Alex Jones & Nick Fuentes CRASH OUT Over Trump's Iran War!
Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes clash over Donald Trump’s Iran war push, accusing him of abandoning "America First" for pro-Israel policies—bombing Iran, funding Ukraine, and sanctioning Cuba—while ignoring Epstein ties. They expose Charlie Kirk’s legacy as a casualty of TPUSA’s alleged Zionist manipulation, dismissing claims he supported war despite his past warnings. The segment ties Trump’s shift to oligarchic neocon agendas, contrasting with Kirk’s anti-war stance, now weaponized by figures like Mikey McCoy. Ultimately, it frames the conflict as a betrayal of MAGA principles, warning of unintended chaos from regime-change wars in Iran, Libya, and Syria. [Automatically generated summary]
Come see me in San Antonio, Albuquerque, Houston, Dallas, Salt Lake City.
We'll be at the comedy store in Los Angeles in April, and then Las Vegas, and then Tulsa, and then Oklahoma City.
Go to jimmydoor.com for a link for tickets because that's where you're going to find the most affordable tickets.
Anywhere else, charges.
So, Kurt, I don't know if you saw this, but here is Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes crashing out over their support for Donald Trump.
Here we go.
Over there, this is about the Iran war.
Finally, Epstein, the Iran war, finally, they were okay with him instituting DEI for Jewish students.
They were okay for him cracking down on hate speech.
They were okay with him doing censorship.
They're okay with him exporting people here legally who are criticizing.
Is they're okay with all that.
They're okay with doing a genocide in Gaza.
They're okay with still funding the Ukraine war.
They're okay with bombing Iran.
They're okay with bombing Yemen.
They're okay with starving the people and doing siege warfare in Cuba.
They're okay with Nicholas Maduro being kidnapped and us doing the decapitation.
They're okay.
But finally, finally, they can't keep covering for this president because that's what.
Okay, well, let's listen.
And I'm watching it sink by its own doing.
And so, this is horrifying.
And so, but I can't sign on the covering of Epstein.
I can't sign on to World War III.
And so, that's why I tried to promote the optimism because I fucking need this, man.
Like, I want to fix the country.
I want to turn it around.
So, it's not that I was delusional.
And I still hope we can turn it around.
But I just sorry, go ahead.
I just get what I'm saying.
I get it.
I get it.
And I listen.
Like I said, I don't think that everybody that supported Trump was being dismissive about these concerns.
I get it.
You know, we all wanted to believe.
I was 18 years old when Trump ran in 2016.
And I remember getting in fights with people.
This is my whole life too.
At 18 years old, I wore the MAGA hat at Boston University, one of the most liberal campuses in the country, and became a pariah.
It's sad to see something you fought and bled for die.
Yeah, and you know, that's my whole adult life.
I know that's a huge part of your life, also.
And now we're witnessing.
It's totally unraveling.
It's an utter and complete betrayal.
It's heartbreaking in many ways.
And when I try to salvage it with people, I get attacked as a liberal, which is a when these people doing that don't even can't even find Iran on a fucking map.
Yeah, well, what's called for is for us to be sober-minded about the entire thing.
You know, I'm because there's a lot of trial.
I've been a realist all time, but was hoping, and now I'm just not even hoping.
I'm just going to be a realist.
Yeah, I mean, and really, it's okay to have hope.
I mean, we hope for a better future, but we got to be brutally honest about what this administration has become.
We got to be brutally honest about what this administration is.
So, Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones are finally stepping off the boat that has already taken us to where we are now and have been for a long time.
You know, they're not.
And hey, guess what?
I still welcome it.
The point being that the beleaguered population wanted all the right things.
So, Trump cleverly said all the right things.
Right.
And America voted in their desperation and exhaustion for the closest thing to what they were demanding.
That's what happened.
And so I actually.
So this is the dialectic they worked it out on us.
So why does he have Nick Fuentes on at all?
Nick Fuentes didn't support Trump.
Nick Fuentes said he was voting for Kamala.
So that doesn't make sense.
Oh my, you know what?
You're right.
Yeah.
So also Fuentes is funded again by Liberty and Levin's.
I don't want to say Jew gold sponsor, but he is.
He's the one that said there's nothing to the Epstein files who's selling Epstein sweatshirts on his as merch right now because you got to admit, Jeff had Aura.
That's, I'm quoting that little piece of shit.
So I don't know what this little play acting is.
They've been, someone's been given permission to do this to maintain some level of credibility, is how I take it.
Here's one more, one more video.
Bottom line is, is that I've confirmed that Israel is basically in control of our foreign policy by our own posture to be allied with them.
Got that confirmed.
What?
Well, let me see.
Whoa, it's March 2026.
That doesn't make any sense that he just now.
I know, I went on his show and I know the dude, and he's very smart.
And there's no way that if I would know that, and he just now figured it out.
That's not, that's not possible.
It's not possible.
It's not possible.
He's known it longer than me.
And I know about Nick Fuentes longer than a bunch of people.
How has he not figured it out?
Because he has to have that asshole on his show, I bet.
Oh, and that is uncontrovertible because now they're trying to damage control.
Oh, no, Trump gave the order.
No, our hey, how did he come to the conspiracy theory that Trump is under Israel control?
Just mean, besides the fact that Trump has repeatedly said he is, Trump repeatedly trots out Miriam Adelson and says, She's got me.
They give me the money that I got to do what they want.
They come to the White House.
What do you want now?
Okay, I give it to him.
It sounds bitter when he does it.
Like he's telling all of us this is what it is.
And every time he does one of these, we've had two stories.
I remember Mary Meduslin and then what's his name?
Luttnick, that wonderful man, where Trump goes, Yeah, isn't that weird?
The guy never ever picked it, took his, he's a bad father.
He never took his kid to school until 9-11.
Go figure.
And you see Lutnick, like, all right, okay, you don't got to keep telling that story.
Very doctrine is, if Israel is attacked, we attack.
And so thank God Russia's not following its agreement with Iran or China, or we'd be in war with them right now.
So it is a fact.
And then the neocons, the Israel lobbies all over here and attacking anybody that points this out and tries to say it's not the case.
Well, I'm getting Yahoo brags about it.
So, I mean, that's the big news.
I'm even defending Trump.
It actually makes me worse that it is now literally true, what I claimed, what I wanted to claim wasn't true because I don't want to believe it, that Trump is an errand boy of Israel.
And how do we deal with that, Nick Fuentes?
Well, if Trump is an errand boy for Israel, then you got to shut down his government.
And that means you got to go into the midterms and you got to get the Democrats in.
And the Democrats hopefully will impede the administration.
That's what they're going to do.
They're going to launch investigations.
You got to be kidding me.
Here's the scam.
You got to be kidding me.
That's what it is.
That's the scam.
That's the dialectic.
You got to be kidding me.
He's saying, well, you got to go and vote for the other uniparty wing, the left wing of the uniparty.
This kid's always been a piece of shit.
I've never seen him in the impressive ones.
I've never once seen Nick Fuentes say anything remotely impressive.
I've heard him say things that were true here and there.
That's fair enough.
But mostly he says the worst shit I've ever heard in my life.
And only real brainwash idiots or closet gay trad kids that are in love with him and bots think this is worth it.
Why does Alex have him on saying it?
I bet he's been instructed to.
I bet he's been instructed to.
I can't believe that's the solution.
He's much smarter to know this.
That's why Democrats watch your investigation.
Who is a fan of this idiot?
You mean the guys, the Democrats who are funding a genocide in Gaza, the Democrats who engineered a war in Ukraine with a nuclear power, the Democrats who did Syria, the Democrats who did Libya?
You mean those people?
And how about the Epstein?
Right.
The ones that never even talked about the Epstein files until Trump was president.
Well, Nick said we can't prove anything bad from the Epstein files.
I'm not a jury asshole.
If I think you might be a pedo and you're giving off the vibes, I'm just going to assume you are.
So there's a little bit more to this.
Hang on.
Peanuts, select committee, all that kind of stuff.
And they're going to grind it to a halt.
And, you know, if Trump is an operative of a foreign government, consider that he's forfeited his entire mandate because his whole basis of support is that he's America first, MAGA.
He's not like the other politicians.
Okay, well, if you're an errand boy for Israel, if you're a puppet of the Jewish state and you're bringing us to war for them, that's not like a small thing.
That's not like a little bit of foreign aid.
We're going to war on their behalf.
He has to be opposed.
And a lot of people don't want to take it there for one reason or another.
But, you know, I don't know what the option is.
I don't know how you work with that.
If you're America first and Trump is Israel first, well, that's not exactly a divide that can be brought.
They're not Israel first, Nick.
You piece of shit.
What's that?
Say it again.
As we know, Democrats are not Israel first.
Oh, yeah, right.
Well, if Trump's Israel first, then we got to get the Democrat Israel first people in there.
Nick Fuentes, brought to you by Jew Gold.
I'm not even making that up.
Liberty and Levin's gold sponsor, according to Nick, decided they don't like Levin, but they do like him.
That makes sense and sounds real and not a lie.
I honestly think that Alex Jones did not, just like Dave Smith, did not see Donald Trump being this horrible.
I didn't.
I didn't see him being this horrible.
But like I said, I was told that he don't have so he never had faith in David.
He ran the most fraudulent campaign I think I've ever seen, if that's the case, which it is the case because everybody from JD Vance to Trump to Stephen Miller, they're all saying, we're the peace people.
The warmongers are the Democrats and the neocons.
We're the peace people.
And so I've never seen anything like it.
I've never seen it.
I've never seen anything like it.
So he was definitely campaigning as a peace and Kamala Harris was too dumb to match it.
Why not just go ahead and repeat it?
So I made the point that Trump is now campaigning to the left of the Democrats, which he was.
He campaigned to the left of the Democrats when it came to vaccines, when it came to big agra and spraying our crops with poison.
He ran to the left of the Democrats when it came to wars.
He ran when it came to free speech and censorship.
He ran to the left.
He is now to the right of everybody.
I mean, in fairness, there really is no such thing as the left.
And as I like to say, if communism didn't exist, capitalism would have to invent it.
We are run by oligarchs.
Occupy Wall Street, a thing I agreed with.
We could see in the files, Bannon and them were behind that.
Do you know that?
Yeah, they planned that one too, but people are sincerely mad.
They channel your anger and then they dissipate it every single time.
They take your real anger about real gripes you got.
And then they start telling you about grievance politics.
Like, that's bad.
That's why you would be involved in politics.
I got a lot of grievances.
They're dialectic.
It's from the, there's the game pieces don't know they're the pieces.
Then there's the players.
That would be Alex and Nick and the game masters who don't have to obey any of the rules.
They get to make up the rules.
L. Ron Hubbard said that.
Did Nick Fuentes support Kamala Harris?
Yeah, Brad Sommer.
I'm going to ask.
I'm asking Grock.
Yeah, he'll tell you.
No, Nick Fuentes did not support her.
It's a lie.
I've showed you the video already of him doing it.
He said he had zero intention for voting for Kamala, and instead he would never vote for Kamala, even as he criticized Donald Trump and JD Vance harshly.
No, he said we have to back Kamala Harris.
That's 100% true.
Grock, look, you can't trust the AI for that.
You just can't.
But the video I sent you from Mikey No Moore, let me plug Mikey No More, Mikey NOH Moore.
That documentary I sent you about Nick Fuentes was made by him, and he documents all these pieces of garbage.
And I don't think Mikey No Moore even understands what he has in his hands with that documentary, but he's explaining a lot of the network of how this shit works.
Because influencers, as the great Zerbignu Brzinski predicted, this is what he predicted.
This shit right here that we just played.
That's the thing.
It's going to be a bunch of people gravitating to personalities, and they're going to tell you what you think.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
Turkey's Complex Role00:15:51
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
But let me just ask you this.
So I saw this and I immediately wanted to get your take on this.
So Sarah tweets out, fresh off murdering 148 Iranian schoolgirls and assassinating Iran supreme leader, Israel is now setting its sights on Turkey.
So let me just give you this and you can respond to it.
A new Turkish threat is emerging.
I want to be very clear.
Turkey and Qatar have gained influence in Syria, are seeking influence elsewhere and everywhere throughout the region.
And from here, I warn, Turkey is the new Iran.
I mean, Erdogan is sophisticated, dangerous, and he seeks to encircle Israel.
And while some senior Israelis were on Qatar's payroll, Qatar and Turkey are nourishing the Islamic Brotherhood monster that is growing and eventually might become as dangerous as the one created by Iran.
Turkey and Qatar are gaining influence not only in Syria, but also in Gaza through the front door and everywhere and trying to create a new choke ring.
Turkey is trying to flip Saudi Arabia against us and establish a hostile Sunni access with nuclear Pakistan.
So it sounds crazy, but again, this is the Greater Israel Project.
And the irony is that Turkey and Israel were fighting together to overthrow Syria.
Now Turkey has a part of Syria and Israel has a part of Syria.
And now he's saying, hey, we got to go against Turkey.
And believe me, they're already bombing Saudi Arabia, Israel to try to do in a false flag attempt to try to draw Saudi Arabia into this war against Iran.
But what do you make of that guy saying that they're now turning their attention to go into Turkey and to treating Turkey like Iran?
And go ahead, take it where you want.
Well, that's not just some guy.
That's Naftali Bennett, who did serve in a power-sharing coalition as prime minister and is, I would think, most likely to succeed Benjamin Netanyahu whenever he leaves the stage.
And he actually took a dig at Netanyahu, who's facing this scandal in Israel called Qatar Gate, because several staffers have been exposed for basically being on the Qatari payroll, which is, you know, you would think it's weird.
Like, Qatar is against Israel, but that's not the case.
You know, they're on anybody's side.
They're on everybody's side.
Anybody they can influence.
And they did material things for them.
So he's clearly jockeying to take on Netanyahu by offering kind of a more broad vision beyond Iraq, a more forward-looking vision for expanding Israel's hegemony throughout the region.
And he's calling for basically open conflict with a NATO state because Turkey is controlled by the AKP party, which is inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood.
But it's still a state that is the number two export partner for natural gas to Israel, that helps supply Israel's war machine, that abides by NATO, that has NATO listening stations directed against Iran, that played a real role in toppling the government of Syria, which was an Israeli priority.
But Israel's already kind of engaged in some war in the gray zone, you could call it, against Turkey in Syria, because the Turkish government, the Syrian government of Ahmed al-Shara, who's like this rebranded al-Qaeda leader, is basically his main backer is Turkey.
And they share this vision of a kind of Sunni Muslim Brotherhood emirate style vision, which does expand to Israel's borders.
The Syrian government's very weak.
It lacks credibility among a large part of the Syrian population.
That's better for Israel.
But I think he sees that Israel faces looming threats if Turkey and Syria become more coherent.
Qatar is part of that same axis.
But we would kind of think that's unusual because both Turkey and Qatar are also financially and politically completely interwoven into the Western imperial architecture to the point where Qatari representatives were hanging out at Jeffrey Epstein's town home on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.
So that shows you kind of how extreme Israel's vision for the future is, that they're actually going to direct their war machine against countries that are NATO member states, that are deeply invested in the Western political world, unlike Iran.
And it also shows you how much Israel needs enemies in order to keep its own society together.
I mean, if all the Palestinians, if the Palestinians just disappeared and voluntarily swam into the sea or self-deported, and Iran just dissolved and welcomed Reza Pahlavi, Israeli society would turn on itself.
It would be a mess.
It's war and the military that is the real basis and cultural pull for keeping Israeli society together.
I mean, it's a colonial society with all of these people from around the world that don't even speak the same language, who struggle to speak the modern Hebrew, and are just, and the one thing that keeps them together is the military.
The military is much larger in Israel than it would need to be for a real country of its size for self-defense.
The military is there for indoctrination purposes.
Naftali Bennett understands this, and he's determined to keep Israel at war perpetually.
It's just not a normal country.
And as long as there is a Israel there that is a Jewish, kind of exclusively Jewish state, which is based on the concept of Jewish supremacy, not because it's Jewish, but because it's ethno-supremacist, there will be war in the region and the U.S. will be pulled into those wars as long as it's there.
And Iran understands that, and that's why there won't be a ceasefire tomorrow or next week.
And so, you know, Scott Ritter was saying how there's no way that the U.S. and Israel is going to win this war and that Iran has the ballistic missiles and they can shut down the oil, all the oil that's coming out of the Middle East.
They have shut down the Strait of Hormuz effectively right now.
So Do you see this as the last gasp of the United States trying to control the Middle East?
Is it going to be, because do you think the U.S. and Israel will lose this and have to admit defeat?
And what will that then make of the Middle East?
Do you buy into that premise?
I mean, I think the question is: what does victory look like for the U.S. here?
And no one can explain that in the administration or around the administration.
No one.
But to me, victory for Israel would be a complete calamity for the entire region and for Europe and for humanity, because it would mean a massive migration crisis, civil war, internal conflict, violence spilling out across borders, and it's already happening.
So how do you spin victory out of that?
We already saw what happened with Syria, the largest outflow of migrants since World War II.
That was the success of the dirty war and regime change, which was cheered on by Western liberals.
So now you have the whole European liberal class, the leadership at least, and these unelected Eurocrats like Ursula von der Leyen and Kaja Khalis, war-mongering morons, have endorsed this war on Iran.
And now what are they getting?
They're getting a 50% spike today in liquid natural gas prices to Europe because Qatar has been forced to cut off supplies.
And what did they already do, which you've covered a million times?
They just sat there and accepted, practically cheered for the Ukrainians and the CIA to blow up the Nord Stream pipeline, cutting them off from cheap Russian natural gas.
So they have abandoned and sacrificed their own public, just as the Gulf family dictatorships have for their relationship with the U.S., which is now effectively being colonized by Israel through Trump.
And so that European leadership is exposed as having no credibility.
They have no idea what they have just supported.
They can't describe what victory is.
But a victory in Iran is a major loss for the European public and the European population, which is already suffering so much from the Ukraine proxy war.
A victory in Iran, victory as defined by Israel, is a major loss for the region.
It's a loss for Iraq.
It's a loss for Lebanon.
It's a win for ISIS.
And it is a loss for the American public, who will soon feel the economic pinch as well.
And I would like to ask, you know, any of those Persian diaspora freaks who are celebrating assassinations in the streets of Westwood in LA and here in D.C. in Georgetown and doing the Trump YMCA dance engaged in secular death cult activity in our streets.
What's your plan for solving the affordability crisis in America?
Do you even care about what Americans, actual Americans are going through?
I mean, or do you only want to use our country as an aircraft carrier for your own, to settle your own scores back home?
Because Americans aren't out there protesting for this war like they were duped into doing back in 2002 and 2003 for Bush's war on Iraq.
I used to see like fairly large rallies of Americans, Republican evangelicals who were like had their brains fried by Fox News, waving flags, and they were singing Toby Keith, I'll put a boot in your ass.
You know, it's raining down on you rhetoric.
There's no Toby Keith singing going on right now.
This is not what Americans want to be focused on.
And Trump will deservedly pay a price.
And if he's impeached for this, he'll actually finally be impeached for something real, which we all saw coming after Miriam Adelson, Netanyahu's pal, was seated directly behind him at his inauguration.
Okay.
Max, I appreciate you making time for us today.
Thank you very much.
It's always great to get your input.
You know more about this than anybody.
You've written books about it.
You were just in Iran last year.
I was in Iran in May of last year, a month before the bombing Israeli assault.
And yeah, I think we talked about it.
And you're making fun of or you're insulting or deriding the Iranian diaspora of the people.
I know some of those people, by the way, in Los Angeles who are cheering on us bombing their country, which doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
No matter how much you hate the government of your country, the last thing you would want is for a superpower to just start bombing schools and police departments and apartment buildings, which is what we're doing.
And, you know, like a lot of people hate Donald Trump here in the United States, like vehemently, they think he's a dictator and a criminal, but they wouldn't want Iran to start bombing us to get rid of Donald Trump.
That doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
But somehow these Iranians, you know, these expats, Iranians are all for us doing the exact thing to their own home country.
It makes no sense.
Yeah, I mean, me and you are very open about our anti-imperialist views and our anti-Zionist views.
And these come from just anti-war, pro-peace sentiments that are very, I think, basic to human nature.
But can you imagine what would happen to our credibility and how our own supporters come out to your shows?
You know, you fill every theater.
What would happen if you started calling for Russia or China to bomb your own country?
I mean, it would just be considered unacceptable.
But that is really like the political and cultural essence of the monarchists.
So I'm not talking about the entire Persian diaspora here in the U.S., they have diverse views.
Some of my closest friends live in Westwood.
But I'm talking about the monarchists.
That is really the essence of it.
And the Miami Mafia that wants the U.S. to be starving Cuba, the country where their parents or grandparents came from, and bombing Cuba.
The U.S. is imposing mass starvation on Cuba right now.
Talk to some friends there.
We're going to publish an interview from a journalist who was just there, who traveled across the entire island.
People are being starved to death and dying excess deaths in Cuba silently.
And people in Cuba call it Gaza without bombs because the U.S., following the policy of Marco Rubio, this Cuban-American who embodies the same mentality as those Persians who want the U.S. to bomb their country, Iran, is blocking oil and all fuel from getting to Cuba.
Can you imagine what it's like to not have energy?
You have to cook on wood in your apartment.
You can't, there's not energy for water pumping, so disease starts to spread.
There is an energy for delivering food.
Transportation is becoming impossible.
Inflation is through the roof.
So even though there is food in some stores, you can't afford it.
And you can't communicate.
So you just silently die.
That's what's happening in Cuba.
And that's the policy of the South Florida Cuban Gusano mafia who deserve nothing but contempt and see the U.S. as nothing but a vehicle for destroying the government that they hate in Cuba.
But if we took on that mentality in the United States towards our own government, you know, we would be seen as just like freaks by even our own supporters.
Charlie vs. Kirk00:13:09
Why can't these people just be normal?
I mean, and I should also say, you know, when I was in Iran, I met many people who do not support the Islamic Republic.
Sat in their homes.
I drank Araq with them in their homes.
You know, so many of the Iranian public drinks at home.
But they don't want war.
I walked the streets of Tehran and Isfahan with my wife, Anya Parrampil, who was not wearing hijab, just walking around like so many women there are not wearing hijab anymore.
Where is their individual freedom when they're being bombed in their apartments?
Where are the individual rights?
Where's the woman life freedom of the over 150 girls in a girls' school who were murdered by the U.S.-Israeli Epstein coalition at their school two days ago?
There should be a right to life.
There should be a right to be free from war, free from fear.
And as long as Iranians can't be free from warfare and having state terror imposed on them and sanctions, which are causing their own form of deprivation, then they're not going to be able to reform from within and their society will be de-democratized.
And you just, if you don't believe me, take a look at the leadership that will fill the void in order to survive this Israeli-U.S. assault.
They're going to be less moderate than Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who, you know, as a female friend told me today, who is a supporter of the Islamic Republic and the Iranian Revolution, she would cite Khamenei's writings and his speeches in order to argue against more religious friends who were opposed to women's ambitions.
And she is a university professor at the major university in Iran, University of Tehran, which is 70% female.
Iran has more women's representation in its parliament and society than the United States.
And this, and women's representation and participation increased dramatically after 1979.
So this isn't known to the West.
I personally am not, you know, I'm not Shia.
I don't believe in the Shia ideology, but it's just something I witnessed there in another culture.
And we're not going to be able to impose our own culture, which is clearly suffering from some serious degeneracy.
We're not going to be able to impose it on them by bombing them.
That's just a fact.
Max Blumenthal, thanks again.
I appreciate it.
Thanks for appreciate you coming on and giving us your insight.
And I apologize again for being late.
I messed up the times.
You're very generous and gracious.
Okay, pal.
Great job, everybody.
Check out Max Blumenthal's work at the Gray Zone.
We all love the Grey Zone.
And I hope to see you, you and your wife, soon, someday, soon.
Hopefully.
Absolutely.
Feels like a lot of people.
Thanks a lot, Jimmy.
All right, buddy.
Talk to you later.
Great seeing you.
So the TPUSA guys are at it again.
So let's just remind you of how Charlie Kirk felt about the Iran war.
He said this in April 3rd of last year.
He said it's going unnoticed because so much other news is happening, but the war drums are beating again in D.C.
The warmongers worry that this is their last chance to get the white whale they've been chasing for 30 years, an all-out regime change war against Iran.
A new Middle East war would be a catastrophic mistake.
Our military stockpiles are depleted from three years of backing Ukraine.
Our effort to reshore manufacturing has only just begun and will take years to bear fruit.
War would worsen our already immense deficit and national debt.
Iran is larger than Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan combined.
Our war would not be easy and could and could easily become a calamity.
Thanks to President Trump's restraint during this first term, America has a golden opportunity to pull away from the Middle East quagmires for good.
We shouldn't throw the opportunity away so that D.C. has-bins can feel tough by sending young Americans to die yet again.
And here's some of the videos that people have been spreading around since this war started about Charlie Kirk.
It's time for us to close the chapter on the Iranian Ayatollah and his henchmen and start a new chapter in the Middle East.
That sounds good, doesn't it?
But what have we learned when it comes to wars and especially wars in the Middle East?
What you draw up on a whiteboard rarely happens.
What you think theoretically is going to occur, there might be unintended and unforeseen consequences, especially when you're talking about a country two and a half times the size of Texas and has 90 million people and was an ancient and great power with well over a dozen ethnic groups.
You have underground Christians.
You don't really have many Jews left in Persia.
But also you have secular younger Persians.
Who's going to run the country exactly, Lindsey Graham?
This sounds like Hillary Rodham Clinton in Libya.
Sounds like Hillary Clinton in Libya.
So this is what he's 100% against it.
Now let's go to the liars and the co-conspirators and Charlie Kirk's cover-up of his assassination is everybody from TPUSA.
They're all unbelievable liars.
And if you want to see it, I was watching Candace Owens on Monday and she shared this clip and her reaction to it.
So let's watch.
Listen.
He also always did have trust with the president and he would look for the bright side of things.
And he was an American patriot.
So he would pray for our success once that began.
So you see what they're doing, right?
They're saying, sure, Charlie talked against the war, but once the war starts, boy, he's going for it.
He's, oh, it's just, you guys just misunderstand.
You just misunderstand Charlie Kirk.
When Charlie Kirk said that a new Middle East war would be catastrophic mistake, he wasn't suggesting that we shouldn't go through with it.
I mean, look at his marriage.
He went through with that.
Am I right?
Come on.
What?
So watch.
This gets even crazier.
Watch this.
And I just want to say that to offer perspective on how I think he would have felt about this.
And that's not to use Charlie as a shield.
That is not to use, say, everything just revolves around him because he's not with us anymore.
And so now we get a chance to twist his words and pretend that we know what he's saying.
We get to invoke the ghost of Charlie Kirk and say that he would be for this war, even though everything he ever said was the exact opposite.
Okay, here we go.
Gets better.
People, all of us are feeling the lack of Charlie in a moment like this because he was a natural leader of the movement.
Well, I think that's also like as soon as all of this broke.
This is the amazing Mikey McCoy.
So this is the guy who, before Charlie Kirk even fell off his chair, was already gone.
He already turned left.
That's his number one man, left.
Okay, here we go.
Here's what he says.
Doubt, you saw that social media immediately went to go find Charlie because he still is, even in death, like the leading voice on a matter like this.
Sorry, go ahead.
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Did you hear Culver is like, whoa, whoa, hey, what, what, what?
You just blew it for us.
You just blew it for us, saying that Charlie Kirk is still the leading voice when it comes to stuff.
What are you doing?
Now people are going to go look at those clips that you just talked about and they're going to know that we're liars.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
Did you see him try to stop him?
He's like, whoa, whoa, well, it's too late.
You already said, well, I'll play it for you guys.
No, I was just going to say, no, Kirk, Scott, on a matter like this.
Sorry.
No, I was just going to say, I'm sorry.
Go ahead.
You already said it, dummy.
You already told everybody to go look at Charlie Kirk's clips where he says the exact opposite of what we're saying now.
And so it's too late.
I tried to stop you.
I was going to interrupt you, but I can't.
You already said it.
It's too late.
The cat's out of the bag, dummy.
Okay, keep going.
And he does keep going.
Upset, though, because for these people that didn't actually know Charlie, like Blake, you said it in private, he would be not happy with the situation.
And he, yeah, I mean, like, you know, like he was in public, you know, like he was in public.
All those videos that people are sharing now on social media, you know, like he, he would be that way in private now, but publicly, he would completely switch and do a 180 and gaslight his own followers.
That's what he would do, right?
Yeah, let's look.
He would express his thoughts.
You'd oftentimes see him talk about on the show.
But then as soon as this would happen, he would have trust in the president.
He would try to calm people down.
He would call, hey, calm down.
We're just slaughtering seven to 12-year-old girls at a school.
Calm down.
We're only bombing hospitals.
Calm down.
We're only bombing all the, we're only slaughtering Iranians.
Would you calm down?
It's only Iranians.
It's only World War III.
It's only a catastrophic calamity.
Just calm down.
He would calm everybody down.
Be cool with the war, you guys.
Trump, I support him.
That is the exact opposite of what Charlie Kirk would do.
The exact opposite.
These guys are such liars, such bought and paid for by Israel.
So if you know anything, and I watched Baron Coleman and he delineated this perfectly, that TPUSA, when it was started, it was started as a Zionist organization behind the scenes.
So this was funded by Zionists.
This was started by Zionists.
This was organized by Zionists.
I don't know if Charlie Kirk knew that, but I think he had woken up to that, which is why they killed him.
And these guys have no problem with the fact that Israel killed him.
They have no problem.
Just calm down.
Everybody, calm down.
Charlie would try to calm everybody down.
Hey, be cool with the slaughter of people that didn't attack us.
Be cool with us starting yet another calamity in the Middle East, slaughtering children.
Be cool with it.
And so it's really irritating for me to see so many people on social media have the opposite reaction to use his voice to actually say what he's actually saying.
It bothers me when they show video clips of Charlie Kirk verbatim saying what he said over and over and over about the Iran war.
It bothers me when people do that and they, you know, they try to twist it so it says exactly what he's saying.
Unlike us who are trying to twist it to say the exact opposite of what Charlie Kirk was out always saying.
This is if you need more proof that these guys were in on the cover-up, are glad Charlie's dead and are complete tools of Zionists and Israel.
I don't know what else I could show you.
They're doing the exact opposite.
Talk about, they're upset that people are showing video clips of Charlie Kirk and what he actually said.
Now, what are we supposed to do?
He makes it so much harder for us to lie when people are showing the actual truth.
Cause chaos to actually cause fear of the situation.
Yeah, you don't want to be afraid of this.
These people are showing Charlie Kirk videos to create chaos and fear, unlike the United States military and Donald Trump, which is doing the exact opposite of what they campaigned on for years.
For years, Trump was the peace candidate.
For years, Trump's campaign rhetoric was, I'm going to, we could end this war in 24 hours.
We don't need to bomb Yemen.
We could solve this with a phone call.
Going into the Middle East was stupid.
It's the biggest calamity ever.
We need to invest that money back in our own country.
This is our verbatim stuff that Donald Trump said.
We should be taking that money we're spending on Middle East wars, and we should build roads and hospitals and schools in our own country.
That's verbatim what Donald Trump said.
But Charlie Kirk, he doesn't, oh, people are using it, so you'd be afraid.
You should be afraid because we're getting into World War III.
Because hatred of President Trump in this whole ordeal, when actually that's not what he would want.
That's not what Charlie.
No, Charlie wouldn't want that.
He'd want you to back this war.
Even Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes came together to oppose Trump on this.
Even Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones are not MAGA anymore.
I have a video clip.
You could go watch it.
It'll be up on the channel when you see this.
They're having an emotional moment.
They tried to cover for Trump and they can't anymore.
Let's listen to what here's Candace Owens.
She reacts to that clip.
Let's listen.
It really is just amazing to watch it.
It's shameless, like I said.
It's just shameless.
They don't even care.
They're going to get there.
They've got the ghost of Charlie.
Aha, we can direct the ghost of Charlie.
Why are you sharing these old clips of him as if he would have stood against the president, even though he literally stood against the president and told him not to go to war with Iran?