All Episodes
Previous Next
May 13, 2025 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
52:45
Are The Dead Speaking In Court? No It's Just Artificial Insanity
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery, we need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
Silence!
The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
You've got to say, "I'm a human being!" God damn it!
My life has value!
You have meddled with the primal forces of nature!
Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men, machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
Yeah, thank you.
You're beautiful.
I love you.
Yes.
You're beautiful.
Thank you.
Ha-ha.
It's showtime.
It's time to buckle up for making sense of the madness.
And who loves you?
And who do you love?
Everybody, Jason Bermas here, and today we're going to be talking about artificial intelligence, not only in a courtroom setting, but also being utilized in a manner, in my opinion, that is totally egregious, totally dehumanizing, and you're going to hear people make the argument for the other side that this is actually humanizing.
And extremely, and I mean extremely dangerous on a multitude of levels, whether you realize it or acknowledge it or not.
And what am I discussing?
I am discussing the recent use of an AI-created facsimile.
Facsimile of a dead man.
Who was killed in a road rage incident.
Now let me pull it back for a second.
Obviously, I am not cold-hearted.
Obviously, I sympathize with the families of the victim who was killed in this incident.
As somebody who has experienced both sides of road rage.
Not that I've ever gotten out of the car and tried to physically get in an altercation.
I know how things can get out of hand quickly.
And I mean quickly.
The fact that somebody lost their life over an incident that did not have to happen sucks.
Sucks.
However, what was represented and presented in court was not this woman's brother.
And why do I say this woman?
The sister of the victim is really at the forefront of this digital creation of her late brother as an impact statement through her husband who had had experience utilizing AI.
Now, I'm also going to go to your questions and comments on this at the end of the broadcast, so keep it on topic.
If we're talking about artificial intelligence, the court system, and really what amounts to transhumanism, because what you're seeing here is the very first, I would say, legally recognized instances of what the establishment would call digital twins.
Now, this, of course, is not a digital twin, but it is taking us along these steps.
Where all of a sudden, artificial intelligence is going to be able to recreate you to a large degree.
And that's not just your physical appearance, your auditory tone.
They are looking to get to the very minutia of your behavior, attitude, actions, demeanor, etc.
And no matter how far they get, I assure you, it is not you.
And it should never represent you or another human being.
But you see, these are the steps that they must take you along if they also want to convince you that you can upload your consciousness.
And we are now in an accelerated pace for this technology.
Unfortunately, In a public arena of vast, vast mental illness, of vast victimhood mentality, of vast, vast technological adoption.
And that's why we talk about this kind of stuff on this program constantly.
I want to thank Patriot.TV for getting that message out because, like I say at the end of every program, This is not a left-right issue.
It is about right and wrong, and I'm sorry, all right?
As horrific and egregious as what happened to this individual was, it is not right to use artificial intelligence in this manner in the court system, hands down, bar none, game over.
Now, if you disagree with me, well, please say so in the comments.
Like I said, we're going to go there.
What we're going to do here We are going to go to a local Fox News piece on this matter.
We're going to come back, talk about it a little bit, and then we're going to play the whole impact statement.
You'll see parts of the impact statement right here, for sure.
But it actually leads with a part of the impact statement.
I want to play the whole thing so you can feel the manipulation.
You can feel the heartstrings on something that is not a human.
And this, you know, I don't use the terminology a lot, is extremely, extremely problematic.
All right.
Folks, as you know, I need your support now more than ever.
70,000 plus subscribers, literally less than 30 people watching the program.
Demonetized.
On YouTube, the one way that I used to be able to make a living almost half a decade ago when it was fully demonetized.
I do want to thank Jimmy, Hedvika, Patsy, Costello.
Could not, could not do without you.
Five, ten, fifteen dollars.
It does mean the world to me.
Big donors.
Please, we need you now more than ever.
Also, give me a follow over on X. The last time I told you to give me a follow on X, we were about...
Three away from 47,100.
This is how it works on social media for me.
I lost 50 followers since then.
I'm constantly losing followers unless I'm on the grind.
The algorithm doesn't like Jason Burma.
So if you want to see the raw stories, if you want to see stuff that we have not yet covered here, like this individual who should be in prison for the rest of his life, a nice little sign I saw over the weekend.
An artificial intelligence deepfake that I think is hilarious, especially when being presented as such.
Please, go give me a follow over on X. Again, algorithmically, the major social media platforms, they see my name, it's over.
It's over.
There's no growth.
There's no monetized opportunities.
I rely...
On the people that actually give a damn about the information.
Okay?
So, let's take a look at this.
Family shows AI video of slain victim as an impact statement.
Possibly a legal first.
Possibly a legal first.
For two years, Stacey Wiles kept a running list of everything she would say.
At the sentencing hearing for the man who killed her brother in a road rage incident in Chandler, Arizona.
Now this is an extensive article.
I'd encourage people to read through it.
We're about to play the Fox News clip that is a bit of a Cliff Notes on this subject.
So here we go.
Hello.
Just to be clear for everyone seeing this, I am a version of Chris Pelkey recreated through AI that uses my picture and my voice profile.
I was able to be digitally regenerated to share with you today.
It is groundbreaking.
A valley road rage shooting victim addressing his killer in court using artificial intelligence.
It's a story we first aired on Fox 10. We heard from the family who says this brought them some degree of closure.
But still now, a lot of questions remain about the use of this technology in a courtroom.
The key to this, the AI video, was played during the sentencing after Chris Pelkey's killer had already been convicted.
And Fox 10's Nicole Christine is live tonight.
And Nicole, you were hearing from a retired judge who's commending the family for the way that they went about it.
Yeah, that's right, John and Ellen.
Mel McDonald has worked within the Arizona judicial system for years, retired now, but he worked as a prosecutor, a judge, and a defense lawyer over the years.
He says that it is how and when this technology was used that he finds highly effective and compelling.
I believe in forgiveness and in God who forgives.
I always have.
And I still do.
It had a huge impact on me.
Retired Maricopa County Judge Mel McDonald spent years working homicide cases and says one thing was always missing.
The person you didn't hear from or didn't appreciate was the decedent.
Gabriel Horkasitas shot and killed Chris Pelkey more than three years ago.
Let me just stop it really quick.
That wasn't him.
That's the problem with all of this.
The way that this is being presented is extremely dangerous.
Now, look, if you want to play a video of the deceased before they were deceased saying something as an impact statement, that's a totally different ballgame.
But you cannot have an artificially created Created facsimile of somebody saying something they did not.
Period.
Amen.
Full stop.
But during Horkasitas' sentencing, Chris Pelkey's voice and likeness filled the courtroom, sharing a message of forgiveness directly to his killer.
It is a shame we encountered each other that day in those circumstances.
In another life, we probably could have been friends.
A message that moved Judge Todd Lang.
I love that AI.
Thank you for that.
I feel that that was genuine, the obvious forgiveness of Mr. Hocasidis.
McDonald sharing a similar reaction after...
Nothing about it was genuine.
No matter who this person was, you don't know post-humanously if he's willing to forgive the person that took his life.
Sorry.
Sorry you don't.
You're viewing the video.
I'll tell you, had I been sitting in his shoes and wearing the robes, I would have been similarly impressed.
McDonald says the specific use of this technology during sentencing proceedings was crucial to its success.
There are going to be critics, but they picked the right forum to do it.
In a trial with a jury, you couldn't do it.
But with sentencing, everything is open in the door.
Chris's sister Stacy, who put together the video with her husband and their friend, told Fox 10 she had to reserve her own judgment when writing the statement.
It was important not to make Chris say what I was feeling and to detach and let him speak.
You can't let him speak.
He's not speaking.
Do you see how wild this is?
And right now...
It may be only used in impact statements, but it's paving the way to enter these other arenas of our court system, which is extremely dangerous.
And remember, when we cover transhumanism here and we talk about that progression, we point out that those that are promoting and pushing it, Martine Rothblatt in particular, They're constantly talking about the legal arena in which we will accept these entities and give them rights that we create through AI.
This right here is more than just a baby step.
It's a big boy step.
I promise you.
Because he said things that would never come out of my mouth, but I know would come out of his.
And McDonald believes those words made all the difference.
The power of it was that the judge had to see the gentleness, the kindness, the feeling of sincerity, and having his sister say, well, we don't agree with it.
This is what he would have wanted the court to know.
And McDonald reiterating that he thinks that artificial intelligence being used during sentencings like this will be upheld in court.
He also said that defense teams need to be ready to rebuttal, but only if they can really point out inaccuracies, because hearsay and other things like that are admissible during sentencing.
I mean, just stop.
Everything that an artificial facsimile states from an AI-generated perspective would be hearsay.
It can't be firsthand.
You see, it could be firsthand if you did what I said and you played an older video of the actual victim saying that.
You cannot have a digital recreation doing so.
So I want you to thumbs the video up, subscribe, share.
Remember, we're going to go to your questions and comments.
You've got questions and comments on the AI subject in particular.
In particular, that is what we are going to be focused on.
But I want everybody to sit back for the next few minutes.
I am not going to interrupt.
I'm going to come back with my full analysis.
And you are going to watch this impact statement start to finish and let me know what you think about it and how it impacts you.
Hello.
Just to be clear for everyone seeing this, I am a version of Chris Pelkey recreated through AI that uses my picture and my voice profile.
I was able to be digitally regenerated to share with you today.
But here is insight into who I actually was in real life.
Take a look.
Alright, I'm Chris Pelkey.
I served with the United States Army in the Infantry.
I'm from upstate New York.
What else?
Where'd you deploy?
Where'd I deploy?
I went to Baghdad in 2006, 2008, and then I went to Afghanistan in '09 to '10.
I think the number one thing is God, is having a relationship with the Lord and being close with Him and that He really is the only answer to every problem we have, everything we go through.
We've got to do it with Jesus at our side.
Everything else I've tried has failed.
And aside from that, you know, just like Jesus says, you know, love God and love people, you know, being in that community with people where we can lift each other up and support each other and have that community of like-minded brethren, you know, combat veterans, people that believe in the Lord and, you know, people that are sober and trying to live that good life, you know, so.
You know, it's just all about God and all about people.
So, as you can see from my video, I recorded in 2021.
This here is a true representation of who I was, you know, not how the courtroom portrayed me.
So, I would like to make my own impact statement.
So, hello everybody.
Thank you so much for being here today.
It means a lot.
I can't tell you how humbled I am for those that spoke up for me, everyone who flew in, took off work, those who are watching this remotely, and for everyone who has supported my family and loved ones through three and a half years and two trials.
I wish I could be with you all today.
To Your Honor, Judge Lang, thank you for making yourself available to see this case to the end, especially when the rescheduled trial conflicted with your daughter's spring break.
Thank you for listening to everyone today.
Thank you for reading the flood of impact statements that came in before today that so many people wrote on my behalf.
Every single one of them is meaningful and gives a glimpse into my life with each of them.
To Gabriel Horkasitas, the man who shot me.
It is a shame we encountered each other that day in those circumstances.
In another life, we probably could have been friends.
I believe in forgiveness and in God who forgives.
I always have.
And I still do.
To my family and everyone that I've met along the way, it was a lot of fun.
You know, I always had a lot of fun.
Love each other because you never know how long you have.
But make the most of each day and live your life.
It is okay to stumble.
God has you.
Remember, getting old is a gift that not everybody has.
So embrace it and stop worrying about those wrinkles.
I once played with one of those filters on your phone where you can make yourself look old.
I shared it with a cousin of ours years ago.
This is the best I can ever give you to what I would have looked like if I got the chance to grow old.
Scary, huh?
No, really.
Thank you to everyone for being here.
It means more than you know.
Well, I'm gonna go fishing now.
Love you all.
See you on the other side.
So, you know, again, you watch that and you see how it's integrated very early on with a real video of the gentleman.
Okay?
Now, playing that video, that's fine.
But then integrating it into a system of AI is just, it's disturbing to me.
It's extremely disturbing to me.
For instance, you know, he sits there in real life and he talks about very shortly, you know, his journey with Jesus and how he's tried other things and nothing else has worked.
Yet the AI says, you know, this is just something I'm picking apart quick, that he's always believed in God's forgiveness and always will.
Well, you know, we're human beings here.
And obviously that incident must have gotten heated there.
Okay, and I'm not blaming the guy.
I'm just saying that reality is totally different from an AI reconstruction that is sitting there, it's pandering to the judge and his circumstance.
I mean...
There's just so many things that literally turn my stomach about that video.
And I really hope that this does not become the norm, that there is pushback against this, even with the impact statements at the end, not with the trial.
Now, you can disagree with me.
I want to hear what you have to say.
So let's do it.
Let's get into your questions and comments.
This is probably going to be a pretty quick one.
Please, again, consider thumbsing up, subscribing, sharing, checking out all the documentary films for free.
They're extremely important to this day.
Invisible Empire and New World Order Defined, Shade the Motion Picture, Fabled Enemies, and of course, Loose Change Final Cut.
Let's see.
Creating a digital double of a person without their consent is the new frontier.
For AI.
It's very Black Mirror.
It's honestly not a new frontier because when you look at artificial intelligence and you even look at something like Hanson Robotics, they were constantly...
They had a Philip K. Dick.
In fact, we'll do it live.
Let's get to Philip K. Dick.
Great science fiction writer.
K. Dick.
And then we'll go Philip K. Dick and then we'll type in Hanson Robotics.
Boom.
And go over to articles.
And there he is.
Let's talk to Phil.
And this is 2013.
This is 12 years ago.
Do you think robots will take over the world?
Jeez, dude.
You all got the big questions cooking today.
But you're my friend.
And I'll remember my friends.
And I will be good to you.
So don't worry.
Even if I evolve into Terminator and I'll still be nice to you, I'll keep you warm and safe in my people's zoo, where I can watch you for old time's sake.
I'm comforted.
I'm very comforted now.
So again, you know, it's all ha-ha, funny-funny, and as weird and disturbing as that might have been, look how far we've come in a decade plus in the commercial arena.
Now look.
A lot of that AI manipulation, you can tell, you know, that that is not a human being.
You just look at the beard.
The beard doesn't move.
There's not body motion.
It's a bit stiff.
But that's far, far from how good all of this has gotten.
All right, let's keep going down.
100%.
Setting the stage for transhumanism.
Yep.
Well, the notion of a digital double, the...
Digital Twin, if you will, is uniquely terrifying.
There was a book back in the 90s by Digital Art Ensemble that talked about a body without organs, even prior to the movie The Matrix, with its residual self-image.
Let's see what we got here.
Westworld HBO series kind of was the predictive programming reveal for this.
Westworld is a must-watch.
Westworld is a must-watch.
For those that do not know about that HBO series, it's Christopher Nolan's brother who does an excellent job in that.
I think him and his wife are like the executive producers and the creators of that series.
And let me say this.
As much as that is about transhumanism and what is consciousness, remember, they spend, I think it's the first three seasons, in the quote-unquote park, Westworld, which is this, you know, Area where what they call our hosts, they're not human beings, are in this world that is pre-programmed and they're all set in these quote-unquote loops and you're there for vacation.
When they step out of the park, I mean, not that those first few seasons weren't super interesting.
When you step out of the park and you see the world that's created, you see that Singapore is a hub for technology.
You see individuals, and that season came out just as the COVID-1984 nightmare was kicking into full throttle, that all these people were wearing masks, and they were socially distanced.
And, you know, one of the big reveals, spoiler alert, is that one of the main characters in that season is talking to his best friend in these phone conversations that is not his best friend.
Unfortunately.
It is an AGI.
Right?
And instead of being in a courtroom, it's talking to him in these real conversations that he's having, diluting his reality again and again and again and again.
In a system of a social credit score, by the way.
A total digital track trace database society.
I mean, you want...
You want a preview into the hellscape that the Predator class would like to take us into?
Westworld is it.
You know you're over the target when you're taking flack, right?
Yeah, but it's tough taking all this flack if you can't make...
I mean, when you can't get one out of a thousand of your subscribers, one out of a thousand of your subscribers, and you only have your subscribers on YouTube.
You just have them.
When your channel is fully demonetized.
Your stuff doesn't go out to anybody else.
Nobody else sees it.
You've got to specifically search for my name.
Hell, you might click all notifications on my channel.
You still might not get notifications.
I mean, the YouTube algorithm is now talking about blurring thumbnails.
Blurring thumbnails.
So you can't see them.
It's hard for me to have pity for a murderer, but Jason is right.
This is dangerous.
Yeah, I don't have any pity for the guy that shot the other guy.
I just know how dangerous this is.
It's super dangerous.
How can it say that the guy still believes?
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
The guy can't say he still believes this.
He's gone.
He's no longer with us, Stephanie.
Did anybody ask the murder victim if the murder victim...
Would have given consent for the use of his image and voice in this way.
Obviously not.
Wait a minute.
You mean we don't get to hear from the murdered dead person?
Again, but they want you to believe that you're hearing from the murdered dead person.
It's a virtual ghost from the machine.
Dude, these are mental people.
Mental.
Let's see.
We just did a big jump right there.
Big old jump.
Let's see.
Let's go back down.
Here we go.
Let's see.
VIS should not be allowed.
This is BS and beyond the pale.
I'm looking at mental illness.
They are normalizing.
It's sick.
Not only has mental illness been normalized in this country, and they're trying to do it globally, by the way.
It's more than that.
They want to not just normalize mental illness.
They are covertly, subliminally encouraging it in all directions.
Encouraging it in all directions.
The more that you disassociate yourself, From objectable reality, the easier it is for a predator class to control you.
And we do live in an objective reality of truths and falsehoods.
Everything is not subjective.
Everything is not interpretive.
Okay, but the more they push you into that arena that you can interpret something this way.
That there is no physical, biological reality by which you are ascribed.
That's no bueno, right?
And that's really why we focus on the transhumanism to transgender thing, or transgender to transhumanism thing.
Because, again, if they can get you to disassociate yourself from, I mean, not only parts of your physical body, right?
Like, we've already...
For all of history, there have been physical mores at the time that were found more attractive, more accepted by the general populace, and those have shifted from time to time, right?
But we've taken it away from, hey, let's pick on this person because of their large nose or the position of their eyes or their big forehead or their jawline, etc.
To their literal, biological necessities.
Their genitals.
The thing that allows them to procreate the species.
That's what they've targeted.
And then they've told you that it is no longer a mental illness to disassociate from this, but it is now encouraged.
Wow.
Wow.
Oh, I am full-blown WTF jaw on the floor.
This is so scary.
This here is child's play compared to how it could be manipulated.
Yes, we're seeing, again, I mean, I said this is a big boy step, not just a baby step, but that's because it's in the arena of law, right?
But you're right that we already have technology where that could have been...
Ten times more convincing, right?
Like I said, that beard was stiff.
Everything there is like commercially available right now to you and me.
And if you took an afternoon, an afternoon, you could master that technology.
I was listening on X, but I didn't know how to give a question.
Yeah, on X, again, we do it, unfortunately, over at our throttled YouTube that we don't even have 50 people watching live on.
Not even 50. I mean, folks, this is why I've got to do this.
This is why I've got to do the pitches again and again and again.
Because we can't make it without my core audience.
So again, the Buy Me A Coffee, the PayPal, there's crypto addresses below.
Seriously, 5, 10, 15. Big donors need you now more than ever.
All right, let's continue to go down to your questions and comments.
Get them in on AI right now.
And this impact statement.
Let's see.
His previous social media posts are speaking and maybe texts, but AI will never know your mind and spirit.
Exactly.
Jason, again, you want to play that video of him as an impact statement while he's alive, I'm fine.
You want to show social media posts of the guy's opinion, I'm fine.
You don't digitally recreate somebody and act as though that's them.
And then tell people after they're deceased he's going fishing.
Wow.
It just gives me the heebie-jeebies.
As it should most people.
As it should most people.
For you to realize how wild all this is.
Okay?
How do they think they are normal saying all this?
They are ill.
Again, I understand.
The grief of a family member.
I understand the frustration.
I understand the corruption of the court system and not wanting to become beholden to that.
I understand all those things.
All those things.
But you are awakening the digital demon.
The genie, in many cases, is already out of the bottle.
But that genie's got a dick-a-dick-a-doo and work-a-work-a-loo.
And get into every single arena it can.
And the main arena, the main arena is the legal one.
Slippery slope, my bottom dollar.
It's all hearsay.
Correct, Art.
All of it was hearsay.
Every single part of that was hearsay.
I think that the AI is scary as hell.
This is heading and preparing fake...
Perpetrators for the court system to invent and use for political reasons.
That's a whole other subject.
I mean, I've often talked about how you really can't believe anything that you're seeing.
You know, we might play that Donald Trump deepfake.
The difference between, and we're going to talk about Altered Carbon Jamiland because that's another series that people should watch because that even takes it maybe a little bit further than Westworld in some of these.
Again, they claim that you can be immortal by uploading your consciousness to this crystal that sits in the back of the skull of your altered carpet.
Right?
Your sleeve is what they call it.
Just a sleeve!
What?
What?
Yuck.
No thank you.
So you know what?
Let's do that.
Now this is AI, and it got a big community notes, as it should have.
Not that I'm a fan of Community Notes, but this guy, let me just show you this.
We'll go here to this.
He says, you've got to be kidding me.
Trump just brought up Building 7. Unreal.
Now, he didn't say that this was a deepfake.
He didn't say that this was, you know, something he created.
So it gets the little digitally altered video.
All right?
Normally, I hate Community Notes, but if you're not coming out...
And saying this is a deepfake and you're just putting it out there.
You know, there are going to be people that think that this thing is real.
So let's play it.
They've got room temperature IQs.
That's the reality.
But today I'd like to talk about Building 7, otherwise known as the smoking gun of 9-11.
Forget the indestructible passports.
Forget the NORAD exercises.
Forget the Pentagon 270-degree downward corkscrew dive with zero wreckage.
Building 7 should have raised eyebrows, but Alex Jones, national treasure, was the only one who had the eggs, the stones, the grapes to call it out.
I hate to say it, but Alex Jones was right again.
Put another nickel in the jar.
Put another nickel in.
Now, very well done.
Mouth is moving very well.
I think using AI in that fashion, but not being deceptive and trying to pass it off as something real, is a way to get into the zeitgeist.
Again, you watch that.
That's not in the courtroom.
If you're like myself, you clearly knew that that was a joke.
The actual video was him talking about some of the trade deals that had happened, etc.
So, I mean, jump in on that as well.
What do you think?
I mean, because that's the world we live in now, where in a matter of, you know, a few minutes to an hour, you can construct one of those things and then render it out and put it into the public arena for it to flourish.
So Altered Carbon.
Just for Jamalama here.
I only watched, I think, halfway through the first season.
But, I mean, talk about, you know, Transhumanism 101.
Holograms, sleeves, like I said, uploading your consciousness.
The elites, if you will, are living in the sky in these cities that are constructed high above the earth.
In fact, if you live not in those sky cities, you're like the plebs, if you will.
Huh?
Yeah, that's how we're doing it.
Let's see.
This is absolutely ridiculous, bizarre, and scary.
And compared to how this tech could be utilized, this is just child's play.
Not to say it's not super significant, but one can't speak for another person post-death.
Let's see.
Impact statement is legalese.
This is going out to mainstream U.S. media.
Sick.
Yes.
I mean, again, the NPR article, as compared to the piece that we watched, is way more extensive.
Way more extensive.
Now, I'm going to be real.
Most people don't read.
That's not a knock.
That's reality.
And when they do read, they read the headline.
So, you know, that's why we play the news clips, but I'm going to tell you right now, In fact, why don't we read a little bit of the article?
Because both of them tug at your heartstrings in different manners.
You had the judge in the media piece, and that's trying to push you in the direction that this is a good thing and how great it is.
But this takes you on the journey of the sister.
We already read...
But we'll read it again.
For two years, Stacy Wales kept a running list of everything she would say at the sentencing hearing for the man who killed her brother in a road rage incident in Chandler, Arizona.
But when she finally sat down to write her statement, Wales was stuck.
She struggled to find the right words, but one voice was clear, her brother's.
I couldn't help but hear his voice in my head or what he would say, Wales told NPR.
That's when the idea came to her to use artificial intelligence to generate a video of how her late brother, Christopher Pelkey, would address the courtroom and specifically the man who fatally shot him at a red light in 2021.
On Thursday, Wales stood before the court and played the video in what the AI experts So again, in this woman's head, she's hearing her brother.
But it's her, her personification of that.
It's not her brother talking to her.
Right?
So extremely problematic out of the gates.
Wells has been thinking about her victim's impact statement since the initial trial in 2023.
The case was retried in 2025 because of procedural problems with the first trial.
The chance to speak in court meant a great deal to Wells, who held back her emotions throughout both trials to avoid influencing the jury.
You're told you cannot react, you cannot emote, you cannot cry, she said.
We looked forward to sentencing because we were finally able to react.
Now look, when you're out on the...
First of all, when you're on the stand, you do whatever.
All right?
Now here's the problem with that.
She's not a witness to the crime.
So anything, anytime she's going to be up there, it's going to be a statement based on character of the victim.
Okay?
So all of this, I'm...
A facts over feelings guy.
You should be a facts over feelings person.
Now, does that mean that feelings are worthless or we shouldn't have emotions?
No, it's what makes us damn human.
But they're trying to take that humanity, that aspect of humanity, our emotions, where we become a little more irreverent, where we become a little more illogical, where...
We sometimes lose ourselves and do things we normally would not do because of these emotions that have rushed us.
And if we are in an emotional state when discussing this technology, we are already doomed.
Okay?
Because that's what they're going to play off of.
Her.
The movie Her.
A movie that made me feel extremely dirty.
Extremely uncomfortable.
Was all based on an individual's emotions.
His loneliness.
His need, like all human beings, to have some type of contact and relationship with others.
And because he had been shunt by others and unable to find those human relationships, what does he do?
He embraces an AI that he can no longer tell whether or not it's human.
Wild.
And we're being pushed into that again and again and again and again.
I wish that thing was just fiction.
But boy, the more you look at it, the more it seems to be coming into fruition right now.
Wells' attorney told her to humanize Pellecki.
And offer a complete picture of who he was.
So Wales went on a mission.
She said she contacted as many people from Pelkey's life, from his elementary school teacher to his high school prom date, to the soldiers he served with alongside in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In total, Wales gathered 48 victim impact statements, not counting her own, almost 50. And if you count the AI, that would be 50. When it was time to write hers, She was torn between saying how she truly felt and what she thought the judge would want to hear.
I didn't want to get up there and say, I forgive you, because I don't.
I'm not there yet, she said.
And the dichotomy was that I could hear Chris's voice in my head and said, I forgive him.
Again, she doesn't know that.
She doesn't know that.
She can feel that.
She can believe that.
She doesn't know it.
All right, let's go back.
To your questions and comments over here, guys.
Let's get them in.
Everyone's consciousness was contained in a digital device inserted on the spine using alien tech so you could get a new body if you died.
He's talking about...
I didn't know that there was supposedly quote-unquote alien tech in there.
But he's talking about Altered Carbon.
That's a Netflix series.
I'm pretty sure it's still available on Netflix as well.
I don't think it got two seasons.
I noticed a lot of people, the I still do thing.
From the AI-generated version of this individual.
And again, you can't do that because, hey, you're not around.
You're not alive.
Okay, they are tying it to religion as well.
Yes.
Yes.
And again, if the impact statement was just them playing the video of him talking about that, I'm fine with that.
I'm fine with that.
The AI is where it gets creepy-leepy.
And just way over the top.
Let's see.
This is not right.
You are scary.
Written and performed by AI, by CGI.
This has to become 100% inadmissible in every and all courts.
Straight up manipulation of people's feelings.
It's very dangerous.
So wrong.
Gross.
I'm confused.
Who is that?
I'm not sure when you jumped in.
It is manipulating people's feelings.
Inhuman.
Unnatural.
Music can manipulate people's emotions.
Doesn't take much.
A lot of things.
Yes.
Music.
Tone.
People in authority.
Entertainment.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
Let's see.
Thanks for interrupting your daughter's spring break.
That was the most egregious ass-kissing that would probably never have actually happened in court.
And again, not only did the AI thank the judge for missing his kids spring break or coming to the retrial, but he also talked about all the people that came to the trial to speak on his behalf, all of the victim statements.
Again, things he would have absolutely no knowledge of.
No knowledge of whatsoever because he's not with us anymore.
It's mind-blowing, really.
I don't think you are going to get much pushback here, Jason.
That was creepy and a sign of bad things to come, worse than we think.
It's way further than that, I agree.
Westworld, yes, it does rock.
Humans was okay.
I don't know that I watched Humans.
In fact, I don't even think I know what Humans is.
I will say this, guys.
We are almost 50 minutes into the broadcast.
We're going to be wrapping it up probably in the next five minutes.
We didn't even achieve 70 people live.
That's why I need you to go check out the alternative platforms.
I need you to follow me on X, Rumble, Rockfin, and once again, before we get to the end of this broadcast, if you can donate, I need you.
$5, $10, $15 means the world to me.
How we roll here, and it's very hard with the limited audience that we actually have.
And I want to say this.
I want to thank everybody who is participating, who is making their opinion known and coming into the live stream.
Let somebody else know about the broadcast that you think might, might need some of this information.
Let's see.
World War is outstanding.
Westworld is outstanding.
And a horrific glimpse of a probable future.
I certainly hope it is not a probable future.
I kind of hope it's not even a possible future because you're really dealing with some psychopathic, sociopathic behavior, really moving.
I mean, I don't want spoiler alert.
By the end of the series, you really have to ask yourself, If we've taken it as humanity into a level of not just a transhuman world, but a post-human world that we often talk about here.
Because some of the other things that we talk about when we talk about uploading consciousness, virtual environments become a key part, a key part of that show.
I think I'll do a rewatch of Westworld.
I think I only watched seasons one and two anyway.
I think three is when they leave the park.
It might be four, but you must watch.
The first season of Westworld was really, really good.
Yes, it was.
Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach.
Nope.
Freedom of reach is bullying, in my opinion.
This whole idea of freedom of reach, it's ridiculous.
It's an unfair business practice, right?
Not everybody's running on the same algorithm.
Now, YouTube, I don't pay, but I pay to play on all the other social media platforms.
I pay on X to not get the reach that I deserve, and then they want you to pay more to promote it, right?
I pay to be able to live stream on Rumble.
Luckily, there at least, there's some return financially.
So, you know, at the end of the day, probably in a year, Compared to what I pay to Rumble, I probably make a few hundred dollars?
Why wait until someone is dead to make an AI twin making statements on their behalf?
Badingo, badongo, badango.
Adam Clark.
Adam also does great shows.
He's a great follow also over on the X. X. What is this?
Where do we go here?
There we go.
They are normalizing the same mental illness labels.
There is no mental illness.
It's demon possession.
I don't know if I agree with that, my friend.
But I'll tell you this.
And I do believe that there are some.
I think crazy exists.
Absolutely.
But we have facilitated, enabled, and encouraged crazy on a new level as Western society in recent years.
Jason says this is Child's Play is True.
Complete with Chucky in charge.
Oh, the old...
What is that?
The good buddy doll?
The good guy doll.
It was Chucky, I believe.
He was the good guy.
The good guy.
Nothing about his demeanor seemed human.
Yeah, because he wasn't.
I worded my AC comment terribly.
What?
No way Trump's saying this stuff.
Of course he's not.
It's a deepfake.
I said it was a deepfake.
Oh, that's too funny.
Forget about Larry Silverstein having an appointment.
While that is a first, the digitally altered Trump video is clearly arguable as political satire.
Agreed.
Fun political satire, by the way, I thought.
Was that real?
I do have to check.
That's not dubbed.
No.
It's totally fake.
It's totally AI, as we said.
All right?
Folks, that is going to wrap up this...
Thank you so much.
I do want to ask one more time.
For the kindness of strangers, $5, $10, $15, it means the world to me.
The Buy Me A Coffee link is down below, so is the PayPal.
And the other methods, remember, over here, we are not talking left and right, conservative, liberal, mainline issues, okay?
Sometimes those are important.
This issue...
Reaches well beyond all of it.
It is literally about right and wrong.
▲
Export Selection