All Episodes
Previous Next
July 4, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
51:21
The Real Deal Report: Friday July 3rd, 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison with Mike Barrett in Seattle and Blake Wally in Austin.
We're here to give you the latest from the Real Deal reports.
The news is pretty striking.
We have been censored.
Dean Ryan TV, the following videos have been flagged for their thumbnails reviewed and removed.
I'm a bit blown away by this.
Mike, do you have any thoughts?
Well, you know, you never know what it is that you get flagged.
Usually it's somebody who's got it out for you that reports, you know, we all have our enemies because we're out here telling the truth.
So we always have somebody who's after us.
And, you know, you just got to go through the comments.
And if you find anybody who's giving you a hard time, just block them is kind of my philosophy.
But again, it's hard to know what's in that image.
That could be offensive to anybody.
We're simply talking about the issues of the day.
I don't see anything there, except maybe it's the Ghislaine... How do you pronounce her name, by the way?
Ghislaine?
I've heard them all.
But, you know, maybe it has something to do with the fact that we're dropping some truth bombs on that, but there's lots of people doing that that aren't getting banned.
So, you know, who knows at this point?
Okay.
Blake, your thoughts.
Yeah I mean at least it was just a thumbnail maybe because it had a firearm on there and some millennial got triggered or could just be yeah exactly one of the one of the enemies of the show and they're not going to you know YouTube's probably not going to go to bat for us so they'll just give them the benefit of the doubt.
Fair enough.
Meanwhile, the left-wing Chop Zone was responsible for a 525% spike in Seattle crime.
How's that for a summer of love?
For almost the entirety of June, the area was plagued with fights, bickering, robberies, and rapes with occupiers targeting both outsiders and each other.
Now it turns out during the same period last year, since compared to the same period last year, there was a 525% jump in crime, even greater than the 300% repeatedly cited by the Seattle police chief.
Meanwhile, a Wisconsin college student—I find this very embarrassing—demanded Lincoln's statue be torn down because, while he was anti-slavery, he wasn't pro-Black.
You know, I thought that we had a representative government and that policies are not to be made by mobs.
I mean, this is incredible.
Like those of all presidents, Lincoln's legacy is complex and contains actions which 150 years later appear flawed, said Chancellor Becky Blank in response to those calling to remove the statue.
However, When the totality of his tenure is considered, Lincoln is widely acknowledged as one of our greatest presidents, having issued the Emancipation Proclamation, persuaded Congress to adopt the 13th Amendment, ending slavery, and preserve the Union during the Civil War.
It's just stunning.
Meanwhile, an exclusive from General Flynn, who started writing a blog, if we don't act, 2% of the people are about to control the other 98%.
I think it's got it exactly right.
I believe the attacks being presented to us today are part of a well-orchestrated, well-funded effort that uses racism I think he's got it right.
our battlefield disposition.
This weapon is used to leverage and legitimize violence and crime, not to seek or preserve truth.
The dark forces weapons formed against us serve one purpose, to promote radical social change through power and control.
Socialism and the creation of a socialist society, their ultimate goals.
I think he's got it right.
The real targets are the destruction of the Constitution and of the US Bill of Rights.
Mike, your thoughts?
Well, first of all, Jim, as you can see, I'm not actually in Seattle.
I'm at Mount Rushmore today, and there have been some modifications made for the big event tonight with Donald Trump coming.
So, here I am in Mount Rushmore, looking very much forward to that.
And I will tell people, I think you should pay attention to his remarks tonight.
They may have some coded messages in them, or there may actually be a verb.
It's going to be really interesting.
Again, is it any surprise to anybody who's got any common sense at all that the CHOP Zone ends up with a massive increase in crime?
They're all criminals.
Every single person that did this is a criminal.
They're seditious, anti-American, anti-capitalist criminals who want nothing more than to destroy the United States.
So are we shocked?
It ended up in a wanton outbreak of crime, including rape, murder, extortion.
You know, it's just big, big shock, right?
Big shock.
I mean, how can anybody not really understand that this was the objective motive of these people?
But I guess we're lucky in one sense, in that, as General Flynn points out, what you've got is you've got People finally exposing who they are.
The Democrats have lived for years by pretending to be real Americans, by pretending they cared about America, by pretending they believed in the same things we did, but they just wanted to modify, tweak things a little bit because we could be better and now that's all exposed as a complete lie.
The progressive Democrat left agenda is to destroy the United States and they are actually now overtly setting about doing that and putting their plan into motion.
The question that remains Mike, I think you got it right.
Flynn and for the rest of us is what are we going to do about it?
Mike, I think you got it right.
Blake, your thoughts.
Yeah, exactly.
So this Chop Zone, I guess they're trying to set a better example for how we should live, getting a taste of what life would be like if we let Antifa run over us.
I guess now people can see what the lawless anarchy looks like.
And it's interesting to see these organizations that have just no understanding of history And especially with this racism is kind of maybe this uncomfortable historical reality.
We're obviously trying to make ourselves better going forward, but trying to take down the statue of Lincoln at Wisconsin is just completely absurd as well.
So got some issues to fix in here.
I think you got it right too, Mike.
Meanwhile, we're here on a Foushee Friday where Fetzer Pest Control is chasing after the rat with a chunk of cheese.
Judge Napolitano, governments do not have the authority to mandate mask wearing.
Judge Andrew Napolitano said federal and state governments don't have the authority to mandate the wearing of face masks.
Prominent Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden, of course, have been supporting it.
Biden recently declared if he became president, he'd have a national mandate But, as Napolitano observes, the federal government can't do it because the federal government is not charged with public health and public safety.
That is an area reserved by the 10th Amendment to the states.
And that brings us to whether the states have the authority, and the answer is again, no.
If a person is known to be contagious, the state could require that person to be quarantined or wear a mask.
But anything short of that, the state cannot interfere with that person's freedom of movement or freedom to wear or not to wear a mask.
So the government's authority is really quite limited here, no matter how aggressive the pandemic may be.
He did acknowledge, with the exception of on federal land or on state land, the governors couldn't compel.
Meanwhile, a new hydroxychloroquine study vindicates President Trump and should end Dr. Anthony Tony the Rat Fauci's career.
A new study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System revealed hydroxychloroquine lowered the death rate among hospitalized COVID patients by at least 50%.
The study examined 2,541 patients in six hospitals.
The study examined 2,541 patients in six hospitals.
More than 26% who did not receive hydroxychloroquine died.
More than 90% of those who received hydroxychloroquine within 48 hours of admission to the hospital said the drug was the key to successful.
Fewer than half that number, 13%, died.
Meanwhile, a man who correctly predicted Trump's win over Hillary Clinton Has now predicted he has a 91% of being re-elected in 2020.
This is Professor Helmut Norpott from Stony Brook told Lou Dobbs that Donald Trump had an 87% chance of winning the 2016, back in August of 2016.
And of course he was spot on.
And now he's predicting that Trump indeed has over a 90% chance of winning in 2020.
Mike, your thoughts?
Well, that's not surprising.
I mean, I think if you look at the models that he used, it's very interesting.
He uses a lot of different metrics than other people use.
And again, the fact that he was one of the few to predict Trump winning in 2016 means that I think his predictions for 2020 are fairly reliable.
And it's also interesting to note that his It's actually up.
It's now 91% as opposed to 87% in 2016.
That doesn't mean it's not going to be a close election, but it does mean that all of the circumstances favor the election of President Trump, which would be a great thing for this country.
So, coming back to Dr. Napoleon Franci, here we are again with The hydroxychloroquine argument is we've been telling you on this show since day one, HCQ with zinc and azithromycin is a cure for the coronavirus.
And the interesting thing about this, Jim, is that the study is actually of patients that are hospitalized.
The effective way to use hydroxychloroquine and zinc and azithromycin is before the patient ever has to be hospitalized.
As soon as he's symptomatic and you suspect it might be COVID-16, If you use the protocol, the bottom line is that the patients recover 100% of the time and never have to go to the hospital and never do pass away.
So what we've got is a situation where we have Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Vlad Zelenko, his protocol is completely vindicated by this study.
Anthony Fauci is once again completely embarrassed and proven to be the fraud that he is.
And the question now, the issue now, is we have to get this study out to people.
And I'm really hoping That the president will be the guy who gets behind this and really trumpets this from the mountaintop, literally, today and other days as we go on.
I mean, we do have an effective treatment for this virus, and you should be saying things like every Major League Baseball team and every soccer team and all of the professional football teams should be running a hydroxychloroquine Um, a protocol and their players will not have to worry about contracting the disease or if they do contract it, they won't have to worry about getting sick from it.
So, the fact that it was so effective in a situation where patients are already sick enough to be hospitalized is really, really important because that's not actually what it's for.
You know, it's supposed to be used at the beginning.
Once again, we have a $20 treatment versus a $3,000 treatment for something like remdesivir, which, by the way, has been shown in the trials they've done so far, not as effective as the HCQ treatment, even after the patient gets sick.
This is a total victory for those of us who have been behind the President's protocol, the hydroxychloroquine, and a big, big victory for Dr. Vladimir Zelenko.
Well said, Mike.
Blake, Yeah absolutely and I mean it's good to see some common sense from Judge Napolitano.
They're acting like this is like Ebola or this is a huge threat when it's really shouldn't be have ever gone to this level.
And of course the hydroxychloroquine.
Yeah great points from Mike there with Fauci.
He was just an authoritative, credible voice to push the vaccine agenda and very expensive treatments this whole time when we should have just used the old tech that was just as effective and they demonized everybody for it.
Yeah, and I hope, as Holster says, 91% Trump wins.
I certainly hope so.
Otherwise, we're going to get stuck with Biden and federal masks and he's controlled by globalists.
He's going to be the ultimate puppet.
But, of course, we've got to fight these mail-in ballots, which will be a threat to this 91% chance.
And yeah, we gotta do everything possible to make sure that does not destroy our chances of this November.
I think you got it right, Blake.
Mail-in ballots?
Ridiculous.
Meanwhile, Tucker draws record 4.3 million viewers amid all-time highs for Fox News Channel.
We began addressing this yesterday, but it's fascinating to look at it in detail because news reporting in the media is so extremely important.
No one's going to deny the channel has millions of viewers, over 60.
However, the data debunks the notion that Fox and its hosts aren't popular with younger key Democrats.
Graphics, it states the opposite.
Take a look.
Fox, led by Carlson, dwarfed the competition.
Tucker Carlson tonight, 791,000.
Hannity, 754,000.
Special Report, 668,000.
The Five, 655,000.
Ingram Angle, 655,000.
The Story, look, all of those, all six of the leading are all from Fox.
Then you got Cuomo Prime, 587.
CNN Anderson Cooper, 568.
655,000 Ingram Angle, 655,000.
The story, look, all of those, all six of the leading are all from Fox.
Then you got Cuomo Prime, 587 CNN Anderson Cooper, 568 CNN Tonight.
Erin Burnett out front CNN.
Notice MSNBC isn't even there.
The demographic of adults ages 25 to 50 are as a primary focus for most advertisers.
The age group is deemed impressionable to new products by cable news sponsors.
If you think the viewership is backloaded, chop off the last five years and extend the criteria down to 18.
Tucker won the valued 18-48 demographic by an equitable margin.
Here are a few of his thoughts.
Carlson tweets once or twice a month.
He just tweeted one time in the entire month, and yet he dominated the competition.
He excels.
Absent the microphone, his competition views as a necessity to capture the demographic he just won.
Twitter is good for pushing content for bloggers and podcast hosts.
It's not time well spent for TV and radio hosts, however.
Meanwhile, MSNBC has an age problem.
In two key demographics, MSNBC didn't have a single show in the top ten.
Two in the top ten among total viewership.
The Carlson-led Fox News owned the first six and five spots in the 25 to 54 and 80 to 49 demographics, respectively.
MSNBC is falling far behind CNN with younger population as well.
Seven CNN shows made the top 20 of adults between 25 and 54.
Only one MSNBC show, Rachel at 11, made it.
The results are similar among adults 18 to 49 in the top 20.
CNN held a 7 to 2 advantage over MSNBC.
Above all else, Tucker's success among the different demographics is a direct response to extreme thinking.
High-ranking media executives have rewarded reporters, hosts, and opinionists for far-left-leaning views that demand change and spark outrage.
That's what gets retweeted, liked, and promoted.
Far-right viewers have their places and niches that mostly exist independently.
Then there's the rest of the country who isn't searching for partisan hacks.
Carlson, over the past quarter, has been the most moderate opinionist on TV.
He's a conservative, yes, but, unlike most in his position, doesn't do PR for the party he supports.
It was he who warned Trump to take the coronavirus seriously when most conservatives were unwilling to acknowledge it.
He pointed out Trump's alarming poll numbers and publicized the possibility he could lose to Joe Biden.
He's also been critical of the Republican Party just this week.
He said it's failed Americans who have supported it.
Mike, your thoughts?
Well, first, Jim, these are interesting numbers, but I first want to comment on Judge Knapp.
I forgot to do that.
I'm shocked to find myself in agreement with Judge Napolitano on anything, but I finally do.
He's absolutely correct.
These mask laws are not laws.
An executive order of any governor only applies to members of the executive branch And if you are on state property.
And if you're not, if you're on your own property or you're in a store, that ain't state property.
So everybody, let's resist.
If you wear a mask because some authoritarian governor tells you you have to, this weekend you completely don't understand what the concept of Independence Day is all about.
Okay?
So reject the government.
Fight back on that.
And again, Jim, this makes the point that I made yesterday, which is that if there really was a Democrat wave, if Joe Biden was in fact really ahead of Donald Trump, you would see the ratings on left-leaning networks like MSDNC and CNN skyrocketing.
In fact, they're cratering, they're getting creamed in all age demographics, and especially this notion of That, oh, the more young people vote, the better it's going to be for the Democrats.
Well, these numbers don't indicate that.
They indicate that young people are watching Fox and watching even old fogies like Sean Hannity, and they must be responding to it because there's no way that these facts and figures and truths don't hit people's heads.
Laura Ingraham has been very big on hydroxychloroquine.
She's been fighting that one for quite some time.
I think this is a solid indication that the professor's prediction that Donald Trump is going to win is coming true.
It simply reinforces what we talked about yesterday that, hey, if Democrats were really ahead, Democrat shows would be doing a lot better in the TV ratings than they are.
But let's wait and see because That may be the next bit of fake news, is they may start faking the ratings.
Like, I for one, I don't believe that the movie Black Panther made a billion dollars in the United States.
I just don't believe that.
I mean, I never heard anybody talking about it.
I'm sure it did quite well, but I wonder if box office numbers in Hollywood are being faked.
The next thing that they will try to fake is TV ratings.
But as of now, the honest ones we have clearly show that Donald Trump's headed for re-election, not the other way around.
For further confirmation, left-wing websites like Common Dreams and Reader Supported News are begging for money.
If Biden were doing so well and the Democrats were prospering, that would most certainly not be the case.
Blayne, your thoughts?
Yeah, absolutely.
They've been collapsing for a while, and it's amazing to see the turnaround, because 10-15 years ago, I could never have imagined that this would be happening.
I used to actually like MSNBC back in those days during the Bush administration as kind of being a voice of reason, but now they're so hyper-partisan, they're unwatchable.
And if you had told me 10, 15 years ago that Tucker Carlson would be the best host news anchor in America, I would have laughed everybody out of the room.
But I'm just, I'm blown away.
I'm so proud of him because he does a terrific job and he doesn't, it's not like Rachel Maddow where she's in her little echo chamber with all of her DNC people.
Like, he's actually trying to, you know, have reasonable discussions with the other side and, you know, try to put out the best information that he can.
So I'm really proud of him and having the different points of view.
And yeah, it's been refreshing to see and I'm hopeful that the younger people are starting to get it too.
In a time of great darkness, the war against the West reaches on.
But only one network can rise to the challenge and save free humanity.
They are the real deal media because telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Here we go.
After Trump was accused of ignoring Russian boundaries, the Pentagon claims there's no corroborating evidence.
This appears to be some kind of gimmick.
They're not giving up after trying the Russia hoax, Ukraine hoax, the impeachment, the coronavirus.
We even had the China hoax coming from John Bolton.
Then we have Black Lives, you know, and all the statue tossing.
This is all completely absurd.
A fairly authoritative source of Pentagon is commenting on the matter.
They made it very clear there's no corroborating evidence.
The Department of Defense, the latest in the Trump administration to denounce A New York Times report alleging Russian military spies had placed boundaries with the Taliban for the death of U.S.
troops.
Quote, to date, DOD has no corroborating evidence to validate the recent allegations found in open source reports.
Regardless, we always take the safety and security of our forces in Afghanistan and around the world most seriously, and therefore continuously adopt measures to prevent harm from potential threats.
Meanwhile, a new book actually reports that the U.S.
was killing Russians in both Syria and Afghanistan.
Excerpts from Legacy of Ashes, the history of the CIA by the Pulitzer Prize-winning Tim Weiner.
The CIA's biggest gun-running mission was its global pipeline to the Mujahideen, the holy warriors in Afghanistan.
We're fighting the 110,000-man Soviet Army of Occupation.
By the way, our man in Afghanistan was Osama bin Laden, who was getting Stinger missiles into the hands of the Mujahideen to shoot down Soviet helicopters and planes and drove them out.
Jimmy Carter idea to use, he saw the opportunity.
I was the first chief of station ever sent abroad with this wonderful order, go kill Soviet soldiers, said Howard Hart, who arrived as a chief in Pakistan in 1981.
Imagine, I loved it.
It was a noble goal, but the mission was not to liberate Afghanistan, No one believed the Afghans could actually win.
From the start, the Saudis matched the CIA's support for the rebels' dollar for gobble.
The Chinese kicked in millions of dollars worth of weapons, as did the Egyptians and the British.
The CIA coordinated the shipment.
Hart handed them over to Pakistani intelligence.
The Soviets were trying to build a natural gas pipeline from Serbia into Eastern Europe.
They got equipment from the U.S.
that failed all this deliberate effort to sabotage.
It looks to me as though the shoe is on the other foot, that it's the U.S.
that's been trying to kill the Russians, not the Russians trying to kill the U.S., and moreover, What could be more absurd than after having heard for three years that Russia was supporting Donald Trump, why would they now be turning around to kill American soldiers?
Mike, your thoughts.
Yeah, I mean, it's utterly ludicrous.
So once again, we know we have a fake news story from the fake news New York Times.
It's not corroborated by anything.
And, you know, the issue is, okay, so are they trying to undermine Donald Trump by trying to convince Americans that he doesn't care about American soldiers and doesn't care about Americans in general, which, you know, it's just ridiculous.
Nobody's going to buy that.
At this point, he's obviously far more patriotic and far more supportive of the soldiers.
He's the one who wants to bring them home, for F's sake.
He's the one who wants to bring them home and get them out of these wars that people are sick of on both sides of the aisle.
So that isn't going to fly.
And the other possibility, of course, we brought up yesterday, is that they're once again trying to drum up some sort of excuse to run another impeachment scam on President Trump before the election.
And if they're doing that, then it shows the other stuff that we've been talking about, which is the TV viewership and the fake news polls, Indicate to them that they're going to lose this election regardless of how much they claim Joe Biden is ahead.
So that's, again, an indication of the weakness of the position of the political left in this country, at least in terms of a free and fair election.
And that's, you know, obviously during the Afghan war, the Russian-Afghan war, of course we were supporting the other side.
That's the way it worked back in those days.
And if the Russians were doing this, it wouldn't be too shocking to anybody.
But other people are trying to say, oh, well, this is Putin's revenge for when Trump hit the Russian mercenaries in Syria.
Well, you know, again, to correct that BS, Putin gave him the locations of the mercenary bases for the Russian Spetsnaz mercenary bases in Syria during their private meeting in Helsinki because they were cabal-owned banking assets.
They were not under control of Putin and the Russian military.
And Putin wanted them wiped off the face of the earth because they were trying to start another war in Syria.
So again, this whole narrative is completely false.
It doesn't bear any resemblance to reality.
And again, if they try to push this towards an impeachment narrative, that's when you know, that's when you know that the Democrats know that they are losing this election.
I think you're right.
Blake.
Yeah, no, they're always trying to start something and go after Trump or whatever.
And of course, there's been a proxy war and battles going on with Russia for decades.
But I think we've seen some common sense.
Part of the reason a lot of people wanted to see Trump get elected in 2016 was the fear that Hillary would Or Jeb Bush or whoever would want to be at war with Russia and we've seen actually some common sense and kind of working together in Syria to stop some of this madness.
So hopefully we don't want to see anything escalate between us and hopefully we'll get to the bottom of that and everybody will stay cool.
They're on both sides of every issue hoping they're going to be able to play somebody.
The U.S.
has urged Israel to make a gesture to the Palestinians to offset annexation.
July 1st was the recently announced annexation date for Israel to seize wide swaths of Palestine, but signs are that we won't actually see anything happening.
Prime Minister Netanyahu has promised to keep working on the issue.
Planned to claim much of the West Bank, including the entire Jordan Valley.
Some reports are the U.S.
had sought him to limit how much he takes at once to avoid angering the Palestinians or precluding future talks.
More over, the U.S.
is now urging Israel to make some concessions to the Palestinians.
Meanwhile, the question arises, what blocked him from actually beginning the planned theft of swashes of Palestine Wealth Bank on the 1st of July?
The reasons are a bit murky, but here are some considerations.
His partner in the Government of National Unity, Betty Glantz, has been saying annexations should be put off until after Israel can deal with the coronavirus pandemic.
In response, Netanyahu is threatening to put together a coalition of pro-annexation parties in Parliament that could overrule Glantz.
The Guardian piece says the Arab Gulf states, with good relations with Jared Kushner, are pressuring him to stop the vast land grab.
It also seems that Riyadh and Abu Dhabi may be afraid annexation will make Iran more popular than they are in the region, since they've been cozying up to Netanyahu while Iran's government has stood strongly for Palestinian rights.
Likewise, the two are still trying to boycott and blackball the small gulf state of Qatar, which has a much firmer track record in supporting Palestinians in Saudi Arabia and the UAR, and Qatar could win a lot of goodwill in the Arab world as a result of its stand.
The European Union and even Britain have come out against annexation.
Michelle Blanchett, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, said that annexation is the illegal period, which is of course true with international law.
Bibi has spent a lifetime spitting in the face of international law, getting away with dissing his European partners.
None of that is likely to deter him.
What may be more important is that Jordan is fiercely opposed to the move.
Israeli military and intel officers value Jordan's security cooperation, but Jordan's government is considering halting if annexation is enacted.
Likewise, Jordan is considering, according to Al Jazeera, halting economic and social interchanges with Israel and expelling Israel's ambassador from Amman, for the moment apparently revoking its peace treaty with Israel, Well, I mean, look, my thoughts are not going to go along with yours.
We already know that.
I think Israel probably should just take the entire West Bank.
I think it's Israeli territory.
I think we should declare those The boundaries of Israel, I'm limited to that.
And then I think the Israelis should help and support financially setting up a Palestinian state on the east bank of the Jordan River.
And the Jordanians are the ones who don't want to do that.
They don't want those people there.
They don't want to have that.
But it would be an easy thing to do.
And there should be a Palestinian or Arab Bill of Rights for living within Israel.
I mean, most of the rules Are pretty good.
Arabs have it pretty good in Israel these days.
And, you know, personally, that's what I think would set up peace.
And as long as all the Arab neighbors would recognize Israel's borders, and Israel would promise that those are going to be our borders, and everybody signs non-aggression pacts and peace agreements, and basically says Israel has a right to exist on that territory, Arabs have a right to live there as well.
and have the same rights as Israeli citizens, I think we have a solution.
But as of right now, it remains a mess and exactly what Israel is up to, I think other people know better than I do. - Blake, your thoughts? - Yeah, it's a very complicated issue.
I don't want to get into too much.
I don't really like Netanyahu much.
I think he's never can seem to help himself trying to take over and commit atrocities on some of these people.
I'm surprised he hasn't been brought down for corruption charges yet.
I just hope there's some way that they can coexist peacefully.
I'm almost Wish we could go back in time and maybe rethink the way that this whole thing was set up in the first place.
It's been nothing but problematic since the get-go.
But yeah, hopefully we can all get together and find something that works for everybody.
I think Netanyahu might have to go, but it could happen hopefully sooner than later.
I stand with Iran, Jordan, Qatar, international law.
This is an atrocity.
The Israelis, for them the final solution is to load all the Palestinians aboard a ship, float it out to sea and sink it.
It's a disgrace.
And when Israel had the opportunity to choose between being a Jewish state and being a democratic state, they chose to be a Jewish state.
Here's a fascinating development.
An alleged ex-Israeli spy claims Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed politicians from Assad.
This certainly appears to be the case.
We speak to alleged former Israeli spy Ari Ben-Meneci about the case of Jeffrey Epstein, American financier and convicted sex offender.
He alleges Epstein honey-trapped blackmailed politicians to be recruited to work for the Mossad.
He discusses how Epstein was introduced to Ghislaine Maxwell before the 1990s as mainstream media claims.
Prince Andrew allegedly was used as a useful idiot.
Former PM Ehud Barak's relation with Epstein, why he believes Epstein did not commit suicide, who could have killed Robert Maxwell, and more.
Meanwhile, Jonathan Turley reports Maxwell's arrest is bad news for Prince Andrew.
According to Turley, it's a surprise Maxwell left Paris to travel to the U.S., given extradition laws in France would have protected her from prosecution.
Frankly, As a criminal defense lawyer, I'm surprised she risked returning to the United States.
She was believed to be living in Paris.
Well known, the Department of Justice was pursuing the case, including demands to interview Prince Andrew, who was pictured with both Maxwell at her London home and a 17-year-old Virginia Roberts.
Now, go free.
Alleges he was sexually abused by the royal and other members of Epstein's network, of which I personally have no doubt whatsoever.
Her arrest may be unnerving for figures like Prince Andrew, writes Turley.
She would be the ultimate cooperating witness if she decided to testify on broader criminal inquiries.
Scuffery and others have alleged she was the primary procurer of young girls.
Meanwhile, let elite pedophile network to be exposed after arrest of Maxwell.
She was arrested in Bedford, New Hampshire around 830 on charges she conspired with Epstein to sexually abuse minors and is expected to appear in a federal court.
It looks very much as though this is all going to become unraveled.
And I think the consequences for very prominent figures in the Democratic Party Including Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and others are going to be devastating for those who have thought they were upright citizens.
Mike, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, not just Democrats, Jim.
There's going to be plenty of Republicans who are going to be implicated in this, too.
People like John Roberts, the Supreme Court Justice, is on the flight logs.
Q put out a list of all the people that they know are on the flight logs.
It's a who's who of Hollywood and entertainment, music, and politics.
And there were not as many of the political names as you might expect, but again, This is exactly how people are compromised.
If you watch the film Godfather 2, where there's a U.S.
Senator who's opposing the Corleone family, Moving to Nevada and setting up shop there.
You know, they get him into a brothel, they set him up, they drug him, they murder a prostitute, and he's in their back pocket.
And this is pretty much exactly the same thing that's happened with Jeffrey Epstein.
And the fascinating thing is another thing he posted was a picture from a security camera which shows a woman who looks an awful lot like Hillary Clinton skulking around the hallways on Epstein Island.
And that's implying to Hillary Hey, we have video of you.
We know everything you did there.
So, there's no question that he was operating almost certainly from a sod that they were designed to compromise American politicians and entertainment figures to do the bidding of whoever the masters are behind, whoever the puppet masters are behind this.
And again, I would not say Prince Andrew is the person who has the most to lose here.
I would say it's Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, And a lot of Democratic politicians.
People are celebrating this like it's some kind of victory.
Well, was it a victory when Jeffrey Epstein got arrested by these same people, the Southern District of New York, which is so corrupt?
There's a TV show called Billions, which is all about the corruption in the Southern District, U.S.
Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York.
How did that one work out for us, folks?
And again, James Comey's daughter is part of the prosecution team.
Is this a patriot?
Arrest or is this a deep state arrest with the intent to kill her?
There's already been stuff floating around the internet of what appear to be headlines that are dated the 11th about Ghislaine Maxwell having to go to the hospital because her coronavirus symptoms are getting worse and this is how they're going to get rid of her.
So again, they get away with this time after time after time because there's so many useful idiots in the left media and the political left that will believe the BS no matter how ridiculous it is.
It just depends on whose hands she's in.
And we don't know right now whose hands she is in.
If she's in the hands of the good guys, then there's no question whatsoever that there are a lot of compromised politicians that are in big, big trouble.
But if she's in the hands of the bad guys, it's going to go the same way as the Epstein thing.
And again, Jim, there's so many weird things about this.
What the hell was she doing in the United States when they were looking for her in the United States?
If she was in France and safe, why wouldn't she stay there?
There's many other countries she could have gone to with the kind of resources she had.
Why was she here near Concord, New Hampshire?
And why did this happen now?
We have more questions than answers and I don't want to be too optimistic yet that this is going to expose the truth because it didn't the last time this happened when Jeffrey Epstein was arrested.
Those are great points, Mike.
Blake, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think Mike covered pretty much most of that there.
It is alarming that they moved her down to the Southern District of New York on this.
I'm not sure what she was doing there.
I think maybe she was trying to get in on some kind of LLC under somebody else's name.
Maybe she thought something, but yeah, you would think she would have gone somewhere where she would have been safer.
Somewhere, but maybe she knows.
Of course, there's a lot of these people that are compromised that are in that area, New York and D.C.
We have a lot of very powerful people there that hold a lot of influence and yeah, we'll see how this unravels.
It's certainly, it's not very optimistic when Epstein already was killed and hopefully she can stay alive to tell her story because the world needs to change.
And she could play a big part in this.
Very good.
Very good, Blake.
We have a billboard outside of Mount Rushmore.
Trump, JFK Jr.
Very intriguing.
Mike, tell us about it.
Well, I mean, there's this guy who's been floating around at Trump rallies, seated behind the president, who looks—his name is Vincent Fusca—he looks an awful lot like you would expect John F. Kennedy Jr.
to look 20 years later.
There's a woman with him Who is the spitting image of Carolyn Bessette Kennedy at age 59.
And they're talking, and again, our friend the Gunner's wife has done lip reading.
And their conversations are all about how he's, Vincent Fusca, is actually junior.
Junior's going to go as Vincent Fusca.
He's playing this role.
He's going to go to rallies all over the place.
These are from 2017 and 2018.
He showed up repeatedly and a lot of people believe that John F. Kennedy Jr.
faked his own death or escaped an attempt to assassinate him and has gone into hiding for 20 years.
And I've done videos on it.
You can go to my YouTube channel and look them up.
And there's all kinds of corroborating evidence to support that.
And one of the rumors about what might happen at Mount Rushmore might be the coming out party For Vincent Fusca as John F. Kennedy Jr.
Now I don't know if that's true.
I seriously doubt it because I've been told that he will not emerge as John F. Kennedy Jr.
Until Joe Biden is out of the way, and as it stands now, Joe Biden is not out of the way, but it certainly makes things interesting, and it's certainly clear that this possibility, this idea has got itself, it's embedded itself as a cultural meme into the cultural consciousness to the point that somebody would post that.
And, you know, look, Jim, we all know there's a lot of things, the truth is very different than what we're told on the news.
And we now have to wait and see just how different is it going to get and, you know, are they going to use these nuclear weapons.
The Trump campaign has a multitude of nuclear weapons.
One of them is this guy.
And believe me, the president did not seat he and Carolyn over his shoulders at a rally for all the cameras to see for no freaking reason.
It was for a reason.
The question is, when are they going to tell us?
Is it going to be this weekend like some of us have Hoped and predicted?
I don't know, but it's going to be fascinating to watch tonight's speeches and the fireworks and tomorrow on the mall and who's on Air Force One with the President.
I mean, you know, even if they pretended this guy was still, quote, Vincent Fusca, if he were to be on Air Force One with the President and walk with him, towards everybody would be like, who the hell is this guy?
In other words, it could change the entire conversation.
And that's kind of what we're all looking for right now.
Because things are pretty bad out there.
Let's see.
Let's see what happens.
That's fascinating, Mike.
Blake, your thoughts?
Yeah, I don't know what else to add to that.
I mean, I can only imagine the magnitude of something like that happening.
It would just set up this incredible new era for our entire country.
Well, you know, Blake, the interesting thing is, guys, the interesting thing is that Donald Trump is, you know, He's not going to necessarily be the unifying figure in this country because he is very polarizing, because he has to be to get the job done.
So he could do his job, he could be re-elected by a large margin, but something, someone that could really completely unify the country is if we found out John F. Kennedy Jr.
was still alive, He's got a Democrat pedigree.
His thinking is now more along the lines of Trump and the Republican thought process.
His love for America.
He could be a unifying, almost messianic figure for the United States if it was revealed to be true.
So that's, you look at it from a long-term perspective, he could be the guy for after Trump.
Mike, those are just fascinating observations.
Meanwhile, we have fan mail.
Nurse Gabby, I love your show.
We celebrated Canada yesterday.
The protests were epic, and I watch you guys all the time.
Thanks for real news.
Sean P. Dean, you were right the first time about UK break-ins.
Burger Lives Matter, just like LinkedIn members matter, as I mentioned on Twitter.
Comments.
Spoonful.
Re-education camp for Mike on Israel.
Stormy skies.
I strongly agree.
Mike Barrett.
Confront insurrection with extreme prejudice and quickly.
Keoni Page.
How about this one?
Oh, you can't expect stormy skies.
I strongly agree.
Spoonful.
Re-education.
KM, I think we're all wanting the indictment's arrest to come, but I wish Mike would be a little more patient.
There's no way it's going down until all the I's are dotted, T's are crossed, and ducks are in a row.
Trump has one shot to get them all.
Can't take any risk of any of them getting off with a technicality.
We are dealing with pure evil.
Personally, I don't think it will happen until after the election.
I'm trying to practice patience.
Have faith, my friends.
Mike, your thoughts?
Um, I'm not impatient, Jim.
I've been waiting three and a half years since Donald Trump's election for them to do something.
Even one thing.
Even if they had just charged Comey with leaking, I would be able to say, okay, have faith, trust the plan, like Hugh's always telling us.
But I don't.
There's many things about this so-called plan that simply don't add up.
Jeff Sessions' behavior.
We were told to trust Sessions.
Sessions has proven he's not somebody you can trust.
Bar, it remains to be seen if you can trust him.
We've been patient long enough and...
There's no after the election if Trump doesn't win the election.
And I think he needs to deploy the MOABs, if not the nukes, to make sure that he wins this election.
And the best way to do that is to start arresting people that are guilty of crime.
So, I appreciate the sentiment.
I don't believe I'm being impatient.
I believe the time has come to act.
Mike, your thoughts?
Yeah, I'd love to hope that something has already happened by now, but we could still see some major stuff, but I'm just trying to be cautiously optimistic.
Meanwhile, we're just going to continue to do what we do and keep putting the truth out there and hopefully these things will transpire soon and we'll win the selection.
Devoutly to be wished.
Meanwhile, my final thoughts?
I have another Conspiracy Guy show on Sunday, the 5th of July, Pizzagate, the American franchise of Pedogate.
It's at JimTheConspiracyGuy.org at 8 to 10 p.m.
Central Time.
That's at JimTheConspiracyGuy.com.
Meanwhile, you can get more of ours at my blog, jamesfetzer.org, on Twitter at Jim Fetzer, Mike Barrett Official, Dean Ryan TV, and of course we have Real Deal Media in the works coming soon.
I want to give each of you the opportunity for a final thought.
Blake, you first.
Well, I guess it could be for a really big weekend.
I'm really excited about that.
It could be some launches, some exciting stuff, and some special reports.
And yeah, God bless America.
All right.
Lost in everything that we've been talking about on this show for the last couple days is that we had 4.8 million new jobs created last month, the month of June, following more than 3.5 million In May, so we lost about 21 million jobs during the economic shutdown.
We've now gained almost eight and a half million of them back, which is a huge thing in just two months.
It was the biggest jobs creation month in the history of the United States of America.
That's never happened before.
The unemployment rate is down to 11%, which normally wouldn't be a good unemployment rate at all.
It would be terrible.
But given where it was a couple of months ago when we got up to the 20s, near the 20% mark, we're making huge strides.
We're coming back.
And as long as these idiot Republican governors don't keep reshutting down their states for this fake pandemic virus, we're going to come back stronger than ever and be doing very, very well by the fall.
The nation's being played by an elementary fallacy of equivocation.
You got the word case, which is ambiguous in its meaning.
If you have the coronavirus because of a test, that's a case.
But that doesn't mean you're sick, that you have the symptoms or deserve hospitalization.
The mainstream, of course, is trading on this ambiguity.
So with the increase in cases, since the death rate is remaining, the number of deaths is remaining relatively constant.
That the increased number of cases mean the death rate is actually diminishing.
But these idiot governors don't know enough to get it right.
They're participating in a plot to undermine the economy even further by more shutdowns.
It's a disgrace.
And even those of us who are doing our best to explain this are being rebuffed by the mainstream media who won't even publish letters to the editor that lay it out.
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, thanking Mike Barra in Seattle, and Blake Wally in Austin.
We're going for a five-day-a-week show as part of the Real Deal Media, but you can anticipate special reports.
We expect to have one for you this weekend, almost certainly tomorrow.
Thank you all for watching.
▲
Export Selection