Patriot TV - https://patriot.tv/msom/Show more Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://rokfin.com/stack/1339/Documentaries--Jason-Bermas
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior #BreakingNews Show less
What are the facts behind the deaths behind the injuries of the COVID-19 4 Hayton Live shot?
To break it down is an analyst and statistician you're not going to want to miss.
It's John Bodwin.
You can check him out at therealcdc.com.
We've got a real hour to unpack all this.
You're not going to want to miss it.
Buckle up and get ready to make sense of the madness.
And we are back.
We are with John Bodwin.
And John, the last time I had you on, you kind of slipped something in there.
And this was on my other broadcast.
It's, you know, a lot quicker and truncated.
I don't know much about your background other than you are an engineer, a statistician, an analyst, pretty smart guy.
I started bringing up engineering, and I believe I brought up DARPA.
And you said that you had done some work in that arena.
So before we even get into how you get into analyzing these shots and what goes on during that time period up until today, and even with the protocols that are still going on today that a lot of people don't realize are still in use, I'd love to get a background of who you are.
And like, if you're, if you've done engineering for DARPA, I'm all ears.
So I wasn't doing it for DARPA per se under contract.
I was selling into DARPA contracts where I would have meetings with the engineers of various companies such as Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Northrop Grumman, Honeywell, and plenty more.
So a lot of them were, when you get into the research labs, that's when it gets really kind of leading edge.
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory in Cambridge, right next to MIT, the MIT Lincoln Laboratory.
Out west, you guys have like Sandia National Labs, Lawrence Livermore.
Those are the research lab.
Some people call them think tanks.
They're doing the real leading edge.
And what they do sometimes comes out to industry.
And I'm an electrical engineer.
So when it comes to semiconductors, some of the more advanced research in the 1970s, 60s, 70s, 80s, even 90s was being done at MIT Lincoln Laboratory.
And they were a customer of mine.
So I was selling both intellectual property and engineering development tools that were used to design and verify semiconductors.
And then in the end, it was semiconductor research and design development.
So if you're developing the process to develop the chips, I kept going up the ladder to the deepest, most technical things.
So anyway, yeah, I sold into like MK6LE.
That's the Mark VI life extension, which is the Trident nuclear missile, the Polaris missile that pops out of submarines.
That is the most awesome weapon in the history of man.
There's nothing stopping that nuclear missile once it's flying.
Well, that's scary.
There's no recall codes.
The movies are all wrong.
Okay.
So, you know what?
I mean, this is kind of going in a, I mean, I think it's a relevant direction.
It's a different direction.
But I mean, especially, so I often talk about the Star Wars program under Reagan, Strategic Defense Initiative.
Now, how far that went, highly, I would imagine it's highly classified.
Robert Bowman, who was very involved at high levels of the Air Force and the military, said that it worked.
He blew the whistle on it before he died.
He didn't give specifics, but said they were successful in that regard.
Now, last time we talked a little Musk, just to throw it in there, before even the conflict really got going, Ukraine-Russia, Musk was goading Putin and then getting into a fight online with the head of the Space Department in Russia, where he said, you know, the nukes in space thing, they've been playing that card now for like 18 months.
There's an open argument where, and I covered it from the beginning, saying, listen, we have nuclear weapons in space.
We would annihilate you.
You are saying that you think the ground level ones, the submarine nuclear missiles that you're talking about, would supersede these possibly fictitious missiles of Russia?
I doubt they're fictitious, but I'm going to let you weigh in because that concerns me.
I do understand, obviously, that a nuclear missile, and we have bases all over the world.
Like you said, they're mobile submarines, even submarines that are powered by nuclear power are absolutely fascinating when you think about it, where we are at power distribution and what those can do.
So what is your take on that when we're talking about nuclear warfare?
Because, I mean, Trump's the only one talking about it.
I mean, at that level, the media certainly isn't talking about it.
Putin is now talking about those satellite systems, I think, that we talked about last time within NATO and the United States.
What are your thoughts?
Well, I don't know much about the satellite ones.
I do know about the submarine ones.
The reason why I say it's the most awesome weapon is even if you have intercept missiles, they go up out of the submarine, they don't like fly across the sky and go hit a target.
They go into outer space and come back.
That's what they do.
You could blow up a nuclear missile in proximity of it such that maybe it doesn't get too heavily damaged from the outside.
What'll happen is it'll tumble through space.
And then there's a window in the nose cone.
And that window has part of the guidance control system with gyroscopes in it.
So there's an eye fog, an interferometric optical gyroscope, but there's also a lens with a camera that takes a picture of the stars.
And based on the positioning of the stars, it'll do a course correction and come back and hit its target.
Nothing is going to stop that thing from hitting its target.
Why are they looking at the stars?
Because you can knock out all the satellites.
You can knock out all other communication and there's nothing left for it to key on to do a course correction, except the stars are something that nobody can ever change.
They're always going to be where they are at any given time.
And so that's why they take a picture of the stars.
They do another recalculation.
That's why it's called the Polaris missile, the North Star.
Nothing's going to stop that thing.
Well, I'm hoping we can stave off any type of nuclear war and we don't have to learn about Polaris missiles in retrospect of some kind of even greater dystopia than the one we live in today.
Speaking of dystopias, what were you thinking prior to COVID-19?
China's Lying Kids Tests00:12:17
Like, what kind of guy were you?
Where were you politically?
Where did you start questioning what the media and the science was telling everybody?
I followed this thing with a very skeptical eye, obviously from probably December, January, when they were talking about China.
In the very beginning, I was joking about it.
I thought it was going to be basically a repeat of what we saw with the bird flu in 2009.
And, you know, in retrospect, that was really a precursor, almost a beta to what we saw later on in super mode.
But it wasn't until, you know, I would say February, early, maybe late January that I was like, oh, God, they're really going to bring this here.
And especially in mid-March, it was undeniable.
I was warning my friends.
They were all thinking I was crazy.
I'm like, no, they're really going to shut down the country.
And then they did it.
So where were you on that spectrum as it occurred?
All right.
So, you know, I was a Republican up until 34 years ago.
So I've been pretty independent-minded.
I thought the Republicans were also lying to the people.
Everybody's lying to the people in parties.
So I'm not a party guy.
Raised a family.
I turned off the news for over 10 years because, you know, I got divorced when the kids were two, four, and six.
And I concentrated on raising my kids.
I coached 50 soccer teams, 500 games, 1,000 practices, and, you know, I don't know how many 100 kids from ages four to 16.
And then got one son out of high school and he bought a motorcycle and he died at 20 years old.
And I sat on the couch depressed.
And I did start getting back into watching politics a few years before that.
And when it comes to the flu coming or whatever, COVID, right?
I never really thought about it.
I never got a flu shot.
You know, I had the flu once, once, you know, what big deal?
I felt lousy.
I felt like dying.
Yeah, okay, that's part of life.
Could I get a shot that would stop me from getting the flu?
No, because everybody I know that gets flu shots gets the flu.
So it never made any sense to me.
I did get a shot when I was four years old for the Hong Kong flu.
Now, it wasn't a vaccine.
It was a mixture of streptomycin and penicillin.
And they wanted to do that so that kids wouldn't get secondary bacterial lung infections.
Now, I didn't even have the Hong Kong flu.
They gave me the shot.
I went deaf in one ear.
So I've been 100% deaf in one ear since four years old.
Thank you very much for trying to make money off me, you know, pediatrician.
All right, so COVID comes.
I don't know what's going on.
I don't really, I'm not a conspiracy guy.
And that has a negative connotation, but really, I'm talking about it in the meaning of the word.
I don't follow conspiracies.
You know, two or more persons engaged in an agreement to commit unlawful acts or a series of unlawful acts and engage in unlawful behavior, common law conspiracy.
In that regard, I just thought something's not right about this.
My son said, ah, this is all BS, but my book starts out.
I was sitting in a bar, had a beer in my hand, talking to some friends from Bible study.
Finnegan's Wake, I think was the bar, you know, an Irish bar on St. Patrick's Day.
And they were talking about, you know, the disease on the news and stuff.
And I was like, you know, people are awfully close to me.
He started getting a little weird about people being close to me.
And I said, hey, guys, everybody's talking about this thing.
I'm going home.
And I left a half a beer.
I never leave a half a beer.
So I have to make the admission that I thought there might be something real.
And I loaded the data within five days.
The CDC had changed the data, historical 2014 through 2018.
I realized they were lying.
The whole thing was a lie within five days.
That was mid-March of 2020.
And from that point on, everything I looked at was, I don't trust either side.
I don't trust people on our side who just spout off on social media with all the BS.
They're not helpful.
They're not helpful unless you're spewing facts, you know, and I need sources.
I need to know how they derive.
What is excess?
Oh, there's excess death.
What does that mean?
Excess based on what?
What's normal?
Oh, normal's normal.
It's like, no, I need a calculation.
I need a formula.
I need to see the data stream.
How many years prior?
What does it look like?
Did you account for seasonality?
So the more I looked into it, everything turned into a rat hole.
And I realized the epidemiologist, the entire study and field of epidemiology is all messed up.
So I'll take a breath here, but I don't know if that's the kind of beginning you want to.
No, that's perfect because, you know, I want to coincide that with maybe what a conspiracy guy was looking at.
So as this is happening, because they're hyping it in China pretty big, right?
And then you're seeing the videos of people dropping dead in the streets.
There's the one where the military guys season up in some kind of, you don't know what to believe, right?
And I'm like, all right.
I never saw any of that because I don't have cable TV.
Well, again, it wasn't really on television.
It was being passed around not just X, but other social media outlets, et cetera.
I mean, you know, women dropping dead in parks in China and that type of thing.
I was off social media since my son died.
So back then, I didn't have any of that.
Yeah.
It was just, you know, word of mouth and somebody said there's a bad disease, but I hear what you're saying.
Yeah.
Well, for me, I mean, the media was still running with the bad thing, right?
But everybody was saying, you know, cytokine storm, these type of buzzwords were being thrown out there, nothing to treat it with, et cetera.
And really from the outset, I had thought bioweapon.
I said, this is very highly unlikely to be zoonotic.
Let's be honest with ourselves, right?
And really, in the very beginnings of this, you had a guy, his name is escaping me.
He ended up passing, but he had won, I think, the Nobel Prize for his work with HIV all the way back in 2008.
He said, this has HIV in it.
And he said, it's got a 12-sequence DNA nucleotide of HIV in this thing.
And I'm like, well, that's not the flu.
And that's not zoonotic.
That tells me that, you know, there's a lot more to this story.
So as this goes on, I also realize that it was probably in the United States, much earlier than they had said.
There seemed to be some cases in New York.
Now they're saying as early as October and September, and I really do believe that, by the way, in the United States.
I think that's what all the evidence shows.
I actually got extremely sick right around November in Thanksgiving, lost my taste for the first time in my life.
But again, no one knew that was a symptom.
I remember I went into this old pizza shop.
Guys like my dad used to work there.
And I take a piece of pizza and it's just wet cardboard.
And I'm like, what the hell is this?
And then I had medical issues, actually.
I just turned 40.
I thought I was just getting old.
But a number of things happened to me over, I can't, and then eventually I couldn't even see a doctor about it, but I thought I was just sick.
We had an awful flu season that year, one of the worst on record.
And I also remembered these stories of popcorn lung.
All these kids who had vaporizers were going to the emergency room.
Now, in my own town, in Oneonta, New York, 21-year-old kid, party kid, liked the cocaine and stuff like that, but also was a juicer on the weights.
He got extremely ill.
He goes to the hospital.
They diagnose him with walking pneumonia.
Okay.
And then they kind of send him on his way.
A week later, he's on a ventilator.
In January, somehow, some way, this kid, after being on a ventilator two weeks, came out of it.
He's one of the few survivors, and he always talks about how he thinks he's case number zero.
Well, I don't think you're case number zero, but you obviously probably had that.
So, before we go to break, you know, in retrospect, before we kind of move on to the shots and the treatments, what do you think happened in regards to this quote-unquote virus?
Because I think it's a number of things.
I think, number one, you do have the virus, but then you have the misdiagnosis on purpose, et cetera, et cetera, go down the line.
And to me, this doesn't seem like a leak at all.
It seems like a global distribution, but that's just my opinion.
I'm going to let you go.
Okay, so I think you were talking about Luc Montagnier in France with the correct.
Then there's Kerry Mullis, who warned us about using PCR, and then he was heart attacked, I think, around August or September of 2019, just before the pandemic.
I do believe that there was a coronavirus that was set off a PCR going around in the fall of 2019, end of summer and fall of 2019.
Whether or not it had the spike on it, I don't know.
Various tests are testing for certain sequences, right?
So there's a rumor of, you know, Jason McClellan down at UT Austin having put the spike in that sequence, having created that, and then somehow it made it over to the North Carolina.
And really, it made it over to Wuhan.
I don't believe China did this.
I believe this was a U.S. developed bioweapon.
Did it escape or was it placed?
It doesn't seem like it escaped because the spread pattern is such that it was New York, Massachusetts, New Jersey in the United States, and it was Bergamo and Lombardy in Italy.
Now, you can make excuses and say, well, they do business with China and the flights were going in there.
And there's a history of the interaction of those peoples.
I'm not buying it.
The spread pattern didn't spread like a disease.
It spread like somebody dropped off a bunch of stuff in these three locations and nowhere else in the world.
So as far as how it spreads, there's a background of coronavirus RNA floating around in various variants, if you want to call them.
So you're going to get positive tests all around the world, even in 2019.
You might even find it in 2018, depending on the tests.
That's why I don't pay attention to the tests.
Let's pretend we didn't have genetic sequence tests and just say, where were people dying of a new disease with weird complications?
It really wasn't happening everywhere.
People were getting colds, seasonal flu and seasonal colds, coronavirus colds that were around before COVID.
And let me just stop you for a second because this whole idea of us, oh, well, they do business together and they travel.
Like, get in the real world, everybody.
It's called connecting flights.
Do you know how many people just go through Chicago, O'Hare alone in that world?
Didn't break out in the Midwest, everybody.
I mean, I can go from airport to airport to airport.
You know how much you got an eight-hour layover in Chicago O'Hare with 50,000 other people around?
I mean, give me a break.
On its face, it's absolutely absurd, but this is what we're fed on the experts.
But I also want people to be taken back to the time that they told you that it could live on a surface for 30 days, right?
And that somehow, I mean, that was a big, people had disinfectant everywhere.
I still see the goddamn Purel all over the place.
It's a good place to take a break.
Get Your Donor Deck Now00:03:27
We're going to come back, John.
Riveting conversation.
This is why we do Making Sense of the Madness so we can break down what really occurred.
I mean, common sense, folks, what really happened to us and is still happening to us via this COVID-19 44 nightmare.
More making sense of the madness after this.
The donor deck represents a groundbreaking independent crowdfunding initiative driven by patriots like you to bring back our esteemed president Donald J. Trump to office.
With unwavering passion, we pledge all profits from the sale to MAGA Inc. and Fight Like a Flint Pack.
The exquisitely detailed challenge coin is a timeless collectible to be passed down to generations.
It symbolizes your continuous dedication to assisting President Trump in his quest to rejuvenate America to its former greatness.
Get your donor deck now.
Go to thepatriot.tv store and click on donor deck.
Enjoy the magnificent artwork and scripture on each playing card, knowing our appreciation for your continuous dedication to assisting President Trump in his quest to rejuvenate America to its former greatness.
You'll get this Keepsake Collectible Challenge Coin acknowledging your support for Donald Trump's run back to the White House and the donor deck of 52 exquisite playing cards plus a beautiful display case to show your challenge coin.
Go to the patriot.tv store and get your donor deck now.
Attention business owners, are you ready to advertise to millions of loyal patriots ready to buy your products or services?
Here is your golden chance to advertise with Jason Burmas and connect with his massive audience on Patriot TV and his incredibly loyal social media followers.
As an advertiser on making sense of the madness, you also reach his followers on the top social media sites as Jason dives into complex current events and conspiracies, offering investigative analysis and thought-provoking discussions to uncover the deeper truths behind the headlines.
When you advertise with Jason on Making Sense of the Madness, you're aligning your brand with integrity, loyalty, and a dedication to truth.
Jason's audience is passionate, conservative, and committed to the values your business stands for.
When given the choice, Jason's followers will buy your products or services over other woke companies.
Don't miss this opportunity to elevate your brand with the power of Patriot TV.
reach out to us today at advertise at Patriot dot TV.
And we are back.
We are with John Bodwin.
The realcdc.com is where you can see all his work, support him, get his book, etc.
I'm going to let you continue.
So again, you do see it in these centralized patterns, and that's where people are breaking out.
At the same time, you know, this is really a time of states' rights and different levels of authoritarianism.
And look, Cuomo just did his Maya Culpa, if you will, up on Capitol Hill about the nursing homes.
He's not going to go to jail.
Legitimate Andrew Capo Cuomo, serial killer, not going to get in trouble for all of it.
Rebranding right now, but because of being in that state of New York, in that concentrated area, media hype, panic, and then protocols on top of his daily briefings really set a media scenario for the rest of the country.
I mean, they were calling this guy America's Governor, John.
Excess Deaths And Numbers00:15:29
Yeah, you know, he's, to me, a useful idiot.
There were people that knew what was going on, but they weren't in New York.
Those people who knew what the NIH National Institutes of Health Protocols would do, those people were in DC.
They understood the behavior that would flow from the written words of their protocols.
So the COVID treatment protocols, they killed more people in hospitals.
That whole New York thing and the nursing home people, all those deaths, that's a weird thing to trace back.
You'd have to get in personal conversations.
I can't imagine why he signed off on that, other than he's stupid and he really isn't the bright guy.
All you got to do is listen to him.
He has the ego, but he doesn't have the brains behind the ego.
So, you know, all that aside, you know, getting past the discussion of origin theories and spread and all that.
Did 1.7 million people die from COVID in the United States?
No.
No, I think about 10 to 20% of that number did.
I think it was like a bad flu year.
I think there was something special about it in the early days.
It had some, it has a prothrombotic effect that causes clotting, but only if it gets past your mucosal defenses in your lungs.
Most of the time, your lungs are going to take care of it.
You're going to have a bad chest cold.
But every once in a while, if it gets into your body on very rare occasions, you will have an ischemic stroke from a clot in your brain.
You will have perhaps a pulmonary embolism or some other thrombotic event.
Those did occur, I believe.
And there's not enough data to show it.
You would need a billion people to be able to find that signal.
And we only have 330 million in the U.S.
So it's really hard to find that signal.
Is it happening?
Yes, I believe it's happening.
Now you take the shots, you try to mimic the spike.
The worst thing about the virus itself.
Oh, let's make a vaccine about that.
So let's talk about that because let's roll it back.
Because number one, in that little segment you just said, you kind of alluded to the fact that as a virus mutates, it mutates to adapt and survive and is less lethal, less effective, et cetera.
However, that's not what we supposedly saw here.
And number two, you talk about the spike.
Now, when we were talking origin theories, you believe that there was, I mean, you talked about the addition of the spike and you named a name.
Explain what you mean by that.
Because honestly, that's the first time I've ever heard anything about the spike when it comes to the virus itself.
Well, I should really just refer to papers, and I don't like research papers, but there were research papers written where people were playing around with certain genetic coding, genetic sequencing to add to a coronavirus to make it more lethal.
And one of the things was the spike protein.
You don't like add it to the virus, you add it to the genetic sequence that creates the virus, right?
So then the spike protein is generated.
So basically, you're talking about, again, genetically engineering a virus in a lab through a sequence of an existing virus and then adding that spike through some type of CRISPR tech.
Yeah, I don't get into the names.
I try to avoid whether it's CRISPR or somebody say, oh, it wasn't really CRISPR.
It was something else.
Like, okay, whatever.
But yes, they're playing around with gene sequences and they're adding something to something that already existed.
Okay.
Gain of function.
Okay.
That's what gain of function means.
Yes, I believe they did that.
It's just my opinion.
Doesn't mean anything.
There's a lot smarter people out there who know the genetics.
I actually, Jason, I don't generally talk about this.
I know you don't.
And that's why I love doing this show so I can get things out of people and have interesting conversations.
So let's start talking about.
Now, you just talked about what you felt were the excess deaths due to the actual virus, but we could also argue a lot of that might have to do with the protocol of treating it, obviously.
But that's after the fact.
Throughout this whole thing, and this is again from the conspiracy guy.
But by the time it had hit April, and they weren't allowing treatments like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, they were demonizing things like vitamin C, vitamin D, etc.
They were censoring on the internet more than you had ever seen.
I mean, this was the full roll call.
And you did have Gates on literally every channel by April telling about you about these new great shots.
Now, if you were paying attention, he was talking about first, second, even third generation of this new technology, mRNA.
And, you know, that's when, first of all, Jason Burmese, who never trusted Bill Gates and warned everybody about him a decade ago in the film Shade the Motion Picture, where I laid out exactly what he would do, and then he did it.
That guy, I started looking into the history of mRNA technology, especially when we were talking about countermeasures.
And I came across DARPA and their contract back in 2013, where they just pumped $25 million into this thing called Adept and Protect.
And it was a partnership with Moderna that had made no products in the past at all.
And if you read through it, yes, they talked about biological viruses, but they also talked about bioweapons in that very sentence.
I mean, it's only like a little one-pager.
It's still on their website.
It's right at the bottom.
But obviously, that relationship continued for some time.
And for me, the red flag is always when the military is involved in anything because they don't have to tell you the truth.
It's inbuilt.
There is a classification system.
There is plausible deniability.
There is compartmentalization.
You talked about useful idiots.
Well, unfortunately, in lower levels of the military-industrial complex, you have a lot of those.
And you just have some very intelligent people that are also not privy to what these programs and projects are about.
I mean, not that I was lining up to take, like you said, any kind of shots.
I'm not any kind of shot guy.
But this got me to the point where I was telling people under no circumstance do you want to take these things for any reason, no matter what they tell you, no matter what they pin.
And believe me, I lost some friends, family members.
A lot of people still think I'm crazy for that.
I remember going on Allison Morrow's show.
She was somebody who was in the mainstream media for a long time, left the mainstream media, saw they were biased.
And even her were sitting there talking.
She said, well, for the elderly and I'm the real, I go, no, Allison.
I go, let me repeat it for you.
For nobody under any circumstance, especially the elderly.
So that's just my little rant and rave on just looking at the technology and the talking points.
What were you seeing in that same time period when they were offering up their solution?
And then we want to get to what you've seen after the fact.
Oh, boy.
So when they started offering the vaccine, I was in law school.
I went to law school in August of 2020.
They promised me I wouldn't have to get a vaccine in writing.
And then they made a mandate and then they kicked me out of school for not getting it.
I have a lawsuit against them that was dismissed now on appeal.
But say the vaccine starts in my second semester of law school.
The torts professor, and I did pretty well in torts and contracts.
He asked me to do a video on economics and the law.
And, you know, everybody, I was the only one who understood the intersection of law and economics, especially with regard to tort law.
So I did my video and I did it on fairs.
I did it on the PrEP Act, the Immunity Shield.
You know, There's a 10-minute video on YouTube right now that I made in April of 2021, less than four months into the vaccine program.
And I showed the number of deaths in bears.
I went through pulmonary embolism.
There are posts on Twitter where I'm showing you pulmonary embolism deaths in young people within months of that vaccine rolling out.
So, where was I?
I mean, I knew immediately it was protermotic.
I didn't know anything about the vaccine, the technology.
I didn't know anything.
All I knew is people were dying.
They were dying from clots.
And that was a fact.
And everybody just ignored bears.
And I got kicked out of school.
And then I found in 2022 early, they said a little girl died.
I think I went through this last time and I got the records.
I now have 1.4 million non-redacted death records.
I wrote a book.
I started writing two and a half years ago about these death records.
And I've shown stuff that nobody else in the world has shown.
I showed that the excess deaths were greater in respiratory in 2020, pneumonia, COPD, ARDS.
And all of a sudden, it shifts on a year boundary when they started putting out the vaccine.
The greater excess was then in clots and bleeding.
So you have hemorrhagic strokes, ischemic strokes.
You have gastrointestinal ischemia and bowel ischemia and hemorrhages, pulmonary embole, deep vein thrombosis in the legs.
So, you know, it was pretty stark.
Now, diseases don't change how they kill you on a year boundary.
Clearly, it wasn't COVID.
COVID was around for a year.
It was the vaccine, without a doubt, no question.
Should have been shut down in two weeks.
In two weeks, there were enough deaths to shut it down.
But the propaganda was so great that I said, I even said, I think it's close to January or February of 21, this won't end till everybody knows somebody, dead or main.
That's what it came to be.
Here we are in 2024.
I have more information that'll choke a horse.
The stuff I just put out a few weeks ago, it's more compiled COVID deaths than anywhere in the world.
So I want to get into those numbers.
We got to take a break.
Folks, this is the reality behind the stats and what you're not hearing in the mainstream media.
Slowly but surely, some of these things have been taken off the market.
There are slight admissions to an extremely rare cases, myocarditis, etc.
But the reality is, in my opinion, they knew what they were doing.
They kept doing it, and it goes beyond the profits.
This is making sense of the madness, and we'll be back after this.
Former National Security Advisor, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, a plea.
He was one of the most respected generals in the military.
Every American needs this historical DVD keepsake.
Flynn delivered the truth, whatever the cost.
Hand signed by General Michael Flynn.
Order now at the Patriot TV store.
Use promo code PTV at checkout to get special savings.
The Patriot TV store, a secure, hassle-free shopping experience.
The world is about to shift.
Banks are going cashless globally with the emergence of central bank digital currency, which will bring with it programmable money and the ability to turn on or off your purchasing power based on your digital social profile.
It's like the equivalent of spyware in your bank account.
You need to get out of the system with the world's safest and most precious assets, silver and gold.
Call Kirk Elliott, Precious Metals, at 720-605-3900.
That's 720-605-3900.
And we are back.
Let's talk about the numbers.
So, like you said, we're in 2024 at this point.
They just signed off on the 10th shot.
I'm not making that up.
Number 10 booster in the house, everybody.
I mean, I guess it's the ninth booster.
If you, if you're going back to the original, I'm sure they're going to get to a Baker's dozen.
Like I said before the break, they've taken some of them off the market.
Every once in a while, there's a slight admission.
But people in the mainstream media on talk shows, they're still saying it was safe and effective.
It's what killed COVID 1984.
What are the true excess death numbers when we look at 2020, 2021, up until today?
Have they lowered?
I mean, obviously, a lot less people are taking that shot, but it is still mandated to some people.
You know, if you want to go to a state school in New York, you got to be up to date.
I mean, that's just a reality.
That's what we're doing to our young people.
I mean, it's pretty disturbing, but it's happening.
So what are you seeing and where are the correlations?
You there, John?
I lost you completely.
I'm sorry.
So I just asked you, when we're talking about from year to year, what are the numbers?
And I was also talking about how some people are still being mandated to take these things, young people in particular.
State schools in New York is what I was saying.
So they're on shot number 10.
I mean, so what are we talking about when we're talking about excess death at this point, year to year?
And I guess in a moment, after we get into those numbers, I do want to talk about long-term effects and what you feel the numbers are showing with not death, but degraded immunity, other types of diseases, et cetera.
Okay.
So excess deaths, I know a lot of people like to hear a number.
And it's what people have been trained and programmed to think about excess deaths.
But let me explain it.
In mid-March to mid-June in Massachusetts, 8,800 excess deaths occurred in very old people.
They weren't available to die again.
So then you have the winter come back around.
Hardly anybody died over the summer in excess at all, right?
So it ended by mid-June.
COVID was pretty much over in Massachusetts by mid-June of 2020.
All right.
November comes around.
People start dying in excess again.
But it's the winter.
So more people die, but it was more people than the more people that's normal.
Well, how do you calculate excess when you just had 9,000 excess people die earlier?
They're not available to die again.
So normal in the 2020 fall of November and December, and then going into January, February, March, that appeared normal.
That appeared like a normal cycle of excess of increased, sorry, not excess, a normal cycle of increased winter seasonal deaths.
But it wasn't normal.
There should have been a deficit.
And when I separated out all the age groups, I was able to determine that it was the 65 to 79s that were then dying in excess, but they were being the deficit of the 84 pluses, 85 pluses, canceled them out.
So, you know, I could say, well, there's 20,000 excess in this year and 11,000 in that year, but you have to look by age group.
Vaccine-Induced Cancer Surge00:09:53
And when you look by age group, you see that there really weren't any excess deaths under 65 until January of, well, there really weren't that many at all under 65, but 65 to 84, it's really 65 to 79.
The 80, 84 group was kind of a switchover group.
But the 85 pluses were in excess in 2020.
And then when the shots came around, so you're talking about a full wave of COVID.
It killed some of the 65, but it didn't kill a lot of them.
But all of a sudden, they start taking the shot and they start dying.
That wasn't COVID.
So it's when people are dying from what.
So I separate out the age groups and I separate out the causes and the combinations of causes.
So I can show you who died from acute renal failure with COVID or without COVID, co-resident on the same death record.
Who died with a pulmonary embolism and a heart attack or just one of the two with or without COVID?
Because I have the record level source data for 1.4 million records.
I can do all those combinations.
So when I tell you something happened, I have a much better view of it than almost anybody in the world.
So I can tell you that specifically, cardiac arrest deaths in Massachusetts alone, 3,000 excess in 21 and 22, not 2020, 21 and 22, 3,000 excess.
There should have been a deficit.
And then pulmonary embolism was 500.
Cardiac arrhythmia was 400.
And then there were some, it's really difficult to find the strokes because there are 50 different codes for stroke.
And they're called ICD-10 codes, and that's how data is tracked.
Pulmonary embolism, there are two.
You either have with or without acute core pulmonality type of pulmonary embolism.
So it's really easy to look at the pulmonary emboli deaths.
With stroke, there are so many different kinds.
It just manifests in all these codes.
Any one given code, because there are 50 of them, is almost two orders of magnitude diminished.
And therefore, it's difficult to find a signal.
You have a lot of noise.
So your signal-to-noise ratio is low.
But I found individual records.
And Jason, here's where it's different for what I do.
Not only do I show you which causes of death in what age groups, that's just data.
But these are people.
I tell you that Cassidy was seven, reacted in five minutes, died in five days, and they told you she died from COVID.
Brianna was 30 years old, reacted in a few hours to her Moderna shot, had an ischemic stroke.
They said, oh, you have a headache.
Go home.
The hospital is for COVID patients.
They told her to go home twice.
She went to the ER.
Then her family had to bring her in because she couldn't remember, she didn't recognize her sister.
So she ended up dying from an ischemic stroke, brought on within hours from the Moderna vaccine.
What did they write on her death certificate?
They said she died of COVID.
Only two weeks earlier, two weeks before Brianna was injected, Diane Dubois, 62, was injected.
It says on her death certificate the vaccine killed her by intracranial hemorrhage in the setting of thrombocytopenia.
And in the report about Brianna, it says where thrombocytopenia is frequent.
And when I say the report about Brianna, I mean a journal-published neurohospitalist journal, okay, six doctors from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical College, wrote a report about Brianna: Fatal Post-COVID mRNA vaccine-associated cerebral ischemia.
That's the title.
And it means the vaccine killed her by stroke.
And five weeks after her, 17-year-old Eden.
This is all just Massachusetts.
Jason, just Massachusetts, 20 miles away from Brianna, Eden, 17, gets injected, has a headache so bad she goes to the doctor twice that week, right?
And then when the headache resolves, a few weeks later, she gets her second dose and she dies from a hemorrhagic stroke.
These are all hidden, and I found them all in the data because I have the records and I correlate them with Ver's records when I have to.
But like I said with Diane, it expressly states the vaccine killed her on her death record.
And Solomon Kizito, 60 years old, injected January 16, 2021.
Excuse me, that's when he died, January 16, 2021.
It says on his death record acute bronchopneumonia in the setting of idiopathic thrombocytopenia.
We don't know where it came from.
That's idiopathic, right?
Where's the thrombocytopenia from in a person recently vaccinated?
It says it on his death record, and it was coded by the CDC as a vaccine death, which is Y59.0.
That means viral vaccines.
That is listed in the causes of death in the codes.
Now, the CDC coded Solomons in the very beginning of 2021, January 16 death, and the next nine that mentioned vaccine, even when the vaccine killed them by pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmia, within one or two days of the vaccine, it's not listed.
That means somebody at the CDC deleted the code when the software called TransAx and Acme at the CDC.
They take the records from the states, they put them in the software.
The software reads the words and says, oh, vaccine, boom, Y59.0.
Well, why isn't it there for the next nine?
Because somebody deleted them.
They're hiding vaccine deaths from the American people.
In Connecticut, first one is coded, the next three are not.
In Minnesota, three are coded, six are not.
They're hiding vaccine deaths that expressly state vaccine as a cause of death in part one on the death records.
It's criminal.
When we're talking about time progression, are we at least seeing less of these now that the shots are not being mandated?
And I guess, are you looking at any of the data of maybe permanent injury or people that have survived these type of thrombosis events?
For instance, last night, DeMar Hamlin got his first interception ever.
And obviously, there was that very famous case of him almost dying on the football field, many suspect due to taking the hate and live shots.
Now, a bunch of lunatics went overboard and said he had died and there were clones and blah, That never seemed to be the case to me.
But I was always skeptical whether or not somebody that did suffer that type of traumatic event would ever be able to return to professional sports.
Yeah, I'm pretty shocked that he's still playing.
But to answer your question, yes.
So if you separate acute and chronic conditions, the acute, so the sudden things that happen, like a pulmonary embolism, if people survive, yeah, they're still living, but a lot of people died.
They died after they got their shots within months.
Are they still susceptible?
Probably not, unless they have an ongoing generation of bad proteins, you know, of which the spike protein is one.
I'm not convinced it's just the spike protein.
I think other proteins are being created by your body because potential DNA contamination in the shots, which is a fact.
Okay, that's been proven.
There's DNA contamination.
There are now, so certain things are going up and some things are going down.
What's going down is the acute prothrombotic stuff, or not pro, the acute thrombotic issues, thromboembolic, I should say.
But what's going up is the cancers.
The cancers are still going up.
So lymph node cancer in Massachusetts is 400% of normal.
That's Massachusetts.
Now, the graphs for other states, they're going up as well, but the curves look a little bit different.
There's so much nuance and explanation I would need to give, but the fact that there's excess cancer deaths is without question.
There's no question about it.
Now, turbo is another issue.
People talk about turbo cancers.
And I'm in the middle of an article right now where I'm trying to explain to everybody to separate the two issues.
One is, are there more cancers and are there more, so that creates, it's a greater likelihood that you will get cancer, but also a greater likelihood that you will get multiple cancers, not just at one site, but multiple sites in your body.
That's separate from the fact that they're growing really fast.
Whereas you would have 10 years, instead of 10 years, you have 10 months, or instead of 10 months, you have 10 weeks.
This is how fast people are dying.
And it takes, you need to feed tumors, right?
Things can't grow without a food supply.
And the way you do that, your body, cancers just don't take from the surrounding tissues.
You know, they do to get started.
But after they get started, they need a blood supply.
So your body does something called angiogenesis, which is blood vessel creation.
So it creates blood vessels to be able to feed.
It'll create new branches off of other arteries or capillaries to be able to feed the tumor so it can grow fast.
Now, the fact that they're growing really fast tells me there has to be angiogenesis.
And if there's angiogenesis, what's causing that?
Is it the fact that you don't have a good immune system?
Maybe not.
It's probably, that's what's causing the cancer.
You're not killing cancer cells that you create every day.
Your body generally cleans them up.
And if you turn or downregulate or dysregulate your immune system, you'll have a greater chance of getting a cancer.
That's a separate issue than why are they growing so fast?
I think the angiogenesis is the reason why they're growing so fast.
I am so far out of my comfort zone here, Jason.
I generally don't talk about these things.
Become a Member00:03:19
I'm so glad you are.
I got to tell you, you know what?
We got to take one final break.
We're going to have about seven minutes to wrap it up.
That's what we like to do here is bring people.
In fact, it's funny because we were talking about just kind of the overall business and how I got into it.
And I told them how much I love to get people out of their comfort zone because that's how we have real conversations.
You know, obviously we're a very intelligent guy that has looked at the statistics in a manner almost nobody, if not nobody else, has done.
This is a vital episode of Making Sense of the Madness.
We're going to wrap it up after this with John Bodwin, therealcdc.com, therealcdc.com is where you want to go check out the book and all of his work.
Back after this with the final segment.
Don't let them win.
Patriot TV is committed to delivering the truth.
America's new network for patriots is growing fast, and we'd love you to join us as a member of Patriot TV.
Your support makes it possible for us to continue to deliver unbiased reporting, thought-provoking discussions, and insights you won't find anywhere else.
From in-depth interviews to behind-the-scenes footage, Patriot TV brings you closer to the voices shaping our nation's future.
Whether it's political developments, cultural shifts, or global affairs, Patriot TV keeps you informed and empowered.
As a member of Patriot TV, you'll get perks like personal invitations to exclusive Patriot TV events where you can gather and network with like-minded Americans.
We'll also host online events throughout the year with General Flynn, who's committed to host live Q ⁇ A webinars where callers like you can ask him questions and get real answers.
Access to these events will be members only.
So go to patriot.tv, click on become a member.
It's fast and easy.
We have a great membership option starting at just $9.99 a month or save with our annual membership for only $99 or take advantage of the best value, the two-year membership for just $159.
Go to patriot.tv, click on become a member.
It's fast and easy.
Do your part to make sure the truth gets out to all patriots and help ensure future programming.
Become a member today.
Just go to patriot.tv, click on become a member, join today.
Attention business owners, are you ready to advertise to millions of loyal patriots ready to buy your products or services?
Here is your golden chance to advertise with Jason Burmas and connect with his massive audience on Patriot TV and his incredibly loyal social media followers.
As an advertiser on making sense of the madness, you also reach his followers on the top social media sites.
As Jason dives into complex current events and conspiracies, offering investigative analysis and thought-provoking discussions to uncover the deeper truths behind the headlines.
When you advertise with Jason on Making Sense of the Madness, you're aligning your brand with integrity, loyalty, and a dedication to truth.
Jason's audience is passionate, conservative, and committed to the values your business stands for.
When given the choice, Jason's followers will buy your products or services over other woke companies.
Don't miss this opportunity to elevate your brand with the power of Patriot TV.
Reach out to us today at advertise at patriot.tv.
And we are back.
See, this is good stuff, man.
Why Nanotechnology Matters00:06:13
This is what we really need to talk about because I don't love spouting.
In fact, I'm extremely reserved when I talk about any of this stuff.
And I always want to put it into the context of I'm a beauty school dropout pizza guy.
I'm not smart at all.
I don't have an MBA.
I didn't even graduate college.
I might have been honors in high school, but who gives a F?
Look, the bottom line is we are being told so many different things from so many people, some more credible than others, in my opinion.
But I'm not a molecular biologist.
You know, you're talking about the differences between excess cancer in different places and turbo cancers.
That's something I really do want to learn more about.
And the bottom line is when I talked about these shots, one of the things that I didn't talk about is the fact that it was bio-nanotechnology.
And again, when you're getting into the realm of bio-nanotechnology, I don't know how to do dark field microscopy.
I wouldn't know what I was looking at if I did know any of these things.
And I also know that obviously we've been working with nanotechnology, as you would know, as a contractor among engineers for a very long time.
You know, I'm 45 years old.
I'd imagine it's right in that realm, 50, maybe even 60 years, the beginnings of bio-nanotech, et cetera, to where we are today.
So I guess my next question is: you know, when we're looking at these types of cancers, possible immune disorders, et cetera, what is the hope out there?
What would you tell?
I would obviously tell people if you're continually taking these things, stop.
But is there any way for you to get them out of your body, your system, et cetera?
You know, there's the Peter McCullahs of the world and, you know, those people that are trying to put protocols out.
Is there any reality to those things?
And then when you're talking about the cancer increase, I mean, 400% is a lot for that time period.
Do you expect that no matter what to rise?
I mean, are we going to see a thousand percent in the next five years?
I hate to say it, but the powers that shouldn't be, the talking heads, the trust of science folks, if you read them, we're going to have a global cancer epidemic, the likes of which we've never thought about by 2050.
All right.
I'm trying to not do this with math.
You know, the slope of a positive slope line versus an exponent.
So cancers were already rising, but when the vaccines were introduced about five to six months later, they rose at even steeper of a slope and much greater rate of change.
And that rate of change actually increased.
So now you're talking about an exponent, not just a positive slope line.
So yeah, cancers are growing at an exponential rate.
And that could be one, the exponent could be 1.1.
It doesn't have to be like squared or more.
There are decimal places and exponents.
Let me get away from the math and just say, yeah, cancers are much higher now.
What can people do?
I want to get back to that part of your question.
I'm not a doctor, not a biologist.
I want to throw that out there.
I've got no advice for anybody.
You know, people who are in really hard times, they'll try anything, right?
Because some of these people, Jason, I don't know if you know them, but I talk to them all the time.
They're friends of mine now.
And they can't walk.
They can't, they got lesions on their body.
I mean, everybody's seen this story about Alexis, right?
She's got, I thought it was, looked to me like thromocytopenia purpura.
I heard somebody else say something else, but I'm pretty sure that's thromocytopenia purpura.
Young, beautiful girl, completely and totally irrecognizable.
Still, the United States media doesn't want to touch it.
Props to the Daily Mail for at least putting it out there into a mainstream arena.
Continue.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So that's and that wasn't the COVID vaccine.
And I do want to stress it's not just the spike protein.
You'll hear certain doctors, certain celebrity doctors talking about the spike protein and the spike detox.
That's all they ever talk about.
But the bigger problem is likely just the fact that you're putting a needle in your arm and you're injecting something that transfects cells.
It slides into human cells pretending to be human with a lipid bilingual.
Your cells have a lipid bilayer.
They have fats on the outsides of them.
And the reason why this is called a lipid nanoparticle, lipid is a fat, right?
It is a fat bubble.
It's a little blob of fat.
And inside that blob of fat is the modified, the mod RNA.
It's not just messenger RNA.
It's not human.
They used N1-methyl pseuduridine.
It's not a human part of that sequence.
So you're putting non-human stuff in your body.
People don't know what they're doing.
The doctors don't even know what these are.
They're just doing what the NIH and CDC tell them to do.
And they're, oh, it's a vaccine now.
Oh, really?
Because it wasn't really a vaccine.
It was a gene drug therapy for a number of years.
And then you changed the definition of the word vaccine in 2020 to call it vaccine.
And Peter Doshi of the British Medical Journal tried to call them out in hearings on that.
It was completely ignored by the mainstream media once more.
We got 30 seconds, John.
Let everybody know how they can support your work and check out more.
Well, I'm going to start saying this now.
Theerealcdc.com.
If you want to support me, just buy an e-book.
You don't have to read it.
Just buy it.
You can buy a combination for 40 bucks of the two books or $12 for the e-book.
I'll give you the codes.
You can download it.
If you don't want to download it, don't download it.
I just figured out like yesterday, that's the best way to support me.
That's what I tell people.
Support the work, support the person, because this information has to get out there.