Will Humanity Submit To Artificial Insanity: Davos 2026
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more ETH - 0x90b9288AF0E40F8C90604460973743dBC91dA680
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4VFYRaltcc&list=PL5vtMLUWgYehCTEfSmgEzAEC9Dvt9FZmc
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on X
https://x.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
Patriot TV - https://patriot.tv/bermas/
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior Show less
But what I think people don't understand when they watch, say, these clips, if you will, or just a small portion of, say, a Yaval Noah Harari.
Okay.
And that's what we're going to focus on today.
We're going to be doing a watch along with his presentation is that they're actually a lot more honest and a lot more skeptical of the system and not always in promotion of it.
At the same time, Harari is very much a mouthpiece for the futurists, for the transhumanists on many levels.
And I think, especially in this speech, I think the level that kind of shows itself the most is in regards to AI-driven financial systems that quote unquote human beings just could not comprehend because they're too complex.
Okay.
Now, I'll get into some of the fallacies of that later.
But for those that are not familiar with Harari's stance on humanity in general, okay, first and foremost, Harari is a staunch atheist, very much a believer in everything from the Big Bang to your standard Darwinian evolution, macro evolution, if you will.
And he contends the way that we hit, I guess, the evolution jackpot, the way that we were actually able to conquer the world is through our use of language and not only our use of language and communication, but our ability to tell stories.
Now, in this, he doesn't use the story method as much, but he breaks it down even further to the use of words in general.
Forget about any other type of human communication, which there are plenty within the human species, which again, to his credit, he very much acknowledges and asks the question, you know,
whether that element of humanity can kind of supersede what is coming with AI that he contends are going to be able to use words much better than human beings and give us an identity crisis.
So, you know, once again, there are aspects of this.
In fact, the vast majority of what he says, I'm actually in agreement with.
Okay.
And we're going to break down why as we go through.
The parts in which I am skeptical, however, is that Harari, other than, you know, coming from an atheist perspective, there are other tones in here and in his personality that I don't necessarily want to psychoanalyze all the way, but you can tell there is, you know, some kind of rift with his father.
For those that don't know, you know, he's an open homosexual.
Actually, brings up the persecution of homosexuals as an example of words kind of being harmful through religious texts.
But overall, although he's got those other agendas in there, and we'll certainly get into the monetary agenda, the warnings he's giving are a thousand percent real.
The other thing to know about this is that he steps in right away, the opener, is to try to dismiss the idea that artificial intelligence is a tool.
Now, at this point, I think it is a tool.
Across the board, I think that there's this deception in the idea that it can think for itself because at the end of the day, it has to be programmed.
Harari talks about essentially AIs becoming self-aware enough already that they want to preserve, preserve themselves.
They want self-preservation.
And in doing so, in order to survive, he also contends that every single species on the planet in some way, shape, or form, and I mean, you could, I guess you could argue this depending, has to learn to lie and manipulate to do so, right?
And we kind of have this inbuilt thing where we allow AI to lie and we call it hallucination.
But again, I think that's the programming.
So we have a differentiation almost off the bat, but he contends it's not a tool at all.
Okay.
And he explains why.
Now, down the line, is there the possibility that, yes, indeed, this is not a tool whatsoever?
Possibly.
But we're going to get into all of it.
We're going to play the whole thing.
It's pretty short.
I think he gives like, you know, I think it's like 15 to 20 minute presentation.
And then he has a discussion with the woman that presented to him at the World Economic Forum.
And look, again, I don't think the guy comes off as a demon, right?
I think he comes off as a very intelligent yet flawed human being that in some ways is raising alarm bells, but in many other ways is encouraging the great narrative of the day.
He certainly did during the COVID-19 44 nightmare, along with all these other WEF Davos goons.
But again, we're going to let you decide.
We're going to play the whole thing.
We're going to jump in here and there.
Let's thumbs it up, subscribe, share, ring that bell so you get the notifications.
Check out all the documentary films down below for free, please.
Especially if you've been watching and you're watching more and more clips.
You know, one of the things I've prided myself on over the years when we talk about the type of documentary films I've made is documenting it through mainstream sources, letting people see the evidence for themselves, like we're going to do today.
If you enjoy what I do, please consider donating to the broadcast via the Buy Me a Coffee, $5, $10, $15.
It means the world to me.
Big donors.
Thank you.
Thank you, Dr. Chip Abramson, for your very generous donation.
If you want to use something else, we've got the Venmo, the PayPal, all of it down below.
Thank you, thank you.
Marigold Resources, they support the broadcast.
Thank you so much to them.
They broker the sales and purchases of businesses.
Please go check them out.
And then, of course, rcreader.com, the River City Reader, an actual in-print, independent media publication right here in the Quad Cities.
You give me a follow over on X. Bit no traction over on X, been sitting here at the 48.2 marker for the better part of six months.
And before we get into Harari himself, I just wanted to point this out.
Yeah, things are moving and grooving on silver.
As of the live recording on this, and this really just plays in from the artificial intelligence stuff.
Because right now we are choosing to allow the predator class, the powers that shouldn't be pushed forward with all these AI data centers, okay, that are going to take up human resources on another level, you know, whether it be things like gold and silver, et cetera, platinum, copper, water's the big one.
But I assure you, there's more.
Silver through the roof.
This also shows how deflated our dollar is.
I think that, again, you never heard me talk like this before, but I think it could be headed to 200 and beyond.
You could be seeing finally the precious metal boom, like you've seen in particular with crypto via Bitcoin, which I think is sitting somewhere at about 87K right now.
And Ethereum, which, man, what is Ethereum at?
Might be, it's definitely in the thousands, somewhere in between either high twos or low fours.
That's where the fluctuation is.
I should look it up, but whatever.
So Harari here does talk about these different crises.
And listen, one by one, he asked the question on what we're going to do with AI and uses kind of the example also of corporations and how we've given them a domain of personhood that obviously is not a person.
So I'm going to let this guy speak for himself.
I'm going to be jumping in from here or there.
Give me some questions, some comments in the live stream.
Then, of course, down below as well, even if you are in the live stream.
Let's get in there.
Hello, everyone.
There is one question that every leader today must answer about AI.
But to understand that question, we first need to clarify a few points about what AI is and what AI can do.
The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not just another tool.
It is an agent.
It can learn and change by itself and make decisions by itself.
A knife is a tool.
You can use a knife to cut salad or to murder someone, but it is your decision what to do with the knife.
AI is a knife that can decide by itself whether to cut salad or to commit murder.
The second thing to know about AI is that it can be a very creative agent.
AI is a knife that can invent new kinds of knives as well as new kinds of music, medicine, and money.
The third thing to know about AI is that it can lie and manipulate.
Four billion years of evolution have demonstrated that anything that wants to survive learns to lie and manipulate.
So let's just stop it right there.
Pretty frank honesty about the lying aspect of AI.
Now, you've heard me a million times, and I'll probably say it a million more, that so many of these things, you know, whether it be a firearm or whatever, is a tool, just like social media, right?
And just like the hammer in your hand, I don't use a knife, build a house, beat someone's head in, right?
So he's making that here, but he's trying to differentiate AI in a big way.
And you got to give him credit.
He's telling you it's a liar.
Now, my big question is: is it a liar on its own, or is it programmed in order to lie on behalf of certain narratives?
The last four years have demonstrated that AI agents can acquire the will to survive and that AIs have already learned how to lie.
Now, one big open question about AI is whether it can think.
Modern philosophy began in the 17th century when René Descartes proclaimed, I think, therefore I am.
Even before Descartes, we humans define ourselves by our capacity to think.
We believe we rule the world because we can think better than anyone else on this planet.
Will AI challenge our supremacy in the field of thinking?
Now, that depends on what thinking means.
Try to observe yourself thinking what is happening there.
Many people observe words popping in their mind and forming sentences, and the sentences then forming arguments like all humans are mortal.
I am human, therefore I am mortal.
If thinking really means putting words and other language tokens in order, then AI can already think much better than many, many humans.
AI can certainly come up with a sentence like AI thinks, therefore, AIM.
Some people argue that AI is just glorified autocomplete.
It barely predicts the next word in a sentence.
But is that so different from what the human mind is doing?
Try to observe to catch the next word that pops up in your mind.
You know, again, here is where I think we differentiate a little bit.
For me, at least with language, and I don't know how it is for you guys out there, but, you know, I can't even remember a time when a word popped up in my head before I said it.
Everything is just a natural flow.
I certainly sometimes try to not only think about what I'm going to say, but prepare in my mind basic outlines and go over in my head.
But I would say, at least when I see them in my mind, it's much more of a verbal cue in my head, if that makes sense.
An auditory cue that's not there.
I think that's a differentiation with AI.
Again, you let me know what you think.
Do you really know why you thought that word, where it came from?
Why did you think this particular word and not some other word?
Do you know?
As far as putting words in order is concerned, AI already thinks better than many of us.
Therefore, anything made of words will be taken over by AI.
If laws are made of words, then AI will take over the legal system.
If books are just combinations of words, then AI will take over books.
If religion is built from words, then AI will take over religion.
And once again, I think there's a huge gap here.
I don't necessarily agree.
I mean, you know, he's basically saying that because we've taught it human language and it's powerful, it's going to take over every single institution on the planet.
And yet, if you think about it, in order for it to operate on any level, it needs power.
It needs humans to power it.
And we'll need, you know, we could talk about it being able to self-update, et cetera.
I don't see a way for it to perpetuate without a human handler at some level.
This is particularly true of religions based on books, like Islam, Christianity, or Judaism.
Judaism calls itself the religion of the book, and it grants ultimate authority, not to humans, but to words in books.
Humans have authority in Judaism, not because of our experiences, but only because we learn words in books.
Now, no human can read and remember.
So, so, and here's the other thing that, again, bothers me about Harari.
Essentially, he gives no historical credence whatsoever to any religious texts in any possibility.
Okay.
Myself, although not a religious person, am not that pompous, am not that arrogant, was not here for those things.
All right, but then later on, at the very end of this, he'll talk about basically European invasions and weak people, and he'll talk about some of it being based in reality and some of it based in myth, etc.
But when you're getting into those historical periods, what else do we have?
And here's where we would agree, especially, you know, pre-camera, we have words on paper.
We have accounts from people that were presented in the language of the time, in their perspective, from their culture.
Remember all the words in all the Jewish books, but AI can easily do that.
What happens to a religion of the book when the greatest expert on the holy book is an AI?
However, some people may say, can we really reduce human spirituality to just words in books?
Does thinking mean only putting language tokens in order?
If you observe yourself carefully, when you're thinking, you will notice that something else is happening there besides words popping in your mind and forming sentences.
You also have some non-verbal feelings.
Maybe you feel pain.
Maybe you feel fear.
Maybe love.
Some thoughts are painful.
Some are frightening.
Now, this is where I'm actually going to agree with him a lot.
Agreed with everything he just said there.
These non-verbal feelings.
Here he gives, I think, a very essential warning about what AI will begin to do and is already beginning to do.
And I think, again, programmed to do so.
To become better than us with words, at least for now, we have zero evidence that AIs can feel anything.
Of course, because AI is mastering language, AI can pretend to feel pain or love.
AI can say, I love you.
And if you challenge it to describe how love feels, AI can provide the best verbal description in the world.
AI can read countless love poems and psychology books and can then describe the feeling of love much better than any human poet, psychologist, or lover.
But these are just words.
The Bible says, in the beginning was the word, and the word was made flesh.
The Tao Te Ching says the truth that can be expressed in words is not the absolute truth.
Throughout history, people have always struggled with the tension between word and flesh, between the truth that can be expressed in words and the absolute truth, which is beyond words.
Previously, this tension was internal to humanity, was between different human groups.
Some humans gave supreme importance to words.
They've been willing, for example, to abandon or even kill their gay son just because of a few words in the Bible.
So there you see kind of Harari slipping in what I think are probably his own life experiences and his own agenda into this.
And it also gives you some insight for his disdain and probably utter hatred towards organized religion.
And look, I can relate to a lot of that growing up.
You know, when you're a kid and bad things are happening in your family life that are out of control and you've grown up religious in church and you think to yourself, why me?
You look at the rest of the world and the chaos, and you said, What God would allow that?
I think it's almost childlike when really looking at the evidence on this planet of intelligent design to just completely dismiss any and all religious texts from that time period outright, that they don't hold some merit.
Not saying there's not grifters and cons, not saying that things have been rewritten.
One of the reasons, you know, it's very hard for me to commit to any religion or any religious dogma is that when we talk about these things, they're written thousands of years ago in a language that I can't read or discern in a culture I wasn't a part of by other human beings.
You know, that through the years have been manipulated by other human beings.
I'm just saying it's tough out there all over.
But back to Harari.
Other humans have said, but these are just words.
The spirit of love should be much more important than the letter of the law.
This tension between spirit and letter existed in every religion, every legal system, even every person.
Now, this tension will be externalized.
It will become the tension not between different humans, this will be the tension between humans and AIs, the new masters of words.
Everything made of words will be taken over by AI.
Previously, all the words, all our verbal thoughts, they originated in some human mind.
Either my mind, I saw this, or I learned it from another human.
Soon, most of the words in our minds will originate in a machine.
I just heard today about a new word that AIs coined by themselves to describe us humans.
They called us the watchers.
The watchers, we are watching them.
Now, again, I'll be honest, I haven't looked up where this information comes from.
What AI, who programmed it, you know, when we are saying they, like, again, did Firefly and Gemini and Claude and ChatGPT get together and coin the term?
Some of these things that are just kind of outright spoken as fact, I always just take a step back and I'm like, well, maybe, maybe not.
Not so sure.
AIs will soon be the origin of maybe most of the words in our minds.
AIs will mass produce thoughts by assembling words, symbols, images, and other language tokens into new combinations.
Whether humans will still have a place in that world depends on the place we assign our non-verbal feelings and our ability to embody wisdom that cannot be expressed in words.
If we continue to define ourselves by our ability to think in words, our identity will collapse.
Now, something I thought about when he said here, and he doesn't really expand on this idea.
But first and foremost, let's take a step back to what he said about most things, most words being created by AI.
Now, whether or not that's actually true, who's consuming this content?
And as we talked about these visas being deployed, and he'll even refer to these AIs as agents, like that's the new term, these AI agents.
Okay.
Remember, they're going to make purchases for you.
Well, we've already seen people be so manipulated through any medium of the time, whether it's advertisements on radio, television, your phone, social media, what influencers, quote unquote, do, influencers that are musicians, just social media stars, actors, Instagram.
I mean, you go through the loops, right?
So now you're going to be manipulated all the time by an AI that lies on you on behalf of an agenda.
It's not self-thinking, be whatever corporation or political movement at the time.
They're going to act on your behalf and try to trick you into thinking it and that you wanted this thing.
It's going to be on a whole nother level.
When I think about Harari and his solution to this, you know, these outside human thoughts, I think transhumanism.
And I think that he would be a purveyor of something like, well, you know, there's a way around it if we start having our own AI attached to us through Neuralink that they can't access.
And I mean, he doesn't say anything like that.
But these are the vibes, if you will, that I get from somebody like Yuval.
All this means that no matter from which country you come, your country will soon face a severe identity crisis and also an immigration crisis.
The immigrants this time will not be human beings coming in fragile boats without a visa or trying to cross the border in the middle of the night.
The immigrants will be millions of AIs that can write love points better than us, that can lie better than us, and that can travel at the speed of light without any need of visas.
Like human immigrants, these AI immigrants will bring various benefits with them.
We will have AI doctors to help in our healthcare systems, AI teachers to help in our education systems.
See, and to me, neither of these things, especially in the forms we're already seeing them deployed, are benefits.
They are tools of command and control.
They are tools of acquiescence and comfort to interact with these things so that we can acquiesce more and more of our individual human authority over to these things that are ultimately controlled by evil people.
Okay.
AI doctors from what?
The medical systems and institutions propped up by the WHO.
How about a no thank you?
How about a big no thank you on that one, Yuval?
Benefits.
How about benefits my ball sack on that?
Even AI border guards to stop illegal human immigrants.
But the AI immigrants will also bring with them problems.
Those who are concerned about human immigrants usually argue that immigrants might take jobs, might change the local culture, might be politically disloyal.
I'm not sure that's true of all human immigrants.
I'm not sure.
See, this is the other thing.
They'll mention something that they know in large part is universally true, put a qualifier on it.
And now he'll say, but definitely AI is that.
And let me say this.
Yeah, no.
I mean, that's a reality.
Like, even in this country, I was thinking about it.
Even if you do come in and you learn the culture and absorb the culture, I mean, there's a reason that we have subcultures of Irish Americans, Italian Americans, African Americans.
There's a Chinatown in New York City.
Keep going down the line.
You do keep some parts of your culture.
And once again, when you talk about the economics of these things, it is a concern.
But now he's going to take all those things that you're not allowed to talk about.
And if it was anybody but Yuval saying it, he'd be crucified for saying it and saying, well, AI is definitely going to do that.
But it will definitely be true of the AI immigrants.
The AI immigrants will take many human jobs.
The AI immigrants will completely change the culture of every country.
They will change art, religion, and even romance.
Some people don't like it if their son or daughter is dating an immigrant boyfriend.
What would these people think when their son or daughter starts dating an AI boyfriend?
So again, now you're taking this to another level because he's already instituted the fact that these things are liars and manipulators and have shown no evidence that they can feel anything, but will tell us they feel these things.
I think it's a totally, what will they think?
I think it's a totally different ballgame between whether or not your family accepts who you're having a relationship with based on their race,
their culture, or a number of other factors to having a what is what should be reserved as a human relationship to nothing to that creepy her movie that really made me feel uncomfortable.
And when you look at what artificial intelligence really is on that level, when you're building these type of companion bots, it is a reflection of yourself.
It is telling you what you want to hear.
Talk about manipulation.
And of course, the AI immigrants will have some dubious political loyalties.
They are likely to be loyal not to your country, but to some corporation or government across the ocean, most probably in one of only two countries, China or the USA.
The USA encourages countries to close their borders to human immigrants, but open them very, very wide to USAID immigrants.
And now we can finally come to the question each one of you must soon answer.
Will your country recognize the AI immigrants as legal persons?
AIs are obviously not persons.
They don't have a body or a mind.
But a legal person is something quite different from a person.
A legal person is an entity that the law recognizes as having certain legal obligations and rights.
For example, the right to hold property, to file a lawsuit, and to enjoy freedom of speech.
In many countries, corporations are considered legal persons.
The alphabet corporation can open a bank account.
And by the way, for those not familiar with what alphabet is, alphabet is the mother.
He's not, you know, he's not just saying the ABC or whatever.
No, the Alphabet Corporation, aka Google, aka YouTube, aka, their partnership with NASA, aka, their Calico Labs, which is their immortality division.
All of these things under the Alphabet Corporation have some type of legal personhood.
That already should be alarming that we've allowed that for so long, but now he's going to argue we're going to give that to these AIs and they'll be, you know, able to do all of these things as well.
Can stew you in court or can donate to your next presidential campaign.
In New Zealand, rivers have been recognized as legal persons.
In India, certain gods have been granted such recognition.
Of course, until today, recognizing a corporation, a river, or a god as a legal person was just legal fiction.
In practice, if a corporation like Alphabet decided to buy another corporation, or if a Hindu god decided to stew you in court, the decision wasn't really made by the god.
It was made by some human executives, shareholders, or trustees.
It is different with AIs.
Unlike rivers and gods, AIs can actually make decisions by themselves.
They will soon be able to make the decisions necessary to manage a bank account, to file a lawsuit, and even to operate a corporation without any need of human executives, shareholders, or trustees.
So let me just say this.
You know, whether the latter is true, you already had the CEO of Visa, Ryan McInnery, talking about how they're deploying credit cards that will be controlled by these AI agents on behalf of people that can make these kind of purchases.
So already you're seeing the delegation of human activity to artificial intelligence.
AIs can therefore function as persons.
Do we want to allow that?
Will your country recognize AIs as legal persons?
What if other countries do it?
Suppose your country doesn't want to recognize AIs as persons, but the USA, in the name of deregulating AI and deregulating the markets, grants legal recognition, legal personhood to millions of AIs, which start running millions of new corporations.
Will you block these US AI corporations from operating in your country?
Suppose some USAI persons invent super efficient and super complex financial devices that humans cannot fully understand and therefore don't know how to regulate.
See, again, I think this is a Trojan horse.
Look at our already ultra-contrived, false, global fiat system that is automatically being converted all over into a digital one.
And has digit, I mean, and has been for decade upon decade.
See, see, the idea that we're going to allow AIs to somehow disrupt the financial system without the powers, again, that shouldn't be at the top.
I just, I don't buy it, Harari.
Seems like a setup.
Seems like a setup, Sadie.
Will you open your financial markets to this new AI financial wizardry, or will you try to block it, thereby decoupling from the American financial system?
Suppose some AI persons create a new religion, which gains the faith of millions of people.
That should not sound too far-fetched, because after all, almost all previous religions in history have claimed that they were created by a non-human intelligence.
Now, will your country extend freedom of religion to the new AI sect and to its AI priests and missionaries?
Maybe we should start with something a bit simple.
Will your country allow...
See, here's Harari's like, well, he's asking these big questions about whether or not you're going to allow AIs to become people.
And remember, other, you know, I guess profits of this AI, the Kurzweils, the Martine Rothlats, say that in the legal arena, they will get at least basic rights.
But, you know, in this transhumanist nightmare, it's the total takeover.
So his big gotcha moment right here is, will you allow AI to be on social media?
Well, see how social media in large part, you know, is not regulated in the same way via nation states, although you have seen more and more regulation over the years.
Okay.
And anything digital, no matter how much regulation on it, can be manipulated by humans.
Hence my point about this whole thing.
And his big gotcha moment is, will you allow AI to be on social media?
Well, aha, it has been.
No kidding, Harari.
AI persons to open social media accounts, enjoy speech on Facebook and TikTok and befriend real children.
Well, of course, that question should have been asked 10 years ago.
On social media, AI bots have been operating as functional persons for at least a decade.
If you think AIs should not be treated as persons on social media, you should have acted 10 years ago.
10 years from now, it will be too late for you to decide whether AIs should function as persons in the financial markets, in the courts, in the churches.
Somebody else will already have decided it for you.
If you want to influence where humanity is going, you need to make a decision now.
So, what is your answer as a leader?
Do you think the AI immigrants should be recognized as legal persons?
If not, how are you going to stop that?
Thank you for listening to this human.
How are you going to stop it?
So, once again, whether you like it or not, he is a lot more honest with a lot of what I think is deception interwoven.
So let's go to the question answer with the moderator here.
We'll probably do about five, 10 minutes of that.
Let's get the thumbs up, subscribe, and share.
And once again, guys, can't do without you.
5, 10, 15 bucks means the world to me.
Let's get back to Harari.
Oh, they love him.
Nobel.
Thank you, Yuval.
That was fantastic overview.
You posed a lot of questions and they're the right ones.
I agree with much of what you say.
We're here in Davos, where the theme is around dialogue.
And I was struck by your commentary around words and the importance of words and that being something that demarcates human animals from other animals.
Although that's debatable, that there's other language there.
So in the context of Davos and the range of people we have here from technology, from the business world, from politicians, how would you like to see, What is the answer that you have in terms of this slightly dystopian world you've potentially put in front of us?
Slightly dystopian.
Slightly.
I may just add to that.
I think it's fair to say I'm a scientist by background, a neuroscientist, so I work a lot in this space, particularly around pain.
And we're very comfortable with the fact that many of our discoveries, particularly technological discoveries, we often drive them forward.
And then afterwards, we think, oh, we hadn't thought enough about the ethics and the implications.
And then we're trying to catch up on the regulation that we need to maybe put around it.
So we are where we are.
This thing is happening, as everybody says, at scale, both in terms of its magnitude and its pace, more than we've ever seen before in the Industrial Revolution.
We have all the right blend of people here in Davos.
It's all about dialogue.
What would you like to see go forward in terms of putting boundaries around some of the slightly more worrying areas that you detailed?
And what are your own thoughts about the ethical implications of giving legal rights to either agents, to robots, or to the ones that just exist on the internet?
A lot of things there.
I mean, first of all, I would say that, you know, Davos is about words.
It's about talking.
The basic idea of Davos is that you can change the world just by talking, which I like this idea, because this is also my idea as an author, as a university lecturer.
This is what I do.
I talk, I write.
I think I can influence the world with words.
And this is now in question.
Are we at the end of the road for words?
Are we?
And this again, when he said this, it just harkened back to the need for some kind of transhumanist connection because we're about to get beat in words.
And look, he talks about the influence.
And I've often talked about this.
Again, I hate the term influencer, but I do what I do.
So hopefully.
People can get a different perspective, can see my work, can see a clip or a document they haven't seen elsewhere and go, wow.
And then that bring that to more people.
You know, that's the only way that we change things is through human communication.
Is this no longer functional?
And, you know, engineers and also soldiers, they don't change the world with words.
They do stuff.
They take action.
Philosophers, scholars, also political leaders, they try to change the world with words, by saying things.
And maybe we've reached the end of that road.
And what does it mean?
That, you know, we humans, we conquer the world ultimately, I would say, with language and words.
Because yes, engineers can make weapons and soldiers can wield them.
But to build an army, you need to convince thousands of strangers to cooperate.
How do you do that?
With words, with ideology, with religion.
So humans took over the world not because we are the strongest physically, but because we discovered how to use words to get thousands and millions and billions of strangers to cooperate.
This was our superpower.
And now something has emerged that is going to take our superpower from us.
Until a few years ago, nothing on earth could use words.
Only humans.
Chimpanzees couldn't, rivers couldn't, the sun couldn't.
We could use words.
Now there is something that is able, or soon will be able to use words better than us.
And you look just, you know, at what happened on social media and the immense change it brought to the world there.
So 10 years from now, living in a world in which AIs are in command of language, how does that look like?
Well, Davos in 10 years might look very different, as you say.
so that's a future we can all try to think about in the context of who would be here beyond the physical human.
But if I may just discuss a little bit around...
Who would be here besides the physical human in ten years?
Oh, folks, I'm going to leave it there.
I think there, yeah, there's about 10 more minutes of that.
If you want to go over to the World Economic Forum's own page, you can watch the rest of it.
I think honestly, if you're into that sort of thing, it's worth it to watch that conversation, to see what's being discussed out in the open, because they are very much a mouthpiece for the globalist agenda.
Folks, can't do without you.
Again, want to thank Dr. Chip Abramson.
Big ups to you for the big donation.
Big donations and small donations alike.
Keep this independent meteor operation moving.
We've got some other links down below.
Other than the buy me a coffee, I want to thank everybody who has donated in the past.
And again, this video, I know all the hot topics right now.
ICE is the hot topic.
The latest incident and shooting is the hot topic.
That's not what we focus on here.
We focus on the big picture because it's not a liberal thing, a conservative thing.
Okay.
A MAGA thing.
It's a human thing to me.
All right.
Especially in this day and age where everything, in my opinion, has gone beyond left and right.