Disassembling the lies and reassembling the truth.
This is the Jason Verma show on today's news talk TNT.
And we are back.
And as a human being, I make mistakes.
Pasta is actually at the top of the hour.
We've got James Raguski with us, which is a good thing because he can so well piggyback on what we were just talking about via the MRNA and the extension of the COVID 1984 nightmare.
He is an independent journalist and an expert not only on this upcoming WHO pandemic treaty, but everything surrounding that nightmare.
So, James, thank you so much for joining us.
And, you know, the previous guest and I were talking about some of these new mRNA drugs that have been rolled out.
We've also talked about this latest Bill Gates video where he makes some astonishing announcements
to the normies out there that were paying attention to the mainstream media,
mainly that they've got a ton of lipid nanoparticles and it is self-assembling bio nanotechnology.
And they are looking to put a plethora of these mRNA strains out there
to solve all sorts of issues, including cancer.
So this agenda is very much rolling forward after being normalized.
This upcoming treaty, although dangerous, is just one part of the puzzle.
And another thing that we have covered here with my previous guest, Josh Walcoats,
is the latest global health security doctrine that our government has already passed
that involves, I believe, 60 plus billion dollars and 50 other nation states being lockstep with this agenda.
So in reality, James, where are we in this transhumanist mRNA movement and where do we need to push back?
Well, we're all in the middle of a really deep pile of poo because they've been doing this for decades.
Back in November of 2022, it was very clear that the United States was working hand-in-hand with the World Bank to set up the Pandemic Fund.
And they've been doling out multiple millions of dollars around the world, building up their laboratory networks to go looking for pathogens to bring them into the lab, do whatever it is they do in these laboratories, and then turn that into a profit But what these negotiations are about is the smaller nations around the world are seeing the profitability in that, and they want a piece of the pie.
So they want them to go through a WHO-controlled pathogen access and benefit sharing system.
They literally said in their amendments, you know, from a year and a half ago, we're not going to give up our sovereign biological resources.
Literally, the definition In this new pandemic agreement, if they do approve it.
Part of sovereignty and maybe rightfully so, the nations see their biological resources as a sovereign asset.
That's not to be given away.
It's essentially to be put into this benefit sharing system.
So what you're really looking at is an agreement to incentivize the search for the next disease X. And, you know, this is not something that is unique to the WHO.
This is what the global health security agenda, or now the global health security strategy, really is all about.
It's biological warfare, research and development.
And the question really comes down to, and it's an interesting question that we're not really going to solve here.
Do you want the WHO to be in charge of the proliferation of biological Great.
You know, pathogens with pandemic potential, or do you want the U.S.
Defense Department to be solely in charge of that?
You know, what we're dealing with here is whether or not this, you know, set of agreements or amendments or treaties or whatever they may want to call them, whether or not they're adopted, we're still dealing with, you know, these pathogens with pandemic potential.
And if the WHO is doing it, Or the Defense Department is doing it.
You both have to look at both of those and go, wait a minute, that's not how you stop the next pandemic.
Having a Wuhan Institute of Virology on every street corner, I exaggerate a little bit, but having them all over the world is not the way to prevent what happened over the last four and a half years.
It's, you know, a guarantee of profit from those actions.
It's actually a promise to make that look like a vacation if they get their way.
And what's really interesting about what you just said is, number one, once the military is involved, people have to understand they have no reason to tell you the truth.
It is inbuilt within the system of classification that they constantly are able to have something called plausible deniability and never tell you the truth.
So, damned if you do, now let's say you give it over to the WHO.
Again, what most people do not understand is large slots, if not the vast majority of this treaty, was written up right here With our lawyers, with our military-industrial complex, and if we do give them that right, we create this new plausible deniability circle, just like we've created with the COVID 1984 nightmare, where the conservatives get to point over there and go, China!
Wuhan!
Lab leak!
But anybody with a brain that's actually following this thing, they go, wait a minute, Maybe not a lab leak.
Yeah, Wuhan.
Yeah, Chapel Hill.
Yeah, the Department of Energy.
Yeah, DARPA.
Yeah, EcoHealth Alliance.
But still, no real accountability.
Instead, what we have are limited closed-door hearings in this country that the media is not even reporting on, with the likes of Daszak, Fauci, and others.
And really, no criminal repercussions, no accountability towards the people because of that inbuilt mechanism of Operation Warp Speed and really Defense Department programs, as you alluded to, that have now gone decades unchecked.
Decades unchecked.
So where do you think this goes?
Do you think that this eventually passes and they have their lovely little plausible deniability circle or do you think there's enough pushback that we won't get that but in fact they'll keep moving forward such as they've done with this new security document and eventually just pull something similar like you said the next big thing Uh, where we may not get a global response, but that won't matter because they'll still continue to take more and more power.
And at the same time, what take away our rights in the process?
Well, let me go back to the beginnings because the vast majority of people really, uh, I'm pretty sure do not have an idea as to where this whole thing started.
The first push to give more power and authority to the WHO, specifically the director general.
Came from a minority report from the Republican Party.
And when Trump was still in office, you know, the whole idea was, well, let's give the WHO authority that it shouldn't have so that the United States could use the WHO to beat up on China.
Well, you know, quite frankly, they're lucky that the WHO didn't have that authority because if they had busted into the Wuhan lab and gotten all the information, It would have led immediately back to D.C.
and all of the laboratories and stuff that they're doing, not to mention the Ukraine and everywhere else around the world.
So to address the plausible deniability, there's been a lot of misinformation about, oh, you know, Tedros wants to be your doctor.
No, he doesn't want to be your doctor.
He wants to be the godfather of a corrupt enterprise that controls the multi-billion dollar contracts that puts pandemic related products into warehouses and distribution hubs Around the world, so they can be in charge of the logistics and, and the contracts for all of these products.
They have a distribution hub in Dubai.
That's 20,000 square meters.
That's four football fields.
Okay.
So what you're looking at is not what people think it is.
It is essentially a trade disagreement that they're trying to work out.
Because the oligarchs in the small nations who want to be playing ball with big pharma are not pushing back against, oh, the jabs are bad or the tests, you know, are not really tests.
They want a piece of the pie.
What they're upset about is they handed over Omicron.
or the genetic sequence of it. And they watched Pfizer and Moderna turn it into the boosters
and make several billion dollars on top of what they made from the Wuhan Institute of Virology 1
genome. And they're like, hey, wait a minute, we're not doing that anymore.
We're not giving you our pathogens without serious investment.
They just put out some of the financials the other day, and some of these countries pay less than $5,000 per year in dues.
The United States was obligated to pay like over $100 million, but a lot of the countries paid very small dues.
And if they get $10 or $100 million contracts coming back at them, that's a pretty easy vote to purchase.
And so what you're looking at here is a business negotiation.
And there have been articles written recently by many people.
There was a secret meeting over the weekend with the United States, the European Union, four African nations, and pharmaceutical representatives.
Boy, I wonder what kind of deal they were crafting to get some votes to have this deal go through in a manner that, you know, everybody wants to keep quiet.
What's really going on?
What's really going on is they want to invest our money in pharmaceutical operations around the world because those nations can't afford to do that.
And so they want to be able to profit by jabbing the people they missed the first time around.
And not just profit, but I would argue experiment on.
You know, you just mentioned the sequencing of Omicron.
For people that do not understand what that means is once they sequenced the virus, Ray Kurzweil came right out and talked about this, that they were able to sequence the virus in about two to three days and from that, They started coding what would become the bio nano shots that were printed up in bio nano factories many of which were partnered via Tesla and CureVac building these factories and they want to build these factories everywhere where they are sequencing the medicine and probably the most alarming thing that we know about or at least can prove because there are a lot of alarming things out there and I'm gonna say right now
Huh?
I'm not a biologist, I don't necessarily know how to read dark microscopy, but what I do know is that they sequenced SV40 into these things, which is simian virus 40, and that was something I was warning people about just from traditional shots, the polio one in particular, having caused cancer in many people through that SV40.
You know, you fast forward literally six, seven decades, they sequence it in this, And then they also openly sequenced a part of the HIV virus in the furin cleavage, I believe the P3 protein.
Yeah, I'm not injecting myself with sequenced cancer and HIV under any circumstance.
And now that you have Gates openly talking about mRNA also being what?
Self-assembling nanotech.
All bets are off.
This is a worldwide mad scientist arena that's being legitimized, and like you said, it's being fast-tracked through the greed of these countries, or the economic potential.
And so those things that you're talking about are in what everyone calls the treaty.
In the amendments, in the super super fine print in Annex 2, they crossed out two words.
Nations had been obligated to report any outbreak of wild-type poliovirus.
But they crossed out wild type because that's not really around anymore.
The only thing that's available is the vaccine derived polio virus.
So while they've been busy giving... And you know what?
Let me stop you, James.
I've got to stop you because again, during this whole nightmare in 2020, one of the things, one of the memes out there that I would get pushback from, from my friends or family members that have no idea what's going on in the real world is you constantly heard, Well, the vaccines took out polio.
You still want polio?
And then, I would actually show them the Associated Press article where the latest polio outbreak, because we never eradicated polio, because in order to do so, you have to have an infrastructure of clean water, sewage, and food.
That's one of the key things to have.
Don't have that in a lot of places in the third world.
Still didn't have polio.
Instead, They gave them oral polio vaccines in places like the Congo, Sudan, a couple of the Stans, and guess what?
There were outbreaks of polio after the fact from the shots admitted in the mainstream media that weren't even shots, again, they were taken orally.
So, you know, that just shows the ignorance of the general public out there.
I'm sorry I interrupted.
Please continue.
By all means, take your words right out of my mouth.
I'm going to have to charge you rent for being inside my head.
And so the other aspect that's in the international health regulations that has been there for 19 years since 2005, when they went through the last round of amendments, is Article 31.
It points to international travel and the language that is currently in there is such an absolute violation of fundamental rights and freedoms.
It says that when you're traveling internationally, the authorities where you're going, not your home country, wherever you may travel to, have the authority to compel the traveler to undergo a medical examination, prophylaxis, some sort of treatment, vaccine, even though these aren't really vaccines, Isolation and quarantine.
And some of the amendments that they've proposed would adjust the language in Articles 24 and 27 so that the isolation and quarantine could be implemented as appropriate.
So, you know, when you look at international law attempting to give authority to, you know, government officials to do whatever they think is appropriate, which would include violating your bodily autonomy, At what point do you ask the fundamental question, how does one person determine whether another man or woman is a hazard to their fellow men and women?
Well, I would say that if somebody had recently or ever gotten an mRNA jab that can be shedding off of their body and their breath, I would say that the people who have those vaccine certificates are the ones who should be isolated and quarantined as a danger to the rest of humanity.
We have to deal with the fundamental question.
All the details of all these agreements and negotiations are very important.
But when you find a detail like that, where it essentially says, trust the test and trust the jab as being a way of determining that a person is not hazardous.
I would venture to say that the people who have those certificates are the ones who are hazardous to your health.
Yet, those are the ones that are going to be roaming around society, scanning QR codes, wearing masks, and taking a dozen more shots.
You look at the reality of the situation, and you've got states like New York trying to build quarantine camps in which they can put you in without you testing positive for anything.