Jason Bermas confronts government gaslighting regarding Jeffrey Epstein's redacted files and alleged geoengineering conspiracies. He critiques the Justice Department for withholding millions of pages while highlighting claims of heavy metal spraying, cloning experiments, and connections between Bill Gates, Monsanto, and weather control theories. Bermas argues that mainstream media and agencies like NASA are covering up evidence of toxic skies, suggesting these plots extend from Epstein's network to historical military tests. Ultimately, the discussion frames current environmental crises as deliberate manipulations designed to obscure state-sponsored chemical warfare against the public. [Automatically generated summary]
Hey, everybody, Jason Burmes here, and we are about to get into Epstein and this latest viral geoengineering article put out there by the Daily Mail that once again shows: hey, guess what?
Our government is not honest with the people and does bad things to them.
Imagine that.
Folks, if you want to support the broadcast, please consider the link down below.
That's how we do it.
$5, $10, $15.
It absolutely means the world to me.
Buckle up and get ready to make sense of the madness.
We're going to be going over some of the new revelations and specifically raw Epstein files.
We're going to look into this apparent hack.
I wouldn't even call it a hack because they show their work.
And it appears that right now there are actually data sets that are not available to the public.
We'll get into that information.
And then in the second half of the show, I want to get into these latest revelations about geoengineering and specifically this Daily Mail article that focuses on a document actually declassified over 20 years ago in 2003,
and then go into actually a largely underreported sting that O'Keefe Media Group and James O'Keefe did on geoengineering while over at Davos.
Folks, there is no doubt about it.
It's one of the most frustrating things out there for me, at least, that I can walk outside of my house, I can use my own two eyeballs, okay, and common sense and see my skies being sprayed.
Teams of four to six airplanes every single time.
Okay, they are not commercial aircraft.
They are clearly spraying the skies.
I'll have literally the other day, blue skies till four or five in the afternoon.
Remember, it just turned daylight savings time.
We've got maybe two, two and a half hours of sunlight left.
And then all of a sudden, I see them going.
All of a sudden, I see the geoengineering program that doesn't exist.
That is such massive gaslighting.
And the frustration comes from what do you actually do about it?
This isn't a right or left issue.
This is an issue about our very air supply, our very water supply, in turn, our entire food supply.
And you and I apparently get no say.
In fact, if you look into the quote-unquote terminology that has been popularized and used even by people like myself for many years, chemtrail, there is no definition for a quote-unquote chemtrail other than a conspiracy theory.
Isn't that lovely?
Again, see it with your own eyes.
You can actually test for it in water, soil, and even blood samples.
You know, there's a lot of work out there also being done on wildlife such as bees that just happen to have massive amounts of aluminum in them.
Massive amounts of aluminum.
And when you look at what we know some of these materials are, okay, what do you have?
Aluminum, strontium, sulfur oxide, barium, all these heavy metals that have no business being in our skies, especially under the guise that we're going to save the planet from global warming by dimming the sky.
Absolute and complete jackassery, ass clownery.
And you know who helped pioneer it?
You know, in this sting, they actually show you that the U.S. military has been doing it for a very long time and very cheaply, and they do it through contracting.
But once again, you look at NASA, they have their fingerprints all over it, all over it, for years and years and years.
Okay, just like they are also the ones that first implemented this idea of wind farms that were going to save the planet.
Hey, I'm all for actual renewable energy if it actually works.
Okay, and it's good for the planet.
Are those things good for the planet?
Are they really highly doubtful?
Classified Military Photographs00:15:10
So, we're going to take a quick break.
We're going to come back.
We're going to do all this Epstein stuff.
Warning: a lot of these files, if they weren't severely redacted, because there's a lot of photographs in this one document, would be extremely disturbing.
But we're also going to talk about the overredactions of these files and how it has led people to break out their jump to conclusions, Matt, and totally get things wrong.
We're going to do it all here on the Alex Jones show.
Go to the alexjonstore.com, get the products, support the Infowar.
It is the fourth hour of the Alex Jones show.
I am Jason Burmes, and it's time to get into babies and Epstein.
Now, let's start this off with the massive amount of reporting before the Epstein files by the mainstream media, although they didn't make a big enough deal about it, of Zorro Ranch and the idea of a quote-unquote baby farm.
The idea that Epstein would literally impregnate 20 plus women and they would be there at the facility to harvest those babies.
Now, that's mean, that's New York Times.
Okay, not in love with the New York Times.
Every once in a while, as limited hangout as they are, they do give you baseline facts that you can go into.
You get into the emails, and of course, there's talks of cloning for spare parts, Epstein wanting to clone himself, specifically jokes about babies and cream cheese.
Very, very odd.
And then there is this specific photograph.
Okay, and really, it's left up to the imagination on what you think that this may be because it really doesn't have context.
Now, I like to show my work, I like to make it so people can easily go in and find this document.
Now, this appears to be a photograph of, I don't even know if that child's one looks six to nine months to me.
I don't know.
Some type of a rattle.
We have already seen the extremely disturbing photographs of, again, this baby with Andrew and this breast-shaped toy.
I kind of want to throw my mouth a little bit just there.
Now, before the Epstein files came out, O'Keefe Media Group had actually published one of the photos of this, including some other stuff that had been under the radar or not reported at all.
Okay, so I want to show everybody specifically this document.
Here it is.
This is right off the Justice Department site.
And look, I don't know whether they went in after the fact because I'm not sure.
You know, if you look at the original one, you just have the face blacked out.
I've even seen versions of this where there is no blackout.
Instead, they just blur the face.
Again, even with that, and we've got to talk about it.
I could see putting that black box, you know, around the child's genitalia, right?
Like that would make sense to me.
You're not going to identify a baby as to who that baby is from a document that's like a decade plus old.
So complete and total over redaction there.
And then in the official vial, you can barely see like the children's fingers and the rattle.
Now, I want you to notice that it's in a white frame.
This is framed on his wall at one of the locations.
Odd thing is, this isn't the only location he has this specific photograph framed at.
And I'll show you how I found that in a moment because we're going to go through this document.
Now, look, I warned you before we got here.
This document in particular has what I mean, you're looking at it.
I don't know whether that girl in the tub with what is presumably Epstein, but may not be Epstein, by the way.
When you look at these documents, there is the unredacted face of another individual on top of a woman.
I'm not sure whether it's the secrets, like his bodyguards.
I know he's been connected to Israeli Secret Service type individuals.
That may be the person.
I'd love somebody to point out who this is.
You can DM me at Jason Burmes on X. Also, give me a follow there.
I get great leads there all the time.
I'm not sure if anybody has done any work on this specific document.
And why is this specific document important?
Because it has that baby in it.
Okay.
It has another piece that should never have been redacted at all in the first place.
And it's 100 pages.
Okay.
So they love not giving you context of what these things are, but we're going to rattle through some of them.
We're just going to boom it right here.
So let's take that one down.
Here's another one of this individual with this girl.
This presumably is either a naked or a near-naked photo.
You know, I'm not going to lie, folks, you know, a lot of these are either nudies or what appear to be, you know, sexual acts.
Okay.
Like, got a pretty good idea here, here.
Now, on this one in particular, listen, I understand protecting the victims.
Absolutely 100%.
This seems to be on top of everything an outdoor photo shoot and should show you that, you know, Epstein probably has a trove more of videos and photographs that we're simply not privy to, even though we've gotten our hands on them.
In fact, you know, I've shown before the fact that this guy, aside from the hard drives, aside from the burned DVDs, he also had blu-rays, which depending if they're single or dual layer, have somewhere between five to 10 to even 20 times the amount of information that you could keep on a DVD, right?
So, you know, we've never, let me say this.
He didn't have those Blu-rays not to burn material on them.
We have absolute evidence of the burned DVDs, the books, the markings.
Again, a lot of that's still overly classified.
A lot of those names, locations, events still blacked out, not blacked out to the extent they used to be.
I've seen nowhere the quote-unquote burned Blu-rays or what is supposedly on that material.
So again, more pictures from this bathtub incident.
We'll keep going through them here.
Like I said, there's about 100 on here.
And again, not against total blackouts.
Now, this doesn't seem to be pornography at all.
So the question is, are you protecting a victim or are you protecting a co-conspirator here?
You know, is it a little from column A, a little from column B?
Again, all these pictures, this is simply one document.
This picture, maybe, you know, explicitly, I mean, there's no way to tell what any of that is, right?
Nothing there.
And then something that looks older, more vintage, seems like a nude selfie, possibly another nude selfie.
But then, I mean, I mean, again, this seems from a shoot.
So if this isn't a victim of trafficking, which who knows, maybe it is, even then, you know, if it's of age, I hate to be crass, but a lot of this stuff, you know, you're supposed to be 18 to see this.
And that doesn't look like, you know, the person's genitals or anything are exposed.
Just another example on how a lot of these, and we're going to get to this in a minute, are overly classified.
So as you can see, as you can tell, right here is another framed photo of this.
However, there is the chance, okay, if you look at the angling, it looks like it's the same exact photo, right?
It's just taken a different angle, but it's in a different frame.
All right.
So two possibilities here.
Either he's got a couple of copies of these things and he has them at different locations, or it was important enough to move to a separate location and then to reframe.
Either way, you've got to wonder why that picture is significant.
So getting back into this, again, these individuals, these collages right here, I think they got a lot of significance.
And why do I say that?
This is not the only type of collage via Epstein.
And it seems like the collages specifically are either made by Epstein himself or one of his prominent girls, right?
I've talked about how there was like this long, it was kind of like a love letter slash birthday card that was very, very much in this style.
And I mean, there's clues all over here.
I mean, about the fashion industry, you know, the fashion starts here, but you see New York City casting in there.
We know about the relationship with Next Model.
We know about the relationship, obviously, with Les Wexner and Victoria's Secret.
We know about the relationship with Jean-Luc Brunel.
Okay.
And that's just scratching the surface.
Hell, you want to get into it.
You want to get into the beauty pageants, et cetera, when he was buddy-buddy with Trump.
And remember, they almost arrested Epstein for the first time in Palm Beach at a beauty pageant in which he was judging.
Okay.
Trump, Miss, what was it, Miss Teen America, Miss Teen USA, those type of things.
Big time into the beauty pageant.
And if you look at the modeling agencies specifically, right, Trump had those modeling agencies.
So Epstein, definitely in that world, the blackout part does seem to be maybe a naked woman.
It's always tough to tell.
But again, if it's just a naked woman and it's not a victim, like this one over here that's blacked out, that looks like that's a clipped photograph.
Okay.
This to me doesn't look like a clipped photograph.
Maybe it is, but it doesn't, it may be someone that's not involved at all.
So, what are we doing here?
And by the way, notice there's also a credit card in here for some reason, a citibank card where I guess some of the number is obfuscated.
Let's keep going through this.
So, we get back to the bathtub scene.
Let's keep going.
More of these girls, this especially maybe some type of explicit photograph, another one of those.
And remember, you're thinking these at least the males in all these are Epstein.
I don't know.
And I'm sure we're coming up to it pretty close.
I think it's somewhere in the halfway mark, and we're just past that halfway mark.
Okay, so before we get to this other individual, this one, this one's important because once again, the speculation on the internet, and by the way, I'll say this 100%.
Those black marks have no business being there.
None.
Zero, zip, and zilch.
And I'm going to explain why.
If you look up that individual, Harold Seward, okay?
He's some kind of a pop artist, modern day artist.
And what you're seeing there, you know, people go, look, it's not a chicken leg.
Yeah, it's not a chicken leg because the guy's copyrighted it and it's a grotesque piece of artwork, supposedly for vegetarianism or veganism, because it's a naked man basically spread eagle.
We're not going to show it here.
You can find it if you want to.
Just look up Harold Seward and his artwork.
And it's, you know, it's at these vegan restaurants and stuff.
It's, it's a dude and it's super imposed.
Is it gross?
Yes.
Why are we censoring that?
It's almost like they want to fuel disinformation and misinformation so they can point it out later.
Oh, look what they fell for.
Look what they thought this was.
They're getting everything wrong.
There are no coded words in relation to sex trafficking, drug dealing, and beyond.
Sorry, but there obviously are.
So, you know, when I looked at this, I actually had people in the comments because I saw the original post and what they said.
There were a ton of people that just said it wasn't even part of the Epstein files.
Well, it is.
It's hidden in this document with a hundred different photographs in it.
Okay.
So let's keep going down this line.
And here's another one.
I'm looking at this.
And to me, there's zero reason for any of it to be censored.
There's no, this is a piece of art.
And who knows?
Again, I could probably find it, fish it out if I thought it was important.
But you have these two blackouts.
Why?
I've already had to say I'm 18 to get into this.
Very blurred out photograph of a woman.
Here we seem to be on the island.
And there it is.
We'll go through the other 30 photographs, but that's not Epstein.
Okay.
Now, the girl here does appear to be of age just from the tattoo.
All right.
And maybe someone's, and that's the funny thing.
Because if this is a victim of sex trafficking, okay, I get it.
You're censoring out the face.
The tattoo is an identifying mark.
Just looking at this guy's face, I feel like this is one of those security assets that traveled with them that I have seen in other photographs.
But Info Warriors, please.
If you know about this photograph, if you know who this person is, DM me, let me know about it.
We'll go into it further.
So again, a lot more of these photographs.
That was a, looked like a dark-haired victim.
This victim seems to look a little different.
Redacted Epstein Files00:11:08
There's a lot of this, folks.
Remember, this is one document.
And look, here you go.
This is some kind of a screenshot from a Zoom meeting of sorts.
Okay.
So let's keep going down on this.
You've got some booking of a flight.
And once again, you've got the passenger here blacked out for whatever reason.
I mean, the DOJ has just done an extremely disgusting job with this.
And we're going to further get into how disgusting that job is in a moment.
So, again, this is just one document.
And you can see the ETA EFTA file right here, 016-45970, that demands attention.
Demands attention.
See, again, right here, we've got some kind of a video conversation.
And that does look like Epstein in the corner.
Like half of his face and body are out, but certainly seems like that's Epstein.
Let me say this: Zero reason, zero reason for this to be censored.
And you know why?
Without even looking, I can tell you what that is.
That's Marilyn Manson, and that is Rose McGowan in there.
I mean, let's just do it live.
Let's see if we can find that exact image.
Now, you know, I'm going to do this because I believe when Rose McGowan was wearing that, Rose McGowan, she's pretty much naked.
Rose McGowan, but again, I'm supposed to be 18.
Unless Rose McGowan was trafficked by Epstein, never seen any evidence that.
Or Marilyn Manson is a co-conspirator.
Why would that be censored?
And even if they were, it shouldn't be censored.
You know, Rose McGowan, Marilyn Manson, red carpet.
Yeah, I mean, it was so easy to find.
I can show that one.
It was so easy to find.
First try.
So let's open this image in a new tab.
Yes, I am over 18.
Come on.
You got to be kidding me here.
You know what?
These are all so small, and that'll be cut off so we can do it.
So there you go.
That's what that is.
I mean, could this look at this?
You guys are a joke at the DOJ.
A joke.
A bad one at that.
Now, this seems to be graphic, could have a victim in it.
But if there's a victim in it and it ain't Epstein, why hasn't that guy been prosecuted?
Here's more of this.
Not sure the significance of Sunshine Health.
Or again, this is a, I can't say it enough.
It's a public thing.
This isn't something Epstein took.
And you're just blacking out the cover.
Like, if I wanted to hunt that one down, I could hunt that one down as well.
We seem to have, again, a picture, or here's Epstein in the corner, actually, video conferencing with this person.
You would imagine if he took screenshots, he probably also took video of it.
All right.
And so now we're down to the last ones that are extremely blurred out.
Okay.
Now I want to move on to the DOJ and the Epstein data sets.
Now, look, I'll be honest, maybe this is some kind of trickery, but I mess around with browsers all the time.
Like, for instance, we'll do a little bit live just to show that I have a baseline knowledge of a lot of this stuff.
So If we go to this Reddit post or anything on any browser, and I right-click and I just go inspect, you get a bunch of the code lines here, right?
And by looking at these code lines at certain points, I can select certain things and delete them.
You know, you can do, you can find out a lot from the source code.
And in this one, it sure looks like there's a bunch of data sets that have login info that you and I do not get.
Okay, so here's the individual right there, and you can see what they're running.
And you notice that 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 through 23 are still restricted, and that there are no 24 through 30 on that.
Okay.
Now, this person again shows you the work.
And that to me is what is important.
Now he goes through, he shows you the files here, data set 12.
Again, pretty smart guy.
And now he just types in 13, page not found.
Okay.
So you guys take this for what you want, but we do know already that we have these admissions that supposedly, there's the login, weird, weird, that we've gotten 3 million pages of files.
Now, that's really important because, number one, I like to be accurate, it's not 3 million files, just like that one file had a hundred different things, and then you have a bunch of duplicates.
But at this time, I would say there's no doubt that we have literally hundreds of thousands of individual files in that dome.
Okay, hundreds of thousands, at least 100, maybe even two.
It's a lot.
We're missing that plus more that they're hiding.
Okay.
And it doesn't look like we're going to get them.
That's what's really disappointing.
Have we seen the last of the Epstein files?
Lawmakers and victims want more release.
Do you think they're breaking the law?
Our Congress has been so damn neutered that even when you've got a genuine guy like Thomas Massey, okay, and someone who was genuine but imperfect, like MTG, who had to leave, and you've got a bunch of people playing political baseball out there, we still can't get, and they pass it.
They pass this Epstein files transparency.
I forget about the convictions, guys.
They won't even give you the relevant files.
Massey's on television saying they retroactively took down certain files.
All right.
They took down certain files.
And he said that they were shielded from lawmakers before they could even view the quote-unquote unredacted versions.
Pam Bondi just had a closed-door hearing.
And look, I get it.
It's a Republican-led oversight committee.
Right and left is over, folks.
It's been for a very, very long time.
I mean, there's some surface-level stuff out there, but if you haven't noticed, right now we are in dire straits with our foreign policy.
And a lot of that is because we've let our domestic policy go out the door, out the door.
And people like Bondi, Patel, Pongino, shameful, shameful.
You know, it's nice to see a guy like Joe Kent actually stand up and have some conviction and not be a yellow belly coward out there.
We're going to come back.
We're going to get into geoengineering, this latest document, O'Keefe Media Group, and much more.
Hit the Alex Jones store right now and support InfoWars.
And we are back.
I am Jason Burmese.
This is the fourth hour of the Alex Jones show.
And, you know, before we transition into the geoengineering, the Central Intelligence Agency, the U.S. military, the ultimate gaslighting of the global population, I just want to point out one more thing, you know, kind of about these files that are not only overly redacted, but like you go into that file right there.
Okay.
Obviously, there is a large significance difference of something like the painting or I'm sorry, the photograph that's framed and it and things like the naked women or girls.
All right.
That one individual and just a random photo of Marilyn Manson and Rose McGowan that should not be at all censored.
Right.
And throughout these files, there's like mentions of Britney Spears.
And I see it all over the place in social media.
These Britney Spears in the Epstein files.
Then you get to it and they're passing around articles, like massive articles.
So nothing.
Talk about nothing Burger confusing Burger.
It's the same thing with, you know, this idea that Biden was wearing a mask and he was actually ex just Johnny nonsense that's in there.
All right.
And look, there was less of that, a lot less of that, because that right there doesn't, it might be from the 2019 criminal case.
Okay.
But that looks like firsthand evidence.
That looks like evidence collected by a police department or an agency, et cetera, where after the fact in 2019 and 2020, you have these random tip lines, right?
And then even when the FBI agents do go and investigate some of these wilder claims, right?
I constantly see the one where the person says that they were also sexually abused by Bush, et cetera.
And they go down.
They don't find that person credible.
Now, we do have crazy people in the world.
That's not to dismiss the crazy allegations because truth is stranger than fiction.
But we also have to acknowledge that Epstein's prominence in pop culture had hit a massive zeitgeist even before they arrested him, hence why he was arrested.
Hence why Ghale Maxwell eventually was arrested.
Hence why Jeffrey Epstein, in my humble opinion, but I mean, look at the evidence, was killed in MCC.
Not committed suicide.
There was not a suicide at MCC for almost 14 years prior.
Zero Suicides at MCC00:11:03
Guess what?
Since his suicide, how many suicides there's been at MCC since?
Zero sauce.
Big old zero sauce.
Weird.
So, again, massive frustrations there that when people are looking into these files, information that could really help flesh out this network, maybe provide journalists independent and even mainstream to delve into further criminal activity so we can at least win in the court public opinion.
Instead, it's clickbait blog post bull shizzle.
Not my thing.
And speaking of, you know, clickbait stuff, over the years with the quote unquote chemtrail thing, right?
That would be a big headline for clickbait.
I've heard everything about what they're spraying in the sky.
And look, I'm not ultimately dismissive that we don't have a multitude of things that have been sprayed in the sky.
As I plan to illustrate in a clip that I'm going to play from a film I made in 2013 called Shade the Motion Picture.
By the way, if you follow me over on my YouTube channel, you can go to my documentaries playlist and you can watch the film that we are about to play a section of in a moment, along with my 9-11 films, Loose Change, Final Cut, and Fabled Enemies.
And of course, what I think is my InfoWars swan song on global governance, Invisible Empire, a new world order defined.
So this article went super mega viral big time the other day.
I had people sending it to me.
Now, if you look at this, and this should also tell you about the classification process and how things are hidden from the public for decades, for decades.
It's a 1965 document that they're referring to.
Okay, now in this document, they do not give you the specifics as to what they are using.
But when we're talking about climate, local weather systems, storm systems, geoengineering, they were doing this post-World War II all over the place.
Another, you know, pioneering InfoWars Alex Jones moment is when Alex Jones went out and interviewed Ben Livingston, basically a man who has been coined the father of weather warfare, flying into hurricanes.
You actually have footage of the military spraying massive barrages of, you know, what is essentially appears to be smoke, okay, on the water of the ocean.
Anybody can watch those declassified videos.
They're everywhere, but really just look up.
And I'm going to show you that in a moment.
It's so frustrating.
So the reason I don't dismiss that there is a multitude of things.
Remember, this is a 1965 document.
We're in 2026.
Okay.
So we're talking about this 60 plus years later.
60 plus years later.
Myself and Alex Jones were not even a twinkle in our parents' eyes when this document was created.
Now, I've played it on this show, but Herman Kahn, one of the individuals that Dr. Strangelove, Peter Sellers, is actually modeled after in that film, is talking about the, from a Hudson Institute perspective.
So we always talk about these think tanks and roundtable groups that are outside of government.
That's what that Hudson Institute still has a seat at Bilderberg every single year.
And he's talking about things like, you know, if the general populace gets out of line, maybe we'll just spray them with stuff.
Maybe we'll just put something in the water supply.
Isn't that lovely?
Really good people.
And I'm sure they've never done it, except for the idea that I have to sit there and watch them do it constantly.
You know, to make that point, all right, nothing drives me more nuts than driving down my streets and it's right in front of me.
This is my neighborhood.
I thought I was hopeful.
You know, I mean, again, I'll just be told that those are natural clouds.
You know, the natural clouds just zigzag.
And what I zoom in here isn't a plane like that's right behind.
That's not a plane doing it.
And this isn't a team of multiple planes, even though I film them.
Oh, that's not a plane either.
That's just a cloud moving in a vertical pattern from nature.
I mean, we film the planes too.
You can get close enough to that.
But I'm usually really able to control my general emotions about subjects like this around my nieces.
They'll tell you, this stuff just drives me nuts.
It just drives me nuts.
I've got to be telling this doesn't even exist.
Oh, look.
There's another one.
But again, it doesn't exist.
I'm having a fever dream that has then been projected onto my phone.
That's all these, it's actually AI.
We'll zoom in and Benjamin Netanyahu will be riding on one of the planes.
Did I say it out loud?
So again, you know, here's just these are just from like the past few, one, I think the past few weeks, a couple of times I broke my phone out.
I could break it out way, way more than this.
I mean, way, way more than this.
But again, I have to show restraint.
I was hopeful, pausing it right there, that when I moved from New York State, okay, that I wouldn't have to deal with this anymore, or at least have to deal with it a lot less.
I had been documenting these things for literally almost, geez, I left in 20, when did we move?
We moved in 2020.
Okay.
I'd been taping them for 15 years at that point in New York State.
I'll never forget it.
We were on a road trip in New York.
And when I say we, it was myself, Corey Rowe, and Dylan Avery.
And certainly, I was somebody that was much more into information beyond 9-11 than the two of them.
They kind of like, you know, dismissed the idea that they were spraying the skies, dismissed the idea of geoengineering.
And then lo and behold, right in front of us, the skies started lighting up just that same way.
And slowly but surely, on that ride, when it was no longer deniable that we'd been driving for an hour and watching these crosshatch patterns, okay, Burmese, you got one.
It ain't one.
Okay.
And again, I can't tell you how much I wanted once I moved from New York to Iowa in the middle of the country.
A place, by the way, Tucker Carlson just covered it that has like the highest cancer rates in the country.
I had no idea.
We have a lot of PFAs in our water supply.
That's one thing.
But, you know, this is the heartland.
This is corn country.
This is soy country.
And we've got the highest rates of cancer here.
Well, I'll tell you what, they're spraying all the time around here.
Just all the time.
And look, I want to give a big shout out.
You know, I don't always agree with James O'Keefe.
And I think he needs to have his feet held to the fire on things like going to the Bohemian Grove Club, et cetera, et cetera.
Even a lot of the Trump worship, you know, he's out there shaking Trump's hand just before the big Iranian strikes are happening over at Mar-a-Lago.
Did great work here.
And for some reason, you know, I posted this, geez, a few weeks ago, not even a few weeks ago, from the beginning of March.
And the report actually, I think, came out at the end of February, and I totally missed it.
But O'Keeffe's actually in a pretty damn good getup.
He's got one of his better disguises.
I think it's a lot better than the old school pimp disguise he had back in the day with that first breakout piece.
And he's talking to multiple individuals about geoengineering, spraying the skies at the World Economic Forum.
Guys, it's a must-watch.
I mean, straight up, this is an absolute 20-minute must-watch because you have a multitude.
I keep doing that.
A multitude.
Live from Davos, O'Keefe infiltrates World Economic Forum in Switzerland of people just casually talking about the geoengineering and the military doing it.
And you bet it.
You know what I mean?
BlackRock, these are the power structures outside of nation states that are dictating these things, okay, in cahoots with the type of government and military and intelligence programs that are outside, unfortunately, of the audit, of the audit of people like you and me.
And therefore, if we can't even audit it, how are we supposed to charge anybody criminally and forget about charge?
How do we prosecute them?
How do we change this?
Like when you've got a guy like RFK Jr. being put on the spot on Dr. Phil, we've played the clip here.
You can go watch it right now.
And first of all, Dr. Phil kind of smugly cuts off the woman who's asking about the spraying of the skies.
And then that guy, who also ran for the president of the United States, okay, admits that they're spraying the sky and that they can't really do anything about it.
And they think it's DARPA.
Well, it's beyond DARPA.
DARPA's a part of it.
But make no mistake, when we are talking about entities like the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, when we are talking about entities like NASA, okay, and the NSA and the U.S. military, they use proxies all the time.
They love, love using proxies.
They love using contractors.
They love using privatized businesses that are either cutouts or become assets.
Global Chemtrail Spraying00:06:22
So I promised we play some clips of my film, I'm sorry, Shade the Motion Picture.
That again, guys, I think it's my best work.
It's now 13 years old.
It'll be 13 years I release this in less than a month.
I think it was like April 15th, okay?
As relevant or more relevant than ever.
We're going to start with Al DeChico, an individual that was being sprayed in Mojave County, okay, at the Mojave County Board of Health all the way back in the summer of 2011, presenting the evidence that they're being sprayed, the physical evidence of what is in his blood supply, what is in the water supply, etc.
So here it is.
I'm here mainly to talk about what's in my blood and what's in the blood of 20 people.
For your information, geoengineering, also known as Chemtrail, is taking place globally, and there are millions of people, scientists, doctors, that know what's going on.
Has anybody been looking at the skies here today?
Because it went from clear blue for many days, and now we've got crisscrosses all over the sky.
My barium was 150 in February.
Now it's 190.
I also have low blood platelets, which is a problem with clotting.
Okay.
I also have rainwater.
If anybody would like to volunteer to drink some.
Anybody want to drink some rainwater?
It has aluminum in it.
I'm going to tell you how much it has in it.
321 parts per billion, 7.4 for barium, and 5.5 for strontium.
Trevor Burgley of the Department of Environmental Quality says this is safe to drink.
Anyone want to drink some?
I don't.
I stay at home.
I am disabled and getting more disabled because of what is in our atmosphere.
Excuse me, sir, but your time's up.
Well, extend it.
You can extend it.
Okay, she spoke for 20 minutes with a high school chemistry class.
There's a lot more information out there than that.
This is terrible.
And you are all being affected by this.
And you better wake up, look up, and realize what's being dumped upon us.
This is for real.
Our own government, the United Nations, is making us sick.
And you better wake up.
Thanks for the extra time, okay?
Thank you.
I want some answers in writing.
A lot of people like to say, well, no, it's not from chemtrails.
It's not from air traffic.
If that's the case, fine.
Where are the toxins coming from?
We need to know this.
All of us need to know this because it's in our blood.
It's in your kids' blood.
It's in your blood.
It's in your hair.
It's in your bones.
The point is, we all live in different households.
We live in different parts of the county.
Some live also in different parts of the state.
We have a couple from Phoenix.
We drink different water because the first thing they were trying to throw at us, oh, it's in the water.
I did immediately a test.
I paid out of my own pocket to see my water if there was any barium.
The water is completely clean.
No barium at all.
The health department put on a little dog and pony show here locally, trying to, in my opinion, placate the public and try and explain where barium might come from, other sources like Brazil nuts, which I don't eat.
The county tried to discredit us and say, okay, this is in some sort of a magic food, like nuts from Brazil, stuff like that.
Come on.
First of all, I eat my own food.
I grow my own food and we all eat from different households.
We don't live in a commune, okay?
So forget the food.
I'm not surprised.
I mean, let's look at the history.
In the last 100 years, it's been proven and completely declassified information.
They've been experimenting on people without their consent or will or knowledge.
So let's not try to say, oh, my god, we'll never do that.
They already done it.
Now the point is, what are they going to do next?
That is exactly the point.
And this newspiece that we feature in here should let you know: hey, they'll spray you with cadmium, radioactive cadmium sulfate, and lie to you about it.
All right.
So, yeah, what it's already been proven and declassified.
Can you imagine the stuff that has not been declassified and that has continued to this day?
But yes, here is yet another verifiable example of where the U.S. populace was sprayed with poison.
Story is so unbelievable, we didn't think it could possibly be true.
But after receiving thousands of records and declassified reports from the Army, it's confirmed that during the Cold War, the United States military conducted secret tests on unsuspecting people in the city of St. Louis.
Lisa Martino Taylor's life work has been to uncover details of the Army's ultra-secret military experiments carried out in St. Louis and other cities during the 1950s and 60s.
This thing was secretive for a reason.
They didn't have volunteers stepping up and saying, Yeah, I'll breathe zinc cadmium sulfide with radioactive particles.
These Army archive pictures show how the tests were done in Corpus Christi, Texas in the 1960s.
In Texas, planes were used to drop the chemical.
But in St. Louis, the Army placed chemical sprayers on buildings and station wagons.
City officials were kept in the dark about the tests.
The Cold War cover story was that the Army was testing smoke screens to protect cities from a Russian attack.
The truth, according to Martino Taylor, was much more sinister.
After enough time goes by, the truth either gets completely hidden or it gets exposed, but still nobody does anything about it.
We have to do something about this.
So let's just skip right over this because I do want to play this little subsection right here with Rosalind Peterson.
And again, props to Alex Jones, Infowars.com for being some of the first to interview Rosalind Peterson and amplify her work.
Bill Gates Funding00:02:19
Can modify the weather just like when Hurricane Sandy came about.
People know there's going to be damage in a certain area and they can bet on that damage and they can make millions.
It's a billion-dollar worldwide industry so that right now I could hire a weather modification company if I had the money and the inclination.
I could have them enhance snow in some area of the United States.
And when I did that, the weather modification company and myself could bet that there would be increased snow in that area during the time of our program.
And thus, I would make money.
By the way, Bill Gates now on public record is a funder into geoengineering programs.
He is also a heavy investor in Monsanto.
There is a line of research on what's called geoengineering, which are various techniques that would delay the heating to buy us 20 or 30 years to get our act together.
Bill Gates of Microsoft has been funding cloud whitening experiments using salt particles to see clouds to brighten them so that it would reflect more direct sunlight back to outer space.
The Earth would receive less direct sunlight.
But is he consulting with us when those clouds, water rains out and the particulates are salt?
Is he responsible then when our rivers and our streams are salted up because of this endeavor to have these type of particulates in our cloud for cloud seeding and cloud whitening purposes?
What may surprise you as well is that Bill Gates actually owns 500,000 shares of biotech corporation Monsanto, the 90 plus percent owner of genetically modified seeds in the United States market.
He benefits on the back end through his investment on Monsanto.
It's almost like I was warning people about Bill Gates and his connections.
By the way, we get into the Peyton Live shots, those type of things.
But Monsatan and geoengineering decades ago.
Oh, and population control is also in this.
Guys, this movie is a little over 90 minutes and I still think it holds up today.
Free Speech Bastion00:01:55
You can go watch it right now in full for free over at my YouTube channel in the documentaries playlist section.
That's youtube.com slash InfoWarrior.
Please go give that a look and then share it with others.
Go check out Invisible Empire, a new world order defined, produced right here at Infowars.com.
Again, well over a decade ago.
This is a bastion of free speech.
We get to break down the real issues that go well beyond left and right right here.
So, folks, I'm going to say it to you right now.
You've got to take power in your own life.
You've got to be like the Al Dachicos in the world and get in the face of your local governments.
Continue to push for accountability, whether it's on geoengineering, whether it's on the Epstein files, whether it's on this insane war that is escalating at a rapid pace.
Because you can't look to others to be your hero.
There are no heroes.
You want a hero?
Look in the mirror every morning and be your own damn hero.
I just want to say thank you to AlexJones and Infowars.com.
And there you go, folks.
It is Epstein Insanity and gaslighting the skies because it is not about left or right, always about right and wrong.
You want to support that?
Please consider doing so.
$5, $10, $15.
It means the world to me.
You can do it at the Buy Me a Coffee.
There are other links down below.
Thank you to all you supporters out there.
And please also spread the documentary films that are free.