Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more ETH - 0x90b9288AF0E40F8C90604460973743dBC91dA680
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4VFYRaltcc&list=PL5vtMLUWgYehCTEfSmgEzAEC9Dvt9FZmc
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on X
https://x.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
Patriot TV - https://patriot.tv/bermas/
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior Show less
Hey everybody, Jason Burmes here, and we are finally going to talk about the Epstein list.
Yes, the Epstein list has finally been revealed to the public.
And that list is his list of Amazon purchases.
Now, I couldn't help myself with the ridiculous intro, the thumbnail slash the title of this video because for many, many years, and I've seen this die down quite a bit, and I'm glad because more people are becoming nuanced about this case.
Release the list.
Release the Epstein list.
There is no list.
It's not a real thing.
There's never a list of clientele in the sense that Jeffrey Epstein was regularly selling or receiving funds for passing off girls and of age women to other people.
That wasn't how it worked.
Okay?
You do have the compromise issue, the blackmail issue, but much rarer than you would think.
So what was really going on?
Well, in that case, first of all, I've said it before.
I'm going to say it again, and people need to realize this.
Epstein was a serial abuser for everything young girl, including their appearance and outfits, which is, again, something that has now been revealed over and over via these files.
We showed you, for instance, in one of our data dumps some of the outfits that Epstein liked to put on his girls.
We've discussed the emails, the internal emails over at the big banks via Jess Staley and others, where they're joking back and forth about Disney princesses and Disney princess outfits because that's something Epstein preferred.
Now, look, I'm not here to kink shame, especially in this regard.
If you are into the play and dress up thing, quite frankly, that's like a mild sort of thing to be into for most people.
It's the serial abuse, it's the compromise, it's the not only the arms deals, but the eugenics aspect of this as well, the power plays.
And I've talked about it before, just in the traditional sense of quote-unquote prostitution, the fact that you're buying people.
And if you don't think that Jeffrey Epstein literally bought people, I don't know that you know how the world works.
So we're going to go over the Amazon list.
What I find the most interesting on this list, and that would be the fact that he bought five copies of the book Filthy Rich, which I reported on again for years and years and years before anybody touched it for some reason.
And it was funny because it was written by a very famous author, James Patterson, with Mike Malloy.
And Patterson had a ton of nonfiction novels out there that many a housewife had read and loved, and he was generally well reviewed.
They gave this like a horrible review for the most part, at least the media did.
It was barely discussed, barely talked about.
And then on the flip side of that, Patterson himself would write another book with Bill Clinton.
Buddied up with Bill Clinton, Patterson did.
Molloy went on the record when asked whether or not he thought that Jeffrey Epstein was intelligence, and he said no, but I don't know if they ever really dug into that avenue.
I read that book.
I reported on that book.
In that book, it was one of the first to kind of lay out the relationship that Trump and Epstein had had because he was from that Florida region.
That's why Patterson says that he wrote the book because it was in the local media that all of this had happened.
And listen, that book had a lot of really great information in it that was accurate and correct information.
And the fact that Epstein bought five copies, well, you can't read five copies yourself.
Let's assume one was for Epstein and maybe not.
Who do the other four go to?
We're going to discuss that.
We're going to discuss another couple of these files.
Then we're going to break down this Fox News piece.
You know, last night I said that I was going to go live with the files again, and I just couldn't do it last night.
I don't know.
Maybe late, late night tonight, two days after Christmas.
That might be more my style.
I don't know.
I don't know how much Epstein I can really dig deep on on a Friday night, but we're not counting it out.
So this one's going to be a shorter video.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, share, ring that bell.
And remember, I can't do it without you.
I cannot do it without you.
I want to thank Lewis, Michael, Ryan, and others who have been supporting the broadcast.
$5, $10, $15, it means the world to me.
But yes, I know the holiday season is tailing down, but before the new year, I could really use some big donors.
Steve Bannon's Phone Revealed00:03:34
They're the ones that really keep this alive.
And again, I want to thrive, not just survive in this arena.
And hopefully we're going to do that together.
So I do want to thank everybody that has contributed to Truly Independent Media.
Big ups to marigoldresources.com.
They broker the sale of businesses.
They buy and sell them.
You know, not them actually, but they help people buy and sell them.
If you're in that game, go check them out at marigoldresources.com.
And then, of course, the River City Reader, RCREADER.com.
Truly Independent Media even has a print outlet here in the Quad Cities.
And give me a follow-on X for stories like this one.
So it's the first one we're going to hit.
Okay?
So this is an email exchange right here.
All right.
And from and to, we don't know.
We don't know.
But we do know that Steve Bannon is not only in pictures with Epstein, but those are framed in Epstein's residences, some of them, several of them, of him and Epstein.
He's laughing it up, Bannon, with Noam Chomsky, somebody who I really don't care for, obviously, and, you know, a guy who's railed against the Central Intelligence Agency and how they control narratives.
And here he is, buddy-buddy, with somebody that appears to be at least working with the agency in some regards and other agencies in some regards, all the way back to Iran-Contra, which was CIA heavy.
So I'm going to say this first.
You know, this picture right here, this could just be a public picture.
But you can see that it says GM photo on Bannon phone.
I hope you're well.
I'm helping out with the responsiveness review for the WBTW.
And I've been looking through Steve Bannon's iPhone 7 on Celebrate.
As I was going through the images from that phone, I found an image of Trump and Ghelain Maxwell on Bannon's phone.
See screenshot from Celebrate Attached.
I discussed with Sonny, and we wanted to flag this for you in case it was of any importance to you since you are on both cases.
Okay, so obviously, probably some kind of lawyer, probably on the Epstein end, but I don't know.
And there's numerous photographs of Ghelain Maxwell and Trump together.
And this could be just one from the public arena.
I do think it's interesting enough to cover, okay?
And then, of course, here we are.
And we've played this Creepfest video.
And this is really what we've been doing is going through a lot of these images.
His purchase history revealed.
And for me, again, a lot of this is kind of like salacious Johnny nonsense, but it does give you, you know, an idea on what the man was into.
You can read for yourself.
I don't, you know, it doesn't have to be an SNL skit right now for me to read this dietary supplement that was on the Epstein Amazon list.
Redacted Files Controversy00:15:16
And then he had a sonic massager from the Prostate Health Center.
We can all imagine what was going on there.
I'm not going to try to give you the visual image.
Like I talked about the ring dings.
We talked about the schoolgirl uniforms.
What did surprise me that there was a Slim Fit tuxedo that he ordered on Amazon?
Now, I don't know whether or not that's an actual tuxedo.
For the price, it probably is.
I don't know if it's necessarily a good one, but we've seen him in that like James Bond type tuxedo with Ghelain Maxwell in that one photograph.
And there it is right there.
Five copies of Filthy Rich.
And as I understand it, if you look, these seem to be from like 2017.
And I'm pretty sure it's 2016 or 17 that that book came out.
Let's see.
July of 2017, the tuxedo.
We see the Army binoculars.
Here's one of the nice little schoolgirl outfits right there.
He liked apple pies, chocolate Tootsie Pups, baby Ruth's chunky bars, chocolate-covered raisins, and nillow wafers.
Personally, couldn't care, but who knows?
Maybe that information cracks the Epstein case one day.
Very doubtful.
Now, I've mentioned this, you know, how meticulous he was.
How here's just some books that there are multiple copies of.
We went over this file.
We talked about how the DOJ said over a million files.
They're now saying 1.7 million files.
And Massey had a great comment on that.
He said, yeah, 1.7 million files for a trafficking network that didn't exist and it only involved two people.
Making a good case for himself right there.
All right.
That being said, we got this Fox news piece to break down.
And look, as far as Fox goes on this, it's pretty balanced, right?
It's not one of those, it's basically two people.
It's a host and a lawyer talking.
So it's not one of these panel pieces where everybody gets to chime in with some ignorant Johnny nonsense if they don't understand.
So let's watch this and break it down as it goes.
Give me the thumbs up.
By the way, give a comment down below.
What do you want to see next on the Epstein coverage?
The DOJ says that it has uncovered potentially over 1 million more Epstein-related files.
And so the Justice Department released this information on Wednesday, and this was potentially found by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI, and they are currently reviewing them for release.
And so, of course, we've been following this as the DOJ has since released thousands of new documents from the Epstein files yet earlier this week on Tuesday as well.
And so, to talk a little bit more about what we're seeing here with this potential new batch of files that the DOJ is going to be investigating, I want to bring into the conversation legal analyst Inima Romani.
Nima, thanks so much for being with us here on Live Now from Fox.
Thanks for having me, Christina.
And so, Nima, I have to first ask you here: when it comes to the Epstein files and the DOJ now saying they potentially have a million more files that need to be released, does this surprise you at any point?
What does this all mean now that they've said this?
1.7 mil.
1.7 mil, dog.
Christina, I wish I could say I'm surprised, but this is another continued embarrassment for the Department of Justice.
We are now one week removed from the December 19th deadline for the DOJ to produce the Epstein files, and obviously they have not met that deadline, at least in full.
Now they're saying there's another million documents that have yet to be reviewed.
Let's not forget that Attorney General Pam Bondi earlier this year said that the Epstein files were sitting on her desk just waiting review.
She promised to make them public well before the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
Well, it seems like she didn't even have a full sense of the Epstein files because I doubt she had a million documents sitting on her desk.
And we're talking about the Southern District of New York.
These.
Let me just stop you.
I don't know that Pam Bondi has a full sense of the hair products that she uses.
And I guarantee you she pays damn well attention to those.
And I talked about this.
You know, I talked about this not only in her regard, but Patel's regard and all these other people.
I never, ever, heard anything besides surface level Johnny nonsense that was in the general arena that was extremely partisan and did not delve into the heart of the issue.
The arms dealer part, the Central Intelligence Agency part, the Mossad part, the transhuman part, the globalism part, like major parts.
You know, just with the arms dealing alone, you're also talking about the integration of the military-industrial complex and the royal family since its inception.
Andrew the arms dealer.
Those important parts.
Never heard.
So to think that any of these jackasses on the inside of the administration really had any idea other than the talking points, I haven't seen the evidence for it.
Are the career prosecutors who prosecuted Epstein the second time in 2019?
So of course they would have more documents.
It's really shocking how disorganized and frankly late the DOJ has been.
And they continue to, whether it's in terms of the redactions or delays or withholding documents outright, fail to follow the law.
So it's very disappointing that those that are tasked to enforce the law can't even follow the law.
I hope they can get their act together soon in the coming weeks.
And Nima, as we're talking about, I want to put up that statement that the Justice Department actually put out on their own ex-account talking about this, saying the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the FBI have informed the Department of Justice that they have uncovered over a million more documents potentially related to the Jeffrey Epstein case.
The DOJ has received these documents from the Southern District of New York and the FBI to review them for release and compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, existing statutes and judicial orders.
We have lawyers who are working around the clock to review and make the legally required redactions to protect those victims.
And we will release the documents as soon as possible.
So let's just stop it while she reads it.
No, this should have been going on from the very actually before the Epstein Transparency Act.
But once that went into play, this should have been minute one, hour one, all this stuff.
So they're already again, they failed to meet the deadline.
They failed to obey the law.
Now, you talk about some of the redactions that they're legally required.
I've seen a lot of people out there just showing documents or photographs that were already in the public arena that they redacted on top of it.
All right.
And yes, some of them are like a picture of the victim, but it's nothing sexually explicit.
And that victim has, quote unquote, been public about this for some time.
So, again, we want all the public records and we want the minimum amount of redactions.
Due to the mass volume of material, this process may take a few more weeks.
The department will continue to fully comply with federal law and President Trump's direction to release the files.
Nima, I have to ask you because it is interesting.
You mentioned it.
It was that deadline one week ago that the Epstein files were supposed to be released underneath the Epstein Transparency Act that President Trump signed.
Is it not interesting that this comes about after that, that they say they found these million more documents?
Will we be able to know any true timeline of when they were discovered, or is it likely that this information is going to stay behind doors there with the Justice Department?
I don't think we'll know.
And for folks that don't understand, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York is part of the Department of Justice.
Those are Department of Justice prosecutors.
And if you're looking at where the Epstein files exist, you'd look to New York, you'd look to Miami.
Those are the U.S. Attorney's Office that prosecuted Epstein.
Now, he's right, but the fact of the matter is that they went to the island as well, Little St. James, and yes, there's documents there as well, but they never investigated Zoro Ranch in New Mexico, and there'd be plenty of files in New Mexico or overseas into the Paris apartment.
And we already know that they never investigated Epstein's office, which he had on Little St. James.
So the fact that you now have a million documents that had previously been unaccounted for leads me to believe that this search was not done in a timely manner.
And those that conducted the search really did not do their job, because this should have been done weeks ago.
Now you're stuck in a situation where the DOJ is further embarrassed.
Some people will believe it's a cover-up, all of this delay.
It just adds fuel to the fire.
Those that are watching and who are on social media believe that this is all a cover-up to protect billionaires and politicians.
So now you have this embarrassing situation where career prosecutors at the DOJ are being asked to work over the holidays to try to do these redactions and review these documents that frankly, should have been done weeks ago, maybe even months ago, when the Department OF Justice, Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, they promised to make the Epstein files public well before the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
So this should have already been done.
Now you have further delays.
You have more documents.
You have redactions, pages, hundreds of pages that are redacted entirely.
One other important deadline that we really should be talking about, Christina, is going to be in early January.
That is when the DOJ is supposed to.
And let's just stop that one here.
So here's something that's really odd to me.
I have not seen that file in the documents blurred out in that way.
In fact, none of the files are blurred out in that way.
This is a file with Leslie Wexner.
What is Fox doing blurring out Leslie Wexner and others sitting next to Epstein?
They weren't blurring out other people's photographs before next to Epstein.
Very bizarre.
Just very bizarre in this piece alone.
Provide a log of any documents that are withheld or redacted.
That will allow House Democrats to potentially challenge those redactions by filing a lawsuit in court.
And a judge may have to sort through this to say, hey, are these redactions all warranted?
Because if you look at the Epstein Files Transparency Act, there are only three categories of documents that can be redacted or withheld.
Those are documents identifying victims of sex abuse, any documents showing sex abuse, that would essentially be child pornography, and anything related to an ongoing investigation.
And we know that the DOJ issued a memo this summer in July saying there's no legal basis to charge any third parties related to the Epstein files.
So I hope the DOJ isn't withholding documents on that basis, although Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche did say the DOJ was going to assert privilege last weekend.
That would be very disappointing if true.
And let's not forget, there also seem to be a subsection in there dealing with quote-unquote national security.
Well, I'm glad you mentioned that because that was my next question.
Where do we go from here with the files that have been released?
Those heavy redactions have been a conversation not only on social media, but also happening in other forms as well.
Many journalists have been critical of this as well.
But when it comes to that, and you said there's a date that's going to be happening in January there, they can kind of challenge that.
I was wondering if we were going to have to wait if there was going to be another administration to go back through.
Are some of these things sort of, is there another path, I should say, to figure out what's in some of the files that haven't been released?
There is a path, and that would be to file a lawsuit to compel the full production.
And then what would happen is a federal judge, a district judge, would have to sort through these redactions himself or herself or appoint a special master to do so.
That's how you challenge redactions because obviously we don't know what we don't know.
But a judge can review the files in camera.
That's a Latin term that means outside the presence of the parties and the public to determine whether these redactions are warranted.
I could tell you, Christina, I think they are excessive.
And this is why there's at least two categories of information that I've seen that appear to be redacted that shouldn't be redacted.
The first is grand jury materials.
And the judges that have considered this issue have ruled that the Epstein Files Transparency Act trumps, no pun intended, any secrecy that grand jury materials typically have under the rules of criminal procedure.
Those materials should not be redacted.
The other thing I see is heavily redacted.
The names of assistant U.S. attorneys, federal prosecutors, those names are being redacted.
Again, there's not a legal basis to do so unless they are a victim of sex abuse, which is high.
Let me say that again.
So, like, if you're going back to the documents in Palm Beach and there's deals being cut with, say, Andrew Acosta, Andrew Acosta's name is also blacked out.
Huh.
How about that?
Just some of the redactions are blatantly in your face and they have nothing to do with protecting the victims.
Contempt Orders Reviewed00:04:23
Highly unlikely.
Again, these redactions seem excessive.
They seem outside of those three categories that I've talked about: victims, child pornography, and ongoing investigations, which I don't think there are any.
So I wouldn't be surprised if at some point a lawsuit is filed and a judge reviews these redactions and determines that they are excessive and unwarranted.
And Nima, speaking of some of those redactions and lawsuits that could potentially be filed, we do know that the Democratic rep Roquana of California says that he and the Republican rep Thomas Massey of Kentucky are going to be bringing charges of inherent contempt of Congress against Attorney General Pam Bondi.
The two congressmen made that, of course, they were the one who sponsored the bill on the Epstein files.
And they were also talking about potentially making this a larger thing against Attorney General Bondi.
I have to ask you, what does that ultimately mean?
And if charges of inherent contempt?
Well, what it ultimately means, and he's going to tell you, I'm sure, is they're also talking about an impeachment.
And then, you know, I don't know that we're ever going to get to criminal charges since we can't get accountability on anything.
But thankfully, the Epstein issue is the one, the one issue that has brought the traditional quote-unquote left and right together.
And people like myself that have been railing against this for a very long time are at least happy that this information is now part of the mainstream narrative as much as they try to cover it up.
Here in contempt of Congress, what potentially does that going to do for Attorney General Pam Bondi?
Roe's one of the best.
I know him personally.
He's a lawyer as well.
And that's certainly one route that he can go to.
That's the political route.
I think the challenge with contempt of Congress is typically those contempt orders, they are enforced by the Department of Justice.
So there's not a whole lot that's going to happen.
Obviously, it'll be a big deal politically.
Folks are talking about potential articles of impeachment against Bondi.
We'll see if that happens as well.
I really do think, though, Christina, the better route, the more effective route would be a lawsuit because then you have the judiciary.
And when you're talking about the judiciary, Article 3, their job really, in many ways, is to deal with disputes between the legislature, Article 1, and the executive, Article 2.
That's what we're dealing with here.
The important thing.
Take a look at that.
There are no more files.
Case closed.
Six months later, after Representative Tommy Massey, Thomas Massey, and Epstein Transparent Acts, there are a million files.
No, 1.7, apparently.
Involving the judges, the judge can also rule on these redactions, determine whether they are legal and appropriate or not.
That's not something that can happen through contempt or impeachment proceedings.
If this is an issue of public trust and transparency, the American people, members of the media, we deserve the full Epstein files.
That was what was promised to us by Donald Trump when he was candidate, when Attorney General Bondi was appointed.
Same with the director of the FBI.
Those promises have not been fulfilled.
So this is an issue of public trust.
This is an issue of transparency.
And I believe that a judge needs to get involved to compel the Department of Justice to do their job and follow the law.
I think that type of order will be more effective than a contempt of Congress order, in my humble opinion.
It is something that we're going to continue to watch.
Right there.
Today, the DOJ claims the Epstein Maxwell file exceeds 1.7 million documents.
And they still expect you to believe this only involves two guilty people.
Folks, I think that's a good spot to wrap this one up.
Give it a thumbs up, subscribe, share, ring the bell.
Please check out all my documentary films for free.
If you are new, and about half the audience every day is new to this broadcast, Shade the Motion Picture and Invisible Empire and New World Order to find.
Burmese Brigade Keeps It Alive00:00:58
Those are the large-scale, what's going on in the world films that I've done that are well over a decade old, okay, at this point and hold up.
You want to learn about 9-11, Loose Change Final Cut, and Fabled Enemies.
It's all down below in that playlist section, documentary films.
I need your support.
There are no paychecks.
The Burmese Brigade is keeping it alive.
$5, $10, $15, big donations.
Thank you so much.
We're looking for a couple of those before the new year.
Do want to give a big shout out to Lewis, Ryan, Michael, and others, all of you guys out there, even those that have contributed via the super chats and beyond.