All Episodes
Previous Next
May 12, 2024 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
18:32
The MRNA TAKEOVER Is Underway!!!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It's time to switch off.
Today's News Talk Radio.
Very entertaining. TNT. Now, one of the major aspects of the COVID-1984 nightmare, in my opinion, really the under-reported aspect, is this led us down the road to transhumanism at an extremely rapid pace.
And that is continuing Through the use of MRNA products that prior to this nightmare were not passing, were not becoming part of the mainstream and not being approved by the FDA. And then just this week we have a viral clip of Bill Gates not only talking about MRNA technology In regards to cancer, but talking about separate types of lipid nanoparticles, those are the ones that go beyond the blood-brain barrier, something traditional vaccines had never done.
But really the one that took me aback was that he was openly now admitting To self-assembling nanotech.
And that was another aspect of this that I told people from the very beginning.
No matter what you think they put in these shots, it was biological nanotechnology and ushered in The bio-nano era of humanity by injecting it into billions of people and they ain't done yet.
Josh Walcos is a great researcher and he discusses these topics and many more.
Tell us about this new mRNA drug that has now been fast-tracked via the FDA that's already out there and on the market.
Well, the the one that I'm before, well, there's a couple of different ones.
The first one that they just recently released is they call it a gene therapy.
It's an mRNA technology.
And Pfizer actually just came out a couple of days ago with a community guidelines release, basically, where they apologize because a two year old, a two year old boy died in the trial.
It's called the daylight trial that they were doing.
So he he died from this technology for a rare form of muscular dystrophy.
And All they have to do is they have to write a letter and release it to us PR, and then they're going to pause this trial, which they've paused it before because another kid died from it.
But, you know, they'll pause it.
They'll reassess it. They'll probably say, you know, we don't really think this is directly caused, you know, from the treatment.
And then they'll probably push on and continue with this technology because that is what their plan is, is to roll this out.
For every conceivable type of condition that you can think of.
Now, the other thing I wrote an article about that I recently released is a drug called Amtagvi.
Okay, this is a drug that is for melanoma, so it's for skin cancer.
And they did the accelerated approval pathway for this particular drug.
And I saw this. It just came up as an article in my feed, and it kind of caught my eye because I saw it was the first of its kind of approval they bill it as.
And I started looking into the approval process and the background of this drug, and it really became disturbing to me because They conditionally approve this based off of Phase 2 trials.
They're in the Phase 3 trials now.
They've rolled this out with a black box warning, and they're actually putting it in people.
It's an infusion, basically.
It's called a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte.
Okay, so basically what they do is they go in and they cut off a piece of somebody's cancer, then they do their thing, run it through this program and like all these different infusions, and then they'll put it back in your body, okay?
And that's supposed to cause your body to react to it and then...
Supposedly decrease the cancer or eliminate it altogether.
The only problem is this actual study is based upon 76 recipients.
And 160 people actually took it and 7.5% of them died.
And that was good enough for the FDA to actually say, yeah, we're going to go ahead and move forward with it.
So, you have a 7.5% chance, based upon the only data they have for it right now, that you're actually going to die directly because of the treatment that you're taking to fix something that you can potentially die from in the future.
And, you know, when you talk about melanoma and skin cancer, it is one of the more survivable cancers out there.
They're really not putting that into relation.
With no treatment or the traditional treatments of chemotherapy or simply surgery.
So that is extremely frightening.
The fact that, again, you're talking about stage three trials going on right now with already having FDA approval.
Again, normally you have to wait several years after the fact to see if there are any long-term side effects.
That's gone now.
We don't even talk about that anymore.
18 months, 36 months, that's going to be enough.
And that is extremely frightening.
In fact, three years is actually on the high end when we start looking at these technologies.
You know, I mentioned that clip of Gates.
Gates is talking about fast-tracking all of these drugs in a quicker fashion than was done via Warp Speed, which was a military program.
And at the end of the day...
MRNA is a military industrial complex project slash product that was not only pioneered by them, but continues to metamorphize with them in the backdrop through these companies, correct? Correct.
DARPA is the one that initially did the investments into the MRNA technology and investments into Moderna as well, right?
So they had a big stake in it.
And Moderna was, billions of dollars were pumped into it before it even had a viable product on the market.
And every product they tried to bring to market was declined because of the way it was, you know, affecting the animals that they were injecting it in.
It was initially supposed to be for cancer.
And then the COVID pandemic came around.
They were able to transition that to the COVID shots.
Pumped the stock up, as you know, and then a bunch of people became billionaires, and then the stock, just like with Pfizer and the rest of these companies, has plummeted in recent months as well.
So it's basically a pump-and-dump scheme and a way to get this technology to market in a fashion that they couldn't do otherwise under the guise of an emergency, okay?
And You know, this this accelerated pathway in the article I wrote that this is something that has been accelerating itself, you know, over the last couple of decades.
So they're just making excuses under the guise of all these this flowery language under transformational technology, innovation.
You know, it's all that that syntax that they use that basically Bypass people's critical thinking skills because they make it seem like it's something that's revolutionary in the pipeline.
But again, I remind people, 7.5% of the people, and it's a black box warning, it's on the insert.
But would you take something, even if you had unresectable melanoma, with the potential
to die in the future from it, but like you said, a lot of people are surviving from this.
Would you get on a plane, let's say, if you knew that there was a 7.5% chance this plane
was going to crash, like basically what you have with boating these days?
Is that something that you would actually do and consider doing?
There are people, they said, yeah, let's go ahead and approve it.
We'll put it in people and see how it goes.
You literally have about half the chance of playing actual Russian roulette.
That's what I would tell people. I mean, think about that, folks.
Two six-shooters, one bullet.
You pick one up.
There's a bullet in there.
That's the chance when you take this drug of mortality after the fact.
I really hope that that...
I was just going to say, and also, that's aside from the other horrible side effects that this thing caused and heart conditions and people who didn't die from it.
So that's just touching. Let's talk about those side effects.
Let's talk about that language, really Bernaysian language that they use, safe and effective, transformative, etc., that they get the public on.
And then let's also talk What time is it?
Now, TNT Radio News.
For TNT, this is James O'Neill.
Israeli forces seized control of Gaza's Rafa border crossing in a limited operation, as
described by the White House.
This action raises concerns about a potential full-scale invasion of Rafa amid ongoing ceasefire
and hostage negotiations with Hamas.
Governor Ron DeSantis spoke at the University of Florida, commending state universities
for maintaining order during graduation ceremonies amid nationwide pro-Palestine protests.
Do not give TNT Radio a follow.
We're on all major social platforms including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Gab, and Getter.
Help us get the word out as we cover the biggest topics of our time right here on today's News Talk.
TNT Radio.
TNT Radio. Now, you were talking about some of the other side effects, not the 7.5% mortality rate from taking the drug, but the after-the-fact stuff.
And, you know, the immediate vision that I got in my head were these new campaigns that you see in airports where they tell you if you have myocarditis, it's because of long COVID. It has nothing to do with it.
You suffer from long COVID, you may have myocarditis now.
You also have these admissions every once in a while in mainstream media and press releases about myocarditis.
You even have AstraZeneca taking their product off the market.
But again, through these Bernaysian tools, these bait and switches, a lot of people are still completely unaware.
So what are some of the other side effects we're seeing with this drug?
Oh, I mean, you're seeing all kinds of heart problems, including myocarditis.
You're seeing lympho.
I'm not real good with these names, cytopenia.
So all these different blood issues that they're having.
It's causing sepsis.
It's causing all kinds of infections.
I mean, You have to look at the article, the list.
I go over every single one of them and kind of explain them in late terms.
And there's too many to even name right here.
It's insane the amount of severe side effects that are attached to this drug outside of the people who actually end up dying from it.
And you have to remember, too, these are people who have the stipulation with the trial is that they actually had underwent treatment that they did not respond to.
And they bill this as a 35 percent responder rate.
So that's why they're they're painting it as something that's revolutionary and good.
But we're talking about a responder rate.
The way that they frame it, it sounds good on its face.
But when you dig into the details, this is after a certain amount of time, so 30 days.
There's all types of different parameters around it.
And then there's different endpoints that they don't talk about when they put out these press releases.
So that's what really piqued my interest looking at this study.
And I was like, this doesn't even make sense.
But the thing that makes sense about it is that The National Cancer Institute entered into a cooperative agreement decades ago with these companies who are trying to bring this tumor infiltrating lymphocyte technology to market.
So this is something that they've been doing for over 20 years.
They have cooperation agreements, which basically means that the NIH is going to get a cut of any profits they're going to make in the future indefinitely.
So they negotiate all this stuff out years and years ago.
So if you look at the article again, I cite an article released after it was announced by the FDA that it was conditionally approved, and they don't even mention these side effects or the mortality rate.
They don't even mention the black box warning that they put on this as a stipulation for people to take it.
So, I mean, they're clearly in league with the government and I advance for biopharmaceuticals, who's the company who brought this market, are in league with the government.
It was always going to be approved no matter what, because the way that if you do a quick search of this particular drug, all the articles of mainstream media are saying this is a revolutionary new treatment.
It's going to open the door up for new cancer treatments in the future.
And that's what this is all about, is to crack open that door because now they're going to try to apply this to all kinds of other cancer treatments and tell you it has some impressive responder rate, but fail to mention to you that it kills up to 10% of the people who ends up taking it.
And the people who's taking this already have depleted immune systems because they've went through treatment, right?
So, I mean, they're just lambs to the slaughter, if you ask me.
So I don't know how people can actually...
View this as ethical.
I mean, it's like the ethics of Joseph Mengele, if you ask me, and they're just continually pushed these things out and just shove it down our throats on accelerated pathways with really no culpability at all.
So the ethics of Mengele is probably a great way to describe it because I think that we've had the inverse of what a medical system should be.
You know, the last place I want to be is a hospital unless I have immediate trauma from some type of a car accident or the like.
Yeah, then I want to be there, but then let's talk about cancer for a moment.
Our generation had been promised time and time and time again that not only were we going to cure cancer, but we were going to live to be 90 plus, 100 in most cases, you know?
Our life expectancy was going to go up.
Our life expectancy in this country has absolutely plummeted.
Meanwhile, what? Cancer rates have absolutely skyrocketed, and now they're set to skyrocket We're good to go.
At the Cancer Moonshot program, and what I see is a wide array of experimentation on the general populace under the guise of cancer treatment via mRNA.
And this is that next step in transhumanism because certain people, like you said, they'll get through it.
You know what I mean? Not everybody's going to die.
Not everybody is going to have these adverse reactions.
And I think they're going to look to those people And their genes and see exactly why they were able to not only survive, but perhaps thrive after these array of shots.
After all, another thing that Gates says in that latest clip is how many of these things they want to put out into the arena so they can see what they do.
I mean, this is mad science stuff on another level, and they've actually given it a name, Cancer Moonshot.
And, I mean, this reminds me of whenever they were doing the ACIP meetings for the approvals for the mRNA shots for kids, right?
So you have this guy who works on the board, who has a vote on it, talking about these mRNA injections for children.
And then somebody came in and was like, you know, how do we know what's going to happen when, you know, he's like, well, you know, we just have to...
Get it in these kids' arms just to figure out what happened.
And I think that encapsulates the mindset of these people, is that they're willing to crack more than a few eggs to make a very profitable omelet.
You know what I mean? And they don't care if some kids have to die or some people who they are going to say are going to potentially die anyway, because that's how they always couch this.
It's always protecting you from something that may happen by killing you in the present.
But you're going to be in a sacrificial land because it's for the greater good, because eventually these are going to be revolutionary moonshot technologies.
It's going to eliminate cancer.
We're going to be in flying cars everywhere, and everything's going to be hunky-dory to the future.
So that's basically the transhumanist agenda.
The way they talk about mRNA is that it is like a computer, right?
So it's programming your cells.
So that's very telling that they use that language around this in order to present it to the public.
Well, again, this was one of those things I warned people about that eventually they would say it was gene therapy, and they would say it was bio-nanotech, and they would say that it does alter your DNA, but that wasn't the initial rollout.
And, you know, when you talk about their results, I want people to understand how they game the system.
It's not just through language, but that is part of it.
In other words, fully vaccinated.
That wasn't a real thing.
That wasn't a real term.
They made that up so that they could put parameters around what fully vaccinated was.
In other words, you could go get your first hate and lie shot.
If you came down with COVID in the next 15 days, it was like you didn't take that shot because you weren't fully vaccinated.
If you die, you're COVID death.
That's right, you're a COVID death.
And then, you know, you're only fully vaccinated for another 30 to 45 days, depending on where you live, if you don't take another shot.
And then once you take that shot, you're still not fully vaccinated for another 15 days.
Then they rolled that out again three months later.
So you had all these people that had taken multiple shots, clearly gotten sick from them.
It did the inverse of what they promised because they were pretty slick about that as well.
They never actually told you officially it was going to stop COVID. That was Rachel Maddow's job.
That was Fauci's job.
But even Bill Gates told you, oh, we're going to have less hospitalizations and less chance of death.
Total Johnny nonsense.
You talked about 7.5% mortality rate on this latest drug.
Remember, their official numbers on COVID-1984 before the shots rollout was.2 to.3 of 1% max, and those numbers were cooked.
Josh Walcos, let everybody know where they can find your stuff, brother.
You can find me at wetofthefree.substack.com.
I actually have an article coming out here in about 20 minutes.
So head over there and subscribe and you can read that and the rest of my stuff.
And then just follow me on X at Josh Walcos.
And I appreciate you having me, Jason.
▲
Export Selection