All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 17, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
44:58
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report 16 October 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm joined today by David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Susan Bradford from Springfield, Virginia.
Have we got news for you.
Music.
Well, just finesse the music.
Meanwhile, Facebook and Twitter are be clowning themselves in a desperate bid to cover up all the Biden revelations.
Very significant.
A policy prohibiting the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization We know we have more work to do.
In other words, this was alleged to have been hacked, so they were denying it to be published.
The Post, by the way, meanwhile, claimed Joe Biden never pressured Ukrainian officials to fire a prosecutor investigating corruption at the Burisma.
Despite a 2017 video in which he boasted about doing that at the Council on Foreign Relations.
This just shows how egregious are the lies coming from the media in their desperate efforts to protect Joe Biden.
After the Post's so-called lead fact checker, Glenn Kessler, tweeted out the text of the Watergate breaking paper's new policy on hacked or leaked material, many were skeptical.
Some pointed to the paper's silence over recent leaks of Trump's tech information, which was hacked.
So, you know, it appears if the information is going to help or hurt Trump, if it's going to hurt Trump, they're going to go with it.
If it won't, They won't.
Meanwhile, it's been observed this is Orwellian.
Twitter hasn't partnered with any fact-checkers.
This whole censorship is happening before anything is fact-checked.
Their official laughable explanation is it's hacked material.
Tech companies have long used a statute to claim free speech protection.
This has passed back in the Reagan years.
Uh, which has got to be changed.
Tucker has also railed against this oppression, describing it as an in-kind donation to the Biden campaign, worrying the high stakes of inaction would, at the very least, run the risk of the election.
I don't think it's that serious in terms of Trump's prospects, but it is a major matter of corruption by the social media giant, Scorpio.
Your thoughts?
Well, I like the title of the article.
Be Clowning, I think, is a new verb, possibly.
But I think it's very accurate for what's going on.
And, you know, they're saying that this information came without authorization.
It's almost like the mainstream media is just simply announcing the death of investigative journalism.
I mean, what in the world are they talking about without authorization?
That is incredible.
And I think the, you know, part of the reason for this mass scramble to protect Joe Biden, it's not just the campaign.
That's certainly a big part of it.
But I think this is essentially how business is done in Washington, D.C., and all the swamp creatures want to make sure things stay the same.
Oh, I think that's great commentary.
Susan, your thoughts?
Yeah, thank you.
And I agree with what Scorpio said.
And also, I think that this is, you know, these social media companies have a vested interest in China and working through their market.
And so I think that they are working on behalf of the cabal, which wants to, you know, Very nice.
I think you're both spot on.
market share in China.
And so they're trying to ensure that their candidate gets into office and that they can censor
any type of political speech that might somehow undermine their position.
So it is very chilling.
But I think we're looking at decades of betrayal by our political classes to China.
And unfortunately, this is the effect.
Very nice.
I think you're both spot on.
Business as usual.
I think that's correct.
Meanwhile, anonymous intel officials say Giuliani, who is revealing all of this, was a target of Russian influence as though he were a useful idiot, ignoring Hunter Biden's millions from Moscow.
Not just that, how do they explain away a photograph of him asleep with a crackpite in his mouth?
Is that because Rudy Giuliani is a useful idiot?
How about the use of a body double at the debate, where Biden has ears with lobes, but this guy, the body double, does not.
Biden has a smoother chin.
This guy's got a dimple.
He has a longer face.
Biden has a rounder face.
He has a double, Windsor.
He has a single.
Or look at the eyes.
The new body double brown eyes.
Biden blue.
Very, very different.
Meanwhile, C-SPAN has suspended Steve Scully indefinitely.
When he was out seeking advice about how to embarrass Trump when he served as the host for the second debate, he claimed he had been hacked.
He's finally come clean and admitted he wasn't hacked, that he is actually a never-Trumper, And he had written to him, a guy named Scaramucci, how should I respond to Trump?
How embarrassingly bad is this?
This is part of C-SPAN.
Meanwhile, James Woods had observed previously, Trump crushed his opponent, Chris Wallace, head to head in the debate.
There was also another fellow wandering around muttering to himself.
This is what we are getting from the media.
Nothing but gross bias and deception.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
You know, it's really quite incredible.
Coming from C-SPAN, C-SPAN has always been this, you know, this bastion of neutrality, and to see a guy plotting and scheming to make Trump look as bad as possible, I think it's just sort of endemic of the kind of political atmosphere we're in.
Trump has all the swamp creatures very upset, and they're mobilizing all forces.
It's all hands on deck to get Trump.
I think that's absolutely right.
Susan, your thoughts?
Thank you.
I'm very disappointed in Scully.
I've always admired him.
I thought he's done great work.
I've been a fan of C-SPAN since the days of Brian Lamb.
It was a great bastion of truth.
It was originally brought into Congress at the request of Newt Gingrich to allow the people to see how the sausage is made on Capitol Hill.
It's very sad to see what has become of it, but I think we shouldn't be surprised because the telecommunications companies do bankroll C-SPAN and so of course I would think that in turn maybe they have some influence and are you perhaps using it or somehow allowing their host to act on behalf of the Democratic Party or at least the establishment.
No president has ever had such an array amassed against him from every side.
Meanwhile, emails!
Hunter Biden strives for a lasting and lucrative arrangement with Chinese nationals.
This is another aspect of the story that would be interesting, meaning lucrative for me and my family.
In one message he sent in May, details of remuneration packages for six people in the business venture were discussed.
He was identified as a chair or vice chair, depending on the agreement with the Chinese, the Shanghai conglomerate, China Energy Company.
Hunter's pay was 850, no doubt, thousand in the correspondence.
He has some office expectations he will elaborate upon.
Meanwhile, Trump is emphasizing Biden's got rich while Americans got robbed at his rallies.
Very appropriate.
The latest Cash1 email appears to outline a provisional agreement where 80% of the equity would be shared equally among four people.
Whose initials related to Hunter and three other recipients.
This is simply disgusting.
Meanwhile, the Joe Biden campaign claims the New York Post Hunter Biden article is false because Twitter censored it.
As though Twitter weren't censoring everything it can that's critical of Biden.
Twitter's response to the actual article itself makes clear that these reported allegations are false and not true.
How absurd is this?
Senator Josh Hawley, super smart guy, in response to Biden claims as rhetorically of Twitter, has now made an editorial claim about the truthfulness of the New York Post story.
They're censoring it because it's true.
They're not censoring it if it were false.
If they could show that, They'd let it go and point it out.
Meanwhile, monopolies donate massive money to Biden-Harris.
Biden gets the monopolies to censor negative stories about him and then points to the monopolies as experts.
Talk about collusion!
Twitter censorship of the Post led Judiciary Committee Republicans like Ted Cruz to subpoena Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey.
Twitter is actively blocking, right now.
This is a story from the New York Post alleging corruption and the Biden family receiving millions of dollars from Communist China.
This is election interference.
We are 19 days out from the election.
It has no precedent in the history of democracy.
The Senate Judiciary Committee wants to know what the hell is going on.
Excellent.
Excellent.
There's going to be a lot of fallout from this.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you know, it's really incredible this behavior we're seeing from these high-tech monopolies.
And this is precisely why monopolies were actually outlawed a long time ago with the Antitrust Act and the laws associated with it.
They're simply not being enforced right now.
And, you know, it's just human nature.
When you give people a monopoly, you're going to have this kind of really bad behavior.
And it'll only get worse until these companies are broken apart.
I think there has to be a restoration of a fairness doctrine as well, which Reagan also allowed to go by the wayside that requires equal time for alternative views on major issues like this.
Susan, your thoughts?
I'm actually very surprised to see that the political classes are shocked, very shocked at what Biden has done.
This has been the way of business for many decades now, that a lot of people go into business to do well and do quite well indeed.
The truth is that Communist China was built by our multinationals and Wall Street.
The Clintons played a key role in that and they are using our federal government as a means for which they can amass money from the taxpayers to themselves and this is just another example of it, sadly.
It's just stunning how we fund our enemies.
It's just appalling, really.
Meanwhile, Twitter locks Trump campaign account less than three weeks before the presidential election.
How bad is this?
Locking the Trump campaign account.
Here it is.
Twitter has suspended Team Trump for posting a video calling Joe Biden a liar, who's been ripping off our country for years, as it relates to the New York Post article.
He added, the suspension comes 19 days out from the election.
How outrageous is this?
Everything Trump is saying is completely correct.
Donald Jr.
reports that now Twitter is blocking access to a government website, even to protect Joe Biden?
This is not only dangerous and corrupt, it's clear election interference.
This is going to have a very bad outcome for Twitter, I have no doubt.
The unprecedented censorship was catalyzed by the scramble to suppress the post-publication of the material showing Joe Biden, while vice president, met with an executive at Prisma.
It's vastly corrupt.
Meanwhile, they beat a hasty retreat.
Twitter no longer to remove hacked content unless it was directly shared by the hacker.
I will imagine the threat of a subpoena has made a difference here to the Twitter CEO.
In a series of tweets, policy chief V.Yagade said the company will no longer remove hacked content unless it's directly shared by actors or those acting in concert.
Instead, it will label tweets to provide context instead of blocking links from being shared.
I mean, give us a break.
This Twitter has gone all over the deep side.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you know, this act of hubris in blocking the President from a social media platform, it really is sort of symbolic.
They're saying that we are more powerful than the President, and we can censor the President, too.
It's an absolutely outrageous act of hubris.
And this idea that, you know, somehow it's out of line, it's out of line to call a politician a liar.
Politicians have been calling each other liars since the dawn of time.
It's just absolutely outrageous and it's just a thin veneer, you know, a cover-up to protect Biden.
It's very, quite simple.
I couldn't agree more.
Susan, your thoughts?
I do.
I agree with what Scorpio said.
And I think Twitter is obviously a weapon of the deep state.
It's another arm of the deep state.
And I think Scorpio also touched on this earlier, that it is a utility that needs to be regulated.
It has too much power as a monopoly.
And I think it is at the height of hubris for them also to provide context, as if we're not smart enough to make our own decisions.
They've done their utmost to dumb us down and to keep information from the public domain.
Now they want to, as Mika Brzezinski said, to tell us what we're to think, rather than allowing us, as citizens of a free democracy, to come to our own conclusions.
Exactly right.
They want to tell us how we should think.
Insulting beyond belief.
Oh, meanwhile, as tech giant censor anti-Biden news, the New York Times Magazine has argued against the First Amendment.
Just incredible.
Meanwhile, for a dose of reality, the 2020 Democratic Party platform is now posted on the internet.
It's a mind-boggling 92 pages explanation, including the following.
Universal health care and Medicaid for all Americans and the illegal aliens.
$15 minimum wage.
Immediate citizenship for illegals.
Free college.
Forgiveness of student loans.
Eliminate border walls and immigration enforcement.
Make Washington DC the 51st state.
Abortion for all women and girls.
70 trillion green new deal where the USA would be a net zero greenhouse gas by 2050.
Close all coal and natural gas power plants by 2035.
By 2030 all new construction in the U.S.
must be net zero greenhouse.
Create a U.S.
agency for global media to ensure only accurate information is reported in the news.
In other words, massive mind control and censorship.
Rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement.
Create a new federal agency of 100,000 to trace every American.
Immediately restore voting rights for convicted felons.
Provide funding to facilitate vote from home and mail-in voting.
Create a new federal credit bureau to replace Equifax et al.
and require banks to use this new credit reporting service that will be set up to assist low-income people in buying houses and cars.
Make gun manufacturers responsible and liable for how guns are used, destroying gun manufacturing.
Declare and treat drug use as a mental illness instead of an illegal activity.
Declare the support for the rights of BLM, multi-gender, and preferential treatment for gays wanting to immigrate to America.
Thanks for sharing, Nancy.
You guys may want to comment before we continue.
I mean, that's quite a stunning array of proposals, some of which, of course, I think have a certain degree of merit, such as a minimum wage, but others are rather stunning.
Scorpio.
Yes, you know, and just to touch on what you and Susan said earlier, just that it is insulting, this notion that we can't figure out what information we want to consume and what we don't.
It's like we're little kids.
It is very insulting.
And, you know, it's incredible.
They're actually talking about essentially a ministry of truth, where only the state narrative will be allowed.
That is extremely dangerous and frightening.
And this idea that we're going to give illegal aliens instant citizenship, that essentially means open borders, which will mean Democrat rule in perpetuity.
Well, it also means flooding the United States, the world's largest welfare state that would be subject to economic collapse within maybe even months.
I mean, it's absolutely stunning.
Susan, your thoughts?
Yes.
Thank you, Jim.
You actually took the wind out of my sails.
I was going to just say just what you had said.
After World War II, our elites cut a deal or a plan at Yalta where they said that their goal was to transform the United States into the largest welfare state and then to bankrupt the country and collapse it into a new world order.
I think you're both spot on.
what they're doing that they're flooding us with dependents who will then take
the remaining assets that we have have left and this Green New Deal is is
really about transforming us into a third world country. I think you're both
spot-on absolutely stunning what's taking place here.
Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell, the GOP, has the votes to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, no doubt about it.
This is one of the great masters of the Senate.
I would liken him actually to Lyndon Johnson, or perhaps Robert Byrne.
Johnson was such a master of the Senate, Mitch McConnell in a lower key style, equally effective.
Judiciary Committee Chair Lindsey Graham officially scheduled the vote for confirmation on next Thursday, the 22nd.
Meanwhile, Trump ends up debating Savannah Guthrie.
Biden is not challenged on the New York Post stories.
Savannah was extremely aggressive in taking him on.
Biden was on ABC while Trump was on NBC.
He faced constant grilling questions drawn seemingly from the Biden campaign's playbook from Samantha Guthrie, who pressed him on his personal experience with COVID finances, alleged support of conspiracy theories.
She'd follow up queries made by audience members that nailed down a point, including about the QAnon Trump said he didn't know about them.
Actually, QAnon has been suggested Trump is pursuing a policy to emancipate children who've been kidnapped subject to sex abuse and, of course, ritualistic murders.
No doubt about it.
She also wondered why Trump would retreat a false theory by someone on the Internet that the United States didn't really kill Osama bin Laden.
Well, we didn't kill Osama, that's absolutely correct, but Savannah doesn't know any better.
Her performance divided the social media sharply between those who thought she was effective and those who thought she was too combative.
Let me just add, by the way, about this, that there was a guy prominent on the internet by the name of Hank Green who suggested that keep Biden's numbers up.
Those should use multiple computers to log in to drive the numbers up.
So while ABC reported that their town hall had around 2.8 million viewers, it's probably closer to half of that.
Meanwhile on NBC itself had 1.8, but CNBC and MSNBC had 1.6 and a million respectively.
So you're talking minimally about four and a half million versus 2.8 as a double what he probably actually received.
Meanwhile, have no fear, new polls show black support for Trump is surging.
We know Trump has a 91% chance of winning a second term on the basis of a model that's really rooted in enthusiasm and early performance in the polls where Trump was superlative.
But it's just more propaganda playing with these numbers.
I thought no one would turn into Biden, for God's sake, why waste your time?
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, about Amy Coney Barrett, I think the Democrats have already given up on trying to stop her nomination.
Her responses have been exemplary.
I don't see how anyone can find much fault in anything she said.
She's proven herself to be a master at not stepping in piles of dookie, let's say, that the Democrats are trying to set up for her.
And you know this QAnon thing, I'm just amazed that they've actually declared it a domestic terrorist organization.
I mean give me a break.
And the mainstream media is just using it as a way to sort of bash any kind of conspiratorial thinking or conspiracy theories.
The problem is it's no longer a theory.
What conspiracy theorists have been warning about for 20 years is actually happening now in real time.
Oh, you're absolutely right.
If you don't understand conspiracies, it's just two or more individuals cooperating to bring about an illegal end.
You can't understand what goes on in the world.
I did an early article about it, thinking about conspiracy theories, using research on JFK to introduce research on 9-11.
and the principles you should apply to sort things out.
And I went through an issue of the then current New York Times,
which was still a reputable newspaper.
On every single page there was a story you could not understand
if you didn't realize this was a conspiracy.
Susan, your thoughts.
Thank you, Jim.
And just to build on what you said, there are early robber barons, including Carnegie and JP Morgan as a banker and Rockefeller.
I mean, they had admitted that they were planning on pursuing public policy for private gain.
So they were actually hatching their own conspiracy.
And as for QAnon, I mean, if it's such a If it isn't a threat, I don't see why they don't just ignore it and give it no possibility, no publicity whatsoever.
But what they have done is they've spoken about it in the news, and then yesterday they did a massive purge of about 20 QAnon YouTube accounts, much of which were just devoted to basic public interest stories.
And with regards to Osama bin Laden, I think that we should come to the truth or that the political establishment should admit the truth about this.
And starting with the fact that Osama bin Laden had an account with the Carlyle Group, which is one of the leading defense contractors in the nation.
And I think after Bush left, second Bush left office, he made $1 billion in the first year working with that firm.
Yeah, Osama actually was our man in Afghanistan.
He was instrumental in getting Stinger missiles into the hands of the Mujahideen.
They used to shoot down Soviet helicopters and planes.
He was an officer in the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman, an official from the agency visited him in a hospital in Dubai shortly before his death from his medical maladies in Afghanistan on 15 December 2001.
Where he was buried in an unmarked grave in accordance with Muslim traditions.
There were local obituaries.
Both CNN and Fox News on the 26th of December 2001 reported announcements of his death.
Barack Obama found it politically expedient to revive him to have him die again on the fake raid in the compound and then had set up a situation where Joe Biden was instrumental in this, where the SEAL team that was involved would put in an old Chinook Vietnam helicopter and the Taliban shot it down to eliminate the witnesses who could testify that it was all fake, phony, and a fraud.
That's the caliber of government we're talking about.
Under the Democrats.
Meanwhile, Mark Christman Miller needs your support for academic freedom.
Get this!
He is being hassled merely by suggesting his students should read scientific articles about whether or not wearing masks is good for your health.
I find this stunning.
He made the point, which is impeccable, that the masks only filter out particles that are larger than three microns, That these are only one micron, that the bass cannot filter out the virus, this is completely outrageous.
So he said, Professor Miller brought up randomized control tests, all so far conducted on the subject, finding masks and ventilators are ineffective at preventing transmission because The COVID-19 virons are too small for those expedients to block them.
But a student was outraged for even mentioning those students.
She made a big campaign with NYU, contacted their bias response line, her reporting getting no satisfaction.
She went on and on.
Her name, Julia Jackson.
What a miserable failure as a student.
The professor emailed us about a BMJ study that allegedly shows the ineffectiveness and health risks of cloths bath, but failed to link it.
The only one I could find concluded cloths weren't as good as medical.
The students called and revoked the Storma tweets.
Many attacked, others thanking her, including Professor Miller's department chair.
So they're going after him on COVID just as they went after James Tracy about Sandy Hook.
And Wolfgang Helbig and me, but Wolfgang wasn't a professor and I was at the time retired.
This is outrageous!
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you know, this whole idea of masking is so... it's sad.
And, you know, as the saying goes, no one gets out of here alive.
So, you know, we have to live our lives.
You can't live your life worrying about some micron Getting through your mask and then therefore you might die, you know, I mean you can live in a plastic bubble Inside your house and never leave the home.
You're still gonna die.
And so people just need to start living their lives and refuse to comply with this masking nonsense because it really is ultimately just sort of a symbolic gesture of servitude and slavery and as far as academia goes Academia is supposed to have the full spectrum of thinking and philosophy, and it's supposed to all come under scrutiny and debate.
And I think the reason why these lefties are so pro-censorship is they know that their ideology will not stand up to the light of day and scrutiny and an open debate.
Yeah, exactly as Sir Karl Popper observed, rational debate is the most effective instrument in discovering the truth, as well as trying to test theories to determine whether or not they might be false by attempting to falsify them, where you only have good reason to believe they're true when your efforts to falsify them prove to be unavailing.
Susan, your thoughts?
Yes, that's absolutely true, Jim.
And I think, too, that under the technocracy, they wanted to have everybody defer to the experts, including the politicians and the professors and the students.
And the experts are those who are politically appointed to give opinions, regardless of what the facts actually suggest that they should conclude.
So, unfortunately, I think this professor is a victim of that, but it's very chilling to see that the students are even opposed to, you know, a lack of free speech.
Yep.
Susie, you're absolutely right.
Pathetic!
The students are offended because their professor is saying something they regard as politically incorrect, and we know how serious is the evidence.
A brain damage from masks cannot be reversed.
These masks are a crime against humanity, a form of child abuse.
To deprive a child or an adolescent brain from oxygen or restrict it in any way is not only dangerous to their health, it's absolutely criminal.
Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain and the damage that's taken place as a result cannot be reversed.
We know all these lockdowns and other measures lead to higher suicide, domestic violence, derailed education, shorter lifespans, decreased public health service, and of course massive economic catastrophe.
This may be the reason why Deagol has pointed out or projected that by 2025 The U.S.
population will drop from approximately 330 million today to fewer than 100 million because we're all in the process of committing suicide, a slow death, by wearing masks.
Here's a wonderful post on my blog about this issue.
Has anyone else not wondered about this?
It's an absolute fact you're depriving your body of vital oxygen for long periods of time with a mask.
Think of those forced to wear masks by their employers all day.
Why are they forcing children to wear masks, who are least likely to even contract this non-fatal influenza?
Because they want to create a bunch of mentally incapable adults, which they seem to have already accomplished.
You have to be living under a rock to not have seen the dozens and dozens of videos and articles confirming mask-wearing protects nobody.
I am not a lemming.
I do not wear a mask.
No one can make me.
Get these masks off the children now.
It's criminally negligent.
When are the morally honest and truthful health professionals going to come forward like Dr. Marguerite Grison-Bresson, whose article we were reviewing, and start blowing the whistle loud?
We keep telling each other we're living in crazy times.
Exactly.
I've even written to the Wisconsin State Journal about how ironic it is that a St.
Crow County judge upholds a mask mandate when the evidence that masks not only do not protect us from the virus because it's too small to be filtered, But that they drive us of oxygen thereby causing brain and cardiovascular damage that cannot be reversed.
And I quote her concluding, perhaps this is the reason that Dingle, a massive website connected to U.S.
intel and defense contractors, predicts the U.S.
population will drop from around 330 million in 2020.
To less than 100 million by 2025.
The judge was no doubt ignorant of the facts, but the American people deserve to know.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you know, this thing with the mask, I think people are underestimating the effect it's having on children, not only physically in terms of the brain damage.
That's certainly very real, very disturbing.
But psychologically, just think of the impact this is having on little children.
You know, the other day I saw a young child in a stroller with a mask on and a plastic sheet over the top of the stroller.
So I can only imagine what kind of effect that would have on a little child to see this sort of behavior normalized.
It's actually very frightening.
And, you know, a lot of young people are losing hope.
I know three people within my sphere, you know, friends and family, three young people who have committed suicide because of this.
They felt hopeless about COVID.
Those are the real victims of COVID.
Oh God, Scorpio, that's so touching and so awful.
I mean, this is going to incapacitate children for the rest of their lives.
Susan, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think what Scorpio said is very apt, and I mean, it's not only the physical damage, but it's the mental trauma, you know, that they are going to live in fear and foreboding for the rest of their lives, which will prevent them from living their full potential, even becoming happy, you know, self-actualized human beings.
I think it's disgraceful that they're doing this to children.
But I guess I'm a little confused as to why children are wearing masks, because I thought that most children were confined to home during this period, and I'm surprised that the parents are forcing This is what the case is.
They're forcing their children to wear a mask on a computer screen when they're engaging with their students or fellow students and teacher.
And they think they're doing good things.
And because this deprivation of oxygen takes about two years to manifest its effects, she is predicting we're going to have an exponential surge in dementia Basically, the mask wearing is killing us slowly, where I think we are the instrument to fulfill the Deagle projections.
Two out of three of us may be dead out of our own responsibility.
Meanwhile, Lawyer says InfoWars host Alex Jones no longer believes Sandy Hook Massacre was a hoax.
This is embarrassingly bad.
Jones, who has faced intense scrutiny from the families of public and Congress, is asking a judge to toss out the lawsuit, arguing he had first a minimum of protection.
I almost feel like I'm the last man standing.
We proved this was a two-day FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Here are a couple of sections from the FEMA manual for the start time, the end time.
I included it as Appendix A in the book.
Here we have a photograph that went worldwide that was supposed to show a policewoman leading children to safety.
Turned out, The Newtown Bee photographer who took that photograph, Shannon Hicks, had taken an earlier one below where you can see parents just standing around, arms folded, hands in their pockets, some in the background casually looking on.
Leading me to describe this photograph as lounging at the massacre, where they rearranged, took the little girl in the pink sweater and the short skirt, put her further back, and brought up this little boy in blue jeans to leave for a better shot.
Just imagine, would you think under emergency circumstances, you'd stop to get a better shot?
Whole thing completely phony.
We learned how they fake the kids.
They use photographs of older children.
So here you can see the youngest victim of the Sandy Hook massacre, Noah Posner, turning into his older brother, Michael Vabner, because they use a photo of Michael Vabner as a child to pose Noah Posner, the youngest victim, even the FBI.
Alex Jones, I'm sorry to say, he's forfeited any sense of respect whatsoever.
intersection of murder and non-negligent manslaughter, zero.
Zero deaths.
So Alex Jones, I'm sorry to say, he's forfeited any sense of respect whatsoever.
In this case, he's been on both sides of the issue again and again.
Didn't do the research during a video deposition, even asserted he'd never even read Nobody Died at Sandy
Hook.
The book Amazon promptly banned after selling nearly 500 copies in less than
a month back in.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, unfortunately, you know, this new development with AJ is really no surprise.
You know, the guy has certain topics that are always verboten to discuss.
It's a limited hangout, and he's really always been about the shekels, you know, selling magic, you know, pills for magic Patriotard pills and stuff like that, more than really telling the complete truth.
And, you know, this Sandy Hook thing, it's just another example of trauma-based mind control.
Preparing an entire generation of children for a very controlled and pretty much a system based on slavery.
Oh, I think you got that right.
Would you believe that when my lawsuit went to the jury, they impaneled a dozen citizens from Madison, all of whom 30 or younger, one man and 11 women, each of whom insisted they'd never even heard of Alex Jones.
Susan, your thoughts?
Yes, I agree with Giuseppe.
Alex Jones does appear to be a limited hangout.
No disrespect to Alex, but he's acknowledged himself.
He's not really doing the research, and his site is essentially very sensational.
He's using the platform to sell pills.
And as we know, pills and pharmaceuticals are the greatest bank funders of mainstream media.
So I find that a little hypocritical on his part.
But we do know that there is a campaign among the elite to grab our guns.
And because there's a campaign, of course, to ultimately conquer America.
And as long as our citizens are armed and are willing to protect themselves, China will have more difficulty taking us over.
I've always felt Alex was good at the first two stages of scientific reasoning, namely puzzlement, something's odd going on here.
Speculation, what are all the possibilities?
But then he never moves forward to separate the authentic from the fabricated evidence and to measure.
the relative support provided by the evidence, including the fabricated, because when you find fabricated,
there typically can be only a few parties who could have fabricated to cover up the crimes
in which they themselves were complicit, with a probability of the evidence,
including fabricated on the alternative hypotheses, which is their likelihood or measure of evidential support.
Where when the evidence settles down, we're entitled to accept the best support it is as true
in the tentative and fallible sense of science, he's never really followed through.
So he gets a sensational aspect out there, benefits there from, Promoting his products, but never actually leads us to a further understanding of the evidence or what actually happened.
Meanwhile, Live Need to Know, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail liveneedtoknow at gmail.com.
We look forward to getting it.
I want to give special thanks to those who participated in the fundraiser we had here on Tuesday.
We have Tom R.D.
Canerito, Michael Ivey, Tony Anthony Meade, Brent Garasi, Ben Stembridge, Kevin Lehman, Joe Olson,
Alan Innes, David Scorpio, Giuseppe Vaffangulo, David Collette, Robert Jeseriske,
Ron and Alexander Patale, where Alexander is an attorney involved in the case
early on and who sent a second, a check of $500 to support,
leading a total of $1,500 from the effort for which I am very grateful.
Anyone who would like to continue could either write at James H. Fetzer, Legal Defense Fund, 800 Violet Lane, Oregon, Wisconsin 53575.
Or if it were more convenient, use Zelle to make an electronic donation using my email address on Zelle, jfetzer at d.umn.edu.
Your final thoughts, Scorpio?
Well, Jim, I'm just really happy that the fundraiser went so well.
It was our maiden voyage.
We're going to have others and give people a greater, you know, no time ahead of the event so we can get more people aboard.
But what happened to you is not only tragic for your own personal experience,
but it's also a symbolic act of what could happen to any of us that dare to
speak the truth outside of what's sanctioned by the government.
So I think your cause is very important on several levels, and
I'm just very happy that it worked out so well.
Susan, your thoughts.
Yes, hi.
Thank you, Jim.
I agree with what Scorpio said.
I'm glad the fundraiser went so well.
And there's clearly a massive campaign to censor those who offer an opinion that differs from the conventional wisdom or what's politically correct.
So we do need more people to be courageous enough, like you, Jim, to try to speak your truth.
And I think we're in for a very interesting ride as we approach this coming presidential election.
Well this is Jim Fetzer in Madison thanking David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Susan Bamford from Springfield, Virginia for the high quality of their comments and assessment.
Let me just add, the First Amendment has never been on such massive assault.
All the social agencies are exercising censorship.
YouTube is taking down thousands and thousands of videos.
The plaintiff, in my case, even admitted He and his group had removed 1,500 videos from YouTube, the vast majority of which undoubtedly had to do with Sandy Hook.
He, during another interview, admitted that his group had been responsible for the removal of tens of thousands of content items from the Internet.
If you believe we are entitled to speak our minds freely, which I have historically regarded as the greatest attribute of the United States as a free nation, then you may want to get involved.
I would welcome your support.
This isn't just about me.
This is about freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and what it means to be an American.
Give it some thought.
Meanwhile, we'll be back on Monday with more from the front of the news you need to know.
▲
Export Selection