Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more ETH - 0x90b9288AF0E40F8C90604460973743dBC91dA680
Watch My Documentaries:
https://rokfin.com/stack/1339/Documentaries--Jason-Bermas
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on X
https://x.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
Patriot TV - https://patriot.tv/bermas/
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior Show less
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery, we need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
I'm a human being!
God damn it.
My life has value.
You have meddled with the primal forces of nature.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men.
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
You're beautiful.
I love you.
Yes.
You're beautiful.
Thank you.
Ha ha.
Showtime.
It's time to buckle up for making sense of the madness.
And who loves you and who do you love?
Hey, everybody, Jason Burmese here.
And these email dumps that are now publicly available and supposedly there is more to come really do have an insight that most people still cannot comprehend.
And I say that because today we are going to highlight a email exchange between Stacey Plaskett and Jeffrey Epstein.
And I'm sorry, not an email exchange, but a text message exchange, okay?
That allegedly took place during a congressional hearing where Michael Cohen, the former lawyer of Donald Trump and one of the main players that helped try to take him down, okay, while he's there, just before Plaskett is going to ask him questions, you know who's feeding the questions to Plasket?
Jeffrey Epstein in 2019.
Now, we're going to also highlight some other things about Plasket in this, but the overarching question is, is this the norm in Washington, D.C., in governments around the world, that not only do you have people like Epstein, when I say people like Epstein, I mean the billionaire class.
I mean the predator class.
I mean abusers and what they think are owners of other human individuals.
Do they really run things this way?
And we're also going to highlight the fact that the media continues to make the narrative about these email drops for the most part because I believe it's the Washington Post that put out the Plasket stuff.
Okay, and kudos to them for doing so.
The narrative continues to be that Donald Trump knew Donald Trump is littered in the files, and that's why Donald Trump is covering it up.
Now, I have a totally different take on it.
Now, these emails don't make anybody look good, and they certainly don't make Trump look good.
Not in the narrative spin that he knew and did nothing, because that narrative has been eviscerated time and time and time again by Bradley Edwards, who said he was the only one of significance working with him.
And, you know, you can generate from that because other investigations ensued that law enforcement did use that information.
And because I say that, some people are saying, oh, you're MAGA, you're a Trump apologist.
Show me the evidence he committed crimes.
I'm all over it.
I've already covered the fact that in this email exchange, again, the latest news, because years ago I covered the fact they were friends, people denied it, that Epstein traveled on Trump's plane, people denied it, that Trump was quoted as saying that he liked his girls young, people denied it.
Again, you can never appease people with the truth.
You can only appease them with their deluded narratives.
But I'm open, right?
Show me the money.
Haven't seen it in that regard.
Now, in the latest dumps, we talked about a model that Epstein said he was dating back in 93 that he quote unquote gave to Trump after the fact.
So again, this is somebody of age.
Epstein surrounded himself with these women.
If you don't think along the way, especially seeing as some of Epstein's other quote unquote ex-girlfriends and who they get married off to, Dubin, for instance, Glenn Dubin, then you don't know how this works or really did work.
Because I have also continued to try to tell people, and kudos to Mike Benz.
He just did like an almost 90-minute breakdown where these emails coincide with like the same exact things that I've been saying.
Is that, yeah, Epstein was a serial abuser.
Most of these girls that were underage were teenagers.
You know, I just saw Megan Kelly trying to differentiate the idea of eight-year-olds and 14-year-olds.
And yes, there's a differentiation there.
But I'll always go to the fact that you don't know how far Epstein went.
Okay.
You know, the average age of a lot of his victims were in those teenage years.
But Nick Bryant, for instance, that's really dug into this case, has said, you know, via the victims fund, there was at least one person, and maybe even the Palm Beach investigation, don't hold me to it, that was 10 years old.
But they didn't fit the criteria.
And obviously, with the Palm Beach case, they only went with the one 14-year-old.
All that's enough for me to say Creepola should be in prison for the rest of his life.
And we see how the sweetheart deal and the co-conspirators were treated.
But this new narrative surrounding the TDS factor, that this is all about Trump.
No, the real story is that Epstein was working with politicians and journalists to try to take Trump down.
I mean, as early as his first run, that's, to me, again and again and again, what I've seen with Michael Wolfe's relationship, okay?
With the relationship with this Thomas Langdon Jr. from the New York Times, all that screams it.
You look at even the relationship with Peter Thiel.
We know almost nothing about it other than Thiel's kind of denial that they had one.
And then you have the Bannon stuff, which, you know, generally has not been fleshed out more, only that they obviously had communications and Bannon is sitting on, I said eight hours the other day.
It's been reported up to 15 hours of videos of Epstein.
And we also reported on the fact that Epstein was trying to reform his reputation, if you will.
All of which are in these emails.
So these headlines of Trump bad and Trump new are extremely misleading, extremely deceptive.
We're going to show you a couple of video clips of the mainstream.
I'm teetering on whether or not we're going to play this TMZ clip of Harvey, you know, the head, because I really want to discern how the media is pointing out real things,
but then the spin of it all without the information or letting the audience know that, again, Trump did speak to victims' lawyers, and it wasn't like he just kept it to himself and this spin that he was holding it close to his chest and he knew and he was helping cover it up.
It just now he's helping cover it up.
You bet he is.
Like now, 100%.
But for the reasons that they're saying, I think it's a lot of Johnny nonsense.
You let me know what you think in the live stream comments.
Remember, we'll take your super chats if you got them.
In the comments down below after the fact, let's get the thumbs up, subscribe if you're new.
About half of our audience is always new.
So we'd love for you to subscribe or ring that bell.
Again, this is a show that's going beyond the mainstream talking points, beyond the left-right narratives, and into the truth of the matter that this guy literally helped get someone elected to Congress and literally, as they're trying to take Trump out, is literally texting her what to say.
And is that the norm?
Is that how influence operations work when it's not about blackmail, but instead curating congressmen, curating politicians, helping them on their rise?
That's why we've been hyper-critical, you know, speaking to the Trump administration, of the relationship between Peter Thiel and not only Trump, but JD Vance, right?
So look, if you want to support the broadcast, we need you now more than ever.
Truly do need you.
$5, $10, $15.
It means the world to me.
It was so much easier when we had these talk shows with paychecks and producers.
Now we're back to grassroots, big donations.
You know, it's the holiday season.
I just got a Christmas list from my niece.
We could use you.
There's also a PayPal link down below.
I do want to remind people that the good people at Marigold Resources do support the broadcast and marigoldresources.com.
If you're buying or selling a business, my man McGreevy has you covered.
He also runs the River City Reader, rcreader.com.
Sent me some interesting stuff on NASA and Mars today that we may cover in a later video.
And give me the follow-on X.
It looks like we actually did get about 30 or 40 followers for some reason in the last few days.
It may be because of the Epstein stuff.
I just don't know.
Let's get into it.
Epstein was texting U.S. House member during 2019 hearing with Michael Cohen.
All right.
Now, let me emphasize how important this is.
Oh, we did a little bit of that.
Thanks for getting in the comments section, everybody.
We're going to talk about the donations in a minute, but this is somebody that is so hungry for power that not only are they working with somebody that everybody knows is nefarious, everybody knows is notorious, even if you're in that region, in that world, before their arrest in Palm Beach.
So before, well before 2010, right?
2008, 2009, all those cases.
All right?
You already know.
Now, you already know by 2019 that there have been books and lawsuits and headlines, right?
I mean, we've covered so much Epstein in that 2017 to 2019 time period and really beyond, especially after the arrest, that just prior to the arrest, Epstein is texting this woman, okay?
Texting this woman.
And we're going to show you the video of when it's going down.
Then we're going to read this article to try and take Trump down as to what to ask Cohen.
So here's the actual moment of this woman taking texts from Jeffrey Epstein.
You stand behind that offer.
If the chairman asks me, and it's, I'll take it under advisement now, and it's not a problem in terms of attorney claim privilege.
Yes, I will turn it over.
You, as my friend Mr. Meadows, pointed out, misled this committee even today in a written submission that contradicted your testimony.
You have suggested you are going to review that.
Did you review it?
Are you going to review it in our next break to correct the record?
Yes or no?
Yes.
Question: You helped out the president's campaign or were involved in the campaign as a representative, as a spokesman, even in your words today.
It was your idea for the campaign dating back to 2011.
Is that accurate?
Yes or no?
Yes.
2011 is a year that sticks in my head.
For it's the year my daughter was born.
See her with a little head down?
See what we got going on there?
Hmm?
Hmm?
It was the year I was diagnosed with cancer.
I was not then pushing.
And by the way, because a little thing came up, you know, she's actually sitting next to Ro Conna.
We may do a watch along with Thomas Massey, Ro Khanna, and that Caitlin Clark, little Leslie, you know, the new mainstream Leslie.
But let's read some of this.
Okay.
What was going down in here?
Okay.
So the text messages indicate that Epstein may have been watching the hearing live, you think?
A little thing called C-SPAN.
Although the name of the person he was messaging was redacted from the released records, the contours of the conversation bears an odd resemblance to the events unfolding on the House floor.
Mr. Epstein asks whether the person on the other end of the text exchange is chewing gum.
Ms. Plaskett in the House stops misticking.
Not anymore.
The unnamed person replies to Epstein.
I love it when people sleuth it out, like actually do the work.
Okay.
At one point, Mr. Epstein mentions Rona, referring or keeper of secrets.
The unnamed person immediately responds, quick, I'm up next.
Is that an acronym?
He goes, that's his assistant, Mr. Epstein said.
A short time later on the House floor, Delegate Plaskett asked Mr. Cohen, who is answering questions about persons close to Donald Trump.
What is Mr. Miss Rona's position?
Good work, Jeffrey Epstein texts in his unnamed conversation partner.
Shortly after Plaskett has asked the question, good work, says my lackey in Congress.
Okay?
It's just, it's wild.
When she returned his campaign contributions, remember she was forced to return these.
Mere months after the hearing, Ms. Plaskett sought to distance herself from Mr. Epstein, explaining the donations by denying personal knowledge of the contributions.
Okay?
Again, cartoon world.
Maximum amounts allowed.
How Jeffrey Epstein's political donations won him his island and a powerful ally.
So again, they just, I didn't know anything.
After the pressure goes on, returns the, I didn't know he helped get her elected, okay, and then was using that power to sway a congressional hearing.
Now, here is at an RFK junior hearing a couple years ago.
I think it's Kat Kamack bringing up Stacey Plaskett and her taking all this money from Epstein and knowing it.
They know it.
I have to bring this up, and since the door was opened, you know, I'm deeply concerned about the fact that there were FEC reports brought up.
Mr. Kennedy, you acknowledge that you don't know where those came from.
You said that you have no affiliation with those.
That PAC, that super PAC, I believe.
The ranking member said she was deeply concerned about the affiliation.
And we seem to have a guilty by association theme going on here.
And so I just have to state for the record that I myself am deeply concerned about the affiliation of the convicted sex trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein, of which the ranking member took campaign donation money from.
So I think that's the beauty of the First Amendment: we have a right to say what we want to say, but we also have the right to be offended.
And look, again, and I know I'll get some flacks for daring to bring this up.
But in 2015, when Epstein again is actively trying to take down Trump's campaign, saying things like he's the only one that can take Trump down, that's later on during the Russiagate stuff.
I mean, literally saying these things in the emails and talking to Wolf.
Let's see, do I still have the, I still have the, it's about a pile of money.
Everything's about a pile.
So I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money.
And he can't wait to talk to his buddy Jeffrey Epstein, who's been talking to for years before 2017 when he's doing the book for a pile of money.
So again, one of the things that Donald Trump was honest about and I liked was the fact that he talked about buying politicians.
He literally said, okay, it's no secret that Donald Trump is rich and it's no surprise that money influences politics.
But few political candidates, let alone presidential contenders, speak about it with as much candor and openness as Donald Trump.
You think?
I will tell you our system is broken.
I gave to many people before this.
Before two months ago, I was a businessman.
I gave to everybody.
When they call, I give.
And you know what?
When I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them.
They are there for me.
That's a broken system.
Okay.
And Rand Paul, again, we like Rand, called him out.
That's what's wrong.
Trump buys and sells politicians of all stripes.
Correct.
Correct.
Okay.
Now, to show you the type of politician that Stacey Plaskett is, you can only imagine how awesome she was during the COVID-19 44 nightmare.
Keynote speaker over at this school.
This is from June of 21.
Maybe she should be wearing two of those bad boys, huh?
Sounds good.
Sounds like the deal.
Now, again, the spin is that Trump's awful.
And now Bondi has announced investigations into the Democrats in there.
How about Stacey Plaskett?
Like Stacey Plaskett should be investigated, but they're going to make it about right, left.
They're going to make it all about Trump.
Okay.
And I think we're going to do the TMZ guy first.
But we're going to do it with the thing showing here on the side.
We'll do it like that.
So it's a little bit, hopefully I don't get it pulled.
Because I want to break down what he says.
All right.
Because I think there's a lot of truth in it.
But all the spin that it starts with is Trump is covering this up because he's in the files.
I'm going to tell you something about my relationship with Donald Trump that tells me he knew a lot about what Jeffrey Epstein was doing back in the day.
So let's just start with these emails where Epstein says that Donald Trump was the dog that didn't bark, meaning Donald Trump knew something that was bad because Epstein even references cops in that email.
So this is not an innocuous thing that Donald Trump knew but hadn't yet talked about.
Let's stop.
So in 2011, remember, first of all, there are no criminal cases until the SDNY picks him up in 2019 during that decade-plus time period.
Okay.
Everything was a civil suit.
It took journalists, well, journalist Nick Bryant to release the partial flight logs and the black book to even get that into the media arena.
And I believe it was through that black book that he called and contacted all those people.
Again, Trump only person to work with these individuals.
Now, we also have that documentation that Jeffrey Epstein was providing information to the FBI after the Palm Beach case.
All right.
So there's a good possibility in 2011 because, you know, again, there are no criminal charges against Epstein until much later.
That, yeah, Trump never went directly to the police.
And at that time, there's no idea, there's no way to know whether law enforcement got in touch with him or if the SDNY did ever after the fact.
So again, this spin that he, oh, he was covering up that he knew.
Again, if you were paying attention, we all knew Trump knew.
At least, again, the ones that aren't like totally TDS on one side or Trump worship syndrome, TWS, on the other.
It's bad.
And then you have Epstein sending an email to Ghelane Maxwell back in 2011 saying that Donald Trump spent hours at his house and that with a with one of the victims.
It was Virginia Juffre.
And Ghelane says, yeah, I've been thinking about that.
Well, the reason they're thinking about it is because, you know, Virginia Roberts was really at the forefront of naming the names and being on the inside as one of the top quote-unquote girls and one of the girls that was abused as a teenager.
And one of the girls, again, that was farmed out to Curry favor and possibly blackmail, but certainly Curry Favor with powerful individuals who she alleges are Ahud Barak and people like Prince Andrew, of course.
So once again, like this email, like the way that they're, you know, the connotation is that it's something nefarious on Trump.
Don't see it.
So there's no evidence in these emails that Donald Trump himself did anything wrong.
But there is clear evidence that Donald Trump knew some of what Jeffrey Epstein was doing.
And some of it was bad enough that the cops were involved.
So now my relationship.
Before we even get into that, remember, the evidence also shows Trump did cut him off in the social arena.
These emails do reference the Mar-a-Lago incident.
Trump's talked about him poaching people from there.
One of them, allegedly, Virginia Roberts, right?
The business deals, the real estate deals, all of that has been discussed.
He certainly, as far as I know, didn't take any campaign contributions from Jeffrey Epstein.
I knew Donald Trump for many, many years.
When he was doing The Apprentice and I was starting out with Celebrity Justice back in 2002, you know, all the way through the time when he became president, we talked on the phone a lot.
And he was a gossip.
He loved to gossip.
And I don't think that's a bad thing.
I mean, a lot of people gossip.
He loved it.
And look, I don't think I'm the only person who was saying this.
I mean, people who knew him, you know, reporters, you know, he just loved to gossip.
And I have to say that when you deal with him personally, he is a very charming, personable, and even funny guy.
See, here he's being, I think, 100% honest.
You know, Trump was a mover and shaker.
I remember watching those stern appearances.
He very, very much loved to gossip.
But the insinuation is that because of this, obviously he knew much more about Epstein than he shared.
No, he did share it.
Again, did he highlight the fact that they were best buddies for years?
No, these documents don't make anybody look good.
Like, I'm actually surprised that I haven't seen the Trump sloppy seconds memes on the girlfriend comment.
But again, they don't want to highlight any behavior or activity that's still legal.
And, you know, that was kind of our relationship when I would call him about a story or whatever.
And so, you know, I'll give you an example.
You know, I remember there was one time when Donald Trump, I was actually in his office and he pointed out the window to a building and he said, I'm not going to name the name, the person, because I have no idea whether this is true or not, but a very famous person would bring women to that, the apartment building and have sex with them.
So that was a gratuitous comment that had nothing to do with why I was there, but he just liked to gossip.
Again, you know, the way that they frame it after the fact is the dangerous part.
Now, I'm going to play, where is it?
Right here, this, at least the first two or three minutes, because here CNN gets to use real talking points about the Trump administration and Pam Bondi and Kash Patel and their podcast tour and how they were going to reveal everything and then not, but again, associate it with Orange Man Bat and Donald Trump.
He's obviously culpable and he knew.
My shorty now is New York Democratic Congressman Dan Goldman.
He's a member of the House Judiciary, Homeland Security Committee is a former federal prosecutor.
So Congressman, the White House says these emails prove nothing.
Clearly, they raise questions.
Do you think they do prove anything?
They absolutely prove something, which is that Donald Trump knew about Jeffrey Epstein's underage sex trafficking ring.
And I say that because I point to the 2011 email with Ghylaine Maxwell, where Jeffrey Epstein wrote to Ghylaine about the dog that hasn't barked, Donald Trump, and that he spent hours with Virginia Duffrey in his house.
And Ghislaine Maxwell says, I have been thinking about that.
Now, the reason why that...
I mean, again, think about the spin that they're putting on that.
Not that Trump knew of the activity and they, you know, had hoped that he didn't go to anybody.
The Virginia Guffray Roberts stuff in particular, but now it's all he was hiding it because of the relationship.
And then they go to the pictures of Epstein with him, with Trump with his kids.
To me, stands out is that these are two co-conspirators discussing something that would be detrimental to their own case.
It would be admissible in court because of that.
And it's in 2011 before Donald Trump was running for president, or you could claim that Jeffrey Epstein was trying to get him back.
And so that just confirms what we have suspected from the 2002 50th birthday letter and the 2003 quote of Donald Trump, where he said that he knows Jeffrey Epstein likes girls on the younger side.
And it further confirms that those DOJ Epstein files are going to be full of references to Donald Trump.
I mean, think again of the spin.
Yeah, they're full of references to Trump because Epstein's actively trying to take him out, right?
And he's constantly being asked by Langdon, the journalist, I think Krasner, somebody who no one else has talked about, that journalist, and Michael Wolf about Trump specifically.
It's just so disingenuous, but at the same time, that they can bring up like all those things about Trump talking about how Epstein liked him on the young side.
That's all real.
Maybe it's benign.
Maybe it's his knowledge of it.
Maybe it's more.
But there is no question that what we have seen over the last six months is a massive cover-up effort by Donald Trump to prevent the release of the DOJ's Epstein files.
That's real.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
Trump is the one that has said no, But again, before he got in, I was extremely skeptical that he would be allowed because President or not doesn't seem to have the real power.
And even if he did, who knows what a lot of his buddies over the year might be guilty of.
And not only buddies, the system in general.
Again, Epstein equals arms dealer.
Prince Andrew equals arms dealer.
A hood Barak equals arms dealer.
Don't want to talk about that aspect.
It's not just the blackmail, the spies, the Mossad, the Israeli angle.
They're not talking about the Saudi Arabian one either.
A lot of arms deals with Saudi Arabia.
You know, the Saudi Arabian address and identity on the fake passport that Epstein had.
As opposed to these files from the estate.
Do you believe that that is why, you know, Kash Patel looked like a deer in headlights soon after becoming the FBI director when for months he'd been on podcasts before having any actual power, talking about, you know, really getting those files that got to be released.
It's all up to the FBI director.
It's the people in power who are keeping it.
And then as soon as he's in power, suddenly he's singing a different tune along with Dan Bongino.
Absolutely.
You hit the nail on the head, Anderson.
And again, you're lobbing these guys softballs, just like lobbing them up.
Well, it's like batting practice because all that's real because Patel is weak and Bongino is weak.
And it's not really their fault because they're being told what to do and they are being told what to do from above.
And they were just really naive and quite frankly, not fit for those positions.
I don't know who exactly would be fit because at the end of the day, if Trump is in on the cover-up, which he seems to be, which he seems to be at the heart of, because he can't release that stuff, anyone he put in those position would be doing the same thing.
Kash Patel and Dan Bongino spent all of 2024 harping on a conspiracy theory about the Epstein files and how they need to be released right away.
Pambondi then pretends or says that she's releasing the Epstein files in February.
And then when called out and said, no, you're not releasing anything new, she made a big hullabaloo about how Kash Patel had not given her anything and she wants it on her desk in the next day in a memo about what happened.
A memo?
Listen, guys, again, I don't know exactly where this is going to end and what exactly we're going to get.
Massey is the man.
Massey is the man.
And they're not mentioning Massey enough.
He's the guy that's really pushed this forward, is the reason we have this new documentation, is the reason that we have a lot of insight into Epstein during that Trump era and how he was actively trying to take him out.
I mean, this, and again, owning politicians, literally owning their asses.
And we have little small glimpses.
This is showing more.
Imagine what's going to be revealed about the bankers, the JP Morgans, the Staleys of the world.
It's coming.
We're going to be doing a lot of shows on this.
There's going to be a lot of media spin.
So if you liked what you saw, thumbs it up, subscribe and share.
Check out all the documentary films for free in the links down below.
And please consider supporting the broadcast.
$5, $10, $15.
It absolutely means the world to me.
Big donors.
We need you now more than ever.
Again, it was sweet in the days of paychecks and networks.
We're on our own yet again.
It is the Burmese Brigade that keeps it alive because, folks, it is not about left or right.