All Episodes
Sept. 17, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
01:19:21
The Fetz Presents (15 September 2020) with Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer on the Fetz Presents.
With Chris Weinert, who has a lot to say about history, historical perspectives, and a multitude of various issues.
Very interesting historical background.
Chris, welcome to the show.
Hey, thanks for having me.
Thanks for having me on.
I appreciate it.
I'm really delighted.
Please do.
Take a pick.
You can begin almost anywhere looking at the contemporary scene, the fact you have so much in the way of an historical background.
What strikes you about what's going on here and now in relation to the past?
Well, it seems like history keeps repeating itself over and over again, just with different times and places and maybe with just more technocracy.
So it's, you know, it's almost like I hear slaves to Kratos and stuff like that as a slang word.
And it's almost seems shockingly relevant that when you look at history and you see almost like the same family lines, the same players, the same bloodlines really controlling the world in different, you know, nations and things like that.
So it's amazing to see Just history kind of all compiling at once and, you know, it's good to be on here and talk with you because you've got a great historic perspective, of course, serving this country and, you know, the research that you've done has been phenomenal.
So I'd just really like to kick the tires with you and talk about some things and, you know, like I said, just, you know, use the resource of other generations so that the younger generations can actually know and see this and maybe learn from it in advance.
Chris, that's a great idea.
Let me turn off some background here.
I'll be right there.
Oh, perfect.
Thanks.
It was an absolute explosion in the region, for sure.
The presidential election.
Chris, we often hear it said that this election is the most important, the most weighty, the most significant
in American history.
I think, you know, in general, that's only trivially true, just because it's the latest election that's going to determine, say, the administration of the government for the next four years.
But in the case of this election, I'm inclined to think that we really are at a bit of a crossroads that these candidates and what they represent could not be more different.
I'm wondering your thoughts about the matter and how you would characterize what's going on.
Well, you've got that right.
Man, I've never seen such a polarization effort from the powers that be.
You know, I almost see like a lockstep thing that they talk about with the Rockefeller New World Order or with the Rothschild New World Order being delivered, you know, mostly from it seems to be the Democratic side in a hurry.
It's almost like a communist agenda as you see it manifesting itself.
And then you see on the other side of things, you know, just the preservation or the hope thereof of preserving the
Constitution, the Republic, and what's left of it on the other side.
So it's almost like, you know, not a fork in the road, but it's something bigger than that.
It's amazing.
What's your thoughts?
Well, you know, Chris, I would have thought that the perfect candidate
for the Democrats would have been the guy who wanted Medicare for all.
I mean, we're in the midst of this coronavirus pandemic.
I've done a huge amount of research.
Yes, it's all fabricated.
It's fake.
The numbers don't add up.
The CDC admitted.
Fewer than 10,000 have actually died from the coronavirus.
Everyone else seems to be cases where they died, and they were said to have died from coronavirus, but it simply wasn't true.
We have that for people who were run over by trucks, committed suicide, were never tested.
Turns out the hospitals are being given sums of money for every patient they identified as COVID.
Minnesota State Senator Scott Jensen, for example, explained that the hospitals in Minnesota were being given $13,000 for every patient they identified as COVID, $39,000 for every patient they put on a ventilator.
This is money-grubbing.
This isn't medicine.
This is certainly not adhering to the Hippocratic Oath, which requires do no harm.
I mean, the harms and consequences that have ensued from the lockdown, shutting down businesses, kids not going to school, It's been elevated suicide, increased domestic violence, child sex abuse.
I mean, there's a huge list here, Chris, of consequences of enormous magnitude.
That are following from all of this and where you may or may not know, but a federal judge just yesterday ruled that the governor of Pennsylvania had exceeded his authority with his lockdown and stay at home mandates, which I believe is going to have ripples and repercussions across the nation.
We may be finally able to emancipate ourselves from this form of medical tyranny.
Your thoughts?
100% agree with you there.
I almost see that not only are they showing their cards, but it's almost like right in your face.
It's hard to miss this.
It's like a eugenics program that is being sanctioned and funded by, I feel, the foreign bankers that run our Federal Reserve.
And in many cases, you know about BlackRock taking over the Treasury and FASB 56 taking our Pentagon budget dark.
There's a lot of stuff that's funding this.
A lot of forces are at hand, not only in dealing with the enterprise that is manufactured from this crisis, but also the agent provocateurs that seem to be funded in some sort of... I'd almost like to say it reminds me of the COINTELP program in the 60s or the 30s.
You know, depending on the certain times and eras, and I'm sure you've seen, you know, these situations maybe manifest themselves over and over again, even in the 90s with the, you know, it seemed like the intelligence agencies trying to start off a race war in the face of NAFTA taking all our jobs and paying for them to go overseas, you know?
That's very interesting stuff, Chris, yes.
I mean, we have an unholy alliance between Antifa, Black Lives Matter, the Democratic Party.
It turns out if you contribute to Black Lives Matter, Chris, it goes to ActBlue, which is a Democratic fund source, so the money contributed to Black Lives Matter goes to Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, I mean, for crying out loud.
Plus, I was astonished how during the four evenings of the Democratic Convention, urban violence was not mentioned even once.
And I'll tell you, Chris, I think that's going to be decisive in this election.
I mean, Americans don't like rioting and looting.
They think the idea of defunding or abolishing police departments is lunacy.
And of course, they're right.
It is lunacy.
How do you think the Democrats came to the point of adopting what is literally an insane political agenda for 2020?
Well, it seems like something that started back in, like, say, the Clinton administration, where they pretty much used to be the party of labor, where they pretty much made a choice, consciously, a decision, along with the NAFTA, to go with big business and big corporations.
The Democratic Party, instead of being more of a grassroots affiliate, seemed to have transitioned into, like, say, a race with the Republican Party in terms of corporate sponsorship and money.
And of course, the people seem to have been sold out along the way, not only by, you know, the Republicans, but by the Democrats.
And in the case of, like, you're talking with Clintons and the UN agendas, it always seems like these UN agendas really come in with Democratic presidents, whether it's Wilson or FDR or going into, you know, LBJ and the Great Society.
And it seems like as these new programs come in, they always seem to turn Members of the caste system against each other and as I say, you know, you know the history of COINTEL and have seen this happen, you know in terms of you know using
Paramilitary forces, you know, to deliver objectives in many cases, you know, in the 30s it was ethnic mafias to not only infiltrate labor unions, but to take over bootlegging and prohibitions type stuff, and then transition, you know, these type of things.
They're doing the same thing now with, you know, the drugs.
You know, Clinton with the tough on crime, doubling the prison population, you know, going into the urban cities with the CIA and things like this with drugs and illicit things like this, and then transitioning You know, almost like the Cold War into a war on independent terrorism or individual terrorism.
And it's really been an amazing transition to see how this group seems to really pinpoint these witch hunts socially and turning each other against each other.
It's been an amazing thing to see, almost like a military thing.
You know, if you'd asked me a year ago whether racism was a problem in America, I would have said absolutely not.
I mean, the Civil War actually wasn't fought over slavery, but the right of the states to secede from the Union, but it certainly had the consequence of abolishing slavery.
We honor Abraham Lincoln for keeping the states United and for Emancipation Proclamation and a host of other issues.
I would have said, you know, we have so many black political leaders, you know, mayors, Maybe fewer in the House or the Senate, but still a fair number now.
And after having elected a black president not once but twice, one of the most indulged members of our society tend to be black.
I mean, look at the NBA and the NFL.
And for them to turn into, you know, champions of social justice, in my opinion, Chris, that's been a calamitous blunder, that politicalization of sports is going to have The effect of turning off about half of their viewers who otherwise would have enjoyed the entertainment.
And frankly, I know enough about professional sports to know most of those games are actually rigged.
Las Vegas knows who's gonna win before, you know, the first The first pass or the first hike or I mean it's just embarrassingly bad.
I remember how stunned I was during the Super Bowl between the Seattle Seahawks and the Patriots when an unusual pass went up in the air but caught on the one-yard line There was only about a minute to play, and it was going to be against the odds that the Seahawks were going to win, because I'm near Madison, Wisconsin, because Russell Wilson played here.
It was just a sensation.
We felt a great loyalty.
But when on the first play, instead of giving it off to their terrific back, where they had four opportunities to score a single yard, Russell Wilson passed, turned the ball over, Then you had the end deliberately go offside to give them a five-yard margin so they couldn't be dumped in the end zone and then kick a field goal.
I mean, it was just, to me, astonishing.
I mean, talk about disillusioning.
And, you know, when these players Like LeBron James now is making a big to-do about social justice.
Frankly, I think it's catastrophic for professional sports because of the precipitous decline in their viewership.
The networks aren't going to be able to offer the big contracts.
That means the teams aren't going to be able to pay the big salaries.
In other words, they're actually doing themselves great damage personally.
But why they, when they're the most pampered members of society, would think they had an obligation to speak up for social justice?
You may or may not have heard, but they asked Michael Jordan to come in and address him on this issue.
And he came in, made an appearance and said, get back to work and left.
And I think he had it right.
And what they're doing now is just ridiculous.
Ridiculous.
Your thoughts?
Well, yeah, if you look at the ownership of most professional teams and you look at the entire infrastructures that have been established from professional sports, you'll notice that in most cities, they have, let's just say these major stadiums that are developed with municipal bonds and with, you know, public funds.
And it's public wealth that goes towards private ownership.
And of course, to me, it seems like these professional owners are politicizing not only the issue, but using their assets as well as their personnel.
And in many cases, it seems like these athletes are part of a A secret society, maybe they call it the Boulay Society and Black Society, that is really directing this pivotal focus on racism in a time where let's just say it would probably be one of the least prominent concerns in the face of other things that are going on, but it's been a manufactured entity that seems to be from both sides.
You know, like you're talking about BLM and Antifa-directed funds going towards ActBlue.
We almost could say that, you know, that Soros or like certain aspects of the financial interests are behind both forces in propelling these type of radicalizations forward.
Almost like in the provisions that they provide in terms of political options are almost absurdities where they have a polarizing effect to draw people into one emotional or limbic reaction based on their personal identities, we'll say.
And of course, it turns the caste system against each other through selective tokenism.
And it's something that has been a long used process or a formula that seems to be constant.
I could certainly see where an attempt to diagnose fault lines in the United States
might come up with a thesis that exacerbating racial tensions might be the key.
I don't even think it's working today.
The Democratic Party focus on identity politics where what matters is the color of your skin or your religion or some other aspect or whether you have You know, are male or female or across some kind of tranny, some kind of lesbian, some kind of gay.
I mean, they're specializing in this politics of identity.
And I think that ultimately is going to lead to consulting the results of the vast amount of social science on different racial groups and their abilities and dispositions overall, a lot of which are highly unflattering to African Americans.
I mean, you know, I have a book on the evolution of intelligence.
And during the course of that, I got involved in looking at a lot of studies of intelligence among different racial groups.
And really, there's complete unanimity on the results of all these tests.
Turns out if you take 100 to be the average IQ, say, that's typical of the average white American.
It turns out that the Asians are better, that they score about 110.
That Jews actually turn out to have the highest collective IQ, about 118.
But blacks fall well short.
Their average is around 80.
So I mean, you know, there's something very bizarre going on here because this is information that's familiar to every social scientist who's ever studied the issue.
I mean, I'm a philosopher.
I'm a philosopher of science.
If I can dig into it and establish these things, certainly someone who's a professional social scientist can do the same.
But where historically America has been very dedicated to the idea of, you know, all men being born equal, which of course is not literally true.
What it really means is equal justice under the law, that everyone should receive due process and an objective hearing and be able to present evidence in their behalf and put up a defense before the state can deprive them of life, liberty, or property.
But now we seem to have an extortion movement taking place where these Black Lives Matter Antifa mobs are looting and rioting and committing arson.
And they're even boasting that if the Democrats, if Joe Biden, who's massively cognitively impaired, I mean, it's embarrassing, in my opinion, that a major American political party would put up Such a completely incompetent candidate, where a staffer, a member of his staff, who's departed in dismay, was relating all the symptoms of his dementia and how his campaign manager has got him on an anti-dementia drug.
And because she was so concerned it might be discovered, she had various interns go out and obtain this drug under fake names.
But where it turns out that this drug has the unfortunate side effect of rendering Joe Biden incontinent, so that now they're having staff meetings about what adult diaper is the one he ought to wear that's the least obtrusive, doesn't crinkle when he urinates.
And I'm saying, you know, maybe Joe Biden's destiny is to make commercials for deep pants.
Yeah, well I tell you, I don't know how they find these reprehensible candidates in the way that they do on the DNC side.
It's almost like it's a race to the bottom or to find the most despicable, objectionable person you could ever find and then throw such media support and let's just Let's just say, hype behind them, unwarrantedly.
Like, you remember when Hillary Clinton was running in 2016?
I remember in Michigan, they were saying that she was going to beat Bernie Sanders in the primary by 30%, and it ended up being quite a significant flip the other way.
And I'm just saying that as far as Joe Biden's concerned, he has got a plethora of history,
let's just say from what I've seen on C-SPAN, of groping young, incubescent girls,
and to the point where C-SPAN, YouTube has scrubbed hundreds of videos.
I remember the whole Obama administration was basically Joe Biden being a creep,
and I remember little kids almost wanting to fight him for doing what they were doing on TV
to their sisters or whatever, and parents as well, Secret Service having a whole parent's back.
I mean, I don't know where they find these people.
It's almost like a gaslighting tactic, or like in the witch hunt days, where they're trying to incite not only victims, but just people that are helplessly brought into this.
It's almost like a complete inversion of anything they say, and it's like their platform is either to go negative or to invert, you know, what is being offered.
It's amazing.
I don't know how to describe it.
I've never seen anything like it.
I remember when Chris Coons was sworn in as junior senator from Delaware, and Biden did the swearing in, and he had his daughter there in the Oval Office.
And after the ceremony, Biden leaned over to her, and it was picked up by the mic, but I actually watched it live.
Yeah.
And said to her, do you have any idea how horny it makes me to be standing next to a 13-year-old girl?
I mean, Chris, that's going to make a terrific campaign commercial, okay?
And believe me, it's going to happen.
I don't even know like if Biden is even campaigning.
He almost reminds me of like, you know, the digital conference, like his very few appearances when him or Hillary or whoever would show up, whether it's now or four years ago.
I mean, they couldn't even really fill a broom closet, but yet they're using smoke and mirrors
and optic perception management and things like this, force multiplication software online.
It's almost like you see the full weight of the military industrial complex,
swearing to the lies of Hillary Clinton or to Joe Biden in many cases.
And it's, even on the Trump side, it's getting scary, as far as people back and forth
with the Q and the trust the plan.
And I'm really skeptical of that as well.
And I hope that it's true, but man, I need to see more from not only Trump,
but from the people he's putting around him.
I really want to have faith in what Trump's doing as well, and I feel that Rothschild is running just candidate A versus candidate B, and it's almost, you know, the CFR and AIPAC are just running a shit show, and America's being raced to the bottom by both options.
Well, I'm a bit more sanguine about Trump.
I do think he actually, as an outsider, represented a major Threat to the establishment in both parties, you know, and that he really has been a new broom sweeping clean.
He really does want to drain the swamp and The swamp is enormous.
We're talking about the whole Florida Everglades.
I mean, it's just outrageous, Chris.
And the number of pedophiles in high position.
Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer.
You can go down quite an awful list and it is just disgusting beyond words.
Sure.
You know, there's a lot of things that are going on right now that not only the mainstream media seems to be ignoring, but they are almost like accomplices or complicit in covering up.
And I just wonder when the American media is ever going to be held to account for some of the misdeeds that they are not only accelerating, but since the repeal of the Smith-Mundak, it almost seems like they are putting a military operation on both sides of this whole perspective.
And really not offering anything of quality in its place and it's almost like the people if they were to make a list I would bet it doesn't matter your political affiliation.
I bet if it was a 20 item list you know 17 out of 20 things would line up somewhat together of things that they expect from each other from society from the government whatever.
Even if it's the right to be left alone, the right to free speech, the lack of censorship.
I mean, you go on and on.
You know, so you really see, like, both sides of humanity being driven into this technocratic control system from each side, whether it's, you know, privatization on one side and austerity or, you know, excessive bureaucracy and unlimited spending on the other.
It almost seems like they're bringing in the UN agenda.
And I don't know how powerful or powerless Trump is in resisting this.
I know that the cabinet around him is frightening, just like it was around
Obama or Clinton or Bush, or, you know, it's, I don't know who picks these guys,
but like, it can't be the American people.
It seems like no matter what is offered, their hearts and minds are absent, but their wallets are in the right place.
There's a force of money behind both candidates.
You've got to appease these donors or this financial behemoth.
To even have a chance to run and by the time you're in that position you probably have either sold your soul or you know you're in a real dangerous position.
You remember since Trump has been elected like CNN and public media have been talking about like assassinations or coups or you know and have since he's been in it.
It's a public address openly talking about assassinating the President of the United States.
Give me a break!
It's stunning!
It's absolutely stunning!
I almost feel it's like surreal, like it's a theatrics almost, like that it can't be happening, or that it's just... I don't know, what's your thoughts on this?
Because man, this is crazy.
Oh, oh it is.
I think...
The Democrats by December of 2019 could see that Trump was cruising to reelection.
He has kept so many of his campaign promises.
He had the most robust economy in our history, a surging stock market.
And Chris, it was having a benefit for the lower ranks.
You know, we heard under Reagan, a rising economy raises all boats.
Well, I don't think it was true then, but it has been true here.
Where it turns out that the wages of the lowest paid worker were rising at the highest rate by curtailing illegal immigration at the border.
He was enabling poor blacks and Latinos to keep their jobs and actually improve their situation rather than have them stolen by illegals.
Where the Democrats just want to open the floodgate.
They want anyone to be able to come into the U.S.
and they want to give them free everything.
I mean, it's enough to make you want to barf.
I mean, it's so outrageous.
And I grant you, you know, big agribusiness really ought to be penalized.
You ought to have massive fines for employing illegals.
But they're trying to save money on labor.
I just think Trump's been doing a heroic job.
Under the most difficult or arduous circumstances one could imagine.
I mean, just look at the array of forces allied against him.
It's staggering.
And he is succeeding in spite of it.
Yeah, you know, I'm still, like I said, I need to see more from Trump for myself to be on board with it.
I'm not buying into the R&D game and the whole thing.
I think if you had to pick a candidate of the two and pick one, no doubt Trump is heads above shoulders a way better candidate than Joe Biden.
I couldn't imagine anyone being worse than Joe Biden.
But, you know, as far as like, you know, Shabbat Lubavitch and Trump's, you know, Israeli Rothschild cabinet around him, I get a little worried about that.
I get a little worried about not only how high finance has taken control of politics, but really how these people have a breakaway society of not only logistic control over our food supply, but over medicine and over the direction of, say, this pandemic hoax that has seemingly been something in the works since the 90s, it seems like.
Looking into Agenda 2020 and Agenda 2025 and all these other incidents as you know about Event 201 and Perbride and Bill Gates and the involvement with that.
It's amazing to see the military development of not only the food supply but the takeover.
If you remember in the 90s along with NAFTA, when Soros crashed the Peso in 93, part of the Mexican Stipulation to get into NAFTA was, in fact, to take a corn deal with Monsanto, where they were pretty much the primary umbrella company of... They're putting out GMO corn.
Yeah, right, right.
And you remember they were having all those seed patent... Oh yeah, it was insane, and they were letting it go all over the fields in Mexico, so the Mexican farmers had not planted it, didn't want it, but were required to pay a royalty for it.
Absolutely, yes.
And as you recall, you know, the similar programs have been implemented into the United States through the Department of Agriculture, subsidizing these behemoths and really putting the onus of competition and production onto the small farmers to where they couldn't compete.
And really, the banks started taking over their farms Forcing them into the agricultural business models of not only Monsanto but Tyson or Smithfield.
Some of these other big agri-companies that are taking the small farmers and drawing them into a production infrastructure that is controlled by them at the top.
And it really turns you know people into like sharecroppers and under this new world order system.
So it's almost like we're seeing a neo-feudalism redevelop itself here in America and it's like there's a corporate interest behind it.
And they're doing you know of course this with the banks and it's with our Well, you know, David, I gave a very early on talk about coronavirus pandemic and that it was calculated to wipe out the middle class and small businesses.
And in effect, we're about to return to a feudal society where you had the rich and powerful ensconced in their castles, surrounded by moats.
Today we call them gated communities, where the rest of us were toiling as serfs or slaves in the field.
That really seems to be the model they have in mind, Chris.
I mean, it's just staggering.
Look at our governor.
Look at our governor in Michigan.
She just like trenched an ivory tower and a bigger moat and electronic fence around her governor's mansion.
So yeah, they're definitely casting their moats and ivory towers.
And yeah, it's amazing.
It's almost like they're bringing on this dark age so that they can, you know, work beneath the fog of war or beneath the midst of these dark ages and really depopulate a lot of people.
And it seems like the people they are going to keep around are going to be reprogrammed to buying their bullshit.
It really is Mark of the Beast.
It's amazing.
I thought she was particularly despicable in a whole series of acts that appear to have been calculated to make her a more plausible vice presidential pick, but no one had heard of her before her atrocities in Michigan.
And after they learned about them, nobody wanted her.
Angela Davis actually said the reason they wanted Biden was not because he was the best, but because he was the most malleable.
He was the one they could most easily pressure into adopting the radical agenda they want to promote.
And I think that's spot on, which means now, and we've had both Biden and Kamala talking about a Harris administration rather
than Biden. I think that's pretty damn troubling because Kamala Harris really is a flyweight. She
humped her way to political prominence having an affair with Willie Brown and he gave
her a couple of plum assignments.
And even as Attorney General in California, she did nothing to improve the situation for minorities.
She suppressed evidence that would have exonerated a man who was on death row.
She's done a host of really despicable things.
And look, remember, When Kamala dropped out, there were 15 other candidates who went further than she.
I gather it was George Soros' son who picked Kamala to be the VP nominee and that Soros is basically running the Democratic Party.
So I think your allusion to him earlier was indeed spot on.
Yeah I don't know if it's necessarily if it's like Soros per se or if there's a collective conglomerate of billionaires that are you know maybe covering that field of the spectrum or that range of the spectrum and then maybe some on the other side like with Adelson or you know on the Republican side like the Koch brothers or Well, there's only one left now or whatever, but like, yeah, you know, so really you see like economic interests manifest themselves in political power or trying to do so right now.
And I think that these billionaires are just so out of touch with not only the will of the people, but their lust or their drive to bring in this technocracy to perfect this neo-feudal slave system.
You know, this is the thing that scares me is that I haven't heard a candidate really even You mentioned this, you know, you hear like the infrastructure programs, you know, talking about 5G and things like this, or you hear about like dealing with the corona crisis is, you know, respirators and ventilators.
And as you know, they're getting 39 grand to put someone on a ventilator.
But in many cases, you're putting someone in a coma and potentially risking their lives and doing it.
Yeah, being put on a ventilator is tantamount to a death sentence.
Yes.
Yeah, it's almost incorrect.
Go ahead.
I spoke over you.
Go ahead.
Oh, no, no.
You're okay.
I was just trying to hear what you said.
Oh, I was saying, yeah, putting one on a ventilator is tantamount to a death sentence.
I mean, it's outrageous.
Yeah.
It's crazy.
And nobody's advocating for the people at all.
I can't believe this is going on.
I know.
I know.
I was fairly certain, and it may yet happen, that they would take Biden out in some kind of dramatic fashion and replace him with maybe, you know, Hillary's already lost twice, and she is such a disgusting person.
I mean, if they wanted to guarantee they'd get even fewer votes, put Hillary on the ticket.
I've also talked- Yeah, you know, this is something that kind of makes me wonder about Go ahead.
Sorry, Jim.
No, you go ahead.
Oh hey Jim, what I was saying though is it makes me wonder about like almost the Trump phenomenon seems to be like they're scaring us into the arms of Trump and Trump has said just about everything in the right way and I just I think that maybe once his actions start to line up with his rhetoric if that's at all possible that he could be a tremendous president if he does use this will of the people as his momentum But I just, I fear that the cabinet around him and the associations with Israel and its ties to, you know, some of these billionaires, it scares me on both sides.
You know, I mean, I just, I know it's hard to find a purist that will get blessed by AIPAC to get on the ticket, but it's tough right now that we're seeing.
And it's like, you're seeing big money just take over everything we have in terms of political offerings.
And I think that is something that really needs to be dealt with first.
We got foreign bankers that run our private Federal Reserve and That's just bad news there.
I mean, you see them like taking with NAFTA, taking products, the goods that are essential to national security, or even to like commerce in America, outsourcing them into China, paying for it with our dollars to do it, and then trying to use us in a Cold War to enforce their intellectual property 30 years after their technocratic slave state goes rogue or whatever.
So, you know, I'm really, you know, seeing a lot of, you know, Cold War antics trying to pivot us against you know Brazil, Russia, India, China and what seems to be a global theatrics of like a Cold War 2.0.
Well, I've been very caustic and critical of Trump's actions in relation to Israel, you know, declaring Jerusalem to be the capital of Israel, the Golan Heights to be a part of Israel when the world recognizes it's Israeli-occupied Syrian territory, where Jerusalem's status as an international city has to be part of a global solution to the Palestinian-Israeli problem.
He defunded the UN agency dealing with Palestinian refugees.
He even, by executive order, redefined anti-Semitism to include criticism of the actions of the government of Israel.
That was despicable.
And I've been very troubled about the role of Jared and Ivanka in all of this.
I mean, Ivanka, to me, is a very interesting person, but Jared is, in my opinion, very troubling.
It would not surprise me if Jared were Mossad.
Oh, 100%.
Like you hear him and Netanyahu and how close they are together and, you know, raised him since he was a kid, sleeped over his house, all this stuff.
Yeah, Netanyahu seems to be one of these, these, you know, meeting in the aisles of every time you look into any historic misdeeds, you know, this guy's name rises to the forefront.
And I just think that that some of these people, you know, that Trump has either political connections to or loyalty to or business ties with, really, he needs to really make a not only a decision, not only between a business decision or direction
of this country, and I just hope that he's not... man, you know what I'm
saying.
Yeah, well here, I... Bibi was here at the White House today with a
United Arab Emirates and Bahrain with a new peace agreement.
Yeah.
And it is the first time in decades and decades that you've had an Arab state recognize Israel.
Most of the propaganda directed against Iran was based upon a mistranslation of a statement by its then Prime Minister who said, this too shall pass, meaning the Zionist domination of Israeli politics translated to mean that Israel would be wiped from the face of the earth, which was just a propagandistic deliberate skewing of language But Iran is actually the most peaceful great nation in the world.
Would you believe, Chris, Iran has not launched a war of aggression against another state since 1775?
And I go out of my way to point out that to appreciate this.
The ratification of the Constitution began in 1787.
George Washington was elected our first president in 1789.
So for longer than the United States has existed as a constitutional republic, Iran has not launched a war of aggression against any other state.
That's astounding.
Well, if you remember how many times the United States and the United Kingdom have been implicated
since the end of World War II in trying to destabilize or take over the Iranian government,
you know, once in 1953 before Mosaddegh, then again taking Mosaddegh out in 1953, Kermit
Roosevelt as you would talk about in some of your videos, and of course, going into
the Shah in 1979, again, Khomeini being, I think, an asset of the intelligence communities
to destabilize the Shah in 1979, and then of course, using Iran as a phantom menace,
along with like Libya and some of these other countries that were considered terrorists,
but of course, they were sitting on some major oil reserves that this group seems to really
want to control.
And I think you're seeing really this consolidation happening now under the umbrella of the US,
UN military force.
It's almost like Rothschild is going into these countries saying, join or die, and really
the United States military is being used to a capacity kind of like the Spanish were used
centuries ago to build infrastructure, the Spanish roads, things like this, and to be
just replaced after a few hundred years of dispossession and after the middle class is
turned out through the encomienda system or whatever.
So I'm just seeing a lot of parallels in history and then like different rise and falls of empires and the same group of bloodline families behind these infrastructures, you know, whether the communes in Rome, you know, or stuff that goes on into the Middle Ages, you know, one thing you can tell is the hammer and sickle.
You see this a lot, you know, whether it's the Bolshevik Revolution, Charles Martel was the hammer, the Maccabees, you know, the hammer.
You see this a lot throughout history and it repeats itself and it's not the first time that these guys have tried to, you know, usher people into communes and control the collective wealth of these civilizations and then using the concept of barbarians versus the collective inclusion of the Roman Empire and its cohorts or satrapies or things like that.
So, yeah, I see a lot of parallels just maybe on a meta thing and looking at history and seeing the same things happen over and over again.
You're a wonderful guest, Chris.
You have a very great breadth of knowledge.
You're so articulate.
You're right on point.
I'm really delighted and impressed and, you know, I'm just Happy, very happy we've had this chance for another conversation.
I want to offer you opportunities to address more to the audience of the world that you think they need to understand about the situation we're in today, as much as you're motivated to do so.
Yeah, thank you for this opportunity, and thank you for the kind words.
I really look up to you a lot, so that means a lot to hear that from you, and I truly appreciate it.
I just wanted to say something you were talking about.
The original 13th Amendment, we kind of, in the email, had incited into this.
In 1811, they were trying to ratify a 13th Amendment to reduce the articles of nobility.
In other words, to make all people equal in the eyes of the law, or just to take away the inclusion or the supremacy of or British appointed lawyers.
And of course, what happened was, is many of the states had a lot of instability come into
the place.
They were trying to redo the 20-year charter on the National Bank in 1811,
as you're aware of, too.
So there was a lot of strong-arming going on from foreign bankers in the
burgeoning United States.
And of course lines of credit were called in to really put us into a tough
put us into a tough spot after the Jefferson administration had left.
There was a significant run-ins with foreign interests like Burr or Chase or some other guys with Jefferson's administration.
And then moving into the Madison one, you know, the War of 1812, as you remember, was, was there was a series of fires being set by vandals.
A lot of courthouses were burned down.
The only thing that the White House was burned down.
The only thing that wasn't was really the patent offices.
And you got to wonder what the heck was going on with that.
And then if you look at the end of that war, they dropped the ratification of the 13th Amendment, which was the articles of nobility were being removed.
And then they forgot all about it, and it was washed to history.
And then we signed the Treaty of Ghent and renewed the second charter of the National Bank.
Technically under Rothschild, it goes to 1835, another 20-year lease.
So it was kind of weird to see this happening and see the infiltration of these guys trying to take away with that.
And then when they fail with that, the Whig Party comes out of nowhere and seems to be representing a lot of British interests.
And this is really what forms a lot of the territories in the West and creates a lot of wealth from the resources that are accumulated from that.
And as you know, One of the precursors to most wars is like technocratic development.
And, you know, it leads us into the Civil War, the development of railroads.
And I think that these were being used under the guise of the fog of war.
But of course, when the war ended, the public funds that built these railroads transitioned into the private ownership of these railroad companies through IPOs and through Wall Street.
And you really see Wall Street kind of integrate itself into the military industrial complex, you know, starting with like the Civil War and moving on.
And, you know, I was looking at a lot of white shoe firms that are out there, you know, whether they're accounting firms or legal firms, you know, they're all headquartered in London, and then they transition to the United States, and they seem to set up these infrastructures of what we know as the military-industrial complex, and in these wars that we get deceived into from the media, whether it's the 1898 Spanish-American War, the, you know, the World War I, you know, with the Lusitania, or World War II with Pearl Harbor, You know, we always seem to go into these wars, and we always seem to have to come together as a nation to develop the next step of technocracy under the fog of war.
And I really feel that we're being thrust into these situations by forces that are not genuine to the interests of the people, and the interests of the people are being hijacked by these economic forces that have strong vested interests.
Just a highlight of what I was kind of going into there.
Oh, it's all fascinating.
I think that Because Trump has done them so much good, we're gonna have an historic percentage of blacks voting for the Republican candidate.
And it appears that Latinos are also pivoting toward Trump, that so many of them fled or their parents to Havana from Cuba.
Now, the fact that Bernie's a self-declared socialist, that Biden appears too weak to have any position of his own, that there appear to be a lot of even Marxists and Communists on the Democratic side that They're going to lose a very significant portion of the Latino vote that Hillary was able to maintain and receive support.
So I think there are a lot of signs, and we're even talking the language of identity politics in terms of these groups, that the Democrats Are going to lose on the basis of a variation on identity politics, which really is the self-interest of these groups who have benefited so much from Trump's economic policies and where the Latinos also, but have been turned off by all the talk of socialism coming from the left, which they dislike in the extreme because of their experience under Castro.
I'm not 100% convinced that it was all justified.
I see Castro as a great nationalist leader who wanted to use the resources of Cuba to benefit the Cubans, just as Hugo Chavez wanted to use the resources of Venezuela to benefit Venezuela, just as Ho Chi Minh wanted to use the resources of Vietnam to benefit the Vietnamese, just as Muammar Gaddafi wanted to use the resources of Libya to benefit the Libyans.
So I have great admiration for nationalist leaders.
I think maybe our time has come to have a nationalist leader of our own and that Donald Trump and his efforts to make America great again is actually going to come very close to doing that with the reservation.
All this nonsense with Israel disturbs me profoundly.
And as you observed before, if you just look at these two candidates, whatever warts and flaws we associate with Donald Trump, Joe Biden's a non-starter.
I mean, it's a no-brainer when it comes to Trump versus Biden, it seems to me, Chris.
Yeah, it's almost like you say, anybody with an IQ over like 80 or 100, it could see this.
You know, it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure this out
like John or Larry could have had this a long time ago.
What I'm saying though is, I almost feel that they're weaponizing the moneyed interest
or the powers that be, whatever you call them, are trying to weaponize the obtuse
through selective tokenism and really inverting history in many cases.
So you're seeing a very organized group of money trying to weaponize certain aspects of the cash system
against each other, as they've done in many instances against ethnic immigrants in this country,
as let's say in their homelands, many of the speculative investments or schemes
that are happening or the wars that are going on, religion or politics, money resources,
they're being brought into these countries by the same group of central bankers
trying to control the resources of the world.
And of course, the people in these countries are driven out and forced to come somewhere.
And it's usually to the United States because it's probably the safest place they could find.
And of course, they come here as every generation and every immigrant group has over time.
But like what's happening is almost like in their homelands, they're They're being torn to shreds by this group of people that is running the military might of our country, and it's not necessarily the will of the people that is being delivered, certainly not democracy, and it's certainly a large degree of rhetoric mobilizing not only ourselves in the notion of patriotism to deliver these things,
But really, we're going to gain really nothing from this.
We're going to just bear the collective guilt and the collective punishment in the eyes of these multinational countries that are being, you know, strong-armed by the United States to uphold the United Nations, a foreign military, a foreign government, a foreign banking system that is controlling direction of our country.
To me, that is something since World War II that has scared me immensely, and it seems like Since World War Two, these group of bankers have consolidated everybody to this World Bank IMF economic system.
And now it's almost like the realization of the people on this is forcing them to create another option through BRICS and to create the second Cold War that we're seeing.
And as you know, in the first Cold War, these guys are dealing with both sides, spinning both populations against each other, racing for technocratic prizes.
You know, most of our military espionage was committed by this certain group of people and they were playing The Russian people against the American people for the sake of the United Kingdom and Israel in my appraisal.
I just want to get your thoughts on that because you you've definitely got a lot more experience than I do and a lot more insight than I do seeing this over time and I just wanted to see if that was a fair appraisal or if I if I see them often in La La Land.
Oh, I'm very impressed with you in so many ways, Chris.
Let me ask you this question.
Has the United States been neglectful of its black citizens?
I mean, you know, Lyndon wouldn't allow Jack to pass the Civil Rights Act because he wanted to make it his act.
He was the driving force behind the assassination so he could become the president of all the people.
He said he would make blacks vote Democrat for the next 100 years.
And, you know, I think he had a lot of success.
On the other hand, it looks as though some of the programs that have been employed have weakened black families.
They've rewarded black mothers for having more children because they get a larger share of the dole from the government.
Affirmative action certainly was intended to give a benefit to minorities.
But I'm wondering if all of that maybe hasn't panned out in a rather bad way.
We've been overwhelmed with political correctness, social promotions.
Students aren't any longer required to actually pass their courses
to be promoted to the next grade on the basis of it might hurt their feelings
that they're not in the same age group they began.
And you have the Common Core in sex education.
And now you have the governor of California just signing a bill that weakens punishment
for adults having sex with children.
I mean, Chris, this is just grotesque.
I mean, this is such an abdication of responsibility to the public good.
I am dismayed.
Yeah it's amazing to see what they're trying to usher in as the new normal and there's nothing normal or right about this at all.
It's almost like they're fucking with us, man, just to see what they get away with
before we tear them limb from limb.
And I just can't believe what they're doing, not only the children, but to the elderly
with various different political operations, what they're doing to our soldiers,
what they're doing to our kids, putting them on the hook for student loans,
training them under this death and debt paradigm to become systems managers for a house of Rockefeller
or Rothschild, the medical institution has been compromised, the service industry has been turned
into something different, the production of goods are non-existent in America,
as you've seen from these free trade deals.
Really, you're seeing America being scaled down to like a third world country.
And of course, the assets and wealth are being stripped out of this country at breakneck speed.
And it's amazing to see how many different people on the political spectrum are just using this political football for something different.
And the truth is not even being called out for what it is.
And like you say, these Democrats are really trying to like turn China to a third world colony of the United Kingdom and the United States.
And I think the American middle class is going to suffer immensely if they have no income, no wages, no means of production.
It's a national security danger, if you ask me, and I just can't believe that this is going on like it is.
And as far as the racism goes, these are, like I say, the caste system and selective tokenism being played against each other.
It reminds me of Jim Crow and the forces behind that in the 20s, trying to push them in for the Industrial Revolution.
You know, it's almost like reverse Jim Crow where they're trying to like force everybody into megacities and burn them out of the, you know, it's nuts.
I've never seen anything like it.
Chris, we have a question.
One thing I'd like to add too is most of these places that are being attacked and burned down are retail stores that are heavily insured by these interests that are probably sending these mercenaries out as well.
So, I don't know, what's your thoughts on that?
I mean, you were alive when COINTELPRO was going on and like... I think the average American families, they talk about suburban families, when they see rioting and looting going on in urban areas, arson taking place, all these threats of violence, people actually being killed, and they're moving out into the suburbs, and they're threatening people to give up their homes to blacks because of systemic racism, which is never defined.
When this country, it seems to me, has done about as much as could reasonably be expected to, you know, make amends for tearing down the statues and monuments was really to exacerbate racial tensions because there were monuments of mutual respect Between the North and the South, statues to Confederate soldiers were to show no hard feelings and that all Americans understood whether you fought for the South or fought for the Union, that didn't mean you weren't a good and decent human being.
And tearing all this down seems to me very deliberately strategized.
This was a tactic that was guaranteed to upset and offend a significant segment of American society, and therefore it was deliberately adopted as a provocation.
Yeah, excellent.
You know, one thing I'd like to add to maybe your comments.
In 1860, there was only 1.4 or 1.5% of the population that owned slaves.
And if you look at like, say, right now, 1.4, 1.5% owns 99% of the capital right now in America and around the world.
So, you know, I don't think that slavery has ever been abolished or ever been diminished.
I think we've all been included under the periphery of the neo-feudal caste system, and we've all been enslaved through socioeconomic debt and usury and things like this.
As far as now the blacks being mobilized through inversions and through rhetoric and through, let's just say, the destruction of culture, It's more or less a detrimental thing, and it's more of them doing a disservice, I think, to not only the historic struggles that everybody's gone through in freeing themselves or finding a way in America, you know, because ultimately, if you look at it, we've all been enslaved by this group of royal families at one point in time, at some point, and that's the reason why we come to America in the first place, and that's probably why people are still coming here to this day.
So really, it's almost like they divide the world into sub colonies and things like that
and create the political theaters that we're seeing to mobilize generations against generations,
to forge people into not only conservative perspectives, but also the neoliberal ones that they're trying to push on.
You know, they're scaring the shit out of the people and cutting them down in wages and labor and opportunities.
And it's, like I said, the same group of central bankers controlling the resources and the wealth
and the collective power of the people.
It, to me, is not democracy and it's not liberty, it's not freedom, it's not constitution, it's slavery.
And really, to keep this, you really can't have us coming together, you can't have people really, you know, saying, hey, we've all been screwed, you know, traditionally, but it's not by each other, it's by the people that are above us.
And once you realize that, you can really put things into a different perspective, I think,
that really kind of explains what's truly going on here.
And maybe, I don't know, what's your thoughts on that, man?
I know I'm just kind of rambling here.
Well, insofar as Antifa and Black Lives Matter appear to be the paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party
and where George Flores has been sponsoring them all, for example, he bust Antifa and Black Lives Matter
into Charlottesville on the same vehicles, brought them in on the same buses.
That whole thing was completely staged to try to create the impression of the transformation of Trump from being a America first to an American nationalist to a white nationalist to a white supremacist to a neo-Nazi.
That's what they were undertaking then and what they continue To undertake now.
If you look at propagandists on MSNBC, among the most despicable of whom is this woman Joy Reid, she was just giving this kind of critique of Trump as a racist and a liar.
I mean, it was unbelievable that the level of public discourse in politics has just sunk into the sewer, Chris.
I'm just dumbfounded.
Yeah, well there's definitely, like I said, an organized group of mutters trying to mobilize people who are certainly ignorant and not paying attention that have made historic transgressions, which I should say that may be culturally associated with their demographics, but I'm seeing like an actual thing.
It reminds me of like in the 60s where they have, you know, Or let's just say like in the 30s with Jim Crow where they have, you know, the major leaders that are Democrats that are running the KKK, scaring the shit out of people but scaring them back into, you know, out of freedom or out of going out into the wilderness or venturing off the plantation.
It's almost like they're doing the same thing now where they're trying to put people on as dependents of the state to make them wards of the state and most of these people are probably products of the for-profit prisons and the tough-on-crime from the 90s.
The whole generational targeting of that and then their fathers in the 60s and COINTELPRO and the weaponized civil rights movements under LBJ and Nixon going the other way.
So I mean, yeah, there's a strong effort to make sure that people never come together
against the real controllers.
And I just see like you're saying, yeah, there are absurdities that are certainly illogical
and they're highly emotional.
And when you orchestrate this kind of violence, right on the cusp of like, say, the Corona outbreak
and the freak out with that, that goes away, people start losing faith in that.
Within a day, Antifa's off all over the place, Chazz is popping up.
You know, this is organized money behind this, as well as, like, say, our federal and local authorities are not only sidestepping this, but they're standing down.
And this is, I think, part of the Operation 2, is to get people to lose faith in the law and law enforcement, and to take justice or things into their own hands out in the streets.
I think that they're trying to push us towards that.
I think that's all highly relevant and illuminating.
We have a comment in the chat room from Bill in Australia, who often calls into my shows, that the Democrats are doing a version of the Cultural Revolution in China.
How would you respond to that?
I think, I think he's right on.
Yeah, it seems to be like a page out of this blueprint.
It's, you know, and if you go back in history and go back in time, they've done this a lot of places.
They did this in Russia with the Revolution too.
They, you know, they did it with Napoleon coming in in the 1800s.
I mean, so like Rothschild has been trying to unite the world under a League of Nations or under like an alliance, a collective banking authority that controls the resources and the wealth of the populations and dictates What did they say?
I care not who makes the laws as long as they control the money or something like that?
Right, right.
Yeah yeah so I mean like I almost think that this is like opiates for the masses for us to really you know end up in the gutter on and you know if we're not careful that will happen because they are doing everything they can to incite us limbically to react to these type of stimuli and in most cases when you see this type of fear and this this the sensationalization of it there's money behind it and they're trying to do something with it and I just fear that something like that's going on on both sides of the spectrum and it's It's scary to see it happening in such speed and just without the anybody in the mainstream media is not even talking about this.
So it's I feel that we've not only been failed by our mainstream media but been betrayed by it as well as our politicians.
So I don't know I'm a little bit losing my faith in the system here and I think we almost got it.
Oh yeah yeah yeah yeah no I understand and agree a hundred percent.
It seems to me the Democrats have actually outlined what they plan to do.
They're telling us Trump will appear to have won a massive election on the 3rd of November, but gradually as the mail-in ballots are counted it'll turn out that That Biden actually won.
Now what that tells me, Chris, is they're gonna size up where they need to add votes and they're gonna manufacture votes to change the outcomes in areas to the extent they can where to forestall this kind of bullshit.
There has to be a massive landslide for Trump.
Frankly, I believe it's gonna happen.
I think he will take anywhere from 40 to 49, even 50 states, even Californians are turning against the Democrats because of all the bullshit in California.
The governor there is, of course, a nephew of Nancy Pelosi, and he's imposed absurd lockdowns and restraints.
And just sign this new bill to, you know, weaken penalties for adults having sex with children.
I think there's a point where the average American just is disgusted beyond words and willing to take a stand, do something they've never done before, in this case, to vote Republican.
I would go a step farther and say that maybe I wouldn't be surprised if people started tarring and feathering these politicians that are just compromising every facet of our values and our morals and our political spectrum and putting us in massive debt to do so.
So, yeah, I don't know.
At some point in time, I wonder what it will take for America to be outraged enough to just demand more of their political spectrum in general.
Chris, I love that idea to tar and feather these politicians.
They so deserve it.
That is so fitting.
I got a compliment.
That's wonderful.
That's just wonderful.
I love it.
Well, you know, another thing is you don't hear anything talking about them taking taxes away.
You know, you don't hear anything about that at all.
They take away our incomes, our revenue for six months.
Our state was shut down here in Michigan for six months.
You know, but you don't hear them talking about lightening up on taxes.
You know, you see credit card companies hammering you and drilling your APR rate up to 30%, you know, charging them $30 late fees if you're a day late.
You know it's crazy to see the predatory lending that is going on and that the asset stripping that as a result of this that has just been mum in the media.
I mean this is like the middle class has just been...
Completely assaulted, if not by the 2008 financial shenanigans than this.
And this is what I think is a cover up.
This Corona thing is a cover up for the financial issues that are going on.
You know, I think the pension funds are probably depleted.
You know, toxic assets are in place of our good money.
And I think that Wall Street has done this to us.
And I think Wall Street is behind not only the problem, the reaction to the solution here.
And I think that really we need to think not only outside the box, but we need to start outsourcing the 1%.
I think this is going to turn out to have been a cover for the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of the United States.
Yes, sir.
I agree.
You're seeing it right now.
And I'm shocked that nobody's flipping out.
You know?
Yeah.
It's amazing.
You know, maybe that's the fluoride's working.
I don't know what else to say.
Something's going on.
Chris, just foresee, if I'm right, and Trump wins a landslide election on November 3rd, but the Democrats try to manipulate.
See, it seems to me Trump knows they're going to try to pull funny business with these mail-in ballots.
I can't believe he would let himself be vulnerable.
But what measures do you know he can take to forestall it, to ensure it doesn't happen?
I think that really the free market is going to sort this out in the exchange of opinions and ideas.
I think that you're right that he will probably win in a landslide.
I don't think it should even be contested.
I don't think it could even be contested.
But you know, it wouldn't be the first time that these guys have tried to take a candidate, like say with Hillary Clinton, and say that she won the popular vote.
I couldn't imagine her, I didn't see anybody or never met anybody that voted for Hillary Clinton.
That supposedly she won all these votes and won all this shit, you know, I'll tell you whether it's with the DNC primary or in the national.
What do they say, fall in love in the primary, fall in line during the national?
Well, I think what the DNC did with Bernie Sanders twice now should show you not only their commitment
to the will of the people or in terms of a socialist or whatever agenda, but also that they're gonna take
a puppet, an antithesis of exactly everything they proclaim to stand for in terms of rhetoric
and put out these candidates like Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden to really, to become like an Obama nation.
And I hate to use a pun here, but it really is.
Like Obama was the same thing.
He was the worst thing that could ever happen to black people.
I hate to say it, but like, I think that that was really, you know, like you said, the great society
and securing the black vote for 50 years.
Well, I think what happened with Obama was in fact an operation to cause this very effect
that you're seeing right now.
And I think in Trump trying to resolve it, he's of course being labeled as a racist
and attributed as a racist.
He does say some pretty He shoots from the hip I'll say that but you know I almost think that this is an operation where they're trying to like Gaslight microaggression on one side and then gaslight the other people the other way on the other side And see what happens out in the streets or this wasn't it astonishing watching those two conventions.
I mean the The quality was all on one side.
Beautifully produced, wide range of speakers, highly intelligent and informed.
But the prior convention had been pathetic, pedestrian, uninspiring.
That's what they say today.
Young people aren't inspired to vote for Joe Biden.
I don't know of anyone who's inspired to vote for Joe Biden.
Biden is a cipher.
He's a nobody.
He's a non-entity.
He's worse because he's corrupt in so many ways, including for his fondling of children endlessly.
I mean, it's a disgrace that a major party nominated a man of this low caliber.
Yeah, you know, they almost would have been better off running like a cartoon avatar or something like that, you know, a fictional creation of fabrication of the deep state, you know, because that's really what Joe Biden is.
You remember, he was one of the guys trying to push a Patriot Act after Oak City.
You know, Biden is just been a toxic person to sell out this country since his inception into political office.
So yeah, you can probably look at his accumulation of wealth and being a public servant and that accumulation of wealth.
Should not be justified by what he's provided in his career.
So yeah, I have a hard time in any way shape or form finding any kind of support for Joe Biden.
I agree with you completely.
You know, as far as like Trump winning this one, it should be a no-brainer.
But man, I don't know.
After seeing these people reacting to COVID the way they have, I don't know what could happen, man.
You never know.
There's a lot of, like you say, contamination points in terms of the election process, the voting machines.
Each 50 states have their own infrastructure and their own way of doing things that can be compromised, as you've seen in the DNC primary and even in the national of 2016.
So, yeah, your thoughts on that?
Well, let me just say, on the fourth day of the Republican convention, NPR was doing polling from Democrats and from Republicans, and so many Democrats called in to say after this they were going to vote Republican.
They had to redesign to make it Trump versus Biden, because otherwise they wouldn't have had any Biden supporters on the air at all!
Sure, sure.
Fair enough.
Hey, do you remember in the 2016 DNC primary where, like, the DNC literally stopped taking exit polls after, like, 25 states because they kept showing, you know, deviations of more than 2% and every single time was favoring Hillary Clinton?
The media never talked about it, nobody ever talked about it, the political interest—Bernie never even talked about it, and he's the one getting screwed.
Like, I mean, so many people were coming to him saying, we got screwed by the system, our ballots were disregarded, our votes were flipped, things like that.
Bernie would not only hear it, not hear it, but just ignored it completely.
And this is what I'm saying.
His reaction to this was calling the Bernie or Bus people Russian bots.
That's how he dealt with this corruption from within the DNC.
So yeah, I think they disaffected a bulk of their people that were paying attention, at least, and they were hoping for a brighter future from them.
And me, as somebody that was a lifelong Democrat, after seeing what they did in 2016, I will have nothing to do with that party in any way, shape, or form.
And I haven't seen them provide any sort of dedication or commitment towards, you know, not only redeeming that mishap, but to stepping in the right direction in terms of looking out for the multitudes.
You know, I just see them bringing in this technocratic slave state on each side, and more so on the DNC side, like you say.
It seems to be in lockstep with like the communist agenda, like you're saying.
It reminds me a lot of parallels of like the Mao regime.
You're a wonderful conversationalist, Chris.
I just got to tell you how impressed I am, and I'm delighted again.
I'm going to say one more time, would you like to add, you know, summing up thoughts for this evening?
I want to have you back again on one show or another.
I've got one on Tuesday now from 3 to 5.
You know, it's the old Raw Deal.
I left Revolution Radio to do all this stuff with Real Deal Media, but it was basically this show, you know, The Fence Presents and The Conspiracy Guy on Sundays.
But I'd like to get you back on the Raw Deal on a Tuesday forthcoming here as well.
I just think you're wonderful and I'm just absolutely delighted to have you on tonight.
Let me give you another window of opportunity to say what you think every American needs to understand about the situation we're in today.
Okay, well I guess I'll do like a quick little timeline.
I'm not trying to take up too much of the people's time or whatever and I thank you for giving me the opportunity to do this and thank you for the kind words and I'd be more than delighted to be on your show, so thank you for that.
So maybe to start this off chronologically, Federal Reserve, 1913, income tax, 1916,
Selective Service Act, 1917, Alien Sedition Acts around the same time of World War I
to try to eliminate dissent into this, the Palmer Raids, 1919, Prohibition, same time, right?
So what you do is you've got a moneyed interest that is taking, let's say, an alcohol
using this as a means to create a black market.
And then once the laws change, transition into controlling the over the,
let's just say the legitimate market, very similar to what you see with like the cannabis
industry in the 70s, making it a Schedule I,
and then now Wall Street runs the cannabis in 50 states.
Well, it's a similar type of notion Let's just say with any sort of model any sort of formulae I think that the true purpose of these world wars, especially World War two was to consolidate the entire national banking system under one group the Bank of International Settlements through the IMF World Bank and To transition us off of gold and silver and to replace it with fractional reserve fiat usury And of course it becomes a petrodollar in the 70s after we dissociate from the gold standard in 71 so I think that really the the formation of the National Security Act in 1947 the the schisms the split up of the the military into the army the Navy the Marines the Air Force they departmentalize our military industrial complex and start using the private sector through Wall Street to
To start running these technocratic innovations for the sake of military and national security being developed with our tax dollars and then transition through Wall Street into not only the capital markets but into the private sector and even skunk works as we're seeing.
There's a tremendous amount of money that's been embezzled from our country through the Federal Reserve System and it seems to be to what Catherine Austin Fitts says to the tune of almost 50 trillion dollars And a lot of this money manifests and represents itself in the deep state and the skunk work things, whether it's in the medical field and the two-tier medical technologies, whether it's in the space and travel exploration, things like this, resource extractions.
So there's been a tremendous amount of money that has been extorted from the public in terms of wealth through this Federal Reserve System and utilized through the military-industrial complex to become what it's become.
And even our media is an instrument of this from the New Deal.
And we've been under an economic emergency since 1933.
So I really think that there's something there there in terms of not only Constitution and it being transitioned into what we're seeing now, but also the UN agenda and it propelling us into what we're seeing as well.
So to keep it short, that's kind of something that I would highlight and maybe get into greater length if given the opportunity at a future date.
Oh, I think that's fantastic.
I love it, Chris.
That's wonderful.
I'm already looking ahead to just the 22nd, next Tuesday, a week from today, on this show, which is in the afternoon from 3 to 5 central.
Would that work for you?
You know what, can I do it the following week, perhaps?
Because I'll be out in Maine, and I don't know if I'll be back home yet, and I don't want to make you late or be... On the 29th?
The 29th?
The 29th?
Would that be possible?
Maybe choose a little bit later of a date than that?
Because, like I said, I do have a prior engagement.
You've got it!
Perfect.
Yeah, that's awesome.
The 29th from 3 to 5 Central.
And you're in Eastern, or are you on Central?
Are you on Central or Eastern?
No, I'm in Eastern, yep.
You're on Eastern, so it'll be four to six.
Yes, sir.
Okay, Chris, wonderful.
I can't tell you how much I've enjoyed this, this evening.
Pleasure is all mine.
I've had a long week, a large meal, and not a lot of sleep, or I would keep us going right now and here, but I'm just delighted.
You are a fabulous guest, and I look forward to having you on the Raw Deal.
Everyone, that's Revolution Radio.
Studio B, The Raw Deal on September the 29th.
I'm gonna have Chris back as my guest on that show.
Chris, I can't thank you enough.
This really has been wonderful, even spectacular.
You're terrific.
Oh, thank you.
Thank you so much.
The pleasure is truly all mine.
I just want to give a shout out to their chat room.
Thanks for chiming in and giving your thoughts.
I didn't really get to see the comments, but I looked at what other people had to say about some of my thoughts.
And if you want to see any more of my material, I have Brutal Honesty on Bitshoot.
Oh, good.
Yeah, say that again, Chris.
Brutal Honesty.
Yeah, Brutal Honesty is the name of my channel on Bitchute.
If you want to listen to me rant off, I usually try to do a video a day and just put my thoughts out there and just, you know, kind of, I try to do my political rantings and do a good hour long, you know, Purge of the soul every day and then just leave it at the door so I can, you know, be a good family man and be a righteous person once I've left it there.
Well, there was a lot of back and forth in the chat room over religious issues.
Judaism and the like, you know, that sort of thing.
But a great appreciation for you, my friend.
So mark your calendar for the 29th, 4 to 6 Eastern, On Revolution Radio, and we'll get a hold of you.
Send me your phone number, Chris, and I'll make sure that my producer has it, and we'll get you on the air.
Oh, excellent.
Thanks so much.
I really appreciate the opportunity to talk with you and to really hear your thoughts on what's going on in the world today.
Tremendous resource to the next generation, so thank you for doing what you do and for giving me an opportunity to share my thoughts.
Chris, you were just terrific.
Just terrific.
I can't thank you enough.
So this is Jim Fetzer with my very special guest tonight.
And I'm going to have him back already here on the 29th.
Chris, we're really tremendous.
You did a great job.
I can't thank you enough.
Fetz Presents and all of you out there, thank you all for watching.
Thanks a lot.
Have a great night.
Chris, you really were just terrific.
Thank you, man.
I really appreciate it.
Oh, I don't know how to do this.
Yeah, I'm lost.
All right.
Export Selection