Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more ETH - 0x90b9288AF0E40F8C90604460973743dBC91dA680
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4VFYRaltcc&list=PL5vtMLUWgYehCTEfSmgEzAEC9Dvt9FZmc
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on X
https://x.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
Patriot TV - https://patriot.tv/bermas/
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior Show less
Hey, everybody, Jason Burmes here, and we're going to be talking not only about the new rebranding of NASA, the space race, kind of this new hero-esque billionaire persona in that arena.
You could liken it to a Bruce Wayne, a Batman-type billionaire, or even a Tony Stark, especially with the defense contracting.
Now that Jared Isaacman is getting ready to overtake the agency.
And very much in line with Elon Musk's outward vision of NASA, which 1,000%, okay, everybody, just so everybody understands it, SpaceX is really a subsidiary of, although it is a rebranding.
You know, it boggles my mind at this point where everybody thinks that like, wow, the system is against Elon Musk.
He is a defense contractor of the highest, highest order.
And the bottom line is, right now, everybody's talking about how he's the richest billionaire.
He's been a defense contractor forever.
Okay?
All these things out there that are out there commercially are in line with the Defense Department.
Okay?
We've got a multitude.
I mean, a multitude of videos to go over.
But this new guy, Isaacman, also comes out of the defense contracting industry.
He's the new Playboy billionaire they want you to talk about, or they will want you to talk about.
You see, NASA is very much a hype show.
And we're going to show you this commercial that NASA put out, the 2025 NASA.
Yes, the 2025 NASA commercial, where there are some parts that are, like they talk about just for a second, quantum.
And NASA is involved with quantum computing and Google.
NASA is involved not only with Google, but DARPA.
Okay.
And so little of what they're actually doing is we're going to the moon, right?
But the big mission, Artemis, that they're selling you on now in the next year is somehow humans are going to circle the moon.
It's a very long distance.
We're going to illustrate that distance.
Now, Isaacman, recently, he has gone the farthest a human being has ever gone in space outside of the Apollo missions.
So Gemini and before, they broke the Gemini record.
I'm going to show you that.
And he and another gentleman and two women, these two women, are the farthest any women have been in space.
And I often misquote this all the time.
I always talk about how it's like 1,500 miles up in the air or something close.
It's not.
I'm going to show you the actual number.
It's actually around 1,400 kilometers.
So if you guys out there can do the math in your head, it's a totally different scenario.
Okay.
Compared to how far away the moon is and then back, it's like not even ballpark.
So, we're actually going to show you Isaacman, get out of the Polaris Dawn, the dragon capsule.
And again, the furthest a human being has gone in space outside of Apollo.
This is Reese.
We're going to show you that video.
You make of it what you want.
I am not, just so everybody knows, a spaces fake guy.
I think it's very real.
I think they lie to us a lot about it.
I watch a lot of these space race, historical DVDs from archive footage from NASA themselves.
You know, I understand there is a high degree of manipulation.
I understand there is a high degree of curation.
I also understand they absolutely fake things, whether it be on the ISS or otherwise.
I also understand what CGI is, very involved in college.
Although I think a lot of those things, including in the past, practical effects, have been used by these people to deceive.
I think a lot of the technology is 100% real.
How limiting that technology and what technology they're actually showing us, who knows?
You know, there are certain things that we'll focus on today with DARPA, the blackjack program, now what's known as Star Shield.
Star Shield.
Haven't heard a lot of people talking about Starshield.
We're going to talk about those things.
And we're going to talk about the evolution of those things.
So this one's going to be a long one.
Not going to lie to you.
You need to buckle it up because we're going to make sense of some madness over a long period of time.
You want to get your two cents in.
We will go to super chats over this.
And if we get the five super chat goal over the next hour, then we'll also do an AMA where anybody can jump in and we'll talk about space in particular.
Okay.
And by the way, I don't think space is a uniform thing.
I don't think it's just a vacuum.
Like, we're also going to talk about the Van Allen belts because I hear a lot of people, again, kind of misquoting whether or not people have been into the Van Allen belts or past the Van Allen belts.
And, you know, again, if Polaris Dawn is real and they really went as far as they did, they did go into like the very beginnings of the Van Allen radiation belts.
And we'll talk about that significance as well.
Let's thumbs it up, subscribe, share, watch all the documentary films for free.
And I need your support.
I need your support.
$5, $10, $15, it means the world to me.
I want to thank everybody that has donated in the past.
I hope everybody had a very Merry Christmas and on into the new year.
We've also got the PayPal down there.
If you like what I do, if you like this information, nobody else is covering, please, please consider supporting the show.
We want to thank MarigoldResources.com.
They broker the sales and purchases of business.
Go check them out.
And then, of course, the River City Reader, RCReader.com, a truly independent media outlet, did a great interview recently with Todd McGreevy, who runs both of those establishments.
For the raw data, give me a follow on X. There's a lot of things that we make commentary on or put out there that we don't end up doing on the show.
And here we go.
This is the guy right here.
This is the Polaris Dawn crew.
Okay, there's Jared Isaacman.
He's now about to head up NASA.
And we're going to get into his past in a moment.
Hey, Musk loves me.
Now, this took a little doing.
He had some obstacles, didn't get voted in at first.
Musk starts attacking Duffy, Sean Duffy, who's the reality star, turned pundit, turned politician.
Well, I guess he's done them all.
He might have done politician before pundit, back to politician, who's running the transportation department.
Okay, but now you've got this guy who you bet, you betcha.
And look, this is the sloppy way to do it, but instead of having to go to a bunch of different articles, and I'm sure there's a lot more here, you know, I want to go into his investments.
And of course, it just starts right away with his primary shift for payments, a major payment processor he founded, and Draken International, a defense firm.
Oh, a defense firm with a large private fighter jet fleet, selling a large stake in Drake and to Blackstone.
Now, we often talk about BlackRock.
Blackstone's the other one.
Yeah, for a significant return.
And now he's got significant financial ties to SpaceX.
And now he is not considered.
He's going to be the next administrator.
Okay.
So I want to take you to Polaris Dawn.
I've shown you, for instance, the crew.
Now, here is the, and this is the thing that's killing me.
This guy's a billionaire investor.
And more and more, we're putting billionaires in space, supposedly, right?
Like, shouldn't we be putting really trained humans into space if that's the reality?
Like, they're not concerned about the stock market or an exchange or some kind of business deal, right?
Or the political perception of something and so on and so on.
They're concerned about, I don't know, navigating and surviving in space.
One of the most brutal environments that you could possibly imagine.
So I got three videos here, and I think I'm just going to cut out.
I'm going to let these videos play for themselves because this is inside and outside the Dragon capsule at its height.
And we'll get to what that height is.
You decide.
Because I know there's going to be a bunch of people going over here.
Oh, it's all fake.
Three Pitch, Two Yaw00:02:55
None of it's real.
I don't believe that.
Okay.
Don't believe that.
And we'll get into why and the evidence I've seen as well as a ton of other issues with NASA.
So again, thumbs it up.
Here we go.
I'm at the bottom of the mobility.
Progressive.
I have a feeling the crowd is about to go wild.
Back at home, we all have a lot of work to do, but from here, Earth sure looks like a perfect world.
Copy review and test makers one, watching from the nose cone.
Up, down, left, and right are threes.
Pitch and roller, three.
Yaw is in two.
So I'm going to stop it right there.
So what you just watched is the actual reality of human space travel, okay, in the last 50 years publicly, no matter whether you believe Apollo's real or not.
Okay?
Okay.
Let's take a look at how far that actually is.
Okay.
So it's 870 miles.
Quantum Leap to Mars00:15:17
You got that?
It breaks Gemini 11 because Gemini is the precursor to Apollo at 853 miles.
Now, what is the distance between that, Polaris Dawn, and the moon?
It's 273 times farther.
You notice that they actually tried to put that up there.
Like, no, it's monumental.
238,855 miles.
That means they're about 238,000, or I'm sorry, 200, yes, 238,000 miles shy of being able to, and they're telling you Mars and they're telling you Mars?
Come on.
Give me a break.
Now, they did seem to go into the Van Allen belts.
If you believe how far they went, 870 miles.
So they're into the beginnings of the Van Allen belts, right?
And then, you know, you have the inner belt of 1,000 to 6,000 kilometers.
So supposedly they're in that inner belt, but not the outer belt, like the further belt.
They're in this inner belt right here.
Now, there's been a lot of talk about the Van Allen belts and radiation with humans.
That's not what we're really doing here.
Instead, we're going to break down the perceptions and realities of NASA.
Okay.
And we're going to show you, we're going to start with the propaganda piece.
Because it's rock and roll NASA.
And there's a bunch of just animations, Johnny nonsense.
The amount of stuff that you actually see that NASA's accomplished in the last year is very minimal.
And the thing is, now it's like a hot chick game.
And I've talked about this before.
They love putting forward attractive women to sell you on the NASA missions.
Now, there will be some truth in this, too.
Okay.
I want everybody to understand that as well.
And we're going to show just a little bit of that truth as well.
So again, thumbs it up.
Here we go.
2025 was the year NASA put America first in space.
We're not just going back to the moon.
We're paving the way to Mars and every milestone this year proved.
Artemis 2 is fully stacked at Kennedy Space Center, and in just months, four astronauts will fly around the moon for the first time in over 50 years.
This lays the groundwork for America to land on the lunar surface during Artemis III.
And this time, thanks to President Trump's vision, when we get there, we stay.
Two American commercial landers also touched down on the lunar surface.
Firefly's Blue Ghost in March, and Intuitive Machines' IM2 right behind it, delivering NASA science and proving the space economy is booming.
The moon is open for business.
We tested new RS-20.
So let's just, I got, I said I was going to just, I can't.
The moon is open.
This is that push towards commercialization.
They're making it sexier, right?
They're making it diverse.
Everything about this screams globalism.
Okay?
Everything about it.
And you talk about propaganda.
I mean, here's some real footage of them testing a rocket.
And that's integrated with 90% Johnny nonsense.
But we're the moon's open for business, everybody.
Five engines certified next-gen lunar spacesuits and rolled out full-scale moon rovers at the Houston Auto Show.
The Artemis generation is ready.
On the International Space Station, we celebrated 25 years of continuous human presence.
While there, Sonny Williams set the women's spacewalk record with 62 hours in the vacuum of space.
NASA dominated more than just the stars in 2025.
We also dominated the skies.
The X-59 took its maiden voyage, reaching an altitude of 12,000 feet.
Now, let me stop this too, because this is another function of NASA.
They are in aerospace and they are in defense.
So, and their business with Lockheed Martin, like you wouldn't believe, and Raytheon, you name down the line.
So, what you're seeing here is basically what they're ready to show the public and commercialize in some sense, probably automated.
They got a pilot in it right now, but eventually automated because they're very, very drone-heavy.
Okay, so that is another purpose of NASA.
Does this thing with the little wheels on the button?
You think this is going to space?
No.
Going to Mars?
Come on.
This one-of-a-kind experimental jet is pioneering quiet supersonic technology that will one day let American aircraft go higher, farther, faster, and quieter than ever before.
In 2025, science soared.
Six new heliophysics missions launched.
The James Webb Space Telescope kept rewriting cosmology.
Sphere X mapped the entire sky in 102 colors.
And Parker's solar probe snapped the closest pictures ever taken of the sun.
From defending Earth against asteroids to fighting wildfires from the sky.
From quantum breakthroughs to discovering interstellar comets, NASA delivered.
NASA delivered.
They're protecting us from comets.
I mean, an asteroid.
I think I'm pretty hard for me to believe.
That's all I'm saying.
I think that's a big scare.
The quantum department is where we're going to go next because that is something they're actually working on.
As to what quantum mechanics is, quantum physics, quantum computing, even.
All I know is they are integrating it publicly into their next level consumer AI, they're telling us about.
And we're not getting access to it as humans.
And we are just getting started.
2025 proves the future belongs to America.
Just wait till you see what we have in store for 2026.
It's like an action movie.
NASA, the action movie.
So I wanted to quickly just point out here, again, right now, you've got the Quantum Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
Okay?
It's what it's called.
All right?
And that's part of Google because Google's the Defense Department, just like NASA's the Defense Department.
Make no mistake.
Private organizations, my ass.
And they achieved quantum supremacy oh, so many years ago.
I mean, they're it.
So we're going to dive into more than just, you know, I wanted to do the Muskerdu.
And basically, if you look at Polaris Dawn here, that's why we had this up.
You know, they show, you know, in orbit, first spacewalk.
It's all historic.
Such a big deal.
Even here before they put Isaacman in there, Musk was openly critical, saying this has disaster written all over it.
There's no way we're going to the moon next year.
And remember, they keep telling us we're going to the moon, Artemis.
They sent Snoopy, supposedly.
And I'm highly skeptical of that flight, by the way.
Any flight they're telling you, whether it's manned or unmanned, driven by rocket technology, 238,000 miles and then back to Earth.
I'm sorry.
There is no other nation, state, or entity that claims to have done it.
Ever.
Ever.
We're it.
Not even close, by the way.
I mean, even the remote stuff that you see from China and, you know, these Russian probes getting there, maybe, maybe they're lying to us about how far away the moon is.
That's a possibility.
Maybe they're lying to us about the technology they're utilizing to get there.
That's a possibility.
But let's color me skeptical.
Instead, they're working on AI, like I said, okay?
And they're working on quantum computing.
And with before we get to this video, and this video is 10 plus years old, this video feeds into the multiverse.
And that's why, again, they push virtual universes too.
So the metaverse, that's why I conflate the two.
In a multiverse, okay, you're not unique.
It's not one run at the title.
You can literally be anything.
Whether or not you have free will, which is the basis of humanity, I don't care what ethos you have, right?
And there are some people that argue against free will, all this pre-determination crap.
You got free will.
Big time decisions.
This eliminates that idea because if you had free will, then everything would pretty much play out the same or close to the same, right?
So I'm not buying it.
And again, it's like you're an automaton.
You're nothing.
What you do doesn't matter.
Right?
Everything's infinite.
And look, I'm a pretty dumb guy.
I'm not saying that there aren't, like, I've unlocked the secrets of the universe, but this interpretation that they're selling you via NASA and Google of what quantum mechanics actually are in this multiverse and how they're going to solve all these problems.
Let's just say Jason's not buying it, but I'm going to give you the opportunity.
This is about a six-minute video, and we got plenty.
Then I'm going to reveal to you what I really think NASA's about.
And we don't even have the document, the future strategic warfare document up today.
We're not even going to cover that.
That's a whole, for those that have never seen that future strategic warfare document, I often bring that up.
And we're in 2025, and it's extremely, it was very accurate, scarily, frighteningly accurate.
We're going to bring that into the mix.
But first, this is the positive spin Google's putting on quantum computing, working with NASA.
Again, NASA doing all this work in this field, AI, quantum computing, things that are classified from me and you and then let out commercially through these entities.
Meanwhile, again, the billionaires are the ones going to space, the benevolent ones.
So six and a half minutes for you on what they're pitching.
Who was it that said, if you think you understand quantum physics, you don't understand quantum physics?
Consciousness, intelligence, free will, determinism, black holes protecting the planet from asteroids, Heisenberg concepts, atoms, ion traps, nuclear magnetic resonance, superconductors, photons, artificial intelligence, machine learning, past and future, classical physics, time travel.
I mean, the whole thing.
I can tell it's going to get very hot as I start speaking.
So tell me if I start to look really shiny.
Quantum physics puts everything into question.
It defies every intuition you have about the natural world.
Quantum is a very strange regime of physics.
Things can exist in this state of superposition where they can be like ghosting on each other, where they could be this and that at the same time.
Entanglement.
Quantum entanglement.
Two objects, if they're quantum mechanically entangled, are still strongly related to each other, even though they can be a vast distance apart.
There's a notion of the multiverse.
There's a whole family of hardwoods in different states and going through different experiences and different life trajectories.
The famous one is quantum tunneling.
Tunneling.
Tunneling?
Tunneling is the slippage between universes.
For a long time, people thought those effects only existed in the microscopic domain, like atoms, electrons, photons.
But really, it's the theory of our universe.
So if you want to build a quantum computer, you want to incorporate those new phenomenon into information processing.
Maybe quantum computation is one of those instruments that's going to allow us to see quantum effects at the human scale.
Google and NASA have teamed up to share one of the world's first commercial quantum computers.
This machine, made by Canada's D-Wave, will be installed in a NASA research center in California.
This is the inside of one of our dilution refrigerators.
All of this infrastructure is to basically operate the chip at a temperature that's two orders of magnitude colder than interspellar space.
The processor is a quantum computer.
It uses things called qubits, as well as being either one or zero.
Qubits can also be both at the same time.
Therefore bringing about a quantum leap in terms of power.
Harnessing principles of reality that are up until very recently completely not observable by us is just fascinating in ways that I can't completely articulate.
Code Word Sustainability00:15:43
The overwhelmingly obvious killer app for quantum computation is optimization.
Optimization problems are extremely difficult problems.
Actually all Google server centers together will not be capable of coming up with the best solution to these optimization problems as they get larger.
So now what is an optimization problem?
Here give you an example.
You want to do a trip through South America and you want to visit a number of cities and then you ask what is the cheapest ticket I can get to visit let's say 20 cities and you can of course different routes and different airlines and sort of imagine I list all the different options I have for my different routes to travel to these cities.
We currently as a civilization we generate vast amounts of data.
It could be climate data, genomic data, but it's very difficult to generate useful insights oft times from that data.
If you can solve optimization problems better, you have an important resource at your hand.
I think, at least it teaches us that we shouldn't be naive about the world.
That we shouldn't think about the world as a simple machine.
It forces us to consider more sophisticated notions of how the reality around us is actually shaped.
I can't ask it how long I'll live or the meaning of life.
Really, we don't know what the best questions are to ask that computer.
That's exactly what we're trying to understand now.
To me the most important question is are we alone?
And I have a feeling that quantum computers as they mature are going to help us answer that question.
This is of course a more long-term research endeavor and there are still tremendous obstacles and big questions.
Some of those will be addressed in D-Wave.
Some will be addressed at NASA and some at Google.
I wasn't sure I would be able to experiment with a quantum computational device in my lifetime and now I'm confident that I will be able to.
How amazing it is that we with our monkey heritage and monkey brains and monkey fingers have somehow lucked into a brain that allows us to ask legitimate questions about the nature of physical reality.
That's so cool.
It's that human risk to go forth into that unknown frontier.
Whether it's space exploration or quantum exploration, we do it because we must.
We do it because that's what it means to be human.
So, we got a super chat.
We're going to get to that in a moment.
Think about the very, how lucky are we?
We're chimp brains.
So Darwinian evolution, macro evolution, not microevolution or adaptation to environment.
That's sold here.
Multiverse, sold big.
You know, when you watch something like that and they associate it with humanity, there are just so many anti-human things that come into my mind, unfortunately.
And a lot of it is this command, control, mobilized globalization that we've seen take place at a rapid clip or seeing take place right now technologically here in the United States with prices skyrocketing.
I know a lot of people talked about inflation on groceries, but right now technology is going through the roof as well because that's taken out of us.
I mean, think about the computational nature of the data centers they were showing you 10 years ago and what's now going on to feed the AI, which also is associated with NASA, because the guy we're about to show you in a moment in this lecture to the Blue Tech Forum, it's largely about fresh water and how it's going to run out for us humans.
And who's getting a big chunk?
It's not who, it's what.
It's the AI.
So the who are really, you know, the billionaire class and their overlords in the predator class, the people that they're trying to get you to embrace as heroes, like the Muskernuts and Isaacman, who we were talking about here.
Let's go to this really quick.
Thank you, Proxnob14.
We really do appreciate it.
Have you seen the two-part episode of Redacted with yet another military whistleblower who got permission to give limited disclosure on UFOs?
I haven't.
I haven't.
You know, when I hear things like this, I often now go back to that individual that was on the recon mission that got that egg-shaped thing.
Right?
I've never seen anything like, okay.
When I saw the video of that reconnaissance, nothing, nothing about whatever that was screamed, aliens.
No, we are constantly, constantly, you know, testing new technologies via governments.
When I say we, I mean humans, via governments, via contractors, via privatized groups.
I mean, you name it.
Nothing alien about it.
All right.
So I want to go to this video from, I believe it's 2011 at the Blue Tech Forum, where the chief scientist of NASA, now there are a bunch of these chief scientists.
You can get to that level.
This guy's their Defense Department guy.
This is the guy behind the document I just mentioned, Future Strategic Warfare 2025.
If you haven't seen that document, must read, must understand.
But here he is just letting the cat out of the bag.
And again, in my eyes, very, very much letting you know that they're aligned with this.
You will own nothing and be happy.
You'll be part of the sustainability crew.
Humans are a bad crowd.
So here you go.
In fact, prevention of collapse of the ecosystem has now become the overwhelming issue.
Current food production is based on freshwater plants, glycophytes.
We're running out of fresh water, as you know.
The code word is sustainability.
The crashing of the ecosystem is due to population growth and the way we're now living, our standard of living.
I mean, wow.
So in 2011, we're running out of fresh water, and now all of a sudden, the AI data centers are using as much fresh water as the bottled water industry, where we've all been trained to drink from that and, you know, allow PFAs and God knows what else into our water supply.
Okay?
He tells you that sustainability is a code word.
Do you know what code words are?
That's when there's a code between a group of people that means something else that other people might not understand.
Huh.
And all this is because there's too many people with a high standard of living.
Wow.
Wow, NASA guy.
Well, what would you do about that, Mr. NASA guy?
The estimates vary between 30 and 50% of a planet that we're currently short to sustain the standard of living and the current population, much less the population growth.
As the Asians and their billions come up, as they are at 9 to 11% growth rate to Western standards of living, we're going to be short three more planets, and they're not readily available.
This will result in peak everything.
This will result in standards of living plunging.
So this is Malthus 101.
Oh, let's stop that.
Malthus 101.
Well, Malthusianism is the value of a life.
It's very eugenics-based.
You wouldn't be suggesting population control or reduction, would you, Dennis?
These innate ecosystem restrictions and shortfalls will necessarily shift world econometrics from a growth mantra to one of sustainability, with possible population control instigated along the way that changes everything.
Whoa.
Whoa, so not only just population control, but population control, you instigate and change everything.
That getting voted on, Dennis?
Who gets to live and die?
Or who gets to reproduce and who doesn't?
And how would you do such a thing, Dennis?
Very, very alarming things to say.
In terms of employment, just as an example, we are at a jobless economic recovery.
There's about 7 million jobs missing.
Some of them were globalized and offshore.
About a few.
The rest of them are gold.
The code word is productivity improvement, which is a code word for ever better automation and robotization.
Huh, that's really, they got a lot of code words here.
And this one's productivity improvement.
And by that, they mean automation and robotics replacing you.
But we've got to reduce the population.
I guess we've got to sustain the robots.
Huh?
Code word for productivity improvement is basically we're replacing you with robots.
Look at the way the robots are going.
Human-level machine intelligence from the IPU Blue Brain Project is now about 10 to 15 years out via biomimetics where they've nanosectioned the neocortex and they're replicating it in silicon.
Okay, and they're having great success at all.
So this is not soft computing.
This is via biomimetics.
We have looked 20, 30 years out with the way robotics and automation and machine intelligence is going at what jobs the machines cannot do.
The answer is none.
We thought we need human touch lightmen in nursing homes for a while, but the Japanese two years ago put robots in the nursing homes, the patients like them much better than the humans.
Hilarious.
All this is hilarious.
The machines are creating wealth within the structures of the ecosystem capability.
The machines are reducing costs, okay?
Producing wealth, but the humans increasingly can't compete.
Hmm.
Can't compete.
Now, it goes even beyond that, where he actually talks about genetically transmuting the human species, you know, lowering the bridge, if you will, to stay on the planet.
Now, we're going to jack the volume all the way down here.
This was a propaganda piece by the World Economic Forum, and we're going to go to some more Bushnell stuff in a moment.
But basically, it's this piece where they're telling you your life is going to be reshaped.
And part of that, you know, the reimagination is actually NASA technologies.
And so much of this is automation, robotics.
You know, look, nobody's in the research lab.
Everything's a QR code.
You're track traced in database.
Constant fear.
15-minute spaces, because why would you want to drive?
Why would you want to have any kind of independence?
But I'm pretty sure on this one, for some of the biometrics, they show you this NASA tech that has a unique heartbeat on you.
Okay?
You can just walk anywhere.
Everybody's having a great time.
Look how gorgeous it is.
I love it.
The trees aren't even getting hit with the sunlight.
Ghost kitchens.
I mean, just delivery takeaway.
No more sitting around and being around other human beings.
Everybody wears a mask and it's so happy.
World Economic Forum.
Here it is.
Oh, you could be identified by your heartbeat.
Isn't that awesome?
Facial recognition systems are stumped by face masks, but you're going to wear a mask.
But your heartbeat is just as unique as your face.
Good thing that NASA invented a system that can ID you from your heartbeat using a laser.
Isn't that great?
Isn't that lovely?
Isn't that the best?
So in a moment, in a little bit, we got a ways to go on this transhumanism kick that we're going to kick back.
All right.
But with brain chips, okay, the Muskernuts and his Neuralink have kind of led the way with public perception of that.
I got news for you.
NASA, DARPA, they've been in the mix for a very long time.
But don't take my word for it.
Just listen to Dennis Bushnell.
This one is 2018.
Now becoming cyborgs.
Humans are now becoming cyborgs.
We have cochlear implants to hear, artificial retinas to see, artificial hearts to live, artificial limbs to move, artificial organs to functions, and brain chips.
There's a couple hundred thousand people wandering around with brain chips now to fix generally defective brains and increasingly to fix memory and other things.
DARPA's working on brain shifts for super soldiers.
And people are now working, thanks to Musk and other people, funding direct machine brain communications.
It's not us versus them, us versus the machines.
We're merging.
And this is the human evolution of the humans.
There is no more natural evolution of anything.
People are convinced that the human evolution of everything is 10 million times faster than any natural evolution.
And so this is just part of the human evolution of the humans, which we'll apply in a little bit when I talk about something else.
So let's just stop it there because then we're going to take a little detour.
We're going to come back to it.
This guy's telling you that natural evolution is over on the planet for everything biological.
Something they're selling you on in that Google piece, the Google NASA piece.
So it's over.
We've taken charge.
Jobs Shift: Merging with Machines00:00:58
Have you and I taken charge?
No, they've taken charge of this.
And at the end of the day, like it or not, we're merging with the machines.
So they're telling you our natural resources are running out.
No.
They're being hoarded by a few to empower a technology that will enslave and eviscerate humanity.
AI.
They're telling you with the water right now.
It's happening.
He's telling you a decade ago, it's going away.
He's telling you you're going to merge with these entities that we are creating that can automate you out and do any of your jobs.
Now, right now, we're going to shift a little bit to one of the ways that they're creating a quote-unquote artificial skin around the planet and have been for a very long time.
Unusual Satellite Signals00:15:10
Starlink is the commercialized vision, but don't worry, it's part of the Defense Department as well, of that.
But for a very long time, we have been basically putting these networks around the planet.
And Bushnell is going to be asked about some of these classified satellite programs right here.
It's not just the United States.
This is a global effort, I assure you.
So here we go.
It's the Russian satellites that are moving in unknown and unusual paths.
In other words, satellites are no longer just satellites, but now they are moving around in unknown and unexplained patterns.
Can you comment on that and the evolution you see of satellites with that similar technology?
The second one is the Russians apparently have satellites up there that describe it.
They're moving in strange ways.
And they're made out of the normal satellites.
Maybe you're doing something different.
And so what's that all about?
No comment.
Oh, come on, Mal.
Killer satellites, are they?
Okay, all right.
Sorry, Ty.
You know, what he didn't tell you is I'm the NASA rep to the National Intelligence Council.
National Intelligence Council rep. You see how gleeful and smiley?
Let's see the little smirkle.
He's got a little smirkle on.
Oh, you want to know?
Oh, you want to know what the class.
No.
We're not going to talk about the classified satellite programs.
Okay.
All right.
Now, a lot of these satellites for a very long time, they're not that large.
They're what are known as CubeSats, and we're going to get into those in a moment.
But I just want to show you a quick rundown.
Again, Musk, number one defense contractor.
All right.
Musk, SpaceX, not taking us to the moon, launching blackjack satellites, now Starshield satellites.
And all this other stuff is simply a distraction away from the track trace database technology, as well as, you know, really weaponized.
You're talking about directed energy weapons and beyond technology that is surrounding us.
So Elon Musk's classified Starshell satellites are emitting an unusual signal.
Amateur astronomer finds you don't say.
Now, again, it's very sexy.
SpaceX.com.
Star Shield supporting national security.
Yes.
Secured satellite networks for government entities.
I mean, yeah, Musk is such a renegade.
They're so concerned about Musk that he's their largest defense contractor for their communications.
And with Starlink, the commercialized version of it, which they, I mean, again, it's exactly what it is.
It was helping run the war in Ukraine for years and it's still utilized.
And it hooked right into the ghost and Sidewinder drones.
All right?
Death drones.
Now, currently, DARPA.mil, oops, keep hitting the wrong button, DARPA.mil slash program slash blackjack, not a lot here.
Very, very small.
All right?
But this is why the Internet Archive is really important.
You want to understand about DARPA and Lockheed Martin and national security space assets.
Critical to U.S. warfighting capabilities.
Okay.
I mean, here it is.
This one is extensive.
We could do a whole episode just reading this.
See?
Okay.
Now, these, again, these are CubeSats.
You're going to learn about CubeSats in a minute.
And really part of that program that I talked about, putting an artificial skin.
Okay, there's a couple of those Mandrake 2 satellites right there.
Very, very small.
Very, very small.
Especially in comparison to a lot of the satellite equipment they do put up below low Earth orbit on balloons.
And I get it.
I know all the Sataloon crew.
They're different programs, folks.
Look how extensive this is.
You got to go to the Wayback Machine to get a whole bunch of this good DARPA, blackjack, NASA goodness.
And it's not that far ago.
I think 2019, this is 2021, is this piece.
But 2019 is where it's at.
And look, if you want to see NASA put up the balloon set, because I mean, look at that.
That's what that quote-unquote Chinese spy satellite really was.
Okay?
It's just one of these.
That's all.
It's part of the network they don't tell you about.
But now, what we're going to do, and by the way, let's thumbs it up, subscribe and share.
I'd say we're about halfway done with the program at this point.
Like I said, we got a lot to go over here.
A whole lot to go over.
Please consider donating to real independent media.
$5, $10, $15.
Big donors.
I could really use a great new year.
If you're out there, thank you for your donations in the past.
Thank you for those donations in the future.
We've also got the PayPal down below.
So I want to take you to the Transformers Conference.
Are you ready for the Transformers Conference?
This is 2016.
NASA has a panel on this, but it's actually opened by somebody else, worked with NASA, worked in the satellite game.
We'll get to that person.
Because a big part of this, as you've probably figured out, we haven't used the T-word much, is transhumanism.
That's what the merging of man and machine are.
Transhumanism.
So this is the Transformers Conference.
You can't make it up.
And this other keynote speaker and others are all about transhumanism.
Oddly, Twitch and Reddit are there also about regulating and moderating speech online.
2016, almost a decade old, extremely relevant.
And they all also start rolling out CubeSat technology and this global network.
And they talk about ion propulsion systems and microjet propulsion and all this stuff we don't really talk about at all.
They also get into Mars, which we'll also get into on the tail end.
But here's a few clips from NASA at Transformers.
When you talk about a revolution, I don't know whether there's anybody out there who has a son or a daughter who goes to St. Thomas Moore Elementary School in Northern Virginia.
First elementary school to send a spacecraft into space this week.
It was elementary school.
It was launched off the International Space Station.
It was among a lot of CubeSats that were sent to station on a probably orbital or a SpaceX vehicle because we have room to do that.
And so there is an elementary school in Northern Virginia that can now brag about, you know, my spacecraft is up there doing stuff.
And once you get that into kids, it's like I did science fairs.
My seventh grade science teacher turned me on to science fairs and I never look back.
I can guarantee you that these kids at St. Thomas Moore, they are never going to be told we can't do that because they're going to say, you know, when I was in elementary school, I made a satellite.
What do you mean we can't do that?
Can't top that.
Oh, kids up that.
So NASA's also very big on propaganda, propagandizing the youth and normalizing.
Listen, I'm all about technology.
And that's kind of one of the things that's fascinated me, fascinated myself about this topic on so many levels.
But these CubeSats, in essence, and these networks that we're talking about from Starshield and otherwise, are actually what this guy is describing right here.
Through ISS, it has been sort of seeding the smallsat market.
But you can't launch into all the different orbits from ISS.
And so what we'll be able to do with our vehicle, Launcher One, is to put these satellites into other orbits.
But I think what's interesting is that the U.S. is now leading a new area, which is the small satellite sector.
And, you know, we're going to see tremendous growth.
The geostationary, the number of geostationary satellites getting launched into orbit isn't really growing right now.
But you're going to see this huge growth in small satellite constellations over the coming years that will establish essentially a new information skin for planet Earth that helps us with navigation and communication and weather and remote sensing.
And I think it'll be eventually sort of a permanent new skin around the planet.
And a lot of that is being catalyzed by the work that was done inside NASA labs and now inside the national lab at ISS.
A permanent skin around the planet.
Now remember, the ISS is international.
And we're not the only ones to claim to have space weapons.
Russia also.
All right.
So who's in charge of this network of cube satellites or this information skin?
You know, there are a lot of questions surrounding this.
Now, when I have questions about technology, I often have questions about how it's produced, right?
And from the impossible engine to fusion technology to plasma technology and beyond, I think that we've been very, very misled.
Listen to what they say about the 3D printing capabilities that NASA had, really the Defense Department.
This is Rocketdyne talking.
Okay.
Rocketdyne had almost a decade ago.
And in just a little bit, a little snipple slips out.
You know, things like solar electric propulsion, another thing I like saying.
So, blow our hair back.
Give us a sense of like what's what you guys are working on.
You know, that's really cool and how it fits into all this.
You know, we're working on, like you said, we support government, we support commercial, and we do primarily propulsion, which is engines, big engines, motors, those type of things, as well as power.
The key things, you know, neat things we're working on today.
We're doing ion propulsion, which is a form of electric propulsion, and it reduces the mass.
You talk about bringing the cost down.
Everything we throw off the planet now has to go on a rocket that costs quite a bit of money.
So, the smaller you can make it, the cheaper it gets.
So, we have solar electric propulsion that we'll be putting on these next missions.
We're working on the technology on NASA contracts and internal, and it'll half or one-tenth the size, depending on how we do that.
So, that's one thing, and it looks just like you see the blue glow from the old Star Trek, it looks just like that, and it is like that.
So, we're working on, we're printing rockets now.
You know, we're doing 3D printing of whole rockets, and a number of people are doing it.
And the hard thing about it.
So, does that mean I can illegally download a rocket?
You know, you, well, you know, rocket technology is still protected, right?
No, but it gets to that.
You get a model, and you can do that.
The really big ones you can't do yet, but you can certainly do the smaller ones.
We talk about the small sats.
We can actually print a whole CubeSat propulsion system in one pass.
And those are things that, you know, bring down not just the cost of the product, they're more efficient, they bring down time, and all of this just continues to fuel the cycle, like as George was saying it.
So, it's really a transformative time.
We're building off the things that we've put in place for the last few decades, but now we can actually take them that next step.
So, there you go.
You know, and by the way, 3D printing of organs is another thing that NASA does openly on the ISS.
So, let's shift to Mars.
Okay.
Now, again, there's been claims that we've been on Mars with rovers for years and years and years, very far away.
How we're remotely controlling anything that far away.
Again, I don't know.
I think we're taking a lot of this stuff faith-based, right?
A lot of faith-based stuff here.
But even here, you'll have Bolden, one of the administrators you've seen talk before, talk about how it's not going to be humans going to Mars first, no matter what.
It's going to be robots, okay?
And one of the people they had on this panel was actually the guy who did the movie about Mars.
It was a book about Mars called The Martian, but it's the movie with Matt Damon.
And, you know, they talk about the Hollywoodized version of what they're selling to people versus the reality.
And to me, that's constantly what NASA is about.
So, robots to be the first on Mars.
And first of all, we'll start with him talking about how we've been on Mars for decades.
But you need to go back and read the book because what you find is, you know, Mark Watney and his crew didn't land on Mars and have all this stuff land with them.
They had been building that up over a period of decades.
And that's exactly what NASA's doing today.
We've been flying what we call precursors.
So they're lead things that we need to do.
On-orbit satellites for navigation, communications, relay, landers that can go out and survey so they know where we're going to land humans.
All that stuff's been going on for 2030.
We've been on Mars for 40 years.
We didn't just come to this rodeo, so to put it.
I think there have been over 10 years.
You've got to be thinking 30, 40, 50 years out.
And Andy is absolutely right.
And I tell people all the time: the very first things on the surface of Mars are going to be robots.
You know, think about what we do for American forces today around the world.
We don't send soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines often into a very hot area first.
We try to get in and make the environment safe for them using robots or whatever.
Fleet of Mars Robots00:07:48
But we're actually, I imagine there's going to be a fleet of robots, maybe humanoid.
They don't have to look like humans.
They're going to establish the habitat.
They're going to go in because with 3D printing, we can put a fleet of robots on the surface of Mars.
We may find, based on what we know about the radiation environment, that we want to go underground rather than have huts on the surface that get blown away in the wind that doesn't exist.
But that was a critical part.
I tell my wife, it's a movie.
So again, there's the movie guy and the science fiction aspect.
But think about this.
They don't necessarily have to be humanoid robots, but we ought to put robots on there, and they're going to build everything for us on this thing.
Huh.
So people not going to Mars then.
Again, this is a decade ago.
Okay, very, very important part.
But it may be that robots dig under, you know, go subterranean and establish the habitat.
Anybody ever do, you know, build houses for charitable reasons?
You don't go there and there are no two by fours on the lot.
There are prefab structures, so you get eaves and walls, and that's what we're going to do on Mars.
But we're going to print it, I think.
We're going to print it, I think.
Now, in line with that, you know, we talked about the multiverse and the metaverse.
And virtual reality, if you actually go to this document, the virtual age is after the bio-nano era.
And we're in the bio-nano era right now, according to these people.
That's a whole nother rabbit trail to go down.
We're not doing that today.
But what we will do is we'll play that same person, Dennis Bushnell, telling you, yeah, no, we're going to send robots or nanobots to Mars first, and then you'll be able to virtually visit Mars, huh?
So again, humans aren't taking that trip to Mars.
Instead, it's going to be in this virtual wonderverse, and we're going to rely on the robots.
Whole lot of that going on, eh?
And you were talking about robot exploration, and I'd mentioned Ray Kurzweil to you, and you'd said that he'd spoken at NASA.
And to me, the way that you described robots almost as kind of like the children of mankind really stuck with me.
And it put what we're doing on Mars right now in a new perspective for me.
Well, that quote, robots being the children of mankind, is actually from Hans Moravic from Carnegie Mellon.
He has various books on this.
Robot is one of them from the early OOs, as I remember.
And the idea is that we are currently becoming cyborgs at a very fast rate.
The IDMBU Brain Project, which is nanosectioning the neocortex and replicating it, Silicon has made such good progress that they are claiming in 12 to 15 years they will be able to market a biomimetic human-level machine intelligence.
The nano-functionalization of robots is continuing apace very rapidly.
So there's no reason why in the 10, 20 year, Well, 15 to 25 years out, that exploration can't be done very well with robots at a cost which has been estimated at about 1,1,000th that of sending humans.
So let me just stop it there.
You notice everything's also business-related.
Billionaires, the moon is open for business, the market of the satellites.
We can do it at such a lower cost with the robots.
One way to do this exploration of Mars and so forth is three ways.
I mean, three stages.
One is to send nano-robots and instrument the planet and send back the data.
And the Brits demonstrated five senses virtual reality, haptic taste, touch, smell, sight, and sound recently.
So everyone could explore Mars anytime they wanted to at 1-1,000th the cost of sending people.
So no one's going to Mars.
But maybe you'll believe that we went to Mars or you went to Mars.
Very total recall there.
Now, before we get to the transhuman aspect, that you guessed it, okay, has a transgender bent.
Again, they want you to reject your biology.
When I say they, the predator class at the top, the people that are trying to institute this authoritarian nightmare of not only transhumanism, but eventually post-humanism for the most of us.
I mean, that's incredible.
But again, World Economic Forum, you'll own nothing and be happy pushing all this technology, all this nonsense.
Oh, they got some Mars stuff for us as well.
Oh, look at that.
Because they're looking for, let's turn the music all the way down.
They're looking for volunteers to practice on Mars.
Look, 3D printing.
Huh?
They're going to spend a year to simulate the conditions of life on Mars in a 3D printed environment.
Take a look.
And this is years ago.
The module is smaller than a tennis court.
The crew will face circumstances that could arise on Mars, including limited resources, communication delays, and equipment failures.
They'll also perform simulated spacewalks.
I mean, this is cartoon-level stuff.
They're going to carry out the scientific research for their physical and mental health.
Are you watching this?
So, again, no one's going to Mars, but they want to take a crew to virtually go to Mars in a simulation.
Right?
And look, the jet pilot stuff I'm happy about because you're probably going to have to go somewhere in space.
But I just, yeah, sometime in the 2030s.
Again, by the numbers, that's crazy talk.
Just don't believe it.
So, are you ready to get from transgender to transhuman?
Now, this is Martine Rothblatt.
This is at that Transformers conference.
This is the person who actually founded SiriusXM Radio.
And this whole trans movement has a hell of a transhuman bent on it as well.
Believe it.
In fact, this person wrote the book on it, From Transgender to Transhuman, a manifesto on the Freedom of Forum.
But here's a few minutes eclipse of Martine, formerly Martin Rothblatt, explaining their vision of the future.
Is also the recipient of this year's Billie Jean King Leadership Initiatives Award, which is devoted to LBGT issues and puts her in an interesting issue because she has a company, or part of the company, is based in North Carolina, which, as you know, right now, she might get arrested for going to the bathroom if the governor had anything to do about it.
Ladies and gentlemen, Martine Rothblatt.
Digital Doppelgangers: Immortality's Edge00:08:30
Martine, one of the basic concepts that you're interested in, it's not just improving lives, but it's actually immortality.
That we're all going to live forever.
And Martine, I might mention, has founded a religion, as one does, known as Terra Sim.
It's based on transhumanism.
And you have the idea that we're not just going to live a long time, but we're all going to live forever.
Tell us your concept of immortality and how that actually would work.
Thanks, Neely.
It's a great pleasure to be here.
The idea is one that has been percolating up from lots of people in the information technology industry for a while.
Perhaps Ray Kurzweil, who is a prolific inventor, is best known for the idea that as our abilities in the information processing industry, computer software, storage of more and more of our thoughts and our ideas outside of our body becomes easier, more automatic, less expensive,
that ultimately we're going to have sort of digital doppelgangers of ourselves that are stored in the cloud and are able to present themselves to any manner of devices.
And that as thousands and thousands of software coders and hackers and people in the maker movement work to make the software that runs these digital doppelgangers ever more lifelike, ever more human-like, there'll come sort of a tipping point when people begin to claim that these digital doppelgangers have achieved what we call consciousness, an ability to have a sense of themselves, hopes, fears, and feelings.
And at that point, I think the activity will move to the legal arena as to whether or not these digital doppelgangers really are conscious, really do have an independent legal identity.
And kind of the trend of progressive thinking is once there's a scientific consensus, and in this case it would be the science of psychology, that being the science of the mind, that these digital doppelgangers are in fact cyber-conscious, then they'll begin to acquire the sorts of rights and protections that we assign to even our pets,
laboratory animals, and to quite a high extent to primates like chimpanzees.
And so in this way, ourselves will kind of morph into a sort of digital consciousness that is recognized by the law.
Morph into a digital consciousness after we give doppelgangers of ourselves rights and well beyond the rights of quote-unquote pets, I assure you.
This is all from that Transformers conference.
We've done extensive work on Rothblatt.
It goes even further than that.
But at that same conference, you had this lunatic who believes he's trans species.
And then we're going to get into Ray Kurzweil just so briefly.
Worked with Google quite a bit, by the way.
Mentor to this person, acolyte of Kurzweil right here.
Here's a quote-unquote trans species lunatic speaking at the Transformers Conference.
But that humans don't have.
So we are in a stage in history that we can actually design what species we want to be.
I consider myself a trans species because I'm adding senses and organs that other species have.
And you can add many, many more senses that other species have and organs that other species have.
And we'll start seeing this in the 20s because it's now growing.
It's happening underground.
There's already many surgeons that are willing to do the surgery anonymously in the same way that in the 50s and 60s transgender operations were being done a bit underground.
Now cyborg surgeries are being done a bit underground.
But in the end, bioethical committees will also accept that cyborg surgeries should be allowed for everyone that wants to extend their perception of reality, at least to the level of.
And remember, at the same time, they're telling you, if you, if you don't want to do this, it's okay.
You could probably upload your consciousness right, that digital consciousness they were talking about.
And and now we're going to show you Ray Kurzweil talking about basically a species of humans that really didn't get a choice and just have billions of nanobots in our bodies that can turn off reality and turn us into a virtual reality.
And when he demonstrates this is again a decade ago.
I think this is like 2000, might even be more than a decade ago.
This could be all the way back in like 2006.
I forget what it is.
I mean, the stuff he shows is actually pretty crude um, but he shows it virtually as a woman, not Ray Kurzwall, but Ramona huh.
And then the transgender to transhuman, the transgender surgeries underground.
Oh okay, huh seems to be a connection here reality.
With that in mind, who is Ramona?
Well, this is a, a project that started a number of years ago.
Uh, she's a female.
Uh, she's my female alter ego, and I wanted to demonstrate at this conference called Ted, Technology Entertainment Design.
At the 2001 TED conference.
A feature of virtual reality, that you can be someone else, because I mentioned that you know you and I could go into a virtual reality environment and Take a walk on a virtual Cancun Beach in virtual reality environments, and we'll have virtual bodies in these virtual reality environments, particularly when it's through the nervous system, when we have Nanobots in our brains that can shut down the signals coming from our real senses, Replace them with the signals that your brain would be receiving if you were in the virtual environment.
Then it'll feel like you're in that virtual environment, and design of new virtual environments will be a new art form and as I go to move my hand, it'll move my virtual hand and so I can be an actor in this virtual environment.
We could shake hands and give each other a hug, or we can take, we can run on the beach or sit down at a desk and have experiences in these virtual reality environments, but your, your body, doesn't have to be the same body that you have in real reality.
A couple could become each other, for example, and it's okay, and so I wanted to demonstrate how you could do that.
So I had magnetic sensors in my clothing as I moved.
A life-size realistic, real-time Animation, pretty photorealistic of Ramona, moved exactly the way I did.
My voice was changing into her voice using some other computer technology, and that drove her lips.
And so it looked like she was giving the presentation, but I was actually being transformed into her.
And the audience could see me and her.
And actually, we have a demonstration to show the folks at home.
But in virtual reality, you can be who you want to be, and you can be where you want to be, and with whom you want to be, and you can even have been who you want to have been.
Well, my childhood was kind of tough, although I didn't really think about that at the time.
You know, you don't really have much to compare to, but my pa, he was always trying hard, but he never did seem to be able to hold on to a job.
Well, I haven't written that many songs, but I try to express what's most deeply on my mind.
In virtual reality, you can be someone else.
You don't have to be the same boring person all the time.
I mean, you all have these personalities inside you that don't quite fit with your bodies in real reality.
So basically, most people just like kill them all off.
Some people don't actually keep any of their personalities, which reminds me of some of my old boyfriends, but that's another story.
Oh, some of his old boyfriends coming from that my pa tried real hard.
Bina 48: The De Facto Global Brain00:10:59
Nothing weird about any of that.
Mr. Kurzweil.
So this is actually a serious project that I intend to continue with and actually make Ramona more realistic and actually more independent.
I have this bet with Mitch Caper that a computer will pass the Turing test by 2029.
And I intend that to be Ramona, actually an independent version of Ramona.
And by the way, you could argue the Turing test has already been passed.
Martine Rothblatt, who is still married to the wife that Martin married, has taken Bina and made Bina 48.
In fact, it's so ridiculous.
Let's just type it in because, you know, that's something we didn't even have on this Bina 48.
Okay.
But again, these people are like a little loony.
And they've recreated their virtual wife, the humanoid robot, Bina 48.
I believe that's the real Bina.
And that's, yeah.
So, so, I mean, that these are the bad scientists, folks.
Now, I told you that we would full circle it back.
And I meant that with Dennis Bushnell, because he's very much in line with all these things.
This is a six and a half minute cut up of him talking about the global brain being Google, transhumanism, what we're going to do with all these people.
And at the very end, telling you what we're going to do with all these people.
So before we get to the coup de grace, okay, the final video sequence, once again, there are no paychecks, guys.
I really do need your support.
$5, $10, $15, big donors.
You mean the world to me.
If you don't like the buy-me-a-coffee, please consider the PayPal down below.
We did get a Venmo at Jason Burmes for the first time.
I want to thank that person.
I think that was Ryan.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
We got the cash app also.
That's all Jason Burmes.
Get ready, because here's Dennis Bushnell telling you everything that's about to go down in Chinatown.
The machines are capable of really good deep learning.
And that's what most of the current AI is based on.
The current AI is essentially soft computing.
It's neural nets, fuzzy logic, agro algorithms, and the deep learning.
The machines coming up as we leave silicon and go to bio-optical quantum nano-molecular and atomic computing, there's another 10 to the 8th to 10 to the 12th to go.
We've come 10 to the 8th so far.
The machine intelligence, currently, there's the soft computing business, but no one really sees a way to get to humans via deep learning or soft computing.
They just don't, not yet.
There's no breakthrough in algorithms.
What we are doing, which will get to humans, people now think, and this is what's worrying people, is the biomimetics part.
This is where you nano section the neocortex, replicate it in silicon, and you don't have to understand how it works.
You just have to make it work this way as an artificial human brain surrogate.
They will all go to Google.
Oh, God.
Okay?
So this is now the de facto global brain, which will only get better.
And we are busily with nanosensors and other sensors networking within 10 years some 3 trillion sensors.
So the global brain will be fed with all of this information, okay?
And it will have all of the contents of all the libraries, and it will read all of everybody's emails and everything else.
And so you end up with a really big global brain.
That's different from intelligence.
Let's just stop for a second.
What he just admitted right there.
This is 2016, by the way.
Okay?
I think it could be up to 2018, but 2016-ish, somewhere in there, well before 2020.
They've got access to all the emails, all the data.
They're reading it.
Okay.
They talk about the biomimetics aspect, not traditional computing.
Another thing that NASA is highly involved in are organoid technology where they take traditional computers and then they interject biological stem cell technology.
All this has taken place.
Okay.
And this guy's, what, National Intelligence Council on top of it?
People that you speak of that are worried about this are worried about the fact that as we develop, which we can now, it looks like, via biomedics at least in the next 10, 20, 25 years, a human-level machine intelligence, there's the conventional rules of we're going to make it friendly to humans.
Well, it turns out that people have now delved into that a bit and they're not so sure we can do that.
Well, you know, humans.
And a really good brain, human-level and beyond machine intelligence could easily produce untoward effects on humans.
It wouldn't have to be malicious.
It would just have to be unthinking and wipe us all out, given our huge reliance upon electrons in everything we do.
In everything we do.
And it didn't have to be malicious, but boy, AI could just take us out by accident.
I'm so glad that we're doing all this.
Just fantastic.
Fantastic, Dennis.
What we're developing this talk is essentially a second intelligent species.
We are, with the biomimetics, where we're nanosectioning the neocortex and replicating it in silicon, people allege we're 10 to 15 to maybe 20 years max out from having a human-level machine intelligence.
The nano robotics is giving all the dexterity, human dexterity, and so forth.
So when one looks in the totality of the human versus the robot, the robot knows more.
The robot has a much better safety record.
In aviation, 85% of the safety issues are human factors.
It's clear if you want a safer system, you have less humans.
The machines so far are...
You want a safer system, you have less humans.
Let me repeat that one for you.
You want a safer system, you have less humans.
But they want human-like intelligence in these entities we're creating.
Are more knowledgeable?
The robot that we're using now to do cancer research and cancer treatments is much better than the human physicians.
The teachers are, in fact, more effective, the robot teachers, in educating children.
They're more creative.
The child has more control and so forth and so on.
The studies show that children learn four to five times faster than they do in conventional schools.
And that's because conventional schools have a large amount of time keeping order.
The classmates are not always supportive for people who are brainy and intelligent, so forth and so on.
So the total education system for the robot teacher tends to be better.
Pushing robot teachers.
Try and take the humanity out of education as much as possible.
As he just dictates all this stuff in a very robotic-like manner.
There will be essentially no jobs the machines cannot do.
We currently have creative software that are doing ideation just as good or better than humans now.
The creative jobs will be the last ones to go, but I have not been able to discern any jobs the machines cannot do as machine intelligence and all the rest of the autonomous robotics develops.
So now we're to your question.
Okay, what do you do with these people?
There's essentially three options.
You've covered one, which is the guaranteed income.
And the machines can produce the productivity, the wealth necessary to pay this.
It's just the machines do the work instead of the people.
Yeah.
Because that's what's going to happen.
Because the UBI is really going to work a universal slave income.
Sure.
Yes, you have to change the cultural milieu, but this is eventually doable.
This is only one approach.
The second approach is the fact that what's changed since you last looked at this is the whole technology level.
And we humans are now converting ourselves into cyborgs.
We now have artificial retinas, artificial hearts.
We have brain chips.
DARPA is working on brain chips for super soldiers.
We can have a high-bandwidth comp port built in so we don't have to use the sensors and they're very limited bandwidth.
And eventually this all ends up with uploading into the machines.
And instead of us versus them, humans versus the machines, we become them, or they become us, or you end up with human-contaminated machines.
Human contaminated machines.
So much anti-humanism, so much pro-transhumanism, so much technology that is being utilized to consolidate power and control us.
A Story Unveiled00:01:20
That's what NASA's really about.
Not the moon or Mars.
Okay?
We've been on this journey now well over an hour.
Notice we weren't talking Republicans, Democrats, left-right, Johnny nonsense.
Instead, we're actually talking about a story.
I don't see anybody talking about this new NASA administrator and where we're going from here.
So if you enjoyed this, first of all, thumbs it up, subscribe, share, ring the bell.
If you're new, please check out all the documentary films for free below.
Loose Change, Final Cut, and Fabled Enemies on 9-11.
Put together much better than this little drab presentation, I assure you.
And then my films, Invisible Empire and New World Order Defined, and Shade the Motion Picture, they all stand up.
I think they're very important to this day.
And remember, there are no paychecks.
This is true independent media.
I can't survive without you.
I'd love to be smiling into the new year.
$5, $10, $15, it means the world to me.
Consider the buy me a coffee, the PayPal, the Venmo, the Cash App, whatever.