All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 1, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
01:15:30
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report Episode 76 - 30 November 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin with David Scorpio in the exotic land of Ecuador
and Chris Weinert from Detroit, Michigan with all the news you need to know.
Welcome.
We begin with a Chicago clerk illegally giving Dominion a $32 million contract and thereby
breaking state law.
David Orr is an Illinois socialist.
He's been Cook County clerk since 1991, the chief election authority for suburban Cook County, the third largest election jurisdiction in the country.
He's been close to Chicago Democrat Socialists of America since the 1980s, a regular at the annual Democrat Socialists of America dinner.
He has abused his position where the voting system, ES&S, based in Nebraska, filed a federal complaint that Cook County chose an uncertified news system Now known as the infamous Dominion 5.5, which was led by an Obama cohort, namely Orr himself, awarded Dominion the $32 million contract in a fake request for a proposal bid.
Before the machines were even certified, causing ES&S to sue for its award.
The spreadsheet knows the award was given to Dominion the same day as the deadline.
David Orr ran Chicago for 28 years from the inside, gave Dominion a 10-year contract, breaking state rules.
This was a big middle finger to Republicans just before he retired in December of 2018.
Embarrassing.
Meanwhile, Michigan complaint.
Vote count's not normal.
A complaint against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
Marks the beginning of Sidney Powell's lawsuit against the state.
Some of the allegations are familiar, such as the Republican challengers were unable to meaningfully observe, meaning when ballots were taken out of envelopes to ensure the signature on the envelope correspond to the voter's signature and their records.
Which was done just to get the records, the ballots, into a stack where they could not be tracked.
And workers were instructed to backdate ballots, meaning they were eligible because they were submitted late.
But Other claims are newer.
Expert witness Russell James Ramsland Jr., for example, works with Allied Security Operations Group and with NASA and MIT in the past.
He said there were four physically impossible spikes totaling almost 385,000 ballots processed in a combined interval of two hours and 38 minutes.
He concluded Dominion alone is responsible for the injection or fabrication.
Of 290,000 illegal votes in Michigan, that must be disregarded.
This is nearly twice the number of ballots by which Biden is leading Trump, around 150,000.
Dr. Naveed Keshavarzia has a PhD in engineering and technology, received advanced training from CIA, NSA, and DHS.
In his sworn statement, he says, The USB memory cards were used to facilitate administrative backdoor access to disrupt polling operations and impact ballot counting across Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Wisconsin.
He also said, after a detailed analysis of the New York Times voting data, in his expert judgment, the vote count distribution in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia are not based on normal system operation.
Instead, they're caused by fraudulent electronic manipulation of the targeted voting machines.
Another affidavit submitted by someone whose name and personal data was redacted was an electronic intelligence analyst with extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world.
Here's an affidavit that's been posted online on Twitter.
An affidavit by Dr. Keshavarz Nia, described by the New York Times years ago as the smartest man in the room, a 35-year-old cybersecurity expert for DIAC, ANS, and DOD concludes the 2020 election was altered, resulting in hundreds of thousands of Trump votes to be transferred for Biden.
Surprise, surprise.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, it's outrageous that this character had been the county, uh, what was it?
The county, um... Cook County!
Yeah, Cook County, the head of the voting process since 1991.
I mean, that is just outrageous.
And of course, Chicago is well known to be one of the most corrupt cities in the nation when it comes to political issues.
And you know, for example, Chicago has not replaced their sewer system or done any upgrades in over 100 years.
I mean, it's just outrageous.
They just steal the money and put it in their pockets and give themselves raises.
And of course, Philadelphia is the other most notorious city for corruption, which is playing a big role in this voter fraud that we're experiencing right now.
But honestly, I think we've reached a point where these people don't have any fear.
They're completely emboldened, you know, by everyone just going along with the program.
And I think the time is coming where we cannot just go along to get along.
And just allow this agenda to keep unfolding.
And isn't it interesting that Nevada is having problems?
And I was just hearing, you know, I watched this disgusting documentary about Joe Biden's road to the White House.
And Nevada was the first state that sort of gave Biden, you know, a momentum to start winning after getting his ass kicked really hard in, you know, the first couple of primaries.
So you're seeing where the corruption points are, just like James McCanny said.
Great points both of you.
I agree with Scorpio and his sentiments about Nevada.
Also I want to point out in the DNC primary that that was the location where Caucus members and superdelegates were even surreptitiously, let's say disenfranchised, and even flipped off by Barbara Boxer and Kamala Harris, who had volunteered as out-of-state helpers in Nevada.
So it was a pretty atypical situation.
I just wanted to point that out as well.
Also, what Scorpio said about Chicago, Philly, and even Detroit, you know, in the 1960s and even in the 40s, it was a hotbed in terms of disenfranchising the minorities, we'll say.
And mobilizing certain support for Democratic people.
We'll just say Truman or Kennedy or LBJ or some of these other, Biden as well.
I can't imagine him getting this kind of support from anybody in America that has any sense of what's going on.
But we are in fact funding our own chains as it seems to be.
So yeah, it's kind of funny how the deep state works this game of inversion.
You know, the ballots, like you were saying, there's more of them coming in than they sent out and there's a lot of surreptitious and duplicity and secrecy going on in the counting process.
They, of course, come out with the Clinton tactics of preemptive counter accusations as well.
It's a typical thing that they've done, historically speaking,
from the DNC to cover up their corruption, is to really gaslight the eyewitnesses and even the victims.
So I think Joe Biden was finally telling the truth for once in his 47 years about setting up
the most elaborate voter fraud network in human history.
And I think these are like UN tools that they use against democracy.
And it's probably not the first time this happens.
It's probably gone on, historically speaking, many, many more times than this.
And we're just living in a bizarre world right now.
So hopefully people can understand the inversion that's happening and who's doing it,
and really see the policy directors that are fueling both parties into this.
It seems to be an infantilized measure of tug-of-war, a struggle against each other to support the irrelevant, I'll say.
And there's so many signs that the election was stolen, including, there wasn't any blue wave.
Biden, because of the way they manipulated the vote, yeah, got more presidential votes, but the down ballot all went Republican.
27 contested races in the House all went Republican.
Even races that were leaning Democrat went Republican.
The down ballot contradicts the top of the ticket that this was legitimate.
Yeah, no exit polls.
No exit polls, too.
That was kind of interesting.
You know, they weren't doing exit polls.
That was kind of interesting.
Right.
Chris, what was up with them covering up the windows in Detroit so people couldn't watch them counting the votes?
What happened there?
You can probably imagine.
I mean, this is a hotbed of underserving this community here in Detroit.
And really, I think it's almost a perception management optic to weaponize whites against blacks and blacks against whites in the perception of this Perpetual support for their own enslavement.
It's crazy.
It is.
It's stunning.
It's devastating.
Meanwhile, it looks very much as though it may wind up before the Supreme Court on the basis of the inequitable handling of Democrat votes and voters and Republican votes and voters as a violation of the 14th Amendment guarantee of equal process under law, which may lead the court to invalidate the election and send it back to Congress Where the House would vote to determine the President, the Senate, the Vice.
Here isn't even being broken on CNN by their far-left host Fareed Zakaria explaining President Trump's path to re-election.
Zakaria told CNN viewers our elections are not simply a matter of whoever gets the most votes wins.
There are legal and constitutional remedies that could enable Trump to stay in office without actually winning the vote.
In other words, there are remedies for Trump to win if enough evidence is provided that a massive number of votes were negated by fraudulent or illegal votes, causing lawmakers to reconsider The system of electing the president is complicated because it was not designed to be directly democratic.
The Constitution calls for states to choose the electors who, in turn, gather to vote for the president.
Over time, states passed laws that ensure their state's popular vote for the presidency would determine the electors, but those are laws, not constitutional obligations.
Zakaria explained a hypothetical situation whereby President Trump is leading the election until mail-in ballots are counted, and Republicans file suits objecting to tens of thousands of illegally cast votes in states, and Democrats file countersuits, essentially throwing chaos into the election.
At that point, legislatures would choose the electors themselves, Here's the worry, he warns viewers, of the nine states.
These are the disputed states.
Eight have Republican-led legislatures.
If one or more decide that balloting is chaotic and marred by irregularities, they could send what they regard as a legitimate slate of lectors who would be Republican.
Democrats may object and file lawsuits in some of those states.
Democrat governors or secretaries of state could send their own slates of electors to Washington.
That would add to the confusion.
But it may well be part of the Republican plan.
When Congress convenes on January 6th to tally the electoral vote, there would be challenges to the legitimacy of some electors.
It's possible some Republican members of Congress could decide that disputed states should simply not be counted.
In one scenario, for example, where the state of Michigan is disputed and its votes not counted, it's possible neither candidate would get to 270, causing a deadlock.
At that point, the Constitution clearly directs that the House of Representatives votes to determine the presidential election, but it does so with each state casting a single ballot.
That ballot would be determined by the members of the legislature.
Here's the bad news for CNN viewers.
There are currently 26 state delegations that are Republican and 23 Democrat with one tie.
So the outcome would be to re-elect Trump.
Sidney Powell, by the way, has mentioned she felt that there was both Venezuelan and Chinese involvement here in the election.
That the Dominion machines were in Venezuela to help Hugo Chavez win elections.
I believe she has that backwards.
They were there to try to steal elections from Hugo Chavez, run by the CIA.
But about China, there is no doubt.
It turns out Dominion voting system patents were given to China, and the HSBC Bank is collateral in 2019.
A rather stunning development.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, that's an interesting article there from old Fareed Zakaria, who of course is a CFR member, and he was also caught plagiarizing someone else's work some many years ago, more than 10 years ago, but of course that was swept under the carpet.
You know, I don't know, has any of these scenarios ever happened in modern history?
I just wonder about that.
I don't know for sure.
I just don't see how they backtrack and let this continue.
What I see is they're just amping up this COVID hype every day, and it seems to me that they're sending out signals that we're going to need to have a complete lockdown.
So we'll see.
I don't know.
Either way, it's going to get crazy because if Trump does pull this off, You know, they're going to unleash the hounds and you're going to have riots in the streets and people saying that he's a dictator and a fascist.
I don't know.
We'll just have to see how it plays out.
It's going to get really weird.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I have a lot of them, but I'll try to keep them somewhat brief and concise here.
I think that maybe there's an elaborate effort for the 1% to kind of start to foist their inequities onto Various proxies will say, like you're talking Iran or Venezuela or some of these stronghold places that are resource laden that they've always tried to get into and have the political justification to do so.
And this type of situation, if it is publicly accepted, would give them somewhat of a credibility in doing this objective that they had long term.
Kill two, five, ten birds with one stone is kind of like the way these guys run and they don't really do anything by accident, I'll have to say that.
So there's some point in time where this, like I was talking about this bizarro world, And people that are living in us and really purchasing into this, uh, this dystopian reality or whatever you call it, or this illusion.
Uh, there's some point in time, people that know what's going on and have to make the distinction between suffering fools and enabling this type of lunacy.
So I think that the court of public opinion might be a prominent factor as well in terms of national support, uh, in a populist candidate like Donald Trump.
Uh, historically speaking, the empire has always tried to take down these populist candidates by undermining them or putting in third party subversions or.
Or throwing them in jail or throwing, you know, a lot of curveballs at them.
Anything from, I'm thinking of various times throughout history this has happened in this country and it seems to be a frequent thing where they really kind of get you to zoom in on the stuff they want to talk about and completely ignore the stuff that's really going on.
So hopefully Sidney Powell will be legit and really get to the bottom of these type of things.
I would like to see a little bit more of a comprehensive legal staff from Trump in terms of specialists in these type of endeavors.
And I'd like to see maybe him make more of a commitment towards, you know, that.
I almost feel like he's trying to tank it to draw his base up and rile his base up behind him.
And it's working perfectly, I have to say that.
Well, I think Trump is very, very smart.
And that he laid a trap with the executive order of 12 September 2018.
And that he really has all the cards.
I even believe that he is drawing in the vaccine companies into a snare.
He's not, I'm convinced, a proponent of vaccinations.
His own son, Barron, suffered damage from vaccines.
And I think he's doing To the vaccine company is what he's done to the Democratic Party and Dominion voting machines and these other miscreants.
That's my take.
I do believe it will be decided by the House of Representatives voting and that Trump will be re-elected.
It could be settled at the state level, of course, if enough state legislatures decide that, given the chaos, they're going to fulfill their obligation under the Constitution to determine who will be the electors.
That's clearly specified by the Constitution.
So if that were to happen, it wouldn't even require for the court to direct it back to the House.
I think one way or the other, Uh, that our next president will be the same guy.
Meanwhile, Sidney Poll has photos of check stops to pay ballot harvesters.
I mean, get this.
Talk about the degree of... In the past, Obama said you can only trust mail-in ballots if the signatures are verified.
That's way back when.
Chris Matthews was still on the air.
Well, it says November 26, 2020.
Is Chris Matthews still on the air?
I thought he got bombed.
But the fact of the matter is they weren't allowing the signatures to be verified.
That's why they were running the Republican observers out.
Meanwhile, a new analysis of Michigan voter data reveals hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were flagged as potentially fraudulent.
Leading statisticians deposit strong evidence that the outcome was manipulated by algorithms, raises questions about Michigan election officials' conduct regarding mail-in balloting.
Of the 3,507,129 ballots requested, the report finds hundreds of thousands of ballots with qualities such as duplicate ballot, R.D., missing ballot address, or year of birth between 1921.
Look at the distribution here of anomalous ballots.
The report explains in detail the various red flags such as 288,783 that had the obligation
sent and the ballot received on the same day.
Postal Service just can't perform that kind of miracle.
The data also include the voters here of birth.
One is 170 years old, likely an error, but the application was not rejected.
In total, more than 1,400 of these absentee voters are over 100 years old.
They could be nursing home patients, supposedly.
There are 217,271 applications without a recorded date that is never received back.
2,271 application without a recorded day that is never received back.
More interesting is the 288,700 AAP that have the application sent and received on the same day.
A fifth section of the report, irrational Michigan absentee ballot findings,
also posit very strong evidence the absentee voting counts in Michigan
have been manipulated by a computer algorithm.
On the surface, it would seem the tabulating equipment in each precinct has been programmed to shift the percentage of absentee votes from Trump to Biden notice never the other way around.
The allegations are premised on the fact the absentee voting trends in Michigan counties deviate from nationwide norms and experience and that the percentage of Democratic absentee voters exceeds the percentage of Republican absentee voters in every precinct.
There are all kinds of oddities here.
Specifically, say for outliers, a percentage of Democratic absentee voters exceeded the percentage of Republican absentee voters.
In every precinct, even more remarkable and unbelievable, these two independent variables appear to track one another.
Look how perfectly correlated they are.
Completely absurd, obviously contrived and manufactured.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, yeah, I mean, the evidence of a massive fraud in this election is everywhere.
I mean, you know, Joe Biden couldn't collect enough people in real life to fill a chat room,
yet he supposedly got 80 million votes.
I mean, the whole premise is absolutely absurd.
The problem I'm having is how do you reverse what's already happened?
I mean, they have the mechanizations of the transition of power so firmly in place right now.
I don't see how they're gonna reverse all this, but maybe they will.
I'm just very skeptical of how they're going to do this great reversal.
I do not believe you'd have legal minds of the quality of Sidney Powell or Ellen Wood declaring that Joe Biden will not be president, that Donald Trump will serve another term without knowing what they're talking about, in my opinion.
They are so exceptional.
They know exactly what they're talking about.
I have a lot of confidence in the circumstances, especially when Trump laid the trap.
He knows everything I think about every vote cast, where it went, what happened to it.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I think also CNN has been kind of backtracking on a lot of this stuff and leaving the loophole at least towards the Trump possible presidency, so I'd have to say that that's probably them trying to save their hemorrhaging credibility to some extent.
Really, you're seeing the same thing happen in the DNC primary in 2016 here in the national, where in this case it was 220,000 votes in a row got dumped in for Hillary Clinton after 10 o'clock closing of the polls.
This was 1045 and 1051 p.m.
in Michigan, a full 45 minutes after the polls closed.
But yet, Flint and Detroit both dump in $110,000 and $120,000 each, all for Hillary Clinton in a row.
And I have to say, the odds of that are very slim, you know, especially given that Bernie Sanders was the person she was running against and he had a lot of support in Flint and in Detroit.
So, you know, I thought that was pretty foolish for them to really make that kind of a ham-handed mistake.
It was reckless, and I don't think that they even really had to atone for this.
To this day, anybody that has pointed this out, including Bernie Sanders himself, they've been transitioning to be called Russian bots and really lambasted by their own party.
Like I say, fall in love in the national, fall in love in the primary.
I'm sorry, fall in love in the primary, fall in line for the national,
is what they were saying in the DNC.
And I think that that is pretty much what they were expecting to go on here again
in 2020.
I don't think Biden even campaigned.
I don't think his platform was anything other than going negative or using fear against the people that were just terrorized by the mainstream media's complicity in this COVID hoax.
I think that it's the same thing as like the flu, basically, in terms of statistics and deaths, historically speaking.
And they are really foisting these type of sensationalized statistics towards this fourth industrial revolution that they're trying to put on And I think that Joe Biden has been chosen by the international financiers to deliver this in.
And I just think the people's resistance is kind of the one thing that they're facing and having a real hard time dealing with around the world.
All very nice points.
I believe Trump laid the trap and he's got the goods.
Meanwhile, here's a definitive case proving Trump won the election.
A thorough and damning new analysis just published calls the legitimacy of this critical period into question.
It shows how completely ridiculous and far-fetched the core of Joe Biden's comeback really was in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia.
It flags four individual vote dumps.
Critical to Joe Biden's victory in these states and shows convincingly that their ratio of Biden votes to Trump votes were profoundly anomalous when compared to other dumps in those states and virtually every other vote dump across the country.
The report is written in dry and academic language, filled with graphs, footnotes, and various hedges, but its implications could not be more obvious.
Indeed, if the authors were less tepid, they might have fairly titled it, Joe Biden's Victory Was Not Legitimate, and Now We Can Prove It.
Because that's exactly what this report does.
It looks at election data, shows what many would expect.
The states and cities had their most suspicious circumstances on election night and into the next day, precisely where the analysis flags extreme anomalies.
Starts out with background on Michigan and Wisconsin, the famous vote spikes.
That were plainly ridiculous and fundamentally changed both the electoral reality and the narrative.
The report reminds us of the infamous spikes.
You can see it right here.
This gigantic leap upward that occurred at three or four in the morning.
Just ridiculous.
This is a major adjustment because a continuation would have been where the blue line would be well below the red for the rest of the duration and where Trump would have beat Biden.
Here's the other.
One was in Wisconsin, one in Michigan.
How bad is that?
The report is based on an analysis of the difference between successive updates in its state, each of which it calls vote updates, but often referred to as vote dumps or vote batches.
It examines across states, and for big states, how democratic it is, does the following.
Defines mathematically what a vote spike is, how rare they are, how during a five-hour period four particularly extreme vote spikes arrive all favoring Joe Biden.
Shows how crucial they were to Joe Biden's win in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia most damningly.
Shows how Biden would have lost these states in the election were these only more spiky than 99% of all vote dumps.
The report describes a measure for showing the relationship between the number of votes Biden wins or loses in any vote dump, as well as a ratio of Trump votes in that vote dump, controlling for the size and political lean of a state.
It just thus normalizes the data across the state.
Quoting from the report, But believability updates relies on the premise that the one or two most Biden-favoring parts of the state, perhaps by ballot type, were counted entirely in these two batches.
If it cannot be shown that the ballots counted during these spikes were qualitatively different from all other vote updates in Michigan, then the results are too extreme along multiple dimensions to be accepted at face value.
Goes on to describe how the same logic applies to the other updates as well.
It's very significant, very telling.
The analysis is incredibly dense but contains several key points.
Four of the seven most extreme vote dumps decided the election for Joe Biden.
This alone is bizarre and fundamentally cuts against the narrative of modern increases in suburban and exurban areas.
The four vote dumps were quantifiably far more extreme than virtually every other vote dump, with only a few others as extreme in their aberration from the inverse pattern observed elsewhere.
The odds of these three states—Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan—being so well representative at the top of the distribution is just over 1%.
When you factor in the vote dump in Georgia as the ninth most extreme point, the odds these three states have five of the top ten Most extreme vote drops to less than one percent.
Clay, there's something different about these states other than others, including other blue states or even other midwestern states.
These vote spikes all occurred in the same five-hour period.
Wisconsin and Michigan both spent around 18 hours counting votes.
And the count took several days in Georgia.
We have since learned the pipe burst story in deep blue Georgia was not true.
Thus, this five-hour period remains of great controversy surrounding how the vote counting was stopped.
Combine that with the results, and an obvious picture comes into view.
In all three states, the count was stopped to give cover for electoral fraud on the scale of hundreds of thousands of votes released in the middle of the night, hoping few would notice.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you know, the evidence just keeps mounting up into a giant mountain of this obvious fraud.
But as Chris said, you know, it seems like the international bankers have chosen Biden to be their guy to deliver the goods on a lockdown and a national mask mandate, etc.
But I, you know, I hope they're able to pull this off.
But unfortunately, I just remain doubtful, to be honest.
Oh, I know and I appreciate that, Scorpio.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I kind of have to say I agree with Scorpio in terms of skepticism and the time frame that we're looking at and how fast this needs to be turned around.
It does seem to be like a wait-to-the-last-minute type situation, but maybe this could be like the aha or the Columbo or Perry Mason moment where they just catch them, you know, at the worst and most inopportune time when they put their guard down and think they got away with it, so.
I'm hoping that's the case and you know we'll see how it goes.
I did notice that there seems to be a 50-state solution very similar like they did in 2016 in the primary.
The DNC and especially governors not only with the lockdown measures but even with this election cover-up it's very synonymous and very co-related so I think that this is a long-term agenda and a bigger goal.
It is a much bigger thing and I think that Trump is maybe a fly in the ointment to this type of thing and I'd like to hope that you're correct Dr. Fetzer in this appraisal that he is not only A white hat, but not part of the white helmet army.
Yeah, I think that really, if you look at a lot of the ballot situations, there's so many mysterious and coincidence theories, we'll just say, that when they add up to such an extent, that it is truly something sinister or possibly malice of forethought.
I don't know, man, it's truly something to see it unpacked and how many people just don't want to see it for what it is.
Maybe the people that are fighting for the truth will stand up and hold the line here.
Yes, there's no doubt whatsoever that there was massive vote fraud, that the election was stolen.
The question is, does the timeline and procedures available allow it to be remedied and corrected in time?
I'm maintaining I believe there is, and you and Scorpio are not so sure, which is a very fair position to adopt.
Meanwhile... Well, Jim, I want to just add one thing.
I agree with Chris.
And by the way, Chris, that was a great analysis.
I hope you're right too, Jim.
I want to come on here and say I was wrong.
Believe me.
Me too.
Me too.
I love to be wrong more than anything.
I just I don't like surprises and I just, you know, I'm a little concerned.
That's all.
So I get it.
I get it.
I think your positions are totally reasonable.
Meanwhile, a correspondent friend sent me case law versus constitutional.
This is from Ron.
Hi, Jim.
SCOTUS will not accept hearing anything but constitutional law.
Trump must file with SCOTUS under the assumption that the voters have been treated unfairly due to the extent of the fraud and not argue the fraud itself.
DT cannot, or should I say SCOTUS, will not hear anything about a case, trial, and or lawsuit with Dominion because that normally would all be handled in lower courts.
It must be about constitutional law and not case law.
They'll laugh DT right out of court, otherwise.
I'm saying all this inclusive of a comment about robbers, where he has a history of being firm on equal rights.
He'll say the elections are a sham and full of fraud, of which the fraud can't be fixed herein.
So SCOTUS will throw their hands up toward the fraud and revert to the Constitution.
Fraud can't be fixed at the SCOTUS level.
SCOTUS will then vote through majority rule, move this to the House and Senate.
Roberts will vote with a yes, in my opinion, humble opinion, rightfully so.
Also, to sweeten the pot, Biden is the one who drilled him back in the day during the sexual harassment issue, so you'll bet Roberts is waiting for some payback.
I think Ron has got it right.
We now return, get this, John Hopkins published a report claiming COVID-19 has relatively no effect on death.
After retrieving data on the CDC website, a professor at Johns Hopkins compiled a graph representing percentages of total death per age category from early February to early September, which includes a period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S.
to after infection rates soared.
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19.
Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in their percentage of deaths in older age groups.
However, it's not seen from the CDC data.
In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remains relatively the same.
This means that the COVID virus is not making a change in the death rate, or the number of deaths, relatively speaking, and therefore is not causally efficacious.
Meanwhile, the study mysteriously disappeared after it revealed, in spite of COVID, no more deaths in 2020 than in prior years.
Johns Hopkins keeps a tracker of COVID cases around the world in the U.S.
The site is used to scare people into staying in their homes and shut off from the real world.
So when a study from Johns Hopkins comes out showing no increase in deaths in 2020 related to prior years, the study has to be taken down.
The Gateway Pundit reported back in August that according to the CDC, only 6% of all deaths labeled as COVID deaths are solely related to the virus.
The remaining deaths have an average of two to three comorbidities present.
Here's an interesting preface.
I've been wondering when someone of noteworthy reputation would actually sit down and compare the number of deaths over the past few years.
Deaths before COVID and then deaths after COVID.
My suspicion went up after flu deaths seem to disappear and the way hospitals are paid to declare COVID-19 infection.
I do find the numbers kind of surprising, after certain government idiots sent known sick people to nursing homes, even if it was just the flu, that ended up killing so many of the old and infirm.
Now get this.
Genevieve Brion, Assistant Program Director of the Applied Economics Master's Degree Program at Johns Hopkins University, critically analyzed the impact that COVID-19 had on U.S.
deaths.
According to her, the impact of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States can be fully understood by comparing it to the total number of deaths in the country.
According to the study, in contrast to most people's assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming.
In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.
The report states, After retrieving data on the CDC website, Rian compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes a period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S.
to after infection rates soared.
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19.
Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups.
However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data.
In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.
Here's a report from the Gateway Pundit about it mysteriously disappearing.
Here's one of her graphs.
This is very fascinating.
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after.
In fact, the percentage of deaths among all age groups remained relatively the same.
Meanwhile, another study reported COVID-19 deaths almost exactly equal the total decrease in deaths by all other causes.
So what they're doing is now lumping deaths by the flu and other respiratory diseases into the COVID basket, where now the number of COVID increase a decrease from all other causes.
Totally fraudulent.
Suggesting very powerfully that it's not a causally significant factor that we should live our lives without worrying about COVID, that it does not justify lockdown, social distancing, or face masks.
Let's get back to life.
Scorpio, your thoughts.
Great points, Jim.
And, you know, the disconnect between reality and what the experts are telling us is just incredible.
And like Chris pointed out, it really is analogous and closely related to what's happening with this election.
I mean, the evidence of fraud for both of these events is so enormous.
Yeah, people just continue about their merry way and believing what they see on TV.
Don't trust your lying eyes.
Trust the experts and trust the TV.
That's how they're pulling off both of these scams on the American people and the world.
It's incredible.
Oh, you're exactly right, and it's because certain so-called authorities are actually betraying their position of trust to propagate advice massively damaging to the United States, where Anthony Tony the Rat Poush has been more responsible for more destruction to America than all of our foreign enemies combined, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Emperor Hirohito, Anthony, Tony the Rat has done more damage to the United States than all of them combined.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, yeah, I'd also like to point that the people that fund him are the ones that have been behind both sides of these wars that you're just mentioning, World War I, World War II, and even the Cold War.
So I think that that's kind of interesting how they play human populations against each other for the extraction of natural resources and even for the exploitation of human resources.
I think it's disgusting how many financial incentives seem to be tied into these COVID cases and it's really disgusting to see as well how the 401k index funds are inextricably tied to these type of measures in peripheral infrastructures as well as like 5G, the vaccine, the fourth industrial revolution, intellectual property and technocracy, things like this.
There's a pretty incestuous relationship between Wall Street, DARPA and the military industrial complex.
And I really think that they're mobilizing and weaponizing these fears, you know, to really divide and conquer by demographics.
And you know the numbers don't lie like you're saying about the flu deaths being replaced by COVID deaths and really them not really being much different historically speaking.
The numbers don't lie but statisticians don't always necessarily tell the truth I have to say that.
So I think it's important also to point out if there's an interview talking about the difference between constitutional and case law with Jerome Corsi and Robert David Steele where they talk about this very same thing that you had presented but one of your viewers had sent to you.
So if you want a little more into the weeds type of info, you can maybe tune into that for another source of information.
I think that there is no precedence in this type of situation, so it's going to be tough to argue precedence in terms of case law.
So yeah, I think it's a great, great point that you make.
No, actually, in an earlier show I did on the Goldfish Report, Louisa had discovered a precedent that's exactly parallel to the situation we're in.
A precedent of the United States Supreme Court.
So, I think you're going to be satisfied with the outcome.
I like it.
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm glad to hear that because, you know, that's one thing that made me nervous.
This is making me feel a little bit better.
Actually, it's a perfect precedent in relation to a state.
This would now be the United States.
It's fascinating.
And may I infer that Robert David Steele and Jerry Corsi were in agreement with the analysis we've been giving here in general?
Yeah, I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing, but yeah, they probably know more about law and how the inner workings of this stuff seem to go, so yeah.
I hope that everybody that has been behind Trump with the shit-eating grin on their faces is absolutely right, and I really hope that this works out, how you guys have planned.
I almost think that it's kind of like, if you look at Johns Hopkins or Harvard or some of these universities or things that are involved with some of these things, There's a lot of connections to the secret societies, the Skull and Bones with Johns Hopkins being founded by Gilman and a couple other guys that were part of Skull and Bones.
Order Ab-Kao and the Hegelian dialect.
They almost like to create these golem enterprises that generate fear and then they come up with like an ordeal type of over sensationalization and then they bring in this new normal as a result of this after the dust settles.
So yeah, I just think we're watching that unfold a little bit here too with maybe this process and it's gonna be interesting to see how it turns out.
Very, very nice points, Chris.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden's moderate mass flips.
He just admitted he's playing a very progressive agenda.
Moderate Democrats.
The moderate Democrat continues to veer more and more left since winning his decisions on staff picks only confirms it.
Now he admits he wants to push an agenda that few will like.
Biden said during an interview on NBC Nightly News he isn't taking nominating Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren off the table for cabinet positions, but noted there's already significant representation among progressives in our administration, and that his very ambitious, very progressive agenda will require really strong leaders in the House and Senate to get it done.
Let me observe that Nancy Pelosi has been begging House Democrats not to take positions in the administration because she knows how powerful is this support for Trump and that they would be replaced by more Republicans.
Highly probable that could happen in the case of Senators too.
So the Democrats want to leave them in place lest they lose them to a Republican.
How stupid can a man get?
We've thrived over four years with strong conservative leadership.
But if Biden does become POTUS, he's vowing to wipe away all the success.
And for what?
Because the radical left got him elected?
Not a chance.
They cost Democrats many seats this year.
Including, by the way, you know, 27 contested seats in the House, all of which went for the Republicans.
Many that were leaning left also went for the Republicans.
Republicans made it clear they don't want socialism, but traditional values that allow them to succeed.
Many Americans may have picked Biden because they thought he'd be a moderate who would bring Republicans and Democrats together.
Forget that, folks.
Biden's promising to be just as divisive, if not more so, than his old boss Obama.
People, other people telling him to what to say is ignoring all that to push a radical agenda, so much for being a president of Democrats and Republicans.
There are plenty of Democrats who don't want a very progressive agenda.
If he does take the White House, it will be up to Republicans in the House and Senate to stop him, not to mention Republican state leaders will need to take his radical decision to the court.
Meanwhile, China will follow the Democrats by compiling lists of people they consider threats.
Get this!
After the election, members of the Democratic Party started coming forward in opposition to Trump supporters.
The left started the Trump Accountability Project to keep track of these people.
It seems China is now taking a page from their playbook.
According to reports, the Chinese Communist Party is going to blacklist anyone who has supported the movements for democracy in Taiwan and Hong Kong.
On November 16, state media from the Global Times said the Massey Project isn't an empty threat.
They said it's a sword hanging over the heads of critics.
The People on the list will not be allowed to enter China land.
Their blacklist is eerily similar to the Democrats.
They claim the people on their list should never serve in government again.
Get this tweet from Jennifer Rubin.
Any Republican now promoting rejection of an election or calling to not follow the will of the voters.
Or making baseless allegations of fraud, should never serve in office, join a corporate board, find a faculty position, or be accepted into polite society.
We have a list.
What do these revelations mean for a potential Biden administration?
One fact is sure.
The vice president can't afford to back down and meet China's conditions.
The federal government can't allow an adversarial foreign entity to dictate orders to the United States.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, those are some interesting articles.
I would make a correction, though.
I don't really believe it's a progressive agenda.
This is a globalist agenda.
Joe Biden is in there to fulfill their wish list and do everything that's on the globalist agenda list.
You know, that's what's going on.
And what we're seeing here, too, is the merging of the Chinese system and the American system.
That's what's happening.
And, you know, the Republicans have helped the rise of China.
Maybe not quite as much as the Democrats, but they've had their hand in the till, and plenty of those people have gotten rich.
helping and advocating for the rise of China.
You know, it's just sort of a business more than a government as I see it.
And yeah, and China was just recently at the G20 meeting advocating a global coding system to track COVID.
So here we're seeing China is again, like your article said, helping to make policy that's going to affect the lives of Americans.
This is outrageous, but it continues.
And it's funny how that lady said baseless charges of the election.
That seems to be the code word that all the people are using that are against looking into the election fraud.
They're baseless charges.
So they're all reading from the same script.
Well, they're committing the elementary fallacy of begging the question by taking for granted an issue that's in dispute.
In fact, we know there's overwhelming evidence that make this not only not baseless, but overwhelmingly supported and confirmed, just the opposite of their allegation.
You're completely right.
However, it's not just a progressive agenda.
It's been overwhelmed by the globalist agenda.
That really is out to destroy America freedom and seize all property and assets by the New World Order.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I agree.
I think it is like more of a perception management game that they're operating to mobilize the rabble by inversions or things like that or pandering to them with selective tokenism or rhetoric, things of that nature.
I think it's also, Scorpio makes a good point about the same forces behind both parties that have outsourced the labor and now want us to go fight China and other countries to enforce intellectual property.
So I think also the fourth industrial revolution is offering things like social contact tracing and even cryptocurrency is going to be another thing that they're trying to push and it's the end of any economic or social privacy and completely unconstitutional I'd have to say as well.
And I think that they are using the threat of blacklist like they did The DNC used that after World War II with the Red Scare.
It's very similar to that.
And I'd like to also point out that liberal governments typically bring in these mass genocides, historically speaking, whether you're talking the Reign of Terror, the Red Shirts, you know, the War of the Roses, the Civil War, the Risorgimento, the Montagnards of France, you know, with the Robespierre.
You go on and on.
And even to, like you say, with, you know, Lukács or some of these other guys like Bela Kun and Hungary, and they did the same in Yugoslavia.
I mean, I could go on and on.
It's like a blueprint or a formula that they utilize.
They're using the same thing with the two-party system like they always have and I think that ultimately if you look at the collective wealth that's being exploited and the money that's behind this exploitation, you'll find the same people and they are really not into this partisan thing.
As much as we are, it's more for us to really get infatuated with.
I also think there's a strong effort to replace the father with the state.
And it's also why these guys have traditionally utilized and built their empires on the backs of widows and orphans and trained the children as janissaries to be weaponized against their own forefathers.
So, yeah, truly, I think this game of inversion is something else.
And, you know, I hope that people start to see it for what it's worth.
Those are sensational comments.
Scorpio, do you want to?
No, I was just going to say the same thing.
Those are great points, Chris, and I agree 100%.
Really well done.
Excellent.
Excellent, indeed.
Meanwhile, Trump is leaving Biden a Christmas gift of Middle East peace.
Will Joe throw it in the trash?
Will Joe Biden and his foreign policy team accept the extraordinary gift Team Trump is leaving them under the Christmas tree?
Or is there hatred for the president?
So all-consuming, they'll toss it in the garbage.
I'm talking about the Abraham Accords.
Peace deals between Israel and various Arab states, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan, that have sought the Jewish state's destruction since its founding in 1948.
Normalization has proceeded so quickly.
Dubai already has a kosher restaurant.
Its supermarkets are stocking Israeli agricultural products, festooned with stars of David, a science fictional site only a year ago.
Over the weekend, Prime Minister Netanyahu met with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the first face-to-face contact we know of between leaders of Israel and Saudi Arabia.
There's no way UAE and Bahrain made peace without Riad's nod.
And Sunday's meeting, therefore, gave rise to the idea that Saudi Arabia might be the next to follow suit.
The establishment of diplomatic ties between the two would represent the fulfillment of a key U.S.
diplomatic goal dating back seven decades, the end of the hopeless but destructive Sunni war against Israel's existence.
It's unlikely the Saudi-Israel deal will happen in the 55 days before Trump leaves office, especially since the Saudis have officially denied the meeting took place, but who knows?
Ben Solomon is impulsive and incautious, his behavior unpredictable.
Riyadh realized more than a decade ago its greatest enemy isn't Israel but Iran, and that in fact the Jewish State and the House of Saud found themselves under the same existential threat once it became clear the Iranians were hell-bent on nukes.
I disagree with that quite strongly.
Iran wasn't even pursuing nuclear weapons.
We had the U.S.
in 2017 concluded they weren't pursuing nukes, reaffirmed it in 2011.
Even the Mossad came aboard in 2012, declaring Iran was not pursuing nukes.
That's a piece of propaganda.
On the other hand, the treaties are real.
There's a general sense among Democrats that anything and everything Trump has touched is corrupted and diseased and must be discarded.
Abraham Accords are part of an outgrowth of the Trump administration's clear tilt toward Israel from the moment it took office and moved the American embassy to Jerusalem.
That alone may have rendered the Accord suspect in Obamian eyes.
But at the same time, Biden now presides over a Democratic Party whose antipathy toward Israel is growing, as represented by the left-wing activists in the House who have made their loathing of the Jewish state a key element of their squad's cheerleading.
Ironically, the squad has committed to a Palestinian cause that its Arab sponsors have now largely abandoned.
I think that's a pretty fascinating piece.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
That's an interesting piece there.
I disagree as parts of it, though.
For one thing, Saudi Arabia has been a longtime secret ally with Israel.
Let's be honest here.
They probably worked together in the 9-11 operation, is my guess.
And many people believe that the Saudi royal family are crypto-Jews.
And that there's Jewish origins to this lineage of royalty.
And there is some evidence to support that contention.
So that's another little fly in the ointment.
And the problem I have with all this great peacemaking, of course, there's no talk about the Palestinian issue.
They're just leaping right over that, leapfrogging right over that.
And, you know, I guess just let Israel have all the territory and just squeeze the Palestinians out and make them, you know, second-class citizens, essentially.
So I don't support that.
And, of course, the newest element that I've just heard is that the occupied territories are now being labeled made in Israel.
Any products coming from those occupied territories are now made in Israel.
So, I guess, you know, I'm all for peace, but I just think that the Palestinians are just going to be left out in the cold here in this deal, and I think that's a tragedy.
I think you're right.
I mean, the Palestinian issue has been the great human rights issue of the last 10 or 20 years.
I mean, it's been outrageous, and it seems to be falling by the wayside.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I'm kind of a little bit all over the place here, but I almost think that some of these distractions or even these efforts to portray Trump as like a despot while these technocrats sneak in their Trojan horse offerings beneath the These distractions.
I almost think that there's a theatrics being played like they did with Nixon and the madman theory and that they have industrial interests that are sneaking in beneath the fog of war beneath the distractions to put in their own measures.
I think that if you look into other operations the CIA Mossad and Mi5 have been involved in historically speaking like operations FF or Ajax or some of the others that have disenfranchised these oil laden countries.
These victims of geography into a dehumanized effort through religious pretenses or Cold War pretenses things like this It's not the first time they've done this for the sake of the almighty dollar or for the the petrodollar or oil I also want to point out that the petrodollar has been diminished since February and we're seeing a new Type of currency that's being traded and it's associated closely with our data and our information I think that this is kind of like the the quantum control mechanism or the inventory that they want to have over the world's population Uh, you know, so I'm seeing like UN and Israel as being like some of these havens that are the goals behind, you know, World War One, World War Two, and this technocratic holy land.
Um, and I think that they are like the pinnacle in terms of developing these, these human inventory devices, I guess would be the best way of putting them.
So yeah, I'm very concerned about this group of privateers that uses instruments like Wall Street and these investment
companies And ties them to our 401ks for you know, it's like I say we're
buying our own chains here. It's pretty crazy Very nice point
Very nice.
Meanwhile, President Trump is the first since Carter not to get the U.S.
involved in new wars.
I think this is very telling.
A month after he was elected in November 2016, Trump laid out his opposition to the Washington Foreign Establishment Consensus.
We will stop racing to topple foreign regimes we know nothing about and we shouldn't be involved with.
Instead, our focus should be on defeating terrorism and destroying ISIS, and we will.
Less than two and a half years later, ISIS has lost 100% of its territory, and the caliphate was declared defeated.
Here's a wonderful map.
Trump's been completely successful, and everyone must bear in mind It was Democrats who created ISIS in the first place.
This was the brainchild of John Brennan, then Director of the CIA, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, and Barack Obama President in 2012, to create a terrorist army to bring pressure on Bashar al-Assad and the government of Syria.
But it cannot have been to bring democracy to Syria, because Syria is already a democracy.
Bashar al-Assad is a democratically elected president of Syria who enjoys the support of over 80% of the Syrian people.
Not only that, but Michael Flynn, then the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, objected to the creation of ISIS as a consequence of which John Brennan recommended Barack Obama should fire him, which Obama obligingly did.
So bear in mind, Mike Flynn was fired by Barack Obama because he opposed the creation of ISIS, which Barack Obama supported.
Now four years later, Trump has proven to have made good on his promise not to bring Americans into new foreign wars.
Here's how it breaks down.
Versus the past.
Barack Obama.
2015 Syria.
2011 Libya.
George W. Bush.
2003 Iraq.
2001 Afghanistan.
Libya, George W. Bush, 2003 Iraq, 2001 Afghanistan, Bill Clinton, 1995 Bosnia, 1993.
1993, Somalia.
George H.W.
Bush.
1991, the Gulf War.
Ronald Reagan.
1983, Lebanon.
Trump previously moved to reduce our troop presence in Syria but was lying to you about the progress.
We learned from an outgoing Syrian envoy, Jim Jeffery, we were always playing shell games to not make clear to our leadership how many troops we had there.
Well, Trump agreed to leave about 200 troops there in 2019.
There were still a lot more than that.
How disgusting can it get?
Meanwhile, the Iranian Nuclear Scientists Association is very concerned about the assassination of their leader.
He was pivotable to any Iranian weaponization possibilities in 2018.
This is very, very unfortunate, if confirmed.
The assassination of Iran's nuclear scientist Mohsen Pakhazadeh is another reckless step that appears intended to poison the well for negotiations under a Biden administration and set the stage for war.
Coming shortly after the assassination of Squassin Soleimani earlier this year, of which I disapprove as strongly as I possibly can, the killing of a scientist who formerly directed Iran's Shelf military nuclear program risked war between Iran, the U.S.
and Israel.
President Biden has made clear his desire to return to the negotiating table and the international agreement that restrained Iran's nuclear program, signaling an end to the failed pressure-only approach directed by Trump, cheered on by Netanyahu and the Saudi Kingdom.
This dramatic escalation in the waning days of the Trump presidency appears to be part of a scorched-earth approach to sabotaging diplomacy and locking in the U.S.
and Iran on a warpath.
While Iran reacted with relative restraint after one of its nuclear facilities was destroyed in an act of sabotage over the summer, each new step weakens those advocating restraint and empowers those advocating confrontation.
Assassination, sabotage, sanctions, and military confrontation have all accelerated the U.S.
and Iran on the path to war, as well as resulted in an expanding Iranian nuclear program.
The killing of military men and scientists will only result in their replacement, and Iran accelerating their pursuit of credible deterrence.
By contrast, sincere diplomacy managed to overcome decades of mistrust and take the dual threats of war and an Iranian nuclear weapon off the table.
It has taken President Trump the better part of four years to return those threats to the fore.
There is still space for urgent diplomacy to stop a rush to war.
Conflict is not inevitable, but it will require restraining those in Washington and around the region who are determined to plunge forward into war.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, those are some great articles and You know, the first one made some great points about the wars.
Trump did not start any new wars.
But does he get any credit for that?
No, quite the opposite.
It's just incredible the duplicity and the level of lies the mainstream media is constantly telling us.
And of course, when he, you know, dared to pull out 2,500 troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Oh, he's endangering the country. We're
gonna have terrorists to blow it up the United States They're gonna kidnap people off the streets. I mean just
absolute hysteria Over something that was actually very good for the country,
but these people don't care about the country. That's the problem
And here, you know Obama the Living Saint he destroyed Libya and
And everybody knew that Libya was sort of the stalwart and the buffer against massive migration coming into Europe.
That was a well-known fact.
It wasn't like some big surprise.
And of course, they destroy Libya.
It's turned into a hellhole with open slave markets now.
And, you know, millions and millions of people have Flooded into Europe by design. That's what they wanted. But
of course, is there any accountability to Obama for that?
No, it's outrageous and you know, Grover Joe already stated that
Syria is on the table. So that's ominous because they want to get rid of Assad over these
different oil pipelines and other agendas that have nothing to do with helping the United States, of course and
about the assassination of the Iranian nuclear physicist, I
I was just watching the news this morning.
They found an Israeli-made machine gun that was operated remotely that killed the guy.
So they pretty much just left the calling card there.
Israel did it.
Everyone knows it.
I mean, it's, you know, kibono, right?
It's pretty obvious.
And, you know, Frankly, I don't have a problem with Iran getting nuclear weapons.
In fact, I hope they do get nuclear weapons as soon as possible, because that's the only way they're going to hold onto their country.
I mean, for God's sakes, Pakistan has nuclear weapons.
So, you know, why do you think we haven't attacked North Korea?
Because they have nuclear weapons.
That's their key to holding on to their country and not having it completely taken over by the central bankers.
So, I don't have a problem with it, frankly.
I completely agree with you, Scorpio.
I mean, not only Pakistan, but India and Israel has a huge stock of undeclared weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological, as well as nuclear.
What would give Iran the greatest security is to have nuclear weapons, and then you'd have a standoff, mutually assured destruction, just as we had with the Soviet Union for the Cold War.
It's the right solution, I agree 100%.
Chris, your thoughts?
I might even suggest the possibility of multilateral disarmament, but that could be another possibility.
I'd also like to point out that, yeah, you guys are talking about the color revolutions under the Obama administration.
I can name at least two dozen that happened in his administration in the Middle East alone and in Northern Africa.
So, I mean, that's just off the top of my head.
I couldn't imagine how many else are around the world.
So, yeah, I think that at some point in time you've got to look at ISIS or Al-Qaeda or Mujahideen or some of these golem enterprises and their creation and how they come in from the intelligence agencies in many cases.
And it was a bipartisan thing between not only the Obama administration but McCain in terms of funding ISIS.
So, this is a bipartisan deception that's going on and it reminds me of them all falling in line with things like the War of Terror after 9-11.
You know, for the Patriot Act, the NDAA, or the AUMF, or some of these other things.
They all seem to be dispatched by the CFR and APAC towards these colonialization agendas for the United Nations.
So, I think there's a slippery slope and a close allegiance, we'll say, that people don't really often consider.
So, I think that also, if you look at the dual citizens and the dual loyalties that were behind bringing these nuclear secrets into places like China, or Pakistan, or India, or some of these other nuclear countries, They were all by the same group of people as well.
They infiltrated our national security complex and have really never, other than the Rosenbergs, paid the price for doing so.
So I think that's kind of interesting.
You know, if these guys never get punished, they'll keep doing it every time.
And it's with something, you know, far more dangerous even.
Maybe biowarfare weapons like COVID.
You never know.
I'd also like to point out that, you know, in terms of national security and the outsourcing of labor or the development of these weapons, that it seems to be these technocrats are trying to use all nations on earth to race towards these technocratic prizes.
And, you know, I could name a bunch of instances that we're talking about, but, you know, not to go off into the weeds or take too much time here, I'd also like to point out that there was an Iranian general, as well as the prime minister of Lebanon, I think, that were kidnapped in 2017.
The general was killed, the prime minister was kidnapped.
arguably by Saudi Israeli forces, and they seem to be very closely linked.
So yeah, looking at history and the Saudi royal family, I don't think that they're necessarily royal
other than that they are maybe affiliated proxies of London.
So back to you guys.
Yeah, the Saudis have often been described as crypto Jews, and I agree with Scorpio
that there's been a lot of collusion historically between Saudi Arabia and Israel,
which they kept covert for political purposes.
I would observe that, you know, making all this fuss about Russian intervention
was to distract the fact that Hillary Clinton had sold off 20% of US...
uranium reserves from Russia for a $145 million donation to the Clinton Foundation, which required the approval of then-President Barack Obama.
So if Julius and Ethel Rosenberg got the electric chair for giving atomic secrets to the then Soviet Union, what do Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama deserve for selling 20% of U.S.
uranium to Russia for $140 million?
Disgusting.
Great points.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send us fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Here we have a new photographic proof.
The real Joe Biden is at the deep tape crater and pedophile.
It's very different from the actor Joe Biden.
The comedy genius secretly saving America.
Check it out on my blog.
We do have a very interesting development.
Did Biden get an ankle bracelet?
What's cracking?
Joe Biden reportedly strained his right ankle, and ankle bracelets are always fitted to the right foot with the inevitable boot.
Why would Biden be walking?
I draw on my 30 years in the hospital administration to tell you a suspected foot fracture always requires a wheelchair.
So, was Biden fitted with an ankle bracelet while media covered this story as an injury in Great Falls Dog Park?
Let me just report, if your mind is now open to the prospect you may want to take advantage of the Fall Strikes and Conspiracies 2020 virtual conference on the 5th and 6th of December next weekend.
I have organized and will moderate, featuring 24 experts on events like JFK, 9-11, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, the 2020 election, the COVID-19 pandemic, The godfathers of sex abuse, Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, staging hate crimes, Jesse Smollett, George Floyd, Bumble Wallace, high-tech censorship, and much more.
I have just authorized a 50% discount for the meeting, cutting the pay-per-view from $100 to $50.
Check it out!
This may be the most important intellectual investment in time and money of your life, False flags and conspiracies 2020.
5 and 6 December.
Use the discount code NTK.
Need to know.
Go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com, falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
Remember, you don't have to watch the whole thing, record it, and then you can come back and pick up the pieces as you like.
The secret of freedom lies in educating the people.
The secret of tyranny in keeping them ignorant.
Final thoughts now.
Scorpio, yours.
The coverage I saw of this Biden accident, they're saying it was a sprained ankle, not a foot injury.
I don't know, that's just what I heard on the mainstream media, which is all lies anyway.
But, you know, frankly I'm dubious about this ankle bracelet thing.
Hillary Clinton supposedly had an ankle bracelet, and so did John McCain, and of course nothing happened.
So maybe I'm jaded, but I just don't think much is going to happen from it.
And, uh, but yeah, those two pictures you had there of Groper Joe are pretty, uh, pretty different.
Yes.
Chris, your thoughts.
I'm still trying to figure out if he's human or cyborg or what kind of super predator he might be.
Talking about Joe Biden, man.
I don't know.
I'm still beside myself that he's even a thing and that, uh, people are claiming to have voted for him in the manner in which they have.
I certainly disagree with the level of support and the optic management behind it.
And I think that really, I'm glad to see the Trump base really standing and holding the line.
And I think that the 150 million plus that didn't vote in this election are really starting to see through this.
And that's probably part of the reason why they don't vote in the first place.
So I think you've got more support than you think beyond the conventional Trump base in terms of fighting corruption and really turning a corner for our country and our future that doesn't involve this 1% controlling everything we do and everything we say and everything that it is to offer.
Yeah, I'd like to see free markets come back.
I'd like to see, you know, us break away from cryptocurrencies and all these things like that.
And even this technocracy that they're trying to, you know, slip around our necks, because this is a millstone.
And I think that really, you know, the evolution of ManChart, and it doesn't show a kid in a hoodie and a skinny jeans, you know, looking at an iPhone, you know, I think that's for good reason.
So I don't know, I'd like to see us get back to maybe our roots and Really restore our values and our integrity, and I think this is a good way for that to happen.
Well, this is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking David Scorpio and the Exotic Line of Ecuador, and Chris Weinert from Detroit, Michigan.
You see the evidence unfold.
Vassy voter theft.
Joe Biden could hardly have scraped up You know, he got 23 million votes is astonishing all by itself.
Trump got around 73.
There was like a 50 million vote difference.
It was an overwhelming landslide for Donald Trump.
The American people don't want riots looting to defund the police.
Probably the most miserable campaign platform ever in history.
They don't want to get rid Thank you all for watching.
We'll be back tomorrow with all the news you need to know.
And check out falseflags2020.com.
This is an event you don't want to miss.
▲
Export Selection