Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 2, 2024 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas

16:10

The Hand Of Fauci EXPOSED!!!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Jason Burmess on today's news talk TNT.
	And we are now joined by Dr. Meryl Nass.
	Thank you so much for being with us.
	I was over on your ex feed and one of the stories that you were highlighting is the fact that Anthony Fauci is now going to have to give up his emails and his cell phone data.
	Now, we've seen Dr. David Morenz and really just the crap show there.
	I mean, the guy looked extremely uncomfortable.
	He tried to maintain his plausible deniability, but anybody with half a brain clearly shows this guy is corrupt.
	He was looking for kickbacks.
	He basically bragged about trying to destroy evidence that could not be destroyed.
	And it wasn't a great look.
	But at the same time, I don't know if we're going to get any type of criminal charges, convictions, etc.
	Where are we with Anthony Fauci?
	And what can we expect in the coming days?
	Because I believe that he is going to have to testify on the 3rd.
	So, I don't really know.
	Anthony Fauci may be smarter than David Morins and did find a way to get rid of his former emails.
	I mean, Hillary Clinton found a way, and it required destroying a hard drive and having her own server.
	You know, Tony could have had his own server too.
	Who knows.
	So he's managed to dodge all the problems so far.
	And Congress, you know, has not yet put his feet to the fire in a way they could have, perhaps.
	So I think, you know, anything could happen.
	It would be nice if the Republicans had a bigger majority in the House.
	It would be nice if there weren't so many rhinos that are willing to give these folks a pass.
	But, you know, that's the Congress we have.
	And so we can only keep our fingers crossed that they're actually going to try to make him accountable in the end.
	And what was your take on the Morin's testimony?
	Because again, there was never a moment where that guy looked comfortable.
	He had a scowl on his face the entire time.
	Obviously, his answers were not sufficient to anybody with a thinking brain.
	And he was called a liar several times by those asking him those questions.
	So, I mean, the media barely covered this thing, But at the same time, there was some pushback, finally, by the other side of the aisle.
	You know, again, I don't love the Republicans, but they've been the most vocal out there.
	You've seen some Democrats kind of chiming in.
	So far, we've seen the Democrat side and some of the Republicans run nothing but cover for Fauci and his cohorts.
	So what did you think about this?
	Is this the sign of some kind of a transition?
	Morens clearly thought he was the smartest guy in the room.
	He clearly believed that he was going to be able to dodge all these sorts of problems and is shocked that he didn't, which means he didn't have a plan B for this situation.
	So he might be easy pickings.
	They might be able to make a deal.
	If he implicates other people, he will get off.
	That's a possibility.
	Morens was very, very deep into the mud.
	Morens co-authored an article with Fauci in September of 2020 in the journal Cell that blamed human beings for the pandemic and for future pandemics and linked climate change to all of this because they've had a narrative.
	I mean, the guy is a physician and a scientist.
	He's no dummy, but he was willing to go along creating false narratives in a very top medical scientific journal.
	I think there will be a lot that he can... I mean, this guy probably knows where all the bodies are buried, so maybe this is an optimal time for them to debrief him, if they're willing to do that.
	Man, I like the smile on your face and I want to have a little bit of positivity here.
	But I just feel like if he was ready to burn people and they were going to have to have not just burn one person, he might end up like a Boeing whistleblower.
	That's just my thoughts.
	And then, you know, you just mentioned the fact that he did a white paper out there projecting the idea of man-made climate change and human beings being the causes of these pandemics.
	It reminds me of Earth 2100, which aired I believe in 2008 and it was a group project
	with I think it was either CBS or ABC.
	They ran this two-hour mockumentary that was half a cartoon and it basically progressed
	through this young woman's life for 100 years of terrible, devastating climate change.
	And in the very first scenes, literally in the first minute, I lived through New York City under full quarantine.
	And there's nobody on the streets and they're in the hazmat suits.
	And then the very next scene is people in masks in California and they've got the blue masks and everybody's looking scared.
	Looks just like the pandemic 15 years later or whatever.
	And then on top of that, Anthony Fauci!
	Happens to be one of the talking heads, along with people like John Podesta, Van Jones, James Woolsey of the CIA, Eric Schmidt of Google then, and Fauci.
	He's only in it for a few minutes and he's kind of on the tail end, but he's talking about zoonotic pandemics caused by climate change and how they are going to increase Over time because of this phenomenon, so this is not a new talking point This is one they have projected for a very very long time and very much tried to implement into the kovat 1984 nightmare most people didn't buy into it however like you said no one's really been held accountable I want to shift gears a little bit
	Also on your page, you've got a lot of RFK Jr.
	RFK Jr.
	Got nowhere near the press conference or press coverage that Donald Trump just got
	at the Libertarian National Convention.
	But, RFK Jr., to his credit, is really the only one talking about biological weapons and biological weapons specifically to this COVID event.
	On the other side of the aisle, when you look at Donald Trump, for instance, he won't acknowledge anything negative about either Operation Warp Speed or the shots that they produced.
	So what does that mean for this country?
	Does RFK Jr.
	get a little bit more shine, a little bit more light, and is this stuff allowed to come out?
	Or is he essentially going to be blackballed through this entire process as the Democrats have tried to do to him?
	Well, he's certainly been blackballed and had a terrible Terrible time trying to get media to cover him.
	At the same time, as you said, he is the only one who promises as a president to give us any accountability for what happened during COVID, where it came from, why it came from, you know, who paid for it.
	I mean, we've heard about a small amount of money going through EcoHealth Alliance, you know, about a million dollars to Wuhan, but Wuhan got a lot more money from USAID, from other federal agencies.
	And EcoHealth Alliance got money from five different federal agencies, and most of it from USAID and DOD, DTRA, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, which was bringing back viruses from around 30 other countries and bringing them to Fort Detrick to be studied and possibly to have gain-of-function research done here in the U.S.
	People don't realize that the moratorium on gain of function was only for SARS like viruses and a bird flu viruses for those 4 years from 19 from 2014 to 2017.
	And there's no moratorium whatsoever on gain of function right now.
	So anyway.
	You know, we're very much at risk of a lab leak or a definite, you know, a deliberate leak of a very dangerous pathogen.
	And the only person who knows anything about that and who cares about it and would shut it down, you know, is Bobby Kennedy.
	And you know, you just said deliberate leak.
	I would say deliberate seeding of a virus, and that is a real possibility.
	You named all these other institutions, the Defense Department in particular.
	But when Peter Daszak actually had to give his closed door deposition, if you read that paperwork, what was in that paperwork?
	U.S.
	Chapel Hill was there.
	You had a university in New York that was also there.
	The Department of Energy was also named in that, along with EcoHealth Alliance.
	So there are a lot of moving parts.
	Do you see this narrative being truncated to strictly EcoHealth, Wuhan, LabLeak?
	Is that going to be the results of these hearings?
	Exactly.
	I mean, that's what they usually try to do is throw one institution, one guy under the bus, blame them and, you know, wash their hands of it.
	But clearly, look, Ralph Baric certainly had the ability.
	He had.
	Created some of the mechanisms by which the covid virus was probably developed, you know, he had created the humanized mice model, for example, and he'd created certain methods for inserting nucleotides into the genome of a coronavirus.
	So, I mean, he's probably the foremost coronavirus researcher in the world, and he also had gotten hundreds of millions of dollars in grants, most from Fauci.
	But there are many other coronavirus researchers around the world, and many who have been allied with him and with Xi Jinping in Europe, in Australia, in Japan, in Singapore.
	Everywhere.
	China, of course.
	Taiwan.
	So, the thing is, you can do this kind of, you can create more virulent organisms anywhere in the world, and there's nothing stopping anyone.
	And governments have been very happy to pay for this research.
	Now, we have a biological weapons convention.
	It was started by President Nixon in 1972.
	We're supposed to not make these organisms where the only justification for that kind of research is that you're trying to make a drug or vaccine.
	But as our former CDC director, Robert Redfield said, none of no gain of function research has ever.
	led to the development of a vaccine or drug to his knowledge.
	And as a virologist and former CDC head and former Army guy, he would know, if anyone knew.
	So, you know, the undercover of doing defensive research, we've allowed, you know, we've let the genie leave, leave the box and We shouldn't have.
	The United States actually scuttled negotiations to strengthen the Biological Weapons Convention, to add inspections, and to stop cheating in 2001.
	The negotiators from about 180 countries were ready to go with a very strict protocol on inspections, and at the last minute, the United States said, we're not doing it.
	That's the end.
	And so there haven't been any rules that would actually force any nation to comply with the terms of that treaty since before or since.
	The WHO wanted to take this over.
	They said they would regulate and supervise gain-of-function research.
	That was claimed in a version in a draft of the pandemic treaty that came out this last February.
	Well, that didn't go over so big.
	The later drafts, they took that out.
	But what we desperately need is a regimen to control this kind of research wherever it's done.
	And the nations need to come together the way they did in 1972 and say, enough is enough.
	We don't need any more of these man-made pandemics.
	And the bottom line is we need criminal accountability to send a message that it will not be further tolerated until we get there.
	I'm not sure any of it's a real possibility.
	And that brings me to really my final question.
	One of the other talking points we're starting to hear is we need a 9-11 commission style to find out what happened during COVID.
	Now, First of all, the 9-11 Commission was a complete and total whitewash.
	And even if you don't believe that, think about the results of that 9-11 Commission.
	No one went to jail.
	Nobody got fired.
	No names were named.
	It was all vapid Johnny nonsense in order to create more bureaucracies and funding through the terror threat.
	That being said, the executive director of that 9-11 commission is at the University of Virginia, I've forgotten his name, and he was the deputy for Condoleezza Rice.
	And he has proposed being the director of a COVID commission.
	And by the way, Meryl, he already has been the director of a private covid commission that's already whitewashed it with the media put out a white paper and done a forum and Zelikow like you said with his connections inside the military industrial complex and these large-scale events
	Should frighten everybody out there.
	It's extremely dangerous.
	That's not the route that we need to go into.
	We got about 90 seconds left in the broadcast.
	What would you like to leave the audience with?
	Where can they check out your stuff?
	And how can they support you?
	So I'm 100% with you.
	I think until people go to jail, nothing gets solved.
	And, you know, in the last few decades, nobody seems to go to jail for white collar crimes anymore.
	And that's what's necessary because, you know, you can find them, but these people have access to infinite money.
	You know, they are connected to the people with the printing press.
	So it has to be jail time and we have to, you know, get very serious about this.
	What we've learned during COVID is that we can't trust the judicial system, that it seems like the judges, you know, are making very odd decisions.
	And so that has to be resolved as well.
	Why are judges making decisions that don't seem to go along with traditional jurisprudence?
	Anyway, if you want to find me, merylnass.substack.com.
	I founded an organization to look into the Who, the Great Reset, the UN.
	It's called doortofreedom.org.
	And my Twitter feed is at Nass, N-A-S-S, Meryl, M-E-R-Y-L.
	Thank you, Jason.
	Thank you.
	A pleasure having you.
	I hope people go over, check your workout, and check this show out Monday through Friday 8 to 10 p.m.
	Eastern where the truth lives.
	It's not about left or right.
	It is always about right and wrong.
	I absolutely love you guys.

▲