We will not bend, we will not break, we will not yield, we will never give in, we will never give up, and we will never back down.
We will never surrender.
Donald J. Trump, December 5th, 2020, Valdosta, Georgia.
I stand with him, Carl.
Meanwhile, here's an extensive discussion of the case for President Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act to destroy election integrity by Stephen B. Meister.
During the presidency of Thomas Jefferson, the 10th Congress enacted the Insurrection Act of 1807 Signed by Jefferson into law to foil the plot of revolutionary war hero Aaron Burr following the destruction of his political career after he shot and killed Alexander Hamilton in a duel which is memorialized in the sensational play Broadway production Hamilton to raise an army to establish his own dynasty in what was then the Louisiana Territory.
The Insurrection Act empowers a president to deploy the U.S.
military and federalized National Guard troops to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, and rebellion, Section 252 states.
Whenever the president considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages or rebellion against the authority of the United States make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the U.S.
in any state, By the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into federal service such of the militia of any state and use such of the armed forces as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or suppress the rebellion.
Generally, the U.S.
military remains free of civil conflicts on U.S.
soil.
No one wants the U.S.
armed forces to be deployed against U.S.
civilians.
When Trump threatened to invoke the Act and send National Guard in response to the George Floyd riots, including, for example, to address Seattle's failure to restore law and order in the so-called autonomous zone, then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper openly stated his disagreement ultimately Trump did not invoke the Insurrection Act, but considering the possibility of invoking it now to address unlawful obstructions to verify ballots and insurrection surrounding the 2020 election generally, two powerful distinctions must be noticed at the outset.
One, Esper is no longer Defense Secretary, having fired and replaced him with Christopher Miller.
And two, troops could be deployed to take control over ballot and voting machines in swing states, not to suppress and disperse rioting civilians.
The President's invocation would not be a declaration of martial law.
The Constitution would not be suspended.
The writ of habeas corpus would still be in place.
The President would be using troops to enforce the law, not to override it.
To understand the case for the potential invocation, we must consider more broadly the 2020 election and surrounding historical circumstances.
May I mention, this is published on my blog.
We'll not go through every detail here, but it's available to you by going to jamesfetzer.org.
Election integrity was shattered by numerous badges of fraud.
At law, fraud is often proven by what are known as badges of fraud, telltale signs of fraud has taken place, short of positive proof of actual fraud, because fraudsters have a tendency of covering their tracks.
In this case, there's a mass of it in the 2020 election.
Consider Shortly after midnight, Trump was leading in all six of the swing states still at issue.
Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada had racked up, apart from those six states, 292 electoral votes to Biden's—232 electoral votes to Biden's 227.
Early, early morning hours of November 4th, not one or two, but all six flipped for Biden.
The early morning November 4th blue shift took place only in the six swing states, nowhere else.
Through a series of spikes, almost entirely consisting of mail ballots, made possible due to radical changes to voting laws following the virus pandemic, in which Biden received the vast majority of the votes.
The spikes included an update in Michigan, showing 141,256 votes for Biden and 5,968 for Trump.
Update in Wisconsin, 143,370 for Biden, 25,163 for Trump.
Update in Georgia, 136,155 for Biden, 29,115 for Trump.
Updated Wisconsin, 143,317 for Biden, 25,163 for Trump.
Updated Georgia, 136,155 for Biden, 29,115 for Trump.
Updated Michigan, 54,000.
Those spikes yielded 426,241 Biden votes but only 64,964 for Trump.
Biden, 4,718 for Trump.
Those spikes yielded 426,241 Biden votes, but only 64,964 for Trump.
Somehow, Biden did very poorly in all parts of the country, except only in exactly where it mattered.
Out of the 3,000 counties in the US, 19 so-called bellwether counties have
had a perfect record since 1980 of voting for the winner.
Trump won 18 of these 19 counties.
For example, Vingo County, Indiana, and Valesenia County, New Mexico, each have perfect records picking the winner since 1952.
The 52 election famously got wrong by the Chicago Tribune, which ran a cover declaring Dewey defeats Truman.
Barack Obama won the two bellwethers in 2008, yet Trump handily defeated Biden in both and 16 other bellwether counties.
In 2008, Obama garnered 69 million plus votes, the most ever until Biden slashed his record with 80 million in 2020.
And yet Trump won the highest share of non-white voters of any Republican since 1960, roughly a quarter of all non-white voters cast their ballots for Trump, according to an Edison exit poll.
Trump improved his 2016 performance, just size 63 million, by 20% with over 74 million.
No incumbent president in history has ever improved his original performance that much and lost.
For example, Obama garnered 3.5 million votes fewer in 2012, yet won a second term.
In some, six swing states were won by Trump on Election Day and all shifted to Biden by morning.
It goes on and on.
Radical change to mail-in ballots.
Dramatic ease of mail-in restrictions.
Dramatic drop in mail ballot rejection rates.
Sworn affidavit of perfect black bubbles filled in on mail ballots.
Sworn affidavit of ballots counted multiple times.
Refusal of election authorities to perform simple signature checks.
Sworn affidavit of mailed ballots backdated.
Sworn affidavits of pristine ballots.
Sworn testimony.
Pennsylvania trucker concerning massive number of ballots shipped from Babylon, New York to Pennsylvania.
Ballots from out-of-state voters.
Ballots from voters listing fraudulent addresses.
Poll watchers denied access.
Video evidence of cases of hitting ballots.
We know too about Dominion software, sworn testimony, Dominion is linked to Smartmatic, evidence that Dominion machines were connected to the internet, Dominion machines were not hardened against hacking, Dominion components made in China, election officials, partisan hacks.
No objective observer would contend the election officials are anything but partisan political hacks.
They have no interest in fair and honest election.
Courts demonstrate reluctance to intervene.
Many court cases have been started in response to the widespread voter fraud, some by the president and others by disenfranchised voters.
But the states have shown a reluctance.
Can Biden run out the clock?
The Electors Clause of the Constitution grants each state legislature the exclusive power to determine the manner in which the state's presidential electors are chosen.
What's less clear is whether the state lawmakers can do either at any time up to January 20th or whether they're foreclosed from doing so after the Electoral College is convened, which this year will be on December 14th.
Still in the absence of timely clarification from the Supreme Court, the state lawmakers may be persuaded they lack constitutional power they truly possess, or may simply be frustrated in exercising that power by Democrat governors refusing to call a special session.
Meanwhile, the president has observed the election system is under coordinated assault and siege that the left wants communism.
Speaking at his recent rallies supporting GOP candidates in Georgia, businesswoman Senator Kelly Loeffner and former business executive David Perdue, Trump said, these people want to go further than socialism.
They want to go into a communistic form of government.
I have no doubt about it.
The President warned, as Chuck Schumer said rather infamously, first we take Georgia, then we take America.
There's a compelling case that an insurrection is unfolding before our eyes.
On the one hand, there's a statistically impossible election outcome coupled with vast evidence over a thousand sworn affidavits.
Demonstrate specific voter fraud and voter counting software and hardware designed for communists to permit voter fraud through voter intention changing algorithms containing Chinese components using foreign-based servers.
On the other hand, following a nearly four-year-long attempt of non-violent coup, including the bogus Mueller investigation and failed impeachment attempt, there's a conspiracy unfolding in the days following the election ...of political hacks, corrupt and complicit news and social media outlets, and partisan or gun-shy courts working together to bring about a massive, fraudulent post-election day blue shift only where it mattered.
And in the equation electorate, at least half of which, likely far more, see the election as having been stolen, foreign leaders saying the same, and formerly mainstream Democrats threatening to pack the court in the filibuster, make DC and Puerto Rico states and finally pack the electorate through amnesty for millions of illegal aliens all for the purpose of achieving a one-party communist totalitarian state and it's no longer a stretch to say the country is facing a coordinated insurrection that presents an existential threat to the republic.
If Biden were to succeed in running out the clock and the fraudulent results were certified without real audits having taken place or the evidence addressed and explained, the silent majority is not likely to remain silent.
Trump supporters could take to the street.
Violence, doubtless, would erupt.
Either way, massive property damage and deaths would ensue.
The coronavirus fraud, no doubt, would continue apace.
If U.S.
election integrity is not restored, the standing of the United States as the greatest democracy as ever known would come to an end.
What would invocation of the Insurrection Act to restore integrity look like?
As students of U.S.
law history know, the 1878 Congress enacted the Posse Comitatus Act to prevent federal troops from interfering with elections in southern states during Reconstruction.
But Posse Comitatus did not repeal the Section 252 of the Insurrection Act.
Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act surgically Not to redo the election in all 50 states, or even in the six swing states.
He could simply invoke it to have U.S.
Armed Forces seize control of the crucial election evidence, ballots, envelopes, dominion, voting machines, and servers in order for the military to conduct an immediate and thorough forensic audit of the vote so that all lawful ballots are counted and all unlawful are disqualified in accordance with the Constitution.
The objective of such a surgical military intervention would be to take the burden off the struggling courts and state legislatures to make sure all legal votes were counted and all legal were not in the sixth.
Carl, I think that's a pretty good summary overview.
a cloud would hang over whomever is ultimately elected president.
The United States could never again complain on the world stage of a rigged communist election.
Carl, I think that's a pretty good summary overview.
Give us your thoughts.
That was my favorite article to read.
Thanks for including that one.
You know, we do need the truth for this election, and nobody should stop demanding the truth until we have it.
The irregularities, you could generously call that, what they are, are prima facie evidence of election fraud.
And the best case that I have with that is in Pennsylvania, where one of those so-called batches of so-called votes
in the early morning hours had 600,000 votes for Biden and 3,000 votes for Trump, a 200 to one ratio.
If you calculate those odds, you come up with a number that has 50 to 60 zeros behind it,
that that was actually just happened to turn out that way.
No, we have to have the truth.
Otherwise, this is civil war.
So again, and I'll probably just repeat this point, Americans need to stand.
They need to stand with the truth.
We got to get the truth to this election.
And that area where that article section called mountains of evidence.
Yeah.
And that's why the Supreme Court is hearing the case.
When you debase the integrity of the election so significantly through dictatorial orders of the governor?
Uh-uh.
Uh-uh.
We gotta have a forensic analysis and get to the truth.
Well said, my friend.
Meanwhile, there are a lot of other developments.
Here's Katherine Herridge giving a number of tweets and reports.
Senior investigative correspondent, military mom, organ donor covering national security and intel.
She's got a lot to tell us.
Two sources with the investigation tell us Hunter Biden's tax blow began in 2018.
sources explain during the election season, the investigation went quiet,
otherwise known as going covert, since it would have violated policy at DOJ and FBI
by taking any set overt steps that would impact the election.
As a matter of course, US attorney or edit, FBI contacted individuals seeking evidence or interview
and advised whether individuals witnessed subject or target approach.
Further development should reveal whether these steps were taken in the Hunter Biden case.
By reporting a week before the presidential election, the FBI interview was voluntary, the source said.
Discussion included his business dealings with the Bidens on Chinese firm C.E.F.C.
as well as Bobulinski's exposure to other Biden family business deals globally, a source with direct knowledge of the FBI that tells CBS News that former Hunter Biden business associate coder Tony Bobulinski was interviewed.
He, of course, did a wonderful interview on Tucker Carlson that had a record 7.8 million Viewers.
Meanwhile, the Biden-Harris transition is releasing, feeling it's less damaging for them to release it than for other sources.
Meanwhile, sentencing former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith for altering CIA record to secure a fourth and final severance for it.
This was, of course, in the Russiagate investigation.
Off Thursday, rescheduled January 7th, allowing victim to outline harm, Small World, presiding judge Boasberg was also on the FISA court.
Meanwhile, in a 43-page opinion, Judge Sullivan called for Parsons to vote his full pardon, a political decision, not a legal one.
Context, Sullivan dismisses the case as moot.
More than seven months after the Department of Justice motion and weeks after a district court ordered Sullivan to act with dispatch, Very embarrassing and shameful in my judgment of Judge Sullivan.
Digging deeper, DOJ filing and directing to Judge Sullivan, consistent with the unmarked D.C.
Circuit Court statement, we trust and expect the District Court to proceed with appropriate dispatch, meaning to send away or offer away with promptness and speed.
Meanwhile, the history of the Constitution, its structure, and the Supreme Court's interpretation of the pardon power make clear that President Trump's decision to pardon Mr. Flynn is a political decision, not a legal one.
The law recognizes the President's political power to pardon the appropriate cases and dismiss the cases moot.
However, as the pardon does not standing alone render Mr. Flynn innocent of the alleged violation.
New more than seven months after the DOJ motion to dismiss, and a more recent full pardon from POTUS, Sullivan finally dismissed the case and moved in a 43-page opinion.
Carl, I thought the judge's conduct here was embarrassing.
It is crazy.
I think I got actually from you the stat that 45% of the voters for Joe Biden did not know anything about what was disclosed on Hunter's laptop.
So I am very optimistic that these so-called Trump cards have not been played and that would be The content on Hunter's laptop, on Anthony on the Wiener laptop, more FISA declassification that you got this clown, Clinesmith, who participated in framing General Flynn.
Oh my god, talk about an attempt to overthrow the government, try to take out the National Security Advisor.
So I really do conclude that if the Blackhats are doing this, Hats off to you, pal.
This is next-level demonstration that you deserve to descend to the next level of hell for the evil torture you are capable of.
But I really do see this as the White Hats, they're orchestrating this to wake the American public up.
And the world.
The American public, in my observation, 98% of them do not have the capacity to look at this factually.
They still get their information from corporate media.
And so the show goes on.
And it has my prayers and best wishes.
The only thing that we need is the truth.
That's it.
And that's where Americans can confidently stand, that given the history of empire and liars, do not take their testimony.
We must have the truth.
Carl, you got that exactly right.
That's, of course, what we're trying to do here.
We do want to hear from you.
Pro or con, send fan mail to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
We're getting some reports.
Steve Gullahardro writes, vaccine trump Pennsylvania.
The COVID-19 vaccine will most likely have the bioweapon in it, along with three mutations of HIV, at least according to Diane Wingington.
You may contact him, Jane Wingington, you may contact him to verify.
Keep hearing Dr. Jim saying the state of Pennsylvania, when it's a commonwealth, under commonwealth law, still technically a state and fraud is fraud, High regard to our incumbent leader Donald Trump.
He's well aware of the plan.
COVID-19 is a bigness model, big business that is, run by the most influential group called the Medical-Industrial Complex.
Meanwhile, commentaries on the 17 states urging the Supreme Court to review the Texas bid to challenge the elections after Trump and his campaign team joined the suit as interveners Trump says he will intervene.
The states that join, we've reviewed already.
It's very significant.
Edward Hendry comments, why are so many states joining?
Because the Texas complaint is a fine analysis of the election fraud and it makes a rock-solid legal argument.
I've attached the complaint for your reading enjoyment.
Ken Paxson, Attorney General of Texas, Brett Webster, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence Joseph, Special Counsel to the Attorney General, should all be heralded for their fine legal work.
It's truly an amazing document.
I'll leave you with one little tidbit from the complaint.
The probability of former Vice President Biden winning the popular vote in the four defendant states – Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – independently, given President Trump's early lead in those states as of 3 a.m.
on November 4, 2020, is less than one in a quadrillion.
Or one in.
Look at the number.
For former Vice President Biden to win these four states collectively, the odds of that happening decreased to less than one quadrillion to the fourth power, or one quadrillion times one quadrillion times one quadrillion times one quadrillion.
A vanishingly small number.
Meanwhile, retired professor of law John Remington Graham has shared his summation of the situation we're in.
Friends, the evidence of Massey fraud in the presidential election on November 3rd, 2020 has been identified and explained in the report of the Gatestone Institute on November 17th and the press conference by Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell on November 10th.
Both internet accessible.
I've never seen in American history or in my career anything like what is now happening.
This material is shocking, includes election fraud caused by computer software controlled by foreign and domestic enemies of the United States, and old-fashioned ballot stuffing.
The evidence is so spectacular and sophisticated that we did not notice other more manageable grounds for contesting the election which Trump probably won handily.
This evidence has been ignored on pretext of pseudo-technicalities such as standing lotches and lack of jurisdiction because judges do not want to do the work of considering it on the merits because they are corrupt and because they are afraid.
And the major news media of the United States, which have always spoken for the Bilderberg Group, housing powers of high finance, which want one world government banking and currency, have done their best to cover it up.
In any event, about 40% of the American electorate believe the election was rigged.
I believe that number, by the way, is actually now higher.
As an example, my son in Minnesota plays poker with friends and their wives, and he knows nobody who thinks the election was not rigged.
So the question of electoral fraud is not going away anytime soon, and it will not be possible to have a peaceful transition of power on January 20th unless this evidence is fairly considered and clarified.
One way or another, sooner or later, we're going to find out what happened.
I would not want to be Joe Biden at the moment.
And the more newspapers tell us not to be concerned, the more concerned we become.
The election fraud cannot be covered up.
It can be studied, and facts can be found, but we cannot cover up any longer.
We now have a new development.
Nobody, including myself, of any political orientation, Republican, Independent, Our Democrat ever saw coming.
on December 1st, the state of Texas and that commenced a suit within the original jurisdiction
of the United States Supreme Court, as she can do under the second section of the third article
of the Constitution against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin, which all received and counted
massive mailing ballots after the date established by Congress for federal elections,
the first Tuesday after the first Monday on even numbered years, as Congress can do
under the fourth section, first article in first section, second article of the Constitution.
Since Texas began this suit, the case has been talkated.
Number 220155.
Responsive pleadings are due at the end of today.
That is actually today, Thursday.
Oh, it may have been Wednesday.
And 17 states have joined Texas because the legal merit has become apparent to students of the case, while the major media of the United States have protested too much or tried to cover up.
Although the effect of adding 17 states will make the suit more respectable.
I've never seen anything like this situation in American history or in my career.
The United States Supreme Court must now decide whether to antagonize the American left or lose respect of the American people as a whole, including many Democrats.
I wager the court will accept the case, not try to dismiss it on pseudo-technicality, because such a course would cause more More risky than accepting the case and finding the truth than doing justice, which establishment Democrats and Tifa and Black Lives Matter would not like.
Which would you rather antagonize, BLM and Tifa and the DNC or the American people?
The suit by Texas and 17 other states turns on an abstract principle having nothing to do with this tasteful questions of electoral fraud.
Which makes the case all the more acceptable to the judiciary.
We have a recent decision of the United States Supreme Court, a 9-0 rendering, unanimous, entitled Foster v. Love, 522 U.S.
is love 522 U.S. 67 of 1997 which holds that whereas here Congress has established a day
for federal elections.
Any state law that allows decisive or material votes cast or received on any other day is null and void, and all such votes must be excluded.
If this principle is applied in the suit brought by Texas and 17 other states, Tump will almost certainly be re-elected as president.
I'm aware that laws and facts are not enough to make accurate predictions about litigation, As took me a long time to learn in practice, and that the power dynamics of courthouse politics must always be weighed as a hard lesson of life, but I see light at the end of the tunnel.
And addendum, there are now 18 states, as of today, not merely 17, who have joined with taxes.
Meanwhile, Trader Joe versus Actor Joe remains an issue.
False Flag and Conspiracies 2020, the archives will soon be made available.
Meanwhile, our final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
I heard that there were 22 states who have now joined that lawsuit.
Excellent!
Yeah, the states were ordered to respond by 3 p.m.
today, Eastern Time, and I read, I just briefly went through, I don't even remember which state, it was a 32-page response, and basically they said to the Supreme Court, Oh, no, it's just frivolous.
Throw it out.
That was their summary of their argument.
Oh, you're kidding me.
Oh, those are the respondents.
Those are the respondents from the states.
Yeah, they were doing it.
You got the 18 bringing the suit, and then you got the four who have responded.
Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Pennsylvania.
And that's what you're citing.
All right, so the odds for this, with this guy saying it's a quadrillion to one and then raised to the fourth power because you have those four states, that comes up to a number that has 60 zeros behind it.
So this is mathematically impossible.
The odds of you winning the lottery are about 175 million to one, so it is more likely that you would win, that you, Jim Fetzer, would win three consecutive Oh, very good, and I thank you for your excellent commentary today.
You, of course, are a student of history, of mathematics, and of economics, and you're excellent in your statistical analyses, I would add.
After a conversation I had with now-retired professor of law Jack Graham, he believes the simplest solution is simply to void all ballots that were cast after midnight on 3 November and let the rest of the vote stand.
And because those votes were illegally cast in order to manipulate the outcome, I believe he has identified the simplest and most direct solution to the problem on the presumption that the states have not mixed the ballots together, which, given the shenanigans involved here, remains entirely a possibility.
The alternative, were that the case, were it impossible to separate the votes, would be to either nullify the electors from those four states, or to have the legislatures of those states determine the allocation.
And because the states are controlled, I believe, in all four cases by Republicans and legislatures, it would be expectable they would cast their votes for Donald Trump.
The other remaining alternative would be that the election as a whole be invalidated and The matter be sent to Congress, where the House of Representatives, based upon one vote per state, would determine the President and the Senate the Vice.
Since there are 26 states that are under control of the Republicans, one would expect that, again, the outcome would be the re-election of the President.
One of these alternatives or another, it seems to me, is a necessary outcome of a grossly unjust electoral system where the Democrats conspired to steal the election with big tech and the social media Where the President appears to have anticipated this would occur by his very deft executive order of 12 September 2018, which because Dominion is located in Canada, Scilla in Spain, the votes were being tabulated in Frankfurt, he now, it appears to me, to have the legal authority to seize the assets not only of Dominion and Scilla,
But all of the parties within the United States who aided and abetted this step at the election, which will include the mainstream media in the United States, the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC.
Earlier the week, the president said big things would be happening this week.
This lawsuit and its ramifications and consequences clearly are among them.
Special thanks to Carl today.
We'll expect Scorpio to be back.
In the meanwhile, we thank all of you for watching.
▲
Export Selection